Searching Public Folders
Hi all, I am trying to use Advanced Find on a Public Folder to also search it's sub folders, however, when I try to select the sub-folders it comes up with the message: the folder you selected does not allow you to search other folders. It doesn't work like this on a mailbox it allows you to search sub-foldersany ideas? Thanks in advance. Stephanie. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: additional display name?
PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at least not without some coding. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email > to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display > the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish) > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everyone wants one but not yours > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > We do that too.. Forgot to include it. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > > > > Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married > > name, set it as the "reply to" address and leave the old one. > > > > That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at > > some point, they will start to see the new display name. > > > > I.E. Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes Paula J > > Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > Works for us...YMMV. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > > > > We traditionally change the user to the married name (at > > their request, of > > course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name: > > > > Paula Jones (Smith) > > > > Tends to work well. > > > > The only way to do what you want would be to create a second > > mailbox and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. > > That's pretty kludgy to me. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: additional display name? > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and > > married name > > > appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them > > both point > > > to the same account? > > > > > > E2ksp3 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Gordon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___NOTICE_ > > > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential > information > > > intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, > > distribution, copying > > > or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you > > > received this transmission in error, please notify the > > sender by reply > > > e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, > > conclusions, and other > > > information in this message that do not relate to the > > > official business of Bain & Company shall be understood to be > > > neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to > > > Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is > > > subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client > > > contract. ___ > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing multiple vendors and multiple layers. I'm also willing to share that in the 4 years since we've implemented our current approach, we have not been the victims of any major virus outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the occasional virus, but we've never had to enter firedrill mode to contain them. I do get administrative virus notifications. But considering I see between 100 and 1000 virus notifications a day from inbound mail, the added assurance of my user being notified is worth it. Maybe I'm just lucky that most of my users will pick up the phone and ask why they got the message in the first place. With regards to spoofed source addresses, there are relatively few that actually spoof source address. Looking over my recent notifications, I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and Fizzer the most, none of which are spoofed source addresses. The only one that currently spoofs source is Sobig, but that's no longer high traffic. So, I honestly thing that you're overstating the impact of notifications being sent to hapless victims of spoofing. As someone else said, its obvious we're not going to change each other's minds. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still > have the wrong Sender address, we'd still be sending > notifications to a bunch of people that didn't send any > viruses, and it's still a bad idea. In fact it's a worse idea > for internal infections because then everyone would get > bombarded with both viruses and virus warnings. > > In our case, I do get notified when viruses are blocked, and > the notifications contain the complete headers of the blocked > messages, so we can keep an eye on things and act accordingly. > > -Peter > > > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:27 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > Here's the problem with not performing sender notifications: > > What if your user is the sender? > > Don't say it doesn't happen. It does, and sometimes that's > the best way for you to know it happened. > > Roger > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:03 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > > > > We don't send sender notifications. It is bad Netiquette in > > the current Trojan environment. It is bad for email lists, it > > is bad for IT departments and it is bad for individual users. > > > > However, we do look at the recipient and administrative > > notifications. If it is klez, sobig, etc. we pretty much > > ignore it. If it is something else we look at the headers and > > see if we can trace it. If we can, we send a notification. > > > > A little extra work for us, but we are not causing extra work > > for others by doing it this way. That is where the above "bad > > Netiquette" comment comes from. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Dan Bartley > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:56 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > A simple change in the notification could solve this problem. > > You could say "your system might possibly be infected with a > > virus" or something along those line. But the problem of > > spoofing your trying to get across is more of a problem with > > e-mail in general then with anti-virus software. What going > > to happen when p*rn spammers start sending messages to users > > as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Harmer, Michael > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:49 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > > > > Ah, but "Don't send me viruses and I won't send you those > > notifications in the first place." is the flaw. They did not > > send you the virus. They mearly were member of some > > distribution list, had their e-mail on a web site, or > > corrisponded with the person that was actually infected. > > Unfortunatly, in your desire to 'assist' those that have no > > technical ability(A noble cause), you send many messages to > > people who have done you no wrong. 99 out of 100 times your > > sending someone a message that indicates that they are > > infected. This causes any responsible pers
RE: OWA and Palms
I honestly don't know how the browser on the Palm devices renders content. There are some alternatives if the graphics of OWA don't work. We use the WAP and PDA products from http://www.leederbyshire.com/ for our Pocket PC folks. It works well and is a very tight interface for the small screen. Also, as announced at MecEd last week, the forthcoming Exchange 2003 OWA will be able to display a smaller screen version of OWA if the FE server detects a small browser. Again, I don't know how the graphics would look on a Palm's screen but it may be worth a shot. > > -Original Message- > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Anyone know how functional Exchange 2000's OWA is when > accessing it from > a Palm? Is there one browser that works better than another, > or does it > pretty much suck no matter what? > > Jason > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Alert Pages
I have not use the PageMaster. However, I've setup and been using the Pagegate from http://www.notepage.com which is a lot better than other paging software I've used in the past. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Sending Alert Pages Importance: High Hi all, has anyone used this software called PageMaster to send NetIQ alerts from Exchange to a pager or mobile phone? http://www.omnitrend.com/pm.html I am just looking for opinions. Thanks, Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help on Q327378
Hi, I've been reading q327378 about changing mailbox size limits in a reasonable time and have added the value for the exchangeIS. Should I be concerned that there is not the value for Dsaccess\Instance0\CacheTTLUser in my registry or one for Mailbox cache limit? If not concerned I can just go ahead and add it, right? Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exmerge in Batch mode
I am trying to set up Exmerge to export specific mailboxes from an Exchange 2000 server in batch mode. I have most of everything set up except the mailbox.txt file. I am having trouble with the format of it. Everytime i run it get "Error Creating EntryID CN=...". Can some one help with the correct format. Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching Public Folders
It's a feature. www.slipstick.com might list some 3rd party products which allowed one to do this. -Original Message- From: Halliday S (ISeLS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:12 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching Public Folders Subject: Searching Public Folders Hi all, I am trying to use Advanced Find on a Public Folder to also search it's sub folders, however, when I try to select the sub-folders it comes up with the message: the folder you selected does not allow you to search other folders. It doesn't work like this on a mailbox it allows you to search sub-foldersany ideas? Thanks in advance. Stephanie. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and Palms
Can I avoid the question as asked and recommend E2K3 and OMA? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:37 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OWA and Palms Subject: RE: OWA and Palms I honestly don't know how the browser on the Palm devices renders content. There are some alternatives if the graphics of OWA don't work. We use the WAP and PDA products from http://www.leederbyshire.com/ for our Pocket PC folks. It works well and is a very tight interface for the small screen. Also, as announced at MecEd last week, the forthcoming Exchange 2003 OWA will be able to display a smaller screen version of OWA if the FE server detects a small browser. Again, I don't know how the graphics would look on a Palm's screen but it may be worth a shot. > > -Original Message- > From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:27 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Anyone know how functional Exchange 2000's OWA is when > accessing it from > a Palm? Is there one browser that works better than another, > or does it > pretty much suck no matter what? > > Jason > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Public folders
Hi all, I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions through there and everyone else can check for availability. The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my personal calendar. Any ideas? Many thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
> I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and Fizzer the most, none of which are > spoofed source addresses. You might want to take another look at these as they all spoof the sender address. Klez and Bugbear are the reason we turned off to notify the sender. Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Spellchecker
http://www.owaspellchecker.com - Original Message - From: "Steve Iadarola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 15:25 Subject: OWA Spellchecker Checked the FAQs and did not see anything. Anyone using a Spellcheck add-on for E2K OWA? Are there any that the list recommends? Outside of waiting for Exchange 2003. TIA, Steve Iadarola _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching User Mailboxes
Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability to do "bricked" restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows though. You have to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And we easily have about 200 conference rooms and pieces of equipment with mailboxes. Thanks! My first drag to boot too! Thanks for a great party. Beer and cookies. Umm ;) Chris (The other white meat) - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exmerge in Batch mode
The Exmerge readme file gives exact examples to follow From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Exmerge in Batch mode Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:09:21 -0700 I am trying to set up Exmerge to export specific mailboxes from an Exchange 2000 server in batch mode. I have most of everything set up except the mailbox.txt file. I am having trouble with the format of it. Everytime i run it get "Error Creating EntryID CN=...". Can some one help with the correct format. Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Public folders
Upgrade to E2K/E2K3. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OWA Public folders Subject: OWA Public folders Hi all, I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions through there and everyone else can check for availability. The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my personal calendar. Any ideas? Many thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Roger, This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see below: Klez - http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.klez.gen.html Email spoofing Some variants of this worm use a technique known as "spoofing." If so, the worm randomly selects an address that it finds on an infected computer. It uses this address as the "From" address that it uses when it performs its mass-mailing routine. Numerous cases have been reported in which users of uninfected computers received complaints that they sent an infected message to someone else. Bugbear - http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] l Uses its own SMTP engine to send itself to all the email addresses it finds. As part of the routine, the worm spoofs the From: address. Fizzer - http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] tml Retrieves the email addresses from the Windows Address Book, cookie files, Internet temporary files, and from files in your personal folder. The worm sends itself to all the email addresses it finds. The worm may spoof the sender's name and email address. Not even counting: http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] tml http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.aspam.trojan.b.h tml http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] html http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] and on and on and on...unfortunately. :0) Jim -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing multiple vendors and multiple layers. I'm also willing to share that in the 4 years since we've implemented our current approach, we have not been the victims of any major virus outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the occasional virus, but we've never had to enter firedrill mode to contain them. I do get administrative virus notifications. But considering I see between 100 and 1000 virus notifications a day from inbound mail, the added assurance of my user being notified is worth it. Maybe I'm just lucky that most of my users will pick up the phone and ask why they got the message in the first place. With regards to spoofed source addresses, there are relatively few that actually spoof source address. Looking over my recent notifications, I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and Fizzer the most, none of which are spoofed source addresses. The only one that currently spoofs source is Sobig, but that's no longer high traffic. So, I honestly thing that you're overstating the impact of notifications being sent to hapless victims of spoofing. As someone else said, its obvious we're not going to change each other's minds. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still > have the wrong Sender address, we'd still be sending > notifications to a bunch of people that didn't send any > viruses, and it's still a bad idea. In fact it's a worse idea > for internal infections because then everyone would get > bombarded with both viruses and virus warnings. > > In our case, I do get notified when viruses are blocked, and > the notifications contain the complete headers of the blocked > messages, so we can keep an eye on things and act accordingly. > > -Peter > > > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:27 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > Here's the problem with not performing sender notifications: > > What if your user is the sender? > > Don't say it doesn't happen. It does, and sometimes that's > the best way for you to know it happened. > > Roger > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:03 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > > > > We don't send sender notifications. It is bad Netiquette in the > > current Trojan environment. It is bad for email lists, it is bad for > > IT departments and it is bad for individual users. > > > > However, we do look at the recipient and administrative > > notifications. If it is klez, sobig, etc. we pretty much ignore it.
RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Just from my experience[1]... The cost of software licenses is inconsequential when you get to the total cost for compliance with many subpoenas. [1] Anecdotal as it may be. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Re: Searching User Mailboxes Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability to do "bricked" restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows though. You have to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And we easily have about 200 conference rooms and pieces of equipment with mailboxes. Thanks! My first drag to boot too! Thanks for a great party. Beer and cookies. Umm ;) Chris (The other white meat) - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Hmmm.. Two interesting things are that a) none of the other sources I checked talked about spoofed sender addresses, and b) my experience has been that the ones I have bird dogged were indeed NOT spoofed, and came from the sender in question. I'll stand corrected on the spoofing issue, but I still feel sender notifications are worth doing. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > Roger, > > This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you > on...however, see > below: > > Klez - > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.kl > ez.gen.html > Email spoofing > Some variants of this worm use a technique known as > "spoofing." If so, the worm randomly selects an address that > it finds on an infected computer. It uses this address as the > "From" address that it uses when it performs its mass-mailing > routine. Numerous cases have been reported in which users of > uninfected computers received complaints that they sent an > infected message to someone else. > > Bugbear - > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.bu > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > l > Uses its own SMTP engine to send itself to all the email > addresses it finds. As part of the routine, the worm spoofs > the From: address. > > Fizzer - > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tml > Retrieves the email addresses from the Windows Address Book, > cookie files, Internet temporary files, and from files in > your personal folder. The worm sends itself to all the email > addresses it finds. The worm may spoof the sender's name and > email address. > > Not even counting: > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tml > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.so > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.as > pam.trojan.b.h > tml > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > html > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.ya > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and on and on and on...unfortunately. :0) > > Jim > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing > multiple vendors and multiple layers. I'm also willing to > share that in the 4 years since we've implemented our current > approach, we have not been the victims of any major virus > outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the > occasional virus, but we've never had to enter firedrill mode > to contain them. > > I do get administrative virus notifications. But considering > I see between 100 and 1000 virus notifications a day from > inbound mail, the added assurance of my user being notified > is worth it. Maybe I'm just lucky that most of my users will > pick up the phone and ask why they got the message in the first place. > > With regards to spoofed source addresses, there are > relatively few that actually spoof source address. Looking > over my recent notifications, I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and > Fizzer the most, none of which are spoofed source addresses. > The only one that currently spoofs source is Sobig, but > that's no longer high traffic. So, I honestly thing that > you're overstating the impact of notifications being sent to > hapless victims of spoofing. > > As someone else said, its obvious we're not going to change > each other's minds. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:44 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > > > > If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still have the > > wrong Sender address, we'd still be sending notifications > to a bunch > > of people that didn't send any viruses, and it's still a > bad idea. In > > fact it's a worse idea for internal infections because then > everyone > > would get bombarded with both viruses and virus warnings. > > > > In our case, I do get notified when viruses are blocked, and the > > notifications contain the complete headers of the blocked > messages, so > > we can keep an eye on things and act accordingly. > > > > -Peter > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tue
Re: Exmerge in Batch mode
I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the mailboxes. The readme seems to be a little vague. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
There's really no 'right' answer to this question IMO. At $vbc we didn't send notifications to the sender, but we did to the intended recipient. At other companies we did the opposite and at 1 we notified everyone and their monkey. Horses for courses I guess. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:46 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender? Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? Hmmm.. Two interesting things are that a) none of the other sources I checked talked about spoofed sender addresses, and b) my experience has been that the ones I have bird dogged were indeed NOT spoofed, and came from the sender in question. I'll stand corrected on the spoofing issue, but I still feel sender notifications are worth doing. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > Roger, > > This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you > on...however, see > below: > > Klez - > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.kl > ez.gen.html > Email spoofing > Some variants of this worm use a technique known as > "spoofing." If so, the worm randomly selects an address that > it finds on an infected computer. It uses this address as the > "From" address that it uses when it performs its mass-mailing > routine. Numerous cases have been reported in which users of > uninfected computers received complaints that they sent an > infected message to someone else. > > Bugbear - > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.bu > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > l > Uses its own SMTP engine to send itself to all the email > addresses it finds. As part of the routine, the worm spoofs > the From: address. > > Fizzer - > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tml > Retrieves the email addresses from the Windows Address Book, > cookie files, Internet temporary files, and from files in > your personal folder. The worm sends itself to all the email > addresses it finds. The worm may spoof the sender's name and > email address. > > Not even counting: > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > tml > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.so > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.as > pam.trojan.b.h > tml > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > html > http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.ya > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and on and on and on...unfortunately. :0) > > Jim > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing > multiple vendors and multiple layers. I'm also willing to > share that in the 4 years since we've implemented our current > approach, we have not been the victims of any major virus > outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the > occasional virus, but we've never had to enter firedrill mode > to contain them. > > I do get administrative virus notifications. But considering > I see between 100 and 1000 virus notifications a day from > inbound mail, the added assurance of my user being notified > is worth it. Maybe I'm just lucky that most of my users will > pick up the phone and ask why they got the message in the first place. > > With regards to spoofed source addresses, there are > relatively few that actually spoof source address. Looking > over my recent notifications, I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and > Fizzer the most, none of which are spoofed source addresses. > The only one that currently spoofs source is Sobig, but > that's no longer high traffic. So, I honestly thing that > you're overstating the impact of notifications being sent to > hapless victims of spoofing. > > As someone else said, its obvious we're not going to change > each other's minds. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:44 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? > > > > > > If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still have the > > wrong Sender address, we'd still be sending notifications > to a bunch > > of people that didn't send any viruses, and it's still a > bad idea. I
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
I forward all my virus notifications to Roger. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender? Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? Roger, This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see below: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge in Batch mode
LegacyExchangeDN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exmerge in Batch mode I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the mailboxes. The readme seems to be a little vague. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
A mailbomber? Sounds like an excellent way to get everyone to hate your company. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
There may be something like this, but I will tell you this. If someone did that to me I would just set up a rule to permanently delete all of their messages. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:22 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Strange Question > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an > email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about > the behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la > ng=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Public folders
Chris, is there no workaround? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Public folders Upgrade to E2K/E2K3. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OWA Public folders Subject: OWA Public folders Hi all, I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions through there and everyone else can check for availability. The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my personal calendar. Any ideas? Many thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Sounds like a mail spamming question to me. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge in Batch mode
Thanks for the help -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:25 AM Posted To: Exchange Server Conversation: Exmerge in Batch mode Subject: RE: Exmerge in Batch mode LegacyExchangeDN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exmerge in Batch mode I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the mailboxes. The readme seems to be a little vague. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Tell your boss it's a great way to get blacklisted. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Sounds like a mail spamming question to me. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Plus, there are probably a dozen different ways that someone could respond to the sender that wouldn't be properly recognized as a "responce" (e.g. replying with a different SMTP server, or from a mobile device remailer) so the mail bombing would continue until they complained to your ISP and every Black Hole service out there. Jim H Couch, Nate wrote: > There may be something like this, but I will tell you this. If > someone did that to me I would just set up a rule to permanently > delete all of their messages. > > Nate Couch > EDS Messaging > >> -- >> From:Avi Smith-Rapaport >> Reply To:Exchange Discussions >> Sent:Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:22 >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: Strange Question >> >> My boss asked me this morning. >> >> Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an >> email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes >> >> until they respond to you? >> >> He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion >> about the behavoral issues etc. >> >> Avi >> >> >> We run exchange 2k and outlook client >> >> >> >> _ >> Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director >> Star Supply Co. >> 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 >> Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Web Interface: >> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la >> ng=english To unsubscribe: >> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange > List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange Question
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Public folders
That is the workaround, unless you'd like to rewrite the Exchange 5.5 OWA ASP scripts to provide functionality not inherent in the product. Ought to be possible theoretically. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:30 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OWA Public folders Subject: RE: OWA Public folders Chris, is there no workaround? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Public folders Upgrade to E2K/E2K3. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OWA Public folders Subject: OWA Public folders Hi all, I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions through there and everyone else can check for availability. The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my personal calendar. Any ideas? Many thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Public folders
Thanks very much for the tips Chris. Much appreciated. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 16:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Public folders That is the workaround, unless you'd like to rewrite the Exchange 5.5 OWA ASP scripts to provide functionality not inherent in the product. Ought to be possible theoretically. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:30 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OWA Public folders Subject: RE: OWA Public folders Chris, is there no workaround? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Public folders Upgrade to E2K/E2K3. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OWA Public folders Subject: OWA Public folders Hi all, I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions through there and everyone else can check for availability. The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my personal calendar. Any ideas? Many thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
I am loving this. I think I will put together a nice document for him. Avi -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Lol. Good answer Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Question Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get answer. - Original Message - From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM Subject: Strange Question My boss asked me this morning. Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes until they respond to you? He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral issues etc. Avi We run exchange 2k and outlook client _ Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director Star Supply Co. 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AV User Interface Recommendations
I was wondering your opinions on the preferred UI for AV software. I have been trying to weigh all of the current AV solutions out there, and I can't decide which is the best, which have problems, etc. Any recommendations? -Darren Johnson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Solutions
Carmila, ON the KVS front it just adds 'stubs' in place of the emails and it is the client that does the redirection retrieval. So no change at the Exchange end. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archiving Solutions Thanks for the replies. Does anyone actually have first hand experience using these things? My major concern is in the area of disaster recovery. How easy/hard is it to restore exchange with these 3rd party solutions? I'm concerned about introducing an SQL server into the picture. Exchange is complicated enough and I'm squirmish about maintaining a SQL server at the same time. Thanks, Carmila -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 6:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions KVS and AttachStor are technologies worth looking at. www.mail-resources.com has a number of other 3rd party tools listed in the web links | server | archival section I believe. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:02 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Archiving Solutions Subject: Archiving Solutions Does anyone have any experience with archiving solutions like veritas storage migrator for exchange? We currently do not impose hard limits on our users due to a lot of regulations that we need to comply with. We have users who have mailboxes close to 3GB. On one exchange server that has 180 users, the total size of the store is already at a 110GB. I'm interested to know what solutions you have in place to keep down the size of user's mailboxes. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock & Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock & Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock & Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock & Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Well KVS will index right up to phrases if you really want it too and archive off the Email journaling system. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Searching User Mailboxes Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability to do "bricked" restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows though. You have to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And we easily have about 200 conference rooms and pieces of equipment with mailboxes. Thanks! My first drag to boot too! Thanks for a great party. Beer and cookies. Umm ;) Chris (The other white meat) - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
"Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange Question
Hells Bells. Sign them all up for AOL. - Original Message - From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:32 PM Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __
Perrmission denied??
I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has "send as" and "send on behalf" permissions. The "send as" was added later but was decided to keep the "send on behalf", as it wouldn't hurt anything. The PF mail address is hidden from the GAL. Receives mail fine. But when the user goes to "send as" he gets "you do not have permissions". However if I unhide the PF mail address from the GAL he can "send as" just fine no errors. Is this a bug. Do I need to remove the "send on behalf" for it to function in the hidden mode. _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Just let him know that you'll probably be blacklisted if he goes forward with this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
RE: additional display name?
True, you cannot forward out of the company unless you set up a CR, but internal email is OK to forward with the folder assistant. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 12:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at least not without some coding. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:22 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email > to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display > the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish) > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everyone wants one but not yours > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > We do that too.. Forgot to include it. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > > > > Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married > > name, set it as the "reply to" address and leave the old one. > > > > That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at > > some point, they will start to see the new display name. > > > > I.E. Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes Paula J > > Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > Works for us...YMMV. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > > > > We traditionally change the user to the married name (at > > their request, of > > course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name: > > > > Paula Jones (Smith) > > > > Tends to work well. > > > > The only way to do what you want would be to create a second > > mailbox and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. > > That's pretty kludgy to me. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: additional display name? > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and > > married name > > > appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them > > both point > > > to the same account? > > > > > > E2ksp3 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Gordon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___NOTICE_ > > > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential > information > > > intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, > > distribution, copying > > > or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you > > > received this transmission in error, please notify the > > sender by reply > > > e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, > > conclusions, and other > > > information in this message that do not relate to the > > > official business of Bain & Company shall be understood to be > > > neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to > > > Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is > > > subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client > > > contract. ___ > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[
RE: Strange Question
Can you clarify if it will be internal "willing recipients" or external "willing recipients"? > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type > of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email > and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in > 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on > his pc whatever. > The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? > It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain > people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system > although the sender is the person that would set the reminder > intervals. > confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > > until you get > > answer. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > > Subject: Strange Question > > > > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > > someone an email, > > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > > > until they respond to you? > > > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > > discussion about the > > behavoral issues etc. > > > > Avi > > > > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > > > > > _ > > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > > Star Supply Co. > > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
I think it's worth pointing out that everyone who does send notification to virus senders participated in what almost amounted to a DOS attack against Microsoft. You'll recall that all sobig-b virus messages report that they came from [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I noticed significant delays in getting mail delivered to Microsoft during the week or so when that virus was "popular". -Peter -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? I forward all my virus notifications to Roger. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender? Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? Roger, This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see below: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Perrmission denied??
Forgot. E2K SP3 One single PF store , From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Perrmission denied?? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:41:39 -0400 I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has "send as" and "send on behalf" permissions. The "send as" was added later but was decided to keep the "send on behalf", as it wouldn't hurt anything. The PF mail address is hidden from the GAL. Receives mail fine. But when the user goes to "send as" he gets "you do not have permissions". However if I unhide the PF mail address from the GAL he can "send as" just fine no errors. Is this a bug. Do I need to remove the "send on behalf" for it to function in the hidden mode. _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.c
RE: Strange Question
What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message -> Junk E-mail -> Add to Junk Senders? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto
Re: Strange Question
After 2 reminders the custom application written by the user automatically sends resume of user to monsterboard.com ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:46 PM Subject: RE: Strange Question I envision a solution like this: Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever) where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe:
RE: Strange Question
As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every > few minutes) > checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type > of request > from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond > in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will > re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing > participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me > like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to > some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that > would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > > until you get > > answer. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > > Subject: Strange Question > > > > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > > someone an email, > > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > > > until they respond to you? > > > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > > discussion about the > > behavoral issues etc. > > > > Avi > > > > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > > > > > _ > > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > > Star Supply Co. > > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mai
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
I appreciate all the feedback. After reviewing the posts, I guess we will have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages. I'm starting to lean toward turning the notification off. Or possibly a combination of both? Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ and then turn the notification back on when it subsides. As I re-read this, that doesn't sound good either. Time to make a decision and stick with it I guess. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender? Off topic. With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually send any virus. I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected. Kind of a catch 22. I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding notification messages to the sender. Have you disabled sender notifications or are you just living with it? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
The fact that the two parties consented to this. Please don't get me wrong, I am completely in agreement with what the Great Crowley says about behavioral issues and all of that, just following up for the boss. Avi -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message -> Junk E-mail -> Add to Junk Senders? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?en
replication issue
Situation: Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced. Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site. Site will not replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are: Event ID: 1059 Source: MSExchangeDS Description: Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error 22. Event ID: 1083 Source: MSExchangeDS Description: Replication warning: The directory replication agent (DRA) couldn't synchronize naming context /o='ORG'/ou='SITE' with naming context on directory 'FIRST-SERVER'. Nothing on Microsoft support is giving any clues to the issue except that DRA error 22 is a JET error. I have removed the added server, cleared its existance, and re-installed. outcome = identical issues. Thoughts? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: additional display name?
But can the PF Folder assistant still access the GAL? Strikes me that it shouldn't be able to, much like Inbox Assistant/Rules Wizard rules can't. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > True, you cannot forward out of the company unless you set up > a CR, but internal email is OK to forward with the folder assistant. > > Cheers > > Paul > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > everyone wants one but not yours > > > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 June 2003 12:35 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at > least not without some coding. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:22 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > > > > IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email > > to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display > > the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish) > > > > Cheers > > > > Paul > > > > Standards are like toothbrushes, > > everyone wants one but not yours > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > > > > We do that too.. Forgot to include it. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > > > > > > > Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married > name, set > > > it as the "reply to" address and leave the old one. > > > > > > That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at some > > > point, they will start to see the new display name. > > > > > > I.E. Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes > Paula J Jones > > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > > > Works for us...YMMV. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: additional display name? > > > > > > > > > We traditionally change the user to the married name (at their > > > request, of > > > course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name: > > > > > > Paula Jones (Smith) > > > > > > Tends to work well. > > > > > > The only way to do what you want would be to create a > second mailbox > > > and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. That's pretty > > > kludgy to me. > > > > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: additional display name? > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and > > > married name > > > > appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them > > > both point > > > > to the same account? > > > > > > > > E2ksp3 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gordon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___NOTICE_ > > > > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential > > information > > > > intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, > > > distribution, copying > > > > or disclosure by any other person is strictly > prohibited. If you > > > > received this transmission in error, please notify the > > > sender by reply > > > > e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, > > > conclusions, and other > > > > information in this message that do not relate to the official > > > > business of Bain & Company shall be understood to be > neither given > > > > nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain > clients, any > > > > information contained in this e-mail is subject to the > ter
Re: replication issue
Looks like a name resolution error. When you added the 2nd server into the existing site, didnt you get some error messages? Try adding the names of the other Exch server into each respective server's hosts files. RPCPing is also your friend. - Original Message - From: "dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:37 PM Subject: replication issue > Situation: Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced. > Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site. Site will not > replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are: > > Event ID: 1059 > Source: MSExchangeDS > Description: > Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error > 22. > > Event ID: 1083 > Source: MSExchangeDS > Description: > Replication warning: The directory replication agent (DRA) couldn't > synchronize naming context /o='ORG'/ou='SITE' with naming context on > directory 'FIRST-SERVER'. > > > Nothing on Microsoft support is giving any clues to the issue except that > DRA error 22 is a JET error. > I have removed the added server, cleared its existance, and re-installed. > outcome = identical issues. > > Thoughts? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Actually, a reasonable compromise for Antigen users is to disable notifications for worm senders, which includes all the sender spoofing mass mailers, but enable notifications for virus senders, which covers the macro viruses that still turn up sporadically. -Peter -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? I appreciate all the feedback. After reviewing the posts, I guess we will have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages. I'm starting to lean toward turning the notification off. Or possibly a combination of both? Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ and then turn the notification back on when it subsides. As I re-read this, that doesn't sound good either. Time to make a decision and stick with it I guess. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender? Off topic. With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually send any virus. I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected. Kind of a catch 22. I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding notification messages to the sender. Have you disabled sender notifications or are you just living with it? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Running Trends ScanMail, so we don't have an option to send notifications based on virus type. Good idea though! -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? Actually, a reasonable compromise for Antigen users is to disable notifications for worm senders, which includes all the sender spoofing mass mailers, but enable notifications for virus senders, which covers the macro viruses that still turn up sporadically. -Peter -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? I appreciate all the feedback. After reviewing the posts, I guess we will have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages. I'm starting to lean toward turning the notification off. Or possibly a combination of both? Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ and then turn the notification back on when it subsides. As I re-read this, that doesn't sound good either. Time to make a decision and stick with it I guess. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender? Off topic. With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually send any virus. I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected. Kind of a catch 22. I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding notification messages to the sender. Have you disabled sender notifications or are you just living with it? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
Use the flag -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Alright... That didn't go over so well. He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. 2 willing participants. Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > -Original Message- > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > -Original Message- > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > until you get > answer. > > - Original Message - > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > Subject: Strange Question > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > someone an email, > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > until they respond to you? > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > discussion about the > behavoral issues etc. > > Avi > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > _ > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > Star Supply Co. > 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511 > Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
Mail Marshall users
Sorry for the semi off topic post. Would anyone who is the administrator of a Mail Marshall service, please contact me off list. I'm looking for some real - world information about it's operation and reliability. Thanks. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every > few minutes) > checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type > of request > from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond > in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will > re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing > participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me > like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to > some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that > would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > > until you get > > answer. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > > Subject: Strange Question > > > > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send > > someone an email, > > it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > > > until they respond to you? > > > > He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the > > discussion about the > > behavoral issues etc. > > > > Avi > > > > > > We run exchange 2k and outlook client > > > > > > > > _ > > Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director > > Star Supply
RE: Strange Question
If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every > few minutes) > checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type > of request > from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond > in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will > re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing > participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me > like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to > some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that > would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on > > his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds > > until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until > > you get answer. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > > Subject: Strange Question > > > > > > My boss asked me this morning. > > > > Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone > > an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes > > > > until they respond to you? > > > > He has not told me
RE: Strange Question
Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every > few minutes) > checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type > of request > from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond > in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will > re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing > participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me > like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to > some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that > would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on > > his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds > > until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until > > you get answer. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM > > Subject: Strange Question > > > > > >
RE: Strange Question
Have the boss just set the reminder flag for "Follow up" on the e-mail with the date/time for 20 minutes hence. It should pop up if the other guy is using Outlook. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:49 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. > > Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to > be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending > him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for > someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email > if that is part of their responsibilities. > > I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever > secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I > give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is > where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read > minds right? > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. > > The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to > be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting > at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure > that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business > goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better > solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > I envision a solution like this: > > > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > > whatever) > > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered > recipient - that > > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" > (flat file, > > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient > clicks on to > > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Alright... > > That didn't go over so well. > > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > > > 2 willing participants. > > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email > and mark it, > > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes > to me then > > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people > he wants > > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the > sender is the > > person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > > > > Avi > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, > then call on > > > his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds > > > until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the p
RE: Strange Question
If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on > > his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds > > until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > Tell your boss you
RE: Strange Question
All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further. Avi -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on > > his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds > > until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > To: Ex
RE: Strange Question
Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it wasn't possible. Case close, it's not worth waiting the time on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further. Avi -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Then tell hi
RE: Strange Question
Wasting...damn spell checker :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it wasn't possible. Case close, it's not worth waiting the time on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further. Avi -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can w
RE: Strange Question
Outlook 2003 will make this possible (as well as user specified sounds, etc.), current versions do not. He will have to wait. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Wasting...damn spell checker :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it wasn't possible. Case close, it's not worth waiting the time on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further. Avi -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11,
Question about public folders
Hi all, I need a brain refresh... here is the scenario: there is an Exchange 2000 server (server A) that only holds users' maiboxes, it does not have a PF store. there are two Exchange 2000 servers (server C and server D) with PF stores. All the servers are in the same Admin group and in the same Routing group. A user whose mailbox is on server A sends a message to a mail-enabled public folder. The message always wants to be delivered to server B (according to message tracking). How does Exchange decide which PF server to deliver message to? Is it supposed to be random or is there some preference set up somewhere? Thanks, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging & Collaboration Spherion Corporation P.S. the real kicker is that server B does not have a replica of that mail-enabled PF. Only server C has it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about public folders
Right Click Database and look at the box that says default public folder server. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi all, I need a brain refresh... here is the scenario: there is an Exchange 2000 server (server A) that only holds users' maiboxes, it does not have a PF store. there are two Exchange 2000 servers (server C and server D) with PF stores. All the servers are in the same Admin group and in the same Routing group. A user whose mailbox is on server A sends a message to a mail-enabled public folder. The message always wants to be delivered to server B (according to message tracking). How does Exchange decide which PF server to deliver message to? Is it supposed to be random or is there some preference set up somewhere? Thanks, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging & Collaboration Spherion Corporation P.S. the real kicker is that server B does not have a replica of that mail-enabled PF. Only server C has it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
You have any opening there? This sounds like the kind of boss I would *love* to work for. :-) - Matt > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. > > Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to > be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending > him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for > someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email > if that is part of their responsibilities. > > I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever > secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I > give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is > where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read > minds right? > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. > > The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to > be accomplished > here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? > To ensure that > emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 > minutes? What is > the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better > solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > I envision a solution like this: > > > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > > whatever) > > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every > > few minutes) > > checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Alright... > > That didn't go over so well. > > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > > > 2 willing participants. > > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type > > of request > > from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark > it, respond > > in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me > then it will > > re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing > > participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me > > like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to > > some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that > > would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > > > > Avi > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > > > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > > > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Strange Question > > > > > > > > > Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes > > > until you get > > > answer. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Avi Smith-Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
10 "Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on Windows XP ?" - one attendee joking ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Question
tell him you need to upgrade to E2K3 and OLK2K3. It has cool flags and rules for better message management. Then you could use OMI to alert him on his mobile device. You will need one as well ;-P - John Q Jr. From: "Bailey, Matthew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Strange Question Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:48:44 -0700 You have any opening there? This sounds like the kind of boss I would *love* to work for. :-) - Matt > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. > > Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to > be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending > him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for > someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email > if that is part of their responsibilities. > > I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever > secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I > give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is > where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read > minds right? > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. > > The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to > be accomplished > here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? > To ensure that > emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 > minutes? What is > the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better > solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > I envision a solution like this: > > > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > > whatever) > > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every > > few minutes) > > checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > Alright... > > That didn't go over so well. > > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > > > 2 willing participants. > > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type > > of request > > from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark > it, respond > > in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me > then it will > > re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing > > participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me > > like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to > > some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that > > would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > > > > Avi > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then > > > call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every > > > 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > > > > > > > Lol. Good answer Andy. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednes
RE: Strange Question
Make him carry a pager...wire it too him so it can shock him. write a rule that forwards e-mails from identified VIPS to the pager. thus he will know about it when it forwards to the pagerprovided you wire him correctly.. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further. Avi -Original Message- From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on the desktop informing of the important email? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people. Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities. I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus. You guys read minds right? Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Question As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote. The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished here? Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? To ensure that emails get read? To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes? What is the business goal that is to be accomplished? Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge. > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I envision a solution like this: > > Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, > whatever) > where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that > would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app > sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a "flag" (flat file, > database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient. > > The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to > acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag. > > Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few > minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > Alright... > That didn't go over so well. > He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix. > > 2 willing participants. > Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of > request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, > respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then > it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two > willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It > seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants > it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the > person that would set the reminder intervals. confused? > > > Avi > > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Strange Question > > > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > "Can we go to mount Splashmore?" > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Se
RE: Question about public folders
That was my first thought. The Default PF store is set up correctly. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question about public folders Right Click Database and look at the box that says default public folder server. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi all, I need a brain refresh... here is the scenario: there is an Exchange 2000 server (server A) that only holds users' maiboxes, it does not have a PF store. there are two Exchange 2000 servers (server C and server D) with PF stores. All the servers are in the same Admin group and in the same Routing group. A user whose mailbox is on server A sends a message to a mail-enabled public folder. The message always wants to be delivered to server B (according to message tracking). How does Exchange decide which PF server to deliver message to? Is it supposed to be random or is there some preference set up somewhere? Thanks, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging & Collaboration Spherion Corporation P.S. the real kicker is that server B does not have a replica of that mail-enabled PF. Only server C has it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
9. What the hell died in there? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions 10 "Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on Windows XP ?" - one attendee joking ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
8. *snore* *mumbling..* -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd 9. What the hell died in there? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions 10 "Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on Windows XP ?" - one attendee joking ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: replication issue
Once I had a hairy migration from 5.5 to 2000. I could not do an in-place migration because 5.5 server was the only one that the organization had. when I installed a new Exchange 2000 server and joined it to the existing 5.5 org, everything seemed to work fine, but in the end the 5.5 server was not available in the Servers container on the Ex2K side, and vice versa - the Ex2K server was not visible from the Ex5.5 side. I finally quit tryin to join a 2000 server to existing 5.5 org. Instead I installed a dummy 5.5 server into the same 5.5 org and joined the site. That worked out well. Then I did an in-place upgrade of the dummy 5.5 server to Ex2K. It worked. Then I installed a real Ex2K server into the org, moved all the users over, then killed the original 5.5 server and then killed the dummy Ex2K server. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: replication issue Looks like a name resolution error. When you added the 2nd server into the existing site, didnt you get some error messages? Try adding the names of the other Exch server into each respective server's hosts files. RPCPing is also your friend. - Original Message - From: "dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:37 PM Subject: replication issue > Situation: Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced. > Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site. Site will not > replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are: > > Event ID: 1059 > Source: MSExchangeDS > Description: > Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error > 22. > > Event ID: 1083 > Source: MSExchangeDS > Description: > Replication warning: The directory replication agent (DRA) couldn't > synchronize naming context /o='ORG'/ou='SITE' with naming context on > directory 'FIRST-SERVER'. > > > Nothing on Microsoft support is giving any clues to the issue except that > DRA error 22 is a JET error. > I have removed the added server, cleared its existance, and re-installed. > outcome = identical issues. > > Thoughts? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ? - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd > 9. What the hell died in there? > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > 10 "Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on > Windows XP ?" - one attendee joking > > > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with > Exchange 2003 ** > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange 2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here? Anthony L. Sollars Technology Consultant Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. 480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 425.254.4845 ) 425.681.4190 2 425.793.6000 -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions 8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ? - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd > 9. What the hell died in there? > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > 10 "Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on > Windows XP ?" - one attendee joking > > > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with > Exchange 2003 ** > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange 2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching User Mailboxes
But does it come with Scharff in box? Chuck -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2000 Admin
I have Exchange 2000 running on a Win2k Server that is also the Active Directory Domain controller. I was the admin of the server but I can no longer administer Exchange for some reason. I checked the Exchange Administration Delegation Wizard but it says I'm an Exchange Full Administrator. I deleted and re-added my self but I still cannot open/administrate other mailboxes. The Delegation wizard does say to verify I am also an administrator of the local machine but this is a domain controller and I cannot access local groups on it and I do not recall do that previously. Anyone have a hint as to what I'm missing? Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd
6. Just how many Exchange Administrators does it take to fill Room D171/175 ? Or, lets see what happens when we schedule our most popular Exchange sessions in the smallest rooms? This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com - Original Message - From: "Anthony Sollars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:28 PM Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd > 7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here? > > Anthony L. Sollars > Technology Consultant > Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc. > 480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055 > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ( 425.254.4845 > ) 425.681.4190 > 2 425.793.6000 > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > 8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM > Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd > > > > 9. What the hell died in there? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > 10 "Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on > > Windows XP ?" - one attendee joking > > > > > > > > ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with > > Exchange 2003 ** > > -- > > Martin Tuip > > MVP Exchange > > Exchange 2000 List owner > > www.exchange-mail.org > > www.sharepointserver.com > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Another MS move
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: MS Purchase
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another MS move
They may want the talent, not the product. - Original Message - From: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:50 PM Subject: OT: Another MS move > totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . > Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for > Exchange? :) > > > > This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador > from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS Purchase
Sorry for the dupe, but I got an error on delivery the first time . . . guess you cannot trust those dang things! :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com - Original Message - From: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:51 PM Subject: OT: MS Purchase > totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . > Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for > Exchange? :) > > > > This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador > from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Purchase
Ex2K3 sp1 ;) themolk. > -Original Message- > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OT: MS Purchase > > > totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . > Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server > or MS AV for Exchange? :) > > > > This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador > from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS Purchase
Exchange 2000 RTM. - Original Message - From: "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM Subject: RE: MS Purchase > Ex2K3 sp1 > > ;) > > themolk. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: OT: MS Purchase > > > > > > totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . > > Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server > > or MS AV for Exchange? :) > > > > > > > > This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador > > from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Purchase
Sorry william - rtm? Not read the manual? themolk. > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MS Purchase > > > Exchange 2000 RTM. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM > Subject: RE: MS Purchase > > > > Ex2K3 sp1 > > > > ;) > > > > themolk. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: OT: MS Purchase > > > > > > > > > totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any > > > predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server > or MS AV > > > for Exchange? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador > > > from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Purchase
Release to manufacturing -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS Purchase Sorry william - rtm? Not read the manual? themolk. > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MS Purchase > > > Exchange 2000 RTM. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM > Subject: RE: MS Purchase > > > > Ex2K3 sp1 > > > > ;) > > > > themolk. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: OT: MS Purchase > > > > > > > > > totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any > > > predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server > or MS AV > > > for Exchange? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador > > > from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2000 Admin
Jim, if this is an AD DC and you are the administrator of the local machine, then you are possibly a domain admin (since the local machine doesnt actually have a local security database, its the DC). Same for local groups, it wont have any. Domain Admins are denied access to mailboxes, and a deny overrides any other setting, so that could be the problem. Glenn - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:55 AM Subject: 2000 Admin > I have Exchange 2000 running on a Win2k Server that is also the Active > Directory Domain controller. I was the admin of the server but I can no > longer administer Exchange for some reason. I checked the Exchange > Administration Delegation Wizard but it says I'm an Exchange Full > Administrator. I deleted and re-added my self but I still cannot > open/administrate other mailboxes. The Delegation wizard does say to verify > I am also an administrator of the local machine but this is a domain > controller and I cannot access local groups on it and I do not recall do > that previously. Anyone have a hint as to what I'm missing? > > > Jim > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching User Mailboxes
"You have to be THIS tall to ride the..." Oh, wait - wrong thread :) -Original Message- From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions But does it come with Scharff in box? Chuck -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Van Hooser? Whoda thunk? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Van Hooser, Chuck Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes But does it come with Scharff in box? Chuck -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default .. . .. We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2000 Admin
Yup I'm a Domain Admin. Can I change it to grant Exchange access to all domain admins? If so do you recall the name/location of the setting? Thanks Jim -Original Message- From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 2000 Admin Jim, if this is an AD DC and you are the administrator of the local machine, then you are possibly a domain admin (since the local machine doesnt actually have a local security database, its the DC). Same for local groups, it wont have any. Domain Admins are denied access to mailboxes, and a deny overrides any other setting, so that could be the problem. Glenn - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:55 AM Subject: 2000 Admin > I have Exchange 2000 running on a Win2k Server that is also the Active > Directory Domain controller. I was the admin of the server but I can > no longer administer Exchange for some reason. I checked the Exchange > Administration Delegation Wizard but it says I'm an Exchange Full > Administrator. I deleted and re-added my self but I still cannot > open/administrate other mailboxes. The Delegation wizard does say to verify > I am also an administrator of the local machine but this is a domain > controller and I cannot access local groups on it and I do not recall > do that previously. Anyone have a hint as to what I'm missing? > > > Jim > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
Hi all, Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore & one office in Sri Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them built in "One forest" or "Two trusted forest". What wil be the pro & con... Any suggestion Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest
One forest is easier for administration. It is not easy to share Exchange GALs between organisations in different forests. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest Hi all, Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore & one office in Sri Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them built in "One forest" or "Two trusted forest". What wil be the pro & con... Any suggestion Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]