RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Yep, it will place the items into the 'Deleted Items' folder of the PST file. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation I got asked once if it was possible and found that an option had been added at some point to Exmerge to allow extraction from the Dumpster for mail on Exchange 5.5 (or later) servers. Exmege version 3.71 has an option "CopyDeletedItemsFromDumpster", which if set to 1 it will copy the dumpster items. The default is 0. Jane Jane F. Elliott Postmaster Team Tektronix, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation As far as I know, Dumpster items do not get extracted by Exmerge. A Mailbox Move loses items in the Dumpster. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Yes purging from deleted item recovery will remove it from the dumpster. I doubt Exmerge would do this as it just exports from the mailbox so I would assume it does the same on the dumpster which of course has to be specifically selected. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Thanks for that - following the article and purging from the necessary folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct? Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and achieved the same result? Stu -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website. This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is retrospective. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. ___
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
I got asked once if it was possible and found that an option had been added at some point to Exmerge to allow extraction from the Dumpster for mail on Exchange 5.5 (or later) servers. Exmege version 3.71 has an option "CopyDeletedItemsFromDumpster", which if set to 1 it will copy the dumpster items. The default is 0. Jane Jane F. Elliott Postmaster Team Tektronix, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation As far as I know, Dumpster items do not get extracted by Exmerge. A Mailbox Move loses items in the Dumpster. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Yes purging from deleted item recovery will remove it from the dumpster. I doubt Exmerge would do this as it just exports from the mailbox so I would assume it does the same on the dumpster which of course has to be specifically selected. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Thanks for that - following the article and purging from the necessary folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct? Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and achieved the same result? Stu -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website. This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is retrospective. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory
You really ought to learn about the concept of paragrpahs. Call Veritas and don't accept the answer that the Exchange server should also be a GC. Yes, installing Exchange on a DC requires you do to more to get it operating than if it were a member server. What happens if the DC function on your Exchange server fails and requires you to rebuild it? Your e-mail could be down for a while! If the DC is a separate box, and another is available, you can simply rebuild it and practically nobody will notice. There is never more than one Configuration domain controller. Exchange will select domain controllers in the same site. If there are no available domain controllers in the site, then after a delay of about 15 minutes (a guess based on observation) it will work from a list of some number of domain controllers (is it 20?) in the organization without regard to any proximity calculations. Just because you make your box a domain controller doesn't mean it will use itself for that purpose if there are other domain controllers in the same site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hague, Jeff Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory Single Exch2K SP3, Win2K AD Domain, several DCs/GCs in place. I am replacing a Win2K DC which happens to be 1 of 2 GCs and holds all FSMO roles (among other things). Earlier this week, I set up the replacement server, installed AD and transferred all FSMO except PDC emulator. Yesterday I set the new DC as a GC and removed GC from the old one. Apparently this has caused Veritas Backup Exec (which also runs on the machine that used to be a GC) to fail when trying to connect to the E2K box for individual mailbox backups. Veritas suggests making sure that the E2K machine itself is a GC which of course means installing AD on it. They dont seem to offer any other suggestions... As I got to thinking about it I figured that would actually fit into my server layout pretty well. Anyway, I have searched the knowledge base articles, read the resource kit and searched back through a year of posts to this discussion list and it looks like the cons for this arrangement are performance and recovery. I dont have any performance issues - the E2K box CPU peaks at 5% occaisionally but is generally barely breathing and there is on average nearly a gig of available RAM. Drive performance is hardly utilized as well so that only leaves the recovery issue. Is this simply that it is more difficult to recover a server that does several things or is there something specific to E2K that makes recovery more difficult if it is also a DC? Also, When I view the DCs on the Directory Access Tab of my E2K servers properties, it list 1 machine as the Configuration Domain Controller. I noticed that changed when I removed GC from the original server. Does E2K pick that machine from the "closest" DC or what? Will that change to the E2K box itself if I make it a GC? Last question - Does anyone know of anything to look out for if I do decide to make my E2K box a DC? Thanks! Jeff Hague MCSE Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
As far as I know, Dumpster items do not get extracted by Exmerge. A Mailbox Move loses items in the Dumpster. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Yes purging from deleted item recovery will remove it from the dumpster. I doubt Exmerge would do this as it just exports from the mailbox so I would assume it does the same on the dumpster which of course has to be specifically selected. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Thanks for that - following the article and purging from the necessary folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct? Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and achieved the same result? Stu -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website. This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is retrospective. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To uns
RE: Heads up on a new virus
On the note of this Virus I think we updated in time. But I see ISSCan was updated post sp4 for Exchange 5.5. Does anyone have the latest version of the file? Paul -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 21:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus This has almost always been the first place I learn about new viruses. I subscribe to numerous virus warning lists and this list has almost always been first to identify a virus that is a true threat. > Well, it wasn't hard, but it also wasn't _automatic_. If I hadn't read this ML > today, I might have missed it. > > Jim H _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Default Calendar coverage period
There is a reghack. I think you may roll out this via a logon script. Key Name: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences Value Name: FBPublishRange Data Type: REG_DWORD Data: 0xc (which is 12) Cheers, Phillip -Original Message- From: norem0rz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Default Calendar coverage period I need to chnge this to 12 months for all of the users... Is there a way to modify it on the back end, so we do not need to do it in Outlook on all the workstations? (think the default is 2 months?) Thanks- ps - Exchange 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Yes purging from deleted item recovery will remove it from the dumpster. I doubt Exmerge would do this as it just exports from the mailbox so I would assume it does the same on the dumpster which of course has to be specifically selected. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Thanks for that - following the article and purging from the necessary folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct? Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and achieved the same result? Stu -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website. This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is retrospective. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
This has almost always been the first place I learn about new viruses. I subscribe to numerous virus warning lists and this list has almost always been first to identify a virus that is a true threat. > Well, it wasn't hard, but it also wasn't _automatic_. If I hadn't read this ML > today, I might have missed it. > > Jim H _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Nick Field wrote: > No, but they do have it in their intelligent updater/xdb update if > you use NAV/SAV CE, it should be easy enough to roll out. > > Nick > Well, it wasn't hard, but it also wasn't _automatic_. If I hadn't read this ML today, I might have missed it. Jim H > > -Original Message- > From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 August 2003 19:42 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus > > > Symantec doesn't have the virusdef file that blocks this ready for > live update yet :-( > > > Aaron Brasslett wrote: >> Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file >> filters. >> >> Aaron >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: Heads up on a new virus >> >> >> >> > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. >> A >> >> -- >> Martin Tuip >> MVP Exchange >> Exchange 2000 List owner >> www.exchange-mail.org >> www.sharepointserver.com >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> -- >> >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Web Interface: >> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang >> =english >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >> Web Interface: >> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange >> List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > The information in this e-mail and any attachment(s) is confidential > and may be legally privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the > addressee. If you are not the addressee, dissemination, copying or > other use of this e-mail or any of its content is strictly prohibited > and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please > inform the sender immediately and destroy the e-mail and any copies. > All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted > by law. Any views expressed in this message are those of the > individual sender. No contract may be construed by this e-mail. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange > List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trend 3.51 and Ex 5.5
I have submitted this to Trend, however I didn't know if anyone here had experienced this before. We are running Trend 3.51 and have the autoupdates set to hourly. They stopped working on the 30th, I can still do the manual update but it doesn't show up in the log's. The log has 2000 events in it. Does anyone know how to clear the log file, under log maintenance it is grayed out. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT-Exch-Trend 381 -IMSS - Lists?
Does anyone know if there are any list's for the Trend suite? Notability the Exchange piece 381 and/or IMSS 5x thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Thanks for that - following the article and purging from the necessary folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct? Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and achieved the same result? Stu -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website. This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is retrospective. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
No, but they do have it in their intelligent updater/xdb update if you use NAV/SAV CE, it should be easy enough to roll out. Nick -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus Symantec doesn't have the virusdef file that blocks this ready for live update yet :-( Aaron Brasslett wrote: > Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters. > > Aaron > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Heads up on a new virus > > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. > A > > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange 2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange > List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information in this e-mail and any attachment(s) is confidential and may be legally privileged. This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the addressee, dissemination, copying or other use of this e-mail or any of its content is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender immediately and destroy the e-mail and any copies. All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. No contract may be construed by this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Sure they do. They've had it for a few hours. http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/defs.download.html > -Original Message- > From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:42 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Heads up on a new virus > Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus > > > > Symantec doesn't have the virusdef file that blocks this > ready for live update yet :-( > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
I am not sure if this was simply bad typing but the file name was an executable called foo (foo.exe) -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus I received this earlier today and being the administrator I knew that I had not sent myself this message. The message included a WinZip attachment which was rather interesting to take apart. It turned out to be an html document that directed the browser to go to a website and run a file foveae -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Search Google for DumpsterAlwaysOn -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Symantec doesn't have the virusdef file that blocks this ready for live update yet :-( Aaron Brasslett wrote: > Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters. > > Aaron > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Heads up on a new virus > > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. > A > > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange 2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange > List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
I received this earlier today and being the administrator I knew that I had not sent myself this message. The message included a WinZip attachment which was rather interesting to take apart. It turned out to be an html document that directed the browser to go to a website and run a file foveae -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Anyone know what the IE system vulnerability is that that article describes? - Peter -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters. Aaron -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachments and the Priv
This whole process is covered under Single Instance Storage functionality of Exchange. Only one instance of a message exists with pointers for each user that was sent the message. If you had three servers and the message was sent to mailboxes on each server then you would have three instances in your site. Check out www.swinc.com for the FAQ. Paul -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachments and the Priv Hi, I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out. Is there a link on MS about this or in a book somewhere. I have not been able to find it. As an Exchange Admin I should know this - argh. When an email with attachment gets sent to 'N' people does that attachment stay in the store as one file or is it stored as 'N' files? TIA, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachments and the Priv
What your referring to is Single Instance Storage... http://www.storageadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=23819 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik L. Vesneski Sent: 01 August 2003 18:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachments and the Priv Hi, I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out. Is there a link on MS about this or in a book somewhere. I have not been able to find it. As an Exchange Admin I should know this - argh. When an email with attachment gets sent to 'N' people does that attachment stay in the store as one file or is it stored as 'N' files? TIA, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachments and the Priv
It is stored as one file per store. Hence the phrase - single instance storage. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Erik L. Vesneski > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Friday, August 1, 2003 1:21 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Attachments and the Priv > > Hi, > > I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out. > > Is there a link on MS about this or in a book somewhere. I have not > been able to find it. > > As an Exchange Admin I should know this - argh. > > When an email with attachment gets sent to 'N' people does that > attachment stay in the store as one file or is it stored as 'N' files? > > > > TIA, > > Erik L. Vesneski > WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist > ISO - Intel Systems > Ph#: 925-658-6161 > www.pmigroup.com > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la > ng=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachments and the Priv
SIS = only one copy until everyone deletes it. -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachments and the Priv Hi, I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out. Is there a link on MS about this or in a book somewhere. I have not been able to find it. As an Exchange Admin I should know this - argh. When an email with attachment gets sent to 'N' people does that attachment stay in the store as one file or is it stored as 'N' files? TIA, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attachments and the Priv
Hi, I get asked this all the time and really have never figured it out. Is there a link on MS about this or in a book somewhere. I have not been able to find it. As an Exchange Admin I should know this - argh. When an email with attachment gets sent to 'N' people does that attachment stay in the store as one file or is it stored as 'N' files? TIA, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Ditto. - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus We do, and hourly. Works great. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:06 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus > > > Just out of curiosity, who here uses trend and how often do > you have it set to update? > > Just curious > > John Parker, MCSE > IS Admin. > Senior Technical Specialist > Digital Display Systems. > > "Be excellent to each other" > ---End of Line--- > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Heads up on a new virus
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS02-015.asp - Original Message - From: "Peter Orlowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:23 PM Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus > Anyone know what the IE system vulnerability is that that article describes? > > > - Peter > > -Original Message- > From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus > > Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters. > > Aaron > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Heads up on a new virus > > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. > A > > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange 2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
We do, and hourly. Works great. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:06 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus > > > Just out of curiosity, who here uses trend and how often do > you have it set to update? > > Just curious > > John Parker, MCSE > IS Admin. > Senior Technical Specialist > Digital Display Systems. > > "Be excellent to each other" > ---End of Line--- > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Thanks Martin. We are already seeing this virus hit our file filters. Aaron -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
We run Trend and automatically update every hour. Paul -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus Just out of curiosity, who here uses trend and how often do you have it set to update? Just curious John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Thanks Martin, got the new definition but learned something strange at the same time Using Trend 3.52 with Ex5.5 SP4, NT4.0 SP6a and have the update set to every hour and it has been working great. I just checked to see what version we were on and all should have been well but we were on 355 not 357, ran the update manually and then checked the logs. By looking in the logs it seems that trend stopped updating at 10pm on the 30th, even the manual update is not showing up in the logs. I am going to Trends site now, but was wondering if any of you other users had seen this in the past. Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Heads up on a new virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL. A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Found the article it is 178630. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website. This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is retrospective. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website. This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is retrospective. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Just out of curiosity, who here uses trend and how often do you have it set to update? Just curious John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. "Be excellent to each other" ---End of Line--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Heads up on a new virus
Already on it and blocked. Thanks Martin. > -- > From: Martin Tuip [MVP] > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Friday, August 1, 2003 12:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Heads up on a new virus > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAI > L.A > > -- > Martin Tuip > MVP Exchange > Exchange 2000 List owner > www.exchange-mail.org > www.sharepointserver.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la > ng=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heads up on a new virus
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MIMAIL.A -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MECC 2003 Venue
Why not share one with us ? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 5:14 PM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue I won an Xbox game by filling out a survey at MEC. Also, I won an Xbox at TechED one year. :D Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Hopefully we all noted that on the wonderful evaluation forms (my evil coworker got cash for doing one of those things, I've been each year since 97 and on his first trip he gets money). I will be the bad guy, I am very pleased that they have joined MEC and Tech-Ed together, working for a government agency I am not able to swing 2 big conferences a year. I was getting ready to start swapping each year, now I don't have to. While the rooms were packed I thought the content was very good, how did it compare to the content of the past MEC's. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact > opposite. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue > > I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. > Oh well. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > MEC is no more... :-( > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was > presented earlier in > > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my > own question? I > > see nuthin on MS' site. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory
I actually waited about 18 hours (before I found the KB article that said you had to) and then rebooted it... Jeff -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory When you made the new DC a GC, did wait at least 5 minutes and then reboot it? Jason > -Original Message- > From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory > > Single Exch2K SP3, Win2K AD Domain, several DCs/GCs in place. > I am replacing a Win2K DC which happens to be 1 of 2 GCs and > holds all FSMO roles (among other things). Earlier this week, > I set up the replacement server, installed AD and transferred > all FSMO except PDC emulator. Yesterday I set the new DC as a > GC and removed GC from the old one. Apparently this has > caused Veritas Backup Exec (which also runs on the machine > that used to be a GC) to fail when trying to connect to the > E2K box for individual mailbox backups. Veritas suggests > making sure that the E2K machine itself is a GC which of > course means installing AD on it. They dont seem to offer any > other suggestions... As I got to thinking about it I figured > that would actually fit into my server layout pretty well. > Anyway, I have searched the knowledge base articles, read the > resource kit and searched back through a year of posts to > this discussion list and it looks like the cons for this > arrangement are performance and recovery. I dont have any > performance issues - the E2K box CPU peaks at 5% > occaisionally but is generally barely breathing and there is > on average nearly a gig of available RAM. Drive performance > is hardly utilized as well so that only leaves the recovery > issue. Is this simply that it is more difficult to recover a > server that does several things or is there something > specific to E2K that makes recovery more difficult if it is also a DC? > Also, When I view the DCs on the Directory Access Tab of my > E2K servers properties, it list 1 machine as the > Configuration Domain Controller. I noticed that changed when > I removed GC from the original server. Does E2K pick that > machine from the "closest" DC or what? Will that change to > the E2K box itself if I make it a GC? > Last question - Does anyone know of anything to look out for > if I do decide to make my E2K box a DC? > Thanks! > > Jeff Hague > MCSE > Network Manager > Randolph-Macon College > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory
When you made the new DC a GC, did wait at least 5 minutes and then reboot it? Jason > -Original Message- > From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory > > Single Exch2K SP3, Win2K AD Domain, several DCs/GCs in place. > I am replacing a Win2K DC which happens to be 1 of 2 GCs and > holds all FSMO roles (among other things). Earlier this week, > I set up the replacement server, installed AD and transferred > all FSMO except PDC emulator. Yesterday I set the new DC as a > GC and removed GC from the old one. Apparently this has > caused Veritas Backup Exec (which also runs on the machine > that used to be a GC) to fail when trying to connect to the > E2K box for individual mailbox backups. Veritas suggests > making sure that the E2K machine itself is a GC which of > course means installing AD on it. They dont seem to offer any > other suggestions... As I got to thinking about it I figured > that would actually fit into my server layout pretty well. > Anyway, I have searched the knowledge base articles, read the > resource kit and searched back through a year of posts to > this discussion list and it looks like the cons for this > arrangement are performance and recovery. I dont have any > performance issues - the E2K box CPU peaks at 5% > occaisionally but is generally barely breathing and there is > on average nearly a gig of available RAM. Drive performance > is hardly utilized as well so that only leaves the recovery > issue. Is this simply that it is more difficult to recover a > server that does several things or is there something > specific to E2K that makes recovery more difficult if it is also a DC? > Also, When I view the DCs on the Directory Access Tab of my > E2K servers properties, it list 1 machine as the > Configuration Domain Controller. I noticed that changed when > I removed GC from the original server. Does E2K pick that > machine from the "closest" DC or what? Will that change to > the E2K box itself if I make it a GC? > Last question - Does anyone know of anything to look out for > if I do decide to make my E2K box a DC? > Thanks! > > Jeff Hague > MCSE > Network Manager > Randolph-Macon College > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Several questions on E2k and Active Directory
Single Exch2K SP3, Win2K AD Domain, several DCs/GCs in place. I am replacing a Win2K DC which happens to be 1 of 2 GCs and holds all FSMO roles (among other things). Earlier this week, I set up the replacement server, installed AD and transferred all FSMO except PDC emulator. Yesterday I set the new DC as a GC and removed GC from the old one. Apparently this has caused Veritas Backup Exec (which also runs on the machine that used to be a GC) to fail when trying to connect to the E2K box for individual mailbox backups. Veritas suggests making sure that the E2K machine itself is a GC which of course means installing AD on it. They dont seem to offer any other suggestions... As I got to thinking about it I figured that would actually fit into my server layout pretty well. Anyway, I have searched the knowledge base articles, read the resource kit and searched back through a year of posts to this discussion list and it looks like the cons for this arrangement are performance and recovery. I dont have any performance issues - the E2K box CPU peaks at 5% occaisionally but is generally barely breathing and there is on average nearly a gig of available RAM. Drive performance is hardly utilized as well so that only leaves the recovery issue. Is this simply that it is more difficult to recover a server that does several things or is there something specific to E2K that makes recovery more difficult if it is also a DC? Also, When I view the DCs on the Directory Access Tab of my E2K servers properties, it list 1 machine as the Configuration Domain Controller. I noticed that changed when I removed GC from the original server. Does E2K pick that machine from the "closest" DC or what? Will that change to the E2K box itself if I make it a GC? Last question - Does anyone know of anything to look out for if I do decide to make my E2K box a DC? Thanks! Jeff Hague MCSE Network Manager Randolph-Macon College _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Question
I inherited Exchange. Was like this when I got here. I am dealing with the problems because I will be doing the Exchange 2000 upgrade. What do you mean...you boss must love you? Are you making fun of my bad situation? My boss does love me because I haven't quit yet! Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Public Folder Question A starting point. Although based on what you said happened then the orphan route is the way to go, as John stated. Your boss must love you. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;259158 From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Public Folder Question Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:32:31 -0400 Hello All. I have a server in my Exchange 5.5 Organization that is no longer there. The server has been rebuilt as something else and is not available anymore. My question is this. This server shows in the Exchange 5.5 Admin program and I can't delete the objects under the public folder because it is looking for the old server that the folders were created "Home" on. I don't need the public folders and want to delete them and the server from my Organization. Help?? s. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Question
A starting point. Although based on what you said happened then the orphan route is the way to go, as John stated. Your boss must love you. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;259158 From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Public Folder Question Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:32:31 -0400 Hello All. I have a server in my Exchange 5.5 Organization that is no longer there. The server has been rebuilt as something else and is not available anymore. My question is this. This server shows in the Exchange 5.5 Admin program and I can't delete the objects under the public folder because it is looking for the old server that the folders were created "Home" on. I don't need the public folders and want to delete them and the server from my Organization. Help?? s. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Question
Because you removed the server without rehoming PF's I think you out of luck. Most of what I know is that if you do not rehome first then move everything off that exchange server, you can not remove it. Maybe someone else on the list has run across this. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Public Folder Question Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:32:31 -0400 Hello All. I have a server in my Exchange 5.5 Organization that is no longer there. The server has been rebuilt as something else and is not available anymore. My question is this. This server shows in the Exchange 5.5 Admin program and I can't delete the objects under the public folder because it is looking for the old server that the folders were created "Home" on. I don't need the public folders and want to delete them and the server from my Organization. Help?? s. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Question
Have you deleted the original Exchange server entry using the Exchange admin tool? That would be the first place to start. Secondly, there are a few KB articles in TechNet that will help you remove orphaned folders. Search for "Orphan Public folders" and select Exchange 5.5 or "all products". That should be a good starting point for your journey. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:33 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Public Folder Question Subject: Public Folder Question Hello All. I have a server in my Exchange 5.5 Organization that is no longer there. The server has been rebuilt as something else and is not available anymore. My question is this. This server shows in the Exchange 5.5 Admin program and I can't delete the objects under the public folder because it is looking for the old server that the folders were created "Home" on. I don't need the public folders and want to delete them and the server from my Organization. Help?? s. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Question
Hello All. I have a server in my Exchange 5.5 Organization that is no longer there. The server has been rebuilt as something else and is not available anymore. My question is this. This server shows in the Exchange 5.5 Admin program and I can't delete the objects under the public folder because it is looking for the old server that the folders were created "Home" on. I don't need the public folders and want to delete them and the server from my Organization. Help?? s. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
I won an Xbox game by filling out a survey at MEC. Also, I won an Xbox at TechED one year. :D Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Hopefully we all noted that on the wonderful evaluation forms (my evil coworker got cash for doing one of those things, I've been each year since 97 and on his first trip he gets money). I will be the bad guy, I am very pleased that they have joined MEC and Tech-Ed together, working for a government agency I am not able to swing 2 big conferences a year. I was getting ready to start swapping each year, now I don't have to. While the rooms were packed I thought the content was very good, how did it compare to the content of the past MEC's. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact > opposite. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue > > I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. > Oh well. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > MEC is no more... :-( > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was > presented earlier in > > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my > own question? I > > see nuthin on MS' site. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
Hopefully we all noted that on the wonderful evaluation forms (my evil coworker got cash for doing one of those things, I've been each year since 97 and on his first trip he gets money). I will be the bad guy, I am very pleased that they have joined MEC and Tech-Ed together, working for a government agency I am not able to swing 2 big conferences a year. I was getting ready to start swapping each year, now I don't have to. While the rooms were packed I thought the content was very good, how did it compare to the content of the past MEC's. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact > opposite. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue > > I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. > Oh well. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > MEC is no more... :-( > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was > presented earlier in > > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my > own question? I > > see nuthin on MS' site. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
RE: Friday Haiku
Can't manage a Haiku today, but you might enjoy this one: NIGHT JOB (With apologies to W H Auden) This is the night job, a daily recorder Making the checksums in batch process order E-mail (rich-text), attachments galore Backed up on tape drives, just to restore Viruses detoxed, servers on-line Innumerable bytes of multipart MIME Past project reports grow steadily older Shoving out whitespace for file and folder Whirring noisily as she demos An encyclopedia of corporate memos Disks turn their heads, confessing each secret Whilst hardware and software struggle to keep it ASCII and EBCDIC, zeroes and ones Transferred to storage in nightly job runs So think of the backups, now before later, Keep them efficient and delete some damn data! -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday Haiku MECC was great. I met a succubus there. After a long bender. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Archiving Methods?
"Best" and "PST" don't really belong in the same conversation, unless the question is "What's the best way to make sure that compliance with discovery requests will cost my company a fortune?" On 07/31/03 20:11, "Eric Holtzclaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the best Archiving tool for Exchange 2000 mailboxes that are > over 2 Gig? > Needs to archived in a PST by date. Either Client or Server based. > > Thanks, Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact > opposite. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue > > I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. > Oh well. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > MEC is no more... :-( > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was > presented earlier in > > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my > own question? I > > see nuthin on MS' site. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday Haiku
MECC was great. I met a succubus there. After a long bender. (double-entendre unavoidable. so sorry.) Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue I spent most of the week sitting down. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:20 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact > opposite. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue > > I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. > Oh well. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > MEC is no more... :-( > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented > > earlier in > > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own > > question? I > > see nuthin on MS' site. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mo > > de=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mo > > de=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002
Chris, Thanks for the response. I checked, and no, the user doesn't have mail delivered to a PST. The only PST in use is ARCHIVE.PST. Mail goes straight to the users' mailbox on exchange. Steve > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:28 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002 > > Does the recipient have mail delivery set to a PST file? > > On 07/25/03 14:39, "Steve Sorenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call > her "User > > A") calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the > > scenario: > > > > 1) User A sends invitation to User B for a meeting. > > 2) User B accepts invitation. > > 3) A short while later (the time varies), User A will receive a > > meeting cancellation of that meeting. > > 4) A check of User B's "Sent Items" folder shows a > cancellation even > > though they never issued the cancellation. > > > > This has happened to User A at least a half-dozen times, and is not > > with any specific recipient. Also, they have been able to send many > > other successful meeting requests. This is on Exchange 2000 > SP3 with > > Outlook > > 2002 on an all Windows 2000 network. Also, this is not happening to > > other users. > > > > Here's some of what I've tried so far: > > > > 1) I've checked the recipients' workstations for any > auto-cancel rules > > and found none. > > 2) I've scanned the workstation for viruses and found none. > > 3) Searched MS's knowledgebase and read anything I could find on > > canceled meetings. > > 4) Tried starting Outlook with the /celanfreebusy and > /cleanreminders > > switches. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions! > > > > Steve > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > > =&lang=e > > nglish > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
MEC is dead. Long live MEC. The Fall 2002 Conference in Anaheim was the last Exchange-centric conference. MEC content has been rolled into TechEd. TechEd 2004 will be in San Diego. Whether or not TechEd is a suitable replacement for MEC is up to the longtime attendees to decide. > -Original Message- > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was > presented earlier in > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my > own question? I > see nuthin on MS' site. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
Down at OPB? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:15 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: MECC 2003 Venue Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue Perfect Sleeping weather for Martin. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:04 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > It will be TechEd, and its SD > > -Original Message- > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier > in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own > question? I see nuthin on MS' site. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
Thanks, our plan is to do a single Saturday migration, however in light of Murphy I'll probably go ahead and do the connector just as a cma procedure. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd If you need to co-exist with some users on 5.5 and some on 2003 then the ADC keeps the Exchange 5.5 directory and your new Active Directory synchronised and ensures that you can route mail between the two. If you can migrate in a single hit then you don't need it. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 12:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain structure (going from two to one). My thinking today has jumped over to the why do I even need to worry about the connector and upgrading exchange since part of this entire conversion is new exchange hardware anyway. We are going to wait until this fall and go right to Ex2K3 from 5.5 and skip over Ex2K. So here is my thinking, if I leave the old server alone, running on 4.0 in the old domain, then when 2K3 is released and I get the software build a new server in the AD on Win2K3. Wouldn't I be able to join that to the 5.5 organization and move the users over to the new server. Decommission the old server and remove the 4.0 infrastructure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
Guess this goes to show the value of researching throughly before making decisions. So far I am not impressed with the Office part. Tried copying some text from a web page and it crashed Word 2002 everytime. The recovery did not work. Pasting to Wordpad worked fine. Another web page pasted fine. Thanks again, we will look into volume license. Bill Kuhl -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro Talk nicely to Dell. They may be able to convert them to a volume licensing agreement for you and issue you a corporate license number. Else your into reactivating every time you change more than two hardware items at the same time (or is it three), or rebuilding a machine. Not nice. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We received new Dell pc's with the software pre-loaded. >From your comment I assume that there is a method from loading from a server and bypass activation. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro Why will you be activating the software? Are these all retail copies? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MECC 2003 Venue
I spent most of the week sitting down. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:20 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact > opposite. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue > > I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. > Oh well. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > MEC is no more... :-( > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in > > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I > > see nuthin on MS' site. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact opposite. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. Oh well. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > MEC is no more... :-( > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I > see nuthin on MS' site. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MECC 2003 Venue
I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. Oh well. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. > > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > > MEC is no more... :-( > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I > see nuthin on MS' site. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
You're out of luck -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We received new Dell pc's with the software pre-loaded. >From your comment I assume that there is a method from loading from a server and bypass activation. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro Why will you be activating the software? Are these all retail copies? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
Talk nicely to Dell. They may be able to convert them to a volume licensing agreement for you and issue you a corporate license number. Else your into reactivating every time you change more than two hardware items at the same time (or is it three), or rebuilding a machine. Not nice. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We received new Dell pc's with the software pre-loaded. >From your comment I assume that there is a method from loading from a server and bypass activation. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro Why will you be activating the software? Are these all retail copies? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
Aye -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro In that instance, you may have to. We dont typically buy with the Office software pre-loaded. - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:59 AM Subject: RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We received new Dell pc's with the software pre-loaded. >From your comment I assume that there is a method from loading from a server and bypass activation. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro Why will you be activating the software? Are these all retail copies? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
Madre De Dios! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue Perfect Sleeping weather for Martin. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:04 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > It will be TechEd, and its SD > > -Original Message- > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I > see nuthin on MS' site. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
So my prediction--made years ago--came true at last. Some prediction: a senior exchange project mgmt dude I met at MECC 2001 said that there would be no more MECCs.. meaning, no MECC 2002. Right. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
In that instance, you may have to. We dont typically buy with the Office software pre-loaded. - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:59 AM Subject: RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We received new Dell pc's with the software pre-loaded. >From your comment I assume that there is a method from loading from a server and bypass activation. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro Why will you be activating the software? Are these all retail copies? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
I guess they think Exchange folks need to learn something they don't know yet. -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue I was told by MS that they want the Exchange folks to go to Teched. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MECC 2003 Venue
Perfect Sleeping weather for Martin. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:04 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue > It will be TechEd, and its SD > > -Original Message- > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: MECC 2003 Venue > > Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? > > Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in > the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I > see nuthin on MS' site. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple OWA servers
I have used windows load-balancing with 2 front-end OWA servers for 3+ years, serving ~3000 users. Never had any problems. Also I have 3 SMTP gateways that are load-balanced and handle ~1,000,000 messages per day each - load-balancing is performing quite well. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: multiple OWA servers You can depend on round-robin DNS to do this, or implement Windows Network Load Balancing or, preferably, a hardware load balancing device to take care of this for you. Round-robin DNS will effectively balance load but doesn't tolerate failures, i.e., if one of two front-end servers fail, about one in two requests will fail. Load balancing is fault tolerant. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: multiple OWA servers I was looking a bit and didn't see anything on this but was curious. If you have mutiple OWA front-end servers (E2K) and when you publish the url for users to access their email via the web client. How Exchange handles which user get which server. Do they all hit the default OWA server and it just knows which OWA server handles that user mailbox? I never saw this explained very well. Has anybody seen a write-up on this and could forward a link for this. Also an install guide for this type of config. _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
I was told by MS that they want the Exchange folks to go to Teched. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
We received new Dell pc's with the software pre-loaded. >From your comment I assume that there is a method from loading from a server and >bypass activation. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro Why will you be activating the software? Are these all retail copies? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
It will be TechEd, and its SD -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MECC 2003 Venue
Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
Don't buy retail copies. Get a corp lic and one media and use the same on all. No activation required. Plus you will find it is cheaper to buy. -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 6:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
It Worked! Wooo Hooo. Q273478 did the job! Thanks to everyone! Thank God It Is Friday! Samantha -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help Did you carefully follow all steps in Q273478 - XADM: How to Completely Remove Exchange 2000 from Active Directory? -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 13:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help Yes. When I ran the /removeorg, it said: Setup cannot update your current installation, because there is no Microsoft Exchange server installed. Even though it said that, I tried to re-run the ForestPrep and still didn't get the option to join an existing 5.5. What am I doing wrong? Please help if you can. Thanks Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help Did you follow Mr. Webb's advice from yesterday and run "update.exe /removeorg" from the Exch SP3 media? - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:18 AM Subject: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the setup > and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried > re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me > the option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. > > Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? > > Thanks > > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
Why will you be activating the software? Are these all retail copies? - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Upgrade to XP Pro
We are looking at upgrading from Outlook 98 to Outlook 2002 as well as the rest of the Office programs from the 97 versions. I have a couple of concerns: After you activate the software, what procedure do you go through when a hard drive dies? Also, does the Save My Settings Wizard work with Outlook 2002 as well? Thanks, Bill Kuhl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
Thanks guys! I am going to try a few drastic measures and after that the "blow-up" idea sounds good. It is just a testbed Thanks for all your help. If you come up with any new ideas, send them my way. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help It's Friday. I would go with the blow-up version. From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 09:28:09 -0400 Is this a test lab? Blow it up and restart or search in Technet on how to manually remove Exch from AD. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:13 AM Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > Yes. When I ran the /removeorg, it said: > > Setup cannot update your current installation, because there is no Microsoft > Exchange server installed. > > Even though it said that, I tried to re-run the ForestPrep and still didn't > get the option to join an existing 5.5. > > What am I doing wrong? Please help if you can. > > Thanks > > Samantha > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > > > Did you follow Mr. Webb's advice from yesterday and run "update.exe > /removeorg" from the Exch SP3 media? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:18 AM > Subject: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > > > > I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the > setup > > and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried > > re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the > > option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. > > > > Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Samantha > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
They also changed the licensing in W2k3 terminal server, not sure I like their reason for doing that little change. I figured their reason was for sites doing an in-place upgrade, but not yet ready to make the exchange conversion, however I'm doing a parallel conversion so I was just wondering if the ADC was needed. I have checked the documentation, and am in the process of doing it again, but only to see if I really need it at all. I know it will work through the trust relationship as I have it running in the lab with out the ADC and my AD users have accounts on the 4.0/5.5 server. Thanks Jeff -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd Those were probably Microsoft's original plans but then for some reason they invented ADC. Must have been a good reason. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain structure (going from two to one). My thinking today has jumped over to the why do I even need to worry about the connector and upgrading exchange since part of this entire conversion is new exchange hardware anyway. We are going to wait until this fall and go right to Ex2K3 from 5.5 and skip over Ex2K. So here is my thinking, if I leave the old server alone, running on 4.0 in the old domain, then when 2K3 is released and I get the software build a new server in the AD on Win2K3. Wouldn't I be able to join that to the 5.5 organization and move the users over to the new server. Decommission the old server and remove the 4.0 infrastructure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
It's Friday. I would go with the blow-up version. From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 09:28:09 -0400 Is this a test lab? Blow it up and restart or search in Technet on how to manually remove Exch from AD. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:13 AM Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > Yes. When I ran the /removeorg, it said: > > Setup cannot update your current installation, because there is no Microsoft > Exchange server installed. > > Even though it said that, I tried to re-run the ForestPrep and still didn't > get the option to join an existing 5.5. > > What am I doing wrong? Please help if you can. > > Thanks > > Samantha > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > > > Did you follow Mr. Webb's advice from yesterday and run "update.exe > /removeorg" from the Exch SP3 media? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:18 AM > Subject: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > > > > I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the > setup > > and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried > > re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the > > option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. > > > > Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Samantha > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
Is this a test lab? Blow it up and restart or search in Technet on how to manually remove Exch from AD. - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:13 AM Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > Yes. When I ran the /removeorg, it said: > > Setup cannot update your current installation, because there is no Microsoft > Exchange server installed. > > Even though it said that, I tried to re-run the ForestPrep and still didn't > get the option to join an existing 5.5. > > What am I doing wrong? Please help if you can. > > Thanks > > Samantha > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > > > Did you follow Mr. Webb's advice from yesterday and run "update.exe > /removeorg" from the Exch SP3 media? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:18 AM > Subject: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > > > > I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the > setup > > and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried > > re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the > > option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. > > > > Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Samantha > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
Did you carefully follow all steps in Q273478 - XADM: How to Completely Remove Exchange 2000 from Active Directory? -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 13:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help Yes. When I ran the /removeorg, it said: Setup cannot update your current installation, because there is no Microsoft Exchange server installed. Even though it said that, I tried to re-run the ForestPrep and still didn't get the option to join an existing 5.5. What am I doing wrong? Please help if you can. Thanks Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help Did you follow Mr. Webb's advice from yesterday and run "update.exe /removeorg" from the Exch SP3 media? - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:18 AM Subject: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the setup > and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried > re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me > the option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. > > Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? > > Thanks > > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
If you need to co-exist with some users on 5.5 and some on 2003 then the ADC keeps the Exchange 5.5 directory and your new Active Directory synchronised and ensures that you can route mail between the two. If you can migrate in a single hit then you don't need it. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 12:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain structure (going from two to one). My thinking today has jumped over to the why do I even need to worry about the connector and upgrading exchange since part of this entire conversion is new exchange hardware anyway. We are going to wait until this fall and go right to Ex2K3 from 5.5 and skip over Ex2K. So here is my thinking, if I leave the old server alone, running on 4.0 in the old domain, then when 2K3 is released and I get the software build a new server in the AD on Win2K3. Wouldn't I be able to join that to the 5.5 organization and move the users over to the new server. Decommission the old server and remove the 4.0 infrastructure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
Yes. When I ran the /removeorg, it said: Setup cannot update your current installation, because there is no Microsoft Exchange server installed. Even though it said that, I tried to re-run the ForestPrep and still didn't get the option to join an existing 5.5. What am I doing wrong? Please help if you can. Thanks Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help Did you follow Mr. Webb's advice from yesterday and run "update.exe /removeorg" from the Exch SP3 media? - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:18 AM Subject: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the setup > and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried > re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the > option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. > > Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? > > Thanks > > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple OWA servers
Each front-end server is separate. Each front-end server can figure out what back-end server is holding the user's mailbox and will know how to proxy the user to the correct back-end. You could load-balance the front-end servers and make them respond the the same IP address and FQDN. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: multiple OWA servers I was looking a bit and didn't see anything on this but was curious. If you have mutiple OWA front-end servers (E2K) and when you publish the url for users to access their email via the web client. How Exchange handles which user get which server. Do they all hit the default OWA server and it just knows which OWA server handles that user mailbox? I never saw this explained very well. Has anybody seen a write-up on this and could forward a link for this. Also an install guide for this type of config. _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
Those were probably Microsoft's original plans but then for some reason they invented ADC. Must have been a good reason. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain structure (going from two to one). My thinking today has jumped over to the why do I even need to worry about the connector and upgrading exchange since part of this entire conversion is new exchange hardware anyway. We are going to wait until this fall and go right to Ex2K3 from 5.5 and skip over Ex2K. So here is my thinking, if I leave the old server alone, running on 4.0 in the old domain, then when 2K3 is released and I get the software build a new server in the AD on Win2K3. Wouldn't I be able to join that to the 5.5 organization and move the users over to the new server. Decommission the old server and remove the 4.0 infrastructure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading thoughts from the been there done that crowd
I have been reading up on the AD connector for exchange and what I need to do etc. However I was wondering if I really need it at all. We are doing a new AD design and trusting back to our 4.0 domain then using the ADMIT tool to migrate users/computers and passwords over to the new domain structure (going from two to one). My thinking today has jumped over to the why do I even need to worry about the connector and upgrading exchange since part of this entire conversion is new exchange hardware anyway. We are going to wait until this fall and go right to Ex2K3 from 5.5 and skip over Ex2K. So here is my thinking, if I leave the old server alone, running on 4.0 in the old domain, then when 2K3 is released and I get the software build a new server in the AD on Win2K3. Wouldn't I be able to join that to the 5.5 organization and move the users over to the new server. Decommission the old server and remove the 4.0 infrastructure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
Did you follow Mr. Webb's advice from yesterday and run "update.exe /removeorg" from the Exch SP3 media? - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:18 AM Subject: ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help > I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the setup > and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried > re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the > option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. > > Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? > > Thanks > > > Samantha > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ForestPrep/Domainprep Question - Please help
I need to re-install ForestPrep. I chose the wrong option during the setup and need to re-run to accept the correct setting. When I tried re-installing it, it just went through the setup and didn't give me the option to Create a new organization or join an existing 5.5. Know of a way to uninstall ForestPrep? Or have any other ideas? Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAMERS hitting my second MX record?
I don't know - we run the exact same configs on all our external relays, so if one rejects it, all 4 will. Then again, when you're using 100% open source software on 100% recycled desktop machines as mail relays, cost isn't much of a factor. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: SPAMERS hitting my second MX record? > > > > My first MX record is to dDoxs. My second is to my email > > gateway, in case eDoxs is down. I'm wondering if spammers can > > pick up on my second MX record and send directly to it. > > Actually, it's very common for spammers to start at your > lower priority > MX records. It makes sense for exactly the reason you specified. > Companies rarely put the expensive anti-spam software on > their secondary > MX relays. > > Ed recommended using a relay to HOLD the mail until the primary is > available again. This method works great provided that most of your > filtering is not done by RBL/SPAM listings (because the source IP has > changed.) > > -Kevin > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAMERS hitting my second MX record?
Think about how SMTP works, and you'll get the answer. In other words, yes. Your primary rejects the message (or the connection in some cases), so the sending MTA correctly identifies that as a failure, and tries the next highest MX - in your case, your gateway. I've got 4 external MX's with ascending preferences, and I start with the highest preference one to see what spammers are up to.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 6:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: SPAMERS hitting my second MX record? > > > I use eDoxs (3rd party company that identifies spam. They use > Brightmail). > > Getting a lot of spam, however. > > My first MX record is to dDoxs. My second is to my email > gateway, in case eDoxs is down. I'm wondering if spammers can > pick up on my second MX record and send directly to it. > > Please advise. > > TIA > > Regards, > Orin > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
