RE: Calendar Question

[Busby, Jacob]

> I have yet to do this but...
> 
> What do I need to do is give my assisatant access to my 
> bosses clendar in outlook.
> What do I need to do to make it so she can view his calendar 
> from her desktop?
> 
> Thanks Ahead of time.

This is really an Outlook question, not Exchange, but...

(Answer based on Outlook 2000; your mileage may vary) Tools - Options - Delegates from 
the Bosses calendar should solve most of your concerns. You can also right click 
individual folders within Outlook and ship out permissions that way. 

The PA can look at the calendar using File - Open Others Users folder. Alternatively 
you can add a secondary mailbox to the PA's Outlook profile within Tools - Services - 
Micorosft Exchange Server - Properties or from Control Panel - Mail.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA Problems

[Bridges, Samantha]

Hello All.

Having problems with users logging into OWA/Exchange 2000.  They put in their username 
and password and domain name.  When they click OK, the window stays and the password 
box is highlighted.  

I verified that the accounts are not locked out and have even reset their passwords.  
This is happening to users who are accessing the OWA from home or other locations.

Any ideas?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working

[by]

There are pros & cons for these 2 methods.

Rule wizard - give user's flexibility to turn on the out of office &
redirect their emails to elsewhere.

Alternate recipient - user has to contact ITS all the time & usually
they like to do redirection too frequently.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2003 10:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working

Out of curiosity, why are you doing this with Outlook Rules?  I would
use
the Alternate Recipient option.  We do this here for a few teachers who
aren't on campus most of the day.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working


Dear all,

Basically a lot of staff are forwarding their email to another account
for
reading it out of hours or when travelling. Both the out of office
assistant
and the rules wizard are used for this purpose by different staff  

For unknown reason for a months now, this email forwarding feature no
longer
works and no obvious errors found.

Exchange MailBox Server 
= Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4 level runs on NT4 member server with OS
SP6a

Exchange Internet Mail Service server 
= Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4 level BUT runs on Windows 2000 member
server
with OS SP3

Client version = MS Outlook XP

The only difference is we have upgraded the Exchange IMC Server OS from
NT4.0
to Windows 2000 last month.

Can someone give me some hints where the problems could be?  

Thanks in advanced.

Regards,
BY 





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cannot login

[Matt]

Thanks you hit the nail on the head. ISP shut down ports. Created  VPN
with 2k real quick customer could login in. How do I know for sure I'm
Handling exchange traffic only?

Thanks again 

Matt

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot login


Yes 

-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot login

Will win2k vpn allow me to set up so only internet traffic destined to
the exchange server is routed correctly and I do not carry customers
internet destined load to internet on my backbone?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot login


You are absolutely right Andy. Since W2K server can act as a VPN, you
have everything you need. 

-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot login

There's really just the investment in time to enable PPTP connections
via RRAS.

The remote users can then set up a VPN using PPTP on their client and
connect up to the server.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:00 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Cannot login
Subject: RE: Cannot login

As of yesterday MANY ISP's started blocking RCP traffic on their
networks. You may want to call your ISP and find out if this is the
case. If it is, you will need to invest in a VPN. 

-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot login

I have to support a temp server for 2 more weeks running win2k sp4 and
exchange 2k sp3. No firewall ( I know) All users are remote. OWA does
work. Outlook worked yesterday not today. All of the sudden no one
remotely can login. I can login the server is my network. This server
has been running fine for 3 weeks. I checked the RPC service  it is
running. All remote users have lmhosts files. Do I need to check for
permissions for remote users?

Please help

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster

[Webb, Andy]

At least the apostrophe was in the right place. :)

-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:19 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
Subject: RE: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster

Of course I meant we'Ve, not we'Re.

-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen 
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 8:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster


We're run it many times over the years and have never had a problem with
it.  It's always done just what it's supposed to do.

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster


Hello Friends.

I want to remove "zombie" accounts for an upgrade to Exchange 2000.  I
will run the DS/IS Consistency Adjuster to complete this task. In some
of the articles that I have read about the DS/IS Consistency Adjuster,
people have experienced a complete corruption of the IS after running
this tool.  

Has this been the case for anyone and is there a "safer" way to remove
"zombie" accounts.  Should a full backup happen before running this? The
articles scared me when they mentioned corruption of the Information
Store.

Thanks

Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: pipe dream or possible

[Kim Schotanus]

I do have a firewall (with port 135 closed) and update 606 of Trend
doesn't find any viruses on the entire network (scanmail, serverprotect
and officescan)

Kim

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 16:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible


But I have a firewall! :) 

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible

Well if it just started in the past few days I'd guess you were having
trouble with a machine or two running that nice friendly RPC-exploit
exploiting worm. No real reason other than half the world seems to be
having problems with it.

> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 August 2003 13:35
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible
> 
> Does anyone have a clue how it is possible that our network
> is having severe ups and downs in connectivity. Connections 
> to the AD and exchange are very unstable, we have the latest 
> AV updates (trend), switches are ok, etc... Any clues?
> 
> Kim
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Problems

[Tony Hlabse]

can you login as one of the external user while internally hooked up

I hope your all using proper version of IE

From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: OWA Problems
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:27:08 -0400
Yah...that seems to be so far.  Everyone who is complaining are located 
outside or are trying from home.

Thanks for the replies.

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Problems
Then you are saying they can use OWa when internal but not externally?

From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: OWA Problems
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:18:09 -0400
Yes.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Problems
Are they able to logon to their mailboxes via Outlook?

- Original Message -
From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: OWA Problems
Hello All.

Having problems with users logging into OWA/Exchange 2000.  They put in
their username and password and domain name.  When they click OK, the window
stays and the password box is highlighted.
I verified that the accounts are not locked out and have even reset their
passwords.  This is happening to users who are accessing the OWA from home
or other locations.
Any ideas?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working

[Ben Schorr]

You don't have to reboot the server for those - just restart the Internet
Mail Service.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 16:50
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working
> 
> Thanks Ben.
> No, I have actually turned off the options "Disabled 
> Automatic Replies to the Internet" & "Disalbe Out off Office 
> responses to the Internet". Just in case it has not 
> recognised my settings, I will reboot the server today & try again.
> BY
> >-- Original Message --
> >From: Ben Schorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working
> >Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:40:58 -1000
> >Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >Is the IMC configured to not allow automatic forwards to the 
> Internet now?
> >
> >-Ben-
> >Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
> >Director of Information Services
> >Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> >http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
> > 
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 16:34
> >> To: Exchange Discussions
> >> Subject: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working
> >> 
> >> Dear all,
> >> 
> >> Basically a lot of staff are forwarding their email to another 
> >> account for reading it out of hours or when travelling. 
> Both the out 
> >> of office assistant and the rules wizard are used for this 
> purpose by 
> >> different staff
> >> 
> >> For unknown reason for a months now, this email forwarding 
> feature no 
> >> longer works and no obvious errors found.
> >> 
> >> Exchange MailBox Server
> >> = Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4 level runs on NT4 member 
> server with 
> >> OS SP6a
> >> 
> >> Exchange Internet Mail Service server = Exchange 5.5 
> Server with SP4 
> >> level BUT runs on Windows 2000 member server with OS SP3
> >> 
> >> Client version = MS Outlook XP
> >> 
> >> The only difference is we have upgraded the Exchange IMC Server OS 
> >> from NT4.0 to Windows 2000 last month.
> >> 
> >> Can someone give me some hints where the problems could be?  
> >> 
> >> Thanks in advanced.
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> BY
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _
> >> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >> Web Interface: 
> >> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> >> ext_mode=&lang=english
> >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> 
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: KCC

[Chris Scharff]

Yes.

> From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:48:43 -0400
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: KCC
> 
> Can you run the KCC (Knowledge Consistency Checker) during the day or should
> it be run off hours?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Alex Alborzfard]

Ditto here. Chris, what type of VPN server/client configuration are you
using?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues


Over dialup? 

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

VPN works just great here.

> From: Alex Alborzfard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:20:54 -0400
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access 
> to remote access to Exchange. But I've heard the performance is really 
> dismal especially over dial-up. I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes 
> care of this problem, by using RPC over HTTP.
> Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead?
> 
> What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues?
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --Alex Alborzfard
> Exchange Admin


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Recipient problem.

[John Strongosky]

No, over atm and t1

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient problem.


Over dialup? 

-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient problem.

Hey you all,

  My users have been getting the following NDR when they try to send an
email,
"Unable to deliver the message due to a recipient problem". These users have
been sending email for the last 4 years and have not had their x400 address
changed so I don't think its any way related to Microsoft's tid. I have
exchange 5.5 sp4 on nt 4.0 sp6a servers. The email will get delivered to the
recipients that are on the local server but when it has to transverse the
mta then there is a  problem. I noticed that this was a problem in exchange
5.0 with the mta not having enough buffer space. These servers have been up
for months and I'm thinking that its time for a reboot. Any thoughts...

john

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Chris Scharff]

Yep.

Step 1. Connect to internet.
Step 2. Open Outlook offline.
Step 3. Click F9 (which initiates my VPN connection)
Step 4. Get beer from fridge.
Step 5. Order Chinese food for delivery.
Step 6. Get another beer from fridge.
Step 7. Read e-mail.


> From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:59:10 -0700
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> Over dialup? 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> VPN works just great here.
> 
>> From: Alex Alborzfard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:20:54 -0400
>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
>> 
>> We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access to
>> remote access to Exchange.
>> But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially over dial-up.
>> I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, by using RPC
>> over HTTP.
>> Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead?
>> 
>> What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> --Alex Alborzfard
>> Exchange Admin
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Digital Signature means "key". Public key.



-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures

I am actually looking for a process for people to sign (digitally) a
document then pass it on to the next person.  This will be an internal
application so the need for an actual key isn't necessary.  A date/time
stamp would be nice as would some sort of historical tracking.



- Matt

Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486



-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures


Matt,

If you mean S/MIME when stating digital signatures, then your solution
may be problematic or difficult to achieve.

A digital signature only provides security by showing the recipient that
the sender is authentic (by checking their certificate is valid) and
that the message hasn't been tampered with in transit.  It also carries
the senders public key for encryption purposes, if configured.  As I
understand it.

The problem with email is that you can never guarantee that the message
has been read by the recipient unless you get them to purposely
acknowledge the receipt of a message.



k

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey,
Matthew
Sent: 13 August 2003 17:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Paperless workflow and digital signatures


I have been asked to research the possibility to use Exchange
2000/Outlook to setup a paperless workflow for certain internal forms
(PO's, RFCE's, etc.).  We currently have the forms saved (Word Doc) on a
common share.  It is filled out, printed, and hand delivered to the
approving parties.

My boss would like to see us use Exchange/Outlook to do a paperless
workflow using digital signatures for approval.  I have never looked
into this so I would appreciate any suggestions from your experiences.

I know the solution needs to be easy to use for the end-user and the
cheaper the better.

TIA,

- Matt

Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Extending the Schema

[Fred]

Right, I agree with you on that, we have 1 site and 1 org so no problem
there with approx 2600 boxes.
> I don't know of any except that you would have to install ADC first and your
> organization name would be fixed at that point in time.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:49 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Extending the Schema
> 
> Currently 5.5 on NT in mixed mode w/4 DC's.  Planning to migrate to E2K on
> W2K in a couple months.  Down time is hard to come by.
> 
> Question:  Are there any repercussions on updating the Schema alot sooner
> than migrating to E2K?
> 
> I have a small (very small) test lab and have noticed the time length (2-3
> hours) it takes to update the schema.  At this time I am unable to DUP the
> majority of our topology for real testing.
> 
> --Fred
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Running eseutil on another non-exchange server

[knighTslayer]

Sure would I guess!

Thanks

k

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson,
Miles
Sent: 14 August 2003 09:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running eseutil on another non-exchange server


Wouldn't it be easier to map a network share on the Exchange server and
use that as the location of the temporary .edb files?

<>

If I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4.0 sp6a and want to run the
eseutil on another non-exchange server because it has more disk space,
would that other server need to be the same OS level or could I run it
on a Windows 2000 server with sp3 for example?

I'm worried that because of the difference in platform levels, when I
copy the defragged database back there may be problems

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Alex Alborzfard]

I was gonna ask the same thing. My other question is: is it as secure as
VPN?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues


Over dialup? 

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

Hell no.

Outlook in offline mode synchronizing every 10 minutes or so works
perfectly. To 99% of the population, there's no appreciable difference to
being online on the LAN.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> 
> Oh yea. Use OST's
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> Outlook via dialup by any means is awful. I don't think you
> will find a
> magic bullet for this. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to
> allow access to
> remote access to Exchange.
> But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially 
> over dial-up.
> I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, 
> by using RPC
> over HTTP.
> Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead?
> 
> What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues?
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --Alex Alborzfard
>   Exchange Admin
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cannot login

[Webb, Andy]

There's really just the investment in time to enable PPTP connections
via RRAS.

The remote users can then set up a VPN using PPTP on their client and
connect up to the server.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:00 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Cannot login
Subject: RE: Cannot login

As of yesterday MANY ISP's started blocking RCP traffic on their
networks.
You may want to call your ISP and find out if this is the case.
If it is, you will need to invest in a VPN. 

-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot login

I have to support a temp server for 2 more weeks running win2k sp4 and
exchange 2k sp3. No firewall ( I know) All users are remote. OWA does
work.
Outlook worked yesterday not today. All of the sudden no one remotely
can login. I can login the server is my network. This server has been
running fine for 3 weeks. I checked the RPC service  it is running. All
remote users have lmhosts files. Do I need to check for permissions for
remote users?

Please help

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)

[ml.exchange]

Same here, Goodlink ROCKS! We started out with 4 handhelds in our IT department under 
BES and slowly moved up to 7 with sales execs. Then they started
wanting to be able to view Word memos attached to emails. We ran into Good at Interop 
about that time and were hooked as soon as we saw the software. 

We converted in January as soon as Cingular made nearly free upgrades available (give 
you the server and base handheld licenses for the cost of 1 year
support we would buy anyway). We have never looked back. 100% wireless sync, basic 
attachment viewing, and soon support for the Treo 600, and PocketPC
smartphones.

Several of our users, myself included, are really looking forward to the Treo/Palm and 
PocketPC phone support to just carry a single device around for email
and phone use.


---
Miles Holt, MCP
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770-303-0426
---
"Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering 
mistakes. Real boats rock." - Frank Herbert, "Chapterhouse: Dune" 
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)

Good Technology...Rocks!
Ive got , my sales guy's love it..like almost 100% itergration with OL/Exchange once 
the unit is setup the only time I have to recradle the unit is to do a
software upgrade to the unit..
USA Only a this time..OK it work in Sao Paulo Brazil 

RIM - BB
Im also demoing the BB BES server for coverage outside the USA BES..ONLY sync's E-mail 
and Calendar..at this time all else MUST be cradled to sync -
Intellisync...

Im not thrilled with the BES...they say they will have Contacts and other Wireless 
sync by Q1 of 2004...

It's no comparison to Good...Now of course the Good device doesn't have a browser at 
this time..
each has it's thing

bill

-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)


Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service?  Or does anyone know 
of alternitive's to the same type of technology?

With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump ship to 
something that is a good replacement before we lose the service.

Thanks!

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or 
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in 
error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers." 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Chris Scharff]

Well, it's certainly improved with every version of Outlook I've used I
found it quite tolerable in Outlook 2000 and later using the methodology I
described elsewhere in the thread. I also used to teach laptop users who to
best use Outlook on the road, so I have rules, sync groups and filters set
to minimize my synchronization times when I'm on the road.

> From: Alex Alborzfard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:00:27 -0400
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> Ditto here. Chris, what type of VPN server/client configuration are you
> using?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> 
> Over dialup? 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> VPN works just great here.
> 
>> From: Alex Alborzfard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:20:54 -0400
>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
>> 
>> We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access
>> to remote access to Exchange. But I've heard the performance is really
>> dismal especially over dial-up. I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes
>> care of this problem, by using RPC over HTTP.
>> Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead?
>> 
>> What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> --Alex Alborzfard
>> Exchange Admin
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cannot login

[Roger Seielstad]

I believe so, yes. Might be a bit of up front work, but there's no reason
the routing engine within Win2k can't handle that.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cannot login
> 
> 
> Will win2k vpn allow me to set up so only internet traffic destined to
> the exchange server is routed correctly and I do not carry customers
> internet destined load to internet on my backbone?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cannot login
> 
> 
> You are absolutely right Andy. Since W2K server can act as a VPN, you
> have everything you need. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cannot login
> 
> There's really just the investment in time to enable PPTP connections
> via RRAS.
> 
> The remote users can then set up a VPN using PPTP on their client and
> connect up to the server.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:00 PM
> Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
> Conversation: Cannot login
> Subject: RE: Cannot login
> 
> As of yesterday MANY ISP's started blocking RCP traffic on their
> networks. You may want to call your ISP and find out if this is the
> case. If it is, you will need to invest in a VPN. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Cannot login
> 
> I have to support a temp server for 2 more weeks running win2k sp4 and
> exchange 2k sp3. No firewall ( I know) All users are remote. OWA does
> work. Outlook worked yesterday not today. All of the sudden no one
> remotely can login. I can login the server is my network. This server
> has been running fine for 3 weeks. I checked the RPC service  it is
> running. All remote users have lmhosts files. Do I need to check for
> permissions for remote users?
> 
> Please help
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)

[Steck, Herb]

Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service?  Or does anyone know 
of alternitive's to the same type of technology?

With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump ship to 
something that is a good replacement before we lose the service.

Thanks!

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged 
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from all computers." 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Linux-based SMTP gateway antivirus recommendations?

[Roger Seielstad]

Trend Micro's Interscan VirusWall. 

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 6:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Linux-based SMTP gateway antivirus recommendations?
> 
> 
> We are seriously considering building a Red Hat / SpamAssassin  /
> gateway antivirus box. Can anyone recommend a good Linux SMTP gateway
> antivirus product?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jason
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Chris Scharff]

And with outlook 2003, RPC over HTTP isn't nearly as remote user useful as
cached mode is.

> From: "Ben Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:41:32 -0500
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> You still have to connect to the VPN to synchronize.  So yes, it is
> still as secure :-)
> 
> The big gain is that users do not notice the performance hit from the
> VPN because they are running everything in offline mode and just
> requesting updated information every 10 minutes or whatever.  The only
> info that gets sent across the VPN is new messages, and anything they
> send. 
> 
> 
> Ben Winzenz
> Network Engineer
> Gardner & White
> (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:59 AM
> Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> Conversation: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> 
> I was gonna ask the same thing. My other question is: is it as secure as
> VPN?
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Services

[Robert Moir]

Without wanting to insult you or anything, you do realise that domain admin and 
exchange admin have nothing to do with each other generally speaking? If you've 
changed things so this isn't the case here fine, but the two don't go together as a 
matter of course.
 
 

-Original Message- 
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wed 13/08/2003 18:18 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Exchange Services



That is correct Ed.  It is the Domain admin account. 

> The account you're using to run the backup has administrative rights on the
> server?
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Force
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange Services
>
> I just setup a new Exchange 5.5/4 server on Windows 2000.  (I'm in the
> process of using Ed's move server method).  I installed the new server in
> the same org/site with a different name and I moved all my users mailboxes
> over.  Everything seems to be working as planned until I try to backup the
> IS.
>
> I use Backup Exec (9.0) and it was failing with "access denied to database
> information store".  Made sure all the permissions were correct and they are
> so I then tried to use plain old NTBackup, whick it too failed with the
> following Event ID:
>
> Event Source: NTBackup
> Event ID: 8010
> Description: Microsoft Exchange services returned 'Access is denied. 'from a
> call to 'BackupOpen()' additional data
> '\\Servername\E$\exchsrvr\DSADATA\\edb4.log'
>
> Any thoughts or suggestions?  Could I have hosed the store during the move?
> (I used Exchange Server Admin to move the mailboxes).  Veritas suggested
> running eseutil and isinteg to check the integrity of the IS.
> Thanks in advance, Scott.
>
>  
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


.+-¦‹-Šx
m¶ŸÿÃ
,Â)Ür‰¿­ë(º·ýì\…öª†ٖy²'µêßiǡ¶Úþ)í™Ùl¥ªä–+-r‰¿r›Šåʸ¬¦W§µêÞÅÈZž­{f¡ץjxž   
b²èº{.nÇ+‰·¦j)m¢Wš½ç±r§él³§‘Ê&!jx.+-i٢žX¬µ§fŠ{0Êy¢

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

[Morgan, Joshua (Greenville)]

I like Antigen






Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015



-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).


For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it turns out my
problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange.  Needless to say
it's gone now.  Is Scanmail still the defacto?  I would like to get the best
antivirus package out there.  Thanks, Scott.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

[Chris Scharff]

Trend is still a fine product (especially if a suite purchase is a
compelling bullet point), but for my shop personally I'm advocating a Sybari
Antigen implementation to coincide with our next infrastructure upgrade.

IMO FWIW YMMV


> From: "Scott Force" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:00:08 -0700
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
> 
> For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it turns out my
> problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange.  Needless to say
> it's gone now.  Is Scanmail still the defacto?  I would like to get the
> best antivirus package out there.  Thanks, Scott.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!

[Martin, Jon]

A tale of bad programming gone awry, and a cautionary tale concerning our future 
ability to push out software upgrades. I work for a company of 1,800 users and over 
the past five years my work has included installing and maintaining the companiy's NT 
domain and Exchange 5.5 system, automating the rollout of the upgrade from Office 97 
to Office 2000, and upgrading the NT domain/Exchange 5.5 system to Windows AD and 
Exchange 2000. Even with that level of experience with Microsoft products (not to 
mention using pretty much every MS OS since 1983) I was surprised at what I went 
through this past weekend.

Task at hand: Install Office 2000 SR-1 (the same distribution we used for the Office 
2000 rollout at our company).

The target: a Dell GX110 with a newly laid-out copy of Windows 2000 Professional fully 
patched and updated using the Windows Update feature.

The installation of Office 2k runs for a while, and then pops up an error message: 
"Windows File Protection: must copy files from CDROM of SP4. Please insert SP4 disk in 
CDROM Drive." OK, a fully patched and updated copy of Win2k now includes SP4. With the 
rollout of SP4 Microsoft has implemented a feature called Windows File Protection, 
which ostensibly will protect certain system files and DLLs from being overwritten, 
causing system instability, in theory a laudable goal. 

Problem number one with this error is that I did not have SP4 on a CDROM because it 
had been installed using the Windows Update feature. So I go out to Microsoft to 
download the Network Administrator version of SP4, unzipped it onto my local drive, 
and burn it to CD. 

I burn the SP4 files to disc two ways, copying the i386 folder to the root of the disk 
(so that all required files were at least one folder down) and also burning the 
contents of the i386 folder to the root (so that all required files were at the root 
level), not knowing which way the system would try to read these files.

Since the installation of the CD burning software required a number of reboots, I was 
forced to abandon the installation of Office 2000 where it errored out. Not wanting 
some hosed-up partial install on my new system, I ghosted back to the image I created 
right before beginning the process (love the Ghost 2003). I start the Office 2000 
install process again, get to the error message, and armed with my SP4 CDROM clicked 
on continue (or whatever), where it refused to recognize my CDROM as acceptable. As 
you might expect, I am less than pleased.

OK, a little research on this Windows File Protection reveals a couple of ways to 
disable it. Both are registry edits. One disables it for one reboot, and one 
permanently. Thinking that it may be a useful feature in the future, I disable it 
temporarily, reboot (again killing the Office 2000 install partway through), and 
restart the install. Loeth and beholdeth, the install completes fine - no errors, no 
pause for the CDROM (which was inserted in the drive).

Again, not wanting some bastardized uncompleted Office 2k install on my system I 
re-image back to the pre-install state. I make the registry change to temporarily turn 
the Windows File Protection off, reboot and restart the Office 2k install. What's 
this? I get the same error message again. Blood pressure is up, invectives are flying. 
OK, that's it. I re-image, use the registry editor to permanently kill the Windows 
File Protection, reboot, check the registry to confirm the kill entry is in place, and 
go to re-install Office 2k. Same error!!

OK, put on the thinking cap. I had one successful Office 2k install. What was 
different about that attempt? One thing: I had attempted a second install of Office 2k 
on the same image (no re-image between attempts). To test this theory, I canceled the 
Office 2k install at the error point, watched it 'undo' whatever it had done, and 
restarted the install process. Loeth and beholdeth again, the installation process 
completed successfully (and partway through it started reading the CDROM drive with no 
problem!).

This does not bode well for future software rollouts. Even though we can theoretically 
disable this Windows File Protection service, telling users 'begin the installation 
process, wait for the error message, cancel the install and restart it' is lame. 

Needless to say, Microsoft is not on my A-list this week.


Jon Martin
Systems Programmer
East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD)
Oakland, CA


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ports over VPN

[Martin Blackstone]

Are you filtering ports through your VPN? 

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ports over VPN

Anyone have a list of the ports used by Outlook to Exchange 5.5 over
vpn?

thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Extending the Schema

[Chris Scharff]

Probably not... Extending the schema well ahead of time is actually a good
idea as it will allow for replication to complete prior to installation. I'd
recommend going to E2K3 though at this point if at all possible.

> From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:48:36 -0700
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Extending the Schema
> 
> Currently 5.5 on NT in mixed mode w/4 DC's.  Planning to migrate to E2K on
> W2K in a couple months.  Down time is hard to come by.
> 
> Question:  Are there any repercussions on updating the Schema alot sooner
> than migrating to E2K?
> 
> I have a small (very small) test lab and have noticed the time length (2-3
> hours) it takes to update the schema.  At this time I am unable to DUP the
> majority of our topology for real testing.
> 
> --Fred
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Global Address List

[Kimberly]

I am new to this group but hopefully, someone can assist on this issue. 
If not, perhaps direct me to another forum?  We use OWA, exclusively, on
front-end servers with a clustered back-end Exchange 2000.  A job
requirement is to disallow use of the Global Address List (no entries are
allowed to be visible), but hiding the mailboxes is not an option due to a
secondary requirement.  I have created a group which explicitly denies
rights to the object All Global Address Lists and have removed the
everyone & authenticated users group but the objects still appear when
using the To/Search feature on a new email in OWA.  Is there a way to
achieve both objectives?  Hide the GAL Entries from view but not hide the
mailboxes?  Does the permission need to be modified on the Global Catalog?

Ideas?  Suggestions?  Reference Articles?

Kimberly


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

ISA group list

[Tony Hlabse]

I will be doing a rather complex deployment it the near future dealing with 
Exchange. Can anyone recommend a good ISA list?

_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

ports over VPN

[Ali Wilkes (IT)]

Anyone have a list of the ports used by Outlook to Exchange 5.5 over
vpn?

thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit

[Ben Winzenz]

It is 16gb, and once you have reached the limit, you have 2 options.

1) run eseutil to perform an offline defrag of the database, removing
any whitespace - cross your fingers and hope that you have enough
whitespace to get below the limit.  Requires roughly 1 1/2 times the
size of the database to perform.  If you choose this option, get the
eseutil whitepaper.

2) upgrade to Exchange 2000 Enterprise. (best option).  It is more
expensive, yes.  But you can peform the install right over the top of
standard, and the store will start right up afterwards. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:37 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit
Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard Limit


What is the limit on the information store in Exchange 2000?  If it is
18 Gbyte, how can you bring the store back up once it has reached this
size?

Thanks!

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential
and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact
the sender and delete the material from all computers." 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

[Aaron Brasslett]

I'll second that.

-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).


I like Antigen






Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015



-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).


For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it turns out my
problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange.  Needless to say
it's gone now.  Is Scanmail still the defacto?  I would like to get the best
antivirus package out there.  Thanks, Scott.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Alex Alborzfard]

We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access to
remote access to Exchange.
But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially over dial-up.
I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, by using RPC
over HTTP.
Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead?

What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues?


Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard
  Exchange Admin


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Services

[Ben Winzenz]

Domain admin doesn't mean snot when it comes to Exchange 5.5.  You need
to make sure that the account you are using to back up Exchange has
rights to the Org, Site and Server.  Many people simply use the Exchange
Service account to back up with.  Either do that, or make sure this
account has Service Account Admin rights on the places I specified. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:19 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Exchange Services
Subject: RE: Exchange Services


That is correct Ed.  It is the Domain admin account.  

> The account you're using to run the backup has administrative rights 
> on the server?
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Force
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange Services
> 
> I just setup a new Exchange 5.5/4 server on Windows 2000.  (I'm in the

> process of using Ed's move server method).  I installed the new server

> in the same org/site with a different name and I moved all my users 
> mailboxes over.  Everything seems to be working as planned until I try

> to backup the IS.
> 
> I use Backup Exec (9.0) and it was failing with "access denied to 
> database information store".  Made sure all the permissions were 
> correct and they are so I then tried to use plain old NTBackup, whick 
> it too failed with the following Event ID:
> 
> Event Source: NTBackup
> Event ID: 8010
> Description: Microsoft Exchange services returned 'Access is denied. 
> 'from a call to 'BackupOpen()' additional data 
> '\\Servername\E$\exchsrvr\DSADATA\\edb4.log'
> 
> Any thoughts or suggestions?  Could I have hosed the store during the
move?
> (I used Exchange Server Admin to move the mailboxes).  Veritas 
> suggested running eseutil and isinteg to check the integrity of the
IS.
> Thanks in advance, Scott.
> 
>   
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode
> =&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)

[Mellott, Bill]

Good Technology...Rocks!
Ive got , my sales guy's love it..like almost 100% itergration with
OL/Exchange
once the unit is setup the only time I have to recradle the unit is to do a
software upgrade to the unit..
USA Only a this time..OK it work in Sao Paulo Brazil 

RIM - BB
Im also demoing the BB BES server for coverage outside the USA
BES..ONLY sync's E-mail and Calendar..at this time all else MUST be
cradled to sync - Intellisync...

Im not thrilled with the BES...they say they will have Contacts and other
Wireless sync by Q1 of 2004...

It's no comparison to Good...Now of course the Good device doesn't have a
browser at this time..
each has it's thing

bill

-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)


Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service?  Or does
anyone know of alternitive's to the same type of technology?

With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump
ship to something that is a good replacement before we lose the service.

Thanks!

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or
legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
from all computers." 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!

[Chris Scharff]

Oh, I agree completely. I was simply repurposing a response I received
earlier today on another topic to see if it sounded any better applied to
another technical issue. It didn't.

> From: "Martin, Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:32:37 -0700
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
> 
> That's a nice, arrogant way to put it. I can only hope that the powers-that-be
> at Microsoft do not have a similar attitude towards their customers. I do not
> think it too much to ask that a fresh install of a supported OS, fully patched
> using their supported methods, would allow me to install their flagship office
> productivity tools in a straightforward manner.
> 
> Jon
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:21 AM
> Posted To:exchange - new
> Conversation:Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
> Subject:Re: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
> 
>> Needless to say, Microsoft is not on my A-list this week.
> 
> You can always switch to another OS. Of course if all OS vendors are doing
> the same thing, then you can either accept it or go without automated
> software updates. No one is forcing you to use software.
> 
> Hmm... Nope. Just drink the cool-aid and move along, nothing to see here.
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ISP/Exchange Question

[bscott]

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 10:19am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> You do not own your ISP's network, your ISP does.
> 
> And that makes any arbitrary decision they choose to implement acceptable?

  Acceptable?  Perhaps not.  You can always switch to another ISP.  Of
course, if all ISPs are doing the same thing, then you can either accept it,
or go without Internet access.  Nobody is forcing you to use the Internet.

> Please sign up here for the Patriot Service Plan comrade.

  The Internet is not a government service.  It is not a constitutional
right, either.  You are paying a private company to allow them to let you
access their network.  They can impose whatever terms they like on that.  
You can accept them, or not.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

MS Word has the Revision feature built-in


-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures

With all do respect, I don't want to argue the symantics of the issue.
I understand public keys and digital signatures but that isn't what I
need for this solution.  I am sorry that the phrases are the same but I
am not aware of that the "catch phrase" is for what I require.  What I
need is to attach a signature(1) (with a time stamp) to either a word
document or a Outlook form.  

(1)The signature being a digitized version of the persons actual
signature.

Thanks,

- Matt

Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486



-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures


Digital Signature means "key". Public key.



-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures

I am actually looking for a process for people to sign (digitally) a
document then pass it on to the next person.  This will be an internal
application so the need for an actual key isn't necessary.  A date/time
stamp would be nice as would some sort of historical tracking.



- Matt

Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486



-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures


Matt,

If you mean S/MIME when stating digital signatures, then your solution
may be problematic or difficult to achieve.

A digital signature only provides security by showing the recipient that
the sender is authentic (by checking their certificate is valid) and
that the message hasn't been tampered with in transit.  It also carries
the senders public key for encryption purposes, if configured.  As I
understand it.

The problem with email is that you can never guarantee that the message
has been read by the recipient unless you get them to purposely
acknowledge the receipt of a message.



k

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey,
Matthew
Sent: 13 August 2003 17:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Paperless workflow and digital signatures


I have been asked to research the possibility to use Exchange
2000/Outlook to setup a paperless workflow for certain internal forms
(PO's, RFCE's, etc.).  We currently have the forms saved (Word Doc) on a
common share.  It is filled out, printed, and hand delivered to the
approving parties.

My boss would like to see us use Exchange/Outlook to do a paperless
workflow using digital signatures for approval.  I have never looked
into this so I would appreciate any suggestions from your experiences.

I know the solution needs to be easy to use for the end-user and the
cheaper the better.

TIA,

- Matt

Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___

RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Martin Blackstone]

Outlook via dialup by any means is awful. I don't think you will find a
magic bullet for this. 

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access to
remote access to Exchange.
But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially over dial-up.
I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, by using RPC
over HTTP.
Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead?

What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues?


Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard
  Exchange Admin


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers

[Waters, Jeff]

Simple really, NO.
Why would you need it?  All that a software inventory, management, etc. tool
is going to do is add overhead to a central resource.  Have you had problems
in the past with strange software just showing up on your servers?  We do an
annual inventory check of all our core systems.  
We do use EZ-Audit as a quick check point type of software for our desktop
systems and I have gone as far as setting up a system variable on all our
servers as a standard, this variable allows us to specifically exclude our
servers from that package when someone in IT log's on the systems.
I would have to ask management what they are hoping to achieve by doing
software inventory/metering on a dedicated production system, then go on
record explaining why that is such a bad idea.

-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers


Hi,

Management is looking at placing LanDesk software inventory/metering on
all production clusters, Exchange servers, SQL DBs, etc. across our
company.

I have worked in companies that implement software inventory solutions
targeting desktops/clients but not to core service IT systems.  

My question is:
What does your company do?  How would you 'resolve' this issue?  If your
company does not use software inventory on core systems do they or you
'work around' the software inventory issue on core systems?

I know how I inventoried core IT systems in my previous experiences but
I am interested in what others do/have done.


Thanks in advance,

Erik L. Vesneski
WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO - Intel Systems 
Ph#: 925-658-6161
www.pmigroup.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)

[Andy David]

Sticking with them for now.
May rethink that when we go to Exchange 2003.

- Original Message - 
From: "Steck, Herb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)


Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service?  Or does
anyone know of alternitive's to the same type of technology?

With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump
ship to something that is a good replacement before we lose the service.

Thanks!

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or
legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
from all computers."


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Martin Blackstone]

Oh yea. Use OST's 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

Outlook via dialup by any means is awful. I don't think you will find a
magic bullet for this. 

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access to
remote access to Exchange.
But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially over dial-up.
I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, by using RPC
over HTTP.
Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead?

What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues?


Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard
  Exchange Admin


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers

[Waters, Jeff]

Nope your right, I'm not.  
If we ran our inventory package to only read from the add/remove program
list, then your right it has no system impact.  However I really want to
know what is installed on the system, so we expand that search to look for
executables on all local hard drives.  By doing that I know what the user
has added that is outside or our system standard.  Any program that does
that type of search is going to have a disk I/O impact thus have a overall
system impact.
If I worked in your environment I might change my mind, however I have
worked for both large and small organizations and have never felt the need
to do software inventory on my production servers.  That's just how I choose
to do it, not how it has to be done.


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange
Servers


You're not working for a software development company, are you? Aside from
IT managed resources, we have a lot of other users running a lot of
applications that are not completely under our control.

When you run as many servers as we do (150+) with a handful of admins,
having the centralized license compliance reporting is really, REALLY handy.
With an implementation like this, we only have to go to one place to find
and understand exactly what our license burden is.

If you're using an inventory package that puts a noticable load on the
machine its inventorying, you bought the wrong package.

Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:08 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on 
> Exchange Servers
> 
> 
> Simple really, NO.
> Why would you need it?  All that a software inventory, 
> management, etc. tool
> is going to do is add overhead to a central resource.  Have 
> you had problems
> in the past with strange software just showing up on your 
> servers?  We do an
> annual inventory check of all our core systems.  
> We do use EZ-Audit as a quick check point type of software 
> for our desktop
> systems and I have gone as far as setting up a system 
> variable on all our
> servers as a standard, this variable allows us to 
> specifically exclude our
> servers from that package when someone in IT log's on the systems.
> I would have to ask management what they are hoping to 
> achieve by doing
> software inventory/metering on a dedicated production system, 
> then go on
> record explaining why that is such a bad idea.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Slightly OT - Software Management Install on Exchange Servers
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Management is looking at placing LanDesk software 
> inventory/metering on
> all production clusters, Exchange servers, SQL DBs, etc. across our
> company.
> 
> I have worked in companies that implement software inventory solutions
> targeting desktops/clients but not to core service IT systems.  
> 
> My question is:
> What does your company do?  How would you 'resolve' this 
> issue?  If your
> company does not use software inventory on core systems do they or you
> 'work around' the software inventory issue on core systems?
> 
> I know how I inventoried core IT systems in my previous 
> experiences but
> I am interested in what others do/have done.
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Erik L. Vesneski
> WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist
> ISO - Intel Systems 
> Ph#: 925-658-6161
> www.pmigroup.com
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
h

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

[Erik Sojka]

Over dialup? 

> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
> 
> 
> I'll second that.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
> 
> 
> I like Antigen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Joshua Morgan
> AIMCO
> W. 864 239-1015
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
> 
> 
> For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it 
> turns out my
> problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange.  
> Needless to say
> it's gone now.  Is Scanmail still the defacto?  I would like 
> to get the best
> antivirus package out there.  Thanks, Scott.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Services

[Ed Crowley]

The account you're using to run the backup has administrative rights on the
server?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Force
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Services

I just setup a new Exchange 5.5/4 server on Windows 2000.  (I'm in the
process of using Ed's move server method).  I installed the new server in
the same org/site with a different name and I moved all my users mailboxes
over.  Everything seems to be working as planned until I try to backup the
IS.

I use Backup Exec (9.0) and it was failing with "access denied to database
information store".  Made sure all the permissions were correct and they are
so I then tried to use plain old NTBackup, whick it too failed with the
following Event ID:

Event Source: NTBackup
Event ID: 8010
Description: Microsoft Exchange services returned 'Access is denied. 'from a
call to 'BackupOpen()' additional data
'\\Servername\E$\exchsrvr\DSADATA\\edb4.log'

Any thoughts or suggestions?  Could I have hosed the store during the move?
(I used Exchange Server Admin to move the mailboxes).  Veritas suggested
running eseutil and isinteg to check the integrity of the IS. 
Thanks in advance, Scott.

  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures

[Bailey, Matthew]

I am actually looking for a process for people to sign (digitally) a
document then pass it on to the next person.  This will be an internal
application so the need for an actual key isn't necessary.  A date/time
stamp would be nice as would some sort of historical tracking.



- Matt

Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486



-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures


Matt,

If you mean S/MIME when stating digital signatures, then your solution
may be problematic or difficult to achieve.

A digital signature only provides security by showing the recipient that
the sender is authentic (by checking their certificate is valid) and
that the message hasn't been tampered with in transit.  It also carries
the senders public key for encryption purposes, if configured.  As I
understand it.

The problem with email is that you can never guarantee that the message
has been read by the recipient unless you get them to purposely
acknowledge the receipt of a message.



k

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey,
Matthew
Sent: 13 August 2003 17:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Paperless workflow and digital signatures


I have been asked to research the possibility to use Exchange
2000/Outlook to setup a paperless workflow for certain internal forms
(PO's, RFCE's, etc.).  We currently have the forms saved (Word Doc) on a
common share.  It is filled out, printed, and hand delivered to the
approving parties.

My boss would like to see us use Exchange/Outlook to do a paperless
workflow using digital signatures for approval.  I have never looked
into this so I would appreciate any suggestions from your experiences.

I know the solution needs to be easy to use for the end-user and the
cheaper the better.

TIA,

- Matt

Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
Voice: 602.631.7486
Fax: 602.294.7486



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

[Ben Winzenz]

You still have to connect to the VPN to synchronize.  So yes, it is
still as secure :-)

The big gain is that users do not notice the performance hit from the
VPN because they are running everything in offline mode and just
requesting updated information every 10 minutes or whatever.  The only
info that gets sent across the VPN is new messages, and anything they
send. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:59 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues


I was gonna ask the same thing. My other question is: is it as secure as
VPN?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues


Over dialup? 

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues

Hell no.

Outlook in offline mode synchronizing every 10 minutes or so works
perfectly. To 99% of the population, there's no appreciable difference
to
being online on the LAN.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> 
> Oh yea. Use OST's
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> Outlook via dialup by any means is awful. I don't think you
> will find a
> magic bullet for this. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
> 
> We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to
> allow access to
> remote access to Exchange.
> But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially 
> over dial-up.
> I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, 
> by using RPC
> over HTTP.
> Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03 instead?
> 
> What are other OL(2000) to EX(5.5/2K) over VPN connectivity issues?
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --Alex Alborzfard
>   Exchange Admin
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cannot view Mailbox Rights...

[Bridges, Samantha]

Hello All.

Still having a problem viewing Mailbox Rights for users.  When I click on the Mailbox 
Rights... button under the Exchange Advanced tab, I get the following error:

The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service could not find the specified object
ID no: c1041722
Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension



Any ideas?  Please help.

Thanks

Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

[Scott Force]

Thanks guys, I'll give them a look also.  If I go the way of Antigen, are
there any undocumented "features" I should look out for?

> Trend is still a fine product (especially if a suite purchase is a
> compelling bullet point), but for my shop personally I'm advocating a Sybari
> Antigen implementation to coincide with our next infrastructure upgrade.
> 
> IMO FWIW YMMV
> 
> 
> > From: "Scott Force" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:00:08 -0700
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
> > 
> > For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it turns out my
> > problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange.  Needless to say
> > it's gone now.  Is Scanmail still the defacto?  I would like to get the
> > best antivirus package out there.  Thanks, Scott.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Watch Out - New Virus

[Erick Thompson]

Keep us updated. I'm thinking about using SUS, and this is a good
example of where it would be useful...

> -Original Message-
> From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
> 
> 
> thanks, I had gotten that.  When I was running the active 
> update from the
> scanmail interface I was getting the error.  After about 30 
> or so tries I
> got the update downloaded to my system.  
> Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
> 
> 
> It wraps add LAST.A to the end
> 
> 
> 
> From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700
> 
> Aye
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
> 
> is anyone else getting the update source not found error?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Watch Out - New Virus
> 
> 
> http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VNam
> e=WORM_MSB
> LAST.A
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Entourage

[Atkinson, Daniel]

I'm thinking about trying out citrix

> -Original Message-
> From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Entourage
> 
> 
> So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Entourage
> 
> I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the 
> semi-absurd situation of maintaining three entirely different 
> mail clients for the Mac, none of which made everyone, happy, 
> and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major 
> upgrades, and were free. I don't find it at all 
> incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their resources on 
> the product that generates some revenue. As far as 
> Entourage's new Exchange awareness goes, it's about what 
> you'd expect from a point upgrade. 
> 
> -Peter
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Entourage
> 
> 
> I don't doubt it.  That makes perfect business sense.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> > 
> > 
> > My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for
> > the Mac because
> > OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a 
> > legitimate chance of
> > displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop. 
> It meets the
> > requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc). 
> > Therefore, the
> > only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its 
> > Microsoft's only way to
> > stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering.
> > 
> > Roger
> > --
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis Inc.
> > 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This is more venting than any serious question:
> > > 
> > > What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1)
> > > What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded
> > > from scratch)
> > > You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server?
> > > 
> > > Why did they get rid of the Outlook product?  Why make an
> > > organization with
> > > Macs go through so many hoops?  It's not like they have to 
> > > code from scratch.
> > > It makes no sense.  The whole idea is to make the products 
> > across both
> > > platforms the same or mostly the same.  They didn't take Word
> > > or Excel,
> > > retool it, take out some important features and call it 
> > > something else, did
> > > they?  Keerist!!
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: Re: New Entourage
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange
> > > > aware, you mean
> > > > 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and 
> > and automatic
> > > > configuration of address book and other account settings to
> > > > support Exchange
> > > > qualifies, then maybe.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> > > > > 
> > > > > I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be
> > > > Exchange-aware if it was,
> > > > > right?  When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18
> > > > months ago we had to
> > > > > settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had
> > > > to switch between
> > > > > OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to
> > > > open up IMAP or
> > > > > POP3 for him.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> _
> > > > List posting FAQ:   
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Web Interface:
> > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> > > ext_mode=&lang=english
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Web Interface:
> > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> > ext_mode=&lang=english
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > ___

RE: Internet Header Question

[East, Bill]

Who do you trust is the question.

The first line shows that a machine calling itself 169.139.15.251 (Call
it "B") connected to your mailhost ("A"), but your mailhost saw its IP
address was 210.91.16.8. If you own machine B, or if it's your trusted
ISP, that's fine. Otherwise it was just a spammer at 210.91.168.8 trying
to cover his tracks.

The next line after that points to 157.124.218.229. If you trust machine
B to resolve the address correctly, that's where you should look. But if
you don't it is likely misdirection - a forged header.

210.91.168.8 has a lot of listings in http://rbls.org. If it isn't the
spammer, the owner has a lot of problems. 157.124.218.229 has no
listings of significance.

-- 
be - MOS

Nothing can be done in one trip.  --Snider


> -Original Message-
> From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Internet Header Question
> 
> 
>  Hello Group,
> 
>I have a question about the Internet headers of an Email. 
> If one looks at
> this Spam Email Header 
> -
>   Received: from 169.139.15.251 (210.91.16.8 [210.91.16.8]) by
> mail.wpbpl.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail 
> Service Version
> 5.5.2656.59)
>   id PYC9TG9D; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:22:09 -0400
> Received: from [157.124.218.229] by 169.139.15.251 with SMTP; 
> Wed, 06 Aug
> 2003 15:21:11 +0600
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Beckie Yaung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Beckie Yaung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: my pictures are ready now
> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 15:21:11 +0600
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>   boundary="F11140.F0BB5D4"
> X-Priority: 1
> --F11140.F0BB5D4
> Content-Type: text/html;
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> --F11140.F0BB5D4--
> 
> --
> 
> 
>Would the spam be coming from the 210.91.16.8, 
> 169.139.15.251, or the
> 157.124.218.229 IP?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PFINFO Question

[Hatley, Ken]

I know I can use PFINFO and PFADMIN, I am asking if you agree with the Karen's 
solution and if not is there any automated ways to get rid of the invalid DNs?

 -Original Message-
From:   Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Monday, August 04, 2003 11:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: PFINFO Question

You can use PFINFO and PFADMIN to do this, yes.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
"Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups."

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PFINFO Question

Does anyone else agree or disagree?

 -Original Message-
From:   Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Monday, August 04, 2003 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: PFINFO Question

Just use ds/is consistency adj in 5.5 and choose to fix all inconsistencies.
I would select all but the reset the home server...
option, but others may not agree with that.  That way you'll get unknown
users and unknown accounts removed from the mailbox permissions as well.

-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PFINFO Question


Has anyone ever used PFINFO and PFADMT.txt to remove invalid DNs from
Public Folders?  I would like to write a macro to remove the DNs from
the PFAdmin file and was wondering if anyone has ever done this.  I have
to clean up our Exchange 5.5 environment in preparation for Exchange
2000 but we have over 2 Public Folders.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick question...

[Rob Hackney]

Thanks guys.
Another question tho - if mail is in the queue directory, why would it
not show in the queue under exchange system manager >default smtp server
> queues?
Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 06 August 2003 17:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick question...


Indeed.  I knocked up a script to remind me weekly of the size of
Badmail, and I've put it up here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/dealing_with_ba.html

It wouldn't be too difficult to make it automatically delete the
contents, too.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 06 August 2003 17:32
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Quick question...
Subject: RE: Quick question...


You might not want to delete the ones in the queue folder.  Besides you
probably can't anyway since they are in use.  Are they of large size and
maybe taking a little while to be sent?  The badmail you can safely
delete. 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick question...

Hi, Exch 2000
I have items in my badmail directory  - most recent from 28/07/03 and I
also have items in my mailroot\vsi1\queue folder. Can I delete these
items?  Nothing is showing up in my queue thru system manager Thanks

Support Analyst
TKC Group Ltd
Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est
Keynsham
BS31 1TZ
UK
0117 916 1320


This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  It should not be deemed to
constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s)
unless a purchase order number is quoted.  Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of TKC Group Ltd.  If you are not the intended
recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return
it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email.

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)


This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to 
whom it is addressed.  It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract 
between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted.  Any 
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of TKC Group Ltd.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do 
not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete 
the email.

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

[ml.exchange]

Actually you can unless you are under an open license. If you are on open, you have to 
order the media kit. Here is the link for select and enterprise. Note
you will need your contract info to register for access.

Select and Enterprise licenses:
https://licensing.microsoft.com/eLicense/L1033/default.asp
Once logged in click on the downloads link on the left hand frame. Then you can search 
for the iso by product.


---
Miles Holt, MCP
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770-303-0426
---
"Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering 
mistakes. Real boats rock." - Frank Herbert, "Chapterhouse: Dune" 
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

that's what I kind'a figured..but since there was that post about there being one..
but little detail given..I figured Id at least try and see...
my poor rep...
thanks martin

bill

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


There is no site on MS that you can do that. MSDN maybe, but that's not what you want. 

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

FYI: I contacted my MS rep for the URL and they gave me the eopen.microsoft.com which 
appears to be basically useless to download..
and While I like my MS rep he had no clue on any of this so IF anyone else could shed 
some light that would be appreciated

thanks
bill

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


If you have Open, Select or Enterprise Agreements with MS they have a site where you 
can download the Volume Licensing versions of their products.  You can
contact your MS rep to get the URL.  You'll need to be added as a user to the site, so 
contact whoever in your company manages the agreement to have this
done.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Ok you peeked my Q
what download site.
OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic...

thanks
bill

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the 
site as of that date.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Exchange was made available on the 4th?  I havne't seen or heard anything yet. 

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

FWIW, should be soon.  It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 
4.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it 
and skip Ex2K?  What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD
completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, 
then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS & EX) and complete the
migration.  I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can 
do another upgrade in 5 months.
You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an 
RC product. Just my thoughts.

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003



OK, next question:  If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) 
with exchange 2000.  And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later?


-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard.

Steven
---
Steven Dickens

Delay on incoming SMTP email

[Phil Thomas]

Hi All,

I'm not sure if this issue started when we moved our SMTP connector from Ex5.5 to E2K 
but I have noticed that incoming SMTP email is delayed until an outgoing email is 
processed. E2k queues are always 0. I'm thinking that this might be an issue with the 
implementation of MailMarshall but I don't have anything to give our MailMarshall 
support guy, so if anyone has experienced this before I'd appreciate your feedback.

Thanks in advanced.

Cheers,
Phil

   
   
Phil Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Infrastructure   Phone:  (07) 38298203   
Redland Shire Council   Mobile: 0408 151 120
   



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Entourage

[Atkinson, Daniel]

Ok, can anyone confirm how it works with E2K?

With 5.5 you get what looks like an IMAP connection...

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 06 August 2003 16:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage

Its designed for E2K or higher 

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage

I got the same results you did, using Entourage with an Exchange 5.5 server.
Does it maybe work better with 2000?

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: New Entourage


I myself don't like the Entourage update for Office X. I don't get anything
more than I did with IMAP it seems. Any public folders that are set to be of
Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly.

Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP?

-Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uselessthoughts.com

- Original Message - 
From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 AM
Subject: RE: New Entourage


> I'm thinking about trying out citrix
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> >
> >
> > So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:44 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> >
> > I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the
> > semi-absurd situation of maintaining three entirely different
> > mail clients for the Mac, none of which made everyone, happy,
> > and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major
> > upgrades, and were free. I don't find it at all
> > incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their resources on
> > the product that generates some revenue. As far as
> > Entourage's new Exchange awareness goes, it's about what
> > you'd expect from a point upgrade.
> >
> > -Peter
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> >
> >
> > I don't doubt it.  That makes perfect business sense.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> > >
> > >
> > > My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for
> > > the Mac because
> > > OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a
> > > legitimate chance of
> > > displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop.
> > It meets the
> > > requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc).
> > > Therefore, the
> > > only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its
> > > Microsoft's only way to
> > > stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering.
> > >
> > > Roger
> > > --
> > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> > > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > > Inovis Inc.
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is more venting than any serious question:
> > > >
> > > > What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1)
> > > > What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded
> > > > from scratch)
> > > > You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server?
> > > >
> > > > Why did they get rid of the Outlook product?  Why make an
> > > > organization with
> > > > Macs go through so many hoops?  It's not like they have to
> > > > code from scratch.
> > > > It makes no sense.  The whole idea is to make the products
> > > across both
> > > > platforms the same or mostly the same.  They didn't take Word
> > > > or Excel,
> > > > retool it, take out some important features and call it
> > > > something else, did
> > > > they?  Keerist!!
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM
> > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > Subject: Re: New Entourage
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange
> > > > > aware, you mean
> > > > > 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and
> > > and automatic
> > > > > configuration of address book and other account settings to
> > > > > support Exchange
> > > > > qualifies, then maybe.
> > > > >
> 

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

[Michael L. Callahan]

If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download
it from the site as of that date.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Exchange was made available on the 4th?  I havne't seen or heard
anything yet. 

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

FWIW, should be soon.  It was made available to Volume Licensing
customers as of Aug. 4.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released
then go to it and skip Ex2K?  What we are/planning on doing is to get
our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let
exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3
(OS & EX) and complete the migration.  I don't see any real advantages
in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months.
You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come
home using an RC product. Just my thoughts.

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003



OK, next question:  If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers
(member servers) with exchange 2000.  And then upgrade to exchange 2003
later?


-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The
Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Hey, sorry that I asked this question...  didn't mean to start up a
major discussion.  Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. 

However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange
2003 in bata or rtm at this time?  I have the enterprise edition 120 day
eval copy at this time.  Once I install it, then I will have to use the
enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires.  

Ron


-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003
platform?


Ron Pennell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution

[Mellott, Bill]

it's what happens when you've beer goggled too much...

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Looking for POP3 Spam solution


What's a google?

> From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:25:43 -0400
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
> 
> Search on Google. I have seen products like that before.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sychronization logs

[Ed Crowley]

My recollection is that it puts a log there only if there is a problem.
Can't say for sure, though, because I'm running Outlook 2003 now.  It puts
log messages for problems only in the Sync Issues folder.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
"Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century."

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sychronization logs

Although this is more of an Outlook question I will through this out. 
Environment is E2K SP3 with user workstations using W2K Professional with
SP3 and Office 2000 SP1. Many user use Outlook 2000 in offline mode. This is
fine as all do not have hi-speed access. The problem is the synch. logs do
not always show up in the deleted items. I thought they write to a log and
place it in the deleted items everytime it runs even though there may be no
changes made? Question is what is the rules for a log file to be placed in
the deleted items. The only way I can get one there is to create a new OST.

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA 2000 Logon Page

[nils . devries]

Hi all


I have an implementation of OWA with Exchange 2000 using ISA server as a
reverse proxy. The ISA server does not have IIS installed for security
reasons and acts as HTTPStoHTTP converter. We would like to have a 
modified logon page for OWA where we can put a security notice from our
company to comply with our comapnies security practises.

My options are

a)Use the login box that appears when users logon.
b)To use one of the error.htmls on the isa server.
c)Use another web page that redirects users to OWA.

I would like to do either option A or B but cannot seem to find any
information out there about doing this. Surely someone must have done
this! Any help or pointers appreciated! I know this can be done with
Exchange 2003 but we are not ready to do AD updates at this point.

Cheers

Nils


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Extending the Schema

[Fred]

Currently 5.5 on NT in mixed mode w/4 DC's.  Planning to migrate to E2K on
W2K in a couple months.  Down time is hard to come by.

Question:  Are there any repercussions on updating the Schema alot sooner
than migrating to E2K?

I have a small (very small) test lab and have noticed the time length (2-3
hours) it takes to update the schema.  At this time I am unable to DUP the
majority of our topology for real testing.

--Fred

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)

[Mellott, Bill]

Remeber with the Pocket PC devices..battery life bites..
with the 957 I can get a solid 5 day of heavy usage without recharge

for the G100..they said a day or maybe two less.

with the my BES demo server and 6710 (GSM and phone) I get about 2 maybe 3
day's minimal phone usage..mainly stand by

remember to balance user exp

Note it's NOT a total 100% sync.
for example Ive got my people on MB restriction's...now this can be a
pain..SInce! the delted Items at this time do NOT "sync" i.e. when my guy's
hit their limit..they cant clean it out..Ive got to do them a favor. and do
it...
Yes it's supposed to come down the pike at some point...

the Word, excel, PDF view cap is cool..but watch your bill's I got some
seriously huge bill's for users running over their monthly MB plan...so
choose your plan's carefully.. I do have to give Cing / Good Kudo's for
giving steep discounts on those users... I didnt have to pay those 1500+ per
user bill's..they disc it nicely...

Also Note: Good can now directly do this setup without Cing and it can be a
bit less $$$

bill

-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)


Any work on when they would be able to do pocketPC devices?  I would rather
wait till then to move.

-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)


Same here, Goodlink ROCKS! We started out with 4 handhelds in our IT
department under BES and slowly moved up to 7 with sales execs. Then they
started
wanting to be able to view Word memos attached to emails. We ran into Good
at Interop about that time and were hooked as soon as we saw the software. 

We converted in January as soon as Cingular made nearly free upgrades
available (give you the server and base handheld licenses for the cost of 1
year
support we would buy anyway). We have never looked back. 100% wireless sync,
basic attachment viewing, and soon support for the Treo 600, and PocketPC
smartphones.

Several of our users, myself included, are really looking forward to the
Treo/Palm and PocketPC phone support to just carry a single device around
for email
and phone use.


---
Miles Holt, MCP
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770-303-0426
---
"Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's
covering mistakes. Real boats rock." - Frank Herbert, "Chapterhouse: Dune" 
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)

Good Technology...Rocks!
Ive got , my sales guy's love it..like almost 100% itergration with
OL/Exchange once the unit is setup the only time I have to recradle the unit
is to do a
software upgrade to the unit..
USA Only a this time..OK it work in Sao Paulo Brazil 

RIM - BB
Im also demoing the BB BES server for coverage outside the USA BES..ONLY
sync's E-mail and Calendar..at this time all else MUST be cradled to
sync -
Intellisync...

Im not thrilled with the BES...they say they will have Contacts and other
Wireless sync by Q1 of 2004...

It's no comparison to Good...Now of course the Good device doesn't have a
browser at this time..
each has it's thing

bill

-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)


Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service?  Or does
anyone know of alternitive's to the same type of technology?

With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump
ship to something that is a good replacement before we lose the service.

Thanks!

"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or
legally
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers." 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMA

Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...

[Andy David]

Looking up "c1041722" in Technet yields a number of hits.

- Original Message - 
From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM
Subject: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...


Hello All.

Still having a problem viewing Mailbox Rights for users.  When I click on
the Mailbox Rights... button under the Exchange Advanced tab, I get the
following error:

The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service could not find the
specified object
ID no: c1041722
Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension



Any ideas?  Please help.

Thanks

Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

[Roger Seielstad]

My point is that you're spending money on an internal AV product for mail
(i.e. ScanMail or Antigen) plus the second layer at the gateway - either
internal or external. My caution is geared towards those who think that they
ONLY need the outsourcer for AV.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:45 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: AV/Spam scanning services
> 
> 
> It's not necessarily about saving money though right? Scanning at the
> gateway (in-house or outsourced) can be a valid additional level of
> protection. A significant number of our customers use some 
> form of gateway
> scanner[1] in addition to their server and desktop based AV solutions.
> 
> [1] MessageLabs, MailSweeper, Trend's Instercan, et al.
> 
> > From: Roger Seielstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 07:10:22 -0400
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services
> > 
> > There are some discussions of a few of them in the archives.
> > 
> > Personally, I'm not a fan of outsourced anti-spam, but 
> that's in part
> > because we're a heavily email dependent company and so we 
> can justify the
> > expense of in house measures to combat those issues.
> > 
> > As a side note - outsourced antivirus doesn't save money - 
> you still need to
> > have an inhouse AV product for email, because scanning at 
> the gateway isn't
> > enough.
> >
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Entourage

[Couch, Nate]

I must say I agree.  Our organization does not allow POP3 or IMAP4 access
currently hence Entourage is useless for MS Exchange access.

I am sticking with Outlook for Mac 2001 until they fix this or until my
company allows IMAP access.

> --
> From: Erik Sojka
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2003 8:11 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: New Entourage
> 
> This is more venting than any serious question:
> 
> What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1)
> What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded from
> scratch)
> You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server?
> 
> Why did they get rid of the Outlook product?  Why make an organization
> with
> Macs go through so many hoops?  It's not like they have to code from
> scratch.
> It makes no sense.  The whole idea is to make the products across both
> platforms the same or mostly the same.  They didn't take Word or Excel,
> retool it, take out some important features and call it something else,
> did
> they?  Keerist!!
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: New Entourage
> > 
> > 
> > Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange 
> > aware, you mean
> > 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and and automatic
> > configuration of address book and other account settings to 
> > support Exchange
> > qualifies, then maybe.
> > 
> > 
> > > From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: RE: New Entourage
> > > 
> > > I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be 
> > Exchange-aware if it was,
> > > right?  When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18 
> > months ago we had to
> > > settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had 
> > to switch between
> > > OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to 
> > open up IMAP or
> > > POP3 for him.  
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface: 
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la
> ng=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MIMAIL virus

[Tony Hlabse]

Well it hit last Friday if you haven't been hit your AV vendor is doing 
their job

From: "Steck, Herb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MIMAIL virus
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:28:29 -0500
Was wondering how many people are getting hit with this at the moment.

Thanks!

This is a test of the disclaimer

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Windows 2000 Backup

[Juancho Ciocon]

Hello Samantha:

In my opinion, BLBs are not worth 2 cents!

NTBackup doesn't do BLBs, as Chris said, however, you could use ExMerge to
export VIP mailboxes (as someone else posted earlier).

We use W2k NTBackup to disk then another scheduler to write that E2k data
to tape and it works very well.

Make sure you have a well-documented restore procedure to go with your
backup plans and understanding all the different restore scenarios (and
steps) is key as well.

Good luck!
-Juancho





> NT backup doesn't do BLBs. It wasn't engineered by Veritas to have that
> level of uselessness. You'll need to waste good money to get that kind of
> inefficiency. 
> 
> > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:20:20 -0400
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Windows 2000 Backup
> > 
> > Hello All.
> > 
> > I noticed that Exchange 2000 can be backed up using the Windows 2000 Backup.
> > Anyone had any experience with this?  It looks like it does BLB too!
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MIMAIL virus

[Couch, Nate]

All I see are the messages that another attachment has been blocked.

I hear them knocking, but they ain't getting' in.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MIMAIL virus


Was wondering how many people are getting hit with this at the moment.

Thanks!

This is a test of the disclaimer


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

[Hurst, Paul]

We use Netbackup, thankfully it's not my responsibility, so the backup team
do BLB's for their sins to our masters.

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003 20:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000


Hello All.

What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000?  Need to do brick
levels too.  I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking
them out of it.

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be 
confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any 
disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this 
communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The 
views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of 
Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. 

This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited.
(05)
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Neil Hobson]

If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported.  That's no.3 in the list here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:06
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Event Sink problems

[Berry Schreuder]

The plot thickens. I have surrounded the path in quotes, resulting in a
request like the one below:

C:\>cscript regevent.vbs add onSyncDelete OfficeCalendar.SyncEvents
"file://./backofficestorage/exchangedemo.local/mbx/Berry/calendar"

Now i get this result:

Error Opening Record : -2147024891 Access is denied.

So apparantly i haven't got permissions on something. But on what? Which
record?

  Berry Schreuder

> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to register an event sink on a calendar folder in a mailbox. I
> have used this command:
> 
> C:\>cscript regevent.vbs add onSyncDelete OfficeCalendar.SyncEvents
> file://./backofficestorage/exchangedemo.local/mbx/Berry/calendar
> 
> It then produces the following output:
> 
> Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved.
> 
> Error Opening Record : -2147217768 Object cannot be created at this URL
> because
> an object named by this URL already exists.
> 
> I've searched on both 2147217768 and 0x80040e98 (hex value) in the
> Knowledge Base and in Google (newsgroups)
> 
> I run the script on an Exchange 2003 server on Windows Server 2003. I am
> logged on as Domain Administrator and have full permissions on that
> specific user's mailbox
> 
> Suggestions anyone?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

How to undo public folder delete

[Vivek Singh]

Hi,

I accidentally deleted some public folders on exchange 2000. Is there a
way to undelete them? Any help will be appreciated!

Thanks and have a great day!

Vivek Singh

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Viewing Error

[Exchange \(Swynk\)]

Clear your browser cache.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Alex Alborzfard
> Posted At: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:48 PM
> Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> Conversation: OWA Viewing Error
> Subject: OWA Viewing Error
> 
> 
> 
> When I try to access email via OWA, after entering the mailbox name
> And then domain\user name and password, I get the "Unable to 
> get renderer"
> error.
> When I click on OK, it loads the OWA mailbox page but without 
> showing the
> emails and
> It displays this header: 
> 
> "Page cannot be displayed. There is a problem within the page 
> you are trying
> to reach
>  and it cannot be displayed"
> 
> The strange thing is that it doesn't happen when you load a 
> new browser
> window, 
> but if you log out and log back in, you'll get the error message.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --Alex Alborzfard
> Exchange Admin
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Finding full mailboxes.

[Patrick Scribner]

Does anyone know of a way to query the exchange server or get some kind of report of 
mailboxes that are full or approaching full?  Aside from going into system manager and 
manually viewing the mailbox sizes?

 
Thanks,
 
Patrick Scribner, MCSE
DBA
Westwood College
303-464-2381
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Server storage capacity

[Ed Crowley]

Exchange does not reserve a large file initially.

Each evening when store maintenance runs it logs an event in the application
log that tells you the amount of that database file size that is free space.
Exchange will reuse the free space before expanding the file.

The database file will never shrink on its own.  You must dismount the store
and run ESEUTIL /D on it.  However, in normal circumstances, you shouldn't
bother because you'll usually not get enough space back to make it worth the
effort.

Exchange retains messages for the period specified in your setting for
deleted item recovery.

There are plenty of answers in the FAQ.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server storage capacity

I've started a slow migration of users from a POP/SMTP system to Exchange.
I've moved over myself and a few other users. I recently run into problem
with low disk space! With only a few users on the server, I have some
concerns. A backup system hasn't been set up yet, so I have a bunch of log
files that will disappear once I do the next backup, so the low disk space
will resolve itself soon. 
 
But, I noticed that the priv1.edb file is over 2 GB. When I check the
Mailbox Store, the total size of the mailboxes is ~ 1.5 gigs. From the
24sever Exchange book, I gather this is the actual data store. Is the
contents of the data store really over 2 GB, or, like SQL Server, does
Exchange reserve a large file from the OS, then manage it internally? 
 
Another question, if I delete a number of messages in Exchange, do I need to
do anything else, or are they actually deleted from the server?
In other words, does Exchange retain the messages after they are no longer
visible in Outlook?
 
Any other pointers to keep mailbox sizes under control?
 
Thanks,
Erick

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Event Sink problems

[Chris Scharff]

I'm just a non-developer whose only claim to fame is knowing the difference
between "your" and "you're", but I believe that your registration syntax is
incorrect. The URL you are using refers to an item which already exists..
The calendar folder of the mailbox Berry (i.e. Your scope is incorrect). I
believe you want to use something like:
file://./backofficestorage/exchangedemo.local/mbx/Berry/calendar/EventRegIte
m1 

Depending on the scope of the sync you may also want to include additional
command line parameters (e.g. -deep).



> From: "Berry Schreuder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:04:42 -0700
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Event Sink problems
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to register an event sink on a calendar folder in a mailbox. I
> have used this command:
> 
> C:\>cscript regevent.vbs add onSyncDelete OfficeCalendar.SyncEvents
> file://./backofficestorage/exchangedemo.local/mbx/Berry/calendar
> 
> It then produces the following output:
> 
> Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.6
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001. All rights reserved.
> 
> Error Opening Record : -2147217768 Object cannot be created at this URL
> because
> an object named by this URL already exists.
> 
> I've searched on both 2147217768 and 0x80040e98 (hex value) in the
> Knowledge Base and in Google (newsgroups)
> 
> I run the script on an Exchange 2003 server on Windows Server 2003. I am
> logged on as Domain Administrator and have full permissions on that
> specific user's mailbox
> 
> Suggestions anyone?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Looking for POP3 Spam solution

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Search on Google. I have seen products like that before.



-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for POP3 Spam solution

I know the spam topic gets beat to death here, but I've got an executive
request here.

What I need is a product that will scan and delete messages on a POP3
server *without downloading them*. Ideally, this would be a product that
runs as a standalone service somewhere, and has a configurable
blacklist.

Anything like this out there?

Jason

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange rejects valid messages

[Chris Scharff]

Unlikely your Exchange server is generating this error. More likely it's
whatever is answering at exchange.satake-usa.com.

> From: "Don Bruess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:43:15 -0700
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Exchange rejects valid messages
> 
> My exchange server 5.5 has just started rejecting messages sent to me with
> and NDR of 552.  I have no limits on my mailbox or on the system default.
> But anytime a messages over 1meg is sent it sends an NDR back to the
> sender with 552 as the reason.
> 
> Anyone have any ideas on this?
> 
> Thanks,
> DL


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Watch Out - New Virus

[Waters, Jeff]

is anyone else getting the update source not found error?

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Watch Out - New Virus


http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB
LAST.A


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

[Martin Blackstone]

Exchange, then the OS.
If you upgrade the OS first, E2k will crap out. 

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

What?  I thought it was the other way around?

OK, for those in the know, please clear this up.  You upgrade Exchange
first, then OS?  Or OS first, then Exchange?



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 


-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


I do not believe you can install Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003.  Windows
2003 runs IIS 6.0, which Exchange 2000 does not support.  On the other
hand Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0.  So the proper upgrade path is
upgrade Exchange 2000 first and then upgrade the OS to Windows 2003.

Thanks,

Steve


> Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 
> platform?
> 
> 
> Ron Pennell
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Watch Out - New Virus

[Tony Hlabse]

It wraps add LAST.A to the end



From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700
Aye

-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
is anyone else getting the update source not found error?

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Watch Out - New Virus
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB
LAST.A
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: pipe dream or possible BECOMES problems

[Bob Sadler]

Try connecting your clients to the IP Address and see if they hold their
connectivity.



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible BECOMES problems


Nope, just the server name, returns correctly...

Kind regards, 
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems Manager
 
INTAS
Avenue des Arts 58
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
 
T. +32 2 549 01 11
F. +32 2 549 01 56
 
===


-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 14:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible BECOMES problems


Are you pinging with ip numbers?  Have you tried pinging with fully
qualified names to see if your DNS is returning the correct results?

Or run NSLOOKUP and see what your DNS shows.

Are your clients configured to connect through the DNS Name or the IP
Address?  IF DNS Name, reconfig one to point to the IP Address and see
if that stays online.  If it does, most likely you are having some sort
of DNS issue.



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 


-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible BECOMES problems


Situation: 5 win2K servers, 2 Domain controllers, Exch2K, SQL2K and
Sharepoint on 1 machine, 
Cisco switches (2950), ...

I rebooted all servers, unplugged switches, complete AV checkup

What can I do more? I can ping all servers from my workstation without
problems/delays

Kim


-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 14:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible


DNS?

MBLAST Virus?

DOS attack?

I'm sure we could just guess all day about this, but perhaps you can
enlighten us a bit more about how things are setup, what you have done
to diagnose the issue, when did this start, did you make changes to
something and then have this start?

If you provide clear information, perhaps the experts can help.



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194



-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible


Does anyone have a clue how it is possible that our network is having
severe ups and downs in connectivity. Connections to the AD and exchange
are very unstable, we have the latest AV updates (trend), switches are
ok, etc... Any clues?

Kim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Exchange

[Bruess, Don]

Bingo, I found on the hardware fire wall an icon I did not recognize, I
researched it and found it set the size limits to 3meg.  Thanks to all who
helped or tried to help.

Don

 -Original Message-
From:   Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Monday, August 11, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange

Well, look in Norton's Virus Filter and see if they setup a limit on
message size.



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 


-Original Message-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange


Yes to virus filter.  We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can
find no settings for limiting the size of e-mail.



 -Original Message-
From:   Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Monday, August 11, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange

That is exactly what he's saying.  Do you have a SMTP Gateway setup to
stop spam, or a virus filter, or both?



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 


-Original Message-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange


Sorry, I am trying to troubleshoot a problem that I have very little
knowledge in so if I appear to be a bit slow please forgive me.  Your
statement saying exchange is not listening confuses me.  Are you saying
there is some other software running between my exchange server and the
rest of the world which is placing its limits on the mail?

 -Original Message-
From:   Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Monday, August 11, 2003 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Strange Exchange

Again, as per the last message you posted and I responded to, this error
is not being generated by Exchange. It is being generated by whatever is
listening at your default gateway. Your mx record may be labeled
exchange.satake-usa.com, but whatever is listening isn't Exchange.

nslookup
Default Server:  m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com
Address:  10.0.0.246

> set q=mx
> satake-usa.com
Server:  m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com
Address:  10.0.0.246

Non-authoritative answer:
satake-usa.com  preference = 10, mail exchanger =
exchange.satake-usa.com

Authoritative answers can be found from:
satake-usa.com  nameserver = ns2.satake-usa.com
satake-usa.com  nameserver = ns1.satake-usa.com exchange.satake-usa.com
internet address = 66.139.24.50

telnet exchange.satake-usa.com 25
Trying 66.139.24.50...
Connected to exchange.satake-usa.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 SMTP service ready
ehlo foo.bar
250-Requested mail action okay, completed
250-HELP
250 SIZE 3072000

Whatever is listening does indeed have a storage limit.

I'm not sure why 30 seconds of research is not possible by anyone else
on the list this morning, but the answer seems abundantly clear once one
stops throwing out wild guesses and actually applies some kind of
methodology to troubleshooting.

> From: "Don Bruess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:41:17 -0700
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Strange Exchange
> 
> I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending
> large files.  I have verified the system default has no limits on a 
> per messages or over all on storage.  I have also verified my personal

> box has no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when

> this started happening but I do know I use to be able to receive any
> size files.  Is there another settings somewhere I have missed? It 
> appears to be limiting e-mail to around 2 meg max and is applying the 
> same rule to the entire exchange server.
> 
> Thanks,
> dl


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.

RE: PF Permissions

[Ed Crowley]

I believe they must be mail-enabled.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PF Permissions


Is it possible for me to use non mail-enabled universal security groups for
public folder permissions?  Or does it have to be mail-enabled? 

I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3.

Thanks,
Carmila




This email message may contain information that is confidential and
proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and
any copies of the original message.  Babcock & Brown takes measures to
protect the content of its communications.  However, Babcock & Brown cannot
guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or
that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Monitoring DL Usage

[Chris Scharff]

Add yourself to all of the DLs and see how often you get mail.

> From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:39:43 -0700
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Monitoring DL Usage
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I would like to monitor the use of our many DL's to see if they're even
>> being used. Does anyone have any recommendations on how to go about this?
>> A search of KB's didn't turn up anything but I might not have used the
>> right query syntax.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Tony


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2K migration issue

[Dickenson, Steven]

Hmmm.  No, it won't work if they're not in the same ORG.  I'd follow Chris's
link from before regarding some of the command line utilities from
Slipstick.  Use one of those to generate/modify the profile during login.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K migration issue


Not too sure that will work. The E2K servers are in AD will the 5.5 servers
are not. Also, the E2K servers are in a new Exchange ORG.

-Original Message-
From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K migration issue

Leave up the old Ex5.5 server for a little while.  Outlook will see that
it's mailbox has moved to a new server, and update the profile itself.

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K migration issue


Hello all,

I was wondering if anyone out there knew of way to script Outlook profile
changes. We are doing an E2K migration and I am looking for a way to
automate the changes to the users Outlook profile. 

We are building out brand new E2K servers and exporting/importing all the
mail from 5.5 to the E2K servers and need to point the users at the new
servers.

Josh Bennett
Exchange Administrator
Cotelligent, Inc.
401 Parkway Drive
Broomall, PA 19008
610.359.5929 Tel
610.353.1693 Fax
www.cotelligent.com
Connecting People to Information
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

[Mellott, Bill]

Ah thanks Miles...well then that would leave me out as I am Open...
Oh well just have to wait for the media.
thanks
bill

-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Actually you can unless you are under an open license. If you are on open,
you have to order the media kit. Here is the link for select and enterprise.
Note
you will need your contract info to register for access.

Select and Enterprise licenses:
https://licensing.microsoft.com/eLicense/L1033/default.asp
Once logged in click on the downloads link on the left hand frame. Then you
can search for the iso by product.


---
Miles Holt, MCP
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770-303-0426
---
"Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's
covering mistakes. Real boats rock." - Frank Herbert, "Chapterhouse: Dune" 
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

that's what I kind'a figured..but since there was that post about there
being one..
but little detail given..I figured Id at least try and see...
my poor rep...
thanks martin

bill

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


There is no site on MS that you can do that. MSDN maybe, but that's not what
you want. 

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

FYI: I contacted my MS rep for the URL and they gave me the
eopen.microsoft.com which appears to be basically useless to download..
and While I like my MS rep he had no clue on any of this so IF anyone else
could shed some light that would be appreciated

thanks
bill

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


If you have Open, Select or Enterprise Agreements with MS they have a site
where you can download the Volume Licensing versions of their products.  You
can
contact your MS rep to get the URL.  You'll need to be added as a user to
the site, so contact whoever in your company manages the agreement to have
this
done.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Ok you peeked my Q
what download site.
OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic...

thanks
bill

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it
from the site as of that date.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Exchange was made available on the 4th?  I havne't seen or heard anything
yet. 

-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

FWIW, should be soon.  It was made available to Volume Licensing customers
as of Aug. 4.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003


Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then
go to it and skip Ex2K?  What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3
AD
completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running
on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS & EX) and complete the
migration.  I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just
so I can do another upgrade in 5 months.
You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come
home using an RC product. Just my thoughts.

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003



OK, next question:  If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member
servers) with exchange 2000.  And then upgrade to exchange 2003 

OWA 2000 Modifying the logon page

[nils . devries]

Hi all

Apologies if this is sent twice but my first post seems to have gone
missing. We have an OWA implementation using ISA server as a reverse proxy
(HTTPS to HTTP converter). The ISA server is in a DMZ and communicates
with an EX2K front end server on the corporate LAN. IIS is not installed
on the ISA server for security reasons. Our security policy requires use
to place a disclaimer on the logon page or login pop up when users logon
via a web browser.

Does anyone know how to add text to the login box that pops up when you
logon for OWA. We have modified one of the error htmls on the ISA servers
to redirect http requests to the https site can we use a similar method
for this? We do not want to use another web page that redirects users to
the ISA server if we can help it.


Hope someone out there has some ideas.

Thanks

Nils De Vries

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: BCC emails

[Exchange List]

Thanks Chris, can you tell me where can I get help/ procedure to do this. Or is there 
a easy way of doing it.

Thanks & Regards,
Irf.

 -Original Message-
From:   Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: BCC emails

Sure, you'll just need to write a categorizer event sink. Course it will
prevent you from receiving messages just like this one. Enjoy.


> From: "Exchange List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:34:41 +0500
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: BCC emails
> 
> Dear List,
> 
> Is there a way to block the bcc mails on server level or is there any software
> any procedure to do that.
> 
> Love u all,
> Irf.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange permissions

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

You can see where the Exchange Org inherits some of the permissions
from.

-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange permissions

What about it?

If I use ADSIEdit to view the permissions at the Org, I see the same
thing that I see in ESM: Domain and Enterprise Admins are inheriting
allow rights for Send As and Receive As. If I go up one level in
ADSIEdit, to the CN=Microsoft Exchange container and view the ACL there,
the Send As and Receive As ACE's aren't even there.

What rights do Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have at the Org level
in your environment? If someone can just tell me that it would be great.

Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 3:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange permissions
> 
> ADSIEdit
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:14 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange permissions
> 
> I've recently inherited an Exchange 2000 Organization. One of 
> the first things that I noticed was that all Domain and 
> Enterprise Administrators have the ability to open and read 
> anyone's mailboxes. I've checked the ACL on our mailbox store 
> (we only have one), and both Domain Admins and Enterprise 
> Admins have an inherited "Allow" under Send As and Receive 
> As. Obviously this is not the default configuration.
> 
> I've made the registry adjustment listed in Q259221 to allow 
> me to see the security tab at the Org level. Even at the Org 
> level, Domain and Enterprise Admins are still inheriting an 
> allowed Send As and Receive As.
> 
> But here's something else I noticed: when I use the 
> Delegation Wizard at the Org level to add an Exchange Full 
> Administrator, and then check the ACL on the Org, the new 
> administrator that I just added gets inherited allows on Send 
> As and Receive As, but also gets explicit denies on both of 
> those ACE's. From that point down the heirarchy, only the 
> explicit deny is inherited.
> 
> So my question is this. At the org level, by default, are 
> Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins set with inherited allows 
> *and* explicit denies on Send As and Receive As? This would 
> indicate to me that perhaps a previous administrator here 
> simply removed the explicit deny?
> 
> If someone could check the ACL on your Exchange Org and let 
> me know what permissions Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins 
> have, I'd much appreciate it.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jason
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&
> lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working

[Mitchell Mike]

How do I get the AGENT tab to show up on my Outlook? I can see some on the
resources I have working, but not on those that are not working.

Thanks,

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 6:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


What did you do to get it working?

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Rob and Ed,

Success at last...  I did finally get this resource to work properly. It was
just a lot of pulling and tugging and getting it all correct.  I will move
the others and see how it goes.

Thanks again for all of your help.

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


(If we have the same setup).. In the 5.5 Admin console, expand Folders,
System Folders, and Events Root.   There should be a folder in there
called
EventConfig_servername for the server that the mailbox resides on.  Open the
Properties of that folder and on the General Tab click the Client
Permissions button.   Add the mailbox and give it Owner rights.

So again, ensure the autoaccept script is uninstalled, do the above steps,
reinstall the autoaccept script, and ;-) it's supposed to work.

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


What did you mean by the mailbox needs owner rights?  I did as you
suggested, but it still didn't work. I created a new resource and scheduled
them both at the same time.  The new resource worked, but the old one
didn't.

Wow..  This is confusing!!  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Right.  I was going to recommend being sure to uninstall the old event
script first as well.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sargent, Rob
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


(FYI the mailbox needs Owner rights.)  So if the EventConfig permissions are
set, reinstall the AutoAccept script on the mailbox and you should be able
to test it immediately.   If that doesn't work, try stopping and
starting
the Event service again and retest.   

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Rob,

I found it and set the permissions.  I suppose it takes time to synch it
up..

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Rob

I am fairly new at AutoAccept utilities... Where do I look for the
EventConfig folder?  Sorry.

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Hi Mike.   Have you set up the client permissions for the mailbox in the
EventConfig folder?   I've forgotten to do that on occasion.And I
think
I learned the hard way that if this step was missed, you need to uninstall
the Autoaccept script again, set up the EventConfig settings, then reinstall
the script.

Rob Sargent

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


Ed,

Thanks.  I thought that was the case, so I deleted the AutoAccept folder on
the resource. I then ran the AutoAccept utility script on that new resource.
I checked the event Service and it was running.  Nothing happened.

I then stopped and started the service again.  To no avail.  Nothing
happens.  Help

Thanks... Ed, you are the best, or so they say!!!

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working


A script does not move with a mailbox.  You must reinstall the script on the
new server and ensure that the Event Service is running.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 

RE: MIMAIL virus

[Wilson, Fenton]

Trend has been blocking it nicely since last Friday.

-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MIMAIL virus


Was wondering how many people are getting hit with this at the moment.

Thanks!

This is a test of the disclaimer


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000

[Bridges, Samantha]

Mine were sounding real loud too.  But to my surprise everything went beautifully.

Hope yours goes just as well.

Good Luck!

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000


Samantha,

Thanks for the offer.  If anything comes up I'll be sure to check with you.
And thanks for the vote of confidence in the whitepaper...  My techie
paranoia alarms are just going off on this one.

Matt

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000


Hello.

I did an in-place upgrade this past weekend.  It is now Monday and all 1000
users have logged into Outlookno problems reported as of yet.  

If I can be of any assistance to you or you want to ask a specific question,
please don't hesitate to ask.  

I used the MS White Paper on In-place Upgrades.  

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000


OK, wonderful.  That will be a big help.  Of course I understand that
whitepapers are written to be the guides to a correct installation. However,
my experiences have told me that you're much better off verifying that the
information in such a document is correct first before trusting it
completely.  I've had too many such instructions leave out some critical
component that meant many more hours of hassle instead of a nice clean
install.

Matt

-Original Message-
From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000


Have a look at the Exchange 2003 help.  They have a step by step walkthrough
of all the upgrade/migration paths.  Its basically a stripped down version
of whats in the whitepapers but its layed out like a checklist.

These whitepapers are not "junk".  Understanding then can mean the
difference between a failed or successful upgrade.

- Peter



-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000

I'm beginning the process of an in-place upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to
Exchange 2000, and I wanted to make sure I had the right ideas about how to
go about this.

1.  I downloaded the In-Place Upgrade Whitepaper from Microsoft.  Is this a
definitive document or is there something in the document that is, in your
experience, junk?  I'd hate to follow this and find out MS has something
wrong...

2.  The server that 5.5 currently resides on is Windows 2000, SP 3, and is
in an NT 4.0 domain at the moment.  I assume I need to bring it into the AD
before I can begin this upgrade process?  Should I do this only if I want to
avoid having to use the ASD connectors?  I'm a bit confused on this point.

3.  I'm trying to get my AD administrators to allow my domain admins to have
the ability to update the schema (for my domain at least).  I realize we
need this, at least according to this whitepaper and the list FAQ.  

4.  My domain is already in native mode, so that isn't a problem.  I've also
transferred all the old user accounts from my NT 4.0 domain over using the
migration wizard, so the SID's should be the same for the accounts when the
users attempt to access their mailboxes after the upgrade.

5.  I'm planning on doing a full online backup before doing anything, of
course.

I'm doing my best to read through all the information I can find on this
topic, but there are often things that are missing from such documents.

Is there anything obviously wrong with what I've talked about above?  Any
specific pointers to give on this process?

Thank you very much,

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL 

RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up

[Bob Jiantonio]

Also,  running smtpreinstall.exe as appropriate for your service pack ,
fixes this issue. (sometimes) YMMV.

There isn't very good info on this utility.  This is the article I
followed:  http://support.microsoft.com/?id=319885

I only did this part though:

For Exchange 2000 SP2 or later you can use the SMTP Reinstall Tool
(Smtpreinstall.exe) to restore the missing Exchange 2000 ESMTP verbs and
the Exchange 2000 versions of the files. Smtpreinstall.exe can be found
in the \Support\UTILS\I386 folder on the Exchange 2000 SP2 or later CD.
Run Smtpreinstall.exe in the previous Step 2: Reinstall Exchange 2000
Server. To run Smtpreinstall.exe: 
1. Copy Smtpreinstall.exe to the \Exchsrvr\Bin folder. 
2. Run Smtpreinstall.exe from that folder. 
3. Restart the computer when you receive the prompt.


-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up


Well, uninstalled symantec avf for exchange, followed Tony's steps as
well, now we got airbiscuits. No inbound or outbound. I am having the
guy reinstall e2k sp3 again and see what happens.. 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up

However, this can be caused by other things, such as a virus scanner.
Sybari Antigen, in particular, does this with certain old versions. 

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
"One man's Spam is another man's UCE."

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up

>From an earlier post today that was resolved via a PSS call

 Hope this helps someone in the future.

Symptom:  Message queue properties displays 'The handle is invalid' and
messages are stuck in the local and outbound queue.
Resolution:
Remove IIS, ensure metabase.bin is removed.
Reboot
Re-install IIS
Re-apply Windows SP
Reboot
Re-install Exchange
Re-apply SP
Reboot

Cause:  Suspected to be caused by a corrupt metabase.bin file but Ms is
not sure.  There will be a KB article published in the near future that
covers this problem.




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I have googled my butt off, and I have cranked up logging. I cannot get
this one. All the smtp queues go into retry almost immediatelly. Help?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New Entourage

[Mike Carlson]

[1] I hate grammar Nazi's. This is email, not English class. G37  0V3R 17!!

[2] I did RTFM. I guess I just didn't get to the part about Public Folders
not showing up correctly. I figured since I was browsing through the recent
posts, I would just ask a simple question and see what others results were
before I went home to try and figure it out. I installed it last night, set
up the account and looked at the public folders. About 10 minutes of time
spent so far. As far as you being too important, I wasn't referring to the
free/busy server issue, I was referring to this:

> >> [3] And I don't really care all that much because I'm playing with
cooler
> >> Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than Entourage,
which
> >> at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs.

If you don't really care, why even reply?

[3] If everyone RTFM from front to back before they even installed the app,
these lists would be little more than haiku Fridays. I think you need to get
off your high horse. If your only worth while response is going to be RTFM,
then why bother sending an email?

-Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uselessthoughts.com

- Original Message - 
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: New Entourage


> It's "you're" not "your". And don't blame me for your inability to RTFM.
> This is indeed a peer support newsgroup; if you don't like my responses
feel
> free to add me to your killfile. I couldn't care less.
>
> Indicating I don't have time to go troubleshoot free/busy issues on my
> machine is hardly an attempt to blow off about how important I am. I was
> simply pointing out the only unexpected issue I've seen with the Exchange
> update for Entourage. The "issue" you describe seems to be expected
behavior
> based on the help files, but I guess you're too important to read those
and
> need the rest of us to do your work for you.
>
>
> > From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:08:13 -0500
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: New Entourage
> >
> > Well your a happy guy. Thanks for the great answer there. For a minute I
> > thought this a group to help each other out, not blow off about how
> > important we are.
> >
> > Since I am not at home and not near a Mac with Entourage installed, I
cant
> > really read the help file right now. I figured if you didn't see the
same
> > issue I would dig further, if you didn't see the same issue, I wouldn't
> > worry about it right now.
> >
> > I would figure the appropriate response would be:
> >
> > 1. I don't have any public folders of calendar or contact type so I cant
> > test it
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2. Yes/No
> >
> > Since you were so helpful, I wont comment on my status of the free/busy
> > server thing either since I have cooler things to play as well.
> >
> > =)
> >
> > -Mike Carlson
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.uselessthoughts.com
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: New Entourage
> >
> >
> >> Do I see Have you read the help files yet? The client is working as
I
> >> would expect it to work for me at the moment based on my reading of the
> > help
> >> files. With the exception of the free/busy server which I haven't had
time
> >> to look into.[1]
> >>
> >> [1] Since Macs aren't supported on my network, it has pretty low
> >> priority.[2]
> >> [2] Plus it's my Mac, which puts it even lower on the priority list.[3]
> >> [3] And I don't really care all that much because I'm playing with
cooler
> >> Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than Entourage,
which
> >> at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs.
> >>
> >>> From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:24:45 -0500
> >>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Subject: Re: New Entourage
> >>>
> >>> Do you see the same issues of Calendar or Contact type public folders
> >>> looking like IMAP folders and not actual contacts or calendar entries?
> >>>
> >>> -Mike Carlson
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> http://www.uselessthoughts.com
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>> From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:05 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: New Entourage
> >>>
> >>>
>  It works just fine in E2K. The Entourage help files contain quite a
bit
> > of
>  information, might try reading those for what the expected
> > functionality
> >>> is.
> 
> > From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 

Re: BCC emails

[Chris Scharff]

MSDN and the Exchange SDK are places to start if you'd like to do it
yourself. Sure there are plenty of developers out there who'd be happy to
take on such a project.

> From: "Exchange List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:15:12 +0500
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: BCC emails
> 
> Thanks Chris, can you tell me where can I get help/ procedure to do this. Or
> is there a easy way of doing it.
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Irf.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:52 AM
> To:Exchange Discussions
> Subject:Re: BCC emails
> 
> Sure, you'll just need to write a categorizer event sink. Course it will
> prevent you from receiving messages just like this one. Enjoy.
> 
> 
>> From: "Exchange List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:34:41 +0500
>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: BCC emails
>> 
>> Dear List,
>> 
>> Is there a way to block the bcc mails on server level or is there any
>> software
>> any procedure to do that.
>> 
>> Love u all,
>> Irf.
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: W2K3 and E2K3 and NTBackup

[David Grimstone (DSLWN)]

Yes.
W2K's will as well. 

-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 8 August 2003 9:28 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2K3 and E2K3 and NTBackup

I'm starting to plan for my 5.5/W2K to E2K3/W2K3 migration. We currently use
NTBackup to backup 5.5 on W2K, and it's great. My assumption is that W2K3's
NTBackup will backup E2K3, but I don't want to assume and I'm not to the
testing stage yet. It that a safe assumption?

Will W2K3's NTBackup backup E2K3?

-Walden


Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]