RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
Without the RUS, objects don't get properly stamped with necessary mail attributes. I can't say how long you should wait. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain Yes to both, although only about 20 minutes ago on the Recipient update service. Am I now dealing with replication delay? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain Also, did you create a recipient update service for that new domain? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice. My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have created a new child domain under our single domain forest which also contains our Exchange 2000 organization. Everything is running in Exchange 2000 SP3 except the domain controllers which are all running SP4. My Problem: I can create users in the new domain in AD Users and Computers including creating the mailbox and configuring the mailbox properties. But when I attempt to log that user in to Exchange with Outlook, I get "The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list." Also, when I look in the GAL I don't see this user (we're using the same GAL for now) and I don't see a mailbox in ESM in our information store. Please if anyone can offer assistance, we would be extremely thankful. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
Yes to both, although only about 20 minutes ago on the Recipient update service. Am I now dealing with replication delay? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain Also, did you create a recipient update service for that new domain? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice. My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have created a new child domain under our single domain forest which also contains our Exchange 2000 organization. Everything is running in Exchange 2000 SP3 except the domain controllers which are all running SP4. My Problem: I can create users in the new domain in AD Users and Computers including creating the mailbox and configuring the mailbox properties. But when I attempt to log that user in to Exchange with Outlook, I get "The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list." Also, when I look in the GAL I don't see this user (we're using the same GAL for now) and I don't see a mailbox in ESM in our information store. Please if anyone can offer assistance, we would be extremely thankful. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
Also, did you create a recipient update service for that new domain? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice. My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have created a new child domain under our single domain forest which also contains our Exchange 2000 organization. Everything is running in Exchange 2000 SP3 except the domain controllers which are all running SP4. My Problem: I can create users in the new domain in AD Users and Computers including creating the mailbox and configuring the mailbox properties. But when I attempt to log that user in to Exchange with Outlook, I get "The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list." Also, when I look in the GAL I don't see this user (we're using the same GAL for now) and I don't see a mailbox in ESM in our information store. Please if anyone can offer assistance, we would be extremely thankful. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
Did you run domainprep in the new domain? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice. My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have created a new child domain under our single domain forest which also contains our Exchange 2000 organization. Everything is running in Exchange 2000 SP3 except the domain controllers which are all running SP4. My Problem: I can create users in the new domain in AD Users and Computers including creating the mailbox and configuring the mailbox properties. But when I attempt to log that user in to Exchange with Outlook, I get "The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list." Also, when I look in the GAL I don't see this user (we're using the same GAL for now) and I don't see a mailbox in ESM in our information store. Please if anyone can offer assistance, we would be extremely thankful. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help. Exchange 2000 and New Child Domain
I didn't have any luck in the archives or MSKB and I know this is probably a simple question so, flame away if you must; I'm short on time and resources and I hope someone will look kindly on me and offer some help or advice. My situation: In order to support a new subsidiary company, we have created a new child domain under our single domain forest which also contains our Exchange 2000 organization. Everything is running in Exchange 2000 SP3 except the domain controllers which are all running SP4. My Problem: I can create users in the new domain in AD Users and Computers including creating the mailbox and configuring the mailbox properties. But when I attempt to log that user in to Exchange with Outlook, I get "The name could not be resolved. The name could not be matched to a name in the address list." Also, when I look in the GAL I don't see this user (we're using the same GAL for now) and I don't see a mailbox in ESM in our information store. Please if anyone can offer assistance, we would be extremely thankful. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up
Do we need to reinstall e2k now then e2k sp3? Kinda sketchy.. -Original Message- From: Bob Jiantonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up Also, running smtpreinstall.exe as appropriate for your service pack , fixes this issue. (sometimes) YMMV. There isn't very good info on this utility. This is the article I followed: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=319885 I only did this part though: For Exchange 2000 SP2 or later you can use the SMTP Reinstall Tool (Smtpreinstall.exe) to restore the missing Exchange 2000 ESMTP verbs and the Exchange 2000 versions of the files. Smtpreinstall.exe can be found in the \Support\UTILS\I386 folder on the Exchange 2000 SP2 or later CD. Run Smtpreinstall.exe in the previous Step 2: Reinstall Exchange 2000 Server. To run Smtpreinstall.exe: 1. Copy Smtpreinstall.exe to the \Exchsrvr\Bin folder. 2. Run Smtpreinstall.exe from that folder. 3. Restart the computer when you receive the prompt. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up Well, uninstalled symantec avf for exchange, followed Tony's steps as well, now we got airbiscuits. No inbound or outbound. I am having the guy reinstall e2k sp3 again and see what happens.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up However, this can be caused by other things, such as a virus scanner. Sybari Antigen, in particular, does this with certain old versions. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "One man's Spam is another man's UCE." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up >From an earlier post today that was resolved via a PSS call Hope this helps someone in the future. Symptom: Message queue properties displays 'The handle is invalid' and messages are stuck in the local and outbound queue. Resolution: Remove IIS, ensure metabase.bin is removed. Reboot Re-install IIS Re-apply Windows SP Reboot Re-install Exchange Re-apply SP Reboot Cause: Suspected to be caused by a corrupt metabase.bin file but Ms is not sure. There will be a KB article published in the near future that covers this problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have googled my butt off, and I have cranked up logging. I cannot get this one. All the smtp queues go into retry almost immediatelly. Help? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Entourage
> This is more venting than any serious question: > > What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1) MAPI? What about it. Outlook for the Mac is dead, and long overdue as well IMO. Configuring an Outlook for the Mac to connect across subnets? I need that ongoing pain like I need another hole in my head. > What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded from scratch) Significantly less coding for RPC over http than to make Outlook OSX native IMO, at least as an overall portion of the development effort. But if one is going to bother with RPC over http, then you'd likely also use MAPI. Seems to be largely a waste of time on the Mac How many 3rd party add-ins did one see for the Mac version of Outlook... ever? More than none? What does MAPI/RPC buy me, if not a development platform? > You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server? It's enabled by default, so I'm not sure what the issue is. Require SSL and it's at least as secure as MAPI. > Why did they get rid of the Outlook product? Hopefully because they realized it sucked complete ass. Entourage was a better product at 1.0 than Outlook for the mac had ever been. >Why make an organization with > Macs go through so many hoops? I use a Mac... I'm replying on one now as a matter of fact. Everything I do on the Mac requires more 'hoops' than the PC equivalent does when it comes to accessing Windows resources. Entourage's Exchange support now allows a user to input a minimum of information and their profile is automatically configured for them. Could it be better? Sure, but it is already significantly better than Outlook for the Mac ever was in a number of respects. Hopefully, Microsoft will continue to make improvements along those lines. >It's not like they have to code from scratch. Changing the code base to support OSX is not an insignificant task and then requires functionality decisions based on a need to maintain feature parity across multiple versions of the OS. > It makes no sense. Depends on how you define the problem. I felt that ditching Outlook for the Mac was long overdue and once I'd seen Entourage was hopeful that it would become the exchange platform for the mac in the future. I'm generally glad that turned out to be the case. > The whole idea is to make the products across both > platforms the same or mostly the same. I don't think that's the idea actually. At least not based on the discussions I've seen involving the Mac Office dev team and portions of their user base. The users want similar functionality, but most recoil at the idea they'd have to use the same horrible Windows implementations to get similar functionality. They pity Windows users for some of the ways feature sets have been implemented. >They didn't take Word or Excel, > retool it, take out some important features and call it something else, did > they? Keerist!! As a matter of fact... Yes, they did. Although I'm curious to know what important features you feel are missing. Also curious to know how you feel the performance of Access or FrontPage compares to the Windows equivalents. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Entourage
My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for the Mac because OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a legitimate chance of displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop. It meets the requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc). Therefore, the only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its Microsoft's only way to stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > This is more venting than any serious question: > > What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1) > What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded > from scratch) > You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server? > > Why did they get rid of the Outlook product? Why make an > organization with > Macs go through so many hoops? It's not like they have to > code from scratch. > It makes no sense. The whole idea is to make the products across both > platforms the same or mostly the same. They didn't take Word > or Excel, > retool it, take out some important features and call it > something else, did > they? Keerist!! > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > > > > > Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange > > aware, you mean > > 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and and automatic > > configuration of address book and other account settings to > > support Exchange > > qualifies, then maybe. > > > > > > > From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400 > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > > I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be > > Exchange-aware if it was, > > > right? When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18 > > months ago we had to > > > settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had > > to switch between > > > OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to > > open up IMAP or > > > POP3 for him. > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backup Software for Exchange 2000
Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
Ok you peeked my Q what download site. OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS & EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails
Greetings, I am encountering into a problem when I try to run ForestPrep to add the first Exchange 2000 server to an existing Exchange 5.5 site. At the time setup runs its checks I am getting an Invalid Character error. I have checked the display names of both the Organization and Sites and there is no problem there. I have also looked at the XADM: Invalid Character Error Occurs When You Upgrade or Join an Exchange Server 5.5 Site KB article 289671. I am in the process of checking for schema attributes that may have multiple descriptions though I have not found any yet. Have any of you encountered this problem before? Are there any recommendations on how to resolve this? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows NT SP6 CA Backup software Mcafee Virus Scanning Thanks in advance, Jamie Domingue _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Header Question
Actually, the spam originated from 210.91.16.8 - the other headers are most likely bogus. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Internet Header Question > > > Well, a quick look on www.samspade.org tells me that 169.139.15.251 is > part of the Broward County Public Schools network in Florida. > > 210.91.16.8 is in Seoul, Korea > > I'm not sure why it displays both those IP addresses as part > of the same > 'hop', someone with a bit more experience can probably explain that. > > > Regards, > > Rob Ellis > IT Manager > Samsara Group plc > Tel 023 9224 7979 > Mob 07974 111867 > MCP BEng(hons) > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 August 2003 14:18 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Internet Header Question > > > Hello Rob, > >What do the other 2 IP's represent that are in the header? > > > Thank you !! > > -Original Message- > From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Internet Header Question > > 157.124.218.229 > > > > Regards, > > Rob Ellis > IT Manager > Samsara Group plc > Tel 023 9224 7979 > Mob 07974 111867 > MCP BEng(hons) > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 August 2003 14:05 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Internet Header Question > > > Hello Group, > >I have a question about the Internet headers of an Email. If one > looks at > this Spam Email Header > - > Received: from 169.139.15.251 (210.91.16.8 [210.91.16.8]) by > mail.wpbpl.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service > Version > 5.5.2656.59) > id PYC9TG9D; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:22:09 -0400 > Received: from [157.124.218.229] by 169.139.15.251 with SMTP; Wed, 06 > Aug > 2003 15:21:11 +0600 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Beckie Yaung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Beckie Yaung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: my pictures are ready now > Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 15:21:11 +0600 > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="F11140.F0BB5D4" > X-Priority: 1 > --F11140.F0BB5D4 > Content-Type: text/html; > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > --F11140.F0BB5D4-- > > -- > > >Would the spam be coming from the 210.91.16.8, > 169.139.15.251, or the > 157.124.218.229 IP? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: KCC
We all want part of your paycheck. It will take as long as it takes. CPU speed, memory tpe of disk confiuration. Run it at night and see the result in the logs for an approx. time. Then decide is you want to run it during the day. From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: KCC Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:08:44 -0400 Will it take a long time? I have a 19Gb IS. Thanks again. Samantha -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: KCC It should be run off hours, but I have run it during the day before with no bad results. I did it at lunch time, though. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: KCC You guys are really funnyoh yah, cracking me up! Anyways, stop playing and tell me what you would do? I would like to run it during the day but I don't want to hurt anything or stop/slow down services from Exchange. Thanks. :) Samantha -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: KCC I think he meant "Yes, it CAN be run during the day. Yes, it SHOULD be run off hours." Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: KCC Yes it can be run during the day? Or Yes it should be run off hours? Thanks for the reply. Samantha -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: KCC Yes. > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:48:43 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: KCC > > Can you run the KCC (Knowledge Consistency Checker) during the day or should > it be run off hours? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
If you're going to waste taxpayer money doing BLBs, might as well do it right... Use CommVault. > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:36:08 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > Hello All. > > What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick > levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking > them out of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
Some observations: I now get 550Mb/min using BackupExec 8.6 against Exchange 2K (store backup, not BLB) - perhaps the limiting factor is the 100MBit net card. The Exchange server has 16Gb of stores on a PIII 600 with 768Mb RAM and Raid 1 data disks. The backup server is a PIII 450. When we were using single-drive DLT, I was lucky to get 200Mb/min, even with decent drivers. We changed to using removeable disks as backup media (basically using disks as tapes) and the speeds shot up although the rest of the setup remained the same. All the best, Andy > -Original Message- > From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 6. august 2003 22:34 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > Wow, how are you doing the gig a minute? I have a 160GB > backup and it takes > almost 24 hours on Veritas 8.6. It really slows down when it hits the > mailboxes though. Do you have the drive mounted directly to > the exchange > server? > > Thanks, > Paul > > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:14 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > > A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote > agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to > your exchange > server). > I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes > approximately > 3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent. > > Raj > > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > > I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you > are using. > > -Original Message- > From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure > your IS is > not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process > > Paul > > -Original Message- > From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information > Stores...does brick level also. > > Nick Thakkar > Network Administrator > American Medical Response > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 209-993-6974 > > > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > Hello All. > > What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do > brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried > talking them out of it. > > Thanks > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ** > ** > ** > This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains > information that is > > confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or > other applicable > privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This > message is > intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). > If you are not > the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; > please immediately > notify the sender that you have received this message in > error and delete > this > message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distri
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
thanks that would be me..as I am my staff ;-) I will contact myreseller..agha thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have Open, Select or Enterprise Agreements with MS they have a site where you can download the Volume Licensing versions of their products. You can contact your MS rep to get the URL. You'll need to be added as a user to the site, so contact whoever in your company manages the agreement to have this done. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Ok you peeked my Q what download site. OK I admit Im a bit clueless on all the details of my volume lic... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download it from the site as of that date. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Exchange was made available on the 4th? I havne't seen or heard anything yet. -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS & EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.sw
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Ed, is correct that is what my ramblings were supposed to mean. Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 August 2003 05:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation >From the dumpster view you can purge items from the dumpster. I believe that is what Mr. Bendall was saying. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "One man's Spam is another man's UCE." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation You are incorrect. The Dumpster is really just a view of the items which have been marked as deleted (i.e. tombstoned) but have not reached the expiration of the Deleted Item Retention. DIR is just the amount of time which elapses between the time something has been marked as deleted and the time it is purged from the information store. Long explanation short is that you can ALWAYS recover a deleted item during the deleted item retension period. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:40 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > Yes purging from deleted item recovery will remove it from the > dumpster. I doubt Exmerge would do this as it just exports from the > mailbox so I would assume it does the same on the dumpster which of > course has to be specifically selected. > > Regards, > > Paul > > -Original Message- > From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 August 2003 19:46 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > Thanks for that - following the article and purging from the necessary > folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct? > > Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and achieved the > same result? > > Stu > > -Original Message- > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange > even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on > Microsoft website. > This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. > It is retrospective. > > Regards, > > Paul > > -Original Message- > From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > Ex5.5 > > I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' > from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does > not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted > items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. > > Thanks > > Stu > > > > Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and > any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you > are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify > the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments > immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any > attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the > contents to any other person. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail > disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to > http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. > -- > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail
RE: KCC
You guys are really funnyoh yah, cracking me up! Anyways, stop playing and tell me what you would do? I would like to run it during the day but I don't want to hurt anything or stop/slow down services from Exchange. Thanks. :) Samantha -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: KCC I think he meant "Yes, it CAN be run during the day. Yes, it SHOULD be run off hours." Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: KCC Yes it can be run during the day? Or Yes it should be run off hours? Thanks for the reply. Samantha -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: KCC Yes. > From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:48:43 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: KCC > > Can you run the KCC (Knowledge Consistency Checker) during the day or should > it be run off hours? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
If the tree falls but there is no one to hear it. :) -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 Even if I plan on not using the FE to access the new Exchange 2003 server? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 You always have to upgrade FEs first -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3 >From Q822942 -For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the back-end server). Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3 before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Entourage
I myself don't like the Entourage update for Office X. I don't get anything more than I did with IMAP it seems. Any public folders that are set to be of Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly. Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP? -Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uselessthoughts.com - Original Message - From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 AM Subject: RE: New Entourage > I'm thinking about trying out citrix > > > -Original Message- > > From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > > So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:44 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the > > semi-absurd situation of maintaining three entirely different > > mail clients for the Mac, none of which made everyone, happy, > > and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major > > upgrades, and were free. I don't find it at all > > incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their resources on > > the product that generates some revenue. As far as > > Entourage's new Exchange awareness goes, it's about what > > you'd expect from a point upgrade. > > > > -Peter > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > > I don't doubt it. That makes perfect business sense. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > > > > > My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for > > > the Mac because > > > OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a > > > legitimate chance of > > > displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop. > > It meets the > > > requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc). > > > Therefore, the > > > only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its > > > Microsoft's only way to > > > stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering. > > > > > > Roger > > > -- > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > > > > > > > > This is more venting than any serious question: > > > > > > > > What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1) > > > > What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded > > > > from scratch) > > > > You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server? > > > > > > > > Why did they get rid of the Outlook product? Why make an > > > > organization with > > > > Macs go through so many hoops? It's not like they have to > > > > code from scratch. > > > > It makes no sense. The whole idea is to make the products > > > across both > > > > platforms the same or mostly the same. They didn't take Word > > > > or Excel, > > > > retool it, take out some important features and call it > > > > something else, did > > > > they? Keerist!! > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange > > > > > aware, you mean > > > > > 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and > > > and automatic > > > > > configuration of address book and other account settings to > > > > > support Exchange > > > > > qualifies, then maybe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400 > > > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be > > > > > Exchange-aware if it was, > > > > > > right? When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18 > > > > > months ago we had to > > > > > > settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had > > > > > to switch between > > > > > > OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to > > > > > open up IMAP or > > > > > > POP3 for him. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___
Re: New Entourage
I think your problem extends beyond 4th grade grammar skills to basic reading comprehension issues. My footnote re: 'not caring' was inference to troubleshooting my free/busy issue, not the clearly documented calendar and contact "issues" you could have resolved by having someone with a 6th grade education read you the FM. I respond to over 6k posts in various forums on average each year. Only in a minor subset of them to I recommend people RTFM or STFW. I guess your egregious and obvious lack of research or effort earned your post a place in that subset. BTW, Footnoting empty air, while humorous, serves only to further demonstrate the failure of the public schools in the community where you grew up. > From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:11:29 -0500 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > [1] I hate grammar Nazi's. This is email, not English class. G37 0V3R 17!! > > [2] I did RTFM. I guess I just didn't get to the part about Public Folders > not showing up correctly. I figured since I was browsing through the recent > posts, I would just ask a simple question and see what others results were > before I went home to try and figure it out. I installed it last night, set > up the account and looked at the public folders. About 10 minutes of time > spent so far. As far as you being too important, I wasn't referring to the > free/busy server issue, I was referring to this: > [3] And I don't really care all that much because I'm playing with > cooler Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than Entourage, > which at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs. > > If you don't really care, why even reply? > > [3] If everyone RTFM from front to back before they even installed the app, > these lists would be little more than haiku Fridays. I think you need to get > off your high horse. If your only worth while response is going to be RTFM, > then why bother sending an email? > > -Mike Carlson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.uselessthoughts.com > > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:32 PM > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > >> It's "you're" not "your". And don't blame me for your inability to RTFM. >> This is indeed a peer support newsgroup; if you don't like my responses > feel >> free to add me to your killfile. I couldn't care less. >> >> Indicating I don't have time to go troubleshoot free/busy issues on my >> machine is hardly an attempt to blow off about how important I am. I was >> simply pointing out the only unexpected issue I've seen with the Exchange >> update for Entourage. The "issue" you describe seems to be expected > behavior >> based on the help files, but I guess you're too important to read those > and >> need the rest of us to do your work for you. >> >> >>> From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:08:13 -0500 >>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: Re: New Entourage >>> >>> Well your a happy guy. Thanks for the great answer there. For a minute I >>> thought this a group to help each other out, not blow off about how >>> important we are. >>> >>> Since I am not at home and not near a Mac with Entourage installed, I > cant >>> really read the help file right now. I figured if you didn't see the > same >>> issue I would dig further, if you didn't see the same issue, I wouldn't >>> worry about it right now. >>> >>> I would figure the appropriate response would be: >>> >>> 1. I don't have any public folders of calendar or contact type so I cant >>> test it >>> >>> OR >>> >>> 2. Yes/No >>> >>> Since you were so helpful, I wont comment on my status of the free/busy >>> server thing either since I have cooler things to play as well. >>> >>> =) >>> >>> -Mike Carlson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://www.uselessthoughts.com >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:48 PM >>> Subject: Re: New Entourage >>> >>> Do I see Have you read the help files yet? The client is working as > I would expect it to work for me at the moment based on my reading of the >>> help files. With the exception of the free/busy server which I haven't had > time to look into.[1] [1] Since Macs aren't supported on my network, it has pretty low priority.[2] [2] Plus it's my Mac, which puts it even lower on the priority list.[3] [3] And I don't really care all that much because I'm playing with > cooler Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than Entourage, > which at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs. >
RE: New Entourage
"..you could have resolved by having someone with a 6th grade education read you the FM" What part of "I figured since I was browsing through the recent posts, I would just ask a simple question and see what others results were before I went home to try and figure it out. I installed it last night, set up the account and looked at the public folders. About 10 minutes of time spent so far" was so difficult to understand? Seemed pretty clear to me, with my 4th grade edgukashun and all. I guess I need to read the RTFM for mailing lists so I can find the part that says: "Be sure to spend lot's of time and completely read the manual over and over just to make sure you don't upset anyone named Chris Scharff because he is really important and doesn't care about things other than the really cool things he is working on. No quick simple questions allowed!" "I respond to over 6k posts in various forums on average each year. Only in a minor subset of them to I recommend people RTFM or STFW. I guess your egregious and obvious lack of research or effort earned your post a place in that subset. " Mr. Iamreallyreallyimportantandmuststickoutmychesttocompensateforothershortcoming s seems to have reared it's ugly head again. I am glad you actually keep track of things like that. I guess everyone needs a hobby. It's really funny to see people get personal in a mailing list. It still baffles me that people have to resort to making personal comments about people they have never met personally. I guess it must make them feel more important and in this case that really seems to fit. "BTW, Footnoting empty air, while humorous, serves only to further demonstrate the failure of the public schools in the community where you grew up." I figured I would put numbers in brackets like you since you are really really cool and way more important than me. -Mike http://www.uselessthoughts.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Entourage I think your problem extends beyond 4th grade grammar skills to basic reading comprehension issues. My footnote re: 'not caring' was inference to troubleshooting my free/busy issue, not the clearly documented calendar and contact "issues" you could have resolved by having someone with a 6th grade education read you the FM. I respond to over 6k posts in various forums on average each year. Only in a minor subset of them to I recommend people RTFM or STFW. I guess your egregious and obvious lack of research or effort earned your post a place in that subset. BTW, Footnoting empty air, while humorous, serves only to further demonstrate the failure of the public schools in the community where you grew up. > From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:11:29 -0500 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > [1] I hate grammar Nazi's. This is email, not English class. G37 0V3R 17!! > > [2] I did RTFM. I guess I just didn't get to the part about Public > Folders not showing up correctly. I figured since I was browsing > through the recent posts, I would just ask a simple question and see > what others results were before I went home to try and figure it out. > I installed it last night, set up the account and looked at the public > folders. About 10 minutes of time spent so far. As far as you being > too important, I wasn't referring to the free/busy server issue, I was referring to this: > [3] And I don't really care all that much because I'm playing with > cooler Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than Entourage, > which at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs. > > If you don't really care, why even reply? > > [3] If everyone RTFM from front to back before they even installed the > app, these lists would be little more than haiku Fridays. I think you > need to get off your high horse. If your only worth while response is > going to be RTFM, then why bother sending an email? > > -Mike Carlson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.uselessthoughts.com > > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:32 PM > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > >> It's "you're" not "your". And don't blame me for your inability to RTFM. >> This is indeed a peer support newsgroup; if you don't like my >> responses > feel >> free to add me to your killfile. I couldn't care less. >> >> Indicating I don't have time to go troubleshoot free/busy issues on >> my machine is hardly an attempt to blow off about how important I am. >> I was simply pointing out the only unexpected issue I've seen with >> the Exchange update for Entourage. The "issue" you describe seems to >> be expected > behavior >>
RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much
Add a static route to the client subnet with Route ADD and have it go out the NIC that is supposed to communicate with the client -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much Hum.. When I do a route print I see the routing table referencing routes to this network from both cards... So what I'm thinking is ... Clients sends request to Exchange Servers first nic with IP X.X.X.1 Server sees request and sends back info from NIC2,different IP Client gets back data but with a different IP than he is expecting. Client gets confused and sends another request this time popping up the message on the screen... Hum. Is this a way to knock out the 2nd nic from being set as a route to this network with out disabling it? Like through the routing table ? Thank you! -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much The default route from that server is probably going out the wrong NIC. -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much Hello Russell, Thanks for replying... here are the answers 1) There is a server that is attached to that message. If you have more than one Exchange server, are you sure you have the right server (it's happened to me here)? It is referring to the server that has the two nic's in it. What happened to you at your location. We do have 2 Exchange servers onsite. 2) Is this a remote user or a local user (I'm assuming a local user, but again, I've been burnt on that also). They are local users 3) Is this all users or one user? All users :( 4) I would start with DNS. Make sure everything is resolving properly. I did nslookups internally and everything is pointing to the gig card on the server. The 10/100 does not seem to be used at all. ??? -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much Hi Joe There are a couple of questions I have: 1) There is a server that is attached to that message. If you have more than one Exchange server, are you sure you have the right server (it's happened to me here)? 2) Is this a remote user or a local user (I'm assuming a local user, but again, I've been burnt on that also). 3) Is this all users or one user? 4) I would start with DNS. Make sure everything is resolving properly. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello all, Here is my problem We have an Exchange 5.5 server that is constantly giving you the message "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" . This is like every 3rd or 4th message. I'm starting with the NIC's, the server has dual NIC's that are active on the network. I'm thinking one is causing some kind of issues when the server sends the data back, and the client gets confused? I don't know just going on a hunch. I wouldn't think we would need dual NIC's on this server. The NIC's are not teamed, nor is this server clustered. Any advice on troubleshooting this message would be highly appreciated!!! Thank you!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Lis
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
Oh yea, you will need to buy the Exchange agent as well. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I would go with BackupExec 9 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AV/Spam scanning services
It's not necessarily about saving money though right? Scanning at the gateway (in-house or outsourced) can be a valid additional level of protection. A significant number of our customers use some form of gateway scanner[1] in addition to their server and desktop based AV solutions. [1] MessageLabs, MailSweeper, Trend's Instercan, et al. > From: Roger Seielstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 07:10:22 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services > > There are some discussions of a few of them in the archives. > > Personally, I'm not a fan of outsourced anti-spam, but that's in part > because we're a heavily email dependent company and so we can justify the > expense of in house measures to combat those issues. > > As a side note - outsourced antivirus doesn't save money - you still need to > have an inhouse AV product for email, because scanning at the gateway isn't > enough. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP queues WAY backed up
>From an earlier post today that was resolved via a PSS call Hope this helps someone in the future. Symptom: Message queue properties displays 'The handle is invalid' and messages are stuck in the local and outbound queue. Resolution: Remove IIS, ensure metabase.bin is removed. Reboot Re-install IIS Re-apply Windows SP Reboot Re-install Exchange Re-apply SP Reboot Cause: Suspected to be caused by a corrupt metabase.bin file but Ms is not sure. There will be a KB article published in the near future that covers this problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have googled my butt off, and I have cranked up logging. I cannot get this one. All the smtp queues go into retry almost immediatelly. Help? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
Veritas Backup Exec -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Entourage
> From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:39:17 +0100 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: New Entourage > >> Configuring an Outlook for the Mac to >> connect across subnets? I need that ongoing pain like I need >> another hole in my head. > > It's not hard, just a hosts file or DNS entry then it workshow is this > so different from windows? WINS? >>> Why did they get rid of the Outlook product? >> >> Hopefully because they realized it sucked complete ass. >> Entourage was a better product at 1.0 than Outlook for the >> mac had ever been. > > Outlook 2001 would be perfectly adequate if they fixed the HTML rendering, > made task requests work and sorted a few other flaws that escape me. Notes, better delegate support, calendaring that doesn't rely on Schedule+, custom forms support, 3rd party integration, support for services other than Exchange. >It's > not exactly a major re-write, just a service pack. OSX support doesn't fall under the 'just a service pack' category in my mind, but I'm not a Mac developer so perhaps I'm naive. > Even without these fixes OL2001 is workable, we have 200 mac users who are > getting on with their jobs. Great, then there's no compelling reason for you to switch. Microsoft has been adding tiny bits of functionality into their server like WebDAV, and some subset of radicals is looking for clients which take advantage of those features and take messaging clients beyond the functionality they present today. Personally, I'd take Ximian's Exchange connector over Outlook 2001 if those were the only two choices I had for running on a Mac. Actually I'd take just about anything else, as my Mac doesn't do OS9 compatibility mode. Course discussions here on the topic aren't going to effect Microsoft much... Better you should send your concerns to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd think. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Entourage
Do you see the same issues of Calendar or Contact type public folders looking like IMAP folders and not actual contacts or calendar entries? -Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uselessthoughts.com - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:05 PM Subject: Re: New Entourage > It works just fine in E2K. The Entourage help files contain quite a bit of > information, might try reading those for what the expected functionality is. > > > From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:18:53 +0100 > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > Ok, can anyone confirm how it works with E2K? > > > > With 5.5 you get what looks like an IMAP connection... > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 06 August 2003 16:41 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > Its designed for E2K or higher > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > I got the same results you did, using Entourage with an Exchange 5.5 server. > > Does it maybe work better with 2000? > > > > -Peter > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:38 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > > > > > I myself don't like the Entourage update for Office X. I don't get anything > > more than I did with IMAP it seems. Any public folders that are set to be of > > Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly. > > > > Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP? > > > > -Mike Carlson > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.uselessthoughts.com > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 AM > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > >> I'm thinking about trying out citrix > >> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44 > >>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>> > >>> > >>> So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative? > >>> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:44 PM > >>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>> > >>> I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the > >>> semi-absurd situation of maintaining three entirely different > >>> mail clients for the Mac, none of which made everyone, happy, > >>> and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major > >>> upgrades, and were free. I don't find it at all > >>> incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their resources on > >>> the product that generates some revenue. As far as > >>> Entourage's new Exchange awareness goes, it's about what > >>> you'd expect from a point upgrade. > >>> > >>> -Peter > >>> > >>> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25 > >>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>> > >>> > >>> I don't doubt it. That makes perfect business sense. > >>> > -Original Message- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for > the Mac because > OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a > legitimate chance of > displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop. > >>> It meets the > requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc). > Therefore, the > only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its > Microsoft's only way to > stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering. > > Roger > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > > This is more venting than any serious question: > > > > What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1) > > What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded > > from scratch) > > You must enable IMAP on yo
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
I can do some large number with it but only really in to file mode -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I am not doing BLB. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 You're not going to get a gig a minute on BLB's regardless of the HW. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 A Gig a minute, really? Using Backup exec 8.6? Are you using a remote agent or is it a local backup ?(backup device connected to your exchange server). I have a 35GB backup and verification process which takes approximately 3 hours using BE 8.6 with remote agent. Raj -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process Paul -Original Message- From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information Stores...does brick level also. Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] 209-993-6974 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/
RE: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Wi n2003 Domain?)
I think it is time for me to update the WebSense categories: Access to this web page is restricted at this time. Reason: The Websense category "Tasteless" is filtered. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:14 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K > Forest/Domain-prep on Wi n2003 Domain?) > > > No SearchBastard for me > > The Web site you are attempting to access > http://www.searchbastard.com/ > is prohibited under the Spherion Internet Usage Policy and has been > blocked/restricted. Do not attempt to disable, defeat or circumvent > this Company security function. Violation of Spherion's > Internet Usage > Policy will be reported to your supervisor and may result in > disciplinary action, up to and including termination. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K > Forest/Domain-prep > on Wi n2003 Domain?) > > Hmm... I'm all distracted trying to figure out this google thing. Who > knew > there was any other search engine on the planet beyond > www.searchbastard.com? Why would anyone bother? > > Dual proc would help, but bumping up the RAM would probably help more. > If > you could only do one, I'd choose the latter. Beyond that... > With users > who'd fall into my 'typical category' I'd imagine you'd > likely be OK (at > the > very least you will be no worse of with E2K3 on this config than you > would > be with E2K on it). To be clear this is a new box correct? Because the > one > downside[1] to a 5.5 to E2K3 migration is that you can't do > it in place, > but > need to swing to new hardware. > > > [1] I see it as a bonus personally. [2] > [2] Seriously. > > > > From: "Dickenson, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:27:09 -0400 > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Server hardware specs for E2K3 (WAS: E2K Forest/Domain-prep > on Wi > > n2003 Domain?) > > > > I guess the question about is it worth the money was more > hypothetical. > > I've since gotten an updated price of $370, which IS worth it to me. > > > > As far as hardware goes, I'm looking for a general "should be okay", > or "not > > a good idea". > > > > My PRIV is 6GB, PUB 30MB. About 450 mailboxes. On average, 50 > clients > > connected at a time, with a maximum of 250 (that's how many PCs we > have). > > No idea what the mail volume is. I'm ashamed to say I'm > not sure how > to > > track it. > > > > We would be running E2K3 SE with McAfee GroupShield on > Win2k3 Standard > > Server. > > > > Hardware is P3600, 784MB of RAM, hardware RAID, 18GB RAID1 > OS/Pagefile/Apps, > > 33GB RAID1 Data/Logs. I can go dual proc if it will help. > > > > Thoughts, ideas? > > > > Steven > > --- > > Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Network Administrator > > The Key School, Annapolis Maryland > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:10 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain? > > > > > > The hardware requirements for E2K3 vs E2K are generally equivalent, > whether > > that hardware is sufficient for you org is not really > something I can > say > > with any degree of certainty. It meets the minimum hardware > requirements I > > believe. > > > > Whether or not it is worth $1000 for you is not really a question I > can > > answer. It is for customers who hire me to do the work, since I > performed my > > last E2K migration the weekend after TechEd and haven't looked back > since. > > > >> From: "Dickenson, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 13:03:45 -0400 > >> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: RE: E2K Forest/Domain-prep on Win2003 Domain? > >> > >> I have considered that, however we have Exchange 2000 EE > free as part > of > > an > >> upgrade advantage purchased with Exchange 5.5 EE. > Upgrading to E2K3 > EE > >> would cost me upwards of $1000. Is it worth it? In > addition, I will > be > >> doing the install on a P3600 with 512MB of RAM and 3 18GB RAID1 > arrays. > > Can > >> the hardware cope well? > >> > >> PS - What the he11 does IMNSHO mean? > >> > >> Steven > >> --- > >> Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Network Administrator > >> The Key School, Annapolis Maryland > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:58 PM > >> To: Exchange Discussions > >>
RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
FWIW, should be soon. It was made available to Volume Licensing customers as of Aug. 4. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Not to ask a stupid question here, why not wait until Ex2K3 is released then go to it and skip Ex2K? What we are/planning on doing is to get our Win2K3 AD completely in place (we are doing a migration) and let exchange keep running on 5.5, then this fall we will build our new 2K3 (OS & EX) and complete the migration. I don't see any real advantages in doing an upgrade today, just so I can do another upgrade in 5 months. You can run Ex2K3 in your lab and test the migration until the cows come home using an RC product. Just my thoughts. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 OK, next question: If my DC is a w2k3 server, can I add w2k servers (member servers) with exchange 2000. And then upgrade to exchange 2003 later? -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 This month's TechNet included an eval version of Exchange 2003 Standard. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Hey, sorry that I asked this question... didn't mean to start up a major discussion. Simple yes or no would have satisfied my needs. However, does anyone know if there is a standard edition of exchange 2003 in bata or rtm at this time? I have the enterprise edition 120 day eval copy at this time. Once I install it, then I will have to use the enterprise edition (licened version) when the 120 days expires. Ron -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003 Are there any restrictions on running Exchange 2000 on a Windows 2003 platform? Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
I would go with BackupExec 9 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing SMTP addresses in bulk
LDIFDE -Original Message- From: Berry Schreuder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing SMTP addresses in bulk When you add an SMTP address to a recipient policy it adds the addresses to all selected users. How can I remove an (or all) SMTP addresses for all users? Berry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migration Wizard and AutoArchive
When you run the Migration Wizard, imported items get their "Date Modified" property set to the date the Wizard is run. If you want to use AutoArchive in Outlook on Migrated Data, nothing gets migrated because it selects on the Data Modified field. Anyone have any suggestions for a workarround? Berry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
Using a SCSI connected Dell SDLT library backing up the local store I get about 900 Mb/min - before I got the right SCSI device driver for W2K it was dog slow at 150Mb/min. The backup software, the infamous Arcserve ;-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much
Are the users offsite via VPN? Outlook is sensitive to packet fragmentation. Weird stuff occurs like the user can receive email but cannot send it. Try lowering the MTU, stepping down from the max in 10's. Also see if the vpn client or router supports udp encapsulazation. Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much Hello all, Here is my problem We have an Exchange 5.5 server that is constantly giving you the message "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" . This is like every 3rd or 4th message. I'm starting with the NIC's, the server has dual NIC's that are active on the network. I'm thinking one is causing some kind of issues when the server sends the data back, and the client gets confused? I don't know just going on a hunch. I wouldn't think we would need dual NIC's on this server. The NIC's are not teamed, nor is this server clustered. Any advice on troubleshooting this message would be highly appreciated!!! Thank you!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: renaming an exchange server
Like I said... you can't rename it. ;) Your best bet make a new server and move mailbox. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:49 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: renaming an exchange server Subject: RE: renaming an exchange server Actually you can. Its just such an enormous hassle that most people don't want to waste their time. This is why I always name them "mail" or something similar. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft. com: 80/support/kb/articles/q155/2/69.asp&NoWebContent=1&NoWebContent=1 Q. How do you rename the Microsoft Exchange Server computer name? A. Note that this will only work if there is only one Microsoft Exchange Server in the Site. This information can also be found in the Microsoft Exchange Resource Kit. Caution: When you rename a server you lose: All connector/DXA configurations on the server. All non-recipient configurations on the server. All profiles for users that connect to the server. To rename the computer running Microsoft Exchange Server: Disconnect all clients from the server. In the Microsoft Exchange Server Administrator program, select the Server name - Advanced tab. Under IS/DS Consistency Adjustment, select a method for adjusting inconsistencies. This step ensures that the information store is up-to-date. >From the Tools menu, choose Directory Export. Ensure that the Assoc-NT-Account field has been exported. You use this file to restore the mailbox, distribution list, and customer recipient permissions. Quit all Microsoft Exchange Server services. Back up \dsadata\dir.edb. Back up \mdbdata\priv.edb and pub.edb. Run the Microsoft Exchange Server Setup program, and choose Remove All. Restart your computer. and delete \exchsrvr. In the Main program group, double-click Control Panel. Double-click Server and then rename the server. Restart your computer. Run the Microsoft Exchange Server Setup program. Choose the same organization and site names as before. Restart your computer. Quit all Microsoft Exchange Server services. Delete *.log from \dsadata and \mdbdata. Restore \mdbdata\priv.edb and pub.edb. If offline copy, run isinteg -patch. IMPORTANT: Do not restore the files from \dsadata. Restart the Microsoft Exchange Server services. Run the IS/DS Consistency Adjustment again on the private and public Information Stores. The consistency adjustment will re-create the directory without any permissions. Import the directory file created in step 4. Be sure to select Append in the Multi-Valued Properties box. Your server should now be running with the same mailboxes and Public Folders but it will have a new server name. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: renaming an exchange server You cannot rename and exchange server. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davinder Gupta Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: renaming an exchange server Subject: renaming an exchange server Hi Experts, Is it okay to rename an exchange 5.5 server? I understand the hassle of updating Outlook profiles. Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Don't know but since it's gone from the dumpster window, I know of no way to get it back. I doubt the entry is zerored out in the database unless you've set that option, though. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP "Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Good point. Although does that really delete the tombstoned object or not? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:00 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > From the dumpster view you can purge items from the dumpster. > I believe > that is what Mr. Bendall was saying. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP > "One man's Spam is another man's UCE." > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger > Seielstad > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > You are incorrect. > > The Dumpster is really just a view of the items which have been marked > as deleted (i.e. tombstoned) but have not reached the expiration of > the Deleted Item Retention. DIR is just the amount of time which > elapses between the time something has been marked as deleted and the > time it is purged from the information store. > > Long explanation short is that you can ALWAYS recover a deleted item > during the deleted item retension period. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:40 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > > > > Yes purging from deleted item recovery will remove it from the > > dumpster. I doubt Exmerge would do this as it just exports from the > > mailbox so I would assume it does the same on the dumpster which of > > course has to be specifically selected. > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 01 August 2003 19:46 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > > > > Thanks for that - following the article and purging from > the necessary > > folders, it's then unrecoverable, correct? > > > > Would exmerge have removed it from the dumpster too and > achieved the > > same result? > > > > Stu > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > > > > Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on > Exchange > > even if you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on > > Microsoft website. > > This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from > any folder. > > It is retrospective. > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation > > > > > > Ex5.5 > > > > I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is > 'shift-deleted' > > from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The > item does > > not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted > > items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. > > > > Thanks > > > > Stu > > > > > > > > Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this > e-mail and > > any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you > > are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > > dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly > > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please notify > > the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments > > immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any > > attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the > > contents to any other person. > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > ---
RE: New Entourage
Oh no, it's another flamefest developing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Entourage [1] I hate grammar Nazi's. This is email, not English class. G37 0V3R 17!! [2] I did RTFM. I guess I just didn't get to the part about Public Folders not showing up correctly. I figured since I was browsing through the recent posts, I would just ask a simple question and see what others results were before I went home to try and figure it out. I installed it last night, set up the account and looked at the public folders. About 10 minutes of time spent so far. As far as you being too important, I wasn't referring to the free/busy server issue, I was referring to this: > >> [3] And I don't really care all that much because I'm playing with cooler > >> Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than > >> Entourage, which > >> at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs. If you don't really care, why even reply? [3] If everyone RTFM from front to back before they even installed the app, these lists would be little more than haiku Fridays. I think you need to get off your high horse. If your only worth while response is going to be RTFM, then why bother sending an email? -Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uselessthoughts.com - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:32 PM Subject: Re: New Entourage > It's "you're" not "your". And don't blame me for your inability to > RTFM. This is indeed a peer support newsgroup; if you don't like my > responses feel > free to add me to your killfile. I couldn't care less. > > Indicating I don't have time to go troubleshoot free/busy issues on my > machine is hardly an attempt to blow off about how important I am. I > was simply pointing out the only unexpected issue I've seen with the > Exchange update for Entourage. The "issue" you describe seems to be > expected behavior > based on the help files, but I guess you're too important to read > those and > need the rest of us to do your work for you. > > > > From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:08:13 -0500 > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > > > Well your a happy guy. Thanks for the great answer there. For a > > minute I thought this a group to help each other out, not blow off > > about how important we are. > > > > Since I am not at home and not near a Mac with Entourage installed, > > I cant > > really read the help file right now. I figured if you didn't see the same > > issue I would dig further, if you didn't see the same issue, I > > wouldn't worry about it right now. > > > > I would figure the appropriate response would be: > > > > 1. I don't have any public folders of calendar or contact type so I > > cant test it > > > > OR > > > > 2. Yes/No > > > > Since you were so helpful, I wont comment on my status of the > > free/busy server thing either since I have cooler things to play as > > well. > > > > =) > > > > -Mike Carlson > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.uselessthoughts.com > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:48 PM > > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > > > > >> Do I see Have you read the help files yet? The client is > >> working as I > >> would expect it to work for me at the moment based on my reading of > >> the > > help > >> files. With the exception of the free/busy server which I haven't > >> had time > >> to look into.[1] > >> > >> [1] Since Macs aren't supported on my network, it has pretty low > >> priority.[2] [2] Plus it's my Mac, which puts it even lower on the > >> priority list.[3] [3] And I don't really care all that much because > >> I'm playing with cooler > >> Exchange tools for both the PC and Mac at the moment than > >> Entourage, which > >> at the moment is working 'good enough' for my needs. > >> > >>> From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:24:45 -0500 > >>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Subject: Re: New Entourage > >>> > >>> Do you see the same issues of Calendar or Contact type public > >>> folders looking like IMAP folders and not actual contacts or > >>> calendar entries? > >>> > >>> -Mike Carlson > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> http://www.uselessthoughts.com > >>> - Original Message - > >>> From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:05 PM > >>> Subject: Re: New Entourage > >>> > >>> > It works
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
But does it make a beeping noise when it backs up? OSHA regs, you know. -- be - MOS L: The average regulation has a life span one-fifth as long as a chimpanzee's and one-tenth as long as a human's -- but four times as long as the official's who created it. > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > > A fast one. > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:10 PM > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > > > What kind of tape drive do you have? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:00 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > > > I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you > are using. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > > > Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make > sure your IS is > > not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process > > > > Paul > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > > > We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored > Information > > Stores...does brick level also. > > > > Nick Thakkar > > Network Administrator > > American Medical Response > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 209-993-6974 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > > > Hello All. > > > > What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? > Need to do > > brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick > levelstried > > talking them out of it. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Big problem with Public Folders in Exchange 2000
I have noticed that our public folders set up as mailboxes are not working. I can send mail to the public folder, and it gets to the folder, but if I try to open, it hangs (message that Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server . You can cancel request...). The message shows in the upper pane, but the details do not show in the details pane. If I open the folder and try to delete some messages (that are spam), I get a prompt asking if I am sure I want to delete, I click yes, and sometimes I have to do this 3 times before the message dissapears. I have restarted the Exchange server and my PC w/ no luck. All of my mailboxes are working, it is just with the public folders. Also, I created a new public folder as a mailbox for testing and when I try to send a message to that account, auto-complete attempts to guess [EMAIL PROTECTED], but displays tester. The message appears in the preview pane, but the details pane is blank with an informational "This item cannot be displayed in the preview pane. Open the item to read its contents." Can anyone explain what is happening and how to fix this? Sorry for the length, but I wanted to give as much info as possible. FYI - it's Exchange 2000 server, Outlook 2002 clients, no obvious events in event viewer, all pertinent Exchange services seem to be running. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
A fast one. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:10 PM Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > What kind of tape drive do you have? > > -Original Message- > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > I can backup at well over a gig a minute, not sure what you are using. > > -Original Message- > From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > Yeah have to agree...Veritas 8.6 works great. Just make sure your IS is > not that big or you'll be in for a long backup process > > Paul > > -Original Message- > From: Thakkar, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > We use Verits Backup Exec 8.6 works wellhave restored Information > Stores...does brick level also. > > Nick Thakkar > Network Administrator > American Medical Response > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 209-993-6974 > > > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 > > Hello All. > > What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do > brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried > talking them out of it. > > Thanks > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Perhaps OWA, perhaps not...
I had some bad expereinces with OWA on 5.5 For some reason uninstalling and reinstalling then reapply SPs did it. From: Steve Hanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Perhaps OWA, perhaps not... Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:27:15 -0400 NT4.0sp6a + ex 5.5 + owa, this is a small simple exchange deployment with OWA is running so that my warehouse guys can see mail. Yesterday we had a power failure and dispite UPS's my exchange box went down fast (and not quietly). The box came back up but it seems like OWA is now pooched.. I'm not sure if the problem is with IIS or OWA, I would lean more to IIS but I'd like more to go on. I get Event IDs 5 290 1003 1011 (the last two seem more like IIS) I'm also looking at Q184841 XWEB: OWA Component for IIS May Cause Heap Corruption I also can't telnet to :80 on the box anymore. When I try to start the MMC for IIS I get an error cannot connect to mail "the data is invalid" Thoughts --steve Steve Hanna Network/Systems Administrator Niagara Plumbing Supply Company Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is nothing common about sense. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange permissions
Not the permissions I'm looking for though. Jason > -Original Message- > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange permissions > > You can see where the Exchange Org inherits some of the > permissions from. > > -Original Message- > From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange permissions > > What about it? > > If I use ADSIEdit to view the permissions at the Org, I see > the same thing that I see in ESM: Domain and Enterprise > Admins are inheriting allow rights for Send As and Receive > As. If I go up one level in ADSIEdit, to the CN=Microsoft > Exchange container and view the ACL there, the Send As and > Receive As ACE's aren't even there. > > What rights do Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have at > the Org level in your environment? If someone can just tell > me that it would be great. > > Jason > > > -Original Message- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 3:46 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Exchange permissions > > > > ADSIEdit > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:14 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Exchange permissions > > > > I've recently inherited an Exchange 2000 Organization. One of the > > first things that I noticed was that all Domain and Enterprise > > Administrators have the ability to open and read anyone's > mailboxes. > > I've checked the ACL on our mailbox store (we only have > one), and both > > Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have an inherited "Allow" under > > Send As and Receive As. Obviously this is not the default > > configuration. > > > > I've made the registry adjustment listed in Q259221 to > allow me to see > > the security tab at the Org level. Even at the Org level, > Domain and > > Enterprise Admins are still inheriting an allowed Send As > and Receive > > As. > > > > But here's something else I noticed: when I use the > Delegation Wizard > > at the Org level to add an Exchange Full Administrator, and > then check > > the ACL on the Org, the new administrator that I just added gets > > inherited allows on Send As and Receive As, but also gets explicit > > denies on both of those ACE's. From that point down the heirarchy, > > only the explicit deny is inherited. > > > > So my question is this. At the org level, by default, are Domain > > Admins and Enterprise Admins set with inherited allows > > *and* explicit denies on Send As and Receive As? This would > indicate > > to me that perhaps a previous administrator here simply removed the > > explicit deny? > > > > If someone could check the ACL on your Exchange Org and let me know > > what permissions Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have, I'd much > > appreciate it. > > > > Thanks > > > > Jason > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=& > > lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 Backup
Hello All. I noticed that Exchange 2000 can be backed up using the Windows 2000 Backup. Anyone had any experience with this? It looks like it does BLB too! Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Wizard and AutoArchive
Autoarchive prior to running the migration wizard and/or don't use Outlook's autoarchive feature. > From: "Berry Schreuder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 04:18:43 -0700 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Migration Wizard and AutoArchive > > When you run the Migration Wizard, imported items get their "Date > Modified" property set to the date the Wizard is run. > > If you want to use AutoArchive in Outlook on Migrated Data, nothing gets > migrated because it selects on the Data Modified field. > > Anyone have any suggestions for a workarround? > > Berry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: renaming an exchange server
Actually you can. Its just such an enormous hassle that most people don't want to waste their time. This is why I always name them "mail" or something similar. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/q155/2/69.asp&NoWebContent=1&NoWebContent=1 Q. How do you rename the Microsoft Exchange Server computer name? A. Note that this will only work if there is only one Microsoft Exchange Server in the Site. This information can also be found in the Microsoft Exchange Resource Kit. Caution: When you rename a server you lose: All connector/DXA configurations on the server. All non-recipient configurations on the server. All profiles for users that connect to the server. To rename the computer running Microsoft Exchange Server: Disconnect all clients from the server. In the Microsoft Exchange Server Administrator program, select the Server name - Advanced tab. Under IS/DS Consistency Adjustment, select a method for adjusting inconsistencies. This step ensures that the information store is up-to-date. >From the Tools menu, choose Directory Export. Ensure that the Assoc-NT-Account field has been exported. You use this file to restore the mailbox, distribution list, and customer recipient permissions. Quit all Microsoft Exchange Server services. Back up \dsadata\dir.edb. Back up \mdbdata\priv.edb and pub.edb. Run the Microsoft Exchange Server Setup program, and choose Remove All. Restart your computer. and delete \exchsrvr. In the Main program group, double-click Control Panel. Double-click Server and then rename the server. Restart your computer. Run the Microsoft Exchange Server Setup program. Choose the same organization and site names as before. Restart your computer. Quit all Microsoft Exchange Server services. Delete *.log from \dsadata and \mdbdata. Restore \mdbdata\priv.edb and pub.edb. If offline copy, run isinteg -patch. IMPORTANT: Do not restore the files from \dsadata. Restart the Microsoft Exchange Server services. Run the IS/DS Consistency Adjustment again on the private and public Information Stores. The consistency adjustment will re-create the directory without any permissions. Import the directory file created in step 4. Be sure to select Append in the Multi-Valued Properties box. Your server should now be running with the same mailboxes and Public Folders but it will have a new server name. -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: renaming an exchange server You cannot rename and exchange server. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davinder Gupta Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: renaming an exchange server Subject: renaming an exchange server Hi Experts, Is it okay to rename an exchange 5.5 server? I understand the hassle of updating Outlook profiles. Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar anomalies.
Shall we assume you've checked the usual suspects -- clock, time zones, etc.? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 12:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar anomalies. Here's an odd one, suddenly all of my clients calendar entries are 2 hours earlier. Almost as if the system clock was changed from Central to Pacific. Has anyone seen this? I am runnign EX2K SP3 on Win2KSP3 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Exchange
One of those devices is running low on disk space? -Original Message- From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Yes to virus filter. We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can find no settings for limiting the size of e-mail. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Strange Exchange That is exactly what he's saying. Do you have a SMTP Gateway setup to stop spam, or a virus filter, or both? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Exchange Sorry, I am trying to troubleshoot a problem that I have very little knowledge in so if I appear to be a bit slow please forgive me. Your statement saying exchange is not listening confuses me. Are you saying there is some other software running between my exchange server and the rest of the world which is placing its limits on the mail? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Strange Exchange Again, as per the last message you posted and I responded to, this error is not being generated by Exchange. It is being generated by whatever is listening at your default gateway. Your mx record may be labeled exchange.satake-usa.com, but whatever is listening isn't Exchange. nslookup Default Server: m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com Address: 10.0.0.246 > set q=mx > satake-usa.com Server: m1w2ksit01.austin.messageone.com Address: 10.0.0.246 Non-authoritative answer: satake-usa.com preference = 10, mail exchanger = exchange.satake-usa.com Authoritative answers can be found from: satake-usa.com nameserver = ns2.satake-usa.com satake-usa.com nameserver = ns1.satake-usa.com exchange.satake-usa.com internet address = 66.139.24.50 telnet exchange.satake-usa.com 25 Trying 66.139.24.50... Connected to exchange.satake-usa.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 SMTP service ready ehlo foo.bar 250-Requested mail action okay, completed 250-HELP 250 SIZE 3072000 Whatever is listening does indeed have a storage limit. I'm not sure why 30 seconds of research is not possible by anyone else on the list this morning, but the answer seems abundantly clear once one stops throwing out wild guesses and actually applies some kind of methodology to troubleshooting. > From: "Don Bruess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:41:17 -0700 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Strange Exchange > > I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending > large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a > per messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal > box has no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when > this started happening but I do know I use to be able to receive any > size files. Is there another settings somewhere I have missed? It > appears to be limiting e-mail to around 2 meg max and is applying the > same rule to the entire exchange server. > > Thanks, > dl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.c
RE: error messages 2
Could you be blocked from sending to them because you are an open relay site and someone may have you blacklisted? Check out your IP address on one of the Blacklist search engines to check it out. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Kim Schotanus > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:48 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: error messages 2 > > This is the second type of error message that people get, and a lot more > frequent: > > The email address could not be found. Check the email address and send > again. The MTS-ID of the original message is > MSEXCH:IMS:BMUK:Freyung:BMUKNT02 3550 (000B09B6) 550 5.7.1 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...Relaying denied > > Anyone have a clue? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la > ng=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Exchange
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Exchange I think someone needs a nap. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange Exchange I'm not sure why 30 seconds of research is not possible by anyone else on the list this morning, but the answer seems abundantly clear once one stops throwing out wild guesses and actually applies some kind of methodology to troubleshooting. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature
Yes it's a registry key that is set. When set affects all users of that domain however you can also set for an individual that will overide the system setting. 1024 is for all folders to show up. I have the settings at work but are also available on MS's site via http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;311154 If you need the exact settings they are in the book Exchange 24/7 by Jm McBee From: "McBee, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:01:25 -1000 Hi everyone: I'm looking for some information on a feature in Exchange 2003 and I have used up all of my ideas on how to find out more info. It was called OWA segmentation in Exchange 2000 and was introduced in Exchange 2000 SP2. It allowed you to turn off public folders, the calendar, contacts, etc.. for certain users. This was either a registry key or an attribute you had to add to the W2K AD. However, it is included in E2K3's schema extensions. However, I cannot find ANY information on the actual values. It is essentially a bit mask, but I can't figure out what the bits mean. Below is the only text I have been able to find on it, and this was in the release notes. The schema attribute name is: msExchMailboxFolderSet I have a customer that is using this in E2K and we are building a 'proof-of-concept' lab for E2K3 and we cannot get this to work. It is driving me crazy and I'm almost thinking I need to open up a PSS incident just to get the documentation on this feature. I was hoping you might be able to find more documentation on this. Any ideas? Thanks, Jim McBee Per-user Feature Segmentation in Outlook Web Access May Require Modification of User Object to Use All Features Outlook Web Access allows you to enable specific sets of features on a server or for individual users. For example, you can enable only Calendar and Messaging. To set this feature segmentation per user, you modify the msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the User object in Active Directory. The value of this attribute determines which features are available to the user. In Exchange 2000, the decimal value for enabling all features on a per-user basis was 1023 (or 0x3FF in hexadecimal). In Exchange 2003, the value has changed. The new decimal value is 4294967295 (0x in hexadecimal). If you had previously enabled all features using feature segmentation, you will need to update the value of the msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the user object to this new value. If you do not update this value, users may not be able to use all the Outlook Web Access features. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature
Sorry couldn't resist From: "McBee, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:18:23 -1000 Hee hee hee I think I have that book somewhere... Actually, the settings have changed between E2K and E2K3. I think there are a few more things you can turn on/off in E2K3. Unfortunately, no one seems to know what the settings are. Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:34 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature Yes it's a registry key that is set. When set affects all users of that domain however you can also set for an individual that will overide the system setting. 1024 is for all folders to show up. I have the settings at work but are also available on MS's site via http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;311154 If you need the exact settings they are in the book Exchange 24/7 by Jm McBee From: "McBee, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:01:25 -1000 Hi everyone: I'm looking for some information on a feature in Exchange 2003 and I have used up all of my ideas on how to find out more info. It was called OWA segmentation in Exchange 2000 and was introduced in Exchange 2000 SP2. It allowed you to turn off public folders, the calendar, contacts, etc.. for certain users. This was either a registry key or an attribute you had to add to the W2K AD. However, it is included in E2K3's schema extensions. However, I cannot find ANY information on the actual values. It is essentially a bit mask, but I can't figure out what the bits mean. Below is the only text I have been able to find on it, and this was in the release notes. The schema attribute name is: msExchMailboxFolderSet I have a customer that is using this in E2K and we are building a 'proof-of-concept' lab for E2K3 and we cannot get this to work. It is driving me crazy and I'm almost thinking I need to open up a PSS incident just to get the documentation on this feature. I was hoping you might be able to find more documentation on this. Any ideas? Thanks, Jim McBee Per-user Feature Segmentation in Outlook Web Access May Require Modification of User Object to Use All Features Outlook Web Access allows you to enable specific sets of features on a server or for individual users. For example, you can enable only Calendar and Messaging. To set this feature segmentation per user, you modify the msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the User object in Active Directory. The value of this attribute determines which features are available to the user. In Exchange 2000, the decimal value for enabling all features on a per-user basis was 1023 (or 0x3FF in hexadecimal). In Exchange 2003, the value has changed. The new decimal value is 4294967295 (0x in hexadecimal). If you had previously enabled all features using feature segmentation, you will need to update the value of the msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the user object to this new value. If you do not update this value, users may not be able to use all the Outlook Web Access features. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-d
RE: Watch Out - New Virus
I don't handle the Trend side of the house. What is SUS without getting flamed From: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:47:19 -0700 Keep us updated. I'm thinking about using SUS, and this is a good example of where it would be useful... > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > thanks, I had gotten that. When I was running the active > update from the > scanmail interface I was getting the error. After about 30 > or so tries I > got the update downloaded to my system. > Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us. > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > It wraps add LAST.A to the end > > > > From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700 > > Aye > > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > is anyone else getting the update source not found error? > > -Original Message- > From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Watch Out - New Virus > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VNam > e=WORM_MSB > LAST.A > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K migration issue
Oops, I missed the part about them not being on the same ORG. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K migration issue Hmmm. No, it won't work if they're not in the same ORG. I'd follow Chris's link from before regarding some of the command line utilities from Slipstick. Use one of those to generate/modify the profile during login. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K migration issue Not too sure that will work. The E2K servers are in AD will the 5.5 servers are not. Also, the E2K servers are in a new Exchange ORG. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K migration issue Leave up the old Ex5.5 server for a little while. Outlook will see that it's mailbox has moved to a new server, and update the profile itself. Steven --- Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K migration issue Hello all, I was wondering if anyone out there knew of way to script Outlook profile changes. We are doing an E2K migration and I am looking for a way to automate the changes to the users Outlook profile. We are building out brand new E2K servers and exporting/importing all the mail from 5.5 to the E2K servers and need to point the users at the new servers. Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000
- Original Message - From: "Matt Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:43 PM Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > Well, these things are a matter of money and time. Money for a test lab and > a new copy of Exchange. We purchased E2K a while ago and have not had the > AD environment to install it in until recently. It's what we bought, so > it's what we're using... Off the top of your head, does E2K3 need to be in > a Win2K3 AD or can it run in a Win2K AD? > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > > That's why test labs rock... And in addition to just reading the E2K3 help, > I'd strongly recommend migration to it over E2K. > > > From: Matt Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:37:33 -0400 > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > > > OK, wonderful. That will be a big help. Of course I understand that > > whitepapers are written to be the guides to a correct installation. > > However, my experiences have told me that you're much better off > > verifying that the information in such a document is correct first > > before trusting it completely. I've had too many such instructions > > leave out some critical component that meant many more hours of hassle > > instead of a nice clean install. > > > > Matt > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:59 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > > > > > Have a look at the Exchange 2003 help. They have a step by step > > walkthrough of all the upgrade/migration paths. Its basically a > > stripped down version of whats in the whitepapers but its layed out > > like a checklist. > > > > These whitepapers are not "junk". Understanding then can mean the > > difference between a failed or successful upgrade. > > > > - Peter > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:49 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > > > I'm beginning the process of an in-place upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 > > to Exchange 2000, and I wanted to make sure I had the right ideas > > about how to go about this. > > > > 1. I downloaded the In-Place Upgrade Whitepaper from Microsoft. Is > > this a definitive document or is there something in the document that > > is, in your experience, junk? I'd hate to follow this and find out MS > > has something wrong... > > > > 2. The server that 5.5 currently resides on is Windows 2000, SP 3, > > and is in an NT 4.0 domain at the moment. I assume I need to bring it > > into the AD before I can begin this upgrade process? Should I do this > > only if I want to avoid having to use the ASD connectors? I'm a bit > > confused on this point. > > > > 3. I'm trying to get my AD administrators to allow my domain admins > > to have the ability to update the schema (for my domain at least). I > > realize we need this, at least according to this whitepaper and the > > list FAQ. > > > > 4. My domain is already in native mode, so that isn't a problem. > > I've also transferred all the old user accounts from my NT 4.0 domain > > over using the migration wizard, so the SID's should be the same for > > the accounts when the users attempt to access their mailboxes after > > the upgrade. > > > > 5. I'm planning on doing a full online backup before doing anything, > > of course. > > > > I'm doing my best to read through all the information I can find on > > this topic, but there are often things that are missing from such > > documents. > > > > Is there anything obviously wrong with what I've talked about above? > > Any specific pointers to give on this process? > > > > Thank you very much, > > > > Matt > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > > =&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode > > =&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _
Re: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature
And one more to help. But it does not explain all of the options. If you still need the list I will send it to you offline tomorrow. I have used and it works just fine. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;311154 From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:34:27 -0400 Yes it's a registry key that is set. When set affects all users of that domain however you can also set for an individual that will overide the system setting. 1024 is for all folders to show up. I have the settings at work but are also available on MS's site via http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;311154 If you need the exact settings they are in the book Exchange 24/7 by Jm McBee From: "McBee, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:01:25 -1000 Hi everyone: I'm looking for some information on a feature in Exchange 2003 and I have used up all of my ideas on how to find out more info. It was called OWA segmentation in Exchange 2000 and was introduced in Exchange 2000 SP2. It allowed you to turn off public folders, the calendar, contacts, etc.. for certain users. This was either a registry key or an attribute you had to add to the W2K AD. However, it is included in E2K3's schema extensions. However, I cannot find ANY information on the actual values. It is essentially a bit mask, but I can't figure out what the bits mean. Below is the only text I have been able to find on it, and this was in the release notes. The schema attribute name is: msExchMailboxFolderSet I have a customer that is using this in E2K and we are building a 'proof-of-concept' lab for E2K3 and we cannot get this to work. It is driving me crazy and I'm almost thinking I need to open up a PSS incident just to get the documentation on this feature. I was hoping you might be able to find more documentation on this. Any ideas? Thanks, Jim McBee Per-user Feature Segmentation in Outlook Web Access May Require Modification of User Object to Use All Features Outlook Web Access allows you to enable specific sets of features on a server or for individual users. For example, you can enable only Calendar and Messaging. To set this feature segmentation per user, you modify the msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the User object in Active Directory. The value of this attribute determines which features are available to the user. In Exchange 2000, the decimal value for enabling all features on a per-user basis was 1023 (or 0x3FF in hexadecimal). In Exchange 2003, the value has changed. The new decimal value is 4294967295 (0x in hexadecimal). If you had previously enabled all features using feature segmentation, you will need to update the value of the msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the user object to this new value. If you do not update this value, users may not be able to use all the Outlook Web Access features. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature
Here is a link that will take you to the values for Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange2003/appendixc.asp Jeff > -Original Message- > From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature > > > Hee hee hee > I think I have that book somewhere... > > Actually, the settings have changed between E2K and E2K3. I > think there are a few more things you can turn on/off in E2K3. > Unfortunately, no one seems to know what the settings are. > > Thanks, > Jim > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:34 AM > Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List > Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature > Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature > > > > Yes it's a registry key that is set. When set affects all > users of that > domain however you can also set for an individual that will > overide the > system setting. 1024 is for all folders to show up. I have > the settings > at work but are also available on MS's site via > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;311154 If you > need the exact settings they are in the book Exchange 24/7 by Jm McBee > > From: "McBee, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:01:25 -1000 > > Hi everyone: > I'm looking for some information on a feature in > Exchange 2003 and > I have used up all of my ideas on how to find out more info. It was > called OWA segmentation in Exchange 2000 and was introduced > in Exchange > 2000 SP2. It allowed you to turn off public folders, the calendar, > contacts, etc.. for certain users. This was either a > registry key or an > attribute you had to add to the W2K AD. However, it is included in > E2K3's schema extensions. > > However, I cannot find ANY information on the actual > values. It is > essentially a bit mask, but I can't figure out what the bits mean. > Below is the only text I have been able to find on it, and this was in > the release notes. The schema attribute name is: > msExchMailboxFolderSet > > I have a customer that is using this in E2K and we are building a > 'proof-of-concept' lab for E2K3 and we cannot get this to work. It is > driving me crazy and I'm almost thinking I need to open up a PSS > incident just to get the documentation on this feature. I was hoping > you might be able to find more documentation on this. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Jim McBee > > > Per-user Feature Segmentation in Outlook Web Access May Require > Modification of User Object to Use All Features Outlook Web Access > allows you to enable specific sets of features on a server or for > individual users. For example, you can enable only Calendar and > Messaging. To set this feature segmentation per user, you modify the > msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the User object in Active > Directory. > The value of this attribute determines which features are available to > the user. > > In Exchange 2000, the decimal value for enabling all features on a > per-user basis was 1023 (or 0x3FF in hexadecimal). In > Exchange 2003, the > value has changed. The new decimal value is 4294967295 (0x in > hexadecimal). If you had previously enabled all features using feature > segmentation, you will need to update the value of the > msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the user object to this new value. > If you do not update this value, users may not be able to use all the > Outlook Web Access features. > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
RE: Watch Out - New Virus
Iis, windows family 2k or higher, ie, and something I cant remember. lol -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus SUS is software update services. Like windowsupdate, but automated and internal to an organization. It, IIRC, distributes and installs critical updates for Windows, not Outlook/Office. Erick > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > I don't handle the Trend side of the house. What is SUS without > getting flamed > > > From: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:47:19 -0700 > > Keep us updated. I'm thinking about using SUS, and this is a good > example of where it would be useful... > > > -Original Message- > > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:38 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > > > > thanks, I had gotten that. When I was running the active > > update from the > > scanmail interface I was getting the error. After about 30 > > or so tries I > > got the update downloaded to my system. > > Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:44 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > > > > It wraps add LAST.A to the end > > > > > > > > From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700 > > > > Aye > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > > is anyone else getting the update source not found error? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Watch Out - New Virus > > > > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VNam > > e=WORM_MSB > > LAST.A > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 ___
RE: Strange Exchange
The disk has 12gig left on it so I don't think that is the problem. Don -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Strange Exchange Could it be that the someone is sending a file that would take up all the rest of the disk space you have reserved for Exchange? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Exchange I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a per messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal box has no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when this started happening but I do know I use to be able to receive any size files. Is there another settings somewhere I have missed? It appears to be limiting e-mail to around 2 meg max and is applying the same rule to the entire exchange server. Thanks, dl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000
Upgrading without testing isn't something I would do... Well, I might do it[1] since I've already done of couple of E2K migrations in the past. E2K3 has simplified a number of things, making the upgrade process more intuitive and less risky.[3] Still, understanding what the process is by actually attempting to complete each step in a lab, even if it's a VMWare instance or two on your desktop, is prudent and reasonable.[4] BTW, there is no schema for your domain. There is a schema for the entire forest and the changes you make regarding Exchange to the schema will have effects on everyone else in your forest. No idea what the scope of your forest is, but just wanted to make sure you were aware of what the minor implications of that might be (like there can only be one Exchange org per forest). Oh, and in-place upgrades are the riskiest possible upgrades. I'd highly recommend against such a path even if you do get around to testing.[5] [1] If I still did E2K migrations.[2] [2] Which don't. [3] Which is part of the reason I only do those now. [4] If you don't have the money or time to test implementing E2K, then I can guarantee you don't have the time or money to troubleshoot and fix a broken install. [5] Another reason I like E2K3, since it doesn't allow in place upgrades. > From: Matt Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:43:06 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > Well, these things are a matter of money and time. Money for a test lab and > a new copy of Exchange. We purchased E2K a while ago and have not had the > AD environment to install it in until recently. It's what we bought, so > it's what we're using... Off the top of your head, does E2K3 need to be in > a Win2K3 AD or can it run in a Win2K AD? > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > > That's why test labs rock... And in addition to just reading the E2K3 help, > I'd strongly recommend migration to it over E2K. > >> From: Matt Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:37:33 -0400 >> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 >> >> OK, wonderful. That will be a big help. Of course I understand that >> whitepapers are written to be the guides to a correct installation. >> However, my experiences have told me that you're much better off >> verifying that the information in such a document is correct first >> before trusting it completely. I've had too many such instructions >> leave out some critical component that meant many more hours of hassle >> instead of a nice clean install. >> >> Matt >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:59 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 >> >> >> Have a look at the Exchange 2003 help. They have a step by step >> walkthrough of all the upgrade/migration paths. Its basically a >> stripped down version of whats in the whitepapers but its layed out >> like a checklist. >> >> These whitepapers are not "junk". Understanding then can mean the >> difference between a failed or successful upgrade. >> >> - Peter >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:49 AM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 >> >> I'm beginning the process of an in-place upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 >> to Exchange 2000, and I wanted to make sure I had the right ideas >> about how to go about this. >> >> 1. I downloaded the In-Place Upgrade Whitepaper from Microsoft. Is >> this a definitive document or is there something in the document that >> is, in your experience, junk? I'd hate to follow this and find out MS >> has something wrong... >> >> 2. The server that 5.5 currently resides on is Windows 2000, SP 3, >> and is in an NT 4.0 domain at the moment. I assume I need to bring it >> into the AD before I can begin this upgrade process? Should I do this >> only if I want to avoid having to use the ASD connectors? I'm a bit >> confused on this point. >> >> 3. I'm trying to get my AD administrators to allow my domain admins >> to have the ability to update the schema (for my domain at least). I >> realize we need this, at least according to this whitepaper and the >> list FAQ. >> >> 4. My domain is already in native mode, so that isn't a problem. >> I've also transferred all the old user accounts from my NT 4.0 domain >> over using the migration wizard, so the SID's should be the same for >> the accounts when t
RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000
Have a look at the Exchange 2003 help. They have a step by step walkthrough of all the upgrade/migration paths. Its basically a stripped down version of whats in the whitepapers but its layed out like a checklist. These whitepapers are not "junk". Understanding then can mean the difference between a failed or successful upgrade. - Peter -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 I'm beginning the process of an in-place upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exchange 2000, and I wanted to make sure I had the right ideas about how to go about this. 1. I downloaded the In-Place Upgrade Whitepaper from Microsoft. Is this a definitive document or is there something in the document that is, in your experience, junk? I'd hate to follow this and find out MS has something wrong... 2. The server that 5.5 currently resides on is Windows 2000, SP 3, and is in an NT 4.0 domain at the moment. I assume I need to bring it into the AD before I can begin this upgrade process? Should I do this only if I want to avoid having to use the ASD connectors? I'm a bit confused on this point. 3. I'm trying to get my AD administrators to allow my domain admins to have the ability to update the schema (for my domain at least). I realize we need this, at least according to this whitepaper and the list FAQ. 4. My domain is already in native mode, so that isn't a problem. I've also transferred all the old user accounts from my NT 4.0 domain over using the migration wizard, so the SID's should be the same for the accounts when the users attempt to access their mailboxes after the upgrade. 5. I'm planning on doing a full online backup before doing anything, of course. I'm doing my best to read through all the information I can find on this topic, but there are often things that are missing from such documents. Is there anything obviously wrong with what I've talked about above? Any specific pointers to give on this process? Thank you very much, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2003 OWA segmentation feature
Hi everyone: I'm looking for some information on a feature in Exchange 2003 and I have used up all of my ideas on how to find out more info. It was called OWA segmentation in Exchange 2000 and was introduced in Exchange 2000 SP2. It allowed you to turn off public folders, the calendar, contacts, etc.. for certain users. This was either a registry key or an attribute you had to add to the W2K AD. However, it is included in E2K3's schema extensions. However, I cannot find ANY information on the actual values. It is essentially a bit mask, but I can't figure out what the bits mean. Below is the only text I have been able to find on it, and this was in the release notes. The schema attribute name is: msExchMailboxFolderSet I have a customer that is using this in E2K and we are building a 'proof-of-concept' lab for E2K3 and we cannot get this to work. It is driving me crazy and I'm almost thinking I need to open up a PSS incident just to get the documentation on this feature. I was hoping you might be able to find more documentation on this. Any ideas? Thanks, Jim McBee Per-user Feature Segmentation in Outlook Web Access May Require Modification of User Object to Use All Features Outlook Web Access allows you to enable specific sets of features on a server or for individual users. For example, you can enable only Calendar and Messaging. To set this feature segmentation per user, you modify the msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the User object in Active Directory. The value of this attribute determines which features are available to the user. In Exchange 2000, the decimal value for enabling all features on a per-user basis was 1023 (or 0x3FF in hexadecimal). In Exchange 2003, the value has changed. The new decimal value is 4294967295 (0x in hexadecimal). If you had previously enabled all features using feature segmentation, you will need to update the value of the msExchMailboxFolderSet attribute on the user object to this new value. If you do not update this value, users may not be able to use all the Outlook Web Access features. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working
Did you check the Internet Mail Service's "Disable automatic replies to the Internet" setting? Even if it looks like it's set right, stop and restart the Internet Mail Service just to be sure. Be aware that enabling this is dangerous. If one of your users, say, mistypes an address in a rule, you could end up with a mail loop that, unchecked, could use up all your disk space and kill your system. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Urgent Help - Email forwarding stop working Dear all, Basically a lot of staff are forwarding their email to another account for reading it out of hours or when travelling. Both the out of office assistant and the rules wizard are used for this purpose by different staff For unknown reason for a months now, this email forwarding feature no longer works and no obvious errors found. Exchange MailBox Server = Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4 level runs on NT4 member server with OS SP6a Exchange Internet Mail Service server = Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4 level BUT runs on Windows 2000 member server with OS SP3 Client version = MS Outlook XP The only difference is we have upgraded the Exchange IMC Server OS from NT4.0 to Windows 2000 last month. Can someone give me some hints where the problems could be? Thanks in advanced. Regards, BY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pipe dream or possible
The glitch is since this morning 8.30 Brussels time With ups and downs -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 14:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible Going on the information provided I'd say it was a glitch of some sort. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 August 2003 13:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible Does anyone have a clue how it is possible that our network is having severe ups and downs in connectivity. Connections to the AD and exchange are very unstable, we have the latest AV updates (trend), switches are ok, etc... Any clues? Kim The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange2K (or 2003) and Outlook 2K2
I created an external contact in a new OU in the AD of a Win2K3 Ent server that is also running Exchange 2K3 (RC1). So the client is using Outlook Express 6.1 with all patch's, we are using Outlook2K2 SPK2 all the patch's. If we send using RTF, the attachments are no where to be found. If I change the properties in the contact so in the GAL it is plain text only, that is fine. It is ok for now but in the future there will be a need to utilize RTF. I looked in the MS Support and found a couple articles that seemed to relate to this but mentioned they were fixed in SPK's for Exchange 2000. Have I missing something in the creation of the external contact? In 5.5 utilizing RTF for external contacts was good if you knew they were using MS email products on the other end. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Question
Thanks for the responses guys and gals. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Question Once permissions are set to share on the bosses go to the shared users outlook then use file|open|other user's folder From: "John Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Calendar Question Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:31:41 -0500 I understand the aspect of setting the perms on his worksation(Outlook) but, how do I set her up so she can see it? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Question You should tell your boss how to do by setting permissions in Outlook. Otherwise, you'd have to log into his mailbox, which isn't a great idea. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Question I have yet to do this but... What do I need to do is give my assisatant access to my bosses clendar in outlook. What do I need to do to make it so she can view his calendar from her desktop? Thanks Ahead of time. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus I don't handle the Trend side of the house. What is SUS without getting flamed From: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:47:19 -0700 Keep us updated. I'm thinking about using SUS, and this is a good example of where it would be useful... > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > thanks, I had gotten that. When I was running the active > update from the > scanmail interface I was getting the error. After about 30 > or so tries I > got the update downloaded to my system. > Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us. > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > It wraps add LAST.A to the end > > > > From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700 > > Aye > > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > is anyone else getting the update source not found error? > > -Original Message- > From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Watch Out - New Virus > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VNam > e=WORM_MSB > LAST.A > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscri
Re: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000
That's why test labs rock... And in addition to just reading the E2K3 help, I'd strongly recommend migration to it over E2K. > From: Matt Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:37:33 -0400 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > OK, wonderful. That will be a big help. Of course I understand that > whitepapers are written to be the guides to a correct installation. > However, my experiences have told me that you're much better off verifying > that the information in such a document is correct first before trusting it > completely. I've had too many such instructions leave out some critical > component that meant many more hours of hassle instead of a nice clean > install. > > Matt > > -Original Message- > From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > > Have a look at the Exchange 2003 help. They have a step by step walkthrough > of all the upgrade/migration paths. Its basically a stripped down version > of whats in the whitepapers but its layed out like a checklist. > > These whitepapers are not "junk". Understanding then can mean the > difference between a failed or successful upgrade. > > - Peter > > > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 > > I'm beginning the process of an in-place upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to > Exchange 2000, and I wanted to make sure I had the right ideas about how to > go about this. > > 1. I downloaded the In-Place Upgrade Whitepaper from Microsoft. Is this a > definitive document or is there something in the document that is, in your > experience, junk? I'd hate to follow this and find out MS has something > wrong... > > 2. The server that 5.5 currently resides on is Windows 2000, SP 3, and is > in an NT 4.0 domain at the moment. I assume I need to bring it into the AD > before I can begin this upgrade process? Should I do this only if I want to > avoid having to use the ASD connectors? I'm a bit confused on this point. > > 3. I'm trying to get my AD administrators to allow my domain admins to have > the ability to update the schema (for my domain at least). I realize we > need this, at least according to this whitepaper and the list FAQ. > > 4. My domain is already in native mode, so that isn't a problem. I've also > transferred all the old user accounts from my NT 4.0 domain over using the > migration wizard, so the SID's should be the same for the accounts when the > users attempt to access their mailboxes after the upgrade. > > 5. I'm planning on doing a full online backup before doing anything, of > course. > > I'm doing my best to read through all the information I can find on this > topic, but there are often things that are missing from such documents. > > Is there anything obviously wrong with what I've talked about above? Any > specific pointers to give on this process? > > Thank you very much, > > Matt > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e > nglish > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Exchange
But the mailbox has no limits on either the individual or the default. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Strange Exchange Its not the attachment per se that's too big. Its that it is causing the mailbox to go over its size limit. -Original Message- From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Exchange The original message was received at Fri, 8 Aug 2003 05:34:09 -0700 (PDT) from localhost [127.0.0.1] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (reason: 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation) - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to exchange.satake-usa.com.: >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE'80870 <<< 552 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable - Message header follows - Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ElCapitan.ad.unocal.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unogate.unocal.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h78CY4pQ015614 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 05:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Halfdome.ad.unocal.com ([134.248.1.120]) by ElCapitan.ad.unocal.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 8 Aug 2003 05:34:04 -0700 Received: from slexch2.ad.unocal.com ([134.248.127.15]) by Halfdome.ad.unocal.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 8 Aug 2003 05:33:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject:FW: All updated presentation Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01C35DA9.45821769" Disposition-Notification-To: "Bruess, Chunju " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:33:29 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: All updated presentation Thread-Index: AcMCvtqAuvtPm9kjTumOUFa73R55mRa6j3Mg From: "Bruess, Chunju " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2003 12:33:36.0070 (UTC) FILETIME=[49833E60:01C35DA9] - Message body suppressed - -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Strange Exchange Please post the complete NDR -Original Message- From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Exchange I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a per messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal box has no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when this started happening but I do know I use to be able to receive any size files. Is there another settings somewhere I have missed? It appears to be limiting e-mail to around 2 meg max and is applying the same rule to the entire exchange server. Thanks, dl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Watch Out - New Virus
Also: www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.blaster.worm.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Watch Out - New Virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB LAST.A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pipe dream or possible BECOMES problems
Have you run a network trace? If so do you notice bursts of traffic? An unusual number of broadcasts? A lot of traffic to / from one source or on one port? Are these outages occurring at regular intervals? Have any patches been applied to any of the servers recently? -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 August 2003 13:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible BECOMES problems Situation: 5 win2K servers, 2 Domain controllers, Exch2K, SQL2K and Sharepoint on 1 machine, Cisco switches (2950), ... I rebooted all servers, unplugged switches, complete AV checkup What can I do more? I can ping all servers from my workstation without problems/delays The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect
Trend has an unstable scan engine. I have had to upgrade to their non-ga of 6.6 in order to resolve the problem you are experiencing. I have had to do this on all servers globally. I would contact them and isolate the issue to the modular engine they have in their product line. I had the same problem and several others over the past two months. Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect This looks like results of being hacked because the patch from MS03-026 has not been applied. (It may have been applied at one time and somebody reran an older SP on the system) Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HongKong Posted At: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:07 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect Subject: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect Does anyone have a problem running Trend Micro Server Protect with E2K? We have a E2K server would not mount Priv1.edb store. This problem occured last week and we isolated it to Trend Micro Server Protect. Everytime we enabled Trend Micro Server Protect, E2K crashed (i.e. priv1.edb would not mount). We had not change anything on the server. Trend Server Protect has been on our E2K for the last three years without a problem. Event logs showed the followings: System Log Error 7031 the RPC service terminated unexpectedly. Application log error 9099 the MAD monitoring thread was unable to read the state of services Application log error 9097 The Mad monitoring thread was unable to connect ot WMI 0x8007005 (This last error 9087 repeated every 5 minutes until the problem was correct.) Application log error 4097 COM+ event system detected a bad return code 8007005 (this error recurs at each attempted log on). Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migrating from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange2000
Hello ! We have just finished migrating our Exchange 5.5 users to Exchange 2000. A two-way-trust was established between the domains. The users log on in NT domain and the Exchange2000 server is in W2K domain . The rights on mailboxes is set in the following way : user in NT domain is associated external account and has full mailbox access to mailbox in W2K domain. After the migration users are not able to access other users calendar folder. The message "unable to display folder" is displayed when they try to access another users calendar. Solution ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Watch Out - New Virus
thanks, I had gotten that. When I was running the active update from the scanmail interface I was getting the error. After about 30 or so tries I got the update downloaded to my system. Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus It wraps add LAST.A to the end From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700 Aye -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus is anyone else getting the update source not found error? -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Watch Out - New Virus http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB LAST.A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000
Samantha, Thanks for the offer. If anything comes up I'll be sure to check with you. And thanks for the vote of confidence in the whitepaper... My techie paranoia alarms are just going off on this one. Matt -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 Hello. I did an in-place upgrade this past weekend. It is now Monday and all 1000 users have logged into Outlookno problems reported as of yet. If I can be of any assistance to you or you want to ask a specific question, please don't hesitate to ask. I used the MS White Paper on In-place Upgrades. Samantha -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 OK, wonderful. That will be a big help. Of course I understand that whitepapers are written to be the guides to a correct installation. However, my experiences have told me that you're much better off verifying that the information in such a document is correct first before trusting it completely. I've had too many such instructions leave out some critical component that meant many more hours of hassle instead of a nice clean install. Matt -Original Message- From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 Have a look at the Exchange 2003 help. They have a step by step walkthrough of all the upgrade/migration paths. Its basically a stripped down version of whats in the whitepapers but its layed out like a checklist. These whitepapers are not "junk". Understanding then can mean the difference between a failed or successful upgrade. - Peter -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exch. 2000 I'm beginning the process of an in-place upgrade from Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exchange 2000, and I wanted to make sure I had the right ideas about how to go about this. 1. I downloaded the In-Place Upgrade Whitepaper from Microsoft. Is this a definitive document or is there something in the document that is, in your experience, junk? I'd hate to follow this and find out MS has something wrong... 2. The server that 5.5 currently resides on is Windows 2000, SP 3, and is in an NT 4.0 domain at the moment. I assume I need to bring it into the AD before I can begin this upgrade process? Should I do this only if I want to avoid having to use the ASD connectors? I'm a bit confused on this point. 3. I'm trying to get my AD administrators to allow my domain admins to have the ability to update the schema (for my domain at least). I realize we need this, at least according to this whitepaper and the list FAQ. 4. My domain is already in native mode, so that isn't a problem. I've also transferred all the old user accounts from my NT 4.0 domain over using the migration wizard, so the SID's should be the same for the accounts when the users attempt to access their mailboxes after the upgrade. 5. I'm planning on doing a full online backup before doing anything, of course. I'm doing my best to read through all the information I can find on this topic, but there are often things that are missing from such documents. Is there anything obviously wrong with what I've talked about above? Any specific pointers to give on this process? Thank you very much, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailt
Re: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect
Mr. Kong, I assume you've excluded the Exchange working directories from being scanned by your file based AV product, is that correct? > From: "HongKong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:06:47 -0700 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: E2K and Trend Micro Server Protect > > Does anyone have a problem running Trend Micro Server > Protect with E2K? We have a E2K server would not mount > Priv1.edb store. This problem occured last week and we > isolated it to Trend Micro Server Protect. Everytime we > enabled Trend Micro Server Protect, E2K crashed (i.e. > priv1.edb would not mount). We had not change anything on > the server. Trend Server Protect has been on our E2K for > the last three years without a problem. Event logs showed > the followings: > > System Log Error 7031 the RPC service terminated > unexpectedly. > > Application log error 9099 the MAD monitoring thread was > unable to read the state of services > > Application log error 9097 The Mad monitoring thread was > unable to connect ot WMI 0x8007005 (This last error 9087 > repeated every 5 minutes until the problem was correct.) > > Application log error 4097 COM+ event system detected a > bad return code 8007005 (this error recurs at each > attempted log on). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pipe dream or possible
No, but how can it be that now, when everyone has left (so also those laptops) that I can't find any trace of it? Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 16:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible None the less, I know where my bet is just because you are reporting the sudden onset of symptoms very typical to this problem. You don't have any machines that pass through the firewall (exchange front end outside the firewall for example?) or laptops who travel with bosses or sales peoples and as such have a slightly "spotty" patch record? Or worse still, the know it all who plugs in their personal laptop without telling you they are doing it. You only need one infected machine on a network to cause disruption from what I've seen. Can you guarantee that every single machine on your network is patched up to date and virus defs up to date and there is no way one could slip through the net. > -Original Message- > From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 August 2003 15:32 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible > > I do have a firewall (with port 135 closed) and update 606 of > Trend doesn't find any viruses on the entire network > (scanmail, serverprotect and officescan) > > Kim > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 16:20 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible > > > But I have a firewall! :) > > -Original Message- > From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:47 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible > > Well if it just started in the past few days I'd guess you were having > trouble with a machine or two running that nice friendly RPC-exploit > exploiting worm. No real reason other than half the world seems to be > having problems with it. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 12 August 2003 13:35 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible > > > > Does anyone have a clue how it is possible that our network is > > having severe ups and downs in connectivity. Connections to the AD > > and exchange are very unstable, we have the latest AV updates > > (trend), switches are ok, etc... Any clues? > > > > Kim > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOW TO hide Public folders view in OWA - - E2K
Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this. Doctor: Well, don't do that! Undo whatever you did and instead restrict access to the top level public folder(s) under All Public Folders. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOW TO hide Public folders view in OWA - - E2K I do not use Public Folders, and want to hide the Public folders view from all users. When users login with OWA and click on the folders list, they get an "Access denied" error. How can I enable it so that this window does not pop-up everytime they go to the folders list view in OWA? This is a Win 2K E2K FE/BE setup. John Q Jr. _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pipe dream or possible
Write an event sink or server side script to do it.. Www.cdolive.com is a good place to start > From: "Brett Wesoloski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:46:35 -0500 > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: pipe dream or possible > > > Exchange 2000 > > Ok not sure if this is possible or just a dream I have. But we are > going to be getting e-mails sent to us in XML format. Is it possible to > have exchange process them? Or does any one know of a way using the > .NET frame work? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Question
Once permissions are set to share on the bosses go to the shared users outlook then use file|open|other user's folder From: "John Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Calendar Question Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:31:41 -0500 I understand the aspect of setting the perms on his worksation(Outlook) but, how do I set her up so she can see it? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Question You should tell your boss how to do by setting permissions in Outlook. Otherwise, you'd have to log into his mailbox, which isn't a great idea. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Question I have yet to do this but... What do I need to do is give my assisatant access to my bosses clendar in outlook. What do I need to do to make it so she can view his calendar from her desktop? Thanks Ahead of time. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus I don't handle the Trend side of the house. What is SUS without getting flamed From: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:47:19 -0700 Keep us updated. I'm thinking about using SUS, and this is a good example of where it would be useful... > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > thanks, I had gotten that. When I was running the active > update from the > scanmail interface I was getting the error. After about 30 > or so tries I > got the update downloaded to my system. > Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us. > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > It wraps add LAST.A to the end > > > > From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700 > > Aye > > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > is anyone else getting the update source not found error? > > -Original Message- > From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Watch Out - New Virus > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VNam > e=WORM_MSB > LAST.A > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchang
Re: ISP/Exchange Question
Inbound, Inbound Inbound INBOUND INBOUND CONNECTIONS! Fscking Road Runner SSMs decided that "inbound" meant _all_. It's really unfortunate for the Austin RR group that I live within stal^H^H^H^Hwalking distance. > RECOMMENDATION > Due to the seriousness of the RPC vulnerability, DHS and Microsoft > encourage system administrators and computer owners to take this > opportunity to update vulnerable versions of Microsoft Windows operating > systems as soon as possible. Microsoft updates, workarounds, and > additional information are available at > http://microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/ > bulletin/MS03-026.asp > > DHS and Microsoft further suggest that Internet Service Providers and > network administrators consider blocking TCP and UDP ports 135, 139, and > 445 for inbound connections unless absolutely needed for business or > operational purposes. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Question
I understand the aspect of setting the perms on his worksation(Outlook) but, how do I set her up so she can see it? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Question You should tell your boss how to do by setting permissions in Outlook. Otherwise, you'd have to log into his mailbox, which isn't a great idea. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Question I have yet to do this but... What do I need to do is give my assisatant access to my bosses clendar in outlook. What do I need to do to make it so she can view his calendar from her desktop? Thanks Ahead of time. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus I don't handle the Trend side of the house. What is SUS without getting flamed From: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:47:19 -0700 Keep us updated. I'm thinking about using SUS, and this is a good example of where it would be useful... > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:38 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > thanks, I had gotten that. When I was running the active > update from the > scanmail interface I was getting the error. After about 30 > or so tries I > got the update downloaded to my system. > Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us. > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > > It wraps add LAST.A to the end > > > > From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700 > > Aye > > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus > > is anyone else getting the update source not found error? > > -Original Message- > From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Watch Out - New Virus > > > http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VNam > e=WORM_MSB > LAST.A > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris
Rmoving 1st storage group
Running Exchange 2000 SP3 with front-end/back-end setup. My first priv.edb is kind of messed up. Are there any restrictions in moving the mailbox's into another store, removing the 1st store and creating a new store in it's place. Current 1st store contains 2 priv's and 1 pub. I thank we can have 4 stores per storage group. I thank the permissions on the store is messed up and can't figure it out. Mostly those of use with domain admin privileges are messed up. When we move the mailboxes to another store, we by-pass the errors that we receive. Thanks R. Pennell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pipe dream or possible
None the less, I know where my bet is just because you are reporting the sudden onset of symptoms very typical to this problem. You don't have any machines that pass through the firewall (exchange front end outside the firewall for example?) or laptops who travel with bosses or sales peoples and as such have a slightly "spotty" patch record? Or worse still, the know it all who plugs in their personal laptop without telling you they are doing it. You only need one infected machine on a network to cause disruption from what I've seen. Can you guarantee that every single machine on your network is patched up to date and virus defs up to date and there is no way one could slip through the net. > -Original Message- > From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 August 2003 15:32 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible > > I do have a firewall (with port 135 closed) and update 606 of > Trend doesn't find any viruses on the entire network > (scanmail, serverprotect and officescan) > > Kim > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 16:20 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible > > > But I have a firewall! :) > > -Original Message- > From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:47 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible > > Well if it just started in the past few days I'd guess you were having > trouble with a machine or two running that nice friendly RPC-exploit > exploiting worm. No real reason other than half the world seems to be > having problems with it. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 12 August 2003 13:35 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible > > > > Does anyone have a clue how it is possible that our network > > is having severe ups and downs in connectivity. Connections > > to the AD and exchange are very unstable, we have the latest > > AV updates (trend), switches are ok, etc... Any clues? > > > > Kim > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > > ext_mode=&lang=english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pipe dream or possible
DNS? MBLAST Virus? DOS attack? I'm sure we could just guess all day about this, but perhaps you can enlighten us a bit more about how things are setup, what you have done to diagnose the issue, when did this start, did you make changes to something and then have this start? If you provide clear information, perhaps the experts can help. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible Does anyone have a clue how it is possible that our network is having severe ups and downs in connectivity. Connections to the AD and exchange are very unstable, we have the latest AV updates (trend), switches are ok, etc... Any clues? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: renaming an exchange server
You cannot rename and exchange server. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davinder Gupta Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: renaming an exchange server Subject: renaming an exchange server Hi Experts, Is it okay to rename an exchange 5.5 server? I understand the hassle of updating Outlook profiles. Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
renaming an exchange server
Hi Experts, Is it okay to rename an exchange 5.5 server? I understand the hassle of updating Outlook profiles. Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help! Accounts not able to log in via OWA
Hello All. Some accounts are unable to logon via OWA. Just keeps coming back with the logon window. It has to be a permissions problems somewhere, but where I changed the permissions on the x:\program files\exchsrvr folder to Read & execute, List and Read for Authenticated users. I stopped/restarted IIS and restarted all Exchange services. Still having problems with some accounts. Please, any ideaswhere else can I look. Also, in AD Users and Computers I noticed that under the Account Tab for a user, the User Logon Name box does not contain a username. Does this have anything to do with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secondary smtp addresses in exchange 5.5
Although Exchange administrator allows me to add additional smtp addresses I can see no way of doing it via import. Putting 2 smtp addresses in the import file causes an error. Adding an additional address via import using the append multi valued properties selected just overwrites the original address. And exporting the email addresses only shows the primary address. Anyone know a way round this? Harriet Wood _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ports over VPN
You are kidding, right? A VPN would wrap all traffic through either a PPTP or L2TP connection. It doesn't use standard ports. PPTP VPN's use IP Protocol 49 (port 1723). L2TP uses UDP Protocol 17 and ports 1701 and 500 (IPSec). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:19 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: ports over VPN Subject: ports over VPN Anyone have a list of the ports used by Outlook to Exchange 5.5 over vpn? thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
> Needless to say, Microsoft is not on my A-list this week. You can always switch to another OS. Of course if all OS vendors are doing the same thing, then you can either accept it or go without automated software updates. No one is forcing you to use software. Hmm... Nope. Just drink the cool-aid and move along, nothing to see here. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ports over VPN
What type of VPN are you using, i.e. Microsoft, cisco routers/pix/concentrators? Are you blocking any ports on the routers (due to DCOM) Nick Thakkar Network Administrator American Medical Response [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ports over VPN You are kidding, right? A VPN would wrap all traffic through either a PPTP or L2TP connection. It doesn't use standard ports. PPTP VPN's use IP Protocol 49 (port 1723). L2TP uses UDP Protocol 17 and ports 1701 and 500 (IPSec). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:19 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: ports over VPN Subject: ports over VPN Anyone have a list of the ports used by Outlook to Exchange 5.5 over vpn? thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISP/Exchange Question
Except that your ISP holds you hostage because it "owns" your DNS entries until you can get them moved somewhere else. Changing ISPs is not a trivial task for most small- to medium-sized businesses. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ISP/Exchange Question On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 10:19am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> You do not own your ISP's network, your ISP does. > > And that makes any arbitrary decision they choose to implement acceptable? Acceptable? Perhaps not. You can always switch to another ISP. Of course, if all ISPs are doing the same thing, then you can either accept it, or go without Internet access. Nobody is forcing you to use the Internet. > Please sign up here for the Patriot Service Plan comrade. The Internet is not a government service. It is not a constitutional right, either. You are paying a private company to allow them to let you access their network. They can impose whatever terms they like on that. You can accept them, or not. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Extending the Schema in AD
Currently 5.5 on NT in mixed mode w/4 DC's. Planning to migrate to E2K on W2K in a couple months. Down time is hard to come by. Question: Are there any repercussions on updating the Schema alot sooner than migrating to E2K? I have a small (very small) test lab and have noticed the time length (2-3 hours) it takes to update the schema. At this time I am unable to DUP the majority of our topology for real testing. --Fred _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Problems
When I try from "inside", I am able to loginno problem. Only when accessing from outside or from home is when the login fails. ??? -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Problems Yah...that seems to be so far. Everyone who is complaining are located outside or are trying from home. Thanks for the replies. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Problems Then you are saying they can use OWa when internal but not externally? From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: OWA Problems Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:18:09 -0400 Yes. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Problems Are they able to logon to their mailboxes via Outlook? - Original Message - From: "Bridges, Samantha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:05 PM Subject: OWA Problems Hello All. Having problems with users logging into OWA/Exchange 2000. They put in their username and password and domain name. When they click OK, the window stays and the password box is highlighted. I verified that the accounts are not locked out and have even reset their passwords. This is happening to users who are accessing the OWA from home or other locations. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOW TO hide Public folders view in OWA - - E2K
Fix the permissions. Since I wasn't there when the unnamed person munged the permissions in the first place, I can't tell you what to undo. You can call PSS for help if you need this fixed. I don't see where 311154 addresses your problem, but maybe I didn't spend enough time with it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOW TO hide Public folders view in OWA - - E2K Thanks for the lesson Ed. So let's say I don't know what I did, or in this case the person who managed this environment is no longer around. What is the easiest way to get the OWA portion back to the og configs w/o backups? Re-install E2K on the FE? Why is doing what is listed in Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 311154 not a better solution? Thanes, - John Q >From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: HOW TO hide Public folders view in OWA - - E2K >Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:02:41 -0700 > >Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this. >Doctor: Well, don't do that! > >Undo whatever you did and instead restrict access to the top level >public >folder(s) under All Public Folders. > >Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP >Freelance E-Mail Philosopher >Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q >Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:52 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: HOW TO hide Public folders view in OWA - - E2K > >I do not use Public Folders, and want to hide the Public folders view >from all users. >When users login with OWA and click on the folders list, they get an >"Access denied" error. >How can I enable it so that this window does not pop-up everytime they >go to the folders list view in OWA? >This is a Win 2K E2K FE/BE setup. > >John Q Jr. > >_ >Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Web Interface: >http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode= >&lang >=english >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Web Interface: >http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lan g=english >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures
Try http://www.80-20.com. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures I am actually looking for a process for people to sign (digitally) a document then pass it on to the next person. This will be an internal application so the need for an actual key isn't necessary. A date/time stamp would be nice as would some sort of historical tracking. - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures Matt, If you mean S/MIME when stating digital signatures, then your solution may be problematic or difficult to achieve. A digital signature only provides security by showing the recipient that the sender is authentic (by checking their certificate is valid) and that the message hasn't been tampered with in transit. It also carries the senders public key for encryption purposes, if configured. As I understand it. The problem with email is that you can never guarantee that the message has been read by the recipient unless you get them to purposely acknowledge the receipt of a message. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: 13 August 2003 17:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Paperless workflow and digital signatures I have been asked to research the possibility to use Exchange 2000/Outlook to setup a paperless workflow for certain internal forms (PO's, RFCE's, etc.). We currently have the forms saved (Word Doc) on a common share. It is filled out, printed, and hand delivered to the approving parties. My boss would like to see us use Exchange/Outlook to do a paperless workflow using digital signatures for approval. I have never looked into this so I would appreciate any suggestions from your experiences. I know the solution needs to be easy to use for the end-user and the cheaper the better. TIA, - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISP/Exchange Question
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, at 4:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Has anyone heard of the Dept. of Homeland security putting out an > anouncement to ISP's to block TCP/UDP ports 135, 137, 445? The DHS advisory doesn't target ISPs in particular. Many ISPs block 135, 137, 138, 139, and 445. More have started blocking with the exploits attacking MS03-026. Given the number of clueless lusers running Windows systems unprotected on the Internet, I find this a pretty reasonable action. Traffic on those ports really doesn't have much business being on the public Internet in the first place. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM)
Any work on when they would be able to do pocketPC devices? I would rather wait till then to move. -Original Message- From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM) Same here, Goodlink ROCKS! We started out with 4 handhelds in our IT department under BES and slowly moved up to 7 with sales execs. Then they started wanting to be able to view Word memos attached to emails. We ran into Good at Interop about that time and were hooked as soon as we saw the software. We converted in January as soon as Cingular made nearly free upgrades available (give you the server and base handheld licenses for the cost of 1 year support we would buy anyway). We have never looked back. 100% wireless sync, basic attachment viewing, and soon support for the Treo 600, and PocketPC smartphones. Several of our users, myself included, are really looking forward to the Treo/Palm and PocketPC phone support to just carry a single device around for email and phone use. --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- "Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock." - Frank Herbert, "Chapterhouse: Dune" -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM) Good Technology...Rocks! Ive got , my sales guy's love it..like almost 100% itergration with OL/Exchange once the unit is setup the only time I have to recradle the unit is to do a software upgrade to the unit.. USA Only a this time..OK it work in Sao Paulo Brazil RIM - BB Im also demoing the BB BES server for coverage outside the USA BES..ONLY sync's E-mail and Calendar..at this time all else MUST be cradled to sync - Intellisync... Im not thrilled with the BES...they say they will have Contacts and other Wireless sync by Q1 of 2004... It's no comparison to Good...Now of course the Good device doesn't have a browser at this time.. each has it's thing bill -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange & Blackberry (RIM) Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service? Or does anyone know of alternitive's to the same type of technology? With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump ship to something that is a good replacement before we lose the service. Thanks! "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
