RE: outlook 2001 mac problem with exchange 5.5

2003-11-05 Thread Wall, Max
Outlook 2001 support for HTML is pretty poor, so most HTML emails don't
display correctly.

Max

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 04 November 2003 20:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook 2001 mac problem with exchange 5.5

Sounds like it could be settings on that Mac.



-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outlook 2001 mac problem with exchange 5.5

We are running Exchange 5.5 with Outlook clients. Some of them are MAC
running OS 9.x and Outlook client 2001. On occasion, when the user receives
an email formatted as html, the html does not show completely and the parts
the shows is not clickable. When he/she forwardes it to a pc, the email
looks fine as it should.

Any ideas

TIA

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

2003-11-05 Thread David, Andy
Im still not clear how liability relates to brick level backups.


-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


Ed,

I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it
would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion.  A
colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted
the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today.  

My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability
under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more
and more of an audit train.  Senior managers throughout the industry are
over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to
prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and
having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road.
 
Kelly


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Quit doing brick level backup!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to
present options.  Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know
of a package with thie capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Public Folder Replication

2003-11-05 Thread Chad Gibson
I’m having problems with some of my folders that are not replicating to
the New 2003 server form a 5.5 server.

I’ve searched and seen that people have had this issue and I can’t seem to
find a fix.

 

Some of my public folders are not getting replicated, if you look in the
replication status you see that they are still “local modified”

 

There are two issues that are weird…it seems this only happens to folders
that are nested several time.  Also the folder directly above it did not
have an associated SMTP address…it was never mail to so the address was
removed.

I fixed one of them yesterday but dont know what I did to get it going
again?!

Can anyone point me to anything that will get my replication going on
these last few folders??

 

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

2003-11-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Don't back anything up.   :)


-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Ed,

I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it
would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion.  A
colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had
posted
the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today.


My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability
under
new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more and
more
of an audit train.  Senior managers throughout the industry are over
reacting
by taking the position of backing up less information to prevent someone
from
saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and having it come back
to
bite them somewhere down the road.
 
Kelly


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Quit doing brick level backup!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level
backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention
of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me
to
present options.  Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone
know
of a package with thie capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

2003-11-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Quit using voicemail :)


-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Ed,

I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it
would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion.  A
colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had
posted
the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today.


My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability
under
new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more and
more
of an audit train.  Senior managers throughout the industry are over
reacting
by taking the position of backing up less information to prevent someone
from
saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and having it come back
to
bite them somewhere down the road.
 
Kelly


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Quit doing brick level backup!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level
backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention
of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me
to
present options.  Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone
know
of a package with thie capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues

2003-11-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
You can sort the queues themselves too.



-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues

So far it has not grown on me... :)

I guess I am just accustomed to being able to sort all messages in the
queue
- regardless of destination domain (originator, sent time).

> -Original Message-
> From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues
> 
> 
> I never had issues with 2000 queue management. You need to 
> give it time
> to grow on you. It is much better than 5.5 queue management.
> 
> If you want to see messages going to a particular remote 
> domain - right
> click on that queue and Enumerate messages. Then you will be able to
> sort them as well.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Andrey Fyodorov, MVP
> Systems Engineer
> Messaging and Collaboration
> Spherion
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange 2000 SMTP queues
> 
> All,
> 
> First I would like to thank all who responded to my "secure e-mail"
> thread
> last week. Looks like we will be looking into Tumbleweed for the
> possible
> solution...
> 
> Now for the question. We are to a point now in our upgrade 
> Project from
> 5.5
> to 2000 that we are replacing our current 5.5 outbound IMC 
> servers with
> 2000
> SMTP connectors. We did a pilot test yesterday - and although delivery
> was
> fine - the queues seem almost impossible to manage under 2000. It
> creates a
> "virtual" queue for each and every SMTP domain that it delivers too.
> Within
> 30 minutes I had 200 queues listed. Refreshes on the queues 
> were taking
> 3 to
> 4 minutes (whether from the console or remotely) -  and the server was
> not
> under a heavy load performance wise. Also, I see no way to sort all
> queued
> messages by "date, originator, etc - as in 5.5... Are there any 3rd
> party
> tools that make queue management any easier?
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: PFAdmin Rehome

2003-11-05 Thread Bendall, Paul
Nobody got any thoughts on this problem?

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2003 12:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PFAdmin Rehome


Hmmm doing some more digging around I notice that the attributes Home-MTA
and Home-MDB are set to the old damaged server. If the folder is already
replicated to the new server can I edit this attributes via ADSI to update
them to the new server?

Regards,

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2003 12:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PFAdmin Rehome


Hi all,

Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP2
PFAdmin 1.3.0

I need some help with PFadmin to rehome public folders. Situation is the
original public folder server has a corrupt database which can't be
repaired, already come to this conclusion with PSS. We need to move all the
PF's homed on this server to another server. I have already run pfadmin to
replicate all PF's homed on the damaged server to the new server and this
has been done successfully, we are talking about 10,000 folders and in a
mixed hierarchy.

Now I want to rehome all pf's to the new server. I thought I could use
PFadmin rehome, but this seems to remove all replicas that are both internal
and external to the home site. Is this by design? Do I need to run pfadmin
then ds/is consistancy to get the GUI to pickup the new home server and then
run pfadmin setreplicas to add back all the old replicas apart from the
damaged server? If this is the case won't I generate a whole lot of traffic?

Any advice / assistance would be much appreciated. Have also logged a call
with PSS but was after your thoughts as well.

Paul




The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for
the
addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express 
written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient,
please 
contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623
8000, or
via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read
our
e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for
the
addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express 
written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient,
please 
contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623
8000, or
via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read
our
e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the
addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or
via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our
e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to 
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

2003-11-05 Thread Alverson, Tom
Destroy all backups after 60 days (or whatever they want the VM retention to
be). 

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Don't back anything up.   :)


-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Ed,

I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it
would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion.  A
colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted
the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today.


My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability
under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more
and more of an audit train.  Senior managers throughout the industry are
over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to
prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and
having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road.
 
Kelly


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Quit doing brick level backup!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to
present options.  Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know
of a package with thie capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


SMTP Addresses

2003-11-05 Thread Matt Hoffman
This might be a silly newbie question, but how does one go about setting
a default set of addresses in Exchange 2000 that will update all the
user accounts with something other than just "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

For example, I already have it set so that all users have addresses at
"@heightslibrary.org" and at "@chuhpl.lib.oh.us."  But the required
addresses from our consortium also include needing the user name part of
be the following formats:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The second of
these is easy...  It's just the alias, but how can I set something up to
format the addresses using the first and last names?  

Basically I'd like to avoid having to do it individually for all my
users.  I know the update service will take care of populating these
accounts with the addresses, I just need to have the system recognize
how I want the addresses formatted.

Thanks,

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SMTP Addresses

2003-11-05 Thread Tony Hlabse
Check the default reciepent policy or if more than one adjust the one for 
the specific users. Is this the Cleveland Height University Heights E2K 
server?



From: "Matt Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SMTP Addresses
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:52:04 -0500
This might be a silly newbie question, but how does one go about setting
a default set of addresses in Exchange 2000 that will update all the
user accounts with something other than just "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
For example, I already have it set so that all users have addresses at
"@heightslibrary.org" and at "@chuhpl.lib.oh.us."  But the required
addresses from our consortium also include needing the user name part of
be the following formats:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The second of
these is easy...  It's just the alias, but how can I set something up to
format the addresses using the first and last names?
Basically I'd like to avoid having to do it individually for all my
users.  I know the update service will take care of populating these
accounts with the addresses, I just need to have the system recognize
how I want the addresses formatted.
Thanks,

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Crave some Miles Davis or Grateful Dead?  Your old favorites are always 
playing on MSN Radio Plus. Trial month free! 
http://join.msn.com/?page=offers/premiumradio

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SMTP Addresses

2003-11-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
You can use the %g and %s strings. %g is given name. %s is surname.

So [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be generating e-mail addresses with the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] format.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion

-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Addresses

This might be a silly newbie question, but how does one go about setting
a default set of addresses in Exchange 2000 that will update all the
user accounts with something other than just "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

For example, I already have it set so that all users have addresses at
"@heightslibrary.org" and at "@chuhpl.lib.oh.us."  But the required
addresses from our consortium also include needing the user name part of
be the following formats:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The second of
these is easy...  It's just the alias, but how can I set something up to
format the addresses using the first and last names?  

Basically I'd like to avoid having to do it individually for all my
users.  I know the update service will take care of populating these
accounts with the addresses, I just need to have the system recognize
how I want the addresses formatted.

Thanks,

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


last checked report

2003-11-05 Thread Wohlgemuth, Mike
Asked of me by one of my admins in in a school ...

"Is there any way to get a report of the last time someone has checked
their email account? "

I know I could look in mailboxes in system manager ... but the mailboxes
are organized administratively and not organizationally ... so, poking
around for 40 mailboxes from over 4000 is not an option ...

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: last checked report

2003-11-05 Thread Tony Hlabse
sort by last logon date. Which version of Exchange?

From: "Wohlgemuth, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: last checked report
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:59:14 -0500
Asked of me by one of my admins in in a school ...

"Is there any way to get a report of the last time someone has checked
their email account? "
I know I could look in mailboxes in system manager ... but the mailboxes
are organized administratively and not organizationally ... so, poking
around for 40 mailboxes from over 4000 is not an option ...
Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: last checked report

2003-11-05 Thread Wohlgemuth, Mike
ex2k ... sorry ..

still makes me poke through for the 40 people that are scattered
throughout my exchange storage groups ...

not a solution .. thanks anyway ...

is that one of the header fields in doing a csvde export? hmmm

Mike
850-487-7509

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: last checked report


sort by last logon date. Which version of Exchange?


From: "Wohlgemuth, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: last checked report
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:59:14 -0500

Asked of me by one of my admins in in a school ...

"Is there any way to get a report of the last time someone has checked
their email account? "

I know I could look in mailboxes in system manager ... but the mailboxes
are organized administratively and not organizationally ... so, poking
around for 40 mailboxes from over 4000 is not an option ...

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SMTP Addresses

2003-11-05 Thread Matt Hoffman
Ah, perfect!

That is exactly what I was looking for.  Unfortunately, the help does
not appear to contain that info in a conveniently logical place.

Thanks!

Matt

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Addresses


You can use the %g and %s strings. %g is given name. %s is surname.

So [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be generating e-mail addresses with the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] format.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion

-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Addresses

This might be a silly newbie question, but how does one go about setting
a default set of addresses in Exchange 2000 that will update all the
user accounts with something other than just "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

For example, I already have it set so that all users have addresses at
"@heightslibrary.org" and at "@chuhpl.lib.oh.us."  But the required
addresses from our consortium also include needing the user name part of
be the following formats:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The second of
these is easy...  It's just the alias, but how can I set something up to
format the addresses using the first and last names?  

Basically I'd like to avoid having to do it individually for all my
users.  I know the update service will take care of populating these
accounts with the addresses, I just need to have the system recognize
how I want the addresses formatted.

Thanks,

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

2003-11-05 Thread Kim Cameron
do a mailbox cleanup to delete the voice mail attachments before you run the backup.  
Let everyone get used to the idea that if they don't listen to voice mail right away, 
they lose it.

You probably wouldn't want to do that every day, though.

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:58 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Forum
Conversation: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


Im still not clear how liability relates to brick level backups.


-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


Ed,

I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it would be the 
only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion.  A colleague of mine recently 
saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted the same question and got the same 
response that nothing existed today.  

My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability under new 
regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more and more of an audit 
train.  Senior managers throughout the industry are over reacting by taking the 
position of backing up less information to prevent someone from saying something 
stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and having it come back to bite them somewhere down 
the road.
 
Kelly


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Quit doing brick level backup!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would allow you to 
exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of voicemails 
created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to present options.  
Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know of a package with thie 
capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

2003-11-05 Thread David, Andy
They do in Apex.


-Original Message-
From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


do a mailbox cleanup to delete the voice mail attachments before you run the
backup.  Let everyone get used to the idea that if they don't listen to
voice mail right away, they lose it.

You probably wouldn't want to do that every day, though.

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:58 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Forum
Conversation: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


Im still not clear how liability relates to brick level backups.


-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?


Ed,

I fully support your position on brick level backups but thought that it
would be the only possible way of supporting this type of exclusion.  A
colleague of mine recently saw my posting and mentioned that he had posted
the same question and got the same response that nothing existed today.  

My only question is how companies are expected to limit their liability
under new regulations such as Sarbanes/Ox when everything is leaving more
and more of an audit train.  Senior managers throughout the industry are
over reacting by taking the position of backing up less information to
prevent someone from saying something stupid in a voicemail or e-mail and
having it come back to bite them somewhere down the road.
 
Kelly


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Quit doing brick level backup!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to
present options.  Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know
of a package with thie capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange

2003-11-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
I have spent all day trying to achieve what seems to be a simple task.

I have Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange installed on a front-end
Exchange 2000 server. Inbound mail first comes to this server and then
is relayed to the appropriate back-end.

So I have been trying to create a simple Inbound SMTP filter to match
bad words in a message subject (quite simple stuff). For some reason
Symantec Mail Security is simply ignoring inbound mail.

I can tell it to scan outbound SMTP mail (a separate option) and create
an outbound SMTP filter - no problem, it detects bad words in outbound
messages.

How can I tell it to start scanning inbound SMTP mail?

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange

2003-11-05 Thread Tony Hlabse
Maybe it's pointing to a different port

From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:42:22 -0500
I have spent all day trying to achieve what seems to be a simple task.

I have Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange installed on a front-end
Exchange 2000 server. Inbound mail first comes to this server and then
is relayed to the appropriate back-end.
So I have been trying to create a simple Inbound SMTP filter to match
bad words in a message subject (quite simple stuff). For some reason
Symantec Mail Security is simply ignoring inbound mail.
I can tell it to scan outbound SMTP mail (a separate option) and create
an outbound SMTP filter - no problem, it detects bad words in outbound
messages.
How can I tell it to start scanning inbound SMTP mail?

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange

2003-11-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
I don't think it has any SMTP port settings. It just sits on the
Exchange server and scans mail as it is leaves/enters the queue.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange

Maybe it's pointing to a different port


From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:42:22 -0500

I have spent all day trying to achieve what seems to be a simple task.

I have Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange installed on a front-end
Exchange 2000 server. Inbound mail first comes to this server and then
is relayed to the appropriate back-end.

So I have been trying to create a simple Inbound SMTP filter to match
bad words in a message subject (quite simple stuff). For some reason
Symantec Mail Security is simply ignoring inbound mail.

I can tell it to scan outbound SMTP mail (a separate option) and create
an outbound SMTP filter - no problem, it detects bad words in outbound
messages.

How can I tell it to start scanning inbound SMTP mail?

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange

2003-11-05 Thread Tony Hlabse
Really. Hmmm Never worked with the stuff. Ask Symantec I guess. It's their 
stuff not really an Exchange issue is it then.

From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:47:44 -0500
I don't think it has any SMTP port settings. It just sits on the
Exchange server and scans mail as it is leaves/enters the queue.
Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange
Maybe it's pointing to a different port

From: "Fyodorov, Andrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:42:22 -0500
I have spent all day trying to achieve what seems to be a simple task.

I have Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange installed on a front-end
Exchange 2000 server. Inbound mail first comes to this server and then
is relayed to the appropriate back-end.
So I have been trying to create a simple Inbound SMTP filter to match
bad words in a message subject (quite simple stuff). For some reason
Symantec Mail Security is simply ignoring inbound mail.
I can tell it to scan outbound SMTP mail (a separate option) and create
an outbound SMTP filter - no problem, it detects bad words in outbound
messages.
How can I tell it to start scanning inbound SMTP mail?

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95.
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Great deals on high-speed Internet access as low as $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Exchange on the road

2003-11-05 Thread Steve Cobb
I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange
mails on the road.  They want to do this from within Outlook.  When I POP
the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his
messages, even those he has already read.  Is there a way around this?  If
I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he
get duplicates?

Thanks,

Steve Cobb

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange on the road

2003-11-05 Thread Mellott, Bill
VPNsetup OL to do traveling user

-Original Message-
From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange on the road


I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange
mails on the road.  They want to do this from within Outlook.  When I POP
the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his
messages, even those he has already read.  Is there a way around this?  If
I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he
get duplicates?

Thanks,

Steve Cobb

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Exchange on the road

2003-11-05 Thread Tony Hlabse
On the POP3 client thereis an option to keep a copy on the server. I assume 
you are using Outlook Express but most others also have this option

From: "Steve Cobb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exchange on the road
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:41:09 -0800
I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange
mails on the road.  They want to do this from within Outlook.  When I POP
the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his
messages, even those he has already read.  Is there a way around this?  If
I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he
get duplicates?
Thanks,

Steve Cobb

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Is your computer infected with a virus?  Find out with a FREE computer virus 
scan from McAfee.  Take the FreeScan now! 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange on the road

2003-11-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Outlook 2003 has a nice local cache mode.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange on the road

I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office
Exchange
mails on the road.  They want to do this from within Outlook.  When I
POP
the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL
his
messages, even those he has already read.  Is there a way around this?
If
I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will
he
get duplicates?

Thanks,

Steve Cobb

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange on the road

2003-11-05 Thread David, Andy
OWA/VPN or leave the messages on the Exch Server.



-Original Message-
From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange on the road


I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange
mails on the road.  They want to do this from within Outlook.  When I POP
the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his
messages, even those he has already read.  Is there a way around this?  If I
let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he get
duplicates?

Thanks,

Steve Cobb

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE?? - RESOLVED

2003-11-05 Thread Alverson, Tom
 I got a chance to stop and start the IS (and the IMC too for good measure)
and the turftable changes finally took effect.  Apparently most of the time
restarting the IMC is all you need but sometimes the IS must be restarted
too (this is exchange 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp3).

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??

I tried your reg file and that didn't help either.  I found (with google's
help) a user on a forum somewhere that ran into the same problem.  He had to
restart the IS for the turftable changes to take.  I can't restart the IS
right now but will try that later.

Tom 

-Original Message-
From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??

Clean out the registry storage of TurfTable.

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete
rs]TurfTable

An empty table is two zero byte values in a row.

QuickFix:
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Paramete
rs]
"TurfTable"=hex(7):00,00
EndQuickFix:

Put the above 4 lines into TurfTable.reg file.  Stop the IMC.  Import it
into the registry.  Start the IMC.

Regards,  Michael

-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??


I completely cleared out the turftable so it should not reject anything, and
it still rejects this message.

Tom 

-Original Message-
From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??

Check for @aa.com & [EMAIL PROTECTED] both are valid to turf the message.
You can temporarily rename the message to .eml and open it to check it out
for other details.

Regards,  Michael

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??


Tom,

With the exception of running Win2k SP2 instead of SP4, I'm running the same
setup you are and have not experienced this to date.  

I would be interested in the resolution, should you ever figure out what is
causing this.

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: EX5.5: can't get rid of TURFTABLE??


I noticed a message in the turf directory that was probably legitimate (from
american airlines) and looked at my turftable entries to see why it was
rejected.  Sure enough, I had aa.com in there so I deleted it and restarted
the IMC (putting the offending message back into the inbound dir while the
IMC was stoppted).  It turf'ed it again?  I thought maybe the turftable on
our other server (first server in org, but all mailboxes moved off of it) so
I removed it there and restarted both  IMC's.  It got turf'ed again... I
then removed ALL entries from the turftable of both server and restarted
both IMC's.  Still gets turf'ed.  What is going on here?  Is there another
service I need to stop and start?  I don't want to reboot right now, but can
later if necessary.

Tom
Ex5.5 sp4 running on win2k sp4


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&

RE: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange

2003-11-05 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
Ok, I know what is going on. In case if anyone runs into the same issue.

On my original test server, everything worked fine. The test server was
a member of its own AD, and the AD DNS name matched the SMTP suffix in
he default recipient policy.

The current test environment is different. The AD DNS namespace is
different from the SMTP suffix specified in the default recipient
policy. I think it is confusing the hell out of Symantec.

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey 
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange

I have spent all day trying to achieve what seems to be a simple task.

I have Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange installed on a front-end
Exchange 2000 server. Inbound mail first comes to this server and then
is relayed to the appropriate back-end.

So I have been trying to create a simple Inbound SMTP filter to match
bad words in a message subject (quite simple stuff). For some reason
Symantec Mail Security is simply ignoring inbound mail.

I can tell it to scan outbound SMTP mail (a separate option) and create
an outbound SMTP filter - no problem, it detects bad words in outbound
messages.

How can I tell it to start scanning inbound SMTP mail?

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange Connections Conference

2003-11-05 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Guess I'll have to just do Disney World next week then!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections Conference

Actually it ends tomorrow! 

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Connections Conference

No, the conference is next week!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Connections Conference

Oy.. anybody else down here in loverly Orlando??


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: last checked report

2003-11-05 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
You'll like how Exchange 2003 can display mailboxes once you get to see it.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: last checked report

ex2k ... sorry ..

still makes me poke through for the 40 people that are scattered throughout
my exchange storage groups ...

not a solution .. thanks anyway ...

is that one of the header fields in doing a csvde export? hmmm

Mike
850-487-7509

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: last checked report


sort by last logon date. Which version of Exchange?


From: "Wohlgemuth, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: last checked report
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:59:14 -0500

Asked of me by one of my admins in in a school ...

"Is there any way to get a report of the last time someone has checked
their email account? "

I know I could look in mailboxes in system manager ... but the mailboxes
are organized administratively and not organizationally ... so, poking
around for 40 mailboxes from over 4000 is not an option ...

Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue

2003-11-05 Thread Fredrick Zilz
Each morning for the last 5, I have ended up rebooting my Exchange 2003
(on windows 2003 member server)because my Outlook clients (xp and 2003)
recieve messages stating that outlook is downloading data from the
exchange server, on non cached setups it just sits like this, on cached
versions a red exclamation appears in the system tray. If you right click
and choose cancel server request, it looks like all is connected for a
minute or so, then it happens again no updates take place.  If I right
click on the outlook icon in the client system tray, it shows three
connections to exchange server mail at least one of which will show
multiple errors and an extended response time.  Synchronization error log
just shows "Network problems are preventing connection to the microsoft
exchange server."  I have windows 2000 sp4, and Windows xp SP1(fully
updated) clients mosly running Outlook 2003 some in exchange cached mode
and some not cached, as well as a couple Outlook xp clients.  All have
same issue.

The server is available (shared folders, remote desktop).  The Event log
does not show any unusual errors - nothing that marks the start of this
issue.  The Outlook 2003 client shows connected but with a red exclamation
on the system tray icon. - does not shift to disconnected.

The Exchange server is a dual xeon 2.4 ghz, 2 gig ram.  Processor usage
does not go above 20%, memory usage is normal, and the server has only one
nic (gigabit) on a managed gigabit switch.  The whole network is only
about 35 computers and three servers.  The whole thing sits behind a
checkpoint firewall, so the lan users are not going through a router or
firewall to reach the server.  All users are experiencing the same thing
at the same time.

After I reboot, all is well until the next morning sometime.  I have Virus
protection on the server but it is set to exclude the exchsrvr directories
and subdirectories.  I have GFI Mail Essentials and GFI Mail Security
running  I have tried disabling GFI Mail Essentials (stopped Services),
but the problem still came back.  Automated Backup has been suspended
until I resolve the issue (arcserve brightstor).

I upgraded office xp to 2003 in about three sets over the course of 5
days. It was only after the last set that I started seeing this issue, but
all are installed off the same shared  folder using the same Group Policy.
 I had two computers on the Beta 2 of Office 2003 for months did not see
this issue.

Exchange Server has been 2003 since the RTM release.

I don't know what else to look at - anybody have any advice?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


FYI - Using Outlook 2003 against Exchange servers

2003-11-05 Thread Brian Ko
If you use Outlook 2003 against Exchange server, 5.5, 2000 and 2003, you may
want to keep this article handy just in case you run into a problem...

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=823343


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue

2003-11-05 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Obviously something is hanging up, and I'm not sure it's Exchange.  Instead
of rebooting the entire machine, you might try restarting individual
services to try to figure out what's hanging.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fredrick Zilz
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue

Each morning for the last 5, I have ended up rebooting my Exchange 2003 (on
windows 2003 member server)because my Outlook clients (xp and 2003) recieve
messages stating that outlook is downloading data from the exchange server,
on non cached setups it just sits like this, on cached versions a red
exclamation appears in the system tray. If you right click and choose cancel
server request, it looks like all is connected for a minute or so, then it
happens again no updates take place.  If I right click on the outlook icon
in the client system tray, it shows three connections to exchange server
mail at least one of which will show multiple errors and an extended
response time.  Synchronization error log just shows "Network problems are
preventing connection to the microsoft exchange server."  I have windows
2000 sp4, and Windows xp SP1(fully
updated) clients mosly running Outlook 2003 some in exchange cached mode and
some not cached, as well as a couple Outlook xp clients.  All have same
issue.

The server is available (shared folders, remote desktop).  The Event log
does not show any unusual errors - nothing that marks the start of this
issue.  The Outlook 2003 client shows connected but with a red exclamation
on the system tray icon. - does not shift to disconnected.

The Exchange server is a dual xeon 2.4 ghz, 2 gig ram.  Processor usage does
not go above 20%, memory usage is normal, and the server has only one nic
(gigabit) on a managed gigabit switch.  The whole network is only about 35
computers and three servers.  The whole thing sits behind a checkpoint
firewall, so the lan users are not going through a router or firewall to
reach the server.  All users are experiencing the same thing at the same
time.

After I reboot, all is well until the next morning sometime.  I have Virus
protection on the server but it is set to exclude the exchsrvr directories
and subdirectories.  I have GFI Mail Essentials and GFI Mail Security
running  I have tried disabling GFI Mail Essentials (stopped Services), but
the problem still came back.  Automated Backup has been suspended until I
resolve the issue (arcserve brightstor).

I upgraded office xp to 2003 in about three sets over the course of 5 days.
It was only after the last set that I started seeing this issue, but all are
installed off the same shared  folder using the same Group Policy.
 I had two computers on the Beta 2 of Office 2003 for months did not see
this issue.

Exchange Server has been 2003 since the RTM release.

I don't know what else to look at - anybody have any advice?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue

2003-11-05 Thread Kevinm[MVP]
This just started 5 days ago but has been running fine since June? And
nothing at all has changed, not even a cable being bumped in the server
room? Any errors at all in the event log?

-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fredrick Zilz
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue

Each morning for the last 5, I have ended up rebooting my Exchange 2003
(on windows 2003 member server)because my Outlook clients (xp and 2003)
recieve messages stating that outlook is downloading data from the
exchange server, on non cached setups it just sits like this, on cached
versions a red exclamation appears in the system tray. If you right
click
and choose cancel server request, it looks like all is connected for a
minute or so, then it happens again no updates take place.  If I right
click on the outlook icon in the client system tray, it shows three
connections to exchange server mail at least one of which will show
multiple errors and an extended response time.  Synchronization error
log
just shows "Network problems are preventing connection to the microsoft
exchange server."  I have windows 2000 sp4, and Windows xp SP1(fully
updated) clients mosly running Outlook 2003 some in exchange cached mode
and some not cached, as well as a couple Outlook xp clients.  All have
same issue.

The server is available (shared folders, remote desktop).  The Event log
does not show any unusual errors - nothing that marks the start of this
issue.  The Outlook 2003 client shows connected but with a red
exclamation
on the system tray icon. - does not shift to disconnected.

The Exchange server is a dual xeon 2.4 ghz, 2 gig ram.  Processor usage
does not go above 20%, memory usage is normal, and the server has only
one
nic (gigabit) on a managed gigabit switch.  The whole network is only
about 35 computers and three servers.  The whole thing sits behind a
checkpoint firewall, so the lan users are not going through a router or
firewall to reach the server.  All users are experiencing the same thing
at the same time.

After I reboot, all is well until the next morning sometime.  I have
Virus
protection on the server but it is set to exclude the exchsrvr
directories
and subdirectories.  I have GFI Mail Essentials and GFI Mail Security
running  I have tried disabling GFI Mail Essentials (stopped Services),
but the problem still came back.  Automated Backup has been suspended
until I resolve the issue (arcserve brightstor).

I upgraded office xp to 2003 in about three sets over the course of 5
days. It was only after the last set that I started seeing this issue,
but
all are installed off the same shared  folder using the same Group
Policy.
 I had two computers on the Beta 2 of Office 2003 for months did not see
this issue.

Exchange Server has been 2003 since the RTM release.

I don't know what else to look at - anybody have any advice?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue

2003-11-05 Thread Greg Eytcheson
I get the same basic issue on a regular basis with Exchange 2003/Windows
2000/GFI Mail Security 8. It happens absolutely every time the
anti-virus (standard BitDefender and Norman) is updated. However, my
slowdown rarely lasts more than about 30 seconds.  I have similar
hardware (dual xeon/2GB RAM) with about 1000 mail users - but I have
never had the slowdowns last more than a minute.

I am quite certain that the problem rests squarely in GFI MailSecurity
but it is not a big enough issue for me to consider changing to a
different AV vendor.  I've just assumed that the update had to
stop/start STORE or some other critical service for the AV engines to
update.  In over three years of using GFI, I haven't had a single
viri/worm/exploit make it past the virus scanner.  With that kind of
record, I will tolerate a few seconds of delay when the virus
definitions are updated.

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fredrick Zilz
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 Outlook 2003 connectivity issue

Each morning for the last 5, I have ended up rebooting my Exchange 2003
(on windows 2003 member server)because my Outlook clients (xp and 2003)
recieve messages stating that outlook is downloading data from the
exchange server, on non cached setups it just sits like this, on cached
versions a red exclamation appears in the system tray. If you right
click and choose cancel server request, it looks like all is connected
for a minute or so, then it happens again no updates take place.  If I
right click on the outlook icon in the client system tray, it shows
three connections to exchange server mail at least one of which will
show multiple errors and an extended response time.  Synchronization
error log just shows "Network problems are preventing connection to the
microsoft exchange server."  I have windows 2000 sp4, and Windows xp
SP1(fully
updated) clients mosly running Outlook 2003 some in exchange cached mode
and some not cached, as well as a couple Outlook xp clients.  All have
same issue.

The server is available (shared folders, remote desktop).  The Event log
does not show any unusual errors - nothing that marks the start of this
issue.  The Outlook 2003 client shows connected but with a red
exclamation on the system tray icon. - does not shift to disconnected.

The Exchange server is a dual xeon 2.4 ghz, 2 gig ram.  Processor usage
does not go above 20%, memory usage is normal, and the server has only
one nic (gigabit) on a managed gigabit switch.  The whole network is
only about 35 computers and three servers.  The whole thing sits behind
a checkpoint firewall, so the lan users are not going through a router
or firewall to reach the server.  All users are experiencing the same
thing at the same time.

After I reboot, all is well until the next morning sometime.  I have
Virus protection on the server but it is set to exclude the exchsrvr
directories and subdirectories.  I have GFI Mail Essentials and GFI Mail
Security running  I have tried disabling GFI Mail Essentials (stopped
Services), but the problem still came back.  Automated Backup has been
suspended until I resolve the issue (arcserve brightstor).

I upgraded office xp to 2003 in about three sets over the course of 5
days. It was only after the last set that I started seeing this issue,
but all are installed off the same shared  folder using the same Group
Policy.
 I had two computers on the Beta 2 of Office 2003 for months did not see
this issue.

Exchange Server has been 2003 since the RTM release.

I don't know what else to look at - anybody have any advice?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]