stuck in local delivery queue
I am having a problem wherein messages are stuck in the local delivery queue. There are no error messages in the event logs. The only thing that I am seeing in the app log is this: Event ID: 1025 Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox An error occurred on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. Function name or description of problem: SLINK::EcUpdate Error: 0x8004010f I'm able to look at the SMTP queues but only for a little while and Exchange System Manager freezes up at some point. CPU utilization and memory utilization looks normal. A reboot seems to fix the problem until it happens again. Has anyone seen this problem before? This is on Exchange 2000 SP3 on Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP3. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read Only Attachments
Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
In some cases the attachments need to be sent as either word or excel documents and the recipient needs to modify it and send it to someone else but the original attachment needs to be kept as well. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions There a reason you don't send the attachment as a PDF? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
You sure about this? Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment. Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with the attachment and the modifications are there! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors
RE: Read Only Attachments
By the way, I didn't reply or forward the email message. I just opened it up and modified it a bit, closed it and said yes to the prompt asking if I want to save the document. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments You sure about this? Here's what I did. I sent myself an email with a word attachment. Opened up the word attachment and made modifications. When I closed the word document, it asked me if I want to save it and I did. Went to a different machine and opened the mail message I sent myself with the attachment and the modifications are there! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It doesn't. See, when you open an attachment in Outlook without saving it first, it really does save it - just in temp files. I don't know where it saves it to (probably the same temp location), but it does not save the original that the sender sent. That would be quite clever if it could do that. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:35 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Read Only Attachments Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended
RE: Read Only Attachments
It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Read Only Attachments
Yes all employees are from our company. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder. Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the document and control which copy they can edit. Are the users all employees of your company/organization? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message
RE: Read Only Attachments
Thank you for the suggestion. I think that's the only other thing that we can do right now. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments O.K., here's another suggestion: Send out an e-mail to all employees instructing them that when they receive these documents via e-mail they are to save them to their hard drive and edit them from there. Violations of this policy will not be tolerated. There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Ed- If you require a technological solution then I would encourage you to look at posting the documents in Read-only network directories or in Public Folders that the users have read-only access to, rather than trying to e-mail them. Either that or be satisfied with the notion that the original, unaltered, document still resides in the Sent Items folder of the original sender. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Yes all employees are from our company. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments Then the original document is still in the sender's Sent Items folder. Not much you can do, in that case, to both let the user edit the document and control which copy they can edit. Are the users all employees of your company/organization? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments It's not in the public folders. It's in the user's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are these being posted to a public folder? If so, only give the users Read permissions to items that are not their own. Then they can read the attachment, save it to their local drive, but not change it in the IS. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Read Only Attachments My users need to be able to save the document to their desktop and modify it. So I don't think protecting a worksheet would work since the other person would need to know the password to edit the sheet and this opens up another issue of forgotten passwords. We basically just need to make sure that the received attachment (original) does not get overwritten when the user opens the attachment in Outlook and plays around with it. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection? Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Read Only Attachments Is there a way of sending attachments as read only? I need to prevent users from modifying and saving attachments back to the information store. I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Clients are all using Outlook 2002. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface
RE: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module
I am particularly interested in knowing whether it can alert you if a store has dismounted for some reason. If you're not using MOM, what do you use to monitor exchange then? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions What do you mean by something wrong. MOM by default has most of the Alerts buit in. It is a matterf of selecting which rules you put in place and configure to the Alerts. My limited experience with the product makes me want to wait for a promised newer version from MS. Remember it is a stripped down versionn of NETIQ From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 21:51:06 -0700 Is anyone using MOM with the Exchange 2000 module pack? I'm interested in knowing how useful it is in monitoring Exchange and alerting you when something is wrong with exchnage. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slightly OT: MOM with Exchange Module
Is anyone using MOM with the Exchange 2000 module pack? I'm interested in knowing how useful it is in monitoring Exchange and alerting you when something is wrong with exchnage. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Reporting tool
What kind of reporting tool do you use? I'm looking for a utility that I can generate reports from such as, DL usage, mailbox size and growth over time, etc... Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)
We use Blackberry and GoodTech. We've had a lot of user issues with Blackberry especially with synchronizing the handhelds. We used to have a user who complained every week because he's got a lot of synchronization issues. We gave him a G100 and we've never heard any complaints from him since. GoodTech is awesome. We have about 90 blackberries and we're moving all of them to GoodTech. -Original Message- From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service? Or does anyone know of alternitive's to the same type of technology? With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump ship to something that is a good replacement before we lose the service. Thanks! The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K migration issue
Are you doing it all in one shot? You can just put a cname in dns and a static record in wins pointing to your old server. If I remember correctly, Outlook was able to find the new exchange server for mailbox that have been moved to e2k as long as the exchange 5.5 server was online the first time the users logged into their mailboxes after the move. -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello all, I was wondering if anyone out there knew of way to script Outlook profile changes. We are doing an E2K migration and I am looking for a way to automate the changes to the users Outlook profile. We are building out brand new E2K servers and exporting/importing all the mail from 5.5 to the E2K servers and need to point the users at the new servers. Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange NDR
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what it means? Been looking it up but I can't find what the web bugs not accepted here message means. This was generated by our external You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. clientmail2.amicus.com #5.7.1 SMTP; 554 5.7.1 Web bugs not accepted here (qid: h7EJQ7Mn023111), caught on imbaspam-ny04 Thanks, Carmila You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. clientmail2.amicus.com #5.7.1 SMTP; 554 5.7.1 Web bugs not accepted here (qid: h7EJQ7Mn023111), caught on imbaspam-ny04 This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange NDR
Amicus is our external relay. They cannot like us since we pay them. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions It means that the mail relay clientmail2.amicus.com either A) doesn't like you or 2) is horribly isconfigured by someone who shouldn't be touching production mail systems. I'd vote for A personally, but I could see 2 as a valid option too.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange NDR We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what it means? Been looking it up but I can't find what the web bugs not accepted here message means. This was generated by our external You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. clientmail2.amicus.com #5.7.1 SMTP; 554 5.7.1 Web bugs not accepted here (qid: h7EJQ7Mn023111), caught on imbaspam-ny04 Thanks, Carmila You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. clientmail2.amicus.com #5.7.1 SMTP; 554 5.7.1 Web bugs not accepted here (qid: h7EJQ7Mn023111), caught on imbaspam-ny04 This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange NDR
Anyways, I figured it out. He was forwarding a yahoo email message(html) and it had an embedded GIF image on it that may be acting as a beacon. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions It means that the mail relay clientmail2.amicus.com either A) doesn't like you or 2) is horribly isconfigured by someone who shouldn't be touching production mail systems. I'd vote for A personally, but I could see 2 as a valid option too.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange NDR We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what it means? Been looking it up but I can't find what the web bugs not accepted here message means. This was generated by our external You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. clientmail2.amicus.com #5.7.1 SMTP; 554 5.7.1 Web bugs not accepted here (qid: h7EJQ7Mn023111), caught on imbaspam-ny04 Thanks, Carmila You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. clientmail2.amicus.com #5.7.1 SMTP; 554 5.7.1 Web bugs not accepted here (qid: h7EJQ7Mn023111), caught on imbaspam-ny04 This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PF Permissions
Is it possible for me to use non mail-enabled universal security groups for public folder permissions? Or does it have to be mail-enabled? I'm on Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 2000
Have you set the allow out of office responses in the global settings? -Original Message- From: D C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Can't seem to get Out of office auto:reply to work, have outlook 2000, exchange 2000, service pack 3- sends inside but not out to internet, I have all the settings for relaying / out of office to internet, but no luck.. anyone have any ideas?? Dan __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zombie ACL's
We're getting this kind of warning on 3 of our E2K servers. The warning has different aliases in the x500 address though. I saw this KB http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;318549 but it applies to SP1 SP2. We're on SP3. Tried it anyways but it didn't fix anything. Does anyone have any other ideas on how to fix this? Thanks, Carmila Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: General Event ID: 9551 An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Mailbox Store (NYMAIL)]/Journal located on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=BABCOCK BROWN/OU=BBIMAIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSHELBY into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is replicated to the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be upgraded in place). If the specified object does NOT get replicated to the Active Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager or the Exchange Client to update the ACL on the folder manually. The access rights in the ACE for this DN were 0x0. This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Zombie ACL's
Ouch... That's like finding a needle in the hay stack! :) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions You have to find them and remove them. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Zombie ACL's We're getting this kind of warning on 3 of our E2K servers. The warning has different aliases in the x500 address though. I saw this KB http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;318549 but it applies to SP1 SP2. We're on SP3. Tried it anyways but it didn't fix anything. Does anyone have any other ideas on how to fix this? Thanks, Carmila Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: General Event ID: 9551 An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Mailbox Store (NYMAIL)]/Journal located on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=BABCOCK BROWN/OU=BBIMAIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSHELBY into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is replicated to the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be upgraded in place). If the specified object does NOT get replicated to the Active Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager or the Exchange Client to update the ACL on the folder manually. The access rights in the ACE for this DN were 0x0. This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Zombie ACL's
Not really. It just says: An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Mailbox Store (NYMAIL)]/Journal located on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions It shouldn't be. Isn't the mailbox with the bad ACL pretty clearly listed in the event log message? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Zombie ACL's Ouch... That's like finding a needle in the hay stack! :) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions You have to find them and remove them. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Zombie ACL's We're getting this kind of warning on 3 of our E2K servers. The warning has different aliases in the x500 address though. I saw this KB http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;318549 but it applies to SP1 SP2. We're on SP3. Tried it anyways but it didn't fix anything. Does anyone have any other ideas on how to fix this? Thanks, Carmila Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: General Event ID: 9551 An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Mailbox Store (NYMAIL)]/Journal located on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=BABCOCK BROWN/OU=BBIMAIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSHELBY into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is replicated to the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be upgraded in place). If the specified object does NOT get replicated to the Active Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager or the Exchange Client to update the ACL on the folder manually. The access rights in the ACE for this DN were 0x0. This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original
RE: Zombie ACL's
Thanks guys! I'll start going through my list. -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions You have to find the mailbox and remove the permissions for Journal for this zombie user. I've had these a few times during our migration. When I see it in the log I first see if I can figure out which department that person used to work for and go and check the permissions of his former co-workers and that usually locates the offending mailbox. Usually takes less then 15 minutes to find. Jeff -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Zombie ACL's We're getting this kind of warning on 3 of our E2K servers. The warning has different aliases in the x500 address though. I saw this KB http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;318549 but it applies to SP1 SP2. We're on SP3. Tried it anyways but it didn't fix anything. Does anyone have any other ideas on how to fix this? Thanks, Carmila -- -- Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: General Event ID: 9551 An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Mailbox Store (NYMAIL)]/Journal located on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=BABCOCK BROWN/OU=BBIMAIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSHELBY into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is replicated to the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be upgraded in place). If the specified object does NOT get replicated to the Active Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager or the Exchange Client to update the ACL on the folder manually. The access rights in the ACE for this DN were 0x0. This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Zombie ACL's
Jim, CSHELBY is actually a user that has left even before we migrated to E2k. She's had delegate permissions to a bunch of our users. I just have to figure out which users. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Carmila, The offending mailbox is listed in the next line down in your error message: The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=BABCOCK BROWN/OU=BBIMAIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSHELBY into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. In this case, it's the mailbox with an alias of CSHELBY. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Zombie ACL's Not really. It just says: An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Mailbox Store (NYMAIL)]/Journal located on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions It shouldn't be. Isn't the mailbox with the bad ACL pretty clearly listed in the event log message? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Zombie ACL's Ouch... That's like finding a needle in the hay stack! :) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions You have to find them and remove them. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Zombie ACL's We're getting this kind of warning on 3 of our E2K servers. The warning has different aliases in the x500 address though. I saw this KB http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;318549 but it applies to SP1 SP2. We're on SP3. Tried it anyways but it didn't fix anything. Does anyone have any other ideas on how to fix this? Thanks, Carmila Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: General Event ID: 9551 An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [MBX:Mailbox Store (NYMAIL)]/Journal located on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=BABCOCK BROWN/OU=BBIMAIL/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CSHELBY into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is replicated to the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be upgraded in place). If the specified object does NOT get replicated to the Active Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager or the Exchange Client to update the ACL on the folder manually. The access rights in the ACE for this DN were 0x0. This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting
Outlook dependency to GC
Is there a dependecy between Outlook 2002 and the global catalog server? I took down one of the GC's for maintenance but we still have 1 other GC that is up and running in the site. What I was thinking was, everything would be okay since I don't have both GC's down. All of a sudden, users are unable to open Outlook. Brought the GC back up and it's back to business as usual. I'm running Exchange 2000 SP 3, Windows 2000 SP3. Clients are Outlook 2002 SP2. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook dependency to GC
Both GC's are in the same site. I checked ESM and exchange has switched to the 2nd GC. I guess we just weren't patient enough. :) Thanks guys! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Are both GCs in the same site? Outlook does keep the GC in the registry, but it gets it from Exchange in a process known as referral. Look in your Exchange server's Properties pages, under Directory Access (I think it is; it's known as DSAccess) and you can see which GCs your Exchange server uses. If there's only one in the site and it goes down, it could take maybe 15 minutes (from my experience) for the Exchange server to decide to use a GC outside the site. That may be enough ammunition for you to purchase a second GC for the site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook dependency to GC Is there a dependecy between Outlook 2002 and the global catalog server? I took down one of the GC's for maintenance but we still have 1 other GC that is up and running in the site. What I was thinking was, everything would be okay since I don't have both GC's down. All of a sudden, users are unable to open Outlook. Brought the GC back up and it's back to business as usual. I'm running Exchange 2000 SP 3, Windows 2000 SP3. Clients are Outlook 2002 SP2. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
I think you got me mixed up with someone else. I'm already on E2k. ;) -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Carmila -- Here's a copy (below) of a message I posted 8/2/2002 about my Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2k upgrade It does not include the issues with OWA in Exchange 2k. OWA 2K is much prettier and much more functional, but it is certainly MUCH slower. Also, you need to edit your URLSCAN.INI file from the default OWA configuration or else you will 1. not be able to read any email in owa with a subject that ends with a period 2. not be able to read any email in owa with a subject that contains a '' Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] (919)960- This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready to upgrade might want to hear the story. I just spent the night upgrading (or trying to upgrade) my exchange 5.5 server. We have a very simple network. 1 domain. 200 users. 1 exchange server. 2 domain controllers (not the exchange server). Started about 2 weeks ago prepping for upgrade. Armed with: White Paper in-place upgrade from msoft exchange 5.5 to msoft exchange 2000 Q316886 How To: Migrate from exchange server 5.5 to exchange 2000 server Q282309 upgrading exchange server 5.5 service pack 4 to exchange 2000 server Q295922 considerations when you upgrade to exchange 2000 server Q296260 how to configure a two-way recipient connection agreement for exchange server 5.5 users Q253829 description of the active directory connector deletion mechanism And, of course, monitored this list (and the sun-exchange) one for upgrade ideas! Now some of the documents have conflicting information. If you weed thru the dates and such you can usually figure out what is really true. For example, the white paper states you MUST have at least one domain running in native mode, but the HOW TO describes a scenario where all domains are in mixed mode. With the domain controllers upgraded to win2k active directory (mixed mode) last month I tackled the exchange upgrade this month. Went thru the white paper and how to, updating the schema (forestprep and domainprep) and ran all the tests listed in those docs to verify it was working. Got exactly the results they told me! First time I ran the actual upgrade got my first rude surprise. My vendor had shipped me the Exchange 2000 standard edition media (which doesn't really say standard on it, just Exchange 2000) and the upgrade process stopped immediately with You can't go from enterprise to standard you idiot Two days later I have the correct media. Take the server off the network and run an online backup (Veritas backup exec with exchange option). Verify the backup worked. With exchange services down get back on the network and run domain tests again. Everything ok! Run the upgrade! The upgrade goes thru several processes but hangs at Setup failed while installing sub-component Site Replication Service with error code 0xC007041D -- retry or cancel search MS knowledge base and looks like a permissions issue (Q278254 and Q273730). Hmm, make sure the exchange service account has all the permissions and click retry. Still no work. Rats. Getting late so time to make the $250 call to PSS! PSS steps me thru lots of stuff, nothing works. They have me change the service account user permissions at the ORG container from CUSTOM to SERVICE ACCOUNT (i'm probably not saying this exactly correct). Still no joy. Try to cancel out of that error message. Nada. Have to task manager/shut down process. They then refer me to the ultimate nightmare: Q264309 - How to Roll Back A failed Upgraded from Exchange Server 5.5. to Exchange 2000. Yuck. Go into registry and delete the stuff, rename the exchsrvr folders, uninstall IIS, restart server, install IIS, re-apply all service packs and hotfixes (that really sucks), delete the renamed exchsrvr folders, setup /r exchange 5.5, restore directory and info store. Restoring directory service doesn't work. Call PSS back. Directory service was trying to start and got hung, can't restore to hung service. Change to manual start and reboot. Directory restores!!! Restore info store. (8 gigs). 2 hours later ready to go! (almost) Now the internet mail connector isn't working. Dawn is breaking and panic begins to creep in. Users will be screaming in about 2 hours. Call PSS again. End up deleting the IMC and creating a new one. They very patiently step me through lots of good stuff, including making sure I'm not an internet relay and that I'm not doing circular logs. They even stand by while I
RE: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000
Don't forget to run NDTSnoMatch. Cleaning up the disabled accounts is no fun. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Any pointers or tips for an upgrade from 5.5 to 2000? I will be upgrading instead of migrating. Just wondering what your thoughts are about upgrading vs. migrating. I don't think I have a choice..I preferrably would migrate, however, I think they (mgmt) are going to make me upgrade. Any tips are appreciated. The server current configuration: Windows 2000 Advanced Server Exchange 5.5 (one server) Outlook 2000/xp clients Thanks in advance for any comments or tips. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Renaming a mailbox
Have you corrected the Display Name? -Original Message- From: Erick Thompaon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions When I created an account, I mistyped the last name of the user. I'm now trying to correct the mistake, but I can't seem to get the change to stick. I've gone over every tab in the ADUC property window and corrected the name, and changed the name in the X400 properties. However, the from name in Outlook is still coming up as the misspelled name, and the mailbox name (in Exchange System Manager) is the misspelled name. I'm not sure if these two are related or now. How do I rename the mailbox, and the from name? Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 in Exchange mode. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSExchangeSA error
I'm getting this error message in my application logs every 13 minutes. Any ideas what's causing this? Source: MSExchangeSA Event ID: 9153 Description: Microsoft Exchange System Attendant reported an error '0x80005000' when setting DS notification. I'm on E2K sp3, mixed mode. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSExchangeSA error
No we did not but we had a power failure in the building last weekend. That's when the errors started happening. The exchange server and the DC were up but the switch died. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did you happen to get rid of a DC recently? If so, is the E2K box still pointed at that DC for DNS? -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MSExchangeSA error I'm getting this error message in my application logs every 13 minutes. Any ideas what's causing this? Source: MSExchangeSA Event ID: 9153 Description: Microsoft Exchange System Attendant reported an error '0x80005000' when setting DS notification. I'm on E2K sp3, mixed mode. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSExchangeSA error
If it loses contact with a DC, wouldn't it automatically find the DC once it comes back up again? The DC is up but it seems like the exchange server still thinks it is down. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Did you happen to get rid of a DC recently? If so, is the E2K box still pointed at that DC for DNS? -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MSExchangeSA error I'm getting this error message in my application logs every 13 minutes. Any ideas what's causing this? Source: MSExchangeSA Event ID: 9153 Description: Microsoft Exchange System Attendant reported an error '0x80005000' when setting DS notification. I'm on E2K sp3, mixed mode. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Format
When sending a message between exchange servers in the org, does exchange follow the internet message formats? Or is the message format only followed then you actually send an email message outside of your org? I'm still stuck with my winmail.dat problem between exchange servers. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Format
It's about 2 users sending to a distribution list. The users say they picked the DL from the GAL. They're sending the message with attachments and are using rich-text format. I know it's only 2 users but they're sending the email messages to the big bosses and it's been driving us nuts. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions I haven't seen all the tracks to this but is it just a couple users to a couple users or an entire site to site with this 'dat' problem? If it's just a couple users I would ensure their personal contact list doesn't have anything special set and they are using that instead of the GAL. From site to site the3 format depends on the version of Exchange I believe, in 5.5 it's x400, not sure if everything is SMTP or not in 2000. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Format When sending a message between exchange servers in the org, does exchange follow the internet message formats? Or is the message format only followed then you actually send an email message outside of your org? I'm still stuck with my winmail.dat problem between exchange servers. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Format
Checked their contacts and they don't have the DL or the members of the DL in their local contacts. I'm switching them the html mail format instead of RTF and see if it still happens. If it does, I guess it's time to give MS a call. Any other other ideas? I'd be glad to hear them. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Well then if everyone is on the GAL and the DL is on the GAL, first thing I would do is ensure none of them have each others names in their Persona Contacts or Personal Address book. If J Smith the boss is on both, even on a GAL DL, the personal settings would take precedence (rule this out from the get go). -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message Format It's about 2 users sending to a distribution list. The users say they picked the DL from the GAL. They're sending the message with attachments and are using rich-text format. I know it's only 2 users but they're sending the email messages to the big bosses and it's been driving us nuts. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions I haven't seen all the tracks to this but is it just a couple users to a couple users or an entire site to site with this 'dat' problem? If it's just a couple users I would ensure their personal contact list doesn't have anything special set and they are using that instead of the GAL. From site to site the3 format depends on the version of Exchange I believe, in 5.5 it's x400, not sure if everything is SMTP or not in 2000. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Format When sending a message between exchange servers in the org, does exchange follow the internet message formats? Or is the message format only followed then you actually send an email message outside of your org? I'm still stuck with my winmail.dat problem between exchange servers. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors
Hidden accounts/recipients
Is there a way to search for accounts/recipients that are hidden from the exchange address list in AD? Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Export PF info
Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export PF info
Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export PF info
I'm able to search for the smtp addresses but I need to know where it is so that I can change it. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions No, sadly, the path of the public folder is not one of the properties promoted to the AD. It would have been really damn helpful if it was - especially since the property exists in the AD and since it was populated in Exchange 5.5. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:15 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export PF info
I'll give this a try. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions You can export the object class of publicFolder and the attribute you want is ProxyAddresses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:18 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info I'm able to search for the smtp addresses but I need to know where it is so that I can change it. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions No, sadly, the path of the public folder is not one of the properties promoted to the AD. It would have been really damn helpful if it was - especially since the property exists in the AD and since it was populated in Exchange 5.5. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:15 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties
RE: Winmail.dat
The problem is, it does not happen when it is sent to individual persons in the GAL. It happens when it is sent to distribution lists. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions The winmail.dat file goes out to a recipient who is configured in the GAL, Outlook Contact, Personal Address Book entry, or one-off address to get rich text messages. Recofigure the appropriate recipient object with rich text unchecked. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Winmail.dat Some of my users are getting the winmail.dat attachments. The messages are coming from users in our Australian office. We're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on both servers, same Org, still on mixed mode. The users in both offices are all running Outlook XP. The weird thing is it's intermittent and it only seems to happen when it's sent to a distribution list. I've been searching on the web and a lot of the articles point to sending from exchange to a non-exchange mail server or sending to a non-Outlook client. Any ideas? Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Winmail.dat
We're using Trend scanmail on both servers. Everything I've found so far points to non-Exchange mail servers and non-MS clients but this is from Exchange going to Exchange and all clients are running Outlook 2002 and using rich text format. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have seen this occasionally with various 3rd party products (Anti-virus or Anti-spam products). Do you have either of these on the Australian server? If so, which ones? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Molkentin Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Winmail.dat July 1 is like April 1... Is like any day I can try pulling a joke on any user! ;) You'd be amazed how many admins fell for that when I suggested it on another list (albeit not an exchange one). V. funny. Interested to see what the resolution is - I've never heard of the problem. themolk. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Winmail.dat I would've fallen for it if I didn't know better. Maybe I can try telling my users that and see if they buy it. :) -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Carmila, It's the international dateline - every time you send an e-mail to a group across it, it attaches the winmail.dat file so that when it is opened, it is read in the local time zone (and reflects that).[1] themolk. [1] Complete BS - but I couldn't help but throw it out there. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Winmail.dat Some of my users are getting the winmail.dat attachments. The messages are coming from users in our Australian office. We're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on both servers, same Org, still on mixed mode. The users in both offices are all running Outlook XP. The weird thing is it's intermittent and it only seems to happen when it's sent to a distribution list. I've been searching on the web and a lot of the articles point to sending from exchange to a non-exchange mail server or sending to a non-Outlook client. Any ideas? Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___NOTICE This electronic mail transmission contains
Winmail.dat
Some of my users are getting the winmail.dat attachments. The messages are coming from users in our Australian office. We're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on both servers, same Org, still on mixed mode. The users in both offices are all running Outlook XP. The weird thing is it's intermittent and it only seems to happen when it's sent to a distribution list. I've been searching on the web and a lot of the articles point to sending from exchange to a non-exchange mail server or sending to a non-Outlook client. Any ideas? Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Winmail.dat
I would've fallen for it if I didn't know better. Maybe I can try telling my users that and see if they buy it. :) -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Carmila, It's the international dateline - every time you send an e-mail to a group across it, it attaches the winmail.dat file so that when it is opened, it is read in the local time zone (and reflects that).[1] themolk. [1] Complete BS - but I couldn't help but throw it out there. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Winmail.dat Some of my users are getting the winmail.dat attachments. The messages are coming from users in our Australian office. We're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on both servers, same Org, still on mixed mode. The users in both offices are all running Outlook XP. The weird thing is it's intermittent and it only seems to happen when it's sent to a distribution list. I've been searching on the web and a lot of the articles point to sending from exchange to a non-exchange mail server or sending to a non-Outlook client. Any ideas? Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Yup, it ain't fun since I'd rather have everything on the server. I don't leave the pst file on the local hard drive. They very rarely access the pst files so I've moved the pst files on to a NAS box where it's being backed up every night and if I need to do a search on those, I use Active Folders. If they need to archive, we've been archiving by deal (only the dead/completed deals) -- one pst file per deal so the pst file usually never gets anywhere near 1 GB. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Sounds like it works for you unless people want to search their whole mailbox after moving small doses into a PST. Also, make sure nobody ever tries to switch a 3GB mailbox to a PST ;-) Have fun with PST's :-) I used to use one back in 1998/99 and suffered more than one time from corruption and data loss. Of course if that'll happen the network admin is in charge to recover the data from the local hard drive of the laptop (which is surely backup'ed every night ;-) I'm happy with having all data on the server. I can search, use OWA or IMAP and the server admin (me, Doh!) takes care of the backup too... Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown
RE: .Pst on OWA?
I've actually downloaded their demo but I haven't got around to playing with it on my test lab. It hasn't really been an administrative nightmare ever since we moved the pst files to a central location. Though it does need a lot of cooperation from the user community and intervention from IT. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions That's fine. PST's aren't a good way to comply with those regulations though, because then you still lose both administrative control of that data as well as the ability to back it up. There's this cool product from Kvault that is designed to address those issues though... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: .Pst on OWA?
I agree with you that it's a lot better to keep everything in exchange that's why I'm seriously pursuing the idea of getting an archiving solution. In our current situation where we do not have the archiving solution, it's either we leave all the email messages on the server and probably at this point, we'd have users that would have 8GB mailboxes and probably the total size of the information store would be at the 250GB mark or archive the mail messages into smaller pst files and put them in a central location (NAS box). I still do have control since it's searchable, and I can run policies on it (using a 3rd party app) and users have stopped bugging us why their 3 GB mailboxes take forever to open up when they're dialing into our network on a 56Kbps line. It's far from ideal but it works for us right now and I'm looking forward to have a better solution. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions At the bare minimum, you've given up centralized administrative control, which IMO is a bad thing when it comes to regulatory compliance. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I've actually downloaded their demo but I haven't got around to playing with it on my test lab. It hasn't really been an administrative nightmare ever since we moved the pst files to a central location. Though it does need a lot of cooperation from the user community and intervention from IT. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions That's fine. PST's aren't a good way to comply with those regulations though, because then you still lose both administrative control of that data as well as the ability to back it up. There's this cool product from Kvault that is designed to address those issues though... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Unfortunately for me, we can't force people to delete email messages because of different regulations that we need to comply with. We need to comply with a 3 year regulation and a 7 year regulation. I understand that you loose single instance store on PST files and has a lot of quirks but we have a handful of users that have 3GB mailboxes and are asking us why it's taking so long to open up their mailbox when they are in remote locations. We are currently not using an archiving solution but are looking into it. In our current situation, we've been using pst's in small doses for people that have extremely large mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions By setting limits on them...they tend to motivate people to clean up their mail, especially when you don't allow them to send mail once they are over their limit. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: .Pst on OWA? Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down? -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. a newbie, you think? Um PST=BAD!!! -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot
OWA with SSL
I seem to be having a problem attaching documents through OWA using SSL. Without SSL, everything works fine but with SSL, whenever I try attaching a document, it comes up with a 404 error. Has anyone had this error before or seen something like this? This is on an E2k front-end server with sp3. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA with SSL
James, Yes we did change it to https://webmail/US. I'll give this a shot and let you know. Thanks, Carmila -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Carmila, Have you made any adjustments to the default OWA logon page? I.E., changed it from https://servername/exchange to say... https://servername/webmail/usa? If so, you could be having the same problem with the ISAPI upload .DLL file that we did. Put a copy of that .DLL in the new path and point the attachments page at that path. I think that's what we did to fix the problem. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with SSL I seem to be having a problem attaching documents through OWA using SSL. Without SSL, everything works fine but with SSL, whenever I try attaching a document, it comes up with a 404 error. Has anyone had this error before or seen something like this? This is on an E2k front-end server with sp3. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple domains.
Is there a way of configuring it so that your bounces do not come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of postmaster@(default recipient policy)? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions The recipient policy doesn't have to apply to anybody (much less everybody) - they just need to BE there. Make a recipient policy that applies to nobody that has all those domains. Get rid of the connector. Problem solved. They'll bounce properly at that point. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Multiple domains. Subject: Multiple domains. Okay, weve got more than one local domain on the exchange server, only one domain is actually used for the servers, i.e. the active directory, the other domains are just legacy internet domains with the MX record set as our exchange server. To allow delivery of emails to people in the exchange organisation you can either use recipient policies with the desired domain, or alternatively add a new connector, add the address space and tick allow relaying to these domains. We have gone for the latter option as we do not want legacy email addresses created automatically within the domain, we only want people who we manually create email addresses to receive email from the legacy domain. However, the problem is we are now getting a large mail queue for the legacy domains as the server is attempting to relay the messages to the end user but the email address does not exist within our organisation. That is people are trying to send emails, i.e. spammers to email addresses that previously existed and the server is continually trying to relay that email back to itself and were getting all sorts of delay notifications etc. What I was wondering is how I can tell the server to realise that the email address doesn't exist and bounce it away ? Or perhaps im going about this whole thing the wrong way, maybe someone can enlighten me :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Solutions
Thanks for the replies. Does anyone actually have first hand experience using these things? My major concern is in the area of disaster recovery. How easy/hard is it to restore exchange with these 3rd party solutions? I'm concerned about introducing an SQL server into the picture. Exchange is complicated enough and I'm squirmish about maintaining a SQL server at the same time. Thanks, Carmila -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 6:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions KVS and AttachStor are technologies worth looking at. www.mail-resources.com has a number of other 3rd party tools listed in the web links | server | archival section I believe. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:02 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Archiving Solutions Subject: Archiving Solutions Does anyone have any experience with archiving solutions like veritas storage migrator for exchange? We currently do not impose hard limits on our users due to a lot of regulations that we need to comply with. We have users who have mailboxes close to 3GB. On one exchange server that has 180 users, the total size of the store is already at a 110GB. I'm interested to know what solutions you have in place to keep down the size of user's mailboxes. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
Ever since I did the update on scanmail, our problem went away. We don't have a metaframe server but almost the same thing happened to 2 of my exchange servers (we have 7). The WWW service would go down almost at the same time on both servers. I originally thought we were hit by a virus but I did a scan and both servers were clean. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have an update on this issue for those of you still following it, and another question. First, I am still in the process of getting the latest version of ScanMail (6.1) from Trend. Apparently 5.1 is no longer supported and they won't talk to me until I get up to date. Also, the problem has been accelerating; we are now seeing the services crash daily and sometimes multiple times daily. The question is, do any of you out there who have heard of this issue also have a MetaFrame server in your organization and have you seen it acting strangely as well? We have seen, on several occasions, the MetaFrame server's WWW Publishing Service stop unexpectedly at around the same time as the Exchange services go down. As always, I welcome any input or suggestions. Thanks...Ray -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
Probably uninstall what you currently have and install the eval. You'll need to recreate your settings but the good news is you don't have to uninstall the eval once you have your serial numbers. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Tried that. It told me that my server does not support trial version upgrades. When I told that to the licensing rep at Trend, she did say she would deliver the paperwork in person and be sure it gets done ASAP. I just don't know if ASAP means today or 47.5 hours instead of 48. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... I think you can install it in trial mode for about 30 days then apply the key later when you get it. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... Thanks again. Have you been able to confirm what version of ScanMail you are using with that build number. I'm still wrestling with Trend to get my serial number for 6.1. Apparently we never got notified our maintenance was up and I had to renew again. Took 3 days to figure that out. Then they told me it would take another 2 days to get the serial number, meanwhile server is failing to send and receive internet mail a couple times a day and the bosses are getting hot. I love their products but Trends licensing really pisses me off! Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... Ever since I did the update on scanmail, our problem went away. We don't have a metaframe server but almost the same thing happened to 2 of my exchange servers (we have 7). The WWW service would go down almost at the same time on both servers. I originally thought we were hit by a virus but I did a scan and both servers were clean. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have an update on this issue for those of you still following it, and another question. First, I am still in the process of getting the latest version of ScanMail (6.1) from Trend. Apparently 5.1 is no longer supported and they won't talk to me until I get up to date. Also, the problem has been accelerating; we are now seeing the services crash daily and sometimes multiple times daily. The question is, do any of you out there who have heard of this issue also have a MetaFrame server in your organization and have you seen it acting strangely as well? We have seen, on several occasions, the MetaFrame server's WWW Publishing Service stop unexpectedly at around the same time as the Exchange services go down. As always, I welcome any input or suggestions. Thanks...Ray -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service
Archiving Solutions
Does anyone have any experience with archiving solutions like veritas storage migrator for exchange? We currently do not impose hard limits on our users due to a lot of regulations that we need to comply with. We have users who have mailboxes close to 3GB. On one exchange server that has 180 users, the total size of the store is already at a 110GB. I'm interested to know what solutions you have in place to keep down the size of user's mailboxes. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help for a Newbe
Brick level backups take forever though especially of you have big stores. -Original Message- From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions If you didn't use the option to back up the mailboxes individually, your way is the only way to restore one mailboxI've been there before myself. I now back up the mailboxes individually. Todd -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re:Help for a Newbe Using Veritas Backup Exec V8.5. Full nightly backup of the Information Store and System State. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help for a Newbe Just one mailbox. That seems like a little overkill. How are you doing your backups? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help for a Newbe I'm REALLY! new to exchange. I inherited a exchange server about a week ago. I need to restore a mail box. (Have not done before but have done some reading) I'll tell you guys how I plan on doing it and would you be so kind to tell me if I have left anything out. 1. build second exchange sever with same server name and same version and patch level. (Does it need to belong to the same domain or does it even need to be on a domain at all?) 2. Copy the priv1.edb and priv1.stm from tape to the restore server. 3. Mount database store and use the eseutil tool to create the pst for the mailbox. 4. import pst file into account needing restored. Are these 4 steps all I need or are there additional steps? Thanks for any input. Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Background Cleanup
See this error message in my logs everyday. Does anyone have any ideas what this is or how I can fix this? Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: Background Cleanup Event ID: 1101 Description: Error 0x8004010f occurred on message 1-14FBCE during a background cleanup on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Background Cleanup
Thanks! That seems to be the standard answer to a lot of things. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Ignore it. That's the official MS answer, from a call to PSS (about something else). -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:24 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Background Cleanup Subject: Background Cleanup See this error message in my logs everyday. Does anyone have any ideas what this is or how I can fix this? Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Category: Background Cleanup Event ID: 1101 Description: Error 0x8004010f occurred on message 1-14FBCE during a background cleanup on database Storage group 1\Store 1A. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
We had the same issue about a month ago. By any chance, are you using Trend scanmail? -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting...
You'd have to call them and ask for it. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Fantastic. How do I get it? I don't see it in their downloads section. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... They have a hotfix -- Build 1178 from March 6, 2003. -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions I had this issue with Scan Mail last week... They have yet to completely fix it Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... Yup. Just got the following from another member as well. - Ray, I had a customer of ours have this problem with Trend.. And it went away when he changed how Trend was scanning for Viruses, either on commit or via SMTP sink, but NOT both. He had thought it was our iHateSpam Server product, but it was Trend. Regards, Bob Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Services crashing and server rebooting... We had the same issue about a month ago. By any chance, are you using Trend scanmail? -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions I have a question to run by the list that I have been unsuccessful in finding any definitive answers to anywhere else. About a month ago, we started having problems with our Exchange 2000 server. It is Ex2K SP3 running on Win2K SP3. At intervals between a couple days and a week, we notice that a number of System Services shut down unexpectedly. Upon looking at the event logs we see the following sequence of events. Event Id: 7031 The IIS Admin Service service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange IMAP4 service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Network News Transport (NNTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange POP3 terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Microsoft Exchange Routing Engine service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The Simple Mail Transport Protocol (SMTP) service terminated unexpectedly... Event Id: 7031 The World Wide Web Publishing service terminated unexpectedly... On 2 occasions, this sequence was followed by the server rebooting on its own and generating an event ID 6008 the previous shutdown...was unexpected. I searched the MSKB and the only thing I could find that seemed to relate was a reference to lingering issues from the CodeRed virus. I used Trend Micro's system cleanup application and confirmed that there were no indications of infection on the server. I am hoping there are others out there that may have seen something like this that can offer some suggestions short of reinstalling the entire system. Please help. Thanks in advance... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org Thought for the day: An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field. --Niels Bohr An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them. --Werner Karl Heisenberg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
