OT: Code red
anyone have an idea that has been working with code red? I have a win2k server that was infected. I re-formatted all hard drives, re-installed OS w/SP2 built-in and patched for CR. Within about 10 minutes I was infected again according to the w3svc log and the symantec scanner for code red. disconnected from network and did same as above. Ran the patch from a floppy. re-connected to the network, ran the new MS Security scanner at: www.microsoft.com/technet/mpsa/start.asp and applied all hotfixes there as well. Note: I ran the CR hotfix and rebooted before I ever attached to the network. 1 hour later CR shows up in the w3svc log again and symantec scanner says I am infected again. Ideas? - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Code red
of course, read my email . . . - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: "Fabrig, Amado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:01 PM Subject: RE: Code red > have you applied the security patch? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:56 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: OT: Code red > > > > anyone have an idea that has been working with code red? > > > > I have a win2k server that was infected. I re-formatted all hard drives, > > re-installed OS w/SP2 built-in and patched for CR. Within about 10 minutes > > I > > was infected again according to the w3svc log and the symantec scanner for > > code red. > > > > disconnected from network and did same as above. Ran the patch from a > > floppy. re-connected to the network, ran the new MS Security scanner at: > > www.microsoft.com/technet/mpsa/start.asp and applied all hotfixes there as > > well. Note: I ran the CR hotfix and rebooted before I ever attached to the > > network. 1 hour later CR shows up in the w3svc log again and symantec > > scanner says I am infected again. > > > > Ideas? > > > > - > > I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as > > they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their > > finals... > > - > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Code red
It also shows up in the logfiles for w3svc and that is the ultimate tell-tale, right? - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: "Bill Kuhn - MCSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:02 PM Subject: RE: Code red Get rid of the Symantec scanner. My dead grandma has a better chance of telling you accurately whether you have Code Red. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Haaker Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:56 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: OT: Code red anyone have an idea that has been working with code red? I have a win2k server that was infected. I re-formatted all hard drives, re-installed OS w/SP2 built-in and patched for CR. Within about 10 minutes I was infected again according to the w3svc log and the symantec scanner for code red. disconnected from network and did same as above. Ran the patch from a floppy. re-connected to the network, ran the new MS Security scanner at: www.microsoft.com/technet/mpsa/start.asp and applied all hotfixes there as well. Note: I ran the CR hotfix and rebooted before I ever attached to the network. 1 hour later CR shows up in the w3svc log again and symantec scanner says I am infected again. Ideas? - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Code red
This appears in my log just once: 2001-08-20 16:28:41 61.187.115.20 - 172.17.1.217 80 GET /default.ida %u90 90%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u 9090%u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0078%u%u00=a 200 - successful? I thought this only showed up in your logs if it *was* successful! TIA. Chris - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:16 PM Subject: RE: Code red > But he's apparently seeing it in the logs as well. > Chris, What do the w3svc logs say? Is the attack successful or not? > You can test your server here: > http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Tools/codered.html > > > > > Andy David > J Muller International > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:02 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Code red > > > Get rid of the Symantec scanner. My dead grandma has a better chance of > telling you accurately whether you have Code Red. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Haaker > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:56 AM > To: ExchangeList@swynk > Subject: OT: Code red > > > anyone have an idea that has been working with code red? > > I have a win2k server that was infected. I re-formatted all hard drives, > re-installed OS w/SP2 built-in and patched for CR. Within about 10 > minutes I > was infected again according to the w3svc log and the symantec scanner > for > code red. > > disconnected from network and did same as above. Ran the patch from a > floppy. re-connected to the network, ran the new MS Security scanner at: > www.microsoft.com/technet/mpsa/start.asp and applied all hotfixes there > as > well. Note: I ran the CR hotfix and rebooted before I ever attached to > the > network. 1 hour later CR shows up in the w3svc log again and symantec > scanner says I am infected again. > > Ideas? > > - > I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more > as > they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their > finals... > - > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Code red
I tried to send the log entry for you to look at, but the AV on the Exchange list kicks it out. Can you tell me what to look for in the log entry to determine if it was successful or not? I thought you only saw the ida.xx entry if it *was* successful. TIA Chris - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:16 PM Subject: RE: Code red > But he's apparently seeing it in the logs as well. > Chris, What do the w3svc logs say? Is the attack successful or not? > You can test your server here: > http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Tools/codered.html > > > > > Andy David > J Muller International > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:02 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Code red > > > Get rid of the Symantec scanner. My dead grandma has a better chance of > telling you accurately whether you have Code Red. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Haaker > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:56 AM > To: ExchangeList@swynk > Subject: OT: Code red > > > anyone have an idea that has been working with code red? > > I have a win2k server that was infected. I re-formatted all hard drives, > re-installed OS w/SP2 built-in and patched for CR. Within about 10 > minutes I > was infected again according to the w3svc log and the symantec scanner > for > code red. > > disconnected from network and did same as above. Ran the patch from a > floppy. re-connected to the network, ran the new MS Security scanner at: > www.microsoft.com/technet/mpsa/start.asp and applied all hotfixes there > as > well. Note: I ran the CR hotfix and rebooted before I ever attached to > the > network. 1 hour later CR shows up in the w3svc log again and symantec > scanner says I am infected again. > > Ideas? > > - > I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more > as > they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their > finals... > - > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Code red
How do you tell the diff? - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:31 PM Subject: RE: Code red > That is just the attempt. > Besides, isn't code red asleep right now? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Haaker > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Code red > > > This appears in my log just once: > > 2001-08-20 16:28:41 61.187.115.20 - 172.17.1.217 80 GET /default.ida > > > > > > %u90 > 90%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u90 > 90%u > 9090%u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0078%u%u00=a 200 - > > successful? I thought this only showed up in your logs if it *was* > successful! > > TIA. > > Chris > - > I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more > as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their > finals... > - > - Original Message - > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:16 PM > Subject: RE: Code red > > > > But he's apparently seeing it in the logs as well. > > Chris, What do the w3svc logs say? Is the attack successful or not? > > You can test your server here: > > http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Tools/codered.html > > > > > > > > > > Andy David > > J Muller International > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:02 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Code red > > > > > > Get rid of the Symantec scanner. My dead grandma has a better chance > > of telling you accurately whether you have Code Red. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Haaker > > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:56 AM > > To: ExchangeList@swynk > > Subject: OT: Code red > > > > > > anyone have an idea that has been working with code red? > > > > I have a win2k server that was infected. I re-formatted all hard > > drives, re-installed OS w/SP2 built-in and patched for CR. Within > > about 10 minutes I was infected again according to the w3svc log and > > the symantec scanner for > > code red. > > > > disconnected from network and did same as above. Ran the patch from a > > floppy. re-connected to the network, ran the new MS Security scanner > > at: www.microsoft.com/technet/mpsa/start.asp and applied all hotfixes > > there as well. Note: I ran the CR hotfix and rebooted before I ever > > attached to the > > network. 1 hour later CR shows up in the w3svc log again and symantec > > scanner says I am infected again. > > > > Ideas? > > > > - > > I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot > > more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for > > their finals... > > - > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTEC
importing 2nd SMTP address
I need to import 2nd smtp address (same domain, different username format). I exported the recipient info, and am going to add it back in and I get an error that an address of that type already exists. I am using SMTP: So I need to use a different tag ? Isnt there also a switch when importing to tell it to do all fields? TIA! - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMS Queue
Orlando FLA - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: RE: IMS Queue > Where is MEC this year? > > > > Andy David > J Muller International > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Queue > > > > All, > > I have a whole bunch of emails piling up in my IMS. The Orignator of all > these messages say " <>" With nothing in between the perenthesis. What is > this telling me? And should I just axe them? > > > Its a method used to cause a denial of service by filling up your outgoing > queues > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMS Queue
no, wait, that was a joke, right? okay, it *is* Monday . . . - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: RE: IMS Queue > Where is MEC this year? > > > > Andy David > J Muller International > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMS Queue > > > > All, > > I have a whole bunch of emails piling up in my IMS. The Orignator of all > these messages say " <>" With nothing in between the perenthesis. What is > this telling me? And should I just axe them? > > > Its a method used to cause a denial of service by filling up your outgoing > queues > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: importing 2nd SMTP address
thanks. 3.21 and 3.22 couldnt be *more* vague . . . and the link doesnt work anymore . . . for me at least. - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:07 PM Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address > faq 3.21 and 3.22 > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > -----Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: importing 2nd SMTP address > > > I need to import 2nd smtp address (same domain, different username format). > I exported the recipient info, and am going to add it back in and I get an > error that an address of that type already exists. I am using SMTP: > So I need to use a different tag ? Isnt there also a switch when importing > to tell it to do all fields? > > TIA! > > - > I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as > they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their > finals... > - > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: importing 2nd SMTP address
got it. I forgot the trailing semicolon on the field - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:24 PM Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address This is vague?? 3.21 Q: How do I add another SMTP address? A: Export to CSV, Edit with Excel, Import from CSV. 3.22 Q: But I can't figure out the Edit part... A: Use the header.exe tool from the Exchange CD (clue: "Secondary-Proxy-Addresses"). A2: Greg Deckler has some nifty Excel formulas for dealing with the S-P-A string: http://www.ncgroup.com/abu/exchange/formulas - see "Magic E-Mail Address Parsing Formula". ps. the link works for me. -Michèle Immigration site: <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> Our new 2001 Miata: <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> Tiggercam: <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> - If life gives you lemons, squeeze the juice into a water gun and shoot other people in the eyes. ----- -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: importing 2nd SMTP address thanks. 3.21 and 3.22 couldnt be *more* vague . . . and the link doesnt work anymore . . . for me at least. - I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their finals... - - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:07 PM Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address > faq 3.21 and 3.22 > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: importing 2nd SMTP address > > > I need to import 2nd smtp address (same domain, different username format). > I exported the recipient info, and am going to add it back in and I get an > error that an address of that type already exists. I am using SMTP: > So I need to use a different tag ? Isnt there also a switch when importing > to tell it to do all fields? > > TIA! > > - > I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as > they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their > finals... > - > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
XCH 2000 OWA
Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K OWA on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend? TIA . . . Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XCH 2000 OWA
OWA only comes with the Enterprise Edition? - Original Message - From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:57 AM Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA 1. To "put" OWA 2000 on a stand-alone server you need to purchase an Exchange 2000 Server Enterprise Edition 2. OWA 2000 cannot connect to an Exchange 5.5 Server > -----Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: XCH 2000 OWA > > Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K OWA > on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend? > > TIA . . . > Chris > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XCH 2000 OWA
okay, bear with me here . . . assuming it installs in roughly the same way xch 5.5 owa does, I only install that owa component on the front-end iis server or do you have to do an "exchange 2k" install now + xch 2k owa? Or do you simply have to blow a XCH 2k EE license for any machine running owa in a front-end/back-end "enterprise strength" configuration? - Original Message - From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:13 AM Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA No, but to put OWA 2000 on a stand-alone Server you need to implement a Frontend/Backend solution which requires at least one Enterprise Edition for the Frontend server machine. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA > > OWA only comes with the Enterprise Edition? > > - Original Message - > From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:57 AM > Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA > > > 1. To "put" OWA 2000 on a stand-alone server you need to purchase an > Exchange 2000 Server Enterprise Edition > 2. OWA 2000 cannot connect to an Exchange 5.5 Server > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: XCH 2000 OWA > > > > Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K > OWA > > on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend? > > > > TIA . . . > > Chris > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XCH 2000 OWA
so you then have to have IIS on that box as well? My original thought was to keep IIS off of my xch boxes . . . - Original Message - From: "Robert Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:42 AM Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA Your other alternative (which is what we do, as a very small institution) is to run E2K and OWA access on one box. Be sure to use SSL. Rob -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA There is no OWA 2000 "component" per se. Its not optional, its part of any E2k install. To create the Front End server, you would need to install Exch 2k EE, then check the "Front-End Server" box under properties. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 09:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA okay, bear with me here . . . assuming it installs in roughly the same way xch 5.5 owa does, I only install that owa component on the front-end iis server or do you have to do an "exchange 2k" install now + xch 2k owa? Or do you simply have to blow a XCH 2k EE license for any machine running owa in a front-end/back-end "enterprise strength" configuration? - Original Message - From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:13 AM Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA No, but to put OWA 2000 on a stand-alone Server you need to implement a Frontend/Backend solution which requires at least one Enterprise Edition for the Frontend server machine. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA > > OWA only comes with the Enterprise Edition? > > - Original Message - > From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:57 AM > Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA > > > 1. To "put" OWA 2000 on a stand-alone server you need to purchase an > Exchange 2000 Server Enterprise Edition > 2. OWA 2000 cannot connect to an Exchange 5.5 Server > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: XCH 2000 OWA > > > > Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K > OWA > > on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend? > > > > TIA . . . > > Chris > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/
Re: XCH 2000 OWA
gotcha . . . - Original Message - From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:11 AM Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA > Dude, if IIS isn't on your E2K boxen, they won't be E2K boxen. > > M > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:55 AM > Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA > > > so you then have to have IIS on that box as well? > My original thought was to keep IIS off of my xch boxes . . . > > - Original Message - > From: "Robert Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:42 AM > Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA > > > Your other alternative (which is what we do, as a very small > institution) is to run E2K and OWA access on one box. Be sure to use > SSL. > > Rob > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:43 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA > > > There is no OWA 2000 "component" per se. Its not optional, its part of > any > E2k install. > To create the Front End server, you would need to install Exch 2k EE, > then > check the "Front-End Server" box under properties. > > > Andy David > J Muller International > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 09:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA > > > okay, bear with me here . . . > > assuming it installs in roughly the same way xch 5.5 owa does, I only > install that owa component on the front-end iis server or do you have to > do > an "exchange 2k" install now + xch 2k owa? Or do you simply have to blow > a > XCH 2k EE license for any machine running owa in a front-end/back-end > "enterprise strength" configuration? > > - Original Message - > From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:13 AM > Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA > > > No, but to put OWA 2000 on a stand-alone Server you need to implement a > Frontend/Backend solution which requires at least one Enterprise Edition > for the Frontend server machine. > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:09 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA > > > > OWA only comes with the Enterprise Edition? > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:57 AM > > Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA > > > > > > 1. To "put" OWA 2000 on a stand-alone server you need to purchase an > > Exchange 2000 Server Enterprise Edition > > 2. OWA 2000 cannot connect to an Exchange 5.5 Server > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: XCH 2000 OWA > > > > > > Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH > 2K > > OWA > > > on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend? > > > > > > TIA . . . > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://w
Re: OWA and Authentication
are you using ms-chap authentication? Netscape does not support that . . . - Original Message - From: "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:57 AM Subject: OWA and Authentication I used the IIS lockdown utility and found that I was getting the "authorization failed" message with Netscape 4.78 afterwards. I dug up KB Q300512 and followed the procedure, and still I am getting this message. What am I missing. Jim Liddil M.S. Lab/IT Manager Phytoceutica Inc. (203)781-2544 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
default IMC behavior in 5.5
The IMC in xch 5.5 is configured to send mail via DNS, and on the Connections tab, under Message Delivery, Specify by Email Domain, you enter mycompany.com and the ip of the internal, private mail server to forward mail to for mycompany.com (another site in this org). Will ALL mail get forwarded to this domain? I would think only mycompany.com mail would and the rest would go to the 'net for DNS delivery, but it seems all mail is going to mycompany.com server. And of course, all mail that is not mycompany.com is getting kicked for no relay . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: default IMC behavior in 5.5
sorry if I was unclear . . . ALL the mail is getting sent to the address specified for the mycompany.com domain regardless of it being addressed to that domain or not. Is that the correct behavior when you set delivery via DNS? I would think only mail for mycompany.com would go there and the rest would go out to the internet for dns resolution and delivery . . . Correct? - Original Message - From: "Mike Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:16 PM Subject: RE: default IMC behavior in 5.5 > The statements you make look correct to me. Is there a question there > somewhere? > > Mike Morrison > NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator > Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: default IMC behavior in 5.5 > > > The IMC in xch 5.5 is configured to send mail via DNS, and on the > Connections tab, under Message Delivery, Specify by Email Domain, you enter > mycompany.com and the ip of the internal, private mail server to forward > mail to for mycompany.com (another site in this org). Will ALL mail get > forwarded to this domain? I would think only mycompany.com mail would and > the rest would go to the 'net for DNS delivery, but it seems all mail is > going to mycompany.com server. And of course, all mail that is not > mycompany.com is getting kicked for no relay . . . > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Documenting Exchange 5.5 Public Folders
I know there are 3rd party apps you can buy to do this, but is there a res kit or other (read MS or free) utility that will allow me to list all my Pub Folder hierarchy? If someone says "screen shots" I will hunt you down TIA Chris "One never notices what has been done; one can only see what remains to be done." Marie Curie (1867-1934) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Powerpoint File in Public Folder
When I put a *.PPS (PowerPoint Show, a format for a Power Point file. When double-clicked the file launches directly into a slide show as opposed to "edit" mode in Power Point) file in a Public Folder (Exchange 5.5, SP4), and then double-click on it, select OPEN, it launches into "edit" mode in Power Point instead of directly into the slide show. If I do it from my hard drive, it works correctly. Anyone ever seen and fixed this? TIA. Chris "It is the nature of man to err, but only the fool perseveres in error". Cicero, (106-43 B.C.); Roman orator, philosopher. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Haiku Friday
Ahhh, another Ohio State fan heard from! ;) (if not an honorary one for denouncing our common enemy!) LOL Chris "It is the nature of man to err, but only the fool perseveres in error". Cicero, (106-43 B.C.); Roman orator, philosopher. - Original Message - From: "Thomas Di Nardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:39 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Michigan people like the Borg only stupid Michigan Brain Trust Michigan Brain Trust Single Process Single Thread One brain that all use Leaving soon I am Back to civilization I can't wait to go -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Groupshield is the borg Resistance is futile now Uninstall wont work -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Sybari will reign In my environment soon Groupshield, kiss my ass. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?
We use it on our DMZ smtp box along with Interscan. It works great and we get about 1 or 2 false positives a day. My only gripe with the product is that there is no "remote" way to release a quaratined mail, like a central console or something. I have to VNC into the server that has it, sift through the log and then release it. A central web-console were I could manage all my e-manager boxes would be nice . . . - Original Message - From: "Smith, Ronni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:02 PM Subject: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity? > Hello all, > > We are looking at getting Trend's E-Manager content filter as an add on to > our Scanmail a/v product to start screening out spam. If you have or are > using E-Manager for Scanmail could you let me know if you would recommend > for or against it and if there are any caveats I need to be aware of? I have > searched my archives of this list for E-Manager and not found much other > than some people who use it and one person who noted an issue but never > mentioned what it turned out to be due to. I also searched just on content > filtering and spam filtering among others but still didn't see all the info > I am after. > > We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and ScanMail 3.5 on WinNT4 in a single > domain. Although this quarter I plan to get the domain up to Win2k so if > there are issues with Win2k I'd like to know that too. The price for > E-Manager is in our range whereas Mailsweeper etc appear not to be and I am > very happy with our Scanmail product but want to get a feel for any issues > with E-Manager. > > I also am curious as to the time it takes to baby sit this. If those of you > using content scanning software (particularly E-Manager but it's probably > similar for all of them) could estimate how much time is required to sort > out the non-spam mail that gets caught in the filters and see that it is > forwarded on to the user it was intended for that would be a big help. I'm > guessing that it takes a bit of tuning of the filters to minimize that but > I've no idea if I'm talking about adding a 5 minutes a week task to my job > or a 5 hours a week (or more) task. > > Thanks very much, > > Ronni > > * > "The pursuit of truth and beauty is a sphere of activity in which we are > permitted to remain children all our lives." -Albert Einstein > - > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Default Permissions
By default are Public Folder permissions applied only to Users in the Site the Server holding the public folders resides in? For example Default and Anonymous? Org-wide or Site-wide? TIA! "To keep your secret is wisdom; but to expect others to keep it is folly." Samuel Johnson (1709-84); English author, lexicographer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ORBZ Question . . .
Just Curious . . . Anyone know the difference between INPUTS and OUTPUTS in the ORBZ listing? Or what they even are? ORBZ Database Information IP: XX.XXX.XX.XXX State: clean Listed in inputs: no Listed in outputs: no TIA "To keep your secret is wisdom; but to expect others to keep it is folly." Samuel Johnson (1709-84); English author, lexicographer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: moving mailboxes
if both exchange servers are in the same site it should resolve the new server location for you. At least that has been my experience. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:50 AM Subject: moving mailboxes > I´m about to move some mailboxes from one exchangeserver to another in the > same site.. Do I have to specify the new exchange server on every client, > or is it taken care of automatically? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MEC
Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MEC
I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: "Crumbaker, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?
I can access and log in just fine . . . - Original Message - From: ".DL Helpdesk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:00 PM Subject: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE? > Subject line says it all! > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?
hey, I dont like it anymore than you do, but my wife enjoys it so what can I do? I dont think the courts have it on the books yet as grounds for divorce . . . - Original Message - From: "Stephen Mynhier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:28 PM Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE? > I wouldn't go around admitting that > My question is: Does AOL require a keyboard without a Caps Lock? > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker > To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: 9/26/01 11:14 AM > Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE? > > I can access and log in just fine . . . > > - Original Message - > From: ".DL Helpdesk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:00 PM > Subject: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE? > > > > Subject line says it all! > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: stationery disabling?
is that similar to "Old Spice"? - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:08 PM Subject: RE: stationery disabling? > "The Great One" was Jackie Gleason. I am "Curmudgeon > Spice". > > Ed Crowley > Compaq Computer > > --- Heather Bellson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thanks oh great ones (ed and cthulhu). > > > > i figured there wasn't a one-stop solution! > > > > heather > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: > > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: > > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Forwarding emails to an external address
create a custom recipient for the external email address and then modify the delivery options to send the mail to this address as well. - Original Message - From: "Khandu Veer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:12 AM Subject: RE: Forwarding emails to an external address > How does one do this in Exchange 5.5? Thanks > > Warm Regards, > - Khandu > __ > Khandu Veer > Formulasys > Sai Chambers, 16, Mumbai-Pune Road, Wakdewadi, Pune 411 003 > Tel: +91-20-553 8611 (x302); Direct: 020-553 2525 Mobile: 098220-16327 > Fax: +91-20-553 6480; e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.formulasys.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:28 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Forwarding emails to an external address > > > Your assumption was correct and it worked beautifully, thanks again. > > Denyse > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:53 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Forwarding emails to an external address > > You mean for single addresses, not for the entire domain, right? (That > would kind of make the Exchange server useless.) If my assumption is > correct, you're looking to create a mail-enabled contact. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Tech Consultant > Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) > All your base are belong to us. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Huot, Denyse > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:32 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Forwarding emails to an external address > > > I'm running Exchange 2000 in an AD environment, and I would like to be able > to forward emails coming into the company to an external address. As simple > as this sounds, I can't seem to find anything on this. Can anyone help or > point me into the right direction? > > Much appreciated, > > Denyse > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LDAP Syntax to Query an Exchange Server
I am trying to write an LDAP query to get the department and phone extension of all of my Exchange users. I looked at this Q article: Q223049 but not being a programmer, my brain was sweating too much ;) Does anyone know of a way query using ldap:// OR are there switches that tell the directory export to get more info than it does? I couldnt find any info on it in the KB . . . but searching that is an art more than a science! TIA Chris - The Future is in Beta - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing XCH 5.5 on a 2000 Server
I was told this is possible. The server is a member server in a NT4 domain. I am logged on to the server with a domain account (Domain Admin privs) trying to install XCH. Get the error "Must be a member of an NT domain . . ." Ideas? Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server
BOINK ME! Didnt find it on my first 3 searches, but the fourth was the lucky charm! Thanks anyhoo, sorry for wasting y'alls bandwidth! :)\ Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server
I neglected to mention that I was installing via the 2 user "terminal server admin mode." When installing Exchange server in this fashion the registry key points to the local machine name for the domain, so Exchange cannot tell it is in a domain. So you modify: HKLM/Software/Microsoft/WindowsNT/CurrentVersion/Winlogon/DefaultDomainName to the domain name instead of the machine name. Viola! :) - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:00 PM Subject: RE: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server > Well Share then! > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server > > > BOINK ME! > > Didnt find it on my first 3 searches, but the fourth was the lucky charm! > > Thanks anyhoo, sorry for wasting y'alls bandwidth! > > :)\ > > Chris > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server
NP. XADM: Error Message: You Must Be Logged Into an NT Domain to Run Microsoft Exchange Server Setup (Q251177) <> Although I was installing Exchange itself, not a Service Pack. Chris - Original Message - From: "Kevin Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:15 PM Subject: RE: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server > Since when? I have built a good number of exchange serves from A TS > NEVER had a problem?? Is there a Q on that?? Please share? > > --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond > Did I just say that out loud? > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Haaker > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server > > > I neglected to mention that I was installing via the 2 user "terminal > server admin mode." When installing Exchange server in this fashion the > registry key points to the local machine name for the domain, so > Exchange cannot tell it is in a domain. > > So you modify: > > HKLM/Software/Microsoft/WindowsNT/CurrentVersion/Winlogon/DefaultDomainN > ame > to the domain name instead of the machine name. > > Viola! > > :) > > - Original Message - > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:00 PM > Subject: RE: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server > > > > Well Share then! > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:56 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server > > > > > > BOINK ME! > > > > Didnt find it on my first 3 searches, but the fourth was the lucky > > charm! > > > > Thanks anyhoo, sorry for wasting y'alls bandwidth! > > > > :)\ > > > > Chris > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis > Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > > == > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ScanMail
Anyone with Trend ScanMail experience or perhaps you just know the difference . . . the latest version of ScanMail comes in 2 flavors: ESE API or MAPI/VAPI Can anyone nutshell the differences and which is recommended? Much Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backing up with Windows 2000
Does anyone have a batch file or command line they would be willing to send me for using Windows 2000 backup.exe to back up my Exchange 5.5 server? Also, IF (hold on to your phasers this is only theoretical) someone were dumb enough to do brick-level backups with someone's Exchange Agent, would they be able to do that to Public Folders as well or just mailboxes? Does this also hold true for Exchange 2000 or does everything change then? Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backing up with Windows 2000
I would love to. I was mainly looking for the switches, etc. for the backup job. I use one with backup.exe for my Exchange 5.5 on NT4, but I cannot figure out if anything changes in backup.exe in Windows 2000. Thought someone might have been there already. Right now I use: ntbackup backup ds \\mail1 is \\mail1 f:\ /b /t normal /l "c:\winnt\backup.log" /e Thanks! - Original Message - From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:10 PM Subject: Re: Backing up with Windows 2000 > Why not just schedule the job? > > I'm so not going to answer your second question. :) > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:39 PM > Subject: Backing up with Windows 2000 > > > Does anyone have a batch file or command line they would be willing to send > me for using Windows 2000 backup.exe to back up my Exchange 5.5 server? > > Also, IF (hold on to your phasers this is only theoretical) someone were > dumb enough to do brick-level backups with someone's Exchange Agent, would > they be able to do that to Public Folders as well or just mailboxes? Does > this also hold true for Exchange 2000 or does everything change then? > > > > Thanks! > > Chris > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stupid Question
My boss is looking for the definitive answer. I KNOW the answer for XCH 5.5. but in XCH 2K does MS support the use of brick - level backups (ducks quickly) Thanks! I know Ed's EMail signature *should* say it all; I have even passed it along to my boss! "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stupid Question
ARCServe 2000 has an Exchange Agent just as in previous version (as does Backup Exec) that allow for brick level backups. In Exchange 5.5 I know MS does not support this (as in screw something up via Bricked Backups and you'll get no tech support from us!) But I am just starting to design my XCH 2K and I dont know due to some new technology in XCH2K if they've changed their stance on this or not . . . - Original Message - From: "Dupler, Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Stupid Question > Can it be done? Yes. It is possible to write a backup system that in > effect copies off the contents of individual mailboxes one at a time, thus > exploding single instance storage into some unfathomable large number that > will require Enron accounting to pay for the backup media. > > Do any shipping backup products support it? I don't know, but would be very > surprised if they didn't. Lots of people make procurement decisions on > dubious criteria. > > Tell you boss that there is no such thing a an individual mailbox and that > it's all an illusion. There is one big group account. It is called the > store. Different users get to see different content based on their > permissions. Regular backup is bricked, since it takes a single image of > the single mailbox that is the store. Maybe that will cause the lights to > come on. > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:27 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Stupid Question > > > My boss is looking for the definitive answer. I KNOW the answer for XCH 5.5. > but in XCH 2K does MS support the use of brick - level backups (ducks > quickly) > > Thanks! > > I know Ed's EMail signature *should* say it all; I have even passed it along > to my boss! > > "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; >it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." >William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backups Checklist
NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in NT4. So if I backup System State, IS and DS through the Exchange Server Checkbox and then the drive with the log files I should be all set for a full restore no? The Exchange server folder on C:\ is all binaries right? I have those on C:, logfiles on D: and the stores on E:. Anything I am missing? I have never had to do a restore before but soon will have to for DR "practice" pursposes. Besides documentation on all my settings and options, am I missing anything all of you tried and true backup gurus know of? Did I mention I HATE BACKUPS!! TIA Chris "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backups Checklist
I always thought that if you backed up priv.edb at midnight and then priv.edb goes down at say noon the next day, that rolling back the log files from midnight to noon when the failure occured would allow you to reclaim the mail that is not in that restored version of priv.edb? - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > If you are doing an online backup, why backup the log files? > > > -----Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backups Checklist > > > NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in NT4. So if I > backup System State, IS and DS through the Exchange Server Checkbox and then > the drive with the log files I should be all set for a full restore no? The > Exchange server folder on C:\ is all binaries right? I have those on C:, > logfiles on D: and the stores on E:. Anything I am missing? I have never had > to do a restore before but soon will have to for DR "practice" pursposes. > Besides documentation on all my settings and options, am I missing anything > all of you tried and true backup gurus know of? > > Did I mention I HATE BACKUPS!! > > TIA > > Chris > > "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; >it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." >William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backups Checklist
THANKS! That was a most excellent slide deck and answers most of my questions. Only other thing is: if I am then doing FULL ONLINE backups every night do I need to worry about turning off circular logging as I will be deleting the log files each night after they are backed up? Correct? - Original Message - From: "Mood, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:27 PM Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > And a cool PPT of the whole thing I found while confirming the log file > thing (I was thinking of trying to replay the log files in event of > longstanding corruption which would be a useless thing to do). > > I always work better with big pretty pictures. > > http://www.exchangeserverboston.com/archives/DBMgmt.ppt > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > > > If you are doing an online backup, why backup the log files? > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Backups Checklist > > > NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in NT4. So if I > backup System State, IS and DS through the Exchange Server Checkbox and then > the drive with the log files I should be all set for a full restore no? The > Exchange server folder on C:\ is all binaries right? I have those on C:, > logfiles on D: and the stores on E:. Anything I am missing? I have never had > to do a restore before but soon will have to for DR "practice" pursposes. > Besides documentation on all my settings and options, am I missing anything > all of you tried and true backup gurus know of? > > Did I mention I HATE BACKUPS!! > > TIA > > Chris > > "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; >it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." >William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- -- > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Backups Checklist
Thanks for the feedback. I do have 3 physical arrays on 2 different controllers (1 with 2 channels) C: mirror - OS D: mirror - Logs E: Raid5 - DBs So it seems I can just do a full online backup of the stores via the "exchange aware" ntbackup. If I lose the store, I can put new disks in my raid5 array, restore the db and then play back my log files from D:. Thanks! Oh yeah, and FLUSH THOSE COMMITTED LOGS ;) he he - Original Message - From: "Mood, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:54 PM Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > The point would be that if the priv or pub got trashed (assuming hardware > failure of some sort on the drive with those files) while the system was > running you could restore the priv or pub from the previous night and replay > the current days log files that are on a different drive (recommended > configuration) to get it back to its most current state. As I understand > it. > > If you have a corrupt db that required you to go back several days you would > not want to replay the log files as you would in essence replay the > corruption. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:48 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Backups Checklist > > > THANKS! That was a most excellent slide deck and answers most of my > questions. Only other thing is: > if I am then doing FULL ONLINE backups every night do I need to worry about > turning off circular logging as I will be deleting the log files each night > after they are backed up? Correct? > > - Original Message - > From: "Mood, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:27 PM > Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > > > > And a cool PPT of the whole thing I found while confirming the log file > > thing (I was thinking of trying to replay the log files in event of > > longstanding corruption which would be a useless thing to do). > > > > I always work better with big pretty pictures. > > > > http://www.exchangeserverboston.com/archives/DBMgmt.ppt > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:08 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > > > > > > If you are doing an online backup, why backup the log files? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Backups Checklist > > > > > > NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in NT4. So if > I > > backup System State, IS and DS through the Exchange Server Checkbox and > then > > the drive with the log files I should be all set for a full restore no? > The > > Exchange server folder on C:\ is all binaries right? I have those on C:, > > logfiles on D: and the stores on E:. Anything I am missing? I have never > had > > to do a restore before but soon will have to for DR "practice" pursposes. > > Besides documentation on all my settings and options, am I missing > anything > > all of you tried and true backup gurus know of? > > > > Did I mention I HATE BACKUPS!! > > > > TIA > > > > Chris > > > > "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; > >it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." > >William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > -- > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this email in error, please imme
Re: Backups Checklist
you mean the one log file that is being written to at the time of the backup? Magic, of course! Hmmm Good question . . . Open File Agent? But then I need ArcServe or BE right? Do *you* know the answer? Besides an OFFLINE backup? LOL - Original Message - From: "Drewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:11 PM Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > Again -- how are you going to back up the log files while they're in use? > > -- Drew > > Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! > "Ook." - The Librarian. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mood, Steve > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > > > The point would be that if the priv or pub got trashed (assuming hardware > failure of some sort on the drive with those files) while the system was > running you could restore the priv or pub from the previous night and replay > the current days log files that are on a different drive (recommended > configuration) to get it back to its most current state. As I understand > it. > > If you have a corrupt db that required you to go back several days you would > not want to replay the log files as you would in essence replay the > corruption. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:48 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Backups Checklist > > > THANKS! That was a most excellent slide deck and answers most of my > questions. Only other thing is: > if I am then doing FULL ONLINE backups every night do I need to worry about > turning off circular logging as I will be deleting the log files each night > after they are backed up? Correct? > > - Original Message - > From: "Mood, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:27 PM > Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > > > > And a cool PPT of the whole thing I found while confirming the log file > > thing (I was thinking of trying to replay the log files in event of > > longstanding corruption which would be a useless thing to do). > > > > I always work better with big pretty pictures. > > > > http://www.exchangeserverboston.com/archives/DBMgmt.ppt > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:08 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Backups Checklist > > > > > > If you are doing an online backup, why backup the log files? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Backups Checklist > > > > > > NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in NT4. So if > I > > backup System State, IS and DS through the Exchange Server Checkbox and > then > > the drive with the log files I should be all set for a full restore no? > The > > Exchange server folder on C:\ is all binaries right? I have those on C:, > > logfiles on D: and the stores on E:. Anything I am missing? I have never > had > > to do a restore before but soon will have to for DR "practice" pursposes. > > Besides documentation on all my settings and options, am I missing > anything > > all of you tried and true backup gurus know of? > > > > Did I mention I HATE BACKUPS!! > > > > TIA > > > > Chris > > > > "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; > >it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." > >William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > -- > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed
OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP
I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to minimize it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link? Much Thanks! "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP
I know what you mean. My company is owned by a Japanese company and all 4000 of them can at least speak passable english. I know about 3 Japanese words. Makes me feel really lazy sometimes! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:03 AM Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP > > Kim, > > Chris wanted a hack to minimize OL2002 to the systray- I searched on Google > and found the link. My statement was kind of a disclaimer; I couldn't tell > by the conversation if the hack worked or not. > > Here's the bit I was looking at- > > [quote[ Heel mooi die Outlook functie... Ik had al een ander proggie > gedowned ervoor [/quote[ > Euh.. Proggie? > Dat is gewoon een registry entry > > [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Preferences] > "MinToTray"=dword:0001 > > sim-pel > > Gepost door mbvisiontt Woensdag 12 December 2001 - 19:43 Score: 1 > (Gemodereerd) > Ja juist ja, en dat werkt niet omdat er bij mij onder 10.0 geen outlook > staat... > > > Paul > > I know I'm a terrible American illiterate :( Have some good friends in > Sittard, we are lucky enough to see them almost every year. They are fluent > in four languages and can get by in at least three more! > > > -Original Message- > From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP > > > what do you want to know? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18 February, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP > > > http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/1362 > > Came up on google, but I can't read Dutch :) > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:32 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP > > > I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to > minimize > it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link? > > Much Thanks! > > "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; >it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." >William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP
I finally found it in English http://www.windowplanet.net/articles/default.asp?article=78 Thanks for all of your help!! - Original Message - From: "Kim Schotanus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:31 AM Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP basically the conversation says that this is a program (proggie = slang) that actually works, and thet he's tried others before... This is only the translation, don't know the tool... Cheers -----Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 February, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP I know what you mean. My company is owned by a Japanese company and all 4000 of them can at least speak passable english. I know about 3 Japanese words. Makes me feel really lazy sometimes! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:03 AM Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP > > Kim, > > Chris wanted a hack to minimize OL2002 to the systray- I searched on Google > and found the link. My statement was kind of a disclaimer; I couldn't tell > by the conversation if the hack worked or not. > > Here's the bit I was looking at- > > [quote[ Heel mooi die Outlook functie... Ik had al een ander proggie > gedowned ervoor [/quote[ > Euh.. Proggie? > Dat is gewoon een registry entry > > [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Preferences] > "MinToTray"=dword:0001 > > sim-pel > > Gepost door mbvisiontt Woensdag 12 December 2001 - 19:43 Score: 1 > (Gemodereerd) > Ja juist ja, en dat werkt niet omdat er bij mij onder 10.0 geen outlook > staat... > > > Paul > > I know I'm a terrible American illiterate :( Have some good friends in > Sittard, we are lucky enough to see them almost every year. They are fluent > in four languages and can get by in at least three more! > > > -Original Message- > From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP > > > what do you want to know? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18 February, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP > > > http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/1362 > > Came up on google, but I can't read Dutch :) > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:32 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP > > > I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to > minimize > it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link? > > Much Thanks! > > "Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; >it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved." >William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Re: Customizing OWA logon page
This kicks arse! IMHO - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:15 PM Subject: Customizing OWA logon page > Please excuse the vendor like nature of this announcement.[1] I wanted to > let everyone know about a project I've been working on with one of our > graphic developers. It's a free "wizard" which allows you to choose from one > of several custom Exchange 5.5 OWA logon pages.[2] > > Here's the URL: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa > > Chris Magdelain[3] created a kickin OWA start page for our internal users > and I suggested that it'd be cool if we could figure out a way to help > everyone replace the default[4] OWA logon pages. For some strange reason, > people actually listened to my suggestion and the above URL is the end > result. After you complete the wizard, there's an e-mail address listed for > feedback... if you have an idea for a new design, use the feedback alias and > I'll bug Chris to add some new templates. > > Hope y'all enjoy it. > > [1] Or not... > [2] #insert std_disclaim.h > [3] Our rocking graphics guy > [4] Butt ugly [5] > [5] Yes, that's the technical term. > > Chris > -- > Chris Scharff > Senior Sales Engineer > MessageOne > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organizational Forms Library
Is there a way to syncronize a form to use from the organizational forms library so it can be used off-line from an OST? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Organizational Forms Library
Seems to synch all forms EXCEPT forms in the Organizational Forms Library. Any other ideas? - Original Message - From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:13 PM Subject: RE: Organizational Forms Library > Yup.. Its one of the options when downloading your offline address book, I > believe. > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Peregrine Systems > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:56 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Organizational Forms Library > > > > > > Is there a way to syncronize a form to use from the > > organizational forms library so it can be used off-line from an OST? > > > > TIA > > > > Chris > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Organizational Forms Library
unfortuntily no. I get no error upon sync. But when I go offline I see all the options from the drop-down menu for choosing a form EXCEPT the Organizational Forms Library. - Original Message - From: "Soysal, Serdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Organizational Forms Library > Could you be suffering from the problem in Q162703? > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:47 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Organizational Forms Library > > > Seems to synch all forms EXCEPT forms in the Organizational Forms Library. > Any other ideas? > > - Original Message - > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:13 PM > Subject: RE: Organizational Forms Library > > > > Yup.. Its one of the options when downloading your offline address > > book, I believe. > > > > -- > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Peregrine Systems > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:56 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Organizational Forms Library > > > > > > > > > Is there a way to syncronize a form to use from the organizational > > > forms library so it can be used off-line from an OST? > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > _ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Job Hunting
Best Exchange/NT/IIS/SQL job hunting web sites anyone? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wal Mart
We have account reps that go there all the time. Bentonville is quite a place to live (not) I am told. They say it is getting better though and they even have a movie theater now. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Getting OWA INBOX Problem
Anyone have experience with: XWEB: Suddenly and Permanently Unable to Reach Inbox Using Outlook Web Access (Q248081) I can get him logged in if he enters first name last name in the box instead of his alias, but then he is screwed using our extranet as the NT Domain login passes the username (which matches his alais) for the OWA login. So using the extranet he cannot access Public Folders which are rendered via OWA. The fixes in the article do not seem to do the trick. THe only thing I havent done is take the OWA box to SP4. The articles says this applies to XCH 5.5 SP3 so perhaps this will do the trick? OWA is on XCH2000 SVR SP2, XCH SP3 all other XCH SVRs are 5.5 SP4 Any other ideas? TIA "It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Lookiing for Document
Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4 SVR? I have been looking to no avail . . . "It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lookiing for Document
ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess why I need it without me saying another word . . . The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . . - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document > What is there to compare? > > > -----Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document > > > Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4 > SVR? > I have been looking to no avail . . . > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lookiing for Document
You would think . . . but I have been searching for 3 days and can only find a few blurbs in different places - Original Message - From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:47 AM Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document > This information should be readily available on MS's web site. > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:41 AM > Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document > > > ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess > why > I need it without me saying another word . . . > The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . . > > - Original Message - > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM > Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document > > > > What is there to compare? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document > > > > > > Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows > NT4 > > SVR? > > I have been looking to no avail . . . > > > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not > the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you > have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > > == > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Settings
Does anyone know how to change the mail server OWA goes to for info without re-installing? During install it asks which Exchange server you want to talk to . . . TIA "It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Settings
that did it! Gracias! - Original Message - From: "paragon400" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:50 PM Subject: RE: OWA Settings > Chris, > > If I remember correctly it is located in the registry at: > > HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeWEB\Parameters > > There is a server object under Parameters and all you would need to do > is point it to the correct server. I am assuming you are talking about > OWA 5.5. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA Settings > > > Does anyone know how to change the mail server OWA goes to for info > without re-installing? During install it asks which Exchange server you > want to talk to . . . > > TIA > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move Mailbox
Does anyone know the impact of moving a user's mailbox while they hae it open in Outlook? I am sure it is not preferred, but we have one user we cannot get ahold of . . . "It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haiku Friday <1st Attempt be nice :>)
Cannot migrate now Why explain the obvious Die CIO die "It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMC Queues
Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20 enteries to the same address all with <> as the originator . . . Has the worm struck you think? "It is the province of knowledge to speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMC Queues
on my way - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > Burrow your way to the FAQ. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: IMC Queues > > > Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20 > enteries to the same address all with <> as the originator . . . > Has the worm struck you think? > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMC Queues
Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS or IMC queue has <> in Originator Field. Any other ideas? The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each outgoing address co.boing.com <> co.boing.com <> co.boing.com <> co.boing.com <> yahoo.com <> yahoo.com <> yahoo.com <> yahoo.com <> etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . . - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > Burrow your way to the FAQ. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: IMC Queues > > > Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20 > enteries to the same address all with <> as the originator . . . > Has the worm struck you think? > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMC Queues
I am sorry, the first sentence is in regards to searching the FAQ at Swynk - Original Message - From: "Thomas Di Nardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:06 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues Have you looked in the FAQ yet? -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC Queues Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS or IMC queue has <> in Originator Field. Any other ideas? The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each outgoing address co.boing.com <> co.boing.com <> co.boing.com <> co.boing.com <> yahoo.com <> yahoo.com <> yahoo.com <> yahoo.com <> etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . . - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > Burrow your way to the FAQ. > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: IMC Queues > > > Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20 > enteries to the same address all with <> as the originator . . . > Has the worm struck you think? > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMC Queues
After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . . Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When InterScan tries to deliver to an unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does not reject the message outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when the message has been accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is bogus, and then sends the bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path. my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop this? I have been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and deleting the emails TIA Chris - Original Message - From: "Durkee, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed yahoo address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your domain. The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go back to the forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them, they aren't going anywhere anyway. > > -Peter > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS or IMC > queue has <> in Originator Field. > Any other ideas? > The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each outgoing > address > > co.boing.com <> > co.boing.com <> > co.boing.com <> > co.boing.com <> > yahoo.com <> > yahoo.com <> > yahoo.com <> > yahoo.com <> > > etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . . > > - Original Message - > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > Burrow your way to the FAQ. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: IMC Queues > > > > > > Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20 > > enteries to the same address all with <> as the originator . . . > > Has the worm struck you think? > > > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > > > > == > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > This message is private or privileged. If you are not the > person for whom this message is intended, ple
Re: IMC Queues
Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my incoming/outgoing external mail . . . and I dont particularly like the idea of someone flooding my boxes with bogus mail . . . - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts from being > delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are eventually > dropped. > > > Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 > Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne > ---- > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . . > > > > Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for > > SMTP servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When > > InterScan tries to deliver to an unknown recipient to > > Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does not reject the message > > outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when the message has > > been accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is bogus, > > and then sends the bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound > > mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path. > > > > my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop > > this? I have been going into the IMS queue every couple of > > hours and deleting the emails > > > > TIA > > > > Chris > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Durkee, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed > > > yahoo > > address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your > > domain. The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to > > go back to the forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel > > free to delete them, they aren't going anywhere anyway. > > > > > > -Peter > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no > > replies for IMS > > > or > > IMC > > > queue has <> in Originator Field. > > > Any other ideas? > > > The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for > > each outgoing > > > address > > > > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > > > > etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . . > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM > > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > Burrow your way to the FAQ. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting > > delivery I see > > > > 10-20 enteries to the same address all with <> as the > > originator . . > > > > . Has the worm struck you think? > > > > > > > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > > > > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > > > > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMC Queues
I did. Thanks. My mom would be proud of you. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 7:29 PM Subject: Re: IMC Queues > Again, READ RFC-821/2821. > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . . > > > > Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP servers > > like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When InterScan tries to deliver to an > > unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does not reject the > > message outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when the message has been > > accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is bogus, and then sends the > > bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound mail. So, this mail follows the > > normal outbound path. > > > > my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop this? I have > > been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and deleting the > emails > > > > TIA > > > > Chris > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Durkee, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed yahoo > > address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your domain. The > > messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go back to the forged > and > > non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them, they aren't going > > anywhere anyway. > > > > > > -Peter > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS or > > IMC > > > queue has <> in Originator Field. > > > Any other ideas? > > > The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each outgoing > > > address > > > > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > > > > etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . . > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM > > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > Burrow your way to the FAQ. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see > 10-20 > > > > enteries to the same address all with <> as the originator . . . > > > > Has the worm struck you think? > > > > > > > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > > > > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > > > > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > The information contained in this email message is
Re: IMC Queues
where can I lay hands on that? - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 7:32 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > Also read "Fish Tacos from Heaven" > > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 4:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > Again, READ RFC-821/2821. > > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Haaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . . > > > > Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP > > servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When InterScan tries to > > deliver to an unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does > > not reject the message outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when > > the message has been accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is > > bogus, and then sends the bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound > > mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path. > > > > my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop this? I > > have been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and deleting > > the > emails > > > > TIA > > > > Chris > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Durkee, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed > > > yahoo > > address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your domain. The > > messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go back to the > > forged > and > > non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them, they aren't > > going anywhere anyway. > > > > > > -Peter > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS > > > or > > IMC > > > queue has <> in Originator Field. > > > Any other ideas? > > > The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each > > > outgoing address > > > > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > co.boing.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > yahoo.com <> > > > > > > etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . . > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM > > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > Burrow your way to the FAQ. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see > 10-20 > > > > enteries to the same address all with <> as the originator . . . > > > > Has the worm struck you think? > > > > > > > > "It is the province of knowledge to speak, > > > > and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen". > > > > Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMA
Re: IMC Queues
I dont know. I just know when this started happening all my MTA queues and IMS queues had a backlog of about 300 messages each, and as soon as started deleting all the <> out of the IMS all the queues cleared out in short order. - Original Message - From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:58 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > So, you think by doing this your mail flow will be faster? > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my incoming/outgoing external > mail . . . and I dont particularly like the idea of someone flooding my > boxes with bogus mail . . . > > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts from being > > delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are eventually > > dropped. > > > > > > Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 > > Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . . > > > > > > Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for > > > SMTP servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When > > > InterScan tries to deliver to an unknown recipient to > > > Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does not reject the message > > > outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when the message has > > > been accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is bogus, > > > and then sends the bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound > > > mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path. > > > > > > my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop > > > this? I have been going into the IMS queue every couple of > > > hours and deleting the emails > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Durkee, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM > > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed > > > > yahoo > > > address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your > > > domain. The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to > > > go back to the forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel > > > free to delete them, they aren't going anywhere anyway. > > > > > > > > -Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no > > > replies for IMS > > > > or > > > IMC > > > > queue has <> in Originator Field. > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for > > > each outgoing > > > > address > > > > > > > > co.boing.com <> > > > > co.boing.com <> > > > > co.boing.com <> > > > > co.boing.com <> > > > > yahoo.com <> > > > > yahoo.com <> > > > > yahoo.com <> > > > > yahoo.com <> > > > > > > > > etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . . > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[
Re: IMC Queues
Most likely because it is a Pentium Pro 200 with 256 MB RAM hosting 60 mailboxes, IMC and Trend Interscan and Scanmail - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:11 AM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > I don't have any idea why that would be the case. > > > Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 > Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne > ---- > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 7:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my > > incoming/outgoing external mail . . . and I dont > > particularly like the idea of someone flooding my boxes with > > bogus mail . . . > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts > > from being > > > delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are > > > eventually dropped. > > > > > > -------- > > > Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 > > > Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . . > > > > > > > > Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP > > > > servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When > > InterScan tries to > > > > deliver to an unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange > > > > does not reject the message outright, like what Sendmail > > does. Only > > > > when the message has been accepted does Exchange find out the > > > > recipient is bogus, and then sends the bounced mail to > > InterScan as > > > > an outbound mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path. > > > > > > > > my next question would be is there anything I can do to > > stop this? I > > > > have been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and > > > > deleting the emails > > > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Durkee, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM > > > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > > The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send > > from a spoofed > > > > > yahoo > > > > address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in > > your domain. > > > > The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go > > back to the > > > > forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them, > > > > they aren't going anywhere anyway. > > > > > > > > > > -Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55 > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no > > > > replies for IMS > > > > > or > > > > IMC > > > > > queue has <> in Originator Field. > > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > > The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for > > > > each outgoing > > > > > address > > > > > > > &g
Re: IMC Queues
LOL okay I yield . . . I should have known better . . . - Original Message - From: "Louis Joyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:00 PM Subject: RE: IMC Queues > Connected to a tape drive to load up 'Sub hunt' during quiet periods. > > Regards > > Mr Louis Joyce > Data Support Analyst > BT Ignite eSolutions > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 March 2002 16:05 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > And its running Novell off of a boot ROM. > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:02 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > Oh, and I forgot to mention that it has no hard drive. > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > Still don't see why that would have any effect, but if you believe it does I > won't argue the point. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:44 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > Most likely because it is a Pentium Pro 200 with 256 MB RAM > > hosting 60 mailboxes, IMC and Trend Interscan and Scanmail > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:11 AM > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > I don't have any idea why that would be the case. > > > > > > > > > Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 > > > Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 7:49 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my incoming/outgoing > > > > external mail . . . and I dont particularly like the idea of > > > > someone flooding my boxes with bogus mail . . . > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM > > > > Subject: RE: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts > > > > from being > > > > > delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are > > > > > eventually dropped. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 > > Senior Sales > > > > > Engineer MessageOne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: Re: IMC Queues > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's > > site . . . > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that this unknown recipient problem does not > > occur for SMTP > > > > > > servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When > > > > InterScan tries to > > > > > > deliver to an unknown recipient to Exchange > > IMicrosoft, Exchange > > > > > > does not reject the message outright, like what Sendmail > > > > does. Only > > > > > > when the message has been accepted does Exchange find out the > > > > > > recipient is bogus, and then sends the bounced mail to > > &
