RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts!
That is not a problem, but a security feature. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving me nu ts! Hi All, I have an outlook 2000 workstation that is blocking all exe files and other nasty extensions I need to turn this OFF! I can find no option to turn this off under the setting in outlook - nor can I find anything useful in TechNet... Any Ideas? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 Disclaimer: The information in this message or attachments (if any) may be confidential or legally privileged material. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and associated material from any computer. Any views expressed in this communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be views of CONNECT Credit Union. Whilst virus-scanning software is utilised by CONNECT, no responsibility is taken for virus damage that may originate from this transmission. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
No. Poor Richard was much smarter. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless Poor Richard. Can't even get a flame right! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless I guess I could be wrong, but I thought Ed was short for Edgar and Dick was short for Richard. If that's not the case, then people have been calling my dad by the wrong name for years! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 1/18/2002 7:31 AM Subject: RE: clustering wireless No dick it wasnt me -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: clustering wireless You're an idea guy, aren't you, Richard? I think I've met you before. You go to MCP classes and sit in the front row and constantly ask the teacher about things that aren't remotely related to the course subject, causing lengthy hours-long digressions. You ask questions like, What happens if I try to run my Exchange server on a MacIntosh? or What would happen if I moved my information store to DECTape? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RAM
Check this site out for deciphering the RAM markings... http://www.arstechnica.com/paedia/r/ram_id-1.html Larry Josefowski Network Operations Analyst Conectiv, Inc. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: RAM Hi I found a box ful of different RAM slots, how can I see what is what? There are about 4 different types in the box and I don't recognise a single one... Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: clustering wireless
Richard, I detect a trend in your posts...have you read the Disaster Recovery White Paper by MS? Reading it would give you a good understanding of the issues that your questions indicate you have... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: clustering wireless Is that possible though to have two exchange servers on the same netowrk so if one fails I can take the tape backup from the other server and just put the info on the other server temporarily. So if one building went on fire and the server got fried can I take the information from the tape and put it on the other server that doesnt have that info on it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: store.exe
Probably would not be a good idea. Are you sure the memory is not being released by Exchange? -Original Message- From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: store.exe Hi all Does anyone know how to restrict the memory allocation used by Exchange 2000? I have a small site that keeps blowing out its memory. Wiondows 2000 SBS / Exchange 2000 service pack, IBM netserver with 896 Mb Ram with 10 users. The store.exe after 24 hours uses all the available RAM and will not release it for other applications so all applications are using the swap file which slows down the server.I would like to restrict the Information store to 384MB ram and allow the other processes to use the rest of the available RAM I know that the system is suppose to be self regulating but I would like to restrict it. I have read some of the articles on Technet but they only talk about restricting the treads and we have tried that but it still has the same problems. Thanks in advanced _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fix monitor
A variation... If God hadn't wanted us to eat animals, why did he make them taste so good? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor I love animals. They're delicious. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 January 2002 15:52 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: fix monitor Subject: RE: fix monitor I am a vegetarian... I haven't had chicken in about 13 years. I forgot what it tastes like. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Thomas Di Nardo| || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/04/2002 10:23 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- --| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: fix monitor | --- --| No, that would taste like troll. Troll probably tastes like eel. I believe eel tastes like ... chicken. Damn! Everything tastes like chicken, even fried Tener. Tom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Would that taste like chicken too? ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Ed Crowley | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/03/2002 11:28 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- --| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: fix monitor | --- --| Mmm... fried Tener Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Davis Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor I realize I am late to this discussion, as I have read many catapult references, however I don't think it was addressed. I am relatively new To the Exchange World, only a year and a half working with it. But I have Been involved with Networking and Computers in general for the last 12 years. I got my start (as probably did everyone here) working on hardware. Richard, I can tell you there are most certainly no user serviceable parts In a monitor. And Opening one up can be Fatal. The Flyback Capacitor Can hold a charge of several thousand volts for years. There is more than enough Voltage there to severely burn you, if not kill you. Like everyone one else Here has said, it's cheaper to buy a new one, then get an old one fixed. Unless.You live near a High School that has a Vocational Education Program that specializes in Electronics. These kinds of schools Will usually Fix the equipment at no charge save for parts. Just An idea. Ken Kenneth Davis IT Manager American Wood Moulding, LLC For a moment, nothing happened. Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:58 PM
RE: recipients
No. Depends on what your definition of send is. There maybe be a character limit in the To: field, but you can use mailing lists to send to many, many more users. For instance, many companies have an All-Company list, which can have thousands of users. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recipients Is there a max amount of recipients you can send to through exchange or is it unlimited. My impression is that the max is 254 is this true. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New year, no contract
Alvin and the Chipmunks. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract The Harmonikats? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract I might be wrong; Maybe she was talking about those three whatzits who sing that christmas song. You know the one, Me, I want a hula hoop? -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract I thought she meant those rather large male-models that women tend to swoon over... PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of the acorns, then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck... -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:01 AM To: Baker, Jennifer Subject: RE: New year, no contract Grrr... -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 02:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Video tape and fuji film. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract How would one know? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yea, but how many of those 20 have seen you sober? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Thank you Serdar - I appreciate that. Paul - I'm going to walk away from this one now, but with two final clarifications: (a) I'm English, with an office in Crawley, West Sussex. I happen to spend most of my time in the US, but I'm fully cognizant of the UK employment situation, and I have hiring influence in both countries. (b) I have nothing to hide. If you search the archives, you'll see that I even put my contact details in most of my posts. I've added them in below again, to make the point. There are also more than twenty folks on this list (a loose guess) that have met me in person. Gary -- Gary K. Slinger Manager, Operations Design and Development CP Ships - Infrastructure Planning Projects Tampa, Florida US Office: +1-813-635-2189 UK Office: +44-1293-582778 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Gary is singing the song that's in everybody's head. He doesn't have anything to hide and has been a very valuable contributor to this list. Your post is nothing but spam. S/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New year, no contract Yes, but we probably don't have such hangups about using search sites, or have our own network of contacts that might be able to help us. I am using the network, and some agencies as well. Under the circumstances, I wonder why you are protesting so much. Do you, perhaps, have something to hide? -- Dr Paul Cummins - Internet Engineer | /\ASCII RIBBON Tel: 07021 117179 Fax: 07092 105150 + \ / CAMPAIGN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| X AGAINST HTML MAIL | / \AND POSTINGS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Survey/Voting
Have you checked Technet out? Read Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q166446) for a quick overview. LEJ -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Survey/Voting Is it possible to conduct an anonymous survey via Exchange/Outlook? On a related note how does voting work? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Survey/Voting
OL2000: (CW) Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q197420) -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Yes it says it works with OL97. Do you know if it works with OL2000 as well? Thanks ALEX P.S. - Martin, don't quit your day job!!! -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Have you checked Technet out? Read Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q166446) for a quick overview. LEJ -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Survey/Voting Is it possible to conduct an anonymous survey via Exchange/Outlook? On a related note how does voting work? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Survey/Voting
Not easily; maybe with some scripting, but I doubt it would ever be entirely anonymous. It would probably be easier to do it from a web server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Thanks is it possible to make it anonymous? -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting OL2000: (CW) Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q197420) -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Yes it says it works with OL97. Do you know if it works with OL2000 as well? Thanks ALEX P.S. - Martin, don't quit your day job!!! -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Survey/Voting Have you checked Technet out? Read Outlook Voting and Vote Processing (Q166446) for a quick overview. LEJ -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Survey/Voting Is it possible to conduct an anonymous survey via Exchange/Outlook? On a related note how does voting work? Thanks Alex Alborzfard MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veratis backup software
Check the archives. It was discussed in depth last week. -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veratis backup software I am sorry if this question has been asked before but I looked through the archives and didn't find much. I am looking for a good software to do backups for Exchange. I currently have Veratis backup exec. Has anyone used this? I am looking for the best any ideas. TIA, Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopping bad email addresses at the gates
Um, no. They are not bad (assuming they are in compliance with all applicable RFCs) until the MTA says they are not valid. -Original Message- From: Jim Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stopping bad email addresses at the gates Hello, Is there a way to bounce bad Internet messages before they get delivered? If I'm understanding the flow correctly, the IMC accepts any message coming in and hands it off to the MTA. The MTA says I don't have a mailbox for that person and sends back out a non-delivery announcement, and in our case also sends a copy to the postmaster for review. Can we stop those messages at the Internet connector? We are running 5.5 with a single small organization right now but will be going to E2K soon. Thank you, JR _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disaster debriefing
Hey, they keep him away from the deep fryer -Original Message- From: Renouf, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disaster debriefing You have your 3 year old working at McDonalds? Sheesh! ;) Phil There is no need for retraining this person - even my 3 year old can say Would you like fries with that? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disaster debriefing
You are leaving out the write time to the hard drive. Depending on RAID, drive speed, etc., etc., I doubt you would get your theoretical rate. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disaster debriefing Well it was a 10G file, which is about 81920 megabits. Let's say you're getting 60MBps transfer rate on your 100Mbps LAN (since it's nighttime, things are pretty quiet), that should take about 25 minutes. Lemme know if my math is wrong. -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disaster debriefing Which means nothing. Try it out yourself - cut and paste, drag and drop, xcopy, whatever - a large file, and while its copying, look at the byte count on the destination drive. That's the FIRST thing done in the copy process. You ever time doing a copy of a 20GB file across a LAN??? It takes a while. A LONG while. There is no need for retraining this person - even my 3 year old can say Would you like fries with that? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disaster debriefing He did wait an hour... And he's confident the copy was complete - same byte count on both the network drive and the local drive. -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disaster debriefing Sounds like he got impatient and didn't wait for the database to finish being copied back to exchsrvr\mdbdata from the network share - which needs to complete before you get your dos prompt back. After he killed ESEutil, he could've also copied it back manually and renamed back to priv.edb instead of tape restore. Then, the defrag effort would not have been in vain. Louise -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disaster debriefing He followed the KB article, whatever it was. Services were down. I think he followed all the right procedures. The temp file was on a network drive that had plenty of room. The defragged temp database exists on the temp drive and is whole. That's how he figures it freed 3.5 gigs. -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disaster debriefing The utility is dangerous in the wrong hands. It can take a very, very, very long time to run. It also gets very snitty when you don't have enough room on the HD (or network share) to create the temp file that is part of the defrag processWhere did he attempt to create the temp fileon the same drive that is almost full? And how is he enjoying his time at home these days? -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disaster debriefing Ok, so we had a disaster the other day. Co-Worker of mine ran eseutil against the private IS to free up some disk space. We were at about 95% capacity on the drive, and it would creep up to about 98% before the nightly incrementals, which brought it back down. Now, I'm not positive what command he ran, but apparently it cleared about 3.5 gigs out of the IS. Right before eseutil exited, however, it apparently hung waiting for a command prompt. I'm a little fuzzy as to what happened after this. I think he tried to reboot, and then the IS didn't come up -- he got some errors, looked them up in the KB to very little avail. So when I got in at 9 the next morning, mail was down. He was still there. We managed to put humpty dumpty back together again restoring from the full backup we made right before starting this procedure. It took several attempts - he had tried restoring from backup before but hadn't had any success. I think the procedure we followed was this: Shut down all exchange services Start System Attendant directory service Restore DS Stop System Attendant directory service Restart System Attendant
RE: Store.exe
Why do you ask? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe I would like to know what everyones average mem usage is for store.exe. Mine sits at around 98000. thanks rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disaster debriefing
The utility is dangerous in the wrong hands. It can take a very, very, very long time to run. It also gets very snitty when you don't have enough room on the HD (or network share) to create the temp file that is part of the defrag processWhere did he attempt to create the temp fileon the same drive that is almost full? And how is he enjoying his time at home these days? -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disaster debriefing Ok, so we had a disaster the other day. Co-Worker of mine ran eseutil against the private IS to free up some disk space. We were at about 95% capacity on the drive, and it would creep up to about 98% before the nightly incrementals, which brought it back down. Now, I'm not positive what command he ran, but apparently it cleared about 3.5 gigs out of the IS. Right before eseutil exited, however, it apparently hung waiting for a command prompt. I'm a little fuzzy as to what happened after this. I think he tried to reboot, and then the IS didn't come up -- he got some errors, looked them up in the KB to very little avail. So when I got in at 9 the next morning, mail was down. He was still there. We managed to put humpty dumpty back together again restoring from the full backup we made right before starting this procedure. It took several attempts - he had tried restoring from backup before but hadn't had any success. I think the procedure we followed was this: Shut down all exchange services Start System Attendant directory service Restore DS Stop System Attendant directory service Restart System Attendant Restore IS Any other combination of services running/not running didn't work out. We're using Veritas Backup Exec BTW. Well everything's back to the way it was before we started this whole mess. I know I've seen discussions about eseutil on this list before, but I wanted to revisit this and get some concrete information. What did we do wrong? What's the right way to use eseutil to gain disk space? I'd appreciate any non-flaming advice, pointers, docs, etc. I find the archives non-intuitive -- or maybe I'm looking in the wrong place? Can't seem to find a good place to type in a search phrase eseutil and have it return relevant data (I'm here: http://www.swynk.com) -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
Affordable is relative. What is the cost to disinfect a server if you get hit with a virus? If you are using a corporate license now, it may become affordable to stick with the Exchange version of what you have Larry Josefowski Network Operations Analyst Conectiv, Inc. (302) 451-5548 -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Limiting a Mailbox to internal communication only.
That will prevent them from getting mail; in order to prevent from them sending, you need to add them on the IMS Restriction tab -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Limiting a Mailbox to internal communication only. How can I limit a mailbox to internal communication only? I.E. no receiving or sending of internet mail. Do I just remove the SMTP address from the account? also Is it possible to limit an exchange account to a computer? In other words, I have a mailbox which I want anyone to be able access but only from our Inspection computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hello All meet...the new guy
And wear a cup, preferably fireproof. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hello All meet...the new guy Hi. Welcome. Hey, take the time and go through the FAQs. They'll help you a bundle. S. -Original Message- From: Desmond Witherspoon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hello All meet...the new guy To all, Hey I just joined this list in the hopes that one of you guys will help in the coming months with some updates and upgrades. With that being said? How the hell is everybody? I received my first messages earlier this morning...and its not totally what I expected. Desmond Witherspoon Network and PC Support Technician Metropolitan New York Library Council 57 East 11th Street New York, NY 10003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2k SP2
When it is ready. (FAQ) -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2k SP2 Out of curiosity, what is the target release date of SP2 for E2k? Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backup
Have you backed up the server before? The NT backup on the Exchange server is a little different, and backs up the Exchange Store, known as an on-line backup. If this sounds new to you, you haven't read the FAQ. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BackUp I am going to use NTBackup to back up my exchange box. I have selected system state, C: drive and Exchange. Are there any issues with doing this? Any recommendations? Thanks, Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.domitianx.com Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size advice
Welcome Luis, Your answer will depend heavily upon how you plan on using it. No, we don't recommend putting mail on the workstation, but keeping it on the server. We also can't answer if it is enough for us: You users and your management have to make that decision, based upon you presenting the facts to them. -Original Message- From: Luis Pérez Lazo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size advice Hello I'd like to know your opinions on whether to let user's mail items on the server or in the wks and the size limit u recommend. We have less than 500 users connecting to Exchange 5.5 through Outlook 2000/97 in a LAN. Mail is left on the server and the size limit is set to 30MB but they want more. We are considering to move to Exchange 2000 where the server version allows only 15GB storage. Is this enough for us? Thanks in advance; Luis _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nimda
I assume it also forces a lock of the Caps Lock key? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda I GOT NAILED BY IT I WAS AT WORK FOR 36 HOURS STRAIGHT TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO FIX IT. FINIALLY I GOT ABOUT 98% OF THE VIRUS OFF ALL MY WORKSTATIONS. AND 100% OFF THE SERVER. MAN THIS VIRUS REALLY CLOGS YOUR SYSTEM AND SCREWS UP ALOT OF PROGRAMS MOSTLY OFFICE 200O -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda We have not had any come in through email. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Nimda I got none ... guess I don't have any friends ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- - Original Message - From: John Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:32 PM Subject: Nimda Did everyone get nailed by Nimda? This list is dead today! I got eight hits from it last night. Thank god for proper working antivirus apps! John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
WASHINGTON, Sept. 11 (UPI) -- Federal officials said a plane has hit the Pentagon. The crash comes nearly an hour after two planes hit the World Trade Center building. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! Importance: High Seems that one of the towers collapsed ... man this is sickening :( Martin - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: Re: Urgent! Something got hit in DC apperantly a Army Helicopter was 'involved' - Original Message - From: Robert Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: RE: Urgent! Is it also confirmed that the Pentagon has been hit with something as well? Rob -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! I saw the second one flying into the building live on TV. Apperantly a hijacked 767 passenger jet from Boston. Most of the newssites are hammered with traffic now; www.ananova.com www.msnbc.com www.cnn.com Martin - Original Message - From: Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Urgent! Folks, If you haven't heard, two aircraft have crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This is not a joke. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
The FBI is investigating reports a Palestinian terrorist group has claimed responsibility for the World Trade Center crashes. The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine has reportedly carried out the atrocity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can someone let me know...
What should you do? Pray to whatever deity that you worship. Side note...Maryland has declared a State of Emergency. -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can someone let me know... Hey, I'm stuck here without radio or TV. The entire net (news wise anyway) is dead. What the heck is going on? I hear all kinds of rumors about martial law, the government telling people to go home and stay home... Should I stay at work, do I need to stay off the roads, what the hell is going on. -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool Corp. http://www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can someone let me know...
Annanova.com is loading pretty fast (out of the UK). -Original Message- From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can someone let me know... At risk of starting a flood of traffic to one of the still-functioning news sites, wired.com is still kinda working. Not heard about Martial law but the BBC are refusing to report rumors, probably quite rightly. Do what you feel is right. JDE -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Can someone let me know... Hey, I'm stuck here without radio or TV. The entire net (news wise anyway) is dead. What the heck is going on? I hear all kinds of rumors about martial law, the government telling people to go home and stay home... Should I stay at work, do I need to stay off the roads, what the hell is going on. -- Craig Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED] IS Manager Stanek Tool Corp. http://www.stanektool.com New Berlin, WI _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
Haven't seen it, and I hope that it is not true. I simply forwarded what I heard, but was not intending to swipe at any religion. I believe that all religions, including Christianity, have been perverted beyond what the founders intended. I suspect that whoever did this (and it looks like a Palestinian thing) has seriously miscalculated the power of an angry United States. We are very opinionated, and are usually very diverse in our opinion which is sometimes viewed, I think, as weakness. I truly hope that God has mercy on their souls. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Yeah but does the Q'uran tell them to have parties in the friggin streets after this tragedy??? Just watched footage of the reaction of the people in Palestine... Yes, they are CELEBRATING! I hope we crash the party. Literally. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! Probably 15 whacko groups are going to claim responsibility before this is done. Please let's not participate in the immediate targetting (and attacks) of the Muslim faithful, or people who have been displaced or displeased by highly complex Middle Eastern politics, as was done in 1993 after two WHITE, AMERICAN, pseudo-patriotic nutcases killed innocent people in Oklahoma City. The Q'uran is a Holy Text. Not a manual of terrorism. -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:25 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Urgent! Subject: RE: Urgent! The FBI is investigating reports a Palestinian terrorist group has claimed responsibility for the World Trade Center crashes. The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine has reportedly carried out the atrocity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Code help!
As opposed to using a rule and/or a custom address? Why? -Original Message- From: Thomas John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Code help! hey guys: Is there a way to forward mail from one account to another? Meaning...My email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I want all email sent there to forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there any code to do this? Been digging for days...no luck! Thomas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Backups?
Umattempt a restore on an offline server? -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Backups? What is the best way to make sure you can get data back? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet E-Mail content filtering program
Ed probably won't be happy that you asked two FAQ questions Content Filtering - FAQ 4.8 Spam/Open Relay - FAQ 3.73 LEJ -Original Message- From: Jake Wallendal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet E-Mail content filtering program Our xxx e-mail has shot through the roof as of late. 1. Is there a good content filtering program that is pretty straight forward? 2. Where can we go to see if our server is spamming? The previous one we used is offline. 3. Will Ed save the day for me again? Thanks Jake Wallendal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving from McAfee GroupShield to Norton Antivirus?
Norton works fine. So does McAfee. Why does your manager want to switch? A good reason would be if there is a cost advantage to it; a bad reason would be because he (or his manager) is more aware of Norton than McAfee. LEJ -Original Message- From: Mike Pelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving from McAfee GroupShield to Norton Antivirus? Folks, My manager is thinking about moving from McAfee GroupShield 4.04 for Exchange (which, is working just fine!) to possibly Norton AntiVirus 2.5 for Exchange. I'm running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I can remember some comments about problems with Norton for Exchange. Is my memory failing me or is this not a good option? Also, we're using McAfee WebShield SMTP to filter all incoming SMTP mail. Is the Norton AntiVirus for Gateways 2.5 any good? Thanks! Mike Mike Pelley E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
Well, if one disk fails in your scenario, you would be good to go. However, if something corrupts your server installation, or causes it to crash, or the controller card goes kablooie, the issue that caused it to crash is more then likely going to be mirrored. YMMV, but I would think, in the time frame that you are talking, you are more likely to have a software issue than a hardware issue (which is what a mirror essentially is guarding against). -Original Message- From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 6:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. When you say mirror goes, do you mean one disk of the mirror fails, both disks fail, or neither disk fails but the OS writes garbage over both? I think I prefer mirroring the drive containing OS and logs but I'm just exploring options with a 3 drive restriction. I guess I want to prevent having to go to backup to restore the stores if at all possible which means mirroring the stores. However then if the OS drive goes the logs are lost. Thus RAID5 with the three drives with two partitions (OS and Exchange) is probably as good as anything for availablity but poor for performance. Best bet of course is to buy more drives, but that is not always an option. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 August 2001 11:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. The same mirror? If that mirror goes you lose everything. If put on separate mirrors, the odds are against both of them failing at the same time. For performance, the EDB files go on a striped set and the logs go on a mirrored set (doesn't need to be striped; no advantage). If you lose your EDB files, you can rebuild from the logs. If you lose your logs you're toast. - Original Message - From: Ian Midgley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 4:27 AM Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. If perfromance is not an issue (I know it's always an issue but for arguments sake...) what would be the disadvantages of putting the logs and stores together on the mirror? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2001 19:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. If the log drive fails, all transactions are committed to the database and Exchange shuts down. (That is in theory.) However, your point is quite valid since the log drive is also the OS drive, and if the OS drive fails, I don't trust anything to shut down right. So I would agree to mirror the OS-Log drive and put the database on the unmirrored third drive. I would also partition the OS-Log drive into two partitions (9 + 9 GB sounds fine, adjusting that one way or the other is fine, too) so that if you have some problem with backups and the logs don't get purged for a period of time it doesn't completely kill your system. Still, I'd want one more drive before I'd call this a production server, even if for only ten months. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. You would put the logs on an unmirrored drive? Data (that has been backed up) can be recovered. Unbacked up logs (created since the last back up) cannot. I'm not sure what the answer would be, given the drive constraints, but I would press for some more drive. I would not trust the logs to a non-redundant spindle. But I also understand the need to keep the logs and data on seperate spindles. Joel K. Osborn Information Systems Technical Specialist Wisconsin Department of Transportation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. Yes. In fact, you could have just a C drive. Now, if you want to have SOME chance of recovery if the server crashes, I would do the following: 1) Format the hard drives 2) Break the RAID 5 3) Take one disk and format it as C: 4) Take the other two disks, and mirror them to create D: 5) Install the OS and Exchange on C: 6) Tell performance optimiser to put the Logs on C: and the Information Store on D:. Then, ghod forbid you lose a spindle, you can still recover. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
RE: Backing up Exchange using Veritas Exec 8.x
Phil, You need to review the white papers on Exchange Disaster Recovery. In short, you do not set it up on your production network. It is hoped (actually, assumed) that you have a lab to try any changes on your server. LEJ -Original Message- From: Phil Labonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange using Veritas Exec 8.x Where can we get info on how to setup a disaster recovery server? Do you install Exchange and set it up the same at the real live server or do you deploy it as well on the network??? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 31, 2001 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange using Veritas Exec 8.x Full daily IS and log backup here. No brick-level. We have a disaster recovery server designated in case we need to restore a single mailbox. Original Message --- From: Sethi, Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:40:26 -0400 Hello, For those of you that use Veritas Backup Exec to backup the Exchange server, what type of back up jobs do you run? Daily Differentials and Full every Friday. DO you backup the IS and the individual mailboxes every evening or just the IS. I think we here have been backing up the individal mailboxes every day as well since we have had numerous problems with users accidentally deleting stuff and needing it restored. Also do most of you utilize the Open File option in veritas as you may have users in email while it is being backed up? I just wanted to get an idea of what type of backup strategy is used by others. Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up Exchange using Veritas Exec 8.x
You're right. We have spare servers, but since we have a bunch of production servers, we don't have one for one backup. We build as needed. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange using Veritas Exec 8.x That depends on the type of recovery you have your spare set up for. If you want to recover the directory as well as the IS, then your statement about being on a separate network is correct. If your spare is more for the occasional single mailbox recovery, or for verifying backups (not of the directory, obviously), then there is no reason the server can't be part of the production network. It must have the same NT version and SP level, the same Exchange SP level and hotfixes applied, and the same Org and Site names (but not joined to any existing site). Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange using Veritas Exec 8.x Phil, You need to review the white papers on Exchange Disaster Recovery. In short, you do not set it up on your production network. It is hoped (actually, assumed) that you have a lab to try any changes on your server. LEJ -Original Message- From: Phil Labonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange using Veritas Exec 8.x Where can we get info on how to setup a disaster recovery server? Do you install Exchange and set it up the same at the real live server or do you deploy it as well on the network??? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 31, 2001 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange using Veritas Exec 8.x Full daily IS and log backup here. No brick-level. We have a disaster recovery server designated in case we need to restore a single mailbox. Original Message --- From: Sethi, Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:40:26 -0400 Hello, For those of you that use Veritas Backup Exec to backup the Exchange server, what type of back up jobs do you run? Daily Differentials and Full every Friday. DO you backup the IS and the individual mailboxes every evening or just the IS. I think we here have been backing up the individal mailboxes every day as well since we have had numerous problems with users accidentally deleting stuff and needing it restored. Also do most of you utilize the Open File option in veritas as you may have users in email while it is being backed up? I just wanted to get an idea of what type of backup strategy is used by others. Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Default Signature
By any chance, you wouldn't mean a header/footer for every message, would you? Have you read the FAQ? -Original Message- From: kiran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Default Signature Hi, I am using exchange 5.5 and want to send a default signature for all the outgoing mails from my domain. Can anyone tell me how to do this, i will be thankful in advance to do so. Regards, kiran. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
It would also be helpful if we know how you have the drives configured. Is the C: drive on a seperate channel? Is it mirrored? Is the 18.2GB drives set up as a RAID 5 (leaving you with 36 GB)? -Original Message- From: John Shi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. Hi, Everyone I have a server that has 3*18.2 GB. I have 4 GB on the C drive. I have installed a Windows 2000 server and SP2 on the C drive. I need to install Exchange server 5.5 on that. I would like to find out what is the best space usage for private Information store, Public Information store, Information Store Logs, Directory Service, Directory Service logs, and MTA. Should I just have C and D drive or I should have C, D, E, F drive? How do I allocate these spaces? The following is what I see from the MS book.. Private Information store C:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA Public Information Store C:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA Inforamtion Store Logs D:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA Directory Service F:\exchsrvr\DSADATA Message Transfer Agent E:\exchsrvr\mtadata I do not know how to allocate the disk space on each drive. Thanks John Shi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
You do. Exact configuration also depends on how you are going to use this. How big do you expect your IS's to grow? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. Hi, Martin I thought I need to partition the drives first before I run the Exchange Optimizer. If I am wrong, please correct me. Thanks John Shi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. Run the Exchange Optimizer. It will determine the best config for you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Shi Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration. Hi, Everyone I have a server that has 3*18.2 GB. I have 4 GB on the C drive. I have installed a Windows 2000 server and SP2 on the C drive. I need to install Exchange server 5.5 on that. I would like to find out what is the best space usage for private Information store, Public Information store, Information Store Logs, Directory Service, Directory Service logs, and MTA. Should I just have C and D drive or I should have C, D, E, F drive? How do I allocate these spaces? The following is what I see from the MS book.. Private Information store C:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA Public Information Store C:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA Inforamtion Store Logs D:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA Directory Service F:\exchsrvr\DSADATA Message Transfer Agent E:\exchsrvr\mtadata I do not know how to allocate the disk space on each drive. Thanks John Shi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rule of thumb for Public Folders
Why not create the subfolders you indicate and then give the responsibility of managing the folders to the respective people? The responsible people can set up permissions on the applicable public folders as needed. You don't need separate subdirectories for that, if that is what you are thinking (a public folder and a semi-public folder?) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rule of thumb for Public Folders An issue has reared its ugly head over public folders. Due to lack of planning in the beginning, we have dumped all folders under the public folder area for folks to post to. Some folders allow all, some folders allow only certain folks to access them. What is the general rule of thumb concerning Public folders? 1. Do you let anyone create them as will? 2. Does the Exchange admin force everyone to go to him for requests? 3. Do all folders under Public Folders let all employees in? 4. Do you create sub folders for folders that are needing restrictions on who access it? I was thinking of creating a Main folder called Company info with subfolders like Bulleting board, MIS tips, HR forms etc. Then creating another Main folder called Business related or something and have sub folders that only certain folks can get to. Does this sound normal? How do you maintain your public folder hierarchy? Thanks!! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns
I was refering to a snap in module for NEMX. There is also the infamous friggin package that shows upMore references in the FAQ, as well.. -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns Hi Larry, Thanks for your help. I was just wondering though, when you mentioned NEMX, is the product you're refering to Nemx TBAV for MS Exchange Server or is there a smaller snap-in for MSX designed specifically for the auto-disclaimers/legalese stuff? What I'm hoping to find (I'm not asking for much am I - ;-)) is a simple elegant non-redundant solution which we can snap into our MSX5.5/TrendAV environment, keeping in mind that we're trying to avoid interferring with: o Emails which need to be signed/encrypted. o Emails which for whatever reason, may need to override inclusion of the auto-disclaimer. o Security/Legal's requirement that this be on All emails (I'm not sure under what circumstances they'll permit exceptions - e.g. only for specific mailboxes or maybe they'll let everyone have the capability of manually overriding the auto-disclm. on a msg. by msg. basis). ... Joe -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns It looks as if you need something with a little more horsepower, such as NEMX, that provides the ability to fine tune the use of filters.. -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns Hi Peter, Thanks for the suggestion. Do you know if it is possible to specify the complete smtp address in the IMS's Address Space (I was under the impression that it only handled domains)? If it can't be set up for specific smtp addresses (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), then this presents a problem, as our security legal depts want the disclaimer to appear on all emails which do not have the specific requirement of leaving it off, and other emails to a specific domain or even the same address within the domain are supposed to have the disclaimer message turned on. Then again, even if it can be config'd for specific smtp addresses, legal/security may only want them to avoid the disclaimer on the specific emails with the requirement. So I'm in need of a solution which can be manually turned off at will by the sender, on a email by email basis; and then there is the possibility that security/legal may ask for it to only be capable of being overridden for specific sender's mailboxes. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns Hi Joe You could create another Exchange server with an IMS that is dedicated to those domains and addresses that have issues with the disclaimer and not run the disclaimer on those machines. Regards Peter Johnson -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 13:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns In the FAQ. (we've used Mimesweeper for SMTP to good effect for this) -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some suggestio ns Good morning to some and good afternoon to the others ... I'm assuming of course that you do go to sleep some time. 8-) We recently implemented the IMSEXT.DLL, in order to throw in the disclaimers which our security and legal departments were looking for. However, this is now causing issues on emails which MUST have only specific text in the body as they tend to ignore it or choke on it when they see disclaimer text as well. How are other people handling issues such as sending an unsubscribe message to a list when the unsubscribe message is only supposed to have a specific subject line and absolutely nothing in the message body? Does anyone know of any alternative products or settings I can use on IMSEXT.DLL or Exchange; which would let the clients override the dislaimer text on an email by email basis, or with the ability to override the auto-disclaimer for specific mailboxes? This requirement also extends to emails relayed off of our IMS (from behind our firewall of course). TIA ... Joe This email communication is intended
RE: A streamlined version of an OUTLOOK mailbox
Calendar and Notes are an integral part of Exchange; if all you want is email, go with SENDMAIL. Most people want to know how to ADD to the Exchange Database; you are wasting your budget resources by purchasing a Lexus when a bicycle would do. LEJ -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A streamlined version of an OUTLOOK mailbox Good morning all, Because of budget restraints my company is interested in creating OUTLOOK mailboxes with limited folders. We want the users to be only able to have the INBOX, DELETED ITEMS, OUTBOX, DRAFTS, CONTACTS and SENT ITEMS folders. We do not want them to have any other folders such as JOURNAL, CALENDAR, NOTES etc. etc. I have run the EXCH32.EXE and deleted the unwanted folders on my OWA TESTING account but once I open this mailbox up all of the folders reappear. Is there anyway to achieve what we are trying to achieve? Regards, Mike Mitchell System eMAIL Administration Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
