RE: PST Alternative?

[Martin Blackstone]

Increase the disk space and thus the limits on the Exchange server. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST Alternative?

I am looking for alternate solutions to using PST files. I have had numerous
users come to me with corrupt files. Are there any out there?

Kevin

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Internal mail limit for Exchange 5.5

[Martin Blackstone]

If you have more than one Exchange server, you can set it at the MTA. But if
you only have one, you cant do anything for internal mail. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pouncey, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 5:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internal mail limit for Exchange 5.5

I am running Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 server with AD. How do I set
internal mail limit send\receive of 5 megs only. I have a 5 meg send\receive
limit set for external SMTP mail. 
Thank you for any the help.

Mark...






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: unhold

[Martin Blackstone]

DeFlowers 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold

DePants

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold

DeThong
 

-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unhold

Unhold


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: doubletake

[Martin Blackstone]

And just to be clear, I said "meet" 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

Cool. A dog thread.
 

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

Mine is like that. Half pit bull, half german shepard and the biggest pussy
you will ever meet. He is nothing but love.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

The dog is 150 pounds, half wolf, half German Sheppard. About the dumbest
most loveable dog I have ever met. But boy does he smell... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail
server

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Kevinm [NY] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: doubletake


What does double take really do for exchange??

Yeah so I have a bit by bit copy of the store, my dog comes in and pees on
my primary server, now what will double take do for me? will it change IP
and Server for me to fail over? How do my users see that there is a double
take server??

Any one run this or have it installed that can tell me?? 

Thanks. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Disc

RE: doubletake

[Martin Blackstone]

Mine is like that. Half pit bull, half german shepard and the biggest pussy
you will ever meet. He is nothing but love.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

The dog is 150 pounds, half wolf, half German Sheppard. About the dumbest
most loveable dog I have ever met. But boy does he smell... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake

That's a huge dog if it can excrete enough wee to flood a beefy mail
server

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Kevinm [NY] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: doubletake


What does double take really do for exchange??

Yeah so I have a bit by bit copy of the store, my dog comes in and pees
on
my primary server, now what will double take do for me? will it change
IP
and Server for me to fail over? How do my users see that there is a
double
take server??

Any one run this or have it installed that can tell me?? 

Thanks. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Internet Mail Issues

[Martin Blackstone]

Oops. TO, not too 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues

Crista, Could you please include the message you are replying too? It makes
it quite difficult for the rest of us to know what you are talking about.

Thx! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues

Exchange 2003, I just started on this list less than 6 months ago, so I may
have missed the discussion.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Internet Mail Issues

[Martin Blackstone]

Crista, Could you please include the message you are replying too? It makes
it quite difficult for the rest of us to know what you are talking about.

Thx! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues

Exchange 2003, I just started on this list less than 6 months ago, so I may
have missed the discussion.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: multiple mailings

[Martin Blackstone]

What kind of database is it? I think if you are pulling from a DB, you would
really want a product that could interface with that DB and do all the
mailings, etc. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Holstrom, Don J.
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: multiple mailings

I am the IT guy at a museum in Washington, D.C. We have an e-mail list of
over 5,000 to whom we send weekly HTML e-mails. My old e-mail program,
PostCast Server & Pro Server, no longer work as they should. So I am looking
for another program.

Is there anything that works within Exchange? 5.5, 2K, or 2003?

The maillist grows and is changed weekly. So I download a new database for
each mailing. Otherwise I could just set up multiple distribution lists
within Outlook.

Anyone else doing something similar to this?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Internet Mail Issues

[Martin Blackstone]

Are you using some kind of dynamic DNS? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 5:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Internet Mail Issues

I have a client who is migrating away from an ISP hosted POP mail account to
a newly created exch 2003 box and we're experiencing "5.5.0 smtp;550 Dynamic
IPs/open relays blocked. Contact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]", "5.5.0
smtp;550-68.37.144.103 blocked by blacklist.mail.ops.asp.att.net." and to
aol "Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified."  I've
contacted both earthlink and att/comcast and both insist that the new server
is not blacklisted and a quick search on ORDB shows we are not blacklisted
(The server had only been up 4 hours and we were getting this message from
att/comcast!)  I've locked down the server and we're not allowing relay so
I'm thinking it might be reverse dns, but comcast (our isp) won't allow us
to host reverse dns or set up an entry for us.  Before we shutdown the
server and get an new ISP that will allow reverse dns, does anyone else have
an idea?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Removing/Deleting Message

[Martin Blackstone]

Isscan may help. Its free.
http://www.softlookup.com/download/down10498.html 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Faust
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 5:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing/Deleting Message

Question:  Is there a way to delete a message from a 5.5 SP4 IS?  The recall
message in Outlook only provides the option.  Our Unix admin did a reply to
all instead of a forward and sent a bad word to the entire company.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD

[Martin Blackstone]

RPC over HTTP 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange
List Server
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD

Hi all,

What do you think are the features I am going to lose if I deploy
Exchange2003 in a Windows2000 AD(native) domain instead of a Windows2003 AD
domain?

So far, based on the following article I could lost the InetOrgPerson
objects :
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822591&Product=exch2
003

thx
-Eric

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

[Martin Blackstone]

How unethical of you to waste your work time reading these. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

I've lost almost 6 hours today alone, just waiting for the next whitty
Deckler comeback.  I'm still waiting.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics


With some of the long diatribes as of late, has anyone thought of adding up
the lost man hours in this lastest flame war?



John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Alpha Display Systems.

Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
 
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of Line---




-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics


This is my definition. Whats yours?
http://tinyurl.com/ys84n

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics


Sure, you can't prove the something is *NOT* white. But you also cannot
prove that something IS white if the person you are talking to will not look
at it and say "Yup, it's white alright." or even agree with your definition
of white. Perhaps, your "white" my "blue"?

The point was that asking me to prove that something is a conflict of
interest is pointless unless you can agree to some ground rules. By not
accepting and agreeing to a basic definition for "conflict of interest",
there are no ground rules and hence it becomes impossible to prove anything.
If you are always going to debate the actual meaning of the term "conflict
of interest", then no one will ever convince you that ANYTHING is a conflict
of interest, let alone white.

> Asking someone to demonstrate a negative is a logical impossibility, 
> and a dishonest debating/argument tactic.  You wouldn't win any awards 
> if you tried to sell me a product with that kind of logic.
> 
>  Jim
> 
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

As a Microsoft Partner, does your company get any freebies?

 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Alright, this is a good question. Bottom line is that if, as the hiring
body, you don't care then ethics are irrelevant in your decision and you do
what you want. Ethics do not have to be the end all, be all of decision
making. And, it is also absolutely not the case that MVP's will always
recommend Microsoft software for their own personal gain.

You are exactly correct, you have final say about what you feel is and is
not relevant about your hiring decisions. But, this does not change the
situation that the MVP title is a real or perceived conflict of interest.
Of course it is, but whether or not you care is up to you.

> My company, Consolidated Widgets, Inc., has previously decided to = 
> standardize on MS software at all levels.  When it comes time to make 
> hiring = decisions, whether for FTEs or for conslutants, how should I 
> proceed?  Let's take = the example of an Exchange deployment project.
> =20
> 
> First thing to be decided:=20
> Do I want a generic technologist?
> Do I want an unrelated technology guru?
> Do I want a Windows/Exchange guru?
> 
> Assuming I choose the last option:
> Do I want someone who has heard of Exchange and may be able to help 
> with = my deployment after reading some books?
> Do I want someone who is an expert, and can demonstrate their 
> expertise somehow?
> 
> The demonstration of the expertise is all that the MVP status is, IMO.  
> = You don't attain MVP status by sending in a bunch of cereal box 
> tops, as one = can do to get an MCSE. =20
> 
> You whole premise is that an employee/conslutant with an MVP will 
> automatically recommend technology from their masters *for their own = 
> personal gain*.  I don't see this being the case.  If I'm hiring Ed 
> (to use him = as an
> example) to help with my Exchange migration, I've already made the = 
> decision to use that MS technology.  At that point, I want the best 
> person I can = find and afford.  Why hire a consultant, if not for 
> their knowledge?
> 
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Priv.edb

[Martin Blackstone]

Update your resume 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb

Damn, I deleted mine and emptied the recycle bin; I have no backups.  What
should I do now? 

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb

Those "html" files are your .stm files. Leave them be!
 

-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb

Its not a large system and as i say its running SBS 2000. So, i will leave
of circular logging then. Its just i've always dealt with 5.5 servers and
that's how i had it there.
The weird thing is when i check the setup of Exchange 2000 i see that on the
C:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\ *.log files Pub1.edb = 16mb (not much usage made of
Public folders)

Howerver, this is what i find wierd, in the same place i have another
pub1 = 14mb and is specified as an html doc??

I see the same for my Priv1.edb database E:\exchsrvr\ priv1.edb = 2.15 GB
priv1 = 7.32 GB (shows its an html document)
no log files can be seen? 

Is this right, should i have a 7.32 Gb priv1 html doc sat next to my
priv1.edb file

anyone shed some light on this? I just inherited the box :(

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

That's no lie! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I can't be the Captain because I don't look good in shorts.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

No, you are the Capt. Don is Julie. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Are you calling me a coke addict? 

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin?  :p 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-ma

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

No, you are the Capt. Don is Julie. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Are you calling me a coke addict? 

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin?  :p 

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscr

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

Your forehead goes to the back of your neck. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

This from the man with a really tall forehead and chicken legs...  Who are
you to talk?   :P

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

You and Don should not be talking about hairlines 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Good choice. The doctor has the same hairline and legs as you.
 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin?  :p 

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.c

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

http://www.showtimemarketing.com/images/charo.jpg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Who the hell was that?  I don't remember no Charo! 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

You want to complain? Fine, your Charo. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I wanna be Issac!!  :P 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin?  :p 

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

You and Don should not be talking about hairlines 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Good choice. The doctor has the same hairline and legs as you.
 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin?  :p 

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

You want to complain? Fine, your Charo. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I wanna be Issac!!  :P 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin?  :p 

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.s

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise director. I'm the Dr. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Ok, so who plays Capt. Stubin?  :p 

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

The Swynk List...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We'll be flaming YOU... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Or is it...

The LOVE Boat...
Exciting and New...
Climb Aboard...
We're expecting YOU... 

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

We have a love connection!! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel Pickens
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Hi Neighbor,
I'm just over a ways, off of I75 and Caruth Haven. 
Right across from Northpark mall in the big ugly gold towers.
Traffic on 75 is horrid right now.

-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I am owned by my MSDN cd cases and Microsoft pens.  Long live the overlord!

It's raining here (Dallas, TX), too.



(A very wet) Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Jolyon,
This Greg doesn't see it that way... He thinks the pens and mousepads are
evil, and will corrupt you. But note, he he thinks utility software should
be free. (he mentioned Novell by name) You missed the last time this
subject came up, it raged for a week with no real conclusion. He is very
consistently inconsistant in his logic.

Its raining here too
Rachel

-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


I was going to ask what form this compensation took.

So it's on the level of the free pens the drugs companies give to doctors
rather than being so much greater than the salary your employer pays that
your loyalty lies utterly with Microsoft then?

*Phew*

Also, can I say again that hawaiilawyer.com sounds impossibly glamorous as I
prepare to trudge out of our crumbly dive of an office and across a very
cold and soggy London in the dark.  I love my job but I still need vitamin
D.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> The sudden absence of "We Love Our MVPs" Post-It pads and MSDN CD 
> cases notwithstanding.


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

You mean to say that in your opinion you are right.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I didn't bring the subject up. You did. And I am still right regardless of
how people wish to justify it in their own minds.
> Why should WE look it up, i.e., check out other professions?  YOU are 
> the one making the irrational assertions.  You have stated your 
> arguments many times, and you have repeatedly been shot down based 
> upon their superficiality.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
> 
> I did not say what you say I said.
> 
> What I said was that, in my opinion, accepting honorary titles from 
> vendors is a conflict of interest and something that should be avoided 
> by those who are, or; technically, consider themselves, professional 
> IT people. That is my opinion. And this is not just my opinion, check 
> out other professions and their views on accepting honorary titles. Go 
> educate yourself on the subject matter.
> 
> Now, the other thing that you are incorrect in is that I did not bring 
> this subject up. This subject came up years and years ago back around
> 1996/1997 during normal list discussions. It is not like I just 
> started blasting people out of the blue. However, it seems that every 
> time I post to this list somebody is still holding a grudge from 
> 1996/1997 and brings this subject up. Once it is brought up, I will state
my opinion and defend it.
> 
> Money is simply the physical manifestation of ego and thus there is no 
> difference between the two. I hold myself to my own professional code 
> of conduct. I have no idea if it is better or different or "longer" 
> than anyone else's. It is mine and that is all I know.
> 
> > No, You are wrong.
> > 
> > Explain to me how you can tell someone that they are unethical AND 
> > not expect it to be taken as an insult.  You feel justified in your 
> > position and that is fine.  When you come into a public forum and 
> > say that anyone who is an MVP is unethical, you cannot expect MVPs 
> > to take it any other way than an insult.  By making your opinions as 
> > a statement, you have committed catagorical slander on a group of 
> > people YOU
> DON'T EVEN KNOW.
> > 
> > If you had said that you disagree with vendor recognition, but that 
> > MVPs do a lot of good for the Microsoft community (this discussion 
> > list being a prime example), then you would be airing your opinion 
> > with out discrediting the good work that some MVPs do.  Can you 
> > really blame anyone for accepting recognition?  It is human nature 
> > to want and
> deserve laud and attention.
> > 
> > It is obvious that you measure yourself a much longer moral 
> > yardstick than the rest of us.  Perhaps you should start your own 
> > Exchange list for-the-morally-upright to keep these reactions from 
> > happening in the future.
> > 
> > Eric Fretz
> > 
> > L-3 Communications
> > ComCept Division
> > 2800 Discovery Blvd.
> > Rockwall, TX 75032
> > tel:   972.772.7501
> > fax:  972.772.7510
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode
> =&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

[Martin Blackstone]

Roh roh 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

I see 62.49.146.170...

www.network-tools.com sees:

IP address: 62.49.146.170
Host name: mailgate.partition.co.uk

Alias:
no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk

Your DNS is outta whack 

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

Hi Don

What address do you see as my MX?

It should be 80.176.164.194

Thanks a lot for the help



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: 11 December 2003 18:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

It's not your Exchange server if your MX record points to your FW.  I
telnetted to your MX and the connection failed... 

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

Hi there

Yeah, the public and private IPs/NAT are all setup as is port forwarding,
has been working for ages, no idea why its stopped now

I think over the weekend I'll move the Exchange Server outside the firewall
and see what happens

Anything I can check on the Exch server?

thanks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: 11 December 2003 15:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

I'm assuming the external interface on the SW has a public IP and the
internal interface has a private IP and you are attempting to NAT you
connection.
In the Sonicwall, under the advanced setting, you should have it setup under
one-to-one NAT the public/private translation for your Exchange server. Then
under Access have a rule to allow port 25 to that private address.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

Hi,
 
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
 
Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall
ProVX firewall
 
Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine
for a number of years
 
Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the
Exchange Server at all
 
I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our
mailserver successfully and send an email from there
 
Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our
Sonicwall ProVX
 
Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall
 
I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and
give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate
the firewall
 
Thanks
 
Nik



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

Concur 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Pepsi.
 

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Interestingly enough you state that you are a professional and yet make a
statement like that. I in no way have attacked you and only posted those
(and another link) on professionals and ethics. My statement was not an
attack, only a point of reference. If you remember, I was also the only
person to respond to your list challenge about your book that followed
through.

You've belittled me without reason or cause. Very professional of you.

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research.

degree <> title

> "check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary
titles."
> 
> 
> Dr. receives honorary degree
> lawyer receives honorary degree
> 
> Just for reference.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

I heard you have operating privileges at the local bath house. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Im Dr. Love.
 

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Actually, degree DOES equal title.

One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt.  The next day Washington State
Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some
mythical contributions I have made to the industry.

My signature would now read:

DR. James Blunt, Computer Engineer

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research.

degree <> title

> "check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary 
> titles."
> 
> 
> Dr. receives honorary degree
> lawyer receives honorary degree
> 
> Just for reference.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

[Martin Blackstone]

Go into Log, Log Settings, at the bottom check on Dropped TCP Connections 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

Surely the firewall logs must show which SMTP connections are accepted or
dropped.
 

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

They don't show errors, just blocked websites and such, they arent very
detailed 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: 11 December 2003 16:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

What do the firewall logs show? 

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server


 Hi,
 
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
 
Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall
ProVX firewall
 
Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine
for a number of years
 
Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the
Exchange Server at all
 
I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our
mailserver successfully and send an email from there
 
Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our
Sonicwall ProVX
 
Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall
 
I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and
give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate
the firewall
 
Thanks
 
Nik



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

[Martin Blackstone]

They will if you crank up the logging 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

They don't show errors, just blocked websites and such, they arent very
detailed 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: 11 December 2003 16:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

What do the firewall logs show? 

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server


 Hi,
 
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
 
Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall
ProVX firewall
 
Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine
for a number of years
 
Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the
Exchange Server at all
 
I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our
mailserver successfully and send an email from there
 
Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our
Sonicwall ProVX
 
Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall
 
I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and
give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate
the firewall
 
Thanks
 
Nik



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

[Martin Blackstone]

I'm assuming the external interface on the SW has a public IP and the
internal interface has a private IP and you are attempting to NAT you
connection.
In the Sonicwall, under the advanced setting, you should have it setup under
one-to-one NAT the public/private translation for your Exchange server. Then
under Access have a rule to allow port 25 to that private address.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

Hi,
 
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
 
Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall
ProVX firewall
 
Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine
for a number of years
 
Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt appear to be reaching the
Exchange Server at all
 
I would ordinarily suspect the firewall, but you can telnet to our
mailserver successfully and send an email from there
 
Our MX record points to mailgate.partition.co.uk which resolves to our
Sonicwall ProVX
 
Any ideas? I dont know a great deal about the Sonicwall
 
I guess i could move the NT server temporarily to outside the firewall and
give it the address of mailgate.partition.co.uk to see if i can eliminate
the firewall
 
Thanks
 
Nik



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

I think what is at issue here is that in the past you have spent time in
this group bashing on the major posters, a number of which are MS MVP's. You
insult us by calling us unethical as we have accepted small gifts from MS as
part of our MVP status. And though you may not believe it, most of us are
not here for those gifts. The time spend working in the public groups costs
us far more than a trinket from MS. For some reason known only to you, our
helping others and receiving recognition for MS makes us less ethical than
others. Please, you don't have to explain yourself again. We have heard it a
dozen times at least. Then you come in and ask for help from essentially
those same people.

I would hope you could understand that after a large amount of bashing by a
person, those same folks may be much less inclined to help or offer a kind
word to you. While what you say is what you believe, you can also understand
that others may find your opinion hurtful or demeaning. But next time you
notice that cool new function in Exchange that people have been asking for,
you may want to stop and wonder if that function is there because some MVP's
listened to your wants and needs and made a suggestion to MS to add that to
this new version.

Just my two cents.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 4:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Here's a perfect example of people picking fights just to pick fights. Let
me break this down for you.
1. I posted a question to a community that is supposedly there to help one
and all, a community I helped build 2. I get a rude reply from Ed 3. I brush
this off and simply tell Ed to play nice 4. I get another, even ruder reply
5. I post a reply back asking why the continued rude behavior. I posted this
because I honestly don't know what the problem is and am interested in at
least achieving a civil relationship between Ed and I. We don't have to be
buddies, but we can at least be civil. Yes, I have moved on from our
differences of opinion, it is not anything that I am losing sleep over,
believe me. But this does not somehow mean that I cannot extend an offer of
civility.

The real question is why wouldn't I respond to rude behavior with an offer
of civility? I try to find some middle ground of civility and all you want
to do is fight and nit-pick over words and try to make trouble. That's too
bad, I guess no good deed goes unpunished.

> "Why a difference of opinion on a single subject causes you to 
> continually complain and be rude is beyond my ability to comprehend. I 
> would prefer if you found it within yourself to get over it, move on 
> and be civil. I have."
> 
> I just have one question about this. If you've moved on, then why did 
> you feel the need to respond?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:55 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
> 
> 
> Yes, I have a fundamental, philosophical problem with the MVP program.
> Regardless of any direct compensation in the form of nik naks, etc. 
> the bestowing of honorary titles is a perk and is more valuable to 
> some than a monetary reward. Hence, in my opinion, it is a conflict of 
> interest and not something that professional IT personnel should 
> engage in. At one point back around the 1996/1997 timeframe I was 
> offered MVP status and turned it down because of this.
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Martin Blackstone]

Its more like Screech from Saved by the Bell VS Danny Partridge. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I can hear the music from Rocky when Rocky enters the ring to do battle with
Apollo Creed 

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5




You can't touch this! 

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I can moonwalk.



-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a brain
seizure.

The subject "Migrating from GroupWise 6.5" means that I am migrating a
client from GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange, specifically Exchange 2000. My
apologies, I thought that would be obvious given that this is an Exchange
list. My fault, I should have been more specific.

Now the reason that this question about the 5.2.6 client comes up in
relation to GroupWise 6.5 is that Microsoft indicates that the GroupWise 6.5
client does not work with the Exchange Migration Wizard. I actually have not
tested this completely but will before the end of the week. I decided to go
with a known entity, the GroupWise 5.2.6 client, the recommended client from
Microsoft. So, from preliminary testing, you have to run the 5.2.6 client to
interact with the Exchange Migration Wizard but it also has to interact with
the GroupWise 6.5 PO, hence the question to the list.

Now, thanks entirely to myself and no thanks to the sarcastic peanut
gallery, I have solved this issue and am more than happy to pass along my
findings in the hope that someone else may benefit from this knowledge.

I was able to get the 5.2.6 client working against the 6.5 PO by removing
the checkbox to enforce a minimum client on the GroupWise PO and by doing
some file copying. What I did was to install the standard GroupWise 5.2.6
client on a workstation. However, running it against the GroupWise 6.5 PO
generated an error, something to the effect that "Your PO does not have the
correct views for this client". So, I went into the "ofviews\win" directory
on the client and copied the non-duplicate files to the "ofviews\win"
directory of the GroupWise 6.5 PO. I did not replace any .vew or .ini files
and while I have not tested it, I would not recommend that you replace any
of the 6.5 files with 5.x files.

Thus far, I have tested this successfully connecting in DIRECT mode to the
GW PO. The GW 5.2.6 client works and the Exchange Migration Wizard works.
One item of note is that the extraction seems to be taking an inordinately
long amount of time. While previous experience has shown DIRECT to be faster
in the extraction versus CLIENT/SERVER, I am going to test CLIENT/SERVER
next. And then I am going to test using a GroupWise 6.5 client instead of
the 5.2.6 client but I do not anticipate that will work. If anyone has some
specific experience on this and knows for sure, I'd appreciate a heads-up so
that I can avoid wasting time.

Since this is the first GroupWise 6.5 migration that I have done and from
the lack of any useful information from the list perhaps one of the very
first or very few, I'll keep the list updated with information on how this
goes and any caveats or issues I encounter.

> I'd like to modify that a bit if I could...  ;o)
> 
> 
> 
> You are aware that this is an Exchange list right?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
> 
> In times like these, IRC commands like "/pimp-slap " would be
> real handy.
> 
> Eric Fretz
> 
> L-3 Communications
> ComCept Division
> 2800 Discovery Blvd.
> Rockwall, TX 75032
> tel:   972.772.7501
> fax:  972.772.7510
> 
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailt

RE: Best backup software for Exchange

[Martin Blackstone]

You are officially black listed 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange

Funny you should say that.  I love my CA Arcserve.

Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky & Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange

Anything not from CA. 



John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tigue Williams
Posted At: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:42 PM Posted To: Exchange
Discussion List
Conversation: Best backup software for Exchange
Subject: Best backup software for Exchange


We are looking at Networker and NetBackup for enterprise backup solutions.
We would like to so the usual mailbox backup and also snap backups from SAN
BCV's. I would like to hear from the members about these two products before
we actually go ahead with the purchase. We are using 5.5 and will likely go
with 2000 or 2003. We are migrating to a SAN as well. Is there any way to do
mailbox backup from the BCV itself? 

TIA



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

[Martin Blackstone]

Aye carumba! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

Madre Del Dios!! 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

I had a blow out last night

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

I have seen it screw up rules, and at times blow them completely out.


-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000


Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on
Exchange 5.5 ? i.e. can I interchange my outlook client between 2000 and
2003 to access my own mailbox on Exchange 5.5 ? Outlook will be installed on
different workstations.

Cheers

Raji Arulambalam   
Senior Systems Administrator  
Environment Bay of Plenty - Regional Council, Whakatane, New Zealand

Email disclaimer: This email and any attachments are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in
any way. If you receive this message in error, please let us know by return
email and then destroy the message. Environment Bay of Plenty is not
responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments
after sending.
**
This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

[Martin Blackstone]

I had a blow out last night

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

I have seen it screw up rules, and at times blow them completely out.


-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000


Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on
Exchange 5.5 ? i.e. can I interchange my outlook client between 2000 and
2003 to access my own mailbox on Exchange 5.5 ? Outlook will be installed on
different workstations.

Cheers

Raji Arulambalam   
Senior Systems Administrator  
Environment Bay of Plenty - Regional Council, Whakatane, New Zealand

Email disclaimer: This email and any attachments are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in
any way. If you receive this message in error, please let us know by return
email and then destroy the message. Environment Bay of Plenty is not
responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments
after sending.
**
This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

[Martin Blackstone]

Yes they can.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000

Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on
Exchange 5.5 ?
i.e. can I interchange my outlook client between 2000 and 2003 to access my
own mailbox on Exchange 5.5 ?
Outlook will be installed on different workstations.

Cheers

Raji Arulambalam   
Senior Systems Administrator  
Environment Bay of Plenty - Regional Council, Whakatane, New Zealand

Email disclaimer: This email and any attachments are confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in
any way. If you receive this message in error, please let us know by return
email and then destroy the message. Environment Bay of Plenty is not
responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments
after sending.
**
This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Snooping

[Martin Blackstone]

Be sure to tell exmerge to recover items from dumpster 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping

Do'h!  Sorry, brain freeze.  I knew better.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping


Not on a pst.


-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping


Doesn't Exmerge still keep user permissions?

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping


Exmerge


-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Snooping


Boss says organization has probable cause. Wants best way to copy users data
for perusal by others (inbox, sent, and deleted folders).

Please assist.

TIA

Regards, 
Orin 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA and SMTP

[Martin Blackstone]

Or my favorite:
There is the right way, the wrong way, or the Microsoft way. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

I'm reminded of the character Yogourt in Spaceballs the Movie, "It's all
about the merchandising".

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Don't they show ISA in there as well? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

Why do Microsoft FE/BE whitepapers show FE in DMZ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

I couldn't have said it better myself. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

What I don't understand is why everyone thinks that placing their FE server
in a DMZ is a more secure/better way/whatever have you.  IMHO, it is not.  I
don't understand what you think you are going to be gaining by placing it
there other than increased headache for the setup and troubleshooting. Some
may offer the argument that if your FE server gets hacked, it is somewhat
isolated.  Let's be honest.  With the ports that are required to be open
between the FE and BE, if someone hacks your FE server, they can own your
internal network whether the FE is in a DMZ or not.  I'm just not convinced
that there is a need to place FE servers in the DMZ.  That, plus I seem to
remember that it is now Microsoft's suggestion to NOT place the FE server in
the DMZ.  I'll see if I can find the reference to that. 

Davinder, you are, of course, welcome to deploy this how you see fit. It is,
after all, your network, not mine.  Ultimately, if you feel it is a better
setup to place your FE server in your DMZ, then do that.  I'm just trying to
offer feedback.  As far as 5.5, that is a different scenario altogether.
5.5 would allow you to install OWA separate from the Exchange mailbox
server.

Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday,
December 09, 2003 10:45 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: OWA and SMTP
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Thanks everybody for replying. The plan is exactly to open 443 from outside
and required ports for GC/LDAP and required ports for BE server. The DMZ is
separate physical network (VLAN) and Firewall is going to allow these
specific kind of traffic only to required specific servers on inside
network. 

You guys seem very concerned with that which I respectfully don't
understand. Also this is exactly what we did in exchange 5.5, right??

Or another idea might be to create an IPSec tunnel between FE server and DCs
and limit the number of ports that way, ideas?


Thanks
Davinder



 -Original Message-
From:   Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: OWA and SMTP

I totally agree.  It is much easier to do extensive logging (and packet
filtering, for that matter) with a good layered firewall, as opposed to
locking down IIS (and Windows) to accept connections in an unsecured zone.  

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Why go through the hassle?  It is much easier (and just as secure) to simply
put the FE server inside your network, open up port 443 and 25 to the FE
server (I would not open port 80 for OWA), and that is all you should have
to do.  If you want to be even more secure, use something like ISA server to
"publish" the FE OWA server.  There are some servers that belong on a DMZ. A
FE OWA server is not one of them.


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:36 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: OWA and SMTP
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Have FE and BE on separate VLANs and set up access lists on the routers
allowing just the back-en

RE: OWA and SMTP

[Martin Blackstone]

Don't they show ISA in there as well? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

Why do Microsoft FE/BE whitepapers show FE in DMZ?

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

I couldn't have said it better myself. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

What I don't understand is why everyone thinks that placing their FE server
in a DMZ is a more secure/better way/whatever have you.  IMHO, it is not.  I
don't understand what you think you are going to be gaining by placing it
there other than increased headache for the setup and troubleshooting.
Some
may offer the argument that if your FE server gets hacked, it is somewhat
isolated.  Let's be honest.  With the ports that are required to be open
between the FE and BE, if someone hacks your FE server, they can own your
internal network whether the FE is in a DMZ or not.  I'm just not convinced
that there is a need to place FE servers in the DMZ.  That, plus I seem to
remember that it is now Microsoft's suggestion to NOT place the FE server in
the DMZ.  I'll see if I can find the reference to that. 

Davinder, you are, of course, welcome to deploy this how you see fit.
It is, after all, your network, not mine.  Ultimately, if you feel it is a
better setup to place your FE server in your DMZ, then do that.  I'm just
trying to offer feedback.  As far as 5.5, that is a different scenario
altogether.  5.5 would allow you to install OWA separate from the Exchange
mailbox server.

Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday,
December 09, 2003 10:45 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: OWA and SMTP
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Thanks everybody for replying. The plan is exactly to open 443 from outside
and required ports for GC/LDAP and required ports for BE server.
The DMZ is separate physical network (VLAN) and Firewall is going to allow
these specific kind of traffic only to required specific servers on inside
network. 

You guys seem very concerned with that which I respectfully don't
understand. Also this is exactly what we did in exchange 5.5, right??

Or another idea might be to create an IPSec tunnel between FE server and DCs
and limit the number of ports that way, ideas?


Thanks
Davinder



 -Original Message-
From:   Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: OWA and SMTP

I totally agree.  It is much easier to do extensive logging (and packet
filtering, for that matter) with a good layered firewall, as opposed to
locking down IIS (and Windows) to accept connections in an unsecured zone.  

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Why go through the hassle?  It is much easier (and just as secure) to simply
put the FE server inside your network, open up port 443 and 25 to the FE
server (I would not open port 80 for OWA), and that is all you should have
to do.  If you want to be even more secure, use something like ISA server to
"publish" the FE OWA server.  There are some servers that belong on a DMZ.
A FE OWA server is not one of them.


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:36 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: OWA and SMTP
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Have FE and BE on separate VLANs and set up access lists on the routers
allowing just the back-end VLAN to only accept traffic from the
front-end
VLAN if it is coming from the FE server, and only the specified ports.

How does that sound?


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

What Martin is saying is that those are not the only ports you have to
open.
There are MANY more that are required to be opened to allow for
communication between the FE server and the BE server, and communication
betweent the FE server and the DC/GC servers.  While the article seems
to
point out the correct ports, the post was misleading in saying that only
80/443 and a "few other

RE: OWA and SMTP

[Martin Blackstone]

 the kb on open ports. I
agree that putting a Front End in a DMZ is no walk in the park and did
not
intend to make it sound that easy.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP


Its much more extensive than that when putting the FE in the DMZ 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

80(HTTP), 443(SSL) and a few others.

Check out kb# 280132

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA and SMTP


I am setting up a Windows 2000 member server in DMZ, which will be our
SMTP
and OWA front end server. Which ports do I need to open to make this
work.
Is there a KB article that you guy could point me to?

Thanks
Davinder




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA and SMTP

[Martin Blackstone]

Its much more extensive than that when putting the FE in the DMZ 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP

80(HTTP), 443(SSL) and a few others.

Check out kb# 280132

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA and SMTP


I am setting up a Windows 2000 member server in DMZ, which will be our SMTP
and OWA front end server. Which ports do I need to open to make this work.
Is there a KB article that you guy could point me to?

Thanks
Davinder




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP Size Restriction on Per User Basis

[Martin Blackstone]

I don't know of any easy way to do that. But I have to admit, 2 MB is pretty
tight. With the encoding overhead, that only allows for about a 1.5 MB file.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Size Restriction on Per User Basis

Dear List,

Setup:

SMTP Gateway:
Exchange 2000:

I have a 2 MB smtp size restriction on gateway, one on my user wants to send
5 MB of file on 10th of every month. I don't want to increase the size on
smtp gateway as it could allow all internet users to throw in mails of 5 MB.
Is there a way to allow certain users to send 5MB size mails as outbound
only.

I hope my question is clear to all.

regards,
Irf.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange client or mapi

[Martin Blackstone]

They work for me 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi

Links are dead off the site.  I also noted that windows messaging is
available form pss.  $250 for a non y2k compliant piece of software.
Lol.

Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky & Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nikki Peterson
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange client or mapi

Sue Mosher's SlipStick site has the XCNG Client:
http://www.slipstick.com/clients.htm#ex

Nikki

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange client or mapi

I sent the Exchange 4 client offline.

- Original Message -
From: "Ronald Mazzotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi

Tried profman2.  doesn't create a profile.  I do NOT want outlook.
Can't find the old exchange client anywhere.  My exchange 200 server
does not have any client installed and I can create a profile no
problem.  The e2k3 is the issue.

Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky & Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi

He'll still need a profile however.
Will profinst work on E2003? Not sure.
http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch50/Utility/1/NT4/EN-US/Profin
st.exe

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi

Is Outlook loaded on the server? Outlook loaded on an Exchange server
was
not recommended. Not sure if this has changed. If yhou insist on using
Arcserve and need a MAPI client try and find Exchange Client 32. That is

safe to use

From: "Ronald Mazzotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exchange client or mapi
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:55:00 -0500

When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops
up
the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler.  Is there a
way
to change this.  I need a profile for Arcserves alert service.

Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky & Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server

[Martin Blackstone]

You didn't SP the OWA box did you? Install SP4 for Exchange. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PEter
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA install on a Win2000 Server

I getting this message when I try to access OWA.
I find something about this in TechNet, but it's only for ISS V.4 in NT
4.0 and not for IIS v.5.0 in Windows 2000.

**
Error Type:
Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8)
Object required: 'Application(...)'
/exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12
Browser Type:
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) 
Page:
GET /exchange/USA/logon.asp 
***

Any suggestions to solve my problem ?

The Exchange server is an updatet Exchange 5.5 (Include SP3) on a NT4.0
server with servicepack 4

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5

[Martin Blackstone]

No. You can use cache mode with any flavor of Exchange.
I believe E2K3 is "optimized" for it, but it works with any flavor. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5

So what is the correct answer?  To use caching mode do you have to be using
both Outlook 2003 AND Exchange 2003??


-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5


Right. All mcary was saying is that he thought you HAD to be using
Outlook 2003 with Exchange 2003 in order to use cached mode.

Jason 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Camara, David
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5

  I think what he meant was that he likes the caching mode.
Not necessarily using outlook 2003 with exchange 2003.


Jose David P. Camara II
IT-NT Administration
Credit Lyonnais
(212)2613868


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5


Are you using Cached mode with Exchange 5.5? I was under the impression
that you had to running both Outlook 2003 and Exchange 2003 for Cached
mode to work.


-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5


This is being sent from Outlook 2003 through a 5.5 server also. It works
fine. Cached mode is cool too. 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5

I am using 2003 on XP to 5.5 right now and it works fine.

-Original Message-
From: Will [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5

> Outlook 2003 on Windows 2000 works fine on Exchange v5.5 (I'm using it
right
> now!).
> 

Yes, same here. 

Also, Outlook 2002 on Windows XP works great for me.

It's just the combination of XP and Outlook 2003 that is causing me
troubles.


The information contained in this message is confidential and is
intended for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message
in error or there are any problems please notify the originator
immediately.  The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of
this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising
from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a
result of any virus being passed on.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** Credit Lyonnais 
This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging
to Credit Lyonnais and is intended solely for the addressees. The
unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or
partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be
guaranteed. Credit Lyonnais shall not be liable for this e-mail if
modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the
sender of the wrong delivery and the mail deletion.

Credit Lyonnais in the Americas: 
Credit Lyonnais Bank New York Branch,
Credit Lyonnais Americas Services Inc.,
Credit Lyonnais Rouse (USA) Ltd., and
Credit Lyonnais Securities (USA) Inc.
*** Credit Lyonnais 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To u

RE: What ports to open

[Martin Blackstone]

HTTP: 80
Or
HTTPS: 443 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rsamman
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What ports to open



My OWA is working from within ( locally ), but I can't access it from home

What ports do I need open to have it working

Thanks


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk

[Martin Blackstone]

Do you have 2 spare slots to put those drives in? If so do that. Then use
the performance optimizer to move the stores. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk

Hi guys,
 
   Will be gratefull if you can contribute to this please. 
 
I have an Exchange 5.5, sp4 server on win 2k with sp4.
 
In my Dell Power Edge 2400, i have two scsi disks
(0&1) within this exchange server. Disk 1 has 3 18g hds with a logical drive
of G.
 
G contains Exchsrvr folder which hosts priv.edb and pub.edb.  its like
g:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\ and the two edb files.
 
Now, G is near capacity and would like to upgrade it to bigger space.
 
I have purchased two 36gb hd from Dell (based on Dell's advise), and ready
to be backing up the G drive and the rest.
 
I would like you to feel free to suggest any tips and tricks that u know
off, or any advise.
 
Thanking you



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup rituals

[Martin Blackstone]

Totally valid question 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Agreed.  Particularly seeing as how I did weekly full, daily incremental,
and am now switching Backup Exec to daily full as I write this!

Tony, might I suggest a nap.  ;)

Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland 

-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


I thought it was a good question.

Arch

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


I'm not asking how to administer my infrastructure.  I've got my ways of
doing things and I'm asking my peers if they have better ideas.  If I
started asking you guys how to add user accounts or "What is SMTP", then
yes, I deserve to be pimp-slapped.

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


If you have a issue that is one thing. But to ask us how to administer your 
infrastructure is another. If your new to Exchange then take some training 
courses first. Many of your questions as of late are basic.


From: Eric Fretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:36:47 -0600

I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space.  I
thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and
time, but maybe not.  Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick
recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)???

Thanks,

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


I prefer full backup every day.


-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get holiday tips for festive fun. 
http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EM

RE: Backup rituals

[Martin Blackstone]

That's it! My bad.
::turns in MVP card:: 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to
familiarize yourself with this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what
to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server to test
these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has enough disk
space. Just to learn it. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup rituals

[Martin Blackstone]

How can you waste tape space? Isn't that what you bought them for? The waste
is in not using the space. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space.  I
thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and
time, but maybe not.  Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick
recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)???

Thanks,

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


I prefer full backup every day.


-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup rituals

[Martin Blackstone]

While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that.
In addition, you will want to familiarize yourself with this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupRestore.a
sp
Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will what
to find the appropriate DR whitepaper.
You should setup a DR server to test these processes on. By server I mean
any spare PC that has enough disk space. Just to learn it. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then
backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Technical Chat tomorrow on Clustering w/Exchange 2003

[Martin Blackstone]

Using Clustering with Exchange 2003
This chat focuses on the "Using Clustering with Exchange 2003: An Example"
white paper posted at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/deploy/depopt
/scenep2.asp.
The paper identifies how Microsoft(r) uses clustering to manage the Exchange
servers that provide messaging. The paper also provides detailed information
about the hardware, software, cluster configuration and best practices for
using server clusters.

To participate go to

http://www.microsoft.com/communities/chats/default.mspx
 
 
 
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Microsoft Windows Server Systems - Exchange MVP
Superior Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5

[Martin Blackstone]

Ok, but what is BLB going to do for you? If you backup the whole store at
once the normal way, you are going to be back up and running a heck of a lot
faster than if you had to restore mailboxes one by one. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5

Murphy's law says that any working device can crap out and any moment.  This
box is running on a gateway 1U server with no RAID drives.  All it takes is
one hardware failure on a drive to take out the Private store and I am
screwed.  This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large
enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes.  I've had to use Backup-to-disk
folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups.  Yes, I know I
need tape drives.  Yes, I know that I need backup exec 9 (and the exchange
agent).  Those are all planned purchased in Q1 of '04.



Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5


It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level 
backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something


From: Eric Fretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600

I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan.
5th.  Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was
built 2.5 years ago!  Brick backups are start because this box could tank at
any moment.  I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it
until then.

I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though.


Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5


You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy
crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment
like they would a Microsoft Mail environment.  Quit depending on it.

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5

For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem
with restoring individual user mailboxes.  Everytime I try to restore an
individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs.  It never
fails or gives an error message.

My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server
(SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5.

Thanks,
Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Set yourself up for fun at home!  Get tips on home entertainment equipment, 
video game reviews, and more here.   
http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___

RE: Sending meeting requests to external Exchange/Outlook users

[Martin Blackstone]

http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/40021/40021.html 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending meeting requests to external Exchange/Outlook users

Hello.
 
Is it possible to send an appointment to an Outlook user in an external
Exchange organization?  If I send a meeting request to an external Exchange
organization, how does the recipient respond?  Will they have the option to
accept/tentative/deny?  Will the appointment "act" differently then when
sending an appointment within your own exchange organization?
 
I have a user who recieved an appointment from an Outlook user from an
external Exchange organization.  She accepted the meeting request and it was
scheduled on her calendar.  I didn't think this was possilbe without proper
permissions or "trusts" between Exchange organizations in separate
Forests???  
 
Thanks for any help or clarification.
 
Samantha
.+--x
m,)r(\Ùy'iÇ)l+-rrÊW{jxm^zx%Sì&Þ^jZ 2G(L\xfybÖ))

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New Virus received in Details.zip

[Martin Blackstone]

I put 691 on my Exchange server on Sat. So far so good, but I haven't seen
any of these new virus's yet. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete
(pfeffepe)
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip

Your welcome.  Waiting on it myself.

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip

Thanks, Pete.  I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses.  One
has to go to the virus enc to search.  I'm surprised that 691 is still in
the CPR state.  Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip


I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be
manually downloaded.  I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia.

http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip

Are u sure?  Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows
no hits for "yaha."

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr


-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip


Morning All

The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file
691 to pick it up.

Enjoy your weekend.

 Sander

-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar 
Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip


Hi All

Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an
existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the
the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks
like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was
picked up.
The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit,
Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much
comes to a standstill after that.
We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the
latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date
with Microsoft patches too.
Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this
virus/variation of a virus.

Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers.

Regards

Sander


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:

RE: Private Store size problems.

[Martin Blackstone]

 
You upgrade to enterprise!!
If you cant get the limits in place to stay below 16GB, well, then you cant
get below 16GB. Short of upgrading, there is no magic bullet.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 6:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Private Store size problems.



My real question should have been this:  What do you do when an offline
defrag won't get Priv.edb filesize small enough to restart the Information
Store?


Eric Fretz

L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:   972.772.7501
fax:  972.772.7510



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Private Store size problems.


I'd continue to focus on purchasing the Enterprise version.  What's the cost
of yo0ur labor in doing the offline defrag?  What's the cost to the company
in the system downtime for you to do the defrag?  What's the cost to the
company of the system downtime if you do hit the 16GB limit?  Then compare
that to the cost of Enterprise Edition.  

You'd best delete things from the store while it is up and right before you
do the offline defrag.  You can also reduce the DIR time period so things
get permanently deleted sooner.  

Speeding up offline defragmentation:  This is a FAQ - the best you can do is
put things on fast storage, make the temp drive a separate spindle from the
live store.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:53 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Private Store size problems.
> 
> 
> My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5
> standard server to
> 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 
> GB limit about
> every 20 days.  Is there any way to access the Private store 
> to prune (or
> even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline?  
> Also, is there
> any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline 
> defragmentation?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric Fretz
> 
> L-3 Communications
> ComCept Division
> 2800 Discovery Blvd.
> Rockwall, TX 75032
> tel:   972.772.7501
> fax:  972.772.7510
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Repost, Make a Calender where users can book meetingroom ?

[Martin Blackstone]

http://www.swinc.com/erm/ 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 4:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Repost, Make a Calender where users can book meetingroom ?

Is there not anyone who can guide me on this one ?

Running Exch 2K3 and Server 2K3

I would like to make a Calender where my users can book ie. an meetingroom.

How do I set this up in Exchange / Outlook so when You invite other users to
Your meeting you at the same time could book a meetingroom

Any one have a link to a guide to How to do this.

One extra thing - i have som laptops that users can book to a meeting - I
would like to make a calender like above to this - but when someone book a
laptop I would like to recive a e-mail so I know I have to make a laptop
ready


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Default save outlook 2002

[Martin Blackstone]

Stays in the store. You have to manually save it locally if you wish. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Paul Natola
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Default save outlook 2002

that is Ideal  considering  they are used to Eudora  which automatically
puts everything in the "attach" folder, However if I may ask  once Exchange
is online  will it take the attachment out of the Store and save it locally?
or will a copy  remain in the store?










Jean-Paul Natola

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Jeroen Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:51 PM
Subject: RE: Default save outlook 2002


> Hi,
>
> You can change the default 'save directory' in the registry. Keep in mind
> that, when you do change the location, every attachment which is opened
will
> be saved and not deleted. See Knowledgebase article 296115 for details
>
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;296115&Product=ol20
> 02)
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeroen Peters
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-Paul Natola
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 10:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Default save outlook 2002
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I just got a laptop back from a traveler  who has switched to outlook in
> anticipation of our Exchange deployment,
>
> Her only complaint is the "default save" folder when she tries to save a
> doc, it comes up with olk917 within the Temp Int Files directory, but when
> she goes to browse to it, it is not there.
>
> A)  why is it not accessable  B) where did it actually save it too?
>
> C)  can I just change the default location?  outlook 2002
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   Jean-Paul Natola
>   Systems Administrator
>   Information Technology
>   Family Care International
>   588 Broadway Suite 503
>   New York, NY 10012
>   Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
>   Fax:212-941-5563
>   Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

[Martin Blackstone]

Word is that Exchange 2003 clusters better than ever.
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

Well I meant this as more of a general discussion as opposed to tied to
a specific version, but for the sake of argument lets says Exchange
2003.

JC 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

What Exchange version? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

OK, I know the majority of this list is against clustering Exchange. But
does anyone have some sound reasoning behind this argument that could be
used to convince someone at the executive level? I don't think many
executives are too compassionate for the "it's harder to administer"
argument. And I need more ammo than just saying that clusters won't
protect you from database corruption anyway.

Thanks

Jason

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

[Martin Blackstone]

What Exchange version? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

OK, I know the majority of this list is against clustering Exchange. But
does anyone have some sound reasoning behind this argument that could be
used to convince someone at the executive level? I don't think many
executives are too compassionate for the "it's harder to administer"
argument. And I need more ammo than just saying that clusters won't
protect you from database corruption anyway.

Thanks

Jason

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

[Martin Blackstone]

But, one could argue that this should have been a documented scenario...
I'm not saying one way or the other. Just that it has taken an interesting
turn.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

But...
A preliminary investigation by Microsoft indicated that the issue occurs
only with Kerberos authentication disabled, which the vendor said is
uncommon. "We recommend that our customers ensure that Kerberos
authentication is enabled, which is the default configuration,"
Microsoft said in a statement Friday. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?


This has taken a new turn...
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/21/HNmsflaw_1.html 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

Not that I am aware of.  My boss just passed it on to me.  I'm not a
participate in that list.  I just thought it was odd since that would be
a huge flaw and Microsoft or anyone for that matter has said nothing.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

All seriousness aside, I know nothing about this issue.  

I'm inferring from the other responses to this thread that if two MVPs have
no knowledge of the issue it probably doesn't exist.  

Mike W: Were there any follow-up posts on NTBUGTRAQ about this?  

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> I saw a posting about it on NTBUGTRAQ.COM.  Some guy had to shut off 
> OWA indefinitely because of the issue.
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > 
> > So you have seen this?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > That's because "Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix 
> > yet".
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have not heard of it...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ben Winzenz
> > > Network Engineer
> > > Gardner & White
> > > (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
> > > Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> > > Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this "flaw"?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Matthew Johnson
> > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and
> > noticed a
> > > severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own 
> > > credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at 
> > > random and has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows

> > > of the issue but does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many

> > > others have seen this issue and have received the same answer from

> > > Microsoft.
> > > 
> > > This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to
> > shut off OWA
> > > indefinitely because of the issue.
> > > 
> > >  
> > >

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

[Martin Blackstone]

This has taken a new turn...
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/21/HNmsflaw_1.html 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

Not that I am aware of.  My boss just passed it on to me.  I'm not a
participate in that list.  I just thought it was odd since that would be
a huge flaw and Microsoft or anyone for that matter has said nothing.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

All seriousness aside, I know nothing about this issue.  

I'm inferring from the other responses to this thread that if two MVPs have
no knowledge of the issue it probably doesn't exist.  

Mike W: Were there any follow-up posts on NTBUGTRAQ about this?  

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> I saw a posting about it on NTBUGTRAQ.COM.  Some guy had to shut off 
> OWA indefinitely because of the issue.
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > 
> > So you have seen this? 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > That's because "Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix 
> > yet".
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have not heard of it... 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ben Winzenz
> > > Network Engineer
> > > Gardner & White
> > > (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 
> > > Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> > > Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this "flaw"?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Matthew Johnson
> > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and
> > noticed a
> > > severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own 
> > > credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at 
> > > random and has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows 
> > > of the issue but does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many 
> > > others have seen this issue and have received the same answer from 
> > > Microsoft.
> > > 
> > > This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to
> > shut off OWA
> > > indefinitely because of the issue. 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Matthew Johnson CCNA
> > > 
> > > Network Administrator
> > > 
> > > Investment Scorecard, Inc. 
> > > 
> > > 615.301.7611
> > > 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > www.investmentscorecard.com <http://www.investmentscorecard.com/>
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > Marcus Ranum's new book "The Myth of Homeland Security" is
> now out and
> > is available from http://www.amazon.com/ranum In this hard-hitting 
> > review of the homeland security business, Ranum shows us how the 
> > problem is vastly harder than it's being made to sound, and how 
&g

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

[Martin Blackstone]

This is no bug. This is BAS.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

Not that I am aware of.  My boss just passed it on to me.  I'm not a
participate in that list.  I just thought it was odd since that would be
a huge flaw and Microsoft or anyone for that matter has said nothing.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

All seriousness aside, I know nothing about this issue.  

I'm inferring from the other responses to this thread that if two MVPs
have no knowledge of the issue it probably doesn't exist.  

Mike W: Were there any follow-up posts on NTBUGTRAQ about this?  

> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Sojka
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> I saw a posting about it on NTBUGTRAQ.COM.  Some guy had to shut off 
> OWA indefinitely because of the issue.
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > 
> > So you have seen this? 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > 
> > That's because "Microsoft knows of the issue but does not 
> > have a fix yet".  
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have not heard of it... 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ben Winzenz
> > > Network Engineer
> > > Gardner & White
> > > (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM
> > > Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> > > Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this "flaw"?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> > Matthew Johnson
> > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and 
> > noticed a
> > > severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own
> > > credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at 
> > > random and
> > > has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows of 
> > > the issue but
> > > does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many others have 
> > > seen this
> > > issue and have received the same answer from Microsoft.
> > > 
> > > This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to 
> > shut off OWA
> > > indefinitely because of the issue. 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Matthew Johnson CCNA
> > > 
> > > Network Administrator
> > > 
> > > Investment Scorecard, Inc. 
> > > 
> > > 615.301.7611
> > > 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > www.investmentscorecard.com <http://www.investmentscorecard.com/> 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > Marcus Ranum's new book "The Myth of Homeland Security" is 
> now out and
> > is available from http://www.amazon.com/ranum In this hard-hitting
> > review of the homeland security business, Ranum shows us how 
> > the problem
> > is vastly harder than it's being made to sound, and ho

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

[Martin Blackstone]

I'm thinking the same thing. 
I imagine this guy managed to flub up his install some way or another and
now it's a bug to him 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

I haven't seen any reports of this on any of the newsgroups or anywhere
else.  If it was this big of a flaw, I suspect there would be a big
stink about it. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:12 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?


That's because "Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix
yet".  

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> I have not heard of it... 
> 
> 
> Ben Winzenz
> Network Engineer
> Gardner & White
> (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 
> Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this "flaw"?
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Johnson
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw
> 
>  
> 
> We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and noticed a 
> severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own 
> credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at random 
> and has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows of the 
> issue but does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many others 
> have seen this issue and have received the same answer from Microsoft.
> 
> This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to shut off OWA

> indefinitely because of the issue.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Matthew Johnson CCNA
> 
> Network Administrator
> 
> Investment Scorecard, Inc. 
> 
> 615.301.7611
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
www.investmentscorecard.com  

 


-
Marcus Ranum's new book "The Myth of Homeland Security" is now out and
is available from http://www.amazon.com/ranum In this hard-hitting
review of the homeland security business, Ranum shows us how the problem
is vastly harder than it's being made to sound, and how special
interests, butt covering, and bureaucracy are threatening to derail any
chance of making progress.
-


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

[Martin Blackstone]

So you have seen this? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?

That's because "Microsoft knows of the issue but does not have a fix yet".  

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> I have not heard of it... 
> 
> 
> Ben Winzenz
> Network Engineer
> Gardner & White
> (317) 581-1580 ext 418
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Posted At: Friday, November 21, 2003 10:57 AM
> Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
> Conversation: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA Flaw?
> 
> 
> Is this BS or has anyone else heard of this "flaw"?
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Johnson
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Exchange 2003 OWA major security flaw
> 
>  
> 
> We have upgraded our servers to Microsoft Exchange 2003 and noticed a
> severe security issue with OWA. When you log in with your own
> credentials you may be logged into another user's mailbox at 
> random and
> has full access to this user's mailbox. Microsoft knows of 
> the issue but
> does not have a fix yet. I was wondering how many others have 
> seen this
> issue and have received the same answer from Microsoft.
> 
> This seems to be a major security flaw and we have had to shut off OWA
> indefinitely because of the issue. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Matthew Johnson CCNA
> 
> Network Administrator
> 
> Investment Scorecard, Inc. 
> 
> 615.301.7611
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
www.investmentscorecard.com  

 


-
Marcus Ranum's new book "The Myth of Homeland Security" is now out and
is available from http://www.amazon.com/ranum In this hard-hitting
review of the homeland security business, Ranum shows us how the problem
is vastly harder than it's being made to sound, and how special
interests, butt covering, and bureaucracy are threatening to derail any
chance of making progress.
-


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=
english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disk Space Threshold

[Martin Blackstone]

Probably the same... 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold

You mean you want to know what the minimum space requirement is before
the Exchange services shut down, like the Exchange 5.5 MTA shuts down
where there's 10MB or less disk space?  I don't know what they are for
Exchange 2000.  :-(

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT)
Posted At: 18 November 2003 19:04
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Disk Space Threshold
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold


Ben,

None of that is what I asked for.

But thanks.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold


BTW - all this information I got was simply from the Help file. Searched
for Threshold and it brought up lots of info.  It is a great source for
information like this.  F1 is your friend :-) 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz
Posted At: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:55 PM Posted To: Exchange
(Swynk)
Conversation: Disk Space Threshold
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold


I read your e-mail.  I provided a solution that will prevent that from
happening in the future.  You didn't say that you didn't require help
with the badmail directory, so I didn't know you'd already fixed that.

So what you want is this?


Free Disk Space

To ensure that enough disk space is available to use virtual memory and
store application data after an application is closed, use the server's
Monitoring tab to add performance limits. When the amount of available
memory falls below a specified limit, the free disk space monitor is
identified on the Monitoring tab with a warning or critical state icon.
You can set a limit for a warning or a critical state, or you can set
both limits.

To set limits for free disk space:

If you have not already done so, select an Exchange 2000 Server monitor
for Free Disk Space, and then click OK. 
In Disk Space Thresholds, in Drive to be monitored, select an available
drive. 
To set a warning state threshold, select the Warning state (MB) check
box, and then type a number in MB that identifies the smallest amount of
disk space on which your server should operate before a warning icon
appears. 
To set a critical state limit, select the Critical state (MB) check box,
and then type a number in MB that identifies the smallest amount of disk
space on which your server should operate before a critical state icon
appears. 


Note   If you also set a warning state limit, the value for the critical
state limit must be less than the warning state limit.

If you want to monitor multiple hard disks on your server, repeat these
steps to add a monitor for free disk space for each drive. 


Tip   To view the current amount of free disk space, on the Monitoring
tab, click the Free Disk Space monitor you just created, and then check
the display in Current available drive space (MB). 

Combined with this?

Exchange 2000 Monitors

The Monitoring tab is available on every computer running Exchange 2000
Server. This tab allows you to define the parameters within which your
server's hardware and software should function before a warning or
critical state icon is displayed; for example, if your server has a 10
GB hard drive dedicated to Exchange, make sure that databases and logs
have no less than 10 GB of memory to use. Once resource monitor
thresholds are met or exceeded, the monitor displays a warning icon on
the Monitoring tab and in the Status window. Regular maintenance should
include checking the Status window and the Monitoring tab of each server
to see whether resources are low and additional resources, such as
memory, are required to ensure server operation. 

To monitor a server:

Start System Manager: On the Start menu, point to Programs, point to
Microsoft Exchange, and then click System Manager. 
Cannot Start the Application
You can manually start the application by following these instructions:
On the Start menu, point to Programs, point to Microsoft Exchange, and
then click System Manager. In the console tree, double-click Servers,
right-click a server, and then click Properties. 
Click the Monitoring tab. 
To monitor a new server resource, click Add. 
Select one of the following resources, and then click OK: 
Virtual Memory
CPU Utlization
Free Disk Space
SMTP Queue Growth
Windows 2000 Service
X.400 Queue Growth
Related Topics


Verify Server and Connector Status

  


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:43 PM Posted To: Exchange

RE: Web outlook woes

[Martin Blackstone]

Exchange version please. 

-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 6:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Web outlook woes

Hey all...

I am experiencing some Web outlook issues.
When my users log into web outlook, the will get (random) page cannot be
found errors.
I have yet to be able to find anything as to why...

But I do notice that it happens to the larger emails, 500kb to 1mb.

Anyone seen anything likr this?




John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Alpha Display Systems.

Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN. 55435
 
952-896-9898 Local
800-388-0008 Watts
952-896-9899 Fax
612-804-8769 Cell
952-841-3327 Direct

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Be excellent to each other"
---End of Line---




-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best Practices materials


Write them all down and then tell them it's written procedure.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best Practices materials


Why not share your controversial procedures and let us commend you or shoot
them down?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pat karr
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Best Practices materials

Does anyone have a template for best practices when MS Exchange is being
used by an org?

I keep having to explain to users that it is industry standand or it's org.
procedure that we do things a certain way but I don't have anything in
writing that dictates those explanations.  I would be very grateful if
someone knows of a link or your own procedures manual that I could follow.

best regards,

Pat  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

[Martin Blackstone]

In my house I have 3 phones. One in the kitchen, one in my office, and one
in my bedroom. All the same number.

I want to have that still. So in my case, going to a single cell really
makes no sense unless I want to carry my phone all over the house. Then when
a call comes in for my wife, having to carry the phone to her. 

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

Sorry...guess you're right on that point...

Guess I was thinking more along the lines of the "having multiple cell
phones with the same number" bit.  If you had 3 Cingular phones with
different numbers and a cradle for each, then at least when they ring,
they'd all ring on one number...would save you the hassle of forwarding them
all by hand every day after hours.

BTW...what would be the point of having multiple cell phones with the same
number?  Wouldn't it be kind of annoying to have them all ring, anytime one
of them received a call?  Wouldn't it be simpler to have work pay for your
cell phone, with the authorization to use it for personal use as well?

Or am *I* missing something?  ;0)

-----Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls


But you still have to use landline service to have this.
I interpret this as simple call forwarding made simpler.

Maybe I am missing something.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

Martin,

This first link may be the answer to your problem...it's what I plan on
going to in the near future.  The second link is an option, if you choose to
wait as long as six months.

Call Forward Service Has Many Advantages - Cingular: 
http://tinyurl.com/vd8n

Home-To-Cell Phone Number Transfers OK'd - Coming soon:
http://tinyurl.com/vd8s


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls


I haven't had a modem in at least 3 years.

I don't even want a landline anymore, but until someone can come up with a
way to have multiple cell phones with the same number, I'm stuck.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

[Martin Blackstone]

But you still have to use landline service to have this.
I interpret this as simple call forwarding made simpler.

Maybe I am missing something.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

Martin,

This first link may be the answer to your problem...it's what I plan on
going to in the near future.  The second link is an option, if you choose to
wait as long as six months.

Call Forward Service Has Many Advantages - Cingular:
http://www.comcast.net/News/TECHNOLOGY//XML/1700_High_Tech/8210408d-9bbc-47c
3-b941-f103ef8f89b4.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/vd8n

Home-To-Cell Phone Number Transfers OK'd - Coming soon:
http://www.comcast.net/News/TECHNOLOGY//XML/1700_High_Tech/87be2f20-ab86-4eb
5-94dc-248053bd0260.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/vd8s

Jim

-Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls


I haven't had a modem in at least 3 years.
I don't even want a landline anymore, but until someone can come up with a
way to have multiple cell phones with the same number, I'm stuck.

Also, one can request an international dialing block on their lines. You
then enter a code to make an international call.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: outsource!?

[Martin Blackstone]

Save money... 

-Original Message-
From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outsource!?

Is that all??? Or do they want better service, less heads, more features,
more stability? They want rid of current staff and practices?
All kinds of reasons. One would need to know what they are in order to be
best show them as wrong. 

-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outsource!?

The same thing they all expect. To save money. 

-Original Message-
From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outsource!?

What is the CIO expecting to get out of this??

-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Hill
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outsource!?

My CIO has asked me to attend a meeting in which IBM is going to propose
outsourcing our e-mail services, taking over for our 350 Exchange 2000
mailboxes.

I'm looking for arguments to marshal against outsourcing.  So far, what I've
got is:
*   security:  We use Clearswift MIMEsweeper to block incoming (and
outgoing) messages containing viruses or executable files (.bat, .exe,
etc.).  This being IBM, I'm sure they can protect against viruses, though.
*   disaster recovery:  Our disaster site is updated in real time.
During the blackout in August e-mail was up twenty minutes after I arrived
at the DR site.  Again, probably not a potent line item against IBM.
*   regulatory:  we have some regulatory requirements for keeping
all records (including e-mail) on site for seven years.
*   integration:  Our CRM solution integrates directly into
Exchange, adding contacts directly to the users' mailboxes.  
*   performance:  I have trouble seeing how performance would be
adequate when the mail server is off site.
*   price:  250 users.  350 mailboxes.  140GB/month (according to
the Journal folders).  That can't be cheap.
*   legacy:  Seven years of preexisting e-mail, spread out among
mailboxes and pst files.  About 200GB all told.

What else am I missing?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: outsource!?

[Martin Blackstone]

The same thing they all expect. To save money. 

-Original Message-
From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outsource!?

What is the CIO expecting to get out of this??

-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Hill
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 7:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outsource!?

My CIO has asked me to attend a meeting in which IBM is going to propose
outsourcing our e-mail services, taking over for our 350 Exchange 2000
mailboxes.

I'm looking for arguments to marshal against outsourcing.  So far, what I've
got is:
*   security:  We use Clearswift MIMEsweeper to block incoming (and
outgoing) messages containing viruses or executable files (.bat, .exe,
etc.).  This being IBM, I'm sure they can protect against viruses, though.
*   disaster recovery:  Our disaster site is updated in real time.
During the blackout in August e-mail was up twenty minutes after I arrived
at the DR site.  Again, probably not a potent line item against IBM.
*   regulatory:  we have some regulatory requirements for keeping
all records (including e-mail) on site for seven years.
*   integration:  Our CRM solution integrates directly into
Exchange, adding contacts directly to the users' mailboxes.  
*   performance:  I have trouble seeing how performance would be
adequate when the mail server is off site.
*   price:  250 users.  350 mailboxes.  140GB/month (according to
the Journal folders).  That can't be cheap.
*   legacy:  Seven years of preexisting e-mail, spread out among
mailboxes and pst files.  About 200GB all told.

What else am I missing?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problem with OWA

[Martin Blackstone]

Gonna need some more info.
Whats your environment? Server specs? Users? Store sizes, etc... 

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA

Thanks a lot, Martin.

Also, what can I do resolve latency issue for Outlook2k clients.  Is there
any utility I can run to make my exchange perform better & faster?  Thanks
again.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=818709 

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA

Yes, there are about three who are using Outlook2k3. Thx.



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA

Do you have ANY Outlook 2003 users? Even one. 

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with OWA

I am currently having an issue with OWA on Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on NT
4.0 Server with SP6a. Lately it just stopped working all of a sudden after
years of running. One of things I have been doing to resolve this issue is
deleting all the files in "exchsrvr\webtemp" directory but it only works for
a short while and quits again.

What can I do resolve this issue once and for all.  I am also curious why
OWA stop working suddenly.

Also on the same server where OWA is configured, all the users are
experiencing slowness while accessing their mail.

What can I do to resolve this latency issue also?

Greatly appreciate your help in advance.  Thanks.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problem with OWA

[Martin Blackstone]

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=818709 

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA

Yes, there are about three who are using Outlook2k3. Thx.



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with OWA

Do you have ANY Outlook 2003 users? Even one. 

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with OWA

I am currently having an issue with OWA on Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on NT
4.0 Server with SP6a. Lately it just stopped working all of a sudden after
years of running. One of things I have been doing to resolve this issue is
deleting all the files in "exchsrvr\webtemp" directory but it only works for
a short while and quits again.

What can I do resolve this issue once and for all.  I am also curious why
OWA stop working suddenly.

Also on the same server where OWA is configured, all the users are
experiencing slowness while accessing their mail.

What can I do to resolve this latency issue also?

Greatly appreciate your help in advance.  Thanks.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problem with OWA

[Martin Blackstone]

Do you have ANY Outlook 2003 users? Even one. 

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with OWA

I am currently having an issue with OWA on Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on NT
4.0 Server with SP6a. Lately it just stopped working all of a sudden after
years of running. One of things I have been doing to resolve this issue is
deleting all the files in "exchsrvr\webtemp" directory but it only works for
a short while and quits again.

What can I do resolve this issue once and for all.  I am also curious why
OWA stop working suddenly.

Also on the same server where OWA is configured, all the users are
experiencing slowness while accessing their mail.

What can I do to resolve this latency issue also?

Greatly appreciate your help in advance.  Thanks.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

[Martin Blackstone]

I haven't had a modem in at least 3 years.
I don't even want a landline anymore, but until someone can come up with a
way to have multiple cell phones with the same number, I'm stuck.

Also, one can request an international dialing block on their lines. You
then enter a code to make an international call.
 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

I'd like to see that happen to me.  My PC doesn't have a modem and I can't
get long distance on my phone without a dialing a tedious phone card string.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

Hear of this one? Outsider seizes PC via Internet and places long distance
calls i.e. to Africa.

Can't find anything on it.

Regards,
orin rehorst


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: How do I set up a system-wide rule?

[Martin Blackstone]

Natively, no.
There may be a 3rd party tool out there for this, but I cant think of any.

-Original Message-
From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How do I set up a system-wide rule?

Hello again.  Here's another question I'd like to throw out there.  

In using W2K, Exchange 5.5 (SP4)& OFFICE XP on the client side.  Without
manually for each individual mailbox on our exchange server, is there a
system-wide rule or 3rd party utility that we can use to create a folder
inside each of our user's mailbox, have the rule then move items from
within their INBOX to this folder and have it expire/deleted after a
certain period of time?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?

[Martin Blackstone]

That's not going to do anything. The mail will just queue on the senders
side and then hit you like bat when you turn on the IMS. 

-Original Message-
From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns?

Greetings,
  2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4.

I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to
help
reduce the amount of UCE we get. Our filtering software just isn't doing the
job.
Any ideas besides using the built in Windows Scheduler or the AT service?




  --Brett

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question about Email Notification

[Martin Blackstone]

Exactly. That's what I do.  

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question about Email Notification

And if your client suppresses read receipts, the sender will never get any
notifications at all! 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question about Email Notification


The delivery receipt indicates that mail server has accepted the email you
sent. There read receipt is a little tougher as "read" can have a lot of
meanings. Lets say I send you an email with a read receipt. You look at it
in the preview pane and then delete it. You then empty your deleted folders.
I will get an email that says Not Read. Now the truth is I did read it but
after I deleted it.

You can see its not something to base your email life on. 

-Original Message-
From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question about Email Notification

Both of these options in Exchange 5.5 are very vague.  What is the true
definition of these two options and is it truly a confirmation that the
recipient "Read" or "Received" the email.

I have heard different stories from both Microsoft and other Exchange
Admins.  Whats your hearsay on this?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question about Email Notification

[Martin Blackstone]

The delivery receipt indicates that mail server has accepted the email you
sent.
There read receipt is a little tougher as "read" can have a lot of meanings.
Lets say I send you an email with a read receipt. You look at it in the
preview pane and then delete it. You then empty your deleted folders. I will
get an email that says Not Read. Now the truth is I did read it but after I
deleted it.

You can see its not something to base your email life on. 

-Original Message-
From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question about Email Notification

Both of these options in Exchange 5.5 are very vague.  What is the true
definition of these two options and is it truly a confirmation that the
recipient "Read" or "Received" the email.

I have heard different stories from both Microsoft and other Exchange
Admins.  Whats your hearsay on this?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PST-file backup problem

[Martin Blackstone]

Yea, you had something covering your eyes, but it wasn't beer. 

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem

Excellent. I thought I remembered something through the beer haze.


-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem




Summary from an MS kb article: (222328 )

Outlook locks personal folder files (.pst) while they are in use; it is not
possible to copy the .pst file while it is locked. Outlook releases the lock
on a .pst file after 30 minutes of inactivity, by default. This article
describes how to control the timeout value after which Outlook releases the
file lock on a .pst file.


> -Original Message-
> From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> Not sure on the period of inactivity on the part of the user,
> but, yea, something like that. Or I could be completely 
> wrong. Its just something that I kinda recall from the back 
> of my mind.  Theres not much back there.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> Andy,
> 
> Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on
> the part of the user, that the .pst file file handle will 
> close itself, allowing the file to be backed up correctly?
> 
> Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back
> them up, the open file handle closes, thereby allowing 
> Veritas to back it up correctly?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:40 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> Yep. I have seen that as well. But, like I said, IIRC, at
> some point the file closes, and it will back them up 
> correctly. (Un)fortunately, I cant test that myself anymore.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> From what I've seen on my systems, Veritas Backup Exec sees
> an open PST as corrupt, not as an open file.  It completes 
> the backup job; but marks it as having failed.
> 
> 
> =
> Arron King
> Network & Systems Administrator
> Ohio Dominican University
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> V: 614-251-4515
> F: 614-252-2650
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal
> folders, IIRC, after (30 min?), the open file handle closes 
> on psts and you can back them up! 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a
> very small exception list - pres & VPs of my org.)  I do 
> backup the stores on my server.
> 
> I have that VIP list in it's own store.  I have 2 other
> stores that hold the remainder of my organization.  I use 
> deleted item retention to allow users to self-recover from 
> "oops I deleted a really important message").
> 
> All of my stores have a size limit.  Granted the VIP store is
> really big (but the overall use is pretty small).  The other 
> stores have reasonable limits, and I do make exceptions for 
> those who can demonstrate the need.  
> 
> PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at
> least in the supported  sense), I had constant problems:  
> * PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their 
> computer on w/outlook open, 
> * Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame 
> me when they
> forget!)
> * PSTs get corrupted
> 
> I would rather rebuild a server  in the very slim event that
> I had a severe crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out 
> problems I used to have with PSTs!
> 
> HTH
> 
> Arron
> 
> 
> =
> Arron King
> Network & Systems Administrator
> Ohio Dominican University
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> V: 614-251-4515
> F: 614-252-2650
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:40 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: VS: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> Hi, and thanx alot for your time!!
> 
> Yes. We aren using Exchange 2000. We have more than 7000
> users. "Keep all emails in store.." A good idea

RE: PST-file backup problem

[Martin Blackstone]

If it moves it to a PST, then it is a client side rule and OL has to be
running. 

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem

Well, I guess the article is correct, but what if Outlook is running and
has a rule that moves messages to a PST, and new messages come in more
frequently than once per 30 minutes?

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov, MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem



Summary from an MS kb article: (222328 )

Outlook locks personal folder files (.pst) while they are in use; it is
not
possible to copy the .pst file while it is locked. Outlook releases the
lock
on a .pst file after 30 minutes of inactivity, by default. This article
describes how to control the timeout value after which Outlook releases
the
file lock on a .pst file.


> -Original Message-
> From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:03 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> Not sure on the period of inactivity on the part of the user, 
> but, yea, something like that. Or I could be completely 
> wrong. Its just something that I kinda recall from the back 
> of my mind.  Theres not much back there.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> Andy,
> 
> Are you saying that after a 30 minute period of inactivity on 
> the part of the user, that the .pst file file handle will 
> close itself, allowing the file to be backed up correctly?
> 
> Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back 
> them up, the open file handle closes, thereby allowing 
> Veritas to back it up correctly?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:40 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> Yep. I have seen that as well. But, like I said, IIRC, at 
> some point the file closes, and it will back them up 
> correctly. (Un)fortunately, I cant test that myself anymore.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> From what I've seen on my systems, Veritas Backup Exec sees 
> an open PST as corrupt, not as an open file.  It completes 
> the backup job; but marks it as having failed.
> 
> 
> =
> Arron King
> Network & Systems Administrator
> Ohio Dominican University
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> V: 614-251-4515
> F: 614-252-2650
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal 
> folders, IIRC, after (30 min?), the open file handle closes 
> on psts and you can back them up! 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
> 
> 
> FWIW, I don't backup or restore individual mailboxes (with a 
> very small exception list - pres & VPs of my org.)  I do 
> backup the stores on my server.
> 
> I have that VIP list in it's own store.  I have 2 other 
> stores that hold the remainder of my organization.  I use 
> deleted item retention to allow users to self-recover from 
> "oops I deleted a really important message").
> 
> All of my stores have a size limit.  Granted the VIP store is 
> really big (but the overall use is pretty small).  The other 
> stores have reasonable limits, and I do make exceptions for 
> those who can demonstrate the need.  
> 
> PSTs are evil - Before I was able to get rid of them (at 
> least in the supported  sense), I had constant problems:  
> * PSTs don't get backed up when a user leaves their 
> computer on w/outlook open, 
> * Users put passwords on PSTs and then forget (and blame 
> me when they
> forget!)
> * PSTs get corrupted
> 
> I would rather rebuild a server  in the very slim event that 
> I had a severe crash versus deal with the day-in, day-out 
> problems I used to have with PSTs!
> 
> HTH 
> 
> Arron
> 
> 
> =
> Arron King
> Network & Systems Administrator
> Ohio Dominican University
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> V: 614-251-4515
> F: 614-252-2650
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, Nov

RE: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

[Martin Blackstone]

Quite common.

A combination of good AV and a nice spyware destroyer like Spybot should
help aliviate the problem. 

-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Your PC seized, modem used for LD calls

Hear of this one? Outsider seizes PC via Internet and places long distance
calls i.e. to Africa.

Can't find anything on it.

Regards, 
orin rehorst


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Removing 1st Exchange Server

[Martin Blackstone]

That should be sufficient. Stop the System Attendant which should stop
everything else. 

-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing 1st Exchange Server

Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0
I'm using Ed's move server method and I'm at the point where I am going to
test and make sure I did everything correctly.  MS article 152959
recommends disconnecting the old server from the network to confirm that
the procedure was followed correctly.  My old Exchange box is my PDC and I
don't want to bring it down.  If I just stop all the Exchange services
will this produce the same effect as removing the box from the network, or
is there something else running in the background the will not give me a
true test that I did everything correctly?  Thanks in advance, Scott.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: System wide signature

[Martin Blackstone]

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327
or
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317680 

-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

How would you do an event sink?

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

If they want internal signatures they will have to spend some money for
something like Nemx.
If they want external, you can use the free event sink.

So I would ask them what the budget is on this and take it from there. 

-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

Its just a question that was asked of my from the big guys.

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

You want disclaimers on internal mail? Why?

- Original Message - 
From: "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: System wide signature


Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook and both of these
knowledge base articles say it won't work with MAPI.

Anybody else have any ideas?

Thanks

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

Hi Greg,

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327
or
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317680



-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

Sorry, Running Exchange 2000 SP3

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

What version of MS Exchange are you running?

> --
> From: Gregory Householder
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: System wide signature
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been asked if there is a way to add a confidentiality clause to
the
> end off all of our messages that are sent system wide. I know you
could
> put it into a signature file, but I'm not sure if there is a way to
set
> it up on the server so that all emails get it attached to it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg Householder
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
la
> ng=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web I

RE: System wide signature

[Martin Blackstone]

If they want internal signatures they will have to spend some money for
something like Nemx.
If they want external, you can use the free event sink.

So I would ask them what the budget is on this and take it from there. 

-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

Its just a question that was asked of my from the big guys.

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

You want disclaimers on internal mail? Why?

- Original Message - 
From: "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: System wide signature


Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook and both of these
knowledge base articles say it won't work with MAPI.

Anybody else have any ideas?

Thanks

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

Hi Greg,

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327
or
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317680



-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

Sorry, Running Exchange 2000 SP3

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

What version of MS Exchange are you running?

> --
> From: Gregory Householder
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: System wide signature
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been asked if there is a way to add a confidentiality clause to
the
> end off all of our messages that are sent system wide. I know you
could
> put it into a signature file, but I'm not sure if there is a way to
set
> it up on the server so that all emails get it attached to it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg Householder
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
la
> ng=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___

RE: System wide signature

[Martin Blackstone]

You want disclaimers on internal mail? Why?

- Original Message - 
From: "Gregory Householder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: System wide signature


Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook and both of these
knowledge base articles say it won't work with MAPI.

Anybody else have any ideas?

Thanks

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

Hi Greg,

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327
or
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317680



-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

Sorry, Running Exchange 2000 SP3

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System wide signature

What version of MS Exchange are you running?

> --
> From: Gregory Householder
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: System wide signature
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been asked if there is a way to add a confidentiality clause to
the
> end off all of our messages that are sent system wide. I know you
could
> put it into a signature file, but I'm not sure if there is a way to
set
> it up on the server so that all emails get it attached to it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg Householder
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
la
> ng=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store Size Question

[Martin Blackstone]

You're welcome! 

-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question

Thanks for the information and the tip. I had found the same information in
the MSKB and used it to get the store mounted and do some housecleaning.



Thanks...Ray

Thought for the day:
A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a
person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as possible.
There are no prima donnas in engineering.
--Freeman Dyson



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question


The 16GB limit applies to the size of the EDB and STM files added
together.

Also, see this:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/09/temporarily_inc.html

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Posted At: 11 November 2003 06:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Information Store Size Question
Subject: Information Store Size Question


I wanted to run this question by the experts to see if I could get a
definitive answer. Our Private Store database reached it's 16GB limit
and, on looking at the files, we found that the Priv.edb file was only
12.4GB. Can anyone tell me how Exchange 2000 figures the 16GB for the
size of the store? Is there some explanation for the missing 3.6GB? I
appreciate your input.
 

Thanks...

Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ccul.org 


Thought for the day:
A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a
person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as
possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering.
--Freeman Dyson



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PST-file backup problem

[Martin Blackstone]

You need to ask yourself a couple of questions.

Why are you using PST files? Obviously you are using Exchange, so where is
the benefit in using PST files? Is keeping them on a file server cheaper
than keeping them on an Exchange server? Disk space costs the same on both.
If it's a standard vs. enterprise thing, then you have the wrong version and
the money you are spending on backups could just as easily be applied to
upgrading the Exchange server.

Why are you backing them up? If the mail isn't important enough to keep on
the Exchange server, it isn't important enough to backup.

While we do allow users to keep PST's, we don't allow them to be stored on
the network, nor do we back them up. 

-Original Message-
From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST-file backup problem

Hello !

My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always have
to back up every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the file every
time it's opened etc. So you cannot take just incremental from changed
files. Usually you end up backing up all PST-files.. Ok.. so what you say! 

The problem is that if you have to pay for every Gig you take, you end up
paying a lot of money!

Is there any third party tool or way to get rid of this problem? 

Having the same problem? Or is it just me ;)

Rgs,

-Arttu-

 





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus with XP

[Martin Blackstone]

C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus with XP

What is the name of this file and where is it location?

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus with XP


Check to see if your local hosts file has a bunch of bogus entries.


-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus with XP


My home computer (window XP) was infected with virus and I clean it. Now
when I open my browser and go to www.google.com it take me to another
website www.cpanel.net. Has anyone seen this before and I do I fix this?
Thank

Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
www.jetproducts.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus with XP

[Martin Blackstone]

Do an scan at http://housecall.trendmicro.com/
Then download Spybot Search & Destroy and run that (don't forget to run the
update before scanning) 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus with XP

My home computer (window XP) was infected with virus and I clean it. Now
when I open my browser and go to www.google.com it take me to another
website www.cpanel.net. Has anyone seen this before and I do I fix this?
Thank

Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
www.jetproducts.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

[Martin Blackstone]

Rather than use cable, switch to a business DSL provider that gives you a
static IP. Then you can use real DNS and you will probably see this issue go
away. 

-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5

Well, I'm hoping to find an EMail Host that will provide outbound relay.
Know of any?

Jim Underwood




-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 15:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5


Then it seems you are out of luck.  AOL does, in fact, block e-mail from
many "dynamic" ip addresses - where or how they get the pools of addresses
is another question.  If you are a business, it may be time to consider
another ISP.  Most business-class solutions that ISP's offer (even cable or
DSL solutions) will include a static IP. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: internet.com

[Martin Blackstone]

Oh yea 

-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: internet.com

anyone else getting weird messages from internet.com concerning this
mailing list ...all in bulk ... a month old?

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Capturing users' access to OWA

[Martin Blackstone]

IIS logs 

-Original Message-
From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Capturing users' access to OWA

Hello folks:

Our environment: native E2k, FE/BE for OWA.

What is the best, most efficient way to track user's access to OWA?  I'm
looking to begin tracking OWA usage (how many users are logging in, how
often and for how long, etc.).  I've read about filtering through the IIS
logs and am just about ready to call into PSS, however, I was wondering if
anyone has come across any other solution.

Thanks in advance!
-Juancho

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PST file conversion

[Martin Blackstone]

http://tinyurl.com/txx0
Or
http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=a
9jPCSDg&p_lva=&p_faqid=59&p_created=995655179&p_sp=cF9ncmlkc29ydD0mcF9yb3dfY
250PTg3JnBfc2VhcmNoX3RleHQ9JnBfcHJvZF9sdmwxPTImcF9wYWdlPTE*&p_li=




-Original Message-
From: Tim John - Domainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST file conversion

Hi,

I expect this isn't really appropriate for this list, but I'll throw in the
question anyway!

My CEO recently left the organisation - end of his contract, so on good
terms - and we exported everything from his mailbox into a PST file for him.
Whilst he can access this from his PC at home, the PC he has at his new
appointment is a Linux desktop with 'Evolution' as the email client.

Is there any way he (or being more specific, I) can open the PST file within
Evolution, or transfer the contents of the PST to the equivalent under the
new email client ?

The simplest way would be to forward everything in the PST file to his new
email address, but the PST file is quite large and contains hundreds,
probably thousands of emails.

Any advice accepted (except to use Outlook - I've tried that one already !)

Tim


DISCLAIMER: The content of this email is confidential and may contain
legally privileged information intended only for the individual or entity
named above.  Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised.  If you
are not the intended recipient, please be advised that the use, distribution
and publication of the above information is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please contact Domainz by returning the email and
destroying the original. Thank you.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Issues

[Martin Blackstone]

Right. Is this an email virus (infected store), or a file system virus? 

-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Issues

Depends entirely on which virus. Is it running around in the store right
now? Do you have Symantec AV Exchange flavor on the system?

-Original Message-
From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Issues

Ok I am in a jam here, due to bad decision making and all of the above I
have the following task:

Our main Exchange and ADC server is infected with a virus(don't ask me
how, I will just leave it as upper management) Is there any easy way of
cleaning the virus off the machine, I am using Symantec corporate and
enterprise editions. How would you guys recommend I clean this virus?
Would you recommend to boot the machine in safe mode and do a full scan?
Or is it a bit harder than that...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sporadic Email Problem

[Martin Blackstone]

It looks like you have 6 different MX records. Verify that each one can
receive email for that domain. You may have one that's messed up and is
rejecting. 
Remember, just because one has the lowest cost, doesn't mean its always
going to receive the mail.

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sporadic Email Problem

>From time to time users cannot receive emails from outside.
The messages bounce with the SMTP 550 relaying error message.
The server is up and all the services are running fine.
Below is a copy of one message sent from Yahoo:

+++
Message/delivery-status  

Reporting-MTA: dns;identixps08.identix.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;web20303.mail.yahoo.com
Arrival-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:28:29 -0500

Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.5.0
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying denied
X-Display-Name: John Smith
+

EX 5.5, SP4 on NT 4 SP6a

There is not much free space to turn SMTP logging on. What could be the
possible culprits?

Thanks

--Alex

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer

[Martin Blackstone]

That's why it bounces.
The listserve may be [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when you send an email to it
from Exchange, Exchange is looking at the local recipients and not seeing it
as a valid email address. 
The best solution would be to have two domain names. Your Exchange should be
@domain.com and the listserv would be @listserv.domain.com

-Original Message-
From: Norbert Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer

Yes they are both using the same domain.

--Norbert

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer

Are they both using the same domain name? So when you send a message to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED], is the Exchange server also using that same domain
name? 

-Original Message-
From: norbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer

Hi all,
I have inherited an exchange 5.5 server, and a list server that is running
freebsd and qmail.  The problem is when I send to the list server through
exchange it bounces my emails with the message: the recipient name is not
recognized.  If I go into exchange and track the message the properties of
the message gives me the error: address not found in the directory, and
may be a personal address book entry.

Should I add them email address to the list server to the recipient list
in exchange?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer

[Martin Blackstone]

Are they both using the same domain name? So when you send a message to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED], is the Exchange server also using that same domain
name? 

-Original Message-
From: norbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and list mailer

Hi all,
I have inherited an exchange 5.5 server, and a list server that is running
freebsd and qmail.  The problem is when I send to the list server through
exchange it bounces my emails with the message: the recipient name is not
recognized.  If I go into exchange and track the message the properties of
the message gives me the error: address not found in the directory, and
may be a personal address book entry.

Should I add them email address to the list server to the recipient list
in exchange?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

[Martin Blackstone]

We just recently went over this. The short answer was no. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?

Is anyone familiar with a backup package for Exchange 2K/2003 that would
allow you to exclude specific file attachments from a brick level backup? 
Senior management has recently raised legal concerns over the retention of
voicemails created through unified messaging and they have challenged me to
present options.  Short of scraping my entire UM strategy, does anyone know
of a package with thie capability?

Thanks in advance,

Kelly

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Limits

[Martin Blackstone]

Personal or standard Day0? 

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits

Other than 0!  





-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits


It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this sort of question.  There's no right or
wrong answer.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible
Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange Limits
Subject: Exchange Limits



Exchange 2000 SP3

Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and
on idividual mailboxes?  I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and
200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years.  Some
"select" staff complained and corporate had me remove both limits.

I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits. Do
any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them?

Thanks for your help!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]