Re: Exchange 2000 DR

[Missy Koslosky]

That's a great question.  I don't know the answer, though.  It'd be nice to
hear what happens - please report back when you complete your testing!
- Original Message - 
From: "Miller, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:21 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 DR



All,

We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will
have no connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 domains
(bm.root - which is an empty forest root placeholder domain) -
(bakernet.com - peer domain to bm.root where all objects live). The Exchange
server (member of bakernet.com) that will used for the DR exercise (Exchange
2000 SP 3) is on a Windows 2000 SP 3 Domain controller (bakernet.com). I
have ran the Veritas IDR process on the server and have identical hardware
at the DR site for the restore. Question: Will services fail because the
forest root domain (bm.root) can not be contacted? Or do I need to also do a
DR of a bm.root Domain controller at the DR site? I have done numerous IDR
recoveries, but have all been on the production network where the bm.root
domain could be contacted

I hope this makes sense!

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Re: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000

[Missy Koslosky]

The move mailbox method would be my recommendation.  No extended downtime,
no risk to the current environment.
- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 9:43 AM
Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000


> What is the best way to upgrade Exchange 5.5. to Exchange 2000? Is it the
> Mailbox move method  or the In place method?
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

[Missy Koslosky]

Gosh, Greg, it's so nice to know that we can rely on you to stir up this
conversation every six months or so so that the new folks will get to know a
little history of the list.

Anyway, this whole diatribe was started because Ed admitted that he's a
vendor whore.  What I'm not understanding is why you feel the need to tell
us that too.  Or maybe all of the MVPs here should also state "I'm a vendor
whore" and then you'll feel like you won a big prize at the fair.  Or
something.

Missy "I'm a vendor whore" Koslosky
- Original Message - 
From: "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5


> Sorry, I should have been more clear. I will restate this for seemingly
> the 11 millionth time. Accepting titles FROM VENDORS is bad and
> unprofessional.
>
> > Actually, degree DOES equal title.
> >
> > One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt.  The next day Washington
State
> > Univ. bestows an honorary doctorate in Computer Engineering, due to some
> > mythical contributions I have made to the industry.
> >
> > My signature would now read:
> >
> > DR. James Blunt, Computer Engineer
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:22 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
> >
> >
> > Well, yes, I would expect that to be the extent of your research.
> >
> > degree <> title
> >
> > > "check out other professions and their views on accepting honorary
> > > titles."
> > >
> > > 
> > > Dr. receives honorary degree
> > > lawyer receives honorary degree
> > >
> > > Just for reference.
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Degrag (ESEUTIL) and retention time

[Missy Koslosky]

I believe that is how it works.
- Original Message - 
From: "Jean-Francois Bourdeau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:18 PM
Subject: Degrag (ESEUTIL) and retention time


Hi

My customer ex 55 has reached the 16 Gb Limit

If now we defrag, gain a couple of hundred megs, mount the store again,
and set the retention time to 0, if we defrag again 24 hours later, will
we gain the space used by the files not really deleted because of the
retention time ?

Thanks

JF


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 3, 2003 9:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit


You can also move the database files to another machine and run ESEUTIL
there.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Fortin
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit


http://support.microsoft.com/?id=185457

I want to do an eseutil to defragment the IS, but I do not have enough
space on the server to have a second copy on the database.

Can I specify to eseutil to put the temporary copy on a network drive ?

Regards,


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange client or mapi

[Missy Koslosky]

I sent the Exchange 4 client offline.
- Original Message - 
From: "Ronald Mazzotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi


Tried profman2.  doesn't create a profile.  I do NOT want outlook.
Can't find the old exchange client anywhere.  My exchange 200 server
does not have any client installed and I can create a profile no
problem.  The e2k3 is the issue.

Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky & Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi

He'll still need a profile however.
Will profinst work on E2003? Not sure.
http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch50/Utility/1/NT4/EN-US/Profin
st.e
xe



-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi


Is Outlook loaded on the server? Outlook loaded on an Exchange server
was
not recommended. Not sure if this has changed. If yhou insist on using
Arcserve and need a MAPI client try and find Exchange Client 32. That is

safe to use


From: "Ronald Mazzotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exchange client or mapi
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:55:00 -0500

When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops
up
the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler.  Is there a
way
to change this.  I need a profile for Arcserves alert service.

Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky & Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Shop online for kids' toys by age group, price range, and toy category
at
MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you!
http://shopping.msn.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Backup rituals

[Missy Koslosky]

That's what transaction logs are for.  If you lost the edb, you can still
recover to the latest mail with the logs.  if you lose the logs, you have
the current copy of the priv.
- Original Message - 
From: "HOLLIDAY, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:47 AM
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


Wouldn't doing a diff/incremental + weekly full give you a tighter
restore point window (restore to the hour instead of to the day)?

Eric Holliday

- "PST's?  We don't need no stinkin' PST's!!"

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Why bother?  The only value I would see in that would be if you were
backing up off-site.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Those of you that do a daily full backup are you doing a diff or
incremental during the day?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals

Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals


While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
Exchange is one of those that you want to do full backups on always. The
reason being is that incremental do not commit and flush the transaction
logs. Only a full backup will do that. In addition, you will want to
familiarize yourself with this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto
re.a
sp
Unless you use a different version of Exchange in which case you will
what to find the appropriate DR whitepaper. You should setup a DR server
to test these processes on. By server I mean any spare PC that has
enough disk space. Just to learn it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup rituals

What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles
on Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good
backups.
My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and
then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.

All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...

Thanks,
Eric

Eric Fretz


The information contained in this message is confidential and is
intended for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message
in error or there are any problems please notify the originator
immediately.  The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of
this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising
from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a
result of any virus being passed on.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit

[Missy Koslosky]

yes
- Original Message - 
From: "Guy Fortin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit



http://support.microsoft.com/?id=185457

I want to do an eseutil to defragment the IS, but I do not have enough
space on the server to have a second copy on the database.

Can I specify to eseutil to put the temporary copy on a network drive ?

Regards,


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Backup rituals

[Missy Koslosky]

Full backups daily.  Anything else is a PITA to restore.  If you don't have
the tape (or the time) to do this, a full on a weekly basis and a daily
differential is the least sucky alternative.  Make sure you have the disk
space available to support a week's worth of transaction log files.

Missy
- Original Message - 
From: "Eric Fretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: Backup rituals


> What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
> through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
> Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good backups.
> My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and
then
> backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.
>
> All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> Eric Fretz
>
> L-3 Communications
> ComCept Division
> 2800 Discovery Blvd.
> Rockwall, TX 75032
> tel:   972.772.7501
> fax:  972.772.7510
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Backup rituals

[Missy Koslosky]

Full backups daily.  Anything else is a PITA to restore.  If you don't have
the tape (or the time) to do this, a full on a weekly basis and a daily
incremental is the least sucky alternative.

Missy
- Original Message - 
From: "Eric Fretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: Backup rituals


> What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites?  I've looked
> through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on
> Exchange administration, but I haven't found "the" way to do good backups.
> My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and
then
> backup the incremental changes to the logs daily.
>
> All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome...
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> Eric Fretz
>
> L-3 Communications
> ComCept Division
> 2800 Discovery Blvd.
> Rockwall, TX 75032
> tel:   972.772.7501
> fax:  972.772.7510
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Calculate size of priv1.stm - and make it smaller

[Missy Koslosky]

What size disks are you using?  Sounds like they must be pretty small.

The only way to make these files smaller is to take them offline and run
eseutil on them - there should be 1221 events in your application event logs
that will tell you how much white space you can reclaim by running the
eseutil in defrag mode.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Troels Majlandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:58 PM
Subject: Calculate size of priv1.stm - and make it smaller


Hi there !

(Running on Exchange 2K3 and Server 2K3)

Is there a way of calculate the size of priv1.stm
and a way to make it smaller
btw, what is the contens of this file ?

I wonder why it is so big,
the priv1.edb is 4Gb and priv1.stm is 1Gb also 25% of priv1.edb.

One og the reason I ask - is that I need to know how big this file are
going to be in to priv1.edb beacuse og harddisk space.
I have priv1.edb on on partition - with (harddisk space - 10%) / number of
mailbox = max mailbox size

But I have the priv1.stm on another partition - and if this file are
always going to be around 25% of the priv1.edb - the I ran out of harddisk
space on this partition.

Backup is running every day so all log file are deleted.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Finding full mailboxes.

[Missy Koslosky]

Full?  Do you mean near their limit?

I'd imagine that Message Stats from Quest could help you do this quite
nicely.
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Scribner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:31 AM
Subject: Finding full mailboxes.


Does anyone know of a way to query the exchange server or get some kind of
report of mailboxes that are full or approaching full?  Aside from going
into system manager and manually viewing the mailbox sizes?


Thanks,

Patrick Scribner, MCSE
DBA
Westwood College
303-464-2381
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OE Marking POP Messages Read

[Missy Koslosky]

This is by design.  I don't believe that there's a fix.

Have you tried IMAP instead of POP?  That should resolve this issue, kinda -
any messages that aren't marked as read in the IMAP client should remain
marked as unread.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Winters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:44 AM
Subject: OE Marking POP Messages Read


When users access their mailbox via POP3, any new messages that are
downloaded are marked as read on the server. Needless to say this causes
confusion when they go to use OL.

Server: Win2K SP4 w/ current hot fixes, Exchange 2K SP3
Client: POP - duplicated in OE (several versions) as well as Eudora POP
client embedded in Sprint Treo cell phones (CE device)

Thanks for any assistance.

Sean

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Permission Issue?

[Missy Koslosky]

My understanding (which may well be flawed, but hey, this is my very own
understanding, ya know?) is that Exchange doesn't really care about this.
But if you're seeing evidence to the contrary, I could well be wrong.
- Original Message -
From: "Blunt, James H (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Permission Issue?


Missy,

In an NT 4.0 domain environment?

I have the same environment as Scott has.  Ex5.5 SP4 on a Win2000 SP2
machine, running in an NT 4.0 domain.  The only difference is that they are
using VPN...we are not at this time.

However, we use one of our Help Desk temps occasionally to break up the
boredom.  We flip his network account between enabled and disabled every 20
minutes or so, for an hour or two, and depending on where the DC's are in
their 15-minute refresh cycle, it can take as little as a minute for him to
be locked out of everything.  When he is locked out, the system asks him to
put in his name and password every time he tries to send an e-mail and then
subsequently denies his request.  It also locks him out of any network
connectivity.  It does let him continue to use his workstation though.

Scott...the only thing I can think of, is that you have changed the default
refresh value for the DC's from 15 minutes to over an hour.

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Permission Issue?


My understanding is that an open session remains open and that disabling the
account will not impact that session.

-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permission Issue?


Somehow this user was able to send out an e-mail an hour after his account
was disabled.  I checked my VPN log and he logged on before he was fired but
didn't log off until 3 hours after he was canned (and his account disabled).
I was st00pid in assuming that the manager at that location would physically
remove him from his PC.

If you're saying no, that this is not possible, how else could he have done
it?

> Nope.
>
> But if you really want to be doubly sure, go modify his account and
> put yourself as the only account on the mailbox with permissions and
> set the Send/Receive limit to zero.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Permission Issue?
>
>
> Windows NT4.0/6a domain running Exchange 5.5/4 single site.  User is
> primary windows NT account for his mailbox.  User gets fired, I
> disable his NT account.  If the user was connected through a VPN at
> 10:00AM and had his Outlook XP client open, then at 11:00AM I disabled
> his account and he never closed the application or disconnected from
> his VPN connection, would he still be able to send e-mail?  TIA, Scott
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode
> =&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Permission Issue?

[Missy Koslosky]

My understanding is that an open session remains open and that disabling the
account will not impact that session.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Force" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 9:11 AM
Subject: Permission Issue?


Windows NT4.0/6a domain running Exchange 5.5/4 single site.  User is
primary windows NT account for his mailbox.  User gets fired, I disable
his NT account.  If the user was connected through a VPN at 10:00AM and
had his Outlook XP client open, then at 11:00AM I disabled his account and
he never closed the application or disconnected from his VPN connection,
would he still be able to send e-mail?  TIA, Scott

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: need Exchange client

[Missy Koslosky]

I sent him a copy offline.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: need Exchange client


You still need it? I can send it to tomorrow when I get to work let me know
offline.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Hi all. Please tell me where I can download the good old Exchange client
from. Thanks!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DNS & DHCP Question

[Missy Koslosky]

Search TechNet for hijack dhcp and you should find some interesting stuff.

BTW, The Key School is an excellent school.  Good gig - and I'd maim to be
able to have that commute (assuming you live near/in Annapolis!)

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Dickenson, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: DNS & DHCP Question


Can you provide more information, or point me in the direction of said
information, regarding this DHCP security vulnerability.

Thanks,
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DNS & DHCP Question


There's a security hole in running DHCP on a domain controller in that it
can easily take over name registrations.  It's best to run DHCP on a member
server.  I believe that DNS is best run in Active Directory Integrated mode
on every domain controller.  In Windows 2003, DNS is improved to repliacte
DNS to all domain controllers in a forest instead of within a domain.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 5:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DNS & DHCP Question

Is it not recommended to run DHCP and DNS services on the Root server in a
Windows AD setup? I will be upgrading our domain to AD next week and wonder
if I should setup another server or two for the DCHP services and DNS
services.

What should the root server be capable of handling?  Should it be just a
root server and that's it?

What are your thoughts on where to "put" these services.

Thanks forum!

Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars

[Missy Koslosky]

Perzactly.
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Winzenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: Time sync problem with other users' calendars


They may all be set to GMT, but is the little box for "Automatically
adjust clock for Daylight Savings" checked?  There is still an option to
do that.


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, July 25, 2003 2:27 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Time sync problem with other users' calendars
Subject: Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars



No, these are all set to GMT which is correct.


Subject: Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars
From: "Missy Koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:43:01 -0400
X-Message-Number: 29

Daylight savings time settings on the machines.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA permissions

[Missy Koslosky]

LOL.  I've been here since late '97 or early '98.  Just haven't had much
time to post as of late!
- Original Message -
From: "Johnny Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: OWA permissions


That was the problem. Thanks guys!

Johnny

PS. Wow, Missy you are still on this list? What's it been 3 years? :)

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA permissions


Do users have log on locally permissions on the OWA server?  If not, they
need them.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Johnny Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: OWA permissions


Hi all,
I just reinstalled Exchange and OWA. As regular Exchange user and a domain
admin I have no trouble logging into OWA. Normal users aren't getting in
though. I tried sharing out the webdata folder but that didn't make a dif so
I put it back to normal. Any ideas?

Johnny

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA permissions

[Missy Koslosky]

Do users have log on locally permissions on the OWA server?  If not, they
need them.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Johnny Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: OWA permissions


Hi all,
I just reinstalled Exchange and OWA. As regular Exchange user and a domain
admin I have no trouble logging into OWA. Normal users aren't getting in
though. I tried sharing out the webdata folder but that didn't make a dif so
I put it back to normal. Any ideas?

Johnny

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars

[Missy Koslosky]

Daylight savings time settings on the machines.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Gowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: Time sync problem with other users' calendars



When one of our PAs puts an appointment into someone's diary, the
appointment moves forward by one hour.  This has happened with two different
user's calendars.  All the PCs and the Exchange (5.5 SP4) server are on GMT.
In one case it did occur to me than an out of sync iPaq might be causing the
problem, but that's extremely unlikely to be the case (the owner and the
iPaq are away at the moment so I can't check).

Is there any good reason why this might be happening?  The Exchange server
is the only server in the site.  I have had other people complain that their
messages are time-stamped one hour ahead, but I've never really been able to
explain it.


Tim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Second Storage Group

[Missy Koslosky]

Yup.  While you might consider a separate array for the second SG for better
performance, it will run without having one.

missy
- Original Message -
From: "Pham, Tuan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:12 AM
Subject: Second Storage Group


In Exchange 2000, can you have the second Storage Group in the same
partition with the existing Storage Group(same physical drive)?

TIA!!!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange Disaster Recovery Story - Comments Appreciated

[Missy Koslosky]

Also, a simple thing to do is to take offline backups of the IS (priv and
pub) and the transaction log files so that you can easily restore them
(without losing any data), should the database move fail.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Couch, Nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:25 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange Disaster Recovery Story - Comments Appreciated


It sounds like you did pretty well if you ask me, and you did.

The only things I can think of would be the following:

1) After doing something like an IS move go into your Exchange Admin and
verify where the server thinks the databases are located (select the server
then Properties - Database Paths).

2) Also look at the database size to check for any inconsistencies.  If the
size doesn't look right (too small more than likely in this instance) you
shoud investigate further and veirfy MS Exchange functionality.

3) After the failed move attempt check the event logs for anything out of
the ordinary.  If you check your logs daily you should be able to pick
abnormal events pretty quickly.  If you don't do this already. . .start.  It
is a good idea to get to know your MS Exchange servers and what is 'normal'
for them.

This is all I can think of right now.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: Bridges, Samantha
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchange Disaster Recovery Story - Comments Appreciated
>
> Hello All.
>
> Yesterday, working in Outlook, the Exchange server became unavailable (or
> network problems were preventing me from accessing the server).  I oversee
> the Exchange server and knew this wasn't good.  When I went to the server,
> I
> found a message that the drive had become corrupt and wanted to run the
> Chkdsk.  In the Event log, an entry logged, The file system structure on
> the
> disk is corrupt and unusable.  Please run the chkdsk utility on the volume
> I:.
>
> After running CHKDSK, I could not get the IS to come up.  Events that
> started appearing were:
>
> Event ID 125 - MSExchangeIS (2192) Unable to create the log.  The drive
> may
> be read-only, out of disk space, misconfigured, or corrupt. Error -1811.
>
> Event ID  - An error occurred while writing to the database log file.
> Attempting to stop the Microsoft Exchange Information Store.
>
> Event 193 - MSExchangeIS (2192) The database engine failed with error -510
> while trying to log the commit of a transaction.  To ensure database
> consistency, the process was terminated.  Simply restart the process to
> force database recovery and return the database to a consistent state.
>
> Their is one more piece to this puzzle, on Sunday, we tried to move the IS
> to a SAN.  During the move, the SAN connection failed and we were forced
> to
> abort during the Optimizer.  When the server came back up, the IS
> (Priv.edb)
> appeared in both the new location and the old. When the server came back
> up,
> all worked fine so we decided not to attempt moving the IS until we
> investigated the issue with the SAN.  I assumed that the move did not
> finish
> and reverted back to the original IS location.  The I: drive was the SAN
> drive that eventually became corrupt.  And when it did, it took out
> Exchange
> because obviously some things did go there and because unavailable during
> the corruption (Log files?).
>
> Well, to make a long story short, I never could get the IS to be
> Consistent.
> I used the eseutil with various switches to no avail.  I ended up
> restoring
> from an Offline backup and running the ISINTEG -patch and restoring a
> couple
> more days backup and that was as good as I could get it.
>
> When all was said and done, I lost approximately 11 hours of data.  From
> 9:00p.m. to 8:15 a.m.
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.  What did I do wrong and what should I
> have done.
>
> Thanks and no laughingit was not a fun day yesterday.
>
> :)
>
> Samantha
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&la
> ng=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange L

Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)

[Missy Koslosky]

I don't argue that there should be size limits on mailboxes.  I personally
think they're silly (with caveats, of course).

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnical)


So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)


Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues
like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your
disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnic al)


Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to
mamangement.

Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever
issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or
Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS"  We are trying to enforce limits
but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we
recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a
"Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits?

I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a
terrabyte(S) or more?  Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and
mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow?  What other points can be
brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information
store or Mailboxes?

Any help is appreciated!

Thanks,
Mario

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Technic al)


Enterprise edition?  The limit is measured in TB.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this
- Original Message -
From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic
al)


Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone
else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether
recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is
(Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools)  If anyone can
help out I would appreciate it.

This is for Exchange 5.5

Thanks,
Mario


***
 The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.
***



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


***
 The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.
***



__

Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al)

[Missy Koslosky]

Standard best practice is to limit the IS to about 45GB in size, and add
additional Exchange servers once you're near that limit.  This is due to the
amount of time it will take to recover a larger IS.

I don't know that MS has any documentation on this.  If you'd like, I'm
certain my employer would be happy to send out a consultant to write this up
for you.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:11 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnic al)


Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to
mamangement.

Is there any type of "Best Practices" or any Limitations due to whatever
issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or
Information store not to get "HUMONGOUS"  We are trying to enforce limits
but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we
recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a
"Point of Discussion" of why to enfore limits?

I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a
terrabyte(S) or more?  Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and
mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow?  What other points can be
brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information
store or Mailboxes?

Any help is appreciated!

Thanks,
Mario

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Technic al)


Enterprise edition?  The limit is measured in TB.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this
- Original Message -
From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic
al)


Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone
else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether
recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is
(Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools)  If anyone can
help out I would appreciate it.

This is for Exchange 5.5

Thanks,
Mario


***
 The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.
***



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


***
 The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.
***



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al)

[Missy Koslosky]

Enterprise edition?  The limit is measured in TB.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASP&NoWebContent=1 documents this
- Original Message -
From: "Rosales, Mario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic
al)


Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone
else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether
recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is
(Whether for technical reasons or "Limitations" of tools)  If anyone can
help out I would appreciate it.

This is for Exchange 5.5

Thanks,
Mario


***
 The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this
communication and notify the sender.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this communication that do not relate to the official
business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
it.
***



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history

[Missy Koslosky]

www.yahoogroups.com seems to have a lot of stuff - AD, W2K, E2K, E2K3, W2K3
lists.
- Original Message -
From: "Shotton Jolyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:03 PM
Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history


Ta, Missy.

RIF'ed?

Anyway I get the idea.  I remember the inernet.com takeover - they added
some branding and links to other of their sites.  Didn't seem that bad at
the time.  Clearly someone who didn't understand the value of what they had
made all sorts of wrong decisions.

What a distressing turn of events.

Where do people go now instead?  I particularly used to use swynk for their
SMS coverage and I may soon be getting back into this area.



-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 July 2003 17:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Routine Maintenance


Well, internet.com bought them, then they RIF'ed Stephen Wynkoop (the
"swynk" in swynk), and then they pretty much botched the list entirely.  I
think it's still running only because they've forgotten about its existence!


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or
entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that
is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient,
you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete from your system.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA Error

[Missy Koslosky]

I'm saying that you can logon to OWA using your SMTP address.  That simple.
- Original Message -
From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: OWA Error


Not too sure what you mean with regards to Exchange 5.5. I know what you're
saying but can this be setup for 5.5? I hadn't read anything that said it
could...

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA Error


Think "smtp address" instead of UPN and it isn't.
- Original Message -
From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: OWA Error


Hi,

I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000?

Cheers,
Tony

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Error


Try ignoring the domain field and put in domain\username in the account
field or use the upn logon.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Posted
At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:54 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: OWA Error
Subject: OWA Error

Hi again,

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3.
Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error
when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and
confirm passwords and it says "Error number: -2147023569 ". Then there's a
link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error
before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing...

Cheers,
Tony


Tony Woods MCSE, CNA
eMail/Network Administrator
National Money Mart
(250) 519-1302 ext 245


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Routine Maintenance

[Missy Koslosky]

Well, internet.com bought them, then they RIF'ed Stephen Wynkoop (the
"swynk" in swynk), and then they pretty much botched the list entirely.  I
think it's still running only because they've forgotten about its existence!

- Original Message -
From: "Shotton Jolyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance



(I've been out of this sort of loop for a while - what happened to SWYNK?)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Store.exe pegging the processor

[Missy Koslosky]

I would not do a defrag without a backup.  Restart the store, take a full
backup, and wait to see what happens.

What's your online maintenance schedule look like?
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:24 AM
Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor


Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario


exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe  has recently
starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is
not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari
antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've:

1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services
2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb
and imc size limit is 5.5mb)
3. reapplied service pack 4
4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests
5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests

Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the
server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server.
The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting
pegged. (i know that's quite a reach)

I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to
avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create
a new database structure

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated

Thanks!!

***
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged
and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in
error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and
review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and
from this address may be stored on the SMG email system.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA Error

[Missy Koslosky]

Think "smtp address" instead of UPN and it isn't.
- Original Message -
From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: OWA Error


Hi,

I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000?

Cheers,
Tony

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Error


Try ignoring the domain field and put in domain\username in the account
field or use the upn logon.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Posted
At: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:54 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: OWA Error
Subject: OWA Error

Hi again,

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3.
Now that I've sorted out the Change Password option, it's returning an error
when you submit. I fill in the info for Domain, Account, old, new and
confirm passwords and it says "Error number: -2147023569 ". Then there's a
link that says 'Back' so that you can try again. Anyone seen this error
before? A search on Google and KB's returned nothing...

Cheers,
Tony


Tony Woods MCSE, CNA
eMail/Network Administrator
National Money Mart
(250) 519-1302 ext 245


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}

[Missy Koslosky]

It's been a while since I've seen a good mail loop.  :)
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}


No need to 'bump' someone with automatic replies to the internet enabled,
not when there are so many other interesting avenues one might explore.

On 07/21/03 17:16, "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I know we discussed this at length before - I posted to the NT/2000
> list, and got this back (first time). To say that I am not happy that
> someone on the list is sending these to  people on the lists is an
> understatement.
>
> Can we not bump this user? Where do they get off sending something like
> this??
>
> I am just angry...
>
> themolk.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
> To: Steve Molkentin
> Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
>
>
> I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail. Your
> message has been queued for delivery. If you would like your message
> delivered to my InBox, it will cost you $300.00.
> This modest sum is enough to keep unwanted junk e-mail from flooding my
> account. This e-mail was sent to you only because you contacted me by
> e-mail. Thank you for your understanding.
> If you choose not to pay, I completely understand, and I respect your
> decision.
> If your message is important, and you choose to pay $300.00 to allow
> your e-mail through, the message will be automatically sent once PayPal
> informs me that the payment has been made. There is no need to send the
> message again.
> You can pay me securely by PayPal with Visa, Mastercard, Discover or
> American Express. If you do not have a PayPal account, you can sign up
> for one at no cost.
>
>
>
> Sign up for PayPal
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}

[Missy Koslosky]

LOL.  I think it's hysterical.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: FW: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}


I know we discussed this at length before - I posted to the NT/2000
list, and got this back (first time). To say that I am not happy that
someone on the list is sending these to  people on the lists is an
understatement.

Can we not bump this user? Where do they get off sending something like
this??

I am just angry...

themolk.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
To: Steve Molkentin
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}


I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail. Your
message has been queued for delivery. If you would like your message
delivered to my InBox, it will cost you $300.00.
This modest sum is enough to keep unwanted junk e-mail from flooding my
account. This e-mail was sent to you only because you contacted me by
e-mail. Thank you for your understanding.
If you choose not to pay, I completely understand, and I respect your
decision.
If your message is important, and you choose to pay $300.00 to allow
your e-mail through, the message will be automatically sent once PayPal
informs me that the payment has been made. There is no need to send the
message again.
You can pay me securely by PayPal with Visa, Mastercard, Discover or
American Express. If you do not have a PayPal account, you can sign up
for one at no cost.



Sign up for PayPal


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Routine Maintenance

[Missy Koslosky]

Why bother with them?
- Original Message -
From: "Gonzalez, Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance


You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them.
They take a long time.


-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

me Im no guru like the other people here...
so I let the server do it
Exchange does the defrag itselfso to me Defrag..done...check
Backup... my backup goes  every night -full Backup...check done (note NO
BLB!!)
my Exchange awhere AV checks for it's updates every 4 hours...check
done...

My Exch55sp4 box, NT4Sp6a+post, veritas 8.6, DLT drive, CPQ 1850R
It run's run's and run's

OK once it a great while I reboot it
some times I look at my log's..some times I dont

If I had my act together all the time..Id do a test DR once in a
while...or
so...

I try not to fix it if it aint broke...
now where is that hammer..

bill

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Routine Maintenance


Hello All.

Just curious what kind of maintenance you all do on Exchange and what
kind
of schedule for maintenance is best or recommended.

Is the only maintenance running an Offline Defrag once a month?

Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server
Outlook 2000/XP clients

Thanks!

Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k

[Missy Koslosky]

Try stopping and restarting the RPC service (although I have some faint
memory that there's a problem and you can't do this for some odd reason.)

If that doesn't help, or you can't do it, I'd uninstall and reinstall TCP/IP
from the server.
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Boynton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k


I take my last comment back.

Successful RPC binding using these parameters:
network address = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
endpoint = 2256
UUID =

protocol sequence = mcacn_ip_tcp
Server Statistics:
#Calls Received at Server = 0
#Calls Initiated by Server = 0
#Packets Received at Server = 0
#Packets Initiated by Server = 0
Ping #1 Failed


With the following popups


RPC call raised exception 0x6ba
The server is unavailable

RPC call to RPING's Server side app raised exception 0x6ba.  The server is
unavailable.

- Original Message -
From: "Missy Koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k


> Anything in the event logs?  Can you use rpcping to reach the server from
> the desktop?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Todd Boynton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM
> Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
>
>
> Just started this morning.  When people try to connect to the exchange
> server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server
is
> unavailable.  IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great.  None of the services are
> complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is.  Just for the heck
> of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers.  Still have the
same
> problem.
>
> Please give me some advice.
>
> Thanks
>
> Todd Boynton
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k

[Missy Koslosky]

Well that stinks.

What happens if you try to create a new profile on a machine?  Can you
resolve the mailbox and server names?  If not, can you enter the server's IP
and get resolution?

M
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Boynton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k


There's nothing obvious in the event log.  I've also turning on a dianostic
logging to maximum.

Yes I can rpcping the server.

- Original Message -
From: "Missy Koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k


> Anything in the event logs?  Can you use rpcping to reach the server from
> the desktop?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Todd Boynton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM
> Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
>
>
> Just started this morning.  When people try to connect to the exchange
> server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server
is
> unavailable.  IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great.  None of the services are
> complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is.  Just for the heck
> of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers.  Still have the
same
> problem.
>
> Please give me some advice.
>
> Thanks
>
> Todd Boynton
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k

[Missy Koslosky]

Anything in the event logs?  Can you use rpcping to reach the server from
the desktop?
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Boynton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM
Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k


Just started this morning.  When people try to connect to the exchange
server (2000, sp3) they get the message saying Microsoft Exchange Server is
unavailable.  IMAP, HTTP, and POP3 work great.  None of the services are
complaining and I can't figure out what the problem is.  Just for the heck
of it (I'm getting desperate) I restarted the servers.  Still have the same
problem.

Please give me some advice.

Thanks

Todd Boynton


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Store.exe memory leak

[Missy Koslosky]

The store is designed to use DBA, which will consume all of the memory
available.

What's in your event logs when the IMS shuts down?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Pouncey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 2:32 PM
Subject: Store.exe memory leak


Help, I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with 2 gigs of memory for 500 users on
a NT Domain . The Store.exe has a memory leak which Consumes all available
memory and stops the Internet Mail Connector.
I have run the Optimizer to limit the Store which did not help.
Thanks for the help...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MS Purchase

[Missy Koslosky]

2000?  hmmm...
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: MS Purchase


Exchange 2000 RTM.


- Original Message -
From: "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: MS Purchase


> Ex2K3 sp1
>
> ;)
>
> themolk.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: OT: MS Purchase
> >
> >
> > totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
> > Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server
> > or MS AV for Exchange? :)
> >
> >
> > 
> > This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
> > from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA config (revisited)

[Missy Koslosky]

Users should be able to connect from any site.  This assumes a normal
configuration.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Chakravarty, Sakti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:24 PM
Subject: OWA config (revisited)


Hi all,

I know this has been discussed before on this list but please bear with me
...

>From my experience, the whitepapers and articles I have read, and the input
from people on this list, I have the understanding that when you set up OWA
for an Exchange 5.5 only organisation that has multiple sites and servers,
you need to only specify one Exchange Server that OWA connects to, and users
whose accounts are not held on that server are automatically redirected to
their home server for access to their mailbox.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exchange/content/whi
tepapers/owa_tshoot.asp
(under the Additional Information heading)

However ... I have a colleague that believes that either:

1. the ASP code in OWA needs to be changed OR
2. users need to enter their Exchange Server name

when multiple servers and sites exist, and that redirection to the user's
home server is not automatic.

Can anyone confirm for me please?

Thanks
Sakti

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange Rules

[Missy Koslosky]

Let me ask this way - what is the rule supposed to do?  If you can't tell
which mailbox it is associated with, how do you know it isn't working?
- Original Message -
From: "Manner, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:26 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange Rules


More detail - the profile is what I do not know - there must be a way to
view all server based rules to the exchange server and the profile they arte
attached too.  The reason I ask is that I am not an exchange expert and my
sr sys admin is not in today - and we are having an issue with the rule
working

thx

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange Rules

How could you not know this?  I think there are some details missing.

Simple answer:  Open the profile you used and see what's there.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Manner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:46 AM
Subject: Exchange Rules


I set a server level exchange rule to an account - how can I check what
account I attached the rule to?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange Rules

[Missy Koslosky]

How could you not know this?  I think there are some details missing.  

Simple answer:  Open the profile you used and see what's there.
- Original Message - 
From: "Scott Manner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:46 AM
Subject: Exchange Rules


I set a server level exchange rule to an account - how can I check what
account I attached the rule to?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant.

[Missy Koslosky]

Use cleansweep from the Back Office Resource Kit (I forget which one...)
- Original Message -
From: "Miller, LT Johnny -wcso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:32 PM
Subject: Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant.


Now I get this error since I changed to the inbox assistant.

"Changes to the rule could not be saved.  There is not enough memory or the
rules are to complex.  Try deleting some rules."

I have only one test rule set up.  All this rule does id move an e-mail to a
folder.

Any thoughts or ideas.


Lt. Johnny Miller
Management Information Division
Warren County Sheriff's Office
550 Justice Dr.
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
513-695-1416 Office
513-695-1286 FAX
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:www.wcsooh.org


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMTP connector issue

[Missy Koslosky]

What's the encoding look like on the client?

That's a WAG, BTW.
- Original Message - 
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:40 PM
Subject: SMTP connector issue


Exchange 2k SP3

Finally, I got an event on this.  Every now and then one of our users
(Random) sends an outbound email with an attachment that gets stuck on
our SMTP connector that connects to our mail gateway.  Below are the
events it triggered in order.  Its not a certain attachment and its not
a certain client.  Its all random.  Clients are sending HTML, RTF, and
plain text.   It happens to all of them.  I'm stuck on this.  It has
been happening for a while so I am kind of frustrated.  I guess it might
lead to PSS.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

1.
Event ID: 327
Source: MSExchangeTransport
Category: Exchange Store Driver


The following call : EcGetMime to the store failed. Error code :
-2147024809. MDB : 2126f66d-a776-4b44-9790-bc6902e8aed1. FID : 1-2E. MID
: 1-2E2AC8B. File : . 




2.
Event ID: 4000

Message delivery to the remote domain '[mail gateway ip]' failed for the
following reason: Unable to open the message for delivery.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item

[Missy Koslosky]

This is by design.  LOL.
- Original Message -
From: "Tener, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:15 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item


We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we switched it over to
exchange 2000 box all public folders are receiving messages as posts not as
message formats. Does anyone know a quick fix to this problem without using
third party programs.

rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sloooooow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003

[Missy Koslosky]

The best workaround is to remove as much stuff as possible from the profile.
But that also means that you won't have all the "stuff" your users want.
Seriously, there's no good workaround.

Missy Koslosky
Exchange MVP
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:53 AM
Subject: Sloow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003


What are the best workarounds for slow logins with roaming profiles? How
does OL figure into it, if at all? Some users have PSTs in addition to
Exchange Mailboxes on the server.
tia


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange2000 to a new server

[Missy Koslosky]

Don't bother keeping the same server name.  Really.  Trust me.  Check out
the Exchange FAQs at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm for more
info.

Missy Koslosky
Exchange MVP

- Original Message -
From: "Microsoft Exchange List Server"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: Exchange2000 to a new server


MSX2000+SP3
1forest,1Org

We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current
exchange2000 server.
Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then
remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000
restore over it..to make it operational in the new box?

any other considerations?
thanks,

=er

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Alternative to UNIX procmail in Exchange

[Missy Koslosky]

Yup.  That or Outlook rules are about your only choices, Samir.

Missy
- Original Message - 
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: Alternative to UNIX procmail in Exchange


write your own SMTP sinks

-Original Message-
From: Samir Arora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Alternative to UNIX procmail in Exchange



Gurus,

We have moved our messaging environment from Sendmail to Exchange and
lot of unix users believe that they have lost capability of procmail in
new environment . The Procmail is used to preprocess the email or
trigger any programs on arrival of email .Alternatively it is used for
filtering the emails which can be done thru rules wizard on outlook.The
Detailed Information about procmail can be found at
http://www.procmail.org
Please suggest your experiences or alternatives available


Thanks 

Samir 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway

[Missy Koslosky]

I've never seen a reason to set these to anything but the defaults.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Ault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway


A survey:

How many days to you have your smtp gateway servers (wexchsrvr or otherwise)
set to reattempt delivery of messages to unreachable hosts?



Tim.
x3683

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: automating the change of delivery outlook

[Missy Koslosky]

Do you mean "change the delivery point in Outlook from a PST to the mailbox
itself"?

If so, no, I do not know of a way to change this programmatically.  Would be
nice, though.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Santhosh, H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:30 AM
Subject: automating the change of delivery outlook


Hi
Does any one know how to change the delivery in outlook to mailbox
by using scripts or resource kit utility

Regards
Santhosh.H
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



**
This message and any attachments are intended for the
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this
communication to others; also please notify the sender by
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Trans logs

[Missy Koslosky]

Are you sure you're doing a NORMAL or FULL backup, instead of a COPY?

And you're checking the dates on the logs, right?
- Original Message -
From: "Ashraph, Elizabeth A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: Trans logs


All the backups being performed are full, and yet the logs are not getting
deleted.  Where would you start in troubleshooting that problem, the backup
system or Exchange?  Thanks.

Liz Ashraph


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trans logs


There is no such option in backup packages, including NTBACKUP, I've worked
with.  If you perform a full (normal) or incremental backup, the backup
program purges the logs.  If you perform a differential or copy backup, the
logs are not purged.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of knighTslayer
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trans logs


Your Exchange aware backup product does that.  Or you do if you manually do
so after a successful off-line backup.

If the logs were not purged, then the option to do so wasn't set.

knighTslayer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ashraph, Elizabeth
A.
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trans logs

Please forgive me in advance for asking this, but in Ex5.5 who deletes the
transaction logs after a full backup, does Exchange or the Exchange aware
Backup software (like Veritas).  Has anyone seen cases where backups are
successful but the logs don't get purged, what might cause this.  Thanks.

Liz Ashraph
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Directory Export - SMTP address

[Missy Koslosky]

The simplest way to do this, IIRC, is to add email addresses as a column
when you're viewing the Recipients container (or the GAL) from Admin.  You
can do a File | Save Window Contents As... (or something like that - I don't
have Admin here) and dump that to a csv.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Hatley, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: Directory Export - SMTP address


How do you export the SMTP address without the entire DN using admin.exe to
export to a .csv file?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: No originator <> messages

[Missy Koslosky]

And the yellow bar worries you?  Exchange can handle a huge queue quite
nicely.  Ignore the queues unless nothing (and I do mean nothing) is moving.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Alverson, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: No originator <> messages


Because I watch the "yellow" bar on the performance monitor (outbound IMC)
to make sure it isn't too big.  Sometimes it indicates a real problem
sending normal mail and other times it just shows that some spammer just
sent us a whole bunch of bad emails that it is trying to NDR.

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator <> messages


Why do we need this?

On 1/22/03 15:06, "Alverson, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



What we really need is a separate set of retry options for NDR's.  Have it
try an NDR once or twice and then give up without notifying your of its
failure to deliver the NDR (instead of the normal retry sequence for real
mail).

TOm

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator <> messages


Charles,

I think what Chris is trying to say is, that's what an NDR is...REFUSING to
accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED], because it doesn't exist, and
trying to deliver notification of that fact to the original recipient.
Exchange sends those notifications back to the originator with <> as the
sender.

What she's asking for is a way to eliminate sending NDRs to nonexistant
return addresses, which is why she sees e-mail backed up in the outbound Q,
addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED], from <>.  Many times, those SPAM
e-mails are sent to what used to be legitimate SMTP addresses within the
organization, but which have since been deleted, due to an employee leaving
the company.  Happens to me every day.

So...Pete's initial suggestion to add the SMTP address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to the Blackhole DL when the employee leaves the
company, is a legitimate and very good suggestion.

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator <> messages


and refuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is what I think she was
accepting.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator <> messages


Exchange accepts mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 1/22/03 13:51, "Charles Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



yes, am i missing something? I've been up all day.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator <> messages


Used Exchange much?

On 1/22/03 13:13, "Charles Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No originator <> mesages


I know this has been talked about many times on here but is there any way to

keep <> no orgininator messages from getting stuck in the outbound queue?


I know that most of them are undeliverable messages usually all to Unknown
Recipients but I see messages in the queue to people that haven't been here
in 3 years.  Is there anyway to block those or remove those before they can
even get that far.  I don't understand I guess why they're all going to no
originator.  I've tried to block them at the Trend server but no luck.
Basically the Internet Mail Connector is just trying to notify the sender of

these but can't.  Any suggestions would be awesome.

Thanks,
Karon Miller
E-Mail Administrator
BSPMLAW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange

Re: DL Question

[Missy Koslosky]

It is silently dropped.
- Original Message - 
From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM
Subject: DL Question


What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members?


TIA,
Joshua





Joshua Morgan
Network Engineer
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Joining Site

[Missy Koslosky]

Very true.
- Original Message - 
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:53 AM
Subject: RE: Joining Site


But he'll need higher permissions later to set up CAs so he might as
well set them up now.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Joining Site


What permissions do you have?  You need at least "view only" on the site
& configuration containers on the 5.5 side.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Callan, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: Joining Site


Trying to run /forestprep and when I goto join an existing 5.5 site, it
asks me for a server name from the 5.5 Site, and when I enter it it
comes back with an error stating I don't have the permissions required
to complete the operation.  Has anyone come accross this, or able to
lend a helping hand.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Joining Site

[Missy Koslosky]

What permissions do you have?  You need at least "view only" on the site &
configuration containers on the 5.5 side.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Callan, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: Joining Site


Trying to run /forestprep and when I goto join an existing 5.5 site, it asks
me for a server name from the 5.5 Site, and when I enter it it comes back
with an error stating I don't have the permissions required to complete the
operation.  Has anyone come accross this, or able to lend a helping hand.

Chris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users

[Missy Koslosky]

There's no "allowed" number of connections, per se, but IIS starts crapping
out after about 200 concurrent OWA sessions.

I don't have a specific reference for this, but I did some extensive testing
on this a couple years ago, and this was what we found.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:33 PM
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users


I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one..


--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-98850@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users


Hey! Your in the Jr Cadet league too!

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm@;wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users


Well go find the answer then report Back Jr Cadet Blackstone.

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-98850@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users


I dunno, But I was thinking the same thing though I don't have any
evidence to support it.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm@;wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users


Why does it stick in my head that you were limited to a Number of mapi
connections in the range of a few hundred pre box? Why on earth would I
think that..

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-98850@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users


What is the setting in IIS configured for?

Otherwise... lots!

William



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange List Server
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Maximum OWA concurrent users


MSX55+SP4
1 MSXorganization
1 server


Does anobody know the maximum OWA concurrent users allowed in
MSX55enterprise version? and MSX5.5 non-enterprise version?

Thanks,
-er


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Public Folder

[Missy Koslosky]

Use Deleted Items retention to restore it.  Make sure that the
"DumpsterAlwaysOn" registry key (search TechNet for info) has been applied
to her workstation so you can restore it from there - and show her how to
recover it so you needn't visit next time she screws up.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Gagrani, Kishore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:24 PM
Subject: Public Folder


A user of ours deleted one Public Folder (she was owner of that ) . I can
see that folder in the Exchange System Manager but don't know how to restore
it to Active Public Folder views.

Any ideas ??


Thanks,
Kishore


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Weird bounced message

[Missy Koslosky]

Use the track message tool in Admin (if 5.5) or the Message Tracking Center
in ESM (if E2K).

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Alborzfard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: Weird bounced message




I looked into tracking.log folder and the log files in there,
but I can't find any useful information in there. Any ideas?

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA and Apache

[Missy Koslosky]

You cannot.

Missy
- Original Message - 
From: "Weatherly, Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:03 PM
Subject: OWA and Apache


Ok sorry if this is an ignorant question but,

Situation:
1 public IP
1 Windows 2000 server in DMZ running an apache web server
Exchange 2000 
Windows 2000 AD

Can I set up the apache web server to provide OWA to users from the
internet, in other words will an Apache web server host the OWA
application

If anyone knows of any articles or websites that explain how to do this 
(If possible) that would be great.




Rob Weatherly



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Multiple updaters for a DL

[Missy Koslosky]

Heck, I'm 9 months pregnant, and, apparently I've lost my mind.  I guess
Chris is right and I'm wrong.  My bad.

M
- Original Message -
From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL


Well, I tried making a DL the owner of another DL. I got a pop-up window
telling me, quite explicity, that one DL cannot own another. It then
suggested that I select another account. It may have suggested a mailbox,
but I can't be sure. I was too busy pounding the desk in triumph. It was
bittersweet, though. I really did want it to work.

So, how do you make it work, Missy? I'm also interested in how to make a DL
the owner of a mailbox. I didn't think that was possible, either. I think
I've got the one-to-one thing sorted out, but I'll check that, too.

- Original Message -
From: "Missy Koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL


> It is indeed a migration issue.  It's dealt with by going through the 5.5
> directory and identifying mailboxes that are owned by DL's and reassigning
> them to *unique* accounts.  (Remember that there is a one-to-one
association
> between AD accounts & mailboxes in E2K, so no account can be the primary
NT
> account for >1 mailbox.)
>
> Missy
> - Original Message -
> From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 1:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
>
>
> You're killing me, Missy.
>
> So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own another. My
> brilliant facility with logic enables me to deduce that it must've been
> someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the whole thing.
>
> So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another whack at it.
>
> On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me somewhat
> concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, collected type).
This
> leads me to two questions:
>
> "Isn't this a migration issue?"
> "How have other people dealt with this?"
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Missy Koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
>
>
> > In 5.5, a DL can own another DL.  In E2K, it cannot.
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
> >
> >
> > That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen. I seem to
> > remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff? Missy? Daniel? Oh,
> > dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL couldn't be the owner
> of
> > another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again and again. It
> > seems to be true.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM
> > Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
> >
> >
> > > I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner field for
the
> > > list.
> > >
> > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> > > Tech Consultant
> > > hp Services
> > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray
> > > Alexander
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Multiple updaters for a DL
> > >
> > >
> > > In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I
> > > _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives...
> > >
> > > EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a:
> > > I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL.
> > > We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the
> > > former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated wi

Re: Multiple updaters for a DL

[Missy Koslosky]

Biotch.
- Original Message - 
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL


Missy still talks to anyone who will listen about our first in person
meeting. 

> -Original Message-
> From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:44 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
> 
> 
> I'm not quite sure now.
> 
> Oh, Missy? Have you met Chris? I think you two would get 
> along famously.
> 
> 
> Yes, I'm aware that Chris and Missy have attended several MEC 
> events, and have probably met in person. I'm making another 
> of my (in)famous attempts at humor. Please see the archives 
> (and good luck to you) for examples of my previous successes. 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04 PM
> Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
> 
> 
> > Dls can't be owners of DLs. What's the question again?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:53 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
> > >
> > >
> > > You're killing me, Missy.
> > >
> > > So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own 
> > > another. My brilliant facility with logic enables me to 
> deduce that 
> > > it must've been someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the 
> > > whole thing.
> > >
> > > So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another 
> whack at it.
> > >
> > > On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me 
> > > somewhat concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, 
> > > collected type). This leads me to two questions:
> > >
> > > "Isn't this a migration issue?"
> > > "How have other people dealt with this?"
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Missy Koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
> > >
> > >
> > > > In 5.5, a DL can own another DL.  In E2K, it cannot.
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Murray Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen.
> > > I seem to
> > > > remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff?
> > > Missy? Daniel?
> > > > Oh, dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL
> > > couldn't be the
> > > > owner
> > > of
> > > > another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again
> > > and again.
> > > > It seems to be true.
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner
> > > field for
> > > > > the list.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> > > > > Tech Consultant
> > > > > hp Services
> > > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf 
> Of Murray 
> > > > > Alexander
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM
> > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > 

Re: recommendation please

[Missy Koslosky]

Good point.
- Original Message -
From: "EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: recommendation please


Or read the book Mien Kompf

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: recommendation please


Google.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM
Subject: RE: recommendation please


Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper.

-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: recommendation please


We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recommendation please


Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter
the un-wanted
e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for
window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great
but I want to
filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too.
Tony


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person
responsible
for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

[Missy Koslosky]

um.  No.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:34 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA


hey how about that Legato (former Vinca) CoStandby? has anyone ever had any
good experience with it? They have been around for a long time too.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 HA


Well, obviously this is an area I've looked into quite a bit. 

My major issue with replication is bandwidth, in a large distributed
Exchange organizations there are in some cases sites which don't have (and
can't obtain) sufficient bandwidth for complete replication. A solution
which used snapshot (Exchange aware) backups and replicated diffs, would
probably be ideal in terms of bandwidth optimization... Recovery from
failover would be my biggest concern. How do the changes get replicated back
quickly in order to bring the production server back online and how
automated will the process be. Another issue which weighs on my mind
somewhat is testing... How easy is it to test failover, and how much
expertise is required to make sure it goes smoothly when the %^&# hits the
fan.  There are also some issues around message routing in the event of a
partial failover: updating of DNS and IP routing, client configuration and
the like.

Short answer: I don't think any full WAN replication solutions are as
straightforward or easy to implement as the vendors might like you to think.
Not that they aren't an appropriate solution for some companies, but
sunglasses are required during evaluation in order to not be blinded by the
sunshine and light the vendors espouse.

And like Missy, I like the Marathon Technologies solutions if for no reason
other than they've been at this game a lot longer than the other players and
have earned a good reputation during that time.

--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244

> -Original Message-
> From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA
>
>
> I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself.
> The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC
> SAN/  Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based
> on the understanding that the replication is a "best effort"
> process and is not guaranteed.  According to EMC, Mirror View
> is confirmed replication between sites.
>
> The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then
> it's not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it.
>
> Cheers,
> Karen
>
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:
>
> > I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange
> works with
> > its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written.  Doing
> > this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is
> > unreliable and is simply, IMO, asking for at trouble.  There is no
> > product out there today that can make this work consistently - they
> > may work for a while, but I would not want to tell anyone that this
> > type of solution (geo-clustering) is a great way to go.
> >
> > Make sense?
> >
> > Missy
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA
> >
> >
> > Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that it
> > does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost?
> >
> > - Karen
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:
> >
> > > There aren't any real best practices for this, as
> Exchange doesn't
> > > do it nicely.  There are other possible solutions - Scharff?
> > >
> > > Missy
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM
> > > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss
> > > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site.
> Management is
> > > concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software 

Re: recommendation please

[Missy Koslosky]

Google.
- Original Message - 
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM
Subject: RE: recommendation please


Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper.

-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: recommendation please


We use Mimesweeper, so far is been working pretty good.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recommendation please


Can someone recommend me what software I should use to filter the un-wanted
e-mail like porn and soliciting e-mail. We are use Inoculate IT 4.5 for
window NT from CAI to check for viruses and it working great but I want to
filter all the soliciting and porn e-mail too.
Tony 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

[Missy Koslosky]

It's not worth the huge chunk of money they're asking, or tons of
organizations would be happy with the solution.  I've tested most of these
solutions in the past, and the only one that made me even think about
deployment was the solution from Marathon Technologies.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA


I agree based on theory, but have not implemented it myself.
The product being considered is Mirror View to go with an EMC
SAN/  Chris, the reason DoubleTake is not an option is based on
the understanding that the replication is a "best effort" process
and is not guaranteed.  According to EMC, Mirror View is confirmed
replication between sites.

The bottom line, though, is that if this doesn't work, then it's
not worth the huge chunk of money they are asking for it.

Cheers,
Karen

On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:

> I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its
> transaction logs - how they're cached and then written.  Doing this
> simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is unreliable and is
> simply, IMO, asking for at trouble.  There is no product out there today
> that can make this work consistently - they may work for a while, but I
> would not want to tell anyone that this type of solution (geo-clustering)
is
> a great way to go.
>
> Make sense?
>
> Missy
> - Original Message -
> From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA
>
>
> Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that
> it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost?
>
> - Karen
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:
>
> > There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it
> > nicely.  There are other possible solutions - Scharff?
> >
> > Missy
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM
> > Subject: Exchange 2000 HA
> >
> >
> > I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss
> > replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site.  Management
> > is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software
> > is out there that can provide this functionality.  DoubleTake is
> > not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with.
> >
> > Any pointers appreciated.
> >
> > TIA,
> > Karen
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sp3 revisited

[Missy Koslosky]

Just one.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:30 PM
Subject: RE: sp3 revisited


Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :)


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: sp3 revisited


My thoughts exactly.

Also - isn't *MS* the horse's mouth?

But seriously, yes.  Service packs are - and always have been, to my
knowledge - cumulative.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: sp3 revisited


So you think the release notes are lying?


-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: sp3 revisited


ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help
me out... I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop
from exch 2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes? I know that ms state that
they are cumulative but would like to hear it 'from the horse's mouth'
thanks Rob

Support Analyst
T.K.C. Sales Ltd.
5 Ashmead Industrial Estate
Keynsham
Bristol
BS31 1TZ
UK
Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302



intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

[Missy Koslosky]

I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its
transaction logs - how they're cached and then written.  Doing this
simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems is unreliable and is
simply, IMO, asking for at trouble.  There is no product out there today
that can make this work consistently - they may work for a while, but I
would not want to tell anyone that this type of solution (geo-clustering) is
a great way to go.

Make sense?

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA


Missy, when you say "doesn't do it nicely," does that imply that
it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost?

- Karen


On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote:

> There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it
> nicely.  There are other possible solutions - Scharff?
>
> Missy
> - Original Message -
> From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM
> Subject: Exchange 2000 HA
>
>
> I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss
> replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site.  Management
> is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software
> is out there that can provide this functionality.  DoubleTake is
> not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with.
>
> Any pointers appreciated.
>
> TIA,
> Karen
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

[Missy Koslosky]

There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it
nicely.  There are other possible solutions - Scharff?

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 HA


I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss
replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site.  Management
is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software
is out there that can provide this functionality.  DoubleTake is
not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with.

Any pointers appreciated.

TIA,
Karen


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Meeting requests, 2 Exchange 5.5 Organizations

[Missy Koslosky]

I promise that posting the same question using two different accounts will
not make the answer to your question show up twice as fast.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:02 AM
Subject: Meeting requests, 2 Exchange 5.5 Organizations


A user sends a meeting request to several different individuals. Some are
in the same Exchange Organization, some are in another Exchange
Organization.  The recipientes in the same Exchange Organization receive
the requests without any problems.  Those recipients in the "Other"
Exchange Organization do not recieve it as a meeting request, and when
they open it, it contains "MIME garbage" - see sample below.

Any thoughts as to what the solution is?


--_=_NextPart_000_01C25905.AB4CA270
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

eJ8+Ig8UAQaQCAAEAAABAAEAAQeQBgAI5AQAAADoAAEIgAcAHgAAAElQTS5NaWN

---  much more deleted -

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification

[Missy Koslosky]

There's no way to do this without rewriting code.  Good request, though.
Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Levis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification


Exchange 2000 SP3.  OWA clients are IE6, SP1.

When emails come in and go right into the Inbox, OWA pops-up that new-mail
notification icon.

However, when emails come in and -- due to various rules -- are delivered to
a sub-folder of the inbox, there is no New Mail notification.

Without re-writing butt-loads of MS's code, anyone know a way to change the
behaviour such a new message in any folder results in Notification?

Thanks!




Chris Levis
Applied Geographics, Inc.
Boston, MA

Don't go where the path leads you.
Instead go where there is no path and leave trails.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 Features

[Missy Koslosky]

You cannot.
- Original Message - 
From: "CHRIS H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM
Subject: Exchange 2000 Features


Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO
replies/autoresponders to the internet on a "per mailbox" basis?

I have been looking through the marketing fluff but have not seen it
mentioned.

TIA

Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Public Folders

[Missy Koslosky]

You need to lock down top-level PF creation.  Q256131
- Original Message -
From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: Public Folders


Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had
deliberately disallowed these under E5.5 and have just found that E2K
re-allows them. Investigating further we found that the EVERYBODY group had
been allowed to provide Create Public Folder and the box was greyed out.
Anybody know a good way off keeping Public Folder permanently locked down
(and hence under our control, not the users)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: filtering e-mail

[Missy Koslosky]

I think that the FAQ might just cover this one...  :)
- Original Message - 
From: "Mellott, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: filtering e-mail


Actually at this point a "form" could be made for this answer.....

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: filtering e-mail


Before?  It's posted daily.
- Original Message - 
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: filtering e-mail


Exchange5.5
WinNT4 sp6
Inoculate IT

I know this have been posted before but can someone recommend what software
I can use to filter Spam e-mail. How does other company filter e-mail base
on the header, body text, or words.

Thank
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange Delete

[Missy Koslosky]

The white space will be available after an online defrag is run, it simply
won't show up as space on the disk itself.
- Original Message -
From: "Pennell, Ronald B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange Delete


Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank
space
(white space) throughout the Information Store.  Only way to recoup the
space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available
for use.

Ron

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Delete


Hello,

I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running
out of room on the second partition where my information store is located.
The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it
is all used up.  My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get
some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second
partition.  The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a
inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size.  Does anyone know
how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this.

Thanks
Rich

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: filtering e-mail

[Missy Koslosky]

Before?  It's posted daily.
- Original Message - 
From: "Tony Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: filtering e-mail


Exchange5.5
WinNT4 sp6
Inoculate IT

I know this have been posted before but can someone recommend what software
I can use to filter Spam e-mail. How does other company filter e-mail base
on the header, body text, or words.

Thank
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: backup failure

[Missy Koslosky]

you are backing up mailboxes, not the information stores.  Check your
documentation, or see the FAQ.
- Original Message -
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: backup failure


Hi,

My backup have failed for the last two days.  I read the log and its says
"unable to attach to \\server\microsoft exchange mailboxes."  my exchange
is working fine, what could be the problem here.

thanks
pauli

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Recovering Deleted Public Folder

[Missy Koslosky]

Recover deleted items should work if you have it enabled.  There's a Q
article on how to do this for a PF.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Aamir Hanif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:33 AM
Subject: Recovering Deleted Public Folder


Guys:

Someone at our office deleted a Public Folder this morning. Unfortunately,
this folder was created yesterday and we did not do a backup last night. I
have set the properties on the Public Folders so that they are not
permanently deleted.

Does anyone know how I can recover the folder?

Thanks a lot.
Aamir.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MS Exchange 5.5

[Missy Koslosky]

What is the domain name that's having issues?  That's the simplest way to
get this sorted out!
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: MS Exchange 5.5


I'm having problems with my Exchange server.  It seems that I can get mail
from inside users, but unable to send or receive from outside.  I thinking
that it's my DNS but I can't pinpoint the problem.  Can you supply a list
of criteria that I need to be probed.

It would really help.

Thanks,

J

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Modifying Users

[Missy Koslosky]

I'd export the directory, gather the names of users that have HR in the
appropriate field, and import those names appropriately to remove them from
the DL's.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:42 PM
Subject: Modifying Users


Apologies if this hits twice . . . I have not seen it on either email addy I
am subscribed with . . .

We have a DL for every user that has a mailbox. Now they want me to take out
everyone in, say, Human Resources which is about 200 people. Is there a
bulk, or scripted way to do this based on department name?

TIA.

Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2k SMTP

[Missy Koslosky]

What do you see in the smtp logs?
- Original Message -
From: Daniel L. Miller
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:17 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


The problem is that it's not just this address.  I'm sending to my own
amfes.com address because it's easy to test - but I can't send to ANY
external address.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Baker, Jennifer
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


Just a WAG, but maybe port 1025 is not talking to 25 and you need to call
symantec.

-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


Thank you.

NSLOOKUP with q=mx reports smtpav.wpdbiz.com is my server, so . . .

telnet smtpav.wpdbiz.com 25
helo smtp.amfes.com
mail from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
data
this is a test
.

And I receive it!

What's my next step?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Fugatt
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


helo 
mail from: 
rcpt to: 
data

Type your message and end it with a . and enter

Mark Fugatt
Pentech Office Solutions Inc
www.4mcts.com
Tel:  585 586 3890
Fax: 585 249 0316
Cell: 585 576 4750
Visit www.msexchange.org for valuable information about Microsoft Exchange


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel L. Miller
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 9:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


How do I do that?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


After you telnet in, do a mock message sending. You will see what the remote
system says when you try to send a message.

-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


OK, I've verified DNS works.
I've verified via NSLOOKUP that I can find a remote server. I've verified
via TELNET that I can access a remote server.

SO WHY ISN'T MY INTERNET E-MAIL WORKING?!?!?!?  This is really getting
frustrating.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel L. Miller
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


OK, I found it in the help file.
Telnet amfes.com 25

Yes, I get in.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


Can you resolve the Mx record for an external domain from the Exchange
server itself? If so, can you then telnet to that Mx record on port 25?

> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:18 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
>
> Text of the NDR below.  I have tried adjusting the time settings.  I
> currently have them set to the minimum so I can get confirmation of
> the rejection quickly!
>
> Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
>
>   Subject: Testing again
>   Sent: 8/18/2002 7:42 PM
>
> The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
>
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 8/18/2002 7:44 PM
> Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified.
> Please retry or contact your administrator.
> 
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
>
>
> What does the NDR say...
>
> >Any attempt to
> > send
> > internet e-mail results in failed delivery notifications.
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: Stores

[Missy Koslosky]

Absolutely.
- Original Message - 
From: Daniel L. Miller 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: Stores


Well, that answers question #1.

Is it possible to move/relocate the primary message store?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fw: Stores


Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel L. Miller
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: Stores


Correct

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Fugatt
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stores


Daniel

It sounds like you are running Exchange 2000 Standard and not Enterprise.

Mark Fugatt

-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stores


I've tried creating a new storage group.  After creation, it won't allow me
to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable.
What's wrong?

What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group.  My primary storage
group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my
data partition.  How can I do this?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]








_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]








_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2k SMTP

[Missy Koslosky]

There's a basic article on telnet use in TechNet.  Have you looked there?
- Original Message - 
From: Daniel L. Miller 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


nslookup
set q=mx
amfes.com

finds mx records and ip address

How do I use telnet?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP


Can you resolve the Mx record for an external domain from the Exchange
server itself? If so, can you then telnet to that Mx record on port 25?

> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:18 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
>
> Text of the NDR below.  I have tried adjusting the time settings.  I
> currently have them set to the minimum so I can get confirmation of the
> rejection quickly!
>
> Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
>
>   Subject: Testing again
>   Sent: 8/18/2002 7:42 PM
>
> The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
>
>   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 8/18/2002 7:44 PM
> Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified.
> Please retry or contact your administrator.
> 
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:35 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP
>
>
> What does the NDR say...
>
> >Any attempt to
> > send
> > internet e-mail results in failed delivery notifications.
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]








_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fw: Stores

[Missy Koslosky]

Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores.
- Original Message - 
From: Daniel L. Miller 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: Stores


Correct

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Fugatt
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stores


Daniel

It sounds like you are running Exchange 2000 Standard and not Enterprise.

Mark Fugatt

-Original Message-
From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stores


I've tried creating a new storage group.  After creation, it won't allow me
to add any mail stores - though it seems public stores are acceptable.
What's wrong?

What I really want to do is MOVE a store/storage group.  My primary storage
group currently resides on my system partition and I want to shift it to my
data partition.  How can I do this?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]








_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IMC issues

[Missy Koslosky]

Ignore them.  They'll eventually time out and disappear from the queues -
they're NDR messages.  If you cannot cannot cannot make yourself ignore
them, whack 'em.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:33 PM
Subject: IMC issues


We are all of a sudden getting hundreds (and I mean hundreds, as I go in
there about twice a day and clean out about 300 at a time) of the following
in the IMC Queues window:

Originator <>

If you go in to read what the error message says, it says "Host unreachable"
even though I can ping it and go to the site on the Internet.

Also, a lot of messages in the queue have this error code:

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [xxx x.x.x Domain of sender address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve]

The above looks like it could be a reverse lookup problem, but I am not
sure.

Anyone been there, done these, hated it?

TIA
Geoff...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

[Missy Koslosky]

Standard will do it, but if you have a lot of RAM in the box, Advanced
Server plays more nicely with E2K (both standard & enterprise).

- Original Message -
From: "Orin Rehorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:24 PM
Subject: FW: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?


Oops, I meant Exchange 2000 Enterprise version.

Regards,
Orin

Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Phone:  (713)670-2443
Fax:  (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html> >

 -Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

Exchange 2000 Net require Win2K Server Advanced, or will Win2k Server
standard do? (Microsoft man said yes but didn't see same in system document
doc.)

TIA

Regards,
Orin

Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Phone:  (713)670-2443
Fax:  (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html> >


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

[Missy Koslosky]

Not to disagree with you Tom (not I!), but there's been a lot of talk lately
about the /3GB switch helping performance, even on systems with 2GB of RAM.

So A/S might be good, but, as you said, probably isn't necessary.

M
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:32 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?


Win2k Server is fine.  As long as you're happy with 4 or less CPUs and 4
or less GB of system RAM.  The only reason to go to Advanced is to
increase to 8cpus, 8GB RAM, clustering.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/serverfamily/default.asp

> -Original Message-
> From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 05:21 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
> Subject: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?
>
>
> Exchange 2000 Net require Win2K Server Advanced, or will
> Win2k Server standard do? (Microsoft man said yes but didn't
> see same in system document
> doc.)
>
> TIA
>
> Regards,
> Orin
>
> Orin Rehorst
> Port of Houston Authority
> (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
> e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Phone:  (713)670-2443
> Fax:  (713)670-2457
> TOPAS web site:   >
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Unsolicited Email

[Missy Koslosky]

a...  Deckler's back.  It's been a long time...

- Original Message - 
From: "Rob Hackney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email


 Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers.  
Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself as the
creme de la merde either (no comments pls!) but why not look at headers?
When our mail server was used as a spam relay I looked at them and could
see where it was routed thru.
And if it is legit mail, you can also see whether you or your isp has a
problem with out bound comms, can you not?


-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August 2002 13:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email


Hey, we're not all PHBs, Erik! Some of us have to do the technical stuff
ourselves




-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 09 August 2002 19:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email


Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers.  

> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email
> 
> 
> First, ignore the advice of reading the RFC's and headers. If an
> individual signed up for a web email service such as Hotmail 
> or Yahoo! or
> brain.com.pk under false pretenses then you will have to contact the
> provider to see if they can help you track down the abuser. All the
> headers are going to tell you is that the email message came from an
> account on www.brain.com.pk which is pretty useless since you 
> already know
> that. They should at least be able to disable the account for 
> you and may
> have some information related to what computer was used to access that
> account.
> 
> If the user had instead used the common SMTP hack to forge a 
> From address,
> then the RFC's and headers would come into play. But 
> depending on how they
> did the hack, you still would probably not be able to 
> determine much if
> they did anything to help cover their tracks.
> 
> As you have discovered, in the world of SMTP and free email 
> services, it
> is extremely easy to forge the From address of an email and it is
> difficult, if not impossible to track this down if the person 
> doing it has
> any amount of a brain what-so-ever. Tell your executives to 
> deal because
> it is the nature of SMTP and the Internet.
> 
> > Dear List,
> > 
> > Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited 
> email with =
> > the name of one of our senior executive. His name was used 
> on free web =
> > based email service (www.brain.com.pk). My question is how 
> can I trace =
> > the culprit.
> > 
> > Help in this regard is really appreciated.
> > 
> > Thanks & Regards.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.


The information in this communication and any attachments is
confidential
and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
If
you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If
you
have received this communication in error please notify us immediately
on
0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. 

Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do
not
relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend & Gilbert are
neither
given nor endorsed by the firm. 



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.i

Re: The infamous "Invalid data in message"

[Missy Koslosky]

>From your original message:  
>I thought we had this fixed but it doesn't appear that it is.  Give me a
call.

- Original Message - 
From: "Stevens, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:31 PM
Subject: RE: The infamous "Invalid data in message"


missy..what number do you speak of?

-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: The infamous "Invalid data in message"


What's your number?
- Original Message - 
From: "Stevens, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:45 PM
Subject: The infamous "Invalid data in message"


This subject has reared it's ugly head once again.  There is very little
documentation that I have found to help remedy this problem.  Does anyone
know how I can go about to troubleshoot this error?  Thank you. Dave


Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject: Invocation of Informal Dispute on the Missed Milestone for
Ground water Operable Unit Record of Decision 1 (C-720) Signature McCracken
Coun ty, Kentucky KY8-890-008-982_v1.TIF
  Sent: 7/22/2002 10:52 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7/22/2002 10:53 AM
Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=DOE;l=ORO-FOB-MX2N-020722155226Z-57677
MSEXCH:IMS:DOE:ORO:ORO-MAIL 3554 (000B09AA) 554 Invalid data in
message

I thought we had this fixed but it doesn't appear that it is.  Give me a
call.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The infamous "Invalid data in message"

[Missy Koslosky]

What's your number?
- Original Message - 
From: "Stevens, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:45 PM
Subject: The infamous "Invalid data in message"


This subject has reared it's ugly head once again.  There is very little
documentation that I have found to help remedy this problem.  Does anyone
know how I can go about to troubleshoot this error?  Thank you.
Dave


Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject: Invocation of Informal Dispute on the Missed Milestone for
Ground water Operable Unit Record of Decision 1 (C-720) Signature McCracken
Coun ty, Kentucky KY8-890-008-982_v1.TIF
  Sent: 7/22/2002 10:52 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 7/22/2002 10:53 AM
Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=
;p=DOE;l=ORO-FOB-MX2N-020722155226Z-57677
MSEXCH:IMS:DOE:ORO:ORO-MAIL 3554 (000B09AA) 554 Invalid data in
message

I thought we had this fixed but it doesn't appear that it is.  Give me a
call.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Storage Groups and Databases

[Missy Koslosky]

I'd leave well enough alone and leave 'em all in one SG.  Your server's
going to be hurting no matter what, but the KISS principle comes into play
here.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Chyka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:58 PM
Subject: Storage Groups and Databases


Hello,

once again thanks for the help on an earlier question.  i have one
more

we have about 1600 users (no more than 500 concurrent) and only one server
until next year sometime.  the server is a dell 6600 with dual xeon 1.6Ghz
processors and 3 gigs of RAM.  it has a Perc RAID card with 128 megs on it
and 2 har drives with RAID 1 for the OS, 2 hard drives with RAID 1 for the
logs, and 3 RAID 5 drives for the database.

my question is should i configure 1 storage group and 1 database for all
the users or should i break them down.  is there even a performance issue
having different storage groups etc.

thanks for any input..

Bob C.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Need to scan a backup for specific information

[missy koslosky]

Or not.  Dain bread here.
- Original Message -
From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Need to scan a backup for specific information


Exmerge.
- Original Message -
From: "Tiresias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: Need to scan a backup for specific information



What's the best way to scan a restored backup for specific text (that might
be present in any mailbox)?  Please don't caution me about the legalities of
this, it's in response to a court order; I just need help with the
technology.

Thanks

Ken T



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Need to scan a backup for specific information

[missy koslosky]

Exmerge.
- Original Message -
From: "Tiresias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: Need to scan a backup for specific information



What's the best way to scan a restored backup for specific text (that might
be present in any mailbox)?  Please don't caution me about the legalities of
this, it's in response to a court order; I just need help with the
technology.

Thanks

Ken T



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Stop System attendant

[missy koslosky]

net stop msexchangesa
- Original Message -
From: "Albert Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:35 PM
Subject: Stop System attendant


Hi there.  I'm running Exchange 2000 and I have a question.

For maintenance purpose, I need to stop the system attendant service.  I
know how to turn it off from the Windows Services manager, but is there a
way to stop it from the command line?

Albert Charron
Trisotech Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Turf directory

[missy koslosky]

Not that hard to test, eh?

- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: Turf directory


Yeppers.
However, I think by default its c:\turfdir, otherwise its a reghack.


-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Turf directory


IIRC, you need to manually create it.

M
- Original Message -
From: "RBHATIA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: Turf directory


That makes a lot of sense. Thanks. However, I have noticed that despite
setting the TURF DIRECTORY location (C:\Exchsrve\Imcdata\Turfdir) on my
Exchange server I see no emails being trapped although I know they are
coming in. Do I have to actually create the TURFDIR folder for the
emails to
be stored in it or does Exchange create it automatically the first time
an
email matches the list ? As of now, the folder does not exist.

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Turf directory


The FROM address will often work, but not necessarily. Below is a header
from a message recently arrived in our turfdir, minus all the weird
characters, that illustrates the point. The FROM domain on this one
appears
to be wonderfulrewards.com, but entering that in Message Filtering
wouldn't
have caught this message. What did catch it was @YOURMAILSOURCE.COM,
which,
while it's all over the place in this example, I always get from the
domain
in the first actual email address found in the archive file, in this
case,
.

om64.yourmailsource.com128.121.16.234c=us;a=
;p=lanepowell;l=SEA0202070923013Q83B7XCI<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>pEwLsRec
eive
d: from om64.yourmailsource.com (128.121.16.234 [128.121.16.234]) by
SEA02.LPSL.COM with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version
5.5.2653.13)
id 3Q83B7XC; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:01:56 -0700
Received: from oc30 (oc30.yourmailsource.com) by om64.yourmailsource.com
(LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:45:50 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:29:50 -0400
From: "Free Credit Card Search" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: We'll guarantee you a New Credit Card!
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 15:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Turf directory


I have a question regarding the Turf directory.
In the list that I set email filtering on, let's say I'm getting email
from
spammers who are spoofing the FROM email address to make it look like
it's
coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when the actual sender is somebody else. Do
I
set my filtering list to block email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Will that
work ?
Or do I need to find out the actual sender of the email ?
I'm running Exchange Server 5.5. SP4
Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distributi

Re: Turf directory

[missy koslosky]

IIRC, you need to manually create it.

M
- Original Message -
From: "RBHATIA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: Turf directory


That makes a lot of sense. Thanks. However, I have noticed that despite
setting the TURF DIRECTORY location (C:\Exchsrve\Imcdata\Turfdir) on my
Exchange server I see no emails being trapped although I know they are
coming in. Do I have to actually create the TURFDIR folder for the
emails to
be stored in it or does Exchange create it automatically the first time
an
email matches the list ? As of now, the folder does not exist.

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Turf directory


The FROM address will often work, but not necessarily. Below is a header
from a message recently arrived in our turfdir, minus all the weird
characters, that illustrates the point. The FROM domain on this one
appears
to be wonderfulrewards.com, but entering that in Message Filtering
wouldn't
have caught this message. What did catch it was @YOURMAILSOURCE.COM,
which,
while it's all over the place in this example, I always get from the
domain
in the first actual email address found in the archive file, in this
case,
.

om64.yourmailsource.com128.121.16.234c=us;a=
;p=lanepowell;l=SEA0202070923013Q83B7XCI<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>pEwLsRec
eive
d: from om64.yourmailsource.com (128.121.16.234 [128.121.16.234]) by
SEA02.LPSL.COM with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version
5.5.2653.13)
id 3Q83B7XC; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:01:56 -0700
Received: from oc30 (oc30.yourmailsource.com) by om64.yourmailsource.com
(LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:45:50 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:29:50 -0400
From: "Free Credit Card Search" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: We'll guarantee you a New Credit Card!
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 15:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Turf directory


I have a question regarding the Turf directory.
In the list that I set email filtering on, let's say I'm getting email
from
spammers who are spoofing the FROM email address to make it look like
it's
coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when the actual sender is somebody else. Do
I
set my filtering list to block email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Will that
work ?
Or do I need to find out the actual sender of the email ?
I'm running Exchange Server 5.5. SP4
Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

[missy koslosky]

groupshield sucks.  sybari doesn't.  simple.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:06 PM
Subject: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari


I see one big differnce in the apps on paper. Sybari utilizies 4 engines
vs. the 1 engine Groupshield utilizies.

Does anyone have real world exp. on which of these products would fit an
Exchange 2K site with only one server in that site and 500 mailboxes on
that  server.

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Unlimited Quotas

[missy koslosky]

For 25 users?  How much disk space do you have?  9 GB?

Really...  if there's no absolute need for quotas, bag the idea.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "James Liddil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:18 AM
Subject: Unlimited Quotas


I am being asked to justify why I have set quotas for users on our E2K
server
with 25 users.  Things that come to mind are that if we give users
unlimited
stores, we will have to buy more disk space in time.  Also we have a
single
processor server with 512 ram.  So I would make a WAG and say that we
will be
looking at a second processor and more RAM.  I am already looking at
more RAM
since our server is paging quite a bit.  And as we implement archiving
and
journaling this will impact disk space as well as the backup (time,
number of
tapes).  I also realize that allowing unlimited space leads to users
never
managing their e-mail.

So besides these reasons are there any other reasons that I should be
thinking about?  Thanks.

Jim Liddil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Converting to Plain Text at E2k outbout IMS

[missy koslosky]

I assume you're setting these as described in Q258696?

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Yeutter, Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:28 PM
Subject: Converting to Plain Text at E2k outbout IMS


Hello,
We send a lot of mail through our IMS to a local Meditech system that
can
only recieve mail in plain text. We are in the process of to an E2K sp2
site
and I'm trying to set up a new entry in Internet Message Formats for the
Meditech system.I began trying to emulate the settings on the existing
Exchange 5.5 site (listed below)  I've experimented with message
encoding,
Character sets, and setting "Exchange rich-text format" to "Never Use".
None
of the changes I make in the Message Format entry effect a change in the
format of messages received at the Meditech system.

 If I send in HTML format, Meditech receives a plain text version with
"=20"
at the line feeds followed by a duplicate version of the message in raw
HTML. A message sent as plain text is fine except for the "=20" line
feeds.

I'm sure of the SMTP domain entry. Is there a piece I'm Missing?  How
can I
tell if an email is actually being processed by my Internet Format
Entry?

Additional Information: The Exchange 5.5 sp4 site that we're migrating
from
converts to plain text that Meditech likes. The same SMTP domain in 5.5
has
the following settings: Send Microsoft Exchange rich text formatting

Never message wrap Send Attachments using UUENCODE  --> Binhex Character
Set
Translation
-- MIME Western European (ISO -8859-1)
-- Non-MIME USA ASCII

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.


Craig Yeutter
Server Engineering
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
650.724-6636

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Email Problems

[missy koslosky]

Will Robinson, silly.
- Original Message -
From: "Baker, Jennifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: Email Problems


Danger will roger!

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Email Problems


Mailbox Full!

- Original Message -
From: "Farquharson, Andrea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: Email Problems


> -Original Message-
> > From: MAIL-SYSTEM
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 5:25 PM
> > To: Finn, Vincent P.
> > Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
> >
> > - ERROR REPORT
> > - Message could not be delivered to the
> > following recipient: Andrea.Farquharson / mime DDT1=RFC-822;
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > because: Unknown Non-Delivery Reason (522)
> > 
> > 
>
>
> > What is the NDR message post it.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Baker, Jennifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:10 AM
> > Subject: RE: Email Problems
> >
> >
> > > You have a pix and fixup is enabled?
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:43 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Email Problems
> > >
> > >
> > > Can anyone suggest how I should troubleshoot this problem?  A
> > > Sprint representative corresponds via email with a few people in
> > > my company. Emails are exchanged okay initially.  Then, for some
> > > reason, at times
when
> > > he tries to email us, he gets an undeliverable message.  This is
> > > the
error
> > > report he receives: Where should I begin to try and resolve this??
> > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: MAIL-SYSTEM
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 5:25 PM
> > > To: Finn, Vincent P.
> > > Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
> > >
> > > - ERROR
REPORT -
> > > Message could not be delivered to the following recipient:
> > > Andrea.Farquharson / mime
> > > DDT1=RFC-822;
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > > because: Unknown Non-Delivery Reason (522)
> >
> --
> --
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees

[missy koslosky]

Per 1, it's all an act.  :)

Re. s&m: I coulda joyfully killed you.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees


Per 1, just using it to illustrate a point. I think the fact that you're
acronym impaired, yet otherwise so knowledgeable about Exchange (and
many,
many other things) was quite illustrative.

Re: Short and mousey.. that was what, 3 years ago? Talk about intensely
funny.

> -Original Message-
> From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:18 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
>
> Per 1, I'm completely acronym impaired.  And that was what, four years
> ago?
>
> Talk about dead dogs.
>
> Just call me short and mousey, why don'tcha?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:23 AM
> Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
>
>
> I must respectfully disagree Mr. Slinger, and not just because you
sided
> with Mr. Woodruff or because Mr. Willingham is working on the specs
for
> my
> new house.
>
> Per 1, not knowing an acronym is hardly the same thing as not being
> prepared
> for class. I didn't chastise Mrs. Koslosky when she saw YMMV in usage
> for
> the first time and e-mailed me to ask what it meant. Course, I did
give
> her
> a fishing lesson.
>
> Per 3, 100% might be a bit high, but 78.2% of all statistics are made
up
> on
> the fly. I don't doubt that he has learned a lot from this list and
> occasionally dips his toe in. I like to think I do the same.
>
> Per 4, it might explain why the acronym "DL" was such a foreign
concept
> to
> him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing
mail
> is
> hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must
> say I
> was quite startled by its simplicity.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:20 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
> >
> > Per 1, that kinda goes to the original purpose of this list.  You
were
> > kinda
> > expected to know that stuff before you showed up here.  But that's
> clearly
> > shot to hell.
> >
> > Per 3, bullshit.
> >
> > Per 4, Not relevant to the conversation.
> >
> > It pains me to defend Woodruff given his previous (lack of)
> contributions,
> > but there you go.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 21:02
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
> >
> >
> > 1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are
not
> > only
> > "Exch Admins" but also server double duty by working in other
> functions in
> > their company. In the case a vice president of a construction
> > company...I.E.
> > work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's,
holler
> at
> > subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost,
> > maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a
> crappy
> > construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as
> money
> > is
> > too tight.
> >
> > 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring
a
> > bell.
> > Have you ever forgotten a person's name?
> >
> > 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by
someone
> > else.
> > I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every
> once in
> > a
> > while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question.
> >
> > 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had
someone
> walk
> > up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards
and
> > forwards, you had no idea it would do?
> >
> > We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough
> > questions because some old superintendent that "knew everything" bit
> their
> > head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound
> > familiar?
> >
> > Arch
> >
> > -Original Messag