from:"Morrison, Gordon"

RE: Winmail.dat

2003-07-01 Thread Morrison, Gordon

I have seen this occasionally with various 3rd party products (Anti-virus or Anti-spam 
products).  Do you have either of these on the Australian server?  If so, which ones?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Molkentin
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Winmail.dat


July 1 is like April 1... Is like any day I can try pulling a joke on
any user!  ;)

You'd be amazed how many "admins" fell for that when I suggested it on
another list (albeit not an exchange one). V. funny.

Interested to see what the resolution is - I've never heard of the
problem.

themolk.

> -Original Message-
> From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:17 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Winmail.dat
>
>
> I would've fallen for it if I didn't know better.  Maybe I
> can try telling my users that and see if they buy it.  :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:12 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> Carmila,
>
> It's the international dateline - every time you send an
> e-mail to a group across it, it attaches the winmail.dat file
> so that when it is opened, it is read in the local time zone
> (and reflects that).[1]
>
> themolk.
>
> [1] Complete BS - but I couldn't help but throw it out there.
> 
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:07 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Winmail.dat
> >
> >
> >
> > Some of my users are getting the winmail.dat attachments.
> > The messages are coming from users in our Australian office.
> >
> > We're running Exchange 2000 SP3 on both servers, same Org, still on
> > mixed mode.  The users in both offices are all running Outlook XP.
> >
> > The weird thing is it's intermittent and it only seems to
> happen when
> > it's sent to a distribution list.
> >
> > I've been searching on the web and a lot of the articles point to
> > sending from exchange to a non-exchange mail server or sending to a
> > non-Outlook client.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carmila
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email message may contain information that is confidential and
> > proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party.  If you
> are not the
> > intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy
> the original
>
> > and any copies of the original message.  Babcock & Brown takes
> > measures to protect the content of its communications.  However,
> > Babcock & Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be
> > intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of
> > errors or viruses.
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






This email message may contain information that is confidential and
proprietary to Babcock & Brown or a third party.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original
and any copies of the original message.  Babcock & Brown takes measures
to protect the content of its communications.  However, Babcock & Brown
cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third
parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusi

RE: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name.

2003-06-10 Thread Morrison, Gordon

What address is being stamped by the RUS (Recipient Update Service) for the users 
experiencing the problem?(i.e. what is their primary SMTP address?)

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 9:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name.

Check the SMTP protocol logs at the exit point to your domain... Verify
the data is correct when it leaves your environment. If you can do this,
then start looking to them for issues...

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:16 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name.
Subject: Reply to bringing up wrong domain name.

We have one of our companies complaining that one of their clients are
having trouble replying to their email.  The client is saying when they
hit reply to an email they received from us, it changes the domain name
of their email address to one that is not one of their SMTP addresses.
Lets say their email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]  When the client replies
it automatically brings up [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Now, works.com would be our
main domain name, but our users who are sending does not have this
domain as an SMTP address.  The client says they don't have any contacts
to pull this address from?  We are running E2k SP3.  Any ideas other
than the contacts?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___NOTICE_
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited.  If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions, conclusions, and other 
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company.  When 
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
terms and conditions in the governing client contract.
___

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

additional display name? - same question, proper thread topic

2003-06-06 Thread Morrison, Gordon

Sorry for the repost.
It's Friday afternoon and I forgot about the thread topic field being a header field.
For those of you who sort by thread topic.


Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as 
distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to the same account?

E2ksp3

Thanks,
Gordon








.


___NOTICE_
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited.  If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions, conclusions, and other 
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company.  When 
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
terms and conditions in the governing client contract.
___

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

additional display name?

2003-06-06 Thread Morrison, Gordon

Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as 
distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to the same account?

E2ksp3

Thanks,
Gordon


























___NOTICE_
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited.  If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions, conclusions, and other 
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company.  When 
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
terms and conditions in the governing client contract.
___

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: EXMERGE ERROR

2003-01-29 Thread Morrison, Gordon

Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the
user mailbox?

-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR


I believe ExMerge can only be run against exchsrvr locally 

Tim.
x3683


-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: EXMERGE ERROR



 Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from their desktop and it
says you do not have permissions on the information store but you
actually do?
I found an article that mentions something about copying the
mapi32.dll file over...

Thanks,
Alex

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Public Folder Replica's

2003-01-13 Thread Morrison, Gordon

If you have subfolders that have different replica settings you need to be careful 
with this, as the propagation will wipe out those sub-settings (unless they have 
somehow fixed this with SP3).

i.e. 

server a,   -folder 1 replicates to server b and c
-folder 2, a subfolder of server a to replicates only to server b
-folder 1 is told to replicate to server D (in addition to B and C)
-When the replica setting (or permissions for that matter)
is propagated it replaces the settings on folder 2 with those
on folder 1 for the chosen categories (replicas, permissions, etc).



/Gordon


-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replica's


right click on the folder in ESM.  It's under all tasks. 

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:35 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Public Folder Replica's
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replica's


How do you propagate the settings?  I don't seem to be able to find the
switch for that.


-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Add a replica to each top level folder and then use the "propagate
settings" feature to cascade this to every sub-folder.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 January 2003 14:01
Posted To: Exchange 55 list server
Conversation: Public Folder Replica's
Subject: Public Folder Replica's


Does anyone know of a way to replicate all Public Folders at once?  We
are replacing a server with a new server and the new server already has
some public folders on it.  I am just trying to get away from having to
go through each folder individually.  We are running EX2000 SP3.  I have
already tried creating a system policy but that doesn't seem to work.  

Thanks in advance.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain 
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically 
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do 
not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the 
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will 
signify your consent to this.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

virus like behavior friendgreetings.com

2002-10-25 Thread Morrison, Gordon

I have had a couple of reports from users this morning saying that have received an 
email from people containing a link to an e-card at www.friendgreetings.com, when they 
click on it the web site starts going through their address book and emailing everyone 
an e-card on the user's behalf.  

acts like a virus, but doesn't look like one to scanners.  

/Gordon

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Exchange 2000

2002-09-24 Thread Morrison, Gordon



IS the website part of their trusted zones within IE?
Try having them hit the server by IP address and see if it works.  If it does, 
register the server with a second domain name in DNS (owabdi.cc, for example).  Do not 
include this second domain name in your trusted zones.


/Gordon

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000


I have seen this crap with MAPI Outlook, when the connection gets cached in named 
pipes and even a workstation reboot does not help. But OWA? What could be cached 
there?

-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000


That sounds exactly like what my problem is.  Except I'm not using a proxy of any 
kind.  They have a direct connection to the internet.  

Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000


I did not take this seriously the other day but now I have a user who can't get into 
OWA. The user belongs to a customer, a company in Brazil. She is not able to log in 
using a particular ID/password. Although she can log in fine using other 
ID/Password(s). There is nothing wrong with this particular ID/Password - I and many 
other people can log in fine from independent locations.

It looks like this user's IE (or proxy?) has cached a connection to a specific mailbox 
and now always wants to hit it, no matter what the logon credentials are. And if the 
credentials don't match the logon is denied.

My guess - something is wrong with the proxy.

-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Exchange 2000


Hello Everyone.
 
I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3.  I have two people that are 
having problems getting into OWA.  When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask 
them for a username or password.  It just goes strait into the inbox.  Any ideas? They 
are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine.
 
Thanks,
 
Greg Householder
Network Specialist
Bravo Development, Inc
Voice: (614) 340-9414
Fax: (614) 326-7943
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bestitalianusa.com  
.rí½¶à³zrmyzræ½´vi
.+--xm,)æ½£r(îº·\bé©½!áµ¶0ê§&zÇé¥±rä ¬:.Ë
mé[hyä\z[,âµ)réZ Zvhå³§+-iÙ¢2ä G(
.+--xm,)æ¹©r(íº·\bí¸½!å¦¶0â§&zÇà ±rà ¬:.Ë
mé[hyâ¹«\z[,æ³)rïZZvhá¯§+-iÙ¢2é¥G(
.+--xm,)Är(çº·\bí½½!æ¶¶0á§&zÇá±±rì¬¬:.Ë
mé[hy\z[,Ä)räZZvhç§§+-iÙ¢2îG(
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðÃ0w¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«rìyªÜ«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jxË0Êy¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³§Ê&

public folder replication issue

2002-09-24 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Environment:
2 e2k,sp2 servers in same administrative group, sitting right next to each other.

Problem:
Public folder are told to replicate between the two, while some obey this request, 
other, impudent folders replicate none or a portion of their backfill contents. New 
material appears to be replicating without issue.

I have attempted to delete and recreate folders without improving the success of 
replication.  Q312966 may be relevant, though while it lists an event that I am seeing 
in the event log, it doesn't describe the symptom of replication issues, so it may be 
unrelated to the issue I am seeing.

Any thoughts, suggestions?

Thanks,
Gordon




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PKI considerations

2002-09-20 Thread Morrison, Gordon





I am looking at adding PKI functionality to my network and am curious as to anyone 
else's experience with the performance impact of it in a production environment.  When 
I added a CA to my lab, suddenly all of my servers were grabbing certs off of it, and 
presumably using them.  I would expect this to cause some performance hit, but haven't 
been able to find anything giving me any kind of guide as too how much of a impact 
this might make on CPU and bandwidth.  Has anyone run across a document with this type 
of information or have this information from their own experience?

Thanks

/Gordon





















_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PKI considerations

2002-09-18 Thread Morrison, Gordon


I am looking at adding PKI functionality to my network and am curious as to anyone 
else's experience with the performance impact of it in a production environment.  When 
I added a CA to my lab, suddenly all of my servers were grabbing certs off of it, and 
presumably using them.  I would expect this to cause some performance hit, but haven't 
been able to find anything giving me any kind of guide as too how much of a impact 
this might make on CPU and bandwidth.  Has anyone run across a document with this type 
of information or have this information from their own experience?

Thanks

/Gordon





















_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Anonymous messages in the outbound queue - gradual topic shift

2002-08-13 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Has anyone played with using the filtering capabilities of e2k to filter out domain 
names and anonymous messages?  A quick stab at it caused messages to stack up in the 
directory lookup  queue (though it did drop the filtered messages appropriately).  
After removing the filter from the default SMTP server the messages that were not 
filtered out did come through

/Gordon

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anonymous messages in the outbound queue


It's normal. They're NDRs, and probably NDRs trying to go to the faked addresses used 
by spammers. Feel free to delete.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anonymous messages in the outbound queue


I've tried several things to prevent messages getting stuck in the
Outbound queue of the IMS it's like someone is relaying SPAM off of us. 
I've installed Trend Micro's InterScan 5 Messaging Security Suite and
tried to block anonymous messages that way.  Are they NDR's or messages to
user's that are no longer here? Normally I just delete them everyday but
I'm concerned that we're being a relay of somekind.  Is this normal for
Exchange 5.5

Thanks!
Karon


   

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other 
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When 
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Interesting spam filtering technology

2002-08-13 Thread Morrison, Gordon


That should be:

http://www.cloudmark.com

As opposed to could-mark...

-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon 
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Interesting spam filtering technology



While this is not meant to be an endorsement of any kind, I have found a kind of 
interesting web site I thought y'all might be interested in...

www.couldmark.com

On the positive side, it so far has not deleted anything that isn't spam.  On the 
negative side, plenty of spam still gets through, and it doesn't play terribly well 
with Pocket PCs.  It's kind of a neat concept though, where each user gets to be a 
node in a neural network deciding whether the messages they receive are spam.

/Gordon















___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other 
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When 
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other 
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When 
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: Interesting spam filtering technology

2002-08-13 Thread Morrison, Gordon



While this is not meant to be an endorsement of any kind, I have found a kind of 
interesting web site I thought y'all might be interested in...

www.couldmark.com

On the positive side, it so far has not deleted anything that isn't spam.  On the 
negative side, plenty of spam still gets through, and it doesn't play terribly well 
with Pocket PCs.  It's kind of a neat concept though, where each user gets to be a 
node in a neural network deciding whether the messages they receive are spam.

/Gordon















___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other 
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When 
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Move user native permissions

2002-07-17 Thread Morrison, Gordon


>From reading technotes, I am supposed to give anyone associated with doing user moves 
>Domain Admin rights (q259426).  It seems that this is so that the AD administration 
>can create a dynamic MAPI profile on the server. 

Is there a way to accomplish this without using Domain Admin Rights?

I would like to be able to have helpdesk staff from around the world to be able to 
deposit mailboxes in a transfer store which they all have access to, but only allow 
local IT staff to move mailboxes out of their local office Exchange servers.

Thanx,

Gordon






























___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for 
the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person 
is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the 
sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other 
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & 
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When 
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: stupid disclaimers

2002-06-06 Thread Morrison, Gordon

And another thing, If the disclaimer comes at the end of the message, what is the 
legal point?  The person has already gotten through all the confidential stuff they 
aren't supposed to look at in the first place...

-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers

Do you think her data was right?

I tend to think that the law of bailments applies to all e-mail and probably
trumps other legal arguments.  I don't think you can become a bailee by
force of someone else's actions.  I am not aware of this case having been
made in court yet, but it is sitting there waiting for the first lawyer that
needs it to grab it and go.

Also, disclaimers can be used against the one doing the disclaiming, as they
might in some circumstances provide prima fascia evidence that the person
doing the disclaiming was perfectly aware of the risks being assumed, and is
thus in no position to claim an exemption from responsibility.

Let's say I send you a note that is in effect an invitation to join a
pyramid scheme. Then at the bottom I add a disclaimer that says the
invitation is void if it is legally found to be a pyramid scheme.  Can I
play dumb or somehow exempt because of my disclaimer?  I don't think so.  In
fact, I think the disclaimer is tantamount to a confession.  

-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers

Not casting aspersions, and it may already be known to the list, but
Elizabeth should probably have disclaimered (sorry ) her message with a
comment about Clearswift's involvement with MIMEsweeper.

Gary

-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 16:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers

http://www.emaildisclaimers.com/

"There are several reasons why you might decide to add disclaimers to your
e-mails. The reasons can be categorized into two groups: legal and marketing
reasons. 

1. Legal reasons 

If you were to be so unlucky to be sued for the contents of an e-mail, it is
not certain whether an email disclaimer will protect you from liability in a
court of law. However, it will certainly help your case and in some
situations might exempt you from liability. More importantly, it may well
prevent the actual occurrence of lawsuits against your company since the
mere presence of the statement might deter most persons from seeking legal
compensation from your company. Therefore the use of disclaimers is always
recommended. There are 6 legal threats that disclaimers can help protect
against:

Breach of confidentiality: By including a disclaimer that warns that the
content of the e-mail is confidential, you can protect your company against
the exposure of confidential information. If the receiver breaches this
confidentiality, they could be liable. 

Accidental breach of confidentiality: If an employee were to receive a
confidential mail from someone and by accident forward it to the wrong
person, the employee, and therefore the company, could be liable. This can
easily happen. For instance a wrongly addressed e-mail can be forwarded to a
postmaster, who might not be authorized to read the mail. Furthermore,
e-mail can easily be intercepted. If you include a statement at the end of
your mail that the message is only intended for the addressee, and that if
anyone receives the e-mail by mistake they are bound to confidentiality,
this could protect you.  etc. etc."

-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers

I'm still fighting the battle of "we don't need no stinkin' disclaimers." So
far, I've won.

BTW, has anybody ever heard if those disclaimers actually hold up in court?

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers

Alright, alright.  There.  Fortunately Mailsweeper allows you to bypass by
adding personalmail in the body somewhere.  Are you happy?

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers

if it's a litmus test

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers

Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute "action"?

> -Original Message-
> From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
> 
> 
> I'm taking action on your message. I'm taking action on it right now. 
> Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah.
> 
> Tell your lawyers to get their $49.95 back from "J.D.'s 'R' Us."
> 
> --
> be - MOS

> 
> Noone ever built a statue to a critic.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > S

RE: OWA Access

2002-04-17 Thread Morrison, Gordon


have you looked at disabling/locking/changing the virtual directory via IIS?
I haven't tried it myself, but I'm guessing that if you went into a lab
environment and tweaked the default website\exchange folder, you could
universally disable OWA without needing to manage individual users.


-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 5:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Access


Hi,

Anyone know of a way to globally disable OWA access for Ex2K users. Deleting
the user is not really an option :)

I don't relish the prospect of going into Protocol Settings on every mailbox
and disabling the HTTP right for every user. Is there a quicker way ?

Regards
Mylo 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

limerick friday (In honor of St. Pats day)

2002-03-15 Thread Morrison, Gordon



On our network we have many AGs
our recipient policy does as it please
my mail lives in MA
but when time came to take messages away
It said that I lived in Belize

For some reason our automatic recipient policies (which we have added our
message retention policies to ) seem to be getting applied indiscriminately.
Has anyone else seen this behavior or have any explanation for it?  This
also seems to hold true with message addressing, in that a user located in
Atlanta may get an address stamp containing references to Zurich.   Again,
this seems to happen randomly and inconsistently.

As always your help is appreciated
/Gordon















.


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Identifying how much space is being taken up by deleted items and deleted mailboxes.

2002-02-22 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Perfmon does offer "total size of recoverable items, which would be
functionally equivalent to what you are looking for (i.e. how much space
could be retrieved if it were not for these tombstoned items), presuming
that what you want is not the total size of the database minus the total
size of actual messages (search on event ID 1221 in your event log).

/Gordon

-Original Message-
From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Identifying how much space is being taken up by deleted items
and deleted mailboxes.


Can someone please help.


1. I am trying to find out how much of our store is being taken up by
user deleted items and deleted mailbox's using Exchange 2000 SP1.

2. I have tried to look for perfmon counters to no avail, as well as
looking on technet for information.

3. Is there any where else to look other than perfmon?

Regards

Marc Mearns

Mobile - 07775-630508
Office  - 020 7695 0286 


**

 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify 
 the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).

 The format of address is:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
 MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

 J Sainsbury plc  (185647 England)
 Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited  (3261722 England)

 Registered Offices:
 33 Holborn
 London
 EC1N 2HT
 
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tweaking RGCs

2002-02-22 Thread Morrison, Gordon


That's what I thought as well.  However, what I am seeing is that if I have
a single RGC pair between two offices, and the connectivity between those
two offices drops: Any user who sends a message that needs that RGC will get
an NDR within a couple of minutes saying that a message loop was detected.
Since there is no other path for the message to take, it seems unlikely that
it can be a loop, and since it comes back within a couple of minutes, it
seems as though it is not using those SMTP settings.

-Original Message-
From: David Lemson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tweaking RGCs


The Delivery Report timeouts are set on the SMTP Virtual Server that
would generate it.  It doesn't matter what kind of connector is used.

-Original Message-----
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tweaking RGCs


Is there any way to tweak the amount of time (or number of retries)a
Routing Group Connector is willing to go through before giving up on a
message and generating an NDR? The general SMTP settings do not seem to
apply.

/Gordon























___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information
intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or
disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received
this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information
in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain &
Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the
Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in
this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing
client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tweaking RGCs

2002-02-21 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Is there any way to tweak the amount of time (or number of retries)a Routing
Group Connector is willing to go through before giving up on a message and
generating an NDR? The general SMTP settings do not seem to apply.

/Gordon























___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Microsoft breaks Mime specification

2002-01-22 Thread Morrison, Gordon

Here I thought it was just because they were talking and did a bad job of
pretending they were trapped inside a box...

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification

http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200201/msg0019
9.html

May wrap.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Is this really the case? Mixed mode requires much hardware?

2002-01-17 Thread Morrison, Gordon


I have a mixed mode org consisting of 5.5/2000 servers. 

 If I want to add an e2k server into its own administrative group into my
environment, do I have to build a corresponding 5.5 server if I want my 5.5
users to be able to email anyone on that server???
Likewise, do I have to wait to remove any 5.5 server until I have converted
every single user to e2k (presuming that I would actually want my 5.5 users
to continue to be able to communicate with my e2k users)?


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ExMerge Security Problems

2002-01-14 Thread Morrison, Gordon


If you use Q262054 as your guide, you could:
Method 1, create an exmerge importer account, which does not have
administrative permissions, but does have full rights to all user mailboxes
(assigned at the information store).
Method 3, it will still work as you tried even with the deny check boxes
showing, though you have to restart the services and log off and back on. 

-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ExMerge Security Problems


John,

Thanks for the advice.  So what would be the next thing to do?
Since the mailboxes are contained in the database file, do I
need to flag the database file itself, with full permissions
to the Administrator?

Regarding the Exchange Admin program, which part of the Tree
do I need to be in to perform the actions that you just
mentioned?  Are we talking about the Message Store that
holds the e-mail, or a different spot?

Thank you VERY much for your help - if I can tackle this, I
am home free (and will be a very happy camper).

Mike

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ExMerge Security Problems


You need to have user level permissions to the mailbox, either to import or
export via ExMerge. If you don't have user permissions (set on the
permissions tab in the Exchange admin program), you will not be able to do a
extract or import.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ExMerge Security Problems


Hello,

This is a continuation of the previous importing .pst thread.

I have since found that particular utility, and have playing
with it the ENTIRE day - with no success.

I made some progress, and I am now in the final stages of
conquering this problem.

The issue revolves around being logged in as "Administrator"
and by default, that particular account does not have the
"Send As" and "Receive As" security setting set to "Allow".

When I found the resolution in the Support area on the MS
Website, it said to simply set the security settings to
"Allow" and I should be able to run the ExMerge utility on
another User's Mailbox without any further problems.

However, the "Deny" setting is checked, and Grayed out which
means, it cannot be undone.  I am not sure how to attack
this problem and was wondering if any of you could help me
regarding this.

Thank you all in advance for your help.

Mike



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Administrative groups in Mixed Mode

2002-01-11 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Says I 
I says to him
more patience is what you need
15 miles an hour - fifteen minutes a hop
and replication will occur indeed!

-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Administrative groups in Mixed Mode



If I create a new server in e2k, 
and put it in a new Administrative group, 
is there any way to get that server to show up in 5.5? 

I can see the Administrative group - shows up, 
but without a 5.5 server - for the config_ca, 
I can't see how I can get the server -  to appear in 5.5
...Any help appreciated

/Gordon


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Administrative groups in Mixed Mode

2002-01-11 Thread Morrison, Gordon



If I create a new server in e2k, 
and put it in a new Administrative group, 
is there any way to get that server to show up in 5.5? 

I can see the Administrative group - shows up, 
but without a 5.5 server - for the config_ca, 
I can't see how I can get the server -  to appear in 5.5
...Any help appreciated

/Gordon


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Address generation stopped with no event logs

2002-01-10 Thread Morrison, Gordon


or try:

XADM: Recipient Update Service Does Not Stamp Users and No Error Is Logged
(Q297124)


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Address generation stopped with no event logs


You could try whacking up diagnostics logging on MSExchangeAL.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 January 2002 16:11
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Address generation stopped with no event logs
Subject: Address generation stopped with no event logs


When I create a new mailbox or mail enabled user, the addresses are not
generated anymore.  I have run and "update now" and a "rebuild" of the
recipient update service as well as waited 12 hours for the addresses to
update.  There are no event logs that indicate any errors.

Thanks,
Noah

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Public folder, hidden data

2002-01-03 Thread Morrison, Gordon


First, if anyone has a good resource for the bits and bytes Enterprise
public folder architecture, I would love to know of it. I seem to be
encountering alot of difficulties in the area, and am not finding much
material describing exactly how I should be able to expect them to behave
across administrative groups.

Now for the question:

I have a single 5.5 org composed of many sites that is being migrated to a
single e2k org of many Administrative groups.  Aside from my first migrated
site, public folders do not seem to want to replicate.  As a work around I
have taken to redirecting users on other servers to look to the server in
the first site (and replicating the 5.5 public folders there), but I really
don't want users in Asia to have to go half way around the world to find out
what their cafeteria is serving for lunch (not to mention things like
bandwidth and storage space).  Maybe I am overlooking something dumb, but my
head is getting pulpy from beating it against the server rack. 

 Has anyone encountered anything similar? The pub1.edb file does not change
from it's original size, the public folder instances under the first storage
group does not list the folders I tell to replicate.  I don't see anything
in the event logs that indicates any issues, and when I look under the
folder itself, it does list the local e2k server as a place it expects to be
replicated to.

Thanks for any help...

/Gordon


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: inactive directory

2001-12-10 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Thanks, this site was handy.  It turns out that the issues was with the
initial AD replication from DCPROMO.  When The initial replication happened,
not all of the required information came through.  From any GUI perspective
everything was there, but if you dug down into the SPNs, you could see that
not all data had been duplicated.  Since the bridgehead server had no way of
requesting information, it couldn't update the missing information.
Manually editing the SPNs on the bridgehead allowed directory replication to
occur and everything else to propagate over.  Thanks to PSS for their help
on this. Apparently this is a known issue, but the cause is unknown so there
is no technote about it.  

/Gordon


-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: inactive directory


http://www.eventid.net


































___


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: extensions to block

2001-12-07 Thread Morrison, Gordon

Personally, I would add in .com and .sys

-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: extensions to block

Ah, I noticed what was missing rather than what was excessive.  Yes, we
allow .TXT files as well as .JPEG and .GIF files.  Not sure about the video
formats; I think we block them but I'd have to go look at the list to be
sure.

We also allow .ZIP files (because we receive quite a few from legitimate
sources) but we scan them at the server and at the desktop with different
A/V products.

Aloha,

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com

> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: extensions to block
> 
> 
> We add .cmd & .bat but subtract .txt.  We also allow the 
> picture extensions. If you want to tick off your users you 
> can also block .doc, .xls, .ppt.  We just make sure to scan 
> them for known viruses before we pass them along (we do 
> quarantine password-protected documents because Sophos can't 
> check them out).
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:09 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: extensions to block
> > 
> > 
> > What list of extensions do you recommend to block infected
> > attachments?
>  
> This one? .js, .vbs, .exe, .txt, .zip, .scr, .pif, .lnk, 
> .avi, .mpeg, .jpeg, .gif, .mov
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

inactive directory

2001-12-07 Thread Morrison, Gordon


This may or may not be slightly off topic, but it is certainly hosing my
Exchange install.  My server seemed to build correctly, and seemed to be
happy becoming a DC and learning all of the DC things there is to know.
Other servers in my domain seem to have some idea that it is there, but
directory replication isn't working.  If I go onto the remote DC at the
other end of my Directory replication agreement, It doesn't even know that I
have Exchange.  It does fill the event log with ID 1411, 1265, and 1645,
which TechNet seems to be wholly unaware of.  Has anyone else seen this? 

/Gordon





_


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Moving users gets 9166 failure

2001-12-04 Thread Morrison, Gordon



When I attempt to move a user from 5.5 (nt4) to 2000 Using a particular
administrative account, I get " Could not connect to source server, Access
Denied". The thing is, I have set up trusts, and granted the account I am
using service account admin rights to the Org, Site, and configuration
containers (as well as explicitly stating it on the user mailbox for good
measure).  The account is also marked as an Exchange Full Administrator on
the e2k Admin group. I have also granted them local administrator rights on
the w2k server. I can map drives and open the mailbox from the admin
account, which would cover all of the permissions I would need I would
think.  My next best step is to try and reboot the servers and see if that
has any impact unless someone can has any suggestions.  BTW, it does work
with a different admin account that seems to have the same rights.

/Gordon


















.










___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA 2000 KISS

2001-11-15 Thread Morrison, Gordon

It worked for me!

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 2000 KISS

Are you sure?  Have you done that?  I'm not saying it won't work, but others
have had trouble getting that to work.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Carlson
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 2000 KISS

You are just trying to set it up so that they don't have to type the
extra \exchange on the end right?

You could also set the default website to point to the same virtual
directory that the \exchange virtual directory points to. I believe that
should work.

Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.domitianx.com

Master Of The Spoon People
Keeper Of None

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2k Disclaimers

2001-11-01 Thread Morrison, Gordon

One of many, my favorite is the vendor who sent mail to "Vain & Co."
Unfortunately I had to smash my head against a brick wall several times to
get that Carly Simon song unstuck.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers

Sounds like it is the Bain of your existence...

-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers

Other than it exists?  This message is coming from 5.5, where I don't have
to Get a c++ compiler to create the disclaimer.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers

Whats wrong with the disclaimer you are using now?

-Original Message-----
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2k Disclaimers

Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share for
disclaimers?

Aside from the fact that it seems sort of silly for Microsoft not to have
included this in the product except as a code example, it would be helpful
to us non developer administrators if some generous Administrator who has
already done this work could get it posted to
slipstick.com/techrepublic/etc

Thanks, or flame away,
Gordon

___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2k Disclaimers

2001-11-01 Thread Morrison, Gordon

Bork is for 5.5. I am looking for a precompiled disclaimer for e2k (hence
the subject line "e2k disclaimers").

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers

BORK

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
"If you think you are experiencing a memory leak, please be aware that
memory
leaks may not be what they appear to be.  You may discover that a memory
leak is
really not a memory leak but a performance enhancement" - MS KB article
268343

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Morrison, Gordon
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2k Disclaimers

Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share for
disclaimers?

Aside from the fact that it seems sort of silly for Microsoft not to have
included this in the product except as a code example, it would be helpful
to us non developer administrators if some generous Administrator who has
already done this work could get it posted to
slipstick.com/techrepublic/etc

Thanks, or flame away,
Gordon

___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2k Disclaimers

2001-11-01 Thread Morrison, Gordon

Other than it exists?  This message is coming from 5.5, where I don't have
to Get a c++ compiler to create the disclaimer.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Disclaimers

Whats wrong with the disclaimer you are using now?

-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2k Disclaimers

Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share for
disclaimers?

Aside from the fact that it seems sort of silly for Microsoft not to have
included this in the product except as a code example, it would be helpful
to us non developer administrators if some generous Administrator who has
already done this work could get it posted to
slipstick.com/techrepublic/etc

Thanks, or flame away,
Gordon

___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

E2k Disclaimers

2001-11-01 Thread Morrison, Gordon



Does anyone have code that they have compiled and are willing to share for
disclaimers?

Aside from the fact that it seems sort of silly for Microsoft not to have
included this in the product except as a code example, it would be helpful
to us non developer administrators if some generous Administrator who has
already done this work could get it posted to
slipstick.com/techrepublic/etc

Thanks, or flame away,
Gordon





___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Antigen on 2000 preferences?

2001-10-31 Thread Morrison, Gordon



Does anyone have any experiences good or bad with the AVAPI implementation
of Antigen for exchange 2000 vs. the traditional ESEAPI?  I have been very
happy with the ESEAPI, but Microsoft seems to indicate that the AVAPI is the
way to go, though it doesn't seem to work very well on the 5.5 side of
things


___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then
destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of Bain & Company shall
be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When
addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ADC makes me go hrmmm..solved?

2001-10-01 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Apparently a Recipient Update Service needs to be built for each site?
This is a single domain, so you wouldn't think it necessary. Once we started
doing this though, two way org level replication worked.  Does this seem
obvious to people, should I go feed myself to Narthyloptep (Cthulhu should
feed on better) as a low calorie, low brain snack? or is this just one more
example of a setting that you only find out about if you want to pay extra
(via time and effort, helpful places like this, or PSS) for a product that
works?

/Gordon

-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC makes me go hrmmm...


Thanks, but that isn't the case, I am creating users with such creative
names as "e2kserver1, user1", "e2kserver1, user2", etc. on the e2k servers.
Does anyone happen to know of a Q-note for safely ripping out ADC and
starting over?  I suppose that I could rebuild the lab -again-, but it would
be nice to be able to just back up this one step and start fresh.

I started out with 2 way connectors, and when that didn't work, I tried
using 2 one way connectors using the same e2k server thinking it would allow
me to more clearly see where the process was breaking down.  When that
didn't work I tried using a 1 way connector on one of the other e2k servers
hoping that would work.  ugh.

Also, does anyone know of a q-note that would explain in great detail the
mechanism by which ADC works.  I have found information about SIDhistory and
about LDAP, but nothing about its process, sort of:

step 1: connect to LDAP on 5.5, export list
step 2: connect to e2k, export list
step 3: compare fields x,y,z for matches, discard fields from both lists
where matches occur
step 4: massage 5.5 data for LDF import to e2k
step 5: massage e2k data to csv for import to 5.5
step 6: import data

This is my guess, but I would like to see it confirmed someplace.

BTW, the end goal of my testing is to try and prove the feasibility of
having a single 2 way ADC pulling from the ORG level of e2k and 5.5 and
dumping into a specified OU/site on the other side, creating enabled
accounts.  It seems as though the tool has the capability to do this, and if
so, would prevent the needless creation of a bazillion trusts and a
bazillion individual site level ADC connections.

I think the coffee is starting to kick in.

/Gordon

-Original Message-
From: Mike Putley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC makes me go hrmmm...


Could it be this - The users used to exist in the 5.5 org but have been
deleted? This will leave invisible tombstones of the users in 5.5 that
the ADC will not delete.

If this sounds like it might be you. Let me know and I'll show you how
to advance the tombstone deletion time closer that the 3-4 days min that
it will let you configure

Mike

-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC makes me go hrmmm...


In my lab I have set up two 1 way agreements.  One pulls all items from
my
5.5 directory and deposits it in an OU called "Legacy" as appropriate.
This
is great because it saves me from building bunches and bunches of ADCs
to
each site in my ORG.  

However...

When I try to build an agreement to take my w2k org and dump it into one
of
my 5.5 sites, I only get the users on the first site. It builds the
containers for the other sites and the system objects but no users. (I
do
have the 'users' check box checked.)

I have also tried to move the connector to other servers and build w2k
site
level specific containers to no avail.

Anybody else seen this or have any thoughts on other things I could
tweak?

/Gordon
|
|
|
| ___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information 
intended only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, 
copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  
If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
by reply e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions, conclusions, 
and other information in this message that do not relate to the official

business of Bain & Company shall be understood to be neither given 
nor endorsed by the Company.  When addressed to Bain clients, any 
information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and
conditions 
in the governing client contract.
_


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:

RE: ADC makes me go hrmmm.......

2001-09-26 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Thanks, but that isn't the case, I am creating users with such creative
names as "e2kserver1, user1", "e2kserver1, user2", etc. on the e2k servers.
Does anyone happen to know of a Q-note for safely ripping out ADC and
starting over?  I suppose that I could rebuild the lab -again-, but it would
be nice to be able to just back up this one step and start fresh.

I started out with 2 way connectors, and when that didn't work, I tried
using 2 one way connectors using the same e2k server thinking it would allow
me to more clearly see where the process was breaking down.  When that
didn't work I tried using a 1 way connector on one of the other e2k servers
hoping that would work.  ugh.

Also, does anyone know of a q-note that would explain in great detail the
mechanism by which ADC works.  I have found information about SIDhistory and
about LDAP, but nothing about its process, sort of:

step 1: connect to LDAP on 5.5, export list
step 2: connect to e2k, export list
step 3: compare fields x,y,z for matches, discard fields from both lists
where matches occur
step 4: massage 5.5 data for LDF import to e2k
step 5: massage e2k data to csv for import to 5.5
step 6: import data

This is my guess, but I would like to see it confirmed someplace.

BTW, the end goal of my testing is to try and prove the feasibility of
having a single 2 way ADC pulling from the ORG level of e2k and 5.5 and
dumping into a specified OU/site on the other side, creating enabled
accounts.  It seems as though the tool has the capability to do this, and if
so, would prevent the needless creation of a bazillion trusts and a
bazillion individual site level ADC connections.

I think the coffee is starting to kick in.

/Gordon

-Original Message-
From: Mike Putley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC makes me go hrmmm...


Could it be this - The users used to exist in the 5.5 org but have been
deleted? This will leave invisible tombstones of the users in 5.5 that
the ADC will not delete.

If this sounds like it might be you. Let me know and I'll show you how
to advance the tombstone deletion time closer that the 3-4 days min that
it will let you configure

Mike

-----Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC makes me go hrmmm...


In my lab I have set up two 1 way agreements.  One pulls all items from
my
5.5 directory and deposits it in an OU called "Legacy" as appropriate.
This
is great because it saves me from building bunches and bunches of ADCs
to
each site in my ORG.  

However...

When I try to build an agreement to take my w2k org and dump it into one
of
my 5.5 sites, I only get the users on the first site. It builds the
containers for the other sites and the system objects but no users. (I
do
have the 'users' check box checked.)

I have also tried to move the connector to other servers and build w2k
site
level specific containers to no avail.

Anybody else seen this or have any thoughts on other things I could
tweak?

/Gordon
|
|
|
| ___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information 
intended only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, 
copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  
If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
by reply e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions, conclusions, 
and other information in this message that do not relate to the official

business of Bain & Company shall be understood to be neither given 
nor endorsed by the Company.  When addressed to Bain clients, any 
information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and
conditions 
in the governing client contract.
_


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|
| ___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information 
intended only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, 
copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  
If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
by reply e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions, conclusions, 
and othe

ADC makes me go hrmmm.......

2001-09-25 Thread Morrison, Gordon


In my lab I have set up two 1 way agreements.  One pulls all items from my
5.5 directory and deposits it in an OU called "Legacy" as appropriate.  This
is great because it saves me from building bunches and bunches of ADCs to
each site in my ORG.  

However...

When I try to build an agreement to take my w2k org and dump it into one of
my 5.5 sites, I only get the users on the first site. It builds the
containers for the other sites and the system objects but no users. (I do
have the 'users' check box checked.)

I have also tried to move the connector to other servers and build w2k site
level specific containers to no avail.

Anybody else seen this or have any thoughts on other things I could tweak?

/Gordon
|
|
|
| ___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information 
intended only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, 
copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  
If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
by reply e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions, conclusions, 
and other information in this message that do not relate to the official 
business of Bain & Company shall be understood to be neither given 
nor endorsed by the Company.  When addressed to Bain clients, any 
information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions 
in the governing client contract.
_


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC Awards 2001

2001-08-23 Thread Morrison, Gordon


Doesn't your footnote apply to children just as well?


Ahh.. such great encouragment once can receieve from this list.

With the imminent birth of my second, my joy is turning into fear or the
unknown.(1)

--rex

1) At least with a computer it does what I expect it to do. Very logical and
orderly.(2)
2) Except for those occasions when it does something totally unexpected. (3)
3) Usually those unexpected things can be traced back to my own silly
actions at some point.

-Original Message-
From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001


Like you can't imagine.

> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
> 
> 
> That must have hurt.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> All your base are belong to us.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rosenthal,
> Daniel A.
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
> 
> 
> You don't want to be away from home now...I had my second in 
> March and still
> can't leave!
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
> >
> >
> > airlines won't let a women who is due in 6 days fly.. liablity risk.
> >
> > Orlando is a bit too far to drive from Chicago.. Besides the
> > need to stop
> > ever hour for her to go to the bathroom, there is the risk of
> > her going into
> > labor and giving birth in the car.. or during one of the
> > keynote sessions..
> >
> > Naw.. I'll just have to pass this year and hit MEC next year.
> >
> > --rex
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:16 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001
> >
> >
> > You could bring your wife ...
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Choi Rex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:50 PM
> > Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
> >
> >
> > > *sigh*
> > >
> > > I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is
> > due with our
> > 2nd
> > > baby the first week of October.
> > > Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem
> > like a good
> > time
> > > to skip out for a week..
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001
> > >
> > >
> > > What about Best Fish Tacos?
> > >
> > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> > > Tech Consultant
> > > Compaq Computer Corporation
> > > All your base are belong to us.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A.
> > > Glazener
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: MEC Awards 2001
> > >
> > >
> > > The deadline is Monday at noon Seattle time.  You should seriously
> > > consider nominating your product/solution(s) for at least
> > one of these.
> > > They are global, and you don't have to exhibit at the MEC
> > to win.  Visit
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2001/awards.asp for more
> > > information and to enter.
> > >
> > > There are 10 categories:
> > >
> > >- Best Solution by a Partner
> > >- Best Solution by a Customer
> > >- Best Developer Tool
> > >- Best Infrastructure Product
> > >- Best Management Tool or Utility
> > >- Best Use of Mobile Technologies
> > >- Best Productivity Solution
> > >- Best Use of Workflow
> > >- Best Vertical-focused Solution
> > >- Best Use of XML
> > >
> > > Please see the Web site for more information.
> > >
> > > Earnie Glazener
> > > Microsoft
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:

E2k migration permissions question

2001-08-16 Thread Morrison, Gordon



In our test environment, every time I migrate a users mailbox by right-click
method.  I then have to manually assign the user permissions to access their
own mailbox.

Is this right

Have I overlooked some obvious setting someplace? Feel free to point me to a
technote. If there is one that is relevant, I haven't found it. 

Thanks,
Gordon
















|
|
|
| ___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information 
intended only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, 
copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  
If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
by reply e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions, conclusions, 
and other information in this message that do not relate to the official 
business of Bain & Company shall be understood to be neither given 
nor endorsed by the Company.  When addressed to Bain clients, any 
information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions 
in the governing client contract.
_


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

43 matches

Mail list logo