RE: Hardware requirements for Front end/ Back end server -- EX2003

[Neil Hobson]

Just to add to this thread.  If you do implement SSL on the back-end, it
can cause a bit of a config headache in the future if you want to add
OMA and ActiveSync.  Basically, with SSL present, you cannot simply use
the default configuration for ActiveSync and OMA - new virtual
directories must be created.

One thing I will say in favour of the FE setup is that things like
ActiveSync and OMA are pretty much easier to setup once the FE is in
place.  Also, you get additional OWA features on the FE, such as the
ability to do a Reply, Reply All and Forward to public folder posts.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Posted At: 13 January 2004 13:33
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Hardware requirements for Front end/ Back end server --
EX2003
Subject: RE: Hardware requirements for Front end/ Back end server --
EX2003


You do not need a FE/BE setup.

Any decently modern hardware will barely notice 100 users. Besides, a
FE/BE setup doesn't really reduce the CPU load on the mailbox server
unless you are doing SSL.

Also, to do FE/BE you need the enterprise version of exchange (at least
for Exchange 2000 - not sure about E2k3). (Two servers + two enterprise
licenses) / 100 users = extremely high email cost per user! 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JohLex
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hardware requirements for Front end/ Back end server -- EX2003


Dear All,

I am getting ready to upgrade an Exch 5.5 system running on NT4 to Exch
2003 on Win 2003 and am trying to decide whther or not to use a front
end server. I will have approx. 100 users accessing this server via
POP3/IMAP and another 30 or so via OWA. Additionally I will have another
200 mailboxes in house.

If somone could point me to a web site where I could find some
definitive info on this or share any personal experiences I would be
very grateful.

Thanks and best regards.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, or if you believe this email is unsolicited 
and wish to be removed from any future mailings, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Internet Mail Issues

[Neil Hobson]

Shirley you can't be serious? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Posted At: 07 January 2004 16:54
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Internet Mail Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues


Who is Shirley Comcast?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of East, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues

Shirley Comcast will allow you to relay your outbound mail through their
MXed, reverse-DNSed mailhost, right? If so, just point your Exchange
server to relay all outbound mail through them.

If not, ditch Comcast. They're not a business-class ISP in my opinion,
at least.

--
be - MOS

Replace repetitive expressions by calls to a common function.


> -Original Message-
> From: Crista Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:51 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Internet Mail Issues
> 
> 
> I have a client who is migrating away from an ISP hosted POP mail 
> account to a newly created exch 2003 box and we're experiencing "5.5.0

> smtp;550 Dynamic IPs/open relays blocked. Contact 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]", "5.5.0
> smtp;550-68.37.144.103 blocked by
> blacklist.mail.ops.asp.att.net." and to aol "Could not deliver the 
> message in the time limit specified."  I've contacted both earthlink 
> and att/comcast and both insist that the new server is not blacklisted

> and a quick search on ORDB shows we are not blacklisted (The server 
> had only been up 4 hours and we were getting this message from
> att/comcast!) I've locked down the server and we're not allowing relay

> so I'm thinking it might be reverse dns, but comcast (our isp) won't 
> allow us to host reverse dns or set up an entry for us.
>  Before we shutdown the server and get an new ISP that will allow 
> reverse dns, does anyone else have an idea?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, or if you believe this email is unsolicited 
and wish to be removed from any future mailings, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs

[Neil Hobson]

Agreed on that.  When I give customers the overall choices, i.e. spread
users randomly across databases and reduce risks to common groups of
users if a database fails, or group certain types of users together on
the same database based on the need to collaborate and therefore improve
SIS, they nearly always choose the former option.

As far as I can see, SIS is taking more of a back seat these days.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Posted At: 07 January 2004 16:46
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange 2k3 store configs
Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs


My general design plan (which may not be applicable here) is to worry
more about the storage group level. I'd design a SG with 4 private
information stores and create those databases at the outset. Then
through day to day operations, I distribute users over those storage
groups. I'd rather have 4 5GB databases in a single storage group than 1
20GB database. Now, there's some SIS downside to that approach, but in
general I tend to like it and if necessary try to group users with like
job functions on a particular database to improve SIS if it is really an
issue. YMMV

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:23 AM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 2k3 store configs
Subject: Exchange 2k3 store configs

I am setting up a plan to restructure our exchange DB config.  Currently
we have 3 DBs.  1 with a mix of companies that is very large (65GB).
The others are 4 to 5GB a piece and are one Exec DB and one company DB.
I started to go the departmental route to separate DBs, but then that
idea was soon realized to created trouble since we have people who
shuffle around a lot here.  What are larger orgs like some of you doing
with your config?  I was thinking company Dbs with a 20GB limit.  After
the 20GB was reached I would then create a second instance of the same
company DB2 and so on for all of our companies.  Just looking for some
input an recommendations of what is the best practice.  Thanks.

Michael Woodruff
System Administrator
inChord Communications Inc. 
A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited
visibility
614.543.6405
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, or if you believe this email is unsolicited 
and wish to be removed from any future mailings, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

RE: HTTP error 404 and OWA

[Neil Hobson]

Does OWA work on the back-end server only?

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web
Posted At: 22 December 2003 21:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: HTTP error 404 and OWA
Subject: HTTP error 404 and OWA


I have a FE/BE configuration with Exchange 2003. When I use the URL
http://FE server/Exchange, I get the Window's Security popup but after
login I get two frames each of them with HTTP error 404, File or
Directory not found. I do not have URLScan nor have I run IISlockdown
tool.

Any help would be appreciated.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, or if you believe this email is unsolicited 
and wish to be removed from any future mailings, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

[Neil Hobson]

I think Ed's answer was appropriate given the amount of information you
gave out in your first post.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Posted At: 22 December 2003 15:22
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?


The document management suggestion was inappropriate because we have a
single document that 2 people have modify rights to and another dozen or
so people can read. So deploying a DMS is an expensive solution when the
problem boils down to preventing 2 people from modifying one particular
file at the same time. Especially if there is an inherent method within
Exchange to prevent the problem from happening in the first place, which
is really all I wanted to know.

Thank you for your answer though.

Jason 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

The answer was correct.  What Ed left out was the "No." at the front in
answer to your question of whether there is any way to prevent multiple
editors of an attachment to a public folder.

Did you go look at the 80-20 web site and see what features there
product offers?  What exactly makes the suggestion of a product which
may solve your problem inappropriate?  There are also lots of others
with different feature sets as Ed alluded.

As for little value to the thread, complaining because you didn't get
the answer you wanted regardless of the veracity of the answer really
has low value.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jason Clishe
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

"Deploy a real document management system"? Not only does this
suggestion not asnwer the question I asked, it is completely
inappropriate for my particular situation, and adds little value to this
thread.

Jason

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?

Deploy a real document management system, one that has the capability to
check out and check in documents.

http://www.80-20.com is one that integrates with Exchange.  There are
many others that may or may not integrate with Exchange.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?


When a user has a Public Folder attachment open, other users can also
open the same attachment and make changes. Is there any way to prevent
this? For example, to force the document to open as read-only when
someone else has it open?

Jason



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended 

RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?

[Neil Hobson]

Definitely.  On an Exchange server with more than 1GB RAM, Advanced
Server is recommended so you can apply the /3GB switch to boot.ini.

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Miles
Posted At: 05 December 2003 09:16
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Ideal setup for exch 2003?
Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?


Almost identical to our field server specification!  Although, I'd
consider Advanced Server, simply because we are having a hell of a job
with virtual memory fragmentation errors on similar systems with similar
amounts of memory.  It would appear that Advanced Server handles memory
in a different way to "ordinary" Server.

Cheers,

Miles

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: 04 December 2003 15:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ideal setup for exch 2003?


Exchange 2000 and 2003 can make good use of dual processors.  The
configuration will vary based upon the load and number of users you are
supporting, but here's an example of the system I just ordered for my
company:

Dell PowerEdge 4400
Windows 2000 Server
Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition
Dual Pentium-4 Xeon 2.8 GHz Processors
2.0 GB of Dual channel DDR RAM  (4 x 512 MB DDR) 4-channel PERC Raid
card

Disks:
2 x 18.2G 10k rpm drives [RAID-1] = C:\ (OS Drive)
2 x 18.2G 15k rpm   drives [RAID-1] = D:\ (Directory Store + SMTP
Queue
+ Swapfile)
4 x 73G 15x rpm drives [RAID-5] = E:\ (Information Store)
2 x 36G 15k rpm drives [RAID-0] = F:\ (Secondary Swapfile + free space
for doing Information Store maintenance)

Quantum VS160 Tape Drive (80/160GB)

Note: For those of you who have been following my saga, I was finally
able to get the executive board to approve $$$ for a new server NOW
instead of 1/2004.  I guess when you equate mail downtime to dollars and
cents, they tend to listen more closely to the IT guy!

E

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: W2k3 Server/Exch2K3 Server Upgrade order

[Neil Hobson]

Why install W2k3 first if that renders Exchange 2000 useless?!

I was using Outlook 2003 first, as were some others in the office here.
We in-placed upgraded to Exchange 2003.  Windows 2003 is being applied
this weekend.  Clients can go any time really, but the best features
will be had when on W2k3/E2k3.

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 19 November 2003 14:00
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: W2k3 Server/Exch2K3 Server Upgrade order
Subject: W2k3 Server/Exch2K3 Server Upgrade order


I have an existing W2000 Server/Exchange 2000 Server/Outlook 2000
Clients setup. What is the proper order to upgrade to W2K Server/Exch2K3
Server/Outlook 2K3 Client? Should I install Exchange 2K3 first? Should I
install W2K3 first ( which renders Exch 2000 useless because Exch 2000
Server is not supported and does not work with Windows 2003 Server)?
Save the clients for last or can they be done at any time? Appreciate
any help, direction or comments provided. Thanks,  Brian

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disk Space Threshold

[Neil Hobson]

You mean you want to know what the minimum space requirement is before
the Exchange services shut down, like the Exchange 5.5 MTA shuts down
where there's 10MB or less disk space?  I don't know what they are for
Exchange 2000.  :-(

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT)
Posted At: 18 November 2003 19:04
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Disk Space Threshold
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold


Ben,

None of that is what I asked for.

But thanks.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold


BTW - all this information I got was simply from the Help file. Searched
for Threshold and it brought up lots of info.  It is a great source for
information like this.  F1 is your friend :-) 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz
Posted At: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:55 PM Posted To: Exchange
(Swynk)
Conversation: Disk Space Threshold
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold


I read your e-mail.  I provided a solution that will prevent that from
happening in the future.  You didn't say that you didn't require help
with the badmail directory, so I didn't know you'd already fixed that.

So what you want is this?


Free Disk Space

To ensure that enough disk space is available to use virtual memory and
store application data after an application is closed, use the server's
Monitoring tab to add performance limits. When the amount of available
memory falls below a specified limit, the free disk space monitor is
identified on the Monitoring tab with a warning or critical state icon.
You can set a limit for a warning or a critical state, or you can set
both limits.

To set limits for free disk space:

If you have not already done so, select an Exchange 2000 Server monitor
for Free Disk Space, and then click OK. 
In Disk Space Thresholds, in Drive to be monitored, select an available
drive. 
To set a warning state threshold, select the Warning state (MB) check
box, and then type a number in MB that identifies the smallest amount of
disk space on which your server should operate before a warning icon
appears. 
To set a critical state limit, select the Critical state (MB) check box,
and then type a number in MB that identifies the smallest amount of disk
space on which your server should operate before a critical state icon
appears. 


Note   If you also set a warning state limit, the value for the critical
state limit must be less than the warning state limit.

If you want to monitor multiple hard disks on your server, repeat these
steps to add a monitor for free disk space for each drive. 


Tip   To view the current amount of free disk space, on the Monitoring
tab, click the Free Disk Space monitor you just created, and then check
the display in Current available drive space (MB). 

Combined with this?

Exchange 2000 Monitors

The Monitoring tab is available on every computer running Exchange 2000
Server. This tab allows you to define the parameters within which your
server's hardware and software should function before a warning or
critical state icon is displayed; for example, if your server has a 10
GB hard drive dedicated to Exchange, make sure that databases and logs
have no less than 10 GB of memory to use. Once resource monitor
thresholds are met or exceeded, the monitor displays a warning icon on
the Monitoring tab and in the Status window. Regular maintenance should
include checking the Status window and the Monitoring tab of each server
to see whether resources are low and additional resources, such as
memory, are required to ensure server operation. 

To monitor a server:

Start System Manager: On the Start menu, point to Programs, point to
Microsoft Exchange, and then click System Manager. 
Cannot Start the Application
You can manually start the application by following these instructions:
On the Start menu, point to Programs, point to Microsoft Exchange, and
then click System Manager. In the console tree, double-click Servers,
right-click a server, and then click Properties. 
Click the Monitoring tab. 
To monitor a new server resource, click Add. 
Select one of the following resources, and then click OK: 
Virtual Memory
CPU Utlization
Free Disk Space
SMTP Queue Growth
Windows 2000 Service
X.400 Queue Growth
Related Topics


Verify Server and Connector Status

  


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:43 PM Posted To: Exchange
(Swynk)
Conversation: Disk Space Threshold
Subject: RE: Disk Space Threshold


Ben, please actually *read* my e-mail.

Anyone?  It wasn't in the Monitoring and Status in ESM.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[

RE: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise

[Neil Hobson]

It's an incredibly uneventful procedure.

1.  Take a backup.
2.  Insert CD - run setup and choose to reinstall.
3.  Apply service pack.

Pretty boring stuff really.

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Posted At: 12 November 2003 22:40
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise
Subject: Exchange 2000 Standard to Enterprise


We are preparing to upgrade from Exchange 2000 Standard Edition to
Exchange 2000 Enterprise Edition and I wanted to know if anyone out
there has done this procedure before? Can you give me some ideas what to
expect? Have you run into any problems? How long does it take and what
impact does it have on the server.

I appreciate any input you can offer.



Thanks...

Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ccul.org 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store Size Question

[Neil Hobson]

The 16GB limit applies to the size of the EDB and STM files added
together.

Also, see this:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/09/temporarily_inc.html

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Posted At: 11 November 2003 06:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Information Store Size Question
Subject: Information Store Size Question


I wanted to run this question by the experts to see if I could get a
definitive answer. Our Private Store database reached it's 16GB limit
and, on looking at the files, we found that the Priv.edb file was only
12.4GB. Can anyone tell me how Exchange 2000 figures the 16GB for the
size of the store? Is there some explanation for the missing 3.6GB? I
appreciate your input.
 

Thanks...

Ray Beckwith
Network Administrator
California Credit Union League
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ccul.org 


Thought for the day:
A good scientist is a person with original ideas. A good engineer is a
person who makes a design that works with as few original ideas as
possible. There are no prima donnas in engineering.
--Freeman Dyson



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange Limits

[Neil Hobson]

It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this sort of question.  There's no right
or wrong answer.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible
Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:23
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange Limits
Subject: Exchange Limits



Exchange 2000 SP3

Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server
and on idividual mailboxes?  I had originally set a 4mb limit on the
SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4
years.  Some "select" staff complained and corporate had me remove both
limits.

I'm looking for ammunition to bolster my case to reinstate the limits.
Do any of you use these settings, if so where do you set them?

Thanks for your help!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam

[Neil Hobson]

This is the first one, if you mean by "first" the admin exam, and
"second" the design exam.

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:08
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Subject: RE: Exchange 70-224 Exam


Is this the first one or the second one? The second one was a pain in
the butt - very long with a lot of stuff to read through, plus it
crashed on me twice  :)

The first one is pretty straightforward.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam

Any advice before I take this exam?  This is my first MCP test so I'm
kind of nervous.  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA on Windows 2003 Web Edition?

[Neil Hobson]

No.

I've covered some of the basic rules here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/upgrading_to_ex.html

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Finnesey
Posted At: 03 November 2003 03:18
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: OWA on Windows 2003 Web Edition?
Subject: OWA on Windows 2003 Web Edition?


Can I install Exchange 2003 OWA on Windows 2003 Web Edition?



Ryan





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm

[Neil Hobson]

Scanning drive M: with file-level AV can increase the size of the STM
file.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin
Posted At: 30 October 2003 00:34
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm
Subject: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm


All advice appreciated...

We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000
environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in
"cached exchange mode".

In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to
approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart from normal mail
services).

Why would this have happened? Is it not related to the introduction of
Outlook 2K3? Is it related? I have not yet run esutil, as there are
other space issues this has now highlighted (and means until I free up
some space elsewhere I can't run it, knowing I need approx 110% free
space, and we now only have 1.79GB free on the drive the db's live on).

I have searched the MS-KB and come up with nada. Ideas, suggestions all
welcome...

Thanks,

themolk. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Tumbleweed

[Neil Hobson]

Really?  I thought it rolled. 

-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Tumbleweed
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed


Tumbleweed rocks.


-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed


Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K
users.

Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(  425.254.4845
)   425.681.4190
2   425.793.6000
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed

Last time I used Tumbleweed, it did not care whether it was used with
Exchange or any other mail system. It was installed on a separate
machine
and talked SMTP on port 25 with the Exchange server.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed

We use it here at Hilton. Exchange 2000, with about 10k users.

-A

-Original Message-
From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tumbleweed


Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000?

Thanks

Richard Tracy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MS Instant Messaging

[Neil Hobson]

Download the Migration Guide.  I wrote about LCS documents here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/10/live_communicat.html

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 October 2003 17:35
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: MS Instant Messaging
Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging


Were you using IM on EX2000?  Is there a migration tool?

 - Matt

-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging

We are using Live Comm. Server here in a pilot environment and it is
working great. We plan to roll it out right along side our Exchange 2003
migration.

Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(  425.254.4845
)   425.681.4190
2   425.793.6000
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Instant Messaging

It worked 50% of the time for me on Exchange 2000.

It actually worked 100% IF I had Windows 2000 for a client. For some
reason Windows 98, ME, and XP clients act differently.

Sincerely,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion


-Original Message-
From: Aaron Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MS Instant Messaging

Does anyone here have much experience with IM server implementation?
Could anyone at least refer me to some good documentation or reference
material. There seems to be precious little out there, from Microsoft or
otherwise.

Thanks!
-A


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions

[Neil Hobson]

Log on Locally is no longer required for OWA.  This change came with
E2k.

As for your problem, see this:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=327843

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 24 October 2003 23:47
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: OWA versus NTFS permissions
Subject: RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions


yes logon locally in place in the w2k member server were owa resides.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:26
PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange List Server
Conversation: OWA versus NTFS permissions
Subject: RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions


Permission granted for users to log on locally?  See the archives for
extensive discussion...

David

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange List Server
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA versus NTFS permissions


Hi all

W2K-AD nativemode (1 forest, 1 tree, 1 domain)
MSX2000+SP3 (mixedmode) running in a W2K+SP4 member server.

The only account able to use OWa is the exchangeadmin account, all other
users got "Error: Access is Denied" after 3 tries. I have followed the
Microst Article Q317471 and still does not work.

Any suggestions? 

thx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch 5.5 Routing Question

[Neil Hobson]

GWART!  :-)

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 October 2003 20:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
Subject: Re: Exch 5.5 Routing Question


I believe the Qwart file takes care of that in 5.5 which was elliminated
in 2000.


From: "Woods, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:08:19 -0800

Hello,

Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP4 boxes. 1 ORG, 3 Sites (A, B, C) in three
different cities across N.A.

I have 2 x400 connectors setup in each location. Each site is setup the
same
in that they all have two x400 connectors, each going to one of the
other
sites. If the VPN link between Site A and Site C goes down and site C is
trying to send mail to Site A, will Site C route it's mail through Site
B to
get to Site A? If not, how can I make this so? Thanks in advance.

Cheers,
Tony

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Want to check if your PC is virus-infected?  Get a FREE computer virus
scan 
online from McAfee.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003

[Neil Hobson]

In the Front-End Toplogy guide whitepaper from Microsoft on Exchange
*2000*, that's the recommended approach. 

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 21 October 2003 22:25
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Upgrade 2000 to 2003
Subject: RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003


I just got out from Exchange 2003 Server training and our instructor
told us that Microsoft has changed their position about putting Front
End servers in DMZ areas.  They are now recommending that put all Front
& Back end servers in your local network then use Proxy solutions to
have your Front End servers to talk to outside of your network.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 7:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrade 2000 to 2003

Can I please have comments on the following plan?

The current setup:

EX01, an Exchange 2000 Enterprise edition server sits on our LAN.  In
our DMZ we have MIS01, a Mobile Information Server 2002 server. (both
these servers are member servers in the AD)

Also in our DMZ, we have a workgroup win2k server which acts as our SMTP
gateway for Exchange.

Users access OWA on EX01 by connecting to our firewall using https, and
the firewall NATs that through to EX01.

All of that works fine.


The plan:

Taking advantage of our Software Assurance, upgrade EX01 to Exchange
2003 enterprise edition.

Buy a license for Exchange 2003 Standard edition, and install that on
MIS01, configure as front end server for OWA, connecting to mailboxes on
EX01

Re-jig so MIS01 is also acting as our SMTP gateway, probably retaining
the workgroup server as a backup MX

MIS functionality (serversync, OMA, etc) is included in Ex2003, so we
don't need MIS2002 anymore.



Thanks in advance.


Regards,

Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange 2000

[Neil Hobson]

Make sure you make the changes in Exchange System Manager, and not IIS
Manager, otherwise they'll be overwritten by a sub-process of the System
Attendant called DS2MB.

As for the red icons, that's a benign error:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=259373

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 13 October 2003 15:11
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in
Exchange 2000
Subject: Problems with IIS settings for Exchange and Public in Exchange
2000


Having a strange problem here where IIS won't hold on to the folder
security settings we want in place for our users.  We've changed them to
Basic Authentication for the Exchange site, and Anonymous for the Public
site.  Any time the server is rebooted it loses these settings and goes
back to the defaults that came with Exchange.  Additionally, it seems to
lose track of the paths for these sites, that is, the path is there in
the settings correctly, and the path itself does exist (the M: drive),
but IIS thinks that the path does NOT exist (red Error icon exists in
IIS Manager) until you go in and browse to the path and then it finds
it.

Has anyone run into this before?  

Thanks,

Matt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RFC postmaster address in exchange 2000 with IP

[Neil Hobson]

Watch out for URL wrap:

http://www.msexchange.org/articles/Exchange_2000_PostmasterIP_And_AbuseI
P_Mailboxes.html

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: Ted Mosher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 07 October 2003 16:12
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: RFC postmaster address in exchange 2000 with IP
Subject: RFC postmaster address in exchange 2000 with IP


Does anyone know how to set a postmaster alias in Exchange 2000 that is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address]? I have a client who got on a blacklist and the
only way off is to reply to a message that they send that would be in
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address] format (including the brackets) - outlook
wont even send to an address with brackets...





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ExMerge for Exchange 5.5

[Neil Hobson]

http://mvps.org/exchange/Exmerge.htm

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 06 October 2003 14:07
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: ExMerge for Exchange 5.5
Subject: ExMerge for Exchange 5.5


 Hello,

   Does anyone know where I could get a copy of the Emerge tool if I
don't have the Microsoft CD's it comes in? This is for an Exchange
5.5/NT4 server...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Trending and Monitoring

[Neil Hobson]

MOM will do most of this for you, but you may also want to consider an
additional product like Promodag Reports or MessageStats from Quest.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 12 September 2003 14:55
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: OT: Trending and Monitoring
Subject: OT: Trending and Monitoring


Another R.F.I

Who uses and would recommend (or decommend) a product for:

-Monitoring (uptime, services, hardware, usage, event logs) Exchange
Servers (and if possible, mailflow inlcuding UNIX SendMail)

-Trending (log usage, performance, mailflow and delivery times) Exchange
Servers (and if possible, mailflow including UNIX SendMail)

TIA...

Ali

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Storage limts not working

[Neil Hobson]

Does this fit the bill?

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=327378

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 15 August 2003 14:44
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Storage limts not working
Subject: Storage limts not working


Exchange 2k sp3.  A user went over our storage limits and cant send.  I
changed her account so she doesn't have any limits until she sends out
these important emails while she is on the road.  The exchange server
isn't reflecting the change though even after I ran the RUS with no
errors?  Any ideas?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Secondary smtp addresses in exchange 5.5

[Neil Hobson]

Ah, that old chestnut!  Use a column 'secondary-proxy-addresses'.  See
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=148339

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 12 August 2003 11:44
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Secondary smtp addresses in exchange 5.5
Subject: Secondary smtp addresses in exchange 5.5


Although Exchange administrator allows me to add additional smtp
addresses I can see no way of doing it via import. Putting 2 smtp
addresses in the import file causes an error. Adding an additional
address via import using the append multi valued properties selected
just overwrites the original address.

And exporting the email addresses only shows the primary address.

Anyone know a way round this?

Harriet Wood

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Neil Hobson]

If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported.  That's no.3 in the list here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:06
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Neil Hobson]

Sure.  I don't fear in-place upgrades from 2000 to 2003 like I did from
5.5 to 2000, though.  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:26
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


They don't have to be in place upgrades correct?  We can bring in a new
Exchange 2003 FE server into the Admin Group and then remove the old?
Thanks. 

-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

I'd be inclined to make all FE servers E2k3 first, since the
non-supported possibility always exists otherwise.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:21 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


Here is my structure...  I have a FE and a few BE servers.  I want to
bring in a new Exchange 2003 server for our upgrade and move all of our
users over to it the remove our Exchange 2000 servers.  So I cant bring
in a Exchange 2003 BE server and keep our Exchange 2000 FE right?  I
would eithor have to not make it a BE server or I would have to upgrade
our current FE to Exchange 2003 first.  Damn, that sucks.  I don't trust
in place upgrades, so how would one go about upgrading the FE?  Can you
have two FE servers (Exchange 2k and 2k3) in the same Administrative
Group?  Thanks.

-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported.  That's no.3 in the list here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:06 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:

RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

[Neil Hobson]

I'd be inclined to make all FE servers E2k3 first, since the
non-supported possibility always exists otherwise.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 06 August 2003 13:21
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


Here is my structure...  I have a FE and a few BE servers.  I want to
bring in a new Exchange 2003 server for our upgrade and move all of our
users over to it the remove our Exchange 2000 servers.  So I cant bring
in a Exchange 2003 BE server and keep our Exchange 2000 FE right?  I
would eithor have to not make it a BE server or I would have to upgrade
our current FE to Exchange 2003 first.  Damn, that sucks.  I don't trust
in place upgrades, so how would one go about upgrading the FE?  Can you
have two FE servers (Exchange 2k and 2k3) in the same Administrative
Group?  Thanks.

-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3

If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported.  That's no.3 in the list here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 06
August 2003 13:06 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
Subject: Upgrade of FE to E2K3


>From Q822942

-For front-end and back-end servers that are in the same administrative
group, you must upgrade the front-end servers to Exchange 2003 (or
install Exchange 2003 on the front-end server) before you upgrade the
back-end server to Exchange 2003 (or install Exchange 2003 on the
back-end server).


Does this include bringing in a completely differnet and new server into
the group (swing method) or do I definitly need to upgrade our FE to 2k3
before adding our first 2k3 server to the Admin Group?  Thanks. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick question...

[Neil Hobson]

Indeed.  I knocked up a script to remind me weekly of the size of
Badmail, and I've put it up here:

http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/dealing_with_ba.html

It wouldn't be too difficult to make it automatically delete the
contents, too.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 06 August 2003 17:32
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Quick question...
Subject: RE: Quick question...


You might not want to delete the ones in the queue folder.  Besides you
probably can't anyway since they are in use.  Are they of large size and
maybe taking a little while to be sent?  The badmail you can safely
delete. 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick question...

Hi, Exch 2000
I have items in my badmail directory  - most recent from 28/07/03 and I
also have items in my mailroot\vsi1\queue folder.
Can I delete these items?  Nothing is showing up in my queue thru system
manager Thanks

Support Analyst
TKC Group Ltd
Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est
Keynsham
BS31 1TZ
UK
0117 916 1320


This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  It should not be deemed to
constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s)
unless a purchase order number is quoted.  Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of TKC Group Ltd.  If you are not the intended
recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return
it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email.

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Messages stuck in queue

[Neil Hobson]

Please do!

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 04 August 2003 15:28
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue


Tried that also, just opened a ticket with MS.  I'll let everyone know
what they say.

Jason


>From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
>Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:09:38 +0100
>
>Also, if you restart the SMTP VS or reboot, do things improve?
>
>Neil
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Neil Hobson
>Posted At: 04 August 2003 15:05
>Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
>Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
>Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
>
>
>Hmmm...not an easy to troubleshoot, that one.  I'm not sure how much 
>you've already ruled out, but:
>
>1. Whack up the MSExchangeTransport event logs to see if any more info 
>is given.
>2. Verify DNS connectivity is OK, e.g. nslookup, etc.
>3. Can you telnet to another server from this server on port 25 and 
>send mail manually?
>
>Try those first.  If all else fails, there's always smtpreinstall.exe 
>on the E2k CD.
>
>Neil
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 04 August
>2003 14:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
>Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
>Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
>
>
>The handle is invalid
>
>Jason
>
>
> >From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
> >Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:49:53 +0100
> >
> >If you right-click the actual queue and bring up the properties, what

> >does the status say?
> >
> >Neil
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 04 
> >August
> >2003 14:35 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
> >Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
> >Subject: Messages stuck in queue
> >
> >
> >One of my exchange servers is failing to route messages.  They are 
> >all stuck in either a queue to our other exchange server or in an 
> >internet mail queue.
> >   We're running Exchange 2k SP3 and Win2k SP3.  Any ideas?  Ive 
> >searched technet and google and haven't found anything useful.
> >
> >Jason Rader
> >Printpack Inc
> >
> >_
> >Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
> >
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Web Interface:
> >http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mod
> >e=
> >&
> >lang=english
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >__
> >
> >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> >intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
addressed.
> >Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
> >not necessarily represent those of Silversands.
> >
> >If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
> >Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >http://www.silversands.co.uk
> >
> >
> >_
> >List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> >Web Interface:
> >http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mod
> >e=
>&lang=english
> >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
>http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Web Interface:
>http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=
>&

RE: Messages stuck in queue

[Neil Hobson]

Also, if you restart the SMTP VS or reboot, do things improve?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson 
Posted At: 04 August 2003 15:05
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue


Hmmm...not an easy to troubleshoot, that one.  I'm not sure how much
you've already ruled out, but:

1. Whack up the MSExchangeTransport event logs to see if any more info
is given.
2. Verify DNS connectivity is OK, e.g. nslookup, etc.
3. Can you telnet to another server from this server on port 25 and send
mail manually?

Try those first.  If all else fails, there's always smtpreinstall.exe on
the E2k CD.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 04 August
2003 14:52 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue


The handle is invalid

Jason


>From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
>Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:49:53 +0100
>
>If you right-click the actual queue and bring up the properties, what 
>does the status say?
>
>Neil
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 04 August 
>2003 14:35 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
>Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
>Subject: Messages stuck in queue
>
>
>One of my exchange servers is failing to route messages.  They are all 
>stuck in either a queue to our other exchange server or in an internet 
>mail queue.
>   We're running Exchange 2k SP3 and Win2k SP3.  Any ideas?  Ive 
>searched technet and google and haven't found anything useful.
>
>Jason Rader
>Printpack Inc
>
>_
>Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Web Interface:
>http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=
>&
>lang=english
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>__
>
>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
>intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
>not necessarily represent those of Silversands.
>
>If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
>Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>http://www.silversands.co.uk
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Web Interface: 
>http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=
&lang=english
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Messages stuck in queue

[Neil Hobson]

Hmmm...not an easy to troubleshoot, that one.  I'm not sure how much
you've already ruled out, but:

1. Whack up the MSExchangeTransport event logs to see if any more info
is given.
2. Verify DNS connectivity is OK, e.g. nslookup, etc.
3. Can you telnet to another server from this server on port 25 and send
mail manually?

Try those first.  If all else fails, there's always smtpreinstall.exe on
the E2k CD.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 04 August 2003 14:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue


The handle is invalid

Jason


>From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
>Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:49:53 +0100
>
>If you right-click the actual queue and bring up the properties, what 
>does the status say?
>
>Neil
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 04 August 
>2003 14:35 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
>Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
>Subject: Messages stuck in queue
>
>
>One of my exchange servers is failing to route messages.  They are all 
>stuck in either a queue to our other exchange server or in an internet 
>mail queue.
>   We're running Exchange 2k SP3 and Win2k SP3.  Any ideas?  Ive 
>searched technet and google and haven't found anything useful.
>
>Jason Rader
>Printpack Inc
>
>_
>Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Web Interface:
>http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=
>&
>lang=english
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>__
>
>This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
>intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
>not necessarily represent those of Silversands.
>
>If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
>Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>http://www.silversands.co.uk
>
>
>_
>List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>Web Interface: 
>http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=
&lang=english
>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Messages stuck in queue

[Neil Hobson]

If you right-click the actual queue and bring up the properties, what
does the status say?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 04 August 2003 14:35
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
Subject: Messages stuck in queue


One of my exchange servers is failing to route messages.  They are all
stuck in either a queue to our other exchange server or in an internet
mail queue. 
  We're running Exchange 2k SP3 and Win2k SP3.  Any ideas?  Ive searched
technet and google and haven't found anything useful.

Jason Rader
Printpack Inc

_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade Questions

[Neil Hobson]

How true.  It's funny that, when faced with MSMail, a lot of the
knowledge does creep back into the brain eventually!  :-)


-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:56
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade Questions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions


Meh.

Whatever does the job.


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 16:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions


We had a customer request MSMail support late last year.  We all ran for
cover.

Neil


The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient
or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential
information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the
intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in
reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
the sender immediately and delete from your system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade Questions

[Neil Hobson]

We had a customer request MSMail support late last year.  We all ran for
cover.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:50
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade Questions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions


I wonder how many organisations are still running NT 3.51 or MS Mail?

Paul

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 16:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions


Feel sorry for my last employers, who were local government.  They're
still running Lotus Notes.  Names witheld to protect the guilty.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:16
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade Questions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions


Or local government ;-)

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 July 2003 16:15
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
> 
> 
> You've never worked for a bank, have you?
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:13 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
> > 
> > 
> > Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, 
> > Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: 
> > Exchange Discussion List
> > Conversation: Upgrade Questions
> > Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
> > 
> > Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0
> Domain will be
> > upgraded to Win2K AD?   :)
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Upgrade Questions
> > 
> > Hello All.
> > 
> > This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active
> Directory.
> > Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows
> 2000 Advanced
> > Server.  I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange 
> > server when the PDC upgrades?  Once the PDC is upgraded, the
> Exchange server
> > will
> > be joined automatically to AD, right?  What things do I
> need to do on
> > the
> > Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade?  
> > I will be
> > upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know 
> > what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the 
> > Exchange 5.5 server.
> > Do I need to do nothing at all?
> > 
> > What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used?
> > During
> > the Exchange 2000 upgrade?
> > 
> > Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers.
> > 
> > Samantha
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&
> lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___

RE: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

[Neil Hobson]

I fancy trying this over-invoicing of old contracts technique; a few
carefully-maniuplated funds wouldn't go amiss.  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:46
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Subject: RE: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL


Oh my :)  Please, I want to help!



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 


-Original Message-
From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 1980 1:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL


FROM THE DESK OF THE CHAIRMAN: 
SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF
WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). 

DEAR PARTNER, 

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL

WE ARE MEMBERS OF A SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR BUDGET AND PLANNING OF THE
FEDERAL MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING(FMWH). THIS COMMITTEE IS
PRINCIPALLY CONCERNED WITH CONTRACT AWARDS AND APPROVAL. WITH OUR
POSITIONS, WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY SECURED FOR OURSELVES THE SUM OF THIRTY
ONE MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS (US$31.5M).
THIS AMOUNT WAS CAREFULLY MANIPULATED BY OVER-INVOICING OF AN OLD
CONTRACT. 

BASED ON INFORMATION GATHERED ABOUT YOU, WE BELIEVE YOU WOULD BE IN A
POSITION TO HELP US IN TRANSFERING THIS FUND (US$31.5M) INTO A SAFE
ACCOUNT. IT HAS BEEN AGREED THAT THE OWNER OF THE ACCOUNT WILL BE
COMPENSATED WITH 30% OF THE REMITTED FUNDS, WHILE WE KEEP 60% AS THE
INITIATORS AND 10% WILL BE SET ASIDE TO OFFSET EXPENSES AND PAY THE
NECESSARY TAXES.

WE INTEND TO USE PART OF OUR OWN SHARE TO IMPORT FROM YOUR COUNTRY
AGRICULTURALAND CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY. THIS IS BECAUSE THE PRESENT
GOVERNMENT OF MYCOUNTRY IS EMPHASISING ON PROVIDING FOOD AND HOUSING FOR
ALL ITS CITIZENSBEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION. HENCE,AGRICULTURAL AND
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ARE IN HIGH DEMAND OVER HERE. WE SHALL ALSO NEED
YOUR ASSISTANCE IN THIS REGARD ON A COMMISSION TO BE AGREED UPON WHEN WE
FINALLY MEET. 
ALL MODALITIES OF THIS TRANSACTION HAVE BEEN CAREFULLY WORKED OUT AND
ONCE STARTED WILL NOT TAKE MORE THAN SEVEN (7) WORKING DAYS, WITH YOUR
FULL SUPPORT.

THISTRANSACTION IS 100% RISK FREE. IF THIS PROPOSAL SATISFIES YOU,PLEASE
REACH US ONLY BY EMAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION. 

PLEASE, TREAT AS URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT. 

YOURS FAITHFULLY, 

DR.JOHN MARK.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Upgrade Questions

[Neil Hobson]

Feel sorry for my last employers, who were local government.  They're
still running Lotus Notes.  Names witheld to protect the guilty.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:16
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade Questions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions


Or local government ;-)

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 July 2003 16:15
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
> 
> 
> You've never worked for a bank, have you?
> 
> --
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:13 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
> > 
> > 
> > Don't know the date, but it will probably be the military.
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, 
> > Andrey Posted At: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:30 AM Posted To: 
> > Exchange Discussion List
> > Conversation: Upgrade Questions
> > Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
> > 
> > Who wants to start placing bets on when the last NT 4.0
> Domain will be
> > upgraded to Win2K AD?   :)
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:49 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Upgrade Questions
> > 
> > Hello All.
> > 
> > This weekend we will be upgrading our NT 4.0 PDC to Active
> Directory.
> > Currently, my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server is running Windows
> 2000 Advanced
> > Server.  I am a bit confused as to what will happen to my Exchange 
> > server when the PDC upgrades?  Once the PDC is upgraded, the
> Exchange server
> > will
> > be joined automatically to AD, right?  What things do I
> need to do on
> > the
> > Exchange server to prepare it for this weekends PDC upgrade?  
> > I will be
> > upgrading Exchange 5.5 to 2000 in two weeks, however I need to know 
> > what I should do for the preparation of the AD upgrade on the 
> > Exchange 5.5 server.
> > Do I need to do nothing at all?
> > 
> > What is this ADC (Active Directory Connector) and when is this used?
> > During
> > the Exchange 2000 upgrade?
> > 
> > Thanks for any clarification, comments and answers.
> > 
> > Samantha
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&
> lang=english
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com

RE: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000

[Neil Hobson]

I've gone as far as disabling services and rebooting sometimes.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 25 July 2003 16:20
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000
Subject: RE: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000


As stated in the original msg I did that. 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000

Shut down all extraneous services. Server agents, backup agents, all AV
agents, etc.
Manually stop Exchange, and IIS as well. 

-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000

Windows 2000 SP3 Advanced Server
Exchange 2000 SP3 with Post SP3 Rollup
Trend Micro Scanmail 6.1
Trend Micro Server Protect 5.5
IIS Lockdown 2.1 using Exchange 2000/OWA template URL Scan Installed

When I install SP4 for Windows 2000 on this box I get the following
errors:

Unable to write ScriptMaps metabase entry

and

Failed to execute regsvr32.exe. Error code: 5.

We always shutdown all AntiVirus Software but in addition I have tried
the
following:

Removing IIS Lockdown and URL scan
Still got same errors

Shutting down all IIS related services
Shutting down all Exchange related services Shutting down all SNMP
related services
Still got same errors

I am Domain Admin with full rights to this box anyone got any ideas?

Also nothing shows up in the event logs these are just window pop-up
errors.

I have successfully installed SP4 on 2 other Exchange 2000 servers with
no problems and nothing different except for hardware.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RUS not working to child domain?

[Neil Hobson]

4 commons ways RUS can break are below.  They may not all be appropriate
to you, but I've cut & pasted them from a word doc of mine.  :-)

1) RUS configuration references a deleted DC or E2K server, or the
servers defined in RUS configuration are flakey at best.  Browse both
entries and choose alternates, if available.

2) Inheritable permissions are removed on an OU and the RUS is no longer
able to reach the objects within it.  (Q297124)

3) RUS is unable to generate email addresses because it is unable to
locate a third party email address generator (DLL file).  This can occur
in mixed environments where an Exchange 5.5 server had fax software or
the like installed.  Exchange 2000 builds its recipient policies based
on Ex55 site addressing (which includes the third party address).  Since
the DLL does not exist on the E2K server used by the RUS, the RUS will
fire Event IDs 2035, 2037, and 2027 if MSExchangeAL
logging is set to max.  (Q286356)

4) If the RUS encounters a distribution list that has its membership
hidden, it will not be able to stamp it with mail attributes and will go
to sleep. (Q287137)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 25 July 2003 15:32
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS not working to child domain?
Subject: RE: RUS not working to child domain?


Chris,

Thanks for the suggestion.  Tried it this morning and Domainprep ran
quite quickly (much more quickly than I've ever seen it run when truly
prepping a domain for the first time)...  

Unfortunately the problem persists.  Further suggestions would be warmly
welcomed.

Joe Pochedley
Weiler's Law - Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do
it himself.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: RUS not working to child domain?


Might try rerunning domainprep as well in that domain... Don't think it
would hurt anything anyway.

On 07/24/03 14:41, "Joe Pochedley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Kind ladies and gentlemen, once again I come forth seeking your
> assistance...
> 
> A number of months ago we began integrating the systems of a company
we
> purchased with our own.  As part of the consolidation we added their
> network to our existing AD as a child domain.  We consolidated email
> servers to a single server.  Adding Exchange mailboxes for their child
> domain accounts went smoothly.  Once the RUS to their child domain was
> added, all the information replicated to the GAL just as I expected
and
> they had live mailboxes...  Now, for some reason RUS no longer appears
> to be working properly with the child domain...  Changes to accounts
> (spelling changes in names for instance) aren't reflected in the GAL
and
> new accounts in the child domain never appear in the GAL.  RUS appears
> to be working fine within the main domain though.
> 
> I've tried to force an update and a rebuild in RUS, neither of which
> made a difference.
> 
> I've turned logging for MSExchangeAL (LDAP, Service Control, and
Address
> Book Synch) to Max, but I don't see any failures or warnings (just a
lot
> of informational messages which I've perused but can't discern
anything
> that looks like a problem).
> 
> I've verified connectivity to the remote child DC which is configured
in
> the RUS (MSKB 294222) by both short name and FQDN.   I even tried
> changing to another DC in the child domain with no effect.
> 
> I've removed and rebuilt the RUS to the child domain.
> 
> I believe that the Exchange Enterprise Servers have proper permissions
> all the way through the child domain per MSKB 328223 (they shouldn't
> have changed since the initial accounts were put in, and everything
> worked OK when I added the first 60 or so accounts)...
> 
> I'm hoping someone else can give a suggestion as to where to
investigate
> next.  Everything looks like it SHOULD be working properly.
> 
> As always, thanks in advance for any assistance!
> 
> Joe Pochedley
> Weiler's Law - Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to
do
> it himself.
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=e
> nglish
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.co

RE: corrupted calendar

[Neil Hobson]

Get it from PSS; that's where I got mine.  It'll be free, too.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Joe Haines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 18 July 2003 15:49
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: corrupted calendar
Subject: corrupted calendar


Anybody know where i can download a copy of scancal 


thanks for your help

***
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is
privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves
the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email
address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG
email system. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Online Maintenance

[Neil Hobson]

No, not 'always'.  The key thing is to make sure the online maint window
is outside of your backup window, otherwise the backup process will halt
the maintenance.  01:00 - 07:00 is ok.  If the window is larger than is
required by the process, multiple runs of the maintenance take place.
Check your event logs to see how long the maint runs take and adjust if
necessary.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 18 July 2003 13:38
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: IS Online Maintenance
Subject: IS Online Maintenance


Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server

The online defrag runs daily.  I see it scheduled for 1:00a.m. to
7:00a.m.
every day.  Is this OK?  Just wondering if I should change this.  What
is the recommended time for Online maintenance to run and for how long?
Their is a radio button for "Always"should it always be running?

Thanks

Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT - MS Outlook mailing list

[Neil Hobson]

The Yahoo Groups Outlook list:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Neil

-Original Message-
From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 09 July 2003 09:17
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: OT - MS Outlook mailing list
Subject: OT - MS Outlook mailing list


Does anyone know of good mailing high traffic mailing list on MS
Outlook?
Thanks.
+++
Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch
http://www.druknet.bt

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2k log reporting

[Neil Hobson]

Promodag is good, as is MessageStats from Quest (www.quest.com)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 09 July 2003 13:51
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange 2k log reporting
Subject: Exchange 2k log reporting


All,
 
I would be interested on feedback on what you all use to monitor and
report on Exchange 2000 e-mail usage. I was using Melia for 5.5 but when
we upgraded the Exchange 2000 version was not ready. I am currently
testing Promodag so I would be grateful of any experience of this
package but also any other packages that you guys recommend. I need to
monitor 2 exchange servers in separate administrative groups and would
like to be able to report on a team by team basis, and also report on
public folders
 
TIA 
 
-Mark

Mark Condron
ICT Manager
 
Tel:  029 2043 1740
Fax:  029 2043 1701
Minicom:029 2043 1702
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wcva.org.uk
www.volunteering-wales.net
 
Wales Council for Voluntary Action (WCVA) Registered Charity: 21809
Company Limited by Guarantee: 425299 Registered in Wales


--
--

CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any
action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the
material whether stored on a computer or otherwise.

-- 

DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specipically
stated.

-- 

   Wales Council for Voluntary Action, 
 Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square,
 Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH

Registered Charity: 21809

Company Limited by Guarantee: 425299
Registered in Wales

Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 

Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.wcva.org.uk


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The spam that gets through

[Neil Hobson]

That all sounds very familiar!  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 09 July 2003 12:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: The spam that gets through
Subject: RE: The spam that gets through


We still do that seat of the pants. We ask the users to forward the
message, intact, to our postmaster group, and we manually analyze it in
a completely unscientific manner.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -Original Message-
> From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 6:27 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: The spam that gets through
> 
> 
> Some of our users use the Delete key - yours truly included - but some

> of them want the spam to analysed further and blocked in the future. I

> guess my question was phrased badly, so I'll rephrase it:
> 
> How do you handle users who receive spam that want that source of spam

> blocked on the filters? (I'm not speaking from a tehcnical angle of 
> tracing the spam, more of an organistional angle)
> 
> > 
> >
> > > Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people 
> > > out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters?
> > > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The spam that gets through

[Neil Hobson]

Trend InterScan Messaging Security Suite I believe, although I don't
administer our internal systems.  The guys that do happended to mention
that SurfControl was way better at catching spam.  I'll see if I can
find some figures.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 08 July 2003 21:19
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: The spam that gets through
Subject: RE: The spam that gets through


What were you using previously, and how many messages enter it from the
Internet in a day?

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.




-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:55 AM Posted To: Exchange
Discussion List
Conversation: The spam that gets through
Subject: RE: The spam that gets through


If it gets past the database of known spam (we use SurfControl), then it
also undergoes a keyword scan.  Sometimes this blocks legitimate mail,
which is a PITA.  I've removed myself from the keyword scanning, as I
was spending more time getting messgaes released than I was dealing with
spam.  It doesn't bother me to delete a few messages.  If it gets past
the keyword scan, then sometimes we evaluate the text, and we add in
specific rules to combat that particular message.  For example, we can't
see much communication involving septic tanks within our normal
day-to-daty activities.  :0)

The manual adding is not very scalable I admit.  But SurfControl's spam
datbase is catching 3x the amount of our previous product.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:45
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: The spam that gets through
Subject: The spam that gets through


Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in
list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The spam that gets through

[Neil Hobson]

I've just shaken my head and sighed at today's OOF messages I've got.
:-)

Including Liam Murphy at HP who I used to work with.  Hi Liam!

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:47
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: The spam that gets through
Subject: RE: The spam that gets through


I usually shake my head then kind of sigh. 

-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: The spam that gets through

Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in
list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The spam that gets through

[Neil Hobson]

If it gets past the database of known spam (we use SurfControl), then it
also undergoes a keyword scan.  Sometimes this blocks legitimate mail,
which is a PITA.  I've removed myself from the keyword scanning, as I
was spending more time getting messgaes released than I was dealing with
spam.  It doesn't bother me to delete a few messages.  If it gets past
the keyword scan, then sometimes we evaluate the text, and we add in
specific rules to combat that particular message.  For example, we can't
see much communication involving septic tanks within our normal
day-to-daty activities.  :0)

The manual adding is not very scalable I admit.  But SurfControl's spam
datbase is catching 3x the amount of our previous product.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:45
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: The spam that gets through
Subject: The spam that gets through


Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in
list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000

[Neil Hobson]

If OOF isn't working at all for this user, it could be that this user's
OOF message is corrupt.  Try the following:

The OOF message is a hidden entry in the user's mailbox.  The Out of
Office Assistant creates a set of two rules in the Inbox subtree.

The first contains a Message Class of
IPM.Note.Rules.Oof.Template.MicrosoftMessage with a field,
PT_String8=MSFT:TDX OOF Rules. The other rule contains a Message Class
of IPM.Note.Rules.OoFTemplate.Microsoft. If one or both of these rules
are corrupted or unsynchronized with the OOF-enabled indicator, then
it's possible that the Out Of Office notification may no longer work.

To resolve this, use the Mdbvue32 utility from the Exchange Server 2000
CD-ROM or the Exchange 2000 Server service pack to delete the two
entries for Out of Office. Export the user Rules from Outlook (client
and server), then use MDB Viewer to manually remove all Rules from the
mailbox.  To do this:

1. Find mdbvu32.exe in the \support\utils directory on any of the
Exchange Server CDs.
2. Run mdbvu32.exe.
3. Click OK to clear the first window that pops up.
4. Make sure that your profile is selected in the Choose Profile window
and click OK.
5. Click on the MDB menu option.
6. Click on the OpenMessageStore option.
7. Make sure that "Mailbox- [user's full name]" is selected and click on
Open
8. Click on the MDB menu option again.
9. Click Open Root Folder.
10. In the Child Folders box - double click on "Top of Information
Store".
11. In the next Child Folders box - double click on "Inbox".
12. Look in the Associated Messages in Fld box. (All of your rules are
in this box).
13. Once you find the rule that you want to delete then close the
properties for that rule.
14. On the MAPI_FOLDER page make sure that the rule that you want to
delete is still highlighted.
15. In the "Operations available (select operation, then push Call
Function button)" text box, push the drop down button to reveal the list
of functions.
16. Scroll down the list of functions until you see "lpFld ->
deleteMessages() (ON SELECTED MSGS)" and then click on it to select it.
17. Next press the Call Function button. This will delete the rule that
you selected.
18. Press the Close button to exit the MAPI_FOLDER window.
19. Press Close again to exit the next window.
20. Press close again to exit the last window.
21. Click on the MDB menu option.
22. Click Store Logoff. (Then click OK and OK again).
23. Click Session and then click on Exit.

Microsoft KB articles that address this issue are:
Q297281 XADM: Out of Office Message Is Not Sent
Q255509 OL2000: (CW) How to Use the Out of Office Assistant
Q253138 XADM: Mdbvu32.exe to Delete Delegate Rules in a User's Mailbox

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 27 June 2003 10:38
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000
Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000


Isn't allowing Out of Office replies to the Internet a great thing :-)

-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussion
Sent: 27 June 2003 10:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOOF Outlook98 and Exchange 2000


Only tested Internally, I don't like allowing Out of Office responses to
the Internet ;-)

Regards
David

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 2003 with Exchange 2000

[Neil Hobson]

Sure we do, but sometimes it's nice to have some info on setting up "the
lab".  :-)

Mike - just run the ExDeploy utility supplied on the E2k3 CD - it covers
step-by-step several scenarios of installation, including deploying an
additional E2k3 server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 27 June 2003 05:42
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange 2003 with Exchange 2000
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 with Exchange 2000


"I was hoping to set it up and move a couple mailboxes over to it to
start playing with it."

Uh huh... Yeah.  We ordinarily call that "a lab". 

-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 with Exchange 2000

Is there a howto or white paper on setting up an Exchange 2003 as a
second server to an Exchange 2000 server? I was hoping to set it up and
move a couple mailboxes over to it to start playing with it.

Any gotchas or "look out fors" that I should know about?

Thanks,
Mike


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP Connector based on REPY address

[Neil Hobson]

Put all ben.com and bill.com users in separate groups, then use Delivery
Restrictions on each SMTP Connector.  Should do the trick.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Pike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 20 June 2003 14:53
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: SMTP Connector based on REPY address
Subject: SMTP Connector based on REPY address


> Hi all,
> 
> I don't know if this is possible without a bit of programming but can 
> you create an SMTP connector based on a domain's reply address (Both
> Exch5.5 and Exch2000).  
> 
> i.e. mail from @ben.com over connector 1 and mail from @bill.com over 
> connector 2
> 
> Any help as always gratefully received.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Andrew
> 

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
_

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2K machine services hanging on starting

[Neil Hobson]

More of a script than a reg hack...

It's a part of my standard E2k server build!

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=305145

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 13 June 2003 17:08
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: E2K machine services hanging on starting
Subject: RE: E2K machine services hanging on starting


There's a reg hack that will hide the M: and put that part of the issue
to bed for good.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Dann
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K machine services hanging on starting


Acknowledged that the M drive is special, can't say it is non existent
as it appears in the folder tree. The question is more about how to
avoid the interactions that cause the hanging behaviour. 

Knowing the mechanism of the lockup would be useful. Setting the
exclusion on an anti virus product should be easy, the backup agent
shouldn't need configuration to exclude drives, that is something done
when specifying a backup. This is why I suspect dependencies may be an
issue (the basic backup agent wouldn't know about Exchange).

If anyone has seen this behaviour it would be interesting to know what
they found. If it hasn't been seen then maybe I should be looking for a
cause not related to Exchange.

regards,
Richard Dann

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 June 2003 19:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K machine services hanging on starting


As I'm sure everyone will tell you shortly, there is no M: drive.  It
does not exist.  Make sure nothing tries to touch the non-existent M:
drive, especially AV products.

David

-Original Message-
From: Richard Dann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K machine services hanging on starting


I've got an Exchange 2000 SP3 machine running on a security hardened W2K
SP3
machine. If I attempt to run an anti virus product on the non Exchange
files
I've had problems with services hanging on starting (if the AV was
allowed
to scan the M drive all sorts of things started locking up).

I've also tried installing a backup application (HP Omniback) to allow
backup to a large tape silo. this caused similar problems (SRS service
showed up as Starting, unable to start or stop other services) until I
set
it to manual start and let everything else start first. 

Has anyone seen similar problems? Do I need to set a dependency for the
backup service or is there something more fundamental going on?

regards,
Richard Dann

 Telenor Business Solutions, a division of international telecoms
organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service
Provider.
For further information, visit
http://www.telenorbusinesssolutions.co.uk. 

With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair
quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail
are
that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any
statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Telenor Business Solutions, a division of international telecoms
organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service
Provider.
For further information, visit
http://www.telenorbusinesssolutions.co.uk. 

With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair
quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail
are
that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any
statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&

RE: RUS problems

[Neil Hobson]

There were issues with the system attendant's detection logic that could
potentially result in stuck threads, causing issues such as the RUS not
stamping addresses.  I don't recall seeing that myself, but a system
attenant service cycle is a quick and free sanity check before calling
PSS!

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 09 June 2003 15:56
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems


Nope Not yet.  I am going to reboot tonight. 


-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Out of interest, have you at any point cycled the System Attendant
service on your E2k box?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:41 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems


I checked all of this.  I don't get any errors in the application log
except the one mentioned.  Everything is set to maximum logging.  I'm
stuck. 


-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Four common ways the RUS can break:

These are the most common ways that the RUS can break:

1) RUS configuration references a deleted DC or E2K server, or the
servers defined in RUS configuration are flakey at best.  Browse both
entries and choose alternates, if available.

2) Inheritable permissions are removed on an OU and the RUS is no longer
able to reach the objects within it.  (Q297124)

3) RUS is unable to generate email addresses because it is unable to
locate a third party email address generator (DLL file).  This can occur
in mixed environments where an Exchange 5.5 server had fax software or
the like installed.  Exchange 2000 builds its recipient policies based
on Ex55 site addressing (which includes the third party address).  Since
the DLL does not exist on the E2K server used by the RUS, the RUS will
fire Event IDs 2035, 2037, and 2027 if MSExchangeAL logging is set to
max.  (Q286356)

4) If the RUS encounters a distribution list that has its membership
hidden, it will not be able to stamp it with mail attributes and will go
to sleep. (Q287137)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:03 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems


Yeah, I have the correct server selected.  I have also tried another in
the same site.  This is definitely weird.  No errors at all.  I might
need to consult PSS on this one.  Thanks. 


-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

It's a silly question, I know, but did you make sure the RUS is pointing
to the correct (and valid) server?

Otherwise the only other references I can find are to problems with a
Global Catalog server.  Not too many exciting KB's for the RUS.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Monday, June 09, 2003 8:44 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems



Exch2k SP3

When I disable an account and hide it from the GAL the RUS stamps the
HideFromAddressList as true, but our Outlook Clients aren't reflecting
the change.  If I do a preview from ESM of the Gal, it shows it as
hidden?  I have restarted Outlook and pointed to a different Global
Catalog Server with no luck.  Also  it looks like if I create a new user
the RUS is not updating it.  I have turned up logging to Maximum on all
relevant stuff and no errors on a rebuild except fo this one.  All of
our DCs and GCs are up.


NSPI Proxy encountered an error while receiving a packet. The target
Domain Controller or the network or a client might be down. The winsock
subsystem returned the error:[0x2746]. The circuit that received this
error is being closed. 



Anyone else experience this before?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://in

RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003

[Neil Hobson]

The last I heard, mainstream support for 5.5 ends on Dec 31st 2003, so
that may be a good enough reason.  You should have stuck with MSMail -
no need for that expensive Exchange rubbish!  :-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 09 June 2003 15:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Subject: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003


Good morning,

Surely you are laughing by now.  But my management team wants to know
why I want to spend all of this money for Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003.  I
mean we are currently on Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5.

How do I justify the expense and get it in the budget for 2004.  Help!!!

Have a great week.

Mike Mitchell
Systems email Administrator
Alverno Information Services
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211

"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take but by the
moments that take our breath away."


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RUS problems

[Neil Hobson]

Out of interest, have you at any point cycled the System Attendant
service on your E2k box?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 09 June 2003 15:41
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems


I checked all of this.  I don't get any errors in the application log
except the one mentioned.  Everything is set to maximum logging.  I'm
stuck. 


-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Four common ways the RUS can break:

These are the most common ways that the RUS can break:

1) RUS configuration references a deleted DC or E2K server, or the
servers defined in RUS configuration are flakey at best.  Browse both
entries and choose alternates, if available.

2) Inheritable permissions are removed on an OU and the RUS is no longer
able to reach the objects within it.  (Q297124)

3) RUS is unable to generate email addresses because it is unable to
locate a third party email address generator (DLL file).  This can occur
in mixed environments where an Exchange 5.5 server had fax software or
the like installed.  Exchange 2000 builds its recipient policies based
on Ex55 site addressing (which includes the third party address).  Since
the DLL does not exist on the E2K server used by the RUS, the RUS will
fire Event IDs 2035, 2037, and 2027 if MSExchangeAL logging is set to
max.  (Q286356)

4) If the RUS encounters a distribution list that has its membership
hidden, it will not be able to stamp it with mail attributes and will go
to sleep. (Q287137)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 09
June 2003 15:03 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems


Yeah, I have the correct server selected.  I have also tried another in
the same site.  This is definitely weird.  No errors at all.  I might
need to consult PSS on this one.  Thanks. 


-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

It's a silly question, I know, but did you make sure the RUS is pointing
to the correct (and valid) server?

Otherwise the only other references I can find are to problems with a
Global Catalog server.  Not too many exciting KB's for the RUS.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Monday, June 09, 2003 8:44 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems



Exch2k SP3

When I disable an account and hide it from the GAL the RUS stamps the
HideFromAddressList as true, but our Outlook Clients aren't reflecting
the change.  If I do a preview from ESM of the Gal, it shows it as
hidden?  I have restarted Outlook and pointed to a different Global
Catalog Server with no luck.  Also  it looks like if I create a new user
the RUS is not updating it.  I have turned up logging to Maximum on all
relevant stuff and no errors on a rebuild except fo this one.  All of
our DCs and GCs are up.


NSPI Proxy encountered an error while receiving a packet. The target
Domain Controller or the network or a client might be down. The winsock
subsystem returned the error:[0x2746]. The circuit that received this
error is being closed. 



Anyone else experience this before?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email
mailt

RE: RUS problems

[Neil Hobson]

Four common ways the RUS can break:

These are the most common ways that the RUS can break:

1) RUS configuration references a deleted DC or E2K server, or the
servers defined in RUS configuration are flakey at best.  Browse both
entries and choose alternates, if available.

2) Inheritable permissions are removed on an OU and the RUS is no longer
able to reach the objects within it.  (Q297124)

3) RUS is unable to generate email addresses because it is unable to
locate a third party email address generator (DLL file).  This can occur
in mixed environments where an Exchange 5.5 server had fax software or
the like installed.  Exchange 2000 builds its recipient policies based
on Ex55 site addressing (which includes the third party address).  Since
the DLL does not exist on the E2K server used by the RUS, the RUS will
fire Event IDs 2035, 2037, and 2027 if MSExchangeAL
logging is set to max.  (Q286356)

4) If the RUS encounters a distribution list that has its membership
hidden, it will not be able to stamp it with mail attributes and will go
to sleep. (Q287137)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 09 June 2003 15:03
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems


Yeah, I have the correct server selected.  I have also tried another in
the same site.  This is definitely weird.  No errors at all.  I might
need to consult PSS on this one.  Thanks. 


-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

It's a silly question, I know, but did you make sure the RUS is pointing
to the correct (and valid) server?

Otherwise the only other references I can find are to problems with a
Global Catalog server.  Not too many exciting KB's for the RUS.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Monday, June 09, 2003 8:44 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems



Exch2k SP3

When I disable an account and hide it from the GAL the RUS stamps the
HideFromAddressList as true, but our Outlook Clients aren't reflecting
the change.  If I do a preview from ESM of the Gal, it shows it as
hidden?  I have restarted Outlook and pointed to a different Global
Catalog Server with no luck.  Also  it looks like if I create a new user
the RUS is not updating it.  I have turned up logging to Maximum on all
relevant stuff and no errors on a rebuild except fo this one.  All of
our DCs and GCs are up.


NSPI Proxy encountered an error while receiving a packet. The target
Domain Controller or the network or a client might be down. The winsock
subsystem returned the error:[0x2746]. The circuit that received this
error is being closed. 



Anyone else experience this before?  Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.silversands.co.uk  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cannot send mail....stuck in Que

[Neil Hobson]

Depends on what error you see in the queue.  The normal one here is
'network error during host resolution' or something like that.  Try
doing an nslookup, and manually connecting via port 25 to the
destination server.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 05 June 2003 16:21
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Cannot send mailstuck in Que
Subject: Cannot send mailstuck in Que


Exchange 5.5 sp4
Windows 2000 Advanced Server

When trying to send mail to an outside school, I see the messages to
this school district are sitting in the Quenever sending out.  I
have no problems sending to any other mailservers.  

Any ideas?  Where can I start to look?

Thanks as always,

Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sending emails that can not be altered

[Neil Hobson]

Indeed.  However, Lotus Notes has a fabulous solution to this problem,
as Notes can prevent messages from being forwarded on, etc.  To invoke
this solution, you simply click the 'Enable Bull$hit Security'[1] tick
box.

Neil

[1] To coin an Ed C phrase

-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 05 June 2003 15:01
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Sending emails that can not be altered
Subject: RE: Sending emails that can not be altered


-Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 June 2003 14:39
> To: Exchange Discussions
> 
> Due to Martha's problems with altering emails. Someone here asked if 
> there is a way to send and email so that the content can not be 
> altered by the recipient andf then forwarded on

Not at all. If worse comes to pass a malicious person could copy the
email out longhand from one window to another, format it to make it look
forwarded (yes the headers wouldn't be quite right but who amoung your
user community looks at those?) and send it on. Sure it wouldn't be the
original email but the damage would be done because I presume what you
really want to protect is the content of these emails, not the random
collection of bits and bytes that were scraped together to take the
content out of the author's mind and put it on screen.

--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
print chr(66) & chr(79) & chr(70) & chr(72)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook XP Licensing

[Neil Hobson]

AFAIK, yes, since you're using E2k.  If you were 5.5, then no.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 04 June 2003 15:50
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Outlook XP Licensing
Subject: Outlook XP Licensing


When you purchase sufficient Exchange 2000 licensing, you're entitled to
install Outlook 2000 on each of the licensed clients, or so im lead to
believe? :o

Anyway, can you install Outlook XP on these clients without the need for
any kind of Office XP license?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Filtering

[Neil Hobson]

They're no longer held in the registry; they're held in Active
Directory.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 May 2003 16:44
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: RE: Filtering


However...Jim McBee (the same Jim McBee that wrote the "Exchange 2000
24/7") is on the list, correct?

With that in mind, there is one page about filtering for E2k on page 681
of Jim McBee's "Exchange 2000 - 24/7" book, but it doesn't list a
registry entry for the Turfing entries.

Jim...do you know where that would be off the top of your head?  Since I
don't have an E2k site, I'm assuming from what I've read, that this
registry entry would be located on the IIS server?

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: 'Avi Smith-Rapaport'
Subject: RE: Filtering


Avi,

1.  Start up Regedt32.exe.
2.  Open up your list in Notepad and copy it.
3.  Go to
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Parameters.
4.  Double-click the TurfTable entry on the right hand side to open it
up.
5.  Paste your entire list in there, click ok. 6.  Close out of
Regedt32.exe, Stop/Start your Internet Mail Service service and you're
done.

Jim
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering


I am having a lot of spamming issues and nobody is interested in
purchasing
a spam helping product. Wanted to know if anyone knows how to mass load
a
list of known spammers and/or spamming domains to the filtering tab of
the
exchange system manager - Message Delivery Properties? When I do add
some
sites it seems to work great but I have compiled a large list now (also
with
some help from a new found friend) and hope I do not have to copy and
paste
each in one at a time. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Avi


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Filtering

[Neil Hobson]

That's a shame; learning to do simple code can save you hours of work.
Anyway, the link was to a piece of code that should be able to do it for
you, so that's the next best thing.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 May 2003 16:35
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: RE: Filtering


But can you just copy paste to it as well?
I don't code, even a little bit, nor do I ever care to.

Avi



-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering



It's simply a multi-valued attribute in AD; it's fairly easy to write
code to import/export this - check out the link below as an example.

http://www.cdolive.net/download/Exchange2000MessageFilterList.zip

Neil
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 28 May
2003 12:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: Filtering


I am having a lot of spamming issues and nobody is interested in
purchasing a spam helping product.
Wanted to know if anyone knows how to mass load a list of known spammers
and/or spamming domains to the filtering tab of the exchange system
manager - Message Delivery Properties?
When I do add some sites it seems to work great but I have compiled a
large list now (also with some help from a new found friend) and hope I
do not have to copy and paste each in one at a time.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Avi


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Filtering

[Neil Hobson]

Nice, but Avi's using Exchange 2000 since he mentioned 'Exchange System
Manager'  ;-)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 May 2003 15:12
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: RE: Filtering


Avi,

1.  Start up Regedt32.exe.
2.  Open up your list in Notepad and copy it.
3.  Go to
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Parameters.
4.  Double-click the TurfTable entry on the right hand side to open it
up.
5.  Paste your entire list in there, click ok.
6.  Close out of Regedt32.exe, Stop/Start your Internet Mail Service
service and you're done.

Jim
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering


I am having a lot of spamming issues and nobody is interested in
purchasing
a spam helping product. Wanted to know if anyone knows how to mass load
a
list of known spammers and/or spamming domains to the filtering tab of
the
exchange system manager - Message Delivery Properties? When I do add
some
sites it seems to work great but I have compiled a large list now (also
with
some help from a new found friend) and hope I do not have to copy and
paste
each in one at a time. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Avi


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Filtering

[Neil Hobson]

Not to mention that there's a limit of around 850 entries for the filter
list.  This is an AD limit.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: David Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 May 2003 14:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: Re: Filtering


adding them one by one will be a never ending battle. 
you are better off going with a third party solution.

--- Avi Smith-Rapaport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having a lot of spamming issues and nobody is interested in 
> purchasing a spam helping product.
> Wanted to know if anyone knows how to mass load a list of known 
> spammers and/or spamming domains to the filtering tab of the exchange 
> system manager - Message Delivery Properties?
> When I do add some sites it seems to work great but I have compiled a 
> large list now (also with some help from a new found friend) and hope 
> I do not have to copy and paste each in one at a time.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Avi
> 
> 
>
_
> List posting FAQ:  
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
>
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
> To unsubscribe:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Small warning: Antigen 7.5

[Neil Hobson]

Indeed.  The technical explanation I'd seen was that code that modifies the contents 
of messages in transport, as in the case of a disclaimer, can corrupt the STM if the 
mail is submitted on the server using DAV, and not, say, other methods such as MAPI, 
SMTP, and X.400.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 May 2003 13:47
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Small warning: Antigen 7.5
Subject: RE: Small warning: Antigen 7.5


As was pointed out this is not strictly a Sybari issue. I received an notification 
from Sybari that included the following information.

Microsoft Knowledge Base Article number 814891 describes an error (Error
-613) that can occur when performing an online backup of Exchange 2000.
Microsoft has identified a situation that causes this problem to occur.

Sybari has received a few reports from some of its customers that online backups of 
Exchange 2000 are reporting this error after they have enabled Antigen's disclaimer 
feature.  Antigen utilizes Microsoft APIs when updating an email message with 
disclaimer text. 

As a result of working with those customers that reported the error as well as with 
Microsoft, those customers have now received a fix from Microsoft Product Support 
Services and are now beginning testing of the fix.

We are making you aware of this potential issue so that you can contact Microsoft 
Product Support Services if after reading the QFE you believe that you should also 
deploy Microsoft's fix.  

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[LN];814891s 

-Dave Vantine

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Small warning: Antigen 7.5


My customer was advised by Sybari to run 7.5 because 7.0 caused high
INETINFO CPU usage, and the SMTP queues to block.

Ed Crowley

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Grafton
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Thanks, Neil.

Sybari have already come back to me with a solution for the affected server,
and its running OK again, but with Antigen 7.0.  They're trying to recreate
the problem in their lab so they can make a more permanent solution, but
haven't managed yet.

Andy

> No, I don't know I'm afraid.  We really only deal with Trend products
> on a regular basis.  I'm aware of Antigen 7.0 (SR1 I
> think) having this problem from either this list or another.
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 27 May
> 2003 11:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
> Conversation: Small warning: Antigen 7.5
> Subject: RE: Small warning: Antigen 7.5
> 
> 
> > Antigen isn't the only 3rd party product causing -613s in the STM.
> > Other products are doing it (eXclaimer springs to mind).  From what 
> > I've read, it may not be entirely the fault of the 3rd
> party product
> > developers.
> 
> Neil do you have more info about that?  Like which Exchange Update
> could be starting this behaviour?!
> Sybari's EU support got back to me already requesting more details and 
> said that they hadn't seen the issue before with 7.5.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Andy
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
> At: 27 May
> > 2003 10:24 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
> > Conversation: Small warning: Antigen 7.5
> > Subject: Small warning: Antigen 7.5
> > 
> > 
> > Note this isn't maligning Sybari or needing help - its just
> a heads up
> > for information.
> > 
> > In summary : watch out for Antigen V7.5
> > 
> > We'd been running Antigen 7.0 on one of our servers for
> about 3 weeks.
> > No problems at all.  Fantastic.  Much better than PantyShield 5.2 
> > (Thanks Chris S).
> > 
> > Last Weds we downloaded V7.5 from their wesite and upgraded to it -
> > plan being to try out the anti-spam stuff.
> > The only change we made to the Antigen config was to activate the 
> > default "spam" list for incoming SMTP.
> >  
> > After reboot we saw the error at the end (ignore the time
> this comes
> > after much testing) when attempting to back up.
> > Fixing it is simple: move mailboxes to another server and
> recreate the
> > private store, but...
> > 
> > We deleted/recreated the private store and the corruption recurred
> > when we moved any mailbox back onto the server.
> > 
> > We uninstalled Antigen V7.5 and recreated the stores.  No problems
> > with corruption no matter how many test mailboxes we moved
> back onto
> > it.
> > 
> > We reinstalled Antigen V7.5 and after a reboot the corruption
> > recurred.  i.e. we're pretty sure that Antigen is causing
> the problem.
> > 
> > I've sent a *long* note to Sybari support and we'll see
> what they make
> > of it.  Some info below.
> > 
> > Event Type: Error
> > Event Source:   ESE
> > Event Category: Logging/Recovery 
> > Event ID:   217
> >

RE: Filtering

[Neil Hobson]

It's simply a multi-valued attribute in AD; it's fairly easy to write
code to import/export this - check out the link below as an example.

http://www.cdolive.net/download/Exchange2000MessageFilterList.zip

Neil
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 28 May 2003 12:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: Filtering


I am having a lot of spamming issues and nobody is interested in
purchasing a spam helping product.
Wanted to know if anyone knows how to mass load a list of known spammers
and/or spamming domains to the filtering tab of the exchange system
manager - Message Delivery Properties?
When I do add some sites it seems to work great but I have compiled a
large list now (also with some help from a new found friend) and hope I
do not have to copy and paste each in one at a time.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Avi


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. 
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Aaaarrrrggghhhh - What ports for OWA through only 1 firewall (no DMZ) besides 80

[Neil Hobson]

Without SSL, it will be just port 80.  Straight into the internal
network?  WOW!

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 04 April 2003 11:34
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Aaaaggg - What ports for OWA through only 1
firewall (no DMZ) besides 80
Subject: Aaaaggg - What ports for OWA through only 1 firewall
(no DMZ) besides 80


Against my very loud protest, a customer insists on deploying OWA to
users on the Internet with no security in place.  They nixed a front end
server, SSL, VPN solution or an ISA server.  

My question is, what port(s), other than port 80, do I need to open up
on the firewall?  This is Exchange 2000 SP3, fully patched.

I've looked through KB article #278339 and #280132 (which discusses
DMZ's), but don't see anything other than port 80 needed.  Am I missing
something?
Any other suggestions on what I can do to secure this (if anything)?  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Quick question re backup

[Neil Hobson]

I thought Exchange 2000 supported online backup of the KMS.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 26 March 2003 15:25
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Quick question re backup
Subject: RE: Quick question re backup


Do not back up M: as it can corrupt the store.

Do not back up exchsrvr\*data directories as all the data those
directories is transient or the files are open.  The only exception is
exchsrvr\kmsdata (if you use it), which you can only back up
successfully if you shut down the Key Management Server service first.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick question re backup




Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000:
If I am backing up the  but not  or the  drive then there is no point in 
backing up  is there? Or should I still backup
the  directory but deselect the mdb data
directory? I thought I had set up the backup procedure so that I wasn't
doing BLB's but I had to examine the procedure closely as I am having
trouble getting all our data onto a 40/80gb dltIV tape with hardware
compression enabled (otherwise software).  
I've had a look at the faq and had a good search around the archives etc
but cannot find a definitive answer on this. Thanks Support Analyst TKC
Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320


This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  It should not be deemed to
constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s)
unless a purchase order number is quoted.  Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of TKC Group Ltd.  If you are not the intended
recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return
it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email.

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Renaming E2K server

[Neil Hobson]

What I've written below is a bunch of rubbish, as you can change the
FQDN on the SMTP virtual server (and thanks to Oliver for pointing that
out!).  It's just that we were having a discussion about this in the
office the other day, and several SMTP gateways cannot do this.

Neil

-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson 
Posted At: 24 March 2003 15:00
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Renaming E2K server
Subject: RE: Renaming E2K server



I did just reply on the MS newsgroups on this, but I'll reply here as
well.  You cannot rename an Exchange server, so your options are to
rebuild the server with a new name, or put in a 3rd party relay that
offers the chance to say HELO using a different name.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Oliver Tann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 24 March 2003 12:27
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Renaming E2K server
Subject: Renaming E2K server


I have to rename my E2K server as it doesn't match its hostname and uses
an underscore (so I can't just change the hostname).  Some external mail
recipients reject mail as the servername and hostnames don't match. It's
also a DC so I'll have to demote it first

My question is simply are there any problems in changing the name of a
mailserver?  Should I stop all the services first?  And do I need to do
anything to the AD once I've demoted it to a member server.

Any help greatly appreciated.
Oliver

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Renaming E2K server

[Neil Hobson]

I did just reply on the MS newsgroups on this, but I'll reply here as
well.  You cannot rename an Exchange server, so your options are to
rebuild the server with a new name, or put in a 3rd party relay that
offers the chance to say HELO using a different name.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Oliver Tann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 24 March 2003 12:27
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Renaming E2K server
Subject: Renaming E2K server


I have to rename my E2K server as it doesn't match its hostname and uses
an underscore (so I can't just change the hostname).  Some external mail
recipients reject mail as the servername and hostnames don't match.
It's also a DC so I'll have to demote it first

My question is simply are there any problems in changing the name of a
mailserver?  Should I stop all the services first?  And do I need to do
anything to the AD once I've demoted it to a member server.

Any help greatly appreciated.
Oliver

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes

[Neil Hobson]

Contact me offlist, as I've a MS utility to do this for you.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: 19 March 2003 15:43
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes
Subject: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes


We are doing a migration from Lotus Notes 5.x to Exchange 2k (finally!).
The migration wizard does not bring across contacts.  Does anyone know
any free utilities to grab contacts from Notes and import to Exchange?

Thanks!

Louanne Fournier, CCNA, MCSE
Technical Analyst
(905) 319-8378 Ext. 240
FAX (905) 319-8397

Just Released: Nexterna Real-Time Service Tool Kit
Get the information you need to jump-start preparations for Real-Time
service at your organization. www.nexterna.com/toolkit

NEXTERNA E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This transmission is intended to be strictly confidential. If you are
not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print,
copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this in
error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message.
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal
criminal law.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question

[Neil Hobson]

Not that I'm aware of.  But how would the Notes feature stop me
re-typing the message and sending that?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Norris Carden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 February 2003 17:15
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question


We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended
(for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not
trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a
question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both
environments can help.

Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or
replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my
knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or
some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003?

Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to
send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER
PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about
how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a
system.

Thanks,

Norris Carden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition

[Neil Hobson]

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=195519

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 February 2003 15:13
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
Subject: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition


The question came up today "what would happen to the exchange server if
the log drives crashed". Assuming that the logs are sitting on a
separate set of spindles. I hope to test this in the lab but wondered if
anyone had had this happen to them.

Warren

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E2k and Permissions

[Neil Hobson]

Admins are denied access to all mailboxes by default in Exchange 2000.
For workarounds, see:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=262054

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 10 February 2003 14:37
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: E2k and Permissions
Subject: E2k and Permissions


When I was running Exchange 5.5 I had rights to view other users
mailboxes to troubleshoot issues Now With Exchange 2000 I get Access
Denied even when logging on with the Exchange Admin Account. Can someone
point me to what I need to se to be allowed to open other users
mailboxes without being that user in Exchange 2000? Or is it possible?




TIA,
Joshua




Joshua Morgan
Method IQ
Senior Network Engineer
Main: (864) 272-1145
Mobile: (864) 449-9912
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Blocking users from Internet mail

[Neil Hobson]

Good point Jason.  I'll let Mark know.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 January 2003 16:32
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Blocking users from Internet mail
Subject: RE: Blocking users from Internet mail


If you follow the instructions in this article, then the users without
Internet email won't be able to use OWA. You'd have to create a new HTTP
virtual directory for them that handles the "fake" smtp address that you
use.

Jason

> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Blocking users from Internet mail
> 
> 
> 
> Just follow this:
> 
> http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF009.html
> 
> Neil
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: 27 January 2003 15:57
> Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
> Conversation: Blocking users from Internet mail
> Subject: Blocking users from Internet mail
> 
> 
> I have customer that is requesting that a few users not be
> able to send or receive Internet mail. Has anyone done this 
> and know the best way to go about doing it?
> 
> I was thinking I could add a restriction to the IMC that
> specifies that accounts that are not allowed to send mail 
> through it, but that would only take care of the sending 
> restriction, right? I still need to prevent them from 
> receiving Internet mail.
> 
> Platform is Exhange 2000.
> 
> J a s o n  C l i s h e
> Senior Network Engineer
> Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group
> 
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Direct: (248) 371-3542 
> Mobile: (248) 891-8780
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> *
> This email and any files transmitted with it are
> confidential and intended solely for the use of 
> the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
> or opinions presented are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of 
> Silversands.
> If you have received this email in error, please 
> contact our Support Desk immediately on 
> 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Blocking users from Internet mail

[Neil Hobson]

Just follow this:

http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF009.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 27 January 2003 15:57
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Blocking users from Internet mail
Subject: Blocking users from Internet mail


I have customer that is requesting that a few users not be able to send
or receive Internet mail. Has anyone done this and know the best way to
go about doing it?

I was thinking I could add a restriction to the IMC that specifies that
accounts that are not allowed to send mail through it, but that would
only take care of the sending restriction, right? I still need to
prevent them from receiving Internet mail.

Platform is Exhange 2000.

J a s o n  C l i s h e
Senior Network Engineer
Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Direct: (248) 371-3542 
Mobile: (248) 891-8780


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP queue

[Neil Hobson]

A virus?  Nah, that's the information stores on servers mailing each
other.  Has anyone made any replication frequency changes for the public
stores recently?  Or perhaps someone has dumped a load of data into a
public folder that replicates everywhere?  Or added new replicas?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 24 January 2003 08:26
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: SMTP queue
Subject: SMTP queue


Dear all,

When I check the Exchange 2000 Queue I noticed that lots of mail are
being send. Messages send are consuming almost all the bandwidth. Sender
of the messages is:"Servername1-IS@domainX. These messages are send to
other Exchange 2000 Servers in the
organization: Server2-IS@domainX.

I suspected a virus, but after scanning no virus was detected.

My questions are.
What can be possibly generating this messages.
What type of messages are these.
And how to troubleshoot them.

Thanks

Michel Fayad

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Delivery Receipts - Exchange 5.5

[Neil Hobson]

Not that I know of, because they're a client thing.

If you're really desperate for such a feature, you may want to upgrade
to E2k and implement a store synchronous event sink, such as:

http://www.ivasoft.biz/rrr.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Furman, Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 08 January 2003 16:34
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Delivery Receipts - Exchange 5.5
Subject: Delivery Receipts - Exchange 5.5


Is there a way to turn off delivery receipts on the Exchange Server
rather than the client?

Morris Furman
Supervisor, Local Network Services
OfficeMax, Inc.
3605 Warrensville Center Rd.
Shaker Heights, OH  44122
* (216) 471-6081
6 (216) 471-5780
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Availability: Monday - Friday/9:00am - 6:00pm


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available

[Neil Hobson]

Far too technical!  Just order the Titanium kit on CD!

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 08 January 2003 16:24
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


Or change the properties of the CD you burned to use UTF instead of
joliet filesystem.

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available



Download it

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 08 January 2003 16:21
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


DL it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


OK, this is a bug in the beta. If you burn it to CD it truncates some of
the file names in the OMA folder. The solution is to DL the .EXE of
Exchange, and extract to your HD, then install it from there.

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


The only thing I find remotely like that are:

Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.ExchangeDataProviderServerResources.Resources.dll
And Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.ExchangeDataProviderServerResources.dll

The top one EZ CD Creator tried to rename. I hade to change cd formats
to UCF to make it stop.

See if you have those 2 filenames the are located in

Server\setup\i386\exchange\OMA\Browse\bin\en
And
Server\setup\i386\exchange\OMA\Browse\bin

respectively

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


9972 files and 407 folders...

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


How many files and folders from the server directory, including the
server directory are there?

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


I'm trying to install on Win2k SP3 server.  It made it almost to the
end.  I am getting an error saying it needs a file called
Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.Exchangedataproviderservice  Any ideas on
what it is looking for? Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


The restrictions are with Ex5.5 and Ex2K not running on .NET 2003.

Ex2003 will run on W2k with limited features or .NET with full feature
support.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


I loaded using NET RC2. Worked just fine. Not sure about windows 2K

- Original Message -
From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


> Uh, no.  I was trying to load it on .Net RC1.
>
> I'll give that a try.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:01 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
>
> It says it runs on Windows 2000 with SP3. Is that what your trying to 
> load it on.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:52 PM
> Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
>
>
> > So I'm guessing you need .Net RC2 to install Titanium B2???
> >
> > I cant get the install to believe that I have ASP.Net 1.1 for IIS
> installed.
> >
> > :(
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
> >
> > Installing it now. Gee like waiting for Santa Claus to arrive. 495MB
Geez
> >
> >
> > - Original Mes

RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available

[Neil Hobson]

I learn a new acronym nearly every day now!  www.acronymfinder.com is my
friend.  :-)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 08 January 2003 16:22
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


DL = Download

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


DL it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


OK, this is a bug in the beta. If you burn it to CD it truncates some of
the file names in the OMA folder. The solution is to DL the .EXE of
Exchange, and extract to your HD, then install it from there.

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


The only thing I find remotely like that are:

Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.ExchangeDataProviderServerResources.Resources.dll
And Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.ExchangeDataProviderServerResources.dll

The top one EZ CD Creator tried to rename. I hade to change cd formats
to UCF to make it stop.

See if you have those 2 filenames the are located in

Server\setup\i386\exchange\OMA\Browse\bin\en
And
Server\setup\i386\exchange\OMA\Browse\bin

respectively

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


9972 files and 407 folders...

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


How many files and folders from the server directory, including the
server directory are there?

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


I'm trying to install on Win2k SP3 server.  It made it almost to the
end.  I am getting an error saying it needs a file called
Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.Exchangedataproviderservice  Any ideas on
what it is looking for? Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


The restrictions are with Ex5.5 and Ex2K not running on .NET 2003.

Ex2003 will run on W2k with limited features or .NET with full feature
support.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


I loaded using NET RC2. Worked just fine. Not sure about windows 2K

- Original Message -
From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


> Uh, no.  I was trying to load it on .Net RC1.
>
> I'll give that a try.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:01 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
>
> It says it runs on Windows 2000 with SP3. Is that what your trying to
> load it on.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:52 PM
> Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
>
>
> > So I'm guessing you need .Net RC2 to install Titanium B2???
> >
> > I cant get the install to believe that I have ASP.Net 1.1 for IIS
> installed.
> >
> > :(
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
> >
> > Installing it now. Gee like waiting for Santa Claus to arrive. 495MB
Geez
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:49 PM
> > Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
> >
> >
> > > MSDN subscription!
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:42 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
> > >
> > >
> > > Does anyone know where I can download the 64 bit itanium version

RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available

[Neil Hobson]

Download it

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 08 January 2003 16:21
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


DL it?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


OK, this is a bug in the beta. If you burn it to CD it truncates some of
the file names in the OMA folder. The solution is to DL the .EXE of
Exchange, and extract to your HD, then install it from there.

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


The only thing I find remotely like that are:

Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.ExchangeDataProviderServerResources.Resources.dll
And Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.ExchangeDataProviderServerResources.dll

The top one EZ CD Creator tried to rename. I hade to change cd formats
to UCF to make it stop.

See if you have those 2 filenames the are located in

Server\setup\i386\exchange\OMA\Browse\bin\en
And
Server\setup\i386\exchange\OMA\Browse\bin

respectively

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


9972 files and 407 folders...

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


How many files and folders from the server directory, including the
server directory are there?

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


I'm trying to install on Win2k SP3 server.  It made it almost to the
end.  I am getting an error saying it needs a file called
Microsoft.Exchange.OMA.Exchangedataproviderservice  Any ideas on
what it is looking for? Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


The restrictions are with Ex5.5 and Ex2K not running on .NET 2003.

Ex2003 will run on W2k with limited features or .NET with full feature
support.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


I loaded using NET RC2. Worked just fine. Not sure about windows 2K

- Original Message -
From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available


> Uh, no.  I was trying to load it on .Net RC1.
>
> I'll give that a try.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:01 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
>
> It says it runs on Windows 2000 with SP3. Is that what your trying to 
> load it on.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hansen, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:52 PM
> Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
>
>
> > So I'm guessing you need .Net RC2 to install Titanium B2???
> >
> > I cant get the install to believe that I have ASP.Net 1.1 for IIS
> installed.
> >
> > :(
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
> >
> > Installing it now. Gee like waiting for Santa Claus to arrive. 495MB
Geez
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:49 PM
> > Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
> >
> >
> > > MSDN subscription!
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:42 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
> > >
> > >
> > > Does anyone know where I can download the 64 bit itanium version 
> > > of
> .net.
> > >
> > >
> > > Mario Fernandez
> > > Network Administrator
> > > DataSynapse
> > > 632 Broadway 5th Floor
> > > New York, NY 10012
> > > tel. (212) 842-8849
> > > fax. (212) 842-8843
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > >
> > > View the DataSyna

RE: User Deleted inbox

[Neil Hobson]

Have you tried the /resetfolders switch?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 08 January 2003 15:49
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: User Deleted inbox
Subject: User Deleted inbox


Dear all
A user has somehow deleted his inbox folder, I didn't know this could be
done! Apparently he managed this while using OWA. I have opened his
mailbox as administrator and I can see it in the deleted items folder,
but how do I recover it, there seems to be no means? Copying it just
creates a normal subfolder. Ex5.5 Nt4 sp6a etc. Many thanks


Vanessa Watkins
Network Manager
Royal Holloway, University of london



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep

[Neil Hobson]

Not that I've heard of.  From 325316:

"There is no difference between running forestprep from the service pack
and running it from the installation CD-ROM."

I'd be interested to know otherwise.

Different kettle of fish for the ADC, though.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 08 January 2003 12:01
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Subject: RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep


So there are updates to the schema in SP3?

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
> 
> 
> Right, the one from the SP3 CD.  And also from the same CD
> later you'll
> want to run:
> 
> update.exe /ForestPrep
> 
> and
> 
> update.exe /DomainPrep
> 
> as opposed from running it from the RTM CD.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Technical Consultant
> hp Services
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
> problems."
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
> 
> 
> Use the ADC on the latest SP for E2K.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Walden H. Leverich III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:47 AM
> Subject: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
> 
> 
> > As step one of a 5.5 to E2K upgrade I'm looking to install the ADC.
> > From what I've read the ADC I want to use is the Exchange 
> ADC, not the
> 
> > windows ADC. Just to clarify though, it's the ADC that came
> with E2K
> > being
> installed
> > on 5.5, right? I can find no ADC on the 5.5 CD, and that
> makes sense
> > since there wasn't an AD when 5.5 was released (at least
> not one they
> > wanted to talk about).
> >
> > -Walden
> >
> > 
> > Walden H Leverich III
> > President
> > Tech Software
> > (516) 627-3800 x11
> > (208) 692-3308 eFax
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.TechSoftInc.com
> >
> > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
> > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change

[Neil Hobson]

That would really add up over 10,000 years.  Should give him time for
Titanium to be released.

-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 20 December 2002 17:03
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change
Subject: RE: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change


Move the server further north. It will have less angular velocity the
further away from the equator it is. Less angular velocity means time
will pass more quickly in that new location. Should cut down the time
from an hour to 59.999 minutes
or so.

Directory replication requires time and patience.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change


Hi,

We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 750 users with Outlook 2000.
We have 30 branches, all of which have their own domain controllers. We
have about 35 domain controllers total.

I'm having a problem when I change users' mailbox size limit. After I
change it, it takes up to an hour to take effect. I understand it may be
a replication issue but is there any way to speed that up? I have
already created a batch file that uses repadmin /syncall to replicate
the domain immediately.

Thanks,

Aaron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Online Defragmentation

[Neil Hobson]

Too much information.

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 19 December 2002 17:15
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Online Defragmentation
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


Thank you very much.  Sorry about that...got everone's panties in a knot
there I see :)

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store.  Database tab,
maintenance interval.

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Online Defragmentation
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


Christ, I thought we were talking about E2K :[ My baad!  

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


Dude. You cant right click on anything in Ex55. You are using E2K,
aren't you?

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


Yes,  right clicking on the server and going to properties.  I'm not
seeing the IS Maintenance tab.

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


You are clicking on the actual name of the server, then properties?

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation


I'm not seeing that tab on the server properties tab.

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Online Defragmentation


IS Maint Tab
Properties of the Server.

- Original Message -
From: "Garrish, Robert B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:27 AM
Subject: Online Defragmentation


> Dear DL Members,
>
> Our environment looks like this.
>
> NT Server 4.0 with SP6a
> Exchange 5.5 with SP4
>
> One of our Exchange Servers is running an Online Defragmentation
> during the business day.  During this time, and shortly after, Outlook
2000
> Clients hang (hour glass).
> In Event Viewer, I see the following IDs (this list is in numerical
> order).
>
>
> Event ID 179
> Source = ESE97
> Category = Online Defragmentation
> Online defragmentation is beginning a full pass on database
> x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb
>
> Event ID 180
> Source = ESE97
> Category = Online Defragmentation
> Online defragmentation has completed a full pass on database
> x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb
>
> Event ID 181
> Source = ESE97
> Category = Online Defragmentation
> Online defragmentation is resuming its pass on database
> x:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb
>
> Event ID 1207
> Source = MSExchangeIS Private
> Category = General
> The database has 735 megabytes of free space after online
> defragmentation has terminated
>
> Event ID 1221
> Source = MSExchangeIS Private
> Category = General
> Cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete.
> Start 115931 items; 658722 Kbytes End 99076 items; 419241 Kbytes
>
>
> How can I turn off the Online Defragmentation, so that it only takes
> place during off hours?
>
>
> Rob Garrish
> Windows NT Engineer
> Wawa Inc.
> 610-558-8371
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_f

RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments

[Neil Hobson]

Indeed.  I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive 
(there's a tech article from MS somewhere).

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Disappearing Calendar Appointments
Subject: RE: Disappearing Calendar Appointments


Do you have Norton Antivirus installed?  I had this very same problem when I had NAV 
installed.



Todd Boynton[EMAIL PROTECTED]

== Communications Specialist
== UNET Technology Services, Network Operations
== Maine School and Library Network
==University of Maine System

 


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disappearing Calendar Appointments


This is going to sound crazy but I have a user that is claiming that a couple of her 
appointments are disappearing off her calendar.  She swears she isn't doing anything.  
Has anyone ever heard of appointments legitimately disappearing from the system?  We 
are running O2002 and EX2000 SP3.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Understanding Public Folder Limits; Exch2000

[Neil Hobson]

In my experience, you need to let the store play 'catch-up', e.g. you
set the limit to 10 days, and the oldest message is only 9 days old.  If
you've got a message 11 days old in the folder, it won't get deleted.

At least, that was my 5.5 experience.  Worth a try.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 16 December 2002 16:08
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Understanding Public Folder Limits; Exch2000
Subject: RE: Understanding Public Folder Limits; Exch2000


Aha.  And if messages are still there after the "age limit for replicas"
has passed -- what should I check?

-Yanek.

> -Original Message-
> From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:54 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Understanding Public Folder Limits; Exch2000
> 
> 
> Every copy of a PF is considered a "replica", including the
> original one.  The limits should apply to all of them.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Understanding Public Folder Limits; Exch2000
> 
> 
> 
> I'm currently replicating content of my 5.5 public folders to
> my 2000 public folders.  In both places the public folder 
> store has a fairly high age limit for all folders in the 
> store.  What I'd like to do is for certain folders keep the 
> limit very very low -- is this possible?  I seem only to be 
> able to set age limit for replicas... and that doesn't seem 
> to get rid of old items in the PF.
> 
> -Yanek.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ===
> This email and its contents are confidential. If you
> are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose
> or use the information within this email or its
> attachments. If you have received this email in error,
> please delete it immediately. Thank you. 
> ===
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: event id 1025

[Neil Hobson]

I would.  You don't have to do a -fix straight away, either.  I've seen
quite a few posts over the years to do with fixing 1025s with isinteg.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 16 December 2002 13:58
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: event id 1025
Subject: event id 1025


Exchaneg 5.5 sp 4
NT 4 sp6

I am getting the following errors in the event log on one of my exchange
servers. They always occur together and about 4x a day at irregular
intervals. one time they are 1 hour apart, then i won't see them again
for 4 or 5 hours 

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS Private
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   1025
Date:   12/16/2002
Time:   4:03:34 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   CCBC-CE
Description:
An error occurred.
Function name or description of problem: EcProcessSearchMessageEvent
Error: 0x8004011b 

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS Private
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   1025
Date:   12/16/2002
Time:   4:03:34 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   CCBC-CE
Description:
An error occurred.
Function name or description of problem: EcTestMsgRestriction
Error: 0x8004011b 


I searched technet and found event id 1025 for :  
EcGenerateReadReport and EcGenerateNRN (Q268831) which says to run
isinteg but I don't want to do that unless it helps with my problem. 
EcDoDeliverMessage (Q235984) which says to have the user clean the
mailbox. and ecGetRestriction (Q182321)which says should be fixed in sp4
which i have or to run isinteg but I don't want to do that unless it
helps with my problem I can't find anything specific to
EcProcessSearchMessageEvent or EcTestMsgRestriction. Should I run
Isinteg or do you have a better suggestion.


Thanks for your input

Elizabeth Thompson
Service and Support Technician
CCBC - Catonsville



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers

[Neil Hobson]

Just create a DL with no members in it, and assign the relevant SMTP
addresses to the DL.  Messages sent to those SMTP addresses are
black-holed; no NDR, no messages to you, nothing!

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:37
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


This is probably a simple question to most of you, but the answer eludes
me. I am the exchange server administrator (that means that I don't
necessarily know how to fix it, but I get all the inbound failure mail).
We have a few accounts that were deleted due to employees leaving,
getting fired, etc.  I deleted their user/email accounts, but they are
on a bunch of junk mail lists.  So I am getting around 50 - 70 emails a
day to those few addresses. It is so many that I am not able to read
through the inbound failures to look for legitimate emails that were
sent incorrectly.  I have tried using the rules wizard in outlook, but
for some reason it does not catch these mails.  Is there a way to do
this at the server level?  I read a couple articles on the turf
directory but don't know how to add entries to it.  
I specifically want the exchange server to delete any mail sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and not send me a notification of inbound failure.
Thanks.


Doug 


-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers

I've found some as well.  But I haven't found anything on how to get
them out of ESM.  

Thanks,

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


I found some KBs on support.microsoft.com for "Event 9318
MSExchangeMTA".  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John
L.
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


Yes, I've done that procedure.  But they still show up in the E2K (white
Icon) in the site.  Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown
below on all my E2K servers.  It seems they're still trying to send
directory updates to these servers.

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: Interface 
Event ID:   9318
Date:   12/9/2002
Time:   11:56:43 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   E2K Server
Description:
An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality
Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error
1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500
%10] (14) 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers



By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon?  If so, that's how they
normally look.

The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin
program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS.  You
then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do.  Is that
what you did?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


All,

I have a question for everyone.  I've retired 5.5 servers from our
Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to
accomplish this.  Now, when I look in ESM on E2K.  It still shows the
Exch 5.5 servers listed in there.  Granted they are ghosted out.  But
how do I get rid of them as well.  I also have a situation like this for
a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as
an Administrative Group in E2K.  Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid
of these servers?

Thank you,

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*

RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers

[Neil Hobson]

So you've ruled out a problem with the Config CA, then?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:13
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


Yea, it's been well over a month.  And they are still resident in the
ESM.

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-----
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers



IIRC, it takes time to replicate the change through to AD.  So, it may
be a problem with your Config CA.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:02
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


Yes, I've done that procedure.  But they still show up in the E2K (white
Icon) in the site.  Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown
below on all my E2K servers.  It seems they're still trying to send
directory updates to these servers.

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: Interface 
Event ID:   9318
Date:   12/9/2002
Time:   11:56:43 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   E2K Server
Description:
An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality
Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error
1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500
%10] (14) 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers



By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon?  If so, that's how they
normally look.

The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin
program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS.  You
then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do.  Is that
what you did?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


All,

I have a question for everyone.  I've retired 5.5 servers from our
Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to
accomplish this.  Now, when I look in ESM on E2K.  It still shows the
Exch 5.5 servers listed in there.  Granted they are ghosted out.  But
how do I get rid of them as well.  I also have a situation like this for
a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as
an Administrative Group in E2K.  Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid
of these servers?

Thank you,

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are so

RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers

[Neil Hobson]

IIRC, it takes time to replicate the change through to AD.  So, it may
be a problem with your Config CA.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 17:02
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


Yes, I've done that procedure.  But they still show up in the E2K (white
Icon) in the site.  Also, I'm getting warning RPC messages that is shown
below on all my E2K servers.  It seems they're still trying to send
directory updates to these servers.

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: Interface 
Event ID:   9318
Date:   12/9/2002
Time:   11:56:43 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   E2K Server
Description:
An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality
Table (LTAB) index: 55, Windows 2000/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error
1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name 5.5 Exch Server [MAIN BASE 1 500
%10] (14) 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers



By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon?  If so, that's how they
normally look.

The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin
program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS.  You
then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do.  Is that
what you did?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


All,

I have a question for everyone.  I've retired 5.5 servers from our
Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to
accomplish this.  Now, when I look in ESM on E2K.  It still shows the
Exch 5.5 servers listed in there.  Granted they are ghosted out.  But
how do I get rid of them as well.  I also have a situation like this for
a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as
an Administrative Group in E2K.  Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid
of these servers?

Thank you,

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers

[Neil Hobson]

By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon?  If so, that's how they
normally look.

The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin
program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS.  You
then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do.  Is that
what you did?

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 09 December 2002 16:52
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
Subject: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers


All,

I have a question for everyone.  I've retired 5.5 servers from our
Organization by following a MS Q article that shows you how to
accomplish this.  Now, when I look in ESM on E2K.  It still shows the
Exch 5.5 servers listed in there.  Granted they are ghosted out.  But
how do I get rid of them as well.  I also have a situation like this for
a site that I removed from the Organzation, where it's still listed as
an Administrative Group in E2K.  Anyone have any ideas how I can get rid
of these servers?

Thank you,

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Disable EX2k RUS per User?

[Neil Hobson]

I believe it to be the 'msExchPoliciesIncluded' attribute.

I think a zero value means the check box is not selected, but you'll see
that when it is activated, it has the IDs of the policies included.
Don't forget to try on a test system first!

Neil 

-Original Message-
From: Paul X. Christopher (UCL-MSD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 22 November 2002 12:20
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Disable EX2k RUS per User?
Subject: Disable EX2k RUS per User?


Hi,

I need to disable the Recipient Update Service for most users, i.e. get
the tick box 'Automatically update e-mail addresses based on recipient
policy' unchecked in AD User Properties/Email addresses.

Does anyone know which AD property controls this feature or has doe this
via code/scripting?

T.I.A.

Paul Christopher
Admin Desktop Service Manager
Management Systems Division
University College London
Gower St
London WC1E 6BT

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Import Lotus Notes PAB

[Neil Hobson]

John Westworth at Microsoft has written a useful utility to do this.
It's on the "Migration Tools & Resources" CD available from MS, but
contact me offlist if you'd like a copy.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Haber, David J. [mailto:David.Haber@;vtmednet.org] 
Posted At: 04 November 2002 13:12
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Import Lotus Notes PAB
Subject: Import Lotus Notes PAB


A new co-worker has an .NSF file from Lotus Notes 5 that he would like
to import into Exchange. Does anyone know of a way to do this other than
purchasing a third party product?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP retry queues

[Neil Hobson]

Probably because the message is waiting to hit the expiration timeout
value set in the SMTP VS.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 16 October 2002 14:31
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: a wish
Subject: SMTP retry queues


Hey all. I am looking for someone who is smarter than me :) to explain
to me why Exchange 2000 is keeping messages in the retry queues if there
are no DNS records for the messages' destination domains?

For example if I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can
see a retry queue for boguscrapdoesnotexist.com, and it is marked
"unable to bind to the destination server in DNS"

Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ADC vs. Exmerge

[Neil Hobson]

I've moved quite a few organisations from 5.5 to 2000, and I've stuck
with the ADC and the move-mailbox method.  This has also included some
dodgy 5.5 installations.

Clean up the 5.5 install before the migration; delete unwanted
connectors, mailboxes, public folders, etc.  Also, as part of the
migration, if you do it right, you should also remove zombie permissions
from public folders and the like.  By the time you move the mailboxes,
your 5.5 system should be pretty clean anyway.

I'd normally choose the move-mailbox method over Exmerge.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 25 September 2002 10:30
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: ADC vs. Exmerge
Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge


Hi,
 
We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB Info Store that is Exchange
5.5 SP4. We have seperate OWA 5.5 and IMS servers. We also run Antigen
6.5. We are planning on moving to Exchange 2000. We have a new server
that we are going to migrate to. I have read the faqs and many white
papers about migrating. From what I've read, the ADC is the recommended
way to go to get your mailboxes, public folders, and settings moved
over. However, one of our staff has brought up the argument that, in
order to have a clean Exchange 2000 server, it is best to not use the
ADC. He says that we should exmerge all our mailboxes, export our public
folders to pst's, reset up our settings, and exmerge/import everything
into the new server. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Should I just
tell him to shut his pie hole?
 
Thanks,
 
Aaron




This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during
transmission from Washington Trust Bank. 


NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and
is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any
review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any
other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named
recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please
reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: changing location of sent item in outlook 2000

[Neil Hobson]

Check out:

http://victori.hypermart.net/unisent.html

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 24 September 2002 12:34
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: changing location of sent item in outlook 2000
Subject: changing location of sent item in outlook 2000


Hi people

In outlook 2000 when I reply to a message in a shared
mail box the copy of 
the sent message goes to my sent item folder, how do I
change the location 
to the sent item of the shared mailbox. Is there a
registry settings that I can modify. I was able to do
it with the deleted item but not sent item.
Thanks



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sending to recipients in a public folder

[Neil Hobson]

Right-click the public folder / Properties / Outlook Address Book tab /
tick the "Show this folder as an email address book" box.

When they compose a new message and click "To..." they'll be able to
select the public folder as an address book from the drop-down list.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 11 September 2002 09:56
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Sending to recipients in a public folder
Subject: Sending to recipients in a public folder


Dear All,

We use public folders for enterprise wide address books

However, when someone wants to send an email to someone contained in one
of these public folders, they have to go into it, right click the
contact, and select "new message"

I have been asked if it is possible to have these public folders appear
as an option when a user clicks the TO button on a new mail message. i.e
so that they have the option to select contacts contained in public
folders in the same way they select from their own contacts or the
global address list

Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.
If you have received this email in error, please 
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: need ammo

[Neil Hobson]

5Mb was quite large in MSMail days!  :-)

Looks rather small these days, IMHO.

Neil
- Original Message -
From: "Dale Geoffrey Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: need ammo


> IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a
> long time ago.  It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5.  However, I
> have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems
to
> be the limit (with exceptions, of course).
>
> Geoff...
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: need ammo
>
>
> A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't
bear
> out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has
> someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the
> 5MB number an off the cuff statistic?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: need ammo
> >
> >
> > The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet
> > inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users
> > think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any
> > kind of data transmission no matter the threat or
> > inconvenience to others.  I have had nitwits send out large
> > messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop.  There is no
> > easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a
> > policy point of view.
> >
> > Our policy here is 5MB.
> > No ifs or butts (pun intended).
> >
> > D.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: need ammo
> >
> >
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit
> > size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment.
> >
> > Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when
> > people try to send too many messages that are too large? What
> > is a reasonable size for SMTP message?
> >
> > Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times
> > large SMTP messages crashed the servers.
> >
> > I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good
> > idea to send large messages.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Andrey Fyodorov
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Public Folders

[Neil Hobson]

You mean like disabling the creation of top-level public folders?

Look at:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q256131

Neil

- Original Message -
From: "Busby, Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:33 PM
Subject: Public Folders


Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had
deliberately disallowed these under E5.5 and have just found that E2K
re-allows them. Investigating further we found that the EVERYBODY group had
been allowed to provide Create Public Folder and the box was greyed out.
Anybody know a good way off keeping Public Folder permanently locked down
(and hence under our control, not the users)

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Recovering Deleted Public Folder

[Neil Hobson]

You can use deleted item recovery, by selecting the parent folder (assumes
you had it set)

Neil

- Original Message -
From: "Aamir Hanif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:33 PM
Subject: Recovering Deleted Public Folder


> Guys:
>
> Someone at our office deleted a Public Folder this morning. Unfortunately,
> this folder was created yesterday and we did not do a backup last night. I
> have set the properties on the Public Folders so that they are not
> permanently deleted.
>
> Does anyone know how I can recover the folder?
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Aamir.
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SRS

[Neil Hobson]

Yes, as you'll need to do this before removing the ADC.  Check out the
article below for further info.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q272314

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 30 August 2002 13:16
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: SRS
Subject: SRS


Can the Site Replication Service be removed once the last Exchange 5.5
server is decommissioned?  Is it used for anything else?

Wilson




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands.

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]