RE: OWA - File not found when logging out
Okay, bad, bad evil things just happened. I re-ran the IISLockdown tool to undo the normal settings. Now, NO ONE can get logged into OWA, including Admin. I just keep getting prompted for user/pass. Outlook still works fine, and mail still seems to be flowing. Remote users are burning up the phone line I checked the permissions on the files before doing this, and everything looked fine. Is there a way to reinstall OWA on SBS without a lot of grief? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - File not found when logging out This is definitely a permissions problem (we had the same trouble)... I remember having to modify the permission on this file... but I will need to look for my notes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - File not found when logging out 404 errors like that might be related to URLScan. Do you have that installed? If so, the default settings on URLscan shouldn't clobber the logoff.asp page though... -Original Message- From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - File not found when logging out Greetings! We've got a client with a fairly new 2000 SBS box. Exchange SP3 and the post SP3 rollup are installed. For some reason, when logging out of OWA, the logout page (To complete the logout) is missing. The file (/exchweb/bin/USA/logoff.asp) DOES exist in the folder, it's just not displayed, with the server reporting it as a 404 error. All other features of OWA work fine (as far as I can tell - no reported issues). Anyone seen this before? I'm not aware of anyone tinkering with the server, and the IIS stuff looks ok. I've tried Googling and KB'ing this, but didn't come up with anything. Thoughts, comments, suggestions, and death threats are all welcome. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA - File not found when logging out
Okay Got things pretty much squared away by restarting all the services including System Attendant, and it looks like everyone can get logged in. The one remaining issue is that one user has several (4-5 afaik) emails in his Inbox that come up as FILE NOT FOUND when viewing them in OWA. They all have valid subjects, etc. I'm checking into that further -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Richard Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - File not found when logging out Okay, bad, bad evil things just happened. I re-ran the IISLockdown tool to undo the normal settings. Now, NO ONE can get logged into OWA, including Admin. I just keep getting prompted for user/pass. Outlook still works fine, and mail still seems to be flowing. Remote users are burning up the phone line I checked the permissions on the files before doing this, and everything looked fine. Is there a way to reinstall OWA on SBS without a lot of grief? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeff Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - File not found when logging out This is definitely a permissions problem (we had the same trouble)... I remember having to modify the permission on this file... but I will need to look for my notes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - File not found when logging out 404 errors like that might be related to URLScan. Do you have that installed? If so, the default settings on URLscan shouldn't clobber the logoff.asp page though... -Original Message- From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - File not found when logging out Greetings! We've got a client with a fairly new 2000 SBS box. Exchange SP3 and the post SP3 rollup are installed. For some reason, when logging out of OWA, the logout page (To complete the logout) is missing. The file (/exchweb/bin/USA/logoff.asp) DOES exist in the folder, it's just not displayed, with the server reporting it as a 404 error. All other features of OWA work fine (as far as I can tell - no reported issues). Anyone seen this before? I'm not aware of anyone tinkering with the server, and the IIS stuff looks ok. I've tried Googling and KB'ing this, but didn't come up with anything. Thoughts, comments, suggestions, and death threats are all welcome. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA - File not found when logging out
Greetings! We've got a client with a fairly new 2000 SBS box. Exchange SP3 and the post SP3 rollup are installed. For some reason, when logging out of OWA, the logout page (To complete the logout) is missing. The file (/exchweb/bin/USA/logoff.asp) DOES exist in the folder, it's just not displayed, with the server reporting it as a 404 error. All other features of OWA work fine (as far as I can tell - no reported issues). Anyone seen this before? I'm not aware of anyone tinkering with the server, and the IIS stuff looks ok. I've tried Googling and KB'ing this, but didn't come up with anything. Thoughts, comments, suggestions, and death threats are all welcome. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No master SID for account
Greetings! We have a client that gets the following Event ID 9548 error: Disabled user /o=[domain]/ou=first administrative group/cn=Recipients/cn=[usename] does not have a master account SID. Please use the Active Directory MMC to set an active account as this user's master account. We've tried http://support.microsoft.com/?id=278966, but that didn't help. Several weeks ago, the user had the same problem, and the only way we could fix it was to kill the user Exchange account and recreate them. But now the problem has returned, and I'm at a loss as to what's causing it. Exchange 2000 SP4 on Windows 2000 SP4 on a Small Business Server 2000 box. I've also looked at http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/11/event_id_9548_s.html http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9548source=MSExchangeIS Ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open relay issues
Okay, I'm still looking through the archives and stuff, but it's late, so I'll post this before I call it a night. Client has a server that suddenly shuts down. I reboot and troubleshoot, to find literally TENS OF THOUSANDS of items in the badmail folder. All dated within the last two or three days. The server had shut down because the drive ran out of space. So I clear that up and start nosing around.. I check for open relay (telnet), and can't find any problem. I start to think maybe this is a SoBig.F issue, until I read some of the NDRs. Within fifteen minutes, badmail starts to accumulate again. I look further, and see a connection in the OPEN SESSIONS section of System Manager. I kill the connection after jotting down some details. Queues are just jammed full of crap - Viagra ads, etc. I clear this out again, along with badmail, and start watching. Sure enough, a short time later, someone from the same IP subnet connects and it starts all over. I look through a ton of articles on open relay, and everything checks out. Then, I run this test: http://tools.appriver.com/openrelay.php http://tools.appriver.com/openrelay.php which basically tries to relay using various combinations of addressing formats. Test #14 fails Test #16 fails Test #28 fails #14 uses a rcpt to format of RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Notice the quotes. #16 uses RCPT TO: relaytest%appriver.com Notice the quotes and the % #28 uses RCPT TO: appriver.com!relaytest notice the format there. I manually tried each on via telnet against the server. Sure enough, the server doesn't complain. But every one bounces back with an NDR complaining about the recipient address. So my belief is that they're attempting one (or more) of these methods, and all of them are bouncing, causing the badmail problem. My question is, how do I close this hole? Server is Win2k SBS SP4, E2k SP3. Connection is firewalled T1. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED])j¹%Ë\¢oâùr®+)éíz·±r§ë^ÆuéZ§X¬ :.±Êâm[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÌ2G(
OWA Logout page not displaying
Hi list, having a small problem with our OWA clients receiving a HTTP 500 - Internal server error The page cannot be displayed, when logging out of OWA. If I turn off friendly http errors I receive, Server Application Error The server has encountered an error while loading an application during the processing of your request. Please refer to the event log for more detail information. Please contact the server administrator for assistance The event log on the cluster has this entry Event ID 36: The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/100/Root Have found several articles relating to similar IIS issues but nothing specific to exchange. Most articles seem to point to the IWAM_MACHINENAME and IUSR_MACHINENAME not being in sync. Anyone experiencd this problem? Cheers Richard *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet
Have a look at MS Q319267 -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2003 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet what is TLS? Sorry if this is a stupid question. :) Sam -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet TLS works like SSL, only for SMTP Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 and XP clients Hello All. I work for a school district in Michigan. We want to send reports to the State that contain information about our students. The information contained in the email attachments must remain confidential and private. Therefore, I need to provide a secure way of sending reports/attachments via email over the Internet. Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated. SSL only provides secure logonsright??? Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move Mailbox
Hi List, Is there a command line option to move mailbox's between 5.5 E2K stores? Something to batch move groups of users. Many thanks Richard *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Mailbox
Thanks, Exmerge is an option which I have used in the past, thought there might be other options. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2003 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Hi bud, Have a look at what exmerge can do for you. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henderson Richard Sent: 16 July 2003 09:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move Mailbox Hi List, Is there a command line option to move mailbox's between 5.5 E2K stores? Something to batch move groups of users. Many thanks Richard *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hard drive space
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2003 15:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Do you need the extra HD space to run an eseutil defrag on EX2000?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is that before or after it falls asleep at 9pm?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Then smokes a cigarette
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
That's not entirely true.
What you need is non-whitespace + 10%(+/- a bit), not current
database +
10%.
The defrag process creates a new database and copies the data
from the old
file into the new one, then replaces the old one with the new one.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
You will need scratch space = current priv size + 10%.
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Sent: Wed Jul 09 06:33:11 2003
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:hard drive space
exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain
on drive where
edb's are. I know to do an offline defrag you need space
equal to the
databases to perform this function. Currently databases are 6
gb and 1 gb
with only 1.5 gb free disk space remaining. Store pegs cpu at
100% every 2
days. A reboot takes
care of cpu for the next 2 days. Databases are not growing at
increased
rate. disabled av sw. Big problem.
Biggest problem for trouble shooting for us is it takes 2
days for the store
service to consume cpu. Usually my next step would be to
replace databases
with new ones to see if they are the problem as per MS. But I
can't do this
for 2 days or more. Need better Ideas.
Thanks
.+--xm
,)?r(? \?y'
i??)?l+-r?rW{jx?m^zx%?S ?^jAZ? 2?G(L\x?fyb?)
)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If
you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or
retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please
delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately.
No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with
good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail
messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations
therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3
RE: hard drive space
Redirect the temp file
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2003 16:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Great so what do you do if you have a 50GB data store on 60GB drives?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes, regardless of your Exch version.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Do you need the extra HD space to run an eseutil defrag on EX2000?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is that before or after it falls asleep at 9pm?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Then smokes a cigarette
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
That's not entirely true.
What you need is non-whitespace + 10%(+/- a bit), not current
database +
10%.
The defrag process creates a new database and copies the data
from the old
file into the new one, then replaces the old one with the new one.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
You will need scratch space = current priv size + 10%.
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Sent: Wed Jul 09 06:33:11 2003
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:hard drive space
exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain
on drive where
edb's are. I know to do an offline defrag you need space
equal to the
databases to perform this function. Currently databases are 6
gb and 1 gb
with only 1.5 gb free disk space remaining. Store pegs cpu at
100% every 2
days. A reboot takes
care of cpu for the next 2 days. Databases are not growing at
increased
rate. disabled av sw. Big problem.
Biggest problem for trouble shooting for us is it takes 2
days for the store
service to consume cpu. Usually my next step would be to
replace databases
with new ones to see if they are the problem as per MS. But I
can't do this
for 2 days or more. Need better Ideas.
Thanks
.+--xm
,)?r(? \?y'
i??)?l+-r?rW{jx?m^zx%?S ?^jAZ? 2?G(L\x?fyb?)
)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hard drive space
Not sure, Martins answer covered what I have done in the past. It is a jet
direct utility so as long as you have the .edb .stm files you may be able
to. Anyone know?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2003 16:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: hard drive space
You can also run eseutil locally on a non-exchange server that has space on
any databases copied over from the prod server.
- Original Message -
From: Henderson Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Redirect the temp file
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2003 16:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Great so what do you do if you have a 50GB data store on 60GB drives?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes, regardless of your Exch version.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Do you need the extra HD space to run an eseutil defrag on EX2000?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is that before or after it falls asleep at 9pm?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Then smokes a cigarette
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
That's not entirely true.
What you need is non-whitespace + 10%(+/- a bit), not current database
+ 10%.
The defrag process creates a new database and copies the data from the
old file into the new one, then replaces the old one with the new one.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
You will need scratch space = current priv size + 10%.
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Sent: Wed Jul 09 06:33:11 2003
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: hard drive space
exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain on
drive where edb's are. I know to do an offline defrag you need space
equal to the
databases to perform this function. Currently databases are 6 gb and
1 gb with only 1.5 gb free disk space remaining. Store pegs cpu at
100% every 2
days. A reboot takes
care of cpu for the next 2 days. Databases are not growing at
increased
rate. disabled av sw. Big problem.
Biggest problem for trouble shooting for us is it takes 2
days for the store
service to consume cpu. Usually my next step would be to
replace databases
with new ones to see if they are the problem as per MS. But I
can't do this
for 2 days or more. Need better Ideas.
Thanks
.+--xm
,)?r(? \?y'
i??)?l+-r?rW{jx?m^zx%?S ?^jAZ? 2?G(L\x?fyb?)
)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: hard drive space
Well that answers that, the answer is yes.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2003 16:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: hard drive space
Not sure about what?
If you can do it?
Technet article: 244525
- Original Message -
From: Henderson Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Not sure, Martins answer covered what I have done in the past. It is
a
jet
direct utility so as long as you have the .edb .stm files you may be
able
to. Anyone know?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2003 16:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: hard drive space
You can also run eseutil locally on a non-exchange server that has
space
on
any databases copied over from the prod server.
- Original Message -
From: Henderson Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Redirect the temp file
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2003 16:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Great so what do you do if you have a 50GB data store on 60GB drives?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes, regardless of your Exch version.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Do you need the extra HD space to run an eseutil defrag on EX2000?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is that before or after it falls asleep at 9pm?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
Then smokes a cigarette
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
That's not entirely true.
What you need is non-whitespace + 10%(+/- a bit), not current
database
+ 10%.
The defrag process creates a new database and copies the data from
the old file into the new one, then replaces the old one with the
new one.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Brady, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: hard drive space
You will need scratch space = current priv size + 10%.
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Sent: Wed Jul 09 06:33:11 2003
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: hard drive space
exchange 5.5 sp4 nt 4.0 sp6 how much free space should remain on
drive where edb's are. I know to do an offline defrag you need
space
equal to the
databases to perform this function. Currently databases are 6 gb
and 1 gb with only 1.5 gb free disk space remaining. Store pegs
cpu at 100% every 2 days. A reboot takes
care of cpu for the next 2 days. Databases are not growing at
increased
rate. disabled av sw. Big problem.
Biggest problem for trouble shooting for us is it takes 2
days for the store
service to consume cpu. Usually my next step would be to
replace databases
with new ones to see if they are the problem as per MS. But I
can't do this
for 2 days or more. Need better Ideas.
Thanks
.+--xm
,)?r(? \?y'
i??)?l+-r?rW{jx?m^zx%?S ?^jAZ? 2?G(L\x?fyb?)
)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: OAB replication in Exchange 2000
We have replicated a copy of the OAB on each server. Have found that if a replica does not exist clients homed too the server don't synchronize. -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 July 2003 16:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OAB replication in Exchange 2000 All, Quick question on the OAB generation in Exchange 2000. In ESM under Offline Address Lists I have a Default Offline Address Lists, being generated by one of the Exchange 2000 servers. I have 70 servers spread across the globe - in 60 Administrative groups (still in mixed mode with 5.5). Seeing how this one server generates the OAB for the environment, should I create additional ones on other servers, or is the OAB replicated across all servers once generated?? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
I have experienced issues with RPC servers being unavailable, the cause being WINS lacking an entry for the Domain. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Cant check the switch as the engineer who looks after that side isnt around this week (politics!!!) we havent experienced any other connectivity issues though There was a spare slot in one of the racks, so I took this compaq desktop down there, plugged it into the same switch as the other two servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on my LAN. Is there any chance you could but the machines on to a hub and try it? It may be a shot in the dark...but worth a stab. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 08:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Hi Thanks for the responses Any of these servers multi-homed? No, but the 2 existing servers that are already in the Exchange Site have 2 network adapters and the Compaq teaming drivers installed Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. Tried putting all three servers (2 existing and 1 new) into each others lmhosts and hosts, imported lmhosts, rebooted, problem persists Verify that you can resolve the hostname properly through both WINS and DNS. Are you referring to any other means other than pinging the netbios then the full hostname? Thanks for any further advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2003 16:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Any of these servers multi-homed? Also, I know you say DNS is working, but try putting all the respective entries in all the server's hosts files. - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:57 AM Subject: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Dear All, This is a problem I had at my previous employer, and I got around it by temporarily removing DNS whilst joining the site, this isnt working here We have 2 Exchange Servers on our private LAN. One has mailboxes, one has IMC. Both Exch 5.5 SP4 Running on NT4 SP6a with only TCP/IP installed Both point to DNS and WINS servers on the same LAN address range There are no problems communicating between the 2 servers However, when attempting to join a 3rd server to the site, it fails at the point of running setup where it starts to make a copy of the directory, saying; A connection could not be made to the remote directory service, possibly due to a network failure. Be sure both directory services are running and
RE: Monitor Email content
yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Nice one, a man with a sense of humour... -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Yawn? Maybe to you, but anytime you want to come out and play with the big boys, pal, this is exactly the kind of issue that has to be addressed. Hit the delete key, or sod off, I don't much care which - this is on topic, and being discussed in a perfectly reasonable manner. You're with an outsourcing company. I'll assume you don't take that pissant attitude to your client sites. -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors
RE: weird PF issue
If user accounts have screwy permissions that can affect PF ACL's working correctly. If your account works ok it may pay to recreate hers? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird PF issue someone else in my team alredy tried that (PCAnywhere-ed to her machine and created a new profile) - didn't help These are the steps I took to no avail: - Created a subfolder under the bad folder and moved the messages in there, then back. - Created a TEMP subfolder under the bad folder, moved it to the top of PF hierarchy, moved the messages in there, deleted the original bad folder, then under the TEMP folder created a new subfolder with the same name as the old bad folder, then moved the new bad subfolder to the original location, then moved all the messages from TEMP folder to the new bad folder. - Did all the previous steps with copying messages instead of moving. - Exported all the messages from the bad folder to a PST file, deleted the bad folder altogether, created a new bad folder (with the same permissions as the original) and imported data from the PST file back. This is the first time my scientific jiggling method failed. :( -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: weird PF issue Maybe try deleting and re-creating the profile on her PC. Does she still have problems if you do that? - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:42 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: weird PF issue Subject: weird PF issue One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing Mailbox name
Does anyone know if having a directory name in 5.5/2000, that is different to a users NT4 Username, would somehow create problems for Offline Address book synchronization? I was thinking along the lines of the address book public folder ACL not being able to resolve client MAPI permissions... -Original Message- From: Glaman, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 17:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mailbox name I exmerge the old mailbox to a pst and delete the old and create a new one. the directory name will be incorrect and our system looks at this entry. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mailbox name The only thing I do differently is change the alias name and rename the domain account to match. Also, I add a NEW SMTP address and leave the other one, so that e-mail addressed to her previous name will continue to be delivered as well. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing Mailbox name I have a user that has gotten married, and her name has to be changed. Does anyone know the procedure of doing this. I was under the impression that if i just changed her name in the display and the SMTP address on Exchange Server, that would have done it, but it was brought to me that there was a correct way of doing it. I really appreciate you help. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Feedback on Quest Spotlight on Exchange
It's great to snapshot what's going on over a short period but not designed for continuous monitoring (which is why we did not purchase it). Excellent help screens that actually explain what the heck all the pretty graphs mean. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 June 2003 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: User Feedback on Quest Spotlight on Exchange we are strongly considering purchasing Quest's Spotlight on Exchange for our 5.5 org. Any feedback from existing customers? The latest Beta seems a great blend of many tools . . . we wanted to go with MOM but it seems monitoring Exchange 5.5 is not an option . . . thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: slow login with mac clients after restore.
Have you tried recreating the Outlook client exchange profile to see if the slow logon still occurs? -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 13:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: slow login with mac clients after restore. Hmmm, this slow login problem has appeared again. All mac clients (outlook 2001) hang for five minutes after entering login credentials. After that the client works perfectly... - Exchange 5.5 SP4 - Macs connecting via IP - Mixed MAC OS versions (9.2 X) - All macs have correct hosts file, and dns servers (dns contains correct info) - Exchange was restored two days ago from backup, to the same server, 1gb of transaction logs played in - All other networking on macs seems fine - All windows clients are fine 1) Are we dealing with Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000? What service pack level are you running? 2) How are the Macs connected to the network? 3) What rev of the MAC OS are they running? 4) Do the Macs have a HOSTS file and if so is it setup correctly? 5) For the restore server did you change anything? More importantly, did you restore to the same hardware or to a completely new server? I'm assuming same hardware at this point. 6) Since the Macs can talk to the server what are the ping times like? (You can use MacPing to determine this if you run anything earlier than Mac OSX. If you are running MacOSX then bring up a terminal window and run it from there.). This will do for a start. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Atkinson, Daniel Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 06:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: slow login with mac clients after restore. last night we did a restore because we've been getting some database errors in the event log. we restored from a good backup and played in the log files as normal - everything worked great and we're up and running again, except now our mac users with outlook 2001 take about 5 minutes to log in. they enter credentials at startup and outlook 2001 just hangs for 5 minutes and then starts and works perfectly. we are going to restart the server at lunch to see if this fixes it but i'm not hopeful. any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode =la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers
LOL, yes lawyers will be first against the wall when the revolution comes...closely followed by accountants -Original Message- From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 14:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers *Has* anyone tested email disclaimers in the courts in the UK, EU or US? I'm not aware of any cases. I do find it ironic that lawyers, who knowingly write in a way that most people do not find clear, should be concerned that the disclaimer should be written so as to be understood by any recipient. It's all Greek to me. Or double-Dutch. Perhaps your disclaimer could consist of Legal disclaimer - you must read this in every relevant language, each linked to a web page which contains the text in that language. Or write it in Esperanto. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 14:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brick level backups That's not funny !! I'm currently involved in discussions with our legal team regarding the validity of English language disclaimers on messages written in various different European languages (we route all our Internet mail through a single SMTP gateway in the UK). The legal team are pushing to add disclaimers in each language. Just because no-one ever reads disclaimers doesn't mean that they are not legally applicable - when was the last time you read the MS license agreement when installing software? And just because I select the other radio button and click OK doesn't mean that I have read the labels attached to those actions either. I would be interested in Williams disclaimer list if he would be happy to publish. Also, does anyone know of a disclaimer adder that is language aware? Otherwise I'm going to have to do some funny tricks with SMTP connectors and routing inside the company. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K machine services hanging on starting
Acknowledged that the M drive is special, can't say it is non existent as it appears in the folder tree. The question is more about how to avoid the interactions that cause the hanging behaviour. Knowing the mechanism of the lockup would be useful. Setting the exclusion on an anti virus product should be easy, the backup agent shouldn't need configuration to exclude drives, that is something done when specifying a backup. This is why I suspect dependencies may be an issue (the basic backup agent wouldn't know about Exchange). If anyone has seen this behaviour it would be interesting to know what they found. If it hasn't been seen then maybe I should be looking for a cause not related to Exchange. regards, Richard Dann -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 June 2003 19:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K machine services hanging on starting As I'm sure everyone will tell you shortly, there is no M: drive. It does not exist. Make sure nothing tries to touch the non-existent M: drive, especially AV products. David -Original Message- From: Richard Dann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K machine services hanging on starting I've got an Exchange 2000 SP3 machine running on a security hardened W2K SP3 machine. If I attempt to run an anti virus product on the non Exchange files I've had problems with services hanging on starting (if the AV was allowed to scan the M drive all sorts of things started locking up). I've also tried installing a backup application (HP Omniback) to allow backup to a large tape silo. this caused similar problems (SRS service showed up as Starting, unable to start or stop other services) until I set it to manual start and let everything else start first. Has anyone seen similar problems? Do I need to set a dependency for the backup service or is there something more fundamental going on? regards, Richard Dann Telenor Business Solutions, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For further information, visit http://www.telenorbusinesssolutions.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Telenor Business Solutions, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For further information, visit http://www.telenorbusinesssolutions.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ghost of 5.5 KMS
Rick, Thanks for that. I did indeed find a reference to the old server in that object. There is also a CA object in the same container which also had a reference to the same server. As I recall the 5.5 clean up instructions said to delete the raw CA object. Any idea whether I should de the same in 2K? regards, Richard Dann -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ghost of 5.5 KMS I had the same problem and here is what we did to resolve it: Open ADSI Edit (Be Careful Here) Connect to Configuration Container cn = configuration cn = services cn = Microsoft Exchange cn = ORGNAME cn = Administrative Groups cn = SITENAME cn = Advanced Security With in the Advanced Security container is the Encryption Object. Open the properties of this object and look at the KMServer attribute. You will probably see a reference to your old Exchange 5.5 KMS server. Clear this attribute in each Administrative Group. Regards Rick Clemens -Original Message- From: Richard Dann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions I've got two servers in an organisation/site, the first is 5.5 SP4 and the second is Exchange 2K SP3. The 5.5 server once had KMS installed. If I try reinstalling it I get an install failure so I've suspicions of something lurking. The KB articles for cleaning up failed installs have been applied so theoretically the server should be clean. I'm now trying to install KMS on the 2K system (which is intended to replace the 5.5 one) and its saying there is already a KMS in the site. This may be a replication problem or there may be something still referencing the dead KMS. Has anyone seen this before or does anyone know what the install program may be detecting? regards, Richard Dann Telenor Business Solutions, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For further information, visit http://www.telenorbusinesssolutions.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Telenor Business Solutions, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For further information, visit http://www.telenorbusinesssolutions.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Marshall users
I found it very good, nice to get real-time mail scanning off the exchange server. Version 1 was abit ugly but once the GUI version came out much easier to use. Configuration easy if your business rules for mail handling are already agreed on. -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 June 2003 15:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Marshall users You who - used it and it was great. Lot of work up front however. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Marshall users Sorry for the semi off topic post. Would anyone who is the administrator of a Mail Marshall service, please contact me off list. I'm looking for some real - world information about it's operation and reliability. Thanks. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store
We also run Legato (networker) with a jukebox have found exchange recovery time consuming (clustered environment). Our stores are spread across multiple tapes. The key seems to be recreating the client index rescanning the tapes, this is especially important if the retention period has expired. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 June 2003 05:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store I would suggest that your case is not the best argument for a separate storage group, but rather a creative technical solution to a miserable technical and political situation. I did forget to note that politics is also a regretfully valid reason for creating a separate SG. The right solution here would be to fix the backup problem. Somehow the costs of the solution are being hidden because they are most certainly higher than if the backups worked. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:30 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store In my experience, if you have very large information stores, it may be helpful to split them into separate storage groups. This way you could create separate backups jobs. And then you could manipulate those backup jobs independently from each other. Especially in my case where in addition to Legato backups I run NTBACKUP to a file (can't trust Legato alone after a few incidents). I have a storage group that has multiple stores and all together they are 60+GB. It takes a long time to do a 60GB backup, plus that's a hige file to handle. I have recently created another storage group and moved half of the users to the stores in the new storage group. Now I have separate NTBACKUP jobs for each storage group. -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store Thanks Andy, that is very helpful. - Matt -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store I thought I covered that already. The extra storage group lets you split those users into a separate backup/recovery set. That's not to say you can't get one database back if there are more than one in a single storage group though. It just may take longer in the single SG situation. Emphasis on may. You can set a storage group to circular logging. Not a good idea for VIP mailboxes, but perhaps useful for public folder replicas or newsfeed public stores. You can set a storage group to zero out deleted database pages. This is not a major feature, nor performance hit. Policies are set on a mailbox store basis though, so you can get that functionality without the additional overhead of the extra SG. Performance would only improve marginally if at all either way. If you put the two sets of log files on two separate sets of disk spindles, then you would increase your log throughput. On the other hand, you would be losing single instance store and so would be writing more into the databases (both STM and EDB) and using much more RAM for overhead rather than data caching. I don't see the benefit in a small environment of an additional SG. The additional IS gives you policy differentiation, so that might be the argument there. -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:55 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store Then what is the upside? Why would you want two Information Stores? - Matt -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store The downside is: 1) it uses much more RAM to add a storage group vs. adding a database or just staying with one. 2) it uses more space because there is a second set of STM and log files and single-instance-store is broken. 3) it may take more backup time and backup tape I'm not arguing against doing it. Just stating facts. -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:11 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store Subject: RE: Second Storage Group or Additional Mailbox Store You don't say anything about why you think you need another database, so there's not
E2K machine services hanging on starting
I've got an Exchange 2000 SP3 machine running on a security hardened W2K SP3 machine. If I attempt to run an anti virus product on the non Exchange files I've had problems with services hanging on starting (if the AV was allowed to scan the M drive all sorts of things started locking up). I've also tried installing a backup application (HP Omniback) to allow backup to a large tape silo. this caused similar problems (SRS service showed up as Starting, unable to start or stop other services) until I set it to manual start and let everything else start first. Has anyone seen similar problems? Do I need to set a dependency for the backup service or is there something more fundamental going on? regards, Richard Dann Telenor Business Solutions, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For further information, visit http://www.telenorbusinesssolutions.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ghost of 5.5 KMS
I've got two servers in an organisation/site, the first is 5.5 SP4 and the second is Exchange 2K SP3. The 5.5 server once had KMS installed. If I try reinstalling it I get an install failure so I've suspicions of something lurking. The KB articles for cleaning up failed installs have been applied so theoretically the server should be clean. I'm now trying to install KMS on the 2K system (which is intended to replace the 5.5 one) and its saying there is already a KMS in the site. This may be a replication problem or there may be something still referencing the dead KMS. Has anyone seen this before or does anyone know what the install program may be detecting? regards, Richard Dann Telenor Business Solutions, a division of international telecoms organisation Telenor, is a leading European Communications Service Provider. For further information, visit http://www.telenorbusinesssolutions.co.uk. With the exclusion of purchase orders/requests with reference to repair quotations the views, information and opinion contained in this e-mail are that of the author. Where it is intended to place reliance upon any statement made, then a formal confirmation should be requested. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Good point , what is the business case for email now? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003 Good morning, Surely you are laughing by now. But my management team wants to know why I want to spend all of this money for Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003. I mean we are currently on Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5. How do I justify the expense and get it in the budget for 2004. Help!!! Have a great week. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take but by the moments that take our breath away. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA ill not let me log in?
It takes a while for the email address to be created? Also an email needs to be sent to the account before you can access the mailbox. -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2003 14:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA ill not let me log in? Exchange 2000 SP3 Windows 2000 SP3 I just built a new Exchange 2000 Server and created a mailbox on it OWA will not let me log in, any ideas. It acts like I have the wrong Username and Password but I know it is right. I have tried Domain\Username and Password I have also tried Username and Password Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Main: (864) 272-1145 Mobile: (864) 449-9912 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and notify the sender immediately. No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations therefore, information expressed in this message is not given or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly authorised representative independent of this message. Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What Service Pack have I?
mine shows it there -Original Message- From: Lee Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What Service Pack have I? Tried that, it just says Build 4417.6? We've just upgraded from Standard to Enterprise Edition. Does this mean I have to reinstall the service Packs? If so can I just reinstall SP3? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SEND ON BEHALF
Hello, I have users who send on behalf of the president of our company. The users request a read receipt for every message that is sent on behalf. Since we upgraded to exch2000 the read receipts no longer go to the person sending on behalf of the president they are only sent to the presidents mailbox. Is there a way to change this setting in exchange 2000. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Rules
The messages are being sent to a distribution list which is a member of the public folder. The only way I got it to work is to send the message directly to the public folder not to the dl, but I want to send it to the dl and have it forwarded from the public folder to my address but it doesn't work. I tested it with another exchange server and got the same result. It work in exchange 5.5 but doesnt work in 2000. I guess its by design or Izzz got to wait for the next service pack. rich -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Rules Where does the mail, that they receive (forwarded) say it is from? Or... What is the address in your domain that mail is being sent to when it is then being processed and forwarded? With either of those addresses, you should be able to type them in the To: line of a message and resolve the name of the mailbox. On 3/27/03 10:39, Manner, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The redirect from checking the email header text to an external email address (I feel works) - the customer states they have not received some - 2 out of 31 - therefore, I feel the rule works and there is a hick-up on their end - but I need to find out the acct that the rule is attached too so I can make sure and then check any bounced messages in the buffer for the 2 emails sent. It is mainly to show the customer that we are working and to check with their IT group. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Rules How do you know its not working? - Original Message - From: Manner, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Rules More detail - the profile is what I do not know - there must be a way to view all server based rules to the exchange server and the profile they arte attached too. The reason I ask is that I am not an exchange expert and my sr sys admin is not in today - and we are having an issue with the rule working thx -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Rules How could you not know this? I think there are some details missing. Simple answer: Open the profile you used and see what's there. - Original Message - From: Scott Manner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:46 AM Subject: Exchange Rules I set a server level exchange rule to an account - how can I check what account I attached the rule to? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public folder rules
Hello, I have 4 public folders and I need a rule that forwards all messages received by the folder to a users mailbox. I used to have this set up when we had exchange 5.5 but since we upgraded to exchange 2000 the rules no longer work for public folders. This is what i do to set it up: I go to the public folder that i want to forward the messages and go to properties. Then click the tab administration, then there is a tab called folder assistant. In this section you can set up a rule to forward the message based on content to a users mailbox. I set this up but it doesnt work, does anyone know why. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder rules
I want all messages sent to the public folder forwarded to a users mailbox. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder rules Without knowing exactly WHAT it is that you are telling the rule to do, it would be rather difficult to tell you WHY it's not working. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder rules Hello, I have 4 public folders and I need a rule that forwards all messages received by the folder to a users mailbox. I used to have this set up when we had exchange 5.5 but since we upgraded to exchange 2000 the rules no longer work for public folders. This is what i do to set it up: I go to the public folder that i want to forward the messages and go to properties. Then click the tab administration, then there is a tab called folder assistant. In this section you can set up a rule to forward the message based on content to a users mailbox. I set this up but it doesnt work, does anyone know why. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder rules
anything sent to the old public chartering forward it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder rules What does your rule say? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder rules I want all messages sent to the public folder forwarded to a users mailbox. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder rules Without knowing exactly WHAT it is that you are telling the rule to do, it would be rather difficult to tell you WHY it's not working. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder rules Hello, I have 4 public folders and I need a rule that forwards all messages received by the folder to a users mailbox. I used to have this set up when we had exchange 5.5 but since we upgraded to exchange 2000 the rules no longer work for public folders. This is what i do to set it up: I go to the public folder that i want to forward the messages and go to properties. Then click the tab administration, then there is a tab called folder assistant. In this section you can set up a rule to forward the message based on content to a users mailbox. I set this up but it doesnt work, does anyone know why. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can this happen with Spam ?
But I believe that just turns it off. It doesn't disable it (I could be wrong, but that's how I believe it to be). A user could just turn it back on. BTW - That's called 'web beaconing' (when images are use for tracking). It's a very effective method for determining if email addresses are valid, and has been used by a LOT of spammers. We've even seen HTML emails that don't have any visible images use this by setting the width height to 0 so the image doesn't appear, but it still gets accessed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Busby, Jacob Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:34 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Can this happen with Spam ? Outlook has a /nopreview switch which alows you to turn off the preview pane for your users. When you deploy Outlook you could deploy it with this switch. I'd love to see a lawsuit raised against spammers. Something along the lines of emotional damages for receiving pornographic e-mail. Hit them in the wallet - it's the only language they understand! Is this possible in Outlook ? The article said something about with the Preview pane being turned on in Outlook, this was more likely to happen or just opening an email with this sort of an image in it could also trigger the code. How can this happen ? This means Outlook is allowing some code to get executed that passes information back to the source. Isn't there a security patch to prevent this from happening ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item
We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we switched it over to exchange 2000 box all public folders are receiving messages as posts not as message formats. Does anyone know a quick fix to this problem without using third party programs. rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PF post feature (was Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item)
sorry about the subject, yeah we purchased a utility called PostToNote but the problem is they dont let you download it after purchase you have to wait for it in the mail 12-24 hours, pretty messed up. The funny thing is that you can download a evaluation version. Rich -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF post feature (was Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item) This is by product design. If you don't want to use a 3rd party event sink, you can write your own or rehome the public folders in question to a 5.5 server. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 3/21/03 21:15, Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we switched it over to exchange 2000 box all public folders are receiving messages as posts not as message formats. Does anyone know a quick fix to this problem without using third party programs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folders
Hello, We recently did a upgrade from exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000. I have two servers both are on windows 2000. 1 box has exchange 5.5 installed and the other has exchange 2000. Last night I rehomed the public folders to the exchange 2000 box. The problem I have now is I cannot recieve email from the outside to these public folders. On the old 5.5 box I had a distribution list setup called [EMAIL PROTECTED] so when people from outside sent to this address it would go to a public folder but now it doesnt. However when you send a email directly to the public folder it receive it. I checked the public folder in exchange manager and it does have the [EMAIL PROTECTED] dl in the members tab. I think everything is set up right but its not working right. If anyone can help me please do. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: user is working at home on ISDN, slow opening attachments
this is a direct dial in to the network. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
user is working at home on ISDN, slow opening attachments
exchange 5.5 sp4 environment. user is on an windows XP/office XP pc. when the user is in the office, everthing is fine. when the user works at home, it will take up to 15 minutes to open a 1meg attachment. opening e-mails with no attachments takes up to a minute. the circuit is a isdn line, 128k. Is this normal?? How can I make this better?? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange 2000
Hello, I just upgraded our server from windows nt with exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 serv with exchange 2000. I have two questions so maybe you guys could help me before i go out and buy a book this afternoon. Does anyone know how to have the administrator account access everyones maybox from outlook. For example if i log into my workstation as administrator and set the profile to any user in outlook and open it, it should open like it did in exchange 5.5. Second question I have two public folders that recieve alot of email and I set it up in exchange 5.5 to delete items older than 5 days. I cant find out where to configure this in exchange 2000. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 2000
Thanks man I got the admin set now i will look up the public folders age limits rich -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 Richard, Search MS for the Q article on how to allow the admin full access, as the Admin doesn't by default have permissions to access the email boxes on 2000. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 March 2003 15:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange 2000 Hello, I just upgraded our server from windows nt with exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 serv with exchange 2000. I have two questions so maybe you guys could help me before i go out and buy a book this afternoon. Does anyone know how to have the administrator account access everyones maybox from outlook. For example if i log into my workstation as administrator and set the profile to any user in outlook and open it, it should open like it did in exchange 5.5. Second question I have two public folders that recieve alot of email and I set it up in exchange 5.5 to delete items older than 5 days. I cant find out where to configure this in exchange 2000. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 vpn
Hello, We use routing and remote access for people to connect to our exchange server and have problems with thier connection. For some reason when people connect to the server they receive an error that their Microsoft exchange server is busy. To fix the problem they have to disconnect their network connection and reconnect to the vpn and then they can get into the exchange server. I set lmhosts file on every client pc to connect to the exchange server. Does anyone know how to resolve this problem. RGDS Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows 2000 vpn
no nat is not enabled but there is a firewall and the ports for vpn are opened -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows 2000 vpn Are there any NAT firewalls between the client and the Exchange server? What VPN client are they using? Nate -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Windows 2000 vpn Hello, We use routing and remote access for people to connect to our exchange server and have problems with thier connection. For some reason when people connect to the server they receive an error that their Microsoft exchange server is busy. To fix the problem they have to disconnect their network connection and reconnect to the vpn and then they can get into the exchange server. I set lmhosts file on every client pc to connect to the exchange server. Does anyone know how to resolve this problem. RGDS Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flusing log files - almost out of space
I set the Exchange option to FULL. I went back out there on Friday. I shut down Exchange gracefully, and checked the logs. Everything was flushed. I nuked the logs and restarted Exchange. Everything is working fine now. I tweaked BENT a little in hopes that an error about writing catalogs disappears. Thanks to all for the refresher info. Much appreciated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:16 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: Re: Flusing log files - almost out of space How exactly did you set the logs to flush in BE? Verify that job method for Exchange (Tools/Options) and the job itself is set for a full online backup. - Original Message - From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Flusing log files - almost out of space Yep. BENT 8.x with the Exchange agent. But it appears it was only flushing the logs on Fridays. Well, last Friday's job didn't finish because it couldn't write the catalog to the drive (due to space). BENT shows the job as successful, but there's an entry in the app log about the catalog failure. That's what makes me think that's why it couldn't flush. I set the daily BU jobs to also flush, but it (apparently) didn't do this on Monday night. I'm heading back there to look at these possible causes/resolutions: XADM: Using Eseutil to Determine Which Logs Have Been Committed http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;182961 XADM: How to Recover from a Full Transaction Log File Drive http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;259751 XADM: How to Tell Which Transaction Log Files Can Be Safely Removed http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;240145 Thanks for the input so far! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:31 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Flusing log files - almost out of space If a full BU is not removing the logs you need to find out why. ? BU software ? Exchange aware? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pat Richard Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Flusing log files - almost out of space NT 4 SP6 (I think) Ex 5.5 SP4 - single org, site, server One problem led to many others. Drive with the log files (also the system drive) ran low on space, so the MTA stopped. I cleared some stuff off the drive to get up to 150MB. MTA started, and it's working. The disk space problem also caused BENT to not run correctly because it couldn't write the catalog to the disk (space was down to 7MB when I got there on Monday). I believe that this caused the Exchange logs to not get flushed. The logs now comprise 3GB of space (and growing). One successful backup has run since, but again, the logs aren't flushed. My question is (to refresh my memory)... Can I stop Exchange, copy the logs to another drive for archiving, then kill the originals, and restart Exchange? If I recall, it should recreate new log files, correct? (I'm making the assumption that the transactions in the logs are committed). It looks like the drive that the store is on has plenty of space (including enough to defrag the store, etc). All services are running fine. But obviously, I need to clear those logs, and want to make sure it's how I remember it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Flusing log files - almost out of space
NT 4 SP6 (I think) Ex 5.5 SP4 - single org, site, server One problem led to many others. Drive with the log files (also the system drive) ran low on space, so the MTA stopped. I cleared some stuff off the drive to get up to 150MB. MTA started, and it's working. The disk space problem also caused BENT to not run correctly because it couldn't write the catalog to the disk (space was down to 7MB when I got there on Monday). I believe that this caused the Exchange logs to not get flushed. The logs now comprise 3GB of space (and growing). One successful backup has run since, but again, the logs aren't flushed. My question is (to refresh my memory)... Can I stop Exchange, copy the logs to another drive for archiving, then kill the originals, and restart Exchange? If I recall, it should recreate new log files, correct? (I'm making the assumption that the transactions in the logs are committed). It looks like the drive that the store is on has plenty of space (including enough to defrag the store, etc). All services are running fine. But obviously, I need to clear those logs, and want to make sure it's how I remember it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flusing log files - almost out of space
Yep. BENT 8.x with the Exchange agent. But it appears it was only flushing the logs on Fridays. Well, last Friday's job didn't finish because it couldn't write the catalog to the drive (due to space). BENT shows the job as successful, but there's an entry in the app log about the catalog failure. That's what makes me think that's why it couldn't flush. I set the daily BU jobs to also flush, but it (apparently) didn't do this on Monday night. I'm heading back there to look at these possible causes/resolutions: XADM: Using Eseutil to Determine Which Logs Have Been Committed http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;182961 XADM: How to Recover from a Full Transaction Log File Drive http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;259751 XADM: How to Tell Which Transaction Log Files Can Be Safely Removed http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;240145 Thanks for the input so far! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:31 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Flusing log files - almost out of space If a full BU is not removing the logs you need to find out why. ? BU software ? Exchange aware? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pat Richard Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Flusing log files - almost out of space NT 4 SP6 (I think) Ex 5.5 SP4 - single org, site, server One problem led to many others. Drive with the log files (also the system drive) ran low on space, so the MTA stopped. I cleared some stuff off the drive to get up to 150MB. MTA started, and it's working. The disk space problem also caused BENT to not run correctly because it couldn't write the catalog to the disk (space was down to 7MB when I got there on Monday). I believe that this caused the Exchange logs to not get flushed. The logs now comprise 3GB of space (and growing). One successful backup has run since, but again, the logs aren't flushed. My question is (to refresh my memory)... Can I stop Exchange, copy the logs to another drive for archiving, then kill the originals, and restart Exchange? If I recall, it should recreate new log files, correct? (I'm making the assumption that the transactions in the logs are committed). It looks like the drive that the store is on has plenty of space (including enough to defrag the store, etc). All services are running fine. But obviously, I need to clear those logs, and want to make sure it's how I remember it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
connect to exchange over vpn
Hello, I have problem with a user that is using vpn connection to read his email off our server. He can log into the vpn and access his email but when he tries to send he recieves the following message: Microsoft Outlook Network problems are preventing connection to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer. The wierd thing is when I set him up here at my office it worked fine also it worked on his cable modem at home. Then when he went to his new office with a new dsl line he started to recieve this message. I looked up the error on google and one suggestion was to remove TCP/IP and add it again. This worked for about 5 hours and the next day he came to the office the same error popped up. I thought the problem might be the dsl line so I had him troubleshoot it with his service provider. They recommended that he upgrade his service to a faster speed. I didnt think this was the issue so I told him to test it out on another internet connection and he did and got the same error. I have about 25 users that connect to vpn and access their email and he is the only one having the problem. He uses windows xp pro and he is trying to connect to exchange server 5.5 sp4 on windows nt 4.0 sp6. Thanks Richard Tener _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem sending html mail
exchange 5.5 sp4, nt4 sp6a clients - windows xp, office xp - with latest service packs when my users are using plain text format to prepare the message, the attachments are delivered to the clinets. when they use html format, the e-mail is delivered but there is no attachment. any sugestions as to where my problem may be thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem sending html mail
prepare a new message, click on the paper clip to attach the word or excel document _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000
Corrupted form cache? Look for and delete frmcache.dat on the client. Then try again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:03 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: Outlook 2000 I a workstation that has read receipt turned on. Each time they go to open or delete the receipt it gives them a dialog box that says: The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead. They click ok and then receipt either opens or deletes depending on what action they were requesting. This is just a Vanilla setup of Office 2000 with Outlook using the Corporate/Workgroup setup. No bells and whistles. What could be wrong? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem sending html mail
e-mails are going to external users the internet mail service/internet mail tab: attachments(outbound) - mine, plain text and html are checked. uuencode is not checked. character sets for both are: western european(iso-8859-1) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem sending html mail
it is set to USER. changing it to ALWAYS and will see what happens _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Journaling
Hi All, I have been trying to get journaling enabled at the site level but have been unable to. I went into the registry and configured the hives according to Technet article # Q239427. However, the mail is still not journaling. Is there something else I should be doing? Thanks, Richard Johnson 212-589-6503 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Journaling
No errors in the event viewer.I wish there was. I am using a mailbox. Do I need to set special permissions to that mailbox? Richard Johnson 212-589-6503 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Journaling All the info to get it running is in that article. Are there any errors in the Application log that might be related? I know that when I have journaling on I do get some delivery errors. Are you using a public folder or a mailbox? We use a PF and had to make sure that all the users have the ability to create items. - Peter -Original Message- From: Johnson, Richard (NY Int) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Journaling Hi All, I have been trying to get journaling enabled at the site level but have been unable to. I went into the registry and configured the hives according to Technet article # Q239427. However, the mail is still not journaling. Is there something else I should be doing? Thanks, Richard Johnson 212-589-6503 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000
Yep. In some clients you can go to ToolsOptionsOtherAdvanced OptionsCustom FormsManage Forms and click the CLEAR CACHE button. But whacking the .dat file is faster. Next time you open a form, it creates a new file and caches the form. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:02 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: Re: Outlook 2000 If I delete it will it regenerate?? - Original Message - From: Pat Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Corrupted form cache? Look for and delete frmcache.dat on the client. Then try again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:03 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: Outlook 2000 I a workstation that has read receipt turned on. Each time they go to open or delete the receipt it gives them a dialog box that says: The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead. They click ok and then receipt either opens or deletes depending on what action they were requesting. This is just a Vanilla setup of Office 2000 with Outlook using the Corporate/Workgroup setup. No bells and whistles. What could be wrong? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem sending html mail
damm, putting settings back to USER. thanks for your sugestion _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
error 4026
Hello, I just received an error on my server event Id 4026, has anyone ever heard about this error. I think the error has to do with a corrupted queue file. After I restarted the server the event file said that exchange found a corrupted queue and it will attempt to rebuild it. Everything is working now before all my messages were stuck in the IMS Queue. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMC not working - error 3051 also
Howdy - been away from the Exchange world for a little while, now thrown back into it. Just looked at the email/file server for a small firm for the first time. No Internet email is going in or out. Mail to others within the office appears to be fine. But the Internet Mail Connector seems to be broken. All services are starting fine, and attempts to send an outbound internet email message (to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) yields the following in the event log: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=EMEK;L=EMEK01-030117191939Z-2. It was originally destined for C=US;A= ;P=EMEK;O=EMEK01;DDA:SMTP=reply(a)mydomain.com; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 19 136] (12) I'm also seeing the following: Warning MSExchangeIS Private MTA Connections 2000 Verify that the Microsoft Exchange MTA service has started. Consecutive ma-open calls are failing with error 3051. Anyone see this before? It's a simple little accounting shop with about a dozen users who are heading into tax season. I'd greatly appreciate any assistance. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: deleting one email
I dont know -Original Message- From: Michael Ahlfont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: deleting one email Sensitivity: Private Hello everyone Is there anyway of deleting an email that was sent out to everyone without manualy deleting it from each users mailbox? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
outlook OT
Did anyone ever encounter this problem, I have a user that uses outlook 2002, sends and recieves from our server using pop3 account. Some reason when he sends a message the message gets stuck in his outbox and people keep recieving multiple copies. I recreated a new user account and it still happens. If anyone has encountered this problem please shed some light. Thanks Richard Tener _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook OT
I wish he used our VPN -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: outlook OT Nope. Mongo use VPN, Citrix or OWA to connect to Exchange Server. - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:18 PM Subject: outlook OT Did anyone ever encounter this problem, I have a user that uses outlook 2002, sends and recieves from our server using pop3 account. Some reason when he sends a message the message gets stuck in his outbox and people keep recieving multiple copies. I recreated a new user account and it still happens. If anyone has encountered this problem please shed some light. Thanks Richard Tener _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A question or two from a user!!!
USE Stationary Picker in tools options then mail format -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A question or two from a user!!! Good afternoon, Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5 NT4. I have a user that writes the following: Mike; Is there a way that I can set up automatic indent on my messages? I have found the indent increase and decrease tabs, but can I have it so my messages automatically start with the indent? Does anyone know where I can find these options on Outlook? I looked high and low. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook memo problem
Hello all, I was wondering if anyone could help me with an outlook problem. I have a user that uses outlook 2000, when she goes to edit her the outlook memo style form she cannot do anyrthing to it. She wants to print in landscape but cannot edit this memo form. She uses windows 2000, I think it might have to do with her permissions on the printer. Any suggestions would be great. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook memo problem
I dont really know if this is solving the problem but it fixed it for the user. I added her to the printer operators group and now she can print in landscape. Rich -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook memo problem Hello all, I was wondering if anyone could help me with an outlook problem. I have a user that uses outlook 2000, when she goes to edit her the outlook memo style form she cannot do anyrthing to it. She wants to print in landscape but cannot edit this memo form. She uses windows 2000, I think it might have to do with her permissions on the printer. Any suggestions would be great. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zantaz
Hi All, Anyone out here using their offline email vault product? If so what are your thoughts? Richard Johnson 212-589-6503 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: public folder restore
thanks Ed and Martin. I did what Ed said to do and moved the public folder contacts to a mailbox, used exmerge to create a PST, and then copied the PST into the public folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
public folder restore
exchange 5.5 sp4 environment one of my users erased contact information from a public folder and I need to restore the folder. I got my diaster recovery surver up and was able to restore the info store, of the home server of the folder, and was able to do a consistancy adjuster. this created all the user mailboxes and the structure of the public folders. When I try to open any public folder, the message contents is unavailable, either the server servicing the folder is down or it has not replicated yet. the diaster server is in the same org/same site as the original server but not the same computer name thanks in advance Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VBS_SLUG.B
Goood Morning All, I got to work today and had about ten emails from my server stating that 10 users had a virus called VBS_SLUG.B on thier pcs. All of these viruses are in the same folder and same file. This is one of the messages that i recieved, Virus Alert!! VBS_SLUG.B is detected on KAREN() in Logistics domain. Infected file: C:\Program Files\folder.htt Detection date: 2002.12.03 06:20:22 Action: Clean Failed (Quarantine Failed) I went to Trend.com to search more information and didnt find an exact match on this virus. I also called trend and they said they didnt have any info on this virus and that i should send them the virus asap. I told them that I couldnt cause i deleted the files that were Quarantined on the server. So how does trend not know anything about a virus that was detected by their program (office scan). Has anyone seen this virus before. I also scanned all the computers that were suppose to be infected and recieved no notifications of them being infected. RGDS RICH _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: longhorn
Has anyone on this list used Microsoft LONGHORN yet and if so is there a link on microsofts website that you can sign up as a beta tester. RIch _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email sent
Does any know why this would happen? A guy at my office sends out an email to a company and it only happens with this company and when this company recieves his emial it has an attachment containing the same text of what is in the email. I think he uses outlook express. Thanks rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Yes I have wins set up on the ras server. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:allan;teaminfo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook OK confusion and headache aside from trying to visualize your environment from your emails. 1. Do you have a Sonicwall firewall and/or MS PPTP Server? 2. A number of times in this thread (my reply included) a WINS server has been mentioned, yet you keep referring to LMHOSTS files. Do you know if you have a WINS server? As a number of people have said, your answer is to connect to a firewall via VPN and have a WINS server available to perform name resolution for you, thus removing the need for your LMHOSTS file and resolving other PCs in the domain. There are more elegant and functional solutions but that is probably the simplest and easiest for you to implement. As an aside http://www.mcseco-op.com/_vti_bin/shtml.exe/rules.htm is a link that includes instructions on how to submit to an MCSE study list (Saluki). Many generic questions such as yours are fielded by MCSEs and students and there is no off topic subjects as long as it involves an MS product in some way. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Yes I can connect to the vpn and read email from the exchange server. I can find the exchange server if I look for it through search for computers on network. We use lmhost file to connect to the exchange server. My VPN server is the primary domain contoller and when i search for it on the network i cant find it. But if i go to my firewall over the internet and enter a username and password to bypass it I can find any computer on the network. I want to be able to search for all computers on my network without bypassing the firewall. If anyone knows what port to open or what to do i would appreciate it. thanks rich ps sorry for hijacking this thread. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:byron;markettools.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Does the vpn work in general from behind the firewall? Do other protocols like icmp work? Is the vpn site-to-site or client-gateway? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Does anyone know what port I would have to open on my sonic wall to let people browse the network over the vpn. If i bypass my firewall at home i can search for computers on my the network but if i dont i cannot find any computers rich\\\thanks -Original Me ssage- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Would you like me to give you an example? we are a hosting company. Customers connect to our Exchange servers from all over the world, from a variety of client OSes. Their machines are not members of our domain. They can't possibly use our WINS. What would you do to allow their PCs to resolve the short name of our Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook No there aren't. There are times in which its easier than doing it a different way, but that doesn't mean there are times in which they must be used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook there are some situations when one must use HOSTS file. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely;TripathImaging.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Neither, use WINS and DNS, works every time... -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Does anyone know what port I would have to open on my sonic wall to let people browse the network over the vpn. If i bypass my firewall at home i can search for computers on my the network but if i dont i cannot find any computers rich\\\thanks -Original Me ssage- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Would you like me to give you an example? we are a hosting company. Customers connect to our Exchange servers from all over the world, from a variety of client OSes. Their machines are not members of our domain. They can't possibly use our WINS. What would you do to allow their PCs to resolve the short name of our Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook No there aren't. There are times in which its easier than doing it a different way, but that doesn't mean there are times in which they must be used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook there are some situations when one must use HOSTS file. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely;TripathImaging.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Neither, use WINS and DNS, works every time... -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Yes I can connect to the vpn and read email from the exchange server. I can find the exchange server if I look for it through search for computers on network. We use lmhost file to connect to the exchange server. My VPN server is the primary domain contoller and when i search for it on the network i cant find it. But if i go to my firewall over the internet and enter a username and password to bypass it I can find any computer on the network. I want to be able to search for all computers on my network without bypassing the firewall. If anyone knows what port to open or what to do i would appreciate it. thanks rich ps sorry for hijacking this thread. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:byron;markettools.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Does the vpn work in general from behind the firewall? Do other protocols like icmp work? Is the vpn site-to-site or client-gateway? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Does anyone know what port I would have to open on my sonic wall to let people browse the network over the vpn. If i bypass my firewall at home i can search for computers on my the network but if i dont i cannot find any computers rich\\\thanks -Original Me ssage- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Would you like me to give you an example? we are a hosting company. Customers connect to our Exchange servers from all over the world, from a variety of client OSes. Their machines are not members of our domain. They can't possibly use our WINS. What would you do to allow their PCs to resolve the short name of our Exchange server? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook No there aren't. There are times in which its easier than doing it a different way, but that doesn't mean there are times in which they must be used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook there are some situations when one must use HOSTS file. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:dely;TripathImaging.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Neither, use WINS and DNS, works every time... -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
lmhost file also you have to take the .sam extension off then edit it. Another thing you will have to use is nbtstat -R and nbtstat -c to check it after you entered the right info in the lmhost file. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
So let me ask you question, I could never figure it out. I have pptp setup on a windows nt server that is my pdc. We use this to connect to our exchange server which is a bdc. If i connect to the my server over the vpn and dont use the lmhost file I cannot connect to my exchage to read my email. So the only way I have been taught is to add a line to my lmhost file on the clients computer then use nbtstat -c then -R to purge the lmhost entries then i am able to connect to the exchange server through the vpn. So if you know of another way I can set this up so I dont have to do it on everyones personal computers at home (as i have been doing for a year now) I would appreciate it. Can i add something to my dns server so people in my office can connect without lmhosts file. appreciate the help rich -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Neither - its not a name resolution issue, since you can connect to other host on your internal network. So, you'd be best off if you ignore Mr. Tener. Many of us have for months. See my previous post about MTU size. Outlook sets[1] the Do Not Fragment bit on much of its traffic with the server. So, it takes the 1516 or so bits, throws it into a packet, and sends it on its merry way. At which point the VPN client intercepts it[2], and encapsulates it into an IPSec packet. Which means an additional padding of about 56 bits for the IPSec header info. That makes the packet somewhere in the order of 1570 bits, and it gets slapped on the wire. Now, your friendly neighborhood[3] router sees that the packet is larger than it can handle (larger than its MTU size) and responds with an ICMP Packet must be fragmented but Don't Fragment bit set. The problem is that your client machine never sees that ICMP message, and so it doesn't automatically adjust its own MTU size down, and so Outlook chokes on sync. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA [1] Stupidly - very very stupidly [2] Probably just like the Cisco clients - it shims the IP stack right around the MPR level [3] Actually, I believe it's the other end of the connection, not the local end, but that's really irrelevant. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
So let me ask you question, I could never figure it out. I have pptp setup on a windows nt server that is my pdc. We use this to connect to our exchange server which is a bdc. If i connect to the my server over the vpn and dont use the lmhost file I cannot connect to my exchage to read my email. So the only way I have been taught is to add a line to my lmhost file on the clients computer then use nbtstat -c then -R to purge the lmhost entries then i am able to connect to the exchange server through the vpn. So if you know of another way I can set this up so I dont have to do it on everyones personal computers at home (as i have been doing for a year now) I would appreciate it. Can i add something to my dns server so people in my office can connect without lmhosts file. appreciate the help rich -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Neither - its not a name resolution issue, since you can connect to other host on your internal network. So, you'd be best off if you ignore Mr. Tener. Many of us have for months. See my previous post about MTU size. Outlook sets[1] the Do Not Fragment bit on much of its traffic with the server. So, it takes the 1516 or so bits, throws it into a packet, and sends it on its merry way. At which point the VPN client intercepts it[2], and encapsulates it into an IPSec packet. Which means an additional padding of about 56 bits for the IPSec header info. That makes the packet somewhere in the order of 1570 bits, and it gets slapped on the wire. Now, your friendly neighborhood[3] router sees that the packet is larger than it can handle (larger than its MTU size) and responds with an ICMP Packet must be fragmented but Don't Fragment bit set. The problem is that your client machine never sees that ICMP message, and so it doesn't automatically adjust its own MTU size down, and so Outlook chokes on sync. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA [1] Stupidly - very very stupidly [2] Probably just like the Cisco clients - it shims the IP stack right around the MPR level [3] Actually, I believe it's the other end of the connection, not the local end, but that's really irrelevant. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook Is it the LMHOSTS file or the HOSTS file ? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener;midship.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook yes you should use the lmhost file on the client pc to map to your exchange server thats what we use here at my office and it works good. If you need more help dont hesitate to email me. rich -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
I think I saw this issue resolved in one of the service packs for office 2000, maybe you can check out the fixes, Im almost positive just not sure which service pack rich -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button EX2k... on Win2k server... what sp levels? What have you done to troubleshoot the clients, i.e. network connectivity, hardware, software. 1. Are they all on the same hub/segment/etc, possibly overused/failing? 2. Do the client pc's have enough resources (i.e. these are older/crappier than the others that work) 3. Have you re-installed outlook on these clients? 4. Have you ruled out all user error? etc -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal;akbank.nl] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Outlook Rules Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, WMS spooler not reponding. Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
no clue why it happens
This is very annoying and I cant figure it out maybe you guys\gals can help. Secrectery sends a message out on behalf of my boss she checks the option for a read receipt and she gets one from the system administrator that the message has been delivered and read. Then my boss gets a read receipt in his inbox exactly like the one below. This is a receipt for the mail you sent to SPECTRUM SHIPPING SERVICES (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] at 10/24/02 10:53 AM This receipt verifies that the message has been displayed on the recipient's computer at 10/24/02 10:54 AM Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Message-ID: 6A849432ADB7D411B8EC00508B122E47014F1204@LOGISTICS1 Disposition: manual-action/MDN-sent-manually; displayed So from here everything looks fine to me but the one problem is the receipt that my boss receives is from one of our distribution list called Holcim (midship) [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have not a clue why he gets the message from this DL when it has nothing to do with the original message that the secratery sent out. The only permissions on this DL is sendas and I checked the secretarys sent items and she did send it out on behalf of my boss. Is there any place that I can check in exchange 5.5 for receipts and see how users get them. I always thought the system adminstrator sent out receipts. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange 5.5 msgs
Good Afternoon All, Today our servers had to be shut down due to the noreaster on the east coast, and we were down for about 3 1/2 hours. Our dns is hosted by our webhost which located in manhattan so we didnt lose any messages today. So heres my problem, after we got power back to the servers we started to receive all the our messages. Then a user in my office told me that his clients were receiving messages that were sent by him yesterday. We use exchange 5.5 sp4 with windows nt 4.0. If anyone has had this problem in the past can you please let me know why or how this could have happened. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 msgs
I forgot to mention that the client received the messages yesterday and the client started to receive the same messages today that he received yesterday. rich -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: exchange 5.5 msgs Once they leave your email server you have no control as to when the recipient get the message. When you shut it down did you check to see the amount of message in queue? When Exchange shuts down it waits for message to be received before shutting down but not 100% on what happens to ones in the send queue. Always good to look at those prior to shutting down services. - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:02 PM Subject: exchange 5.5 msgs Good Afternoon All, Today our servers had to be shut down due to the noreaster on the east coast, and we were down for about 3 1/2 hours. Our dns is hosted by our webhost which located in manhattan so we didnt lose any messages today. So heres my problem, after we got power back to the servers we started to receive all the our messages. Then a user in my office told me that his clients were receiving messages that were sent by him yesterday. We use exchange 5.5 sp4 with windows nt 4.0. If anyone has had this problem in the past can you please let me know why or how this could have happened. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HelpDesk Software
What do you mean available for exchange? What integration would u want? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing INBOXES
are they using outlook express to read their email or do they use outlook with internet only. Cause if they do by default the option to leave messages on the server is not checked. So if someone goes home to read their email with these options enabled when they get to the office they wont see any messages. rich -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
what permissions do the users have, I know that if you have Admin privleges you can open anyone mailbox. A -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opening other user's mailboxes Hallo, I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes. In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which states: Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto security, then set the permissions. Hope this helps. From reading this list, I know to ignore the M drive for doing backups. But in this case can I change permissions as mentioned above? I don't see how to do it in the Exchange Administrator console nor on the client. Thanks, AW Exchange 2000, client Outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
does this swink still work
I havent seen an email from the list in awhile. Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TEST - Answer
What is My Boss Too? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer I'm sure it could get worse. New answer. A boss that thinks he knows something about computers and tries to tell you how to do things yet he has a hard time with the right clicking concept -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer This thread. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: TEST - Answer What is Exchange Hell? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 13:23 Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ok.. Let me try this... A peircing beeping noise coming from your Exchange server when you come in tomorrow morning. Brian -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer shut up Shut Up SHUT UP! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer No no no. You have to give the answer, the answer has to be in the form of a question... -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
Revisiting offline defrag question
Hello all, I would like to ask everyone's suggestions, I asked about offline defrag a couple days ago and many of you were very helpful. Thanks for all your great information. I have exchange 5.5 sp4 running on windows nt srv sp6a and my secondary partition where the exchange database is located is approximately 12.9gig in total size. I have 1.98 gigs of space left on this drive and it is diminishing very quickly about 200mb a week. The priv.edb file is 8,791,048 in size and the pub.edb is 946,184 in size. Recently I have archived alot of emails from peoples mailboxes, a few gigs at least. Also in the past other people have left our company and I deleted their mailboxes which were pretty big usually close to 1 gig in size. Since I have done alot of deleting I haven't really noticed any space on this secondary partition freed up. So last night I archived about 1.5gigs of email and came in today and noticed that I haven't gained any space back on this partition. In the event viewer it shows this about my online defrag report. The database has 53 megabytes of free space after online defragment has terminated event 1221. Event 1207: cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete Start: 20843 items; 445797 Kbytes end: 20742 items; 445487 Kbytes From the info above would anyone consider doing an offline defragment of the exchange database? I have never done this before and would like your suggestions, thanks very much for your time. RGDS Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Revisiting offline defrag question
I dont know what mailbox manager is so I guess Im not using it, also I dont have any deleted items retension set up. RGDS Rich -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Revisiting offline defrag question The 1221 report on your ISPRIV is what counts, as that's the amount of whitespace in the database. Are you running Mailbox Manager on the server? We use it to purge old Deleted Items and Journal entries, and it helps a lot. Configuring Outlook / office not to journal helps too, if you don't need it. What sort of deleted item retention period do you have? Cheers, Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 September 2002 14:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Revisiting offline defrag question Hello all, I would like to ask everyone's suggestions, I asked about offline defrag a couple days ago and many of you were very helpful. Thanks for all your great information. I have exchange 5.5 sp4 running on windows nt srv sp6a and my secondary partition where the exchange database is located is approximately 12.9gig in total size. I have 1.98 gigs of space left on this drive and it is diminishing very quickly about 200mb a week. The priv.edb file is 8,791,048 in size and the pub.edb is 946,184 in size. Recently I have archived alot of emails from peoples mailboxes, a few gigs at least. Also in the past other people have left our company and I deleted their mailboxes which were pretty big usually close to 1 gig in size. Since I have done alot of deleting I haven't really noticed any space on this secondary partition freed up. So last night I archived about 1.5gigs of email and came in today and noticed that I haven't gained any space back on this partition. In the event viewer it shows this about my online defrag report. The database has 53 megabytes of free space after online defragment has terminated event 1221. Event 1207: cleanup of items past retention date for Item Recovery is complete Start: 20843 items; 445797 Kbytes end: 20742 items; 445487 Kbytes From the info above would anyone consider doing an offline defragment of the exchange database? I have never done this before and would like your suggestions, thanks very much for your time. RGDS Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe I can try it out this weekend. Rich -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
lmfao -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance It solved the problem here, we had 3000 contacts in a public folder, Secretaries where getting incredibly upset. When I tested this in the lab it worked great, when I applied it to the live server I became a hero Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe I can try it out this weekend. Rich -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Way OT - Websites
A very well designed website is www.zombo.com put your speakers on though. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
you dont like it i thought it was pretty good, just the thought of some guy speaking into a mic about his website makes me laugh. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites Tener... Why does it not surprise me that you like that web site? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites A very well designed website is www.zombo.com put your speakers on though. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
peter pan one is very good try this one http://www.realultimatepower.net/ -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/ -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
I killed the nija master. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites www.bluesforbuddha.com/ninjas/ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:57 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Way OT - Websites Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites peter pan one is very good try this one http://www.realultimatepower.net/ -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/ -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
public folder
Hello all, If I delete a 396mb public folder will this free up 396mb on my hard drive. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: public folder
So when I do a backup they space will come back or it will only come back if i do a offline defragment. Sorry Im not to familiar with what happens to deleted items in exchange. Rich -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder When you delete a bunch of emails, what happens to the space on the private store. Same rules apply to Public Store. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: public folder Hello all, If I delete a 396mb public folder will this free up 396mb on my hard drive. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: public folder
I know it is really stupid question but i never did a offline defrag and someone the other day told me that when you do an offline defrag you need the same amount of free disk space on your hd as you have in your database. Is this true, thanks. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder Oh nohere comes the flames -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Coleman Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder In order to really recover the space that comes from deleting email, mailboxes, etc. an offline defrag is a must. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
