RE: Outlook won't bring in mail
Tom, We have had the same problem here and we have not been able to figure it out. Seems like if they click in outlook all of the sudden several messages appear at once. ??? Let me know if you figure it out. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Outlook won't bring in mail Got a weird one here. Client : Win2k Outlook 2000 Server: Exchange 5.5 NT 4 SP 6a I have exchange and some clients sitting in one subnet (say 10.0.0.whatever) and clients sitting in another (say 192.168.20.whatever). Clients in the exchange subnet get their mail just fine, however clients in in the 192 subnet have a difficult time getting outlook to bring in their mail in a regular fashion. When they start outlook up, it connects to exchange and pulls all of their mail in, but here is were it gets weird. If outlook is the only running application, it will continue to bring mail in, however if other applications are being run, and outlook goes to the background, the only way that the client can bring in their mail is to click on their inbox or hit send and rec. I've never seen this happen before, and tweaks that I've done to the settings in outlook don't seem to fix anything. Thoughts? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook won't bring in mail
In my environment we are setup in a Corporate environment. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Do you have the Outlook clients setup as Internet Mail? Or Corporate Workgroup? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Tom, We have had the same problem here and we have not been able to figure it out. Seems like if they click in outlook all of the sudden several messages appear at once. ??? Let me know if you figure it out. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Outlook won't bring in mail Got a weird one here. Client : Win2k Outlook 2000 Server: Exchange 5.5 NT 4 SP 6a I have exchange and some clients sitting in one subnet (say 10.0.0.whatever) and clients sitting in another (say 192.168.20.whatever). Clients in the exchange subnet get their mail just fine, however clients in in the 192 subnet have a difficult time getting outlook to bring in their mail in a regular fashion. When they start outlook up, it connects to exchange and pulls all of their mail in, but here is were it gets weird. If outlook is the only running application, it will continue to bring mail in, however if other applications are being run, and outlook goes to the background, the only way that the client can bring in their mail is to click on their inbox or hit send and rec. I've never seen this happen before, and tweaks that I've done to the settings in outlook don't seem to fix anything. Thoughts? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook won't bring in mail
In our environment they do not pull the e-mail. What happens is when you startup in the morning mail comes in fine. Throughout the day, Outlook will be running in the background and you will not get any mail. As soon as you click on something in Outlook... BAM! 3-4 messages arrive all at once. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail If that's the case they shouldn't be downloading email at all. They should just be getting their email when it comes in. You said that they are Pulling their mail in. If it's setup in the Corporate environment then they should receive their mail in real time. Maybe i'm not reading something right here. Let me know. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail In my environment we are setup in a Corporate environment. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Do you have the Outlook clients setup as Internet Mail? Or Corporate Workgroup? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Tom, We have had the same problem here and we have not been able to figure it out. Seems like if they click in outlook all of the sudden several messages appear at once. ??? Let me know if you figure it out. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Outlook won't bring in mail Got a weird one here. Client : Win2k Outlook 2000 Server: Exchange 5.5 NT 4 SP 6a I have exchange and some clients sitting in one subnet (say 10.0.0.whatever) and clients sitting in another (say 192.168.20.whatever). Clients in the exchange subnet get their mail just fine, however clients in in the 192 subnet have a difficult time getting outlook to bring in their mail in a regular fashion. When they start outlook up, it connects to exchange and pulls all of their mail in, but here is were it gets weird. If outlook is the only running application, it will continue to bring mail in, however if other applications are being run, and outlook goes to the background, the only way that the client can bring in their mail is to click on their inbox or hit send and rec. I've never seen this happen before, and tweaks that I've done to the settings in outlook don't seem to fix anything. Thoughts? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook won't bring in mail
We had suspicions that it was the UDP packets however, this occurs randomly and in my case it's throughout the company. Not just on one subnet. There is no router or firewall just a switch. Considering it happens randomly, I think the switch isn't the problem here. We used a product from NetIQ called Queue check and verified the udp packets are getting through just fine. Of course this is random so??? At any rate do you think it is possible that the Exchange server is not sending the UDP packet? I'm pretty sure it's the network, however one of the guys here asked me to post the question. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Sounds like it is more like the New Mail notification message does not get processed by the client. I would be on a network problem. Have you checked the NIC settings? If it is on a switch try setting to 100mb/full duplex. Make sure that the Exchange server is on a switch and can be set to 100mb/full duplex as well. Are there any routers between the clients and server? It sounds like it since they are on different subnets. New mail notifications are sent as UDP packets. If you have routers or a firewall that is blocking UDP, then this will cause the behavior you are seeing. I would check those rather than lay the blame on the clients. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail In our environment they do not pull the e-mail. What happens is when you startup in the morning mail comes in fine. Throughout the day, Outlook will be running in the background and you will not get any mail. As soon as you click on something in Outlook... BAM! 3-4 messages arrive all at once. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail If that's the case they shouldn't be downloading email at all. They should just be getting their email when it comes in. You said that they are Pulling their mail in. If it's setup in the Corporate environment then they should receive their mail in real time. Maybe i'm not reading something right here. Let me know. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail In my environment we are setup in a Corporate environment. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Do you have the Outlook clients setup as Internet Mail? Or Corporate Workgroup? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Tom, We have had the same problem here and we have not been able to figure it out. Seems like if they click in outlook all of the sudden several messages appear at once. ??? Let me know if you figure it out. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Outlook won't bring in mail Got a weird one here. Client : Win2k Outlook 2000 Server: Exchange 5.5 NT 4 SP 6a I have exchange and some clients sitting in one subnet (say 10.0.0.whatever) and clients sitting in another (say 192.168.20.whatever). Clients in the exchange subnet get their mail just fine, however clients in in the 192 subnet have a difficult time getting outlook to bring in their mail in a regular fashion. When they start outlook up, it connects to exchange and pulls all of their mail in, but here is were it gets weird. If outlook is the only running application, it will continue to bring mail in, however if other applications are being run, and outlook goes to the background, the only way that the client can bring in their mail is to click on their inbox or hit send and rec. I've never seen
RE: Outlook won't bring in mail
Thanks for the article however, we do not have a router in the middle. These are users that are sitting locally on the LAN. I have had no reports of users having this from remote as described in this article. I have also, searched Tech Net with no success. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook won't bring in mail http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=inde xreq=viewarticleartid=1 (line wrap) Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail In our environment they do not pull the e-mail. What happens is when you startup in the morning mail comes in fine. Throughout the day, Outlook will be running in the background and you will not get any mail. As soon as you click on something in Outlook... BAM! 3-4 messages arrive all at once. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail If that's the case they shouldn't be downloading email at all. They should just be getting their email when it comes in. You said that they are Pulling their mail in. If it's setup in the Corporate environment then they should receive their mail in real time. Maybe i'm not reading something right here. Let me know. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail In my environment we are setup in a Corporate environment. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Do you have the Outlook clients setup as Internet Mail? Or Corporate Workgroup? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook won't bring in mail Tom, We have had the same problem here and we have not been able to figure it out. Seems like if they click in outlook all of the sudden several messages appear at once. ??? Let me know if you figure it out. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook won't bring in mail Got a weird one here. Client : Win2k Outlook 2000 Server: Exchange 5.5 NT 4 SP 6a I have exchange and some clients sitting in one subnet (say 10.0.0.whatever) and clients sitting in another (say 192.168.20.whatever). Clients in the exchange subnet get their mail just fine, however clients in in the 192 subnet have a difficult time getting outlook to bring in their mail in a regular fashion. When they start outlook up, it connects to exchange and pulls all of their mail in, but here is were it gets weird. If outlook is the only running application, it will continue to bring mail in, however if other applications are being run, and outlook goes to the background, the only way that the client can bring in their mail is to click on their inbox or hit send and rec. I've never seen this happen before, and tweaks that I've done to the settings in outlook don't seem to fix anything. Thoughts? Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
Relay Server Crash
My internet mail relay server ran out of disk space and the MTA shutdown this morning. After investigating, I found a file in the C:\exchsrvr\imcdata\in called DK2sqvw7 that is 2.86GB dated for yesterday at 2:24PM. I moved some files off the drive and was able to restart the MTA and mail was still flowing. I later checked to see how disk space was doing and found that the DK2sqvw7 files was gone and my server had gain the 2.86GB of space back. Does anyone know what causes this or what happened here? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay Server Crash
Yes, they have everything on the C:\ with only 4GB of disk space. This isn't a server that I usually maintain. Our NJ office has authority there. I have been complaining since I walked in the door about no limits being in place. That was my suspicion, I just wanted to confirm it. I have already started a discussion to put at least a reasonable limit there. SOMETHING... Thanks for your reply... Regards, LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Relay Server Crash It's an inbound message awaiting conversion. If you don't want it to happen again, you'll need some limits on your IMS. The MTA shut down because of the lack of disk space (I am assuming that you have all of the paths still on the one drive). Tris Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay Server Crash My internet mail relay server ran out of disk space and the MTA shutdown this morning. After investigating, I found a file in the C:\exchsrvr\imcdata\in called DK2sqvw7 that is 2.86GB dated for yesterday at 2:24PM. I moved some files off the drive and was able to restart the MTA and mail was still flowing. I later checked to see how disk space was doing and found that the DK2sqvw7 files was gone and my server had gain the 2.86GB of space back. Does anyone know what causes this or what happened here? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
File stuck in the IMS
We have had a piece of mail stuck on one of the bridgehead servers. I was working on removing it. I found the file in the exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive and match it to the one stuck in the inbound message awaiting delivery queue. I moved the file out into a folder on the desktop. The file is still there and I just wanted to confirm with that the IMS would need to be restarted to clear it. Also, I wanted to make sure I'm not missing any steps to get rid of the message. Note: I have tried to delete this through exch admin but, it's stuck! Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: File stuck in the IMS
Right, now I located the file. I can't do anything during production hours. I was going to follow the same procedure you suggested with the exception of stopping the IMS first. Missed that step. Thanks for telling me that. The interesting thing is the file I located is in the archive folder instead of the in folder? This brings me to ask why do messages get dumped to the archive folder? The exact location I am referring to is exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: File stuck in the IMS Generally, all you should have to do to unstick a blocked IMS queue in Exchange 5.5 is to stop the IMS, remove the bad message and restart the IMS. From your problem description, I can't tell what you did. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: File stuck in the IMS We have had a piece of mail stuck on one of the bridgehead servers. I was working on removing it. I found the file in the exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive and match it to the one stuck in the inbound message awaiting delivery queue. I moved the file out into a folder on the desktop. The file is still there and I just wanted to confirm with that the IMS would need to be restarted to clear it. Also, I wanted to make sure I'm not missing any steps to get rid of the message. Note: I have tried to delete this through exch admin but, it's stuck! Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: File stuck in the IMS
Sorry, I wasn't specific here. Mail is moving through just fine. It's just sitting there in the queue. I can see mail passing it. I just thought at some point I should try to get it out of there. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: File stuck in the IMS It seems to me that if your IMS is broken, you should do something during production hours. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: File stuck in the IMS Right, now I located the file. I can't do anything during production hours. I was going to follow the same procedure you suggested with the exception of stopping the IMS first. Missed that step. Thanks for telling me that. The interesting thing is the file I located is in the archive folder instead of the in folder? This brings me to ask why do messages get dumped to the archive folder? The exact location I am referring to is exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: File stuck in the IMS Generally, all you should have to do to unstick a blocked IMS queue in Exchange 5.5 is to stop the IMS, remove the bad message and restart the IMS. From your problem description, I can't tell what you did. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: File stuck in the IMS We have had a piece of mail stuck on one of the bridgehead servers. I was working on removing it. I found the file in the exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive and match it to the one stuck in the inbound message awaiting delivery queue. I moved the file out into a folder on the desktop. The file is still there and I just wanted to confirm with that the IMS would need to be restarted to clear it. Also, I wanted to make sure I'm not missing any steps to get rid of the message. Note: I have tried to delete this through exch admin but, it's stuck! Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: File stuck in the IMS
In this case, then I don't understand why the message appears in the queue and if I check in the exchsrvr\imcdata\in folder there is nothing but the archive folder. I did a search on the date of the message and located it in the archive folder. I opened it in notepad to verify it was the correct message. Why its sitting in the queue is a mystery to me. ??? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: File stuck in the IMS Something in the archive folder would not be the problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: File stuck in the IMS Right, now I located the file. I can't do anything during production hours. I was going to follow the same procedure you suggested with the exception of stopping the IMS first. Missed that step. Thanks for telling me that. The interesting thing is the file I located is in the archive folder instead of the in folder? This brings me to ask why do messages get dumped to the archive folder? The exact location I am referring to is exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: File stuck in the IMS Generally, all you should have to do to unstick a blocked IMS queue in Exchange 5.5 is to stop the IMS, remove the bad message and restart the IMS. From your problem description, I can't tell what you did. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: File stuck in the IMS We have had a piece of mail stuck on one of the bridgehead servers. I was working on removing it. I found the file in the exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive and match it to the one stuck in the inbound message awaiting delivery queue. I moved the file out into a folder on the desktop. The file is still there and I just wanted to confirm with that the IMS would need to be restarted to clear it. Also, I wanted to make sure I'm not missing any steps to get rid of the message. Note: I have tried to delete this through exch admin but, it's stuck! Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: File stuck in the IMS
Too obvious.. sorry no prize for you. Already did that.. I'm telling you it's stuck. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: File stuck in the IMS Refresh? (or is that too obvious?) -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: File stuck in the IMS Sorry, I wasn't specific here. Mail is moving through just fine. It's just sitting there in the queue. I can see mail passing it. I just thought at some point I should try to get it out of there. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: File stuck in the IMS It seems to me that if your IMS is broken, you should do something during production hours. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: File stuck in the IMS Right, now I located the file. I can't do anything during production hours. I was going to follow the same procedure you suggested with the exception of stopping the IMS first. Missed that step. Thanks for telling me that. The interesting thing is the file I located is in the archive folder instead of the in folder? This brings me to ask why do messages get dumped to the archive folder? The exact location I am referring to is exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: File stuck in the IMS Generally, all you should have to do to unstick a blocked IMS queue in Exchange 5.5 is to stop the IMS, remove the bad message and restart the IMS. From your problem description, I can't tell what you did. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: File stuck in the IMS We have had a piece of mail stuck on one of the bridgehead servers. I was working on removing it. I found the file in the exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive and match it to the one stuck in the inbound message awaiting delivery queue. I moved the file out into a folder on the desktop. The file is still there and I just wanted to confirm with that the IMS would need to be restarted to clear it. Also, I wanted to make sure I'm not missing any steps to get rid of the message. Note: I have tried to delete this through exch admin but, it's stuck! Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Outlook BUG question
Why do you say this? Do you think it will continue to happen over and over again? I keep telling this to my manager but I have nothing to support the statement. I have been asking the question over and over again what causes this. I know logging into the mailbox with different clients will have negative effects and could be the cause. I'm wondering though if it could be the environment itself since the environment is running 2000 and the delegate is running 98. Any thoughts on that? One other thing... all the conf rm's displays their free busy time inconsistently. Is there any way to fix this? LaCretia Sandoval -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question That might work. I hope you don't mind doing it every couple of months or so! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed
RE: PAB Sync Tool
Yes, I did... Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PAB Sync Tool And you did this after you imported the PAB into your Contacts? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PAB Sync Tool Question, we had our user using the PAB Sync Tool when users personal distribution lists addresses need to be updated to the GAL. This was used when we had Outlook 98. This year we rolled out Outlook 2000 and the PAB Sync Tool no longer works. I found an Outlook feature in the contacts where you put your personal distribution lists in contacts and when you open the personal distribution list there is an update button. When you click the update button it gives you a few options to update the personal address book and remove any that could not be fixed. I ran this option and NOTHING happened. Is this Microsoft's joke to let users sit in front of the screen expecting something to happen to their distribution list or am I missing something here? If this feature doesn't work, does anyone know if there is a replacement for the PAB Sync Tool? Or...if it works will someone enlighten me? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook BUG question
I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PAB Sync Tool
I imported the personal address book to contacts however, I'm trying to see if there is a way to update personal distribution lists that are stored in your contacts to the GAL. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PAB Sync Tool It sounds as if something is corrupted... You dont need the PAB anymore do you? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PAB Sync Tool Yes, I did... Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PAB Sync Tool And you did this after you imported the PAB into your Contacts? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PAB Sync Tool Question, we had our user using the PAB Sync Tool when users personal distribution lists addresses need to be updated to the GAL. This was used when we had Outlook 98. This year we rolled out Outlook 2000 and the PAB Sync Tool no longer works. I found an Outlook feature in the contacts where you put your personal distribution lists in contacts and when you open the personal distribution list there is an update button. When you click the update button it gives you a few options to update the personal address book and remove any that could not be fixed. I ran this option and NOTHING happened. Is this Microsoft's joke to let users sit in front of the screen expecting something to happen to their distribution list or am I missing something here? If this feature doesn't work, does anyone know if there is a replacement for the PAB Sync Tool? Or...if it works will someone enlighten me? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: Outlook BUG question
Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Outlook BUG question
So true.. our company logo should beWe love to micro manage LaCretia -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Well, I already walked down to the managers office and printed all your nice reply's. He just said lets see what happens after you create a new conf rm. Export the data from the old one. Delete the old one. Have a secretary input all of the future appointments and lose all the old appt data. (I think this will raise some hairs with the users). He said if we re-do it and this problem doesn't occur again then, we correct all of them that are broken in this manner and *POOF* problem solved. Can you say BIG WASTE of time and MONEY? Ah management logic. If I really want it to happen, and keep on issuing decrees to make it so, then it will happen. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Major Misconceptions Held By Your Boss: That things happen just because they want them to. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook BUG question
I would just catch it and throw it right back at you!!! LaCretia -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Outlook BUG question
Do you sell those? I could really use one? How about a 'full body anti dung suit'? I could really use one around here. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook BUG question I have now placed my 'anti dung' screen on my monitor. Strange, i can no longer see mails from Richard Tener... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Just wait till I start throwing dung at you. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question What, you got something against the Monkees? Of just monkeys like Mr. David here? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Bad, very bad Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question And then I saw her face, and now I'm a Script Believer... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question LaCretia, why is it not acceptable? Perhaps we can give you good arguments that will sway them from their folly and make Script Believers out of them all. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook BUG question Yes, I am currently working on a situation that is not acceptable by the company as well, but short of a law suit, we will probably have to live with it as will you. Auto Accept Script. Get it, install it, use it. It is used by countless thousands who LOVE it. -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook BUG question I found out that there is a problem between Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 in how the delegate is configured for conference rooms. Our company, had us configure our conference rooms with the default permissions set to reviewer to keep users from directly booking the conference and causing double bookings. When our company rolled out Outlook 2000, then I found that the resource booking in Outlook had been fixed so, I attempted to get rid of the delegate and make all conference rooms a resource instead. I found out that once you move to Outlook 2000 the permission on the conference room has to be a minimal of author permissions for the default user. If you try to set the permissions back to reviewer then it notifies you that you don't have enough permission. This was a problem because our company has users that constantly double book and then get into it over it. I tried to revert the conference room back to using the delegate and now it won't go back. I tried to export the calendar, delete the mailbox, recreate it, import the calendar information, and BAM the problem carry's over. The company is now making me re-create the conference room that is broken and then input on future appointments and lose all past appointments to get it back to the configuration of default reviewer permissions and use the delegate. Here it gets hairy... daily I am having conference rooms break and display this problem. At first I realized it was probably because we were logging into to the conf rm with an Outlook 2000 client to configure it. I stopped all of this and installed Outlook 98 and explained that all conference rooms would have to be configure on that box with that client. I keep having the problem pop up though, and from what I can tell it's not being logged into at all. Could this be reoccurring because the environment is using 2000 and the delegate is using 98? Anyone run into this? HELP! By the way I called Microsoft and they told me to live with it or implement auto accept script. This was not acceptable by the company at all. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: GWART
I had tried just raising the cost here and leaving it as is however, mail still flows into one bridgehead and out the other. I would like to do a drawing of our GWART on a diagram to make sure it's optimally configured. I have been having trouble though since it appears the GWART is sectioned and it does not tell where one section starts and one begins. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: GWART Actually, what I meant to say is that, although I'd agree that * is the usual way to go, doesn't the presence of a *@* in the GWART appear as a better route than * ? That being said, I'd just change both to * and raise the cost of the route I didn't want stuff to go down. Neil -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 January 2002 13:03 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: GWART Subject: Re: GWART Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space. Missy - Original Message - From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM Subject: RE: GWART Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better match than just *. But you still haven't stated what your desired flow is Neil -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: GWART Subject: RE: GWART One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the other is listed as *:. One of our admins from our NJ site stated that we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead. I tend to disagree though. I tend to think that the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:. Everything I have researched has stated that it should be *;. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GWART I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon. What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow for IMS traffic? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GWART I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. I decided to look into the routing table to see why this is. However, I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered that there is no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. Does anyone out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file? I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: GWART
So If I change it on both bridgeheads to be *: then traffic for each site should flow through the bridgehead for that site right? Also, I had a question about the administrative management domain name. What is this used for? I read that if you set this up for each site then the traffic will be more controlled. Currently all sites in the entire org are set to the default None. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: GWART Neil has it right, however - '*@*' more closely matches the target address, so the connector with which that is associated will be chosen every time. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: GWART Nope. LaCretia is correct - * should be the only address space. Missy - Original Message - From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:49 AM Subject: RE: GWART Something in the back of my mind says that *@* is a better match than just *. But you still haven't stated what your desired flow is Neil -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 January 2002 12:37 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: GWART Subject: RE: GWART One of the address spaces on one bridgehead is listed as *(A)* and the other is listed as *:. One of our admins from our NJ site stated that we need to add the *(A)* to the other bridgehead. I tend to disagree though. I tend to think that the *(A)* needs to be set to match *:. Everything I have researched has stated that it should be *;. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GWART I've read them, but could I explain how to in general. Um, not without a six pack... however, it is Friday afternoon. What is the address space on your IMS boxxen? What is the desired flow for IMS traffic? -Original Message- From: Sandoval, LaCretia, Triaton/US [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GWART I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. I decided to look into the routing table to see why this is. However, I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered that there is no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. Does anyone out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file? I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
GWART
I have two sites with two bridgeheads in place. My problem is, internet traffic is coming in one and going out the other bridgehead. I decided to look into the routing table to see why this is. However, I decided it would be easier to review the table by printing the GWART0.MTA information and read through it. I discovered that there is no entry for the new site that I brought up with the new bridgehead. Does anyone out there have any experience reading the GWART0.MTA file? I am having trouble piecing all of the routes together to draw a picture of how traffic is flowing through our site. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, LaCretia Sandoval _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
