RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Paul, Thanks for this; I avoided O2K as it needs the admin kit (is that the name) to install on TS but Outlook98 installs apparently OK. The symptoms you describe are very similar. When you say 'transformed', what are you referring to? Cheers, Roger -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Was Outlook Transformed to work with TS? We use W2K AS with TS to provide our Accounts with the means to run a legacy Access database that has grown so fat it needs a dual 1Gig + 512Mb RAM to process the queries (yes, I know - what a waste but the migration to SQL is happening slowly). Anyway back to the point. Fire up Access in a TS session and all is well and good. Fire up Access as an App on the server and it runs like a two-legged hamster. O2K had to be transformed to work with TS - I not know if other office versions need this but does any of it fit with your predicament Roger? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW just did, less than 10 ms. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Dumb question, but have you tried pinging your server and checking the response time? -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Folks, Does anyone recognise this bizarre situation. Outlook 98 on a NT4 Terminal Server (hosting a witches brew of other applications to do with telephone logging). MAPI profile connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP3 + store fix. Console auto logs in to run telephone statistics collection and uses Outlook 98 for the purposes of e-mailing reports. If you manually send mail to GAL entries, no problem. If you manually send mail to an SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the Outlook process freezes as you type the '@' (this is not displayed) and task manager shows it burning lots of cpu. It eventually returns control. The automated report mailing process by necessity uses SMTP addresses and times out the application. Bizarrely if you check the properties of any of the standard folders they do not display permissions tabs, synchronisation tab etc as if the folders were based on a PST. BUT if you login to the same user via the TS client service, Outlook 98, using the same mail profile behaves completely normally! As this is a live logging service with bundles of bespoke applications I'm completely stuffed when it comes to experimenting with the service. Any thoughts? Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Roger, I haven't had the pleasure of installing any version of office previous to 2K on a TS so I wouldn't know if anything had to be done via an admin kit or transform file (quite likely the same), sorry. Hopefully someone else on the list might be able to shed some light on the matter. If previous versions have to be transformed to work with TS then we might have some more luck... I would look into Dominic's suggestion of the profiles possibly having an effect as this may help. Regards PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Paul, Thanks for this; I avoided O2K as it needs the admin kit (is that the name) to install on TS but Outlook98 installs apparently OK. The symptoms you describe are very similar. When you say 'transformed', what are you referring to? Cheers, Roger -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Was Outlook Transformed to work with TS? We use W2K AS with TS to provide our Accounts with the means to run a legacy Access database that has grown so fat it needs a dual 1Gig + 512Mb RAM to process the queries (yes, I know - what a waste but the migration to SQL is happening slowly). Anyway back to the point. Fire up Access in a TS session and all is well and good. Fire up Access as an App on the server and it runs like a two-legged hamster. O2K had to be transformed to work with TS - I not know if other office versions need this but does any of it fit with your predicament Roger? PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW just did, less than 10 ms. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Dumb question, but have you tried pinging your server and checking the response time? -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 10:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Folks, Does anyone recognise this bizarre situation. Outlook 98 on a NT4 Terminal Server (hosting a witches brew of other applications to do with telephone logging). MAPI profile connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP3 + store fix. Console auto logs in to run telephone statistics collection and uses Outlook 98 for the purposes of e-mailing reports. If you manually send mail to GAL entries, no problem. If you manually send mail to an SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the Outlook process freezes as you type the '@' (this is not displayed) and task manager shows it burning lots of cpu. It eventually returns control. The automated report mailing process by necessity uses SMTP addresses and times out the application. Bizarrely if you check the properties of any of the standard folders they do not display permissions tabs, synchronisation tab etc as if the folders were based on a PST. BUT if you login to the same user via the TS client service, Outlook 98, using the same mail profile behaves completely normally! As this is a live logging service with bundles of bespoke applications I'm completely stuffed when it comes to experimenting with the service. Any thoughts? Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW
Long shot here, but have you checked the location and accessibility of the address lists that the client uses for 'auto' name resolution? Nick -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook address resolution SO SLOW Folks, Does anyone recognise this bizarre situation. Outlook 98 on a NT4 Terminal Server (hosting a witches brew of other applications to do with telephone logging). MAPI profile connecting an Exchange 5.5 SP3 + store fix. Console auto logs in to run telephone statistics collection and uses Outlook 98 for the purposes of e-mailing reports. If you manually send mail to GAL entries, no problem. If you manually send mail to an SMTP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) the Outlook process freezes as you type the '@' (this is not displayed) and task manager shows it burning lots of cpu. It eventually returns control. The automated report mailing process by necessity uses SMTP addresses and times out the application. Bizarrely if you check the properties of any of the standard folders they do not display permissions tabs, synchronisation tab etc as if the folders were based on a PST. BUT if you login to the same user via the TS client service, Outlook 98, using the same mail profile behaves completely normally! As this is a live logging service with bundles of bespoke applications I'm completely stuffed when it comes to experimenting with the service. Any thoughts? Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
