SMIME/Encryption and Slow Performance on Client
Hi, I have a few users using SMIME and Digital Signatures when emailing internally as well as with a nother external company. - When emailing internaly with the 'Encrypt messages and attachments' the end user has fast performance via Outlook. - When emailing externally with the 'Encrypt messages and attachments' & the 'Add digital signature to this message' they are 'hourglassed' sending the email for about 30 seconds. If they receive an email back with the same level of encryption from the external company it takes 80 seconds for the email to open up after typing in the users pw. - The digital signature has been added locally from the external users. Outside of normal testing internally and externally I am unsure of why the long delay is occuring. Is this due to the digital signatures, the SMIME, CA, or anything in the Exchange environment? Or is this normal? Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski Intel Lead - WCDC/ISO www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Purely from an Exchange I/O perspective, given the choice between 500MB of RAID10 storage built out of 72GB drives (16 of them roughly) and 500MB of RAID10 storage built out of 18GB drives (64 of them roughly), the 18GB drive setup will be measurably faster than the other. A higher number of smaller spindles will benefit performance. Adjusting your design to optimize more toward the money axis will cost performance. Also remember that many of the E2K white papers were written before 72GB drives were commonly available. Just because the "common" size is now 36GB+ doesn't change the fact that 4 18GB drives in a stripe set are faster than 1 72GB drive though. One must consider the availability of the parts though, so perhaps 32x36GB drives would be a good way to balance performance and storage cost. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 5:25 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Slow performance Subject: RE: Slow performance I am serious. I remember reading a white paper about Hosted Exchange and they wrote about that. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you sure about that or are you referring to MS Disk Manager and RAID5. Many SANS have luns set up for RAID on 36 or even 72 gig or larger drives. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > track down the issue. > > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > we
RE: Slow performance
EMC clarion. Raid 5 --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Is it RAID10? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I just bought a SAN with 20 72 gig disks in . --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I am serious. I remember reading a white paper about Hosted Exchange and they wrote about that. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you sure about that or are you referring to MS Disk Manager and RAID5. Many SANS have luns set up for RAID on 36 or even 72 gig or larger drives. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always turned off, > whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends > that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, > but it does sound like this might be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats > look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about > what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. > > > -----Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 > gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > Wilson > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to > check for fragmentation proble
RE: Slow performance
Is it RAID10? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I just bought a SAN with 20 72 gig disks in . --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I am serious. I remember reading a white paper about Hosted Exchange and they wrote about that. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you sure about that or are you referring to MS Disk Manager and RAID5. Many SANS have luns set up for RAID on 36 or even 72 gig or larger drives. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > track down the issue. > > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > Wilson > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper > on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you > be running short of space? How does your page file compare > to your RAM? > > David > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: Exchange Discu
RE: Slow performance
I just bought a SAN with 20 72 gig disks in . --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I am serious. I remember reading a white paper about Hosted Exchange and they wrote about that. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you sure about that or are you referring to MS Disk Manager and RAID5. Many SANS have luns set up for RAID on 36 or even 72 gig or larger drives. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > track down the issue. > > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > Wilson > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper > on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you > be running short of space? How does your page file compare > to your RAM? > > David > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is > being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the > calendar
RE: Slow performance
I am serious. I remember reading a white paper about Hosted Exchange and they wrote about that. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you sure about that or are you referring to MS Disk Manager and RAID5. Many SANS have luns set up for RAID on 36 or even 72 gig or larger drives. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > track down the issue. > > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > Wilson > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper > on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you > be running short of space? How does your page file compare > to your RAM? > > David > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is > being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the > calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep > poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is > screaming in your ear that "email is down". > > > Wilson > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
RE: Slow performance
I believe he was referring to a SAN configuration - and yes, MS does not recommend using large raid 5 sets on a SAN. Raid 10 is the preferred method. Exchange 2k writes in small 4k blocks. Using raid 10 with 15K drives would really up the performance. It also matters how the data files are broken up in Exchange. If you email me directly I can provide some performance counters which can help pinpoint the bottle neck. [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you may be best suited if you rebuild the SAN properly... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance If so, that would be hilarious, right up there with "640k should be enough for anybody." I would hope it's just as much an urban legend. > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:05 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Slow performance > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend > building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
If so, that would be hilarious, right up there with "640k should be enough for anybody." I would hope it's just as much an urban legend. > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:05 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Slow performance > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend > building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Are you sure about that or are you referring to MS Disk Manager and RAID5. Many SANS have luns set up for RAID on 36 or even 72 gig or larger drives. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > track down the issue. > > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > Wilson > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper > on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you > be running short of space? How does your page file compare > to your RAM? > > David > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is > being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the > calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep > poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is > screaming in your ear that "email is down". > > > Wilson > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a > network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the > kb's. Our server was
RE: Slow performance
Isn't there a white paper from MS that does not recommend building RAID5 with drives larger than 18GB> -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > track down the issue. > > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > Wilson > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper > on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you > be running short of space? How does your page file compare > to your RAM? > > David > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is > being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the > calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep > poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is > screaming in your ear that "email is down". > > > Wilson > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a > network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the > kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was > running at like 80 and killing the box. > > > -Original Message- > From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > How much Ram do you have?
RE: Slow performance
I'm referring to controllers in general and not the specific one(s) used in the original post. > -Original Message- > From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 > controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't > have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time > comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then > initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the > cache will be disabled. > > > Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance > drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the > controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. > > [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to > you, you should have the cache disabled. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > > be the case. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > > track down the issue. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > > > Wilson > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper > > on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you > > be running short of space? How does your page file compare > > to your RAM? > > > > David > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > > > > Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is > > being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the > > calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep > > poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is > > screaming in your ear that "email is down". > > > > > > Wilson > > > > > > -Original Message- &g
RE: Slow performance
Are you referring to the array controller or the HGS80 controller? If it is a raid controller then, no you don't have to CHANGE it regularly - just charge it...when the time comes for a charge the system will inform you. You then initiate the charging process, and while it's charging the cache will be disabled. Also, Raid 5 on the SAN? I have seen serious performance drops using large raid 5 sets with a san. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > track down the issue. > > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > Wilson > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper > on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you > be running short of space? How does your page file compare > to your RAM? > > David > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is > being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the > calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep > poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is > screaming in your ear that "email is down". > > > Wilson > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a > network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the > kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was > running at like 80 and killing the box. > > > -Original Message- > From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your > calander that people access at the same time? > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Slow perform
RE: Slow performance
A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a battery[1], it's OK to have it on. [1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should have the cache disabled. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Is there a concensus on this? > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > I always thought that write-back cache should be always > turned off, whether it has battery or not. > > -Original Message- > From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only > recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the > controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might > be the case. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your > disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you > better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help > track down the issue. > > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used > with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. > The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. > We just migrated the users over to this server about four > weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. > > Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. > > Wilson > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper > on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you > be running short of space? How does your page file compare > to your RAM? > > David > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > > Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is > being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the > calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep > poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is > screaming in your ear that "email is down". > > > Wilson > > > -Original Message- > From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a > network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the > kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was > running at like 80 and killing the box. > > > -Original Message- > From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Slow performance > > How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your > calander that people access at the same time? > > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Slow performance > > > Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The > machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The > store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index > files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. > > > Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 > seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the > calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook > for several minutes. > > The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything > els
RE: Slow performance
We went through this discussion with MS (via Premiere Support) and at lease with a Dell SAN they told us to turn it on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Is there a concensus on this? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I always thought that write-back cache should be always turned off, whether it has battery or not. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/
RE: Slow performance
Is there a concensus on this? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I always thought that write-back cache should be always turned off, whether it has battery or not. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscri
RE: Slow performance
I always thought that write-back cache should be always turned off, whether it has battery or not. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resou
RE: Slow performance
Yeah we looked into the cache and it is enabled with size of 32k.. good point though. I've so far checked all the SAN settings and it seems fine. Ugh.. I guess I'll move the public folder to a different store on a different mirror set. See if that helps.. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
RE: Slow performance
hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.
RE: Slow performance
lmfao -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance It solved the problem here, we had 3000 contacts in a public folder, Secretaries where getting incredibly upset. When I tested this in the lab it worked great, when I applied it to the live server I became a hero Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe I can try it out this weekend. Rich -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange L
RE: Slow performance
It solved the problem here, we had 3000 contacts in a public folder, Secretaries where getting incredibly upset. When I tested this in the lab it worked great, when I applied it to the live server I became a hero Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe I can try it out this weekend. Rich -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: Slow performance
Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe I can try it out this weekend. Rich -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Do you do full text indexing. That can kill your box. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
RE: Slow performance
Can you confirm that running the client on the server is slow? IE eliminating the network. Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 23:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Arc
RE: Slow performance
Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com
RE: Slow performance
The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down". Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
1.5 gigs or ram. Wilson -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Perfmon will be your friend initially. There's no reason this should be slow offhand, so pinpointing the bottleneck may take a bit of poking about. > -Original Message- > From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Slow performance > > > Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The > machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The > store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index > files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. > > Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 > seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the > calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook > for several minutes. > > The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything > else I can do to speed this up a bit? > > If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. > > Thanks, > Wilson > > > > > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slow performance
Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
