RE: Exchange "Project Book"

[Maglinger, Paul]

Great idea.   Didn't this pop up a month or two ago?  Maybe on another
list...?  Regardless, I'd be interested in it.



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange "Project Book"



I've been discussing with a technical publisher about doing an Exchange
book that is project oriented. That is, the book has a specific goal in
mind, from beginning to end.

 

I have suggested a "soup-to-nuts" guide to installing and configuring
Exchange Server 2007 in small and medium organizations.

 

I would love to hear, either in this newsgroup or directly, what y'all
think about that concept. Good or bad.

 

Also, if you have other ideas about a project oriented Exchange book,
I'd like to hear that too.

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[David Lum]

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start
unless I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they
are an admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because
on other systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT
an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with
people having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Kennedy, Jim]

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were local 
admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a non-admin




From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start unless I 
give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they are an admin 
when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because on other systems 
where I know it was all configured when they were NOT an admin it worked OK.

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with people 
having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands"






~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[David Lum]

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server.
Having them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing
admin rights, then launching Outlook again to add them back gives
"Cannot start Outlook" message.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were
local admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a
non-admin

 

 

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start
unless I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they
are an admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because
on other systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT
an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with
people having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Exchange (Sunbelt)]

Did you use the wizard for connecting the users to the domain? And to install 
the software.

S

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server. Having 
them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing admin rights, 
then launching Outlook again to add them back gives "Cannot start Outlook" 
message.

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were local 
admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a non-admin




From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start unless I 
give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they are an admin 
when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because on other systems 
where I know it was all configured when they were NOT an admin it worked OK.

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with people 
having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands"












~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Carol Fee]

I have had this happen when during the Outlook or Office installation on
a computer, Run All from My Computer was not selected.
 

CFee

 



From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights



I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start
unless I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they
are an admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because
on other systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT
an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with
people having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Bingham, Kevin]

Check access to the mapisvc.inf file.\ (usually C:\windows\systems32\)
I've seen this one before on certain 3rd party server-side applications.

 

You could also verify that the OAB path doesn't, by some weird turn,
only have access granted to the Administrators group and not the user
themselves (usually C:\Documents and Settings\\Local
Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook)

 

 



From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server.
Having them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing
admin rights, then launching Outlook again to add them back gives
"Cannot start Outlook" message.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were
local admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a
non-admin

 

 

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start
unless I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they
are an admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because
on other systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT
an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with
people having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 
This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain 
privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from 
disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error, please 
inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any 
printed copy.   Thank you. 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[David Lum]

No wizard, I set up this SBS box before I realized SBS had wizards for
everything so I was installed/configured like a normal 2K3 domain except
having Exchange, SQL and the DC on the same box.

 

It seems like if they are an admin the first time I launch and configure
their Outlook under their UserID , then removing the admin breaks it. If
they are not an admin the first time I open Outlook with their ID on the
box, it doesn't matter if they're an admin or not. Weird.

 

Dave

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange
(Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Did you use the wizard for connecting the users to the domain? And to
install the software.

 

S

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server.
Having them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing
admin rights, then launching Outlook again to add them back gives
"Cannot start Outlook" message.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were
local admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a
non-admin

 

 

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start
unless I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they
are an admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because
on other systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT
an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with
people having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Don Andrews]

Try running filemon and see where you are getting access denied?

 



From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 8:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

No wizard, I set up this SBS box before I realized SBS had wizards for
everything so I was installed/configured like a normal 2K3 domain except
having Exchange, SQL and the DC on the same box.

 

It seems like if they are an admin the first time I launch and configure
their Outlook under their UserID , then removing the admin breaks it. If
they are not an admin the first time I open Outlook with their ID on the
box, it doesn't matter if they're an admin or not. Weird.

 

Dave

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange
(Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Did you use the wizard for connecting the users to the domain? And to
install the software.

 

S

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server.
Having them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing
admin rights, then launching Outlook again to add them back gives
"Cannot start Outlook" message.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were
local admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a
non-admin

 

 

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start
unless I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they
are an admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because
on other systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT
an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with
people having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: additional receive connector for anonymous

[Angie Urtel]

In theory, I get it.  Forgive my stupidity, but I've never had to configure
a second IP.  Is it as simple as Adding a second address in the Advanced
TCP/IP properites?
Then, would that IP resolve to an addtional MX record or just a normal host
record?  (it will only be used internally)

Currently we have mail.domain.com (MX) that resolves to our primary IP on
the Hub Transport.

The big question - it appears this would not require a downtime - am I
correct with this assumption?

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Michael B. Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  I use another IP address and bind it to the additional connector.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> MCSE/Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Angie Urtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:34 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* additional receive connector for anonymous
>
>
>
> My organization has an additional (3rd) Receive Connector for Internal
> Hosts that need to relay SMTP.  This connector allows Anonymous connections
> from certain IPs.  The default Receive Connector is not setup for Anonymous
> access.
>
> My issue is - we have an application that is in the IP list for the
> Internal Hosts connector, but is routing (and getting blocked because its
> not authenticated) through the default connector.  What is the
> procedure/rules/flow to get some machines to use this additional connector?
> As far as I know, this is the first time it has not worked.
>
> The application is setup to use a generic DNS name for the Hub Transport
> server.  I see the IP in the SMTP Receive logs, initiating a connection with
> the wrong connector.
>
> All of the articles I find just say to allow Anonymous on the Default
> Connector, which I don't want to do.  Any tips?
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Exchange (Sunbelt)]

Yup, that's what happens when you don't run the wizard's. It's going to create 
more issues

S

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

No wizard, I set up this SBS box before I realized SBS had wizards for 
everything so I was installed/configured like a normal 2K3 domain except having 
Exchange, SQL and the DC on the same box.

It seems like if they are an admin the first time I launch and configure their 
Outlook under their UserID , then removing the admin breaks it. If they are not 
an admin the first time I open Outlook with their ID on the box, it doesn't 
matter if they're an admin or not. Weird.

Dave

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

Did you use the wizard for connecting the users to the domain? And to install 
the software.

S

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server. Having 
them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing admin rights, 
then launching Outlook again to add them back gives "Cannot start Outlook" 
message.

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were local 
admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a non-admin




From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start unless I 
give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they are an admin 
when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because on other systems 
where I know it was all configured when they were NOT an admin it worked OK.

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with people 
having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands"


















~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Exchange (Sunbelt)]

The quickest way to fix this is manually remove all the pc's from the domain 
and go through the checklist wizards one by one. This will set up your AD 
perms, the Exchange organization, certs etc.


SBS is definitely not Server 2003. The SBS team mangled the hell out of it to 
get it to work properly. I cannot stress this enough..

I'm surprised I'm the only one to reply about the wizards yet...Normally you 
would get a flood..:)

Once you've run the wizards on the server, from each pc run 
http://servername/connectcomputer and follow the wiz...

S

PS Best place for SBS Admins is the Yahoo SBS Group...

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

Yup, that's what happens when you don't run the wizard's. It's going to create 
more issues

S

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

No wizard, I set up this SBS box before I realized SBS had wizards for 
everything so I was installed/configured like a normal 2K3 domain except having 
Exchange, SQL and the DC on the same box.

It seems like if they are an admin the first time I launch and configure their 
Outlook under their UserID , then removing the admin breaks it. If they are not 
an admin the first time I open Outlook with their ID on the box, it doesn't 
matter if they're an admin or not. Weird.

Dave

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

Did you use the wizard for connecting the users to the domain? And to install 
the software.

S

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server. Having 
them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing admin rights, 
then launching Outlook again to add them back gives "Cannot start Outlook" 
message.

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were local 
admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a non-admin




From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start unless I 
give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they are an admin 
when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because on other systems 
where I know it was all configured when they were NOT an admin it worked OK.

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with people 
having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands"





















~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

R: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[HELP_PC]

I wasn't on line. Yes Wizards for SBS !
 
GuidoElia
HELPPC
 

  _  

Da: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Exchange (Sunbelt)
Inviato: giovedì 10 aprile 2008 18.55
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights



The quickest way to fix this is manually remove all the pc's from the domain 
and go through the checklist wizards one by one. This will set up your AD 
perms, the Exchange organization, certs etc.

 

 

SBS is definitely not Server 2003. The SBS team mangled the hell out of it to 
get it to work properly. I cannot stress this enough..

 

I'm surprised I'm the only one to reply about the wizards yet...Normally you 
would get a flood..:)

 

Once you've run the wizards on the server, from each pc run 
http://servername/connectcomputer and follow the wiz...

 

S

 

PS Best place for SBS Admins is the Yahoo SBS Group...

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Yup, that's what happens when you don't run the wizard's. It's going to create 
more issues

 

S

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

No wizard, I set up this SBS box before I realized SBS had wizards for 
everything so I was installed/configured like a normal 2K3 domain except having 
Exchange, SQL and the DC on the same box.

 

It seems like if they are an admin the first time I launch and configure their 
Outlook under their UserID , then removing the admin breaks it. If they are not 
an admin the first time I open Outlook with their ID on the box, it doesn't 
matter if they're an admin or not. Weird.

 

Dave

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Did you use the wizard for connecting the users to the domain? And to install 
the software.

 

S

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server. Having 
them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing admin rights, 
then launching Outlook again to add them back gives "Cannot start Outlook" 
message.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were local 
admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a non-admin

 

 

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start unless I 
give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they are an admin 
when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because on other systems 
where I know it was all configured when they were NOT an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with people 
having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Michael B. Smith]

I think most of the SBS'ers hang out on the NT list instead of the Exchange
list. :-P

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

The quickest way to fix this is manually remove all the pc's from the domain
and go through the checklist wizards one by one. This will set up your AD
perms, the Exchange organization, certs etc.

 

 

SBS is definitely not Server 2003. The SBS team mangled the hell out of it
to get it to work properly. I cannot stress this enough..

 

I'm surprised I'm the only one to reply about the wizards yet...Normally you
would get a flood..:)

 

Once you've run the wizards on the server, from each pc run
http://servername/connectcomputer and follow the wiz...

 

S

 

PS Best place for SBS Admins is the Yahoo SBS Group...

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Yup, that's what happens when you don't run the wizard's. It's going to
create more issues

 

S

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

No wizard, I set up this SBS box before I realized SBS had wizards for
everything so I was installed/configured like a normal 2K3 domain except
having Exchange, SQL and the DC on the same box.

 

It seems like if they are an admin the first time I launch and configure
their Outlook under their UserID , then removing the admin breaks it. If
they are not an admin the first time I open Outlook with their ID on the
box, it doesn't matter if they're an admin or not. Weird.

 

Dave

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Did you use the wizard for connecting the users to the domain? And to
install the software.

 

S

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server. Having
them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing admin
rights, then launching Outlook again to add them back gives "Cannot start
Outlook" message.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were local
admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a non-admin..

 

 

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start unless
I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they are an
admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because on other
systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT an admin it
worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with people
having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution.

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

[Bob Fronk]

Most of the bs'ers too.

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

I think most of the SBS'ers hang out on the NT list instead of the
Exchange list. :-P

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange
(Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

The quickest way to fix this is manually remove all the pc's from the
domain and go through the checklist wizards one by one. This will set up
your AD perms, the Exchange organization, certs etc.

 

 

SBS is definitely not Server 2003. The SBS team mangled the hell out of
it to get it to work properly. I cannot stress this enough..

 

I'm surprised I'm the only one to reply about the wizards yet...Normally
you would get a flood..:)

 

Once you've run the wizards on the server, from each pc run
http://servername/connectcomputer and follow the wiz...

 

S

 

PS Best place for SBS Admins is the Yahoo SBS Group...

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange
(Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Yup, that's what happens when you don't run the wizard's. It's going to
create more issues

 

S

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

No wizard, I set up this SBS box before I realized SBS had wizards for
everything so I was installed/configured like a normal 2K3 domain except
having Exchange, SQL and the DC on the same box.

 

It seems like if they are an admin the first time I launch and configure
their Outlook under their UserID , then removing the admin breaks it. If
they are not an admin the first time I open Outlook with their ID on the
box, it doesn't matter if they're an admin or not. Weird.

 

Dave

 

From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange
(Sunbelt)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Did you use the wizard for connecting the users to the domain? And to
install the software.

 

S

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

Nope, no .PST's - they all point to local 2K3 Exchange (SBS) server.
Having them as admin and removing their Outlook profile, then removing
admin rights, then launching Outlook again to add them back gives
"Cannot start Outlook" message.

 

From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

PST storage on the C drive perhaps? If it was created when they were
local admins they probably would not have proper rights to it as a
non-admin

 

 

 

 

From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2K3 requires admin rights

 

I have a some users that when they log  onto a PC Outlook won't start
unless I give them admin rights on the PC. I think this happens if they
are an admin when Outlook is installed and configured for them, because
on other systems where I know it was all configured when they were NOT
an admin it worked OK.

 

Has anyone seen this before? Google-Fu sends me to many links with
people having the same issue, but I find no satisfactory resolution...

 

Dave Lum  - Systems Engineer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025
"When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Davis H. Elliot 
Company company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: additional receive connector for anonymous

[Michael B. Smith]

You don't need any downtime.

 

I don't know if you are using EMS or EMC, but the process goes like this:

 

1)  Change existing connectors to bind to only the IP addresses on the
machine

2)  Add a new IP address to the machine

3)  Create the new-receiveconnector and bind it to the new IP address

4)  Set-receiveconnector for all of the other relevant attributes for
the connector.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Angie Urtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: additional receive connector for anonymous

 

In theory, I get it.  Forgive my stupidity, but I've never had to configure
a second IP.  Is it as simple as Adding a second address in the Advanced
TCP/IP properites?
Then, would that IP resolve to an addtional MX record or just a normal host
record?  (it will only be used internally)

Currently we have mail.domain.com (MX) that resolves to our primary IP on
the Hub Transport.  

The big question - it appears this would not require a downtime - am I
correct with this assumption?

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Michael B. Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I use another IP address and bind it to the additional connector.

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Angie Urtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: additional receive connector for anonymous

 

My organization has an additional (3rd) Receive Connector for Internal Hosts
that need to relay SMTP.  This connector allows Anonymous connections from
certain IPs.  The default Receive Connector is not setup for Anonymous
access.

My issue is - we have an application that is in the IP list for the Internal
Hosts connector, but is routing (and getting blocked because its not
authenticated) through the default connector.  What is the
procedure/rules/flow to get some machines to use this additional connector?
As far as I know, this is the first time it has not worked.

The application is setup to use a generic DNS name for the Hub Transport
server.  I see the IP in the SMTP Receive logs, initiating a connection with
the wrong connector.

All of the articles I find just say to allow Anonymous on the Default
Connector, which I don't want to do.  Any tips?


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Email editing

[Bob Fronk]

What is the best way to confirm that someone edited an email?

 

Example:  User A sends out an email to several people.  Then a few days
later User A forwards their original sent message (from sent items) to
another person, but edits the original email to change the time sent,
the body and who the original email was sent to.

 

Is there a way a recipient of the forwarded message can tell what was
edited?

 

Bob Fronk

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Davis H. Elliot 
Company company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange "Project Book"

[Bob Fronk]

Sounds like a good read Once you get it done!

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange "Project Book"

 

I've been discussing with a technical publisher about doing an Exchange
book that is project oriented. That is, the book has a specific goal in
mind, from beginning to end.

 

I have suggested a "soup-to-nuts" guide to installing and configuring
Exchange Server 2007 in small and medium organizations.

 

I would love to hear, either in this newsgroup or directly, what y'all
think about that concept. Good or bad.

 

Also, if you have other ideas about a project oriented Exchange book,
I'd like to hear that too.

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Davis H. Elliot 
Company company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Email editing

[Steve Ens]

ask them?

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  What is the best way to confirm that someone edited an email?
>
>
>
> Example:  User A sends out an email to several people.  Then a few days
> later User A forwards their original sent message (from sent items) to
> another person, but edits the original email to change the time sent, the
> body and who the original email was sent to.
>
>
>
> Is there a way a recipient of the forwarded message can tell what was
> edited?
>
>
>
> Bob Fronk
>
>
>
> This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
> the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
> read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
> in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
> Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
> make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
> responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
> or attachments.
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Email editing

[Bob Fronk]

Besides that... need undeniable proof.

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Email editing

 

ask them?

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

What is the best way to confirm that someone edited an email?

 

Example:  User A sends out an email to several people.  Then a few days
later User A forwards their original sent message (from sent items) to
another person, but edits the original email to change the time sent,
the body and who the original email was sent to.

 

Is there a way a recipient of the forwarded message can tell what was
edited?

 

Bob Fronk

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of the Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although
precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this
email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

 

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Davis H. Elliot 
Company company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Email editing

[Steve Ens]

LOL, get CSI on the job. Those programs they use on tv can come up with any
information you need. Other than that, I can't help you.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Besides that… need undeniable proof.
>
>
>
> Bob Fronk
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:14 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Email editing
>
>
>
> ask them?
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> What is the best way to confirm that someone edited an email?
>
>
>
> Example:  User A sends out an email to several people.  Then a few days
> later User A forwards their original sent message (from sent items) to
> another person, but edits the original email to change the time sent, the
> body and who the original email was sent to.
>
>
>
> Is there a way a recipient of the forwarded message can tell what was
> edited?
>
>
>
> Bob Fronk
>
>
>
> This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
> the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
> read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
> in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
> Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
> make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
> responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
> or attachments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
> the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
> read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
> in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
> Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
> make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
> responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
> or attachments.
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Email editing

[Kennedy, Jim]

You would have to compare it to the original, and the email logs..



From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email editing

Besides that... need undeniable proof.

Bob Fronk

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Email editing

ask them?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What is the best way to confirm that someone edited an email?



Example:  User A sends out an email to several people.  Then a few days later 
User A forwards their original sent message (from sent items) to another 
person, but edits the original email to change the time sent, the body and who 
the original email was sent to.



Is there a way a recipient of the forwarded message can tell what was edited?



Bob Fronk



This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Davis H. Elliot 
Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses 
are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any 
loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.







This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Davis H. Elliot 
Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses 
are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any 
loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Email editing

[Michael B. Smith]

Get the original out of their sent items folder.

 

If you have subjects being listed in your message tracking, you could at
least search for the message-id, size, subject, date, etc. etc. - that would
be strong evidence, although not conclusive.

 

Otherwise you are SOL, I think. This is one of the things that RMS addresses
(Rights Management Services).

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email editing

 

Besides that. need undeniable proof.

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Email editing

 

ask them?

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What is the best way to confirm that someone edited an email?

 

Example:  User A sends out an email to several people.  Then a few days
later User A forwards their original sent message (from sent items) to
another person, but edits the original email to change the time sent, the
body and who the original email was sent to.

 

Is there a way a recipient of the forwarded message can tell what was
edited?

 

Bob Fronk

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
or attachments.

 

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
or attachments.

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Email editing

[Bob Fronk]

I have the original from Sent items and have already done what you
suggest.  It points to the message being edited before forwarding, but
just wanted to see if there was another way.

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email editing

 

Get the original out of their sent items folder.

 

If you have subjects being listed in your message tracking, you could at
least search for the message-id, size, subject, date, etc. etc. - that
would be strong evidence, although not conclusive.

 

Otherwise you are SOL, I think. This is one of the things that RMS
addresses (Rights Management Services).

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email editing

 

Besides that... need undeniable proof.

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Email editing

 

ask them?

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

What is the best way to confirm that someone edited an email?

 

Example:  User A sends out an email to several people.  Then a few days
later User A forwards their original sent message (from sent items) to
another person, but edits the original email to change the time sent,
the body and who the original email was sent to.

 

Is there a way a recipient of the forwarded message can tell what was
edited?

 

Bob Fronk

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of the Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although
precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this
email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of the Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although
precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this
email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

 

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Davis H. Elliot 
Company company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Email editing

[Michael B. Smith]

Ah. Well, then you should have TWO messages from the sent items folder, no?
That's pretty darn conclusive..

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email editing

 

I have the original from Sent items and have already done what you suggest.
It points to the message being edited before forwarding, but just wanted to
see if there was another way.

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email editing

 

Get the original out of their sent items folder.

 

If you have subjects being listed in your message tracking, you could at
least search for the message-id, size, subject, date, etc. etc. - that would
be strong evidence, although not conclusive.

 

Otherwise you are SOL, I think. This is one of the things that RMS addresses
(Rights Management Services).

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email editing

 

Besides that. need undeniable proof.

 

Bob Fronk

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 1:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Email editing

 

ask them?

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What is the best way to confirm that someone edited an email?

 

Example:  User A sends out an email to several people.  Then a few days
later User A forwards their original sent message (from sent items) to
another person, but edits the original email to change the time sent, the
body and who the original email was sent to.

 

Is there a way a recipient of the forwarded message can tell what was
edited?

 

Bob Fronk

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
or attachments.

 

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
or attachments.

 

 

 

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not
read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed
in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the
Davis H. Elliot Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to
make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email
or attachments.

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: additional receive connector for anonymous

[Angie Urtel]

thank you!

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Michael B. Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  You don't need any downtime.
>
>
>
> I don't know if you are using EMS or EMC, but the process goes like this:
>
>
>
> 1)  Change existing connectors to bind to only the IP addresses on the
> machine
>
> 2)  Add a new IP address to the machine
>
> 3)  Create the new-receiveconnector and bind it to the new IP address
>
> 4)  Set-receiveconnector for all of the other relevant attributes for
> the connector.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> MCSE/Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Angie Urtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:17 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: additional receive connector for anonymous
>
>
>
> In theory, I get it.  Forgive my stupidity, but I've never had to
> configure a second IP.  Is it as simple as Adding a second address in the
> Advanced TCP/IP properites?
> Then, would that IP resolve to an addtional MX record or just a normal
> host record?  (it will only be used internally)
>
> Currently we have mail.domain.com (MX) that resolves to our primary IP on
> the Hub Transport.
>
> The big question - it appears this would not require a downtime - am I
> correct with this assumption?
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Michael B. Smith <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use another IP address and bind it to the additional connector.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> MCSE/Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Angie Urtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 09, 2008 2:34 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* additional receive connector for anonymous
>
>
>
> My organization has an additional (3rd) Receive Connector for Internal
> Hosts that need to relay SMTP.  This connector allows Anonymous connections
> from certain IPs.  The default Receive Connector is not setup for Anonymous
> access.
>
> My issue is - we have an application that is in the IP list for the
> Internal Hosts connector, but is routing (and getting blocked because its
> not authenticated) through the default connector.  What is the
> procedure/rules/flow to get some machines to use this additional connector?
> As far as I know, this is the first time it has not worked.
>
> The application is setup to use a generic DNS name for the Hub Transport
> server.  I see the IP in the SMTP Receive logs, initiating a connection with
> the wrong connector.
>
> All of the articles I find just say to allow Anonymous on the Default
> Connector, which I don't want to do.  Any tips?
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

DC not working?

[Jim Dandy]

1) I'm using RPC over HTTPS to connect to my Exchange server.
2) I have both front end and back end Exchange 2003 servers.
3) I have two DCs (server 2003).

I rebooted one of my DCs and lost connectivity to mail while the DC was
rebooting.  Does that mean that the other DC which was up was not
working properly?  Note: the DC that was rebooted is handling all 5 of
the FSMO roles and it is the Global Catalog server.  Perhaps RPC over
HTTPS needs one of the FSMO roles or the GC to function?  Can someone
clarify?

Thanks for your help.

Curt

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: DC not working?

[Michelle Weaver]

Exchange requires access to the GC in order to function.

Michelle


-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DC not working?

1) I'm using RPC over HTTPS to connect to my Exchange server.
2) I have both front end and back end Exchange 2003 servers.
3) I have two DCs (server 2003).

I rebooted one of my DCs and lost connectivity to mail while the DC was
rebooting.  Does that mean that the other DC which was up was not
working properly?  Note: the DC that was rebooted is handling all 5 of
the FSMO roles and it is the Global Catalog server.  Perhaps RPC over
HTTPS needs one of the FSMO roles or the GC to function?  Can someone
clarify?

Thanks for your help.

Curt

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: DC not working?

[Michael B. Smith]

You need to make both of those DCs into GCs.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DC not working?

1) I'm using RPC over HTTPS to connect to my Exchange server.
2) I have both front end and back end Exchange 2003 servers.
3) I have two DCs (server 2003).

I rebooted one of my DCs and lost connectivity to mail while the DC was
rebooting.  Does that mean that the other DC which was up was not
working properly?  Note: the DC that was rebooted is handling all 5 of
the FSMO roles and it is the Global Catalog server.  Perhaps RPC over
HTTPS needs one of the FSMO roles or the GC to function?  Can someone
clarify?

Thanks for your help.

Curt

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange "Project Book"

[Amer Karim]

Likewise.

 

 

From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: April-09-08 6:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange "Project Book"

 

Sounds excellent!  Having just done my first I found myself looking all over
for scraps of info, not wanting or having the time sit down and read the
entire technet and white paper.

Matt

 

  _  

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange "Project Book"

 

I've been discussing with a technical publisher about doing an Exchange book
that is project oriented. That is, the book has a specific goal in mind,
from beginning to end.

 

I have suggested a "soup-to-nuts" guide to installing and configuring
Exchange Server 2007 in small and medium organizations.

 

I would love to hear, either in this newsgroup or directly, what y'all think
about that concept. Good or bad.

 

Also, if you have other ideas about a project oriented Exchange book, I'd
like to hear that too.

 

Thanks!

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: DC not working?

[N Parr]

I've noticed this in my environment also but I've always had both my
DC's as GC's.  Yet still when I reboot my "Primary" DC my Exchange
connectivity still fails. From what I've read the GC is the only thing
Exchange cares about for connectivity and your suppose to leave the FSMO
roles on the first DC.  Could it just be the DC that's gets rebooted
isn't down long enough for Exchange to start looking at the other one
before the first comes back up.  Or should Exchange jump straight to the
secondary and you shouldn't receive any timeouts at all?

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DC not working?

You need to make both of those DCs into GCs.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DC not working?

1) I'm using RPC over HTTPS to connect to my Exchange server.
2) I have both front end and back end Exchange 2003 servers.
3) I have two DCs (server 2003).

I rebooted one of my DCs and lost connectivity to mail while the DC was
rebooting.  Does that mean that the other DC which was up was not
working properly?  Note: the DC that was rebooted is handling all 5 of
the FSMO roles and it is the Global Catalog server.  Perhaps RPC over
HTTPS needs one of the FSMO roles or the GC to function?  Can someone
clarify?

Thanks for your help.

Curt

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange "Project Book"

[Jason Gurtz]

> I’ve been discussing with a technical publisher about doing an
> Exchange book that is project oriented. That is, the book has a
> specific goal in mind, from beginning to end.
> 
> 
> 
> I have suggested a “soup-to-nuts” guide to installing and configuring
> Exchange Server 2007 in small and medium organizations.

I'm a fan of this idea.  In general, the "cookbook" format (in this case
one recipe from the sounds of it) seems adaptable to a wide variety of
scenarios.

Also, this market is oh so commonly using exchange (that's the "only" mail
server, right?), has no expert, and so they can use all the help they can
get.

The subject matter seems straightforward but I would expect at least an
overview or list of cautions regarding deliverability and filtering
issues, perhaps in an appendix if they don't fit the overall content and
flow of the main text.

~JasonG

-- 

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: DC not working?

[Michael B. Smith]

Worst case should be 15 minutes (that's the default resync interval) unless
you have manually overridden the DSAccess routines (on the Directory
Services tab of the Server Property sheet in ESM).

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: N Parr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 4:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DC not working?

I've noticed this in my environment also but I've always had both my
DC's as GC's.  Yet still when I reboot my "Primary" DC my Exchange
connectivity still fails. From what I've read the GC is the only thing
Exchange cares about for connectivity and your suppose to leave the FSMO
roles on the first DC.  Could it just be the DC that's gets rebooted
isn't down long enough for Exchange to start looking at the other one
before the first comes back up.  Or should Exchange jump straight to the
secondary and you shouldn't receive any timeouts at all?

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DC not working?

You need to make both of those DCs into GCs.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DC not working?

1) I'm using RPC over HTTPS to connect to my Exchange server.
2) I have both front end and back end Exchange 2003 servers.
3) I have two DCs (server 2003).

I rebooted one of my DCs and lost connectivity to mail while the DC was
rebooting.  Does that mean that the other DC which was up was not
working properly?  Note: the DC that was rebooted is handling all 5 of
the FSMO roles and it is the Global Catalog server.  Perhaps RPC over
HTTPS needs one of the FSMO roles or the GC to function?  Can someone
clarify?

Thanks for your help.

Curt

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

routing problem

[Bill Songstad (WCUL)]

I'm having a bit of a puzzler.  I think it has to with DNS but I can't
seem to pin it down.  

 

I added a second exchange 2000 server to a domain and moved one user
(user2) to the second server (server2).

User2 can send external mail fine.  And can send mail to himself fine.
But, when user2 sends email to any user on server1 the email is routed
out through the firewall proxy and then back in.

 

The domain network setup is like this:  public.com mx 30
=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd (external interface of the firewall)

Private.net  exchange servers: server1.private.net server2.private.net

Recipient policies have mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] being the default. 

DNS server=server1.private.net and forwards externally to the firewall.
But it has a zone internally for private.net with hosts and mx records
mx 10 server1.private.net mx 20 server2.private.net

 

When user2 sends an email to a user on server1, an outbound queue
appears on server2 labeled "server1.private.net (outbound)" but the
email only arrives after spending several minutes swirling around on the
firewalls smtp proxy.

 

There are no connectors or smart hosts configured on either box.

 

Does anybody have any thoughts on why the servers are sending the mail
outbound rather than routing them directly to the other server?

 

I swear my head's about to pop.

 

Bill Songstad

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: routing problem

[Bill Songstad (WCUL)]

To update things, after the spin around the firewall, the emails wind up stuck 
in a current session on server1 for delivery from server2 but there they time 
out.  Emails the other direction, from server1 to server2, are delivered in a 
timely fashion.  
 
Brain hurts... must have beer...



From: Bill Songstad (WCUL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 4/10/2008 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: routing problem



I'm having a bit of a puzzler.  I think it has to with DNS but I can't seem to 
pin it down.  

 

I added a second exchange 2000 server to a domain and moved one user (user2) to 
the second server (server2).

User2 can send external mail fine.  And can send mail to himself fine.  But, 
when user2 sends email to any user on server1 the email is routed out through 
the firewall proxy and then back in.

 

The domain network setup is like this:  public.com mx 30 =aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd 
(external interface of the firewall)

Private.net  exchange servers: server1.private.net server2.private.net

Recipient policies have mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] being the default. 

DNS server=server1.private.net and forwards externally to the firewall.  But it 
has a zone internally for private.net with hosts and mx records  mx 10 
server1.private.net mx 20 server2.private.net

 

When user2 sends an email to a user on server1, an outbound queue appears on 
server2 labeled "server1.private.net (outbound)" but the email only arrives 
after spending several minutes swirling around on the firewalls smtp proxy.

 

There are no connectors or smart hosts configured on either box.

 

Does anybody have any thoughts on why the servers are sending the mail outbound 
rather than routing them directly to the other server?

 

I swear my head's about to pop.

 

Bill Songstad

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: routing problem

[Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT)]

Hey Bill:

Understand about the brain hurting and needing beer.

Some fundamental questions; Are server one and server 2 in the
same Exchange organization?  Are they in the same routing group? Are
they in the same administrative group?

What is USER2's SMTP address as stamped on the account by RUS?
Is it different from users on Server 1? If so, does Server 1 know how to
get there internally or is everything pointed at the firewall for
routing resolution?

I have more, but this should be a start.


John H. Matteson, Jr.
Systems Administrator/ITT Systems
FOB Orgun-E
Afghanistan
DSN - 318 431 8001
VoSIP - (308) 431 - 
Iridium - 717.633.3823
Roshain - 079 - 736 - 3832

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes
here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he
shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an
outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or
birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming
in every facet an American, and nothing but an American... There can be
no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but
something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one
flag, the American flag.. We have room for but one language here, and
that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole
loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
Teddy Roosevelt; 1907

-Original Message-
From: Bill Songstad (WCUL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 4:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: routing problem

To update things, after the spin around the firewall, the emails wind up
stuck in a current session on server1 for delivery from server2 but
there they time out.  Emails the other direction, from server1 to
server2, are delivered in a timely fashion.  
 
Brain hurts... must have beer...



From: Bill Songstad (WCUL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 4/10/2008 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: routing problem



I'm having a bit of a puzzler.  I think it has to with DNS but I can't
seem to pin it down.  

 

I added a second exchange 2000 server to a domain and moved one user
(user2) to the second server (server2).

User2 can send external mail fine.  And can send mail to himself fine.
But, when user2 sends email to any user on server1 the email is routed
out through the firewall proxy and then back in.

 

The domain network setup is like this:  public.com mx 30
=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd (external interface of the firewall)

Private.net  exchange servers: server1.private.net server2.private.net

Recipient policies have mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] being the default. 

DNS server=server1.private.net and forwards externally to the firewall.
But it has a zone internally for private.net with hosts and mx records
mx 10 server1.private.net mx 20 server2.private.net

 

When user2 sends an email to a user on server1, an outbound queue
appears on server2 labeled "server1.private.net (outbound)" but the
email only arrives after spending several minutes swirling around on the
firewalls smtp proxy.

 

There are no connectors or smart hosts configured on either box.

 

Does anybody have any thoughts on why the servers are sending the mail
outbound rather than routing them directly to the other server?

 

I swear my head's about to pop.

 

Bill Songstad

 


 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~