Wireless Analyzer
We do not use wireless at all to avoid regulatory issues that are not worth it. That said, PCI standards require that we use a wireless analyzer to ensure that no rogue WAP is set up on our network. Makes sense. I have looked at several and the price ranges all over the place. Since all we need to do is look for unauthorized wireless, I don' t need all the features of most of these. I am curious who else is working on PCI and has similar issues or approaches for this piece. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Found this, may help. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb684892.aspx From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes I believe that the totals in ESM include the DIR, while the Outlook totals do not...however I could be wrong. On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Davies,Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes we do. From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2008 15:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes Do you use deleted item retention? On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Hosting Multiple domains in Exchange 2003
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jonathan Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I've removed the 2 PTD DNS servers, but my DNS checks still show them listed and mail is still failing. I removed them Wednesday 5/28, I figured 24 hours the propagate but this morning their still showing up for me. For a change of registered name servers, you have to wait for: 1. The registrar reseller to process the change (if you're using a reseller (but many registration services are really just resllers)) 2. The registrar to process the change 3. The registry to process the change 4. TTL to expire on any cached records The TTL on the GTLD zones is 48 hours, so you're generally waiting at least two days. Some resellers/registrars can be slow, so 70 or 80 hours is not unheard of. In any event, the shirevalleydesign.com domain looks like it's okay right now. Both registered nameservers are responding properly, and both return the same zone information. Are you still having trouble sending mail to/from them? In addition I've just learned that email from our main company is failing to reach 2 other domains that are hosted on this exchange server. [...] DNS entries are correct for all of the domains. No offense, but you said that before and you were wrong then. :-) Post the domain names, and I or others can investigate. The more information you give people, the more likely someone will be able to help you. -- Ben ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Can I see IMF filtered log file?
Hello everyone, Do you know if MS provides a log to IMF filtered mail? We have Exchange 2003 sp2. Thanks, Bob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Exchange Mailbox sizes
Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt _ This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes
I believe that the totals in ESM include the DIR, while the Outlook totals do not...however I could be wrong. On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Davies,Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes we do. *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 03 June 2008 15:53 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes Do you use deleted item retention? On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Sender Reputation Filter in Exchange 2007
I have an external IP/company that keeps getting blocked by our SRF. I know I can manually allow it, but I'd rather figure out why it's getting blocked, or what part of the check is failing - if possible. (already referenced http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124512(EXCHG.80).aspx) We have our SlrBlockThreshold set to 7. I know the default is 9. Also does anyone know of a way to clear the SLR rating on the Edge server, if the company recently migrated to a new system? Not sure if it's related but they are now using SPF and we have not yet implemented an SPF policy. The IP that is getting blocked is not their MX record. Thanks Angie ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Do you use deleted item retention? On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Yes we do. From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2008 15:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes Do you use deleted item retention? On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Love you too, dill-weed. Shook From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Mailbox sizes Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Don't be hatein' ShookiePoo. From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes Love you too, dill-weed. Shook From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Mailbox sizes Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Can I see IMF filtered log file?
This might help... http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/IMF-Managers.html Rick -Original Message- From: Bao, Gang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Can I see IMF filtered log file? Hello everyone, Do you know if MS provides a log to IMF filtered mail? We have Exchange 2003 sp2. Thanks, Bob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OWA - Basic and Premium
No ideas how to change this back to premium? -Original Message- From: Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA - Basic and Premium System - Server 2K, E2K3 The server was bounced a week ago (after having MS updates applied) and a new version of Symantec Mail Security for Exchange was also installed. Prior to this when anyone used OWA they showed the Premium setup. Since the reboot everyone now only has the Standard version. I've searched around and can't find anything that seems to apply. Any ideas? Cheers, Cameron ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OWA - Basic and Premium
ASSUMING that all clients are using a supported IE browser, did anything/anyone mess with segmentation options either in the Exchange server's registry, on user attributes in AD, or on a DC's attributes? http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=833340 -Bonnie -Original Message- From: Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA - Basic and Premium No ideas how to change this back to premium? -Original Message- From: Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA - Basic and Premium System - Server 2K, E2K3 The server was bounced a week ago (after having MS updates applied) and a new version of Symantec Mail Security for Exchange was also installed. Prior to this when anyone used OWA they showed the Premium setup. Since the reboot everyone now only has the Standard version. I've searched around and can't find anything that seems to apply. Any ideas? Cheers, Cameron ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
Hi, I have several users that are getting this error when sending using our exchange 2007 server in outlook, thunderbird Eudora, windows mail etc. Ive done a lot of research on this and got the subject of this message from the receive logs on the server 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender I see that a lot of sites have postings that suggest that the users do not have the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender I also see that various postings have various different methods of granting the said permission so my questions are these 1) Does that make sense that adding that permission is what needs to be done? I don't feel so comfortable about running permission altering things when I don't fully understand the repercussions. 2) What is the proper way to grant this permission, I see one posting that has a syntax granting it to a particular user (-user 'domain\username') and another one that uses -user AU (which I have no idea what AU stands for, but implies that it grants it to everyone). Has anyone run into this and have a suggestion? Its worth noting that there are several accounts also that have no problem sending and seem to work fine. Also I am talking specifically about users using IMAP/SMTP and not MAPI. Thanks! Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Exchange 2007 Sp1 Public folder disk guidance?
I can't seem to find anything on this particular subject. We are going to implement a few CCR clusters and as a result we will need to bring up dedicated Public folder servers. We will still have OLK2003 clients and a lot of PF's that are in use, so we can't get away from them. Does anyone have any guidance for disk configurations for a dedicated Public folder server? - John Barsodi ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 Sp1 Public folder disk guidance?
A PF is just a really big mailbox. How big is your PF store? Go from there. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 5:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 Sp1 Public folder disk guidance? I can't seem to find anything on this particular subject. We are going to implement a few CCR clusters and as a result we will need to bring up dedicated Public folder servers. We will still have OLK2003 clients and a lot of PF's that are in use, so we can't get away from them. Does anyone have any guidance for disk configurations for a dedicated Public folder server? - John Barsodi ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 Sp1 Public folder disk guidance?
Thanks! From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Sp1 Public folder disk guidance? A PF is just a really big mailbox. How big is your PF store? Go from there. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 5:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 Sp1 Public folder disk guidance? I can't seem to find anything on this particular subject. We are going to implement a few CCR clusters and as a result we will need to bring up dedicated Public folder servers. We will still have OLK2003 clients and a lot of PF's that are in use, so we can't get away from them. Does anyone have any guidance for disk configurations for a dedicated Public folder server? - John Barsodi ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
