RE: Help with custom GAL
Socome clean. What were you going wrong? :-P Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Help with custom GAL http://support.microsoft.com/kb/280435/EN-US/ I got it working...thanks for all your help, wish I found this earlier! Travis Travis Krampy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am a member of that security group, and I did remove the permissions on the ohter custom GAL I created a new custom GAL with default permissions and I still dont see anything... Kennedy, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] And if it is a new group, did you relog after making yourself a member -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Help with custom GAL If you remove that security does it show up? (And secondly, are you a member of that group?) Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Help with custom GAL It is not listed at all. The only security that was changed was I added the group that is supposed to view. Only the default permissions inherated. I just wanted to be sure it shows up Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] So you click on the Address Book in Outlook and in the drop-down for address books, your addr book is not listed at all? Or is it empty? Did you set any security on the address book within ESM? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Help with custom GAL Yes it does...I am not in cached mode. I tried your link and still nothing. Anything else I can try? Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] My bad. I missed the non-cached mode too. Does the preview button give you the expected results? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Help with custom GAL http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/forcin g-an- offline-address-book-to-get-updated.aspx Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Travis Krampy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Help with custom GAL Hi I have an exchange 2003 SP2 server, Outlook 2003 NON-Cached mode. I created this GAL at around 9:00AM and I still do not see the custom GAL in my Outlook Address list. I did a update and a rebuild of the RUS. Anyone know why I cant see this GAL? Any help on this is greatly appreciated Thanks Travis ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5
Indeed we are slowly moving towards RAID6 On some of the EMC Systems we have here. From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 9:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5 Just an opinion, but if your going that route, use Raid 6 if your controller does it. Your scenario puts you in jeopardy the moment one drive fails, as during the rebuild your not redundant. In Raid 6, two can go and bring you down to zero ft which is no worse than what you would have your way accept it can happen faster without loosing it all. jlc From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5 Haha yup sorry bout that, Webster is correct 8 Drives Plus One Hot Spare, all Fiber 15K From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5 From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5 Is it safe to assume that you meant RAID 5+1? If not.what is RAID 8? I believe he means RAID5 configured as 8 drives plus 1 hot spare. Webster _ This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and delete the original message and any attachments from your system. _ _ This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by attorney/client or other privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me by e-mail reply and delete the original message and any attachments from your system. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OT: Microsoft methods of innovation
One of the folks I work with presented me with the email below. I know some of you people out there are either employed by or know people at Microsoft. Is anyone familiar with the concept and form mentioned below? Care to share? Essentially, for many years, Bill Gates has gone into seclusion for two, one-week Think Weeks a year where he takes hundreds of 'papers' that his employees have submitted on new ideas for the company and reviews them. . .I have read about this several times and was wondering if anyone knew anyone well enough at Microsoft to ask them if they have a form that the employees use to create the 'papers' that he reads or is it up to the individual submitting the idea the format? If there is a prescribed format, would your friend send us a sample? When you think about it, there are a lot of people in this organization with a lot of good ideas. Possibly we would get more of those flowing up through the ranks if we had a form that helped people assemble their thoughts and provide their insights in an organized manner. Surely Microsoft through encouraging this has come up with a form/format that helps people assemble their thoughts and provide a sufficient level of detail to understand thoroughly what they are speaking to. If people concentrated on the really important things in life, there'd be a shortage of fishing poles. - Doug Larson Paul ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Using OWA on a public computer
You seem to have, shockingly, omitted the version of Exchange... Doesn't sound like 2003 behavior. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Using OWA on a public computer When my users connect to the Exchange server for the first time on a given computer an editor control must be installed or they won't be able to reply or create new messages. I found that I had to add the Exchange server to the trusted sites list in IE to prevent problems installing the control. I'm not sure if that is the best or preferred method but it has been working. The problems start when they want to use a public computer, at a conference for example. I just had a person call me saying that a public computer is asking for a smart card when she tries to connect to the Exchange server. There must be a way to do this that is easier for the end users. A pointer in the right direction would be helpful. Roger ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5
I have 56 spindles -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5 Indeed we are slowly moving towards RAID6 On some of the EMC Systems we have here. Just for my overall perspective on this Raid6 topic: Like anything else, it's a tradeoff. In this case yet another performance hit for peace of mind. I wish I could remember the exact formulas and numbers, but the basic idea is that the chance of failure while rebuilding increases with the amount of spindles and volume size (length of time to rebuild). A little research should turn up the numbers, but I think I feel safe saying if there's less than 8 drives the RAID6 perf penalty probably isn't worth it. Of course, every situation is different and one must consider the value of the data, backup strategy in place, recovery time, etc... On the other end, if spindles goes more than 15-20 or so, you would probably start looking more at layered raid levels like 50 or even 60 to increase redundancy and perf at the cost of storage space and $. Does anyone here have their exchange DBs on 20+ spindles? 8-)... ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Using OWA on a public computer
I'm guessing they require s/mime and that's the control he is referring to. I didn't comment because I didn't know how to fix his problem.not sure it can be fixed other than don't require s/mime. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer You seem to have, shockingly, omitted the version of Exchange... Doesn't sound like 2003 behavior. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Using OWA on a public computer When my users connect to the Exchange server for the first time on a given computer an editor control must be installed or they won't be able to reply or create new messages. I found that I had to add the Exchange server to the trusted sites list in IE to prevent problems installing the control. I'm not sure if that is the best or preferred method but it has been working. The problems start when they want to use a public computer, at a conference for example. I just had a person call me saying that a public computer is asking for a smart card when she tries to connect to the Exchange server. There must be a way to do this that is easier for the end users. A pointer in the right direction would be helpful. Roger ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5
My bad. 46 spindles and 10 spares. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 9:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5 I have 56 spindles -Original Message- From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: VMWare RAID 10 or Raid 5 Indeed we are slowly moving towards RAID6 On some of the EMC Systems we have here. Just for my overall perspective on this Raid6 topic: Like anything else, it's a tradeoff. In this case yet another performance hit for peace of mind. I wish I could remember the exact formulas and numbers, but the basic idea is that the chance of failure while rebuilding increases with the amount of spindles and volume size (length of time to rebuild). A little research should turn up the numbers, but I think I feel safe saying if there's less than 8 drives the RAID6 perf penalty probably isn't worth it. Of course, every situation is different and one must consider the value of the data, backup strategy in place, recovery time, etc... On the other end, if spindles goes more than 15-20 or so, you would probably start looking more at layered raid levels like 50 or even 60 to increase redundancy and perf at the cost of storage space and $. Does anyone here have their exchange DBs on 20+ spindles? 8-)... ~JasonG -- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Using OWA on a public computer
Sorry for being unclear Carl and thanks for responding. It is Exchange 2003. I've been reading and it looks like I goofed pretty badly from a security perspective by not setting up a certificate. I've got them connecting on 80 instead of 443. I'm still not clear about the application of the S/MIME control B. Smith mentioned, but I don't think I need it in this case. I'm thinking that if I get the certificate working there should be no problems connecting from a public computer... does that sound right to you? From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer You seem to have, shockingly, omitted the version of Exchange... Doesn't sound like 2003 behavior. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Using OWA on a public computer When my users connect to the Exchange server for the first time on a given computer an editor control must be installed or they won't be able to reply or create new messages. I found that I had to add the Exchange server to the trusted sites list in IE to prevent problems installing the control. I'm not sure if that is the best or preferred method but it has been working. The problems start when they want to use a public computer, at a conference for example... I just had a person call me saying that a public computer is asking for a smart card when she tries to connect to the Exchange server. There must be a way to do this that is easier for the end users. A pointer in the right direction would be helpful. Roger ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Global Approved Sender?
A number of our staff use Outlooks Junk Mail filter to manage their newsletters and such. How can I add an approved sender to everyone's Outlook Safe Senders list? Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ You got to be very careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there. - Yogi Berra ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Don't you just hate it when...
You're searching in various web forums for the solution to an (apparently) undocumented issue and the original poster ends the thread by letting you know that he solved the problem, but he doesn't include any info or links to indicate how. Gosh, that makes me so mad!!! :-) -Roger ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Using OWA on a public computer
Lack of a certificate doesn't cause the problem you began with. But a certificate is a Really Good Idea if access from the Internet-at-large is being allowed. And one wouldn't have normally enabled S/Mime by accident. Could someone else have done that? If you don't think so, perhaps you could be a bit more descriptive about what is showing up on the screen - word-for-word repetition works wonders when trying to get help via e-mail. Or take a screen shot, post it to a picture-hosting website, and post the URL to that here. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer Sorry for being unclear Carl and thanks for responding. It is Exchange 2003. I've been reading and it looks like I goofed pretty badly from a security perspective by not setting up a certificate. I've got them connecting on 80 instead of 443. I'm still not clear about the application of the S/MIME control B. Smith mentioned, but I don't think I need it in this case. I'm thinking that if I get the certificate working there should be no problems connecting from a public computer. does that sound right to you? _ From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer You seem to have, shockingly, omitted the version of Exchange... Doesn't sound like 2003 behavior. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Using OWA on a public computer When my users connect to the Exchange server for the first time on a given computer an editor control must be installed or they won't be able to reply or create new messages. I found that I had to add the Exchange server to the trusted sites list in IE to prevent problems installing the control. I'm not sure if that is the best or preferred method but it has been working. The problems start when they want to use a public computer, at a conference for example. I just had a person call me saying that a public computer is asking for a smart card when she tries to connect to the Exchange server. There must be a way to do this that is easier for the end users. A pointer in the right direction would be helpful. Roger ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Don't you just hate it when...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Don't you just hate it when... You're searching in various web forums for the solution to an (apparently) undocumented issue and the original poster ends the thread by letting you know that he solved the problem, but he doesn't include any info or links to indicate how. Gosh, that makes me so mad!!! :-) I came up with just a solution for people who do that. Webster ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Global Approved Sender?
You can via a few ways. Group Policies seem the easiest to me: http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/HA011402621033.aspx From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Global Approved Sender? A number of our staff use Outlooks Junk Mail filter to manage their newsletters and such. How can I add an approved sender to everyone's Outlook Safe Senders list? Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ You got to be very careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there. - Yogi Berra ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Don't you just hate it when...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 LOL! From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Don't you just hate it when... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Don't you just hate it when... You're searching in various web forums for the solution to an (apparently) undocumented issue and the original poster ends the thread by letting you know that he solved the problem, but he doesn't include any info or links to indicate how. Gosh, that makes me so mad!!! :-) I came up with just a solution for people who do that. Webster -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3 Charset: iso-8859-1 wsBVAwUBSGEx/Hsd9fh7bf6mAQhm2wf9FS4H7FEqBttMF1cl9SxWXj+XmgoHioSX WusTvd780YeEAtEfjMd7D15qp46Zjk1gutD/A8Juw8PnlMhz2DnF+cuwTS4vWrTT nCBXRxhJGNgS+zPsq6cuT+JsmmlTgfNdi3QPg79aQvr/VoT5hjB9WC7x6vqPoOGS uWtwVCJZfmV3n7LZe9AK+QWn5nIHMvT3ZEws2NBBqo5CFoXygiKTriJ+HftCqn9Z VZuvKl6NKuc1e4ggWZOY/r/yCOwGyw9cNXIpfo060WzBDx6958d1sfkkN8SoQbzo JpMYIzTXYKIz5MQHhXBeasn60iMpFoTWb5TkFsbpHVbAlJZfnwu3mg== =mgPP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Global Approved Sender?
I agree - GP is the way to go. Now to research how best to do that... Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ Don't confuse the organization chart with who does what. Real activity often takes place between the organization chart lines. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Global Approved Sender? You can via a few ways. Group Policies seem the easiest to me: http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/HA011402621033.aspx From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Global Approved Sender? A number of our staff use Outlooks Junk Mail filter to manage their newsletters and such. How can I add an approved sender to everyone's Outlook Safe Senders list? Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc. 727.572.7076 x388 _ You got to be very careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there. - Yogi Berra ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Don't you just hate it when...
Perfect! Roger From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Don't you just hate it when... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Don't you just hate it when... You're searching in various web forums for the solution to an (apparently) undocumented issue and the original poster ends the thread by letting you know that he solved the problem, but he doesn't include any info or links to indicate how. Gosh, that makes me so mad!!! :-) I came up with just a solution for people who do that. Webster ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Microsoft methods of innovation
I think she was looking for an example of the form they use, not necessarily the delivery system. -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Microsoft methods of innovation 4 things come to mind: SharePoint, Forms Server, InfoPath and work flows. -Original Message- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT: Microsoft methods of innovation One of the folks I work with presented me with the email below. I know some of you people out there are either employed by or know people at Microsoft. Is anyone familiar with the concept and form mentioned below? Care to share? Essentially, for many years, Bill Gates has gone into seclusion for two, one-week Think Weeks a year where he takes hundreds of 'papers' that his employees have submitted on new ideas for the company and reviews them. . .I have read about this several times and was wondering if anyone knew anyone well enough at Microsoft to ask them if they have a form that the employees use to create the 'papers' that he reads or is it up to the individual submitting the idea the format? If there is a prescribed format, would your friend send us a sample? When you think about it, there are a lot of people in this organization with a lot of good ideas. Possibly we would get more of those flowing up through the ranks if we had a form that helped people assemble their thoughts and provide their insights in an organized manner. Surely Microsoft through encouraging this has come up with a form/format that helps people assemble their thoughts and provide a sufficient level of detail to understand thoroughly what they are speaking to. If people concentrated on the really important things in life, there'd be a shortage of fishing poles. - Doug Larson Paul ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Using OWA on a public computer
Carl, I don't think it is the S/Mime control but I'm still not sure if that is a UI control or a behind the scenes component... I need to read about it when I have a few minutes free. The control I had trouble installing is just an edit box with a toolbar at top. If the control is not installed you can read mail but there is no way to edit text so you can't reply or create new messages... the place where the edit box usually sits is empty. I'll have to continue this one later after I've had a moment to compile the missing info. Thanks very much for the help! Roger From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer Lack of a certificate doesn't cause the problem you began with. But a certificate is a Really Good Idea if access from the Internet-at-large is being allowed. And one wouldn't have normally enabled S/Mime by accident. Could someone else have done that? If you don't think so, perhaps you could be a bit more descriptive about what is showing up on the screen - word-for-word repetition works wonders when trying to get help via e-mail. Or take a screen shot, post it to a picture-hosting website, and post the URL to that here. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer Sorry for being unclear Carl and thanks for responding. It is Exchange 2003. I've been reading and it looks like I goofed pretty badly from a security perspective by not setting up a certificate. I've got them connecting on 80 instead of 443. I'm still not clear about the application of the S/MIME control B. Smith mentioned, but I don't think I need it in this case. I'm thinking that if I get the certificate working there should be no problems connecting from a public computer... does that sound right to you? From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer You seem to have, shockingly, omitted the version of Exchange... Doesn't sound like 2003 behavior. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Using OWA on a public computer When my users connect to the Exchange server for the first time on a given computer an editor control must be installed or they won't be able to reply or create new messages. I found that I had to add the Exchange server to the trusted sites list in IE to prevent problems installing the control. I'm not sure if that is the best or preferred method but it has been working. The problems start when they want to use a public computer, at a conference for example... I just had a person call me saying that a public computer is asking for a smart card when she tries to connect to the Exchange server. There must be a way to do this that is easier for the end users. A pointer in the right direction would be helpful. Roger ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Mail Server Requires Authentication Bounce Message
Mike: I agree All are cached mode. Local and Inter-office (via site-to-site cisco vpn). Client anti-virus = Symantec 10.1 (no Exchange scanning). Server Protection = GFI MailSecurity GFI MailEssentials. Client Firewall = Windows. Clients are also configured for RPC/http in case they travel to locations outside of my inter-office network. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000, MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:48 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Mail Server Requires Authentication Bounce Message Subject: Re: Mail Server Requires Authentication Bounce Message Well... it sounds it there is a break in recognized authentication. Are these clients working offline or cached? Local network? VPN'd? What AV/client-firewall is in place? On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:28 PM, ExchList [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike: the domain is MY domain. This has happened while sending to multiple external domains [possible 5 or 6] (two of which perform zero filtering). The funny thing is that when employee #1 was sending to external_Recipient_XYZ and getting it bounced, Employee #2 was able to successfully send to external-Recipient_XYZ. Then several hours later employee #1 can successfully send mail to the same recipient again. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for your company -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:45 PM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Mail Server Requires Authentication Bounce Message Subject: Re: Mail Server Requires Authentication Bounce Message mail.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;503 Is mail.domain.com your domain or the final-recipient domain? How many external domains does this problem occur with. Is it always the same ones? On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:19 AM, ExchList [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh my gosh am I about to hang myself over this problem; with what seems to be a simple issue is evading me for a solution. Exchange 2003 SP2, Windows 2003 R2 (patched) A few times per week, users will report that when sending to 'one particular' email address - it gets bounced with the message below. Other outbound messages from the client at that time will go through. And at the same time if another employee sends an email to the same recipient it will go through. Each employee that experiences this bounce message is sending to a different recipient/domain; and they don't always get bounced. My research has revealed a number of old posts with the same problem but do not provide any solutions. I case of beer for the one who solves this for me - so I can sleep at night. PLEASE HELP ME! mail.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;503 This mail server requires authentication when attempting to send to a non-local e-mail address. Please check your mail client settings or contact your administrator to verify that the domain or address is defined for this server. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000, MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Ghost delegates
Probably been covered before but I have several people getting NDRs from departed users when they send out meeting requests, how do I track them down an get rid of them forever? Thx ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ghost delegates
Look up MDBVU32, that should help you remove the delegate piece from a user if it isn’t showing in Outlook. (If it is, just have that user remove the SID). As for finding the actual user that is generating the bad responses, I am pretty sure that requires detective work on your side. I don’t know if the invisible delegate rules can be accessed via PoSH, if so, that would make tracking down a SID in a delegate list trivial. -troy -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ghost delegates Probably been covered before but I have several people getting NDRs from departed users when they send out meeting requests, how do I track them down an get rid of them forever? Thx ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ghost delegates
Thx, I remember seeing that recently, is it run from the Exchange server? John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 5:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ghost delegates Look up MDBVU32, that should help you remove the delegate piece from a user if it isn’t showing in Outlook. (If it is, just have that user remove the SID). As for finding the actual user that is generating the bad responses, I am pretty sure that requires detective work on your side. I don’t know if the invisible delegate rules can be accessed via PoSH, if so, that would make tracking down a SID in a delegate list trivial. -troy -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ghost delegates Probably been covered before but I have several people getting NDRs from departed users when they send out meeting requests, how do I track them down an get rid of them forever? Thx ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Ghost delegates
I believe it requires some Outlook files to run, so you are probably stuck on the desktop. It is portable though, no installer. -troy -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 2:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ghost delegates Thx, I remember seeing that recently, is it run from the Exchange server? John W. Cook System Administrator Partnership For Strong Families 315 SE 2nd Ave Gainesville, Fl 32601 Office (352) 393-2741 x320 Cell (352) 215-6944 Fax (352) 393-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+ -Original Message- From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 5:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ghost delegates Look up MDBVU32, that should help you remove the delegate piece from a user if it isn’t showing in Outlook. (If it is, just have that user remove the SID). As for finding the actual user that is generating the bad responses, I am pretty sure that requires detective work on your side. I don’t know if the invisible delegate rules can be accessed via PoSH, if so, that would make tracking down a SID in a delegate list trivial. -troy -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ghost delegates Probably been covered before but I have several people getting NDRs from departed users when they send out meeting requests, how do I track them down an get rid of them forever? Thx ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
A tricky question on sending email with a different account
Exhange Standard 2007 on W2K3 I have a request to create an account that will send reports from an app that runs on a terminal server. I've configured Outlook on the server for this account and now when other users log in to this server the reports they run should be from the account I just created and not their own account. They also shouldn't be sending on behalf. When clicking the Mail properties of the account I see the ability to Change this account but I don't want to do this manually for each of the user accounts. Is there a location in the exchagne console to do this for multiple accounts? Any responses appreciated. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange with a virtualized DC at remote location?
Depending on how much resources you've got free on it could be worth doing, 15K disks will def help :-) From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 June 2008 17:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange with a virtualized DC at remote location? Thanks Ray. I do have Logs and DB on separate Disks, but I don't have another disk that I can set aside for just the VHD. I do however, have another server there doing a completely separate role, perhaps it makes sense to put the virtual DC on that... It's a Dell PE 2850 / 4GB Ram, 15RPM Disks. From: Raymond Brighenti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 7:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange with a vitualized DC at remote location? Of course it's so not going to be recommended but you could do it. What's the exact spec of the box you're putting it on? If you have the Logs and DB on separate disks to the VHD of the domain controller it should fine with enough RAM. Actually if it's system is big enough and only 30 users it should be fine, heck there's even an MS article on doing it with SBS and TS! http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=8E1B8271-17A0-4 F3A-A379-19ECF37D4229displaylang=en Although seeing in the case of a reboot Exchange will be coming up before the DC you'll need to make sure it can still see the DC at your site, it'll no doubt slow booting up and if you rebooted when the link we down you may find yourself in a bit of trouble :-) If have a DC there is the only thing you need then maybe just combine the 2, anyway, for 30 users and big horsepower shouldn't be a prob. Ray From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 June 2008 23:57 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange with a vitualized DC at remote location? Open for thoughts: Perhaps I could move my Exchange server to a remote site / collocation. Now, I have a dedicated VPN link between the collocation center and our office, which does have a DC, 2 actually.But exchange will want a DC/GC to chat with if the link ever fails. To avoid buying more hardware and save on collocation costs, what if I just fire up a DC/GC inside a VMware Server (GSX, not ESX) on the exchange box? The box has PLENTY of horsepower, and a DC for 30 users can't need than 512mb of ram, right? What do you think? Cross posted to Exchange list, sorry. Thanks Sam --- Actix is the trading name of Actix Limited, with registered offices at: 200 Hammersmith Road, London, W6 7DL, United Kingdom. Actix Limited is registered in England and Wales with company no. 02660615 and VAT no. GB 858742087. Actix GmbH is registered in (Sitz der Gesellschaft): Dresden, Germany with company no. Handelsregister Amtsgericht Dresden HR B 19204 and VAT no. (Ust-IDNr.) DE 813 115 475. Managing Directors of Actix GmbH (Geschaeftsfuehrer): Johannes Huebner, Dietrich Hunold and Karl-Peter Moehres. Information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, and please delete the message from your system immediately. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Actix. Whilst Actix takes every effort to ensure this message is virus free it cannot guarantee that this is the case. It is the recipient's responsibility to carry out such virus checks as it deems necessary. Actix company details: www.actix.com http://www.actix.com/ . --- Actix is the trading name of Actix Limited, with registered offices at: 200 Hammersmith Road, London, W6 7DL, United Kingdom. Actix Limited is registered in England and Wales with company no. 02660615 and VAT no. GB 858742087. Actix GmbH is registered in (Sitz der Gesellschaft): Dresden, Germany with company no. Handelsregister Amtsgericht Dresden HR B 19204 and VAT no. (Ust-IDNr.) DE 813 115 475. Managing Directors of Actix GmbH (Geschaeftsfuehrer): Johannes Huebner, Dietrich Hunold and Karl-Peter Moehres. Information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, and please delete the message from your system immediately. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Actix. Whilst Actix takes every effort to ensure this message is virus free it cannot guarantee that this is the case. It is the recipient's responsibility to carry out such virus checks as it deems necessary. Actix company details: www.actix.com. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~
RE: A tricky question on sending email with a different account
Do you know that the app uses MAPI to send mail? If you do nothing, and the user runs the app, does this e-mail come from the user who's logged-in, regardless of who that is? Carl From: MarvinC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 6:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: A tricky question on sending email with a different account Exhange Standard 2007 on W2K3 I have a request to create an account that will send reports from an app that runs on a terminal server. I've configured Outlook on the server for this account and now when other users log in to this server the reports they run should be from the account I just created and not their own account. They also shouldn't be sending on behalf. When clicking the Mail properties of the account I see the ability to Change this account but I don't want to do this manually for each of the user accounts. Is there a location in the exchagne console to do this for multiple accounts? Any responses appreciated. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Using OWA on a public computer
I've run into this problem - you can view emails, but when composing a new email, or replying to one, it won't let you type anything. This was, in my case, unrelated to S/MIME, and IE7 was asking to install an editing control. My workaround? Use Firefox. Give them the version from www.portableapps.com on a USB stick, and it works like a champ. Not sure what is causing this, as it's only happening on my AU office's server, not in the US. Weird. On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When my users connect to the Exchange server for the first time on a given computer an editor control must be installed or they won't be able to reply or create new messages. I found that I had to add the Exchange server to the trusted sites list in IE to prevent problems installing the control. I'm not sure if that is the best or preferred method but it has been working. The problems start when they want to use a public computer, at a conference for example… I just had a person call me saying that a public computer is asking for a smart card when she tries to connect to the Exchange server. There must be a way to do this that is easier for the end users. A pointer in the right direction would be helpful. Roger ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Using OWA on a public computer
I recall there being a patch for Exchange to fix this. I don't remember which one but this might be it: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911829/en-us From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 9:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer Sorry for being unclear Carl and thanks for responding. It is Exchange 2003. I've been reading and it looks like I goofed pretty badly from a security perspective by not setting up a certificate. I've got them connecting on 80 instead of 443. I'm still not clear about the application of the S/MIME control B. Smith mentioned, but I don't think I need it in this case. I'm thinking that if I get the certificate working there should be no problems connecting from a public computer... does that sound right to you? From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Using OWA on a public computer You seem to have, shockingly, omitted the version of Exchange... Doesn't sound like 2003 behavior. Carl From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Using OWA on a public computer When my users connect to the Exchange server for the first time on a given computer an editor control must be installed or they won't be able to reply or create new messages. I found that I had to add the Exchange server to the trusted sites list in IE to prevent problems installing the control. I'm not sure if that is the best or preferred method but it has been working. The problems start when they want to use a public computer, at a conference for example... I just had a person call me saying that a public computer is asking for a smart card when she tries to connect to the Exchange server. There must be a way to do this that is easier for the end users. A pointer in the right direction would be helpful. Roger ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Power shell scripting
Basic Powershell for Exchange consists of cmdlets and parameters. Technet has lost of resources on the basics. Here is a basic introductory article from Technet magazine (it's not very good, but it covers the basics. ignore the spelling mistake or two) http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc160866.aspx Thankfully, they fixed and focused the article and put it here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb245704.aspx The Exchange Management Shell whitepaper is helpful. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb266977.aspx If you are looking to learn Powershell beyond the Exchange Management Shell, then the Scripting portal is home base: https://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter/hubs/msh.mspx An Exchange Management Shell Quick Reference guide: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=01A441B9-4099-4C0F- B8E0-0831D4A2CA86 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=01A441B9-4099-4C0F -B8E0-0831D4A2CA86displaylang=en displaylang=en In the Exchange Management Shell, the cmdlet Get-ExCommand will return all of the EMS cmdlets. If you like the feel of a real book, I recommend Windows PowerShell for Exchange Server 2007 SP1 by Wrox Press. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470226447/104-0110334-2555953?ie=UTF8 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0470226447/104-0110334-2555953?ie=UTF8tag =mojmedgroblo-20linkCode=xm2camp=1789creativeASIN=0470226447 tag=mojmedgroblo-20linkCode=xm2camp=1789creativeASIN=0470226447 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 6:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Power shell scripting Dear Friends I want to learn power shell scripting from the basic. can any one guide me from were i can start? Thanks Regards Nirav Doshi System Administrator Bitscape IT solution ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Moving exchange 2007 cluster to a new SAN or RAID
Thank you Micheal. Yes there is no down time when using Move-mailbox, in addition the new created DBs will have smaller size than the old DBs. However if down time is allowed, I think moving the Exchange databases and transaction logs to the new disks. (Move Storage Group Path and then Move Database Path) will be faster than Move-mailbox. Abdullah Zayan Exchange Administrator Diyar United Company (KOC Outsourcing Project) From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 5:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving exchange 2007 cluster to a new SAN or RAID I guess the answer is just do it. I'd create a new storage group(s) and new stores and use move-mailbox. Russ' blog tells you how to move the quorum, I'd do it a little differently by adding in the new disks first so I could use move-mailbox instead of having to take the SGs offline while doing a datacopy. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Zayan, Abdullah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 12:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving exchange 2007 cluster to a new SAN or RAID Moving the SGs, databases, logs and quorum to new RAID10 hard disks provided that I can see both the new disks on RAID10 and the existing disks (RAID5) as well. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 6:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving exchange 2007 cluster to a new SAN or RAID Is your question how to move HARDWARE? Or how to move mailboxes? Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Zayan, Abdullah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 6:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving exchange 2007 cluster to a new SAN or RAID Hi I would like to ask if there is any guide on how to move Exchange 2007 SCC (Single Copy Cluster) shared disks to a new SAN or new RAID. Searched through Microsoft and got the below URLs but one for Exchange 2003 and the other for moving the quorum. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927468/en-us http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927468/en-us http://russkaufmann.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!9628511B4C1D269C!303.entry http://russkaufmann.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!9628511B4C1D269C!303.entry I appreciate any other guides. Abdullah Zayan Exchange Administrator Diyar United Company (KOC Outsourcing Project) ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
