Stopped being spoofed
What is the best methodology to prevent user email addresses being spoofed and having NDRs being returned to those accounts? I know we can't prevent the spoofing but is there no way to stop the NDRs? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stopped being spoofed
Implement sender authentication mechanisms such as SPF and Sender ID. Thats what they are for. Of course, it depends on if the recipient is using SPF as well. But it absolutely helps. Be sure to use -all in the authentication string to enforce a rejection. ~all in many cases will not cause the forged message to be rejected, unless the anti-spam application has been tweaked to do so. I *will* reject a ~all, but many products wont by default or wont at all. Beyond that, you are looking at getting into anti-spam methodologies that involve Message-ID tracking and other header scrutiny methods that aren't truly proved or perfected yet. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best methodology to prevent user email addresses being spoofed and having NDRs being returned to those accounts? I know we can't prevent the spoofing but is there no way to stop the NDRs? -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Stopped being spoofed
So no good solution...yet -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stopped being spoofed Implement sender authentication mechanisms such as SPF and Sender ID. Thats what they are for. Of course, it depends on if the recipient is using SPF as well. But it absolutely helps. Be sure to use -all in the authentication string to enforce a rejection. ~all in many cases will not cause the forged message to be rejected, unless the anti-spam application has been tweaked to do so. I *will* reject a ~all, but many products wont by default or wont at all. Beyond that, you are looking at getting into anti-spam methodologies that involve Message-ID tracking and other header scrutiny methods that aren't truly proved or perfected yet. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best methodology to prevent user email addresses being spoofed and having NDRs being returned to those accounts? I know we can't prevent the spoofing but is there no way to stop the NDRs? -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stopped being spoofed
There are also solutions that stamp all your outgoing email with a custom X-Header. When valid NDRs come back, they will contain this header in the original message. All other NDRs can be safely ignored. --James On 10/20/08, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Implement sender authentication mechanisms such as SPF and Sender ID. Thats what they are for. Of course, it depends on if the recipient is using SPF as well. But it absolutely helps. Be sure to use -all in the authentication string to enforce a rejection. ~all in many cases will not cause the forged message to be rejected, unless the anti-spam application has been tweaked to do so. I *will* reject a ~all, but many products wont by default or wont at all. Beyond that, you are looking at getting into anti-spam methodologies that involve Message-ID tracking and other header scrutiny methods that aren't truly proved or perfected yet. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best methodology to prevent user email addresses being spoofed and having NDRs being returned to those accounts? I know we can't prevent the spoofing but is there no way to stop the NDRs? -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Sent from my mobile device ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned]
Hi Guys, Is anyone running (Or has run) Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment? I only have a userbase of around 70 with mailboxes of .5 - 1.5Gb (Spread over 2 stores). I've done some reading and found some positive writeups but I want some real world info! Cheers Dave ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned]
We did for testing, and still do run some servers as virtual for CAS and Edge Transport servers. It's been pretty reliable. Mailbox servers didn't seem to scale well in a virtural environment. -Original Message- From: Dave Hornby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 7:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned] Hi Guys, Is anyone running (Or has run) Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment? I only have a userbase of around 70 with mailboxes of .5 - 1.5Gb (Spread over 2 stores). I've done some reading and found some positive writeups but I want some real world info! Cheers Dave ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned]
I'm running Exchange 2007 virtualized with Hyper-V for around 500 mailboxes and 80-GB stores, and it works fine. I hate to make assumptions, but I'm thinking it might be safe to assume that it would perform similarly with VMWare. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Dave Hornby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned] Hi Guys, Is anyone running (Or has run) Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment? I only have a userbase of around 70 with mailboxes of .5 - 1.5Gb (Spread over 2 stores). I've done some reading and found some positive writeups but I want some real world info! Cheers Dave ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stopped being spoofed
This is essentially the same as those that track the Message-ID - however, not all legitimate NDRs will contain the original custom or MTA headers. So its a risky endevor depending on how that information is used. But it seems to be the current path toward a viable solution. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:17 AM, James Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are also solutions that stamp all your outgoing email with a custom X-Header. When valid NDRs come back, they will contain this header in the original message. All other NDRs can be safely ignored. --James On 10/20/08, Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Implement sender authentication mechanisms such as SPF and Sender ID. Thats what they are for. Of course, it depends on if the recipient is using SPF as well. But it absolutely helps. Be sure to use -all in the authentication string to enforce a rejection. ~all in many cases will not cause the forged message to be rejected, unless the anti-spam application has been tweaked to do so. I *will* reject a ~all, but many products wont by default or wont at all. Beyond that, you are looking at getting into anti-spam methodologies that involve Message-ID tracking and other header scrutiny methods that aren't truly proved or perfected yet. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best methodology to prevent user email addresses being spoofed and having NDRs being returned to those accounts? I know we can't prevent the spoofing but is there no way to stop the NDRs? -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Sent from my mobile device ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stopped being spoofed
SPF is great. If you arent using it - you should. It only gets better as more people adopt it. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So no good solution...yet -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stopped being spoofed Implement sender authentication mechanisms such as SPF and Sender ID. Thats what they are for. Of course, it depends on if the recipient is using SPF as well. But it absolutely helps. Be sure to use -all in the authentication string to enforce a rejection. ~all in many cases will not cause the forged message to be rejected, unless the anti-spam application has been tweaked to do so. I *will* reject a ~all, but many products wont by default or wont at all. Beyond that, you are looking at getting into anti-spam methodologies that involve Message-ID tracking and other header scrutiny methods that aren't truly proved or perfected yet. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best methodology to prevent user email addresses being spoofed and having NDRs being returned to those accounts? I know we can't prevent the spoofing but is there no way to stop the NDRs? -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Stopped being spoofed
Now that I agree with. -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stopped being spoofed SPF is great. If you arent using it - you should. It only gets better as more people adopt it. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So no good solution...yet -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stopped being spoofed Implement sender authentication mechanisms such as SPF and Sender ID. Thats what they are for. Of course, it depends on if the recipient is using SPF as well. But it absolutely helps. Be sure to use -all in the authentication string to enforce a rejection. ~all in many cases will not cause the forged message to be rejected, unless the anti-spam application has been tweaked to do so. I *will* reject a ~all, but many products wont by default or wont at all. Beyond that, you are looking at getting into anti-spam methodologies that involve Message-ID tracking and other header scrutiny methods that aren't truly proved or perfected yet. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best methodology to prevent user email addresses being spoofed and having NDRs being returned to those accounts? I know we can't prevent the spoofing but is there no way to stop the NDRs? -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned]
I would actually bet that it would perform quiet well on VMWare. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:49 AM, John Hornbuckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running Exchange 2007 virtualized with Hyper-V for around 500 mailboxes and 80-GB stores, and it works fine. I hate to make assumptions, but I'm thinking it might be safe to assume that it would perform similarly with VMWare. John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us -Original Message- From: Dave Hornby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned] Hi Guys, Is anyone running (Or has run) Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment? I only have a userbase of around 70 with mailboxes of .5 - 1.5Gb (Spread over 2 stores). I've done some reading and found some positive writeups but I want some real world info! Cheers Dave ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned]
I've been running Exchange 2007 on Windows 2003 in ESX since May 2007 with zero problems. I've got about 50 heavy mail users in a single 54GB store and it performs very well. I recently installed Exchange 2007 on Windows 2008 in ESX at a customer's site for approximately 45 users. Again, no issues and very good performance. Exchange 2007 is a memory pig so make sure your VMware server has plenty of RAM. -Jeff -Original Message- From: Dave Hornby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned] Hi Guys, Is anyone running (Or has run) Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment? I only have a userbase of around 70 with mailboxes of .5 - 1.5Gb (Spread over 2 stores). I've done some reading and found some positive writeups but I want some real world info! Cheers Dave ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Dummy Email Account
Exchange 2003 I recently receive a request for a new email account that should only be able to send out emails but not receive any. Can this be done? Thanks, Margo ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned]
We have customers here in the UK that have deployed E2K7 totally on virtual servers (VMware). Other (larger) customers have deployed Hub/CAS on virtual, mailbox on physical, etc. All good news as far as I'm aware (as long as it's designed correctly of course!) -Original Message- From: Dave Hornby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 October 2008 13:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned] Hi Guys, Is anyone running (Or has run) Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment? I only have a userbase of around 70 with mailboxes of .5 - 1.5Gb (Spread over 2 stores). I've done some reading and found some positive writeups but I want some real world info! Cheers Dave ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Dummy Email Account
Restrict the senders in the mailbox. I went right from E5.5 to E2k7, so I'm not all that familiar with E2k3. Pretty sure you can do that there. -Joe -Original Message- From: Margo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Dummy Email Account Exchange 2003 I recently receive a request for a new email account that should only be able to send out emails but not receive any. Can this be done? Thanks, Margo ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stopped being spoofed
I forgot to mention that there are also DNSBL's that list known backscatter senders, such as: http://www.backscatterer.org/ On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that I agree with. -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stopped being spoofed
Especially spammers. :P From: Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Stopped being spoofed SPF is great. If you arent using it - you should. It only gets better as more people adopt it. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) wrote: So no good solution...yet ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stopped being spoofed
And another DNSBL... http://www.domainsthatallowOOFstolistservers.org From: Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Stopped being spoofed I forgot to mention that there are also DNSBL's that list known backscatter senders, such as: http://www.backscatterer.org/ On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) wrote: Now that I agree with. -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Stopped being spoofed
Of course spammers that set up shop enough to do that will be on DNSBLs. As I'm sure you're well aware (but others might not be), SPF and Sender-ID are primarily for spoofing. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Especially spammers. :P From: Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: Re: Stopped being spoofed SPF is great. If you arent using it - you should. It only gets better as more people adopt it. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Beckett, William (Bill) wrote: So no good solution...yet -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: DL management by group...
The interesting bit here is that you, as an administrator, don't necessarily have a choice about whether a DL is converted to a Security group or not. As Rob noted previously, if you secure a folder in Outlook, you must use a mail-enabled group. If that mail-enabled group is not a security group already, the conversion happens automatically. Any random user can therefore switch Distribution groups to Security Groups and therefore cause an increase in security tokens. It's a ton of fun when you get up around 1000 tokens and things start breaking... like logons. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: DL management by group... That's nice data to have. Thanks for confirming my naive thoughts. On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Campbell, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO, it's usually better to keep them separate. Mail enabling security groups that aren't being used as DL's just clutters up your GAL. Making DL's security groups that aren't ever used to assign permission slows down authentication by causing the users to get assigned a bunch of security tokens they have to drag around that aren't good for anything. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: DL management by group... Cool. I could convert it, but I think I'd like to keep my security groups separate from my DLs - there may be no technical reason to do so, but it makes more sense to me. Seem reasonable? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM, James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Concur - whether global or universal, in order to use the group to assign permissions, it must be a security group. Interesting that it doesn't even give you the option to choose the group - we have had cases before where public folder permissions have been applied using DL's, and it automatically switches the scope of the group from distribution to security. Does not affect the ability of the group to still receive email. James Winzenz Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security Pulte Homes Information Services From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 11:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: DL management by group... CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment [Scanned]
Yup, entire production environment; ~9500 mailboxes, ~10TB of data. Couldn't be happierwell I could, but nothing to do with Virtualization. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Dave Hornby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Guys, Is anyone running (Or has run) Exchange 2007 on VMWare in a live environment? I only have a userbase of around 70 with mailboxes of .5 - 1.5Gb (Spread over 2 stores). I've done some reading and found some positive writeups but I want some real world info! Cheers Dave ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Dummy Email Account
I would create a distro-group with no members and give who ever will be doing the sending Send As rights. You could also do a public folder with the anonymous and default permissions set to none. -alex On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Margo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 2003 I recently receive a request for a new email account that should only be able to send out emails but not receive any. Can this be done? Thanks, Margo ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
