Re: Email Discovery when using ADRMS
Correct and it can be easily delegated to compliance teams. === Andrew Levicki MCSE MCITPEA CCNA ITIL On 2010/03/26, at 6:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: This is a feature of Exchange 2010. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Mayo, Shay [mailto:shay.m...@absg.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Email Discovery when using ADRMS Hi All, I have been asked to setup Active Directory Rights Management server. My question is, does anyone have a way to perform email discoveries when using ADRMS? I get asked by Legal and HR almost weekly to do email searches and our current email discovery software, Discovery Attender from Sherpa Software, can’t open the me ssages that are secured by ADRMS. Exchange 2007 Thanks, Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
Re: R2 VSS backup issue
Interestingly enough, I ran a successful backup this morning after unloading Trend Office Scan and also waiting until Backup Exec was finished. I have another one scheduled for 10 AM with Trend loaded but BUExec idle. - Original Message - From: Michael B. Smith michael @ smithcons .com To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist @ lyris .sunbelt-software.com Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:07:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: RE: R2 VSS backup issue You need to be looking at: A] are you releasing and deleting snapshots after you copy them to the backup drive? B] how much VSS storage space you allow and whether the current backup now exceeds it. Check out the vssadmin command. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http :// TheEssentialExchange .com From: Chipshead @comcast.net [ mailto : Chipshead @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: exchangelist @ lyris .sunbelt-software.com Subject: R2 VSS backup issue 2008 R2 server using VSS to backup Exchange 2010 to a network shared folder. Backups ran fine until this past Monday. They now fail consistently with The backup operation that started at '2010-03-25T20:37:30.509267500Z' has failed with following error code '2147943530' (Not enough server storage is available to process this command.). Please review the event details for a solution, and then rerun the backup operation once the issue is resolved. Size of backup set is @ 100 GB. Target shared network backup folder resides on a drive with 1 TB free. Sever hosting shared backup folder is also a media server for Backup Exec 2010. 2008 VSS backup has been running fine while network backups run. 2008 R2 server has @ 100 GB free on C:\. Event log, Google and technet seems useless. Tried creating an differnt folder to backup to with no sucess. I'm thinking it may be some sort of a conflict with BU Exec but I question why iot started happening this past Monday when previously it was backin up fine. Any input appreciated. Thanks. Steve
Publishing items in users agenda
Hello all, As a school we want to publish the teachers lessons directly into their agenda. Anyone here knows a way to do this? Or maybe a paid solution what can do this. Our lessons are available in ics format. It is possible to open the public ics in their outlook, but we want to push them into their personal agenda. This way it is also synchronized with the mobile, owa, ... We use Exchange 2010 and Outlook 2007 for all our clients. Thnx! Met vriendelijke groeten, KHLim Katholieke Hogeschool Limburg Associatie KULeuven http://www.khlim.behttp://www.khlim.be/ Tim Vandael ICT Systeembeheerder Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan gebouw B, bus 1, 3590 Diepenbeek T +32 11 23 08 94 - F +32 11 23 07 89 - G +32 478 40 52 36 tim.vand...@khlim.bemailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be inline: image001.gif
Configureing OWA 2K10 in Coexistence
All- I'm setting up an server with all the roles on one server. Currently the client is using https://webmail.company.com to access their webmail externally to their E2K3 box. What I want to do is use that same name on the E2K10 CAS server and have E2K10 handle all OWA request for both servers (e2k10, e2k3). What I'm unsure of is how do I setup redirection so users won't have to type out https://webmail.company.com/owa? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: Configureing OWA 2K10 in Coexistence
There is no such thing as CAS-to-FE proxying. However, you can configure the CAS to redirect the user to the Exchange 2003 server. Typically, you will do something like this: Set-OWAVirtualDirectory CAS2008\OWA* ` -Exchange2003URL https://legacy.example.com; And the Exchange 2003 server will have the 2010 SAN certificate loaded which includes legacy.example.com. This does necessitate that you have TWO external IP addresses. You configure redirection the same as you did in Exchange 2003 and/or Exchange 2007 - you put a redirection script in the root of the website, whether it's ASP, ASPX, Perl, or whatever. commercial I cover this in the May 2010 cover article of WindowsITPro. :) /commercial Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Configureing OWA 2K10 in Coexistence All- I'm setting up an server with all the roles on one server. Currently the client is using https://webmail.company.com to access their webmail externally to their E2K3 box. What I want to do is use that same name on the E2K10 CAS server and have E2K10 handle all OWA request for both servers (e2k10, e2k3). What I'm unsure of is how do I setup redirection so users won't have to type out https://webmail.company.com/owa? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: [MARKETING] RE: Configureing OWA 2K10 in Coexistence
I cover this in the May 2010 cover article of WindowsITPro. :-) WTG Mike! ~JasonG
RE: Outlook 2007 - Win7 - Password Prompts - confusion??
Hi James,
If your Windows 7 systems have e1kexpress Event ID 27 in the system log,
then you should also take a look at the SipsEnabled System Idle Power
Saver (SIPS) in the Advanced tab of your Intel NIC. You may need to
update the Intel NIC drivers to see the SIPS feature in the Advanced
tab?
Check out the Intel discussions below on the 82567LM NIC that ship with
new Dell systems.
http://communities.intel.com/message/80336
http://communities.intel.com/thread/9913
http://communities.intel.com/message/72785
Not only can this setting cause Outlook 2007 to prompt for password, but
it may also corrupt the OST file.
Here is a tool that can be used to control the SIPS feature:
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp
?lang=encc=nlprodTypeId=12454prodSeriesId=3785404prodNameId=3785039
swEnvOID=2097swLang=13mode=2taskId=135swItem=vc-80464-1
javascript:openExternal('http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSuppo
rt/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=encc=nlprodTypeId=12454prodSeriesId=3
785404prodNameId=3785039swEnvOID=2097swLang=13mode=2taskId=135swIt
em=vc-80464-1')
From: James Hill [mailto:james.h...@superamart.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2007 - Win7 - Password Prompts - confusion??
But only effecting Windows 7 clients?
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, 26 March 2010 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2007 - Win7 - Password Prompts - confusion??
Fixed in 2007 sp1 ur8. :-P
Seriously. It was caused by an office security patch a couple months
ago.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: James Hill [mailto:james.h...@superamart.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2007 - Win7 - Password Prompts - confusion??
I have an issue with outlook that I'm finding a little difficult to
troubleshoot. Trying to search for ideas is like finding a needle in a
haystack.
Infrastructure details:-
Windows XP SP3 and Windows 7 clients.
Outlook 2007 SP2
Exchange 2007 SP1 with Update Rollup 7
Outlook Anywhere in use
ISA Server in the mix but for this issue it is all internal.
These clients are laptops connected to the network via wired and
wireless (they are sitting on a dock) at the same time. Outlook has
been opened without any issues and has been in use. If the user then
undocks the laptop the following occurs:-
XP SP3 clients reconnect to the Exchange server and it's all pretty
seamless. The user doesn't notice.
Windows 7 clients attempt to reconnect to the Exchange server but fails
and then prompts the user for credentials. Entering the creds just
results in continuous password prompts.
If the user then closes and reopens Outlook on the Windows 7 client all
is well.
Going the other way (from Wireless to Wired) there is no issue.
Any suggestions are more than welcome!!
RE: Configureing OWA 2K10 in Coexistence
And the Exchange 2003 server will have the 2010 SAN certificate loaded which includes legacy.example.com. Upgrading our existing cert costs more than just getting another cert for legacy.mycompany.com so a silly question… An existing cert for mail.mycompany.com points to 2K3 FE’s. Could we move the mail.company.com to the CAS array and get a separate legacy.company.com cert on the FE's? Assume we’re not using OutlookAnywhere externally so (hopefully) no need for autodiscover.mycompany.com. /confused:)
RE: Configureing OWA 2K10 in Coexistence
Sure, you can do that. The disadvantage is that you'll have a short switchover timeframe during which the FE will probably not be accessible. (That is, the interval between when you put in the new certificate and update your DNS and then the DNS propagates to everwhere you need it to.) Using a SAN certificate containing the old and the new name avoids that. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Configureing OWA 2K10 in Coexistence And the Exchange 2003 server will have the 2010 SAN certificate loaded which includes legacy.example.com. Upgrading our existing cert costs more than just getting another cert for legacy.mycompany.com so a silly question… An existing cert for mail.mycompany.com points to 2K3 FE’s. Could we move the mail.company.com to the CAS array and get a separate legacy.company.com cert on the FE's? Assume we’re not using OutlookAnywhere externally so (hopefully) no need for autodiscover.mycompany.com. /confused:)
Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
Sure have. It was very common in 2007 migrations and only slightly less so in 2010 migrations. Just create the Interop-RGC. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
Really? It blows my mind by just running a typical installation that is guided by MS would create issues like that. Thanks again Mike for your help... you've been very insightful on many occasions for me. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Sure have. It was very common in 2007 migrations and only slightly less so in 2010 migrations. Just create the Interop-RGC. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
One question I have for you though.. should I suppress link state routing prior to performing this? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Sure have. It was very common in 2007 migrations and only slightly less so in 2010 migrations. Just create the Interop-RGC. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
Yessir. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization One question I have for you though.. should I suppress link state routing prior to performing this? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Sure have. It was very common in 2007 migrations and only slightly less so in 2010 migrations. Just create the Interop-RGC. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
I filed a bug, and they fixed one instance of the issue, but apparently the larger issue is that setup creates objects that may not be replicated in AD by the time setup goes back to try to use them. This is a common issue. And some of the problems cause fatal setup errors, this one doesn't happen to be a fatal issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Really? It blows my mind by just running a typical installation that is guided by MS would create issues like that. Thanks again Mike for your help... you've been very insightful on many occasions for me. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Sure have. It was very common in 2007 migrations and only slightly less so in 2010 migrations. Just create the Interop-RGC. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
Re: Anybody heard of these guys?
The 3cx system has a link to voip to phone line products on their web pages. THey will even let you on their forums for tfree community support in getting it running. It was recommended to me as a nice way to test PBX/OCS2007 integration testing in my home lab as well and it was nice for that. It's a pretty nice looking little product in that it also runs on Windows and I don't need to go pay attention to a linux box. Just normal Windows stuff. I seriously considered getting one of those hardware boxes and just running it as my main home setup for fun. :) Been a while since I fired up my test environment though. On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Chris Drobny cdro...@lmsintellibound.com wrote: I love my shoretel system. Very easy to use. Chris Drobny Network/Systems Administrator LMS Intellibound, Inc. cdro...@lmsintellibound.com 770.724.0562 office 404.797.9710 cell -Original Message- From: Patti Cavlovic [mailto:pcavlo...@qwestcenter.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anybody heard of these guys? I am doing the same thing right now - shopping for an VoIP system. Have seen the Shoretel and worked with Cisco a few years back. I am also getting a lot of calls from the Alcatel-Lucent guys. Would love to hear feedback on any of these. -Original Message- From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:den...@advancedav.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anybody heard of these guys? I'm currently shopping for an IP solution. ShoreTel may be the way I go eventually but I have a local fellow trying to sell me Asterisk PBX on Linux. Asterisk also sells every flavor of digium telephony interface card to connect your home grown PBX server to the public switched network. Dennis Melahn IT Director Advanced Audio Visual
RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
Crap! As I solve one issue, another arises. I'm trying to log into my test account via owa (https://server.company.com/owa) I get the login page.. but when I submit my credentials it times out on me. Even when I try and access it from IIS Mgmt Console it gives me the same issue. Another issue is when I restart my server the DB's never mount. I have to manually mount them each time. I'm wondering if the above issue is directly related to this. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization I filed a bug, and they fixed one instance of the issue, but apparently the larger issue is that setup creates objects that may not be replicated in AD by the time setup goes back to try to use them. This is a common issue. And some of the problems cause fatal setup errors, this one doesn't happen to be a fatal issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Really? It blows my mind by just running a typical installation that is guided by MS would create issues like that. Thanks again Mike for your help... you've been very insightful on many occasions for me. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Sure have. It was very common in 2007 migrations and only slightly less so in 2010 migrations. Just create the Interop-RGC. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
No. I doubt highly that they are related. In both cases, you should be getting event log entries providing clues. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Crap! As I solve one issue, another arises. I'm trying to log into my test account via owa (https://server.company.com/owa) I get the login page.. but when I submit my credentials it times out on me. Even when I try and access it from IIS Mgmt Console it gives me the same issue. Another issue is when I restart my server the DB's never mount. I have to manually mount them each time. I'm wondering if the above issue is directly related to this. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization I filed a bug, and they fixed one instance of the issue, but apparently the larger issue is that setup creates objects that may not be replicated in AD by the time setup goes back to try to use them. This is a common issue. And some of the problems cause fatal setup errors, this one doesn't happen to be a fatal issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Really? It blows my mind by just running a typical installation that is guided by MS would create issues like that. Thanks again Mike for your help... you've been very insightful on many occasions for me. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Sure have. It was very common in 2007 migrations and only slightly less so in 2010 migrations. Just create the Interop-RGC. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization
Which AV for Exchange are you running? I had a similar issue with an earlier build of Forefront (was my fault though as I had downloaded a version that wasn't quite 2010 compatible). -Greg From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization No. I doubt highly that they are related. In both cases, you should be getting event log entries providing clues. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Crap! As I solve one issue, another arises. I'm trying to log into my test account via owa (https://server.company.com/owa) I get the login page.. but when I submit my credentials it times out on me. Even when I try and access it from IIS Mgmt Console it gives me the same issue. Another issue is when I restart my server the DB's never mount. I have to manually mount them each time. I'm wondering if the above issue is directly related to this. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization I filed a bug, and they fixed one instance of the issue, but apparently the larger issue is that setup creates objects that may not be replicated in AD by the time setup goes back to try to use them. This is a common issue. And some of the problems cause fatal setup errors, this one doesn't happen to be a fatal issue. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Really? It blows my mind by just running a typical installation that is guided by MS would create issues like that. Thanks again Mike for your help... you've been very insightful on many occasions for me. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization Sure have. It was very common in 2007 migrations and only slightly less so in 2010 migrations. Just create the Interop-RGC. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 install w/coexisting E2K3 Organization All- I installed an Exchange 2010 server into an Exchange 2003 organization(1 E2K3 server, 1 E2k10 server). All the pre-req's passed with no problems, exchange installed fine. One issue is that when Exchange 2K10 was installed it didn't create RGC between to the two servers, also the E2K10 server doesn't show up in the created admin group during installation. So no, I cannot replicate PF's or send mail between servers. Has anyone seen this behavior before? Thank you, John Bowles
E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication
All- I'm trying to replicate my public folders from E2K3 to E2K10. I've set all the limits for replication up to 2GB (seemingly that's as high as you can go on either RGC and PF DB). Problem is that my replicas are getting queue's up on the RGC between the two servers. Am I missing something here? All message sizes seem to be under the allotted size limitation. Thanks, John Bowles
RE: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication
Yea, PF replication traffic queue is slowly dwindling down. Will I not see the replica's on E2K10 until all the traffic has been replicated? Or should I be able to view what's been replicated over in ESM2k10? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication Define queued up? Is traffic passing, but only 2 or 3 messages at a time? Are email messages passing first with no delay? (They should be.) etc. etc. PF replication can cause a huge backlog at the transport layer. In general, that really isn't a problem. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication All- I'm trying to replicate my public folders from E2K3 to E2K10. I've set all the limits for replication up to 2GB (seemingly that's as high as you can go on either RGC and PF DB). Problem is that my replicas are getting queue's up on the RGC between the two servers. Am I missing something here? All message sizes seem to be under the allotted size limitation. Thanks, John Bowles
RE: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication
Did you replicate the hierarchy? That should be your first step. :) Otherwise, you should see the replicas as they backfill, absolutely. Get-publicfolder -server whatever \ Shows you what folders are on what server (exchange 2007 and above) Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication Yea, PF replication traffic queue is slowly dwindling down. Will I not see the replica's on E2K10 until all the traffic has been replicated? Or should I be able to view what's been replicated over in ESM2k10? From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication Define queued up? Is traffic passing, but only 2 or 3 messages at a time? Are email messages passing first with no delay? (They should be.) etc. etc. PF replication can cause a huge backlog at the transport layer. In general, that really isn't a problem. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: E2K3-E2K10 PF Replication All- I'm trying to replicate my public folders from E2K3 to E2K10. I've set all the limits for replication up to 2GB (seemingly that's as high as you can go on either RGC and PF DB). Problem is that my replicas are getting queue's up on the RGC between the two servers. Am I missing something here? All message sizes seem to be under the allotted size limitation. Thanks, John Bowles
