RE: Insert company logo in email?
Steve: We use Policy Patrol from Red Earth Software, not too expensive, and has some great features, including configuring both a HTML/RTF and TXT format disclaimer. Not to mention all the built in rules for compliancy, attorney client communications, etc... Works with Exchange 2003/2007 and I believe they are testing 2010 right now. http://www.redearthsoftware.com Regards, Jim Restucci Axcess Internet(r) From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 06:38 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Insert company logo in email? I'll be using the Vipre email security to do this (formerly known as Ninja). Not free, but it definitely is value added antispam. On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:35 AM, David Mazzaccaro david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.commailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com wrote: Exchange 2003 / Outlook 2003 I have been asked to find out what is involved in inserting our company logo at the bottom of all outgoing emails. We use Outlook w/ Rich Text (we do not allow HTML email per a GPO) IIRC, there was a free program... GF something... that could do this? Or maybe it only did disclosures (text)? Obviously, I could send out instructions to have everyone manually edit their signatures to add the logo... but I'd rather have it automated. Thx
RE: Exchange 2007 iPhone 3GS
Andrew: We have a few iPhones on our network, and had no problem configuring them; the best advice I can give to you, is Test your Exchange Server at http://www.testexchangeconnectivity.com The tools there will help you in determining what parts are not working correctly and how to fix them. Regards, Jim Restucci Axcess Internet(r) From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 04:24 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 iPhone 3GS No advice for Exchange 2007, but we had one heck of a time setting it up for Exchange 2003. Still can't send attachments from the iPhone without using a 3rd party app. I've heard that integration with 2007 is better, but we're not quite there yet. On a related note, a lot of the people that had iPhones turned them back in and went back to the Blackberry. I will let you know that Apple Tech Support is less than useless and Microsoft is somewhat unwilling to help on problems with rival manufacturers. Good luck and may God have mercy on your soul. -Paul From: Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk] Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 5:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 iPhone 3GS Hi all, I've read all the previous posts about iPhones with Exchange 2007. My question is very simple and please don't laugh: How do I set it up? I am the Exchange Administrator, so I guess I should know. But I've only ever administered Exchange with BlackBerry devices. So I don't know. I would appreciate a nudge in the right direction. And not just a link to lmgtfy.comhttp://lmgtfy.com! Thanks in advance, Andrew
RE: Mail Server Requires Authentication Bounce Message
Joseph, This seems to be a problem on the mail server receiving the mail. It's possible they have the authentication set to Basic and Integrated instead of Anonymous. I would inquire with the recipients mail admin to check and see if that is the case. HTH, Tom From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mail Server Requires Authentication Bounce Message Oh my gosh am I about to hang myself over this problem; with what seems to be a simple issue is evading me for a solution. Exchange 2003 SP2, Windows 2003 R2 (patched) A few times per week, users will report that when sending to 'one particular' email address - it gets bounced with the message below. Other outbound messages from the client at that time will go through. And at the same time if another employee sends an email to the same recipient it will go through. Each employee that experiences this bounce message is sending to a different recipient/domain; and they don't always get bounced. My research has revealed a number of old posts with the same problem but do not provide any solutions. I case of beer for the one who solves this for me - so I can sleep at night. PLEASE HELP ME! mail.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;503 This mail server requires authentication when attempting to send to a non-local e-mail address. Please check your mail client settings or contact your administrator to verify that the domain or address is defined for this server. Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000, MCP Network Blade Inc. 49 Marcy Street Somerset, NJ 08873 732-213-0600 www.networkblade.com http://www.networkblade.com/ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: email archiving
Hi Paul, My environment is almost exactly as yours. We are a Non-Profit entity also. We have been using GFI Mail Archiver with SQL Server 2005 which has worked well, however some of the Exchange MVP's may state that Journaling is not a good choice due to the fact it could cause high CPU usage however we have not seen that occur in this environment...yet! YMMV! If I had it to do over again, I would choose another program. One I have looked at is from MailTrust, www.Mailtrust.com http://www.Mailtrust.com or you can go with the one offered by our host, Sunbelt-Software, which looks very nice indeed called, Sunbelt Exchange Archiver. You have to decide if you want to host your own archival solution or outsource. Both have their Pro's and Con's, the biggest negative being security of information in the email's archived if you outsource and loss of control. HTH some, Tom From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: email archiving I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat. We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor. I don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn Journaling on on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive. Can someone give me an in-a-nutshell explanation of how this works? Is this the best solution for our money? Any alternatives? We are a non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant. We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003. Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub). Thanks, Paul Everett IS Dept. Lee Mental Health Center 239-791-1551 Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org blocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/ to learn more. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message, including attachments. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: email archiving
SEA doesn't use Journaling. Direct Archiving eliminates need for Journaling SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates the need for the Exchange Journal mailbox. Immediate archiving onto storage media improves the performance of the Exchange server, helps to ensure legal compliance, and diminishes the necessity to apply scheduler, threshold and quota archiving jobs. From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Bob are you running it with journaling turned off? From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I am using SEA and am very happy with it. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email retention. Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on. From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: email archiving I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat. We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor. I don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn Journaling on on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive. Can someone give me an in-a-nutshell explanation of how this works? Is this the best solution for our money? Any alternatives? We are a non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant. We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003. Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub). Thanks, Paul Everett IS Dept. Lee Mental Health Center 239-791-1551 Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org blocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/ to learn more. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message, including attachments. This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system. This e-mail contains the thoughts and opinions of the sender and does not represent official Parkview Medical Center policy. This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above, may be confidential and/or legally privileged: and, must be treated as such in accordance with state and federal laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this communication, or any of its contents, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return to sender and delete the message from your computer system. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: email archiving
SEA = Shook in his underwear. From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: email archiving Hmmm, I get the impression that Bob likes SEA On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I am not mistaken... SEA will do that. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:16 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: email archiving Ah. I'm looking at an archiving solution to take care of three servers, one each in the UK, US and Australia. That'lll prove interesting. We're currently using MJ to get all mail to a mailbox here, and (YUCK!) manually archiving to PSTs. It's painful, sinful, and a heinous waste of time and resources, along with being not useful in the event that we need to recover email. Thanks be to Chuthulu that we haven't yet run into a discovery motion, or anything like it. Kurt On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just one Exchange server. (However I do have a replicate server using DoubleTake at another site) Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: email archiving How many Exchange servers, and how widely separated are they? On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Journaling is NOT enabled. I am using SEA's Direct Archive and see very little (if any)impact on our Exchange server. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Bob are you running it with journaling turned off? From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I am using SEA and am very happy with it. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email retention. Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on. From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: email archiving I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat. We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor. I don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn Journaling on on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive. Can someone give me an in-a-nutshell explanation of how this works? Is this the best solution for our money? Any alternatives? We are a non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant. We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003. Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub). Thanks, Paul Everett IS Dept. Lee Mental Health Center 239-791-1551 Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org to learn more.
RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Found this, may help. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb684892.aspx From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes I believe that the totals in ESM include the DIR, while the Outlook totals do not...however I could be wrong. On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Davies,Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes we do. From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 June 2008 15:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes Do you use deleted item retention? On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes
Don't be hatein' ShookiePoo. From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes Love you too, dill-weed. Shook From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Mailbox sizes Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size. It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call Microsoft ? Cheers Matt This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: You do not know me..
OH good one DON!!! From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: You do not know me.. hate=want On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Kat Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My my my... that is an awful lot of hate you got goin' there, my dear!! :-) On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate you. Shook -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: You do not know me.. Blackstone keeps his Shook ticks on his headboard. TVK -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: You do not know me.. That's two ticks on the chalk board Martin. =) M -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 8:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: You do not know me.. I think I found the other part! Hi, my gentleman I am looking for a man. I want to get married and to live happily. Life is passing by and I am looking at it like from the window of a moving train... I feel lonely in my heart... this loneliness is causing pain to me... I know only one remedy - it's love... love that only a man can give to a woman... What about me? I am good looking, kind, attentive, caring... maybe you'll ask why I am lonely then?... I'll tell you! My life was hard here, in my country, I am disappointed with men here and with life in this country... I feel my second half is not here... Maybe it's you? If you wish to get to know me... Andy Shook -Original Message- From: Matthew Talley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 12:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: You do not know me.. I find your email on dating site and I wished to write to you. You do not know me... and I do not know you... But I trust in destiny and I hope that destiny give me a chance I want to find a kind, honest and clever man. My name - Natalya. My age-26 years.It is difficult to tell about myself. If this is of any interest to you, write to me I hope, I can see your letter soon. In the following letter I to tell about myself and send my photos. Write on my personal email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] now I write with the work and my chief does not know about it. Sincerely, Natalya. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ -- Kat Collins - The Email of the species is more powerful than the Mail! ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: SSL Certificates for OWA
I am using godaddy, at 20 bucks a year, very hard to beat that and all browsers natively support their cert including my mobile devices, which in the end is worth the money From: Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 6:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SSL Certificates for OWA In the past we have used an internal Certificate Authority but I've read there is a Free Third party provider called StartSSL. http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/SSL-Enabling-OWA-2003-Using-Free-3rd Party-Certificate.html What's everyone's opinion about this site; if you have experience with it; and what is everyone using for SSL encryption? TIA, Tom ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
iphone and corporate email
Can anyone point me in the right direction on how to configure an iphone to work with my corporate email (if it is possible)? I am running Exchange 2007 SP1. We are currently using Blackberry devices, but the new boss has an existing iphone he wants to use. Thanks in advance. Jonathan Jenkins ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Adding new email address to 200 users
or just use powershell google this Modify Exchange 2003 Users Primary SMTP And look at my blog on mostly mail. I have written a workable powershell script to add new addresses to users... If for some reason udating a new policy isnt in the cards. Murray ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Xobni released
Only problem I have seen is that Xobni only works with cached mode and some organizations have a policy to not use cached mode... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Xobni released This is one of the few Outlook add-ins I would actually pay for. I can get Outlook to max out CPU on its own. I can't seem to get Xobni to do so. I am going to test your public folder issue later today. Gmail is still 'beta'. :P From: Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Xobni released This is still a beta and still acts like one. The previous beta I tried marked messages in public folders as read when they weren't. This one locked up Outlook @ 100% CPU in less than 5 minutes of poking at it. Didn't even get to see if they'd fixed the marked-as-read problem. I'll try it again when the word beta has been banished... From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Xobni released Xobni was released publicly today: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/technology/05xobni.html?_r=1oref=slog in ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Xobni released
Not sure about that indexing thought, xobni is not that much different then enabling Instant search on an outlook client is it? All it has to do is make a local index file... Cached mode has lots of advantages and a few disadvantages, one deploying it in an organization with high change can lead to offline address book issues at the best of times. I am a big advocate of cached mode but understanding its sweet spot and where best to leverage and when to use online mode can help in the deployment and to the end user experience greatly... -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Xobni released Only works with cached mode? That's a stellar selling point. Really. If it were to index an Exchange box directly, that would be a very bad thing - bring it to its knees, if more than one or two users used it. Pity the fools who ban cached mode. That's their problem, not mine. On 5/5/08, Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only problem I have seen is that Xobni only works with cached mode and some organizations have a policy to not use cached mode... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Xobni released This is one of the few Outlook add-ins I would actually pay for. I can get Outlook to max out CPU on its own. I can't seem to get Xobni to do so. I am going to test your public folder issue later today. Gmail is still 'beta'. :P From: Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Xobni released This is still a beta and still acts like one. The previous beta I tried marked messages in public folders as read when they weren't. This one locked up Outlook @ 100% CPU in less than 5 minutes of poking at it. Didn't even get to see if they'd fixed the marked-as-read problem. I'll try it again when the word beta has been banished... From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Xobni released Xobni was released publicly today: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/technology/05xobni.html?_r=1oref=slog in ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Xobni released
Install needs cached mode, in ONLINE mode it wont install... -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Xobni released I don't think that's true though. The FAQ recommends cached mode - and explicitly notes that if you don't use cached mode you'll abuse the Exchange server. But the documentation may lag behind the beta; and I'm not about to reindex my mailbox to test. Sorry :-P Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 10:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Xobni released Only works with cached mode? That's a stellar selling point. Really. If it were to index an Exchange box directly, that would be a very bad thing - bring it to its knees, if more than one or two users used it. Pity the fools who ban cached mode. That's their problem, not mine. On 5/5/08, Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Only problem I have seen is that Xobni only works with cached mode and some organizations have a policy to not use cached mode. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Xobni released This is one of the few Outlook add-ins I would actually pay for. I can get Outlook to max out CPU on its own. I can't seem to get Xobni to do so. I am going to test your public folder issue later today. Gmail is still 'beta'. :P From: Carl Houseman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Xobni released This is still a beta and still acts like one. The previous beta I tried marked messages in public folders as read when they weren't. This one locked up Outlook @ 100% CPU in less than 5 minutes of poking at it. Didn't even get to see if they'd fixed the marked-as-read problem. I'll try it again when the word beta has been banished... From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Xobni released Xobni was released publicly today: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/technology/05xobni.html?_r=1oref=slog in ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Exchange 2007 SP1 Rollup 1
Does anyone know how to determine if the following Exchange 2007 Rollup has already been installed on my Exchange box? I am assuming it would have been installed as a part of a Windows Update, but if I go to Add/Remove programs, I don't see it listed. Any advice would be appreciated. Also, has anyone installed this rollup and found that is fixes some of the memory issues that have been discussed in this group with Exchange 2007? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/945684 Jonathan Jenkins Jenkins Restorations, Inc. www.jenkinsrestorations.comhttps://jrie-mailweb.jenkinsrestorations.com/owa/redir.aspx?URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.jenkinsrestorations.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange 2007 SP1 Rollup 1
That was it. Now it shows up. How about the memory usage? Any noticed improvements since installing the Rollup? Jonathan Jenkins Jenkins Restorations, Inc. www.jenkinsrestorations.comhttps://jrie-mailweb.jenkinsrestorations.com/owa/redir.aspx?URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.jenkinsrestorations.com From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 SP1 Rollup 1 Do you have Show updates ticked in Add/Remove programs? Mine shows up. From: Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2008 12:17 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 SP1 Rollup 1 Does anyone know how to determine if the following Exchange 2007 Rollup has already been installed on my Exchange box? I am assuming it would have been installed as a part of a Windows Update, but if I go to Add/Remove programs, I don't see it listed. Any advice would be appreciated. Also, has anyone installed this rollup and found that is fixes some of the memory issues that have been discussed in this group with Exchange 2007? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/945684 Jonathan Jenkins Jenkins Restorations, Inc. www.jenkinsrestorations.comhttps://jrie-mailweb.jenkinsrestorations.com/owa/redir.aspx?URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.jenkinsrestorations.com ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
