Re: Activesync/cert issue
The error you are getting is confusing but normal as Exrca will always try to hit autodiscover on your default domain name (ex if you administer acme.com) the test will run against acme.com (will fail) and then try autodiscover.acme.com You should see later in your test an attempt on autodiscover.thanksal.comhttp://www.thanksal.com As for the cert have you re-enrolled and copied the certificate to the device? On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Scott Weber swe...@thanksal.com wrote: I’m just going to throw this out there since its late and some maybe reading this. ** ** I have an exchange 2003 server running our own cert server on it for self signing certs for owa. After a reboot today we started having all sorts of weird active sync issues. Mainly geared toward iPhones and iPad. But they will not sync at all. ** ** I noticed the cert expired some time so in an attempt to re-do quickly since some higher ups were lost without their email, I attempted to re-self sign a cert to correct this issue. ** ** Now If I try to add a new account to an ipad , it just fails and will not sync at all. ** ** Is there anyway to completely remove the CA and all the certs to this point and basically just start over? And now when I run the exchange connectivity.com test I get the following: ** ** Testing the SSL certificate to make sure it's valid. The SSL certificate failed one or more certificate validation checks. Test Steps ExRCA is attempting to obtain the SSL certificate from remote server thanksal.com on port 443. ExRCA successfully obtained the remote SSL certificate. Additional Details Remote Certificate Subject: CN=www.thanksal.com, OU=Al Boenker Insurance Agency, Inc., O=Al Boenker Insurance Agency, Inc., L=Fort Worth, S=Texas, C=US, Issuer: CN=VeriSign Class 3 Secure Server CA - G3, OU=Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)10, OU=VeriSign Trust Network, O=VeriSign, Inc., C=US. Validating the certificate name. Certificate name validation failed. Tell me more about this issue and how to resolve it Additional Details Host name thanksal.com doesn't match any name found on the server certificate CN=www.thanksal.com, OU=Al Boenker Insurance Agency, Inc., O=Al Boenker Insurance Agency, Inc., L=Fort Worth, S=Texas, C=US. ** ** But now its trying to autodiscover against our real certificate on our webserver which has nothing to do with our exchange server. Almost as if the local cert server root cert is bad or something. ** ** I don’t know.. I have been searching Google high and low but, just not sure what to check out next.. ** ** Thanks for your time reading this, if you have any ideas, I would love to hear them. ** ** Thanks Scott ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Scott Weber || IT Systems Administrator Boenker Group of Companies swe...@thanksal.com p.817.306.2565 c.817.584.2245 ** ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: EAS Attachments
What about roaming users? My understanding is that if you had a BES International plan enabled for your SIM card then all email traffic generated would not make your telephone bill any higher even if you are a UK citizen downloading 10 MB Excel files 10 times a day to your BB from a meeting room in Japan. Whereas if these same people switch to Active Sync, all traffic generated for downloading attachments and just normal sync will become a lot more expensive. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Guyer, Don dgu...@che.org wrote: Correct. I have yet to find a complete comparison on the pros/cons between using BES vs. not using BES but, this gives a high level of the new BES world: http://vowe.net/archives/013555.html Regards, Don Guyer Catholic Health East - Information Technology Enterprise Directory Messaging Services 3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073 email: dgu...@che.org Office: 610.550.3595 | Cell: 610.955.6528 | Fax: 610.271.9440 For immediate assistance, please open a Service Desk ticket or call the helpdesk @ 610-492-3839. -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 7:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: EAS Attachments On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: Moving forward, as RIM has announced full EAS support, is it worthwhile continuing with BES server licenses if your device management needs are very low? From what I'm told: Classic BB and new BB are two completely different platforms. Separate them in your mind completely. New BB uses ActiveSync for sync purposes. The server-side software provides device management and policy functions, for both new BB and third-party (iOS/Android) devices; it does not provide any sync functions. -- Ben --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Catholic Health East and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the sender regarding the error in a separate email. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Anyone using Backup Exec 2012 for Exchange 2010?
Have you disabled Snapshot technology on the Advanced Open File Options in BE? On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tom Miller tominyorkt...@gmail.com wrote: Yup. I have an account that is Exchange org role that does the backups. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote: You've got your service account suitable permissions? On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Tom Miller tominyorkt...@gmail.comwrote: V-79-57344-64247 failure reading object. Sometimes I get errors about an Exchange database being corrupt. Exchange does not report any issues with any of the copies, though. V-79-57344-34108 There are others. I've read the Symantec KBs on these errors but they do not seem to apply. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote: What is the error you are getting? On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom Miller tominyorkt...@gmail.comwrote: Yes, same SP as the Exchange servers. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.comwrote: You have Exchange management console installed on the BE server? On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Tom Miller tominyorkt...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having a difficult time getting Exchange 2010 backups from Backup Exec 2012. BE is fully patched and Exchange is at SP3. These are servers on VMWare. The vmware snapshot backup runs okay. The problem is the DAG backups. DAG backups tend to run slowly and in many cases time out during a backup. I've tried various options: disabling GRT, trying different VSS providers, changing compression. DAG backups error out. Anyone on the list able to back up a DAG with Backup Exec 2012? If so, what did you do to get it to work? I don't have issues with my other virtual or physical servers - just Exchange. Thanks, Tom --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Design question regarding smart-host
Thanks Tina, Jim, All relevant remarks. I will end up NAT-ing our 2 hub IPs as suggested. As for outgoing SMTP, Jim is right we don't filter at all SMTP for outgoing traffic, i told my manager we should do something about it but he is having a hard time believing that if i would close port 25 except for our HT it will not cause any issues... Anyways thanks a lot for putting me on the right track, much appreciated! On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Tanya Pinetti tpine...@outlook.com wrote: Alexander, If you went with a single Edge server, you would lose redundancy as the single Edge is now your single point of failure. If you used both HTs, you have redundancy. While you can go with one public IP NAT'd to both HT servers (as mentioned by Jim below), I would prefer a one-to-one NAT assuming you have enough public IPs. For me, one-to-one makes troubleshooting easier. -- From: kennedy...@elyriaschools.org To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Design question regarding smart-host Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:17:51 + This is for outgoing email correct? You still only need one public IP. NAT both servers to the same IP. I would assume you can still use the old IP your spam appliance used….should be a quick setup in your firewall. *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2013 1:16 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Design question regarding smart-host We have two HT servers actually. I think that is why i thought about using an edge sync server so i would only need one public IP. Le lundi 18 mars 2013, Tanya Pinetti a écrit : All you need is a spare public IP and NAT it to your HT server. I prefer not using an Edge server if you are sending all outbound emails to FOPE since your networking team will have an ACL on the firewall allowing only your HT server SMTP access to the FOPE subnet. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We currently use an old Anti-Spam appliance as our smart host, it is located in a DMZ and has a NATed IP for sending emails to the outside world. We only have one Send Connector in our Exchange Org. and it uses this smart-host for all emails. I have created a new send connector to test our new smart-host ( mail.messaging.microsoft.com as were moving to FOPE). After an email was sent for testing, i received a notification from Microsoft that states that the IP used to send the email was blocked and banned. When i checked the IP, i found out it is the one our internal clients are getting when they go on Internet (if i go to whatismyip.comfrom my workstation i get that IP, all clients are NATed to that one public IP). As all our clients are using this IP, we would like to use a dedicated public IP for sending emails. In our situation the only solution i see would be to setup our own smart-host first (let say a Edge Sync Server), create a default send connector on our Exchange HUBs to direct emails to this Edge Sync server and create another Send connector on the Edge Sync server to direct emails to FOPE. Am i correct? Or is there a way to do differently? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Design question regarding smart-host
Thanks Tanya :) sorry about the mistake On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Tina, Jim, All relevant remarks. I will end up NAT-ing our 2 hub IPs as suggested. As for outgoing SMTP, Jim is right we don't filter at all SMTP for outgoing traffic, i told my manager we should do something about it but he is having a hard time believing that if i would close port 25 except for our HT it will not cause any issues... Anyways thanks a lot for putting me on the right track, much appreciated! On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Tanya Pinetti tpine...@outlook.comwrote: Alexander, If you went with a single Edge server, you would lose redundancy as the single Edge is now your single point of failure. If you used both HTs, you have redundancy. While you can go with one public IP NAT'd to both HT servers (as mentioned by Jim below), I would prefer a one-to-one NAT assuming you have enough public IPs. For me, one-to-one makes troubleshooting easier. -- From: kennedy...@elyriaschools.org To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Design question regarding smart-host Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:17:51 + This is for outgoing email correct? You still only need one public IP. NAT both servers to the same IP. I would assume you can still use the old IP your spam appliance used….should be a quick setup in your firewall. *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2013 1:16 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Design question regarding smart-host We have two HT servers actually. I think that is why i thought about using an edge sync server so i would only need one public IP. Le lundi 18 mars 2013, Tanya Pinetti a écrit : All you need is a spare public IP and NAT it to your HT server. I prefer not using an Edge server if you are sending all outbound emails to FOPE since your networking team will have an ACL on the firewall allowing only your HT server SMTP access to the FOPE subnet. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We currently use an old Anti-Spam appliance as our smart host, it is located in a DMZ and has a NATed IP for sending emails to the outside world. We only have one Send Connector in our Exchange Org. and it uses this smart-host for all emails. I have created a new send connector to test our new smart-host ( mail.messaging.microsoft.com as were moving to FOPE). After an email was sent for testing, i received a notification from Microsoft that states that the IP used to send the email was blocked and banned. When i checked the IP, i found out it is the one our internal clients are getting when they go on Internet (if i go to whatismyip.comfrom my workstation i get that IP, all clients are NATed to that one public IP). As all our clients are using this IP, we would like to use a dedicated public IP for sending emails. In our situation the only solution i see would be to setup our own smart-host first (let say a Edge Sync Server), create a default send connector on our Exchange HUBs to direct emails to this Edge Sync server and create another Send connector on the Edge Sync server to direct emails to FOPE. Am i correct? Or is there a way to do differently? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Design question regarding smart-host
We have two HT servers actually. I think that is why i thought about using an edge sync server so i would only need one public IP. Le lundi 18 mars 2013, Tanya Pinetti a écrit : All you need is a spare public IP and NAT it to your HT server. I prefer not using an Edge server if you are sending all outbound emails to FOPE since your networking team will have an ACL on the firewall allowing only your HT server SMTP access to the FOPE subnet. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We currently use an old Anti-Spam appliance as our smart host, it is located in a DMZ and has a NATed IP for sending emails to the outside world. We only have one Send Connector in our Exchange Org. and it uses this smart-host for all emails. I have created a new send connector to test our new smart-host ( mail.messaging.microsoft.com as were moving to FOPE). After an email was sent for testing, i received a notification from Microsoft that states that the IP used to send the email was blocked and banned. When i checked the IP, i found out it is the one our internal clients are getting when they go on Internet (if i go to whatismyip.comfrom my workstation i get that IP, all clients are NATed to that one public IP). As all our clients are using this IP, we would like to use a dedicated public IP for sending emails. In our situation the only solution i see would be to setup our own smart-host first (let say a Edge Sync Server), create a default send connector on our Exchange HUBs to direct emails to this Edge Sync server and create another Send connector on the Edge Sync server to direct emails to FOPE. Am i correct? Or is there a way to do differently? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Issue with load balancers, relay, autodiscover
First error message is normal, it is because of the way the test is done, it first try an autodiscover test with your domain name in the URL. If your domain is contoso it will try first Autodiscover to https://contoso.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xlmhttps://mycompany.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xlm I get the same error myself but autodiscover works fine from outside. On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Tom Miller tmil...@sfgtrust.com wrote: This past weekend I inserted two Barracuda load balancers into my Exchange 2010 environment. With a few exceptions, they seems to be working well. ** ** I need some suggestions from the list on a few things: ** ** External autodiscover is failing, then succeeding. In the log when I get test connection, I see this: ** ** Autodiscover to https://mycompany.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xlmfailed (0x800c203) Autodiscover to https://autodiscover.mycompany.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml starting* *** GetLastError = 0; httpStatus=200 Autodiscover to https://autodiscover.mycompany.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml succeeded ** ** Any ideas on this one? ** ** The second issue I have is relay. I have a relay for our various environmental, copiers, BusinessObject systems, and other equipment/systems. That worked fine with I used Windows NLB on the CAS servers. Now that I’m using the load balancers, the relay works only for internal recipients. If a relay is destined for external e-mail addresses, it fails. This is particularly an issue for our BusinessObjects systems, which send out reports to non-internal addresses. Any thoughts on this one? ** ** Thanks, Tom --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Issue with load balancers, relay, autodiscover
How is your receive connector configured for relaying (Authentication and Permission Groups) ? On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Tom Miller tmil...@sfgtrust.com wrote: Thanks! I'm back to Exchange after years away from it so this is still new(ish) to me. ** ** Tom ** ** *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:32 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Issue with load balancers, relay, autodiscover ** ** First error message is normal, it is because of the way the test is done, it first try an autodiscover test with your domain name in the URL. If your domain is contoso it will try first Autodiscover to https://contoso.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xlmhttps://mycompany.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xlm I get the same error myself but autodiscover works fine from outside. On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Tom Miller tmil...@sfgtrust.com wrote: This past weekend I inserted two Barracuda load balancers into my Exchange 2010 environment. With a few exceptions, they seems to be working well.** ** I need some suggestions from the list on a few things: External autodiscover is failing, then succeeding. In the log when I get test connection, I see this: Autodiscover to https://mycompany.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xlmfailed (0x800c203) Autodiscover to https://autodiscover.mycompany.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml starting* *** GetLastError = 0; httpStatus=200 Autodiscover to https://autodiscover.mycompany.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml succeeded Any ideas on this one? The second issue I have is relay. I have a relay for our various environmental, copiers, BusinessObject systems, and other equipment/systems. That worked fine with I used Windows NLB on the CAS servers. Now that I’m using the load balancers, the relay works only for internal recipients. If a relay is destined for external e-mail addresses, it fails. This is particularly an issue for our BusinessObjects systems, which send out reports to non-internal addresses. Any thoughts on this one? Thanks, Tom --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist ** ** --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Archiving not working
I have enabled archiving on a couple of users mailboxes and it works OK. However i have this one user that has a 8GB mailbox with more than 5 items, i have enabled a default archive for items older than 2 years. If i look at his archive mailbox there are now 16 items only for 143KB of space in the online archive. I doubt all his current emails are less than 2 years old so archiving does not work properly. Anyway i can see and fix the archiving issue without having to go to his outlook? Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Import PST into online archive
Thanks, Most of our users have online archives that have the same folder structure as their archive PST file. let say - there is a sub-folder Inbox\Partners in the online archive and the same sub-folder in the PST file - i use the switch -ConflictResolutionOption KeepLatestItem The import will eventually import new messages in the sub-folders and in case of conflict keep the newest one? On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Bruckner, Ian imbr...@ilstu.edu wrote: Get-Help New-MailboxImportRequest –Detailed ** ** -ConflictResolutionOption KeepSourceItem | KeepLatestItem | KeepAll The ConflictResolutionOption parameter specifies the action for the Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Replication service (MRS) to take if there are multiple matching messages in the target. This parameter takes the following values: * KeepSourceItem * KeepLatestItem * KeepAll The default value is KeepSourceItem. ** ** Ian *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, February 08, 2013 09:37 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Import PST into online archive ** ** Hello, I have a question about importing PST files to Exchange Online archive. I have enabled archive on a user and set a retention policy with a Policy Tag to Archive All Other Folders in the mailbox with Age limit retention 731 days. The online archive is showing up and everything older than 2 years is archived, all good. Now that user has 3 PST's files on her local laptop. I understand the correct command to import the PSt in the online archive is: New-MailboxImportRequest –Mailbox Johan –FilePath \\2010AD02\PST-Files\johan-archive.pst -IsArchive If i do it for the 3 files, will email and email folders be appended into the archive or will the folders be overwritten? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Playing with DSN message
Thanks Steve, i was trying with the Set command because there is already a custom message in place. So if i try your command i receive: [PS] C:\Users\arose\Desktop\Exchange ScriptsNew-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acmegroup.com.' Active Directory operation failed on REMTC4DC02.corp.acmegroup.local. The object 'CN=WarningMailbox,CN=9,CN=Dsn Customization,CN=Transport Settings,CN=acmeGROUP,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN =Services,CN=Configuration,DC=acmegroup,DC=local' already exists. + CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (0:Int32) [New-SystemMessage], ADObjectAlreadyExistsException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ED0367BD,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.Dsn.NewSystemMessage And if i try the set command [PS] C:\Users\arose\Desktop\Exchange ScriptsSet-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acmegroup.com.' Cannot process argument transformation on parameter 'Identity'. Cannot convert value -QuotaMessageType to type Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.SystemMessageIdParameter. Error: ' -QuotaMessageType' is not a valid value for the identity. Parameter name: identity + CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (:) [Set-SystemMessage], ParameterBindin...mationException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentTransformationError,Set-SystemMessage On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Steve Goodman st...@stevieg.org wrote: Hiya, ** ** It looks like the syntax is slightly incorrect. It should be the New- cmdlet, and the TechNet article has the single quotes in the wrong place.* *** ** ** New-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acme.com.' ** ** Steve ** ** *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 07 February 2013 12:31 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Playing with DSN message ** ** Hello, I am trying to customize the Warning Quota message but it fails: [PS] C:\Users\arose\Desktop\Exchange ScriptsSet-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no long er need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acme.com.' The '' operator is reserved for future use. At line:1 char:72 + Set-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you d o not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (inbox, Sent Items,...). BRI f you have any concerns or questions, please contact itsupp...@remarkgroup.com.' + CategoryInfo : ParserError: (:OperatorToken) [], ParentContainsErrorRecordException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : RedirectionNotSupported I am just following MS articale: You can include HTML tags when you modify a customized DSN message by using the following command syntax: Set-SystemMessage Identity -Text 'HTML DSN message text to display with A HREF=urlhypertext/A.' http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125230%28v=exchg.80%29.aspx --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions
Re: Playing with DSN message
Sweet! That did it, thanks again! On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Steve Goodman st...@stevieg.org wrote: If you’ve got it set, I think it would be ** ** Set-SystemMessage -Identity en\WarningMailbox -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acme.com.' ** ** Steve ** ** *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 07 February 2013 13:50 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Playing with DSN message ** ** Thanks Steve, i was trying with the Set command because there is already a custom message in place. So if i try your command i receive: [PS] C:\Users\arose\Desktop\Exchange ScriptsNew-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acmegroup.com.' Active Directory operation failed on REMTC4DC02.corp.acmegroup.local. The object 'CN=WarningMailbox,CN=9,CN=Dsn Customization,CN=Transport Settings,CN=acmeGROUP,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN =Services,CN=Configuration,DC=acmegroup,DC=local' already exists. + CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (0:Int32) [New-SystemMessage], ADObjectAlreadyExistsException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ED0367BD,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.Dsn.NewSystemMessage And if i try the set command [PS] C:\Users\arose\Desktop\Exchange ScriptsSet-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acmegroup.com.' Cannot process argument transformation on parameter 'Identity'. Cannot convert value -QuotaMessageType to type Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.SystemMessageIdParameter. Error: ' -QuotaMessageType' is not a valid value for the identity. Parameter name: identity + CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (:) [Set-SystemMessage], ParameterBindin...mationException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentTransformationError,Set-SystemMessage On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Steve Goodman st...@stevieg.org wrote:** ** Hiya, It looks like the syntax is slightly incorrect. It should be the New- cmdlet, and the TechNet article has the single quotes in the wrong place.* *** New-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acme.com.' Steve *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 07 February 2013 12:31 *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Playing with DSN message Hello, I am trying to customize the Warning Quota message but it fails: [PS] C:\Users\arose\Desktop\Exchange ScriptsSet-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you do not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no long er need (Inbox, Sent Items,...). BRIf you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to contact itsupp...@acme.com.' The '' operator is reserved for future use. At line:1 char:72 + Set-SystemMessage -QuotaMessageType WarningMailbox -Language EN -Text 'Dear colleague, BRYour immediate attention is required. Your mailbox is reaching its maximum size. If you d o not clean emails now, you will soon be unable to send and receive any emails. BRBR Please clean your Deleted Items, delete any emails you no longer need (inbox, Sent Items,...). BRI f you have any concerns or questions, please contact itsupp...@remarkgroup.com.' + CategoryInfo : ParserError: (:OperatorToken
Re: Why are some System PF mail enabled?
All these PF these email addresses make FOPE interface less clear to me. Also, The DST does not have the ability to exclude specific users or specific addresses from the synchronization process. I think I'll switch to csv import then. Or i could get rid totally of PF, actually we don't use any except for OAB right now. Thanks. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote: They have email addresses because that is how Exchange routes system messages. :P ** ** In later versions of Exchange, they switched to using GUIDs so that the system messages never show up in other places. ** ** If you have Exchange 2003 in your environment, you don’t want to mail-disable them. ** ** *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 7, 2013 11:36 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Why are some System PF mail enabled? ** ** Hi, I am setting up directory synchronization on FOPE. I have added one of our domain and enabled it, sync went successfully but i see a lot of System Public Folders being pushed to the Users provisioning. System PFs for some reasons are mail enabled, on the dozen of StoreEvents folders i see in the PF management console, a few are mail enabled. So is Schema, schema-root, exchweb,...and OAB\First Administrative Group (remaining of our 2003 servers). I am not sure yet how i can prevent FOPE from provisionning these PFs as user accounts, or would it be safe to mail disable them? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Outlook 2010: Exchange account importing PST
I have seen it happen for numerous PST especially old ones, i think it has to do with fragmentation of the PST file, importing the file creates a new one not fragmented at all, same thing happens would happen if you had used the Compact Now button in Outlook under File Properties). On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Greg Saunders gsaund...@myitanalyst.comwrote: Setup new exchange user in Outlook 2010 with caching to OST file. I am doing a File / Open / Import to import a previous PST file. This one happened to be around 7GB, but done many over last few days. I just happened to be watching this one all the way through... not just what Outlook is saying, but watching the OST and PST file sizes. Outlook was importing and while it is doing this you see the dialog box. Eventually the dialog box goes away as if everything is done. Now I don't close Outlook yet, because I can tell the OST file is still syncing with exchange. Once it looks like it is done I will close Outlook and move the PST file to an archive folder in case we ever need it. BUT what I noticed in this case was the PST file was shrinking in size. I did NOT expect to see this. It kept gradually decreasing in size. In this case it went from 7GB down to 2.6GB when it finally stopped shrinking. WHY is it doing that. I didn't think importing actually altered the PST file... I thought it just IMPORTED... not take anything out of it. Is it possible it was compressing itself after the import? I am guess all it did was compress it since after closing and re-opening everything both files seem to have the same number of items. Greg --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Prevent open relay
Understood, thanks guys On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Peter Johnson johnson.pet...@gmail.comwrote: By definition an open relay is an SMTP server that will accept and forward on email for domains for which it is not responsible. By default any Exchange Server post 2000 will be not be an open relay by default IIRC correctly. If u have an antispam service in the cloud and your edge device/firewall is configured to only SMTP from your provided IP addresses a default receive connector should be fine. On 26 Jan 2013, at 13:20, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just wondering how would one prevent being an open relay yet still be able to receive emails from most domains (hotmail, gmail,...) without any configuration? How would you need to configure your receive connectors, i just realize i did not have to worry about it as we receive our emails from an online anti-spam provider so we just allow its set of IPs, but for a shop that receives directly emails from outside whether or not you have an edge server? --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: Witness share name is outdated
Thanks i did ran the command manually again Set-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup -Identity DAG1 -WitnessServer nlgswbak01.corp.group.local -WitnessDirectory E:\WITNESS_DAG1 But the Share Path is still not good. [PS] C:\Windows\system32get-cluster DAG1 | Get-ClusterQuorum | fl Cluster: DAG1 QuorumResource : File Share Witness (\\remcorpsym01 .corp.group.local\DAG1.corp.group.local) QuorumType : NodeAndFileShareMajority On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Maybe have a glance at this: http://blogs.technet.com/b/timmcmic/archive/2010/07/13/exchange-2010-file-share-witness-oddities.aspx -- *From:* Alexander Rose *Sent:* Friday, January 25, 2013 4:46 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Witness share name is outdated Hi, Since i moved the witness share to a new server i receive the following error in the logs (remcorpsym01.corp.group.local is the name of the old witness server) : Log Name: System Source:Microsoft-Windows-FailoverClustering Description: File share witness resource 'File Share Witness (\\remcorpsym01.corp.group.local\DAG1.corp.group.local)' failed a periodic health check on file share '\\nlgswbak01.corp.group.local\DAG1.corp.group.local'. Please ensure that file share '\\nlgswbak01.corp.group.local\DAG1.corp.group.local' exists and is accessible by the cluster. I guess it is no big deal since the check is performed on the correct server (nlgswbak01) but i was wondering if i can fix this for clarity? Thanks --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
Re: SMTP server stopped working
Hum, how can i create a SMTP connector now that exchange has been uninstalled. If i try from the EMC i receive: You must have at least one SMTP VSI in this routing group to create an SMTP connector SMTP logging is ON Here are the latest entries: 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 422 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 422 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 782 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 782 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 1125 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:32 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 1125 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:33 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 1485 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:33 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 1485 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:33 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 1844 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:34 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 2641 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:34 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionCommand REMCORPEXCH03 0 2641 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:22:34 180.222.200.11 OutboundConnectionResponse REMCORPEXCH03 0 3000 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 235 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:24:13 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:25:42 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 240 88844 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 235 109 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:00 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:26:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:27:22 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 240 81922 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 235 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:28:48 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 16 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:29:52 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 240 64219 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 235 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:01 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 250 16 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:31:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:32:22 10.1.1.2 nlwussv01 REMCORPEXCH03 240 80750 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:33:20 10.135.136.4 jptoksv04.corp.acmegroup.local REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:33:20 10.135.136.4 jptoksv04.corp.acmegroup.local REMCORPEXCH03 240 282 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:36:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:36:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:41:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:41:05 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:46:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:46:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:51:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:51:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:56:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 250 0 SMTP 2013-01-08 15:56:06 10.1.1.13 remcorpnagios REMCORPEXCH03 240 0 SMTP On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.comwrote: More than likely, you don’t have an outgoing connector configured. Turn on SMTP logging in IIS and look at THOSE logs. The presence of a file in BadMail doesn’t mean anything other than delivery failed. It doesn’t tell you why. ** ** *From:* Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, January 8, 2013 10:37 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* SMTP server stopped working ** ** Hi all, ** ** Our first 2003 mailbox server has being used by printers, monitoring apps as a SMTP server to send notifications. I just removed Exchange 2003 from this server from the Add/Remove Programs panel and left
Re: Move All Replicas PF leaves folders
Nevermind, i had to wait another couple of minutes and the folders are
gone...
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Still in coexistence mode 2003/2010, i have moved all the mailboxes to
2010. Now trying to remove the public folders from the e2k3 servers, i went
in the EMC and clicked Move all Replica on the PF store. After a while most
folders are gone but some remain making it impossible to remove the PF
database.
On the last e2k3 mailbox server the remaining folders are the ones used
for OAB, the folders are:
- OAB version 3a
- OAB version 4
For some reasons there was a PF database on the last E2k3 Front-End
server, that contains the following folders after i clicked Move All
Replica (and waited for replication)
- Exchange V1
- microsoft
- schema-root
- StoreEvents{0EBFC521-349E-48E3-8EE0-C5B1C7740C3A}
Not sure why they wont go away, all i can think of is that in an attempt
not to loose any PF i had set the e2k10 PF server as a replication partner
on these folders, now if i try to remove the e2k10 server from the
replication tab (from the 2003 EMC), the remove button is grayed out.
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
