RE: One contact list for a company
I think the best thing would be to load them into the GAL. Updating them might be a challenge though. If they want one contact list for all contacts the GAL is the way to go IMO. Mike This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:cbusitl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 3:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: One contact list for a company I have a company (8 users, 4K contacts) that use office 365 and want to work off of only one contact list for outlook and mobile devices. Does anyone have any ideas on how I might be able to accomplish this? They would like when one person updates a contact to update on all computers and phones. If it were only outlook that would be easy (shared mailbox) but adding in the mobile devices I'm at a loss for idea's. The only way I can think to accomplish this would be to export the master contact list to each computer then whenever anyone updates a contact send a vcard to everyone. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Adding 2 CAS Servers
When your first CAS server is setup there is no CAS array yet. Since CAS is the first role that needs to be installed you can't have a CAS array without first having a CAS. Chicken and egg scenario Mike This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 3:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Adding 2 CAS Servers Hi Michael, Why except for the first? On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote: Except for the first. From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.ukmailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2012 9:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Adding 2 CAS Servers Just to avoid confusion, a CAS will always be inserted into a CAS array automatically, and removed when you uninstall the role. You cannot add/remove servers from an array on a whim. From: bounce-9552906-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.commailto:bounce-9552906-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-9552906-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]mailto:[mailto:bounce-9552906-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of pramatow...@mediageneral.commailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com Sent: 03 October 2012 14:21 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Adding 2 CAS Servers I'd put up the two new servers, add them to the array, when all is good remove the role from the existing servers. Or, as Steve just said, try and get HLB's. They are *so* much better than wnlb. Used wnlb at first, now Kemp and the difference is night and day. From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]mailto:[mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Adding 2 CAS Servers Hello, We are still in the process of setting up an Exchange 2010 infrastructure to live in coexistence with our current Exchange 2003 mail system. So far we have setup 2 servers running Exchange 2010 and holding the CAS/HUB/MBX roles, both member of a DAG and a cas array. Because of the limitation that you cannot use windows NLB on DAG members, we want to add 2 CAS/HUB servers to the picture so we can use NLB. How would it affect our current setup? Do we need to uninstall the CAS role from the 2 current all-in-one servers or can we just leave them (without them being member of the NLB members)? Would they need to be removed from the casarray? Thank you. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Adding 2 CAS Servers
Like Steve said I would definitely consider HLBs over WNLB. We are also migrating from 2003 to 2010 and went with Kemp load balancers. We tested WNLB but it was much more difficult to manage than the Kemp devices. We purchased a pair of Kemp LM-2200s for less than $4k. By the time you factor in the cost of Windows and Exchange server licenses you are getting close to a pair of redundant HLBs anyways. Mike This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. From: Steve Goodman [mailto:st...@stevieg.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Adding 2 CAS Servers Hiya, If you're able to get budget to licence 2 additional Exchange Standard edition servers, are you 100% sure you can't afford a LB? Have you checked out Load Balancers like those from KEMP? NLB is really a poor alternative. Especially if you're using a virtual environment. You don't need to uninstall the CAS and HT role from those servers but I would if you definitely want to go down that route. Steve From: Al Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com]mailto:[mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: 03 October 2012 14:01 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Adding 2 CAS Servers Hello, We are still in the process of setting up an Exchange 2010 infrastructure to live in coexistence with our current Exchange 2003 mail system. So far we have setup 2 servers running Exchange 2010 and holding the CAS/HUB/MBX roles, both member of a DAG and a cas array. Because of the limitation that you cannot use windows NLB on DAG members, we want to add 2 CAS/HUB servers to the picture so we can use NLB. How would it affect our current setup? Do we need to uninstall the CAS role from the 2 current all-in-one servers or can we just leave them (without them being member of the NLB members)? Would they need to be removed from the casarray? Thank you. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Role required for database backups in Exchange 2010?
Thanks Joe. I had noticed the same thing. The fact that no one else has responded pretty much confirms my thought. We like to make sure our backup accounts have the minimum required permissions to perform their backups. If Org Management is required then so be it. Mike From: Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 11:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Role required for database backups in Exchange 2010? I just recently set this up with Netbackup, and had to use the Org Management role. Looking at the Exchange security groups in ADUC, I don't see any other that says anything about it. Joe Heaton ITB - Enterprise Server Support From: Mike Celone [mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com]mailto:[mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 8:25 AM To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Role required for database backups in Exchange 2010? Which of the default roles in Exchange 2010 allows you to perform backups of the database? We have a 2 server DAG and I am able to backup everything using an account that has the Organization Management role but is there a lesser role that can be used to perform backups of the databases? I can't seem to find this information anywhere but I'm sure it must be documented. I must not be putting the right search terms into Bing or Google. Mike Celone Network Systems Manager Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.comblocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Forefront roadmap changes
I know that UAG can also be used but that comes with much more expensive licensing than TMG. TMG was licensed by CPU where UAG is CAL based. It would be much more expensive to license UAG over TMG for just about everyone. Mike This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. -Original Message- From: May, Jeff [mailto:j...@bbandt.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forefront roadmap changes Any ideas on the replacement, or maybe I am missing something, for the TMG??? We are currently looking at this for our OWA and Outlook Anywhere publishing and moving off our old ISA systems. Jeff A. May, MobileIron Certified SA and Security Specialist Client Server Engineer IV Client Server Engineering/IT Messaging Services Mail Code - 100-99-08-20 E-Mail - j...@bbandt.com -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forefront roadmap changes FYI. http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2012/09/12/important-changes-to-forefront-product-roadmaps.aspx Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Exchange 2003 Connection Filtering
Out of the box the Exchange 2003 IMF doesn't provide anyway to whitelist an address or domain. I know there are tools like IMF Tune that can be added that will add this but I was hoping there was a way to do this with out of the box Exchange 2003. Well I guess it's ammunition to add to my Exchange 2010 upgrade request... Mike From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 5:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 Connection Filtering We don't use connection filtering (we have appliances to do that) but from the description, I suspect you are correct that it will see the connecting server always as your parent company's relay. Any way to add blackberry.net to a whitelist? From: Celone, Mike [mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2003 Connection Filtering I've got a question about the Connection Filtering in Exchange 2003. All our incoming email is handled by our parent company's mail relays. They then pass on any mail intended for our server to my Exchange environment. Does the connection filtering in Exchange 2003 look into the headers of the email to see where the email originated from or does it just check the last connection? If it only see the last connection then this won't help me because all email always appears to come from our parent company's mail relays. The reason I ask is lately a lot our Blackberry activation messages are ending up in people's junk mail folders (I think it's related to our Outlook 2010 rollout but I'm not 100% sure yet) and it's causing my activations to fail. I figure if I can add the Blackberry network range to my connection filter that would prevent them from being tagged as junk mail. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Disclaimer Software (Pulls info out of AD?)
I 2nd this. We implemented this recently and it's working great. Mike From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Disclaimer Software (Pulls info out of AD?) Take a look at C2 Exchange Rules from www.codetwo.com. Inexpensive, easy to configure. Roger Wright ___ Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos: what you do today might burn your butt tomorrow. On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote: We may be looking for software to help automate/standardise email signatures. Right now the legal text is appended by our edge gateway (as you'll see on this message), but actual Outlook signatures are set by each person individually. What's the best way to put in place a corporate Outlook signature that is still unique to the message sender i.e. name/job title/phone number/email is automatically populated? I know there are seldom technical solutions to people problems, but people don't do it or forget. Thanks, Paul MIRA Ltd Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England Registered in England and Wales No. 402570 VAT Registration GB 114 5409 96 The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
RE: Exchange 5.5 and AD Question
Chuck I did this same upgrade many years ago. While we ran the Exchange ADC it's not necessary unless you want to migrate directory information from the Exchange 5.5 database to AD. If you are not worried about that then you really don't need to do it. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:cha...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 and AD Question I am working for a new client that has a very old set up still using Exchange 5.5 and an NT 4.0 domain. I plan on upgrading the domain this weekend and then in the next month or so moving to Exchange 2003 (for now!) since that seems to be the easiest migration path at this point (apart from creating a new Exchange group and starting from scratch. My question is during the period between upgrading the domain and upgrading Exchange, it is absolutely necessary to install the Active Directory Connector or will I be OK without it for a few weeks until I start the Exchange upgrade process? I realize there are benefits in running it, but is it necessary? I need a little sanity check before I upgrade the domain. Chuck
Office 2010 Standard + Exchange Online Archives
Can someone confirm that Outlook in Office 2010 Standard can access an Exchange online archive? We are looking to deploy Office 2010 Standard this year and later deploy Exchange 2010. In our testing so far we have not been able to access the Exchange online Archive folder while using Outlook in Office 2010 Standard but it works fine in the Outlook Web App. I haven't seen anything that says it can't but so far it's not working. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author.
RE: OOF for only 2 users
Just make sure that Allow automatic replies is enabled and a server side rule will work. Mike From: Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OOF for only 2 users Will a server side rule ignore the server setting that prevents auto replies from going out to the internet? Also, they don't want an auto forward. They want senders to be notified of their new email, ie replacement or in one case, moving to a different college. From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OOF for only 2 users Server side rule? Also setup a contact in AD with a autoforward to their home email. I do that for execs too. On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu wrote: Sent this earlier and it didn't appear to get to the list, so apologies if it is a duplicate. We've got two people that are retiring on July 1. Our president and VP. Both would like to have an automated reply sent to anyone that emails them. The reply would say, xxx has retired, if this is a personal email, xxx can be contacted at x...@homeemail.com. If it is work related, his replacement may be contacted at yyy.company.com http://yyy.company.com/ . On our exchange 2003 server, we've disabled auto replies to the internet. Any way we can enable that for only those two people? This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author. image001.png
Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade
This might be a little OT but I know we are just starting out with testing Outlook 2010 and have run into an issue. We are upgrading from Outlook 2003 to Outlook 2010 and have found that when we reply or forward an email we get an undeliverable message with the following text. This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again later, or contact your network administrator. Unknown Error. Error is [0x80040900-0x80040900-0x0003ee]. We can create a new email and it sends fine but cannot reply or forward. We are running Exchange 2003 SP2 fully patched. I've Googled (and Binged) this and have found plenty of other people with the problem but no real answers yet. Any help is appreciated. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author.
RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade
It is happening with internal and external messages. Also I just tried disabling Cached Mode and when I try to reply to a message I get a message window that says Unknown Error. Mike From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade I believe I have seen this when someone had an address prefix as EX instead of SMTP. Does this happen replying to both internal AND external messages? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Celone, Mike [mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade This might be a little OT but I know we are just starting out with testing Outlook 2010 and have run into an issue. We are upgrading from Outlook 2003 to Outlook 2010 and have found that when we reply or forward an email we get an undeliverable message with the following text. This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again later, or contact your network administrator. Unknown Error. Error is [0x80040900-0x80040900-0x0003ee]. We can create a new email and it sends fine but cannot reply or forward. We are running Exchange 2003 SP2 fully patched. I've Googled (and Binged) this and have found plenty of other people with the problem but no real answers yet. Any help is appreciated. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author.
RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade
Upgraded from 2003 but also a fresh install on another machine has the same issue. I just recently found this link. http://outlookliveanswers.com/forums/p/2671/12674.aspx The last post on the first page might be the issue... Mike From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade Did you upgrade Outlook or do a fresh office install? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Celone, Mike [mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade It is happening with internal and external messages. Also I just tried disabling Cached Mode and when I try to reply to a message I get a message window that says Unknown Error. Mike From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade I believe I have seen this when someone had an address prefix as EX instead of SMTP. Does this happen replying to both internal AND external messages? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Celone, Mike [mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade This might be a little OT but I know we are just starting out with testing Outlook 2010 and have run into an issue. We are upgrading from Outlook 2003 to Outlook 2010 and have found that when we reply or forward an email we get an undeliverable message with the following text. This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again later, or contact your network administrator. Unknown Error. Error is [0x80040900-0x80040900-0x0003ee]. We can create a new email and it sends fine but cannot reply or forward. We are running Exchange 2003 SP2 fully patched. I've Googled (and Binged) this and have found plenty of other people with the problem but no real answers yet. Any help is appreciated. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author.
RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade
After checking out our server I see we are getting an MSExchangeIS error 9693 whenever I try to send a message. Looks like we have reached our limit of 16382 Named Props in this database. I'm hesitant to increase this until I can figure out what is using up all the named properties in my database Mike From: Celone, Mike Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade Upgraded from 2003 but also a fresh install on another machine has the same issue. I just recently found this link. http://outlookliveanswers.com/forums/p/2671/12674.aspx The last post on the first page might be the issue... Mike From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade Did you upgrade Outlook or do a fresh office install? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Celone, Mike [mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade It is happening with internal and external messages. Also I just tried disabling Cached Mode and when I try to reply to a message I get a message window that says Unknown Error. Mike From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade I believe I have seen this when someone had an address prefix as EX instead of SMTP. Does this happen replying to both internal AND external messages? Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Celone, Mike [mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Possibly OT: Unable to reply or forward after Outlook 2010 Upgrade This might be a little OT but I know we are just starting out with testing Outlook 2010 and have run into an issue. We are upgrading from Outlook 2003 to Outlook 2010 and have found that when we reply or forward an email we get an undeliverable message with the following text. This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again later, or contact your network administrator. Unknown Error. Error is [0x80040900-0x80040900-0x0003ee]. We can create a new email and it sends fine but cannot reply or forward. We are running Exchange 2003 SP2 fully patched. I've Googled (and Binged) this and have found plenty of other people with the problem but no real answers yet. Any help is appreciated. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of its author.
RE: Blackberry devices Push Email
Actually with the BES Express some carriers allow you to use the BIS plans instead. This was a new change with the Express version only. T-Mobile allows you to use a BIS plan but you won't get OTA activations for your devices, they would need to be connected to the server. I know Verizon does require you to have a Enterprise plan even if you use the BES Express server. Mike -Original Message- From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry devices Push Email BIS is actually handled by Rim and works with your phone carriers. It's a portal you login to and setup your connection or you can configure Internet email right on your phone. It in turns polls the mail servers and then delivers the email to your phone. It works perfectly with OWA on Exchange 2003 - 2010. No additional charges other than how your carrier charges for Internet usage. Also pop services.. www.blackberry.com/go/vzw for example BES Express, latest version. Is completely free. If you have an Exchange server you can install it on your server or a separate server and it will sync all contacts/calendar/emails/tasks. You must have your blackberry provisioned for BES services by the cell carrier. Some charge for this; others include it. Bes professional 4.x charged 99.00 per blackberry that is no longer the case in bes express version 5. -Original Message- From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry devices Push Email BIS is Blackberry Internet Service. It will sync via your OWA portal. BES express is free so $$ shouldn't be an issue any more if that's what's stopping you from running a BES server. -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 7:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry devices Push Email Hi Steve What is BIS ? Is it possible without to push email without any BES/BIS/Blackberry servers deployed? Thanks John -Original Message- From: Koivisto, Steve [mailto:steve.koivi...@rosedmi.com] Sent: 28 May 2010 13:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry devices Push Email John, The latest version of BIS supports this. My Bold 9700 is able to send/receive email from one of my Exchange servers without being on BES. Steve -Original Message- From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 5:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry devices Push Email A quick question. Can a Blackberry device such as a BB Bold 9700 support push email without having a BES server, maybe using the BB equivilant of ActiveSync? We have a few a Windows/Symbian based devices that have push email to the phones. The Windows based ones use ActiveSync and SSL cert and the Symbian ones use Mail For Exchange and a SSL cert Thanks John ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com **
RE: Blackberry devices Push Email
I have a Bold 9700 on ATT and it doesn't do this. The ATT version has a slightly older OS 5 than the T-Mobile one though. I am on OS 5.0.0.405 whereas the T-Mo 9700 comes with OS 5.0.0.586. Could be a bug in that version. Mike -Original Message- From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 9:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry devices Push Email [Shook hijack] Speaking of the 9700 (T-Mobile), I've noticed with the new threaded SMS function, that sometimes contact names are not displayed when a text message is received, only the sending number. Yes the contacts are in my local address book and it doesn't seem to be sending carrier specific. Anyone else seeing this behavior? Shook -Original Message- From: Koivisto, Steve [mailto:steve.koivi...@rosedmi.com] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry devices Push Email John, The latest version of BIS supports this. My Bold 9700 is able to send/receive email from one of my Exchange servers without being on BES. Steve
RE: Exchange disclaimer software
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I downloaded the Code Two product and really like it. However is there a way to get it to not put it's little ad at the bottom that says Disclaimer added by CodeTwo Exchange Rules or is that just part of the trial? Mike -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 3:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange disclaimer software Take a look at http://www.codetwo.com/exchange-rules/. I played with this product early last year and it was pretty easy to implement. I'm not sure it will provide a central solution for all your servers, though. Die dulci fruere! Roger Wright ___ On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Celone, Mike mike.cel...@rfsworld.com wrote: We are currently running Exchange 2003 and need to start adding disclaimers to our outgoing emails. I started looking into software for this but there are so many of them out there I don't know where to start. I have looked at GFI Mail Essentials already (just the free product for doing disclaimers) and while it worked it made a mess of large email exchanges. A few things I am looking for in a package: 1. We have multiple SMTP servers around the globe so a package that I can centrally manage all the servers would be great. 2. The ability to identify a disclaimer has been added already and will not add any new ones. 3. The ability to apply a disclaimer for a specific group of people. What are others using out there? Suggestions are greatly appreciated. Mike Celone
Exchange disclaimer software
We are currently running Exchange 2003 and need to start adding disclaimers to our outgoing emails. I started looking into software for this but there are so many of them out there I don't know where to start. I have looked at GFI Mail Essentials already (just the free product for doing disclaimers) and while it worked it made a mess of large email exchanges. A few things I am looking for in a package: 1. We have multiple SMTP servers around the globe so a package that I can centrally manage all the servers would be great. 2. The ability to identify a disclaimer has been added already and will not add any new ones. 3. The ability to apply a disclaimer for a specific group of people. What are others using out there? Suggestions are greatly appreciated. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com
Nesting query based distribution groups
Is it possible to nest a query based distribution group inside a universal group? We are using Exchange 2003 SP2 in a Windows 2003 Native forest. I thought I read somewhere in the past you could do it but can't figure it out now. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com
RE: Phantom recipient undeliverable
Somebody has a delegate setup in their mailbox. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com From: chipsh...@comcast.net [mailto:chipsh...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Phantom recipient undeliverable Exchange 2003 SP 2. Outlook 2003. User sends meeting request to recipients. One accepts and responds and immediately gets a Sys Admin undeliverable notice referencing a user who has not had an account on our network for 4-5 years and who is no longer listed anywhere in Active Directory as near as I can tell. This phantom user was not listed on the original meeting request. This one has me scratching my head. Any ideas? Thanks.
RE: Messages awaiting directory lookup
Anyone? I have some more information on this. I am consistently getting the following error on this server in the applications log. The categorizer is unable to initialize. The error code is '0x80070057 : 0x0001' Google does not turn up much information. Mike From: Celone, Mike [mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Messages awaiting directory lookup Hi All, I have an Exchange server that is queuing up messages in the Messages awaiting directory lookup queue. I've checked all the usual stuff (DCDiag, permissions,etc) but not having any luck getting it to send the messages. I have been going through the Microsoft KB article 251746 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/251746 and so far nothing has gotten it to release them. I am getting the following error in the event log The transport configuration type 2 for the directory entry with DN or GUID CN=MICROSOFT MTA,CN=DK-HILEX01,CN=SERVERS,CN=DENMARK ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS,CN=RFS,CN=MICROSOFT EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=RFSWORLD,DC=NET is not one of the supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in the identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 23 217] (8) Anyone seen this before? I'm guessing this has something to do with it but not finding much information on Google about it. I was told before I started all this that the site had lost power and the UPS failed so it could be something corrupt on the server that is causing this. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com
Messages awaiting directory lookup
Hi All, I have an Exchange server that is queuing up messages in the Messages awaiting directory lookup queue. I've checked all the usual stuff (DCDiag, permissions,etc) but not having any luck getting it to send the messages. I have been going through the Microsoft KB article 251746 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/251746 and so far nothing has gotten it to release them. I am getting the following error in the event log The transport configuration type 2 for the directory entry with DN or GUID CN=MICROSOFT MTA,CN=DK-HILEX01,CN=SERVERS,CN=DENMARK ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS,CN=RFS,CN=MICROSOFT EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=RFSWORLD,DC=NET is not one of the supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in the identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 23 217] (8) Anyone seen this before? I'm guessing this has something to do with it but not finding much information on Google about it. I was told before I started all this that the site had lost power and the UPS failed so it could be something corrupt on the server that is causing this. Mike Celone Manager of Information Systems Radio Frequency Systems v. 203-630-3311 x1031 f. 203-634-2027 m. 203-537-2406 OnNet: 28971031 mike.cel...@rfsworld.com blocked::mailto:mike.cel...@rfsworld.com
