Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1

[Charles Whitby]

Our company recently relocated, and we moved our exchange server from one
subnet to another.  We of course gave the Exchange 5.5 server a new IP
address and made sure WINS has been updated on our NT4 network.  Internal
e-mail works correctly.

We have a Checkpoint FW-1 protecting us fromt he bad guys.  When the
firewall is disabled mail to/from the 'net works fine.  When enabled, no
joy; can't send in or out.

I checked the rules on the firewall (after making the appropriate address
changes within its databases) and they look like they should work, but they
don't.

Any hints of other places to look?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1

[Charles Whitby]

Our ISP points our e-mail to an external address.  Our Cisco router (via the
magic of NAT) takes those packets and forwards them internally to thye
correct address.  This is working fine UNTIL we fire up the firewall.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1


You have an MX record for your exchange server.  Did you have that changed
to point to the IP address?

-Original Message-
From:   Charles Whitby [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Monday, November 12, 2001 6:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Moving  Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1

Our company recently relocated, and we moved our exchange server
from one
subnet to another.  We of course gave the Exchange 5.5 server a new
IP
address and made sure WINS has been updated on our NT4 network.
Internal
e-mail works correctly.

We have a Checkpoint FW-1 protecting us fromt he bad guys.  When the
firewall is disabled mail to/from the 'net works fine.  When
enabled, no
joy; can't send in or out.

I checked the rules on the firewall (after making the appropriate
address
changes within its databases) and they look like they should work,
but they
don't.

Any hints of other places to look?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1

[Charles Whitby]

Yes, I did that.  Still no joy.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1


I think you are looking in the right place. The FW.
Since the mail works when the FW is down, the NAT and MX stuff is
probably OK.

Have you tried deleting all the FW rules relating to SMTP and recreating
them?

-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 5:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1


Our ISP points our e-mail to an external address.  Our Cisco router (via
the magic of NAT) takes those packets and forwards them internally to
thye correct address.  This is working fine UNTIL we fire up the
firewall.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1


You have an MX record for your exchange server.  Did you have that
changed to point to the IP address?

-Original Message-
From:   Charles Whitby [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Monday, November 12, 2001 6:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Moving  Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1

Our company recently relocated, and we moved our exchange server
from one
subnet to another.  We of course gave the Exchange 5.5 server a
new IP
address and made sure WINS has been updated on our NT4 network.
Internal
e-mail works correctly.

We have a Checkpoint FW-1 protecting us fromt he bad guys.  When
the
firewall is disabled mail to/from the 'net works fine.  When
enabled, no
joy; can't send in or out.

I checked the rules on the firewall (after making the
appropriate address
changes within its databases) and they look like they should
work, but they
don't.

Any hints of other places to look?

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Change Exchange IP

[Charles Whitby]

If you're running OWA, you may need to update that.

Also, we have a web application that enables a potential customer to send
e-mails to our CS department from the web site.  If you have something like
that you may have to update the SMTP settings in IIS (or whatever you use)
on your web server.

Also if your Exchange box is running the IMS service and you're being NAted
by a firewall or router you will need to update those settings.

Just recently did this, so the memories are fresh (but almost healed)

Hope it helps.

-Original Message-
From: Bao, Gang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Change Exchange IP


We plan to change the IP number of our EXCHANGE server. Is there any thing
that I should be care of? I know changing the name of Exchange will create
problem, but haven't heard any on changing IP.

I would be grateful if you could give any advice and comments.

Thanks.

Bao




 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Change Exchange IP

[Charles Whitby]

We have OWA set up on a computer in our DMZ.  I beleive the only change I
had to make on it was inform it of the new WINS server address so it could
find our Exchange box.

We have a Cisco 2500 series router connecting us to the 'net that is also
NATing our exchange box.  Our public e-mail address is resolved by our ISP
to the WAN port of this router: the router then takes anything to do with
e-mail, ports 25 and 110, and sends them to the proper internal private
address (via our Checkpoint FW1).

We don't have any kind of VPN set up so I can't help you there.

Hope this helps.

-Original Message-
From: Diane Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Change Exchange IP


Oh good, so I can pick your brain huh :-)   I'm in process of doing this and
it's not working.  What settings do I need to update to use OWA through a
Firewall and a NAT.  I read a MS doc that says to static route 2 ports on
the exchange server, how does this affect my internal LAN users?

Would this also affect my telecommuter users who VPN/PPTP into my email
server?  

TIA,
Diane

-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 5:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Change Exchange IP


If you're running OWA, you may need to update that.

Also, we have a web application that enables a potential customer to send
e-mails to our CS department from the web site.  If you have something like
that you may have to update the SMTP settings in IIS (or whatever you use)
on your web server.

Also if your Exchange box is running the IMS service and you're being NAted
by a firewall or router you will need to update those settings.

Just recently did this, so the memories are fresh (but almost healed)

Hope it helps.

-Original Message-
From: Bao, Gang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Change Exchange IP


We plan to change the IP number of our EXCHANGE server. Is there any thing
that I should be care of? I know changing the name of Exchange will create
problem, but haven't heard any on changing IP.

I would be grateful if you could give any advice and comments.

Thanks.

Bao




 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Palm Pilot Devices

[Charles Whitby]

The apps that come with any of the Palm devices should let you synch with
OL2000 quite nicely.

I do it all the time, and I have a IIIxe.

-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 1:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Palm Pilot Devices


This is a bit off topic, but the company president is looking to buy a
hand held electronic scheduler/calendar.  He will be using Outlook 2000 on
his desktop and would like something that will interface with OL 2000.  I
would  appreciate any suggestions from the list, since I am not
experienced in the Palm Pilot technology.

Thanks in advance,

JRiley

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Internet mail question

[Charles Whitby]

I currently have to active connections to the 'net: one through provider A
(whom we've had for some time but are phasing out) and one through provider
B (whom we're phasing in).  Both have active connections tot he network
segment where the unprotected interface of my firewall lives.

E-mail comes and goes just fine through Provider A when I set its router as
the default gateway on my firewall.

When I set up provider B's router as my default gateway I can send e-mails
fine, but can't receive them.

I know that the required DNS changes showing my new addresses haven't
filtered through yet.  My question is, when I'm using my new provider as my
default route to the 'net and some one sends an e-mail to me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], shouldn't it still be able to come in via my old (and
still activeand connected) internet connection and be delivered to my
exchange server?

Configuration:

Exposed firewalla.b.c.180
/29 network
Old connection (A)  a.b.c.179  /29
network
New connection  (B) a.b.c.177 /29
network

I'm probably missing something totally obvious here, but hey, a chance to
learn is a chance to learn.

Thanks.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Internet mail question

[Charles Whitby]

My MX record still point to address assigned using the block of addresses we
had with the old provider.  These still still be valid because the circuit
is up. And our firewall and the Cisco router NATs the true internal address
to a valid public address.  So it seems that I should still be able to at
least recieve mail through the old circuit until the DNS changes settle in.

But I'm apparently still overlooking something.

Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Internet mail question


It all depends where your MX record points to...the Dns does have to
propagate to see the new server/address...

-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Internet mail question


I currently have to active connections to the 'net: one through provider A
(whom we've had for some time but are phasing out) and one through provider
B (whom we're phasing in).  Both have active connections tot he network
segment where the unprotected interface of my firewall lives.

E-mail comes and goes just fine through Provider A when I set its router as
the default gateway on my firewall.

When I set up provider B's router as my default gateway I can send e-mails
fine, but can't receive them.

I know that the required DNS changes showing my new addresses haven't
filtered through yet.  My question is, when I'm using my new provider as my
default route to the 'net and some one sends an e-mail to me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], shouldn't it still be able to come in via my old (and
still activeand connected) internet connection and be delivered to my
exchange server?

Configuration:

Exposed firewalla.b.c.180
/29 network
Old connection (A)  a.b.c.179  /29
network
New connection  (B) a.b.c.177 /29
network

I'm probably missing something totally obvious here, but hey, a chance to
learn is a chance to learn.

Thanks.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Timesheets

[Charles Whitby]

Title: RE: Change Of IPs



"Building Applications with MS Outloook 98" from the M$ Press showed 
examples of doing stuff like that.  I'm sure the tools in OL2K work the 
same.
 

  -Original Message-From: Clayton 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 
  5:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Timesheets
  
  Has anyone out there ever implemented a 
  timesheet solution within Outlook/Exchange? What sort of customization is 
  required, and what kind of resources are available 
  (books) on building apps within Outlook that do not go to heavy into code. I 
  think Stu may have posted something on this for me as we changed SMTP domains 
  recently, and I couldn't post, but I haven't spotted anything on the list, or 
  on the site archives.
   
  TIAClaytonList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Server based AV solutions for Exchange 5.5 on NT 4

[Charles Whitby]

We are a fairly small company (approx. 70 users) using Exchange 5.5 on NT
4.0 on our inside network and running OWA on another box in our DMZ. We are
running IMS on the Exchange box which is NAT'ed by our router (and also
guarded by our Checkpoint firewall.  We're running NAV CE on our desktops.

I would appreciate suggestions (and or horror stories) on AV soutions for
Exchange in such a setting.

If you don't want to clutter up the group then direct (and uninfected)
e-mails would be welcome.

Thanks

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Difficulties resolving some external e-mail addresses

[Charles Whitby]

I've noticed that there are some outgoing e-mail messages bound for
recipients at certain e-mail addresses (most noticably addresses at MSN and
AOL) that seem to sit in the outbound queue of the IMS for extended periods
of time before being delivered.  They show a condition of [host unreachable]
while they are in the queue.  However, I can ping and do nslookups on the
sites and get responses.  The messages almost always eventually get
delivered, but it may take hours.  The remaining (and vast majority) of our
e-mails go through fine.

I would appreciate any insights or hints as to what to look for.

Thanks.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Database size

[Charles Whitby]

Don't forget goodies like cc:Mail (where the PO's could live equally well on
a NetWare, NT, or Unix boxes and talk to each other quite nicely)

And servers that didn't require a reboot every time you loaded a new NLM and
stayed up months at a time (I had one that ran for 18 months straight w/o a
single hiccup)

Yeah, things are much better now..



-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size


Yes?  Some of us are still stuck in those days.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size


ah yes, the happy days of Cheyenne and Novell.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  
Our new 2001 Miata:  
Tiggercam:  
-
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain, but if
the plural of mouse is mice, wouldn't the plural of spouse be spice?" 
-


-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size


The last time I remember any kind of success with ArcServe was when Computer
Associates didn't own it and it was running on Novell.  Ever since Computer
Associates got involved, it has become unreliable garbage.

So as far as my experience has been  IT SUCKS!

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size


You mention ArcserveIT. What has your experience been with the product. Mine
has been nothing short of consistent pain and frustration. I believe I have
gone through all of their upgrades with the hope that the new version will
be the fix all. I actually remember them referring to the 2K ver. as the
"Holy Grail". Not so I tell you...:(

JC

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size


Well I wouldn't say I prefer BE.  I'd say whatever is cost effective for
you.  ArcWreckIt is not cost effective anytime to anyone in my opinion.
Although, there are those that have somehow been successful with it.  NT
Backup works just fine.  It depends on the needs of your company.  You'll
want to address all of the data you backup, not just exchange and
restorability will also need to be taken into account.

With exchange, I perform online backups nightly.  You might want to check
out the DR whitepapers on the MS site for clarification.

Any other questions...  Ask away.

D



-Original Message-
From: Julie Lienemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size


What are your backup suggestions? I notice you refer to Backup Exec, online
backups etc.

Thanks Julie

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size


400 users or a 1000 users, it doesn't particularly matter.  If you have the
disk space, leave the database alone.

As an example, a rater recent one I might add, I ran eseutil (the hard
repair) on a DB the other night.  Now granted, they didn't have any backups
so they were already up sh!t creek without a paddle.  When all was said and
done, they wound up losing emails and some attachments.  This utility is a
very nasty beast, so one should exercise extreme caution when running it.

Of course, they now have fully functional and reliable backups.  For some
reason, some lovely admin thought you should use BE with the Exchange Agent,
backup all of the exchsrvr directories, do the online backups, do brick
level backups, and last but not least have circular logging enabled.
Needless to say, sparks were shooting out of mine eyes...



-Original Message-
From: Nick Bradford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Database size


err - we were supporting in excess of 400 users on one box

If you have a fairly static environment then there is no reason that the db
would blow out...  The original mail that sparked all this described a
situation where 50 odd mailboxes had been removed from the store and the db
did not shrink.  This is to be expected because the online defrag cannot
reclaim white space from the db. The only way to reclaim that space (should
you want to :) ) is to run an offline.

Nick 



-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange

Adding Corporate/workgroup service to OL2000

[Charles Whitby]

I have a machine that on which OL2000 was originally configured for Internet
mail only.  I want to add the corporate/workgroup services so I can use it
to connect to a local exchange box but I cannot get OL2000 to let me add the
service.  I even removed and reinstalled OL2000 (and even all of Office2000)
with no luck.  Looks like there's still a registry setting somewhere taking
precedent.

Any hints would be appreciated.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Adding Corporate/workgroup service to OL2000

[Charles Whitby]

Yep, there it is.

Can't believe I missed that.

Thanks to all who repsonded

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding Corporate/workgroup service to OL2000


Tools-->Options-->Mail Services-->Reconfigure Mail Support.

Might require the CD or network installation point.

William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+

-Original Message-
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Adding Corporate/workgroup service to OL2000


I have a machine that on which OL2000 was originally configured for Internet
mail only.  I want to add the corporate/workgroup services so I can use it
to connect to a local exchange box but I cannot get OL2000 to let me add the
service.  I even removed and reinstalled OL2000 (and even all of Office2000)
with no luck.  Looks like there's still a registry setting somewhere taking
precedent.

Any hints would be appreciated.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5

[Charles Whitby]

Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box.

The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back
them up.  However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file
to run at a given time via the AT command.

I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done.
Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or
point me to a source that shows.

Thanks in advance.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5

[Charles Whitby]

Thanks to all.

-Original Message-
From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange
5.5


Here follows a copy of the batch file that we use.

you will need to modify the server name and may be where you put the backup
log.


rem ** 21/3/99 Backup Written by Mark Newton
rem ** This will backup the information store and directory service on
ESLSERVER01
rem ** modified 10/5/01 by AN Bingham for EXCHANGE-UK
ntbackup backup DS \\EXCHANGE-UK IS \\EXCHANGE-UK /v /d "Exchange-uk IS-DS"
/b /hc:on /t Normal /l c:\winnt\backup.log /e
ntbackup eject
exit





Kevan




-Original Message-----
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 February 2002 16:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: NTBACKUP command line parameters for backing up Exchange 5.5


Running Exchange 5.5 on an NT4SP6 box.

The GUI version of NTBACKUP recognizes the Exchange IS and DS and will back
them up.  However, I would like to put the proper commands in a batch file
to run at a given time via the AT command.

I've STFW'd and RTFM'd and haven't been abl;e to find how this is done.
Could someone either show some examples of how they may have done it or
point me to a source that shows.

Thanks in advance.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



*
This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service
*


*
This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service
*


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Info store to mailbox ratio

[Charles Whitby]

Title: Message



67 mailboxes, 3GB 
store.
(yeah, I know..small 
potatoes)

  -Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 
  3:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Info 
  store to mailbox ratio
  our is 
  1300 mailboxes/ 22 GB store (with warning at 50 MB, stop 
  sending/receiving at 100 MB)
  

-Original Message-From: Ken Leyba 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:17 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Info store 
to mailbox ratio
~1300 Mailboxes @ ~40Gb and fighting management to implement 
limits.
 
-Ken LeybaWindows/Exchange System 
Administratorhttp://www.csudh.edu/exchangeCalifornia State 
University Dominguez HillsPhone: 310-243-2815 Fax: 
310-516-3877

  -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 
  9:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Info 
  store to mailbox ratio
  
  Just curious what everyones Info store to mailbox ratio is?  
   
  Ours:   524 mailboxes / 31gb info store
   
  Talk to somone's whose was 72 mailbox / 47 gb info 
  store.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 Question....

[Charles Whitby]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question


Does anyone know of a bouncer mailbox on the internet that I can use to test
my sending and recieving. I used to know of one, but now it seems as if it
takes hours to reply to my test message, not really a good thing.
 
Thanks 
John Majetic


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: RE: sharing outlook

[Charles Whitby]

Net Folders (OutLook 2K or lower)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RE: sharing outlook


There is no exchange involved. We have a small LAN. I have my address 
book where there are many address and their email. I want to give 
access that address book to some one else through the network without 
loging into my computer. How can that be done?
Yas

- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, March 4, 2002 9:26 pm
Subject: RE: sharing outlook

> If you are connected via MAPI to an Exchange Server, you can share 
> mailboxcontainers by changing permissions.
> 
> Right click on contacts.
> Properties -->Permissions.
> 
> Is this what you mean?
> 
> William
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: sharing outlook
> 
> 
> How can I share my outlook profile(address list) to some one else 
> in 
> the same office who is connected to the same LAN?
> Yas
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Re: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all

[Charles Whitby]

And a true Southerner knows it isn't pronounced as it looks...

On Feb 6, 2008 10:21 AM, Campbell, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
>
>  And chitterlings…….
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:10 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all
>
>
>
>
>
> Not just red-eye gravy, but what about milk gravy?   MM Mmmm!
>
> And only a TRUE southerner would know about pokeweed, horehound candy,
> sorghum, and breeches...
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Tom Strader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:20 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OT: YEE HAW: I'm Southern Y'all
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * Southernisms:*
>
> 1.) Only a true Southerner knows the difference between a hissie fit and a
> conniption, and that you don't "HAVE" them, -- you "PITCH" them.
>
> 2.) Only a true Southerner knows how many fish, collard greens, turnip
> greens, peas, beans, etc. make up "a mess."
>
> 3.) Only a true Southerner can show or point out to you the general
> direction of "yonder."
>
> 4.) Only a true Southerner knows exactly how long "directly" is - as in:  
> "Going
> to town, be back directly."
>
> 5.) All true Southerners, even babies, know that "Gimme some sugar" is not
> a request for the white, granular sweet substance that sits in a pretty
> little bowl on the middle of the table.
>
> 6.) All true Southerners know exactly when "by and by" is. They might not
> use the term, but they know the concept well.
>
> 7.) Only a true Southerner knows instinctively that the best gesture of
> solace for a neighbor who's got trouble is a plate of hot fried chicken
> and a big bowl of cold potato salad. (If the neighbor's trouble is a real
> crisis, they also know to add a large banana puddin'!)
>
> 8.) Only true Southerners grow up knowing the difference between "right
> near" and "a right far piece." They also know that "just down the road"
> can be 1 mile or 20.
>
> 9.) Only a true Southerner both knows and understands the difference
> between a redneck, a good ol' boy, and po' white trash.
>
> 10.) No true Southerner would ever assume that the car with the flashing
> turn signal is actually going to make a turn.
>
> 11.) A true Southerner knows that "fixin'" can be used as a noun, a verb,
> or an adverb.
>
> 12.) Only a true Southerner knows that the term "booger" can be a resident
> of the nose, a descriptive, as in "that ol' booger," a first name or
> something that jumps out at you in the dark and scares you senseless.
>
> 13.) Only true Southerners make friends while standing in lines. We don't
> do "queues", we do "lines," and when we're "in line," we talk to everybody!
>
> 14.) Put 100 true Southerners in a room and half of them will discover they're
> related, even if only by marriage.
>
> 15.) True Southerners never refer to one person as "y'all."
>
> 16.) True Southerners know grits come from corn and how to eat them.
>
> 17.) Every true Southerner knows tomatoes with eggs, bacon, grits, and
> coffee are perfectly wonderful; that redeye gravy is also a breakfast
> food; and that fried green tomatoes are not a breakfast food.
>
> 18.) When you hear someone say, "Well, I caught myself lookin' .. ," you
> know you are in the presence of a genuine Southerner!
>
> 19.) Only true Southerners say "sweet tea" and "sweet milk." Sweet tea
> indicates the need for sugar and lots of it - we do not like our tea
> unsweetened. "Sweet milk" means you don't want buttermilk.
>
> 20.) And a true Southerner knows you don't scream obscenities at little
> old ladies who drive 30 MPH on the freeway. You just say, "Bless her heart"
> and go your own way.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **
>
> Note:
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and
> confidential and
> protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended
> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
> to
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>
> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
>
> **
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

hello

[Charles Whitby]

index-linked interest rate; inflation-proof interest rate hey!
how are you doing recently?
I have found a trustworthy company that have sales certification and
all business license. i can guarantee it is the best company i had met
before
I received  iPhone4, just 5 days. No doubt. I am very pleased to be
able to share with you,
hope you can visit  : www.ioffec.com
maintain a good momentum of growth in the national economy

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Re: ios6.1 woes

[Charles Whitby]

Yeah, there are YouTube videos showing how to bypass the iPhone screen lock.

Maybe Apple has contracted some former Windows security guys to do some
work on iOS...

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan <
jderrenbac...@keitercpa.com> wrote:

>  It would be nice to have an ETA from Apple so I can make the decision on
> what to do.
>
> Is it 24 hours away or 24 days away? 
>
> ** **
>
> I heard 6.1 also makes iPhone users passwords irrelevant. 
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:29 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ios6.1 woes
>
> ** **
>
> Apple has identified a fix and will make it available in an upcoming
> software update
>
> Ref: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4532 
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Michael B. Smith 
> wrote:
>
>  TO the best of my knowledge, that information is not public.
>
>  
>
> *From:* Kleciak, Clint D A7IT [mailto:clint.klec...@cigna.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:52 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: ios6.1 woes
>
>  
>
> Anyone know if this effects 2007 as well or is it just 2010.  I only see
> reference to 2010.
>
>  
>
> thanks
>
>  
>
> ___ 
>
> Clint Kleciak
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Confidential, unpublished property of CIGNA. Do not duplicate or
> distribute. Use and distribution limited solely to authorized personnel. ©
> Copyright 2013 CIGNA
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com ]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:25 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ios6.1 woes
>
>  
>
> I believe they're working on it and will have a fix when it's ready like
> iOS 4.0.1 which fixed a similar issue.
>
>  
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Kuehn, Shannon  wrote:*
> ***
>
> Yes but it still showed up on American phones.  4S and 5 in Chicago that I
> witnessed.
>
>  
>
> Apple is not promising a fix and they’re offering no comment.  Just
> annoying…
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* Adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:16 PM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ios6.1 woes
>
>  
>
> I don't believe Apple promised a fix for the Exchange logging issue in
> 6.1.1.
>
> I believe it was only targeted for the European connection problem.
> The ZDNet article referred to in Steve Ens' blog confirms that:
> http://www.zdnet.com/apple-releases-ios-6-1-1-after-eu-network-bugs-711140/
> 
>
>  
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Kuehn, Shannon  wrote:*
> ***
>
> You are correct.  Totally bogus that Apple has yet to truthfully address
> such a flaw.  I think I was really optimistic it took care of the Exchange
> issue.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:30 PM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ios6.1 woes
>
>  
>
> D'oh!
>
>  
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Michael B. Smith 
> wrote:
>
> I’ve confirmed. 6.1.1 does NOT address this issue.
>
>  
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:54 PM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ios6.1 woes
>
>  
>
> http://thoughtsofanidlemind.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/ios6-activesync/
>
>  
>
> The link here would disagree, but maybe they have released something more
> in the last 12 hours...
>
>  
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Kuehn, Shannon  wrote:*
> ***
>
> Call me crazy (many do), but I saw it with my own eyes on 2 iPhone 5
> phones.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:35 AM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ios6.1 woes
>
>  
>
> The fix  is only for the 4s.  No other phone is getting it currently**
> **
>
>  
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Dan Hyatt  wrote:
>
> I actually installed it on my Verizon iphone 4S.
>
> So far so good.
>
> > From: mich...@smithcons.com
>
>
> > To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
> > Subject: RE: ios6.1 woes
>
> > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:47:51 +
>
>
> >
> > 6.1.1 is a VodaPhone fix. That's all :)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 5:57 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: ios6.1 woes
> >
> > Not showing for me yet
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Kuehn, Shannon 
> wrote:
> > > Have your users go into Settings, General, Software Update. Make sure
> > > they’re connected via wi-fi and you will see 6.1.1 in the update queue.
> > > Have them download + install and hopefully (*fingers crossed*)
> > > everything is back to