Re: Is it possible..

2002-07-03 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 


Nah, we got bought out by another company that uses Notes. Don't get
me wrong, it's a powerful product by damn it's horribly written and
nightmare to use/deploy/manage!!
Anyway, thanks for your suggestions - I was able to empty out Calendar
but Notes Migration tool blows up nevertheless..
Off to Notes mailing list..
See ya!

Dimitri Limanovski
SCT/GES Cambridge
System/Network Manager
617-452-0400
www.sct.com
Innovation - Speed - Excellence



|-+--->
| |   "Matthew|
| |   Carpenter"  |
| |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   r.com>  |
| |   |
| |   07/03/2002 01:11|
| |   PM  |
| |   Please respond  |
| |   to "MS-Exchange |
| |   Admin Issues"   |
| |   |
|-+--->
  
>---|
  |
   |
  |To:  "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |
  |cc: 
   |
  |Subject: Re: Is it possible..   
   |
  
>---|



Sorry, I misread that. Must be day before a holiday. You truly have
odd
management. Do they work for Lotus Notes?

- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Is it possible..


"The rest of the normal world???"

I have not heard of anyone migrating that direction, sorry

- Original Message -
From: "Dimitri Limanovski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:36 AM
Subject: Is it possible..


Does anyone know if it's possible to delete all entries in user's
Calendar?
Sadly, unlike the rest of the normal world, we're migrating from
Exchange to
Notes and I'm having problem migrating one user over.
Notes Migration tool blows up while migrating items in his Calendar
and I'd
like to export it out to PST first and then delete either the whole
folder
or it's contents, if possible..
Server: Exchange5.5 SP4, client: Outlook2000 SR2.
Thanks in advance!



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm






List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Is it possible..

2002-07-03 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Does anyone know if it's possible to delete all entries in user's
Calendar?
Sadly, unlike the rest of the normal world, we're migrating from
Exchange to
Notes and I'm having problem migrating one user over.
Notes Migration tool blows up while migrating items in his Calendar
and I'd
like to export it out to PST first and then delete either the whole
folder
or it's contents, if possible..
Server: Exchange5.5 SP4, client: Outlook2000 SR2.
Thanks in advance!



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Lost Custom Recipient

2002-05-03 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Created Custom Recipient to forward all mail to that address. Gave it a
standard name (Auto Forward for user_id), filled in all user info and
clicked OK.
Now for the life of me I cannot find it. Not in Hidden Recipients, not in
Recipients, nowhere! I first thought that I accidentally hit Esc instead of
Enter, but when I try to re-create it, I get an error that "The email
already exists in this organization".
Does anybody know what's going on?
Thanks!

P.S. Exchange 5.5 SP4+hotfixes on WinNT4.0 SP6a+hotfixes

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Admin hanging

2002-04-24 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: RE: Admin hanging



Is 
it Exchange Admin on your workstation or on the 
server?
I had this problem 
when Admin was installed on my local machine and was hanging every time I'd try 
to delete mailbox or CR - ended up reinstalling it from the 
CD.
 
Dimitri
P.S. You gotta 
love Notes formatting HTML message!

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:45 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Admin 
  hanging
  Exchange 5.5 sp4 I can delete a DL quickly 
  -Original Message- From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:32 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  Re: Admin hanging 
  I got the wrong idea when I saw the subject... 
  Is this 5.5 or 2000?  How quick does it move if you were 
  to delete a DL or CR? 
  ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct 
  dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com 
  "One man's ceiling is another man's floor" 
  |-+> | 
  |   
  "MHR(Michael | | 
  |   
  Ross)"   | 
  | 
  |   
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| | 
  |    
  | | 
  |   04/24/2002 10:20 
  | | 
  |   
  AM   
  | | 
  |   Please respond 
  to| | 
  |   
  "MS-Exchange | | 
  |   Admin 
  Issues"    | | 
  |    
  | |-+> 
    
  >--|
    
  |  
  |
    |   
  To:   "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  |
    |   
  cc:    
  |
    |   Subject:  
  Admin 
  hanging    
  |
    
  >--|
  The Admin program on  one server hangs when i try to 
  delete a mailbox.. any ideas? 
  Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 
  17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 
  60477 MCSE MS Exchange 
  Administrator 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4

2002-04-23 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Not so pretty here. VAPI puke on me twice, allowing viruses inbound.
SP for GroupShield has fixed a lot of issues but I'd still pick Antigen or
Trend Micro any day over McAfee..

Just my $.02 worth.

-Original Message-
From: Van Otterloo, Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4


Groupsheild has worked great for us.  Simple install and it has been
blocking a lot of viruses.  I have no problems with it.

Brad Van Otterloo, EE, MCSE on Win NT 4.0, MCP+Internet
Network Administrator/Controls Engineer
Diversified Plastics Corporation


-Original Message-
From: Richardson, Roy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 SP4


Any gotchas anyone one had with running McAfee GroupShield 5.0 on Exchange
5.5 SP4?  Management has backed me into the corner and I am forced to
finally install some type of anti-virus on the Email server.  Any tips,
tricks, hints, or allegations would be appreciated.

Roy Richardson
Webmaster/System Administrator
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000

2002-04-11 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

I thought you'd still have to add additional email to every user's SMTP
address for rerouted domain: ie, route all @abc.com to @xyz.com so I'd have
to add additional SMTP address for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to already existing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTP address..
Unless you forward everything over to sendmail box and setup aliases on it..

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000


That was easy. In Exchange admin, Connections, IMS, on the routing tab I
enabled "Reroute incoming SMTP mail...". Then by pressing "Add" I
entered the domain, and chose the option "Should be rerouted to this
domain" and entered the primary domain that I use for all email. I had
about thirty domains on one server all routing this way. 
This works for inbound only. 
I found it very useful as we kept acquiring domains and I was able to
ensure to management that the domains would work for inbound. If a
certain user needed to send email with a different domain from the
primary (different project or division) I could change it manually. 
If I could do this for Exchange 2000 without having to enter individual
addresses to each user for each domain then I would be very happy. 
Hope this helps,
Simon.



-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 11 April 2002 17:48
Posted To: Exchange List
Conversation: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000
Subject: RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000


Just curios: how did you achieve this in 5.5 without adding additional
SMTP address?

-Original Message-
From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000


Hello,
In Exchange 5.5 I could have one domain mapped to another, so
@domaina.com would automatically go to @domainb.com,
without having to add the second domain to everyone's SMTP email
address. Very useful when the company wanted all of their domains to
work for inbound email and also meant I didn't have to modify every
account each time a new one was bought. However despite lots of research
I can't seem to find that feature on Exchange 2000. Am I missing
something obvious? Thanks, Simon Butler.

--
Simon Butler, SysAdmin
Radiant Real-Time, Bracknell, UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)1344 742802 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000

2002-04-11 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Just curios: how did you achieve this in 5.5 without adding additional SMTP
address?

-Original Message-
From: Simon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Multiple Domains in Exchange 2000


Hello,
In Exchange 5.5 I could have one domain mapped to another, so
@domaina.com would automatically go to @domainb.com,
without having to add the second domain to everyone's SMTP email
address. Very useful when the company wanted all of their domains to
work for inbound email and also meant I didn't have to modify every
account each time a new one was bought. However despite lots of research
I can't seem to find that feature on Exchange 2000. Am I missing
something obvious?
Thanks,
Simon Butler.

--
Simon Butler, SysAdmin
Radiant Real-Time, Bracknell, UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 (0)1344 742802 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA Failed to get to your inbox

2002-04-01 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

No offense, but aren't you a little behind on service packs?
Exchange is up to SP4 plus various hot fixes, NT4.0 is up to SP6a +
post-SP6a rollup..
Maybe this is what's causing this?

-Original Message-
From: Rick Radzville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA Failed to get to your inbox


Salutations learned gurus,

I re-enabled OWA today, and trying to login, I get this error message, 
"OWA Failed to get to your inbox". The IIS server(4.0, no SP) is on the 
same box as the Exchange server(5.5, SP2). Settings on the IIS server 
allow anonymous logon and NTLM. Can anybody provide some guidance on this?

Thank you,
Rick


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange server reboot simple q

2002-04-01 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Only when I apply hotfixes or service packs. 
No need to reboot it once a month - keeping a clean, updated system will too
make wonders for network stability.

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q


I cold-boot my entire network once a month.. it works wonders for network
stability.


Thanks!

Joe Irvine
Director of Information Technology
The Business Office, Inc.
(609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860
www.tbopayroll.com


-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange server reboot simple q


Just curious-- how often do people reboot their exchange servers?  Or do
you?  Our exchange server has been up for 7 months straight now w/o a
reboot. I am wondering if it would be a good idea to reboot it every now
and then-- free up any memory leakages, etc..  Is it necessary, or can I
let it just keep chugging away until it is necessary?  Any input,
thoughts, etc. would be great.  Thanks.

paul green
seattle


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Heres one for you!

2002-03-19 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: Message



I thought "borked" 
was official admin phrase?

  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:04 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Heres one for 
  you!
  Definitely sounds NOS related to me. Try re-applying SPx for your NOS 
  and see if that changes anything. Sounds like something got horked (official 
  admin phrase) at initial install. If you're getting API failures, the DLL(s) 
  causing the problem might continue to degrade until null function occurs. This 
  is not uncommon, but is rare.
   
  What 
  type of Hardware is this running on? Is it in the WHCL?
  -Rick
  
  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 
  11:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Heres one 
  for you!
  After saving an 
  exchange server with a disaster recovery all seems to be working well, except 
  Im getting this error message
   
  Event ID 8250 
  MSExchangeAL
   
  The Win32 API call 
  'DsGetDCNameW' returned error code [0x862] The specified component could not 
  be found in the configuration information.  The service could not be 
  initialized.  Make sure that the operating system was installed properly. 
  
   
   
   
  I have found 
  nothing on mskb, or eventid.net so I submitted it. All seems to be running 
  well, this only occurs at bootup along with a MAD.EXE all servers in use 
  error, but then everything initializes and runs fine. 
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Confirm: OWA from DMZ<->Exchange from LAN

2002-03-15 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Yeah, that's the way it is right now but the company that purchased us would
not allow any access to machines on the LAN.
So it's either on DMZ or nowhere at all.. Welcome to the corporate world!

P.S. But anyway, is this a correct config?

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Confirm: OWA from DMZ<->Exchange from LAN


You've poked so many useful holes on one side that you've compromised the
full functionality of what would be a DMZ.

Why not just open 443 (HTTP over SSL) right through and put the OWA server
inside?

Just my opinion, of course.

William


-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Confirm: OWA from DMZ<->Exchange from LAN


Meaning..?

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Confirm: OWA from DMZ<->Exchange from LAN


You, sir, no longer have a DMZ.


-----Original Message-
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Confirm: OWA from DMZ<->Exchange from LAN


I just want to confirm that (as per Q259240), all I need to allow from the
OWA server, located on the DMZ to the Exchange server located on the LAN and
vice versa are the following ports:
OWA->Exchange
1. Directory Service: anything that's not immediately after 1023 range (1225
in MS example);
2. Information Store: same as above (1226 in MS example);
3. Endpoint Mapper: port 135
Exchange->OWA
1. RPC communication: 1024 through 65535 
Is this correct? Anything else needs to be done?
Thanks!


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Confirm: OWA from DMZ<->Exchange from LAN

2002-03-15 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Meaning..?

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Confirm: OWA from DMZ<->Exchange from LAN


You, sir, no longer have a DMZ.


-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Confirm: OWA from DMZ<->Exchange from LAN


I just want to confirm that (as per Q259240), all I need to allow from the
OWA server, located on the DMZ to the Exchange server located on the LAN and
vice versa are the following ports:
OWA->Exchange
1. Directory Service: anything that's not immediately after 1023 range (1225
in MS example);
2. Information Store: same as above (1226 in MS example);
3. Endpoint Mapper: port 135
Exchange->OWA
1. RPC communication: 1024 through 65535 
Is this correct? Anything else needs to be done?
Thanks!


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SSL on OWA

2002-03-07 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

FWIW, Entrust has been working fine for the past 2 years here.
1/2 price of VeriSign, if you purchase 2-year contract.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA


We use thawte.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA


Sounds good. Do you know anyone who works there?

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA


I recommend Verisign.

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 6:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA


Why not just gen up your own self-signed cert?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! 


-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA


Our current cert is nearing expiration. Verisign has also opted to up the
cost to almost 900 bucks. With aspirations of putting a cert on the
workstyle server as well as some secure web sites we are looking to an
alternative to verisign. With CA built into windows it seems like a good
alternative.

Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 5:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA


Not sure you need to set up a CA at all.  Just use the cert and you will be
fine.

David

-

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Yet Another Forwarding Question

2002-03-04 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: RE: Content Filtering and User Statistics




I need to forward 
all OUTBOUND messages to Sendmail box and was wondering if it's possible to do 
so in Exchange5.5.
I've seen similar 
entry under "Message Delivery: Forward all messages to host XYZ" under 
"Connections" tab in Properties of IMS but not sure if it applies to INBOUND or 
OUTBOUND mail.
Thanks in 
advance!
 
Dimitri
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outgoing e-mail using the Recipients I.P. address

2002-02-28 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Roger that. Outlook2K will not send mail in this format.
You can do it by hand by telneting to Exchange server on port 25 and typing
everything in by hand.

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Kurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outgoing e-mail using the Recipients I.P. address


Per my earlier message (last week, I think), while the Exchange IMS is quite
willing to take this, Outlook2k (and probably other versions) won't accept
an address in this form.

Weird, but true, non-rfc-compliant behavior from MSFT software.

| -Original Message-
| From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:23
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: RE: Outgoing e-mail using the Recipients I.P. address
| 
| 
| Exchange requires square brackets as advised in RFC2821.
| 
| devone@[206.15.131.101]
| 
| 
| -Original Message-
| From: Nelson Aguillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:42 AM
| To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
| Subject: Outgoing e-mail using the Recipients I.P. address
| 
| 
| Hello everyone,
| 
| I just got a phone call from one of our vendors and he tells 
| me that they're
| having problems with their domain name, and because of that, 
| they can only
| receive e-mail by having the sender use the IP address of their e-mail
| server. He said they are receiving e-mail from other 
| customers that are
| using this temporary method.
| 
| My question is,
| 
| How do we do this?
| 
| I tried typing his e-mail address this way: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|   (not the real address of 
| course), but it did
| not work.
| 
| Suggestions?
| 
| Thanks,
| 
| Nelson Aguillon
| 626.937.6693
| 
| List Charter and FAQ at:
| http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
| 
| List Charter and FAQ at:
| http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
| 
| 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Adding Additional Internet Address

2002-02-28 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Got it! I had "Secondary-proxy-address"..
Thanks, William!

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding Additional Internet Address


Section 3.21-3.23:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm

William


-Original Message-----
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:17 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding Additional Internet Address


This is not what I need. All I need is to automate (to some degree) addition
of secondary email address for users.
That's all. All DNS/MX stuff is taken care of.

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding Additional Internet Address
Importance: High


create a sub domain on your dns server on that subdomain point the mx record
to the server that you want

-Mensaje original-----
De: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Expuesto a las: Jueves, 28 de Febrero de 2002 02:54 p.m.
Expuesto en: Trafico de Mails
Conversación: Adding Additional Internet Address
Asunto: Adding Additional Internet Address


I need to add additional Internet (SMTP) address to all mail-enabled objects
in organization.
In other words, if user's email is [EMAIL PROTECTED], I need to add additional
email address as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I already have MX entry taken care of and routing configured to accept
inbound mail for new.domain.com.
>From what I remember, there was a way to add additional Internet address by
doing Directory Export, manual update and Import.
The only problem - I can't seem to find what exactly to update in the
exported CSV spreadsheet! I tried adding "%SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to
already existing "SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in "E-mail Address" column but when
I try to import it back in, I get an error stating that event has been
logged in Application Log in Event Viewer. But of course, there's nothing
there.
I also checked Q155594 which does this differently, by creating custom
recipient - the route I don't want to follow.
Can anyone help me out with this one?
Thanks in advance!

Dimitri
P.S. Exchange5.5 SP4 on WinNT4.0 SP6a

Lis

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Adding Additional Internet Address

2002-02-28 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

This is not what I need. All I need is to automate (to some degree) addition
of secondary email address for users.
That's all. All DNS/MX stuff is taken care of.

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Adding Additional Internet Address
Importance: High


create a sub domain on your dns server on that subdomain point the mx record
to the server that you want

-Mensaje original-
De: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Expuesto a las: Jueves, 28 de Febrero de 2002 02:54 p.m.
Expuesto en: Trafico de Mails
Conversación: Adding Additional Internet Address
Asunto: Adding Additional Internet Address


I need to add additional Internet (SMTP) address to all mail-enabled objects
in organization.
In other words, if user's email is [EMAIL PROTECTED], I need to add additional
email address as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I already have MX entry taken care of and routing configured to accept
inbound mail for new.domain.com.
>From what I remember, there was a way to add additional Internet address by
doing Directory Export, manual update and Import.
The only problem - I can't seem to find what exactly to update in the
exported CSV spreadsheet! I tried adding "%SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to
already existing "SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in "E-mail Address" column but when
I try to import it back in, I get an error stating that event has been
logged in Application Log in Event Viewer. But of course, there's nothing
there.
I also checked Q155594 which does this differently, by creating custom
recipient - the route I don't want to follow.
Can anyone help me out with this one?
Thanks in advance!

Dimitri
P.S. Exchange5.5 SP4 on WinNT4.0 SP6a

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Adding Additional Internet Address

2002-02-28 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

I need to add additional Internet (SMTP) address to all mail-enabled objects
in organization.
In other words, if user's email is [EMAIL PROTECTED], I need to add additional
email address as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I already have MX entry taken care of and routing configured to accept
inbound mail for new.domain.com.
>From what I remember, there was a way to add additional Internet address by
doing Directory Export, manual update and Import.
The only problem - I can't seem to find what exactly to update in the
exported CSV spreadsheet! I tried adding "%SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to
already existing "SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in "E-mail Address" column but when
I try to import it back in, I get an error stating that event has been
logged in Application Log in Event Viewer. But of course, there's nothing
there.
I also checked Q155594 which does this differently, by creating custom
recipient - the route I don't want to follow.
Can anyone help me out with this one?
Thanks in advance!

Dimitri
P.S. Exchange5.5 SP4 on WinNT4.0 SP6a

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Aut. Repl. and Altern. Recip. Don't Work Together.

2002-02-15 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Sorry for cryptic subject but Lyris has rejected my message 4 times because
of the reserved subject lines..


Really weird problem this time:
In the process of migration to Lotus Notes I need to forward messages from
our Exchange server to the Notes server and auto-reply to the sender with
generic message saying that user email address has changed.
I do it "per-user" basis so to forward mail for every user I created
appropriate alternate recipient with their new Notes email address. I also
select "Deliver Messages to both Recipient and Alternate Recipient".
Auto-replies are also done on "per-user" basis so I login to user mailbox
via Outlook and create a new rule, as described in Q291956
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-AU;q291956). 
The problem is that if I have auto-forward via alternate recipient on,
auto-reply rules don't work. Mail gets forwarded to alternate recipient OK
but sender doesn't get an auto-reply message. If I disable auto-forward,
auto-reply works just fine.
Another weird part is even though I have "Deliver Messages to both Recipient
and Alternate Recipient" selected, messages are not being copied to the
local Exchange mailbox while being forwarded to alternate recipient!
Has anyone seen anything like this before? I'm at the point where I'm
planning to re-apply Sp4 and all the hot fixes again!

Dimitri
P.S. Server: Exchange5.5 SP4 + hot fixes; client: Win2K SP2, Office2K SR2 +
hot fixes.
FWIW, there's nothing else wrong with the server - it's been working
perfectly fine for the past 3 years.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Auto-Forward to Alternative Recipient Not working

2002-02-08 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Well, not 100%.
I have a bunch of users that have email accounts on our systems but all
their mail is being automatically forwarded to their other Internet
accounts.
I have their Internet accounts setup as "Alternate Recipient" and "Deliver
messages both to recipient and alternate recipient" is NOT SELECTED so all
messages that come into that mailbox get automatically forwarded to the
Internet address specified in "Alternate Recipient" field and nothing gets
accumulated in the Inbox.
Well, messages do get forwarded without any problems but copies of these
messages are still sitting in the Inbox. I can't figure out why..
Unchecking "Deliver messages both to recipient and alternate recipient" is
the right thing to do when I only want the "Alternate Recipient" to get mail
and not the local mailbox, right? Am I missing something?

Thanks!

P.S. Exchange5.5 SP4 + all hot fixes on WinNT4 SP6a + all hot fixes; OWA on
the separate server, if it makes any difference.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Migration from lotus notes

2002-01-22 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Martin,
Thanks for your reply! Quitting was the first thing that ran through my mind
however I simply can't afford it with current market situation.
Your scenario is exactly what I've had in mind and probably will have to
implement, unless someone knows of a better way.
Read access to Exchange with mail forwarding from old Exchange email
addresses to new Notes ones.
Lotus Notes, here I come!

P.S. Anyone knows of a good Notes mailing list? My only experience with
Lotus software was cc:Mail couple of jobs ago and I cried of happiness when
I got the hell out.
God, Lotus makes awful software!!

-Original Message-
From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Migration from lotus notes


Ah, I've been that direction too. My company had a short phase of
temporary insanity (brought on by listening to the Gartner Group too
much) and got part way into migrating from Exchange to Notes. Then came
the revolution (really!).

As you might expect, there are very few tools for migrating from
Exchange to Notes. It's just not a direction reasonable people would
choose to go, so that's no surprise. Of the few products that there are,
only one works to the point of being useful, though it's still FAR from
perfect. That was the product from Binary Tree (www.binarytree.com).
It's almost a year since I used it, but at that point, it was still
riddled with bugs and unbelievably slow. However, at least it moved the
mailboxes across at least mainly intact and at least most of the time,
which the other products didn't seem capable of.

If I was put in a similar position again, the first thing I'd do is
quit. Seriously. However, if you don't want to do that, I would very
seriously recommend that you make no attempt to migrate user data. It
just isn't worth the time and money and hassle, not just to you, but
also to your users. Leave their Exchange data where it is, leave then
with read access to it for reference, and start fresh with empty Notes
mailboxes. Yes, they'll hate you for it, but then... they're going to
hate you anyway for the migration, so what difference does it make?

> -Original Message-
> From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 22 January 2002 15:45
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Migration from lotus notes
> 
> 
> How about migrating from Exchange to Notes?
> Our company has been sold (watch f*ckedcompany.com) and the 
> buyer is using
> Lotus Notes.
> We will have migrate all our mail to their mail system so I 
> was wondering if
> anyone has had any experience with this.
> Wish us luck!
> 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Migration from lotus notes

2002-01-22 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

How about migrating from Exchange to Notes?
Our company has been sold (watch f*ckedcompany.com) and the buyer is using
Lotus Notes.
We will have migrate all our mail to their mail system so I was wondering if
anyone has had any experience with this.
Wish us luck!

-Original Message-
From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 6:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Migration from lotus notes



Which tool are you talking about?

I migrated a few hundred users from Notes to Outlook last year, and it
was almost completely painless. The users were so grateful they still
bring me boxes of chocolates most weeks. :)

> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 20 January 2002 22:48
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Migration from lotus notes
> 
> 
> Hey guys,
> 
>   has anyone had much success using the migration tool to move to
> exchange from notes?  Any major issues or articles that have 
> been really
> useful?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jason Dwyer
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Question: Deleted Items Retention

2002-01-10 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: Message



Does anybody 
know if I'll have to restart the Exchange IS service (or any other services) if 
I enable "Deleted Items Retention" as well as Private Information Store "Storage 
Limits"? 
This Exchange5.5 SP4 on 
WinNT4.0 SP6a + hot fixes. Thanks in advance! 
Dimitri
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS Lockdown Tool v2.1

2001-12-27 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: Message



Did you take 
default "OWA for Exchange5.5" configuration?
I was wondering if 
URLScan will mess up HTTPS access to OWA? 
From what I've 
seen so far it only does method/keyword filtering and not the protocol/port 
itself..
 
Dimitri

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 27, 
  2001 2:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IIS 
  Lockdown Tool v2.1
  It worked on 
  5.5 test box for me
  

-Original Message-----From: Dimitri Limanovski 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 
27, 2001 10:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
IIS Lockdown Tool v2.1
I was 
wondering if anybody tried new version of IIS Lockdown tool yet and if 
there're any issues with OWA or any other Exchange 
components.
From what I've 
seen, it now comes bundled with URLScan and has pre-built configuration 
schemes for OWA on both Exchange5.5 and 2000.
Please post 
your findings..
Can be 
downloaded here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/tools/locktool.aspList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

IIS Lockdown Tool v2.1

2001-12-27 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: RE: Troubleshooting NDR messages



I was wondering if 
anybody tried new version of IIS Lockdown tool yet and if there're any issues 
with OWA or any other Exchange components.
From what I've 
seen, it now comes bundled with URLScan and has pre-built configuration 
schemes for OWA on both Exchange5.5 and 2000.
Please post your 
findings..
Can be downloaded 
here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/tools/locktool.asp
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Body Scanning Utility for GroupShield

2001-12-17 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Has anyone installed Body Scanning Utility for GroupSUCKS on Exchange5.5?
I was planning to bundle this install along with Resolve Names Utility
sometime this week but was wondering if anyone has encountered any issues
these add-ons.
Also, is reboot required after installation is completed? README.TXT doesn't
mention anything about it.
TIA,

Dimitri

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

FW: Microsoft Security Notification Service

2001-12-14 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

FYI

-Original Message-
From: Microsoft
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
osoft.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Microsoft Security Notification Service


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

- --
Title:  13 December 2001 Cumulative Patch for IE
Date:   13 December 2001
Software:   Internet Explorer
Impact: Run Code of an Attacker's Choice
Max Risk:   Critical
Bulletin:   MS01-058

Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletin at: 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-058.asp.
- --

Issue:
==
This is a cumulative patch that, when installed, eliminates all 
previously discussed security vulnerabilities affecting IE 5.5 and
IE 6. In addition, it eliminates three newly discovered
vulnerabilities. 

 - The first vulnerability involves a flaw in the handling of the
   Content-Disposition and Content-Type header fields in an HTML.
   stream. These fields, the hosting URL, and the hosted file data 
   determine how a file is handled upon download in Internet
   Explorer. A security vulnerability exists because, if an
   attacker altered the HTML header information in a certain way,
   it could be possible to make IE believe that an executable file
   was actually a different type of file -- one that it is
   appropriate to simply open without asking the user for
   confirmation. This could enable the attacker to create a web
   page or HTML mail that, when opened, would automatically run an
   executable on the user's system. This vulnerability affects 
   IE 6.0 only. It does not affect IE 5.5.

 - The second vulnerability is a newly discovered variant of the
   "Frame Domain Verification" vulnerability discussed in Microsoft
   Security Bulletin MS01-015. The vulnerability could enable a
   malicious web site operator to open two browser windows, one in
   the web site's domain and the other on the user's local file
   system, and to pass information from the latter to the former.
   This could enable the web site operator to read, but not change,
   any file on the user's local computer that could be opened in a
   browser window. This vulnerabilty affects both IE 5.5 and 6.0. 

 - The third vulnerability involves a flaw related to the display 
   of file names in the File Download dialogue box. When a file
   download is initiated, a dialogue provides the name of the file.
   However, in some cases, it would be possible for an attacker to
   misrepresent the name of the file in the dialogue. This could be
   invoked from a web page or in an HTML email in an attempt to
   fool users into accepting unsafe file types from a trusted
   source. This vulnerabilty affects both IE 5.5 and 6.0.

Mitigating Factors:

File Execution Vulnerability: 

 - The vulnerability could not be exploited if File Downloads have
   been disabled in the Security Zone from which the file is being
   received. In most attempts to maliciously exploit this 
   vulnerability the file would be received from the Internet or
   Intranet zone. Therefore, disabling File Downloads in these zones
   can protect customers. This is not the default setting for either
   of these zone, however. 

 - This affects IE 6.0 only. 

Frame Domain Verification Variant: 
 - The vulnerability could only be used to view files. It could not
   be used to create, delete, modify or execute them. 

 - The vulnerability would only allow an attacker to read files that
   can be can be opened in a browser window, such as image files,
   HTML files and text files. Other file file types, such as binary
   files, executable files, Word documents, and so forth, could not 
   be read. 

 - The attacker would have to have knowledge of the exact file name
   and location in other to successfully read the file on the
   local system.

File Name Spoofing Vulnerability: 
 - The determination on choosing to accept a file download from an
   Internet site should always be based on the trustworthiness of
   the source and not on the file type. File downloads should never
   be accepted from an untrusted source, no matter how harmless the
   type may appear to be.

Risk Rating:

 - Internet systems: Critical
 - Intranet systems: Critical
 - Client systems: Critical

Patch Availability:
===
 - A patch is available to fix this vulnerability. Please read the 
   Security Bulletin at
   http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms01-058.asp
   for information on obtaining this patch.

Acknowledgment:
===
 - Jouko Pynnonen of Oy Online Solutions Ltd
   (http://www.solutions.fi/index.cgi/?lang=eng)

- -

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS 
PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCL

RE: How could .pif file get through....

2001-12-11 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Join the club.. GroupSUCKS did the same thing here after 4174 DAT update and
got few people infected with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I now check extensions list every day, until I move to Antigen.

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Craig Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How could .pif file get through



We blocked the usual set of attachments in Groupshield for Exchange 5.5 some
months ago. Including .pif

Yet this morning I received an e-mail with a .pif attachement?

Anyone had this problem?


Craig

 
This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you
are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the
information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please
contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is
for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or
used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice
should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters
relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require
diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: NTBUGTRAQ - Potential Problem with Microsoft Security Bulleti n MS01-057

2001-12-08 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

FWIW, I upgraded WWW server from IE4 to IE6 and applied the patch this
weekend - everything works just fine.

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: NTBUGTRAQ - Potential Problem with Microsoft Security
Bulleti n MS01-057


Interesting

-Original Message-
From: Peter Koso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Potential Problem with Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-057


Potential issue with this security patch.  Running NT 4.0 SP6a and Exchange
5.5 SP4.

Issue is with an older version of IE on the exchange server. We were running
IE 4.01 SP1.  The patch applies fine but upon reboot there is an error
message

"procedure entry point wnsprintfa could not be located in the
dynamic link library shlwapi.dll"

See MS knowledgebase Q284706

The error manifests itself with OWA (outlook Web Access) users not seeing
any text of their emails.  They can logon fine and see the subject lines -
but clicking on the message brings up a white page.

Resolved (with help from MS tech support) by backing off the patch,
installing IE 5.5 SP2 and re-installing the patch.  This takes several
reboots.

regards,

Peter Koso
Beansprout Networks


Delivery co-sponsored by Trend Micro, Inc.

BEST-OF-BREED ANTIVIRUS SOLUTION FOR MICROSOFT EXCHANGE 2000
Earn 5% rebate on licenses purchased for Trend Micro ScanMail for
Microsoft Exchange 2000 between October 1 and November 16. ScanMail
ensures 100% scanning of inbound and outbound traffic and provides
remote software management. For program details or to download your
30-day FREE evaluation copy:
http://www.antivirus.com/banners/tracking.asp?si=53&bi=245&ul=http://www.a
ntivirus.com/smex2000_rebate

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Client not receiving email from us but can from any other sit e

2001-12-07 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Looks like DNS issue to me..
Did you try to do a NSLOOKUP to see if you can resolve their domain name?

-Original Message-
From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Client not receiving email from us but can from any other site


Exchange 5.5... Outlook 2k client

We are trying to send email to one of our clients.  they can send to us
without problem.  I can send to them from an external email address (yahoo)
with no problem.  After we send messages we do not receive a "undeliverable
reply".

Here is my thoughts let me know if you guys have any idea.  Since we do not
get a undeliverable reply it appears that the email is going someplace.  any
email I send to their name does not get bounced back.  example if I send to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (don't want to use their email address hope you don't mind)
I receive no undeliverable message.  if I send to any other email address
that is wrong I get a bounce back.  if I send to a yahoo account that does
not exist it bounces it back.We are on a sprint network so I though
maybe sprint is not able to resolve their name correctly so I called sprint
had them send an email and it go through fine.  so I have no idea what the
problem could be. Please help.

Thanks 
James

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-057

2001-12-07 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Anybody knows if this'll have to be applied on the Exchange box itself or on
the web-server, if OWA is hosted separately?
Also, has anybody applied this yet? I want to make sure there're none of the
side effects of MS01-030..

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-057


OWA admins beware...

-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Product Security [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 15:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS01-057


The following is a Security  Bulletin from the Microsoft Product Security
Notification Service.

Please do not  reply to this message,  as it was sent  from an unattended
mailbox.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

- --
Title:  Specially Formed Script in HMTL Mail can Execute in
Exchange 5.5 OWA
Date:   06 December 2001
Software:   Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Server Outlook Web Access
Impact: Run Code of Attacker's Choice
Max Risk:   Medium
Bulletin:   MS01-057

Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletin at: 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-057.asp.
- --

Issue:
==
Outlook Web Access (OWA) is a service of Exchange 5.5 Server that
allows users to access and manipulate messages in their Exchange
mailbox by using a web browser. 

A flaw exists in the way OWA handles inline script in messages in
conjunction with Internet Explorer (IE). If an HTML message that
contains specially formatted script is opened in OWA, the script
executes when the message is opened. Because OWA requires that
scripting be enabled in the zone where the OWA server is located,
a vulnerability results because this script could take any action
against the user's Exchange mailbox that the user himself was
capable of, including sending, moving, or deleting messages. An
attacker could maliciously exploit this flaw by sending a 
specially crafted message to the user. If the user opened the
message in OWA, the script would then execute. 

While it is possible for a script to send a message as the user,
it is impossible for the script to send a message to addresses in
the user's address book. Thus, the flaw cannot be exploited for
mass-mailing attacks. Also, mounting a successful attack requires
knowledge of the intended victim's choice of mail clients and
reading habits. If the maliciously crafted message were read in
any mail client other than a browser through OWA, the attack
would fail. 

Mitigating Factors:

 - A successful attack would require the victim to read the message
   in a IE using OWA only. The attack would fail if read in any
   other mail client. 
 - A successful attack would also require knowledge of the version
   of OWA in use. The attack would fail on other versions of OWA. 
 - A successful attack can only take action on the mailbox on the 
   Exchange Server as the user. It cannot take action on the user's
   local machine. It cannot take actions on any other users mailbox
   directly. Nor can it take actions directly on the Exchange Server.

Risk Rating:

 - Internet systems: Moderate
 - Intranet systems: Moderate
 - Client systems: None

Patch Availability:
===
 - A patch is available to fix this vulnerability. Please read the 
   Security Bulletin at
   http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms01-057.asp
   for information on obtaining this patch.

Acknowledgment:
===
 - Lex Arquette of WhiteHat Security (http://www.whitehatsec.com)

- -

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS 
PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS
ALL 
WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE 
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
IN NO EVENT 
SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY
DAMAGES 
WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL,
LOSS OF 
BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR
ITS 
SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME
STATES DO 
NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL
OR 
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 7.1

iQEVAwUBPA/6iY0ZSRQxA/UrAQGilggAikP7XNxSWstX7sQ67uO5sqSKDhaY/CAz
Zb02lYKG9tztDRZ8uI+mpwYkdDLXvMDL3q7DsZAJO9x0IU0yJZ6/SE2gKaavQkmA
G03QoNwIKekVLbMvzMXq/HQIGooGCAPqBVGh3agD7kDUhs7JMr+t94Rx3gR659t/
jPm7IBlKLHk0PIebRxuqZS7JfnYsTIeFVhNFoMVWd9Dt6bUJQ17RkhDM7yuQI+ca
k5jku2BqD+TVpu7w+gmqvGqr7FB3WismKFeZJ8yjNBBuMkEwhflkc

RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses

2001-12-06 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

True but I don't think GroupSUCKS will let you specify to block everything
(*.*) and then specifically allow certain files that you need.
This is what William was talking about (and probably has implemented in his
Exchange paradise) and I like the idea very much myself..
Another point to Antigen..

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses


Yes, Antigen allows you to block filename or *.extension. However,
Groupshield will allow you to block filename and extension - but it requires
service patch 7 obtainable from their prime support.

 Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.


-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses

Speaking of blocking *.*, does Antigen allow you to do this?
In GroupSUCKS you can specify which attachment types to block but not vice
versa..

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses


So if I rename gone to lynch.scr it will get through?

Do you have a fulltime attachment blocker admin?

How about *.* except what you need?

William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP

-Original Message-
From: Terry Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses


Some of you might be interested in specific attachments to block?  

These are from known viruses.  The list does not include every know
virus attachment, but it's a good starting point.

***Know Virus Attachments*
ADMIN.DLL
ANTS3SET.EXE
BackDoor-G2.cfg
BackDoor-G2.cli
BackDoor-G2.svr.gen
Card.pif
Common.exe
CSRSS.EXE
DESKTOP.EML
disk.exe
docs.scr
dwarf4you.exe
FLCSS.EXE
fun.pif
hamster.ZIP.scr
HTTPODBC.DLL
Humor.TXT.pif
images.pif
joke.exe
KAK.HTA
KAK.HTM
LOAD.EXE
Me_nude.AVI.pif
MEP*.TMP.EXE
midgets.scr
MMC.EXE
MSREXE.EXE
New_Napster_Site.DOC.scr
news_doc.scr
PUTA!!.EML
PUTA!!.SCR
README.??
README.EML
README.TXT.pif
Rede.exe
RICHED20.DLL
RUN.EXE
s3msong.MP3.pif
SAMPLE.EXE
searchURL.scr
SERUP.pif
sexy virgin.scr
Si.exe
Sorry_about_yesterday.DOC.pif
UserConf.exe
WINDOS.EXE
WQK.EXE
YOU_are_FAT!.TXT.pif
GONE.SCR
***Know Virus Attachments*

Terry Lynch
Internal Network Administrator
Vendaria, Inc.
316 Occidental Avenue South
Second Floor
Seattle, WA  98104
206.223.4000 x255
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vendaria.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses

2001-12-06 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Speaking of blocking *.*, does Antigen allow you to do this?
In GroupSUCKS you can specify which attachment types to block but not vice
versa..

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses


So if I rename gone to lynch.scr it will get through?

Do you have a fulltime attachment blocker admin?

How about *.* except what you need?

William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP

-Original Message-
From: Terry Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses


Some of you might be interested in specific attachments to block?  

These are from known viruses.  The list does not include every know
virus attachment, but it's a good starting point.

***Know Virus Attachments*
ADMIN.DLL
ANTS3SET.EXE
BackDoor-G2.cfg
BackDoor-G2.cli
BackDoor-G2.svr.gen
Card.pif
Common.exe
CSRSS.EXE
DESKTOP.EML
disk.exe
docs.scr
dwarf4you.exe
FLCSS.EXE
fun.pif
hamster.ZIP.scr
HTTPODBC.DLL
Humor.TXT.pif
images.pif
joke.exe
KAK.HTA
KAK.HTM
LOAD.EXE
Me_nude.AVI.pif
MEP*.TMP.EXE
midgets.scr
MMC.EXE
MSREXE.EXE
New_Napster_Site.DOC.scr
news_doc.scr
PUTA!!.EML
PUTA!!.SCR
README.??
README.EML
README.TXT.pif
Rede.exe
RICHED20.DLL
RUN.EXE
s3msong.MP3.pif
SAMPLE.EXE
searchURL.scr
SERUP.pif
sexy virgin.scr
Si.exe
Sorry_about_yesterday.DOC.pif
UserConf.exe
WINDOS.EXE
WQK.EXE
YOU_are_FAT!.TXT.pif
GONE.SCR
***Know Virus Attachments*

Terry Lynch
Internal Network Administrator
Vendaria, Inc.
316 Occidental Avenue South
Second Floor
Seattle, WA  98104
206.223.4000 x255
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vendaria.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange SP2 Released

2001-12-05 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Sorry guys, my tests are not going to be available for a while - I'm stuck
with 5.5 for now due to the monetary issues in the company.. 
But as always with MS products - test'em in the lab first!!

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange SP2 Released


Let us know how your tests go. ;)

I like the OWA fixes... logoff, new mail popup...

William


-Original Message-----
From: Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange SP2 Released


FYI it's ~190Mb

http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/sp2/english.asp


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Exchange SP2 Released

2001-12-05 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

FYI it's ~190Mb

http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2000/sp2/english.asp



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Groupshield help

2001-12-04 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Eric,
For some reason I can't send you attachments - I get "recipient name not
recognized".
I'll try again but for now here's the link to KB article on how to do manual
update:
http://www.mcafeeb2b.com/support/technical-support/faqid.asp?id=663&pCode=GS
HEX

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:58 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Groupshield help


Dimitri,

Thank you for your reply.  I went to that FTP site, and did not see any
files relating to 4174.  Can you send it to me?  How do I apply it manually?

Thank you very much for any help you can provide!

Eric Brouwer
Network Administrator
Village Green Companies
Phone 248.932.2775
Fax 248.538.2775
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.villagegreen.com

This electronic message and all contents contain information which may be
privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The
information is intended to be for the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this
message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in
error, please notify me immediately and destroy the original message and all
copies. 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

2001-12-04 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

You need to get the 4174 DATs to catch it and of course McAfee FTP servers
are hammered!
Use ftp:/ftpeur.nai.com and manually download the sdat-4174.zip. You will
then have to manually apply it to your Exchange server, witch is major PITA
by itself.
See in  FAQs on www.mcafeeb2b.com for "Why are all attachments being
blocked?" question on instructions how to do it.
Feel free to email me with any questions.

Dimitri


-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Groupsuck REALLY sucks...

Even though I already had the latest dat installed, and all my services are
running, two instances of this virus made it through.  Thankfully I don't
trust GS, and I sent out a warning and my users actually read it, and acted
on it.

Any idea why GS might not be catching them?  Everything looks like it's set
up properly.  I caught all the Badtrans viruses last week.

-Original Message-
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Download and save the file sarcx86.exe, and then execute it on the system to
be updated.

-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm



Which file do you grab from there 

-Original Message- 
From: Philip Youngworth [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:37 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


You can get the sarc update from their ftp server. 

ftp://ftp2.symantec.com/public/english_us_canada/antivirus_definitions/norto
  
n_antivirus/specdef 

You should be able to grab the sarc there for it. 

-Original Message- 
From: Cicerrella, Steve [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


Seeing this one already.I have not found a patch for "Norton for 
Exchange" yet.Already sent a broadcast to the users pleading with them 
to use some common sense and explicitly telling them NOT to open that one. 
I wonder how many of them will open it anyway..   ;) 

Steve 



-Original Message- 
From: Briggs, Bruce [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:41 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm 


Just in case you are not aware yet, there is a new virus out there. Lots of
incoming infected mail here, right now. We got an automatic update this
morning for Antigen which is protecting us. Hope the same for you.

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

Bruce Briggs 
System Administration 
State University of NY 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  


*** 
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s)
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material.  Any review, 

retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of 
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in
error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any
computer.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

2001-12-04 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

I am so PISSED OFF!!
Our POS GroupShield after an update to 4172 DATs simply lost "SCR" from the
list of blocked extensions!!!
WTF?!?! And of course some dumb-ass user got an email infected with
W32/Goner and opened it!
I got it under control now by adding SCR back in and initiating full IS
scan.. So far only one infected message that was succesfully cleaned..
But still, WTF is up with GroupShield?! I am moving to Antigen, that's for
sure.

Sorry for this rant


-Original Message-
From: Briggs, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Just in case you are not aware yet, there is a new virus out there.
Lots of incoming infected mail here, right now.
We got an automatic update this morning for Antigen which is protecting us.
Hope the same for you.

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bruce Briggs
System Administration
State University of NY

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Wondering

2001-12-04 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: Message



For all Canadian 
residents and visitors I highly recommend "La Maudite" (which I believe 
translates to "the Bitch") for your beer of choice.
Very malty, smooth 
unfiltered taste and best of all - 13.5% ABV!! 
Every time I go there I bring back at least two 
cases.
 
My $.02
 
 
 -Original Message-From: 
Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 
2001 10:20 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering

  Samuel Adams
  
-Original Message-From: Don Ely 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 
10:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
C'mon now.  That stuff is nasty...  Lagers, Ale's, 
etc...  that's where the good beer is.  Micro Brews are the only 
half way decent thing coming out of America for beer.
 
D
 
 "Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be 
looking for it." -Henry David Thoreau 

  
  -Original Message-From: Boswell Tim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 
  7:07 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Wondering
  nah, you have no taste...
  
-Original Message-From: Don Ely 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
14:58To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
3 more words...
 
Piss
wa
ter
 
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Boswell 
  Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 
  04, 2001 6:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Wondering
  3 words:
  Bud
  Weis
  Er
   
  
-Original Message-From: Clayton 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
Lived there for 2 and a half years mate, innit? 
Canadian Beer is better.
 
Sees ya laters geez

  -Original Message-From: 
  Jones Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  December 4, 2001 9:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Wondering
  All this talk of beer, and you only mention 
  lagers... Come to England and try a real 
  beer :o) 
  Cheers Matt 
  -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:30 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wondering 
  Dutch Beer? That is all I drink here in the 
  Netherlands Antilles, and I can't stand it 
  anymore! Amstel is awful here, and the Grolsch aint that 
  good either. Heinekin is a watery beer like 
  substance. 
  Canadian Beer rules the whole world, even England, 
  sorry Lads, but you can't beat a good 
  bottle of Kokanee eh! 
  -Original Message- From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: December 3, 2001 3:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Wondering 
  Dutch beer is the best, pick either one ;) 
  
  > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- 
  > Van: maggie whitton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Verzonden: vrijdag 30 november 2001 
  23:02 > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues > Onderwerp: Re: 
  Wondering > > > Don't start on 
  beer...Grolshor Cellis a tiny mini brewery > in Austin. :) > - 
  Original Message - > From: 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 
  "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:15 PM 
  > Subject: RE: Wondering > > > > Maybe it's because you won't tell us your 
  name? > > > > -Michèle > > 
  Immigration site:   
  > > The Miata:   
  > > Tiggercam:   > > 
  - 
  > > I love deadlines. I especially love the 
  swooshing sound > they make as 
  they > go > 
  > flying by. > > 
  - 
  > > > 
  > > > -Original 
  Message- > > From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:14 
  PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues > > Subject: Re: 
  Wondering > > > > > > None of the 
  criteria's that you have mentioned, however as > you

RE: BadTrans and Webshield - Was: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm

2001-11-29 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Mike,
We're using 4.0.70 engine and 4172 DATs (hopefully 4173 will download
tonight) and it's been catching PIF, SCR and other blocked attachments just
fine.
Exchange5.5 SP4 on NT4.0 SP6a.
Where did you hear about Hotfix 10? 

Dimitri

-Original Message-
From: Mike Moser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: BadTrans and Webshield - Was: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


Ole - 

The same thing is happening to me and to another admin that I spoke to
earlier today. BadTrans is getting through Webshield despite a block on the
attachment types (.pif and .scr) and the current (4172 and 4173) dat file
(though I'm using the older 4140 engine). The other admin I spoke to
suggested that hotfix 10 for Webshield may help as it scans the headers as
well as the message body. But I'm letting someone else try this first since,
as you mentioned, GroupShield is removing the attachments when they hit the
store...so far.

Mike Moser


-Original Message-
From: Ole Søgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


Hi all
Have anyone experienced the same thing as we have: It's just floating
through NAI's WebShield SMTP - both the attachment blocking and the virus
scan, but is detected by GroupShield in the store

Ole Soegaard
TV 2/Denmark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26. november 2001 18:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


I have seen 4172 catch it today.

-Original Message-
From: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


NAI claims to have this covered:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99069
with any DAT files after 4168  (were now at 4172)
AlV

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: Message



So what is the 
best practice with defragmentation? 
MS says that 
"ESEUITL is not considered a tool for regular maintenance and should only 
be used in case of emergency after contacting Microsoft Technical Support". On 
the other hand, there're people here that use it on monthly 
basis!
So, to use or not 
to use?
 

  -Original Message-From: Kopec, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:41 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Eseutil
  This 
  statement is NOT entirely accurate.  Try the following syntax and you can 
  direct wherever you want including mapped drives.  For example, 
  C:\exchsrver/bin>eseutil /d /ispriv 
  /tf:\tempedb.edb.  Notice, there is no space between the 
  /t and the drive you wish to defrag on.
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:23 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Eseutil
  I'm 
  not familiar with E2K, but on 5.5 I regularly (read monthly) run 
  eseutil.  I run it because that is the ONLY way to regain space in the 
  Exchange DB that has been freed up by messages being deleted etc.  If I 
  did not do this on a regular basis I would hit the Exchange 5.5 IS 
  limit.
   
  I 
  would guess that it would be /t f:/tempedb.edb   or what ever you 
  plan to use for the defrag.  It may not work, it doesn't work in 5.5 when 
  you try to redirect the temp database, it must run on the same physical drive 
  that it is stored.
   
  Good 
  luck.
  Sherry
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil
Why do you need to defrag the IS? Has MS told you to do 
this?
eseutil is a tool that if you are not familiar with, you shouldn't be 
using. Now tell us why you want to do it.

  
  -Original Message-From: Irfan GM 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 
  2001 12:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Eseutil
   Hi 
   How do I use the /t switch with eseutil , 
  i need to defrag the database and there is not enogh storage space 
   in C: , where exchange 2000 is 
  loaded. 
   Thanks  Irfan List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Routing and Relaying

2001-10-22 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

We currently have O'Reilly's WebBoard server in house that needs to send
(relay) mail out to external users that subscribed to the service.
Currently, I have our Exchange5.5 SP4 set to allow relaying for "Host and
clients that successfully authenticate" to prevent relaying but allow our
dumbass sales force to get their mail the way they're accustomed to.
Now, there's another setting there - "Host and clients with these IP
addresses" - where I thought I could simply put an IP address of the
WebBoard server and Exchange would allow it to relay through.. But it looks
like BOTH conditions must be met in order for this to work, i.e. client
should have valid (allowed) IP address AND authenticate successfully in
order to relay.
Unfortunately, WebBoard doesn't have any authentication mechanism in place,
like Outlook/Express does so I'm pretty much stuck here..
Is there any other way to trick Exchange to allow relaying from specified
IP? Is there a workaround I could use?
TIA for any help!

Regards,
Dimitri

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Groupshield

2001-09-26 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 
Title: Message



I have a copy 
of the hot fix, applied it couple of months ago. Worked fine, I no longer need 
to worry about #2, 3 and 11.
I can email it if 
anybody's interested. Zipped version is over 3Mb so make sure your message size 
limit is set accordingly.
I hear all-new, 
latest-the-greatest GroupShield 5 is going to be out soon but I'm not 
looking forward to find out if it's any good - my next anti-virus is 
ANTIGEN!
 
Dimitri

  -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 
  10:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Groupshield
  
  Already 
  contacted Trend and notified my customers to expect the move. NAI has been 
  miserable in supporting this since 4.5 was 
  introduced.
   
  Miserable 
  product, miserable support. Winning 
  combination.
   
  Steve
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Brian 
  Bauer ** Network Technician [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:40 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Groupshield
   
  I got 
  the hotfix, with pretty much no screaming necessary.  I asked the tech 
  why they wont post it, and they said it would break more than it would 
  fix.  How about that for a product...
   
  Should 
  we be looking at something else than NAI?
  -Original 
  Message-From: Randal, 
  Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:23 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Groupshield
  We've alread been hit 
  by #11.  Arrggghhh.
   
  Phil
   
  -Phil 
  RandalNetwork EngineerHerefordshire CouncilHereford, UK 
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Clark, 
  Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 13:11To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Groupshield
  Just 1 
  or 2 things. I'm going to try to call today. If anybody has the fix, would be 
  nice to get it rather than call and convince them 
  otherwise.
   
  thanks
   
  Steve 
  Clark
  Clark 
  Systems Support, LLC
  AVIEN 
  Charter Member
  "Who's 
  watching your network?"
  www.clarksupport.com
   
  301-610-9584 voice
   
  240-465-0323 Efax
   
  
   List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Ports

2001-08-30 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

Is there a pre-defined list of ports that need to be open for Outlook (or
any other MAPI client) to connect to Exchange server?
I tried searching the TechNet for "Outlook ports" but didn't get much info
back.
TIA,

Dimitri

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Custom OWA Login Page

2001-08-17 Thread Dimitri Limanovski 

I know it's been here before and I even had one especially nice site
bookmarked but can't find it now.. 
And archives are not accessible for some reason via the link on the bottom..
Does anybody have a custom-made OWA login screen? If yes, could I take a
peek?
Mucho Gracias!

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm