RE: domain
Title: Message That's a wide open question. Are you talking for an internal network or just for a DMZ deployment? A box in the DMZ should be in its own separate thing (domain or WG, doesn't matter which). If that box gets compromised, then the damage is only limited to that box. The attacker doesn't also get access to the production domain or any other DMZ boxes. -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: domain Can anyone settle a bet? I have a coworker who is saying a workgroup is more secure than a domain, I say its the otherway around. He is also betting me that any servers setup in your DMZ should be setup in workgoups and not domains...List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: brain dead:header info
Open the message, then select Options from the View menu. -Original Message- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: brain dead:header info ok. I am brain dead today. I have forgotten how to view the header info from outlook 2000. Can someone throw me a bone and remind me? thanks Liz List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Large attachments / Emails vanishing
Title: Message Do you have delivery restrictions on the IMC? -Original Message-From: Craig Sterley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Large attachments / Emails vanishing We have an Exchange 5.5 server sp4 running on NT4 sp6a the seems to be losing emails that are large in size( haven't determined exact size yet - seem to fluctuate). There is nothing in the event viewer indicating an error, the file is gone from the queue on the exchange server and it never gets to where it is suppose to go. Any ideas on this??? List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MDBDATA folder
Title: Message I also take a full bump every night. I sometimes don't get the cleaning process right, though. -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MDBDATA folder I always do nightly full. It makes the restore process cleaner, too. -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MDBDATA folder Legato and it's set to do a once a week full backup and daily incrementals. For some reason I was under the impression that this log files cleared themselves after a preset 24 hour period. So now that I have been set straight, I shall change the backup schedule to a nightly full. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: MDBDATA folder If circular logging is off, then the system will continue to write logs until it is either backed up properly with an Exchange aware backup program, or in your case until the disk is full. What are you backing up with? -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: MDBDATA folder Hopefully someone can answer this, I didn't have much luck on Google or Technet. On my E2K server, the MDBDATA folder keeps filling up with transaction logs and fills the up the disk instead of overwriting them to the point of shutting down the MTA service. Circular logging is not enabled and I can't find any reason why they are not being overwritten. Anyone else seen this? Thanks Garland Mac Neill Systems Administrator Solbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 7/24/2002List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 7/24/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: team calendar
Title: Message Can you post yours here? -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: team calendar i used to use it on an exchange serveryou will have to read the docs for it, its simple to setup but involves a webserver, its almost like a webapp that accesses exchange Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: team calendar i think i have that, but how do i use it.. i installed it, but I dont see much more.. if its useful only for pst files, or net folders.. we dont use those. -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: team calendar there is an awesome one that MS made, and its free...search the msdn for "Outlook Team Calendars" i believe its version 2.0d Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:47 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: team calendar Please help me out.. ive just gotten my first request for a team calendar.. how can i set this up with e 5.5 sp4 and outlook 2000 ?List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OOO of the Day
Title: Message Who? Matt? -Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OOO of the Day Hahahaha... I love the arrogance of idiots... someone really needs to teach the guy a lesson. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: OOO of the Day LOL that is too funny. Let's all email him and tell him to either remove the OOO or pause his list service... LIKE AN ADULT - Original Message - From: Garland Mac Neill To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: RE: OOO of the Day Damn, I missed that one. Of course that would because someone deleted the transaction logs from the MDBDATA folder. Doing a hard reset is a painful thing. Wait until I get a hold of my mini me. I apologize...long night. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:03 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OOO of the Day Snip I am currently out of the office and will not be checking email until I return on Monday, July 29th. Please contact Bob Mcwilliamfor pressing issues. If you receive this from posting to a listserver, please (really) don't tell me to turn it off. Time to act like an adult. Dan 'scuse me, but we act like adults all the time don't we? Who's Bob Mcwilliamfor how do we contact him? Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client
Sweet sweet love. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client Oh? What are we making? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client That's great. But we are not making stir fry here. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client Nope, mine woks like a champ without any problems... -Original Message- From: David Elebute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client I have set the MTU to 1400 and went back to V. 3.5.1 E, and in the VPNClient.ini file added OutlookNotify=1; but still getting the same results. Is there anything else that anyone else has seen concerning this topic? David Elebute Director of MIS SuperClubs -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client Check your MTU settings... They should be at 1400 for best results... -Original Message- From: David Elebute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: MS Outlook 2000 w/Cisco VPN Client Has anyone experienced the synchronization problem w/Outlook 2000 and Cisco's VPN client V 3.5.2 C? It is hanging up attempting to synchronize with our Exchange 5.5 Servers. Cisco delivered a fix; add OutlookNotify=1 to VPNClient.ini file in the program installation directory, but I tried it and still did not solve the problem. Besides upgrading to Outlook 2002, has anyone been able resolve this problem? All responses are greatly appreciated. David Elebute Director of MIS SuperClubs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Title: Message Looking cool isn't enough of an excuse? -Original Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Now I don't have an excuse to wear my sunglasses when I read my email. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! :) I even changed the colorsI didn't want to continue to blind others..;) Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! LOL!!! great foof. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:04 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Okay, I'll have to accept the label of "Foof Queen". Well at least I have some "official" letters to put behind my name now... Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! That is Insolence. We have all come to respect each other and abuse is part of that. Ask the Foof Queen from yesterday. ;-) -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Why would I do that? I'd like you to use your knowledge to assist new users, rather than call them trolls or put in a cryptic message about "it's been two weeks". I don't care whether you're happy or sad about it. I'm new here, and I didn't know that part of the list charter was to denigrate less-experienced admins rather than answer their question. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! That is not nice Don. If he is trying to make me feel badhe failed. - Original Message - From: "Ely, Don" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Figures! -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Sorry, I don't get it - Original Message - From: "Tom Meunier" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:11 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! This is a FAQ, and I'm afraid to post the link for fear that Matthew will flame me, and then say "How about [repost of the FAQ link that I had just posted]?". I'll look at your logs, since that's NOT a FAQ. -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 09:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5 uses, besides 25 110? Also, if anyone wants to look at the Event Logs, simply click on: http://www.rogue-admins.com/dansworld/Exchange_Attack_App_Eve ntlog.zip [This is a new link new file from the one previously posted by me.] Cheers! Dan "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley:
RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
Title: Message Can you open my milk, mommy? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:15 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! I have never seen this guy before. How are we to know that they are "MS-Exchange Admin" staff? I thought this list was self moderated? I feel like I am in Romper Room sometimes, and have been told to 'settle down'. - Original Message - From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! I don't have to try to be clever - I have a proven track record. -Original Message-From: Szalkiewicz, Toni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 17 July 2002 16:08To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! This resource is not for showing off, please keep the comments relevant to the issues and do not "pad-out" the thread by trying to be clever ! Thank you for your corporation in this matter MS-Exchange Admin Staff -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 July 2002 16:03To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! I'm always thinking of others so, here's a little reason for you to wear your sunglasses ;) Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Now I don't have an excuse to wear my sunglasses when I read my email. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:43 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! :) I even changed the colorsI didn't want to continue to blind others..;) Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message-From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! LOL!!! great foof. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:04 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Okay, I'll have to accept the label of "Foof Queen". Well at least I have some "official" letters to put behind my name now... Sherry Abercrombie - FQ Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! That is Insolence. We have all come to respect each other and abuse is part of that. Ask the Foof Queen from yesterday. ;-) -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Why would I do that? I'd like you to use your knowledge to assist new users, rather than call them trolls or put in a cryptic message about "it's been two weeks". I don't care whether you're happy or sad about it. I'm new here, and I didn't know that part of the list charter was to denigrate less-experienced admins rather than answer their question. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5
RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise
If you translate Crooked Pudding Supplier into British English, the letters spell out LES. It's also known to refer to chaps who hang around with orange bouncy characters, such as the bloke at www.tiggercam.co.uk -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise OK. I'll take the bait for the great amusement of all. What's LES? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise ::snickering:: -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise LES Mutter. /LES Thanks, Don. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise E5.5 Enterprise only is available by purchasing E2K Enterprise. They come on separate CD's in the same box... Clear enough for ya? :o) -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise Don would you please clarify. Does 5.5 Enterprise come on its own CD as part of the media pack of E2K or are you stating that you can still purchase 5.5 Enterprise independently of E2K. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise 5.5 Enterprise comes on a CD of its own... :P -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise I believe that is fiction. 5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Enterprise CD, though. -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 5.5 upgrade to Enterprise I'm trying to get a straight answer on this one. My MS reseller seems to be confused on this. Currently have Exchange 5.5 Standard and would like to move to 5.5 Enterprise. I've searched the list archives. I thought I read here that 5.5 Enterprise comes on the E2K Standard CD. Is this fact or fiction? Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mac Clients
Dan will follow up with an answer to this question in a few months. It will probably be in another unrelated thread, though. -Original Message- From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mac Clients We're using Windows 2000 and Exchange 5.5 and I have a few Mac OS X users. What native OS X clients are out there for Exchange? Using emulation Outlook:mac 2001 is crashing. Any hopes of getting a native OS X client for Exchange? --- Ken Leyba Windows/Exchange System Administrator California State University Dominguez Hills List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
Cabal is a nonsense word, which doesn't exist in any known language, which describes something which doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] WTH is a cabal? Is that anything like a caBOWL? heh - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:15 PM Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] I know nothing of the cabal which does not exist! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] There is however the secret cabal which does not exist -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] The moderator here is the same as the other lists as far as I know and that would be Stu... -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] Actually, all 3 Sunbelt lists (Exchange Admin, Mac-NT AlphaNT) have a similar charter. By the way, who *is* the moderator over here, anyway? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Re: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] Sorry, I didn't know this was the Mac-NT AlphaNT list. I must have misposted. - Original Message - From: Dan Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:31 AM Subject: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] Guys, We have a rule over in the Mac-NT AlphaNT lists here on the Sunbelt site: When going off topic, change the SUBJECT line. It makes life easier for those of us who actually NEED the info! Cheers! Dan Mac-NT AlphaNT list moderator List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!
LOL! -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Hey Dan! You never did get back to Ed Woodrick on this list all those years ago as to why Exchange uses an Access database as an engine format! -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 16 July 2002 15:55 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! OK, does anyone have a list of the ports Exchange 5.5 uses, besides 25 110? Also, if anyone wants to look at the Event Logs, simply click on: http://www.rogue-admins.com/dansworld/Exchange_Attack_App_Eve ntlog.zip [This is a new link new file from the one previously posted by me.] Cheers! Dan There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. (Jeremy S. Anderson) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:36 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! U... Telneting to the server alone does NOT mean the server is an open relay... I can telnet port 25 to any server in the world, that doesn't mean I can relay mail... -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:38 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Actually, no.. if you can telnet to the mail server you can relay. No hacking needed. This is by the very nature of exchange. I would recommend looking at not allowing characters like %$! Through your firewall. Here's a link to check to see if you have an open relay.. http://www.abuse.net/relay.html Thanks, Joe Irvine -Original Message- From:Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Importance: Low Look at the 4031 error messages, which indicate SOMEONE is trying to relay through the server, and since unauthorized relaying is prohibited that tells me someone has hacked in. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Then it's sorta in production then, yes? Was there a concern other than the 4318's? -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:55 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED! Yes, it's connected, and the DNS servers have been pointed at it for about a week... --- This attachment has been scanned for hostile code: Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!]
Didn't you get the minutes from the last meeting? *There is no cabal*! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary disagrees: Main Entry: 1 ca·bal Pronunciation: k-'bäl, -'bal Function: noun Etymology: French cabale cabala, intrigue, cabal, from Medieval Latin cabbala cabala, from Late Hebrew qabbAlAh, literally, received (lore) Date: 1614 : the artifices and intrigues of a group of persons secretly united to bring about an overturn or usurpation especially in public affairs; also : a group engaged in such artifices and intrigues Main Entry: 2 cabal Function: intransitive verb Inflected Form(s): ca·balled; ca·bal·ling Date: 1680 : to unite in or form a cabal -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 01:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: General list discussion [WAS:RE: Exchange 5.5 server HACKED!] Cabal is a nonsense word, which doesn't exist in any known language, which describes something which doesn't exist. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: My fav OO response today...
::mutter:: * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Asst. VP, Technology Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: My fav OO response today... Pointy Haired Boss[1] http://www.dilbert.com [1] Also known, in some cirlces as an Erik, for some reason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 July 2002 14:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: My fav OO response today... Here's my ignorance...PHB? Pat Smith MCP, CCNA, CCA Systems Administrator FishNet Security 816.421.6611 -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: My fav OO response today... I wish! Here's another one. User (a different one) calls me. He says he's been on holiday and in his absence, User3 (yet another one) has been using his PC. He says he's logged on, but has got User3's email and desktop. My first theory is that he hasn't actually logged on, and that User3 had just left the box logged in. Oh no. User boy had seen User3's name in the box, so had typed in User3's password. And was surprised to find that he got User3's settings. He was promoted to PHB level not long afterwards. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Tiggers *bounce* users -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 July 2002 13:12 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: My fav OO response today... You made that up! :P -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: My fav OO response today... True story. A number of years ago, when we first got Internet email for all users, I sent a nice helpful message to all staff, telling them that it was available, and stating the format of their aliases. I even gave an example. I got one reply from a user asking what their email address was. Not bad. Apart from the fact that it came from the user I had used as an example in my message. It seems he only read the first few lines in preview... And people wonder why I get a wee bit frustrated with users. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 July 2002 20:10 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: My fav OO response today... What is my email address? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official
RE: Information Store Maintenance
Bastard Operator from Hell. The pinnacle of customer support to which we mortals can only hope to rise. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance BOFH??? -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance No, you're the red-headed step child, the BOFH, the queenB of HKU. :P Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance I'm the Dean of HKU... ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Hard Knocks U. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance HA! Where do you think we get our knowledge? :P -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance But nothing compares to this list.. Thanks to all for your suggestions and comments. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance support.microsoft.com has almost all the answers that technet does... :P -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Thanks! You answered that faster then I could get my TechNet booted up! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance XADM: How to Run Eseutil on a Computer Without Exchange Server (Q244525) http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q244525 http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-u s;Q244525 William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Can I copy the database to another machine, and run ESEUTIL on that machine? Can I just copy the utility or do I need to install exchange on this other machine? -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Just make sure you have enough disk space free on the drive that the priv.edb is on, MS recommendation is 110%, so if your priv.edb is 15.5 GB you'll need to have about 16+ GB free space on that drive. Otherwise, you'll have to run it across the network and that will slow your time down considerably. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Standard Version from Back Office. Thanks -Original Message- From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance This link is the how to of the defrag utility. http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q192185 http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-u s;Q192185 Are you running an Enterprise Version or the Standard Version? George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:01 PM To:
RE: Information Store Maintenance
Yep. (Obviously you don't wanna do this during normal usage hours ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Soif I stop and restart the services I should see the real size at the time the services were restarted? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance As long as the file is opened, you don't see the change in Windows Explorer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance I was concerned that I would not be able to monitor the size of the database. I was checking it using explorer and it has steadily maintained 10-11GB. I never worried about it. Now that it is 15.5GB I became more concerned. -Original Message- From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Hello, Instead of suspecting that you have whitespace, why not check the event log? event ID 1221 if I remember correctly... not to mention what other have eluded to: -mute point if you have 5 gigs of free space and not over 16gb limit -lots of downtime-risk -what problem do you think will be solved? PLUS- at least this way, Exchange wont have to use cycles to resize the DB as it grows... Thank you, Patrick MHR(Michael Ross) To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance 07/10/2002 12:22 PM Please respond to MS-Exchange Admin Issues AMEN BRUTHA!! -Original Message- From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance I ran it on two different servers that had been running for 3 years. Each IS was around 32 GB. It took about 3 hours and was 5 GB when it was finished. The biggest improvement was that the backup didn't use 32GB of space on the tapes every night. George -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance It should take you about 2-3 hours. Our database is 27 GB in size and im going to defrag it this weekend. I should be able to shrink it to about 25 GB -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Think he may be worried about bumping the 16 gig limit for non enterprise??? Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance You don't need to run this utility. Exchange maintains itself - are you having problems that you believe will be resolved? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:52 PM
RE: Information Store Maintenance
We all choose our own poisons ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Why not? I like answering questions like; is there a problem with the mail? from 200 users. Almost as much as answering that depends 200 times to the question when will the mail be back up? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Yep. (Obviously you don't wanna do this during normal usage hours ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Soif I stop and restart the services I should see the real size at the time the services were restarted? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance As long as the file is opened, you don't see the change in Windows Explorer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance I was concerned that I would not be able to monitor the size of the database. I was checking it using explorer and it has steadily maintained 10-11GB. I never worried about it. Now that it is 15.5GB I became more concerned. -Original Message- From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Hello, Instead of suspecting that you have whitespace, why not check the event log? event ID 1221 if I remember correctly... not to mention what other have eluded to: -mute point if you have 5 gigs of free space and not over 16gb limit -lots of downtime-risk -what problem do you think will be solved? PLUS- at least this way, Exchange wont have to use cycles to resize the DB as it grows... Thank you, Patrick MHR(Michael Ross) To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance 07/10/2002 12:22 PM Please respond to MS-Exchange Admin Issues AMEN BRUTHA!! -Original Message- From: Morse, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance I ran it on two different servers that had been running for 3 years. Each IS was around 32 GB. It took about 3 hours and was 5 GB when it was finished. The biggest improvement was that the backup didn't use 32GB of space on the tapes every night. George -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance It should take you about 2-3 hours. Our database is 27 GB in size and im going to defrag it this weekend. I should be able to shrink it to about 25 GB -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance Think he may be worried about bumping the 16 gig limit for non enterprise??? Jay Personette [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mavtech.com/ (281) 455-3993 -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Information Store Maintenance You don't need to run this utility. Exchange maintains itself - are you having problems that you believe will be resolved
RE: Public folder administration access problem.
Title: Message
Yo.
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S
(ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July
09, 2002 10:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
RE: Public folder administration access problem.
It's
amazing how far you can go when you talk nonsense and act like an
idiot!
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 09 July 2002 15:06To:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Public folder administration
access problem.
Good for you Kevin, maybe there is hope for English 101
dropouts :)
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center
Administration Team Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
-Original Message- From:
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public folder administration access problem.
Firstly, check out who has rights to Create Top Level
folders here (In Exchange Admin) Org A-Site-Configuration-Information
Store Site COnfiguration.
ENSURE (take note not INSURE) that you are selected in the
Top Level Folder Creation listbox.
Kevin
-Original Message- From:
Belbin Clive (5K9) Croydon PCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2002 13:40 To:
MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public folder
administration access problem.
The new e-mail address for the Croydon Primary Care Trust is
now " @croydonpct.nhs.uk ". Please edit your
address book appropriately.
Hi All,
I'm having difficulty getting administrative access to part
of the Public Folders tree - I've given myself more access permissions than
you could shake a stick at through Exchange Admin and waited several days to
see if it makes any difference but it doesn't.
Caveats first - I'm the fireman here, I had no part in
creating the situation!
We have Organisation A containing Site A containing two
servers. Server A is NT4 SP5, Exch 5.5 SP3. Server B is NT4 SP6, Exch 5.5
SP4. Server A is our mail gateway. 80% of our mailboxes are on Server A and
20% of our mailboxes are on Server B.
Server B has recently been added to the site and mailboxes
have been imported into it from PSTs which in turn were exports of mailboxes
from Server X (NT4 SP6, Exch 5.5 SP4).
The problem exists in Organisation A.
The Hierarchy in public folders, seen through OL97 client,
is thus:
Public Folders
|___
Favorites |___ All Public Folders
|___ Internet
Newsgroups
| |___ {several appointments
containers}
|___ Quarantine
Folder {blah}
I can rename "All Public Folders" but I can't create
subfolders directly in it - when I click OK in the create subfolders
dialogue, I get a "... do not have sufficient permission...see folder
contact or system administrator..." message. I am a system administrator. In
properties of All Public Folders there is no contact listed, so I couldn't
contact them even if I thought it would help.
I can create subfolders of the Internet Newsgroups folder.
The symptoms are the same when using the OL2K
client. I have tried running DS/IS Consistency
Adjuster on both servers. On Server A I get a number of messages of the form
"The description for Event ID () in Source ( xxx) could not be
found. It contains the following insertion string(s): {blah}". Server B is
able to find Event descriptions. Consistency Adjuster generates Event IDs
7024, 7040 and 7042 on server A, Event IDs 7024,7028, 7040 and 7017 on
Server B.
On Server A, the system event log contains a large
number of event 10003s : "Access denied attempting to launch a DCOM Server
using DefaultLaunchPermssion. The server is: {?class? string in
here}."
It may or may not be relevant but Server X is not as yet
connected in any way to Organisation A, but I would like to connect in order
to migrate the Public folders of Organisation X to Organisation A using
inter-organisation replication.
Can anyone shed any light on what may be (not) happening
here?
Clive Belbin, Systems Support
Contractor, Croydon Primary Care Trust.
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they
are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
Health Informatics Service (Croydon Primary Care Trust) 020 8401 3900
or 020 8680 2008 Ext 212.
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
RE: Exchange Conference
Title: Message And the C stands for Corona. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:35 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Plus MEC isn't just for Exchange anymore. They changed the E to mean Enterprise. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Nothing particularly Exchange specific as this per say... -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange Conference I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that I need to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct. The question that I've been asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange conferences that will be offered. Other than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings related to Exchange, I've found nothing searching on Microsoft's event site. Do yall know of any other Exchange conference going on in the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as much as or more information than MEC2002? Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this here list, so he'll want to know if you guys know of anything else. (Actually, he wants me to go, it's our CTO that is asking if there's something else available.)Thanks yall! (Yall is Texan for you all, all of you, yous guys etc) Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Conference
Title: Message Is "All Yall's" the plural possessive? -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference "Yall" is both singular and plural. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference I thought "Yall" was singular, and the plural was "All Yall". -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Conference I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that I need to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct. The question that I've been asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange conferences that will be offered. Other than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings related to Exchange, I've found nothing searching on Microsoft's event site. Do yall know of any other Exchange conference going on in the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as much as or more information than MEC2002? Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this here list, so he'll want to know if you guys know of anything else. (Actually, he wants me to go, it's our CTO that is asking if there's something else available.) Thanks yall! (Yall is Texan for you all, all of you, yous guys etc) Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Conference
Title: Message
All
yall's base done belong to us.
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:42
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
Conference
Oh
geeze, one of them there English major type persons
"All
Yall's" could be plural OR singular possessive, depending on whether the
"yall" being referenced is one person or multiple persons. While "Yall"
usually refers to multiple people, that is not always true when spoken by a
native Texan ;)
Sherry Abercrombie
Data Center Administration
Team Information
Technology "With
sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
-----Original Message-From: Erik Sojka
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:36
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange
Conference
Is
"All Yall's" the plural possessive?
-Original Message-From: Abercrombie,
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002
2:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Exchange Conference
"Yall" is both singular and plural.
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center
Administration Team Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
-Original Message- From:
Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference
I thought "Yall" was singular, and the plural was "All
Yall".
-Original Message- From:
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:
Exchange Conference
I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that I need
to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct. The question that I've been
asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange conferences that will
be offered. Other than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings related to
Exchange, I've found nothing searching on Microsoft's event site.
Do yall know of any other Exchange conference going on in
the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as much as or more
information than MEC2002?
Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this here list,
so he'll want to know if you guys know of anything else. (Actually,
he wants me to go, it's our CTO that is asking if there's something else
available.)
Thanks yall! (Yall is Texan for you all, all of you,
yous guys etc)
Sherry Abercrombie Data Center
Administration Team Information Technology
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList
Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList
Charter and FAQ
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Conference
Title: Message Really! If you're going to use "Yall", at least be gramatically correct about it. ;) -Original Message-From: Whitby.Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference Isn't it really "Y'all"? ( At least in Georgia it is...) -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange Conference "Yall" is both singular and plural. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference I thought "Yall" was singular, and the plural was "All Yall". -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Conference I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that I need to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct. The question that I've been asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange conferences that will be offered. Other than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings related to Exchange, I've found nothing searching on Microsoft's event site. Do yall know of any other Exchange conference going on in the next 6 - 9 months anywhere that would offer as much as or more information than MEC2002? Hey, my lead knows that I participate in this here list, so he'll want to know if you guys know of anything else. (Actually, he wants me to go, it's our CTO that is asking if there's something else available.) Thanks yall! (Yall is Texan for you all, all of you, yous guys etc) Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange Conference
Yo. Hatfield. -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference How about good old Lansdale, know where that is? Perhaps we should go to mapchat -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exchange Conference Lancaster County PA here, about 20-30 minutes east of Hummelstown. Though i do NOT know what the Pennsylvania Dutch for y'all is.. h... -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 15:22 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference I live about 40 minutes south of there. My college roommate was from Hummelstown. Small world. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference I've got relatives in Hummelstown, PA :) Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Jeremiah Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference Its Yunz over here in picksburg pennsylvania. ;-) -Original Message- From: Whitby.Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference Isn't it really Y'all? ( At least in Georgia it is...) -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference Yall is both singular and plural. Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Conference I thought Yall was singular, and the plural was All Yall. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Conference I've just about gotten my leadership convinced that I need to attend MEC2002 in Anaheim this Oct. The question that I've been asked is to find out if there are any OTHER Exchange conferences that will be offered. Other than some 1/2 day Tech Net briefings related to Exchange, I've found nothing searching on Microsoft's event site.
RE: Issue with custom recipient
If a recipient is ambiguous (for the reason you describe and for various others), then Outlook will prompt you to resolve ambiguous recipients either when you press Ctrl-K or when you send the message. -Original Message- From: Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Issue with custom recipient Hmm i just read my own email and it seems very confusing. The basics of it is if you have John smith in your exchange database and then you have another John Smith come on board. How will outlook tell apart who is who.???/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Issue with custom recipient
Assuming that you're replying to me; I just tried this with two people whose names I know to conflict. I created a new message. I typed smith in the To: field I pressed Ctrl-K. Outlook popped up a dialog box, and among the choices listed were Office, phone, title, company and alias. Hopefully one of those can be used to identify the correct person. If the users try using the To. button when composing an email, they can also look at the properties of a GAL entry. I prefer user education instead of kludging the department names to the last name. What if John Smith_Marketing joins the IS department? Also, unique aliases can help. The first John Smith hired gets to be [EMAIL PROTECTED] The more recently hired one gets to be [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where x is his middle initial). -Original Message- From: Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Issue with custom recipient Right i got that far but how will it tell apart if you have two same dispaly names. John smith in accounting,John smith in Marketing. From what i understand Exchange does not recognize the spacebar. What i mean by that i have John smith_Accounting Then i have John smith_Marketing. It appears that in both it recognizes only Jsmith in the alias name unless i put them together [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Footer
Title: Message Ahh -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 5:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Footer How do I setup exchange 2k to add a footer to all outbound email. Thanks, Chris Peden Information Technology Director Sundowner Interiors 1110 CR6 West Elkhart, IN 46514 P: 574-262-1523 F: 574-264-0022 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sundownertrailer.com List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Footer
Title: Message I was hoping with the short week, that we could get by without someone asking this FAQ. 5PM EST the day before the holiday, and the streak is still alive, baby!!! -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 5:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Footer uh yeah ok Thanks, -Chris- IT Director Sundowner Interiors -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 4:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Footer Ahh -Original Message-From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 5:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Footer How do I setup exchange 2k to add a footer to all outbound email. Thanks, Chris Peden Information Technology Director Sundowner Interiors 1110 CR6 West Elkhart, IN 46514 P: 574-262-1523 F: 574-264-0022 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sundownertrailer.com List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Relay
Why do we care? -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Relay Hello all! The URL I posted 18 months ago is dead: Try this one instead: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/tec hnet/security/pr odtech/mailexch/excrelay.asp (probably needs to be unwrapped) Cheers! Dan Please CC any replies to me as I'm a DIGEST subscriber. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Dan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 8:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Relay Hey guys, Let's slow down a bit and talk about relaying - The good, the bad, the ugly... Yes, relaying is good for road warriors as with it they can send as well as receive mail while on the road, using any dialup connection to the Internet. The problem is spammers using these open relays - Or even hijacking improperly closed relays - to flood junk mail all over the place... With YOUR header on it! What you want (and what I provide my customers) is *authorized* relaying. This means that only people who are authorized - Authenticated - can send mail. Outsiders (including spammers) are blocked, because they can't authenticate against an NT Domain. If you's guys would only make a few mouse clicks in Exchange Admin to secure your server instead of wasting keystrokes in a pissing contest... Anyway, punch up: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/exchange/relay.asp and follow the steps about halfway down (starting at screen 2 up through screen 4); and you'll be fine. For reference, take a look at http://www.orbs.org/otherresources.html Cheers! Dan PS: Never get into a pissing contest with a prick... You'll always lose! -Original Message- From: Whitson, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Relay No they don't run them. They actually bring litigation against people who access our equipment illegally. I guess you shouldn't worry. I will just forward the information and be done with it. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:00 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: FW: Relay So you'll fix your open relay then, or does your legal department maintain your mail server? William -Original Message- From: Whitson, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:01 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Relay If you do that again I will be forced to forward the information to our legal department and they will take care of the mater. Richard L. Whitson Exchange Administrator Labor Ready Inc. (800)610-8920 ext 3174 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Looking for More Advice
Title: Message Who? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice Oops... Les isn't on this list. I mean they're used to it. -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:28 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice POP users experience discomfort on a daily basis anyway. Their used to it. -Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice Sherry, Ihad the samedilemma a few months ago when I moved to a new Exchange server. Don't sweat keeping the same server name, use the "Ed Crowley Method" that William's link points to. I can certainly testify that it is indeed "a beautiful thing". YourPOP users may experience momentary discomfort (changing server names, but no big deal really)but MAPI clients (like Outlook)do indeed automagically find their mailboxes on the new server, plus you can take your time moving the boxes over. That in itself is a luxury we get to enjoy all too seldom. I put my new server online, made sure I had it fully patched and configured, moved my mailbox first- strictly for testing connectivity of course ;-) then after a few days started moving user mailboxesin massquantitiesover night. Have fun and let us know how it goes! -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Looking for More Advice
Title: Message And who are you? -Original Message-From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice POP causes me less discomfort[1] than you might think.[3] [1] I use it for personal mail[2] at home [2] Tiggercam correspondence, mostly. [3] I'd get some help with your homophone confusion issues ;-) Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]IT Manager, Sanderson Townend GilbertActing in a personal capacityhttp://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 14:28To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice POP users experience discomfort on a daily basis anyway. Their used to it. -Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice Sherry, Ihad the samedilemma a few months ago when I moved to a new Exchange server. Don't sweat keeping the same server name, use the "Ed Crowley Method" that William's link points to. I can certainly testify that it is indeed "a beautiful thing". YourPOP users may experience momentary discomfort (changing server names, but no big deal really)but MAPI clients (like Outlook)do indeed automagically find their mailboxes on the new server, plus you can take your time moving the boxes over. That in itself is a luxury we get to enjoy all too seldom. I put my new server online, made sure I had it fully patched and configured, moved my mailbox first- strictly for testing connectivity of course ;-) then after a few days started moving user mailboxesin massquantitiesover night. Have fun and let us know how it goes! -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice Thanks, I'll be taking a look at this too. Sherry -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Looking for More Advice That's certainly one way. Personally, I would consider getting over the need to maintain the same servername, and install the second server and move the mailboxes. It is just easier, less down time, MAPI clients automatically get pointed to the new server. It's a beautiful thing. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm William -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Looking for More Advice I will be installing a new Exchange server box this weekend. (Yeah) My question is: Is the method described in Q155216 the best way to move an Exchange server? I will be upgrading to Exchange 5.5 Enterprise in this move, however, I want to have the same computer, organization, site name etc. to keep the impact on users to the minimum. Neither the old, nor the new server is a PDC or BDC. After reading this article through several times I believe that this is the way I want to do this, but would like to have that confirmed for you guys and gals on the list. TIA Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ***The information transmitted in this email is intended only forthe person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and maycontain
RE: Error 1104 in app log
Or they shouldn't. There. That should keep both sides happy. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log From now on, everyone should use both utils on a daily basis -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log And to think that once, someone on this list criticised me for recommending that someone run eseutil. Hell, I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:48 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Error 1104 in app log Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log Damn Neil, quit trying to help people out! :) -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log Pardon me? Exactly what part of my message is giving you s**t? Realise that some people on this list are not happy with running serious utilities like ISINTEG. I responed a lot on this list (ok, a little less lately) but as far as I'm concerned you could be a developer thrown into managing your company's Exchange server, which I've seen on this list. How am I supposed to know your limitations in Exchange? You may be a guru, you may not be. I'm certainly not going to assume you know all about isinteg. Neil -Original Message- From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:33 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Error 1104 in app log Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log Thanks for the help. Neil did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed or just like giving people s**t. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log I've seen the 'error in background cleanup' type messages in 5.5, caused by a file-based AV scanner running on the databases. An ISINTEG cleaned this up, and this may be the solution to the problem below (equally, a call to PSS may be a good idea if Brien's not confident with ISINTEG) Neil -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 June 2002 15:06 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Error 1104 in app log Subject: RE: Error 1104 in app log I have seen similar errors in 5.5 and have concluded that an attachment has been deleted but a pointer to it still exists. Of course, I could be wrong too ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:52 AM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: Error 1104 in app log Has anyone seen this error before? Microsoft doesn't give much information about it. I get 17 of them everyday around the same time 1:18-1:20pm. this is what shows up in my logs. Error 0xf9bf occurred during a background cleanup on attachment 110707c on database first storage group\mailbox store this is what I found on Microsoft site. I'm not sure what they are referring too. Any Ideas Source(s): MSExchangeIS MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store MSExchangeIS Public Store Event ID: 1104 Component: Information Store Symbolic Name: msgidAttachCleanupError Explanation A problem occurred during an attempt to delete an attachment. A write conflict may have occurred. User Action Verify that the appropriate permissions are set for folder and messages. Brien Mayer Senior Network Administrator Merchant's Tire (703)393-4416 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Compacting
Is this list where I go to get Computer Associates support? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting That freak was the one holding you down while I beat you until you understood. He's trolling for fresh fish out of boredom perhaps. Pay attention in class. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting Yes I know. It is a learning process!!! I have never stated that I know everything, unlike this FREAK just did. Thanks again. - Original Message - From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: RE: Compacting Yeah, it took me 5 or 6 e-mail to beat that into YOUR head. -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:58 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting O crap. Are you nutz? You are trying to defend running ESEUTIL AND BLBs?? Do you have a death wish? That has never been done successfully. Not individually, nor collectively. All hard core Exchange Admins who have been doing this for years have both of those items on the black list. We have gone round and round here for months on both issues. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Compacting thats why I do BLB. -Original Message- From: Steve Balen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Again, defragmentation happens daily when ese runs. I am assuming this person means don't compact the store. Running eseutil can be a dangerous thing. Running either of the utilities that will change the structure of the store, can be a dangerous thing and should only be done in extreme measures (like if the IS wont start and you don't have a decent-recent backup of the store, or if you have a huge priv.edb file are running out of diskspace and know that compacting would free up a lot of space an have cheap managers who wont spend money on either more disk space or another server to offload folks to). As you will see, many folks in here are weary (with good reason) about running eseutil against the store. About the only util people tend to run is isinteg just to check the integrity of the store. Even if it needs to be fixed, most folks will just build another server and move mailboxes off of the server with a store that may have a lot of errors or is too big for its own good. Bottom line again, is to only use eseutil as a last ditch effort or isinteg -fix if the store is not accessible. FWIW - these are the reasons you keep impeccable backups of your stores and transaction logs - just like Wilford Brimley says check your blood sugar and check it often, exchange admins say check your backups and check them daily. Once you have a good base of backups, a couple weeks to a month, you will want to test and document your disaster recovery methods 1) to make sure it works and b) to get it down packed so you can do it in a minimal amount of time. Also, I recommend never letting your stores (mostly the priv.edb) get out of hand (getting too big) because it becomes harder to manage it (longer to back it up, longer to restore it, etc.) If it does get too big, either implement strict or more strict mailbox storage policies or simply build another exchange server and move users off of it - if it is e2k, of course, storage groups are a god send for thing like this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:10 PM To: Balen, Steve B - Raleigh, NC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET Subject: RE: Compacting Never? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Compacting DON'T DEFRAG!!! - Original Message - From: Bill Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Compacting 2000, 5.5, all versions? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Compacting Has it been a month already? Since it is a bright relational database, it runs an online maintenance process nightly by default that defrags the contents of the databases. It takes care of itself. William -Original
RE: User Profiles/Template
That's because you're not a member of the secret cabal, which does not exist. -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template I don't think I've ever seen Don or Kevin OT like that. -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: User Profiles/Template I don't hear anybody complain when Don or Kevin makes an oops and post to the wrong list. most of us are subbed on more than one list. I'm not trying to be snotty but the poor guy doesn't really need to get hammered when all that needed to be said was change the extension on the profile to .man. ;4} M - Original Message - From: Garland Mac Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:38 AM Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template It's not the OT post I'm harping about, it's the fact it's on the wrong list -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: User Profiles/Template to both of you. don't go getting all high and mighty about what get discussed on this list. threads move to off topic all the time and unless you can look back and say with out a doubt that you have never made any sort of off topic post. please feel free to use your delete button. Matt - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: Re: User Profiles/Template MessageWhere did he say he was an MCP? and more to the point... WHY IS THIS ON THE EXCHANGE LIST? - Original Message - From: Matt Moore To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: Re: User Profiles/Template Possibly not. I see several customers that have network admins. that got the job and title by default. Most of them know how to push the power button and that is about it. They do have my phone number and use it when the p hits the fan. ;4} Matt - Original Message - From: Garland Mac Neill To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:11 AM Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template Once Again... YOU ARE AN MCP?!?!?!?!?!? Go to the book case, pull down the down book on NT 4 Server and the one called Network Essentials...you know the ones you passed to get your MCP..and read the damn things.. -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template how is this High Importance ? -Original Message- From: Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: User Profiles/Template Importance: High Hi folks, I would like to limit what my users can see and do on their desktop like; No My Computer, Cannot Run, or cannot run Explorer and not see the network neigbourhood on their desktop. They would log on to an NT Server 4.0 PDC domain. I would be glad for any input on creating a template or profile for this purpose. Thanks. Emmanuel __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of Standard Bank. The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ___ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:
RE: User Profiles/Template
With invisible ink. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template Did you fill out the non existent application?? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template Damnstill blacklisted... -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template That's because you're not a member of the secret cabal, which does not exist. -Original Message- From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template I don't think I've ever seen Don or Kevin OT like that. -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: User Profiles/Template I don't hear anybody complain when Don or Kevin makes an oops and post to the wrong list. most of us are subbed on more than one list. I'm not trying to be snotty but the poor guy doesn't really need to get hammered when all that needed to be said was change the extension on the profile to .man. ;4} M - Original Message - From: Garland Mac Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:38 AM Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template It's not the OT post I'm harping about, it's the fact it's on the wrong list -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: User Profiles/Template to both of you. don't go getting all high and mighty about what get discussed on this list. threads move to off topic all the time and unless you can look back and say with out a doubt that you have never made any sort of off topic post. please feel free to use your delete button. Matt - Original Message - From: Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: Re: User Profiles/Template MessageWhere did he say he was an MCP? and more to the point... WHY IS THIS ON THE EXCHANGE LIST? - Original Message - From: Matt Moore To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: Re: User Profiles/Template Possibly not. I see several customers that have network admins. that got the job and title by default. Most of them know how to push the power button and that is about it. They do have my phone number and use it when the p hits the fan. ;4} Matt - Original Message - From: Garland Mac Neill To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:11 AM Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template Once Again... YOU ARE AN MCP?!?!?!?!?!? Go to the book case, pull down the down book on NT 4 Server and the one called Network Essentials...you know the ones you passed to get your MCP..and read the damn things.. -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: User Profiles/Template how is this High Importance ? -Original Message- From: Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 14:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: User Profiles/Template Importance: High Hi folks, I would like to limit what my users can see and do on their desktop like; No My Computer, Cannot Run, or cannot run Explorer and not see the network neigbourhood on their desktop. They would log on to an NT Server 4.0 PDC domain. I would be glad for any input on creating a template or profile for this purpose. Thanks. Emmanuel __ Disclaimer and confidentiality note Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of Standard Bank Group Limited is proprietary to the company. It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender unless
RE: The Martin Blackstone Content Filtering List AKA smut list
Mr. Smut, the Baron of Ass? -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: The Martin Blackstone Content Filtering List AKA smut list I think we should change his name to Mr. Smut. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: The Martin Blackstone Content Filtering List AKA smut list Thanks! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: The Martin Blackstone Content Filtering List AKA smut list In the long standing history of publishing the infamous words from Mr. Blackstone such as the Martin Blackstone List of Danger (http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm ), the latest list produced for content filtering has been published at www.clarksupport.com/images/filter.txt http://www.clarksupport.com/images/filter.txt . For the more mentally challenged or brain dead of us, you can click on Scripts and Tips from www.clarksupport.com http://www.clarksupport.com/ and go to the bottom of the page. resume banging head on desk Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Poll time
Only his wife can tell you about that... -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Poll time Wow Martin... for some reason I thought you were at the reigns of one of the big systems. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Poll time E55 on W2K server 70 Users Compaq ML530 Dual Xeon 1GB 2x18 Ultra 3 for OS and Logs 4x36 Ultra 3 for IS -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Poll time Exchange 2000 SP2 Native Mode 2 NODE cluster Windows Advanced Server SP2 (active/active) 8000+ users Proliant DL580, Quad Pentium III XEON - 700 MHZ - 2 MB cache each processor 3 GB Physical Memory 60 GB RAID on each server Each server is attached through a HBA to an MA6000 SAN One store is 22 GB and the other store is 13 GB Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Poll time Exchange 2000 25 users Dell Poweredge 2450 Dual 733 P3 1 Gb RAM 2 (two) Gb IS (they hate me but I don't allow packrats... :) Also web server and MS Project Central server -Original Message- From: Mark Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Poll time Exchange 5.5 ent. 90 users Dell Poweredge 4500 Quad 700 Xeon (1 meg cache) 1 gig of RAM 24 gig IS (Major Packrats here) -Original Message- From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Poll time Don't ask me why I'm in Polling mode today... but I was just curious and thought it might serve some positive purpose to see what kind of environments everyone is running in. See who has the most people on the smallest boxes and who has the largest org. I used to take pride on my little single proc 200mhz w/mmx Compaq server that acted as the PDC, File Server, Exchange Server, Fax Server, SQL Server for 110 people. So what ya got out there? Exchange 2000 2 sites 700 users Quad 1ghz XEON 3 gigs of RAM at each site 12 gig store at one site and 8 gig store at the other Dell Shop (we've been having ALOT of RAID card failures... anyone else?) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mirroring of Log files.
Title: Message Usually the HW RAID will support mirrors as well. Plug in two drives into the array, and check the RAID options... -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mirroring of Log files. In the discussion on server sizing for Exchange 2000 it was mentioned by several that I should be looking at getting away from using RAID5 for my OS, the application as well as the log files. Mirroring was mentioned quite often as how it should be configured. How are people doing this? In the past, we have tried using mirroring that comes with NT and have had pretty poor results. Is there some sort of hardware mirroring similar to the hardware RAID that I am using now? I do not see us reconfiguring our existing 5.5 servers to accomplish this but I do want to make sure that I have our 2000 optimally deployed. Ken PowellSystems AdministratorClark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)Vancouver, Washington[EMAIL PROTECTED]Voice:(360) 397-6121 x4658Fax: (360) 759-6001 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Rule Capacity in Outlook 2000
The amount of storage allowed for server-side rules is 32kb. Total. It is independent of the number of rules. This is a server-side setting, not a client-side setting, which applies to Exchange 5.x and 2000. If you run up against this limit, try either consolidating existing rules together, or use different criteria (i.e. change a rule so that it triggers on a From address if that is shorter. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Manager, Network Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Rule Capacity in Outlook 2000 Hi is there a limit to the number of Rules you can have in Outlook 2000? We have Outlook 2000 on the clients and Exchange 5.5 at the Server. i remember Q article on the limits of up to 50 rules in the older versions of outlook but could not find a write up on Outlook 2000 Jeán Paul Reece ARAE Networks Inc.\Advanced Research And Engineering 908-310-3074 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Connecting Businesses and People The information in this transmittal is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. If you are neither the intended recipient(s) nor a person responsible for the delivery of this transmittal to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any unauthorized distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify us immediately at the above phone number and delete this message from your sys List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Oh man you are kidding...
And if so, what OS and SP? -Original Message- From: Precht, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oh man you are kidding... Why do you use OE? -Original Message- From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 16:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oh man you are kidding... And once again the convenience vs. security debate is launched. The downside of Outlook was it's ability to execute some script attacks from the preview pane. This is solved somewhat in later versions and patches. And is defeated through a percentage of end-users inability to control their double-click. ANY OS that has file execution associations can be hit by a virus. Both KDE and GNOME are building this functionality into their interface and as such will also be subject to this kind of attack. It is more effectively solved by preventing the executable type files from passing through your server in the first place. If someone wants to email an executable, they can zip it. At least then it is a two stage process for infection and the local desktop anti-virus sw has a shot at the new virus that your Exchange servers anti-virus missed. Even if an end user is infected (floppy, etc) they mail bomb's their own email box as the server refuses to send those attachment types internally as well. I have yet to see a legitimate reason to email an scr file in a corporate environment. :) If it is vbs or js, then the developer can rename it as txt and assume that the recipient can rename it to vbs or js. As to alternative's to Outlook in asked about in another message. You can use Eudora, Netscape Mail, Pine, etc (POP3 or IMAP).. You just LOSE the Email/Calendaring integration function which is the primary appeal of the Exchange server in a business environment. Of course, I am aware of a company that has an Exchange server and uses Outlook Express!? -sp -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oh man you are kidding... It is what happens when people insist on using Outlook as their MUA. BS! You can get any type of virus if you open a mail and execute an attached file. Siegfried / List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Banned list
Title: Message Yup. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list Ass Baron?? -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list ::shaking fist in the air:: Ass Baron!! Where are you?!?!? -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list Why didn't someone come up with a list like this before? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list In my case, I use Praetor. You need a 3rd party app to do that. Yes, the last one is for doubles, and it should be = *.???.???, not ???.???.???. -Original Message-From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list How would you go about implementing a banned list?? That last entry is for double extensions right? Thanks for any help! Info: W2K SP2 Exch 5.5 SP4 NAV for Exchange 2.17 Nick -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Banned list We discussed earlier the list of banned extensions for attachments. Here is my quickies list for those who were questioning. Any additions??? 386 cpl jse pl ade cpp jtd plx adp crt lib prc adt csc lnk reg app crt mdb scr asm csc mde sct asp css mht* sh asx dll msc shb bas dot msi shs bat drv mso smm bin exe msp swf btm fon mst sys c for obj vb cbt hiv ocx vbe chm hlp oft vbs cla hta ov? vss cmd inf pas vst cla* ins pcd vxd
RE: Attachments and Exchange
No and then! -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments and Exchange AND THEN!? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller Posted At: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:55 AM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Attachments and Exchange Subject: RE: Attachments and Exchange No da man. Just a Man Sure I would love one.. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments and Exchange You da manyou need a job? %^) -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments and Exchange http://www.praetor.net this thing should do it. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments and Exchange Yes.. It starts with a P... Let me go find it. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Attachments and Exchange I remember a product from a few years ago that would take all incoming attachments on Exchange and strip them from the mail, then store them elsewhere while still making them available to the user as if they were in the DB. I can't find it now. Does anyone remember this tool? MailEssentials will strip them, but I don't think it allows the user to retrieve them as if they are still in the DB. J List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Off Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K Domain
Title: Message At least he didn't ash about SP level. A minor step in the right direction. -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:46 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Off Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K Domain Well, you know, auto responders and all that... ;o) -Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Off Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K Domain Which OS? WTF? - Original Message - From: Precht, David To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:52 AM Subject: RE: Off Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K Domain which OS ? What groups do the users belong to? -Original Message-From: Michael Morisoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:18 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off Topic: Why can any user add a computer into Win2K Domain I know this is off topic, but since AD and Exchange are so intertwined I thought I would ask this anyway. For some reason, I have had three separate occasions where normal non-admin users have been able to add the computers into my AD Domain. I checked the Group Policy Object under; Computer Settings Windows Settings Security Settings Local Policy User Rights Assignment Add workstation to domain It shows that only domain admins can add computers to the domain. If this is correct, how is it that non-admins have been able to add computers to the domain. Thank you for any help. Mike List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Banned list
Title: Message That's OK, but you're no ass baron. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Banned list We discussed earlier the list of banned extensions for attachments. Here is my quickies list for those who were questioning. Any additions??? 386 cpl jse pl ade cpp jtd plx adp crt lib prc adt csc lnk reg app crt mdb scr asm csc mde sct asp css mht* sh asx dll msc shb bas dot msi shs bat drv mso smm bin exe msp swf btm fon mst sys c for obj vb cbt hiv ocx vbe chm hlp oft vbs cla hta ov? vss cmd inf pas vst cla* ins pcd vxd cmd isp pgm wsc com js pif wsf *.???.??? wsh I am not adding url, office extensions, etcList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Grrr..Port26
Title: Message It's more of an issue of tweaking existing software to work with the newer products. From a migration point of view, there are little differences between W2K and .NET. However, if you wanted to run existing software on .NET, then you would have to meet the minimum requirements and SP versions before installing. It's part of the joy of testing beta software. I trust that MS will have everything in order by .NET's release. -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Grrr..Port26 I was under the impression that the .NET stuff was just an upgrade for the 2000 product line. So does that mean it's going to be another adventure in upgrading from 2000 to .NET as it was from NT to 2000? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Grrr..Port26 Exchange2000 has too many issues on .Net that it isn't worth troubleshooting. Last I heard, it will require sp3 for Exchange2000 to be able to participate in a .Net domain and more than sp3 for it to reside on a .Net domain controller. A few people have got it to install and route email though. -Original Message-From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Grrr..Port26 On exchange 2000 I have been able to set smtp to port 26 in the past but on this new .net beta server Im not able to do it, it keeps bonding to 25 even when I set it up in the properties of the smtp connector.. Anyone else seen this problem is it a .net problem with beta or an e2k issue? Thx List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Banned list
Title: Message ::shaking fist in the air:: Ass Baron!! Where are you?!?!? -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list Why didn't someone come up with a list like this before? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list In my case, I use Praetor. You need a 3rd party app to do that. Yes, the last one is for doubles, and it should be = *.???.???, not ???.???.???. -Original Message-From: Nickolaos Fotopoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Banned list How would you go about implementing a banned list?? That last entry is for double extensions right? Thanks for any help! Info: W2K SP2 Exch 5.5 SP4 NAV for Exchange 2.17 Nick -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Banned list We discussed earlier the list of banned extensions for attachments. Here is my quickies list for those who were questioning. Any additions??? 386 cpl jse pl ade cpp jtd plx adp crt lib prc adt csc lnk reg app crt mdb scr asm csc mde sct asp css mht* sh asx dll msc shb bas dot msi shs bat drv mso smm bin exe msp swf btm fon mst sys c for obj vb cbt hiv ocx vbe chm hlp oft vbs cla hta ov? vss cmd inf pas vst cla* ins pcd vxd cmd isp pgm wsc com js pif wsf *.???.??? wsh I am not adding url, office extensions, etc List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: 16 GB Limit?
Hookers and beer for everyone!! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? I've got you all beat - I'll bring live entertainment. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Not mine... I give them live demonstrations... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man, is that just typical for the execs? -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: 16 GB Limit? It did at a company I used to work for...They approved a P.O. for Enterprise that that they had been sitting on for 3 months right away :) Jay Personette -Original Message- From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Sorry to bring this up again, but this is to make sure I understand before a 3 PM meeting today with my CTO about Exchange, if the priv.edb on Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange will come to a screeching halt? Yes or no? Thanks, Sherry I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan. There is a hardcoded 16GB database limit to each of the private information store and public information store in the Exchange Standard version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? MSExchangeIS Private? Storage Limits? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? GB, not MB. There is a separate 16GB limit on each of the priv.edb and pub.edb. The online maintenance that runs each night will report the database information to the application event log. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? It is agreed that the limit is 16MB. How is that determined? Through the aggregate size of the mailboxes and private folders? Or the size of the Priv and Pub? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 16 GB Limit? Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all the docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between 5.5 and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar 5.5 had the 16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it. Am I right? If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5? John Majetic List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List
RE: 16 GB Limit?
ooOOooh. Do I smell some more letters after your name? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? I am a Technology Whore. Add that to all my Bio's. Unless here I am just slut, as these lists are for free. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? We'll, someone last week said all consultants were prostitutes so somebody better bring lots of quarters ;) Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Hookers and beer for everyone!! -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? I've got you all beat - I'll bring live entertainment. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Not mine... I give them live demonstrations... -Original Message- From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Man, is that just typical for the execs? -Original Message- From: Jay Personette [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: 16 GB Limit? It did at a company I used to work for...They approved a P.O. for Enterprise that that they had been sitting on for 3 months right away :) Jay Personette -Original Message- From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Sorry to bring this up again, but this is to make sure I understand before a 3 PM meeting today with my CTO about Exchange, if the priv.edb on Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange will come to a screeching halt? Yes or no? Thanks, Sherry I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan. There is a hardcoded 16GB database limit to each of the private information store and public information store in the Exchange Standard version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? MSExchangeIS Private? Storage Limits? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? GB, not MB. There is a separate 16GB limit on each of the priv.edb and pub.edb. The online maintenance that runs each night will report the database information to the application event log. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? It is agreed that the limit is 16MB. How is that determined? Through the aggregate size of the mailboxes and private folders? Or the size of the Priv and Pub? Dan Munley -Original
RE: 16 GB Limit?
No. -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Sorry for highjacking the thread, but is there any maintenance other than backups, event log, and IS size monitoring that really needs to be done on a regular basis? John Majetic -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Mgmt is real big on my being able to run off-line defrag regularly Yes, we've already discussed at length the complete waste of time this is. -Original Message- From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? He he. I'm actually going to enjoy this meeting.I'm going to enjoy saying I been telling you this was going to happen, na na na na na. Okay, I probably won't say it exactly like that, but I will enjoy it! My off-line defrag this past weekend gained me nada, zippo, zilch, zero. The stripe set it's on is a total of 25 GB, the IS is @ 12.6 growing, if I can get drives for this server is a big IF, so far I've found none (Compaq 1850R), Exchange Enterprise 5.5 is unavailable that I've found for purchase. Looks like I get a new/second Exchange server out of this deal. Mgmt is real big on my being able to run off-line defrag regularly and/or isinteg if there is database corruption, I'm at the point that I can't do that easily or quickly, of course that's the other part of what they want, it must be quick. Sooo, I've configured a nice little Compaq ML530 with dual processors, 2 GB ram 6 18 GB drives.I'm going to enjoy playing with my new server :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Yes. Absolutely. From Paul Robichaux's Managing Exchange Server 5.5: If you're running the Standard Edition of Exchange, and your public or private IS is very close to the 16GB limit, the IS will shut down instead of growing beyond that limit. If this happens, do an off-line defragmentation of the database (see Chapter 17 for details) to reclaim the database whitespace, then restart the IS. If the database is already compacted, then you may have to consider upgrading to Enterprise Edition to get the store to start. -Original Message- From: Sherry Abercrombie [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? Sorry to bring this up again, but this is to make sure I understand before a 3 PM meeting today with my CTO about Exchange, if the priv.edb on Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange will come to a screeching halt? Yes or no? Thanks, Sherry I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan. There is a hardcoded 16GB database limit to each of the private information store and public information store in the Exchange Standard version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? MSExchangeIS Private? Storage Limits? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? GB, not MB. There is a separate 16GB limit on each of the priv.edb and pub.edb. The online maintenance that runs each night will report the database information to the application event log. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? It is agreed that the limit is 16MB. How is that determined? Through the aggregate size of the mailboxes and private folders? Or the size of the Priv and Pub? Dan Munley -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 16 GB Limit? Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5, but all the docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate between 5.5 and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that regualar 5.5 had the 16GB limit, and
RE: Black listed
Title: Message Are you currently or have you ever been a member of a spamming operation? -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Black listed I don't understand this. I have an ISP att.net and they have given my DSL Router a static IP. I have a PIX firewall and the address there is static. My Internet email is provided by Aye.Net. They have received my list IP's from the Router and Firewall as Black Listed. I have gone to the three sites they say they retrieved the black listings from and I see my two IP's on the list resolving back to my ISP. But I don't see why the IP's are Black Listed. Can anyone explain this and how I can prevent it from happening again. (My Company is on probation with the email provider to find out the cause of this black listing.) My Exchange server resides on the internal side of the firewall. It does not have Internet Mail Connector added. Exchange is 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 Sp6a. Any help is appreciated.Humor is welcomed at this moment.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Black listed
Title: Message Is your ISP a known spam harborer? Were your IP addresses previously owned by a known spammer? -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Black listed Nope. I am just a simple Credit Union with simple users. Nothing fancy like spam lists or otherwise. - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Black listed Are you currently or have you ever been a member of a spamming operation? -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Black listed I don't understand this. I have an ISP att.net and they have given my DSL Router a static IP. I have a PIX firewall and the address there is static. My Internet email is provided by Aye.Net. They have received my list IP's from the Router and Firewall as Black Listed. I have gone to the three sites they say they retrieved the black listings from and I see my two IP's on the list resolving back to my ISP. But I don't see why the IP's are Black Listed. Can anyone explain this and how I can prevent it from happening again. (My Company is on probation with the email provider to find out the cause of this black listing.) My Exchange server resides on the internal side of the firewall. It does not have Internet Mail Connector added. Exchange is 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 Sp6a. Any help is appreciated.Humor is welcomed at this moment.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Black listed
Title: Message Truly nobody, or just specific recipient sites that use the blacklist? -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Black listed Over a year. I don't think so. I have been working just fine until about noon on Friday. Then *Blam* no more outgoing. Not even any errors they would disappear out of the Outbox and nobody would receive them. - Original Message - From: Dawn R. Ashford To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:52 PM Subject: RE: Black listed How long have you had those IP addresses? Any chance they are new, and the old owner is the one who got blacklisted? -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Black listed Nope. I am just a simple Credit Union with simple users. Nothing fancy like spam lists or otherwise. - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Black listed Are you currently or have you ever been a member of a spamming operation? -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Black listed I don't understand this. I have an ISP att.net and they have given my DSL Router a static IP. I have a PIX firewall and the address there is static. My Internet email is provided by Aye.Net. They have received my list IP's from the Router and Firewall as Black Listed. I have gone to the three sites they say they retrieved the black listings from and I see my two IP's on the list resolving back to my ISP. But I don't see why the IP's are Black Listed. Can anyone explain this and how I can prevent it from happening again. (My Company is on probation with the email provider to find out the cause of this black listing.) My Exchange server resides on the internal side of the firewall. It does not have Internet Mail Connector added. Exchange is 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 Sp6a. Any help is appreciated.Humor is welcomed at this moment.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Black listed
Title: Message ::snicker:: -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 5:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Black listed I am unsure about the first but it is ATT. They should be ok.SNIP - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:52 PM Subject: RE: Black listed Is your ISP a known spam harborer?SNIP List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Black listed
Title: Message Have you gotten a bounce indicating that you are being blocked? If your net space is on one or several blacklists, that doesn't necessarily mean that *all* users *everywhere* on the Internet will be blocking you. Check your SMTP logs and see what happens when you send a message... -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 5:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Black listed Third party AYE.NET Email provider using pop and smtp. AYE.NET has opened up my email to allow me to find out why I am black listed. But more and more it is looking like my ISP has someone in my NETBLOCK that is spamming or being accussed of it and the lists are blocking the entire subnet of 12.*.*.* - Original Message - From: Preston Jeffares To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:26 PM Subject: RE: Black listed O.K. am I the only one who noticed this??? If you don't have the Internet Mail Service installed... how are you sending or receiving mail??? -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 5:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Black listed Nope nothing there. Internet Mail service is uninstalled. - Original Message - From: Mike Newell To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:48 PM Subject: RE: Black listed If you open the Exchange admin and click on connections, Internet mail service do you see a bunch of email waiting to be delivered in the outbound queue? Or if you click on the routing tab is the option to re-incoming mail selected? These are ways to check and see if you're currently relaying mail or potentially setup to relay. -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Black listed Nope. I am just a simple Credit Union with simple users. Nothing fancy like spam lists or otherwise. - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Black listed Are you currently or have you ever been a member of a spamming operation? -Original Message-From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Black listed I don't understand this. I have an ISP att.net and they have given my DSL Router a static IP. I have a PIX firewall and the address there is static. My Internet email is provided by Aye.Net. They have received my list IP's from the Router and Firewall as Black Listed. I have gone to the three sites they say they retrieved the black listings from and I see my two IP's on the list resolving back to my ISP. But I don't see why the IP's are Black Listed. Can anyone explain this and how I can prevent it from happening again. (My Company is on probation with the email provider to find out the cause of this black listing.) My Exchange server resides on the internal side of the firewall. It does not have Internet Mail Connector added. Exchange is 5.5 sp4 on a NT 4.0 Sp6a. Any help is appreciated.Humor is welcomed at this moment.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SPAM from this list???
You don't get off that easily. You understand why people get upset about spam, right? It is theft. Other people are paying for your advertising in the form of network bandwidth and disk space. You get free advertising. -Original Message- From: Thomas Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: SPAM from this list??? Ray and Everyone on the list, I deeply apologize for the inconvenience. I am currently working with a few people who are members of this list and I was trying to see if my organization could provide others with value. Please delete the mail that you got from me and I will not contact you again. I promise. Tom List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
Can you do it in a boat? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email I'm telnetting into port 25 to mail.noblehealth.org (tried IP address also). The application is called telnet. Can you telnet into your address? Can you do it from outside your firewall? -Original Message- From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email How are you trying the telnet? What are you typing and in which application? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
Hey man, I was drunk and she told me she was a sheep! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email Erik's done it with a goat. Don't deny it, I've got pictures. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email Can you do it in a boat? -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email I'm telnetting into port 25 to mail.noblehealth.org (tried IP address also). The application is called telnet. Can you telnet into your address? Can you do it from outside your firewall? -Original Message- From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email How are you trying the telnet? What are you typing and in which application? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
Quiet. We're talking. -Original Message- From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email I am connected to an Outside connection on my Laptop. I open Internet Explorer, and type in: Telnet://mail.noblehealth.org:25 and when I hit enter, it opens up Hyperterminal, which makes the connection, and I see data with time and dates pop up, so this tells me that I have successfully telneted, isn't that so? or am I doing it wrong? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
Seriously; Can you forward the entire string you get upon connection in Hyperterminal? -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email Quiet. We're talking. -Original Message- From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:12 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email I am connected to an Outside connection on my Laptop. I open Internet Explorer, and type in: Telnet://mail.noblehealth.org:25 and when I hit enter, it opens up Hyperterminal, which makes the connection, and I see data with time and dates pop up, so this tells me that I have successfully telneted, isn't that so? or am I doing it wrong? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email
Do you work for aol? Are you getting your ISP service from AOL? -Original Message- From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Cannot receive Inbound Email 220 logs-wa.proxy.aol.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.10.0/8.10.0; Wed, 15 May 2002 11:08:34 -0400 (EDT) List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Can someone settle this....
Title: Message Still happee! -Original Message-From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone settle this Actually its called called Outlook 2002, but regardless, you'll see that boxwhether you are on dial-up or the local LAN. Its Microsoft's way of telling you "Im not dead, it just looks that way". -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:20 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Can someone settle this I think the info box is new to OXP. O2K was just a slow over a dial up, but no info box to let you know. mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can someone settle this Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6 Outlook XP and Outlook 2000. My coworker and I are trying to determine how Outlook really works. We have noticed that when we are dialed up on our laptops and connected to our network via an IPSEC VPN connection (same with PPTP), when we connect to Exchange via Outlook XP there are times we get a message that it is requesting information from the server and has a status bar. Under Outlook 2000 there was no information box like that. My argument is that under XP, it is telling you that is requesting information and this is normal operation, given that it's working on a dialup. I should clarify, that we get this box when we are trying to open email or change folders. He says this is some kind of error that needs to be resolved. Can some one shed some light on this. If you need more information please let me know. Garland Mac Neill Systems Administrator Solbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you.== List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: It's Friday!!
Title: Message No sleep, no days off ever again (at least for the next 18 years). -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's Friday!! I don't get it -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's Friday!! I have a baby -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: It's Friday!! Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have lots of Krispy Kreme doughnuts (including a few crullers), Kona Special Blend coffee, and I have Monday off. Three day weekend, yippee! It's going to be a GOOD day!! Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: It's Friday!!
Title: Message Lemme recap ;) Sherry: I have donuts today and I have off Monday! Others: Cool, I wish I had donuts and/or a day off. Martin: I'll never have a day off again. But it's still a good day because of Rebecca Diane Blackstone. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:36 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's Friday!! I have one too, but am lucky. She has slept a minimum of 8 hours per since she was 3 weeks. (currently 15 months). I just don't see how that relates to Sherry's original call to Carpe Friday!! -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's Friday!! No sleep, no days off ever again (at least for the next 18 years). -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's Friday!! I don't get it -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: It's Friday!! I have a baby -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: It's Friday!! Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have lots of Krispy Kreme doughnuts (including a few crullers), Kona Special Blend coffee, and I have Monday off. Three day weekend, yippee! It's going to be a GOOD day!! Sherry Abercrombie Data Center Administration Team Information Technology "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Stopping the madness
Disable Automatic replies to the Internet on the IMC at the Exchange server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Stopping the madness Does anyone know how to disable Outlook's O_O_Ass_stant's capability to automatically forward emails to another address? We have had some problems with people setting OOA on and forwarding their mail to a free mail service. Some services have restrictions on the size of the email they will accept (2MB). Somebody sends somebody the latest goofy MPEG file and it gets forwarded and rejected over and over and, well, you know the rest of the story Thanks in advance. Dan Munley List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Ethernet cable
I do it randomly for fun just to fsck with the users. -Original Message- From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ethernet cable We do this all the time with our 5.5 server. No issues yet. -Original Message- From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ethernet cable We need to do some work on the Ethernet wires that connect to Exchange. Should there be an issue with simply unplugging the cable, rerunning it and plugging it back in without shutting down the services? I realize that the users will not be able to connect while it is unplugged but downtime is much less with just unplug and replug than shutdown and restart. I want to make sure that I do not cause an issue with Exchange itself. NT 4.0 Exchange 5.5 (with IMS) Thank you, John List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Testing exmerge
Are you using an Alpha version on your Intel server or vice versa? -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Testing exmerge I am receiving the following error when I start exmerge... The image file c:\exmerge\ExMerge.exe is valid, but is for a machine type other than the current machine. Any ideas? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Winnt4.0 SP6a Thanks Steve List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: ESEUTIL
Title: Message DB Maintenance and a defrag run automatically every night (check your logs for Event 1221). Any whitespace recovered from either the auto defrag or running ESEUTIL will be used again very shortly through normal server use. The space recovered (which again will get used again) do *not* balance the out downtime required to run the tool, and the potential to seriously corrupt your Store. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: ESEUTIL Seriously? This server has been up for 4 years, and I am pretty sure it has never been run. Does it fragment like a normal hard drive on a workstation or server would, which needs regular maintenance? Exch 5.5 SP4 -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: ESEUTIL Only when necessary? Only during DR procedures? Only under direction of PSS? Only if you're encountering the 16GB DB limit in the Standard version? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: ESEUTIL What is the recommended calendar for using this defrag tool? Once a month? Twice a year? Once a decade? List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set ting up a new user
Can you ping it from a moat? Can you ping it in a boat? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set ting up a new user Can you ping the server by name? Can you ping the server by IP? Can you ping any other servers by name? -Original Message- From: Kevin Fjelsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when setting up a new user I am having a problem resolving the name of an exchange server on a newly added computer. * Exchange server is 5.5 SP4. * The Exchange server is runing on W2k with the latest service packs. * If I log onto the new user directly on the Exchange server box I can use outlook 2000 and specify the Exchange server name and the mailbox name for the user and it works fine. * if I go to the new user's machine and attempt to set up the server access I.E. type in the name and use the check name button the server is not found. * The new user's machine is joined to the domain where the exchange server resides. * Even if I log on asa domain administrator on the new machine and try and resolve the Exchange server name it is not found. * I tried the removal of the TCP/IP protocol which is noted in the Microsoft knowledge base and then re adding it again. THis did not solve the problem. * I can access and use domain resources from the new machine. * What is the problem? Kevin Fjelsted List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set ting up a new user
What about the boat? -Original Message- From: Kevin Fjelsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Problem resolving the name of an Exchange 5.5 server when set ting up a new user Yes I can ping the server both by name and address from the machine in question. Kevin List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Antigen Content Filter
Title: Message *tener* *hanji* *avi* -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Antigen Content Filter Nothing makes my day like adding entries like this: * Britney * * anna* * Free * * Fun* * * sexy * So many sad end users... So many happy admins... Has anyone come up with an official "Martin Blackstone Content Filter List" yet? Robert Micciche IT Operations Manager MCP, MCP+I, CCNA, MCSE Cooper Wiring Devices mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cooperwiringdevices.com List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
I don't know of any way to do that, other than manually creating and maintaining an Everybody but William DL. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:01 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: all minus one Hello everybody, Is there a way to send mail to distribution list all but excluding one or two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: all minus one
As long as the recipients are on the same server, then yes. The DL gets expanded to the individual recipients before the message gets sent, so SIS is retained whether a DL is used or not. -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one I have an other question attached to this. I understand when a mail is sent to a DL, it will be a single instance storage. When you select so many users, will this still be a single instance storage? Thanks Mal -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Never even thought of that - cool! Plus, you could add them as bcc's so that people wouldn't see the other recipients, if required. -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Wow! Cool!!! -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one New Message. Click To: button. Highlight DL. Click Properties. Select names, minus exceptions. Click on 'To' under Add to (lower left). -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one Thank you sirs. I got it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one If it is a one time thing, quickly remove the folks from the DL, send the mail, then put em back... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: all minus one That would be a neat feature, but I've never seen it on Exchange. :o| -Original Message- From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: all minus one Hello everybody, Is there a way to send mail to distribution list all but excluding one or two people? I checked in the rule wizard, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks Mal List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Blockers
Title: Message I couldn't find the whitepaper, but the info seems to have been supplanted by a series of links and KB articles. http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/Out2ksec.aspx http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q263296 You install the OL98/2K security enhancement, and it will block all Level 1 attachments by default. If you have Exchange, you can set a flag in the Registry that instructs the OL security update to look for a special PF that will override the default settings. The PF doesn't receive the attachments, but is a custom-developed form that contains the settings. OL checks the PF, and uses the administrator-controlled settings to derive a customized Level-1 and Level-2 list. ** Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE ** Manager, Network Services ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** -Original Message-From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:06 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers ok, i will bite. do you setup the public folder to recieve the messages? how does that work??? Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville 410-869-1141 -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook Blockers If you're using Exchange, you can. Read the whitepaper on the file blocking features and it tells you how to set up a public folder that will let you restrict based on username. You can also muck with the Registry in 2002, but we've just used the PF. ** Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE ** Manager, Network Services ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Blockers Is there a way to adjust the level one list of automatically banned attachments in 2000/2002? For normal users this is fine, but as an admin, I need exe, bat, asp, etc files. Or do I need to just keep zipping everything? Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DNS
Title: Message What problem are you having? Other than you doing something wrong? :0) -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS off topic.. we have a DNS setup.. say..company.com we want to create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in Australia control JUST that subdomain. im lost.. what am i doing wrong?? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DNS
Title: Message Are you talking about delegating permission to AD objects (security/permission related and done through ADUC)? Or are you talking about delegating a DNS zone to another server (not security related and done via the DNS snapin)? I think you may have them confused with each other. Which tool did you use to delegate what to whom? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS i went thru the delegation wizard, and while i created a delegation, i cant see how i tell it who can do what in that delegation, nor can ya pull up a properties on it. All you can do it tell it what Server hosts it. -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS What problem are you having? Other than you doing something wrong? :0) -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS off topic.. we have a DNS setup.. say..company.com we want to create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in Australia control JUST that subdomain. im lost.. what am i doing wrong?? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DNS
Title: Message Strictly DNS then. There is no delegation wizard *in DNS* to do this, so you may first want to check the delegation you did before and ensure that you didn't transfer the zone to another server. What you want is the Security Tab. Right-click on the au.company.com zone in DNS, and select "Properties". Go to the Security tab. Modify to your heart's content. Keep in mind that the "delegation" you're thinking of and the "delegation" available under DNS are two different things ;) -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS Im talking about allowing a defined group of admins rights to the subdomain ONLY. DNS is setup as company.com with a subdomain called au. This subdomain is au.company.com. we want Admins in AU to be able to work with the records in au.company.com but not be able to touch anything else in DNS. We are win2k native mode. -----Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS Are you talking about delegating permission to AD objects (security/permission related and done through ADUC)? Or are you talking about delegating a DNS zone to another server (not security related and done via the DNS snapin)? I think you may have them confused with each other. Which tool did you use to delegate what to whom? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS i went thru the delegation wizard, and while i created a delegation, i cant see how i tell it who can do what in that delegation, nor can ya pull up a properties on it. All you can do it tell it what Server hosts it. -----Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS What problem are you having? Other than you doing something wrong? :0) -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS off topic.. we have a DNS setup.. say..company.com we want to create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in Australia control JUST that subdomain. im lost.. what am i doing wrong?? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: DNS
Title: Message Hmmm. You're right. I just created a new domain under my existing zone and could not find a properties tab. The security settings and permissions are applied per zone and apply to all domains in that zone. What should work is creating another zone separate from the company.com zone. (separating zones does not change anything about the relationship between the zones nor does it affect the AD domain hierarchy). Once you create the au.company.com zone you should be able to set its permissions appropriately. -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS Its not a zone. au.company.com is not a zone. we have one zone company.com in THAT zone there is a subdomain called au -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS Strictly DNS then. There is no delegation wizard *in DNS* to do this, so you may first want to check the delegation you did before and ensure that you didn't transfer the zone to another server. What you want is the Security Tab. Right-click on the au.company.com zone in DNS, and select "Properties". Go to the Security tab. Modify to your heart's content. Keep in mind that the "delegation" you're thinking of and the "delegation" available under DNS are two different things ;) -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS Im talking about allowing a defined group of admins rights to the subdomain ONLY. DNS is setup as company.com with a subdomain called au. This subdomain is au.company.com. we want Admins in AU to be able to work with the records in au.company.com but not be able to touch anything else in DNS. We are win2k native mode. -----Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS Are you talking about delegating permission to AD objects (security/permission related and done through ADUC)? Or are you talking about delegating a DNS zone to another server (not security related and done via the DNS snapin)? I think you may have them confused with each other. Which tool did you use to delegate what to whom? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS i went thru the delegation wizard, and while i created a delegation, i cant see how i tell it who can do what in that delegation, nor can ya pull up a properties on it. All you can do it tell it what Server hosts it. -----Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DNS What problem are you having? Other than you doing something wrong? :0) -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DNS off topic.. we have a DNS setup.. say..company.com we want to create a subdomain called au.company.com and let only the Admins in Australia control JUST that subdomain. im lost.. what am i doing wrong?? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charte
RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?
Title: Message Yo. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Word Bizatch!! The Exmerge is in the hizouse!! -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? No, I chose not to, I loved shutting down MTA's and servers to run Exmerge. ;o) Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Did you have AV on your Exch server -Original Message-From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:33 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Used to live a few blocks from there... Don ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message-From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Anything between 156th and E. Lake Sammamish/Fall City Road??? Heheh -Original Message-From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:17 PMPosted To: Exchange 2000 ServerConversation: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary?Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? lives in Redmond? -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: April 10, 2002 4:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? What is a 'Microsoft resident'? Is that some form of internship? -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? I think it's ridiculous. -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? Our environment has Trend running on the firewall for anti-virus and content filtering. We have NAV running on the desktops. We are currently evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K Exchange servers (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN). However, our Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems and instability (particularly Symantec's product). He said that when a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a quick ExMerge on the server is just as effective as pushing out virus defs using the AV product. With AV software on the firewall and on the desktops, what do people think about not putting AV on the Exchange servers themselves? -- Matt Lathrum General Dynamics Decision Systems When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG
RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
Nope. Your only recourse is to Exmerge the mailbox to a CD, delete the account, recreate a similar account in the new OU, then Exmerge the data back in. This *will* break all existing pointers to the person (I.e. a person replying to an message will get an NDR unless they re-address the message) It's normally not recommended to use OUs in 5.5 for this reason. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Manager, Network Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: Kevin Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 I have created several organizational units on my Exchange 5.5 server. The organizational units divide our users into several Recipients. I would like to move these email accounts from the Recipients folder to the other sub organizational folders. Can this be done? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
Wow. Good article. So them MVPs know some stuff, huh? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 This is the best method I have found http://www.mvps.org/exchange/containermove_frames.htm --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 Nope. Your only recourse is to Exmerge the mailbox to a CD, delete the account, recreate a similar account in the new OU, then Exmerge the data back in. This *will* break all existing pointers to the person (I.e. a person replying to an message will get an NDR unless they re-address the message) It's normally not recommended to use OUs in 5.5 for this reason. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Manager, Network Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: Kevin Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 I have created several organizational units on my Exchange 5.5 server. The organizational units divide our users into several Recipients. I would like to move these email accounts from the Recipients folder to the other sub organizational folders. Can this be done? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
The old message still contains the pointers to the old address (i.e. when replying, a new lookup isn't automatically performed). And that makes sense; to perform another lookup against the GAL or Contacts folder would add some unnecessry load to the server. It's reasonable for Outlook to assume that nothing has changed with the recipients' address(es) when replying to a message. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Manager, Network Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: JENSEN, TIMOTHY C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 Wouldn't the creation of an X.500 address on the new mailbox resolve the NDR problem on emails sent prior to the move? Tim Jensen Cingular Wireless, Chicago -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 Nope. Your only recourse is to Exmerge the mailbox to a CD, delete the account, recreate a similar account in the new OU, then Exmerge the data back in. This *will* break all existing pointers to the person (I.e. a person replying to an message will get an NDR unless they re-address the message) It's normally not recommended to use OUs in 5.5 for this reason. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Manager, Network Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: Kevin Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 I have created several organizational units on my Exchange 5.5 server. The organizational units divide our users into several Recipients. I would like to move these email accounts from the Recipients folder to the other sub organizational folders. Can this be done? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5
'tis good for cleaning up such a scenario, though. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 Great solution. But as you can see, it is still a lot of work. To me it just ads fuel to the fire of why NOT to use containers -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 They certainly do ... That is the only real solution I have ever seen to move between OU's. It is still no fun. I do not think he mentioned in there, something William has learned the hard way, That the letters DN OU CN and all the like are CASE SENSITIVE. So if you do mess with them MAKE sure you do not change the case. Else ADC and Exchange migrations will be no fun. Not that ADC is ever fun. --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 Wow. Good article. So them MVPs know some stuff, huh? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 This is the best method I have found http://www.mvps.org/exchange/containermove_frames.htm --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 6:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 Nope. Your only recourse is to Exmerge the mailbox to a CD, delete the account, recreate a similar account in the new OU, then Exmerge the data back in. This *will* break all existing pointers to the person (I.e. a person replying to an message will get an NDR unless they re-address the message) It's normally not recommended to use OUs in 5.5 for this reason. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Manager, Network Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: Kevin Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving users between OUs in Exchange 5.5 I have created several organizational units on my Exchange 5.5 server. The organizational units divide our users into several Recipients. I would like to move these email accounts from the Recipients folder to the other sub organizational folders. Can this be done? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Making email delete itself
Title: Message That guy was one of the vendor weasels at MEC00. I think the premise is that the recipient doesn't get an email, but they get a secured URL which points to the message content. When the sender says so, the message (stored on the Disappearing servers) disappears, and subsequent attempts to read the message yield a 404. I asked the guy at the weasel booth "why can't I just copy and paste out of IE?" He didn't have an answer. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 2:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Making email delete itself Interesting app... I am assuming there are options to SAVE mail you don't want to go poof? -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Making email delete itself Yes. It's called disappearing email: http://www.disappearing.com Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Making email delete itself My CEO has been told by a colleague that there is an Outlook 2000 add-on that will remove messages past a preset expiration date, no matter where the message has been sent. He's getting info on the name of this application at my request. Has anyone ever heard of an app that will actually do this? TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ "Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. Assimilate you, we will" List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Making email delete itself
Title: Message The same lawyers who are writing these ridickerous disclaimersappended to everyone's messages? -Original Message-From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 2:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Making email delete itself Consider legal implications as well. Once an e-mail leaves your corporate e-mail system, it no longer belongs to your company. Trying to enforce a policy like this to everyone outside your company doesn't sound like it would bode too well with the legal community. You should do some serious checking with your legal folks to find out if something like this (I still think it is not possible to do anyway) would be legal. If not, all it would take is another company to get a whiff of what you were doing, and they would slap you with a huge lawsuit. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Making email delete itself Ben. I'm with you. Really. I tried to tell him that I didn't think it was a good idea, but I have to find out what I can, regardless. Eric Holliday LMI Exchange Administrator -Original Message-From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Making email delete itself I think you and your CEO are both dreaming. You think there is an app out there that will not only control your mail system, but everyone else's mail system in the world? That, in essence, is what you are saying. Wake up. It's not going to happen. You can control what is on your system, or organization, and that is it. Now if that is what you were referring to, then that's different. Mailbox Manager from SP4 will manage mailboxes and delete items past a certain date. But that is only within your organization, and only on the servers that have implemented it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message-From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Making email delete itself My CEO has been told by a colleaguethat there is an Outlook 2000add-on that will remove messages past a preset expiration date,no matter where the message has been sent. He's getting info on the name of this application at my request. Has anyone everheard of an app that will actually do this? TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. Assimilate you, we will" List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: WLKMMAS, members please help
I have a solution for you, but since the question was addressed to the WLKMMAS, I shant help. Unless you want to post another message addressed to the ESJMAS. -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: WLKMMAS, members please help I am doing a little fill in sys admin at a place. you know the job. just watch the servers and make sure nothing happens. Well when I walked in this morning the receptionist was telling me she couldn't get at the company phone book (public folder). It was there when I left yesterday. Anyway I'm not very good at 5.5. is there a way I can restore just that folder with out hosing / setting back the whole exchange. They are using backup exec. with the exchange agent. The exchange backup is just that a job called exchange and exchange is selected. I'm waiting till tonight when all the users are gone and I can do a restore. any thoughts or ideas. Tia Matt List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Outlook Today
Messages don't normally get moved to Outlook Today. OLT is more of a view of your account, not really a folder. What are you seeing that makes you think this? Try sending a message to the affected account with a unique subject, then use Advanced Find to search for that message. What folder is it in? -Original Message- From: Oscar Velasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Today Where do they go and how can one retrieve messages that have been move by mistake to the Outlook Today . MS Outlook 2000 on Win2k Pro. Thanks, Oscar List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise
It is straight forward and will retain all the configurations. -Original Message- From: arae_net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 Standard to Enterprise has anyone upgraded Exchange 5.5 Standard Edition to Enterprise? It is supposed to be straight forward and retain all the configurations. Please offer any suggestions if applicable. thanks JR _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5
I want to install patches all ni-i-ight. Brick backups ev-er-y day!!! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5 Not all patches are applicable to your installation. Installing patches because you may want to prevent issues that may or may not show up violates the engineering principle of KISS. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5 You shouldn't eh - so, wait until I have the problem, then patch? No thanks. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5 You shouldn't install hotfixes just because they exist. You should only install fixes if you are experiencing issues that the hotfix addresses. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5 Nope - just keeping them up to date so I don't have problems. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5 You must have had a lot of problems with your servers to have to install those patches. -Original Message- From: Clark, Steve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5 I've got every hotfix, patch and update install on all my 5.5 servers with no problems. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Patches after SP4 for Exchange 5.5 There appear to be about 8 patches that have been released since Exchange 5.5 SP4. Has anybody had any problems with any of these patches? Is it recommended to install them separately, over a several week period, or should I just go for it and install them all now? Thanks. Robert List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: datbase
Title: Message Call PSS. 1018 errors are bad. -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:01 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: datbase ok I did what MS said.. exmerged it out created a new DB exmerged it back in the store runs, and people work, but i cannot back it up I get this in the event log MSExchangeIS (3124) Direct read found corrupted page (118500) with error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup ? Michael Ross Panduit Corp. 17301 Ridgeland Ave Tinley Park, IL 60477 MCSE MS Exchange Administrator List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
And since your message was so important, we'll send it to you first!! -Original Message- From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits Importance: High i like it too, please send it to me! -Mensaje original- De: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Expuesto a las: Miércoles, 20 de Marzo de 2002 05:50 p.m. Expuesto en: Trafico de Mails Conversación: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits Asunto: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits I'd love that little app myself! Thanks! Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com -Original Message- From: Adams, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits Yhea send that to me too.. i like that -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits Man that is funny...I need you to send that to me...keep my sanity by watching others go crazy. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits We do the same type of thing, in-house. We wrote a little program that we send out as an attachment from time-to-time. We send it to everyone in the company with a forged header to appear to come from elsewhere, and we include a nice little pigeon-english subject, similar to I send you this file to have your advice ;-). If the (l)user runs it, a nice little box pops up on their PC and lets them know that they could have just hosed their machine and seriously fzckued up the network. It also logs their username to a text file on one of our servers, so we can keep tabs on who we caught. It makes for good entertainment on a Friday afternoon. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits I heard a comment on some tech show last week from someone who was talking about the dangers of email bombs, and apparently there is a service out there that you can connect to, compose a tempting junk mail for your users, and send it off to see who will actually blow off the be careful policy at work and just open the message and/or corresponding attachment anyway. I assume that when someone opens the attachment, it will in turn e-mail some kind of a report back to the service (or maybe directly to you?), where you can gather stats on who/how many went for it. This guy quoted a stat -- something like 40% of users will typically open any message/attachment regardless of policy or the repeated preaching by email admins. I got a call recently (rather irate user) trying to open an attachment from an unsupported app... user: I can't open an attachment me: what is it - a word doc or spreadsheet or something? user: I don't know me: is it something you were expecting from someone? user: no me: why are you trying to open it? user: I just want to see what it is me: just ignore it user: but why can't I open it? me: you're PC doesn't recognize what it is user: well, I sent to so-and-so, and what's-her-name, (etc..), and they can't open it either me: sigh just delete it and I'll tell them to do the same Our users not only dive into the unknown, but they make sure their friends are doing the same - aarhhhh! These guys get the sermon on a regular basis but it just doesn't sink in. When I heard about this kind of service out there, I thought this is kind of sneaky (would it even be considered a kind of entrapment?), but it would clearly demonstrate the problem to the managers here. Someone on another list once made a very wise comment (probably been said here too) about trying to use technology to solve behavioral problems, but that's not my intent. I'd like to use technology to raise awareness of the problem - not to solve it. The service might give us a more tangible idea if there are a lot of people here that blow off policy and just open everything they get, and it could be up to the managers here to deal with the offending staff
RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits
Jaysus Christmas, people. Don't send this to the list. Jim H: can you put the application on a server somewhere so all of the frigging AOLusers can shut up? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits Please send the app to me as well. Thanks! Greg Pickett, MCSE Information Systems Manager S. A. Miro, Inc. 303-741-3737 www.samiro.com -Original Message- From: Joe Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits I'd love that little app myself! Thanks! Joe Irvine Director of Information Technology The Business Office, Inc. (609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com -Original Message- From: Adams, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits Yhea send that to me too.. i like that -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits Man that is funny...I need you to send that to me...keep my sanity by watching others go crazy. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits We do the same type of thing, in-house. We wrote a little program that we send out as an attachment from time-to-time. We send it to everyone in the company with a forged header to appear to come from elsewhere, and we include a nice little pigeon-english subject, similar to I send you this file to have your advice ;-). If the (l)user runs it, a nice little box pops up on their PC and lets them know that they could have just hosed their machine and seriously fzckued up the network. It also logs their username to a text file on one of our servers, so we can keep tabs on who we caught. It makes for good entertainment on a Friday afternoon. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT (slightly) - how to test your users e-mail habits I heard a comment on some tech show last week from someone who was talking about the dangers of email bombs, and apparently there is a service out there that you can connect to, compose a tempting junk mail for your users, and send it off to see who will actually blow off the be careful policy at work and just open the message and/or corresponding attachment anyway. I assume that when someone opens the attachment, it will in turn e-mail some kind of a report back to the service (or maybe directly to you?), where you can gather stats on who/how many went for it. This guy quoted a stat -- something like 40% of users will typically open any message/attachment regardless of policy or the repeated preaching by email admins. I got a call recently (rather irate user) trying to open an attachment from an unsupported app... user: I can't open an attachment me: what is it - a word doc or spreadsheet or something? user: I don't know me: is it something you were expecting from someone? user: no me: why are you trying to open it? user: I just want to see what it is me: just ignore it user: but why can't I open it? me: you're PC doesn't recognize what it is user: well, I sent to so-and-so, and what's-her-name, (etc..), and they can't open it either me: sigh just delete it and I'll tell them to do the same Our users not only dive into the unknown, but they make sure their friends are doing the same - aarhhhh! These guys get the sermon on a regular basis but it just doesn't sink in. When I heard about this kind of service out there, I thought this is kind of sneaky (would it even be considered a kind of entrapment?), but it would clearly demonstrate the problem to the managers here. Someone on another list once made a very wise comment (probably been said here too) about trying to use technology to solve behavioral problems, but that's not my intent. I'd like to use technology to raise awareness of the problem - not to solve it. The service might give us a more tangible idea if there are a lot of people here that blow off policy and just open everything
RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ
Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass Off! -Original Message- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ This may require a little translation. ROTFLMAO? Don's and my opinions may differ on the equipment, but I think everyone will recomend a proxy instead of sticking your email on a dmz. too Many holes. You may want to specify the the ip of that machine only. Chris --- Joe L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ROTFLMAO jlc -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ Consultant's name and email address please. -Original Message- From: Craig Sterley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ It was based on a recomendation from a consultant to provide a more secure environment on our internal network. -Original Message- From: Brian Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ Craig, Why are you moving your exchange server to the dmz? Brian -Original Message- From: Craig Sterley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving our exchange 5.5 server to DMZ We are going to be moving our Exchange 5.5 sp4 server into our DMZ off our firewall from our internal network. I know there is something that must be done as far as configuring the communication ports that exchange uses. Does anyone have a good resource for this information on making these changes? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: The case of the vanishing email
Send a message to the user with a keyword in the subject that won't normally be found in his/her messages. rollerskate for example. Use OL's find feature to find all messages with rollerskate in the subject. -Original Message- From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: The case of the vanishing email Does anyone have their dearstalker pipe with them today? I have a user who cannot send mail to a particular mailbox, or to be more accurate he can send the mail and it goes it even seems to arrive at the client (lil envelope in the system tray) but there is nothing in the users folders. The message tracking tells me it's been delivered, there don't seem to be any rules setup on the client to dump mail from this user. Every other user can send to this person and receive from the guy whose mail is getting lost. Any Ideas? Stu List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SSL - no visble certificate
Can you clarify no visible certificate? If the client can't see the cert, how can it verify the cert? -Original Message- From: Michael Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SSL - no visble certificate I've been asked to set-up an OWA Exchange 5.5 server that uses SSL but without the client seeing the certificate. I am using MS Cert Server but the certificate is displayed each time I access the OWA server. Clients must be able to access OWA from Internet Cafes so imbedding the certificate is not possible. I'm told the banks can do it. Will Thawte or VeriSign certificates do this for me because they are trusted providers? Thanks in advance, o knowlegeable ones! List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this.
I'll be able to afford it once I get my money from that Nigerian Prince who secretly contacted me. It's either your software or Penis enlargement. I don't know yet which SPAMMER I'll buy from... -Original Message- From: Thomas Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:53 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this. Hi, I have partnered up with a company that basically automates the repetitive tasks associated with MS Exchange Administration. Everything from fully provisioning new accounts by simply entering the employee's ID number, to deactivating accounts and scheduling them for deletion at a later date, to moving mailboxes can be automated. The tools are about 90% out of the box and 10% customizable to a particular organization's business rules making it very application specific. If you are interested, drop me an e-mail and we can discus your situation. Thanks for your time. Tom Verde List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: e-mail arriving in batches
Title: Message Is it that the mail is arriving on the server in batches? Or the notification on the client is messed up to suggest that the emails appear in the Inbox in batches? -Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: e-mail arriving in batches rebooted the server all clients are affected with the problem -Original Message-From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: e-mail arriving in batches What did you reboot ? the client or the server ? I didnt think Outlook 97 worked with Exchange -Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 14:28 To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: e-mail arriving in batches Our clients are not getting e-mail in Outlook unless they click on another folder within Outlook. Then the mail is sent/received in batches. I don't believe it's a udp port issue. Any other ideas? Last time a reboot fixed the problem, but I'd rather not have to do that again. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows 2000 using Outlook 97, 2000, 2002 Angie Sawyer List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message KMart does; There is a KMart employee on the Swynk list. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm the same with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing so. I'm a Target kind of guy. Just to be on topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I... -Original Message- From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 you must not be married. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer. I don't think they exist. Are you sure you have the name right? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK. They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA. Using SSL of course... :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's.
RE: No reminders for one user (me)
Title: Message Gee, Ray, where do you get that from?? -Original Message-From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 12:13 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: No reminders for one user (me) There's a utility called scancal (I think) available from MS that may be worth looking at. -Original Message-From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: No reminders for one user (me) Try removing any reoccurring reminders from the calendar. I came across this and it turned out to be a corrupt reoccurrence - The clean options didn't work on it. Regards, Neil Raggett -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 07 February 2002 15:07To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: No reminders for one user (me) Using Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP 6a. Outlook 2k I don't get ANY reminders. Other users do. I have default reminders set to 15 minutes before an event. Schedule an event (or more likely have someone schedule one for me). I never get a reminder, all others that I have checked with do. I have tried starting outlook with /cleanreminders and /cleanfreebusy. Still no reminders. What am I missing (i.e. what did I mess with this time)? Thanks for any help Kelly List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: How do you send a recurring message
What happens when you try it for yourself? Yegods! If you had experimented a bit yourself instead of waiting for the list members to do your work for you, you could have had this finished by now. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How do you send a recurring message Thanks for the input. When assigning a recurring task does it send you a message to let you know you have to do it again and again and again? Thanks again, Mike -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How do you send a recurring message In outlook use the options then use View-Options-Do not deliver before. Or you can assign a task and put in recurring updates ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: How do you send a recurring message Good afternoon, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4 Does anyone know how to send a reminder (recurring) message? I have several users that need to be reminded of tasks that have to be done (once a week, once a month, once a year, etc.) They do not want this to be a recurring meeting eating up time slots. Thanks in advance for all of your help and harassment. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5
Dude, you don't recognize the name of Dr. Milton R. Dogg, Internet Architect? The world-famous Dogg Foundation? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5 The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg. Is Snoop Dog your bro? William -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5 You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please go strait to the FAQ [8] and read about circular logging. Then post here what your error message is in the Event log. [1] sar Are you on crack or do you have only 2 gig drives?? /sar [2] [2] Remembered the tags this time [3] [3] But seriously Circular logging is bad [4] [4] you should really read the DR white paper too [5] [5] You did not specify version so here are both [7] [6] Hi Guiseppe!! [7] 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/B ackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp [8] the FAQ http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Scott Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Transaciton logs in 5.5 We had to turn off circular logging for Arcserver to backup exchnage a while back. Anyway, the information store won't start up because it says the transaction logs are too full. I re-enabled circular logging, but the information store still won't start. Any ideas? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
