RE: Outlook

2001-11-01 Thread John Matteson

Exmerge. It may be able to extract the data you are looking to get rid of.
Search technet for "ILOVEYOU" to get the latest version. Read the
EXMERGE.DOC file carefully. It's about 60 pages and very well done.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe



-Original Message-
From: Beth Doughty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook


We're using Outlook 2000 with MS Exchange Server 5.0 sp 4.
A user has managed to enter approximately 40,000 records into her calendar
for the year 2031 (not sure how that happened).  Is there a way to wipe out
a group of messages from her calendar for a range of time Jan 2031-Dec 2031?
I was thinking about autoarchive, but I want to be able to put a range and
not autoarchive her entire calendar.

Any thoughts? tips?

Many, many thanks!
Beth Doughty

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: ARGGHHSEERRVVEE!

2001-11-01 Thread John Matteson
Title: RE: ARGGHHSEERRVVEE!



Weren't you 
looking for a way of reducing your storage and backup 
requirements?
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
Do the voices in my head bother 
you? 

  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:03 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  ARGGHHSEERRVVEE!
  Last time I did an arcserve test like that I ran eseutil in 
  repair mode. The file size of PRIV.EDB ended up to be 5 meg.. from the 
  original 6 gig.
  Store started up great though... ;) 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  ARGGHHSEERRVVEE! 
  So I tested my backups again today.  I was able to 
  successfully restore the DB's (priv and pub - no dir 
  for me).  Of course, small wonder that the IS wouldn't start.  So I run isinteg and test it.  Of course, it 
  was left in an Inconsistent State.  So I run 
  eseutil to check the integrity.  It tells me the 
  Database is corrupted.  THANK YOU COMPUTER ASSOCIATES!  In all 
  fairness, I think this happened last time I tested my 
  restores as well, and I ended up having to repair it 
  with eseutil.  I'll have to see what it brings me this time.  I'm gonna start using NTBackup soon as I can get around to 
  getting the single tape drive hooked up.  I'm 
  sick of this.  Oh well. 
  Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems 
  Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. Novi, MI  48375 (248) 675-2802 Work 
  (734) 678-4423  Cell http://www.peregrine.com/ 
  <http://www.peregrine.com/> 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Recovery Server Question

2001-11-02 Thread John Matteson

You may now write the check for all contributors to attend the next MEC.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe



-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Recovery Server Question


I can definitely relate. I finally finished my mailbox recovery server
yesterday and restored and verified my backups today for the first time
ever! I was so happy I finally got it to work I restored it again.
My thanks to all on this list who contributed to my success.
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Recovery Server Question


Thanks for the help Stephen,

I figured out what I was doing wrong.  When you run the DSIS consistency
adjuster, there is a check box to "Synchronize with the directory and create
new entries for mailboxes that do not have a corresponding directory entry".
Guess what box I did not check!  
Checked that box, ran the adjuster again and surprise, surprise, I've got
Recipients!

Anyway - I am happier now that I've verified backups successfully on both of
my DR servers.

Jim "Still thanking God it was only a test" Holmgren


Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
 


-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Recovery Server Question


Hi Jim,
I posted a response to the list @ an hour ago but for some reason it hasn't
shown up. I had the exact problem you are experiencing except with my Public
store. I found that if I went into Exchange Admin on the Recovery server,
went to Servers, Public Information Store Properties and on the Instances
tab, added the Public Folders on the left side to the Folders on the
Information Store side, I could access them from within Exchange Admin and a
mail client once I set permissions. Hope this helps.

Stephen J. Norton
Manager of Information Technology
Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green PA
1000 Elm Street
Manchester, NH 03105
Voice: 603-627-8147
Fax: 603-641-2302
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Recovery Server Question


Hi All,
I asked this yesterday, but it got caught in a rather large thread, so I'm
going to post it again.
I have an Exchange 5.5 (sp4) server running on Win2k (SP2).  I have built
a recovery server using same OS and SP levels.  I created a new site using
exact same Org and Site names on my recovery server.  I restored the IS
from my production server from tape to the recovery server, ran isinteg
-patch and ran the DSIS consistency checker per the MS whitepapers.  The
problem is, none of my mailboxes show up in the Recipients container.  I
can see them listed under Private Information Store  - Mailbox Resources,
but I cannot view their properties from there.  I get the error message
"The object cannot be found in the directory, this may be because
replication has not completed" when I try to see their properties.
I checked the event log and it says that I have restored the private
information store and public information store.

Anyone know what I did wrong?

Thanks,
Jim "Thank God this is only a test" Holmgren

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup

2001-11-02 Thread John Matteson

All together now

"HI Steve!"

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe



-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 6:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup


I'll go for CA Anonymous ONLY if it offers some sort of a twelve step
program.

"Hi my name is Steve and I use CA products".

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup


Don't worry William, you're not alone (Grin).  Anyone here second the motion
to create a formal Computer Associates Support Group? (we could call it CA
Anonymous)

Seriously, I am at the point where I am about ready to stick a separate tape
drive (single as opposed to the changer right now) on my Exchange box and
have NTBackup back it up.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.


 -Original Message-
From:   Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup

I think I am still on 6.61 sp1.  Thanks.  

I also got a reply from Computer Associates with that one.  Apparently they
do not like what I have to say about their products.  Unfortunately they are
3 years late in expressing their concern.

William


-Original Message-
From: James Gosnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 31, 2001 1:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup


I am a fully signed up member of the CA bashing bandwagon and for the same
reason as William, I have to use their products every day. The ArcserveIT
Exchange agent at our HQ has never ever given me a clean backup in a year,
there is always an error message or some small glitch. I do restore fairly
regularly so it does work (although it's very tricky to restore as well)
but it's so inconsistent.

There is a Service Pack 2 for ArcserveIT 6.61 which I assume you are
using? You can get it from the CA site or I can mail it to you (11MB zip
file), you have to run it on both the backup server and the server with
the agent on it.

James.



> Warning:  Unhelpful, but very therapeutic, rant:
>
> I don't have much in the way of useful assistance here, other than, don't
> use ArcServeIT.  The exchange agent is crap.  It's worse than a buttload
of
> POP connectors.
>
> Is this opinion from the bandwagon of Computer Associates bashers?  No,
it's
> from using the poorly written product for a few years.  I no longer
support
> nor intend to jeopardize important information such as email with any CA
> product as a result of working with the Exchange Agents.  They do make
some
> good software, but not in this department.
>
> Again, though ignored multiple times before, I invite Computer Associates
to
> join this forum of peers and defend their applications to the people that
> actually use them.  Because, last I checked there is no Computer
Associates
> MVP programme, and frankly you don't have enough money to afford me to
look
> up the answer.
>
> Otherwise, it would seem you need sufficient rights to install this
> software, and you don't have such.
>
> Some thoughts...
>
> >>Exchange server 5.5 SP2
>
> Why only sp2?  I hope you at least have the post-sp2 IMS fixes applied or
> you do not have this connected to the internet.
>
> >>I suspect the Exchange Administrator account is corrupted.
>
> Not the likely target.
>
> >>I logged into the Service Account and made sure I was Administrator
there
> too.
>
> I'm not sure I understand that.
>
> >>When I tried to install A/V software I couldn't log in as Exchange
> Administrator either.
>
> That must have been the other frustrating piece of crap software known as
> EjaculateIT.  Personally, I'd go with grisoft's product (www.grisoft.com),
> as Warren has done, if I could.
>
> The above thoughts are solely my own.
>
> William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Warren Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:12 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup
>
>
> Can anybody offer any words of wisdom on this?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Warren Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: October 29, 2001 7:46 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: ARCSERVE for IBM 1/2" DAT 35/70MB drive...Administrator rights
> on 

RE: outlookweb

2001-11-02 Thread John Matteson

How do you know you are receiving new mail?

Is your outlook/Outlook express client set for POP3 delivery so that all
your mail is pulled off the server prior to OWA seeing it?

Is your Outlook client set to deliver to a PST file and dumping the mail out
of the INBOX prior to your seeing it on OWA?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe



-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: outlookweb


yes I am

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: outlookweb


are you clicking on the "check for new mail" buttoN?

-Michèle
Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com>
Our new 2001 Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley>
Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk>
-
The real measure of your wealth is how much you'd be worth if you lost all
your money. -- Anonymous
-


-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: outlookweb


Hi
Can someone help me figure out why I can send from outlook web but not
receive. Nothing happens no error message when try to receive.

Brien Mayer
Network Administrator
Merchant's Tire
(703)393-4416
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: I got a tough one

2001-11-02 Thread John Matteson



Are the 
two users in Missoula using two different Exchange servers?
 
Are the 
two users in Missoula looking at the GAL on line or offline 
(OAB)?
 
Does 
someone in a different site (other than Seattle) have a similar 
problem?
 
Is user X 
in the Missoula site, or somewhere else?
 
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
Reduce your stress; Resign as the 
General Manager of the Universe 

  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Rick Ward - HQ 

To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:49 
PM
Subject: I got a tough one

So 
here's a tough one for everyone...
 
 
Specs:
WIN2K(Advanced Server) SP1
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Running on HCL hardware(Dell)
1 
bridgehead supporting 34 sites spread across the US
 
Scenario
1.) Client in site Missoula opens Outlook 2000(running on WIN98 
SE).
2.) Client opens GAL and searches on name "User 
X"
3.) Finds name "User X" and double clicks the 
name
4.) Standard Screen comes up with all information about that user, 
address, location, Title, etc.. etc.. Everything shows except for(Drum roll) 
the ZIP Code
5.) Another user in say Seattle, where the main network is, tries the 
same thing and can see the Zip(which existed all along).
 
Why is this happening?
 
Now the user in Missoula can go to another computer and might see 
that ZIP code, but 5 minutes later may not.List Charter 
and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: I got a tough one

2001-11-02 Thread John Matteson



You may 
have a problem with Directory Replication.  Check the 
following:
 
    LMHOSTS/HOST file on each machine involved. Make sure any 
information contained therein is correct.
 
    In the Missoula site, go to the server where 
the Directory Replication connector resides, go to the Seattle connector and 
request a full reload of the directory information from Seattle. Yes you know 
that it will take hours to process.
 
If this 
does not clear the problem, you may end up having to break the DR connector 
between your site and Seattle.
 
If this 
doesn't solve the problem, you may have a problem with your local DIR.EDB file 
and need to call PSS for assistance.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
Reduce your stress; Resign as the 
General Manager of the Universe 

  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:03 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I got a tough 
  one
  see 
  >> below
  -Original Message-From: John Matteson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 
  10:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: I got a 
  tough one
  Are the 
  two users in Missoula using two different Exchange 
servers?
  >>Same Server
   
  Are the 
  two users in Missoula looking at the GAL on line or offline 
  (OAB)?
  >> Online
  Does 
  someone in a different site (other than Seattle) have a similar 
  problem?
  >> YES
  Is user 
  X in the Missoula site, or somewhere else?
  >>Somehwere Else
   
  John Matteson; Exchange 
  Manager Geac 
  Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
  Reduce your stress; Resign as 
  the General Manager of the Universe 
  

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rick Ward - HQ 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 
  4:49 PM
  Subject: I got a tough one
  
  So here's a tough one for everyone...
   
   
  Specs:
  WIN2K(Advanced Server) SP1
  Exchange 5.5 SP4
  Running on HCL hardware(Dell)
  1 bridgehead supporting 34 sites spread across the 
  US
   
  Scenario
  1.) Client in site Missoula opens Outlook 2000(running on WIN98 
  SE).
  2.) Client opens GAL and searches on name "User 
  X"
  3.) Finds name "User X" and double clicks the 
  name
  4.) Standard Screen comes up with all information about that user, 
  address, location, Title, etc.. etc.. Everything shows except for(Drum 
  roll) the ZIP Code
  5.) Another user in say Seattle, where the main network is, tries 
  the same thing and can see the Zip(which existed all 
  along).
   
  Why is this happening?
   
  Now the user in Missoula can go to another computer and might see 
  that ZIP code, but 5 minutes later may not.List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: .dat file

2001-11-12 Thread John Matteson

Where did you pick up that little pearl of wisdom? Is there a list of these
type switches for Notepad?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)



-Original Message-
From: Warren Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


Did you know that if you use .LOG as the first line in your notepad document
it inserts the date and time?  It creates a great little journal and
automatically inserts the date/time field every time you open it up.

Warren

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 8, 2001 5:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


I think we should get rid of all the word processors and about half of the
other applications in favor of notepad. Anyone else got like 200 TXT files
on their desktops with notes, phone numbers, IP addresses and other
important info .

 Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.


-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file

whenever I get a format I don't recognise, or an attachment that's somehow
gotten it's name corrupted in the post, I find notepad can often pull enough
out of it to at least give an inkling as to what's inside...

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 November 2001 10:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


yeah, found it.  It was an rtf file...

-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 November, 2001 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


depends vastly on what's in it... a .dat can be pretty much anything
from a
windows system file to a videoCD and about 200 things in between...do
you
have any idea what the content of the file is?

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 November 2001 09:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: .dat file


Hi,

how do I open or convert a .dat file?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/01/01


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA installation

2001-11-12 Thread John Matteson

Also the Exchange 5.5 FAQ has a good section on OWA as well.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)



-Original Message-
From: NeoNexus Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA installation


These may be old, but try them

www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=15769

www.microsoft.com/smallbusinessserver

www.microsoft.com/technet/resource/technet/apps/outlook/owa/owa1.htm



- Mark W. Harrison
System Manager, NeoNexus Systems
(716) 475-9180 x 221
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.neonexus.com
--
- Original Message -
From: "Mathews, James E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 02:21 PM
Subject: OWA installation


If someone has the white papers on how to install OWA could you toss me the
link.

I set OWA up a few months ago and worked great but the server I had it on
went down and rebuilt and it is not working.

I made a big mistake and did not document what I did last time to get it to
work.

I searched Microsoft and all it came back with was installation of Exchange
not the OWA portion.

We are running Exchange 5.5 and using MS office 2k.

Any help would be great.

Thanks
James

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: An email in the IMS

2001-11-12 Thread John Matteson

Scott will also have to take a look in the IMCDATA/OUT directory and find
the mails that are looping and delete them. You may be able to go into the
IMC via the Exchange Admin program and delete them from the QUEUE tab. Just
hope you delete the correct messages.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: An email in the IMS


It's called a mail loop and it is the #1 reason why you don't do
forwarding for ANYONE.
You are lucky you caught it.

You need to turn off the forward now. It will eventually stop looping,
but not until the forward it off.

-Original Message-
From: Scott Burgin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: An email in the IMS


Running Exchange 5.5, sp4 on a NT 4.0, sp6 server.
We have a traveling executive here who had us set up his domain email
account to forward email to his ameritech and aol account. Anyway,
someone sent him an attachment that his Ameritech account rejects.  So
what happens is that the IMS queues the email message and continues to
try and send it, but it keeps getting rejected.  So he gets these
rejection messages and the IMS fills up and boggs down email traffic.  I
went to his local PC and opened up Outlook and found the email that
contained the file that was too big and deleted it early this morning. 
BUT!, the message for some reason keeps queueing into the IMS Queue.  I
delete them out of the queue, but they keep reappearing.  I don't know
what to do at this point. Help!

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Can I delete my BADMAIL

2001-11-12 Thread John Matteson

Yes.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)



-Original Message-
From: Larry Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Can I delete my BADMAIL


I have a lot of items in my badmail directory (exch 2000).  Can I just
delete them?

Larry 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Event ID 183

2001-11-12 Thread John Matteson

The event 1221 shows the amount of whitespace in the Private or Public
Information Store. In a nutshell this is the amount of space available in
the information store without the IS having to expand it's physical size.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)



-Original Message-
From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Event ID 183


Can anyone elaborate on my previous email?
Thx:P
Rodney Li

> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
> 
> --_=_NextPart_001_01C167D3.EE2AFE80
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>   charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> I get them all the time. I'm not 100% sure why as yet. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 2:10 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Event ID 183
> 
> 
> Hello All,
> I have the following message in my event viewer: MSExchangeIS (321) Online
> defragmentation of database 'F:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' was interrupted
> and terminated. The next time online defragmentation is started on this
> database, it will resume from the point of interruption. It looks like the
> online defrag can not terminate even though information store maintenance
> is scheduled from 12:00 AM to 04:00 AM.
> 
> The other intriguing event is event 1221. The database has 2 megabytes of
> free space after online defragmentation has terminated.
> 
> Has anyone seen these event messages? Exchange 5.5 SP4. Everything is
> running OK. I do have a couple of event ID 290 about the MTA also.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rodney Li
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> --_=_NextPart_001_01C167D3.EE2AFE80
> Content-Type: text/html;
>   charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  charset=3Diso-8859-1">
>  5.5.2651.75">
> RE: Event ID 183
> 
> 
> 
> I get them all the time. I'm not 100% sure why as =
> yet. 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Rodney Li [ HREF=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] T>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 2:10 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Event ID 183
> 
> 
> 
> Hello All,
> I have the following message in my event viewer: =
> MSExchangeIS (321) Online
> defragmentation of database =
> 'F:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' was interrupted
> and terminated. The next time online defragmentation =
> is started on this
> database, it will resume from the point of =
> interruption. It looks like the
> online defrag can not terminate even though =
> information store maintenance
> is scheduled from 12:00 AM to 04:00 AM.
> 
> 
> The other intriguing event is event 1221. The =
> database has 2 megabytes of
> free space after online defragmentation has =
> terminated.
> 
> 
> Has anyone seen these event messages? Exchange 5.5 =
> SP4. Everything is
> running OK. I do have a couple of event ID 290 about =
> the MTA also.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rodney Li
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>  HREF=3D"http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm"; =
> TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.=
> htm
> 
> 
> 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


> 
> --_=_NextPart_001_01C167D3.EE2AFE80--




RE: manual

2001-11-13 Thread John Matteson

The Outlook 98 and Outlook 2000 books by Sue Mosher.

I'm sure volume discounts can be arranged from the publisher.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)



-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: manual


Where can I find an easy to use manual for Outlook 2000 and 98 to hand
out to users?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: exchange 2000 send list

2001-11-13 Thread John Matteson

The external addresses go into Custom Recipients, then the CR's go into the
Distribution list. Add the list of authorized users to the ACCEPT FROM list
on the DL.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)



-Original Message-
From: Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 2000 send list


Hi all,

I have over the 200 email-adresses that i must send mothly an email.
Is there a way to make a distribution list with external email adresses in
Exchange 2000.
Only users in some departments may see the list in their addressbook,
other may not.

Thanks in advantage

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-14 Thread John Matteson

So.. you're saying what.. that the members of this list aren't competent?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


Requires?

If that were so, this list wouldn't exist.


-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange


On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Lefkovics, William wrote:
> 3) They both will require competent administrators to function well

  I've found *anything* requires a competent administrator to function well.

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not
|
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Oracle vs. Exchange

2001-11-14 Thread John Matteson
Title: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange



I'm sure 
that we have all had days where the brain fog was thick.
 
Yes there 
are a number of other administrative functions, but whom, other than an Exchange 
admin, has to get involved with so many of them as a routine portion of their 
job? WINS/DNS, DHCP, Hardware, Routing, Firewalls, and all the others I've 
missed.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
My toys! My toys! I can't do this 
job without my toys! 

  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:14 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange
  I'm not.  :) 
  Some members probably aren't really that competent at 
  times.  Then again, this is just an Exchange list, there are many more 
  admin functions...
   -Original Message- From: 
    John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent:   Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:57 
  PM To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues Subject:    RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange 
  So.. you're saying what.. that the members of this list aren't 
  competent? 
  John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac 
  Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 
  239 - 2981 
  My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Oracle vs. Exchange 
  Requires? 
  If that were so, this list wouldn't exist. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:18 AM To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. 
  Exchange 
  On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Lefkovics, William wrote: 
  > 3) They both will require competent administrators to 
  function well 
    I've found *anything* requires a competent 
  administrator to function well. 
  -- Ben Scott 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in 
  this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy 
  of any other person, entity or | | organization.  All information is provided without warranty of 
  any kind. | 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: .dat file

2001-11-14 Thread John Matteson

Thanks. I'll check it out.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Warren Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


In the "index" of Notepad Help, the first five or six alphabetical entries
are the documentation on programming tips for Notepad.  This includes
headers and footers and also some information on using Notepad to set up web
pages.

Warren

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 12, 2001 7:01 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


Where did you pick up that little pearl of wisdom? Is there a list of these
type switches for Notepad?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)



-Original Message-
From: Warren Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


Did you know that if you use .LOG as the first line in your notepad document
it inserts the date and time?  It creates a great little journal and
automatically inserts the date/time field every time you open it up.

Warren

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 8, 2001 5:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


I think we should get rid of all the word processors and about half of the
other applications in favor of notepad. Anyone else got like 200 TXT files
on their desktops with notes, phone numbers, IP addresses and other
important info .

 Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.


-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file

whenever I get a format I don't recognise, or an attachment that's somehow
gotten it's name corrupted in the post, I find notepad can often pull enough
out of it to at least give an inkling as to what's inside...

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 November 2001 10:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


yeah, found it.  It was an rtf file...

-Original Message-
From: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 November, 2001 11:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: .dat file


depends vastly on what's in it... a .dat can be pretty much anything
from a
windows system file to a videoCD and about 200 things in between...do
you
have any idea what the content of the file is?

-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 November 2001 09:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: .dat file


Hi,

how do I open or convert a .dat file?

Kim

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/01/01


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 11/01/01


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Public Folder as an email recipient

2001-11-15 Thread John Matteson

Any Public Folder can receive mail directly. You need to set DEFAULT
permissions to CONTRIBUTOR.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral;
begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil,
it multiplies it... Through violence you may murder the hater, but you do
not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate...Returning
violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night
already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out hate; only love can do
that. -- Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.



-Original Message-
From: Rajagopal, Sriram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder as an email recipient


Hi,

I wuld like to know how to setup the public folder as a email recipient in
exchange5.5...is ther any other way other than creating a folder in the
container and having the mail id for that folder configured to rec.
mails.Can we create a mailbox directly in the public folder??


Ram.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: looking for hardware

2001-11-15 Thread John Matteson

Unless you have a power related failure on a Saturday.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925

-Original Message-
From: Simon Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:11 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


I use DELL for all our intel needs and have never gone back to anything
else. Their machines are as stable as anything - the build quality is
extremely cool and their support services and on site maintenance
rocks!.


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Swift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 November 2001 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: looking for hardware


Don't buy Dell in my experiance they are very unstable.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Agents

2001-11-26 Thread John Matteson

That's listed as CUSTOMS Agents (Please note the "S" on the end).

Or it could be a widget program designed for use with Lotus Notes.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Agents


Those are people who check your bags when you come into the USA from a
different country. If that it - it could be people who have email addresses
that you want to forward mail.

ellery

-Original Message-
From: Mike Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Agents


hi list,
knows somebody what "custom agents" are??

thanx mike



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Blocking attachments

2001-11-27 Thread John Matteson

Since when did anyone working with computers get any respect?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


I never get an respect.

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


But has his been hijacked by numerous web sites with no credit given?? I
don't think so.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Of course : > 

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Kevin Miller's list is superior.  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


The world famous Martin Blackstone blocked extension list should help
you. Does anyone have that?

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking attachments


I know this has been asked many times before, but what extensions are
you guys blocking in Antigen?

Thanks,

Joseph L. Heaton, MCSE
NT Administrator
FDI Consulting, Inc.
1610 Arden Way,  Suite 145
Sacramento, CA  95815
(916)921-4390 x.228

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: RE: Blocking attachments

2001-11-27 Thread John Matteson

At least they were EX Navy, could you imagine getting diving pay to clear a
pond of golf balls.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha


-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: RE: Blocking attachments


Nice one!

Kevin

OT - I once saw a documentary about two ex-US Navy divers who's sole job in
life was to empty US golf course lakes of lost golf balls. They got paid 20
cents per ball. Talk about over-qualified to do the job - remind you of
anyone?? 

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2001 15:36
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Some golf, sports club things... Members only deal...  McDonalds is
Tuesdays : >

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Macdonald's or Burger King??

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2001 14:47
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Last month my owners treated my department to a very nice lunch : >

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Since when did anyone working with computers get any respect?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because
wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine.
Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


I never get an respect.

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


But has his been hijacked by numerous web sites with no credit given?? I
don't think so.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Of course : > 

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Kevin Miller's list is superior.  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


The world famous Martin Blackstone blocked extension list should help
you. Does anyone have that?

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking attachments


I know this has been asked many times before, but what extensions are
you guys blocking in Antigen?

Thanks,

Joseph L. Heaton, MCSE
NT Administrator
FDI Consulting, Inc.
1610 Arden Way,  Suite 145
Sacramento, CA  95815
(916)921-4390 x.228

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm

2001-11-28 Thread John Matteson

We are catching it at the gateways using Nemex. So far, 167 hits since
midnight.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Ole Søgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


Hi all
Have anyone experienced the same thing as we have: It's just floating
through NAI's WebShield SMTP - both the attachment blocking and the virus
scan, but is detected by GroupShield in the store

Ole Soegaard
TV 2/Denmark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 26. november 2001 18:09
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


I have seen 4172 catch it today.

-Original Message-
From: Albert Vasquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Alert: W32/BadTrans.B-mm


NAI claims to have this covered:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99069
with any DAT files after 4168  (were now at 4172)
AlV

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Blocking attachments

2001-11-28 Thread John Matteson

BOOO!

No Zoup for you!

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Blocking attachments


Did you hear about the Buddhist who refused Novocain during a
root canal?  He wanted to transcend dental medication.


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2001 14:41
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Since when did anyone working with computers get any respect?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:32 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


I never get an respect.

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


But has his been hijacked by numerous web sites with no credit given?? I
don't think so.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Of course : > 

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


Kevin Miller's list is superior.  

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blocking attachments


The world famous Martin Blackstone blocked extension list should help
you. Does anyone have that?

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blocking attachments


I know this has been asked many times before, but what extensions are
you guys blocking in Antigen?

Thanks,

Joseph L. Heaton, MCSE
NT Administrator
FDI Consulting, Inc.
1610 Arden Way,  Suite 145
Sacramento, CA  95815
(916)921-4390 x.228

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: What tools are good to measure bandwidth across a internet ro uter

2001-11-28 Thread John Matteson

NetIQ, Microsoft Operations Manager works.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: What tools are good to measure bandwidth across a internet
ro uter


What are some good tools or software to measure the amount of bandwidth used
over time across. 

ellery

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exchange Mailbox Logon

2001-11-29 Thread John Matteson



Are you 
talking about the login information that is stored in the Event log? If so, it's 
kept until it is purged out the bottom of the log. If there is someplace else 
you are looking, please specify.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because 
wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe 
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha

  -Original Message-From: Todd White 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 
  4:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Mailbox Logon
  anyone?
   
  Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax 
  The contents of this e-mail and any 
  attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors 
  and are intended to be private and confidential.  This material is 
  intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed.  The material 
  is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade 
  secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express 
  permission of LaserComm Inc.  If you have received this message in error, 
  please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the 
  correspondence.
  
-Original Message-From: Todd White 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 29, 
2001 9:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Exchange Mailbox Logon
Is there a way 
to delete the mailbox logon log that Exchange keeps in Exchange Server 
5.5?  If not how long and how many does it keep of the last people that 
logged on to a specific mailbox?
 
 
Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax 
The contents of this e-mail and any 
attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors 
and are intended to be private and confidential.  This material is 
intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed.  The 
material is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright 
and trade secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the 
express permission of LaserComm Inc.  If you have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the 
correspondence.
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Exchange Mailbox Logon

2001-11-29 Thread John Matteson



It keeps 
only the last login for that particular mailbox. Since it is an entry in the 
private information store, it probably only keeps the last 
entry.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because 
wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe 
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha

  -Original Message-From: Todd White 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 
  4:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 
  Mailbox Logon
  located with the Exchange Admin program, under server, private 
  information, Logons
   
  Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax 
  The contents of this e-mail and any 
  attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or licensors 
  and are intended to be private and confidential.  This material is 
  intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed.  The material 
  is protected by various laws, including those related to copyright and trade 
  secret, and may not be used, copied or distributed without the express 
  permission of LaserComm Inc.  If you have received this message in error, 
  please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the 
  correspondence.
  
-Original Message-From: John Matteson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 
3:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange Mailbox Logon
Are 
you talking about the login information that is stored in the Event log? If 
so, it's kept until it is purged out the bottom of the log. If there is 
someplace else you are looking, please specify.
 
    John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing 
because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious 
doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. 
-- 
Buddha

  -Original Message-From: Todd White 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 29, 
  2001 4:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange Mailbox Logon
  anyone?
   
  Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax 
  The contents of this e-mail and any 
  attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or 
  licensors and are intended to be private and confidential.  This 
  material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is 
  addressed.  The material is protected by various laws, including 
  those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied 
  or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc.  If 
  you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by 
  return e-mail and delete the correspondence.
  
-Original Message-From: Todd White 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, November 29, 
2001 9:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Exchange Mailbox Logon
Is there a 
way to delete the mailbox logon log that Exchange keeps in Exchange 
Server 5.5?  If not how long and how many does it keep of the last 
people that logged on to a specific mailbox?
 
 
Todd White System Administrator LaserComm Inc. 972-941-0276 Voice 972-941-0223 Fax 
The contents of this e-mail and 
any attachments are the property of LaserComm Inc, its subsidiaries or 
licensors and are intended to be private and confidential.  This 
material is intended solely for the individual to whom it is 
addressed.  The material is protected by various laws, including 
those related to copyright and trade secret, and may not be used, copied 
or distributed without the express permission of LaserComm Inc.  If 
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by 
return e-mail and delete the correspondence.
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Wondering

2001-11-30 Thread John Matteson

Now you have someone to call when your cell phone drops a call in the middle
of a word.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wondering


Verizon???

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely - Verizon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Wondering


What's your question?  I'm not sure that I've seen any posts from you...

It is also quite possible no one knows the answer to your question.

D

"Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it."
-Henry David Thoreau

-Original Message-
From: Eric Mailloux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Wondering


Well... I have to ask.


Is it :


* the way I ask my questions?
* are my questions too long?
* are my questions to vague or not precise enough?


Whatever it is, I would like someone here to tell me because my
questions almost never get answered. This is a discussion group. Nobody
has the obligation to answer every question that is posted, and
especially my questions. And I understand that. But if this discussion
group works like a "members only" social club, let me know. I'll try to
find the information and answers I need somewhere else.




Eric Mailloux
Administrateur réseau
Groupe TelPlus Inc.
(418) 524-9455, poste 109
 

L'information que contient ce courriel est confidentielle et peut
contenir des informations privilégiées sur le plan technique et/ou
juridique. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez nous en
aviser immédiatement par courriel. Veuillez également supprimer ce
courriel de votre système, vous abstenir de le copier ou de l'utiliser
pour quelque raison, ni en divulguer le contenu à quiconque.
 
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally and/or
technically privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please reply immediately by e-mail and then delete this message from
your system. Please do not copy or use this email for any purposes, or
disclose its contents to any other person.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Running a file level scanner on exchange dirs???

2001-12-03 Thread John Matteson

PLEASE READ THE FAQ!!

Do not, REPEAT Do NOT, run a file level scanner on your Exchange server. You
will F*SCK up many files that are necessary for Exchange to operate
correctly.

USE ONLY AN EXCHANGE AWARE SCANNER like TREND MICRO's SCAN MAIL.

If you (or your pointed headed boss) insist on running a file level scanner
on an Exchange server, EXCLUDE any and all directories that are named
EXCHSRVR and all the subdirectories. This will minimize that you will F*SCK
up important Exchange files.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha


-Original Message-
From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Running a file level scanner on exchange dirs???


I'm using Nav 7.5 on my exchange server and it has found a few viri over the
past few weeks in the IMC dir.

Is this dangerous to scan the exchange dir, and quarantine viri if found?

If so why?

Thanks inavance,

Howie

Howie Pince
Network Administrator
A+, MCSE 2000
Higher Dimension Research Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
651-256-1987
www.superfabric.com <http://www.superfabric.com> 
 
 
 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 5:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange partition getting huge over the weekend... : found
o ut!!!


I do (with ServerProtect), but I exclude the exchsrvr directories from the
scan. Seems to work well.

Evan


 -Original Message-
From:   Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Sunday, December 02, 2001 6:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange partition getting huge over the weekend... :
found o ut!!!

A client of mine did, and it wiped their entire information store and all
mailbox contents

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 3 December 2001 6:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange partition getting huge over the weekend... : found
out!!!


Please tell me you did not run a file level scanner on the server.

Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST


-Original Message-
From: Eric Mailloux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange partition getting huge over the weekend... : found
out!!!


Antivirus software

I have a planned virus scan on sunday midnight That's the
reason for the unusual amount of log files...


Bye,

Eric

-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Mailloux 
Envoyé : 2 décembre, 2001 14:02
À : MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Objet : Exchange partition getting huge over the weekend...


Hello!

Exchange 2000 SP1.

The Exchange partition (M:\ drive) gets huge overly fast during the
weekend  : from 2.1GB on friday PM to almost 9.0GB on monday AM. No one
is at the office during that time. I only have about 50 mailboxes on the
server. What causes the log files to get this numerous this fast, over
the weekand when it is not the case during the week? Is there a way or a
tool that would allow me to view all the activity that went on on the
mail server???

Could it be that I am being used as a relay???


Thank you! 


Eric Mailloux
Administrateur réseau
Groupe TelPlus Inc.
(418) 524-9455, poste 109
 

L'information que contient ce courriel est confidentielle et peut
contenir des informations privilégiées sur le plan technique et/ou
juridique. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez nous en
aviser immédiatement par courriel. Veuillez également supprimer ce
courriel de votre système, vous abstenir de le copier ou de l'utiliser
pour quelque raison, ni en divulguer le contenu à quiconque.
 
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally and/or
technically privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please reply immediately by e-mail and then delete this message from
your system. Please do not copy or use this email for any purposes, or
disclose its contents to any other person.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter a

RE: Wondering

2001-12-04 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



Says 
whom?
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because 
wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe 
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha

  -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 
  2001 11:12 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Wondering
  All 
  Exchange admins are beer drinkers. Therefore, we are discussing Exchange 
  resources.
  
-Original Message-From: Joe Irvine 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
15:26To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering

I 
just have one question What does this conversation have to do with 
exchange admin issues?
 

 
Thanks!
 
Joe Irvine
http://www.tbopayroll.com/
609-597-1155
 
-Original 
Message-From: Scot 
Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:20 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
 
Samuel 
Adams
-Original 
Message-From: Don Ely 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:09 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
C'mon now.  
That stuff is nasty...  Lagers, Ale's, etc...  that's where the 
good beer is.  Micro Brews are the only half way decent thing coming 
out of America for beer.
 
D
 
 
"Success usually comes to those who 
are too busy to be looking for it." -Henry David Thoreau 
-Original 
Message-From: Boswell 
Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:07 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
nah, you have no 
taste...
-Original 
Message-From: Don Ely 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
14:58To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
3 more 
words...
 
Piss
wa
ter
 
 
-Original 
Message-From: Boswell 
Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 6:55 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
3 
words:
Bud
Weis
Er
 
-Original 
Message-From: Clayton 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
14:49To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
Lived 
there for 2 and a half years mate, innit? Canadian Beer is 
better.
 
Sees ya 
laters geez
-Original 
Message-From: Jones 
Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: December 4, 2001 9:49 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
All this talk of beer, and you only 
mention lagers... 
Come to England and try a real beer 
:o) 

Cheers Matt 
-Original 
Message- 
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 14:30 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Wondering 
 
Dutch Beer? That is all I drink here 
in the Netherlands Antilles, and I can't stand it anymore! Amstel is 
awful here, and the Grolsch aint that good either. Heinekin is a watery 
beer like substance. 
Canadian Beer rules the whole world, 
even England, sorry Lads, but you can't beat a good bottle of Kokanee 
eh! 
-Original Message- From: 
Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: December 3, 2001 3:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Wondering 
 
Dutch beer is the best, pick either 
one ;) 
 
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- 
> Van: maggie whitton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > 
Verzonden: vrijdag 30 november 2001 23:02 > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues > Onderwerp: Re: Wondering > > > Don't 
start on beer...Grolshor Cellis a tiny mini brewery > in Austin. 
:) > - Original Message - > From: 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, 
November 30, 2001 3:15 PM > Subject: RE: Wondering > > 
> > Maybe it's because you won't tell us your name? > > 
> > -Michèle > > Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> > > The 
Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> > > 
Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> > > 
- > 
> I love deadlines. I especially love the swooshing sound > they 
make as they > go > > flying by. > > 
-

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

2001-12-04 Thread John Matteson

Antigen for Exchange
Trend Micro Scanmail for Exchange.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: Brad Metzler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


Eric,
We use groupsuck here still, (primarily because we can't get rid of
it clean) but it has worked flawlessly (yeah I know, a miracle). I have had
a few other people try to sell me other on-board scanners for exchange, but
the two I had seen demo'd both broke SIS by opening and copying messages in
the MTA for the scanning process. This also triggers delivery notification.
Is there another on-board product out there that does suck, doesn't break
SIS and doesn't open messages and trigger delivery notification as part of
the scanning process?

Brad


-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


I have nothing good to say about Groupsuck.  How they can sell that product
is beyond me.  I am also getting away from it ASAP.

Just to warn you, the uninstall is not clean.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

2001-12-05 Thread John Matteson

Yep, then you have to run the database utilities to fix the broken links and
database pages. Besides, a message with a worm usually is a throw away
anyway.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm


my (limited) understanding is that IISCAN will let you nuke the attachments
but leave the messages intact (not sure why anyone would want to do that in
the case of a self-replicating worm but...).  Meanwhile exmerge will kill
the message and attachment together (not just the attachment).  But I have
only read some of the Q's from technet and have no real experience with the
tools  --  so I'm not sure -- which utility is more appropriate?



> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Zorz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 4, 2001 8:40 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> ISSCAN
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:46 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
>   
>   
>   exmerge 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:43 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
>   
>   
>   Hi there,
>
>   Is there any tool with which I can clean all the mailboxes
> on my exchange from this dirty "Hi" message?
>
>   Thanks
>   mal
>
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Bob Fronk (BTR Technologies, Inc)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:13 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
>
>   Configure NAV for Exchange to block attachments.  This
> stopped "goner" in its tracks.  I block: *.com, *.exe, *.scr and also the
> "double extensions" like *.jpg.vbs.  and assorted others. 
>
>   
> <http://service4.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/docid/271215411
> 348>
>
>   Bob
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:03 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
>
>   We just got this one.  Norton's on Exchange and the desktops
> did NOT catch
>   it and our virus definitions are current, so be careful.  We
> are downloading
>   Antigen as I type.
>
>   Karen Palmer
>   SCJD
>
>
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>   
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>   
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Wondering

2001-12-05 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



Nope.. 
can't stand the stuff. It stinks, and really stinks when it goes 
stale.
Prefer a 
good bourbon, or blended whiskey.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
My toys! My toys! I can't do this 
job without my toys! 

  -Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 
  2001 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Wondering
  You 
  mean who says all admins drink beer? I was just guessing! Don't you? What, not 
  even a little bit? Not a tiny amount in a sherry glass at Christmas? ;-) 
  
   
  Kevin
  
-Original Message-From: John Matteson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 04 December 2001 
15:38To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Wondering
Says 
whom?
 
    John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing 
because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious 
doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. 
-- 
BuddhaList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Upgrading

2001-12-05 Thread John Matteson

That's what I had to do when I upgraded a single server site. From 4 to 5,
then SP's then up to 5.5.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Upgrading


I "thought" you had to upgrade to 5.0, then 5.5?

-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Upgrading


Greetings all,

I am currently attempting to upgrade our current mailserver--MSExchange
4.0--SP2 to MS Exchange 5.5.  I have manuals etc. and thought all was
going well.  The process started and I could see the progress going
through its routine.  Currently, the screen has a white background and a
blue box where before I could see the installation progress percentage
completed information and cursor is now the famous hour glass--like the
installation has stalled.  My question to you all--is this normal or has
the installation indeed stalled?  The server OS is NT4.0 SP6.

I do have the systemed backup up, but hope I don't need to use it.

A prompt response would be appreciated.

JRiley

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Disparate and Wanting a Drink!!!

2001-12-06 Thread John Matteson

Win2K comes with an SMTP server built in. Does that suit your needs?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Deparate and Wanting a Drink!!!


Hi all,

I would like a recommendation of an mailserver software that is good and
not super expensive that has a trial version.  Any recommendations are
welcome.

JRiley

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: From Microsoft re: GONER Virus

2001-12-06 Thread John Matteson

Thanks Scott for the pointer.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: From Microsoft re: GONER Virus



>From Jerry Bryant [MS]:

For you Exchange administrators..
I want to make sure you are aware that there is a virus cleanup package(for
Exch5.5 & 2K) out on:

ftp://ftppss.microsoft.com/outgoing/mail/

Exchange 2000: w32goner2k.zip

Exchange 5.5: w32goner55.zip

These packages include the latest exmerge and mta clean utilities as well as
detailed step-by-step instructions. The readme file in
the main zip files contain instructions on how to protect your environment
moving forward.

Please let us know if you have any questions!



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?

2001-12-06 Thread John Matteson

If you are unsatisfied with the level of professionalism, or service, the
price of your subscription to this list will cheerfully be refunded.

And besides, not all guru's go around in saffron robes chanting OM MANNA
PADA OMMM.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?


About the beerthing, I agree, it's going on for far too long. It's
totally unprofessional.

About your problem, have you created a SMTP connector on your Ex2k
server that forwards to your 5.5 server?
You can have it set to forward all mail to that 5.5 server or forward
mail based on a domain suffix.

Hope this helps. Good luck.

Bob

> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: woensdag 5 december 2001 18:16
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: Aren't there supposed to be gurus in here?
> 
> 
> Off topic rant: I find it funny how many people here jump all 
> over other
> people for not giving enough information when they describe 
> problems, yet
> those same people don't respond to messages where enough 
> information is
> given, presumably because it is simply too long to read, and those
> best-beer-in-the-world-wankfest messages just come too fast 
> and furious. 
> 
> With that in mind, and hoping that nobody here feels 
> insulted, I will keep
> it short...
> 
> Does anyone here know how routing within a site works between 
> Exchange 2k
> and Exchange 5.5(w/ADC)? Or maybe point me in the right 
> direction? I have an
> E2k server that just won't forward messages from the Internet 
> to mailboxes
> that reside on the 5.5 servers. Messages within the site work 
> fine, or from
> the Internet to the 5.5 server to a mailbox on the E2k server.
> 
> I've looked in archives, knowledge base, white papers...basically the
> consensus is that anything going to an E2k server is 
> considered inbound and
> it should recognize an address within the site.
> 
> Drew
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses

2001-12-06 Thread John Matteson
Title: RE: Blocking attachments: Know Viruses



With 
ScanMail, you have the option of stripping out all the attachments with the 
click of a radio button.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Stop plate Tectonics! 

  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:34 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Blocking 
  attachments: Know Viruses
  Same with ScanMail...seems to be one of its weaknesses. 
  
   -Original Message- From: 
    Dimitri Limanovski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent:   Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:44 
  AM To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues Subject:    RE: Blocking 
  attachments: Know Viruses 
  Speaking of blocking *.*, does Antigen allow you to do 
  this? In GroupSUCKS you can specify which attachment 
  types to block but not vice versa.. 
  Dimitri 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Blocking attachments: Know Viruses 
  So if I rename gone to lynch.scr it will get through? 
  
  Do you have a fulltime attachment blocker admin? 
  How about *.* except what you need? 
  William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP 
  -Original Message- From: Terry 
  Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blocking 
  attachments: Know Viruses 
  Some of you might be interested in specific attachments to 
  block?  
  These are from known viruses.  The list does not include 
  every know virus attachment, but it's a good starting 
  point. 
  ***Know Virus Attachments* 
  ADMIN.DLL ANTS3SET.EXE 
  BackDoor-G2.cfg BackDoor-G2.cli BackDoor-G2.svr.gen 
  Card.pif Common.exe CSRSS.EXE DESKTOP.EML disk.exe docs.scr dwarf4you.exe FLCSS.EXE fun.pif hamster.ZIP.scr HTTPODBC.DLL Humor.TXT.pif images.pif joke.exe KAK.HTA KAK.HTM LOAD.EXE Me_nude.AVI.pif MEP*.TMP.EXE midgets.scr MMC.EXE MSREXE.EXE New_Napster_Site.DOC.scr news_doc.scr 
  PUTA!!.EML PUTA!!.SCR 
  README.?? README.EML README.TXT.pif Rede.exe RICHED20.DLL RUN.EXE s3msong.MP3.pif SAMPLE.EXE searchURL.scr SERUP.pif sexy virgin.scr Si.exe Sorry_about_yesterday.DOC.pif UserConf.exe WINDOS.EXE WQK.EXE YOU_are_FAT!.TXT.pif GONE.SCR ***Know Virus 
  Attachments* 
  Terry Lynch Internal Network 
  Administrator Vendaria, Inc. 316 Occidental Avenue South Second Floor 
  Seattle, WA  98104 206.223.4000 
  x255 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vendaria.com 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?

2001-12-06 Thread John Matteson

If you export using only the CR object checkbox, you will get all but one
column you need to do the import. Add the MODE column, and specify MODIFY.
Change the HIDE FROM AB from blank or zero to "1".
Then Import.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


As I said in my original mail, the only 3 fields you need are
Obj-Class,Directory Name, and Hide from AB.  No need to go hunting for
header.exe now!

Neil
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 06 December 2001 16:14
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Bulk hiding GAL entries?
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


I believe that you can do a directory export and then import.  You can
use the Header utility to give you the proper column for the GAL.

Darrin Carter 
Senior Systems Engineer 
Elegrity, Inc. 
415.821.0900 (main) 
415.826.7758 (fax) 
415.726.0413 (direct) 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.elegrity.com 
-Original Message-
From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


for 400 of them??  rather you than me!!

Karen
-Original Message-
From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2001 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


properties of the contact
advance tab.

-Mensaje original-
De: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Jueves, 06 de Diciembre de 2001 08:36 a.m.
Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Asunto: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


Does anyone know of a way of bulk hiding Custom Recipients from the GAL?
I've got to hide about 400 contacts from an external company. I've got
them listed in Find Recipients, but I don't much fancy hiding them all
individually. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to do this? Sadly,
company policy dictates that they all get hidden now, then deleted in a
month or so, so the delete key is out of the question :~{
Oh yeah, Ex55 SP4, NT4 SP6 
Thanks in advance 
Tim 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: MS Exchange Client Software

2001-12-06 Thread John Matteson

You really don't want to install Outlook on your Exchange server.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Client Software


The old Exchange client is no more, and was superceded by Outlook.
However, if you still have the CDs, it will still work and connect to
your server.  I still use the 4.0 and 5.0 clients in labs, etc.  I guess
they just won't be supported by Microsoft any more.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 06 December 2001 16:27
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: MS Exchange Client Software
Subject: MS Exchange Client Software


Greetings all,

Yesterday I was desperate and now I am sleeping like a Babe--thanks for
the push to Antigen.  My environment is a small and thought cost would
be prohibitive, but due to educational pricing we can afford it.
Now--my current question.  When I installed Exchg. 4.0 I had a companion
CD to install Exchange Client software on the workstations.  With my 5.5
upgrade, I don't have this software instead Outlook 2000 was shipped.
Is there still Exchange client software available or has this been
replaced with OL 2000?  If the client exists, where might I get a copy?

Thanks in advance,

JRiley

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands
or any of its subsidiary companies.
If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk
Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?

2001-12-06 Thread John Matteson

True, one may not NEED the MODE column in this situation, but since the
files are reusable, it might be nice to have it for future use.

As for the others fields, he may need them in this situation. The original
question does not state that all the CR's are in the same container, so he
will need container information in order to do the hide, should they be
spread about in differing containers. And using the NOTE field, he can put
in a little notice to delete the bleeding things in about a month or so.

It is the simplest way of getting the job done. He DID say that his boss
wanted it done ASAP; today; right now; "why didn't you think of my need and
have it completed before I requested it."

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2001 16:54
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


Crap.  You don't need MODE.  The mode is, by default, an update
operation unless you specify otherwise.

Also, if you pre-create your CSV file with the fields mentioned below,
then use the CR object checkbox, you won't get loads of unnecessary
fields.  The distingushing field you need is Directory Name.  The rest
are useless!

Neil

-----Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 06 December 2001 16:38
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Bulk hiding GAL entries?
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


If you export using only the CR object checkbox, you will get all but
one column you need to do the import. Add the MODE column, and specify
MODIFY. Change the HIDE FROM AB from blank or zero to "1". Then Import.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Stop plate Tectonics!



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


As I said in my original mail, the only 3 fields you need are
Obj-Class,Directory Name, and Hide from AB.  No need to go hunting for
header.exe now!

Neil
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 06 December 2001 16:14
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Bulk hiding GAL entries?
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


I believe that you can do a directory export and then import.  You can
use the Header utility to give you the proper column for the GAL.

Darrin Carter 
Senior Systems Engineer 
Elegrity, Inc. 
415.821.0900 (main) 
415.826.7758 (fax) 
415.726.0413 (direct) 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.elegrity.com 
-Original Message-
From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


for 400 of them??  rather you than me!!

Karen
-Original Message-
From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2001 15:10
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


properties of the contact
advance tab.

-Mensaje original-
De: Boswell Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Jueves, 06 de Diciembre de 2001 08:36 a.m.
Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Asunto: Bulk hiding GAL entries?


Does anyone know of a way of bulk hiding Custom Recipients from the GAL?
I've got to hide about 400 contacts from an external company. I've got
them listed in Find Recipients, but I don't much fancy hiding them all
individually. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to do this? Sadly,
company policy dictates that they all get hidden now, then deleted in a
month or so, so the delete key is out of the question :~{ Oh yeah, Ex55
SP4, NT4 SP6 
Thanks in advance 
Tim 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)

2001-12-06 Thread John Matteson

Boy, have you got him hoodwinked. :-)

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


YES!

Thank You, Thank You.
Our SLMail blew a gasket a couple of weeks ago and corrupted all the email
waiting for delivery. It was out of date and they wouldn't support it unless
we bought a new version.
So I used the opportunity to pitch Exch to my boss again. For some reason he
seriously thinks I am a computer god and doesn't question me any more

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


Hey!

Is that a REAL Exchange Server you're posting from?

"received by mail01.superioraccess.net with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2655.55)"

Congratulations.

William

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


Actually don't best practices say NOT to install any file based scanner on
Exch? But if you have to, be sure to exclude the \exchsrvr folders.

-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


Best practises dictate that you omit certain things.say, the .edb files
from the scan.  Done correctly, file based AV on an Exchange boxen is ok.

J

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


I though running a file based scanner on an Exchange server was a mortal sin
(like light beer)?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: BOERO MANSILLA Roberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


norton 7.5 corporate
great combination, on my own opinion

-Mensaje original-
De: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Jueves, 06 de Diciembre de 2001 12:59 p.m.
Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Asunto: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


Were thinking or purchasing Antigen.  I didn't realize it didn't protect
your system files also. Is this pretty typical, for instance does ScanMail
do the same thing? Are those of you running Antigen running any other virus
protection on Exchange?
 
(different) Robert
 
-Original Message-
From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


No problem, but that very likely was a miracle.

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


I fear for your servers life : > 
 
 
--
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE CKST

-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)


Thanks Robert. I assume you've had no conflicting issues running both on one
box. And the uninstall of InnoculateIT actually went smoothly?

-Original Message-
From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen (Ejaculate IT)



Word of warning about removing Inoculate IT: 

1.  Antigen is a groupware messaging solution, it protects the IS and IMC.  
2.  Antigen does NOT protect your file system, c:\winnt\system32 for
example. 

What I did: 

1.  Remove Inoculate IT for Exchange. 
2.  Install/config/run Antigen. 
3.  Re-install Inoculate IT, the normal server version NOT the Exchange
version. 

Result: 

1.  Antigen (and whatever AV scanners you chose in Antigen) protects your
Mail infrastructure. 
2.  Inoculate IT protects Your Windows NT Server. 



-Original Message- 
From: Stephen J. Norton [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:05 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Antigen 


I've gotten approval to install Antigen on my Exchange box. I'm currently 
running InnoculateIT 4.5. Has anyone had any experience removing

RE: Remote Administration

2001-12-10 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



NetMeeting 
Remote Desktop Control?
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
Reduce your stress; Resign as the 
General Manager of the Universe 

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 
  12:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Remote 
  Administration
  PcAnywhere?
  

-Original Message-From: Jamison, Chris 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 
2001 12:19To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Remote 
Administration
I am on a W2K 
Active Directory domain.  I am running Exchange 2K.  Is there a 
remote administration tool for Exchange2K that I can install on Windows 
XP.  I have the .msi for the Domain administrative tools but I can't 
run the exchange 2K admin. tools.  (the install looks for the W2K tools 
with it can not find)
 
Chris 
Jamison 
Network Systems 
Manager Penn-America Group, 
Inc. ph: 
215-773-7736 fax:215-443-3667 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Palm Pilot Devices

2001-12-11 Thread John Matteson
Title: RE: Palm Pilot Devices



Point of 
order:
 
    
The "Skunkworks" were part of Lockheed Martin, 
not NASA.
 
Just 
thought you'd like to know.

  -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 
  11, 2001 1:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Palm Pilot Devices
  OPINION: 
  Palm= Ancient garbage. 
  Pocket PC is a NASA Skunkworks device compared to a 
  Palm. 
  BUT:  Pocket PC is heavier, battery life is far 
  shorter.  If he is only doing simple stuff (text email) Palm might be the 
  way to go.  
  Pocket PC Native: 
  Word Outlook Excel PowerPoint IE 
  (FULL not clipping) Voice recorder Natural handwriting VPN 
  PS  A Windows NT forum is a better place for this 
  post... 
  -Original Message- From: John 
  Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 1:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Palm 
  Pilot Devices 
  This is a bit off topic, but the company president is looking 
  to buy a hand held electronic 
  scheduler/calendar.  He will be using Outlook 2000 on his desktop and would like something that will interface with OL 
  2000.  I would  appreciate any suggestions 
  from the list, since I am not experienced in the Palm 
  Pilot technology. 
  Thanks in advance, 
  JRiley 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Deperate--Still

2001-12-12 Thread John Matteson

Regular zips, or password protected zips?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Deperate--Still


FYI -- this blocks unwanted file types, but doesn't block them if they're
inside zip files.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com>
The Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley>
Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk>
-
"Information Superhighway is really an acronym for 'Interactive Network For
Organizing, Retrieving, Manipulating, Accessing And Transferring Information
On National Systems, Unleashing Practically Every Rebellious Human
Intelligence, Gratifying Hackers, Wiseacres, And Yahoos'." -Keven Kwaku 
-



-Original Message-
From: Radu, Tibi 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:59 AM
To: Sharik, Michèle
Subject: RE: Deperate--Still


I added *.zip to the filter list and selected "Detect Only" in the Action
list.

-Original Message-
From: Sharik, Michèle 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Radu, Tibi
Subject: FW: Deperate--Still


So how did we get our installation to ignore the stuff inside zip files?

-Michèle
Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com>
The Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley>
Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk>
-
"Captain, could I play some jazz?" "Make it soul, No. 1" 
-


-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deperate--Still


Nope.  If you filter *.exe or any other extension, Antigen will strip it
from a zip archive and replace it with .txt.

-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deperate--Still


If you don't specifically filter *.ZIP (i.e. take it out of your filter
list), Antigen will ignore ZIPs.

I send ZIPs with various included file types back and forth with clients
very frequently.

-Original Message-
From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deperate--Still


How did you do that? I can't get it to ignore zipfiles :(


> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 6 december 2001 17:48
> Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Onderwerp: RE: Deperate--Still
> 
> 
> we use Antigen & we can ignore things inside zip files
> ::confused:
> 
> -Michèle
> Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com>
> The Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley>
> Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk>
> -
> Kaden thought of the old Klingon proverb: Fool me once, shame
> on you: fool
> me twice, prepare to die. 
> -
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 6:49 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Deperate--Still
> 
> 
> Then why can Antigen be installed on our testserver and scanmail does 
> not? According to scanmail, the core cannot be installed on that
> system, even
> tho win2k + Ex2k are installed and working just fine.
> One thing i miss in Antigen is the ability to ignore zipfiles that
> contain filtered extensions, i WANT to be able to 
> send/receive zipfiles
> with .exe's in em. and so do some of our customers (who 
> weren't all
> that excited this morning after i installed Antigen on our server last
> night, one of their clients regularly send zipfiles with 
> .exe's in them
> hehe)
> 
> But for the rest i do love Antigen.
> 
>  wonder why Scanmail won't install tho  any ideas?
> 
> Bob
> 
> All your beer are belong to us!
> 
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Verzonden: woensdag 5 december 2001 21:38
> > Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Onderwerp: RE: Deperate--Still
> > 
> > 
> > Or Scanmail. Either should do the job just fine
> > 
> > -Original Message-
>

RE: Exmerge Question

2001-12-12 Thread John Matteson

If you have the entire Exmerge package, there is a 60 page MS-Word doc that
covers all the options available in Exmerge.

You should be able to specify only messages with the SCR file attachment.
The document is very detailed and if you can't do it in the GUI itself, you
should be able to specify the conditions you want in the various INI files
that go along with it.

Search TechNet for "ILOVEYOU" and that will lead you to the latest Exmerge
package.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exmerge Question


Hello All,

I have a couple of clients who are using InoculateIT (aka EjaculateIT) &
the Exchange Agent and they got infected with the Goner virus last week.
These clients mainly got infected because they didn't have the latest
virus definitions because the virus came out before the definitions were
updated. Anyway, the clients who didn't have the updated virus
definitions were updated and a full scan was performed. On each of these
clients, I noticed it only caught one instance of the Goner virus which
it found in the administrator mailbox. It deleted the attachment but I
noticed there was more than one infected message in that mailbox that it
didn't touch; there were also dozens of other mailboxes with infected
messages that it didn't catch or touch as well. Anyway, my idea was to
use Exmerge to extract all messages with Hi in the subject and with an
attachment of gone.scr. I ran Exmerge and it did remove the messages but
I noticed some of the PST's that it created were extremely large. those
large PST's were opened in Outlook and messages that I didn't want
extracted had been extracted. All the uninfected items that I didn't
want extracted had some form of word hi in the subject (eq: China). I
had to manually delete the infected messages and move the uninfected
messages back into each individual mailbox. I also changed the criteria
for Exmerge to only pull messages with attachments of gone.scr and no
subject and it seems like the same thing happened. Is there a way to
have Exmerge only move messages of an exact subject that I define. Also,
can Exmerge move items from public Folders? I noticed certain public
folder have the infected item within them and I would like to have them
removed as well. Any help would be appreciated. TIA!!!

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Eudora client and Exchange 5.5

2001-12-12 Thread John Matteson

Make sure, when you build the image, that you take away the Personal Folder
service. PST=BAD.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!


-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eudora client and Exchange 5.5


Exchange as pop is only temporary until we get the outlook clients
rolled out.  I have created a desktop image for them but they have not
rolled it out yet and it could take some time.  I'm cutting them over
from Worldmail tomorrow.  This will tide them over for now.

Darrin Carter
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCA
Senior Systems Engineer
Elegrity, Inc.
415.821.0900 (main)
415.826.7758 (fax)
415.726.0413 (direct)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.elegrity.com



-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eudora client and Exchange 5.5


Temp. or perm. use Exchange as POP ?

-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 17:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eudora client and Exchange 5.5


Thanks for the info guys, the client is actually going to Outlook but
I'm cutting them over tomorrow to use Exchange as a POP server and their
existing Eudora client.

I wanted just to verify with you guys because what the client was
telling me made absolutely no sense.

Darrin Carter
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCA
Senior Systems Engineer
Elegrity, Inc.
415.821.0900 (main)
415.826.7758 (fax)
415.726.0413 (direct)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.elegrity.com



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eudora client and Exchange 5.5


Correct...you can just POP it.
Of course your client is wasting his money if he only wants to use
Eudora rather than OL.

-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eudora client and Exchange 5.5


I am actually using Eudora as a pop client.  So Outlook never has to be
run against the mailbox?

Darrin Carter
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCA
Senior Systems Engineer
Elegrity, Inc.
415.821.0900 (main)
415.826.7758 (fax)
415.726.0413 (direct)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.elegrity.com



-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Eudora client and Exchange 5.5


Eudora won't be able to use it as a MAPI client, I think.  It should be
able to POP/SMTP with it.

-- Drew

Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
"If ignorance ever goes to $40 a barrel, I want drillin' rights on that
man's head." Texas Agriculture Commissioner Jim Hightower discussing
President George Bush's policies.

-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Eudora client and Exchange 5.5


If you create a new mailbox in Exchange do you need to use Outlook to
"initialize" the mailbox or would the Eudora client be able to utilize
the mailbox on it's own?

This doesn't make sense to me but I have a client that is claiming that
this is the case.

Thanks,

Darrin Carter
CNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCA
Senior Systems Engineer
Elegrity, Inc.
415.821.0900 (main)
415.826.7758 (fax)
415.726.0413 (direct)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.elegrity.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail

2001-12-13 Thread John Matteson

A better management console?

When will Sybari ever come out with a console that will allow you to make
GLOBAL changes once and push them out to the servers?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail


Also, if the .zip file is password protected, it will ignore it as well.
And what's Trend have that we don't?
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
"One man's ceiling is another man's floor"

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: How to create a distributionlist with external members ?

2001-12-13 Thread John Matteson

The users that are outside of your company will need to be added to the
Exchange directory as Custom Recipients. Once that is done, you can then
include them in a Distribution List. They should not be added as mailboxes,
if they are not there to catch their mail.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Freya Jongkind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How to create a distributionlist with external members ?



Hello,

I want to create a distributionlist in MS Exchange Server 5.5 with persons
working in an other compagny.
e.g. : we = compagnyA   they = compagnyB
distributionlist@compagnieA <mailto:distributionlist@compagnieA>  with
members user1@compagnyB <mailto:user1@compagnyB> ,  user2@compagnyB
<mailto:user1@compagnyB> , user3@compagnyB <mailto:user3@compagnyB> 

How do I do this , for the moment I can create members with mailboxes in our
domain like user1@compagnyA <mailto:user1@compagnyA> ,
have others distributionlists as a member and recepients as well.
I didn't find any information on it, but perhaps I looked in the wrong
direction.
Can someone help me ???

Thanks


Freya Jongkind
ICT Operations & Support Engineer

* Dit e-mailbericht en alle documenten die ermee verzonden worden,
zijn vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend voor gebruik door de persoon of de 
onderneming waaraan ze geadresseerd zijn. Indien deze e-mail verkeerdelijk
bij u terechtkomt, gelieve de afzender te verwittigen en deze bestanden van
uw computer te verwijderen.



"Dit e-mailbericht en alle documenten die ermee verzonden worden,
zijn vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend voor gebruik door de persoon of
de onderneming waaraan ze geadresseerd zijn. Indien deze e-mail
verkeerdelijk bij u terechtkomt, gelieve de afzender te verwittigen
en deze bestanden van uw computer te verwijderen.

Ce message e-mail ainsi que tous les fichiers transmis sont confidentiels
et uniquement destinés à l'usage de la personne ou de l'entité à qui
ils sont adressés. Si vous avez reçu ce message e-mail par erreur,
veuillez en informer l'expéditeur et le supprimer de tout ordinateur."

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exmerge Question

2001-12-13 Thread John Matteson

Search TechNet for "ILOVEYOU" and that will lead you to the latest Exmerge
package.
===
This will still lead you to the latest and greatest version, AFAIK.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Exmerge Question


Where can I find the latest & greatest version of Exmerge. All I have is
the 3 files that are necessary for it to run. So I have no documentation
for it at the moment. If someone could point me to its location or send
me a copy, it would be greatly appreciated. TIA!

-Original Message- 
    From: John Matteson 
Sent: Wed 12/12/2001 8:22 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Exmerge Question



If you have the entire Exmerge package, there is a 60
page MS-Word doc that 
covers all the options available in Exmerge. 

You should be able to specify only messages with the SCR
file attachment. 
The document is very detailed and if you can't do it in
the GUI itself, you 
should be able to specify the conditions you want in the
various INI files 
that go along with it. 

Search TechNet for "ILOVEYOU" and that will lead you to
the latest Exmerge 
    package. 

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! 


-Original Message- 
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:47 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Exmerge Question 


Hello All, 

I have a couple of clients who are using InoculateIT
(aka EjaculateIT) & 
the Exchange Agent and they got infected with the Goner
virus last week. 
These clients mainly got infected because they didn't
have the latest 
virus definitions because the virus came out before the
definitions were 
updated. Anyway, the clients who didn't have the updated
virus 
definitions were updated and a full scan was performed.
On each of these 
clients, I noticed it only caught one instance of the
Goner virus which 
it found in the administrator mailbox. It deleted the
attachment but I 
noticed there was more than one infected message in that
mailbox that it 
didn't touch; there were also dozens of other mailboxes
with infected 
messages that it didn't catch or touch as well. Anyway,
my idea was to 
use Exmerge to extract all messages with Hi in the
subject and with an 
attachment of gone.scr. I ran Exmerge and it did remove
the messages but 
I noticed some of the PST's that it created were
extremely large. those 
large PST's were opened in Outlook and messages that I
didn't want 
extracted had been extracted. All the uninfected items
that I didn't 
want extracted had some form of word hi in the subject
(eq: China). I 
had to manually delete the infected messages and move
the uninfected 
messages back into each individual mailbox. I also
changed the criteria 
for Exmerge to only pull messages with attachments of
gone.scr and no 
subject and it seems like the same thing happened. Is
there a way to 
have Exmerge only move messages of an exact subject that
I define. Also, 
can Exmerge move items from public Folders? I noticed
certain public 
folder have the infected item within them and I would
like to have them 
removed as well. Any help would be appreciated. TIA!!! 

List Charter and FAQ at: 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

.+-

@A+a0 z[lpjoZ\zm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail

2001-12-14 Thread John Matteson

This sounds exactly like a Dilbert cartoon I have on my wall.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925

-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 4:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail

Me preaching to users: "as a preventative measure against computer viruses,
please don't access your web-based personal mail accounts like Yahoo or
Hotmail from the corporate desktop."
What (several of) the users hear: "please don't open any mail if it's from
someone with a hotmail or yahoo account as all these messages will have a
computer virus"




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Information Store Limit

2001-12-14 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



You will 
end up spending more money for disk space (server side or workstation side) if 
you put PST files into the mix. You loose a lot of advantages for  SIS and 
other things.
 
Have you 
talked to management? What about getting management to back you running Exchange 
Mailbox Manager on the server? Thought about running Exmerge against the store 
to clear out all the MP3/AVI/MPEG/MOV files that are littering up the 
place?
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: Randy Hensel 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:35 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information 
  Store Limit
  
  I will have to go 
  with William on this one.  I have 
  147 users the top 10 offenders account for more that 9GB of data.  As I see it I have 2 options, Spend 
  $3300 on an Enterprise upgrade, 
  or set storage quotas and encourage the use of PST files.  Seems like a no brainer to me, I have 
  5 users with more than 1GB each.  
  I don't mind users saving every little email but it seems logical that 
  they should find somewhere else to put them.
   
  
  Randy 
  Hensel, 
  MCP, Network Systems Administrator
  Coffey 
  Communications, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  509.525.0101 
  Ext. 594
  509.525.4793 
  (Fax)
  http://www.coffeycomm.com
  -Original 
  Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 
  2001 5:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store 
  Limit
   
  
  What 
  else you got? ;o)
  
   
  
  Not for 
  primary email storage.  Only for 
  archiving.
  
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: David N. 
  Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 13, 
  2001 5:23 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information Store 
  Limit
  
  but 
  stable ?
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 
2001 19:46To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Information Store Limit

It is 
a viable form of email archiving.

 

William

 
-Original 
Message-From: David N. 
Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 13, 
2001 4:34 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Information Store Limit

as in 
don't use them
-Original 
  Message-From: Randy 
  Hensel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 
  2001 19:07To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Information Store Limit
  I'm 
  not sure I can recover that much space, I am planning an upgrade to 
  2000.  I don't have a quota in 
  place it looks like I will need to implement that as well as plan some 
  formal training on the use of pst files.
   
  
  Randy 
  Hensel, MCP, Network Systems Administrator
  Coffey 
  Communications, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  509.525.0101 
  Ext. 594
  509.525.4793 
  (Fax)
  http://www.coffeycomm.com
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 
  2001 3:59 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Information Store Limit
   
  
  If 
  you recover enough space within the database (perhaps 6GB+), an offline 
  defrag would not be a bad idea.  
  
   
  
  Otherwise, yor 
  plan is certainly sound.  Do you have a formal mailbox quota policy 
  in place?
  
   
  
  William
  
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Randy 
  Hensel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 13, 
  2001 3:57 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: 
  Information Store Limit
  I am running Windows NT 4.0 SP 
  6a and Exchange 5.5 SP 4 (not Enterprise) I have run up against the 
  16GB information store limit.  
  I have managed to the IS started again and would like to take steps 
  to reduce the IS size.  My 
  plan is to:
   
  1.  
  Move data to PST files 
  2.  
  delete unused mailboxes 
  3.  
  reduce deleted item retention 
  
   
  Is this a good 
  plan? Should I also do an off line defrag? Any thing else? 
  
   
  Thanks
   
  Randy 
  Hensel, MCP, Network Systems Administrator
  Coffey 
  Communications, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  509.525.0101 
  Ext. 594
  509.525.4793 
  (Fax)
  http://www.coffeycomm.com
   
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.

RE: Exmerge Question

2001-12-14 Thread John Matteson

Can you get to the FTPPSS site? The web pages bounce me around to an FTP
site, but I can't do anything once I'm there.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exmerge Question


Indeed.

It's also in the goner.scr 'eradication suite'[1]

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q314002

William

[1] I like that term... 'eradication suite'.


-----Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exmerge Question


Search TechNet for "ILOVEYOU" and that will lead you to the latest Exmerge
package.
===
This will still lead you to the latest and greatest version, AFAIK.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Exmerge Question


Where can I find the latest & greatest version of Exmerge. All I have is
the 3 files that are necessary for it to run. So I have no documentation
for it at the moment. If someone could point me to its location or send
me a copy, it would be greatly appreciated. TIA!

-Original Message- 
From: John Matteson 
Sent: Wed 12/12/2001 8:22 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Exmerge Question



If you have the entire Exmerge package, there is a 60
page MS-Word doc that 
covers all the options available in Exmerge. 

You should be able to specify only messages with the SCR
file attachment. 
The document is very detailed and if you can't do it in
the GUI itself, you 
should be able to specify the conditions you want in the
various INI files 
that go along with it. 

Search TechNet for "ILOVEYOU" and that will lead you to
the latest Exmerge 
package. 

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! 


-Original Message- 
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:47 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Exmerge Question 


Hello All, 

I have a couple of clients who are using InoculateIT
(aka EjaculateIT) & 
the Exchange Agent and they got infected with the Goner
virus last week. 
These clients mainly got infected because they didn't
have the latest 
virus definitions because the virus came out before the
definitions were 
updated. Anyway, the clients who didn't have the updated
virus 
definitions were updated and a full scan was performed.
On each of these 
clients, I noticed it only caught one instance of the
Goner virus which 
it found in the administrator mailbox. It deleted the
attachment but I 
noticed there was more than one infected message in that
mailbox that it 
didn't touch; there were also dozens of other mailboxes
with infected 
messages that it didn't catch or touch as well. Anyway,
my idea was to 
use Exmerge to extract all messages with Hi in the
subject and with an 
attachment of gone.scr. I ran Exmerge and it did remove
the messages but 
I noticed some of the PST's that it created were
extremely large. those 
large PST's were opened in Outlook and messages that I
didn't want 
extracted had been extracted. All the uninfected items
that I didn't 
want extracted had some form of word hi in the subject
(eq: China). I 
had to manually delete the infected messages and move
the uninfected 
messages back into each individual mailbox. I also
changed the criteria 
for Exmerge to only pull messages with attachments of
gone.scr and no 
subject and it seems like the same thing happened. Is
there a way to 
have Exmerge only move messages of an exact subject that
I define. Al

RE: Exchange Topology tool

2001-12-14 Thread John Matteson

It will give you HTML/RTF documents as well, AFAIK. You can get a free trial
run against one server to check out the documents they provide.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Topology tool



Ecora will document all your servers, but last time that I tried, it was
all plain text.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
"One man's ceiling is another man's floor"


|+->
||  "Douglas Hull" |
||   |
|| |
||  12/14/2001 09:50 AM|
||  Please respond to  |
||  "MS-Exchange Admin |
||  Issues"|
|| |
|+->
 
>---
|
  |
|
  |   To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
  |   cc:
|
  |   Subject: Exchange Topology tool
|
 
>---
|




Does anybody know of a tool that will generate a visio diagram of your
exchange topology? I found one on the MS website but it only works with
active directory. I am using Exchange 5.5 on a mixture on W2K and NT boxes
in our organization without AD.

Many thanks.
Doug

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm






List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Information Store Limit

2001-12-14 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



    Depending on how far back this stuff goes, you 
can look into a message archiving system, this pulls mail that meet certain 
criteria (age, size, whatever) off to tape and leaves you with a link to the 
data inside the message. When you need the message back, you click on the 
message, wait for the tape to access the data and it gets restored 
automagically.
 
    As for upgrading to Enterprise, that would be a 
solution as well. Management needs to make some decisions.
 
    Personally, if these JPG files are in "active" messages (the 
business client is current), then I would kick management to get the upgrade to 
Enterprise and look at getting some additional hardware to support the growing 
mail store.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: Randy Hensel 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:13 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Information 
  Store Limit
  
  We are a publishing 
  company and we deal a lot with jpg files, most of our clients send them to us 
  via email.  We have an FTP server 
  but most clients are not that tech savvy.  A quick check of who the top offenders 
  are shows that without exception they are the client contacts who receive 
  these JPG files.  These users like 
  to keep these files to refer to back to when doing new jobs.  I can understand the need to keep 
  them, I just don't think it is necessary to keep them 
  on the server.  For those who say 
  PST files are bad.  What would you 
  do? Upgrade to Enterprise, and let 
  users have unlimited mailbox size? (that's not a 
  rhetorical question, I understand your reasoning but it doesn't leave many 
  options)  Imposing arbitrary 
  limits is not going to fly as Frank pointed out.  That is something I am considering but 
  there is a lot of data to purge before I can even consider 
  that.
   
  
  Randy 
  Hensel, 
  MCP, Network Systems Administrator
  Coffey 
  Communications, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  509.525.0101 
  Ext. 594
  509.525.4793 
  (Fax)
  http://www.coffeycomm.com
  -Original 
  Message-----From: John 
  Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:37 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Information Store Limit
   
  
  You 
  will end up spending more money for disk space (server side or workstation 
  side) if you put PST files into the mix. You loose a lot of advantages 
  for  SIS and other things.
  
   
  
  Have 
  you talked to management? What about getting management to back you running 
  Exchange Mailbox Manager on the server? Thought about running Exmerge against 
  the store to clear out all the MP3/AVI/MPEG/MOV files that are littering up 
  the place?
  
   
  John 
  Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate 
  Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 
  2981 
  With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 
  
  
-Original 
Message-From: Randy 
Hensel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:35 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Information Store Limit
I will 
have to go with William on this one.  
I have 147 users the top 10 offenders account for more that 9GB of 
data.  As I see it I have 2 
options, Spend $3300 on an Enterprise upgrade, or set storage quotas and 
encourage the use of PST files.  
Seems like a no brainer to me, I have 5 users with more than 1GB 
each.  I don't mind users saving 
every little email but it seems logical that they should find somewhere else 
to put them.
 

Randy 
Hensel, MCP, Network Systems Administrator
Coffey 
Communications, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
509.525.0101 
Ext. 594
509.525.4793 
(Fax)
http://www.coffeycomm.com
-Original 
Message-From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 5:24 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Information Store Limit
 

What 
else you got? ;o)

 

Not 
for primary email storage.  Only for 
archiving.

 
-Original 
Message-From: David N. 
Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 5:23 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Information Store Limit

but 
stable ?
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 
  19:46To: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Information Store Limit
  
  It 
  is a viable form of email archiving.
  
   
  
  William
  
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: David 
  N. Precht [mailto:[E

RE: Test for Problem with List

2001-12-17 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



COMMS Check 
Satisfactory
 How 
me?
Over!
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: Darrin J. Carter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:53 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Test for Problem 
  with List
  Sorry, Just testing as my posting don't seem to be 
  appearing..List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue

2001-12-17 Thread John Matteson

That would be a client side issue, you may want to check on
WWW.SLIPSTICK.ORG and purchase one of Sue Mosher's books on Outlook.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Maybe this is an Exchange Issue


Good afternoon,

Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4

I have a user that is asking the following and I haven't a clue where to
begin:

Original Work history couldn't find how to change the default, although I
know that my default for this is "busy".
Debbie called to inquire when scheduling an all day appointment the default
comes up as '' free '' and she has to manually select ''busy ''. She is
inquiring if there is an option that when this prompt comes up the default
would show as '' busy ''. Please assist. Thanks!

Have a great holiday season.

Regards,
Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Test for Problem with List

2001-12-17 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



QSL.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:25 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Test for 
  Problem with List
  Read 
  you 5 by 5 
   
  ZBZ 
  5
  
-Original Message-From: John Matteson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 
12:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Test 
for Problem with List
COMMS 
Check Satisfactory
 How me?
Over!
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs 
fly just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: Darrin J. Carter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 
  10:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Test 
  for Problem with List
  Sorry, Just testing as my posting don't seem to be 
  appearing..List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Searching shared contacts

2001-12-18 Thread John Matteson

For some reason, it's called "slam dancing".

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Searching shared contacts


That noise those damn kids next door keep making. Is that racket supposed to
be music? I thought they were making a snuff film!

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Searching shared contacts


What noise?

-Original Message-
From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Searching shared contacts


Thanks to everyone who contributed suggestions.  I've got a couple of good
ideas to look into.

Guess this DL really is worth the noise.

;o)  Bob Peitzke

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 3:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Searching shared contacts


don't ABV = BAD?  or at least, really annoying to configure?

-Michèle
Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com>
The Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley>
Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk>
-
Psychic Klingon: You will die on a good day. 
-


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 5:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Searching shared contacts


You could use Address Book Views in Exchange5.5 to maintain separate view of
the clients in the GAL and Galmod for their maintenance.

Or maintain them in Public Folders as advised.

Or you could use a third party app.  ACT2000 is not bad.  Goldmine is
another.  Access2000 is another.  These can be integrated with Outlook, but
all require a little work and training.
http://www.slipstick.com/dev/database.htm

William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, WLKMMAS


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 12/15/01 1:37 PM
Subject: RE: Searching shared contacts

I think you're stuck with PFs.  :-(

-Michèle
Immigration site:  <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com>
The Miata:  <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley>
Tiggercam:  <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk>
-
"Anytime you can express your age in signifcant fractions of a century,
its
a bit of a downer." - David Horza 
-


-Original Message-
From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Searching shared contacts


Mainly cuz we in IS don't want to be the ones maintaining these
contacts.
They are business relationships best maintained by the people involved,
and
we don't want them messing with our GAL. 

Bob

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 10:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Searching shared contacts


Why not simply add those contacts INTO your GAL?

-- Drew

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Interesting UDP port problem - Resolved

2001-12-19 Thread John Matteson

Good afternoon to you all:

We just went through a very interesting evolution regarding our
Exchange server (NT4.0 SP6, Exchange 5.5 latest SP and patches). Our
firewall admin was seeing UDP packets, bound for various port numbers,
attempting to depart for the Internet. These packets were dropped, but
logged. These various IP addresses were mostly AT&T dial-up accounts, or
cable modem accounts coming in through our VPN service to the Exchange box.

It seems that the Outlook client connects via both the native IP
address on the client end, as well as the IP address assigned by the VPN.
UDP packets bound for the VPN addresses are processed normally by the
client. Exchange also generates UDP packets with the destination IP of the
client's native IP address. These are the packets that the admin was seeing
self-destructing on the firewall.

This seems to be SOP for Exchange. I don't know how useful this
information is, but it is interesting.

Have fun you all.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Employee Departures

2001-12-19 Thread John Matteson
Title: Employee Departures



Mailbox is notated the day the termination notice is received, usually 
the day of, or the day after the employee departs. 7 to 14 days later, it's 
archived to a PST file and the mailbox is nuked.
 
90 
days after archiving, the pst file is nuked.
 
You 
need to talk to your HR office to get on the route sheet for terminated 
employees. Either that or cultivate good friends in payroll who will tell you 
when someone departs.
 
John 
M.

  -Original Message-From: William Smith 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:54 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Employee 
  Departures
  What is your general policy for the time between a 
  employee being let go and the removal of his mailbox? I just finished an audit 
  of the size of the disk usage on my exchange server and noticed that there are 
  at least 2GB of old users who have left the company.
  William L. Smith Systems Administrator List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Employee Departures

2001-12-20 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



We use 
Enterprise administrator to handle the NT side of things. The NT accounts are 
disabled at the same time as the Exchange mailboxes and we run reports about 
every 90 days to nuke the NT accounts.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 
  10:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Employee Departures
  what 
  about NT accounts?
  

-Original Message-From: John Matteson 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 
2001 20:49To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Employee Departures
Mailbox is notated the day the termination notice is received, 
usually the day of, or the day after the employee departs. 7 to 14 days 
later, it's archived to a PST file and the mailbox is 
nuked.
 
90 
days after archiving, the pst file is nuked.
 
You need to talk to your HR office to get on the route sheet for 
terminated employees. Either that or cultivate good friends in payroll who 
will tell you when someone departs.
 
John M.

  -Original Message-From: William Smith 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 
  5:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Employee 
  Departures
  What is your general policy for the time 
  between a employee being let go and the removal of his mailbox? I just 
  finished an audit of the size of the disk usage on my exchange server and 
  noticed that there are at least 2GB of old users who have left the 
  company.
  William L. Smith Systems Administrator List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Director's requirements

2001-12-20 Thread John Matteson



Outside of 
working hours. Sort the addresses so that you can batch the mail to the 
same domains at the same time. Be prepared for a lot of 
bounces.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: Lester 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 
  3:44 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Director's 
  requirements
  My Director wants to be able to send a 1MB 
  attachment to over 6 clients who are external to our network. So all this 
  will go thru the IMC. I have only a 256kbps net connection. This is going to 
  generate huge traffic, due to which entire services will be distrupted. Is 
  there any alternative solution I can offer him ? Or is there no solution at 
  all ?
   
  Please help..!!!
   
  Regards,
   
  LesterList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Director's requirements

2001-12-20 Thread John Matteson

NO ZOUP FOR YOU!

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Director's requirements


I've never done it in a group beforeooops, wrong list  :-)

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 20 December 2001 13:25
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Director's requirements
Subject: Re: Director's requirements


do it in groups ... like 10 waves of sending
- Original Message - 
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 04:39 
Subject: RE: Director's requirements


Do it outside working hours

-Original Message-
From: Lester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 December 2001 08:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Director's requirements


My Director wants to be able to send a 1MB attachment to over 6
clients who are external to our network. So all this will go thru the
IMC. I have only a 256kbps net connection. This is going to generate
huge traffic, due to which entire services will be distrupted. Is there
any alternative solution I can offer him ? Or is there no solution at
all ?

Please help..!!!

Regards,

Lester

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: single instance storage retention on mailbox move

2001-12-20 Thread John Matteson

Depends on how you move the mail box.

If you use "MOVE MAILBOX" in Exchange admin, then I believe that you do
retain SIS, but you lose any mail that was in the user's "Deleted Items
Retention" area of the Information Store.

If you use EXMERGE to move the mail, they you loose SIS.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Andrew Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 7:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: single instance storage retention on mailbox move


Hello,

We're upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2000 soon, and I just wanted to check
something with everyone who's done it before.

I'm planning to install a new server and then move the existing mailboxes
across to it.  Is single instance storage retained on the new server for all
the moved mailboxes?  I've already checked on the MS website and the
following article says it will be:

Store Does Not Grow When Moving Users to Another Server (Q175481)

But just wanted to double check with someone who's already done it.

Thanks,
Andrew.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Employee Departures

2001-12-20 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



I can 
delete the user's NT account without getting rid of the mailbox. I can change 
the properties of the mailbox and assign it to another user if I want to, I 
don't have to get rid of it.
 
But once I 
get rid of the mailbox, all the messages are recycled into free 
electrons.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: John Riley 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:13 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Employee 
  Departures
  A a neophite does all this discuss mean that when 
  a user is deleted as a domain user and also is deleted as an exchange 
  recipient his stored messages don't disappear also?
   
  JRiley
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
John 
Matteson 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:14 
AM
Subject: RE: Employee Departures

We use 
Enterprise administrator to handle the NT side of things. The NT accounts 
are disabled at the same time as the Exchange mailboxes and we run reports 
about every 90 days to nuke the NT accounts.
 
    John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs 
fly just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 
  2001 10:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Employee Departures
  what about NT accounts?
  

-Original Message-From: John 
    Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
December 19, 2001 20:49To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Employee Departures
Mailbox is notated the day the termination notice is received, 
usually the day of, or the day after the employee departs. 7 to 14 days 
later, it's archived to a PST file and the mailbox is 
nuked.
 
90 days after archiving, the pst file is 
nuked.
 
You need to talk to your HR office to get on the route sheet for 
terminated employees. Either that or cultivate good friends in payroll 
who will tell you when someone departs.
 
John M.

  -Original Message-From: William Smith 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 
  2001 5:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Employee Departures
  What is your general policy for the time 
  between a employee being let go and the removal of his mailbox? I just 
  finished an audit of the size of the disk usage on my exchange server 
  and noticed that there are at least 2GB of old users who have left the 
  company.
  William L. Smith Systems Administrator List Charter and 
  FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: "send as" public folder

2001-12-27 Thread John Matteson

Subscribe yourself to the same mailing list, but set your status to NOMAIL.
You can post as yourself and receive your posts in the PF.

Now, if you need to confirm a subscription, unhide the PF from the GAL, then
do a REPLY to the subscription message. Under the VIEW menu, select the FROM
field and put the public folder's address in it.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Bonner, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: "send as" public folder


Is there a way to send as from a public folder? I'd like to have messages
from a mailing list sent directly to a public folder, but in order to
subscribe I need to "send as" that public folder. I've given myself "send
as" permissions on the public folder, but it still doesn't work. Any ideas
or is this something that can't even be done?

Jon Bonner



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000 server

2001-12-28 Thread John Matteson

Microsoft Mail Postoffice Server.

There's something that REALLY didn't work.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000 server


You're half right.

Outlook97 never really worked.

William


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: 12/27/01 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000 server

I thought Exchange didnt work with Outlook 97.. Call me crazy
-Original Message-
From: Eric Wittenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000 server


I have now tried using Outlook 97 from a old computer at home and it was
able to get all of the attachments.
 
Eric Wittenberg, MCSE CNA ASE 
Technical Systems Analyst 
3D Computer Services Ltd. 
Edmonton, Alberta 
(780)484 9788 Fax (780) 484 9811 
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
URL www.3dcomp.com
 
-Original Message-
From: Eric Wittenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 problem on 2000 server
 
Internal originated e-mail is affected also. Only Outlook Express so
far. Groupshield for Exchange Server.
 
Eric Wittenberg, MCSE CNA ASE 
Technical Systems Analyst 
3D Computer Services Ltd. 
Edmonton, Alberta 
(780)484 9788 Fax (780) 484 9811 
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
URL www.3dcomp.com
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Forwarding mail to an external account

2002-01-02 Thread John Matteson

But in this case, Patrolman Bob can go by the desk and arrest the miscreant.


Take your hands off the keyboard and move away from the desk!


John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forwarding mail to an external account


Yeah, just like they properly manage their work email  Like ignoring the
mailbox over limit notice EVERY DAY...

- Original Message -
From: "Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 08:02
Subject: RE: Forwarding mail to an external account


Can happen if the external account gets full and starts sending nastygrams
back to the Exchange account (We got AOL very mad at us for something
similar) but it's up to the user to properly manage the other account.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forwarding mail to an external account


Is not a way to also start a mail loop ?

- Original Message -
From: "Snook, Kevin S (ITD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 08:41
Subject: RE: Forwarding mail to an external account


> Create an Alternate Recipient (Delivery Options) on the Mailbox in
Exchange
> Admin (you will need to create a custom recipient first) or create a rule
on
> the mailbox. You should look at the security implications of EVERYTHING
from
> his Inbox going to an external address. Most orgs. don't allow this type
of
> thing.
>
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Couchman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 January 2002 12:54
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Forwarding mail to an external account
>
>
> One of my users has retired and wished to have any mail sent to him here
> forwarded to an external account. It there any way to do this in exchange?
> I'm running MS Exchange 5.5.
>
> Ptl. Bob Couchman
> Unit 57
> Network Administrator
> Madisonville Police Department
> 99 East Center Street
> Madisonville, KY 42431
> (270) 821-1720
> (270) 824-2115 (fax)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Visit the Madisonville Police Department on the internet at
> http://www.madisonvillepd.com <http://www.madisonvillepd.com/>
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Help! Locked out!

2002-01-02 Thread John Matteson

Simon:

I don't think "Felony Stupid" is a crime, yet.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925

-Original Message-
From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help! Locked out!

Well at least when you find out who changed the password then you can arrest
them, lock them up and swallow the key - most of us ordinary IT admins would
like to be able to do that with certain users :-)

Simon

Oh and Happy New Year to youse all.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Help! Locked out!

2002-01-04 Thread John Matteson

And if I remember correctly, Heinlein got locked up for walking around his
neighborhood one summer's evening. Then again, that may have been Bradberry.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Kurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Help! Locked out!


Stupidity is not a sin, the victim can't help being stupid.  But stupidity
is the only universal crime;  the sentence is death, there is no appeal, and
execution is carried out automatically and without pity. 
--Robert A. Heinlein

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: replacing small business server

2002-01-04 Thread John Matteson

Exmerge to move all the mailbox data to PST files, Export the directory
information for the users using Directory Export function of the admin
program.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925



-Original Message-
From: Anthony Cominoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: replacing small business server


I have an older Small Business 4.5 Server that is being replaced with a
new server. It will be set up identical to the old server. I am not
familiar with Exchange enough to know the process of "migrating" all the
database/mailbox information onto the new server. If anyone can shed a
little light on the process or warn me of potential pitfalls it would be
much apreciated.

Thanks in advance

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: forgive me

2002-01-04 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



When you 
finish installing the program, look in the registry for that package, and see if 
it has an INSTALL PATH entry.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
Manager Geac 
Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly 
just fine. - RFC 1925 

  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:50 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: forgive 
  me
  its 
  an application from dell that looks at a system variable 
  someplace
  

-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 
04, 2002 1:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: forgive me
What are you installing?
 
You select the path in setup for Exchange2000.
 
William Lefkovics, 
MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
---
Why just ride, when you 
can fly?
http://www.airborne.net
---
Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:43 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: forgive 
me
forgive me, but 
i want to set my default program installation to be d:\program Files and not 
C:\Program Files.. how can i do this?
 
Michael Ross
Network Analyst 2
Panduit Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If at first you don't 
succeed, Skydiving isn't for you.
 
 List Charter 
and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





SNMP on an Exchange server.

2002-01-07 Thread John Matteson

Good afternoon to you all:

I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the
PerfMon MIB from Microsoft.

My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual
configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't,
different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and
trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.

2002-01-08 Thread John Matteson

It's not that I didn't believe you, I just posted the question to several
lists at one time.

The question still remains, does the MIB have to be modified for each
individual server or can a generic (Exchange specific) MIB be created and
installed without futzing the SNMP service.

Logic tells me that I can use the generic Exchange MIB on all Exchange
servers regardless of configuration, however I'd like to confirm this one
way or the other prior to doing something that may cause smoke to escape the
components.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SNMP on an Exchange server.


This was already answered on the swynk list.  You didn't believe me?
Hmmph...

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2002 20:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SNMP on an Exchange server.


Good afternoon to you all:

I am in the process of building a MIB file for Exchange based on the
PerfMon MIB from Microsoft.

My question is this; do I need to customize the MIB file for the individual
configuration of the Exchange server (some have IMC's, others don't,
different drive configurations, etc). OR, can I use one generic MIB file and
trust that the SNMP service won't choke when I rebuild MIB.BIN.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: exporting gal

2002-01-09 Thread John Matteson
Title: RE: exporting gal



Don't make 
it easy for him, make him look it up, he'll remember it that way 

 
John 
M.

  -Original Message-From: Missy Koslosky 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:32 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: exporting 
  gal
  secondary-proxy-addresses is the header field 
  that needs to be added to the target csv.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Rick Ward - HQ 

To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:48 
PM
Subject: RE: exporting gal

Start ADMIN in RAW mode (-r) and look at the Raw properties 
of the Email Address screen. The headers you need should show up there. Just 
add that to the top(header row) of your source spreadsheet .CSV file you're 
using to export the data with.
-Original Message- From: 
Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:24 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: exporting gal 
I am trying to export the gal so that i can add an 
additional internet email address for everyone. We are changing from a .com 
to a .org. When i export the list i only get one smtp address listed. I have 
4 alias that i use. I don't want to get rid of the old .com just yet. How 
can i get all of them to show? Is there an easier way to add a new address 
for all of my users?
thanks in advance 
dave 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Brick Level Backups

2002-01-09 Thread John Matteson

NIET! Open file manager may be fine for SQL databases, MDB files, but
Exchnage is more than just a pair of EDB files. There are a lot of actions
that are controled by/performed by the Exchange agent that an open file
manager/open file agent has no fricking idea about.

If you are going to use a backup service other than what comes with
Exchange, use a product that supports Exchange.

Unless you really like explaining why your 10grand system can't restore the
CFO's budget from last week.

John M.

-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Brick Level Backups


I have seen posts from people stating that Brick Level Backups of
Exchange are bad. I was just discussing this with a fellow engineer and
wanted to find out the reason why the Brick Level Backups are bad. What
the issues with this type of Backup? If Brick level Backups are bad then
why purchase an Exchange Agent for whatever backup app thats being used
when you could just use a Open File Agent which should backup the Store
& Directory files. Any info would be appreciated. TIA!
.+-

@A匫a偍0z[lpjo⁓Z\佅zm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Ghosts of Ex employees.

2002-01-09 Thread John Matteson

Check the bosses Outlook client to see if the secretaries are still in the
"DELEGATE" list. If they are, delete them. All check the boss mailbox to see
if the "alternate recipient" field still has the deleted account in it.

John M.

-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ghosts of Ex employees.


Hi Folks,

For a few of our ex-employees, mainly secretaries, whose mailboxes have been
deleted from the Exchange server 5.5 sp4 on NT 4 sp6, each time one sends an
email to a mailbox they may have been connected to i.e. their bosses, an
undeliverable message is returned.

Any ideas why this is happening? It reminds me of tombstone objects I read a
while ago but not sure.

Tia.

Frank

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service
is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive antivirus
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: www.star.net.uk

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Brick Level Backups

2002-01-09 Thread John Matteson

Before you remove it, you need to make sure that there are no connectors on
it, no public folder homed on it, no mailboxes, etc.

Given that those have already been acomplished, you need to shut down
Exchange services on the server to be deleted, then delete it with the
Exchange admin program, connected to a different server.

After that, you can shut the server down completely and remove it via server
manager.

John M.

-Original Message-
From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Brick Level Backups


Folks,
It's late for me.  I am tired.  I am going to remove a Exchange server from
the site.  All are NT4 XCH 5.5.  Basically this means deleting it within the
xch admin program then from server manager?  Am I forgeting anything???
David Kopec   
Electronic Messaging Specialist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Conflict Messages

2002-01-11 Thread John Matteson

Public Folder conflict messages?

What sort of conflict message?

Misdirected mail from someone in the USMC?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Conflict Messages


I am running Exchange 5.5 spk4 on an NT 4.0 Server.  I keep receiving
these "conflict messages" in my Inbox.  Where are these settings and how
can I change them?

M

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Conflict Messages

2002-01-11 Thread John Matteson

If you are just an OWNER, you won't get the conflict messages. You get the
if you are a "Folder Contact" for the folder.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Conflict Messages


The notification in this case is sent to Owners of the public folder.

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 11 January 2002 17:15
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Conflict Messages
Subject: RE: Conflict Messages


They are multiple edits in a public folder.

I just want to find the section that allows me to change who receives
the email/notification.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: unhold

2002-01-15 Thread John Matteson



This is the 
operator... Have I reached the party to whom I am speaking?
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because 
wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe 
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha

  -Original Message-From: Gary Gregg 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:44 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  unhold
  
   List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Email Groups

2002-01-15 Thread John Matteson

I'll make it a hat trick.

Bill and Peter are correct. There is no way to address a message to a
distribution list and then Exempt a particular address from the list in the
commercial version of the product. However, in the Defense Messaging System
version of the product, that function is available.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise
men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe
it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha



-Original Message-
From: Kiernan, Margaret M. (x2255) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Groups


When replying to a group within Outlook (2000) running on Exchange 5.5, SP4
is there any way to eliminate the reply going to a particular user within
that group?  



--
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.  In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the
sender by reply email.  Please advise immediately if you or your employer
do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Any helpful hints for deleted mailboxes?

2002-01-22 Thread John Matteson

Crank up your Disaster recovery procedure and restore from a known good tape
backup. Recreate the mailboxes on the operational server. Once you recover
the mailboxes to PST files on the recovery server you can import the data
into the new mailboxes.

Do you have Microsoft's DRP white paper?

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
...I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where
they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of
their character. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.



-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Any helpful hints for deleted mailboxes?


Good morning,

Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 sp4

Our Security team deleted two mailboxes.  Yep.  They replied YES to the do
you want to delete this mailbox message.  Yep these are active mailboxes (oh
yeah...  one was even a Vice President..  how cool is that.)

Is there anyway to get those mailboxes back?  We have a good backup tape of
our database.  But we are very limited on our space.

Any helpful hints here?

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OWA on a Linux web server?

2001-08-13 Thread John Matteson

Well... personally, any product that doesn't have a phone number that I can
call at two in the morning and scream "HELP ME!" needs to be taken out back
and reduced to cinders with my little Tommy-Atomic Ray gun.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 6:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on a Linux web server?


Actually, I profess that OpenBSD is FreeBSD done right.

-Original Message-----
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on a Linux web server?


Do it up right: FreeBSD.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual
rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. Ayn Rand


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on a Linux web server?


No kidding!

What's wrong with OpenBSD?

-Original Message-
From: Bue Gloeet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on a Linux web server?


Why would you ever want to do that?

-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 8. august 2001 17:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA on a Linux web server?


In the true socratic method, I teach by asking a question with a question:

Mikkel, can you install Exchange on a Linux/Apache web server?

Drew (MOS)

KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp

Beat him out of recognizable shape!

-Original Message-
From: Mikkel Bro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA on a Linux web server?


Hi All,

Can we install Outlook Web Access on a Linux/Apache web server?

Regards
Mikkel



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




Flag for Followup settings

2001-08-13 Thread John Matteson

Good afternoon to you all:

Would any of you know off hand where to set the default time for the
"FLAG FOR FOLLOW-UP" feature? I would like to change it from the default of
5:00 pm.

    Thanks.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Flag for Followup settings

2001-08-13 Thread John Matteson

Yes, within the Outlook client.
I know this is a server list, but some of the people on here are rather
sharp with the client side too.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 

Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Flag for Followup settings


You mean within Outlook? 

I didn't know you could change that!

William

-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Flag for Followup settings


Good afternoon to you all:

Would any of you know off hand where to set the default time for the
"FLAG FOR FOLLOW-UP" feature? I would like to change it from the default of
5:00 pm.

    Thanks.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: service packs and directory replication

2001-08-14 Thread John Matteson

I believe the statement that you may have heard is that in a site
with multiple servers, the bridgehead server should be the first one
updated.

With earlier service packs for Exchange 5.5, if you didn't update
the bridgehead first, replication between the updated site and other sites
would stop, only because replication between servers inside the site got
fouled.

IMHO, it is still good practice to update the bridgehead server
first in any case, since if it goes belly up, the users won't notice
immediately. You'll have some time to recover before the mob storms your
office.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: Richardson, Kendall (UNISYS)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: service packs and directory replication


I was told that bridgehead servers between exchange sites have to be running
the same service pack to make directory replication work correctly, but I
haven't been able to validate this statement.  Is there any validity?

I am running Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT4 and the remote bridgehead server at the
top of our org is 5.5 SP4 on NT4.  thanks for the help

Ken Richardson



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Is there a way to export all PRIV db to individual pst files?

2001-08-15 Thread John Matteson

Read the Word document that comes with the utility. It explains it in great
detail, but plain English so that someone that's not very familiar with
Exmerge can do a complex one or two step extract/import operation.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is there a way to export all PRIV db to individual pst
files?


I think it's available in this download as well:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/love_letter.htm

William

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is there a way to export all PRIV db to individual pst
files?


Exmerge. It requires that the store be mounted and working. You can get
it from the resource kit.

-Original Message-
From: Llanos Carlos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Is there a way to export all PRIV db to individual pst files?


Greetings,

I have a PRIV Database where I need to export all the contents of the
mailboxes to separate ".pst" files.

Is there such a tool to accomplish this task?

Tanks in advance for all yours responses.

Respectfully,

Carlos Llanos
Systems Manager
Whittier College

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: OAB Version 2 Sub-folder

2001-08-15 Thread John Matteson



You 
should delete the various Offline address books that are generated (if you have 
more than one), then re-create them. If that doesn't help, move the OAB to a 
different server in the site.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Do 
not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. 
- Bruce 
Lee 

  -Original Message-From: Kopec, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:51 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OAB Version 2 
  Sub-folder
  Its 
  checked, the 4. and 5. compatibility thing.  Errors are event 5004 SA 
  Generation of the offline Address Book is complete. Result: An error 
  occurred.  I have looked into this but there can be about 100 reasons why 
  you get this very vague error.
  
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 
2001 11:21 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
OAB Version 2 Sub-folder
Errors in Event Log? There is a setting in the Offline Address Book 
in DS Site Configuration which is called Exchange 4.0 and 5.0 compatibility 
- how do you have this set?
 
Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Kopec, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 15 August 2001 15:29To: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OAB Version 2 
  Sub-folder
  Yes we generate but we have been having failures in this.  We 
  are using 5.5 solely throughout our org.
  
-Original Message-From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 
15, 2001 11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: OAB Version 2 
Sub-folder
How do you have the Exchange 4.0 and 5.0 Compatibility set? Don't 
you generate an OAB in each site?
 
Kevin

  -Original Message-From: Kopec, David 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 15 August 2001 
  15:08To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OAB 
  Version 2 Sub-folder
  Would 
  anyone have any insight on this?  In the XCH 
  Admin/Org/Folders/System Folders/OAB then another 
  subfolder representing the site here.  Then there is the 
  standard OAB Version 2 folder under that.  But my question is, 
  under the OAB Version 2 folder is a sub folder titled, 
  "0a8ef82b-4d3a-11d5-98ec-0008c7e63303".  What is this folder?? We 
  have been having issues generating/replication OABs to our 2 over 
  sea's sites and I feel this may be connected to the 
  issue.
   
  
  David Kopec Electronic Messaging Specialist Technology Services and Solutions Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis 
  email has been scanned for viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service 
  which is being trialed by the GSI 10th August 2001 to 
  21stSeptember 2001. For further details, please see 
  ttp://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/gncnotices/gncinformationnotice5_2001virusscanning.pdfIn 
  case of problems, please call your organisations IT 
helpdesk.List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmThis 
  email has been scanned for viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service 
  which is being trialed by the GSI 10th August 2001 to 21stSeptember 
  2001. For further details, please see 
  ttp://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/gncnotices/gncinformationnotice5_2001virusscanning.pdfIn 
  case of problems, please call your organisations IT 
helpdesk.List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Stupid Question

2001-08-15 Thread John Matteson



Simple answer to stupid question.. Different ORGs are 
not able to share anything. You can put up the InterOrg Directory Replicatior 
and get CR's in the directory for the opposite org, but that's really not 
"sharing".
 
I 
think, in theory, you could move the orgs to E2k, using different ORG names, put 
them in different trees and join into one forest, but I don't 
know.
 
Oh, 
btw, if you're going to reply to a message of one subject to start a different 
thread, please snip out all of the old message.
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Do 
not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. 
- Bruce 
Lee 

  -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:50 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Stupid 
  Question
  Specs:
  2 
  Exchange ORGS(Exchange 5.5 SP4), exist on the 
  same WAN, different subnets.
  NOS 
  = WINDOWS 2000 AS(SP2) - We are on a 2000 Domain(forest)
  Both 
  Exchange servers exist in the same Forest
  
   
  Scenario:
  We 
  wish to be able to fully share emails, GAL, directory, etc.. as if 
  it was part of another site. We want to route SMTP email from Exchange ORG A 
  directly to Exchange ORG B and internal email will MTA over and back exactly 
  as if it were just another site within it's ORG.
   
  Without using DRAS, can you do this via the normal connectors available 
  in 5.5? If so, how?
   
  I do 
  have the option to just create a new site in the same org. The problem is, for 
  legal reasons, we want to have this in a seperate ORG with it's own SMTP 
  address.
   
  I 
  could be suffering from brain fade at this point.. and I haven't attempted to 
  test this. I just wanted to ping some of the more senior people to make sure 
  this is possible and where I could find some documents to provide me steps. I 
  couldn't find anything in Technet, with the exception of using a DRAS 
  connection over TCP/IP scenario which means loading RAS services, configuring 
  dial connections, etc... ew.
   
  Thanks in advance for your help
   
  -Rick
   
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Email Template

2001-08-16 Thread John Matteson
Title: RE: Email Template



A 
dime? they cut loose with a DIME? Big spenders!  

 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Do 
not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. 
- Bruce 
Lee 

  -Original Message-From: MLewis 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:57 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Email 
  Template
  Those tools at Hypermart are very nice indeed, but I need free I 
  work for a bunch of cheapos who want the universe for a 
  dime.
   
  Marcella D. 
  Lewis
  Network Administrator
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
  "If 
  the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail." 
    --Abraham Maslow
  
-Original Message-From: Ray Zorz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, August 16, 
2001 10:53 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Email Template
I posted this earlier, but maybe since there's a couple 
helpdesk-type questions on the table I'll repost.  This is from Sue 
Mosher - Outlook MVP:
 MANAGING EXTRA MAILBOXES IN EXCHANGE 
From time to time, I want to highlight solutions developers 
who really seem to understand what people want from Outlook. One such 
developer is Victor Ivanidze, whom I met while I was living in Moscow and 
whose web site at http://victori.hypermart.net/ 
features COM add-ins for Outlook 2000 and 2002, sample forms to add header 
fields to Internet messages,
and various other tips. 
Lately, Victor has focused on one of the stickier issues in 
Outlook in an Exchange environment -- working with a secondary mailbox. As 
you probably know, with proper permissions, you can open another mailbox and 
see all its folders, respond to messages in its Inbox, etc. A typical 
example is a Support mailbox that help desk staffers access in addition to 
their own mailboxes. 
The hard part comes when you want to ensure that messages 
sent from the other mailbox have the right From address and are stored in 
the other mailbox's Sent Items folder. I wrote an article a few years ago 
(http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4855) 
on various ways to meet those goals and concluded that it was easier to 
abandon the shared group mailbox approach and use a public folder instead. 

Victor has breathed new life into the group mailbox 
approach, however, by offering two COM add-ins that together make it 
possible to handle a secondary mailbox's messages seamlessly. RightFrom is a 
utility that automatically fills in the correct From address when you reply 
to or forward a message in the other mailbox. The second utility, 
UniSent,
ensures that those replies and forwards are stored in the 
Sent Items folder of the other mailbox, not in your own mailbox. It also 
puts items that you delete from the group mailbox into the group mailbox's 
Deleted Items folder. 
Remember that, if you're implementing a group mailbox, there 
are two different ways to set permissions to allow other users to send on 
behalf of the mailbox. If the Exchange administrator grants Send on Behalf 
Of permission to the Support mailbox, outgoing messages will show both the 
actual sender and the Support mailbox. If you want to hide the  actual 
sender's name and address, you need to grant Send As permission to the 
user's Windows account. 
-Original Message- From: 
MLewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
Email Template 
You're running the same setup I have running here.  We 
don't have a "helpdesk" per se, so we created a 
Helpdesk mailbox that users submit their requests to 
either by email or task request.  With that, everyone in IT 
needs access to this mailbox, so in Exchange, go to the 
mailbox permissions tab for the helpdesk account you 
want those users to share, give those users permission to that mail account.  If the permissions tab isn't 
viewable in Exchange, go into Tools, Options, 
Permissions and check the box next to 'show 
permission page for all objects' -- this is assuming you're running 
Exchange 5.0 and up.  After permissions have been set, 
tell the users to go to their Outlook program, 
choose Tools, Go into the properties for their MS Exchange Server Account, go to the Advanced tab, and under 'Open 
these additional mailboxes' add the shared user 
account, and it will open an additional set of 
mailbox folders for this shared account, which is separate from their main Exchange account. 
Marcella D. Lewis Network 
Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMA

RE: Additional Mailboxes

2001-08-17 Thread John Matteson

In the Outlook client click on VIEW, click on FROM FIELD, add the name of
the support mailbox to the from field. Click on SEND.

You have to do this for each outgoing message.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: Shamim Rahman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Additional Mailboxes


I set up a support mailbox and gave permissions to several users, but I have
two problems:

1. When any of these users send out mail from support (tests currently), the
messages seem to have the "on behalf of" in the
from field. Don't know how to get rid of this, I set all the specific
users up with "Send As" permission in the permissions tab.

2. I removed one of the users from the permissions tab, but that user can
still access the support mailbox.


Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks

Shamim


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Recover deleted items (formerly Outlook something or other)

2001-08-17 Thread John Matteson

However, you have to have Deleted Items Retention enabled in the
public/private information store for this to work.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Recover deleted items (formerly Outlook something or other)


maybe my comments should have been shorter?

Question: Since Exchange keeps messages after deleting them, BUT marks
them for deletion and hides them, can you turn DumpsterAlwaysOn after the
fact (say a user has hard deleted a ton mail accidentally), and recover
after you turn this option on for the client? In other words, can a client
access deleted items that are marked as such, and hidden if the reg entry
is done after the hard delete?

Thanks
Pat


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Outlook Issue

2001-08-17 Thread John Matteson
Title: Message



The 
deleted items go off into never never land until IS maintenance runs, then they 
get recycled into blank pages in the database.
 
John Matteson; Exchange 
ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
Standards(404) 239 - 2981 Do 
not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. 
- Bruce 
Lee 

  -Original Message-From: Dave Vantine 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 
  12:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
  Issue
  Out 
  of curiosity?
   
  What 
  is the effect of  setting the Deleted item retention to 0 days and 
  unchecking the "Don't permanently delete items until store has been backed up" 
  on the General tab of the Private Information Store 
  Properties
   
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 
12:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Outlook Issue
There is a setting in Tools-->Options-->Other-->Advanced 
Options that will ensure a prompt comes up warning that these items will be 
permanently deleted.
 
Otherwise, I can only think of the Shift-Delete Mr Blackstone refers 
to.
 
William
 
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, August 17, 
2001 9:39 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Outlook Issue
Stop holding down the shift key when 
deleting

  
  -Original Message-From: PANCHAL, 
  PRAVEEN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 
  17, 2001 9:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Outlook Issue
  Hi: 
  When I delete any item from Inbox, instead of 
  going to Deleted Items folder the item gets lost in thin air. I do not 
  know where it goes. Could someone tell me (1) where to find the lost item 
  and (2) how to configure Outlook so that the Deleted items move to Deleted 
  Items folder and do not disappear. I tried looking at all the folder 
  properties but could not get much help.
  Thanks. 
  - 
  Praveen Panchal, CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CNE 
  Executive Director of Information 
  Technology Hostos Community College, 
  City University of New York 500 Grand 
  Concourse Bronx, New York 10451 
  Phone (718) 518-6641 Fax (718) 518-6643 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  http://www.hostos.cuny.edu 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





RE: Mailbox Resources, but no recipients

2001-08-17 Thread John Matteson

How long has it been since you moved the mailboxes?
The information store and the directory don't match up immediately.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mailbox Resources, but no recipients




I have problem, no?
Resources;  recipients
should they be equal?



I moved a bunch of mailboxes from what is, now, our IMC only server, but
there are still mailbox resources left behind.  Q284199 talks about running
DS/IS consistency adjuster for orphaned resources, but only if  ADSI/LDAP
was used to delete the mailboxes.  ADSI/LDAP was not used and the boxes were
moved not deleted.

I can't seem to find the right search terms, but I'm sure the answer is in
TechNet somewhere.  Any help or search terms would be appreciated.

John Sanborn
Exchange Administrator
AZ Army National Guard
(602) 267-2981

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Favorite Things...

2001-08-20 Thread John Matteson

And you'll get to see her in her six inch heels.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Favorite Things...


Sheesh.  A hug at MEC.

Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Lefkovics, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: Favorite Things...


What's my commission? ;)

William

-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Favorite Things...


Hey there...

I'm on a brief information-gathering mission.  I'm looking for your insight
here - what are your favorite tricks for administering E2K via the ESM?
What's your favorite thing that ESM does, or allows you to do easily?  And,
on the other side, what do you dislike about it?  Is there anything you wish
that you could change?

In order to save everyone else from boredom, send replies to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].  Unless you forget, in which case everyone will still
live...

Thanks,
Missy Koslosky



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Viewing Multiple Mailboxes

2001-08-21 Thread John Matteson

Yes, it does. Move the PF up to your FAVORITES folder in the Outlook client,
and it will show you how many messages you haven't read.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981 
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee


-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Viewing Multiple Mailboxes


Ah ha! Thanks for all the posts. I toyed with the idea of public folders,
but the public folder doesn't display the number of un-read messages which
is something the department manager wanted.

Regards,
 
Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell & Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 


-Original Message-
From: Montgomery, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Viewing Multiple Mailboxes


On the client just add that mailbox to the list of "Open these Additional
Mailboxes".  This can be found under the advanced tab in the Exchange
properties. 

-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Viewing Multiple Mailboxes


How can I setup a mailbox to be viewed by a department? 

Scenario: Mailbox created to receive messages from a company that needs to
be viewed by one department. I'd like each user to have the additional
mailbox shown in the folders view of their Outlook 98 client. I've setup the
Global Group to be the Primary NT account for this mailbox. Are there
specific client settings that need to be made? I know I've done this once
before but I can't remember how I accomplished it.
 
Exchange 5.5 sp3, NT 4 sp6a, Outlook 98
 
Regards,
 
Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell & Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the
intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or
privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250
and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the
sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the
communication in error.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the
intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or
privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250
and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the
sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the
communication in error.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Keep copies of all email

2001-08-23 Thread John Matteson

That is the ARCHIVE directories in the IMCDATA tree.
You have one for INbound traffic and one for OUTbound traffic.

However, this only covers the IMC and does nothing for X.400 connector,
internal deliveries (inside the same site or server) or the X.25 connector.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe


-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Keep copies of all email


I think there is a dir on the Exchange server where a copy of all mail
outbound is created (archive or something). If forced, I could look.

Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax

-Original Message-
From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Keep copies of all email

How can I keep a separate copy of each email the goes in or out of the
exchange server?

Smpt,MAPI,etc..

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




RE: Searching the store to extract msg

2001-08-23 Thread John Matteson

Exmerge. Search the KB (technet or online) for ILOVEYOU and it should point
you to a Q article where you can download the package. Ignore everything but
the EXMERGE directory. READ.. READ AGAIN.. then READ FOR A THIRD TIME the
Exmerge.DOC file that comes with it. It explains in great gory detail what
Exmerge can do.

John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981

Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe


-Original Message-
From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Searching the store to extract msg


Is there any utility, 3rd party app, or admin procedure to search the
information store for all emails that contain specific text or sender.  
We have a help desk application that sends email  to users.  The app
crashed.  Mgmt is looking to retrieve messages that were sent out from the
application to exchange users in trying to recreate the incidents.  Oh
yeah, the help desk app can't be restored.

Thanks for any help

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




  1   2   3   4   >