RE: OWA installation

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: OWA installation





Simply go through the install on the future OWA server for exchange. Do a custom install with only the OWA options checked.

-Original Message-
From: andrew bancroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA installation



Hello,
Sorry if this is a bit basic.  I am trying to set up owa on a W2K server running iis5.0, seperate from my exchange servers.  I only have a exchange 5.0 cd and 5.5 upgrade.  How can I get the relevant OWA parts of Exchange 5.5 installed on the w2K machine ?

Andrew Bancroft


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

OWA attachments

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: OWA attachments





I have a user that always gets mail returned from a recipient on a certain domain. Apparently their mail system does not accept ANY attachments. I realize that OWA is HTML based, but the NDR states that the mail was refused due to attachment "unnamed.htm". Does OWA send mail as an HTML file? TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

OWA attachments

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message




I have a user that always gets mail returned from a recipient on a certain 
domain. Apparently their mail system does not accept ANY attachments. I realize 
that OWA is HTML based, but the NDR states that the mail was refused due to 
attachment "unnamed.htm". Does OWA send mail as an HTML file? TIA
Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, 
A+Network 
Engineer and Exchange AdministratorSARMA
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA installation

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: OWA installation





Do you have the latest version of ASP? I worked with MS on our install due to firewall issues. The readily stated that they refused to support me since we are using NAT. I have never had a problem since though. If you can get me your email address, I will email you the docs they gave me. Mine is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ 
Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator
SARMA 
1801 Broadway 
San Antonio, TX 78215 




-Original Message-
From: andrew bancroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA installation



I have run the owa setup but get a message.
 
Processing file: E\Server\setup\i386\webasp.uns at or near line 5 The network path was not found MS Windows NT ID no: 0xc0020035

Any ideas ? - I have seen there is a similar message displayed if asp isn't installed but it is.


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

A brain flash moment

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: A brain flash moment





Where can I go to set permissions on the All Public Folders portion to prevent people from creating folders at the root? There is no permissions tab there. People create these dammed folders and even the Admin can not remove them. TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Unable to access busy/free in Exchange 2K w/Outllook 2K and 2 K2

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



When 
you say no other users experience this problem, are they all set up the same way 
this user is? 

  
  -Original Message-From: Steve Frank 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 
  2002 1:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Unable 
  to access busy/free in Exchange 2K w/Outllook 2K and 2K2
  Hiya!  We 
  have a problem user on our network and she's using Outlook 2K (I'm using 
  Outlook 2K2).  Her busy/free data is not available so if I want to invite 
  her to a meeting, her data isn't showing up.  In a new calendar invite 
  she ends up with "No information.  No free/busy information could be 
  retrieved."  I'm pretty unclear about the details on how this works 
  underneath. We're using Exchange 2000 SP1, no other users experience this 
  problem.  It's like her machine is not uploading her busy/free data, and 
  I don't know how to make it do that.  I've recreated her profile on her 
  local machine just as a quick fix, but it has made no different.  She 
  doesn't get any error messages in her Outlook saying she cannot update the 
  busy/free data, which is what I typically find fixes for on 
  support.microsoft.com.  Can anyone offer me some toubleshooting 
  hints?  Thanks in advance! 
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Low cost folder mirroring software

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Low cost folder mirroring software





For some reason my message didn't go through. I suggest Second Copy 2000 as well. Www.centered.com 


-Original Message-
From: Briggs, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Low cost folder mirroring software



Second Copy
http://www.centered.com/


This is inexpensive and works reasonably well.


Bruce Briggs
System Administration
State University of NY


-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Low cost folder mirroring software




Hey, this is way off topic but this group is the smartest listserv I am on. I need your assistance in finding free/cheap mirroring software. Any ideals?

I need to replicate (mirror) some sub-folders and files between two servers (all on the same network). They need to be able to replicate changes once a day (not all the time).  It will involve replicating about three gig of data first with about 100 Meg of changes /all/deletes each day. These are all word, PDF, txt, and excel files. Lastly, I need to replicates the sub-folders to a subfolder of a different name. What are some good free or low priced software? 


ellery july
Technical Lead
Northwest Area Foundation
332 Minnesota
e-1201 
St. Paul, MN 55101
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone - 651-225-3895 
fax   - 651-225-7695  


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Future plans

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



We have future plans 
to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use 
THEIR email domain. ie:
 
We are abc.com, and 
they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for 
the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that 
company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as 
inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this 
example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach 
it.
 
EXCH 5.5 SP4 
NT4
Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and 
Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 
BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: A brain flash moment

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



PERFECT!!
 
See, 
this list is good for something!! Thanks a million!

  
  -Original Message-From: Rob Wilcox 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 
  2:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: A brain 
  flash moment
  Step 3 from here...
   
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q169198
   
  I think (?)
   
  Thanks
   
  Rob
  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 February 2002 
  19:47To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: A brain flash 
  moment
  Where can I go to set permissions on the All Public Folders 
  portion to prevent people from creating folders at the root? There is no 
  permissions tab there. People create these dammed folders and even the Admin 
  can not remove them. TIAList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Future plans

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



I need 
to be more specific I see.
 
This 
is for use on the LAN. They want functionality to do ALL their email from 
Outlook, and they want as convenient as possible, and they want it NOW (you know 
the drill). IN other words, no OWA, and no POP.

  
  -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 
  2:54 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future 
  plans
  have 
  them give you account on there server and pop the mail 
off.
   
   
  --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
  Did I just say that out 
  loud? 
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 
12, 2002 12:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Future plans
We have future 
plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of 
us to use THEIR email domain. ie:
 
We are abc.com, 
and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling 
mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as 
well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept 
xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost 
myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best 
way to approach it.
 
EXCH 5.5 SP4 
NT4
Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer 
and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: spam control

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



I 
would agree with that to an extent. The problem is that you would have to block 
internet mail for most people to keep from getting flooded. I don't mind the 3rd 
party tool. It works great and is very flexible. Exchange 5.5 is just too low on 
extras

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  February 12, 2002 7:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: spam control
  No, 
  I don't. Its just a matter of preference. I don't want to have to go trudging 
  through all the false positives for this stuff. It isn't my fault or my 
  problem that my users put their email address in every site on the net, then 
  wonder why they get so much spam.
  

-Original Message-From: Nelson 
Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
February 12, 2002 4:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: spam control
Why don't you recommend installing a spam control software on 
Exchange?  Do you use something else to control it?
 
thanks for your input.
 
 
Nelson W. Siqueiros
ADCS Inc.
858-676-9800 x 120

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: spam control
  I suggest 
  you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are 
  big.
  PS, Get to 
  SP4.
  

-Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - 
ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
February 12, 2002 3:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: spam control
Hello,
    What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our 
Exchange 55 SP3 server?  any input would be very 
helpful.
 
thanks
 
Nelson
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
This electronic message and any 
attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or 
entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or 
use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, 
please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the 
message in error, and delete it. Thank 
  you.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
This electronic message and any attachments 
contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The 
information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and 
access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of 
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received 
this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank 
you.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: spam control

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Why 
would you suggest NONE??? We use Praetor from CMS Connect, and have been very 
happy. It is great for many other uses too, including redirectors, auto 
responses, relay blocking, etc.
 
www.cmsconnect.com
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 
  February 12, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: spam control
  I suggest you 
  use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are 
  big.
  PS, Get to 
  SP4.
  

-Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS 
Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 
2002 3:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: spam 
control
Hello,
    What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 
55 SP3 server?  any input would be very helpful.
 
thanks
 
Nelson
 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
This electronic message and any attachments 
contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The 
information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and 
access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of 
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received 
this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank 
you.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Future plans 2

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



I am 
going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. 
TIA

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PMTo: 
  'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'Subject: Future 
plans
  We have future 
  plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us 
  to use THEIR email domain. ie:
   
  We are abc.com, 
  and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail 
  for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as 
  that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com 
  as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in 
  this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to 
  approach it.
   
  EXCH 5.5 SP4 
  NT4
  Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and 
  Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 
  BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215
   
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Double-take failover

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Double-take failover





I have never even heard of it.


-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double-take failover



Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!!

Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange.


I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange.


John M.


-Original Message-
From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Double-take failover



Hello all,
I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover.  The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine.  This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist.

I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already.  I don't know much about how the domain works.


Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4


exchange = 5.5 


The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back.

TIA,
Jeff


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



No it 
doesn't. I think John is right. There is an easy way to send incoming mail to 
another box, but your issue is that you also want this box to be copied on EVERY 
message that this box SENDS right? I have not seen that done myself. Hopefully 
someone here knows.

  
  -Original Message-From: John Matteson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 
  10:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward 
  all activity from a mailbox
  But 
  does the alternate recipient work with outbound mail?
  
-Original Message-From: Todd White 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 
2002 9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Forward all activity from a mailbox
In the Exchange Admin Program go to the mailbox you need to 
have mail delivered FROM.  Choose the Delivery Options tab, select 
Alternate Recipient, and choose the mailbox or custom recipient you want 
this delivered to.  You have the option to deliver to both if 
necessary.
-Original Message- From: 
Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forward 
all activity from a mailbox 
I have a business need to forward a copy of all mail (both 
inbound & outbound) from an Exchange 5.5sp4 
mailbox. 
A copy of all mail generated by this mailbox should go to 
another mailbox in the directory. The client uses 
OWA so client forwarding rules will not work. 

I am already sending all inbound mail to the mailbox and an 
alternate recipient, but forwarding a copy of the 
outbound mail has me stumped. 
Thank-you 
Jean Luc 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Future plans 2

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Future plans 2





What do you mean legally? If we have the permission of the owner of the domain, there is no issue.


-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Future plans 2



Other than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a large amount of time and effort to do.  You may not even legally be able to do more than this.  Check with your legal department.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Future plans 2


Get them to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via OWA.



Neil Hobson


Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions 


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 February 2002 15:21
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Future plans 2
Subject: Future plans 2



I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM
To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'
Subject: Future plans



We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie:

We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are

authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it.

EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4
Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+
Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator
SARMA
1801 Broadway
San Antonio, TX 78215



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 

not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Future plans 2

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



I am 
saying that they basically want the functionality of having 2 domain addresses 
so that they can go back and forth and send and receive mail as xyz.com OR 
abc.com. Another company owns the new domain, and we will just be using 10-12 
mailboxes completely separate from them.

  
  -Original Message-From: Steve Wyman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 
  10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future 
  plans 2
  as 
  you saying they want you to send as [EMAIL PROTECTED] for 
  example but not receive on the XYZ domain.
   
  Whereas you will continue to send and receive on 
  abc.com
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 13 February 2002 
15:21To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Future plans 
2
I 
am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. 
TIA

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 
  PMTo: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'Subject: Future 
  plans
  We have future 
  plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some 
  of us to use THEIR email domain. ie:
   
  We are 
  abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without 
  handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for 
  xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) 
  and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something 
  since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with 
  this? That is the best way to approach it.
   
  EXCH 5.5 SP4 
  NT4
      Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer 
  and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 
  78215
   List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Ewww, 
That sounds HORRID! If that is your only option, I would say screw it. That is 
an ugly set up

  
  -Original Message-From: Todd White 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 
  2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Forward all activity from a mailbox
  Since you use OWA couldn't you setup the account in Outlook on a local 
  desktop, such as yours,  and set a rule there?  Even thought the 
  user is using OWA this might work.  Also, do you have this setup on the 
  IMS to allow forwarding to the outside world?
  
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 
2002 10:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Forward all activity from a mailbox

Not unless 
something has changed.  Alternate Recipients apply to inbound mail 
only.  Unless someone else can think of something, I don't know of a 
way to accomplish this without Rules.  Possibly, if a server-side rule 
could be configured, it would be easy enough to log in to his mailbox with 
another client and accomplish that, but I don't know if a server rule will 
be able to accomplish this.  It might take a client-side rule, which he 
has already stated can't be done because this individual is using 
OWA.
 



Ben 
Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems 
Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 
 
-Original 
Message-From: John 
Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 
11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Forward all activity from a mailbox
 

But does the 
alternate recipient work with outbound mail?

  -Original 
  Message-From: Todd 
  White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 
  9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Forward all activity from a mailbox
  In 
  the Exchange Admin Program go to the mailbox you need to have mail 
  delivered FROM.  Choose the Delivery Options tab, select Alternate 
  Recipient, and choose the mailbox or custom recipient you want this 
  delivered to.  You have the option to deliver to both if 
  necessary.
  -Original Message- From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 
  2002 6:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: Forward all 
  activity from a mailbox 
   
  I 
  have a business need to forward a copy of all mail (both inbound 
  & outbound) from an Exchange 5.5sp4 
  mailbox. 
  A 
  copy of all mail generated by this mailbox should go to 
  another mailbox in the directory. The client uses OWA so 
  client forwarding rules will not work. 
  I am 
  already sending all inbound mail to the mailbox and an 
  alternate recipient, but forwarding a copy of the outbound 
  mail has me stumped. 
  Thank-you 
  Jean 
  Luc 
   
  List 
  Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Future plans 2

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



That 
is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to 
implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will 
discuss with them the different options that truly seem 
available:

  They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use 
  their domain
  there 
  is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR 
  address book
I have 
not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative 
otherwise

  
  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 
  2002 1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Future plans 2
  
  I'm just saying that 
  you may want to consult with your legal department.  Having the 
  permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal 
  world.  You are talking about basically interchanging internal company 
  information.  That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to 
  accomplish this.  The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a 
  project like this, which may not even be possible.  In your given 
  scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it 
  as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for 
  their employees.  Otherwise, mail is going to bounce.  Why?  
  Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost 
  gets most of the messages sent to it.  There will be some messages that 
  get sent to the other server.  There isn't any way around this.  
  That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at 
  the other company.  You get a message for a person at the other company, 
  and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it.  You 
  don't have any recipients with that name set up.  Ends up being very 
  messy.
   
  I was thinking 
  earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up 
  being messy, and I don't think it would work.  They could, however, set 
  up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail 
  to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to 
  your server.  That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using 
  OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are 
  asking.  Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a 
  solution to your problem.
   
  If they are so 
  insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the 
  solution?  Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or 
  forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own 
  addy's.
   
  
  
  
  Ben 
  Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems 
  Administrator 
  Peregrine Systems 
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Future 
  plans 2
   
  What do 
  you mean legally? If we have the permission of the owner of the domain, there 
  is no issue. 
  -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, 
  February 13, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
  
   
  Other 
  than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a large 
  amount of time and effort to do.  You may not even legally be able to do 
  more than this.  Check with your legal department.
  Ben 
  Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems 
   
  -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, 
  February 13, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
  
  Get them 
  to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via 
  OWA. 
   
  Neil 
  Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk 
  Microsoft Gold Certified 
  Partner For 
  Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions 
  -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 13 
  February 2002 15:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List 
  Conversation: Future plans 
  2 Subject: Future 
  plans 2 
   
  I am 
  going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA 
  -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 
  PM To: 
  'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans 
   
  We have 
  future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want 
  some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie:
  We are 
  abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without 
  handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for 
  xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are
  authoritative) and then accept xyz.co

RE: instant messaging

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: instant messaging





From what I have seen, IM services like AIM can dynamically switch ports. The only suggestion I have is to not allow your users the ability to install software.

-Original Message-
From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: instant messaging



I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I don't want the overhead and the user support issues.


I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. 
Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise?


John Weber
Consultant
Centerlogic
503-262-0490 x203



-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double-take failover



We tested Double Take but never implemented it.  There wasn't an option to change the "failover time".  It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that.  From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk.  You may want to give them a call.

 
Robert
 
-Original Message-
From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Double-take failover




First and foremost: 


What is the PDC? 
What is the BDC? 


You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you.  


PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. 


-Original Message- 
From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: Double-take failover 



Hello all, 
I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. 
Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover.  The #2 machine 
takes over the identity of the #1 machine.  This works fine, what doesn't 
work is the login to the domain. 
I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network.


When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account


doesn't exist. 


I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already.  I don't


know much about how the domain works. 


Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 


exchange = 5.5 


The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers


running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when 
failed over and failed back. 


TIA, 
Jeff 


List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: instant messaging

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Also, 
why on earth would you have support issues? I don't support nonbusiness related 
functions.

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
  13, 2002 3:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  instant messaging
  From what I have seen, IM services like AIM can dynamically 
  switch ports. The only suggestion I have is to not allow your users the 
  ability to install software.
  -Original Message- From: John 
  Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  instant messaging 
  I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I 
  don't want the overhead and the user support issues. 
  I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. 
  Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully 
  outside the enterprise? 
  John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 
  -Original Message- From: 
  McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Double-take failover 
  We tested Double Take but never implemented it.  There 
  wasn't an option to change the "failover time".  It would automatically 
  failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that.  From what I remember 
  though, they have a tech support help desk.  You may want to give them a 
  call.
   Robert   -Original Message- 
  From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Double-take failover 
  First and foremost: 
  What is the PDC? What is the BDC? 
  
  You need to provide more information about your domain if 
  anyone is to help you.  
  PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. 
  -Original Message- From: Jeff 
  Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover 
  Hello all, I have two exchange servers 
  that are running double-take. Everything is fine and 
  dandy until I test the failover.  The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine.  This works fine, what 
  doesn't work is the login to the domain. 
  I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email 
  over the network. 
  When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says 
  the account 
  doesn't exist. 
  I have inherited this network and the domain was setup 
  already.  I don't 
  know much about how the domain works. 
  Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 
  exchange = 5.5 
  The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two 
  other servers 
  running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work 
  fine when failed over and failed back. 
  TIA, Jeff 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: instant messaging

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



I 
could be wrong, but I believe the question was, "has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the 
enterprise?" although those are all very valid reasons to not allow 
the traffic. 
So has anyone successfully done 
so?

  
  -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  February 13, 2002 3:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: instant messaging
  1.  Circumvents your firewall and allows users to download and run 
  any file type that they please.
  2.  Circumvents your SMTP AV solution.
  3.  Allows Users to send any documentation to anyone; this can't 
  be tracked, traced or monitored.
  4.  Circumvents any SMTP routing restrictions or blocks that you 
  might have.
   
  I'm 
  sure there are plenty of other better reasons.  I am wrangling with this 
  myself...
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 
4:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
instant messaging
From what I have seen, IM services like AIM can dynamically 
switch ports. The only suggestion I have is to not allow your users the 
ability to install software.
-Original Message- From: 
John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: instant messaging 
I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I 
don't want the overhead and the user support issues. 
I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. 
Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully 
outside the enterprise? 
John Weber Consultant 
Centerlogic 503-262-0490 
x203 
-Original Message- From: 
McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
Double-take failover 
We tested Double Take but never implemented it.  There 
wasn't an option to change the "failover time".  It would automatically 
failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that.  From what I remember 
though, they have a tech support help desk.  You may want to give them 
a call.
Robert   -Original Message- 
From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover 
First and foremost: 
What is the PDC? What is the BDC? 

You need to provide more information about your domain if 
anyone is to help you.  
PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. 
-Original Message- From: 
Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover 
Hello all, I have two exchange 
servers that are running double-take. Everything is 
fine and dandy until I test the failover.  The #2 machine 
takes over the identity of the #1 machine.  
This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to 
the domain. I lose my domain login and in result 
cannot pass email over the network. 
When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says 
the account 
doesn't exist. 
I have inherited this network and the domain was setup 
already.  I don't 
know much about how the domain works. 
Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 
exchange = 5.5 
The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two 
other servers 
running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work 
fine when failed over and failed back. 
TIA, Jeff 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>  

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Steven

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



eh?

  
  -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 
  3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Steven
  Who is for 
  destroying this mans server?
   
  Milton 
  R Dogg
  Spam 
  this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter 
  and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: spam control

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: spam control





Well for us, the spam slammer is a very welcome side effect. We needed the app to do confirmations. We receive data attachments from clients to enter into our own database, and to verify that data, we have the app force an email to KNOWN regulatory email addresses to verify that the data is valid. The app is a great spam stomper to boot, so I am happy.

-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam control



I sort of agree, but I have (had) an @home.com email address and only had it because I was a cable modem subscriber.  I never used this address for anything other than checking it once a month for my billing information. Guess what?  I get about 8 junk emails each day on that account now.  I know that I never filled out any form anywhere with it.  So, I'm guessing that good old bankrupt @home sold it.  I guess that probably wouldn't happen with any of our companies since we wouldn't sell the address, but it wouldn't be difficult for that address to get leaked out by someone else or through a business card or something like that.

As for third-party spam-control software, we currently use nothing.  I find it hard to justify the cost because not everyone receives the spam or as much as others.  I typically get about 5-10 a day here myself, but I've filled out countless forms for product evaluations and such.  Shift+Delete works fine for me, just a bit annoying is all.  I am considering evaluating eManager to go with our ScanMail, but I'm in no hurry.  In the meantime, I just keep adding domains to block when they are obviously not a company we plan on doing business with anytime soon.  Em5000.net, 0mbranetworking.com, optinmembers.com, stuff like that...

Martin Blackstone wrote:


>  No, I don't. Its just a matter of preference. I don't want to have to 
> go trudging through all the false positives for this stuff. It isn't 
> my fault or my problem that my users put their email address in every 
> site on the net, then wonder why they get so much spam.
>
>  -Original Message-
>  From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc.
>  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:47 PM
>  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>  Subject: RE: spam control
>
>  Why don't you recommend installing a spam control software
>  on Exchange?  Do you use something else to control it?thanks
>  for your input.  Nelson W. SiqueirosADCS Inc.858-676-9800 x
>  120
>
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Martin Blackstone
>   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: spam control
>
>   I suggest you use none, but if you insist,
>   MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big.PS, Get to
>   SP4.
>
>    -Original Message-
>    From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc.
>    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>    Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PM
>
>    To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>    Subject: spam control
>
>    Hello,    What software do you guys
>    recommend to control spam on our
>    Exchange 55 SP3 server?  any input would
>    be very helpful.thanks Nelson List
>    Charter and FAQ at:
>    http://www.sunbelt-
>    oftware.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
>
>
>    This electronic message and any
>    attachments contain information which is
>    confidential and may be legally
>    privileged. The information is intended
>    solely for the individual or entity
>    named above and access by anyone else is
>    unauthorized. If you are not the
>    intended recipient, any disclosure,
>    copying, distribution, or use of the
>    contents of this information is
>    prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
>    have received this electronic
>    transmission in error, please reply
>    immediately to the sender that you have
>    received the message in error, and
>    delete it. Thank you.
>
>   List Charter and FAQ at:
>   http://www.sunbelt-softw
>   re.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
>  List Charter and FAQ at:
>  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
>
>
>  This electronic message and any attachments contain
>  information which is confidential and may be legally
>  privileged. The information is intended solely for the
>  individual or entity named above and access by anyone else
>  is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>  disclosure, copyi

RE: Mass calendar update

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Mass calendar update





Any chance you know the URL? I am bad at search engines...


-Original Message-
From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mass calendar update



There's a custom form for this on slipstick.com. Modify it with your holidays and send to your clients. The appointments get put on each calendar. 

    
Laura Bibel
Allegheny Energy: Information Services
Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mass calendar update



Exchange 5.5 SP3 on ?NT4 SP6.  Is there any way to plug all the company's holidays into everyone's calendar in their mailbox on the server?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Steven

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Hell 
$10!!! 
 
I am 
in!!

  
  -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 
  2002 4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Steven
  you 
  did not get this 4 times??
  
  
  How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if 
  anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems?
  Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from 
  Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry.
  Offer ends February 28, 2002.
   
   
  --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
  Did I just say that out 
  loud? 
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
13, 2002 1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Steven
eh?

  
  -Original Message-From: Milton R 
  Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
  13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Steven
  Who is for 
  destroying this mans server?
   
  Milton R Dogg
  Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big 
  DoggsList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Steven -> Sonicwall

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall





What does Sonicwall run on. Oh nm...I can look it up


-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall



you like your sonic wall?  what model do you have and how much did it
cost you/your company?  I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200...   i
have never used one..  can I block ports?  I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ???

Paul


-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server
Conversation: Steven
Subject: RE: Steven



I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure.


-Original Message-
From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Steven



There he is! Get him!
(But seriously, Huh?)


--- Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Steven
> 
> 
> Who is for destroying this mans server?
>  
> Milton R Dogg
> Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002
 


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002
 


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Steven -> Sonicwall

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall





What do you mean? You can do port blocking with many firewalls.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall



You need packet filtering for that. Check out a Packeteer Packetshaper.


-Original Message-
From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall



you like your sonic wall?  what model do you have and how much did it
cost you/your company?  I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200...   i
have never used one..  can I block ports?  I need to block ports like 1214
(kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ???


Paul


-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server
Conversation: Steven
Subject: RE: Steven



I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure.


-Original Message-
From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Steven



There he is! Get him!
(But seriously, Huh?)


--- Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Steven
> 
> 
> Who is for destroying this mans server?
>  
> Milton R Dogg
> Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002
 


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002
 


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Steven -> Sonicwall

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Napster still exists? LOL I thought that was ancient 
history!

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  February 13, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
  It 
  works for some, but not others. As you say, it will work with AOL. But what 
  about something like Napster? 
  

-Original Message-From: David N. 
Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
13, 2002 5:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
what about blocking login.oscar.aol.com ?

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, February 13, 2002 17:55To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
  Port 
  blocking wont work for most of these new toys. They have the ability to 
  jump ports. What you need is something that can read TCP headers. So it 
  knows rather than what port to block, it knows what 
  software.
  

-Original Message-----From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 
2002 2:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
What do you mean? You can do port blocking with many 
firewalls. 
-Original Message- From: 
Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:48 
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall 
You need packet filtering for that. Check out a 
Packeteer Packetshaper. 
-Original Message- From: 
Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:39 
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall 
you like your sonic wall?  what model do you have 
and how much did it cost you/your company?  
I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200...   i have never used one..  can I block ports?  I need to 
block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so 
people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? 
Paul 
-Original Message- From: 
Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM 
Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: 
Steven 
I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall 
here...pretty secure. 
-Original Message- From: 
Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 
PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven 
There he is! Get him! (But 
seriously, Huh?) 
--- Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I 
think) > > 
-Original Message- > From: Milton R 
Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Steven > 
> > Who is for 
destroying this mans server? >  
> Milton R Dogg > 
Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs > List Charter and FAQ at: > 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> > > > > 
List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> > 
__ 
Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE 
Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

--- Incoming mail is certified 
Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). 
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 
2/8/2002   
--- Outgoing mail is certified 
Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). 
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 
2/8/2002   
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:h

RE: Steven -> Sonicwall

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



How 
much did the Packetshaper cost? Is that high overhead? Or is it pretty 
basic?

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 
  14, 2002 8:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Steven -> Sonicwall
  Napster still exists? LOL I thought that was ancient 
  history!
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
It 
works for some, but not others. As you say, it will work with AOL. But what 
about something like Napster? 

  
  -Original Message-From: David N. 
  Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
  13, 2002 5:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
  what about blocking login.oscar.aol.com ?
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, February 13, 2002 17:55To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Steven -> 
Sonicwall
Port 
blocking wont work for most of these new toys. They have the ability to 
jump ports. What you need is something that can read TCP headers. So it 
knows rather than what port to block, it knows what 
software.

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 
  2002 2:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
  What do you mean? You can do port blocking with many 
  firewalls. 
  -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:48 
  PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall 
  You need packet filtering for that. Check out a 
  Packeteer Packetshaper. 
  -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: Steven -> Sonicwall 
  you like your sonic wall?  what model do you have 
  and how much did it cost you/your 
  company?  I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200...   
  i have never used one..  can I block 
  ports?  I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. 
  ??? 
  Paul 
  -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM 
  Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: 
  Steven 
  I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall 
  here...pretty secure. 
  -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 
  PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: Steven 
  There he is! Get him! (But 
  seriously, Huh?) 
  --- Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
  > I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I 
  think) > > 
  -Original Message- > From: Milton R 
  Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 
  PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  > Subject: Steven > 
  > > Who is for 
  destroying this mans server? >  
  > Milton R Dogg > Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs 
  > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > > > > > 
  List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  > > 
  __ 
  Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE 
  Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  --- Incoming mail is certified 
  Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system 
  (http://www.grisoft.com). 
  Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release 
  Date: 2/8/2002   
  --- Outgoing mail is certified 
  Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system 
  (http://www.grisoft.com). 
  Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release 
  Date: 2/8/2002   
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-s

Off topic:: Outlook Calendar

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



There 
is a nice feature online to add various sports team schedules to your OUtlook 
Calendar. Is there one out there for Olympic events? I am most interested in the 
hockey schedule. TIA
 

Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and 
Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 
BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Off topic:: Outlook Calendar

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



http://www.calendar-updates.com/

  
  -Original Message-From: Crouthamel, 
  Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  February 14, 2002 8:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Off topic:: Outlook 
Calendar
  This 
  sounds like a neat feature. Where do you get it?
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 
9:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off 
topic:: Outlook Calendar
There is a nice feature online to add various sports team schedules 
to your OUtlook Calendar. Is there one out there for Olympic events? I am 
most interested in the hockey schedule. TIA
 

Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer 
and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** 
  Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or 
  its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by 
  the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the 
  intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such 
  person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or 
  the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
  strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify 
  the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, 
  conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to 
  official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
  the company.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mass calendar update

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



That 
looks like a great feature, but it will not work for Outlook 2000/2K2. Any 
knowledge of where there is a compatible option?

  
  -Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 
  8:40 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mass 
  calendar update
  http://www.slipstick.com/addins/calendar.htm
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
13, 2002 4:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Mass calendar update
Any chance you know the URL? I am bad at search 
engines... 
-Original Message- From: 
Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:07 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mass calendar update 
There's a custom form for this on slipstick.com. Modify it 
with your holidays and send to your clients. The appointments get put on 
each calendar. 
    
Laura Bibel Allegheny 
Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 
Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

-Original Message- From: 
Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mass 
calendar update 
Exchange 5.5 SP3 on ?NT4 SP6.  Is there any way to plug 
all the company's holidays into everyone's calendar in their mailbox on the 
server?
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 
voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Future plans 2

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Future plans 2





He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, neither will I...


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Future plans 2



you must not be married.


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Future plans 2



I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you refer.  I don't think they exist.  Are you sure you have the name right?

-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Future plans 2



The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK.  They've got several people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA.  Using SSL of course... :-)


Neil Hobson


Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
 
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Future plans 2
Subject: RE: Future plans 2



That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain 

there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message-

From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Future plans 2



I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world.  You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information.  That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this.  The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible.  In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees.  Otherwise, mail is going to bounce.  Why?  Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it.  There will be some messages that get sent to the other server.  There isn't any way around this.  That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company.  You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it.  You don't have any recipients with that name set up.  Ends up being very messy.

I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server.  That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking.  Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem.

If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution?  Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE 
Network/Systems Administrator 
Peregrine Systems 


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Future plans 2


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Future plans 2

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



What 
the hell do WalMart employees need mailboxes for? To let each other know that 
the Dale Earnhardt bandanas are on sale this week?

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  February 14, 2002 11:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2
  You 
  know the answer Mr B.  They both use Exchange.  WalMart, based in 
  Arkansas, may well be the largest Exchange2000 deployment at around 300,000 
  mailboxes.
   
  William
  
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 
14, 2002 9:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Future plans 2
I'm the same 
with KMart. I have never been in a WalMart and have on intention of doing 
so.
I'm a Target 
kind of guy.
 
Just to be on 
topic, Do you think Kmart or Wal-Mart use Exchange? 

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 
  9:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Future plans 2
  He may be. My wife won't set foot in WalMart. Actually, 
  neither will I... 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Andrew Philips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:13 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
  you must not be married. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
  I've never been inside one of these 'WalMart' places you 
  refer.  I don't think they exist.  Are you sure you have the 
  name right?
  -Original Message- From: 
  Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:44 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
  The reason I mentioned OWA in the first place is because 
  I've done this for a customer of mine in the UK.  They've got several 
  people from a small corner-shop outfit in the USA (called WalMart I 
  think...!) accessing mailboxes on their system via OWA.  Using SSL of 
  course... :-)
  Neil Hobson 
  Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk 
  Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative 
  Solutions   -----Original Message- From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Posted At: 13 February 2002 21:09 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: RE: 
  Future plans 2 
  That is the best answer I have received, and you are 
  right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to 
  nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different 
  options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA 
  to use their domain 
  there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected 
  sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around 
  this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original 
  Message-
  From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 
  I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your 
  legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't 
  mean squat in the legal world.  You are talking about basically 
  interchanging internal company information.  That, plus you don't 
  have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this.  The owner of 
  the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not 
  even be possible.  In your given scenario below, if you were to add 
  an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to 
  have a way to route the messages destined for their employees.  
  Otherwise, mail is going to bounce.  Why?  Because the way that 
  MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the 
  messages sent to it.  There will be some messages that get sent to 
  the other server.  There isn't any way around this.  That means 
  that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the 
  other company.  You get a message for a person at the other company, 
  and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it.  
  You don't have any recipients with that name set up.  Ends up being 
  very messy.
  I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients 
  for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't t

RE: pop3 access

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: pop3 access





I assumed the alias matched the NT username. That is the first thing that MS demands practically. You NEED that username and alias in Exch to match

-Original Message-
From: John Mello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pop3 access



Put the domain in with the username.  I've seen this happen when the alias is different from the username.


John


-Original Message-
From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pop3 access


Not sure if you got my last message:


Because we have one user who works remotely (out of state) who prefers to use an Outlook2K client via internet mail.  She is temporarily using owa until I can get this working again.

Fred
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pop3 access



Why pop3?


-Original Message-
From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 18:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pop3 access



The company I work for,  WHY do you ask?


Fred


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pop3 access



Is this YOUR exchange server or someone elses ?


-Original Message-
From: MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 20:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pop3 access



Mail Manager?, Hosting Control Panel?,  Is this in the Exchange Administrator?


Thanks,


Fred 


-Original Message-
From: Mal Sasalu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: pop3 access




Would this help?



1. Why do I get this error, "There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected."? - Here is the error message I keep getting and the settings I have using outlook

express:


There was a problem logging onto your mail server. Your Password was rejected.
Account: 'Account Name', Server: 'mail.domain.ext', Protocol: POP3, Server
Response: '-ERR Bad login', Port: 110, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 0x800CCC90, Error Number: 0x800CCC92


incoming mail=mail.domain.ext
outgoing mail=smtp.isp.ext
account name=accountuser
password=accountpassword



When you change your account password it does not change an email addresses' password. You need to change the username's password to what you want it to be. You need to do this in the Mail Manager, located in your Hosting Control Panel =) 

 
 Mal Sasalu
Information Systems & Facilities
Phone: (403) 295-4914 NovAtel Inc.
Fax:  (403) 295-4501    1120 68th Avenue
NE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    Calgary, AB
T2E
8S5
 
http://www.novatel.ca


 -Original Message-
From:   MSexchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, February 01, 2002 4:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:    pop3 access


Hello All,
 
ex55srvsp4 on win2ksrvsp2 behind msproxy2
 
I have a user trying to access pop3 mail.  My tests (using Outlook
Express5) keep coming back to the repeated logon screen with the 0x800CCC90 and 92 errors.  I have tried almost everything according to the MS articles associated with this error id.  Please help me think out loud and give me any advice based on your experiences.

 
Thanks,
 
Fred Valdez


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: could not open one or more attachments in outlook

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: could not open one or more attachments in outlook





Yes if they are blocked by Outlook. Outlook 2K has two levels of blocking. One you can control, and one you can not. Other than that, we will need more specifics.

-Original Message-
From: JFadigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: could not open one or more attachments in outlook



anyone seen this before


Jeff


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact





Holy crap! 48 Gs on your priv.edb??? For 230 users??? I feel better now about ours. I am trying to enforce a cleanup here, with a high user of 800 MB. Wheh, at least I am not the worst dog in the pen...

-Original Message-
From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 5:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact



I am in a similar position.  We had a 250MB warning, 300MB prohibit and a sales person complained to my boss and my boss said to remove the limits on EVERYONE.  Now, I have 6 mailboxes in the 1GB+ range and the majority of the other mailboxes are above 400MB+.  Of course all of these huge mailboxes are on laptops, so the OST is frickin huge and every other month it gets corrupted and has to be recreated.  My company is about 230 user with a priv.edb of 47.5GB.  Backups only take a whopping 8 hours for full backup, meaning about the same for a restore.  Management is upset that the restore would take so long, but they aren't willing to enforce limits, or delete mail.  Oh well, what can I do.

Mike Z


-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 5:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact



They tend to save the little metal handles from Chinese carryout containers, also "just in case".  You gotta fill the living room with something, no?

-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 17:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact



True indeed. We've got exec levels at over a Gig mailboxes. Pretty ridiculous, eh.  That's what happens when they build an exchange server w/o limits! W 

-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact



275 warning, 300 prohibit.  Wow that's pretty lenient.  You must have ample IS space on your server. Im forced to set mine at 50MB warning 60 mB prohibit.  But then again there are over 500 mailboxes.  

 
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact
 
Use the HEADERS.EXE file to build a CSV template of the mandatory and optional values you want to extract from the database. Use the directory export tool with the CSV file you generated with HEADERS and then set the limits you wanted on the boxes you wanted, then import.

 
Barring that, and you want to set a GLOBAL value, use the values on the server in the Private Information Store object. This will not overwrite any values set on individual mailboxes.

 
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981 
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. 
 
-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact
Right that's the basic idea I was thinking about, but I'd prefer not to manually set the individual mailbox limits.I was hoping someone had a script.

 
10q
W 
-Original Message-
From: Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact
The best way I can think of is to set a global limit on all mailboxes and then specify the limits for those over on a per mailbox basis.

 
Neil
-Original Message-
From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 February 2002 19:13
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Applying Mailbox LimitsAfter the Fact
Does anyone know of a utility or script that can do the following under Exchange 5.5, Win2k Server SP2, About 250 or so recipients: I would like to apply mailbox limits at 275mb warn and 300mb disable send. 

The twist is that for existing users over 300mb I would like their limit warning to be 75mb more than what they currently have and their disable send limit to be 100mb more than what they have. Is there a utility or script available that will scan my mailboxes and apply these limits? Maybe I haven't figured out the correct wording yet but I can't find any reference to this on the web or technet. Thanks, 

William L. Smith 
Systems Administrator 
Riptech, Inc. 
Real-Time Information Protection 
2800 Eisenhower Avenue 
Alexandria, VA 22314 
http://www.riptech.com 
w: (703) 373-5158 
c:  (703) 946-0894 
f:   (703) 373-6158 
e:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Li

RE: OWA sessions wont release...

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: OWA sessions wont release...





Did you verify that they are clicking on "logoff" before they close the browser? I had issues with remotes just closing the browser causing this.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:36 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA sessions wont release...



I'm noticing a strange problem on our newly implemented OWA server.  A few client sessions are never fully disconnecting.  The client is closing out of their browser... but if I go and look in the Security logs... Every thirty minutes on the dot I see a logoff audit from that client and then immediately a Network Logon audit.  This goes on in an endless loop.  I've verified the client is closed and there is no traffic through the firewall... so it seems like an IIS problem.  Anyone seen this before?

Preston Craig Jeffares
Network Engineer
Georgia Department of Motor Vehicle Safety
  


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Recover Deleted Items

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Recover Deleted Items





Was there a change in that period in the Deleted Item Retention settings in Admin?


-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Recover Deleted Items



I need some help with a certain situation.  When the COO of my company receives mail to his corporate account after he reads the mail he deletes it, and then at the end of the day he empties his deleted items folder.  He was on the road from 2/9/02 thru 2/13/02.  He needed to recover a file from the Deleted Items Recovery, and was exploring.  He was scrolling down, when he noticed something.  After the last e-mail he received on 2/8/02 instead of it going to 2/9/02 it went to 2/14/02.  What happened to the messages that he deleted when he was away.  I need to find an answer for this.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Chris


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



What 
are you referring to? You didn't include it in your reply

  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 
  12:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: My recent 
  $*#($#@($&#
  Sorry all, I don't manage the exchange servers and 
  didn't know they allowed this kind of crap.  They don't now! 
  Don Ely Network 
  Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 
  516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 
  email http://www.tripathimaging.com 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Sorry 
I don't do domestic at all. Serve me a stout or I will kick your a$$. If it's 
yellow, I don't touch it, lol

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
  NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 
  February 15, 2002 1:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: My recent $*#($#@($&#
  Awe. 
  come on, it's Friday.  Give the guy a break.  It's not like he 
  invited us all over and served lite beer.
   
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
  NAOCERT, Exchange Administrator(207) 989-9115 
  voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
-Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 
2:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: My 
recent $*#($#@($&#
Yeah, I know, but damn...  First time in my career I've used the 
stupid thing and I just wanted the company to know I was gone.  
Instead, I let the entire world know.  Ah well, it won't happen again 
and there's an exchange admin still looking for his tail as we 
speak...  ;o)
 
 
 
 
Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct 
(336) 516-4519 - 
Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com 


  
  -Original Message-From: Ben Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 
  2002 1:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  My recent $*#($#@($&#
  
  If you don't know 
  what he's referring to, I wouldn't worry about it.  Some of us 
  though, had a little grin when it happened J
   
  Don't worry Don, 
  it happens at least once to the best of us.
   
  
  Ben Winzenz, 
  MCSE
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator
  Peregrine 
  Systems
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:36 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: My 
  recent $*#($#@($&#
   
  
  What are you 
  referring to? You didn't include it in your reply
  
-Original 
Message-From: Ely, 
Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 
12:27 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: My recent 
$*#($#@($&#
Sorry all, I don't manage 
the exchange servers and didn't know they allowed this kind of 
crap.  They don't now! 
Don Ely 
Network 
Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. 
(336) 
290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 
email http://www.tripathimaging.com 

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Gee 
that wasn't sexist or anything.
 
and 
BTW: yeah, but what kind of whiskey? Candy ass Crown? jk

  
  -Original Message-From: Preston Jeffares 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: My recent 
  $*#($#@($&#
  You're all women... real men drink Whiskey.
  
-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 15, 
2002 3:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
My recent $*#($#@($&#
> Chimay or nothing 
Leffe Brown. Or Blonde. List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

OWA again

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Has anyone had 
issues with people getting the following:
 
"...OWA only 
supports message bodies up to 100K Please create a new message with a smaller 
size..."
 
The issue is that 
they get this error (which I have never heard before) and it just sits on the 
original message. Plus, that message is usually only a few lines. Upon 
researching, the recipients are GETTING that original message. So, as you can 
probably deduce, they are retyping the message, and the recipient receives 
multiple copies. So far I have only seen this happen with recipients on the GAL. 
Any experience?
 
Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and 
Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 
BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA again

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Sorry, 
SP4 on the Exch and OWA servers

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 
  February 16, 2002 10:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: OWA again
  I 
  have heard no mention of the SP level of this Exchange 
  server.
  

-Original Message-From: Bert Macias 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 
2002 2:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 
OWA again
I had one user that solved this problem with an 
upgrade of IE...he had been using v 4.x  or something to that 
effect...

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matthew 
  Carpenter 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:19 
  PM
  Subject: OWA again
  
  Has anyone had 
  issues with people getting the following:
   
  "...OWA only supports message bodies up to 100K Please 
  create a new message with a smaller size..."
   
  The issue is 
  that they get this error (which I have never heard before) and it just 
  sits on the original message. Plus, that message is usually only a few 
  lines. Upon researching, the recipients are GETTING that original message. 
  So, as you can probably deduce, they are retyping the message, and the 
  recipient receives multiple copies. So far I have only seen this happen 
  with recipients on the GAL. Any experience?
   
      Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer 
  and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 
  78215
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Watch those TechNet CD's

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Watch those TechNet CD's





That's odd, I always look at discs before I put them in the tray...h lol


Just messing with you. I think defective CDs are not an MS specific problem. Can't blame Bill for EVERYthing


-Original Message-
From: Ken Leyba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Watch those TechNet CD's



Over the weekend at a consulting gig we were installing Exchange 5.5 SP4 and during the middle of copying the files the installer dies with read errors. After the second attempt with the same error we popped the CD only to find that it had two defects on the surface.  Two little plastic bumps in the middle of the tracks.

We ended up downloading all the SP4 files from the MS website and luckily recovering with no problems.  That liitle bug cost us over two hours :^(  My associate called MS this morning and they said they couldn't replace a single CD but were going to send us the latest TechNet Welcome kit with all the current CD's!

-
Ken Leyba
Windows/Exchange System Administrator http://www.csudh.edu/exchange California State University Dominguez Hills
Phone: 310-243-2815 Fax: 310-516-3877


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 Question....

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Neil 
if you are going to introduce a new topic, please change the 
subject,

  
  -Original Message-From: Neil Raggett 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:58 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
  Question
  How 
  does message journaling work with things like read receipts?  
  
   
  If I 
  send a message with read receipts turned on and the person reading the 
  journaling mailbox reads it, will I get a receipt back from that?  Same 
  with delivery receipts?
   
  Just 
  curious (As I have no plans on using it or bothering to test it) 
  really.
   
  Neil
  
-Original Message-From: Bob Chyka 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 25 February 2002 
14:35To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 
Question
Hello everyone,
 
i was wondering if there is a way to have a 
copy of everyones incoming and outgoing mail sent to a generic mailbox 
without the user knowing.  my boss at another company wants a copy of 
every piece of e-mail coming in and going out sent to a "generic" mailbox 
that only he has access to.  
 
any help/info is appreciated
 
thanks,
Bob C.List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 Question....

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Why?
 
Just 
tell them straight out. Either something is fishy here, or your manager 
sucks.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  February 25, 2002 1:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
  Out of respect 
  to Stu, I will refrain from saying what I think about 
  this..
  

-Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
10:21 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 Question

Wow...
 
-Original 
Message-From: Bob 
Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:31 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Re: 
Exchange 5.5 Question
 
sure 
doesmonitors everything except e-mail which we all know he now 
wants...

- Original 
Message - 

From: Allen 
Crawford 

To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Monday, February 
25, 2002 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 
Question
 
Or 
hire better managers.  That's 
their job.  Employees goof off, 
whether it is on the phone, too many breaks, etc.  Does he monitor phone calls 
too?
 
-Original 
Message-From: Milton R 
Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:39 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 Question
 
Your boss should 
Hire better people if he feels the need to police them. Or fire the people 
he suspects.
 
Milton R 
Dogg
Of The Dogg 
Foundation
 
-Original 
Message-From: Bob 
Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:35 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Exchange 
5.5 Question

Hello 
everyone,
 
i was wondering if 
there is a way to have a copy of everyones incoming and outgoing mail sent 
to a generic mailbox without the user knowing.  my boss at another 
company wants a copy of every piece of e-mail coming in and going out sent 
to a "generic" mailbox that only he has access to.  
 
any help/info is 
appreciated
 
thanks,
Bob 
C.
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 Question....

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Yeah I 
think this is a case when someone higher up needs to get involved. Does this 
person have the right to just decide to read all mail in the company? There are 
always legal issues with reading financial information, etc on a company, even 
from within. I would definitely raise a flag on this.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  February 25, 2002 1:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question
  Which would 
  imply that unless said boss has written permission, he is in violation and 
  could be terminated.
  

-Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
11:11 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Exchange 5.5 Question
Taken from Medaille.edu's email 
policy:
 
"You must respect the confidentiality of other 
people's electronic mail and must not attempt to read, "hack" into other 
systems or other people's logins, or "crack" passwords, or breach computer 
or network security measures."
 
They forgot to include "except 
management".

  -Original Message-From: Allen Crawford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 
  10:21 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange 5.5 Question
  
  Wow...
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Bob 
  Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:31 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Re: 
  Exchange 5.5 Question
   
  sure 
  doesmonitors everything except e-mail which we all know he now 
  wants...
  
  - Original 
  Message - 
  
  From: Allen 
  Crawford 
  
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Sent: Monday, 
  February 25, 2002 11:14 AM
  Subject: RE: Exchange 
  5.5 Question
   
  Or 
  hire better managers.  That's 
  their job.  Employees goof 
  off, whether it is on the phone, too many breaks, etc.  Does he monitor phone calls 
  too?
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Milton 
  R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:39 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Exchange 5.5 Question
   
  Your boss should 
  Hire better people if he feels the need to police them. Or fire the people 
  he suspects.
   
  Milton R 
  Dogg
  Of The Dogg 
  Foundation
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Bob 
  Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:35 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Exchange 
  5.5 Question
  
  Hello 
  everyone,
   
  i was wondering 
  if there is a way to have a copy of everyones incoming and outgoing mail 
  sent to a generic mailbox without the user knowing.  my boss at 
  another company wants a copy of every piece of e-mail coming in and going 
  out sent to a "generic" mailbox that only he has access to.  
  
   
  any help/info is 
  appreciated
   
  thanks,
  Bob 
  C.
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: spam question

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: spam question





Depends on what you are running. With my system, I drop mail that is spam, not return it. In such a case, they do not get an NDR, because I am deleting their mail. This is a great tool against relay freaks. They think their relay is getting through, when in truth, I AM EATING IT FOR LUNCH. 

-Original Message-
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question



Another question. Don't the spammers know that they have hit a legit address because they don't get a non-delivery notice. Can't they put two and two together and figure out which are the real addresses? Why would they need a read receipt. just a thought. dave

-Original Message-
From: Anthony Getor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question



In Outlook 2000, this option is set by going to Tools-->Options-->E-mail
Options-->Tracking Options.


Tony



-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question



OutL2000 never asked about sending read receipts, but OutL2002 does.


Steve


-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question



I wouldn't think so, unless the spammers are coming from your own Exchange Server.  All I know is that whenever someone from the outside world requests a read receipt, I'm usually asked if I want to send it or not.  Of course, that is with Outlook (Internet Mail Only) and Outlook Express at home.  I'm not so sure I've ever seen it with the Corporate/Workgroup setting...

 -Original Message-
From:   Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:    spam question


I try to lecture my lusers all the time about not unscribing to spam mail that they are sending their legitimate address back to whomever. I tell them to just delete it. Now internally when I send a read receipt to someone it will tell me that it was not read. Is this what happens when you delete spam? Are they (spammers) still getting a notification that it's a real address?

dave


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: spam question

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: spam question





I have never heard of filtering spam at the firewall. How could a firewall possibly do that? Unless of course you know who the culprit senders are, but that changes continuously.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question



It's also a waste of resources as the mail still has to travel through the firewall, into the IMC, get routed to dev null. Better to block them at the firewall (if possible) and return them a 5xx error. Dropping the request (as some do) returns a 4xx error so the mail will queue on their systems and retry.

As too why they would have a read receipt is beyond me. Most spammer could give a damn if their mail gets there or not. They are charging by the piece sent, not delivered. Spam houses take the add, merge it with a database of names and open up the mail cannon. Relayers wouldn't want a receipt anyways. That would give me a way to go after them directly rather than try to get the open relay to shut his hole.

> -Original Message-
> From: Drewski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:09 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: spam question
> 
> Doesn't that violate RFCs? :P
>  
> -- Drew
> 
> Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
> Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn 
> from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent 
> disinclination to do so. --Douglas Adams
> 
>   -Original Message-
>   From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:03 PM
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>   Subject: RE: spam question
>   
>   
> 
>   Depends on what you are running. With my system, I drop mail that is 
> spam, not return it. In such a case, they do not get an NDR, because I 
> am deleting their mail. This is a great tool against relay freaks. 
> They think their relay is getting through, when in truth, I AM EATING 
> IT FOR LUNCH.
> 
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Eldridge, Dave [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:50 AM 
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
>   Subject: RE: spam question
> 
> 
>   Another question. Don't the spammers know that they have hit a legit 
> address because they don't get a non-delivery notice. Can't they put 
> two and two together and figure out which are the real addresses? Why 
> would they need a read receipt. just a thought. dave
> 
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Anthony Getor [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:15 AM 
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
>   Subject: RE: spam question
> 
> 
>   In Outlook 2000, this option is set by going to
> Tools-->Options-->E-mail
>   Options-->Tracking Options.
> 
>   Tony
> 
> 
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [ 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:30 PM 
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
>   Subject: RE: spam question
> 
> 
>   OutL2000 never asked about sending read receipts, but OutL2002 does.
> 
> 
>   Steve
> 
>   -Original Message- 
>   From: Allen Crawford [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 AM 
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
>   Subject: RE: spam question
> 
> 
>   I wouldn't think so, unless the spammers are coming from your own 
> Exchange Server.  All I know is that whenever someone from the outside 
> world requests a read receipt, I'm usually asked if I want to send it 
> or not.  Of course, that is with Outlook (Internet Mail Only) and 
> Outlook Express at home.  I'm not so sure I've ever seen it with the 
> Corporate/Workgroup setting...
> 
>    -Original Message- 
>   From:   Eldridge, Dave [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
>   Sent:   Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:45 AM 
>   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
>   Subject:    spam question 
> 
>   I try to lecture my lusers all the time about not unscribing to spam 
> mail that they are sending their legitimate address back to whomever. 
> I tell them to just delete it. Now internally when I send a read 
> receipt to someone it will tell me that it was not read. Is this what 
> happens when you delete spam? Are they (spammers) still getting a 
> notification t

Outlook 2K

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Outlook 2K





Is it possible for a user to have hidden a personal folder even from themselves?


I have a user that moves mail over to a personal folder via the "Move to folder" icon, which drop s a list of recently used folders.

It accepts the move without error, yet she can not find that folder after the fact. I know this sounds silly, but was curious about perms on personal folders. TIA


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: spam question

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: spam question





I understand the issue, and yes relaying can be handled at the firewall. What I was questioning was the idea of filtering spam (or house, whatever) at the firewall. I had not heard of a firewall examining headers, subjects and bodies for spam type information.

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 3:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question



Michael answered your question about the firewall but the other part of that is there are two types of spammers. The Spam House and the relayer. The spam house has customers pay them to send mail to people on their mailing lists or ones provided by the customer. These folks have domain names, ISP's and semi human operators. Some times you can complain enough to them that you don't want their mail offerings and they will remove you from their lists. These folks can also be blocked by domain name/ip address. 

The second type is the realer. These subterranean creatures use open relays to bomb away. These folks are harder to catch as they will use anyone they can find that's a relayer to sent their mail. It's about impossible to block these folks using domain names/ip addresses as they change the relays they use about as often as I change my socks (daily before you ask). I dislike these weasels the most.

> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:54 PM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: spam question
> 
> I have never heard of filtering spam at the firewall. How could a 
> firewall possibly do that? Unless of course you know who the culprit 
> senders are, but that changes continuously.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Schwartz, Jim [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:36 PM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: RE: spam question 
> 
> 
> It's also a waste of resources as the mail still has to travel through 
> the firewall, into the IMC, get routed to dev null. Better to block 
> them at the firewall (if possible) and return them a 5xx error. 
> Dropping the request (as some do) returns a 4xx error so the mail will 
> queue on their systems and retry.
> 
> As too why they would have a read receipt is beyond me. Most spammer 
> could give a damn if their mail gets there or not. They are charging 
> by the piece sent, not delivered. Spam houses take the add, merge it 
> with a database of names and open up the mail cannon. Relayers 
> wouldn't want a receipt anyways. That would give me a way to go after 
> them directly rather than try to get the open relay to shut his hole.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Drewski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:09 PM 
> > To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> > Subject:  RE: spam question 
> > 
> > Doesn't that violate RFCs? :P
> >  
> > -- Drew
> >  
> > Visit <http://www.drewncapris.net>! Go! Go there now! 
> > Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn 
> > from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent 
> > disinclination to do so. --Douglas Adams 
> > 
> >   -Original Message- 
> >   From: Matthew Carpenter [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
> >   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:03 PM 
> >   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> >   Subject: RE: spam question
> >   
> >   
> > 
> >   Depends on what you are running. With my system, I drop mail 
> > that
> is
> > spam, not return it. In such a case, they do not get an NDR, because 
> > I
> > am deleting their mail. This is a great tool against relay freaks. 
> > They think their relay is getting through, when in truth, I AM EATING 
> > IT FOR LUNCH. 
> > 
> >   -Original Message- 
> >   From: Eldridge, Dave [ < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] 
> >   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:50 AM 
> >   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> >   Subject: RE: spam question
> > 
> > 
> >   Another question. Don't the spammers know that they have hit a
> legit
> > address because they don't get a non-delivery notice. Can't they put
> > two and two together and figure out which are the real addresses? Why 
> > would they need a read receipt. just a thought. dave 
> > 
> >   -Original Message- 
> >   From: Anthony Getor [ < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] 
> >   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 

RE: Unable to create item in Public Folder

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Unable to create item in Public Folder






Why don't you change the rights in the Exchange Admin program.


Go to Client Permissions on the General tab. If you truly are an Exchange Admin, you can change it there, and see who has control of it right now.

-Original Message-
From: Don Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Unable to create item in Public Folder



Good question! I can't tell since I am not the owner anymore.  Even my partner who has permissions to create can't see who the owner is!  Just to make sure to check the owner, I look at properties of "Public folders" right?

> Who 'owns' the public folder?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:15 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Unable to create item in Public Folder
> 
> 
> Hi guys and gals,
> 
> For some reason, I can't create items in the Public folder anymore.  I 
> have Exchange Admin rights.  My co-worker has same rights and has no 
> problem.  We are running Exchange 5.5 sp3 on NT4 box.  Any ideas?
> 
> Don G.


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Is it worth the extra expense?

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Is it worth the extra expense?





Take the extra money and buy a huge ass plasma flat screen display.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Is it worth the extra expense?



Take the extra money and upgrade RAM and add disks.  Use a mirrored pair for OS, mirror for Logs, and raid 5 for store.  You'll be happy in the long run with recovery vs speed.

-Original Message-
From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Is it worth the extra expense?



We are looking to purchase a Compaq Proliant ML370 1.2GHz, 512mb Ram with 3 x 36.4GB Hard drives in a raid 5 for our new Exchange Server. Is it worth the extra Expense to go for the 15,000rpm hard drives over the 10,000 rpm hard drives? The extra cost would be about £950 that's $1345. Would we see much extra performance?

We are only a small company at the moment with 50 users.


Your thoughts would be very welcome


Kevan Dickinson
Network Engineer
Oxford Natural Products Plc
The Stable Block
Cornbury Park
Charlbury
Oxfordshire
OX7 3EH


Tel:  +44 1608 813300
Dir:  +44 1608 81
Fax: +44 1608 813301


www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com
Company No: 3554809




*
This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service
*



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OMG Im in big trouble. Exchange admins help.

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: OMG Im in big trouble. Exchange admins help.






I am shocked that it was that simple. That sounded like a bear.


-Original Message-
From: zeek Turmoil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OMG Im in big trouble. Exchange admins help.



Ya Im glad I called. Just feel like ouch $245 for something simple. If I just upgraded my Microsoft system attendant to service pack 2 I would have seen that. Z

-Original Message-
From: Wayne Hanks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OMG Im in big trouble. Exchange admins help.



aren't you glad you called them now :-)  sounds simple but you could have been there for days tearing your hair out.  Glad it turned out so well for you.

-Original Message-
From: zeek Turmoil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 28 February 2002 10:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OMG Im in big trouble. Exchange admins help.



Ok I called. 
Here's the fix
You need service pack 2 for exchange on the machine. In AD go to exchange tasks choose Remove Exchange attributes. Then recreate the mailbox. Thats it Zeek

-Original Message-
From: zeek Turmoil 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OMG Im in big trouble. Exchange admins help.



It's that bad huh. All righty I will give them a call. Thanks all Z


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OMG Im in big trouble. Exchange admins help.



Call PSS.


In the US:  1-800-936-4900
Best $245 you'll spend.



-Original Message-
From: zeek Turmoil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OMG Im in big trouble. Exchange admins help.




Here's the story,
I was moving mailboxes from one machine to another because backup exec was toast on the mail sever. It would backup and say it was ok but you could never restore. I moved over a couple of mailboxes and the ADMINISTRATOR account. Next thing I know I see a scsi controller error on the machine and it reboots. I received an error stating boot.ini was bad then it went to could not load ntsokrnl.exe. please restore the file. I swapped the scsi raid card for the exact same model. Started the server up and received the same message. I edited the boot.ini to point to the correct drive. The machine booted and I received a ton of errors. It somehow lost most of the registry settings. Services dont start up including exchange. I tried to do a setup /disasterrecovery but it doesn't recognize that exchange is installed on the machine. If I try to run exchange setup it states that IIS needs to be installed and that I must first delete the crapped out server from exchange system manager.

My questions.
1)What do I do next?


2)Should I remove the server from exchange system manager then reinstall dump the log files back in and do a eseutil repair?

3)The accounts I moved were not important except for the ADMINISTRATOR account. I cant seem to delete the mailbox because it can not connect to the dead server. Is there a way to recreate the all powerful administrator mailbox?

4)How screwed am I (Be nice it's been a bad day)


Im running exchange 2000 all around on compaq servers


Thanks fer any help
Zeek


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Connected Sites

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Any 
one point to an article for Connectnig Sites to native Exchange 5.5 
(SP4) for separate domains please?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Connected Sites

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



I 
guess so. Is that a 5.5 option? I don't see that here.

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  February 28, 2002 11:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Connected Sites
  You 
  mean using the Inter-org Connector?
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 
8:07 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Connected 
Sites
Any one point to an article for Connectnig Sites to 
native Exchange 5.5 (SP4) for separate domains 
please?List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Connected Sites

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



From 
what I have read, that is an E2K and AD ability. Is there no way to connect two 
Orgs via Ex 5.5 in an NT4 domain?

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 
  28, 2002 12:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Connected Sites
  I 
  guess so. Is that a 5.5 option? I don't see that here.
  

-Original Message-From: William 
Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
February 28, 2002 11:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Connected Sites
You mean using the Inter-org 
Connector?

  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 
  8:07 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Connected Sites
  Any one point to an article for Connectnig Sites 
  to native Exchange 5.5 (SP4) for separate domains 
  please?List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Content Filtering and User Statistics

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Just 
do add a different option, we use Praetor by CMS Connect. I have been very happy 
with the monitoring and flexibility, although I am not sure about reports. I can 
see the traffic, but would have to inquire about that aspect. I love the 
antispam layout, and options it provides.
 
I am 
surprised you had to call MS to know about the relaying. Exch is very 
vulnerable; there are not enough built in tools for 5.5 to do much about relays. 
Praetor slams that shut as well as ME. 

  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:28 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Content 
  Filtering and User Statistics
  Ditto here.  We've been very happy with the content 
  filtering from Mail Essentials.  You can also setup company wide 
  disclaimers on outgoing email & auto-replies for mailboxes, and set size 
  limits on outgoing mail.  We would be very lost without this 
  software.  
  Word of advise though, if you are using Exchange to prevent 
  relay's, you'll need to set this up in Mail Essentials because ME gets the 
  smpt mail first and then passes it to exchange and exchange will accept it 
  & relay it on.  This bit of info cost my organization a $245 call to 
  Microsoft.
  Sherry Abercrombie 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 
  Content Filtering and User Statistics 
  I am very happy with Mail Essentials from GFI, and bought 
  through Sunbelt. Just keep in mind it will not filter in-house messages, just 
  what goes out through you Internet mail connector. It logs the mail as two CSV 
  files, one for incoming, and one of outgoing, and I just import them in to 
  Access or Excel, and then you can sort the data anyway you like.
   John Majetic 
  -Original Message- From: 
  AdminLists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Content 
  Filtering and User Statistics 
  To All:   I have been asked to begin filtering messages based on the content of 
  the email or the content of the attachment.  I also need to be able to 
  call up statistics on who sends the most mail, who gets the most mail, 
  etc.  I am currently running Exchange 5.5. And have Antigen for 
  Antivirus.  
   Thanks for any suggestions, 
  Vince 
   
   List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

script for emailing?

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



ANyone 
know of a good way to have a PC do an auto email each day? Can you do that 
through a BAT file or something? I need it to attach a TXT file too. Any 
ideas?

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 
  2002 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Content Filtering and User Statistics
  Just 
  do add a different option, we use Praetor by CMS Connect. I have been very 
  happy with the monitoring and flexibility, although I am not sure about 
  reports. I can see the traffic, but would have to inquire about that aspect. I 
  love the antispam layout, and options it provides.
   
  I am 
  surprised you had to call MS to know about the relaying. Exch is very 
  vulnerable; there are not enough built in tools for 5.5 to do much about 
  relays. Praetor slams that shut as well as ME. 
  

-Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 
1:28 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Content Filtering and User Statistics
Ditto here.  We've been very happy with the content 
filtering from Mail Essentials.  You can also setup company wide 
disclaimers on outgoing email & auto-replies for mailboxes, and set size 
limits on outgoing mail.  We would be very lost without this 
software.  
Word of advise though, if you are using Exchange to prevent 
relay's, you'll need to set this up in Mail Essentials because ME gets the 
smpt mail first and then passes it to exchange and exchange will accept it 
& relay it on.  This bit of info cost my organization a $245 call 
to Microsoft.
Sherry Abercrombie 
-Original Message- From: 
Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:14 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Content Filtering and User Statistics 
I am very happy with Mail Essentials from GFI, and bought 
through Sunbelt. Just keep in mind it will not filter in-house messages, 
just what goes out through you Internet mail connector. It logs the mail as 
two CSV files, one for incoming, and one of outgoing, and I just import them 
in to Access or Excel, and then you can sort the data anyway you 
like.
John Majetic 
-Original Message- From: 
AdminLists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Content 
Filtering and User Statistics 
To All:   I have been asked to begin filtering messages based on the content of 
the email or the content of the attachment.  I also need to be able to 
call up statistics on who sends the most mail, who gets the most mail, 
etc.  I am currently running Exchange 5.5. And have Antigen for 
Antivirus.  
Thanks for any suggestions, 
Vince 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: script for emailing?

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Thanks 
all, looks like Blat has what I need. Great job!

  
  -Original Message-From: William 
  Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 
  2002 3:40 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  script for emailing?
  Have 
  a look at many of the command line emailers - blat, postie, mapisend.  
  They support attachments and scheduling.
   
  You 
  can also place an RFC2821 compliant email in the pickup folder in 
  Exchange(which gets checked every 600 seconds by default I 
  think...).
   
  Or 
  you can use Outlook, too.
  http://www.slipstick.com/dev/olforms/skedrpt.htm
   
  William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, 
  ExchangeMVP
   
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:59 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: script for 
emailing?
ANyone know of a good way to have a PC do an auto 
email each day? Can you do that through a BAT file or something? I need it 
to attach a TXT file too. Any ideas?

  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: script for emailing?

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



What 
do you mean? I changed the subject. I just didn't delete the rest of the 
emailu beast!! lol

  
  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:00 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: script for 
  emailing?
  thread hijacker
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 
2002 15:59To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: script 
for emailing?
ANyone know of a good way to have a PC do an auto 
email each day? Can you do that through a BAT file or something? I need it 
to attach a TXT file too. Any ideas?

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 
  2002 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Content Filtering and User Statistics
  Just do add a different option, we use Praetor by CMS Connect. I 
  have been very happy with the monitoring and flexibility, although I am 
  not sure about reports. I can see the traffic, but would have to inquire 
  about that aspect. I love the antispam layout, and options it 
  provides.
   
  I am surprised you had to call MS to know about the relaying. Exch 
  is very vulnerable; there are not enough built in tools for 5.5 to do much 
  about relays. Praetor slams that shut as well as ME. 
  

-Original Message-From: 
Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 
March 01, 2002 1:28 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Content Filtering and User 
Statistics
Ditto here.  We've been very happy with the content 
filtering from Mail Essentials.  You can also setup company wide 
disclaimers on outgoing email & auto-replies for mailboxes, and set 
size limits on outgoing mail.  We would be very lost without this 
software.  
Word of advise though, if you are using Exchange to 
prevent relay's, you'll need to set this up in Mail Essentials because 
ME gets the smpt mail first and then passes it to exchange and exchange 
will accept it & relay it on.  This bit of info cost my 
organization a $245 call to Microsoft.
Sherry Abercrombie 
-Original Message- From: 
Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:14 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Content Filtering and User Statistics 

I am very happy with Mail Essentials from GFI, and 
bought through Sunbelt. Just keep in mind it will not filter in-house 
messages, just what goes out through you Internet mail connector. It 
logs the mail as two CSV files, one for incoming, and one of outgoing, 
and I just import them in to Access or Excel, and then you can sort the 
data anyway you like.
John Majetic 
-Original Message- From: 
AdminLists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:03 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
Content Filtering and User Statistics 
To All:   I have been asked to begin filtering messages based on the 
content of the email or the content of the attachment.  I also need 
to be able to call up statistics on who sends the most mail, who gets 
the most mail, etc.  I am currently running Exchange 5.5. And have 
Antigen for Antivirus.  
Thanks for any 
suggestions, Vince 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MTA Warning

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: MTA Warning





My notes show this to be a WINS replication error. Is this machine doing WINS also? If you have made changes to the server you will need to reapply SP4. I guess it just depends on what you mean by, "I already installed SP4". It may need to be reapplied.

-Original Message-
From: Richardson, Kendall (UNISYS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: MTA Warning



I have Exchange 5.5, SP4 installed on an NT4, 6a server.  For the past week I have been getting a lot of warnings in my event viewer (see below).  This morning I've logged about 20, occurring at random intervals from 2 minutes to 20 minutes apart.  Technet has this exact event ID, but the solution is to install SP4, which I have already done.  Other than the log entries, I haven't noticed any problem with the server operation-mail is all flowing normally, but I feel like the other shoe is getting ready to drop soon.  Can you point me to some other troubleshooting paths that I can look at.  Thanks much for the help.

Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: Interface 
Event ID:   4283
Date:       3/4/2002
Time:       11:03:34 AM
User:       N/A
Computer:   VASRV2
Description:
Unable to recognize an internal message identifier. Internal connection
handle (LPI) 1-15-2   Error code: 8464  [POP4 POP4 UP 7 228] (14)




Ken Richardson




List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: script for emailing?

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Oy, 
now we are all going in circles!
 
BLAT 
worked great. Thanks everyone

  
  -Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 
  12:31 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: script 
  for emailing?
  Try 
  Blat...public domain software (read: free) and works well.
  http://www.interlog.com/~tcharron/blat.html
   
  -Jim
   
  
  Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com 
  We bring innovation to interactive 
  communication. Advertising.com -- 
  Superior Technology. Superior Performance. 
  
-Original Message-From: David N Precht 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 4:11 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: script for 
emailing?
Right...

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 
  2002 06:12To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  script for emailing?
  What do you mean? I changed the subject. I just didn't delete the 
  rest of the emailu beast!! lol
  

-Original Message-From: David N. 
Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 
2002 11:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: script for emailing?
thread hijacker

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 
  01, 2002 15:59To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: script for emailing?
  ANyone know of a good way to have a PC do an 
  auto email each day? Can you do that through a BAT file or something? 
  I need it to attach a TXT file too. Any ideas?
  

-Original Message-From: 
    Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Friday, March 01, 2002 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Content Filtering and User 
Statistics
Just do add a different option, we use Praetor by CMS 
Connect. I have been very happy with the monitoring and flexibility, 
although I am not sure about reports. I can see the traffic, but 
would have to inquire about that aspect. I love the antispam layout, 
and options it provides.
 
I am surprised you had to call MS to know about the relaying. 
Exch is very vulnerable; there are not enough built in tools for 5.5 
to do much about relays. Praetor slams that shut as well as ME. 


  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 
  1:28 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Content Filtering and User Statistics
  Ditto here.  We've been very happy with the 
  content filtering from Mail Essentials.  You can also setup 
  company wide disclaimers on outgoing email & auto-replies for 
  mailboxes, and set size limits on outgoing mail.  We would be 
  very lost without this software.  
  Word of advise though, if you are using Exchange 
  to prevent relay's, you'll need to set this up in Mail Essentials 
  because ME gets the smpt mail first and then passes it to exchange 
  and exchange will accept it & relay it on.  This bit of 
  info cost my organization a $245 call to Microsoft.
  Sherry Abercrombie 
  -Original Message- From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:14 
  PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  Subject: RE: Content Filtering and User 
  Statistics 
  I am very happy with Mail Essentials from GFI, and 
  bought through Sunbelt. Just keep in mind it will not filter 
  in-house messages, just what goes out through you Internet mail 
  connector. It logs the mail as two CSV files, one for incoming, 
  and one of outgoing, and I just import them in to Access or Excel, 
  and then you can sort the data anyway you like.
  John Majetic 
  -Original Message- From: AdminLists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:03 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Content Filtering and User Statistics 
  
  To All:   
  I have been asked to begin filtering messages 
  based on the content of the email or the content of the 
  attachment.  I also need to be able to call up statistics on 
 

RE: sharing outlook

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: sharing outlook





I agree that Peachtree sucks, but how about database evils? These freaks yell at us weekly because they have the stripped version of ACT 4.0, ffs, and want it to work properly with 50+ users (it is designed for 15). They refuse to pay for the SQL upgrade, or even a switch to something better, and it is OUR damn fault that it is slow, difficult to work with, and wiggy!!!

AGGG


-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:16 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: sharing outlook



If you're not on Outlook 2002 and using the often maligned PST.  You can share via Net Folders.


Steve


-Original Message-
From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: sharing outlook



Oh almost forgot. After it's delegated the other user must open it from the file menu with the open special command. Matt

- Original Message -
From: "Matt Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: sharing outlook



> I can't remember right off the top of my head but, it's called
> delegating permission to another user.  It's done by folder or mailbox 
> in outlook.
Try
> a search in help for delegate.  If you don't find anything post again
> and I'll look deeper.  Sorry it's been a while. Matt
> - Original Message -
> From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:26 PM
> Subject: RE: sharing outlook
>
>
> > If you are connected via MAPI to an Exchange Server, you can share
mailbox
> > containers by changing permissions.
> >
> > Right click on contacts.
> > Properties -->Permissions.
> >
> > Is this what you mean?
> >
> > William
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:04 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: sharing outlook
> >
> >
> > How can I share my outlook profile(address list) to some one else in
> > the same office who is connected to the same LAN? Yas
> >
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
>


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Scheduling of rooms for events

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events





Sure it works. You mean just keep calendars as Public Folders. There is no unique set up that I know of


-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Scheduling of rooms for events



We are going to try to use Exchange 2000 for the scheduling of rooms and events here on campus by using public folders with calendars, is anyone

using Exchange for this. Will Exchange work for this?   Is there any
particular setup necessary for this?


Any feedback would be appreciated.



Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Scheduling of rooms for events

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Yes, 
that is exactly what we did. We made a folder to group them as "Conference 
Rooms" and then had a Calendar for each inside.

  
  -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:18 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Scheduling of 
  rooms for events
  Matthew,
      How did you set yours up?
   
      I'm thinking about doing one calendar per 
  room.
   
  Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services 
  CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania
  
-Original Message-----From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:13 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Scheduling 
of rooms for events
Sure it works. You mean just keep calendars as Public 
Folders. There is no unique set up that I know of 
-Original Message- From: 
Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:10 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Scheduling of rooms for events 
We are going to try to use Exchange 2000 for the scheduling 
of rooms and events here on campus by using public folders with calendars, 
is anyone
using Exchange for this. Will 
Exchange work for this?   Is there any particular setup necessary for this? 
Any feedback would be appreciated. 
Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services 
Center California University of Pennsylvania 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Scheduling of rooms for events

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Yes, 
just make sure that anyone that needs to see it has reviewer 
perms

  
  -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:30 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Scheduling of 
  rooms for events
  Matthew,
      What kind of persmission are need?
   
      I was think only giving the person that is responsible 
  for the room, Editor permissions, will this work?
   
      
  Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services 
  CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:22 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Scheduling 
of rooms for events
Yes, that is exactly what we did. We made a folder to group them as 
"Conference Rooms" and then had a Calendar for each 
inside.

  
  -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 
  10:18 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Scheduling of rooms for events
  Matthew,
      How did you set yours up?
   
      I'm thinking about doing one calendar per 
  room.
   
  Eric SaboNT AdministratorComputing Services 
  CenterCalifornia University of Pennsylvania
  
-Original Message-----From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 
11:13 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Scheduling of rooms for events
Sure it works. You mean just keep calendars as Public 
Folders. There is no unique set up that I know of 
-Original Message- From: 
Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:10 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Scheduling of rooms for events 
We are going to try to use Exchange 2000 for the 
scheduling of rooms and events here on campus by using public folders 
with calendars, is anyone
using Exchange for this. Will 
Exchange work for this?   Is there any particular setup necessary for this? 
Any feedback would be appreciated. 
Thanks, Eric Sabo 
NT Administrator Computing 
Services Center California University of 
Pennsylvania 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Scheduling of rooms for events

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events





Info on resources for what specifically?


-Original Message-
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events



Does anyone have good info on resources in exchange I
know this figures in, but I can't find good
Documentation.
Thanks
Chris
--- Matthew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, just make sure that anyone that needs to see it
> has reviewer perms
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:30 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events
> 
> 
> Matthew,
> What kind of persmission are need?
>  
> I was think only giving the person that is
> responsible for the room,
> Editor permissions, will this work?
>  
> 
> 
> Eric Sabo
> NT Administrator
> Computing Services Center
> California University of Pennsylvania
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:22 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events
> 
> 
> Yes, that is exactly what we did. We made a folder
> to group them as
> "Conference Rooms" and then had a Calendar for each
> inside.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:18 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events
> 
> 
> Matthew,
> How did you set yours up?
>  
> I'm thinking about doing one calendar per room.
>  
> 
> Eric Sabo
> NT Administrator
> Computing Services Center
> California University of Pennsylvania
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:13 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Scheduling of rooms for events
> 
> 
> 
> Sure it works. You mean just keep calendars as
> Public Folders. There is no
> unique set up that I know of
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:10 AM 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Subject: Scheduling of rooms for events 
> 
> 
> We are going to try to use Exchange 2000 for the
> scheduling of rooms and
> events here on campus by using public folders with
> calendars, is anyone
> 
> using Exchange for this. Will Exchange work for
> this?   Is there any 
> particular setup necessary for this?
> 
> Any feedback would be appreciated.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Eric Sabo 
> NT Administrator 
> Computing Services Center 
> California University of Pennsylvania 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>
<http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm>
>  
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses





Yes but to use the From field, won't they have to have completely separate mailboxes set up?


-Original Message-
From: AGUIAR John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Multiple SMTP reply addresses



Well, one of the fields they can work with from within the client (Outlook) is the "from" field. Set that up and let them select which account the outbound message is from. We have that configured here for some users and it works well. John

-Original Message-
From: Will Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Multiple SMTP reply addresses



We have a some users who require two SMTP addersses with different domains. (i.e [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]), thats fine and I can do this with within their mailbox settings.  The problem is they also need to be able to reply to incoming message using either address, and this is where I've come un-stuck.

Any assistance is greatly appreciated. (even if it's just to say it's not
possible!)


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Ex-Employees Emails

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Ex-Employees Emails





Interesting. I never thought of doing that, but it sounds like it would work. Since I use a 3rd Party Filter, I simply add their username to the list of a Rule I have that dumps the mail. I never even see it, and thank the gods I never see those dammed NDRs anymore.

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ex-Employees Emails



For X amount of time, I have the e-mail forwarded to their ex-boss or replacement.  Then I blackhole them, which means create a DL, and don't put anyone on the list.  Just add their address to the list of SMTP addresses.

-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ex-Employees Emails



Could someone recommend to me what to do with emails from ex-employees we have taken off our Exchange Server? A while ago someone said there is a way of configuring an Distribution List and including all the ex-employees as members of this list and the emails just go into some sort of a black hole. Not sure about the details now.

Thanks


Frank





___
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is private, confidential and may also be legally privileged .  If you are not the intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephoning on +44 (0)207 459-3600.

When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are for their use only and are  subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. __

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.330 / Virus Database: 184 - Release Date: 2/28/2002



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

DUMB Question

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



I am 
having a typical issue with a nontech manager.
 
In the 
mailbox resources page of the private information store it shows mailbox 
resource size totals in K.
 
That 
total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is confusing the hell 
out of me too, much less himself.
 
For 
example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that is using roughly 
23 MB of space, right? Sheesh
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: DUMB Question

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Thank 
you everyone, at least I am crazy but not totally ignorant,

  
  -Original Message-From: Matt Moore 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 
  1:31 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: DUMB 
  Question
  give this to your boss.
  As a Unit of MeasureWe use bytes, like bits, 
  to measure capacities and speeds. To distinguish bytes from bits (lowercase 
  "b"), we use an uppercase "B." For large numbers of bytes we add prefixes such 
  as K, M, G, T.
  
KB = Kilobyte (KIL-oh-biit) = Thousand bytes 
(actually 1,024). 
MB = Megabyte (MAAG-uh-biit) = Million bytes 
(technically 1,024 x 1,024 = 1,048,576). 
GB = Gigabyte (GIG-uh-biit) = Billion bytes. 
BrainAid: Giga rhymes with bigga. Think bigga = 
billion. 
TB = Terabyte (TAIR-uh-biit) = Trillion 
bytes. 
   
  Matt
   
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
William Lefkovics 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:27 
AM
Subject: RE: DUMB Question

YES!  Absolutely yes.
 

  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 
  11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: DUMB 
  Question
  I am having a typical issue with a nontech 
  manager.
   
  In the mailbox resources page of the private information store it 
  shows mailbox resource size totals in K.
   
  That total, in the 1,000s is equivalent to MB, right? Now he is 
  confusing the hell out of me too, much less himself.
   
  For example, if Joe Blow is using 23,254 K, he has a mailbox that 
  is using roughly 23 MB of space, right? 
SheeshList Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) fixed thanks for every one's help

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) fixed thanks for every one's  help





Very nice. Good job all


-Original Message-
From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel) fixed thanks for every one's help



Thanks that did it, don't know how that got checked... I appreciate you taking your time to help.


-Original Message-
From: Steve Rosco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Opening excel attachments (only excel)



OL2000: Unable to Double-click to Open an Excel Attachment
see KB article: Q231342


-Original Message-
From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Opening excel attachments (only excel)



Outlook 2k
Exchange 5.5
2000 pro work station



if we try to open up an excel attachment it comes back with "can not find specified file"  if I open up word it works fine

I can save the file and then open it and that works ok also.  it is only excel and will not open with a double click or a right click view.

WHAT I HAVE DONE.
I did a repair on office 
I also tried to find where different types of attachments are saved or settings for them with no luck.


I did find if I log on as a different user and set up outlook under a different profile I am able to open excel attachments.

so looks like it is something with is profile.  we have had win 2k profiles mess up just don't want to recreate all his settings if I give him a new profile.

thanks in advanced for any help.


James 


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Attachments Disappearing

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing





Yes if they are sending the attachments via Word, it may not arrive if the receiver does not use Word as their editor. It depends on how it is sent

-Original Message-
From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Attachments Disappearing



Is she using Word as her e-mail editor?


> -Original Message-
> From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Attachments Disappearing
> 
> 
> I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain
> people outside our
> email system, the attachments do not reach the intended 
> person. The email
> gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she 
> sends the same
> attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in 
> tact. If someone
> else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did 
> NOT receive
> the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have 
> any ideas where
> to start looking?
> 
> Murray
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at: 
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 


#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 


#


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Error 9318

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



 
I am getting an 
event logged on my PDC every 10 minutes. This is event ID 9318. According 
to www.eventid.net, I reviewed the 
associated Qs, and most pertain to Exch2K and/or 2K domains. Here is the 
dialogue of the event:
 
"An RPC 
communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) 
index: 151, NT/MTA error code: 1722 
Comms error 1722, Bind 
error 0, Remote Server Name 
 [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) "
 
I am running 
Exch 5.5 SP4, ONE site, ONE server. I have no connectors or any other add ons, 
so there is no MTA to MTA issue, or RPC communications that I know of. The ONLY 
one that seemed possible is the Q that stated the server needed more RAM. I have 
512 in there though, so I am not convinced that is a problem. Any 
ideas?
Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and 
Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 
BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215
 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SSL on OWA

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: SSL on OWA





Right, you don't need to set up a CA server to do SSL over OWA.


-Original Message-
From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SSL on OWA



Not sure you need to set up a CA at all.  Just use the cert and you will be fine.


David


-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: SSL on OWA


Hi all,


We currently have a cert from verisign to enable ssl for our OWA users. We are in the process of setting up Windows 2000 Certificate Authority on our test network and are stumped with the first option of what to install, enterprise or standalone CA. We don't want to issue certificates to users on the outside, we just want them to establish a secure connection with our OWA server like it is currently configured with the verisign cert. Any insight is appreciated. Thanks.



Jonathan Crouthamel - MCSE/CNA
Technical Services Supervisor
Systems Administrator
Datavision-Prologix, Inc.
Phone: 215.442.7400 x1150
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company.

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: I guess no one knows this one...

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



Soo
 
I 
guess no one has seen this eh?
 
I get 
the event every ten minutes, so I was just trying to resolve 
it!!

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 
  2002 8:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Error 
  9318
   
  I am getting an 
  event logged on my PDC every 10 minutes. This is event ID 9318. According 
  to www.eventid.net, I reviewed the 
  associated Qs, and most pertain to Exch2K and/or 2K domains. Here is the 
  dialogue of the event:
   
  "An 
  RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table 
  (LTAB) index: 151, NT/MTA error code: 1722 
  Comms error 1722, Bind 
  error 0, Remote Server Name 
   [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) "
   
  I am running 
  Exch 5.5 SP4, ONE site, ONE server. I have no connectors or any other add ons, 
  so there is no MTA to MTA issue, or RPC communications that I know of. The 
  ONLY one that seemed possible is the Q that stated the server needed more RAM. 
  I have 512 in there though, so I am not convinced that is a problem. Any 
  ideas?
  Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and 
  Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 
  BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: SMTP relaying turn off

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message



If you 
go to the routing tab of the IMS, choose routing restrictions. Choose Hosts and 
Clients with these IP addresses and leave it blank. Be sure to have "Reroute 
incoming mail" checked with your domain listed. There are a few other tricks 
too, especially if you have a 3rd party item.

  
  -Original Message-From: Mathews, James 
  E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:23 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: SMTP relaying 
  turn off
  on exchange 5.5 
  how do I turn off SMTP relaying.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Test

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Test





..es


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 11:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Test



Test


List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this.

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration  of Exchange, respond to this.





What's so wrong about it? It can't be any more wrong than the SPAMMER who sent the first email. 


Don't take it personally SPAMMER, but you picked the wrong list to send to. Exchange nerds hate SPAMMERs more than anyone else. Well, except for the guy who needs the penis enlarger. 

-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this.



But it feels so right!


-Original Message-
From: David N Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this.



That's wrong.


-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 13:58
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this.



Greetings!  I recently partnered with a company called Pumpnhump Inc. We have a really inexpensive penis enlarger that also monitors Exchange. If interested, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this.



ROTFLMAO.


Go for the latter - it never hurts to be one up on the others.


Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
    301-610-9584 voice
    240-465-0323 Efax
 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.


-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: If you are looking for tools to help with the Administration of Exchange, respond to this.


I'll be able to afford it once I get my money from that Nigerian Prince who secretly contacted me.  


It's either your software or Penis enlargement.  I don't know yet which SPAMMER I'll buy from...


> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Verde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:53 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: If you are looking for tools to help with the
> Administration of Exchange, respond to this.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
>    I have partnered up with a company that basically automates the
> repetitive tasks associated with MS Exchange Administration.
> 
>    Everything from fully provisioning new accounts by simply entering 
> the employee's ID number, to deactivating accounts and scheduling them 
> for deletion at a later date, to moving mailboxes can be
> automated.  The tools
> are about 90% out of the box and 10% customizable to a particular
> organization's business rules making it very application specific.
> 
>    If you are interested, drop me an e-mail and we can discus your
> situation.  Thanks for your time.
> 
> Tom Verde
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_


Do You Yahoo!?


Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Event ID 1115

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Event ID 1115





Is this a repeat? This was already answered by several people


-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Event ID 1115



Has anyone seen this error before. I have been getting it on my e2k box and have no idea what is causing it. Thanks.


Exchange 5.5 sp4
Exchange 2000 sp2


Event Type: Warning
Event Source:   MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   1115
Date:       3/11/2002
Time:       8:12:05 AM
User:       N/A
Computer:   EXCHANGE2
Description:
Error 0xfae2 returned from closing database table, called from function JTAB_BASE::EcCloseTable on table 5-43E359. 


For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 






Jonathan Crouthamel - MCSE/CNA
Technical Services Supervisor
Systems Administrator
Datavision-Prologix, Inc.
Phone: 215.442.7400 x1150
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the company.

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Antigen/ CA thread hijack

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Antigen/ CA thread hijack





LOL


They are monitoring lists to see who hates them. Too funny. Shouldn't they be on the phone handling customer service calls?

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen/ CA thread hijack


I think it's more Enterprise focussed than ArcServeIT and has greater
functionality.


But I absolutely detest when marketing people use terms like:
"BrightStor is CA's industry-leading end-to-end storage management
solution."


Industry-leading???  


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen/ CA thread hijack



Isn't brightstor that same thing new name?? What have you done with our
William?


--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen/ CA thread hijack



Their Brightstor product is much better than its ArcServeIT predecessor.


Most of my comments and vomitting pertain to their abyssmal effort with
the Exchange agents.  But we don't want to bring that up again...



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Antigen/ CA thread hijack



FYI - CA is monitoring this list somewhat. I got a nice phone call or 2
and an even more PC email from someone asking why I didn't like their
products. Apparently, they really don't like my website full of comments
from Mr. Lefkovics. I indicated to them they should really offer an Q&A
forum on this list with Stu's assistance or at least respond to some of
the customers having problems


As far as I know, they never went that route - I guess it's not safe to
approach the numbers


Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
    301-610-9584 voice
    240-465-0323 Efax
 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen


Oh goodness.  


Schedule the uninstall for Friday night to give you lots of time to
recover if necessary. Do you also need to de-unicenter this server?


William



-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen



While we are on the subject, has anyone run InnocualteIT for Exchange
and Antigen concurrently on an Exchange server? If not, what has been
the experience of un-installing InnoculateIT? Thanks again. Steve


-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen



Yup - they did a blurb on an email some time back.
 
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax
 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information
and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the
prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
 
-


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

OWA "Change password" option

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: OWA "Change password" option





Is the "Change Password" portion of OWA handled any differently? 


I have seen some instances where the user will receive a "Can't find page" error when trying to do this. The web server connects through the firewall to the internal Exchange server. It authenticates to the internal domain. There might be firewall issues that I haven't been able to address yet. I've tried using DMZ accounts and have had the same results. I've been to Microsoft's web site and used technet and found no useful 


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Anybody else getting these?

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Anybody else getting these?





Nope, sorry


-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anybody else getting these?


Your message
  Subject: RE: Setting up a list server, argh!
was not delivered to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
because:
  Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count
exceeded.  Message probably in a routing loop.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Thanks a lot!!!! LAX_NOTES

[Matthew Carpenter]

Ahhh
crap.

Thanks
a lot, now I AM getting them. You shouldn't have said anything!!!

 

-Original
Message-

From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 

Sent:
Friday, March 15, 2002 12:40 PM

To:
Matthew Carpenter

Subject:
DELIVERY FAILURE: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop
count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.

 

Your
message

 

 
Subject: OWA "Change password" option

 

was
not delivered to:

 

 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

because:

 

 
Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded.  Message
probably in a routing loop.

 

 

 

 




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Hidden Email Accounts???

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Hidden Email Accounts???





Is there a way to find out where an assigned SMTP address is (a nondefault address) without going account by account? Hmmm...maybe an Export?

There are a few addresses that pop up here and there from before I was hired on, and I can not see where they were assigned.

Also, is there a way to where an account is listed besides the DLS, ie alternate recipient the sae way? Hmmm...maybe an Export? TIA

5.5, SP4, NT4



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Hidden Email Accounts???

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









I think that will be all I need to use.
Thanks all

 

-Original Message-
From: Micciche, Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:04
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Hidden Email
Accounts???

 



Export as csv, import to
excel and then choose:





 





EDIT> FIND.  Type
in the address you are looking for and Excel will point you to it instantly.





-Original
Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:43
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Hidden Email Accounts???

Is there a way to find out where an assigned SMTP
address is (a nondefault address) without going account by account?
Hmmm...maybe an Export?

There are a few addresses that pop up here and there
from before I was hired on, and I can not see where they were assigned.

Also, is there a way to where an account is listed
besides the DLS, ie alternate recipient the sae way? Hmmm...maybe an Export?
TIA

5.5, SP4, NT4 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Apology

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Apology





Huh?


But I thought you loved me?


-Original Message-
From: Chad Kemmerlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Apology
Importance: High


I would like to apologize for sending you the email yesterday with the
subject "I'm here if you need me."  This was not sanctioned by Sunbelt
Software and I we therefore not entitled to send such an email to you.


Again, I apologize.


Chad Kemmerlin
Skyhawk Consulting



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Restricting Internet e-mail flow

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Restricting Internet e-mail flow





3rd party


-Original Message-
From: German Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Restricting Internet e-mail flow


Hello guys:


Do you know how can I restrict internet e-mail capabilities for one group of
users?


The problem is that I need to restrict a group of specific users from
sending e-mail to all internet domains except one (for an associated
company).


Please advice.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Restricting Internet e-mail flow

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









I don't know of a way to block
SMTP addresses from sending to all but ONE domain. If Exchange can do it, I
would like to know too.

 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:49
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow

 



But I think
the key here is he still wants to be able to send to one particular domain





-Original
Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:48
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow



Why 3rd party?





 





What Exchange version?





 





5.5:





Section 3.6:





http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm





 





2000:





Section 5.3:





http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec5.htm





 





 





William





 





-Original
Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:31
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow

3rd party 

-Original Message- 
From: German Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:24
PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow 

Hello guys: 

Do you know how can I restrict internet e-mail
capabilities for one group of 
users? 

The problem is that I need to restrict a group of
specific users from 
sending e-mail to all internet
domains except one (for an associated 
company). 

Please advice. 

 

List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Restricting Internet e-mail flow

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









A CR for an entire domain? Now I am
really lost.

 

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:54
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow

 



Add the external domain
as a CR with an X400 address.





 





Actually, what version of
Exchange is it first.





 





 





-Original
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:49
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow



But I think
the key here is he still wants to be able to send to one particular domain





-Original
Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:48
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow



Why 3rd party?





 





What Exchange version?





 





5.5:





Section 3.6:





http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm





 





2000:





Section 5.3:





http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec5.htm





 





 





William





 





-Original
Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:31
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow

3rd party 

-Original Message- 
From: German Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:24
PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Restricting Internet
e-mail flow 

Hello guys: 

Do you know how can I restrict internet e-mail
capabilities for one group of 
users? 

The problem is that I need to restrict a group of
specific users from 
sending e-mail to all internet
domains except one (for an associated 
company). 

Please advice. 

 

List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: blocker software

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









We use Praetor by www.cmsconnect.com. I
have been VERY happy with it. They have excellent support, and answer questions
very quickly (yes, REAL people). I think we paid $1800 for our licenses.

 

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 6:29
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: blocker software

 



I love mail essentials,
it has content filtering, inbound/outbound checking, can do the tag line addon,
and also can do pop3/etrn type retrivals. It uses the win2k embedded smtp
connector and you can put it in the dmz and act as the smtp relay to the
internal exchange server. You can block domains,keywords,phrases, and just
about everything else. Theres also auto-responders which I played with a bit,
that are nice.





-Original
Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:00
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: blocker software



ok





what im looking for is...





software that doesnt cost a ton..
but will block the usual joke of the day.. mass mailing offers.. stuff like
that that come thru.





If i can find one that isnt too
costly, and doesnt replace our current AV, I may be able to get it purchased...





 



Michael Ross

Panduit Corp.

17301 Ridgeland Ave

Tinley Park, IL 60477

MCSE

MS Exchange Administrator



 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchnage substitue

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









Not so fast, you need to know how big
the site is. ACT SUCKS when you overload it. Plus, the SQL option is very
expensive

 

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:19
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue

 



You want something that
does lots of stuff, but takes no brains to run?





 





goldmine or Act2000.





 





-Original
Message-
From: Joe L. Casale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchnage substitue

I need
a solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and contacts, but no
mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin dependant, this site also
doesn't even have a domain. Any ideas? They all use OL.

jlc



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchnage substitue

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









You just said that you did not need
email capabilities. I think you lost us now. 5-10 people?? Go with Goldmine.
ACT still sucks

 

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:25
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue

 

5-10 people!
the act one sux cuz you cant send out html mail I heard. This company does html
site bilding, he he...

I will investigate
goldmine!

jlc

 

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:19
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue

 



You want
something that does lots of stuff, but takes no brains to run?





 





goldmine
or Act2000.





 





-Original
Message-
From: Joe L. Casale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchnage substitue

I need
a solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and contacts, but no
mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin dependant, this site also doesn't
even have a domain. Any ideas? They all use OL.

jlc



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 utility

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









For what specifically? Outlook use? Outlook
Programming? Exchange Administration? Exchange Setup? 

 

-Original Message-
From: Annette K. Raymond
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:36
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 utility

 



Hi:





 





I'm a newbie
and need a recommendation for a book on Exchange 5.5 (SBS 4.5), Outlook 2000
clients.





 





Thanks!





 





Annette





Annette K. Raymond, Office Manager

**

This message
is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for
the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may
contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential, or otherwise
legally prohibited from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee,
you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message
or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by email or telephone at 706-548-1151, and delete
all copies of the message.

Fortson, Bentley and Griffin, P.A., 440
College Avenue North, Suite 220, Athens, GA  30601 





-Original
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:57
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 utility



Outlook.





 





Type the email
addy in the To field and hit Ctrl K 





-Original
Message-
From: Senter, John M
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:56
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 utility

There is a utility that will allow me to put in a
SMTP address and it will show what mailbox has that address.  I cannot
find the documentation I had on that and want to know if anybody remembered the
name.  I believe it is on the resource kit but did not see a name that
looked familiar.

Thanks 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchnage substitue

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









It is made for a max of 15 users (unless
you use the SQL upgrade). The base product starts to flake at more than that
number of users (at the same time).

 

-Original Message-
From: Annette K. Raymond
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
8:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue

 



Question about
ACT:  when you say it sucks if you overload it, what constitutes
overloading it?





-Original
Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:41
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



NEMX is a Goldmine
add-on?





 





-Original
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:34
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



You are probably
thinking of NEMX tools for Goldmine which allows this. GM 5.7 now supports the
colanders thing.





 





SUPPOSEDLY,
GM6 will finally include full Exch support.





-Original
Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:29
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



We have users that synch
Outlook and Goldmine.  It even supports iCalendars from Outlook/Exchange.





 





Am I thinking of another
product?





 





-Original
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:25
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue



At least ACT
supports Exch. Goldmine has been around forever and still has no Exch support.





-Original
Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:22
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue

Not
so fast, you need to know how big the site is. ACT SUCKS when you overload it.
Plus, the SQL option is very expensive

 

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:19
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue

 



You want
something that does lots of stuff, but takes no brains to run?





 





goldmine
or Act2000.





 





-Original
Message-
From: Joe L. Casale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchnage substitue

I need
a solution like exchange for one site that has scheduling, and contacts, but no
mail. I wanted to use exchange, but its to admin dependant, this site also
doesn't even have a domain. Any ideas? They all use OL.

jlc



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: backup problems

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: Message









What do you mean you don't need
Outlook? According to their documentation, you MUST have a mail profile set up
for the Backup service account on the server that is doing the backups. I may
have missed it, are you running the backup on this server, oir remotely. Even
so, it looks like your issue is not permissions, or access. I agree that you
should reinstall the agent. Our issue was a handful of items that they don't
bother to tell you upfront. We had to pay the $89 incident fee to find out. We
seem to be running in good order now though. What a pain in the a_s.

 

-Original Message-
From: Joe Irvine
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
9:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup problems

 



I'm running 8.6 with no
problems I wiuld reconmmend re-installing the exchange agent adn maybe the
latest exchange and windows service packs.





 



 

Thanks! 

Joe Irvine

Director of Information Technology 
The Business Office, Inc.

(609) 597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860

www.tbopayroll.com 



-Original
Message-
From: Zangara, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002
12:50 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup problems`



Same problem I am getting - I use
8.5 I was hoping 8.6 would solve it but does not seem so by your error.





 





If you figure this out let me
know.  I am thinking of going to a different product.





 





 



Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
IT Manager
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



I went
to a general store. They wouldn't let me buy anything specifically. -- Steven
Wright 





-Original
Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:54
AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: backup problems`



We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4.





We use Backup Exec 8.6 build 3278.





I have one server that is giving me






Media Name: "Media created 3/26/2002 10:37:20 AM"
Backup of "\\MailServer\Microsoft Exchange
Information Store "
Backup set #2 on storage media #1
Backup set description: "Backup FULL"
Backup Type: FULL - Database & Logs (flush committed logs)
Backup started on 3/26/2002 at 10:38:40 AM.
The Exchange Store service is not responding. Backup set canceled.
^ ^ ^ ^ ^





 





Backup completed on 3/26/2002 at 10:50:00
AM.
Backed up 0 Exchange Server store(s)
Processed 2,285,764,782 bytes in  11 minutes and  20 seconds.
Throughput rate: 192.3 MB/min





 





 





As an error.





We do NOT have Outlook installed on
the exchange server, and should not need to have it installed.





Anyone got an idea of why this is
happening on just this ONE server?





 



Michael Ross

Panduit Corp.

17301 Ridgeland Ave

Tinley Park, IL 60477

MCSE

MS Exchange Administrator



 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchnage substitue

[Matthew Carpenter]

Title: RE: Exchnage substitue





I would say their website. Our company is too cheap, so we do not have it. The quote was VERY expensive (10s of thousands). 

http://www.act.com/products/index.cfm


-Original Message-
From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue


WHere can I get information about the sql upgrade.
Thanks
chris
--- Matthew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is made for a max of 15 users (unless you use the
> SQL upgrade). The base
> product starts to flake at more than that number of
> users (at the same
> time).
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Annette K. Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:03 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
> 
>  
> 
> Question about ACT:  when you say it sucks if you
> overload it, what
> constitutes overloading it?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:41 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
> 
> NEMX is a Goldmine add-on?
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:34 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
> 
> You are probably thinking of NEMX tools for Goldmine
> which allows this. GM
> 5.7 now supports the colanders thing.
> 
>  
> 
> SUPPOSEDLY, GM6 will finally include full Exch
> support.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:29 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
> 
> We have users that synch Outlook and Goldmine.  It
> even supports iCalendars
> from Outlook/Exchange.
> 
>  
> 
> Am I thinking of another product?
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:25 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
> 
> At least ACT supports Exch. Goldmine has been around
> forever and still has
> no Exch support.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Carpenter
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:22 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
> 
> Not so fast, you need to know how big the site is.
> ACT SUCKS when you
> overload it. Plus, the SQL option is very expensive
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:19 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchnage substitue
> 
>  
> 
> You want something that does lots of stuff, but
> takes no brains to run?
> 
>  
> 
> goldmine or Act2000.
> 
>  
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:13 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchnage substitue
> 
> I need a solution like exchange for one site that
> has scheduling, and
> contacts, but no mail. I wanted to use exchange, but
> its to admin dependant,
> this site also doesn't even have a domain. Any
> ideas? They all use OL.
> 
> jlc
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
>
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards(r)
http://movies.yahoo.com/


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm