RE: Email Discovery when using ADRMS
Well unfortunately we wont be moving to 2010 at least for a year. Does anyone know of any solutions with 2007, even if it is a 3rd party solution? Thanks Shay From: Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk] Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Email Discovery when using ADRMS Correct and it can be easily delegated to compliance teams. === Andrew Levicki MCSE MCITPEA CCNA ITIL On 2010/03/26, at 6:41, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.commailto:mich...@smithcons.com wrote: This is a feature of Exchange 2010. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Mayo, Shay [mailto:shay.m...@absg.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Email Discovery when using ADRMS Hi All, I have been asked to setup Active Directory Rights Management server. My question is, does anyone have a way to perform email discoveries when using ADRMS? I get asked by Legal and HR almost weekly to do email searches and our current email discovery software, Discovery Attender from Sherpa Software, can't open the messages that are secured by ADRMS. Exchange 2007 Thanks, Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
Email Discovery when using ADRMS
Hi All, I have been asked to setup Active Directory Rights Management server. My question is, does anyone have a way to perform email discoveries when using ADRMS? I get asked by Legal and HR almost weekly to do email searches and our current email discovery software, Discovery Attender from Sherpa Software, can't open the messages that are secured by ADRMS. Exchange 2007 Thanks, Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
RE: Exchange Design Recomendation
I know. Its more political than anything else. From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:42 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Design Recomendation That doesn't require a subdomain. It simply requires that you put a particular user as a local administrator on the Exchange server and delegate them permissions for a particular OU full of users. Really, truly, there are rarely reasons for subdomains anymore. From: Mayo, Shay [shay.m...@absg.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Design Recomendation For the most part, we want them to be able to fully admin their exchange servers. I think we want them to be able to manage their servers but make sure they can't screw up the entire org. From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Design Recomendation What kind of management is required on the Exchange servers is required by the admins in the sister company? On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Mayo, Shay shay.m...@absg.commailto:shay.m...@absg.com wrote: We are about to merge our 2000 user sister company into our Active Directory. We have always had a single domain architecture and now are wanting to move to a multidomain architecture so the sister company's admins can still manage their resources. So I am looking for design ideas. I think the best approach would be to install all of the exchange servers in the same domain and delegate administration to certain Exchange servers to the sister company admins, but I have to present other approaches such as installing the sister company's Exchange servers in their sub domain and discuss why this would or wouldn't be a good idea. So if anyone has any input or can point me to a good article, it would be greatly appreciated! This will be all Exchange 2007 servers. Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
Exchange Design Recomendation
We are about to merge our 2000 user sister company into our Active Directory. We have always had a single domain architecture and now are wanting to move to a multidomain architecture so the sister company's admins can still manage their resources. So I am looking for design ideas. I think the best approach would be to install all of the exchange servers in the same domain and delegate administration to certain Exchange servers to the sister company admins, but I have to present other approaches such as installing the sister company's Exchange servers in their sub domain and discuss why this would or wouldn't be a good idea. So if anyone has any input or can point me to a good article, it would be greatly appreciated! This will be all Exchange 2007 servers. Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
RE: Exchange Design Recomendation
For the most part, we want them to be able to fully admin their exchange servers. I think we want them to be able to manage their servers but make sure they can't screw up the entire org. From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange Design Recomendation What kind of management is required on the Exchange servers is required by the admins in the sister company? On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Mayo, Shay shay.m...@absg.commailto:shay.m...@absg.com wrote: We are about to merge our 2000 user sister company into our Active Directory. We have always had a single domain architecture and now are wanting to move to a multidomain architecture so the sister company's admins can still manage their resources. So I am looking for design ideas. I think the best approach would be to install all of the exchange servers in the same domain and delegate administration to certain Exchange servers to the sister company admins, but I have to present other approaches such as installing the sister company's Exchange servers in their sub domain and discuss why this would or wouldn't be a good idea. So if anyone has any input or can point me to a good article, it would be greatly appreciated! This will be all Exchange 2007 servers. Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
Microsoft Supporting VMWare Exchange Servers Work Around
Hey, Exchange 2007 on Windows 2003 SP2 in VMWARE. Long story short, our company decided to save a few bucks and not renew our premier support with Microsoft. We now have professional support and have recently found that Microsoft will no longer support our 12 Exchange 2007 servers because we are running them on Windows 2003 in VMWARE. They said they would support us if we were running Windows 2008 in VMWARE, which is frustrating but anyway The way they always have busted us is about an hour into the call, they say lets run the Best Practice Analyzer which then pops up and says Exchange 2007 on Windows 2003 in VMWARE is not supported and then the tech is like Sorry wish I could help you... My question is, does anyone have a trick to getting around this? Maybe some way to disable this in BPA? Thanks Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
Exporting Mailboxes in Exchange 2007
Hey, I need to export several hundred users mailboxes to PSTs that are scattered across a few different Exchange 2007 servers. Does someone know of an easy way to do this? Maybe powershell reading the names from a text file or something? Thank you Microsoft for not including Exmerge in 2k7 Thanks in advance, Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Large Mailboxes Performance
Hey, Just curious what type of performance people have had with large mailboxes on Exchange 2007. Our company has a strict email retention policy that purges email after 30 days, but we have about 200 people though that have special circumstances where they need to store email long term. We implemented an archiving product from C2C about 1 and ½ years ago which turned out to be a far less than desirable solution for our users. We have fully migrated to Exchange 2007 and are kicking around the idea of not having a 3rd party archiving system and just allowing larger mailboxes (3-10 GB) for these special users. So my question is, what kind of performance have you guys seen with mailboxes this large? Do they benefit from Office 2k7 or have they actually ran fine with Office2k3? Lastly, a lot of these users travel and will be using cached Exchange mode. So I am mainly worried about performance from large OSTs Thanks Shay Mayo // Systems Administrator AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group Ph. 469-365-7160 // s...@absg.commailto:s...@absg.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Large Mailboxes Performance
Thanks Sam. You mean keep the file level virus scanner off the OSTs? Shay From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 8:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Large Mailboxes Performance Absolutely no issues here, as long as the inbox is 2000 Items.Many 10GB mailboxes here... Olk03 and Olk07 Keep your workstation file-level virus scanners off them too. From: Mayo, Shay [mailto:shay.m...@absg.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 8:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Large Mailboxes Performance Hey, Just curious what type of performance people have had with large mailboxes on Exchange 2007. Our company has a strict email retention policy that purges email after 30 days, but we have about 200 people though that have special circumstances where they need to store email long term. We implemented an archiving product from C2C about 1 and ½ years ago which turned out to be a far less than desirable solution for our users. We have fully migrated to Exchange 2007 and are kicking around the idea of not having a 3rd party archiving system and just allowing larger mailboxes (3-10 GB) for these special users. So my question is, what kind of performance have you guys seen with mailboxes this large? Do they benefit from Office 2k7 or have they actually ran fine with Office2k3? Lastly, a lot of these users travel and will be using cached Exchange mode. So I am mainly worried about performance from large OSTs Thanks Shay Mayo // Systems Administrator AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group Ph. 469-365-7160 // s...@absg.commailto:s...@absg.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Large Mailboxes Performance
Hey Martin, I do understand that it is more of an Outlook thing but can you elaborate on Control the items in their folders? Thanks Shay From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 8:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Large Mailboxes Performance I don't think large mailboxes from an Exchange perspective are a performance issue. The issue mainly lies in Outlook performance and if your users can somehow learn to control the items in their folders, the performance will be fine. From: Mayo, Shay [mailto:shay.m...@absg.com] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 6:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Large Mailboxes Performance Hey, Just curious what type of performance people have had with large mailboxes on Exchange 2007. Our company has a strict email retention policy that purges email after 30 days, but we have about 200 people though that have special circumstances where they need to store email long term. We implemented an archiving product from C2C about 1 and ½ years ago which turned out to be a far less than desirable solution for our users. We have fully migrated to Exchange 2007 and are kicking around the idea of not having a 3rd party archiving system and just allowing larger mailboxes (3-10 GB) for these special users. So my question is, what kind of performance have you guys seen with mailboxes this large? Do they benefit from Office 2k7 or have they actually ran fine with Office2k3? Lastly, a lot of these users travel and will be using cached Exchange mode. So I am mainly worried about performance from large OSTs Thanks Shay Mayo // Systems Administrator AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group Ph. 469-365-7160 // s...@absg.commailto:s...@absg.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Syncing Gals Between Orgs
Hey - What are you guys using to sync Global Address Lists between Organizations. It would be Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2007. Thanks Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Looking for PowerShell Script to Configure User's OOO Message
Hey, Can anyone point me in the direction of a powershell script I can use to configure a user's out of office message? Thanks and Happy New Year. Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Server Admin Position in Frisco TX
Hey, Sorry, I know this is a little off topic. Anyway we have an opening here in Frisco TX (Dallas Suburb) for a server admin to support a 400 server network. Looking for someone with Exchange, AD, SMS, Openview and Sharepoint skills. If interested, send me your resume. Thanks Shay CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Job Postings?
I get $1000 if they hire one of you guys, so my wallet said it was OK. From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Job Postings? I saw that it was OK on the NT System Admin list, is it OK to post job openings on this list as well? Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Senior Messaging Engineer Azaleos Corporation T: 206.926.1945 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This electronic mail transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender, delete it and destroy it without reading it. Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
