RE: Anti Virus Software

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: RE: Anti Virus Software



Well 
I think it's wonderful.  Don't think of it as AV software (although nothing 
has ever got past it of that nature) and more as a very sophisticated 
 Content Filter, a Reporting tool, and an easier way of implementing 
additional functions such as auto response, relay blocking, user level control 
of e-mail , spam blocking etc
 
ahh 
go see the web-site, it's early and my typing fingers aren't working too well 
yet.
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Jason Dwyer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 23 April 2002 5:55 
  p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Anti Virus 
  Software
  Guys,
      Thanks for all the responses.. certainly an interesting decision 
  to make.
   
  One thing 
  extra, noone commented on Mail Marshall?
   
  Regards, 
  Jason Dwyer 
  
-Original Message-From: Bryan Hanes 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 23 April 2002 2:32 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Anti Virus 
Software
Here's my $0.02 on this subject. 
We use Officescan for desktops, Antigen for Exchange and 
Norton for our servers.  This way we are covered round robin. 

More and more it is getting to the point that you really 
*SHOULD* use a different vendor solution for your desktop, mail and servers, 
instead of going full hog on one vendor for everything.  This way you 
are covered from all angles as everyone's scan engines detect virii 
differently.
I agree that it may cost a little more money and time for 
different vendors, but I definitely do sleep at night knowing my rear is 
covered.
And yes, McAfee/NAI stinks for an AV solution. 
Regards, Bryan 
-Original Message- From: 
Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:10 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anti Virus Software 
Here is something I actually posted for someone else 
recently. 
OK, here is my Trend spiel. I am now 
in my second company where I have done a full Trend rollout using their Neat 
Suite product. http://www.antivirus.com/products/neatsuite/exchange.htm I 
paid 3K for a 100 User license. This bundle includes 
the VirusWall gateway, Scanmail for Exch, Server Protect, and Office Protect 
for the desktops. These conversions came about from two virus outbreaks that 
McAffee and/or Norton could not contain. The first was ILOVEYOU. We upgraded 
to Scanmail mid virus. It passed though our Groupshield, but I was able to 
contain it from being executed (thank god for small env). I literally 
downloaded and installed Scanmail on the fly. No testing, nothing. Just went 
for it and never looked back. We later upgraded the rest of the clients. 
They called my the virus hunter there because nothing ever got past me 
again. At my latest gig, we were running the whole Mcaffee suite here. My 
first week we had a big outbreak. We ended up rebuilding about 20 PC's and a 
couple of servers. Once again, we upgraded to Trend.
So I can tell you, first hand,. 
Mcaffee isn't good enough. Period. As long as you use it, you will get 
virus's that pass right through it. Its better than nothing, but not good 
enough.
Now here is a bonus about 
OfficeProtect. If you run it via a logon script, it will automatically 
uninstall NAI, or NAV and then install itself. WONDERFUL!! Lot less work for 
you. We have also found that our stations are much more stable than they 
were on Mcaffee/NAI.
Honestly, I do not believe you can 
buy a better product. I know Antigen is a fine product, but it only covers 
your Exch box. It isn't going to protect you when someone opens a hotmail 
message. That WS will still get infected. I demod Antigen when I did the 
Exch rollout. It is a fine product, but I dislike the GUI. In the end the 
guy from Antigen asked me "If you could have either Trend or Antigen today 
and they were both free, which would you pick?". I said Trend. I couldn't 
leave what to me has been a perfect program behind. That just how much I 
love it. I sleep well at night knowing that I am covered by the best money 
can buy.
-Original Message- From: 
Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:42 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anti Virus Software 
Hi all, 
    I have sent this 
to both lists as it covers both Exchange and NT. 
I have read with interest a lot of threads with regards to 
whether or not one should use AV on servers/exchange etc.. and I am of the 
opinion that the more the merrier.
Currently we have been using NAV 7.6 corp for our desktops, 
file server and exchagne server.  It is now time to renew and when I 
informed the boss about the price, she wants me to review the options.  
From the looks of

RE: Content Filtering

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Content Filtering



yet 
another fine Kiwi product, as is Mail Marshal.

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2002 
  11:10 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Content Filtering
  And 
  just for him: http://www.mailwasher.net/
   
  
-Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 
2002 4:09 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Content Filtering
I use Mail Marshal www.marshalsoftware.com and 
love it.
 
There are also Mail Essentials and Mime Sweeper.
 
cheers
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Steve Hart 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2002 11:06 
  a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Content 
  Filtering
  Hi guys, list newbie here. 
  1st Question - Our CEO has recently asked me to 
  check into content filtering software. Is there an obvious product of 
  choice?
  Were running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0 with 
  Antigen 6.2 
  Thanks, Steve 
  ---   
  Steve Hart   MCSE, A+ 
  MIS Manager List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL 
INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual 
or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic 
message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call 
collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Content Filtering

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Content Filtering



I 
use Mail Marshal www.marshalsoftware.com and love 
it.
 
There are also Mail Essentials and Mime Sweeper.
 
cheers
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Steve Hart 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2002 11:06 
  a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Content 
  Filtering
  Hi guys, list newbie here. 
  1st Question - Our CEO has recently asked me to 
  check into content filtering software. Is there an obvious product of 
  choice?
  Were running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0 with Antigen 
  6.2 
  Thanks, Steve 
  ---   
  Steve Hart   MCSE, A+ 
  MIS Manager List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook in Other Languages

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



William - shocked to my core I am!!!
 
 
Simon who's going home to bed now'cos it after midnight down 
here

  -Original Message-From: William Lefkovics 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2002 
  12:32 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Outlook in Other Languages
  And 
  a cunning linguist you are.  Take some ribbon with that 
  bow.
   
  
-Original Message-From: Lynn Karen 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 
5:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Outlook in Other Languages
I 
never wanted to be an Exchange Administrator anyway ...  I 
wanted to be a l
 
...linguist!!
 
(Shame I only speak English and a smattering of 
school French and German ...)

  -Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 10 April 2002 
  13:19To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Outlook in Other Languages
  take a bow, Karen!
  
-Original Message-From: mark verschaeve 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 11 April 
2002 12:19 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook in Other 
Languages
Correct.
persoonlijk is singular (one adress book)
persoonlijke is plural (more maps)

  
  -Original Message-From: Lynn 
  Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: woensdag 10 
  april 2002 14:01To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook in Other 
  Languages
  Singular and plural forms (one address book, but many 
  folders)? 
  Karen 
  > -Original Message- > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > Sent: 10 April 2002 12:54 > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > 
  Subject: RE: Outlook in Other Languages > 
  > > Why does 
  Personal = Persoonlijk in one place and Persoonlijke > in another? > > Just curious :-) > 
  > Simon (1/8th Dutch) > > > -Original 
  Message- > > From: mark verschaeve 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2002 11:45 
  p.m. > > To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues > > Subject: RE: Outlook in Other 
  Languages > > > > > > In Dutch. 
  > > > > Public 
  Folders -> Openbare Mappen > > 
  Personal Address Book -> Persoonlijk Adresboek > > Personal Folders -> Persoonlijke Mappen 
  > > Outlook Address Book -> Outlook 
  Adresboek > > > > > > Mark 
  Verschaeve. > > 
List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook in Other Languages

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



take 
a bow, Karen!

  -Original Message-From: mark verschaeve 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2002 
  12:19 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Outlook in Other Languages
  Correct.
  persoonlijk is singular (one adress book)
  persoonlijke is plural (more maps)
  

-Original Message-From: Lynn Karen 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: woensdag 10 april 2002 
14:01To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
in Other Languages
Singular and plural forms (one address book, but many 
folders)? 
Karen 
> -Original Message- > 
From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 10 April 2002 12:54 > 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: 
Outlook in Other Languages > > > Why does Personal = Persoonlijk in 
one place and Persoonlijke > in another? 
> > Just curious :-) 
> > Simon (1/8th 
Dutch) > > > 
-Original Message- > > From: mark 
verschaeve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2002 11:45 p.m. 
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Outlook in Other Languages > > > > > > In Dutch. > > 
> > Public Folders -> Openbare 
Mappen > > Personal Address Book -> 
Persoonlijk Adresboek > > Personal Folders 
-> Persoonlijke Mappen > > Outlook Address 
Book -> Outlook Adresboek > > 
> > > > Mark 
Verschaeve. > > > 
> -Original Message- > > From: 
Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: woensdag 10 april 2002 13:21 
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Outlook in Other Languages > > > > > > I know I've asked this before but I need some help. 
> > > > I'm looking for 
translations of the following terms as they apply to > > Outlook: > > > > 1) "Public Folders" > > 2) 
"Personal Address Book" > > 3) "Personal 
Folders" > > 4) "Outlook Address Book" 
> > > > If you are a 
user of Outlook in Dutch, French, German, > > 
Italian, Spanish etc, > > I would be grateful 
if you could send me the text that is > displayed 
by > > Outlook for these terms. 
> > > > To explain, I 
have a utility that builds mail profiles from > 
> the command line > > (createprf.exe at 
www.mailsoftware.co.uk). However, the > > 
interface I use > > creates these profiles 
with English text. If people on this > > list 
can give me > > these translations, I can 
rebuild this utility for > > international 
use.  > > > 
> Thanks. > > > 
> Kevin > > > 
> PS Thanks to Sander Filius for pointing this out! > > > > List Charter and FAQ 
at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> > > > 
> > > > List 
Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> > > > 
## 
> ### > 
Notice of Confidential information > The 
information contained in this electronic mail is > CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may > be 
LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or > entity named above. If you > are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > the use, dissemination, > 
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly > prohibited. If you have received > 
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify > us by return or telephone > call 
collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original > message. Thank you. > 
> This e-mail message has been scanned and 
cleared by > MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com > > 
## 
> ### > 
> List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook in Other Languages

[Simon Curtiss]

Why does Personal = Persoonlijk in one place and Persoonlijke in another?

Just curious :-)

Simon (1/8th Dutch)

> -Original Message-
> From: mark verschaeve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2002 11:45 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Outlook in Other Languages
> 
> 
> In Dutch.
> 
> Public Folders -> Openbare Mappen
> Personal Address Book -> Persoonlijk Adresboek
> Personal Folders -> Persoonlijke Mappen
> Outlook Address Book -> Outlook Adresboek
> 
> 
> Mark Verschaeve.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: woensdag 10 april 2002 13:21
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Outlook in Other Languages
> 
> 
> I know I've asked this before but I need some help.
> 
> I'm looking for translations of the following terms as they apply to
> Outlook:
> 
> 1) "Public Folders"
> 2) "Personal Address Book"
> 3) "Personal Folders"
> 4) "Outlook Address Book"
> 
> If you are a user of Outlook in Dutch, French, German, 
> Italian, Spanish etc,
> I would be grateful if you could send me the text that is displayed by
> Outlook for these terms.
> 
> To explain, I have a utility that builds mail profiles from 
> the command line
> (createprf.exe at www.mailsoftware.co.uk). However, the 
> interface I use
> creates these profiles with English text. If people on this 
> list can give me
> these translations, I can rebuild this utility for 
> international use.  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> PS Thanks to Sander Filius for pointing this out!
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange question

[Simon Curtiss]

The FAQ is out of date - I'm shocked!

Good to hear though.

> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2002 3:24 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange question
> 
> 
> Well, she's moved to San Francisco from Ohio with her husband 
> to pursue her
> music dreams.
> She is doing very well, I hear, but taking a break from pursuits in
> technology.  :o)
> 
> I'll request this info be added to the FAQ.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange question
> 
> 
> How is Michèle these days?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2002 1:57 p.m.
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange question
> > 
> > 
> > "Pretend for a moment I'm not psychic" - Michèle Sharik
> > 
> > What version?
> > 
> > 5.5:
> > Section 3.23:
> > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
> > 
> > 2000:
> > Section 3.17:
> > http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec3.htm
> > 
> > William
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: arae_net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:47 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange question
> > 
> > 
> > Is there a white paper on this? 
> > 
> > JR
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:08 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange question
> > 
> > 
> > Internet domains? Or NT domains? 
> > 
> > You can only run one instance of Exch on a server. You can 
> > have multiple
> > internet domains. For NT domains, you could use trusts.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: arae_net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:52 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Exchange question
> > 
> > 
> > Can a single Exchange server house two different mail 
> systems for two
> > different domains?
> > 
> > JR
> > 
> > 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange question

[Simon Curtiss]

How is Michèle these days?

> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2002 1:57 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange question
> 
> 
> "Pretend for a moment I'm not psychic" - Michèle Sharik
> 
> What version?
> 
> 5.5:
> Section 3.23:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
> 
> 2000:
> Section 3.17:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec3.htm
> 
> William
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: arae_net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:47 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange question
> 
> 
> Is there a white paper on this? 
> 
> JR
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:08 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange question
> 
> 
> Internet domains? Or NT domains? 
> 
> You can only run one instance of Exch on a server. You can 
> have multiple
> internet domains. For NT domains, you could use trusts.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: arae_net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:52 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange question
> 
> 
> Can a single Exchange server house two different mail systems for two
> different domains?
> 
> JR
> 
> 
> 
> _
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> _
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: backup problems

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



See 
Q306962 on how to create a MAPI profile without installing 
Outlook
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2002 3:24 
  a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: backup 
  problems
  
  What do you mean 
  you don't need Outlook? According to their documentation, you MUST have a mail 
  profile set up for the Backup service account on the server that is doing the 
  backups. I may have missed it, are you running the backup on this server, oir 
  remotely. Even so, it looks like your issue is not permissions, or access. I 
  agree that you should reinstall the agent. Our issue was a handful of items 
  that they don't bother to tell you upfront. We had to pay the $89 incident fee 
  to find out. We seem to be running in good order now though. What a pain in 
  the a_s.
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Joe Irvine 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:12 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: backup 
  problems
   
  
  I'm 
  running 8.6 with no problems I wiuld reconmmend re-installing the exchange 
  agent adn maybe the latest exchange and windows service 
  packs.
  
   
   
  Thanks! 
  Joe 
  Irvine Director of 
  Information Technology The 
  Business Office, Inc. (609) 
  597-1155, Fax (609) 597-2860 www.tbopayroll.com 
  
  
-Original 
Message-From: Zangara, 
Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:50 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: backup 
problems`

Same problem I am getting - I 
use 8.5 I was hoping 8.6 would solve it but does not seem so by your 
error.

 

If you figure this out let me 
know.  I am thinking of going to a different 
product.

 

 
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT 
ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


I 
went to a general store. They wouldn't let me buy anything specifically. -- 
Steven Wright 
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:54 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: backup 
  problems`
  
  We are running 
  Exchange 5.5 SP4.
  
  We use Backup 
  Exec 8.6 build 3278.
  
  I have one server 
  that is giving me
  
  Media Name: 
  "Media created 3/26/2002 10:37:20 AM"Backup of "\\MailServer\Microsoft 
  Exchange Information Store "Backup set #2 on storage media 
  #1Backup set description: "Backup FULL"Backup Type: FULL - 
  Database & Logs (flush committed logs)Backup started on 3/26/2002 
  at 10:38:40 AM.The Exchange Store service is not responding. Backup 
  set canceled.^ ^ ^ ^ ^
  
   
  
  Backup completed 
  on 3/26/2002 at 10:50:00 AM.Backed up 0 Exchange Server 
  store(s)Processed 2,285,764,782 bytes in  11 minutes and  20 
  seconds.Throughput rate: 192.3 MB/min
  
   
  
   
  
  As an 
  error.
  
  We do NOT have 
  Outlook installed on the exchange server, and should not need to have it 
  installed.
  
  Anyone got an 
  idea of why this is happening on just this ONE 
  server?
  
   
  Michael 
  Ross
  Panduit 
  Corp.
  17301 Ridgeland 
  Ave
  Tinley Park, IL 
  60477
  MCSE
  MS Exchange 
  Administrator
  
   
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 98 Offline folders

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Outlook 98 Offline folders



The 
corporate default is to use the worst version of Outlook ever? - 
niice.
 
I 
don't know the answer as I've only ever used 98 for about five minutes and that 
was a lng time ago.
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Joseph 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2002 11:11 
  a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook 98 
  Offline folders
  With outlook 98, does anyone know of a way 
  to set all folder to be enable for offline access?  The client has 
  several hundred folders and subfolders and I can't upgrade outlook because of 
  corporate defaults.  I wish I could since you just select all with the 
  newer versions of outlook.
  Joseph List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: O O F Replies

[Simon Curtiss]

AFAIK that word is FROM the UK - I know I am! I'm not there now, but I was
born there.

> -Original Message-
> From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2002 2:37 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> 
> 
> "Lollygagging"??  Has that word made it to the UK yet?
> 
> Karen
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 20 March 2002 04:55
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> > 
> > 
> > It's short for 'you get to keep your job for another month, now stop
> > lollygagging and get back to work'
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 4:50 p.m.
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Re: O O F Replies
> > > 
> > > 
> > > "Well done?"  What does that mean?  
> > > - Original Message - 
> > > From: "Joe L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:46 PM
> > > Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > HAHAHA
> > > > Now that's funny!
> > > > jlc
> > > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:08 PM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> > > > 
> > > > Overtime? What's overtime? Is that when ou work long hours 
> > > and they say
> > > > 'well done' and then wander off?
> > > > 
> > > > Simon
> > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 4:06 p.m.
> > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can always say the server is broke, and to fix it, 
> > > you need about
> > > > > 120 hours OT to fix OOF's, and therefore re-enable them. 
> > > Then you make
> > > > > some cash for the headache!
> > > > > 
> > > > > jlc
> > > > > 
> > > > > he he he
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:22 PM
> > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > Subject: O O F Replies
> > > > > 
> > > > > The joy of defending disallowing O O F replies has fallen to 
> > > > > me at last.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Apart from
> > > > > 
> > > > > 1) Mail Loops
> > > > > 2) Annoying the thousands of people on mailing lists you are 
> > > > > subscribed
> > > > > to
> > > > > (yes I know you can subscribe from PF's)
> > > > > 3) Can only be turned on/off for whole org
> > > > > 4) Not all e-mail systems will necesarily get the O O F reply 
> > > > > (not sure
> > > > > this
> > > > > is true these days?)
> > > > > 5) Staff issues - not turning on/off appropriately, not 
> > > > > updating text of
> > > > > message
> > > > > 6) Not Best Practice as customer may never see it, and it 
> > > > > place the onus
> > > > > of
> > > > > communication on the customer
> > > > > 
> > > > > Shame auotmatic replis to the internet is a different 
> > > control as then
> > > > > this
> > > > > would not be an issue!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Can anyone think of any other ammo - the archives contain 
> > > nothing much
> > > > > as we
> > > > > obviously haven't discussed this in the last month - 
> > shock horror!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Simon Curtiss
> > > > > Systems Administrator
> > > 

RE: Applications using CDO

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Applications using CDO



1) 
Follow the instructions from MS for creating the Outlook security Setting 
Public Folder -  I forget where on  their site it is and you can allow 
this to happen for all or some users.
 
2)not my area - sorry
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 21 March 
  2002 10:06 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Applications using CDO
  Two Questions
  1.)
  I am trying to send Email 
  between applications using CDO but, since we have the Outlook security patch I 
  recieve a msgbox saying "A program is trying to 
  automatically send e-mail on your behalf.  Do you want to allow 
  this?" with 'Yes' 
  and 'No' buttons.  Is there 
  a way around this?
  2.)
  Regardless if this could 
  be done or not can CDO be used to send e-mail between applications that are 
  running as a windows services?
  TIA
  Chris Bodnar
  Network 
Engineer
  Essent 
  Corporation
  610-559- 
  X:24List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: content

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



I 
can't believe they actually called the prodcut that!

  -Original Message-From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2002 
  2:54 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  content
  We 
  are looking at this product.
   
  http://www.mimesweeper.com/products/pornsweeper/default.asp
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:34 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
content
ok
Im looking at 
surfcontrol and trendmicro.
 
Im looking for a 
content filter for exchange that will look at pictures comming in and 
determine which is a naked lady, and which is a good picture of my 
kid..
 
I think the 
technology is called 'I-4" or something like that.List 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: O O F Replies

[Simon Curtiss]

It's short for 'you get to keep your job for another month, now stop
lollygagging and get back to work'

> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 4:50 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: O O F Replies
> 
> 
> "Well done?"  What does that mean?  
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Joe L. Casale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:46 PM
> Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> 
> 
> > HAHAHA
> > Now that's funny!
> > jlc
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:08 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> > 
> > Overtime? What's overtime? Is that when ou work long hours 
> and they say
> > 'well done' and then wander off?
> > 
> > Simon
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 4:06 p.m.
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> > > 
> > > 
> > > You can always say the server is broke, and to fix it, 
> you need about
> > > 120 hours OT to fix OOF's, and therefore re-enable them. 
> Then you make
> > > some cash for the headache!
> > > 
> > > jlc
> > > 
> > > he he he
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:22 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: O O F Replies
> > > 
> > > The joy of defending disallowing O O F replies has fallen to 
> > > me at last.
> > > 
> > > Apart from
> > > 
> > > 1) Mail Loops
> > > 2) Annoying the thousands of people on mailing lists you are 
> > > subscribed
> > > to
> > > (yes I know you can subscribe from PF's)
> > > 3) Can only be turned on/off for whole org
> > > 4) Not all e-mail systems will necesarily get the O O F reply 
> > > (not sure
> > > this
> > > is true these days?)
> > > 5) Staff issues - not turning on/off appropriately, not 
> > > updating text of
> > > message
> > > 6) Not Best Practice as customer may never see it, and it 
> > > place the onus
> > > of
> > > communication on the customer
> > > 
> > > Shame auotmatic replis to the internet is a different 
> control as then
> > > this
> > > would not be an issue!
> > > 
> > > Can anyone think of any other ammo - the archives contain 
> nothing much
> > > as we
> > > obviously haven't discussed this in the last month - shock horror!
> > > 
> > > Simon Curtiss
> > > Systems Administrator
> > > ABN AMRO Craigs
> > > Tauranga
> > > +64 (0)7 577 4708
> > > 
> > > ##
> > > ##
> > > #
> > > Notice of Confidential information 
> > > The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL
> > > INFORMATION and may
> > > be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or 
> > > entity named
> > > above. If you
> > > are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
> that the use,
> > > dissemination,
> > > distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
> > > prohibited. If you
> > > have received
> > > this electronic message in error, please immediately notify 
> > > us by return
> > > or telephone
> > > call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original 
> message. Thank
> > > you. 
> > > 
> > > This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal
> > > www.marshalsoftware.com 
> > > 
> > > ##
> > > ##
> > > #
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > 
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 

RE: D****** F######: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: FW: D** F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.



Oh 
now I've got oen but it's slightly different - EUR_NOTES not LAX_NOTES 
!?
 

Your message
Subject: O O F Replies
was not delivered to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
because:
Error transferring to EUR_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded. 
Message probably in a routing loop.

  -Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 
  2002 4:12 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  D** F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum 
  hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
  Not me, well not yet.
   
  Simon
  
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 
4:07 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: FW: 
D** F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum 
hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
Anyone else getting one of these bounces for every message 
sent to the list? 
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT 
Manager Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear 
Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message- From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM 
To: Zangara, Jim Subject: DELIVERY 
FAILURE: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count 
exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
Your message 
  Subject: RE: performance issues 
was not delivered to: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
because: 
  Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; 
Maximum hop count exceeded.  Message probably in a routing loop. 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

  
  Notice of Confidential information 
  The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL 
  INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or 
  entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
  notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
  document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message 
  in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 
  07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
  This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: D****** F######: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: FW: D** F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.



Not 
me, well not yet.
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 
  4:07 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: FW: 
  D** F##: Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail .box; Maximum 
  hop count exceeded. Message probably in a routing loop.
  Anyone else getting one of these bounces for every message 
  sent to the list? 
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT Manager 
  Special Projects Engineer Premiere 
  Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
  Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:28 PM To: Zangara, Jim Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: 
  Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; Maximum hop count exceeded. 
  Message probably in a routing loop.
  Your message 
    Subject: RE: performance issues 
  was not delivered to: 
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  because: 
    Error transferring to LAX_NOTES/SVR/ISC mail.box; 
  Maximum hop count exceeded.  Message probably in a routing loop. 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: O O F Replies

[Simon Curtiss]

Overtime? What's overtime? Is that when ou work long hours and they say
'well done' and then wander off?

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 4:06 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: O O F Replies
> 
> 
> You can always say the server is broke, and to fix it, you need about
> 120 hours OT to fix OOF's, and therefore re-enable them. Then you make
> some cash for the headache!
> 
> jlc
> 
> he he he
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:22 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: O O F Replies
> 
> The joy of defending disallowing O O F replies has fallen to 
> me at last.
> 
> Apart from
> 
> 1) Mail Loops
> 2) Annoying the thousands of people on mailing lists you are 
> subscribed
> to
> (yes I know you can subscribe from PF's)
> 3) Can only be turned on/off for whole org
> 4) Not all e-mail systems will necesarily get the O O F reply 
> (not sure
> this
> is true these days?)
> 5) Staff issues - not turning on/off appropriately, not 
> updating text of
> message
> 6) Not Best Practice as customer may never see it, and it 
> place the onus
> of
> communication on the customer
> 
> Shame auotmatic replis to the internet is a different control as then
> this
> would not be an issue!
> 
> Can anyone think of any other ammo - the archives contain nothing much
> as we
> obviously haven't discussed this in the last month - shock horror!
> 
> Simon Curtiss
> Systems Administrator
> ABN AMRO Craigs
> Tauranga
> +64 (0)7 577 4708
> 
> ##
> ##
> #
> Notice of Confidential information 
> The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL
> INFORMATION and may
> be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or 
> entity named
> above. If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use,
> dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
> prohibited. If you
> have received
> this electronic message in error, please immediately notify 
> us by return
> or telephone
> call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank
> you. 
> 
> This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal
> www.marshalsoftware.com 
> 
> ##
> ##
> #
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

O O F Replies

[Simon Curtiss]

The joy of defending disallowing O O F replies has fallen to me at last.

Apart from

1) Mail Loops
2) Annoying the thousands of people on mailing lists you are subscribed to
(yes I know you can subscribe from PF's)
3) Can only be turned on/off for whole org
4) Not all e-mail systems will necesarily get the O O F reply (not sure this
is true these days?)
5) Staff issues - not turning on/off appropriately, not updating text of
message
6) Not Best Practice as customer may never see it, and it place the onus of
communication on the customer

Shame auotmatic replis to the internet is a different control as then this
would not be an issue!

Can anyone think of any other ammo - the archives contain nothing much as we
obviously haven't discussed this in the last month - shock horror!

Simon Curtiss
Systems Administrator
ABN AMRO Craigs
Tauranga
+64 (0)7 577 4708

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Marshall

[Simon Curtiss]

Have 
you been to www.marshalsoftware.co.nz 
?
 
 
  the software is great, what do you specifically want to know 
about?
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Vien Dang 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2002 2:24 
  p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Mail 
  Marshall
  Any comment about Mail Marshal? The information 
  is limited on the website ...
  Thanks.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Mal Sasalu 

To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: 04 March, 2002 14:29
Subject: RE: Mail Marshall


 
 
http://www.systemoptions.com/asp/mailmarshal/mailmarshal.htm
 
 
 
From: Karen Palmer 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:49 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Mail 
Marshall
 
Can 
anyone provide the link for this software or the company name?  My 
search engines did not turn it up.
 
Thanks,
 
Karen 
Palmer
List Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Is it possible to send forms between Companies

[Simon Curtiss]

Is there a way of creating a Form at two totally seperate companies, so that
when our users fill in the form and send it to the other company, that the
second company can see the form in the e-mail?

cheers

Simon 


Simon Curtiss
Systems Administrator
ABN AMRO Craigs
Tauranga
+64 (0)7 577 4708

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Restart after changing Deleted Item Retention Time?

[Simon Curtiss]

No it doesn't

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Rybski Dajo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 9:14 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Restart after changing Deleted Item Retention Time?
> 
> 
> Does the store (or another service) need to be restarted 
> after changing
> deleted item retention time?
> Exchange 5.5
> 
> Dajo
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Attachments Disappearing

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: RE: Attachments Disappearing



and 
you are certain that this one user hasn't changed it?

  -Original Message-From: Murray Freeman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:58 
  a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments 
  Disappearing
  No, we are 
  using Outlook and it's set for rich text
   
  Murray
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:50 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Attachments 
Disappearing
Yes if they are sending the attachments via Word, it may not 
arrive if the receiver does not use Word as their editor. It depends on how 
it is sent
-Original Message- From: 
Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:37 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Attachments Disappearing 
Is she using Word as her e-mail editor? 
> -Original Message- > 
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m. 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Attachments Disappearing > 
> > I have one user 
who when she sends attachments to certain > 
people outside our > email system, the 
attachments do not reach the intended > person. 
The email > gets there, but without the 
attachment. However, when she > sends the 
same > attachment to some individuals, the 
attachment arrives in > tact. If someone 
> else here sends the same attachment to the individual 
who did > NOT receive > the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have 
> any ideas where > to 
start looking? > > 
Murray > > List 
Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
> 
# 
Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL 
INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual 
or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic 
message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call 
collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by 
MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 
# 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Attachments Disappearing

[Simon Curtiss]

Is she using Word as her e-mail editor?

> -Original Message-
> From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:32 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Attachments Disappearing
> 
> 
> I have one user who when she sends attachments to certain 
> people outside our
> email system, the attachments do not reach the intended 
> person. The email
> gets there, but without the attachment. However, when she 
> sends the same
> attachment to some individuals, the attachment arrives in 
> tact. If someone
> else here sends the same attachment to the individual who did 
> NOT receive
> the attachment, the attachment arrives in tact. Anyone have 
> any ideas where
> to start looking?
> 
> Murray
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Wait while data is transferring

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Wait while data is transferring



Um 
possibly dumb question, but why are they clicking on send/receive 
anyway?
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 28 February 
  2002 6:26 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Wait 
  while data is transferring
  Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP6. 4 servers in our 
  site.  Users on the Batavia server, when they hit the Send / Receive 
  Button in Outlook will get a message saying that they are retrieving data from 
  another server in the site.  The process makes mail retrieval 
  excruciatingly slow.  The users in question have nothing on the other 
  server.  Any ideas where to poke with my sharp stick?
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
  NAOCERT, Exchange Administrator(207) 989-9115 
  voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter 
  and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Burning PST files.

[Simon Curtiss]

When you copy it back to the hard drive you must turn the Read Only
attribute off on the PST file.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 February 2002 10:57 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Burning PST files.
> 
> 
> Is it possible to burn PST files to a CD and still use them?  
> We have some
> users with very large PST files that
> are gobbling up server space.  We tried burning a PST file to 
> a CD, but we
> were then unable to access it.
> Even after copying the file back to their home drive and 
> trying to take
> ownership of it.  Has anybody had any
> success with this?
> 
> Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Robert
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: E2k in need?

[Simon Curtiss]

www.mailmarshal.com
 
I 
love it.
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Jamison, Chris 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 26 February 2002 
  1:29 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: E2k in 
  need?
  
  I am on the search for a GOOD 
  anti-spam and content filtering tool (software) for my Exchange 2K mail server 
  and possibly for internet filtering.  
  Any suggestions?   
   
  Chris 
  Jamison 
  Network Systems 
  Manager Penn-America Group, 
  Inc. ph: 215-773-7736 
  fax:215-443-3667 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   List Charter 
  and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: public folder: unread count

[Simon Curtiss]

If the Public Folder is in your Public Folder Favourites it will display how
many are unread in each folder when you click on the Favourites in the tree
view.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 February 2002 8:26 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: public folder: unread count
> 
> 
> System:
> Windows 2000 Server SP2 With AD
> Exchange Server 2000 SP1
> 
> Problem:
> With my inbox, through outlook, I can see how many unread items I have
> next to the inbox folder, in blue parentheses.  I have public folders
> where all the posts from this list are put, and I'm telling 
> exchange to
> make the views specific to each user who looks at the folder. 
>  Is there
> any way to make the public folder display how many unread items there
> are in the public folders?  It's not a problem or anything, 
> but it would
> just be nice.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 2/19/2002
>  
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: e-mail arriving in batches

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



Indeed, try: 
http://support.microsoft.com/view/tn.asp?kb=304849
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Briggs, Bruce 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2002 
  9:21 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: e-mail 
  arriving in batches
  You 
  can get this same result if a firewall has been added between the clients and 
  the Exchange server.
   
  Bruce Briggs System 
  Administration State University of NY 
   
  -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 
  19, 2002 3:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  e-mail arriving in batches
  Are 
  you using a proxy server?  MS Proxy Client will cause this every 
  time.  This is absolutely a UDP problem, I have lived this nightmare 
  myself.
  
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, February 
19, 2002 2:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: e-mail arriving in batches
It is USUALLY 
UDP related. Have they made any changes to their 
network?

  
  -Original Message-From: Angie Sawyer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 
  11:28 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: e-mail 
  arriving in batches
  Our clients are not getting e-mail in Outlook unless 
  they click on another folder within Outlook.  Then the mail is 
  sent/received in batches.  I don't believe it's a udp port 
  issue.  Any other ideas?  Last time a reboot fixed the problem, 
  but I'd rather not have to do that again.
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows 2000 using Outlook 97, 
  2000, & 2002 
  Angie Sawyer List Charter and 
  FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Calender items not showing bold

[Simon Curtiss]

Are you sure the event is set as 'busy' and not 'free' ?

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2002 6:36 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Calender items not showing bold
> 
> 
> It did not work. if i go to that date the event is there but still not
> showing up in bold. any other ideas.
> thanks
> 
> dave
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:20 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Calender items not showing bold
> 
> 
> Just click Start-->Run, then type in "outlook /cleanfreebusy" 
> and click OK.
> That is what Peter is suggesting.  Whether it works or not will be
> determined by you.
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:08 AM
> To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject:  RE: Calender items not showing bold
> 
> where is that? in calender options? 
> dave
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dahl, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Calender items not showing bold
> 
> 
> Try the cleanfreebusy switch when you start Outlook.  That 
> should resolve
> this for you.
> 
> Peter Dahl.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:07 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Calender items not showing bold
> 
> 
> I just downloaded a pst file from calender-updates.com (cool 
> site). After
> importing, the dates don't show up in bold but I can click on 
> that day and
> the event is there. How can I get these to show in bold? thanks
> 
> dave
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Steven -> Sonicwall

[Simon Curtiss]

Sadists!

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2002 11:54 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
> 
> 
> That's my fav too!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
> 
> 
> We here at the Dogg Foundation LOVE the packeteer. A very 
> power inexpensive
> product. The favorite thing to do it have morphius packets 
> redueced to 1k..
> It is fun to watch people keep trying.
> 
> Milton R Dogg
> Of The Dogg Foundation..
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:48 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
> 
> 
> You need packet filtering for that. Check out a Packeteer 
> Packetshaper.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:39 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Steven -> Sonicwall
> 
> 
> you like your sonic wall?  what model do you have and how much did it
> cost you/your company?  I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200...   i
> have never used one..  can I block ports?  I need to block 
> ports like 1214
> (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ???
> 
> Paul
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM
> Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server
> Conversation: Steven
> Subject: RE: Steven
> 
> 
> I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Steven
> 
> 
> There he is! Get him!
> (But seriously, Huh?)
> 
> --- Steve Ens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think)
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Steven
> > 
> > 
> > Who is for destroying this mans server?
> >  
> > Milton R Dogg
> > Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> >
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! 
http://greetings.yahoo.com

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool

[Simon Curtiss]

If you have other reasons to purchase it Mail Marshal will do this too. Too
expensive as just a reporting tool though.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Ploughe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2002 6:17 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool
> 
> 
> I am looking for a utility that can be used to generate 
> statistical type
> reports on Exchange server usage-- numbers of internal 
> emails, external
> emails (sent and received), top senders/receivers, etc...
> 
> I read about Sunbelt's MELIA but it looked like over-kill for 
> my purposes.
> Are there any purely reporting tools that are free or 
> relatively inexpensive
> that anyone can recommend?
> 
> TIA 
> 
> 
> Jay Ploughe
> Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer
> Network Administrator
> Kiwanis International
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Steven

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



nope, not here
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2002 
  11:12 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Steven
  you 
  did not get this 4 times??
  
  
  How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if 
  anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems?
  Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from 
  Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry.
  Offer ends February 28, 2002.
   
   
  --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
  Did I just say that out 
  loud? 
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
13, 2002 1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Steven
eh?

  
  -Original Message-From: Milton R 
  Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
  13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Steven
  Who is for 
  destroying this mans server?
   
  Milton R Dogg
  Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big 
  DoggsList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: spam control

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



www.marshalsoftware.com 


  -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 12:27 
  p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: spam 
  control
  Hello,
      What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 55 
  SP3 server?  any input would be very helpful.
   
  thanks
   
  Nelson
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  This electronic message and any attachments 
  contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The 
  information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and 
  access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, 
  any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this 
  information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
  electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that 
  you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank 
  you.



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Deploying the Outlook Security Form

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: RE: Deploying the Outlook Security Form



Sorry I haven't been paying attention to this thread but if you are using 
NT4.0 policy and not W2K then if you set something in a policy, then you have to 
un-set it to make it enabled/disabled. e.g if you 'ticked' something, then leave 
it as a 'unticked' field not greyed out.
 
Does 
that make sense?
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 
  2002 3:48 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Deploying the Outlook Security Form
  
  Hmm.. oddly enough, I 
  removed the "Disable Registry Editing Tools" restrictions from the users' 
  profiles, and it still says there was a permissions error on the registry when 
  trying to import outlook.reg. The user in question has Power User rights on 
  his W2k machine. 
   
  Thanks,
   
  Evan
   
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: Evan 
  Brastow Sent: Monday, 
  February 11, 2002 12:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Deploying the Outlook 
  Security Form
   
  Well, 
  no, because  "Registry Editing Tools Have Been 
  Disabled", which I always thought was a good policy to have in place so that 
  users couldn't go installing their own apps as they please (something which we 
  have a policy (paper, one, I mean) in place here to prevent, but that doesn't 
  always stop people). I guess I have to disable that for everyone for now, have 
  them log off and on, make those changes, and then re-enable it, and have them 
  log off and on again.. 
   
  Thanks,
  Evan
   
   
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:28 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Deploying 
  the Outlook Security Form
   
  can you 
  open regedit and go to that key?
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 11:20 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Deploying 
  the Outlook Security Form
  Thanks 
  for the reply. I didn't think this would work, because if I go to a user's 
  computer while they are logged in, and try to manually run the .reg file, it 
  gives a permissions error. I'm not sure why a logon script would have better 
  luck?
   
  Thanks,
   
  Evan
   
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:09 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Deploying 
  the Outlook Security Form
   
  if you use .pol 
  files for your logon policies you can use that to put that setting in 
  effect. 
  If you use logon scripts, you can set 
  that reg key in your logon script hkey current user is editable by the 
  user logging into the box so a logon script would work. 
  -Original 
  Message- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 11, 
  2002 10:53 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin 
  Issues 
  Subject: Deploying the Outlook Security 
  Form 
  
   
  I am trying to 
  finally get the "Outlook Security Form" to work for our Outlook 2000 users (on W2K 
  Pro, logging into an NT4 domain). We are not using Group Policies at 
  this time. I have never found a way to modify the HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Security 
  key, since my users 
  can't modify the registry like this, and 
  I can't access the 
  HKEY_CURRENT_USER key remotely using 
  regedt32. 
  I did some more 
  digging at this as time has allowed and I've come across this section of the 
  readme.txt file that comes with admpack.exe. In it, it says that in order to 
  change the registry key on a user's machine, you do the 
  following: 
  
   
  2.4.1  
  Update the Outlook policy template file for Windows 2000 1  On the Start menu, 
  click Run, and then type "gpedit.msc" to    start the Group Policy 
  Editor. 
  2  Import the Outlk9.adm 
  template. 
  3  Expand the following series of 
  folders: 
     User 
  Configuration\Administrative Templates. 4  Right-click Administrative 
  Templates, and then click Add/Remove    Templates on the shortcut 
  menu. 
     In you see "Outlk9" in the 
  Current Policy Templates list,    select it, and then click 
  the Remove button to    remove the old 
  template. 
  5  Click the Add 
  button. 
  6  Use the Look in box to locate 
  where you saved the updated    Outlk9.adm template. Select 
  the file name, and then click the    Add button to add the new 
  template to the folder. 7  Click Close to return to the 
  Group Policy Editor. 8  Expand the following series of 
  folders: 
     User 
  Configuration\Administrative Templates\Microsoft Outlook    
  2000\Tools|Options\Security. 9  Double-click the Outlook virus 
  security settings policy name. 10 Click Enabled, and then select the 
  Apply individual settings    for Outlook virus security 
  check box. 
  11 Click the Apply button to apply the 
  new policy, and then cl

RE: wow

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message




Nah, 
once it's in place it works a treat - adding someone to have access to a new 
type of attachment takes very little time.
 
It's 
my fourth line of defence - after first AV check, Mail Marshal content 
filtering, & second AV check. So even if something makes it's way through 
all those the user will probably not have permission to access the file, not 
even to forward it on to anyone else either.
 
Simon

  --Original 
  Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, 12 January 
  2002 8:00 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  wow

  I think I 
  misread. Sounds messy though.
  

-Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 
10:29 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
wow
Actually Michael is correct, we have this solution already in 
place, no third party products.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Friday, January 11, 2002 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: wow
  No, he is 
  wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the 
  version of it or Outlook.
  You need a 
  3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software 
  to block attachments at the Exchange server.
  

-Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
wow

Anybody knows 
how?
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 
12:29 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow
 

actually, if 
youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange 
what attachments to open.

Therefore, you 
can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted 
to

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 
  11:19 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  wow
  
  How about 
  this one? 
  http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/
  "This patch is intended for users 
  with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 
  'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) 
  blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and 
  LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be 
  able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after 
  installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity 
  Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions 
  will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your 
  office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your 
  choice." 
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 
2002 10:26 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
wow

anyone see 
this?


Free Email 
Previewer/Screener For Outlook

 

 
I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support 
on the Outlook 2000 security patch which 
disallows receiving certain types of 
files Their response, of course, was 
that there was no way to fix it, but I 
COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a 
version that allows me to change those settings. 
No surprise, to override a Microsoft 
caused issue, I just have to give them 
more money.

 

 
HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility 
called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook 
gives you a nifty preview screen that 
allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft 
says you cannot get. I recommend it to 
anyone who has applied this patch, and 
wants to get to their enclosures. You can find 
it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/

 
Michael 
Ross
Network 
Analyst 2
Panduit 
Corp.
 

RE: Customize over size limit message

[Simon Curtiss]

When 
I was a an awkward teenager (you know the type) my Dad would always say 
'Nothing's Impossible if you set your mind to it' [1] so with that attitude you 
could say that reverse engineering MS Exchange is possible! 
[2]
 
 
[1] 
Actually I would respond "You can't strike a match on jelly" 
[3]
[2] 
Just not by me!
[3] 
and boy did he try - he even tried freezing it - to no 
avail!

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 2002 
  11:59 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Customize over size limit message
  Are 
  you holding out? ;-)
   
  
  -----Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 
  2002 3:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Customize over size limit message
  You're asking ME!
  
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 2002 
11:56 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Customize over size limit message
>>unless you want to 
reverse engineer & then hack the Exchange server 
code
 
How might I go about that?
 
     
    
-Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 
10, 2002 2:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: Customize over size limit message
Pay MS loadsamoney
 
Otherwise - No - unless you want to reverse engineer & then hack 
the Exchange server code
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Mike Cosca 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 
  2002 11:54 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Customize over size limit message
  
  Is anyone aware of a way to 
  customize the over the size limit warning message.
  EX 5.5 sp4
   
  Thanks,
   
  Mike 
  CoscaList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL 
INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual 
or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic 
message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call 
collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

  
  Notice of Confidential information 
  The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL 
  INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or 
  entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
  notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
  document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message 
  in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 
  07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
  This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Customize over size limit message

[Simon Curtiss]

You're asking ME!

  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 2002 
  11:56 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Customize over size limit message
  >>unless you want to reverse 
  engineer & then hack the Exchange server code
   
  How might I go about that?
   
   
  
  -Original Message-----From: Simon Curtiss 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 
  2002 2:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Customize over size limit message
  Pay MS loadsamoney
   
  Otherwise - No - unless you want to reverse engineer & then hack 
  the Exchange server code
   
  Simon
  
-Original Message-From: Mike Cosca 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 
2002 11:54 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Customize over size limit message

Is anyone aware of a way to 
customize the over the size limit warning message.
EX 5.5 sp4
 
Thanks,
 
Mike 
CoscaList Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  

  
  Notice of Confidential information 
  The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL 
  INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or 
  entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
  notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
  document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message 
  in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 
  07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
  This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Customize over size limit message

[Simon Curtiss]

Pay 
MS loadsamoney
 
Otherwise - No - unless you want to reverse engineer & then hack the 
Exchange server code
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Mike Cosca 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 2002 
  11:54 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Customize 
  over size limit message
  
  Is anyone aware of a way to 
  customize the over the size limit warning message.
  EX 5.5 sp4
   
  Thanks,
   
  Mike 
  CoscaList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: outlook-fax

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



Take 
the fax number out of the Fax number field and put it in comments or some other 
field - like Business 2
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Mal Sasalu 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 4 January 2002 6:50 
  a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  outlook-fax
  
   
   
  Hello 
  All,
   
      
  When sending a new mail message in outlook from contact list, is there 
  a way to avoid outlook 2000 listing the fax number of the contact person and 
  to show only email addresses? 
   
  Thanks
  MalList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Help! Locked out!

[Simon Curtiss]

Well at least when you find out who changed the password then you can arrest
them, lock them up and swallow the key - most of us ordinary IT admins would
like to be able to do that with certain users :-)

Simon

Oh and Happy New Year to youse all.

> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Couchman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 January 2002 7:54 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Help! Locked out!
> 
> 
> A bow to the exchange gods here is due. A change in the
> password on all of the exchange services got me back into
> exchange. Still some troubles. I'll bless you with those
> Friday. (My next scheduled computer network day). I'm a
> police officer full time and a network admin once in a
> while. Interesting combination. Oh, and I'm still supposed
> to be able to keep everything running tip top! LOL
> 
> Thanks again,
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:42:31 -0800 
>  "Lefkovics, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q274814
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q157780
> > 
> > William 
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:42 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: Help! Locked out!
> > 
> > 
> > Don't look at me ;)
> > 
> > - Original Message - 
> > From: "Lefkovics, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:32 
> > Subject: RE: Help! Locked out!
> > 
> > 
> > > Who changed the Exchange Service account password?  Or
> > who changed what
> > > account the exchange services use?
> > > 
> > > William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, ExchangeMVP
> > > ---
> > > Why just ride, when you can fly?
> > > http://www.airborne.net  
> > > ---
> > > Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bob Couchman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:29 AM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Help! Locked out!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > For some unknown reason.. (I can hear the sighs now)
> > > Exchange has just crapped out on me. I'll copy the
> > Event Log
> > > for your review:
> > > 
> > > Message #1
> > > Logon attempt with current password failed with the
> > > following error: 
> > > Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. 
> > > 
> > > Message #2
> > > The Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service failed
> > to
> > > start due to the following error: 
> > > The service did not start due to a logon failure.  
> > > 
> > > Message #3
> > > The Microsoft Exchange Directory service depends on the
> > > Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which
> > failed to
> > > start because of the following error: 
> > > The service did not start due to a logon failure.  
> > > 
> > > And so on and so on
> > > 
> > > I have not changed the password to the exchange
> > > administrator account. I can't get exchange started to
> > check
> > > the password or change it. I have looking the domain
> > user
> > > list and indeed the account was locked as it is
> > supposed to
> > > be after three bad password attempts. I've unlocked the
> > > account and restarted the machine. Still no luck. It
> > appears
> > > to me that somehow, the account that Exchange used to
> > log
> > > into the network with has been either altered or
> > corrupted
> > > somehow. 
> > > 
> > > How do I fix this problem? BTW, I'm running MS Exchange
> > 5.5
> > > on NT 4 network.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bob 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > 
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > 
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > 
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
>  NAME="Signature" ROWS="4" COLS="60">
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, ple

RE: as I run out the door here for possibly (hopefully) the last time in 2001...

[Simon Curtiss]

Cheers William and happy holidays to all the rest of you.

Thanks guys & gals for all the help & humour.

love from New Zealand


Simon


> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, 23 December 2001 9:08 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: as I run out the door here for possibly (hopefully) the
> last time in 2001...
> 
> 
> To all, whether burdened or elated with the product called 
> Exchange Server,
> best of the season to you and yours.  May you be surrounded 
> by love and
> understanding always, but especially over any holidays you 
> may celebrate.
> 
> Thanks to our hosts for allowing people like me to vent, ask, 
> and answer
> questions, and otherwise neglect real work.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> William
> 
> William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
> With Exchange2000, Microsoft has upped its standards.  Now up yours. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David N. Precht
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Sent: 12/22/01 8:12 AM
> Subject: RE: as I run out the door here for possibly 
> (hopefully) the last
> time in 2001...
> 
> Best wishes for the New Year all !
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ONG Liang Bu (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 05:11
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: as I run out the door here for possibly (hopefully) the
> last time in 2001...
> 
> 
> I will second that.  Have been with this list for 2 yrs and 
> save my skin
> many many times.
> 
> Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all.
> 
> Ong LB
> Singapore
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 5:07 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: as I run out the door here for possibly (hopefully) the last
> time in 2001...
> 
> 
> I feel the need to thank all of you on this list who's expertise and
> efforts helped make 2001 a bit easier on my brain.  I'm sure there's a
> few thousand out there who share the sentiment.  On behalf of 
> all of us
> "semi-pro's" -- thanks again and Happy Holidays.
> 
> randy.
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Employee Departures - Blackholes

[Simon Curtiss]

Possibly losing the company money? It's amazing how many people never retry
sending after getting an NDR, so if you don't deal with it the
contact/contract/confirmation etc may never occur.

> -Original Message-
> From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 21 December 2001 6:57 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Employee Departures - Blackholes
> 
> 
> Well, what does that make me considering I don't even receive the NDR
> notifications?  :)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:31 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Employee Departures - Blackholes
> 
> Yes.  We are lazy admins.
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:13 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Employee Departures - Blackholes
> 
> 
> So what's the point of black holes anyway?  Just to reduce the NDRs?
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> 
> The blackhole is to create a DL that has multiple SMTP addresses of
> ex-employees, but make sure there's no members in the DL. 
> Messages sent
> to the relevant SMTP addresses simply vanish. Shame you can't 
> put a few
> selected people into the DL as well. :-)
> 
> Neil
>  
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Is the offline defrag my only choice?

[Simon Curtiss]

Is that your Priv.edb or Pub.edb that has 369Mb of whitespace? From what
your saying 50Gb does seem unusually large.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 21 December 2001 9:39 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Is the offline defrag my only choice?
> 
> 
> Event ID 1221 says:
> 
> The database has 369 megabytes of free space after online 
> defragmentation
> has terminated. 
> 
> If I understand what you are saying, I would only be freeing 
> up 369MB of
> whitespace by doing an offline defrag?  My concern is that I have
> approximately 350 regular mailboxes, 50 dl's and 50 cr's, and I can't
> believe that I actually have 50GB of mail with 350 mailboxes. 
>  My 2 largest
> mailboxes are just barely over a 1GB, and only 20 or so 
> mailboxes are above
> 500MB.  If I am missing something here, please feel free to 
> correct me.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike Z
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:54 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Is the offline defrag my only choice?
> 
> 
> The online defrag defrags data within the file.  It doesn't 
> change the file
> size.
> 
> What does event ID 1221 show in the application event log?
> 
> If the whitespace is significant, then perhaps an offline 
> defrag would be
> appropriate for you.
> 
> William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:25 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Is the offline defrag my only choice?
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am running Exchange Enterprise 5.5 SP3 on NT4 Enterprise 
> Server. Before I
> started at this company, the previous Exchange admin wasn't 
> deleting ANY
> mailboxes of old employees, which totaled approximately 11 GB 
> that could be
> deleted.  My pub.edb is just about up to 50GB, which takes 
> almost 9 hours to
> backup, and I noticed after deleting roughly 4GB of old 
> mailboxes, the edb
> file was still the same size.  I really need to shrink this 
> edb file, as the
> backups, and for that matter, the restore takes way too long. 
>  I am not 100%
> certain of the best, or safest, method to complete this 
> process as I keep
> hearing conflicting stories.
> 
> 1.  Online defrag will free up the disk space, which is 
> running nightly, but
> it's not clearing up space for me.  These people also usually 
> say that never
> run the offline defrag.
> 2.  Offline defrag is the only method, and they use it on a 
> regular basis,
> meaning once per month/every other month.
> 
> Just looking for some more comments and/or concerns of doing 
> the offline
> defrag, since the nightly online defrag isn't doing anything 
> to free up
> space.
> 
> TIA,
> 
> ~Mike Z
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory

[Simon Curtiss]

You've never installed Exchange? You have to run the Microsoft Exchange
OptimiSer after the install, or changes to the hardware, or service pack
installs, or.

Of course I've never used Exchange 2000 - maybe it's not part of that
version?

cheers

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 17 December 2001 3:10 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> 
> 
> Never used it
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 20:38
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> 
> 
> Well the spelling is correct in English English, we don't use as many
> Z's as American English.
> 
> What is your query about Perf Opt?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, 17 December 2001 2:28 p.m.
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > 
> > 
> > both
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 19:18
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > 
> > 
> > Are you querying the tool or my English spelling of it?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Saturday, 15 December 2001 2:30 p.m.
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Performance Optimiser ?
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 19:22
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On my EX 5.5Sp3 NT4.0 Sp6a server Event.exe is using 0% CPU and 
> > > 1000K of RAM, Store is using abiout 5% and 49700K of RAM 
> - out of a 
> > > total of 57600K of RAM.
> > > 
> > > Have you run Performance Optimiser recently? Added any 
> new hardware?
> > > 
> > > Simon
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 5:30 a.m.
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Well, today events.exe is back to the normal CPU level i.e. less
> > > > than 10%. However, the memory usage is still in the high 280MB.
> > > Anyone has some
> > > > ideas as to why this is happening?
> > > > Events.exe is using more memory that Store.exe! Can you 
> guys look 
> > > > at your process utililization and let me know where yours range?
> > > > Thx,
> > > > Rodney Li
> > > > > Exchange 5.5 Event Service doesn't put much useful info
> > > > into the event
> > > > > log. Try to increase the logging level for the Event Service:
> > > > > 
> > > > > XADM: How to Set Diagnostic Logging Levels for the Event
> > > Service:=20
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dkb;EN-US;q190705
> > > > > 
> > > > > Also, to provide detailed error logging, consider if you
> > > > might want to
> > > > > add some logging code to the event script itself (if not
> > > > done already).
> > > > > See http://www.cdolive.com/agent6.htm for some tip & tricks.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:10 PM
> > > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU,
> > memory =20 The
> > > > > > Event Viewer was the first place I checked. Nothing
> > > out of the
> > > > > > ordinary.
> > > > > > I do have some MSExchangeES events but it doesn't provide
> > > > any detail
> > > &g

RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory

[Simon Curtiss]

Well the spelling is correct in English English, we don't use as many Z's as
American English.

What is your query about Perf Opt?

> -Original Message-
> From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 17 December 2001 2:28 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> 
> 
> both
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 19:18
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> 
> 
> Are you querying the tool or my English spelling of it?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, 15 December 2001 2:30 p.m.
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > 
> > 
> > Performance Optimiser ?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 19:22
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > 
> > 
> > On my EX 5.5Sp3 NT4.0 Sp6a server Event.exe is using 0% CPU
> > and 1000K of
> > RAM, Store is using abiout 5% and 49700K of RAM - out of a total of
> > 57600K of RAM.
> > 
> > Have you run Performance Optimiser recently? Added any new hardware?
> > 
> > Simon
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 5:30 a.m.
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well, today events.exe is back to the normal CPU level i.e. less 
> > > than 10%. However, the memory usage is still in the high 280MB.
> > Anyone has some
> > > ideas as to why this is happening?
> > > Events.exe is using more memory that Store.exe! Can you guys
> > > look at your
> > > process utililization and let me know where yours range?
> > > Thx,
> > > Rodney Li
> > > > Exchange 5.5 Event Service doesn't put much useful info
> > > into the event
> > > > log. Try to increase the logging level for the Event Service:
> > > > 
> > > > XADM: How to Set Diagnostic Logging Levels for the Event
> > Service:=20
> > 
> > > > 
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dkb;EN-US;q190705
> > > > 
> > > > Also, to provide detailed error logging, consider if you
> > > might want to
> > > > add some logging code to the event script itself (if not
> > > done already).
> > > > See http://www.cdolive.com/agent6.htm for some tip & tricks.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:10 PM
> > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > Subject: Re: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, 
> memory =20 The 
> > > > > Event Viewer was the first place I checked. Nothing
> > out of the
> > > > > ordinary.
> > > > > I do have some MSExchangeES events but it doesn't provide
> > > any detail
> > > > as to
> > > > > what mailbox it is.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Any other ideas?
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Rodney Li
> > > > >=20
> > > > > > Does the event log have any strange events ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Rodney Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My exchange server has been a bit slow for the past two
> > > > > > > mornings. When I checked the CPU/Memory usage, it 
> seems that
> > > > > > > events.exe is among the top
> > > > > > > three. It was about 50% when users complained about
> > > > > > > slow performance. I
> > > > > > > know that process is related to the Microsoft
> > > > > > > Exchange Event Service.
> > > > > > > I am thinking that it's normal to have this process
> > > > > > > using a decent amount
> > > > > > > of CPU but not that 

RE: Exchange Topology tool

[Simon Curtiss]

Unfortunately the link from that page to exmap.exe gives you a 404 :-(

> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 15 December 2001 6:19 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool
> 
> 
> Quick search at www.microsoft.com for "Exmap" reveals (may be 
> wrapped):
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/Tec
> hNet/prodtechn
> ol/exchange/downloads/topology.asp
> 
> Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Engineer
> Advertising.com
> 
> We bring innovation to interactive communication.
> Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: EALES, Jack / RSAIFS - IOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:09 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool
> 
> 
> which is available where??
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 December 2001 15:01
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange Topology tool
> 
> 
> THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED ON THE INTERNET - Please read the detailed
> disclaimer below.
> --
> 
> Exmap will do the trick for 5.5
> 
> 
> -Jim
> 
> Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Engineer
> Advertising.com
> 
> We bring innovation to interactive communication.
> Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Douglas Hull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 9:51 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange Topology tool
> 
> 
> Does anybody know of a tool that will generate a visio diagram of your
> exchange topology? I found one on the MS website but it only 
> works with
> active directory. I am using Exchange 5.5 on a mixture on W2K 
> and NT boxes
> in our organization without AD.
> 
> Many thanks.
> Doug
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> ***
> The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
> the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
> retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
> any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
> If you received this email in error, please contact the
> sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> The following message has been automatically added by the 
> mail gateway to
> comply with a Royal & Sun Alliance IT Security requirement:
> 
> As this email arrived via the Internet you should be cautious 
> about its
> origin and content. Replies which contain sensitive information or
> legal/contractual obligations are particularly vulnerable. In 
> these cases
> you should not reply unless you are authorised to do so, and adequate
> encryption is employed.
> 
> If you have any questions, please speak to your local desktop 
> support team
> or IT security contact.
> --
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> ***
> The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
> the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, 
> retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
> any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
> If you received this email in error, please contact the
> sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

##

RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory

[Simon Curtiss]

But then again there's no reason not to run it either is there?

> -Original Message-
> From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 17 December 2001 12:53 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> 
> 
> No software change has been done recently. Last time I ran Performance
> optimizer was a while ago..maybe a year ago. I don't see why 
> I should run
> it since there hasn't been any change.
> 
> Rodney Li
> 
> > Performance Optimiser ?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 19:22
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > 
> > 
> > On my EX 5.5Sp3 NT4.0 Sp6a server Event.exe is using 0% CPU 
> and 1000K of
> > RAM, Store is using abiout 5% and 49700K of RAM - out of a total of
> > 57600K of RAM.
> > 
> > Have you run Performance Optimiser recently? Added any new hardware?
> > 
> > Simon
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 5:30 a.m.
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Well, today events.exe is back to the normal CPU level i.e.
> > > less than 10%.
> > > However, the memory usage is still in the high 280MB. 
> Anyone has some
> > > ideas as to why this is happening?
> > > Events.exe is using more memory that Store.exe! Can you guys 
> > > look at your
> > > process utililization and let me know where yours range?
> > > Thx,
> > > Rodney Li
> > > > Exchange 5.5 Event Service doesn't put much useful info
> > > into the event
> > > > log. Try to increase the logging level for the Event Service:
> > > > 
> > > > XADM: How to Set Diagnostic Logging Levels for the 
> Event Service:=20
> > 
> > > > 
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dkb;EN-US;q190705
> > > > 
> > > > Also, to provide detailed error logging, consider if you
> > > might want to
> > > > add some logging code to the event script itself (if not
> > > done already).
> > > > See http://www.cdolive.com/agent6.htm for some tip & tricks.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:10 PM
> > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > > Subject: Re: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory =20
> > > > > The Event Viewer was the first place I checked. 
> Nothing out of the
> > > > > ordinary.
> > > > > I do have some MSExchangeES events but it doesn't provide 
> > > any detail
> > > > as to
> > > > > what mailbox it is.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Any other ideas?
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Rodney Li
> > > > >=20
> > > > > > Does the event log have any strange events ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Rodney Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My exchange server has been a bit slow for the past two 
> > > > > > > mornings. When I checked the CPU/Memory usage, it 
> seems that
> > > > > > > events.exe is among the top
> > > > > > > three. It was about 50% when users complained about
> > > > > > > slow performance. I
> > > > > > > know that process is related to the Microsoft
> > > > > > > Exchange Event Service.
> > > > > > > I am thinking that it's normal to have this process
> > > > > > > using a decent amount
> > > > > > > of CPU but not that much. My thinking is that since
> > > > > > > I have a number of
> > > > > > > scripts running on our resources, the latter would
> > > > > > > consume some CPU/memory
> > > > > > > but 50% was not that reasonable. I have about 200
> > > > > > > resources on one server.
> > > > > > > Right now, events.exe is 

RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory

[Simon Curtiss]

Are you querying the tool or my English spelling of it?

> -Original Message-
> From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 15 December 2001 2:30 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> 
> 
> Performance Optimiser ?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 19:22
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> 
> 
> On my EX 5.5Sp3 NT4.0 Sp6a server Event.exe is using 0% CPU 
> and 1000K of
> RAM, Store is using abiout 5% and 49700K of RAM - out of a total of
> 57600K of RAM.
> 
> Have you run Performance Optimiser recently? Added any new hardware?
> 
> Simon
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 5:30 a.m.
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > 
> > 
> > Well, today events.exe is back to the normal CPU level i.e.
> > less than 10%.
> > However, the memory usage is still in the high 280MB. 
> Anyone has some
> > ideas as to why this is happening?
> > Events.exe is using more memory that Store.exe! Can you guys 
> > look at your
> > process utililization and let me know where yours range?
> > Thx,
> > Rodney Li
> > > Exchange 5.5 Event Service doesn't put much useful info
> > into the event
> > > log. Try to increase the logging level for the Event Service:
> > > 
> > > XADM: How to Set Diagnostic Logging Levels for the Event 
> Service:=20
> 
> > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dkb;EN-US;q190705
> > > 
> > > Also, to provide detailed error logging, consider if you
> > might want to
> > > add some logging code to the event script itself (if not
> > done already).
> > > See http://www.cdolive.com/agent6.htm for some tip & tricks.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:10 PM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Re: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory =20
> > > > The Event Viewer was the first place I checked. Nothing 
> out of the
> > > > ordinary.
> > > > I do have some MSExchangeES events but it doesn't provide 
> > any detail
> > > as to
> > > > what mailbox it is.
> > > >=20
> > > > Any other ideas?
> > > >=20
> > > > Rodney Li
> > > >=20
> > > > > Does the event log have any strange events ?
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Rodney Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My exchange server has been a bit slow for the past two 
> > > > > > mornings. When I checked the CPU/Memory usage, it seems that
> > > > > > events.exe is among the top
> > > > > > three. It was about 50% when users complained about
> > > > > > slow performance. I
> > > > > > know that process is related to the Microsoft
> > > > > > Exchange Event Service.
> > > > > > I am thinking that it's normal to have this process
> > > > > > using a decent amount
> > > > > > of CPU but not that much. My thinking is that since
> > > > > > I have a number of
> > > > > > scripts running on our resources, the latter would
> > > > > > consume some CPU/memory
> > > > > > but 50% was not that reasonable. I have about 200
> > > > > > resources on one server.
> > > > > > Right now, events.exe is using about 250MB of
> > > > > > memory!! even more than the
> > > > > > information store service.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have anyone experienced similar problems? How can I 
> > > > > > troubleshoot this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Rodney Li
> > > > > >
> > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >

RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail

[Simon Curtiss]

So do I use ISA for this  - could of used my firewall instead to to block
the Mesenger/ICQ side I suppose. There was a list of ip addresses & ports
posted to the list a while back, I'll have a look for it on Monday when I'm
back in the office unless someone has posted it before me.


Night all - it's 2:15 am here in NZ and I only logged in to see if there was
an e-mail from a friend, so why I'm doing THIS I have no idea! dedication?
or stupidity?

Simon

-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 7:30 p.m.
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail


Off topic.. But I use ISA ..

B

-Original Message-
From: Greg Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 December 2001 08:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Antigen vs. ScanMail


How would I go about blocking things like this? Use an entry in the local
DNS pointing to a custom web page maybe?

Regards,... Greg

- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Curtiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail


> heh heh heh - Did that about two months ago -  a few complaints for a
while,
> now it's accepted. MSN Mesenger & ICQ etc also blocked
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 2:26 p.m.
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> >
> >
> > Two jobs ago, the Security dept blocked AOL.com, hotmail.com,
> > yahoo.com,
> > etc. So that was that...
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 18:24
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> >
> >
> > Sounds like you may have a communications problem.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:41 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> >
> >
> > Me preaching to users: "as a preventative measure against computer
> > viruses, please don't access your web-based personal mail
> > accounts like
> > Yahoo or Hotmail from the corporate desktop." What (several of) the
> > users hear: "please don't open any mail if it's from someone with a
> > hotmail or yahoo account as all these messages will have a computer
> > virus"
> >
> > 
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Brent Hudson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: December 13, 2001 3:11 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> > >
> > > Just my 2c (for what its worth)... educating users and
> > hammering your
> > > point home re the trials and tribulations of viruses does
> > also help...
> >
> > > the only drawback is the 1000 messages you get "er.. is this
> > > attachment ok to open"
> > >
> > > later
> > > Brent
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 13 December 2001 09:01
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> > >
> > >
> > > We 'just' changed over to the Trend suite from *cough* CA's
> > wannabe
> > > version of antivirus. Other then the fact that I got the message
> > > attachment blocking up and running less then an hour before
> > the goner
> > > virus starting hammering our server, it was not too painful to
> > configure.
> > > Some of the trial's and tribulations of the install:
> > > The tvcs console wants a default password...not the one you
> > installed
> > > it with.and of course it is not in their documentation,
> > but IS on
> > > their knowledge base..yippee...esp when you discover that after
> > > totally un-installing and re-installing because you think
> > you've made
> > > a mistake. The console itself...well...personally I don't like the
> > > lack of functionality that it provides (when you compare it to the
> > > individual product consoles), but...it does kind of work.
> > > So far, so good! Its pushing the install to the NT machines
> > without
> > > too many problems, and will eve

RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail

[Simon Curtiss]

heh heh heh - Did that about two months ago -  a few complaints for a while,
now it's accepted. MSN Mesenger & ICQ etc also blocked

> -Original Message-
> From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 2:26 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> 
> 
> Two jobs ago, the Security dept blocked AOL.com, hotmail.com, 
> yahoo.com,
> etc. So that was that...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 18:24
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> 
> 
> Sounds like you may have a communications problem. 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:41 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> 
> 
> Me preaching to users: "as a preventative measure against computer
> viruses, please don't access your web-based personal mail 
> accounts like
> Yahoo or Hotmail from the corporate desktop." What (several of) the
> users hear: "please don't open any mail if it's from someone with a
> hotmail or yahoo account as all these messages will have a computer
> virus"
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From:   Brent Hudson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:   December 13, 2001 3:11 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject:RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> > 
> > Just my 2c (for what its worth)... educating users and 
> hammering your 
> > point home re the trials and tribulations of viruses does 
> also help...
> 
> > the only drawback is the 1000 messages you get "er.. is this 
> > attachment ok to open"
> >  
> > later
> > Brent
> >  
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 13 December 2001 09:01
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> > 
> > 
> > We 'just' changed over to the Trend suite from *cough* CA's
> wannabe 
> > version of antivirus. Other then the fact that I got the message 
> > attachment blocking up and running less then an hour before 
> the goner 
> > virus starting hammering our server, it was not too painful to
> configure.
> > Some of the trial's and tribulations of the install:
> > The tvcs console wants a default password...not the one you
> installed 
> > it with.and of course it is not in their documentation, 
> but IS on 
> > their knowledge base..yippee...esp when you discover that after 
> > totally un-installing and re-installing because you think 
> you've made 
> > a mistake. The console itself...well...personally I don't like the 
> > lack of functionality that it provides (when you compare it to the 
> > individual product consoles), but...it does kind of work.
> > So far, so good! Its pushing the install to the NT machines
> without 
> > too many problems, and will even uninstall CA's product 
> first before 
> > it installs (very slick!) and the definitions are deployed pretty 
> > quickly to the machines when they come online in the am.
> > The server protect piece works pretty smoothly as well and yes,
> you 
> > can push out the install to remote servers fairly easily.
> > It took us a while, but we finally managed to get corp to make a
> wise 
> > decision! *grin*
> >  
> > Two thumbs up to Trend!!
> >  
> > Smile Lots!
> > Cameron
> >  
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Crouthamel, Jonathan
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:31 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> > 
> > 
> > Do you utilize centralized management with Trend? ie
> updating 
> > desktops via a console. I guess my question is, does Trend have a 
> > similar product to NAI's EPO?
> >  
> > Thanks for the info...After all these threads its been
> narrowed down 
> > to two products.
> >  
> > Jonathan
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Moody, Jacqueline
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:24 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Antigen vs. ScanMail
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > We also started with NAI and had a lot of
> problems
> > with it.  The desktops defaulted to checking mapped network drives, 
> > which slowed some logons down to a crawl.  We now have 
> Trend deployed 
> > throughout the enterprise (165 site WAN, 400 servers, 20,000+ 
> > workstations, Exchange) and are very, make that extremely 
> happy with 
> > it.  For Exchange, I wouldn't look at anything other than Trend or
> Antigen.
> > 
> >

RE: How could .pif file get through....

[Simon Curtiss]

I don't believe you can be TOO cautious - not until you know there are no
bugs in Outlook!

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 2:22 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: How could .pif file get through
> 
> 
> The default list GroupShield uses is pretty comprehensive, IMHO.
> Possibly even TOO cautious...
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: TIM CARFREY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: 12 December 2001 19:08
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: How could .pif file get through
> > 
> > 
> > We also use GroupShield. IS there a list of attachments and 
> file names
> > that should be block? I am looking for a good list.
> > 
> > > Yes.  Fortunately Groupshield caught them. But Mcaffee 
> > claimed that if =
> > > I
> > > installed MR-1a the problem would go away. Until them I am 
> > blocking =
> > > .pif,
> > > .scr and .exe among others.  Had over 7000 hits with the 
> W32/Goner =
> > > virus and
> > > not one got thru.
> > > 
> > > Larry Kent
> > > Network Administrator
> > > SBCCOM-Natick
> > > Natick, MA 01760
> > > DSN 256-4981  Comm: (508) 233-4981
> > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:10 AM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: How could .pif file get through
> > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > > As are NAI products generally.
> > > >=20
> > > > Anybody else see their WebShield product completely 
> > ignore BadTrans
> > > > recently?
> > > >=20
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory

[Simon Curtiss]

On my EX 5.5Sp3 NT4.0 Sp6a server Event.exe is using 0% CPU and 1000K of
RAM, Store is using abiout 5% and 49700K of RAM - out of a total of 57600K
of RAM.

Have you run Performance Optimiser recently? Added any new hardware?

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 14 December 2001 5:30 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> 
> 
> Well, today events.exe is back to the normal CPU level i.e. 
> less than 10%.
> However, the memory usage is still in the high 280MB. Anyone has some
> ideas as to why this is happening?
> Events.exe is using more memory that Store.exe! Can you guys 
> look at your
> process utililization and let me know where yours range?
> Thx,
> Rodney Li
> > Exchange 5.5 Event Service doesn't put much useful info 
> into the event
> > log. Try to increase the logging level for the Event Service:
> > 
> > XADM: How to Set Diagnostic Logging Levels for the Event Service:=20
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dkb;EN-US;q190705
> > 
> > Also, to provide detailed error logging, consider if you 
> might want to
> > add some logging code to the event script itself (if not 
> done already).
> > See http://www.cdolive.com/agent6.htm for some tip & tricks.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rodney Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:10 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Re: Events.exe consuming a lot of CPU, memory
> > >=20
> > > The Event Viewer was the first place I checked. Nothing out of the
> > > ordinary.
> > > I do have some MSExchangeES events but it doesn't provide 
> any detail
> > as to
> > > what mailbox it is.
> > >=20
> > > Any other ideas?
> > >=20
> > > Rodney Li
> > >=20
> > > > Does the event log have any strange events ?
> > > >
> > > > --- Rodney Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > My exchange server has been a bit slow for the past
> > > > > two mornings. When I
> > > > > checked the CPU/Memory usage, it seems that
> > > > > events.exe is among the top
> > > > > three. It was about 50% when users complained about
> > > > > slow performance. I
> > > > > know that process is related to the Microsoft
> > > > > Exchange Event Service.
> > > > > I am thinking that it's normal to have this process
> > > > > using a decent amount
> > > > > of CPU but not that much. My thinking is that since
> > > > > I have a number of
> > > > > scripts running on our resources, the latter would
> > > > > consume some CPU/memory
> > > > > but 50% was not that reasonable. I have about 200
> > > > > resources on one server.
> > > > > Right now, events.exe is using about 250MB of
> > > > > memory!! even more than the
> > > > > information store service.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have anyone experienced similar problems? How can I
> > > > > troubleshoot this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Rodney Li
> > > > >
> > > > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > > >
> > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
> > > > your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
> > > > or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
> > >=20
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Characters being moved in messages

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



I 
don't have exactly this issue but something similar
 
If 
a user with a WinTerm that has Windows CE 3.5 Sp1 as the OS and has the 
colours set to 64K rather than 256, then in the preview panel area parts of the 
e-mail will be invisible! If you highlight the area then you can see the text , 
as soon as you un-highlight it it disappears again. It is totally random as to 
which e-mails and which area of the screen it will do it in. I ave reported it, 
but not head aything back. The easy solution is to not use 64K colours (and 
frankly in a WinTerm environment you don't need/want it 
anyway.
 
We 
use both Wyse & Compaq WinTerms and it's the same on both (The new Wyse 3200 
terminals suck btw, the Compaq T20's are cool). I believe SP2 for Windows CE 3.5 
is out but I haven't had a chance to test it yet to see if it's fixed 
this.
 
cheers
 
Simon
 
p.s. 
anyone else having problems getting to www.compaq.com? IIt's been unavailable to me 
for two days & I tried www.compaq.net as 
an alternative and it went to MSN?!

  -Original Message-From: Simon Sculthorp 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 11 December 2001 
  8:11 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Characters 
  being moved in messages
  Hi,
   
  Exchange 5.5 
  server running SP4. Clients are OL98, OL2000, OL2002 and Outlook 
  Express.
  Has anybody else 
  seen messages that have characters moved around. Generally this tends to be 
  the first letter of a word tacked on to the back of the last 
  word.
   
  It only happens 
  intermittently to about four users, out of a client base of about 500. One of 
  these users also intermittently gets a whole line that changes colour to lime 
  green after he sends it out!
   
  It only happens on 
  mail send externally and in HTML and seems to follow these users. We use 
  MailSweeper to scan for viruses and we have a third party, MesageLabs, that 
  scans our mail for viruses, Spam and Pornography. We've changed their 
  profiles several times.
   
  I've got a call 
  open with Microsoft, but we don't seem to be getting very far. I wondered if 
  anybody out there had come across something similar before these users drive 
  me nuts.
   
  Any help 
  gratefully accepted.
   
   Attachments 
  in this message have been sweptby NAIs TVD (version 4.0.4175) for the 
  presenceof known computer 
  viruses. 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm_This 
  message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internetdelivered 
  through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For furtherinformation 
  visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively callStar Internet 
  for details on the Virus Scanning Service.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm

[Simon Curtiss]

Why only check once a day? I run the update check every 8 hours, I'm
thinking of making it more frequent than that.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2001 10:12 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> Thats very true. We changed from 6am to 4am, If that will help.
> Mike Johnson  
> GRFLLP
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Briggs, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:06 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> Depends on when you have Antigen set up to check for an 
> automatic update and
> which anti-virus engines you are running.
> We were lucky and got an automatic update which covered us 
> about 15 minutes
> before we started getting hit.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> Neither did Antigen until we blocked all.scr's. 
> Mike Johnson
> GRFLLP
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:03 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: *** Warning *** New Virus - W32.goner.a@mm
> 
> 
> We just got this one.  Norton's on Exchange and the desktops 
> did NOT catch
> it and our virus definitions are current, so be careful.  We 
> are downloading
> Antigen as I type.
> 
> Karen Palmer
> SCJD
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> This electronic message (email) is intended only for the 
> use of the individual or entity named above, and may 
> contain information that is privileged, confidential 
> and protected from disclosure under applicable law. 
> If the reader of this message is not the intended 
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
> communication, or the taking of any action relative 
> to its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us 
> immediately by telephone at (310) 553-1707 or by email. 
> Please destroy all hard copies of this communication 
> and delete it from all electronic files. Thank you. 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> This electronic message (email) is intended only for the 
> use of the individual or entity named above, and may 
> contain information that is privileged, confidential 
> and protected from disclosure under applicable law. 
> If the reader of this message is not the intended 
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
> communication, or the taking of any action relative 
> to its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us 
> immediately by telephone at (310) 553-1707 or by email. 
> Please destroy all hard copies of this communication 
> and delete it from all electronic files. Thank you. 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: New virus threat?

[Simon Curtiss]

I block all .pif files as a matter of course and have never had to let one
through as legitimate yet.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2001 7:12 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: New virus threat?
> 
> 
> Anyone know anything about a virus with the subject line of 
> "If you have
> upgraded your Internet" and an attachment named "acquire.pif". Thanks
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Delay messages

[Simon Curtiss]

Mail Marshal will do this - www.mailmarshal.com

cheers

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2001 7:29 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Delay messages
> 
> 
> Exchange does not have this capability.  You'd need to purchase a
> third-party SMTP mailer with this feature and use it as a smart host.
> 
> Missy
> - Original Message -
> From: "LE PERDRIEL Jean-François" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 10:38 AM
> Subject: Delay messages
> 
> 
> How could i delay sending messages which are (for example) over 1 Mb.
> I would like to send them after 8 P.M.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exch 2k and Indexing Service..

[Simon Curtiss]

I would have thought that you definitely don't want it running. It's of no
use as your Exchange server isn't being used for anything other than
Exchange and so it's just using CPU cycles that could be put to better use
- ya know for like the SETI client ;->

cheers

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 December 2001 4:07 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exch 2k and Indexing Service..
> 
> 
> Does Exchange 2k (specifically a front-end server running 
> OWA) need the
> Indexing service to function?  We're trying to lock this one down as
> much as possible and were wondering if killing that service would have
> any serious ramifications.
> 
> Preston Craig Jeffares
> Network Engineer
> Georgia Department of Motor Vehicle Safety
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: exchange Mailbox manager

[Simon Curtiss]

You are running it in Clean Mailboxes mode and not in Audit mode? - On the
general tab.

cheers

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 30 November 2001 7:08 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: exchange Mailbox manager
> 
> 
> Good afternoon,
> 
> Exchange 5.5 Outlook 98.
> 
> We are trying to implement Mailbox Manager on our test 
> server. We have it
> turned on and have our settings in place. We press Clean Now 
> and nothing
> happens.  We also have it scheduled to run at 3:00 a.m. every 
> morning.  We
> do have aged eMAIL in our mailboxes.
> 
> Nothing happens.  Nothing disappears like we were hoping.  
> Nothing moved
> from the folders to the deleted items folders. No reports sent to the
> administrator none the users.
> 
> What could we be doing wrong?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this problem.
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Mike Mitchell
> Systems eMAIL Administrator
> Alverno Information Services
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OO test

[Simon Curtiss]

Yuh Huh!

> -Original Message-
> From: Bob t. Berge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 30 November 2001 12:35 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: OO test
> 
> 
> Did I just receive a double OO message from Behzad Zamanian?
> 
> 
> Bob ten Berge
> deVisie automatiseringsdiensten
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Tina II

[Simon Curtiss]

*Groan*

Everyone else getting double replies from M. Zamanian - an OOO & a rule
too!?

> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2001 3:01 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Blocking spammers domain
> 
> 
> Well I know that Australians can be pretty annoying, but you 
> want to block
> e-mail from the whole country!
> 
> cheers
> 
> Simon (the Kiwi)
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2001 4:58 a.m.
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Blocking spammers domain
> > 
> > 
> > I have NT 4.0 Exchange 5.5. I want to block all emails 
> > originating from .RU
> > or .AU domains. I have added a Custom Recipient with *.ru and 
> > under IMS
> > select reject emails from *.ru
> > 
> > I am not sure if it is going to work or if there is any other 
> > way of doing
> > it.
> > 
> > Any suggestions.
> > 
> > Anwar
> > 
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > 
> 
> ##
> ###
> Notice of Confidential information 
> The information contained in this electronic mail is 
> CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
> be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or 
> entity named above. If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> the use, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received
> this electronic message in error, please immediately notify 
> us by return or telephone
> call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original 
> message. Thank you. 
> 
> This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by 
> MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 
> 
> ##
> ###
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Blocking spammers domain

[Simon Curtiss]

Well I know that Australians can be pretty annoying, but you want to block
e-mail from the whole country!

cheers

Simon (the Kiwi)

> -Original Message-
> From: Anwar Qureshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2001 4:58 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Blocking spammers domain
> 
> 
> I have NT 4.0 Exchange 5.5. I want to block all emails 
> originating from .RU
> or .AU domains. I have added a Custom Recipient with *.ru and 
> under IMS
> select reject emails from *.ru
> 
> I am not sure if it is going to work or if there is any other 
> way of doing
> it.
> 
> Any suggestions.
> 
> Anwar
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Anti-virus software for Exchange

[Simon Curtiss]

erm.. talking to myself, but...

Case in point, I have a virus coming in today that is going straight through
Network Associates VirusScan NT -  DAT 4172 like butter, but Mail Marshal
has stopped the lot. 4173 has yet to appear

Beware of e-mails with an underscore before the name! eg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

cheers

Simon


> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2001 10:43 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Anti-virus software for Exchange
> 
> 
> Only Antigen is an AV package, the other two are Content 
> Filters (and much
> much more) - Frankly I would go with Mail Marshal and Antigen 
> (I don't use
> Antigen myself - we use the unmentionable product 
> *cough*Inoculate*/cough*
> but Antigen users are very rabid in their endorsement of the 
> product- so
> maybe it's OK ;->) - I don't believe that *any* AV product 
> alone is enough
> to keep you safe these days and I'm a rabid endorser of Mail 
> Marshal - my
> Exchange level AV product has only seen 1 virus in the last 
> two years, 'cos
> they just don't get that far.
> 
> www.mailmarshal.com  Try it you'll like it.
> 
> As for cost - well how much is your business worth, and on 
> the sharp end of
> the stick how much is your job worth?
> 
> cheers
> 
> Simon
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2001 2:42 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Anti-virus software for Exchange
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Has anybody got any opinions/recommendations on anti-virus 
> software for
> Exchange 5.5 ?  I've come across MailMarshal, Antigen, and GFI
> MailEssentials, but they all seem quite expensive.
> 
> Thanks for any input. 
> 
> Tony.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> ##
> ###
> Notice of Confidential information 
> The information contained in this electronic mail is 
> CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
> be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or 
> entity named above. If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> the use, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received
> this electronic message in error, please immediately notify 
> us by return or telephone
> call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original 
> message. Thank you. 
> 
> This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by 
> MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 
> 
> ##
> ###
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Anti-virus software for Exchange

[Simon Curtiss]

Only Antigen is an AV package, the other two are Content Filters (and much
much more) - Frankly I would go with Mail Marshal and Antigen (I don't use
Antigen myself - we use the unmentionable product *cough*Inoculate*/cough*
but Antigen users are very rabid in their endorsement of the product- so
maybe it's OK ;->) - I don't believe that *any* AV product alone is enough
to keep you safe these days and I'm a rabid endorser of Mail Marshal - my
Exchange level AV product has only seen 1 virus in the last two years, 'cos
they just don't get that far.

www.mailmarshal.com  Try it you'll like it.

As for cost - well how much is your business worth, and on the sharp end of
the stick how much is your job worth?

cheers

Simon

-Original Message-
From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2001 2:42 a.m.
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anti-virus software for Exchange


Hi,

Has anybody got any opinions/recommendations on anti-virus software for
Exchange 5.5 ?  I've come across MailMarshal, Antigen, and GFI
MailEssentials, but they all seem quite expensive.

Thanks for any input. 

Tony.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database

[Simon Curtiss]

My has the year gone by that fast!?  Looks like it will be just William and
me on the list tomorrow like last year.

Hope you all get stuffed - in the nicest possible way of course.

cheers from NZ

Simon

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2001 10:35 a.m.
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database


Well, Don, I hope something goes down for you.  It seems you're due.

Happy American Thanksgiving everyone.  

William

-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database


That would explain why I haven't taken vacation in god knows how many
years...  My networks don't haven't gone down and I haven't left them to
give them the chance...  ;o)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Deleting a Single Message of Exchange Database


It is a fact. If you want your network to go down or some other critical
mishap, all you have to do is take the day off.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1

[Simon Curtiss]

So your smtp-relay resource has the new Exchange Server IP address in it?

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Whitby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2001 1:56 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Moving Exchange server and Checkpoint FW1
> 
> 
> Our company recently relocated, and we moved our exchange 
> server from one
> subnet to another.  We of course gave the Exchange 5.5 server a new IP
> address and made sure WINS has been updated on our NT4 
> network.  Internal
> e-mail works correctly.
> 
> We have a Checkpoint FW-1 protecting us fromt he bad guys.  When the
> firewall is disabled mail to/from the 'net works fine.  When 
> enabled, no
> joy; can't send in or out.
> 
> I checked the rules on the firewall (after making the 
> appropriate address
> changes within its databases) and they look like they should 
> work, but they
> don't.
> 
> Any hints of other places to look?
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Spaming

[Simon Curtiss]

Start here

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/exchange/relay.asp


Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Maurice.O'Neill [mailto:maurice.o'[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2001 10:32 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Spaming
> 
> 
> Hello everybody,  I would like or I would appreciate any help 
> with how to
> prevent spaming on my mail server.  Last week I was spammed I 
> use exchange
> 5.5 with service pack 3 and I thought this should prevent me 
> from being
> spamed but I was wrong. Also, when I go into my queue on my 
> IMC connection
> I can see Domainstop.org coming up as destination hosts quite 
> frequently
> with either no originator or with something like 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> as originator.  I do not have a clue what this means or 
> pionts at, am I
> still being spamed?  Can any one tell me how can I secure my Exchange
> Server from being hit again.  Any help would really be appreciated.
> 
> Maurice
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Free RAM [1]

[Simon Curtiss]

Cheers Joe

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2001 6:02 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Free RAM [1]
> 
> 
> 1/2 gig on pdc for 200 users, plenty...
> Put it in the exchange server.
> jlc
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:56 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Free RAM [1]
> 
> Yes I've found 128Mb of RAM and I have a choice of two 
> servers to put it
> in.
> The hardware is the same Compaq Proliant PIII 550 with 512 Mb of RAM,
> running NT4.0 sp6a. One server is the Exchange Server and one is the
> PDC.
> 200 or so users and mailboxes.  Which is the best place to put it, I'm
> thinking the Exchange server, but....
> 
> 
> cheers
> 
> Simon
> 
> [1] free for me I mean [2]
> [2] sorry!
>  
> Simon Curtiss
> Systems Administrator
> ABN AMRO Craigs
> Tauranga
> +64 (0)7 577 4708
> 
> ##
> ##
> #
> Notice of Confidential information 
> The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL
> INFORMATION and may
> be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or 
> entity named
> above. If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use,
> dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
> prohibited. If you
> have received
> this electronic message in error, please immediately notify 
> us by return
> or telephone
> call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank
> you. 
> 
> This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal
> www.marshalsoftware.com 
> 
> ##
> ##
> #
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Free RAM [1]

[Simon Curtiss]

Yes I've found 128Mb of RAM and I have a choice of two servers to put it in.
The hardware is the same Compaq Proliant PIII 550 with 512 Mb of RAM,
running NT4.0 sp6a. One server is the Exchange Server and one is the PDC.
200 or so users and mailboxes.  Which is the best place to put it, I'm
thinking the Exchange server, but


cheers

Simon

[1] free for me I mean [2]
[2] sorry!
 
Simon Curtiss
Systems Administrator
ABN AMRO Craigs
Tauranga
+64 (0)7 577 4708

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Microsost's take on Nimda

[Simon Curtiss]

nope it's still there - did you remember to put the whole URL in? It's
wrapped.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Western [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2001 1:46 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Microsost's take on Nimda
> 
> 
> nice link.  it's been pulled.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2001 12:00 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Microsost's take on Nimda
> 
> 
> Check out:
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/tec
hnet/security/
topics/nimda.asp

Phil

-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

MANAGING EXTRA MAILBOXES IN EXCHANGE

[Simon Curtiss]

I know that people are always asking about this topic and I found this
article in an old  copy of Sue Mosher's EMO newsletter the other day.
Hopefully helpful.

cheers

Simon

Simon Curtiss
Systems Administrator
ABN AMRO Craigs
Tauranga
+64 (0)7 577 4708

==
MANAGING EXTRA MAILBOXES IN EXCHANGE
>From time to time, I want to highlight solutions developers who really
seem to understand what people want from Outlook. One such developer is
Victor Ivanidze, whom I met while I was living in Moscow and whose web
site at http://victori.hypermart.net/ features COM add-ins for Outlook
2000 and 2002, sample forms to add header fields to Internet messages,
and various other tips. 
Lately, Victor has focused on one of the stickier issues in Outlook in
an Exchange environment -- working with a secondary mailbox. As you
probably know, with proper permissions, you can open another mailbox and
see all its folders, respond to messages in its Inbox, etc. A typical
example is a Support mailbox that help desk staffers access in addition
to their own mailboxes. 
The hard part comes when you want to ensure that messages sent from the
other mailbox have the right From address and are stored in the other
mailbox's Sent Items folder. I wrote an article a few years ago
(http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=4855) on
various ways to meet those goals and concluded that it was easier to
abandon the shared group mailbox approach and use a public folder
instead. 
Victor has breathed new life into the group mailbox approach, however,
by offering two COM add-ins that together make it possible to handle a
secondary mailbox's messages seamlessly. RightFrom is a utility that
automatically fills in the correct From address when you reply to or
forward a message in the other mailbox. The second utility, UniSent,
ensures that those replies and forwards are stored in the Sent Items
folder of the other mailbox, not in your own mailbox. It also puts items
that you delete from the group mailbox into the group mailbox's Deleted
Items folder. 
Remember that, if you're implementing a group mailbox, there are two
different ways to set permissions to allow other users to send on behalf
of the mailbox. If the Exchange administrator grants Send on Behalf Of
permission to the Support mailbox, outgoing messages will show both the
actual sender and the Support mailbox. If you want to hide the actual
sender's name and address, you need to grant Send As permission to the
user's Windows account. 
 
Subscribe:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Essentials or Antigen

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



I'm 
a Mail Marshal fan too, but why keep away from Mail 
Essentials?
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: m2web 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2001 12:53 
  p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Mail 
  Essentials or Antigen
  Also take a look at Mail Marshal at www.marshalsoftware.com
  KEEP AWAY FROM MAIL ESSENTIALS.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Moody, Jacqueline 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 

Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 
12:00 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Essentials or 
Antigen

I 
recommend you look at Trend too.  I have noticed a pattern with 
anti-virus software on Exchange while I've been on the list, and that 
pattern has been success through all these bad outbreaks with both Antigen 
and Trend.

  
  -Original Message-From: Gabe Austin 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 
  2:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mail 
  Essentials or Antigen
  I'm looking to 
  go away from Norton on my Exchange Server. I've looked into Mail 
  Essentials and Antigen. If I'm looking to do content filtering, extension 
  filtering, basically blocking unwanted content from my site, which is the 
  best product? Is there someone around that can speak to the both of these 
  products?
  Gabe List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Off topic ... blocking chat programs

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Off topic ... blocking chat programs



Found it
 
AOL 
IM - block port 5190 on:
205.188.3.160
205.188.3.176
205.188.5.204
205.188.5.208
205.188.7.164
205.188.7.168
205.188.7.172
205.188.7.176
 
ICQ 
- block port 5190 on:
64.12.162.57
205.188.179.233
 
MSN 
block 64.4.13.17
 
Yahoo block port 5050 on:
 aaagh too many
 
basically 216.136.175. 142 to 145
216.136.224.213 to 214
216.136.225.11, 12, 35,36,83,84
216.136.226. 117 to 118
216.136.131.93
 
 
Stu 
wrote he wqas going to block all ports to those IP addresses on his PIX and that 
AOL changes the IP addresses every 6 months - thanks AOL!
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Irfan GM 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2001 
  11:22 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Off 
  topic ... blocking chat programs
  anyway thanks simon , looking forward for your 
  inputs
  
-Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
September 19, 2001 4:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Off topic ... blocking chat 
programs
Seriously, look at the archives of the Sunbelt 
Win-Security list -  there was a list of ports in the W2K newsletter 
the other week, I've got a copy but I can't find it right now. I'll see if I 
can find it in the morning, it's 11:20 pm and I'm just finishing a bad 
evening in which I got nowhere - (put long boring story 
here)
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Irfan GM 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 
  2001 10:56 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Off topic ... blocking chat programs
    Hi guys , 
   Slightly off topic , but chose this forum 
  , hoping for an answer.  My 
  question is how do i block chat programs like icq, msn messenger etc 
  .  I have windows 2000 domain with 
  no proxy server , can i do it using DNS server ?  so that all these chat programs resolve their 
  respective ip addresses internally ? 
   Thanks  Irfan 
      List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL 
INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual 
or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic 
message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call 
collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 

List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Off topic ... blocking chat programs

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Off topic ... blocking chat programs



Seriously, look at the archives of the Sunbelt 
Win-Security list -  there was a list of ports in the W2K newsletter the 
other week, I've got a copy but I can't find it right now. I'll see if I can 
find it in the morning, it's 11:20 pm and I'm just finishing a bad evening in 
which I got nowhere - (put long boring story here)
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Irfan GM 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2001 
  10:56 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off topic 
  ... blocking chat programs
    Hi guys , 
   Slightly off topic , but chose this forum , 
  hoping for an answer.  My question is 
  how do i block chat programs like icq, msn messenger etc .  I have windows 2000 domain with no proxy server , can 
  i do it using DNS server ?  so that 
  all these chat programs resolve their respective ip addresses internally 
  ? 
   Thanks  Irfan 
      List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Off topic ... blocking chat programs

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Off topic ... blocking chat programs



Do 
you have a firewall?... or something, anything to stop the unwashed getting 
in!!!
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Irfan GM 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2001 
  10:56 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Off topic 
  ... blocking chat programs
    Hi guys , 
   Slightly off topic , but chose this forum , 
  hoping for an answer.  My question is 
  how do i block chat programs like icq, msn messenger etc .  I have windows 2000 domain with no proxy server , can 
  i do it using DNS server ?  so that 
  all these chat programs resolve their respective ip addresses internally 
  ? 
   Thanks  Irfan 
      List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook and the Security public folder

[Simon Curtiss]

Title: Message



The easiest way to 
propogate it is to c reate the appropriate registry settings on one 
machione and then use regedit to make a .reg file - you can give this to 
everyone to run on their PC and viola! easy 
peasy.
 
Simon
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-From: 
Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 18 
September 2001 1:42 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook and the Security public 
folder

  That's great.  Thanks for  your help.
  Jamie
  

-Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 
2001 9:24 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Outlook and the Security public folder
Yes, we have set up the security settings public 
folder and had to create the Security subkey on some client 
machines.  We have tested on those machines and everything worked as 
expected.
 
Thanks,
   Peter Dahl.

  
  -Original Message-From: Arnold, 
  Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 
  17, 2001 9:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Outlook and the Security public folder
  I have tried to apply the Outlook Security 
  Settings public folder.  The folder was no problem.  The problem 
  is on the client machine.  When I tried to add the new DWORD value, 
  the subkey of HKCU\Software\Policies\Micorsoft\Security didn't contain the 
  "Security" subkey.  The article says to add the DWORD value to the 
  Security subkey, but it reads like the subkey should be there.  If 
  it's not there, can I just add it?
   
  Thanks in advance.
   
  JamieList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mail Spooler

[Simon Curtiss]

Mail 
Marshal will do this, but that's not it's primary function which is content 
filtering, virus-checking & traffic analysis. I do heartily recommend it 
however.
 
www.marshalsoftware.com
 
cheers
 
Simon

  -Original Message-From: Martin Henriksen 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 
  7:57 p.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mail 
  Spooler
  Hello 
  All.
   
  Can anyone 
  recommend a good mail spooler? I want to place the mail spooler on a 
  different server, have this server recive mail and forward it to the 
  exchageserver, so i dont have direct connection between the i-net and my 
  mailserver.
   
  Any suggestions 
  are much appreciated
   
  Regards, 
  
  Martin Henriksen, 
  MCPSystems Engineer
  Consensus it a/s Carl 
  Jacobsens Vej 20, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark Phone    : +45 
  3613 Fax    : +45 
  3613 2223 Mobile    : +45 4016 
  2266E-mail    : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 
and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the 
use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please 
immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and 
destroy the original message. Thank you. . 
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   www.marshalsoftware.com 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: IIS Lock Down tool.

[Simon Curtiss]

Well I would be very very careful, 'cos I just got bitten by this b$@%@%d.

I got an unrecoverable BSOD on my single Exchange Server and at 4pm on
Sunday and it took me 9 hours to wrestle the server back into production. No
data loss in the end - and as much as everyone hates ArcServeIT (and I'm one
of them) it saved my butt with the Disaster Recovery Option that we use.

I'm curious - does anyone who's used ArcServe 2000 still hate the product or
is this all based on the bad bad bad experiences they had with 6.5, 6.61 etc
etc etc.

I ask as I can upgrade Inoculate & Arcserve for my whole organisation for
less than $NZ 2500, or replace with Antigen & BE for about $NZ 20,000 - as
you could guess this will be pretty hard to argue through with my CFO -
Antigen in particular, as we use Mail Marshal which has all (and more) of
the content filtering that is in Antigen.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 September 2001 6:13 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I already have it installed on my Exchange test server so far it seem
> OK, also I will look for some more info.
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:55 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> The tool is all or nothing.  Depending on what your servers are doing,
> it
> may stop or corrupt production files.
> You will have to research and test before deploying.  (who does that,
> right?)
> Also, check out:  http://www.securityfocus.com
> drill down to Microsoft then IIS.  You may find a better 
> solution there.
> 
> John Allhiser MCSE CCNA
> Network Engineer
> Business Men's Assurance 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Rosas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:52 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: IIS Lock Down tool.
> 
> 
> I am trying to find more information about the IIS lock Down tool; I
> want to know if there is any problems or any reason why not 
> to use this
> tool.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **
> 
> Juan Rosas, MCP, CNA
> Network Engineer
> APICS--The Educational Society for Resource Management
> 5301 Shawnee Road, Alexandria, VA  22312
> Direct Phone: (703) 354-8996 x 2393FAX: 703/354-9386
> WEB:  www.apics.org  EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
> 
> Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations 
> expressed in
> this message are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
> the views of APICS or its affiliates.  Please note also that all data
> transmitted on APICS systems are subject to archival review. 
> 
> APICS: Making Business Run Better.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Windows Update

[Simon Curtiss]

It's fine in New Zealand :-)

> -Original Message-
> From: Shirley Laliberte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 31 August 2001 8:07 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Windows Update
> 
> 
> There's a definite problem we've been trying all day to run 
> updates and it's taking hours-we cancel and try again later 
> and this seems to work.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Shirley Laliberte
> Chief Financial Officer/Technology Manager
> Quincy Municipal Credit Union
> http://www.qmcu.org/
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Windows Update
> 
> I was doing an Office XP upgrade last night and it took over 
> 20 minutes to
> download 13 MB on a T1 after hours. I blamed it on IE 6.
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:40 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Windows Update
> 
> 
> Is anyone else having problems with windowsupdate.microsoft.com? I can
> connect to the site but it never finishes loading. Ping 
> requests are timing
> out (207.46.106.88) and tracert shows a drop after some 
> router (as far as I
> can tell). It's probably a problem somewhere along our LONG 
> route, but I
> thought I'd ask if anyone else was having problems.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sean Martin, MCSE
> Network Administrator
> Ribelin Lowell & Company
> Insurance Brokers, Inc.
> 3111 C Street, Suite 300
> Anchorage, Alaska 99503
> Ph: (907) 561-1250
> Fax: (907) 561-4315
> Cell: (907) 229-0885
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the
> intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains 
> confidential and/or
> privileged information intended only for the addressee. If 
> you have received
> this communication in error, please call us immediately at 
> (907) 561-1250
> and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, 
> please e-mail the
> sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the
> communication in error.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Orbz

[Simon Curtiss]

Ah, another DA fan - may he RIP

Simon

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2001 08:04
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Orbz


Somebody
Else's 
Problem

-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com 
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley 
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk 
- 
Don't sweat petty thingsor pet sweaty things. 
- 

-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Orbz


SEP?
 
What is that?


Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Liar: One who tells an unpleasant truth. 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Orbz


I think that qualifies as an SEP.

-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com 
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley 
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk 
- 
Nobody can make you feel inferior without your permission. - Eleanor
Roosevelt 
- 

-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Orbz


Sorry - should have been more specific. 
Not my exchange server.  Client's pop3 ipswitch server set wide open for
relay.  Not on my network at all.  Jerk of a client I am probably going to
drop but I hate walking away from something that is half a**ed set up.
Owner wants to send and receive his ixnet.com account from his office and
won't take no for an answer.
Maybe if his corporate email starts bouncing 
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message- 
From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:16 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Orbz 


VPN from home, or OWA. 
  
You will not be able to send or receive mail from 20 % of population, if you
are on Open Relay List. 
-Original Message- 
From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:02 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Orbz 



What are the consequences of an open relay?  I know of one that I cannot get
them to change because one users wants to send email from his home account.
It makes me angry but they will not listen.  Maybe if I show them some valid
reason other than being black listed they might wake up.
Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
Special Projects Engineer 
Premiere Radio Networks 
A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 
Direct: (818) 461-8620 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   




-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:55 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Orbz 


> And I also don't like the fact that some outside organization is 
determining how we as admins set up our systems. 
When your system is configured as an open relay, then spammers are able to 
steal your resources and use them to steal other people's resources. They're

not forcing anyone to use their lists - the lists are available as a service

only.  The people who use those lists have chosen not to receive mail from 
open relays.  They're merely protecting their own property from misguided 
and/or malicious property owners/caretakers such as those who run open 
relays. 
You are free to ignore them, if you wish.  But you must be prepared to deal 
with the consequences if you do. 
BTW, Siegfried, how's that Event Sink coming to allow E2K to use the RBL? 
-Michèle 
Immigration site:  < http://LadySun1969.tripod.com 
 > 
Our new 2001 Miata:  < http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley 
 > 
Tiggercam:  < http://www.tiggercam.co.uk  > 
- 
Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggie!"... Till you can find a rock. 
- 


-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:38 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Orbz 

RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?

[Simon Curtiss]

I'm sure that MS can redefine 'Gold' to mean whatever they want it to mean.
:-)

> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2001 9:01 a.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> The code won't be gold til sp2 methinks.
> 
> William
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:59 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> Hmmm... My copy is the full release version...  What part of the world
> are you from?  Is MS discriminating against you or something?  
> 
> Office XP has been around for quite a few months now...
> 
> Oh wait!!  I'll bet you're talking about Windows XP aren't you.  ;o)
> Incidentally, the "gold code" will be released soon.
> 
> http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010821/tc/xp_gold_code_relea
se_just_da
ys_away_1.html

D

-Original Message-
From: Paul M. Puccinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?


Correct - I'm not going to base a decision on beta software.

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Petukov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?


until Office XP is actually available?


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?

[Simon Curtiss]

There is an exception to the rule (well maybe not an exception, but I can't
think of the right word) and that is that the Backoffice CAL will no longer
be available after October 1st and you will need to  get CAL 'Core' packs
which I believe will be more expensive.  Backoffice CAL's were the cheapest
way to get EX, SQL & NT Cals together.

Simon

> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2001 12:26 p.m.
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> Of course I do
> http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO61803,00.html
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Sean Martin, MCSE
> Network Administrator
> Ribelin Lowell & Company
> Insurance Brokers, Inc.
> 3111 C Street, Suite 300
> Anchorage, Alaska 99503
> Ph: (907) 561-1250
> Fax: (907) 561-4315
> Cell: (907) 229-0885
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:15 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> Does someone have an URL confirming same?
> 
> William
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:16 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> That is what I heard from Microsoft.  End of Feb.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:13 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> I was told by a CDW rep that it was pushed back to the end of 
> February,
> 2002
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Sean Martin, MCSE
> Network Administrator
> Ribelin Lowell & Company
> Insurance Brokers, Inc.
> 3111 C Street, Suite 300
> Anchorage, Alaska 99503
> Ph: (907) 561-1250
> Fax: (907) 561-4315
> Cell: (907) 229-0885
> Email:  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul M. Puccinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:59 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> Didn't MS back off and put that off until Feb 1?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Peitzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:03 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: MS new licensing plan Oct 1st?
> 
> 
> I'm curious about what approach other shops in the 60-120 
> user range are
> taking to Microsoft's new SW licensing plan that takes effect October
> 1st.
>  
> Is your shop buying Upgrade Advantages now on your 
> NT/Win2K/Exchange/SQL
> Server products?
>  
> Bob Peitzke
> Information Systems Manager
> Sander A. Kessler & Associates
> Santa Monica, CA, USA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the
> intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains 
> confidential and/or
> privileged information intended only for the addressee. If 
> you have received
> this communication in error, please call us immediately at 
> (907) 561-1250
> and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, 
> please e-mail the
> sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the
> communication in error.
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

#
Notice of Confidential information 
The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may
be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone
call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. 

This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal   
www.marshalsoftware.com 

#

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm