[expert] One more problem with anonymous BeroFTPD
Hello, How i'd let upload files for anonymous users. My configuration looks like: > more ftpaccess # This file was generated by the KDE BeroFTPD configurator. # (c) 1998 by Bernhard Rosenkränzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) class all anonymous,guest,real * autogroup root all upload * /home/ftp/incoming yes ftp ftp 0777 nodirs loginfails 5 private no show-everytime message yes message /welcome.msgLOGIN message .messageCWD=* readme README* LOGIN readme README* CWD=* passwd-checknonewarn log commands real log transfers anonymous,real inbound log transfers anonymous,real outbound anonymous-root /home/ftp dl-free-dir * /home/ftp/incoming --->ls -al /home/ftp drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 1024 Aug 25 09:58 ./ drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 1024 Jul 22 09:40 ../ d--x--x--x 2 root root 1024 Jul 16 18:18 bin/ d--x--x--x 2 root root 1024 Jul 16 18:18 etc/ drwxrwxrwx 2 root ftp 1024 Aug 25 09:58 incoming/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Jul 16 18:18 lib/ drwxr-sr-x 2 root ftp 1024 May 11 03:39 pub/ Thank U >Mike Abney wrote: > > (I've tried to send this once before, but it didn't seem to make it to > the list -- sorry if you get it twice.) > > Hey, > > I've got the Bero FTP server (latest non-cooker Mandrake RPM of > BeroFTPD) up and running just about the way I want it, but I'm having a > slight problem. When a real user logs in everything gets displayed > properly, including the welcome message. However, when anonymous users > log in I've set up the typical, "You are number %N of %M anonymous users > allowed," welcome message. (Pardon me, if I got the %N and %M wrong, I'm > not anywhere I can look up the right values -- it's right in the actual > file, however.) I've checked (via highlight and click-to-paste) that the > file I've assigned as the anonymous class's login message exists and has > that text in it. But the text never gets displayed. > > Any ideas? Is this a known bug of BeroFTPD that I just haven't seen > posted anywhere? > > Thanks, > > Mike
Re: [expert] Multilink / EQL ?
Hi DJ, the only information that I can find about eql is that it is (i believe) included in the 2.2.xx source, however the eql_enslave program is unusable for the 2.2.xx kernel. I've been doing some extensive searching for it, but am unable to find a working version, nor was i able to fiddle with the eql_enslave.c file to get it working (i'm a _very_ basic hack with c). If you have any information or ideas as to how we can get this going, would you be able to post back? I'm stumped for ideas at this point in time. =[ Zak - Original Message - From: DJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 29, 1999 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [expert] Multilink / EQL ? > I am in the process(waiting on card shipment) of setting up 6 or 8 > modems from a remote site on our wan to do almost the same thing. Let me > know if you find any info > > thanks DJ > > > > > Zak McKracken wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I've just spent about 3 hours looking for something that will allow me > > to use two dialup accounts (either with the same ISP, or a different one - i > > can do both), that will allow for the use of both modems to share data to a > > network. basically the EQL stuff that i had a look at looked good, but I > > was unable to track down anything that would compile/run on either of my > > mandrake boxes, and multilinking involves going back to kernel 2.2.2 > > > > If anyones managed to do this - would you be able to fill me (and anyone > > else) on how you did it? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zak >
Re: [expert] 5th ide device problem
---Reply to mail from Timothy Litwiller about [expert] 5th ide device problem > ok, I'll try that next question then, since this is a cd-rw drive that I am > adding to the system, can I have two appends? > > say append="ide2=0xXXX,XX","hde=ide-scsi" ? You can use the command like this: append="ide2=0xXXX,X hde=ide-scsi" ---End reply -- Jonathan Dlouhy Tuesday, August 31, 1999 "We are Microsoft. Resistance Is Futile. You Will Be Assimilated."
Re: [expert] 5th ide device problem
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Timothy Litwiller wrote: > ok, I'll try that next question then, since this is a cd-rw drive that I am > adding to the system, can I have two appends? > > say append="ide2=0xXXX,XX","hde=ide-scsi" ? append="ide2=foo hde=ide-scsi something_else=somethin" Yep sure can > Axalon Bloodstone wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Timothy Litwiller wrote: > > > > > any ideas how to get linus to see a device connected to the 3rd ide > > > channel? > > > > > > > It should auto probe, > > [root@homie ide]# ls -l > > total 0 > > -r--r--r--1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 drivers > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hda -> ide0/hda > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hdc -> ide1/hdc > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hde -> ide2/hde > > dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide0 > > dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide1 > > dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide2 > > [root@homie ide]# > > > > But you may have to append something like "ide2=0xXXX,XX" (X's being io > > and irq) > > -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Axalon
Re: [expert] Sendmail problems
"Morton, Andrew (A.) [EXCHANGE:WOLL:4009-M:BNR]" wrote: > > Hi, folks. > > Short form question: > === > > Could some kind soul please tell me how to DISABLE all the new anti-spam > stuff in sendmail 8.9.3? Just to answer my own question... 1: /usr/lib/sendmail-cf/README is very useful. 2: I added FEATURE(relay_local_from) FEATURE(promiscuous_relay) FEATURE(accept_unresolvable_domains) to /usr/lib/sendmail-cf/cf/redhat.mc 3: m4 redhat.mc > /etc/sendmail.cf Now all the 'sender domain' and relaying checks are disabled.
Re: [expert] Apache and SuExec
OK, I have done this and it mostly works, but you apparently compiled it with --suexec-caller and --suexec-userdir options that I don't use. Steve Philip, in another message said that I should put the options I want to add into a .spec file and do a rebuild. This seems like a good idea, but I don't have enough information yet. > Add the options that you want to the .spec file in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ I don't have a /usr/src/redhat directory on the machine. All I have in /usr/src is: RPM/ linux@ linux-2.2.9/ should I just create the directory (with nothing in it)? When I downloaded the source rpm (for an old version), it put all the source in /usr/src/RPM/SOURCES. There is a SPECS directory in /usr/src/RPM. Is that the directory you meant? > then rebuild the package with 'rpm -ba <.spec-file>'. Once I downloaded the appropriate src rpm for the old version of apache, it put a apache.spec file in /usr/src/RPM/SPECS, so I think that is the appropriate file to modify. So I'll download the src rpm for the netrevolution version of apache and try it. Thanks for all your help, both of you! == [EMAIL PROTECTED] S/W Developer http://www.ad1440.net/~devnull == Linux Viruscan: Windows 95/98/NT Found Remove it ? (Y/y) == GCS/GIT@ d?(pu) s+:++ a29 c$ UL+++$(!B)(S+++) P++ L++(+++@) E W+++ N+ o? K w O- M- V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5++ X+ R++ tv--@ b+++ DI++ D+@ G e++ h@(++) r+++(r) y(*) == -Original Message- From: Jean-Michel Dault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, August 30, 1999 8:24 PM Subject: Re: [expert] Apache and SuExec > >Go to http://coruscant.netrevolution.com/pub/NEW and grab the new Apache >1.3.9. It is compiled with SuExec, but has also suexec-frontpage, EAPI, >shared memory, and is compiled with DSO support, so you can use all the >pre-compiled modules. > >Jean-Michel Dault >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:59:06 -0700 (PDT) >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [expert] Apache and SuExec >> >> >> I've just installed a fresh installation of Linux-Mandrake 6.0, >> and am now trying to configure the web server so that it works the same >> way as my web server on my old machine. This has MOSTLY been accomplished >> except for one major thing: >> >> I used to have SuExec configured on my old webserver. To do this, >> I had to recompile it with the appropriate options and re-install it, etc. >> This was using Apache 1.2 before I found RPM's and before APACI. >> >> It appears that the default Apache that comes with Linux-Mandrake >> 6.0 does not have SuExec compiled in, so I need to recompile it. I have >> unzipped the src RPM, but I cannot find in it anywhere what the original >> options it was compiled with are. >> >> Does anyone know how to compile this so that it's the same as the >> one that comes with the distribution? I can then use those options and >> add the ones I need for SuExec. >> >> == >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] S/W Developer http://www.ad1440.net/~devnull >> == >> Linux Viruscan: Windows 95/98/NT Found Remove it ? (Y/y) >> == >> GCS/GIT@ d?(pu) s+:++ a29 c$ UL+++$(!B)(S+++) P++ L++(+++@) E W+++ N+ o? >> K w O- M- V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5++ X+ R++ tv--@ b+++ DI++ D+@ G e++ >> h@(++) r+++(r) y(*) >> == >> >
Re: [expert] Kernel panic???
- Original Message - From: Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 30, 1999 12:10 AM Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel panic??? > Sridhar G wrote: > > > "Kernel panic : VFS : Unable to mount root fs on 03:0c." > > 03:0c is hda12. Is that where you compiled the new kernel for? > > Are you booting from a compiler output floppy? If so, you may have > not compiled to floppy (must be make bzdisk) but are using a floppy > from a previous kernel compile for which the partition has been deleted > or now occupies a different sequence spot on the physical drive so has > a different name (hda?). > > -- > Ron Stodden > Using Virtual Access > > > > IWhen I compiled the kernel I did not include second extended file system, due to which the it could not load the root partition. Thanks for your help Cheers Sridhar
Re: [expert] XWindows refuses to load
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Vincent Danen wrote: > I've had a few crashes (power failures, etc.) which I think are really > screwing up my system. Standard MDK6.0 system, everything but the kernel > upgraded (using 19mdk... 27mdk is no longer in the updates?). Anyways, > this is what the X-server gives me when I do a startx or try to load > gdm/kdm/etc.: > > [snip] > (**) FontPath set to "unix/:-1" [snip] > _FontTransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111 > failed to set default font path 'unix/:-1' > Fatal server error: > could not open default font 'fixed' looks like either you didn't install or didn't start the font server. Install XFree86-xfs, start it with the command /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs start and everything should be ok. > When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send > the full server output, not just the last messages > > mach64ProgramClkMach64CT: Warning: Q < 10.6667 > X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). > > -- > How do I go about fixing this? I can't wait for a reply right now, but > this has happened to me twice now on this machine (and never once on the > server machine... mind you, it has a UPS protecting it somewhat). Any > ideas? Going to do a reinstall right now, but if this happens in the > future I'd like to know how to fix it. > > Thanx. > > > Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ: 16978834 > BBBS/LiI . Internet Rex for Linux Beta > Stronghold Enterprises/X BBS . http://shx.tzo.net > Telnet://shx.tzo.net . Weblogin-http://shx.tzo.net/shx > > PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 0D78 A158 03AF 127D 9E08 880B 719A DCB1 Or replace the "unix/:-1" with a really long list of font paths... -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Axalon
Re: [expert] XWindows refuses to load
Vincent Danen wrote: > > I've had a few crashes (power failures, etc.) which I think are really > screwing up my system. Standard MDK6.0 system, everything but the kernel > upgraded (using 19mdk... 27mdk is no longer in the updates?). Anyways, > this is what the X-server gives me when I do a startx or try to load > gdm/kdm/etc.: > > XFree86 Version 3.3.3.1 / X Window System > (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6300) > Release Date: January 4 1999 > If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer > than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting > problems. (see http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) > Operating System: Linux 2.2.9-chmou1 i686 [ELF] > Configured drivers: > Mach64: accelerated server for ATI Mach64 graphics adaptors (Patchlevel > 0) > (using VT number 7) > > XF86Config: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XF86Config > (**) stands for supplied, (--) stands for probed/default values > (**) XKB: keycodes: "xfree86" > (**) XKB: types: "default" > (**) XKB: compat: "default" > (**) XKB: symbols: "us(pc101)" > (**) XKB: geometry: "pc" > (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" > (**) XKB: model: "pc101" > (**) XKB: layout: "us" > (**) Mouse: type: Microsoft, device: /dev/mouse, baudrate: 1200 > (**) Mouse: buttons: 3, 3 button emulation (timeout: 50ms) > (**) Mach64: Graphics device ID: "My Video Card" > (**) Mach64: Monitor ID: "My Monitor" > (--) Mach64: Mode "800x600" needs hsync freq of 64.02 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1024x768" needs hsync freq of 62.50 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1152x864" needs hsync freq of 62.42 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 64.25 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1024x768" needs hsync freq of 70.24 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1152x864" needs hsync freq of 70.88 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 74.59 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1600x1200" needs hsync freq of 75.00 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1152x864" needs hsync freq of 76.01 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 78.86 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1024x768" needs hsync freq of 80.21 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 81.13 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1600x1200" needs hsync freq of 87.50 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1152x864" needs hsync freq of 89.62 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 91.15 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1600x1200" needs hsync freq of 93.75 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1600x1200" needs hsync freq of 105.77 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 107.16 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1800X1440" needs hsync freq of 96.15 kHz. Deleted. > (--) Mach64: Mode "1800X1440" needs hsync freq of 104.52 kHz. Deleted. > (**) FontPath set to "unix/:-1" > (--) Mach64: PCI: Mach64 RagePro rev 92, Aperture @ 0xe400, Registers @ > 0xe600, Block I/O @ 0xd000 > (--) Mach64: PCI (92) and CONFIG_CHIP_ID (124) don't agree on ChipRev, > using PCI value > (--) Mach64: Card type: AGP > (--) Mach64: Memory type: SDRAM (4) > (--) Mach64: Clock type: Internal > (--) Mach64: Maximum allowed dot-clock: 230.000 MHz > (**) Mach64: Mode "1152x864": mode clock = 89.900 > (--) Mach64: Virtual resolution: 1152x864 > (--) Mach64: Video RAM: 8192k > (--) Mach64: Using hardware cursor > (--) Mach64: Using 16 MB aperture @ 0xe400 > (--) Mach64: Using 4 KB register aperture @ 0xe600 > (--) Mach64: Ramdac is Internal > (--) Mach64: Ramdac speed: 230 MHz > (--) Mach64: Horizontal Sync width (32) in mode "1152x864" > shortened to 248 pixels > (--) Mach64: Pixmap cache: 2 256x256 slots, 8 128x128 slots, 32 64x64 slots > (--) Mach64: Font cache: 16 fonts > _FontTransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111 > failed to set default font path 'unix/:-1' > Fatal server error: > could not open default font 'fixed' > > When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send > the full server output, not just the last messages > > mach64ProgramClkMach64CT: Warning: Q < 10.6667 > X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). > > -- > How do I go about fixing this? I can't wait for a reply right now, but > this has happened to me twice now on this machine (and never once on the > server machine... mind you, it has a UPS protecting it somewhat). Any > ideas? Going to do a reinstall right now, but if this happens in the > future I'd like to know how to fix it. chkconfig xfs on /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs start startx You'll notice that the errors are about not being able to set the font path used by the X font server (xfs). That causes it to fail when it tries to find the default 'fixed' font. BOOM! Running xfs should clear up the problem. -- Steve Philp Network Administrator Advance Packaging Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [expert] Apache and SuExec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've just installed a fresh installation of Linux-Mandrake 6.0, > and am now trying to configure the web server so that it works the same > way as my web server on my old machine. This has MOSTLY been accomplished > except for one major thing: > > I used to have SuExec configured on my old webserver. To do this, > I had to recompile it with the appropriate options and re-install it, etc. > This was using Apache 1.2 before I found RPM's and before APACI. > > It appears that the default Apache that comes with Linux-Mandrake > 6.0 does not have SuExec compiled in, so I need to recompile it. I have > unzipped the src RPM, but I cannot find in it anywhere what the original > options it was compiled with are. > > Does anyone know how to compile this so that it's the same as the > one that comes with the distribution? I can then use those options and > add the ones I need for SuExec. Add the options that you want to the .spec file in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ then rebuild the package with 'rpm -ba <.spec-file>'. -- Steve Philp Network Administrator Advance Packaging Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [expert] 5th ide device problem
ok, I'll try that next question then, since this is a cd-rw drive that I am adding to the system, can I have two appends? say append="ide2=0xXXX,XX","hde=ide-scsi" ? Axalon Bloodstone wrote: > On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Timothy Litwiller wrote: > > > any ideas how to get linus to see a device connected to the 3rd ide > > channel? > > > > It should auto probe, > [root@homie ide]# ls -l > total 0 > -r--r--r--1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 drivers > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hda -> ide0/hda > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hdc -> ide1/hdc > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hde -> ide2/hde > dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide0 > dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide1 > dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide2 > [root@homie ide]# > > But you may have to append something like "ide2=0xXXX,XX" (X's being io > and irq)
Re: [expert] Apache and SuExec
Go to http://coruscant.netrevolution.com/pub/NEW and grab the new Apache 1.3.9. It is compiled with SuExec, but has also suexec-frontpage, EAPI, shared memory, and is compiled with DSO support, so you can use all the pre-compiled modules. Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:59:06 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [expert] Apache and SuExec > > > I've just installed a fresh installation of Linux-Mandrake 6.0, > and am now trying to configure the web server so that it works the same > way as my web server on my old machine. This has MOSTLY been accomplished > except for one major thing: > > I used to have SuExec configured on my old webserver. To do this, > I had to recompile it with the appropriate options and re-install it, etc. > This was using Apache 1.2 before I found RPM's and before APACI. > > It appears that the default Apache that comes with Linux-Mandrake > 6.0 does not have SuExec compiled in, so I need to recompile it. I have > unzipped the src RPM, but I cannot find in it anywhere what the original > options it was compiled with are. > > Does anyone know how to compile this so that it's the same as the > one that comes with the distribution? I can then use those options and > add the ones I need for SuExec. > > == > [EMAIL PROTECTED] S/W Developer http://www.ad1440.net/~devnull > == > Linux Viruscan: Windows 95/98/NT Found Remove it ? (Y/y) > == > GCS/GIT@ d?(pu) s+:++ a29 c$ UL+++$(!B)(S+++) P++ L++(+++@) E W+++ N+ o? > K w O- M- V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5++ X+ R++ tv--@ b+++ DI++ D+@ G e++ > h@(++) r+++(r) y(*) > == >
[expert] XWindows refuses to load
I've had a few crashes (power failures, etc.) which I think are really screwing up my system. Standard MDK6.0 system, everything but the kernel upgraded (using 19mdk... 27mdk is no longer in the updates?). Anyways, this is what the X-server gives me when I do a startx or try to load gdm/kdm/etc.: XFree86 Version 3.3.3.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6300) Release Date: January 4 1999 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting problems. (see http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) Operating System: Linux 2.2.9-chmou1 i686 [ELF] Configured drivers: Mach64: accelerated server for ATI Mach64 graphics adaptors (Patchlevel 0) (using VT number 7) XF86Config: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XF86Config (**) stands for supplied, (--) stands for probed/default values (**) XKB: keycodes: "xfree86" (**) XKB: types: "default" (**) XKB: compat: "default" (**) XKB: symbols: "us(pc101)" (**) XKB: geometry: "pc" (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" (**) XKB: model: "pc101" (**) XKB: layout: "us" (**) Mouse: type: Microsoft, device: /dev/mouse, baudrate: 1200 (**) Mouse: buttons: 3, 3 button emulation (timeout: 50ms) (**) Mach64: Graphics device ID: "My Video Card" (**) Mach64: Monitor ID: "My Monitor" (--) Mach64: Mode "800x600" needs hsync freq of 64.02 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1024x768" needs hsync freq of 62.50 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1152x864" needs hsync freq of 62.42 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 64.25 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1024x768" needs hsync freq of 70.24 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1152x864" needs hsync freq of 70.88 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 74.59 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1600x1200" needs hsync freq of 75.00 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1152x864" needs hsync freq of 76.01 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 78.86 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1024x768" needs hsync freq of 80.21 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 81.13 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1600x1200" needs hsync freq of 87.50 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1152x864" needs hsync freq of 89.62 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 91.15 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1600x1200" needs hsync freq of 93.75 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1600x1200" needs hsync freq of 105.77 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1280x1024" needs hsync freq of 107.16 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1800X1440" needs hsync freq of 96.15 kHz. Deleted. (--) Mach64: Mode "1800X1440" needs hsync freq of 104.52 kHz. Deleted. (**) FontPath set to "unix/:-1" (--) Mach64: PCI: Mach64 RagePro rev 92, Aperture @ 0xe400, Registers @ 0xe600, Block I/O @ 0xd000 (--) Mach64: PCI (92) and CONFIG_CHIP_ID (124) don't agree on ChipRev, using PCI value (--) Mach64: Card type: AGP (--) Mach64: Memory type: SDRAM (4) (--) Mach64: Clock type: Internal (--) Mach64: Maximum allowed dot-clock: 230.000 MHz (**) Mach64: Mode "1152x864": mode clock = 89.900 (--) Mach64: Virtual resolution: 1152x864 (--) Mach64: Video RAM: 8192k (--) Mach64: Using hardware cursor (--) Mach64: Using 16 MB aperture @ 0xe400 (--) Mach64: Using 4 KB register aperture @ 0xe600 (--) Mach64: Ramdac is Internal (--) Mach64: Ramdac speed: 230 MHz (--) Mach64: Horizontal Sync width (32) in mode "1152x864" shortened to 248 pixels (--) Mach64: Pixmap cache: 2 256x256 slots, 8 128x128 slots, 32 64x64 slots (--) Mach64: Font cache: 16 fonts _FontTransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111 failed to set default font path 'unix/:-1' Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send the full server output, not just the last messages mach64ProgramClkMach64CT: Warning: Q < 10.6667 X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). -- How do I go about fixing this? I can't wait for a reply right now, but this has happened to me twice now on this machine (and never once on the server machine... mind you, it has a UPS protecting it somewhat). Any ideas? Going to do a reinstall right now, but if this happens in the future I'd like to know how to fix it. Thanx. Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ: 16978834 BBBS/LiI . Internet Rex for Linux Beta Stronghold Enterprises/X BBS . http://shx.tzo.net Telnet://shx.tzo.net . Weblogin-http://shx.tzo.net/shx PGP Public Key Fingerprint: 0D78 A158 03AF 127D 9E08 880B 719A DCB1
Re: [expert] printer database
Well, with the help from this maillist I've decided to get a Cannon BJC-2000... Once I get a cable for it I'll let everyone know how it goes Michael
[expert] Apache and SuExec
I've just installed a fresh installation of Linux-Mandrake 6.0, and am now trying to configure the web server so that it works the same way as my web server on my old machine. This has MOSTLY been accomplished except for one major thing: I used to have SuExec configured on my old webserver. To do this, I had to recompile it with the appropriate options and re-install it, etc. This was using Apache 1.2 before I found RPM's and before APACI. It appears that the default Apache that comes with Linux-Mandrake 6.0 does not have SuExec compiled in, so I need to recompile it. I have unzipped the src RPM, but I cannot find in it anywhere what the original options it was compiled with are. Does anyone know how to compile this so that it's the same as the one that comes with the distribution? I can then use those options and add the ones I need for SuExec. == [EMAIL PROTECTED] S/W Developer http://www.ad1440.net/~devnull == Linux Viruscan: Windows 95/98/NT Found Remove it ? (Y/y) == GCS/GIT@ d?(pu) s+:++ a29 c$ UL+++$(!B)(S+++) P++ L++(+++@) E W+++ N+ o? K w O- M- V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5++ X+ R++ tv--@ b+++ DI++ D+@ G e++ h@(++) r+++(r) y(*) ==
Re: [expert] linux 6.0 instalation question
yes, that is completely possible. cameron [ How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL ] On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Jan Herbert wrote: :Hello, : :I just picked up linux 6.0, and I want to know if I can install linux on :a 4 gig partition that I already created on an 8.4 gig drive?Windows is :also installed on the other partition of that drive. : :thanks in advance, :Ian Herbert :
Re: [expert] linux 6.0 instalation question
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Jan Herbert wrote: > Hello, > > I just picked up linux 6.0, and I want to know if I can install linux on a 4 gig partition that I already created on an 8.4 gig drive?Windows is also installed on the other partition of that drive. > > thanks in advance, > Ian Herbert > Yes you can. However, if Windows occupies the lower 4 gig of the hard drive, then linux may not boot except with a boot floppy if you install LILO, the linux loader program. In that case, I recommend you get Partition Magic, which comes with Boot Magic, and should allow you to boot linux from wherever it is on your hard drive. bug
Re: [expert] linux 6.0 instalation question
Of course you can. Don't forget that you will need to create at least 2 partitions to install linux: the root (/) and a swap partition (between 48 and 128 kB). You can also choose to put certain directories in a separate partition, but this only starts to make sense if you have more than one hard disk (performance) or if you find yourself reinstalling linux rather often and you want to keep your home directories and other stuff. Also, you will need to boot linux from a partition that resides completely under the 1024 cylinders boundary (about 2 GB). You can make a small partition (5-10 MB) for this purpose that you would mount as /boot then. Hope this helps, Jo PS: it's amazing what I learned the past two months! > Jan Herbert wrote: > > Hello, > > I just picked up linux 6.0, and I want to know if I can install linux > on a 4 gig partition that I already created on an 8.4 gig > drive?Windows is also installed on the other partition of that drive. > > thanks in advance, > Ian Herbert
[expert] True quality!
Just caught this tidbit in the Linux Today press releases and thought it should be brought to everyone's attention. Mandrake seems to have "won" the quality award with their 6.0 release. LSL's upcoming "Linux Update" CD contains all the released updates for the major distributions. Their release shows Mandrake having the FEWEST UPDATES! Congrats to the Mandrake team! -- Steve Philp Network Administrator Advance Packaging Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [expert] 5th ide device problem
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Timothy Litwiller wrote: > any ideas how to get linus to see a device connected to the 3rd ide > channel? > It should auto probe, [root@homie ide]# ls -l total 0 -r--r--r--1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 drivers lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hda -> ide0/hda lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hdc -> ide1/hdc lrwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 hde -> ide2/hde dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide0 dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide1 dr-xr-xr-x3 root root0 Aug 30 16:49 ide2 [root@homie ide]# But you may have to append something like "ide2=0xXXX,XX" (X's being io and irq)
[expert] linux 6.0 instalation question
Hello, I just picked up linux 6.0, and I want to know if I can install linux on a 4 gig partition that I already created on an 8.4 gig drive?Windows is also installed on the other partition of that drive. thanks in advance, Ian Herbert
Re: [expert] Unresolved symbols in 2.2.9-27mdk
Svante Signell wrote: > I have problems compiling the 3dfx device Device3Dfx-2.2-3.src.rpm due > to unresolved symbols in netwave_cs.o. It was also present in the > previous kernel, 2.2.9-19mdk. > > depmod -a gives: > /lib/modules/2.2.9-27mdk/pcmcia/netwave_cs.o unresolved symbol(s) > > Is it possible to turn this warning off, for example in > /etc/conf.modules. I am not using pcmcia. > > Sincerely, > Svante Signell did you remove old kernel source and headers before installing new (2.2.9-27) versions.
Re: [expert] Kernel panic???
John Aldrich wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, you wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I compiled kernel source 2.2.9-27mdk and installed it. While boot up I get > > the error message > > > > "Kernel panic : VFS : Unable to mount root fs on 03:0c." > > > > What is the reason for this and what do the numbers mean. > > > > > Did you change lilo.conf and did you remember to run /sbin/lilo > afterwards? If not, that's your problem when configing the kernel did you build the filesystem driver into the kernel or make it a module. I rember once(older kernel) having the option to build the filesystem driver or as a module. . it must be built into the kernel
Re: [expert] 5th ide device problem
that was a good one. Sorry about the typo Bug Hunter wrote: > > mail him a picture. :) > > sorry, couldn't resist. > > On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Timothy Litwiller wrote: > > > any ideas how to get linus to see a device connected to the 3rd ide > > channel?
[expert] Lnx4Win kernel (initrd.gz) was upgraded succefully
Hello all, Lnx4Win kernel (initrd.gz) was upgraded succefully was a lot of works but now all is right. This initrd.gz works with 2.2.5-15, 2.2.9-27.mdk and 2.2.11-2mdk kernels You can find it in http://www.fisica.unige.it/~linuxgrp/download.htm Home page of my site is http://www.fisica.unige.it/linuxgrp Bye and thanks a lot at all but in particular to QAlexander and Axalon R.A.Foglietta
Re: [expert] 5th ide device problem
mail him a picture. :) sorry, couldn't resist. On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Timothy Litwiller wrote: > any ideas how to get linus to see a device connected to the 3rd ide > channel?
[expert] printer database
http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/pht/printer_list.cgi Provides a comprehensive database of printers. You are wise to ask before you buy. The "Winprinter" has become common on the low end of the price range. The Winprinter offloads the thinking part of printing onto OS specific software, and that OS is Win95/98, less often it includes Win31 and NT, and rarely, DOS . There are few, if any , software drivers for Winprinters under Linux. The box must list DOS separately if Linux/ghostscript is likely to have a likely workalike. If it doesn't mention DOS, or says DOS programs can print under the Win DOS box or Win printing facilities, you likely have a Winprinter. I just bought a 697C HP at WalMart for a C note on a closeout. May still be available. On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, you wrote: > Hi all. Does anyone know if I can get a Lexmark Z11 or a Canon BJC-2000 > working under Mandrake 6.0? printtool doesn't show filters for either > one. I'm trying to buy a cheap printer thats available localy, and these > are two of the best options right now. Any ideas? > > Michael
[expert] kdehelp and info pages
Hi! Does somebody know why kdehelp can't display info pages anymore? Regards tom
Re: [expert] Unresolved symbols in 2.2.9-27mdk
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, you wrote: > I have problems compiling the 3dfx device Device3Dfx-2.2-3.src.rpm due > to unresolved symbols in netwave_cs.o. It was also present in the > previous kernel, 2.2.9-19mdk. When I compiled the 3dfx rpm, I had similiar problems. I simply moved netwave_cs.o out of the pcmcia directory. After I moved it out, I did not have any problems with the rest of the install. Steve
Re: [expert] Drives not unmounting cleanly everytime (& wordperfect update)
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, you wrote: > > This is a known problem with the stock kernel install from the CDROM. > > You HAVE to upgrade the kernel and init scripts to fix it. Just > > remember to edit your lilo.conf and re-run /sbin/lilo afterwards. :-) > > John > > What would be the change that we would make to lilo.conf? > Just to point to the new kernel. That's all I would suggest backing up your existing lilo.conf (say by doing a "cp lilo.conf lilo.bak" or something) and then editing lilo.conf to point to the new kernel instead of the old one or to point to the NEW kernel as the default boot and leave the existing kernel as say "linux-old" or something. John
[expert] 5th ide device problem
any ideas how to get linus to see a device connected to the 3rd ide channel?
Re: [expert] Unresolved symbols in 2.2.9-27mdk
how about upgrading your kernel? cameron [ How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL ] On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Svante Signell wrote: :I have problems compiling the 3dfx device Device3Dfx-2.2-3.src.rpm due :to unresolved symbols in netwave_cs.o. It was also present in the :previous kernel, 2.2.9-19mdk. : :depmod -a gives: :/lib/modules/2.2.9-27mdk/pcmcia/netwave_cs.o unresolved symbol(s) : :Is it possible to turn this warning off, for example in :/etc/conf.modules. I am not using pcmcia. : :Sincerely, :Svante Signell :
Re: [expert] ports 80 & 21 in use
>Now I have to recompile the kernel. :-) Oh, > well... Why not just install one of the smp rpms? Works great on my dual celeron setup. -- Brett Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: [expert] Can recieve but can't send mail via Windows client
Try to add your local domain to /etc/mail/access. If this doesn´t work look at http://www.suse.de/sdb/en/html/smt_sendmail.html It´s a manual which worked for me. After you have configured your sendmail.cf after that manual the only thing you have to do is to add your smarthost to your sendmail.cf. Good luck, Peter Hermanns -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Devin Vo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Montag, 30. August 1999 15:11 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [expert] Can recieve but can't send mail via Windows client Yeah, network stuff is all set. It's the relay thing that I can't seem to figure out.
[expert] Slight problem with anonymous BeroFTPD
(I've tried to send this once before, but it didn't seem to make it to the list -- sorry if you get it twice.) Hey, I've got the Bero FTP server (latest non-cooker Mandrake RPM of BeroFTPD) up and running just about the way I want it, but I'm having a slight problem. When a real user logs in everything gets displayed properly, including the welcome message. However, when anonymous users log in I've set up the typical, "You are number %N of %M anonymous users allowed," welcome message. (Pardon me, if I got the %N and %M wrong, I'm not anywhere I can look up the right values -- it's right in the actual file, however.) I've checked (via highlight and click-to-paste) that the file I've assigned as the anonymous class's login message exists and has that text in it. But the text never gets displayed. Any ideas? Is this a known bug of BeroFTPD that I just haven't seen posted anywhere? Thanks, Mike
Re: [expert] Anti-spam programs
Mr. Aldrich; If you find this sugarplum program to be effective, please relay the information to the mailing list or me directly. Where is it available from? I am very interested for exactly the same reasons. There will never be any effective legislation against unsolicited email, therefore it is up to responsible sysadmins to protect themselves. Unleash the Jihad! ;) Jason S. Antonacci Computer Support Specialist IV Univ. of Georgia - Savannah River Ecology Lab ~~~ Office: 803.725.5894 Mobile: 706.373.0821 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 29 Aug 99 10:56:53 >>> I was browsing on Linuxberg and found a couple neat-sounding programs, one called "Ricochet" and another called "Sugarplum." Ricochet is supposed to bounce SPAM messages back to their original sender and Sugarplum is supposed to (somehow...haven't looked at the doco yet ) "poison" SPAMMer databases with so much bogus info that the databases are either useless or are discarded. Anyone used either of these Has anyone out there got something better??? I've become quite adept at tracking down the original SPAMMER's ISP and getting them booted (many use Hotbot or one of the other "free" email services, so I guess it's no big loss to them!) OTOH, if they're using Hotbot or mail.com, I'd love to poison their databases to they have to go out and spend MORE money for new databases that I can further poison! I want to make it too expensive for these a-holes to continue spamming! John
Re: [expert] ports 80 & 21 in use
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, you wrote: > Hi all, > First, let me say I am a little more than a newbie, but a lot less than an > expert, so be gentle! > Right now I am running a web server on a win98 box, Apache 1.3.9 to be > exact. I want to run the server under Linux cause I'm tired of having to > reboot a couple time a week. So this weekend I installed Mandrake 6.0, and > tried installing Xitami web server. (I want the ftp server included with > Xitami ). However when I tried to run it, it said ports 80 & 21 were > already in use. I can run it fine with -d 2000 which moves the ports to > 2080 and 2021. However I don't want to have to add :2080, etc. to my ip > address for people to connect. I want to be able to use the default ports. > So my question is, how can I find out what's using 80 & 21, and if I do, > how can I move them to another port so Xitami will be able to access them? > And CAN I do this? > Probably need to disable APACHE in Mandrake's startup, I would guess. I'm in much the same boat as you -- an experienced neophyte. ;-) I've been running Linux (mostly) on my machine here at work (occasionally rebooting to Windows ) for over 6 months. Just last week, I put the finishing touches (hardware-wise that is) on my SMP Linux box. Now I have to recompile the kernel. :-) Oh, well... Anyhow, APACHE is installed by default, so that's the likely problem. Type "setup" from the Root console prompt and disable APACHE under " System Services." John
Re: [expert] Supported printers under mandrake
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, you wrote: > Michael Bannister wrote: > > > > Hi all. Does anyone know if I can get a Lexmark Z11 or a Canon BJC-2000 > > working under Mandrake 6.0? printtool doesn't show filters for either > > one. I'm trying to buy a cheap printer thats available localy, and these > > are two of the best options right now. Any ideas? > > It doesn't look like either are supported. Here's what I'm using to get > info: > > http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/ > You might take a look at http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/pht/printer_list.cgi. According to this site, the BJC-2000 *is* supported by Linux: Canon Perfectly BJ-10e, BJ-20, BJ-200, BJ-5, BJC-210, BJC-240, BJC-250, BJC-600, BJC-600, BJC-610, BJC-620, BJC-70, BJC-800, LBP-1260, LBP-1760, LBP-4+, LBP-4U, LBP-8II, LIPS-III Mostly BJ-300, BJC-2000, BJC-4000, BJC-4100, BJC-4200, BJC-4300, BJC-4310SP, BJC-4400, BJC-7004, BJC-80, LBP-4sx I see that it "MOSTLY" works in Linux. Here's what Grant Taylor (the site author) says he means by "mostly" : Mostly These printers work almost perfectly - funny enhanced resolution modes may be missing, or the color is a bit off, but nothing that would make the printouts not useful.
Re: [expert] Can recieve but can't send mail via Windows client
Yeah, network stuff is all set. It's the relay thing that I can't seem to figure out. - Original Message - From: Hassan Monzavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 28, 1999 11:26 AM Subject: Re: [expert] Can recieve but can't send mail via Windows client > > Has you windows machine can ping other computers beyound your Linux box? > > If not. Does IP Forwarding/Gatewaying is enable in your kernel or do you > have it as a module? > > Does your Windows machine recognize your Linux as router? > > > > On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Devin Vo wrote: > > > I'm running 6.0 as a gateway on Cable. I would like to use window's outlook or any other mail program to check mail that have account on the gateway machine. > > I can receive mail but can't send anything out via the windows machines. I can send if the user is logged into (telnet) the gateway machine. This use to be an easy fix on Redhat 5.0 by install the imap package but can't get it to work with Mandrake. I have looked everywhere but can't find a simple straight answer without > > trying to learn all of Sendmail (sorry sendmail config is beyond my understanding and I have tried many times...just end up with a useless system). > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > > > Mandrake 6.0 > > Ipchains > > Cable Modem to the outside world > > > >
Re: [expert] ports 80 & 21 in use
this means that the default applications are using them i.e apache and FTP. disable ur apache and ftp and ur set Richard Heine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/30/99 12:21:55 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Hamka B Hj Suleiman/SKO/PCSB/Petronas) Subject: [expert] ports 80 & 21 in use Hi all, First, let me say I am a little more than a newbie, but a lot less than an expert, so be gentle! Right now I am running a web server on a win98 box, Apache 1.3.9 to be exact. I want to run the server under Linux cause I'm tired of having to reboot a couple time a week. So this weekend I installed Mandrake 6.0, and tried installing Xitami web server. (I want the ftp server included with Xitami ). However when I tried to run it, it said ports 80 & 21 were already in use. I can run it fine with -d 2000 which moves the ports to 2080 and 2021. However I don't want to have to add :2080, etc. to my ip address for people to connect. I want to be able to use the default ports. So my question is, how can I find out what's using 80 & 21, and if I do, how can I move them to another port so Xitami will be able to access them? And CAN I do this? Thanks, Richard
[expert] Unresolved symbols in 2.2.9-27mdk
I have problems compiling the 3dfx device Device3Dfx-2.2-3.src.rpm due to unresolved symbols in netwave_cs.o. It was also present in the previous kernel, 2.2.9-19mdk. depmod -a gives: /lib/modules/2.2.9-27mdk/pcmcia/netwave_cs.o unresolved symbol(s) Is it possible to turn this warning off, for example in /etc/conf.modules. I am not using pcmcia. Sincerely, Svante Signell
[expert] Out of Topic Multimode 4 core fiber bandwidth
anyone knows the bandwidth that a four core multimode fiber can carry? I've heard that for a multimode, one core can carry 100 megabit so 4 cores should be 400 megabit is this correct?
