[expert] Installation problem with Mandrake..

2003-04-06 Thread Darin
I just upgraded my workstation here and it seems that I can no longer
install Mandrake.
I've tried MNF 8.2, Mandrake 9.0, and 9.1.

I can boot off the first CD, but when I hit enter to start the
installation, the bar gets about 9/10ths of the way across and then my
screen goes blank and the Caps Lock and Scroll Lock lights start
flashing on my keyboard.  The machine is then locked up hard and has to
be powered off.. 3 finger salute does no good.. Google searches indicate
that the flashing keyboard lights indicate a kernel panic of some sort..


Anyone have any ideas on how to get around this?

System configuration is:

ASUS P4T533-C motherboard Intel 850E chipset
P4 2.53 533mhz bus
1 gigabyte Samsung 1066RDRAM
Sapphire ATI Radeon 9700
Hercules Game Theater XP sound card
Intel 10/100 ethernet built into motherboard


Darin -


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


RE: [expert] You Don't Need to Burn CD's to Install

2002-10-04 Thread Darin


David Guntner wrote:
 
 I wish I know who the rocket scientist at Mandrake was that decided 
 ISOs that create CDs larger than 650M was a good idea, so that I could

 thank him with a large brick. :-(

Just curious.. Have you been out to buy blank CDs lately?  Not meaning
any offense here, but I buy 200 or so every other month, and its getting
quite hard anymore to even find 74 minute blanks.  And, if I do find
them, the cost difference between them is negligible.

Darin -




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Toshiba laptops

2001-09-19 Thread Darin

Check here: http://www.linux-laptop.net/toshiba.html

Their site has all kinds of good info.. Helped me get going on my Dell
Laptop.
- Original Message -
From: David Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: [expert] Toshiba laptops


 Does anyone have any experience of LM 8 on a Satellite - I'm thinking of
buying a Satellite 2800-600 and I'm a bit concerned about sound support, not
that it's essential.

 Many thanks

 David








 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Aureal AU8830 Superquad

2001-08-31 Thread Darin

Lyric,
I have an Aureal SQ2500, which uses the 8830 chipset.. This is by far
the best sound card out there.. It beats the SB Live hands down..

The drivers for it can be obtained here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/aureal
You will want to get the 1.1.2 drivers, and patch number 407654.  The patch
will fix a bug caused problems with ARTSD.  The patch can be obtained here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=407654group_id=810
9atid=308109

Once you untar and unzip the drivers, save the patch into the aureal
directory under the name aureal.diff
Then do 'patch -p1  aureal.diff'
That will patch the source code..
Then do 'make' to compile
Then do 'make install' to install the driver..
Its best to do this as root..

Thats all I had to do to get it to work.. After that, the drivers have
worked flawlessly for me..

Darin -

- Original Message -
From: lyric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: [expert] Aureal AU8830 Superquad



 Hey all,

 Does anyone have the above soundcard working under Mandrake 8.0?  If so,
 did you have to install any special drivers to make it work, or did
 Mandrake find and configure it for you?

 I have one of those cards sitting on my desk right now, and I would like
 to make use of it in my Linux machine.

 Please let me know what was required in order to get this card up and
 running, if it doesn;t onvolve too much hassle, I should like to upgrade
 my soundcard this weekend.

 Thanks.
 Lyric


 Current Linux kernel 2.4.3-20mdk uptime: 5 days 21 hours 40 minutes.









 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] MDK 8.1 question

2001-08-27 Thread Darin

Does anyone know if 8.1 will continue to include FreeSWAN?
I didnt see it on either CD, even though its still part of Cooker.

Darin -




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] MDK 8.1 question

2001-08-27 Thread Darin

Yes, I mentioned that in my message.. I realize that its currently in
Cooker.
However, its not on the 8.1 Beta. So, my question is, will it find its way
on to 8.1 final?

Darin
- Original Message -
From: Sergio Korlowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] MDK 8.1 question



 It is there in /cooker :

 freeswan-1.91-2mdk.i586.rpm
 --





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] How is 8.0 on laptops?

2001-08-09 Thread Darin Martin

Sheldon,
For work, I use a Dell CPIa366xt laptop with a P-II 366..
Everything works perfectly under Mandrake 7.2... I had some issues with
sound under MDK 8 with the NeoMagic chipset..  Hopefully, they will be
resolved when 8.1 comes out..  It even recognizes the ethernet built into
the docking station, and the 3com PCMCIA modem.

I did have some initial configuration problems with X-Windows, but the Linux
on Laptops site was extremely helpful..  They had info on how to configure X
for my exact model.. The URL is http://www.linux-laptop.net/

Darin -
- Original Message -
From: Sheldon E. Newhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:58 PM
Subject: [expert] How is 8.0 on laptops?


 Hello,
  I am thinking of upgrading the RedHat 6.1 on my laptop to Mandrake 8.0.
 However, with the RH I could not get X working properly without a lot of
 trouble.  The laptop is a Gateway 9300XL. It supports the same X as the
 Dell inspiron 7500.  Anyone out there running Mandrake 8.0 on one of these
 laptops?  Did you get X working?

 TIA,
  -sen








Re: [expert] SMP systems (continued)

2001-08-08 Thread Darin Martin

Actually, a lot of it depends on the architecture...
Xeons are really only designed for 4 way SMP.. 8 and 16 way solutions are
custom designs and the cost per CPU goes way up.
Plus, the GTL bus that Xeons use can easily saturate the memory bus at the 4
way level.. All 4 CPUs have to share the same memory bandwidth.  So, they
dont scale nearly as well as Sun, Alpha or MIPS.
The Alpha uses the EV6 bus.. It is quite capable of scaling well to 16 and
32 CPUs with little problem.. But, the Alpha is a high-cost option as well.
Sun UltraSparc II and III processors can scale as high as 64 processors in a
single box.. SGI has Origin servers that can scale even higher..
Linux will run well on any of these platforms..

Also, for a better high end disk solution, you might try checking into EMC
hardware.. They are expensive, but they're about the best around for Unix
servers..  IBM is the best for mainframes... If you're just looking for a
small solution (say under 200 gig) you may want to stay with a
Mylex/Compaq/Adaptec RAID soluiton.  But, anything beyond that is where EMC
sits..

My employer has used EMC on our cluster of Sun E1 systems, and has been
quite pleased.. We have 4 or 5 terabytes for our Unix machines. They run
24/7 with no problems.




- Original Message -
From: Rusty Carruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] SMP systems (continued)


 Julia A. Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks to all that sent me email about multi cpu mother boards...  One
  more question...  I've used linux quite a bit with dual CPU systems, but
  I'm thinking about a motherboard that supports 4 CPU's...  I've heard
  rumor that you just don't get a linear increase in computing power when
  you go over 2 CPU's...

 True, but you don't get linear from 1 to 2 either.

 And the rumor I'd heard was that you don't lose much of the multiplier
till
 you reach like 16 cpus  (If thats really just a rumor I'm sure we'll
 get corrected here real soon now  ;-)

   That the task scheduler doesn't make efficent use
  of the extra CPU's...

 That's a new one on me.  Maybe thats true of the 'other' OS, but that's
not
 my understanding on linux.

  Also is it possible to do something like dedicate
  a single CPU to just doing filesystem I/O?

 No.  Then it would not be *S*MP...

  That would make using
  software RAID almost as fast as using a hardware RAID controller.

 Actually, since Linux can (I think) share KERNEL tasks across multiple
cpus
 as well as the user tasks, that you get this bonus by using 2 cpus
anyhow

 Again, standing by for correction ;-)

 rc


 Rusty E. Carruth   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: (480) 345-3621  SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE   ___
 FAX:   (480) 345-8793 7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116   \e/
 Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2 Tempe, AZ 85284-1825V
 ICBM: 33 20' 44N   111 53' 47W  http://tuxedo.org/~esr/ecsl/index.html







[expert] MDK 8 Kernel questions

2001-07-25 Thread Darin Martin

Hi all,
I'm currently running Mandrake 8 on a dual Pentium Pro system.  It is
the firewall/server for my home.. Behind it, are 4 other systems that my
family uses so we can all share the DSL line.

Currently, its running the default 2.4.3 SMP kernel, but I noticed that on
the second CD is a secure kernel 2.2.19.  The secure name has me wondering
if it would be better to be running the older version instead. And, does it
support SMP?

If running the 2.2.19 secure is better, are there instructions for
installing and setting up LILO to point to it?  Are there any special
considerations for falling back from 2.4.x to 2.2.x?

Any information would be appreciated.

Thanks

Darin -





[expert] S/Wan VPN setup

2001-06-27 Thread Darin

Does anyone have any experience with this?  I just recently got set up to
use VPN so that I can work from home and I'd like to continue using Mandrake
for work..

Thanks.

Darin -





Re: [expert] 2D Video Card

2001-04-25 Thread Kathy and Darin

Matrox makes some of the best 2D cores around.. If you're not concerned
about 3D at all, Matrox is definitely the way to go..

Darin -
- Original Message -
From: Randy Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:10 PM
Subject: [expert] 2D Video Card


 I'm getting started on a new linux box and am having trouble finding the
 information I need for the video card. I don't game so I don't really care
about
 3D. I need a good 2D card that is no problems under linux and will make a
21
 inch monitor look as good as my 19 does. Any suggestions on a card like
this for
 $125 or less? I also don't need TV or anything like that.
 Thanks,
 Randy Donohoe








Re: [expert] nVidia question

2001-01-10 Thread Darin

On Tuesday 09 January 2001 17:33, you wrote:


 Secondly, if the above situation does not apply to you, try disabling AGP
 by doing the following. In the "Screen" section of your XF86Config-4 file
 add the line:

 Option "NvAgp" "0"

 This info is in the Nvidia FAQ and with my AMD-751 mobo I have to add this
 line in order for X to work correctly. Hope this helps...

 -Chris

Chris,
   Thanks for the pointer.. That got it working for me.. I can now play UT...

Thanks again





[expert] nVidia question

2001-01-09 Thread Darin

Hi,
   I've tried following the suggestions on the MandrakeUser site, the nVidia 
site, and any others I could find out there..  I still cannot get the bloody 
thing to work..
   One question:  Is there a known problem with the nVidia kernel driver and 
the AMD Irongate 751 chipset?  I notice that when it loads, it loads an 
AGPGART driver also.. Does this work with the AMD-751 chipset?

I have the following config:

FIC-SD11 motherboard with Athlon 700 not overclocked
256 meg Micron PC-133 SDRAM
Guillemot Maxi Gamer Xentor 32 TNT2 Ultra 175/183
Soundcard with Aureal Vortex2 chipset
Creative Labs 5x DVD
Sony CRX-140E CD-R
WD 10.2 gig EIDE
D-Link 530TX 10/100 Ethernet


I can get everything working just fine except for the nVidia drivers.. After 
following any of the instructions out there, I get a blank screen and a 
locked system when I try to start X from the console.

If anyone has any ideas at all, I'd appreciate hearing them..

Thanks..

Darin -




Re: [expert] cd burner firmware upgrade

2000-11-18 Thread Darin


 Does anybody know a  way possible to upgrade my cd burner firmware, all
 of the installers are windows obviously :( I have a Yamaha CRW4416E

You might try this:  http://www.formware.com.bi
They have firmware for just about anything CD related.. Dont know if they
would have info on upgrading firmware in Linux or not.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] cd burner firmware upgrade

2000-11-18 Thread Darin

woops.. Make that http://www.firmware.com.bi
I should check my typing more closely...




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] $display not set?

2000-11-17 Thread Darin

Dude, Im sure people would be more willing to respond to your messages if
you'd just turn off HTML in Outlook Express..
- Original Message -
From: "Brent Timmer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 11:36 PM
Subject: [expert] $display not set?


 alleoOkay, I was playing a simple game of pingus, and tried to exit.  It
 froze, and I had to force a log out.  Then, my resolution was messed up.
I
 went into drakconf to fix it, and it said I had to restart kdeinit.  I
 logged out, and restarted x server, and it seemed to go into an endless
 loop.  I restarted linux, and it won't go to the log in screen.  I log in
as
 root, type kdeinit, and it says "$DISPLAY is not set."  I'm sure someone
can
 help me on this one, please?





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Aureal Sound Card and MDK 7.2

2000-11-03 Thread Darin

Roland,
There are open source drivers for the Aureal cards at
www.sourceforge.net.. I have them installed in 7.2 and they work perfectly.

Darin -

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:00 AM
Subject: [expert] Aureal Sound Card and MDK 7.2


 Does anyone know where I can get Aureal drivers for 7.2???

 Roland









 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] AMD Athlon Chips

2000-10-30 Thread Darin


- Original Message -
From: "Chris Spencer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] AMD Athlon Chips


 First of all, the names are different. The socket A is an Athlon, which
has
 an off-die L2 cache. The slot A is a Thunderbird and its L2 is on-die.

 -Chris


Ummm... You have it backwards
The Slot A is the Athlon.. It has 512k of L2 cache separate from the CPU die
Socket A is the Athlon Thunderbird with 256k of L2 cache on the CPU die.
There is also the Duron, which is the economy version of the Thunderbird.
Its Socket A also, but only has 64k of L2 cache on the CPU die.

Darin -




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] kpackage problems

2000-10-24 Thread Darin

Angus,
I had the same problem with 7.2beta3.  I had to use RPM in an xterm or
from the console for that version.

However, 7.2rc1 doesnt have the problem at all.. Kpackage runs fine.

Darin -
- Original Message -
From: "Angus Beath" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 5:57 PM
Subject: [expert] kpackage problems


 Greetings Mandrake users,
 I have recently installed 7.2beta2 and have noticed an alarming tendency
in
 kpackage to segfault and die on me at any given opportunity. Is anyone
else
 experiencing this kind of problem, and what is the way to get around it? I
 have tried other packaging programs and they aren't as easy to manipulate
as
 kpackage (especially gnorpm). Maybe there is a better way. Suggestions?
 Regards,
 Angus Beath









 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
 Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] 7.2 RC1 and Nvidia driver installation

2000-10-15 Thread Darin

Hi,
  I'm trying to get Unreal Tournament running under LM 7.2 RC1 but I'm having 
a few problems.

   Does anyone have any useable instructions on installing nVidia drivers?  
The instructions on the nVidia site are cryptic at best.  All I can get now 
is my monitor going into oversync when starting UT.
I have been able to get the Kernel module for the drivers loaded.  I just 
cant seem to figure out the rest..

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Darin -



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 7.2 RC1 and Nvidia driver installation

2000-10-15 Thread Darin

On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, you wrote:


 Passes:
 - Get XF401 working with "nv" driver.
 - Decide if you want to try AGP access with nVidia's propietary AGP
   or with kernel AGP GART. Configure your kernel and build it.
   AFTER that, build NVdriver kernel module. Its build depends on
   gart being selected on kernel or not. This is why you must build
   your own NVdriver. A driver built with gart active does not work
   on a kernel built without gart, and viceversa. It is not selectable
   at runtime. If you change your mind about agp, rebuild NVdriver.
 - Remove /usr/X11R6/lib/libMesaGL.*,/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.*,
   /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/[libGLcore.a,glx.a]
 - Put nvidia's libGL.so* libGLcore.* at /usr/lib (i prefer that location
   better than /usr/X11R6/lib, so when you upgrade XFree dont have
   to copy again libGL's, just remove those from /usr/X11R6/lib).
   Run ldconfig to recreate libs links and cache
 - Put nvidia_drv.o - /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers
 - Put libglx.so.1.0.5 - /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions, and
   ln -s libglx.so.1.0.5 libglx.so. Make sure you DON'T have glx.a or
   libGLcore.a lying in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions. That is
   a common mess...
 - Change your driver in XF86Config-4 from "nv" to "nvidia". Also make
   sure you Load "glx".
 - If you cant get the resolution you had with "nv" XFree driver try
   adding Option "IgnoreEDID" "1" in your Device section.

 If you cant get this working, send a XFree.log attached...
 Good luck.

I tried all of this, and now UT cores when I try to start it.
If I try to start any of the Mesa demos, My monitor goes blank and my system 
locks.

I'm about ready to give up on this.. I've been able to figure out most 
anything, but this one just seems to be beyond me.

If anyone has any suggestions, it would be appreciated.. Thanks..

System config:

FIC-SD11 Athlon board, Irongate 751 chipset
Athlon 700
128 meg PC-133
Guillemot Xentor 32 TNT2 Ultra 175/183
Vortex 2 sound card
Dlink 10/100 ethernet
5x DVD
Mitsumi CD-RW


Thanks

Darin -



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Building an AMD Duron System

2000-10-11 Thread Darin

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, you wrote:

 Is an AMD processor equivalent to an intel chip, in terms of instruction
 set, etc...

Yes, except for SSE.. Most programs dont use SSE.  Many video card drivers 
do, but those drivers also have 3DNow optimizations as well.

 Are the power supply requirements so rigid as mentioned in the AMD website?

Yes.. The two things that you should not go cheap on are the power supply and 
the RAM.. By a power supply from the AMD list and buy good RAM.. That will 
ensure that you have a stable system

 Will any hardware on an Intel system suit an AMD system?

Yes..

 ANy recommendations of a good motherboard for a Duron processor.

The ASUS A7V is probably the best Duron board..

 Appreciate any feedback from people who have/built an AMD system

I've had my Athlon system for over 6 months now.  I've been extremely pleased 
with its stability and performance.

Darin -



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Sever Dissappointment with upgrade to Mandrake 7.0 from 6.1

2000-01-31 Thread Darin

Did you use DiskDrake to re-size your fat32 partition?  I did and lost
everything on my 10 gig drive in the process.  
After recovering from my Ghost image, I re-installed 7.0 on a second drive.

But, all was not well..  I chose to do a beginner install.  I thought I'd see
just how well it would go.  Everything installed and came up just fine.  But, I
tried to set up KPPP to dial to my ISP.. That was no problem either.  Except
that once I was connected to my ISP, I could no longer open any applications in
KDE..  As soon as I disconnected from my ISP, I could once again open
applications.
So, I thought I'd be slick and open stuff up before starting KPPP.  Well, that
worked, but I couldnt connect to anything.. Not even by entering the direct IP
address.

So, I blew that install away and re-installed in expert mode.  This time I was
able to get things set up and going.

Then, I decided to upgrade another system I have from MDK 6.1 to 7.0  That too
turned into an exercise in futility.  Once the upgrade was complete, my pppd
settings no longer worked, the supermount system didnt like the devices or the
IO chip on that system (Its a Compaq Deskpro so that part doesnt surprise me
very much) and most of the software I had set up on this system was gone.  So,
I completely wiped the partitions on that system and reinstalled 6.1.  It took
6.1 20 minutes to install, another 30 minutes to set up config files and
compile a few applications and it was back in business.  The Compaq system is a
system I use for work and has to be up and online at all times, so I didnt feel
like tinkering around for the next day or two trying to get 7.0 to behave.

I do see great things in the new installer and the Drake utilities.  But, they
need more work and more testing before I will consider using them in a
production environment.  Especially DiskDrake and its partition re-sizing code.
I really like the feel of the installer.  It does need a few improvements to make 
it more intuitive for both new users and experienced users.  
Like everyone else, this has not soured me on Mandrake.. I will be
downloading 7.1 when its made available.. 

Darin -
Senior Systems Engineer



On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, you wrote:
 tommiyI'm sorry but I don't have any ready solutions for
 your present problems.  What I do have are some suggestions as
 to how to prevent such problems in the future.  Anyway here's
 what I do.  I have one primary partition and one extended
 partition on my 9.1 gig scsi hard drive.  The primary partition
 has windows on it and uses 1/3 of the space (just under 3 gigs)
 on the drive.  The extended partition takes up the rest of the
 drive and contains 6 partitions. It has in order a 15 meg ext2,
 a 128 meg swap, a 2.6 gig ext2, a 15 meg ext2, a 128 meg swap,
 and a 2.6 gig ext2.  The primary partition is sda1 and the
 extended partition contains sda5-10.  This leaves room for 2
 linux installations of /boot, swap and /.  When a new release
 comes out I install it clean on the set of 3 partitions I'm not
 currently using.  Then I can slowly customize and install
 updates till I'm ready to stop using the old version and start
 using the new one on a daily basis.  I've never upgraded, but
 instead always installed each new version fresh and migrated to
 using the new release slowly.  There are other ways too, but
 this method is mine and I've never had any severe
 disappointments.
 
 Alan
 
 
 tommiy wrote:
  
  Well when 7.0 came out i got excited and bought the CD thinking...hey
  6.1 was cool...damn 7 must be betterwhat a dissappointment.
  
  I selected an upgrade and now I find I have an absolute multitude of
  problems to work throughseems lots of things are now brokenall
  come with the distro...
  
  First my ppp scripts no longer function...cool huh and all I used to use
  was ifup ppp0.
  
  This is now broken by a new app in the initscripts called ppp-watch. Now
  if I try the old ifup ppp0 ppp-watch barfs and rejects it. Off to the
  source code time to resolve that...in the mean time I probably broke
  everything and went back to the init scripts from 6.1 to make it work
  again oh by the way this also appears to make linuxconf ppp side of
  life to fail as well...it gives the same errors in messageskppp
  still goes but I hate KDE! Would seem to identify where the testing went
  thou.
  
  Also appears that the IDE patches weren't in the kernel cause my ALI
  board chipset is no longer recognised and installed as simplex...DOH!
  off to get another patch and patch the kernel
  
  Next for some reason starting gnome is as slow as an absolute wet
  week!!! On 6.1 it came up faston 7.0 it takes approximately 3
  minutes for the desktop icons to appear...
  
  Sigh appears that the reasons I went to Mandrake are fast dissappearing
  ;((
  
  Anyone have some cluse to the slow enlightenment startup I would
  appreciate.
  
  Regards



Re: [expert] What is going on?

2000-01-31 Thread Darin Martin

I have a mitsumi 32x that has worked fine with 6.0, 6.1 and 7.0.  
- Original Message - 
From: "ibi" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] What is going on?


 I'm looking for a new CD-ROM. 6.0 doesn't like my old Mitsumi at all.
 Any suggestions? I don't want to upgrade L-M.
 
 Pj
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



[expert] My 7.0 installation experience and a few questions

2000-01-25 Thread Darin Martin



I've run Mandrake since 6.0 and never had a problem 
with it.

Boy was I in for a shock when I installed 
7.0

First, when I tried to make a boot disk with 
rawwritewin.exe or rawwrite.exe I received an error message that says 
LoadLibrary16 Failed when I try to get the program to write the image to 
disk.
So, I used rawrite.exe from a command prompt to get 
the boot disk created.. The BIOS on my machine is too old to allow me to 
boot from CD

Next, The graphical installation is very smooth and 
easy to use. I have a 10 gig WD drive that had Win98SE and Win2k installed 
on it under a single partition. I re-sized the partition using Disk Drake 
down to 7900k to give me plenty of room for Mandrake 7. The installation 
completed fine, and Mandrake boots great. But, the data on my Fat32 
partition is completely destroyed. Some directories were completely 
empty.. One told me that I had 19gig of files in it (on a 10 gig 
drive).
Good thing I keep a current Ghost image available 
for me to recover from.

So, I recover my main drive. I have a 2 gig 
SCSI drive in this system also.. I move everything off of it on to my freshly 
restored 10gig drive and install Mandrake. The install goes 
smoothly. No problems at all.
I get everything booted up and it detects my dual 
Pentium Pro processors and loads the SMP kernel, just like past versions of 
Mandrake had done. KDE comes up, I'm able to set resolutions and color 
depth with no problems.
Then, I go to set up my 28.8 external modem to dial 
up to my ISP. KPPP looks the same as it has for some time now. I 
enter the DNS settings, etc and tell KPPP to dial. I get connected and 
logged into my ISP normally.. Thats were the trouble begins.
I tried to open Konsole to try some traceroutes and 
pings. For some reason, Konsole wont open. I tried opening X-Chat to 
get on to IRC.. No go.. X-Chat also refuses to open.
I can, however, open Netscape and use it with no 
problems.

As soon as I close KPPP, I can open as many Konsole 
and X-Chat copies as I want. But, as long as I am connected to my ISP, 
there are very few programs that I can open. This more than anything has 
me seriously confused. I've tried fiddling with all the settings in KPPP 
and the one thing I found out is that if I dont set up any DNS or default 
gateways, applications will open fine. As soon as I set those things up, 
very few applications will open.

If anyone has any ideas, I'm open to 
them.


A couple of constructive criticisms:

! - Make it an option to choose runlevel 3 or 
runlevel 5 from the installer. I prefer booting to the console and then 
deciding if I want to go into X or not.

2 - Disk Drake needs to be a little more robust 
with regard to resizing partitions.

If it were not for these few things, everything 
would be perfect. I think the installer is great. Its a major 
improvement over the redhat installer. I hope you guys keep improving on 
it.

Darin -



Re: [expert] Dual Processors Systems yeah or nah

1999-11-24 Thread Darin Martin


- Original Message -
From: Orlando Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 9:51 PM
Subject: [expert] Dual Processors Systems yeah or nah


 I am considering building a dual Pentium 2 or Celeron system.  I have been
 told that NT only benefits from the dual processors using specific
software
 applications such as Adobe.  And that it generally cruises along on one
CPU.
 Is this true and if it is does the same logic apply for Linux.  The system
 will be a dual boot workstation.  What are the pros and cons on both OS's
 and what are the recommended CPU and board combos?



Thats sort of half-right.. NT and Linux can benefit from dual CPUs.  The NT
and Linux kernels manage which app uses which CPU.  A particular program can
switch from one CPU to another several times a second.  So, the statement
that NT uses only 1 CPU is really not true.  The catch is that typically,
most programs wont run any faster than they do on a single CPU system.  This
is because most programs are single-threaded.  If a program were
multi-threaded, it would be able to have threads go to different CPUs and
thus use more CPU time.  Adobe Photoshop is multi-threaded, so image
manipulation will work more quickly in NT on a dual system than a single
system.. Quake III Arena also supports SMP, so it you have a dual system,
you should see higher framerates with a dual system.




Re: [expert] Mandrake SMP w/ P54C??

1999-11-24 Thread Darin Martin

I have dual P-Pro 200 with 128 meg.  If I run 2 copies of SETI@Home, xosview
and Ktop both show the CPUs at 99%.

My install was a plain vanilla install of Mandrake 6.1

- Original Message -
From: Yann-Erick Proy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake SMP w/ P54C??



 same problem with Duel PIII-600mhz with 1GIG ECC PC-100 RAM. Had
 abosultely no luck at all with it, lastly resoerted to RedHat 6.1 as well.
 [Mandrake Bug?]

 On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, istiqfar wrote:

  I experience the same on dual processor PIII Xeon 500MHz with 2 gig
  ram.
 
  finally, i use redhat 6.1 :-(

On the other hand, I had SMP success with a dual PIII 450MHz 128MB ECC RAM
(Mandrake 6.0 R2 as well as Debian 2.1R3) and a dual Celeron 466MHz 128MB
(Mandrake 6.1).

Two CPUs displayed as well in /proc/cpuinfo and xosview. As for performance,
I have no benchmark results to provide but I doubt I have ever seen xosview
displaying both CPUs in use. I don't have any time to investigate further
and conclude.

Kind regards,

Yann

--
Yann-Erick Proy  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quartz Informatique  --  http://www.quartz.fr/  --  Annecy (F-74000)

La diversité est source de richesse.





Re: [expert] High level SMP systems...

1999-11-22 Thread Darin Martin

Round-robin is where the http daemon alternates requests between two
different boxes.
This has a couple of advantages.  First, if one box goes down, you still
have part of your hardware up so you dont have a single point of failure.
Also, its more cost effective in the hardware area.  A single 4 way Xeon box
will easily cost you 6-7 thousand dollars.  But, two dual P-III boxes will
cost a lot less for the basic hardware..

Granted, a single 4 way Xeon box sounds really hot and sexy but its not
really very smart if you're wanting to set up a high-traffic web site.. You
want to eliminate all single points of failure.  Plus, I must admit I'm a
bit jaded.. A 4 way Xeon is nothing where I work.. I get to work on large
Sun Enterprise servers that have 64 processors and 40 gigs of ram.  We have
7 back end servers and all of them are sent requests from our two web server
boxes using the round-robin process..


- Original Message -
From: Pastor Torrente, Guillermo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 4:44 AM
Subject: RE: [expert] High level SMP systems...


 please, what is "round-robin"?

 TIA!

  ------
  De: Darin Martin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Enviado el: lunes 22 de noviembre de 1999 7:12
  Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Asunto: Re: [expert] High level SMP systems...
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Matthew Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Expert Mandrake List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 10:10 PM
  Subject: [expert] High level SMP systems...
 
 
   Does anyone know of any board manufacturer who makes a quad way SMP
  intel
   P2/3 motherboard?
  
   Thx
  
  The standard P-II/P-III chips will not work in 4 or 8 way configurations
  because of limitations in the LX, BX, and i820 chipsets.  The 450 NX and
  GX
  chipsets will allow up to 8 way SMP, but those are chipsets that will
only
  work with the more expensive Xeon processors that are slot 2 instead of
  slot
  1.
 
  It would be theoretically possible to make P-II and P-III chips work in
4
  or
  8 way SMP, but it would require a custom motherboard design.  ALR used
to
  do
  things like that.. I don't know if they still do.  You might try
checking
  with them.
 
  Companies like Tyan, ASUS, Abit, etc... probably would not want to
invest
  the time and money in developing something that is not very mainstream.
 
  Just curious.. Why not go with a clustered approach with round-robin..
Or
  a
  Beowulf style approach?  Either way.. You'll get there for a lot less
  money
  than an expensive 4 way solution..
 
 
 
 
  
 
 





Re: [expert] Xfs and Truetype Fonts

1999-10-14 Thread Darin

On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, you wrote:
 
Please turn off the bloody HTML...

Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: 


-- 
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [expert] SMP newbie

1999-09-17 Thread Darin

On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 Hello all!
 
 I've taken the plunge and picked up a pair of Celeron 400's and an Abit
 BP6 board.  This is my first foray into the wild yonders of SMP, so
 forgive my naive questions.
 
 I was under the impression that since the kernel and libc libraries
 natively support SMP, applications would automatically make use of both
 processors without intervention.  I'm wondering whether I was incorrect.
 
 As a test, I ripped an audio track from a CD and started 'notlame' (also
 tested 'bladeenc' with similar results) to encode the wav file.  Using
 top, the encoding process never used more than 50% of CPU time.  This
 makes me think that it's only making use of one processor.  Even using
 'nice -19 blah' never yielded much more than 50% CPU.
 
 Was I naive to think that applications "auto-magically" benefit from
 SMP?  Anyone know of an MP3 encoder that will make use of the second
 processor?

Steve,
   Were you using Top to see application activity?  I think you probably were.
When Top shows 50% CPU  being used in a dual CPU system, that means that the
ripper/encoder were using all of 1 CPU.  KPM shows things a little differently.

Anyways.. To answer your question.  If you want a single application to use
both CPUs, it has to be capable of multi-threading.  Without that, the program
can never use more than 1 CPU at a time.  I'm not aware of too many
applications that can do that.  I know Photoshop when used with NT can use more
than 1 CPU.
But, there is an advantage.. Take the CD Ripping and Encoding for example.  I
use Krabber with CD Paranoia and Bladenc.  Krabber allows you to start more
than 1 encoder at a time.  So, I have it start 2.  That way, the CD is done
ripping in 1/2 the time.  Or, I can run Seti@HOME reniced at 20 and still have
plenty of horsepower left to do other things so that it gets full use of the
other processor.  I can also compile apps and still do other things while the
app compiles.

Darin -
--
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



[expert] Helios is out

1999-09-17 Thread Darin

The official announcement is on the main site, theres an ISO on the primary and
seconday mirrors!   WooHoo!
I'm glad I've been using fmirror on my system here for the last few days.. I
was wondering why there were no updates today.

 --
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



RE: [expert] Bug Reports...

1999-09-14 Thread Darin

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 Quite true! I issued the same remark on the french list and I got the reply
 that :"Not every body uses KDE after all..." (dixit) Personnaly, i'd
 rather wait a few days and get the final release of KDE rather get a
 pre-something
 Too bad
 
KDE 1.1.2 is out.. Its on the KDE mirrors now.



Re: [expert] Bug Reports...

1999-09-14 Thread Darin

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 Vincent Danen wrote:
 
  But you're coming damn-near to assuming
  Mandrake is going to pull a Mickeysoft and release 6.1 without fixing the
  bugs first.
 
 Confidence misplaced.   6.1 (Helios) is already released and downloadable 
 from the mirrors.
 
 And this without even waiting for KDE 1.1.2, due next week!


Actually, its not completely done.. If you check file tiimestamps, they are
updating it once a day.. 

--
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [expert] Bug Reports...

1999-09-14 Thread Darin

On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 I recently read a post from Gael, requesting that we stop bashing them
 about the bug reports. Well unfortunately I cannot do that. Not until the
 problem/problems get resolved. The developers have to understand that if
 a product has bugs in it, that those bugs have to be answered and fixed
 before going to the next release. I know I have come down hard before on
 the lack of response from the Mandrake Team on getting things done and
 answering questions, and yes the response has picked up somewhat. But
 legitimate bugs are not getting answered. 
 
 Something must be done about this.

Theres a real easy way to fix it.. Get the source and compile it yourself.

Heres an even better question:  Did you buy Mandrake or did you download it? 
And when I say buy it, I dont mean from CheapBytes.  Did you buy a support
agreement?  People that buy genuine copies of Mandrake, or support agreements
obviously are going to get preferential treatment.. Sorry, thats how a business
works.  Don't like it?  You're more than welcome to go out and build your own
Linux distribution.  I downloaded my copy of Mandrake 6 and I would never dream
of attacking these people the way you have in this forum.. 

Next question:  If you think this is such a simple problem to fix, why dont you
help a little and fix it?  And then, submit the fix to the developers?
Isn't that supposed to be what Linux is all about??  Everyone helping everyone
else to make Linux better??

Axalon, Gael, and the others don't have to monitor this list.  I, personally am
grateful for their presence here.

--
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



[expert] Is 6.1 ready?

1999-09-10 Thread Darin




I just happened to be checking the primary 
mirrors at ftp.sunet.se and sunsite.uio.no have fresh 6.1 directories. In 
fact, the Norway site was in the process of updating while I was 
there.

Does this mean that 6.1 is done?

Darin -


Re: [expert] Suggestion for Mandrake

1999-09-09 Thread Darin

On Thu, 09 Sep 1999, you wrote:
To clairify, I did not mean to remove the pentium version. The boxed
 version could have 2 CDs. I don't think that would make Mandrake have to up
 the price very much. If you are using a PIII or Zeon are you loosing that
 much by running PII optimized code?
 

P-II, P-III and Xeon processors all use the same instruction set.  The only
difference is the MMX and SSE instructions for optimizing graphics and sound
processing.  Hardly anyone uses those special sets anyways.  
Thats why the choice is i686 when you go to compile the kernal.  That basically
supports anything from the Pentium Pro on up.  When you get right down to it,
the P-II, P-III and Xeon processors are nothing more than a Pentium Pro core
with different caching systems and MMX/SSE instructions added on.

--
Cthulhu for President in 2000 - Why settle for the lesser evil



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: Linux-Mandrake 6.1pre available for download and tests

1999-09-01 Thread Darin

On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, duncan hall wrote:
 
  How is this different to COOKER?
  
  Dunc
 
 Cooker is an on going ever changeing development project.
 
 Cassini is the prerelease of 6.1, containing less "bleeding edge" software
 than cooker. The Cassini team "basicly" took Cooker in one hand Venus in
 tthe other smashed them togather (eg removed some really instable stuff)
 And so on and so forth.
 
 You'll have to compare version info between cooker cassini and venus by
 hadn cause i'm not gonna cover that.. take to long
  

Is there time to get the 2.2.12 kernel in before release??  Or is it too late
for that already?



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: Linux-Mandrake 6.1pre available for download and tests

1999-08-31 Thread Darin

On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, you wrote:
 On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, you wrote:
  Aug, 31 1999 ANNOUNCE: Linux-Mandrake 6.1pre available for download
  and tests
  -
  
 Will we be able to upgrade to this with RPMs or will this require a
 reinstall? Any idea if the kernel included will like dual-PPro any
 better? ;-)
 Thanks...
   John

John,
   I compiled and installed 2.2.12 last week.. The SMP works a little more
efficiently than the 2.2.9 that I was running..   The 6.1pre release has kernel
2.2.11 which as I recall had a memory leak problem..