[expert] Removing read modules
Hi, The CPIA module dies on me on occations and I need to remove and reload it for it to work again. Most times, I can do this, but sometimes it refuses to remove the modules because it is budy. Obviously, I have tried the rmmod -r cpia or rmmod cpia and all related modules. I have removed all other modules that rely on cpia and so it should be removed. Upto this point I can only fix this by just restarting the computer, but that seems dramatic and a little too much like windoze. (Hey, I wanna brag about how long my box has been up!) TIA. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Removing dead modules
Hi, The CPIA module dies on me on occations and I need to remove and reload it for it to work again. Most times, I can do this, but sometimes it refuses to remove the modules because it is busy. Obviously, I have tried the rmmod -r cpia or rmmod cpia and all related modules. I have removed all other modules that rely on cpia and so it should be removed. Upto this point I can only fix this by just restarting the computer, but that seems dramatic and a little too much like windoze. (Hey, I wanna brag about how long my box has been up!) TIA. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] CD Writing and the Via 686b southbridge
Well, I have actually bin hit quite a bit of times with the bug. I treid many things and could not get the corruption to stop. I finally gave up when it became clear it was a chipset thing. However, no problems with CDRW, only when I am doing large transfers between these two drives. So , it is not that rare for people like me that use it quite a bit. To avoide the corruption, I just use one IDE drive now and do small transfers to the second. On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Tom Brinkman wrote: On Monday 30 July 2001 07:41 pm, Ron Johnson wrote: Do I remember properly that because of the bug in this chip, that the LM80 2.4 kernel SRPMs have DMA disabled on IDE CDRs and CDRWs? And that that means that creating CDR* disks from IDE CDR* devices is impossible on motherboards that have the 686b? I believe this business of the VIA-IDE bug is greatly overblown. It only rarely supposedly affects large transfers across IDE channels (100mb). I have a VIA chipset board (Soyo k7vta pro) and have never experienced this bug. I just burned backup copies of Mandrake Freq2 last night. I have 2 IBM HDDs on ide0, and a CDrom and CD-RW on ide1. Both LM 8.0 (various 2.4.x kernels) and Freq2 (2.4.5-5) have set up all the drives using 32bit and DMA during install. No problems, either burning CD's or while testing moving a 700mb file across ide. In researching this bug before I bought the VIA board I came across three elements that are said to provoke the bug. Older VIA chipsets (there's been bascially 3 steppings since the chip was introduced). SB sound cards, particularly SB Live! PCI, and then mostly with Abit motherboards. Newer Western Digital HDD's. I have none of the above, and since my research was done on the Net, take it with a grain of salt. I have had some correspondence with a friend who has all the above, 2 new WD HDDs, a pci SB Live!, on a Abit KT7a, yet he's never experienced the bug or had problems burning CD's either.
[expert] USB-uhci/ webcam STRANGE problems
Hi, My old motherboard's IDE died, so I replaced it with a new AOPEN AK73 PRO(A). On the old motherboard, I used a ZoomCam USB cam with no problems. I just loaded the modules and everything worked. The uhci always used IRQ 3 on my old system. Now, basically everything but the motherboard is the same and when I load usb-uhci (modprobe usb-uhci), I get PCI: Found IRQ 3 for device 00:07.2 IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:07.2 IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:07.3 usb-uhci.c: Detected 2 ports PCI: Found IRQ 3 for device 00:07.3 IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:07.2 IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:07.3 usb-uhci.c: Detected 2 ports the devices 00:07.2 and .3 are the following (cat /proc/pci Bus 0, device 7, function 2: USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (rev 22). IRQ 11. Master Capable. Latency=32. I/O at 0xd400 [0xd41f]. Bus 0, device 7, function 3: USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (#2) (rev 22). IRQ 11. Master Capable. Latency=32. I/O at 0xd800 [0xd81f]. and usb-uhci adds itself for IRQ 11 (cat /proc/interrupts) 0:6062202 XT-PIC timer 1: 23933 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 7:160 XT-PIC via82cxxx 10:1050611 XT-PIC eth0 11: 2 XT-PIC usb-uhci, usb-uhci 12: 34724 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse 14: 179587 XT-PIC ide0 15: 4 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 Well, when I modprobe cpia, my webcam modules, I get this : usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=2 (error=-110) usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=3 (error=-110) I would really appreciate ANY help on this, as I am completely lost. I have tried many things, especially changing a lot of BOIS settings .TIA
Re: [expert] USB-uhci/ webcam STRANGE problems
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, etharp wrote: have you tried (as root, in a text console) running (typing) kudzu? and what did it say and do? since you changed the MOBO The strange thing is that it DID NOT recognize and add the USB hub ports until later on. Not that I did not have the USB enable, it was enabled the whole time. But I changed something in the BOIS (I was at the point of almost randomly changing options) and during boot it recognized and asked me to add them. I did and since then it has not mentioned them again. I wish I would remeber exactly what I changed. On Thursday 26 July 2001 20:50, Nima S. Panahi wrote: Hi, My old motherboard's IDE died, so I replaced it with a new AOPEN AK73 PRO(A). On the old motherboard, I used a ZoomCam USB cam with no problems. I just loaded the modules and everything worked. The uhci always used IRQ 3 on my old system. Now, basically everything but the motherboard is the same and when I load usb-uhci (modprobe usb-uhci), I get PCI: Found IRQ 3 for device 00:07.2 IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:07.2 IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:07.3 usb-uhci.c: Detected 2 ports PCI: Found IRQ 3 for device 00:07.3 IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:07.2 IRQ routing conflict in pirq table for device 00:07.3 usb-uhci.c: Detected 2 ports the devices 00:07.2 and .3 are the following (cat /proc/pci Bus 0, device 7, function 2: USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (rev 22). IRQ 11. Master Capable. Latency=32. I/O at 0xd400 [0xd41f]. Bus 0, device 7, function 3: USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (#2) (rev 22). IRQ 11. Master Capable. Latency=32. I/O at 0xd800 [0xd81f]. and usb-uhci adds itself for IRQ 11 (cat /proc/interrupts) 0:6062202 XT-PIC timer 1: 23933 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 7:160 XT-PIC via82cxxx 10:1050611 XT-PIC eth0 11: 2 XT-PIC usb-uhci, usb-uhci 12: 34724 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse 14: 179587 XT-PIC ide0 15: 4 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 Well, when I modprobe cpia, my webcam modules, I get this : usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=2 (error=-110) usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=3 (error=-110) I would really appreciate ANY help on this, as I am completely lost. I have tried many things, especially changing a lot of BOIS settings .TIA
[expert] Email attack?
I recieved this email at my server for panahi.com. It was sent by server outside of panahi.com, but labeled as if it was from our domain to our domain. It seems to be an attack but I cannot figure out an attack on what. Should I be worried , should I check other logs..? Please help if you know. I am running 8.0 Beta 2 with most of the packages upgraded to 8.0 final. TIA -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:03:50 -0500 (CDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello: =AB=DC=A9=EA=BAp=A5=B4=C2Z=B1z! =B8=B2=B5=E5=A4=FD=B8=B2=B2=B3=A5=F8=B7~=A5=CD=AA=AB=AC=EC=A7=DE=B0=B7=B1d=C1=BF=AEy=A1A=A1A=A6b=B7|=AD=FB=A5N=B8=B9=AA=BA=A6a=A4=E8=BD=D0=BF=E9=A4J AA2 =A4~=AF=E0=ACd=B8=DF=A9=D2=A6=B3=A4=BA=AEe=C1=DC=A1I=A5=CD=AA=AB=AC=EC=A7=DE=AA=BA=B5o=AEi=B4N=ACO=B1z=AA=BA=B3=CC=A8=CE=BE=F7=B7|=A1A=A4=A3=ADn=A7=D1=B0O=A8=D3=B3}=B3}=A1I=A1I=C1=D9=A5i=A5H=A5=D3=BD=D0=A7K=B6O=A5[=A4J=A6=A8=AC=B0=AD=D1=BC=D6=B3=A1=B7|=AD=FB=A1A=A5i=A5H=BE=D6=A6=B3=AB=DC=A6h=BA=D6=A7Q=A1A=A6=A8=A5\=AA=BA=A4H=A7=E2=B4=A4=BE=F7=B7|=A1A=A6=B8=B5=A5=AA=BA=A4H=B5=A5=AB=DD=BE=F7=B7|=A1I=A1I=A1I
Re: [expert] buggy mouse/keyboard
Well ,the keyboard is a new dell keybaord I got from a dell computer (the server is not Dell.) It was working great there, but I guess I can try it again. The mouse I have tried with one another computer, a laptop. However, the laptop's ps/2 ports are quarky and act wierd, so maybe to bad things combined made it work. Can a bad mouse screw up and cause the problem with the keybaord? Also, unless the PS/2 ports on the motherboard have gone bad , they were working too. I bet it is something simple I am overlooking, but I have overlooked it a hundred timeAH! On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Rusty Carruth wrote: Nima S. Panahi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have had this problem with my mouse and keyboard that I have tried everything with it and still have problems. ... Can you try the offending hardware on another box? My first guess is that the mouse and/or the keyboard are/is failing. Otherwise I'm stumped (just call me Clue Challenged, its ok ;-) rc Rusty Carruth Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (480) 345-3621 SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE FAX: (480) 345-8793 7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116 Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2 Tempe, AZ 85284-1825 ICBM: 33 20' 44N 111 53' 47W
[expert] buggy mouse/keyboard
I have had this problem with my mouse and keyboard that I have tried everything with it and still have problems. The mouse is configured correctly, as it is a ps/2 microsoft (no wheel) old school mouse and I have X and the console setup for it. However, many times it acts erratic, jumps around and acts like I push the buttons. It looks VERY much like a miss configuration, but I am sure I have set it up right. The strange thing, however, is the ps/2 keyboard. The keyboard works great, expect for a couple of points. Randomply it goes crazy and types single characters for me, or puts everything in caps, or maps the keys to some wierd set of symbols. The non-random part I can reproduce is if I use the repeat feature or hold some buttons. Then the problems are not random but happen on queue. 90% of the time I can reset the keyboard to act normal, but holding down two bottons, like the shift and ctrl, or things like at for a few seconds. The first linux installed on the machine was 8.0 beta 2 and it has had it even with 8.0 final. It has never had any other OS on it, but it is a server and I mostly ssh into it anyway. However, it would be nice to fix the problem. TIA.
Re: [expert] Mandrake 8 GLX (Nvidia)
I have always used the src.rpm files (kernel and GLX) and they work great! From my experience, it works with 8.0b2, 8.0b3, 8.0RC1, and the 8.0 final. Tars work great too and are just as fast as the src.rpm. But I like RPM and stick with it. Look closely, he said he downloaded the tar files from the nvidia webpage. They are not, I repeat, not rpm's. They need to be uncompressed and then compiled. This insures that you can use them on any distribution, although I could not get them to compile on LM8 RC1, maybe after I install the final release they will work. Adam
Re: [expert] VMware 2.0 and Mandrake 8.0.
Um, I am sorry, I miss read the question. My problem is still the same though, I cannot install any linux guests under linux host. It hangs at lilo. On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Nima S. Panahi wrote: I am have same problem. I cannot, for the life of me, install a new vmware machine because of the lilo problem. I have not tried grub or to see what exactly the problem is, since I just kept using the old ones. Oh yeh, the problem started when I got 8.0beta2 and was there for beta3. Now, with 8.0 final, vmware segments and does not run anyways. This 8.0 final release is not as half as stable as Mandrake's other final releases. It feels like a beta or maybe even an alpha. On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Lars Roland Kristiansen wrote: Hi i am trying to make win2k to run inside VMware in mdk8.0 - i have an 13 gb ibm drive with wintendo on the first 4gb (/dev/hda1) and mandrake on the rest. When i try starting VMware it all goes fine, but when coming to the lilo point it just hangs (i think it may be the grafical lilo-thing that is messing it up) Please help ___ Mvh./Yours sincerely Lars Lars Roland Kristiansen | Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stud. Scient. Mathematics | TLF(home):39699914 - 116 Copenhagen University - | Home address: Bispebjerg parkalle Institute for Mathematical Sciences | 22 - 2400 københavn NV - room 116. Url: www.math.ku.dk | Politics is for the moment, equations are forever - Albert Einstein
RE: [expert] VMware 2.0 and Mandrake 8.0.
I am using 2.0.3 and the newest release (799). On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Andrew Judge wrote: take a look at the version of VMware you are running. There are issues with some Unix guest OS that were not resolved in 2.0.2 that supposedly are in 2.0.3 and 2.0.2 comes with 7.2. There are also problems with XFree86 4 and it is not yet supported but works as long as you don't full screen it. I believe that 2.4 support is only just coming out Currently, Red Hat 7.1 and other distributions that use the 2.4.x kernel are not supported as host operating systems for VMware Workstation 2.0.3 for Linux. Our engineering team is working on this compatibility issue and we will release an update to fix it as soon as possible. --quote VMware Andy Judge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars Roland Kristiansen Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 9:15 PM To: Mandrake-expert Subject: [expert] VMware 2.0 and Mandrake 8.0. Hi i am trying to make win2k to run inside VMware in mdk8.0 - i have an 13 gb ibm drive with wintendo on the first 4gb (/dev/hda1) and mandrake on the rest. When i try starting VMware it all goes fine, but when coming to the lilo point it just hangs (i think it may be the grafical lilo-thing that is messing it up) Please help ___ Mvh./Yours sincerely Lars Lars Roland Kristiansen | Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stud. Scient. Mathematics | TLF(home):39699914 - 116 Copenhagen University - | Home address: Bispebjerg parkalle Institute for Mathematical Sciences | 22 - 2400 københavn NV - room 116. Url: www.math.ku.dk | Politics is for the moment, equations are forever - Albert Einstein
Re: [expert] VMware 2.0 and Mandrake 8.0.
I was suspecting that. There is something up with my install? I mean, I can't even install vmware anymore, the program vmware either hangs or segments. I have tried many fresh installs to no avail. Other apps that ran before also segment, even after recompiling , even with kgcc. I just can't figure it out and it is driving me crazy! On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Doug Byfield wrote: On Monday 23 April 2001 07:10, Chris Spencer wrote: If you went to the VMware site you'd see that 2.4.x kernels are not supported. Its a VMware problem, not Mandrake Funny, I have used VMware 2.0.3 on Mandrake 7.2 with 2.4x kernel, Mandrake 8.0 with 2.4.3 kernel and Debian 2.2 with 2.4.2 kernel. NT4 runs fine in all these situations. (Don't know about Redhat 7.1) When a company says that a distribution is not supported it doesn't always mean that it won't work, just means that they haven't checked it out to the point where they would officially endorse its use. I guess this is a case of YMMV (your mileage may vary)
Re: [expert] VMware 2.0 and Mandrake 8.0.
I realize this. However, my point is that it was working fine with 2.4.2 before me messing with 8.0. Now, vmware will segment out with 2.4.2 AND 2.4.3 with the 8.0 final. I know it is a VMware problem, but I just want to know what is going on. If I wanted just push the button and have things work w/o knowing why, I would use windows (chills as I say it). If you went to the VMware site you'd see that 2.4.x kernels are not supported. Its a VMware problem, not Mandrake -Chris
Re: [expert] VMware 2.0 and Mandrake 8.0.
I tried both. But to not matter! I believe I have found the problem (at least a big part of it). Among the many reinstalls I did, I did a bare install with X and KDE and the such. It seemed to actually work then ( I did not install anything from the second CD except for the kernel source, at this was suggested on the list before). On of these fresh installs allowed both VMware gsx and VMware workstation to work! Even thought it was extremely slow, I started adding packaged one by one as needed. Well, I was recompiling a software, and it needed libsafe. As soon as I installed libsafe, vmware did the exact same crashing and hanging. Infact, many other programs, such as cksfv, also segmented! I feel SO much better now that I can run VMware and have applications not segment on me! You mentioned that you installed vmware many times. Did you just install over the existing vmware, or did you use the uninstall script?
Re: [expert] 8.0 final --brakes MANY applications
Well, from what I have learned upto this point , you will be just fine as long as you only install exactly what you need, the least amount from CD 2, as the problem packages seem to be coming from there. Especially, libsafe WILL mess your system up. Other than that, it should be fine. Hopefully mandrake people will be able to find out what exactly is going on. Other than that, 8.0 ROCKS! Nice job Mandrake! On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Neal Lippman wrote: So, from reading all the posts here, it seems clear that I should NOT d/l MDK 8.0...maybe the 8.1 release will work right. So my question is: I am thinking of shifting from KDE 2.1 over to the latest Gnome - although I need to keep both installed because I actually have an app or two that requires the KDE libraries. But, I want to try evolution and maybe nautilus, esp evolution as I am really in need to an Outlook replacement on a Linux system. How are people finding the latest Helix d/l - working, or not? Neal
Re: [expert] 8.0 final --brakes MANY applications (Software Installeris first on that list)
I believe I have a handle on the problem now. I did a complete fresh and minimal install, without using anything from the second CD except for kernel source. I then went about recompiling programs and they worked! infact, I did not have to use kgcc as before and the previously compiled versions worked also! So relieved, I started to track down what I thought was a naughty library somewhere. It was VERY slow, but I slowly kept adding rpm's, especially lib's. As soon as I hit libsafe, all HELL broke loose and I was getting the exact same thing again! It seems like libsafe is at least a big player in all this. Anyone know why? Any suggested fixes, especially since I have a program that needs libsafe to compile.
[expert] 8.0 final --brakes MANY applications
Its driving me crazy! Everysince upgrading from 8.0 final from 8.0 beta3, many applications segmet out where before worked. Its seems that almost all programs that did not come with 8.0 final segment fault. I have tried recompiling the ones that I could with kgcc, kg++ and the such. However, I still get most of them crashing. The binary only packages, such as vmware (workstation or gsx) are hopeless. My system is a AMD T-bird 1.2 GHz. I basically installed 99% of 8.0 final. PLEASE HELP!! Its driving me crazy... TIA
Re: [expert] VMware 2.0 and Mandrake 8.0.
I am have same problem. I cannot, for the life of me, install a new vmware machine because of the lilo problem. I have not tried grub or to see what exactly the problem is, since I just kept using the old ones. Oh yeh, the problem started when I got 8.0beta2 and was there for beta3. Now, with 8.0 final, vmware segments and does not run anyways. This 8.0 final release is not as half as stable as Mandrake's other final releases. It feels like a beta or maybe even an alpha. On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Lars Roland Kristiansen wrote: Hi i am trying to make win2k to run inside VMware in mdk8.0 - i have an 13 gb ibm drive with wintendo on the first 4gb (/dev/hda1) and mandrake on the rest. When i try starting VMware it all goes fine, but when coming to the lilo point it just hangs (i think it may be the grafical lilo-thing that is messing it up) Please help ___ Mvh./Yours sincerely Lars Lars Roland Kristiansen | Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stud. Scient. Mathematics | TLF(home):39699914 - 116 Copenhagen University - | Home address: Bispebjerg parkalle Institute for Mathematical Sciences | 22 - 2400 københavn NV - room 116. Url: www.math.ku.dk | Politics is for the moment, equations are forever - Albert Einstein
[expert] login based smtp/ ssmtp
Hi, I run a webmail and email system. The only access I want to give is secure SSL type. I have already setup a SSL based imap, pop3, and webmail system. However, for the simap and pop3s users, they need smtp . My users are all over the world and I cannot select access based on network, therefore I want to have an SMTP server that allows usage if people login. I also want this smtp server to be ssmtp (over SSL). I am using Postfix on the system, any help or direction pointing will be great. Thanks!
Re: [expert] best video card for Linux?
My Geforce 2 DDR 32MB works bad when combined with a VIA K133 (or K133A) chipset and possibly more chipsets. With the newer kernel 2.4, it will work better with the agp port driver and not hang as much. However, there is the bad image quality at resolutions above 1024x768 and any decent refresh rate. From what I hear, many people have the same blurry images problem with this chipset and AMD, so I would stay away from it. Quoting Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wednesday 07 March 2001 02:00 pm, Jeff Malka wrote: My old Matrox Millennium video card just went dead on me. Still works but the reds are gone and everything is blue (me too). I am therefore going to have to get a new video card. What are the good ones to look at for Linux? I am running Mandrake Linux 7.1 You got 2 choices to make which card and which drivers. Some cards like the Voodoo3 ($55 up) have open source drivers and are very Linux compatible, fully supported. Then there's the Nvidia cards (GeForce, $80 up) that are newer better hardware, but you'll need to get their closed source, binary only drivers from the manufacturer as distros like Mandrake will never furnish/support closed source hardware. It'd be a good idea to research the driver issuses before you buy anything. -- Dale Earnhardt, the greatest stock car driver ever, he's won his 8th and His Greatest Championship Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay I am MIGHTY! I have a glow you cannot see... I have a heart as big as the moon As warm as bath water We are superheroes men... We don't have time to be charming... The boots of evil were made for WALKING.. We're watching the big picture friend We know the score We are a public service... Not Glamour boys.. Not captains of industry.. Not makers of things... Keep your vulgar money!!! We are a justice sandwich (No toppings necessary) Living rooms of America, do you catch my drift DO YOU DIG???!!!??!! Nima S. Panahi The Berry Theory Group University of Chicago Room 117 5735 South Ellis Ave Chicago, IL 60637 Tel#: 773-702-7052 http://www.panahi.com http://www.uchicago.edu Geek Code (for those who can decode): -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- GS d- s:+ a-- C UL+++ P L+++ E- W+ N+ K- w-- O- M-- UF+++ V-- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R tv+ e+++ h--- y+++ G !PS !PE !Y !b DI --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: PGP 6.5.8 mQGiBDqnBXARBAD9dCljsV1TkWotjKJoP+pOY3dbryQ3uZS8dOUb9yp4ePg1GCty Jcnd0Nuwqp6lk56pFjbl1R+38UJeF5zpBySG6JlZrolybJV0sVcLjFeA5QAx2Pw3 /Fpqb6I+E2OT3+0ACQpzigPGWK8lsJtZo12xW/9bbftiJ73D3K5/HkRL/wCg/9P0 Ovqs5zxW+lHG7jbKgx7lzg0EAPHXI9POQNaZPt9Yu8YpQ2j0yTTDQvV3hjiGSt4z QIub+yNXfmGfyHQtuTXAoGCJDxcf6hUOqbsVKc3febbRG/mwa4iQfM3+RL4lANoc IS825tEXKBhW4r3baFXKjrGlL/OoaLbM9P6WC7H4zGCYsh5hsrg8R/6HL109kPq8 TDT2A/9b5Ff3vOdYPDcyGlT/I6bD3/5gDwl6DEQCEFHdt46nobQYw/SSSGVjY4Ft O1Sctam5mvUO8PynYcIk9S305C+OQTEDKqvOp11nlAFnLDPkrd4ZTKjLCBw/Yg9c e+/JQZb4efrQK/xQGN1k2qY0TuRh+RDw+4l2edSt7HKACsx3N7QgTmltYSBTLiBQ YW5haGkgPG5pbWFAcGFuYWhpLmNvbT6JAE4EEBECAA4FAjqnBXAECwMBAgIZAQAK CRCiRcZBiSUXy0AqAKDE7eQ28TNlFtRBTVDjpvCQlzUDswCdHrnFVDAredgNdWS8 a50bw4Cd69O5Aw0EOqcFdRAMAMwdd1ckOErixPDojhNnl06SE2H22+slDhf99pj3 yHx5sHIdOHX79sFzxIMRJitDYMPj6NYK/aEoJguuqa6zZQ+iAFMBoHzWq6MSHvoP Ks4fdIRPyvMX86RA6dfSd7ZCLQI2wSbLaF6dfJgJCo1+Le3kXXn11JJPmxiO/Cqn S3wy9kJXtwh/CBdyorrWqULzBej5UxE5T7bxbrlLOCDaAadWoxTpj0BV89AHxstD qZSt90xkhkn4DIO9ZekX1KHTUPj1WV/cdlJPPT2N286Z4VeSWc39uK50T8X8dryD xUcwYc58yWb/Ffm7/ZFexwGq01uejaClcjrUGvC/RgBYK+X0iP1YTknbzSC0neSR BzZrM2w4DUUdD3yIsxx8Wy2O9vPJI8BD8KVbGI2Ou1WMuF040zT9fBdXQ6MdGGze MyEstSr/POGxKUAYEY18hKcKctaGxAMZyAcpesqVDNmWn6vQClCbAkbTCD1mpF1B n5x8vYlLIhkmuquiXsNV6UwybwACAgv8DPKLqokHNU9mh9tifScKuPbggYaFhtZv sSF7eHaYnbAwkxVpxJlQluVrR4BeVjS0XZRXQZ2QozvRN3Z6Bnf3V4yByYpL/wCB HrPJxpfSSYljM22dzsVZnK0o7wDq+Liej1FC4wj+cWSXB1FP/tLxq51dE/ccv+6C ROeCNmA7uilZPXnAHcbbyuZHHcraQ4I+Td4xhk4aaSLjB55uOhcWdybqvuV8JI3S 97iM1E0Ruid7XdzrNppsMUPTLZvHZRVX4cr6yY7pvHQGqCpPa2LDdWLfc5zbnFED oRhB2HwMu3gD6mrchF3tSYKlbpTlGjS/96TQFqnCElOsQDaiGrtR8uD27nM8huLc 3JQtzLUT/QS+jqmxBd9Z9ue927+gDH4NwAdxedflOuCbtlGO269Iqgsn6CtoBrpD QXWR5p4HIIIe+C0ylsdACITpKHiINEN6oO1iaN53oPlc1XeGIt10UFLSwJE//y9P nsEyLUAdAYPvkWTzFSfw9iNhJOzZ3i5TiQBGBBgRAgAGBQI6pwV1AAoJEKJFxkGJ JRfLs9YAn1Pc2YKVdwNsbLUWFfhXIlToKpiZAKC5H1JVUkrrjxlkCgJedLtsZrXG 8Q== =iaoO -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
RE: [expert] NEC Laptop Problems
It could be that you selected too many packages and you are running out of space. I had a similar problem with my old laptop. Quoting Ben Keed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: come to think of it, it was towards the end of the install, and i was prompt a few times because it couldn't install some features. I'll give it another go tommorrow and see what happens cheers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andre LABBE Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 8:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:[expert] NEC Laptop Problems Hi You don't say which type and model. The time to install varies a lot according the speed of the laptop. I have an Umax Actionbook 340T (Time laptop and some other are the same) and LM 72 works fine with it, I use the kernel 2.4.2, every thing is supported. But I recall that the install took a couple of hour to install and I didn't have all the options selected. Another problem that I have found with the 2 CD Distribution is the install always moans that some files cannot be installed ( at least with my CDs), luckily enough they are not system files. But the real problem is if you miss the box to click continue the box vanishes or goes 'under' the install progress bar and you're stack because you cannot continue the install, and that always happen near the end of the install. Andre I am MIGHTY! I have a glow you cannot see... I have a heart as big as the moon As warm as bath water We are superheroes men... We don't have time to be charming... The boots of evil were made for WALKING.. We're watching the big picture friend We know the score We are a public service... Not Glamour boys.. Not captains of industry.. Not makers of things... Keep your vulgar money!!! We are a justice sandwich (No toppings necessary) Living rooms of America, do you catch my drift DO YOU DIG???!!!??!! Nima S. Panahi The Berry Theory Group University of Chicago Room 117 5735 South Ellis Ave Chicago, IL 60637 Tel#: 773-702-7052 http://www.panahi.com http://www.uchicago.edu Geek Code (for those who can decode): -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- GS d- s:+ a-- C UL+++ P L+++ E- W+ N+ K- w-- O- M-- UF+++ V-- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R tv+ e+++ h--- y+++ G !PS !PE !Y !b DI --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
