[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-20 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
 willytex@ wrote:
 
  do.rflex wrote:
   Congress, White House Pointing Fingers Over
   Who Killed Bonus Provision...
  
  You need to get some smarts, Mr. Manning,
  the AIG bonuses aren't even a blip on the radar
  compared to the crazed spending by the Obama
  Democratic Party Congress. And nobody knows
  where the money is even going. Obama is turning
  into a nightmare spender.
 
  The Obama, Reid and Polosi clique are bent on
  ruining our economy and turning this country
  into a Soviet-style communism. There's anger
  brewing in the masses and like Barry2 says,
  rebellion is in the air. 
 
 LOL !...only among the minority rednecks like you and Chuck Norris,
 Richard. What a joke.
 
  Where would we be if it weren't for the minority of rednecks (patriots) that 
took issue with the powers that be in the late seventeen hundreds?
   Probably best to wait before making a judgment.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-20 Thread boo_lives
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
  willytex@ wrote:
  
   do.rflex wrote:
Congress, White House Pointing Fingers Over
Who Killed Bonus Provision...
   
   You need to get some smarts, Mr. Manning,
   the AIG bonuses aren't even a blip on the radar
   compared to the crazed spending by the Obama
   Democratic Party Congress. And nobody knows
   where the money is even going. Obama is turning
   into a nightmare spender.
  
   The Obama, Reid and Polosi clique are bent on
   ruining our economy and turning this country
   into a Soviet-style communism. There's anger
   brewing in the masses and like Barry2 says,
   rebellion is in the air. 
  
  LOL !...only among the minority rednecks like you and Chuck Norris,
  Richard. What a joke.
  
   Where would we be if it weren't for the minority of rednecks (patriots) 
 that took issue with the powers that be in the late seventeen hundreds?
Probably best to wait before making a judgment.

If you've studied the american patriots at all you know they were definitely 
not rednecks.

Anyone with an ounce of economic sense knows the current crisis was created and 
started long before obama was around, and the current spending is to stimulate 
the economic in response to this crisis.  Funny how $5 trillion in debt 
incurred during bush yrs before he created a crisis didn't raise an eyebrow for 
these republican idiots.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-20 Thread Richard J. Williams
boo_lives wrote:
 Anyone with an ounce of economic sense knows 
 the current crisis was created and started 
 long before obama was around...

So, Richard Holbrooke approved the AIG bonuses 
when he served on the AIG board. Holbrook also 
got sweetheart deals from Angelo at Countrywide. 
But where was Holbrook when Enron was going down? 
Now Holbrook is Obama's special envoy? So, this 
is the hope and change in Washington D.C. with 
Obama.

Read more:

'Strike Two for Holbrooke'
Kausfiles, March 20, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/ddtwgv



[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-20 Thread Richard J. Williams
  Dodd will be defeated in the next election, now
  he's trying to put the blame for the AIG bonuses
  on Tim, Barak, Harry and Nancy. 
 
boo wrote: 
 You're finished Richard. Give it up old man. You 
 are all washed up, and no-one cares about your 
 stupid Chevy truck that has broken down.
 
So, Tim Gaithner knew about the AIG bonuses on March 
3rd, not just last weekend. Business as usual in
Washington, D.C. Dodd will be defeated in the next
election - he's finished. Next to go will be Tim
Gaithner, I predict.

'Congress, Geithner knew about bonuses on March 3rd'
Posted by Ed Morrissey
Hot Air, March 20, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/d2bl29




[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-19 Thread off_world_beings


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willy...@... wrote:

 do.rflex wrote:
  Congress, White House Pointing Fingers Over
  Who Killed Bonus Provision...
 
 You need to get some smarts, Mr. Manning,
 the AIG bonuses aren't even a blip on the radar
 compared to the crazed spending by the Obama
 Democratic Party Congress. 

Er, that money from Obama is money for a very large part of a CONTINENT
the size of Europe, and almost as big an economy as Europe. It is called
the USA Richard.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-19 Thread off_world_beings

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Robert babajii...@...
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , enlightened_dawn11 no_reply@
wrote:
 
  this partisan warfare has reached an unhealthy level, with the
radicals on the right not even willing to wait to see the effects of the
president's policies. it wouldn't have been tolerated even ten years
ago, but the poison of the bush era continues to seep into american
politics. pathetic and disturbing.
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
  
   Judy wrote:
Treasury is stabbing Dodd in the back to cover
up its own stupidity, and as I said earlier, the
right-wingers are happily helping out in that
effort...
   
   It would probably be in the best interests of
   the country for Obama, Gietner, Dodd, Reid, and
   Pelosi to just resign today, snip
 
 Basically I think they're stuck on keeping any change from seeping
through.
 They are afraid of any real change of anything.
 Ronald Reagan is their hero, and that's that.

Yes, that would be the Ronald Reagan who supplied Saddam Hussein with
chemical weapons to use (on a daily basis) against the Iranians. The
right wing are LITERALLY insane.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-19 Thread off_world_beings


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willy...@... wrote:

 do.rflex wrote:
  Congress, White House Pointing Fingers Over
  Who Killed Bonus Provision...
 
 You need to get some smarts, Mr. Manning,
 the AIG bonuses aren't even a blip on the radar
 compared to the crazed spending by the Obama
 Democratic Party Congress. And nobody knows
 where the money is even going. Obama is turning
 into a nightmare spender.

 The Obama, Reid and Polosi clique are bent on
 ruining our economy and turning this country
 into a Soviet-style communism. There's anger
 brewing in the masses and like Barry2 says,
 rebellion is in the air. 

LOL !...only among the minority rednecks like you and Chuck Norris,
Richard. What a joke.


 Dodd will be defeated in the next election, now
 he's trying to put the blame for the AIG bonuses
 on Tim, Barak, Harry and Nancy. 

What is so hilarious is that you do not even realise that the
Republicans will loose EVEN MORE seats in 2010. Its over for the
Republican party. It will take 20 years for them to come back. Their
MAIN base, the christian fundamentalists have given up on them, and most
of their base are bankrupt anyway and can't afford to buy the party,
like they back in 2000 and 2004. Hell, even the people who rigged the
elections for Bush have been saying so, and have turned against the
Republican party now.

You're finished Richard. Give it up old man. You are all washed up, and
no-one cares about your stupid Chevy truck that has broken down.

Start hitch hiking.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willy...@... 
wrote:

 Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., 
 won passage of a provision earlier this year that 
 they said would have prevented the type of payments 
 now at the center of a storm.
 
 It was dropped without explanation in the final 
 compromise on the economic stimulus measure, 
 replaced by a less restrictive set of conditions 
 backed by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and 
 accepted by the White House.

This is false. Actually it was the White House
that insisted on the provision that excluded AIG;
Dodd opposed it. The administration is dishonestly
trying to pin it on Dodd, and the right-wingers
are happily helping out.

http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuse\
s/

http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l

Dodd has his ethical problems, but he was on the
side of the angels in this instance.

 
 Full story:
 
 'White House, Dems backpedaling on AIG'
 By David Espo
 Associated Press, March 17, 2009
 http://tinyurl.com/dajxoo





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread Richard J. Williams
  Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., 
  won passage of a provision earlier this year that 
  they said would have prevented the type of payments 
  now at the center of a storm.
  
  It was dropped without explanation in the final 
  compromise on the economic stimulus measure, 
  replaced by a less restrictive set of conditions 
  backed by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and 
  accepted by the White House.
 
Judy wrote:
 This is false.

That's just your opinion - I don't agree. According 
to Harry Reid, the Dodd words were included. Dodd
did it - maybe in the future he should read the bill
BEFORE he signs it - then he wouldn't have to go into
back-pedal mode.

I think we should look at what we did put in the 
bill. We did put the Dodd language... - Harry Reid

During a late-night, closed door meeting last month, 
negotiators for the House, Senate and White House 
agreed to strip an amendment to the stimulus bill 
that would have restricted bonuses to any company 
receiving federal bailout funds. Instead of that 
measure, another measure by Senator Chris Dodd (D) 
from Connecticut was inserted that limited executive 
compensation, but specifically exempted bonuses.

Read more:

'Stimulus backroom deal backfires'
By Mark Matthews
ABC-KGO TV, Tuesday, March 17, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/cszubn

 Actually it was the White House that insisted on 
 the provision that excluded AIG; Dodd opposed it. 
 The administration is dishonestly trying to pin 
 it on Dodd, and the right-wingers are happily 
 helping out.
 
 http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuse\
 s/
 
 http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l
 
 Dodd has his ethical problems, but he was on the
 side of the angels in this instance.
 
  
  Full story:
  
  'White House, Dems backpedaling on AIG'
  By David Espo
  Associated Press, March 17, 2009
  http://tinyurl.com/dajxoo
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willy...@... 
wrote:

   Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., 
   won passage of a provision earlier this year that 
   they said would have prevented the type of payments 
   now at the center of a storm.
   
   It was dropped without explanation in the final 
   compromise on the economic stimulus measure, 
   replaced by a less restrictive set of conditions 
   backed by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and 
   accepted by the White House.
  
 Judy wrote:
  This is false.
 
 That's just your opinion - I don't agree.

Not a matter of opinion, sorry.

Actually it was the White House that insisted on
the provision that excluded AIG; Dodd opposed it.
The administration is dishonestly trying to pin
it on Dodd, and the right-wingers are happily
helping out.

http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuse\
\
 s/
http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l

Dodd has his ethical problems, but he was on the
side of the angels in this instance.





 According 
 to Harry Reid, the Dodd words were included. Dodd
 did it - maybe in the future he should read the bill
 BEFORE he signs it - then he wouldn't have to go into
 back-pedal mode.
 
 I think we should look at what we did put in the 
 bill. We did put the Dodd language... - Harry Reid
 
 During a late-night, closed door meeting last month, 
 negotiators for the House, Senate and White House 
 agreed to strip an amendment to the stimulus bill 
 that would have restricted bonuses to any company 
 receiving federal bailout funds. Instead of that 
 measure, another measure by Senator Chris Dodd (D) 
 from Connecticut was inserted that limited executive 
 compensation, but specifically exempted bonuses.
 
 Read more:
 
 'Stimulus backroom deal backfires'
 By Mark Matthews
 ABC-KGO TV, Tuesday, March 17, 2009
 http://tinyurl.com/cszubn
 
  Actually it was the White House that insisted on 
  the provision that excluded AIG; Dodd opposed it. 
  The administration is dishonestly trying to pin 
  it on Dodd, and the right-wingers are happily 
  helping out.
  
  http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuse\
  s/
  
  http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l
  
  Dodd has his ethical problems, but he was on the
  side of the angels in this instance.
  
   
   Full story:
   
   'White House, Dems backpedaling on AIG'
   By David Espo
   Associated Press, March 17, 2009
   http://tinyurl.com/dajxoo
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread Richard J. Williams
Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., 
won passage of a provision earlier this year that 
they said would have prevented the type of payments 
now at the center of a storm.

It was dropped without explanation in the final 
compromise on the economic stimulus measure, 
replaced by a less restrictive set of conditions 
backed by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and 
accepted by the White House.
   
  Judy wrote:
   This is false.
  
  That's just your opinion - I don't agree.
 
Judy wrote:
 Not a matter of opinion, sorry.
 
Somebody is lying, that's fer sure; either Dodd
or Reid - that's my opinion.

Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, the 
corporate crony who is the largest recipient of 
AIG donations, is now leading the charge to tax 
the retention payments in order to recoup the 
$450 million the company is paying to employees 
in its financial-products unit.

But Dodd, it turns out, was for protecting AIG's 
bonuses before he was against them. 

Read more:

'Spare us your fake furry, DC hypocrites' 
Posted by Michelle Malkin
New York Post, March 18, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/c3nepd

 Actually it was the White House that insisted on
 the provision that excluded AIG; Dodd opposed it.
 The administration is dishonestly trying to pin
 it on Dodd, and the right-wingers are happily
 helping out.
 
 http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuse\
 \
  s/
 http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l
 
 Dodd has his ethical problems, but he was on the
 side of the angels in this instance.
 
  According to Harry Reid, the Dodd words were included. 
  Dodd did it - maybe in the future he should read the 
  bill BEFORE he signs it - then he wouldn't have to go 
  into back-pedal mode.
  
  I think we should look at what we did put in the 
  bill. We did put the Dodd language... - Harry Reid
  
  During a late-night, closed door meeting last month, 
  negotiators for the House, Senate and White House 
  agreed to strip an amendment to the stimulus bill 
  that would have restricted bonuses to any company 
  receiving federal bailout funds. Instead of that 
  measure, another measure by Senator Chris Dodd (D) 
  from Connecticut was inserted that limited executive 
  compensation, but specifically exempted bonuses.
  
  Read more:
  
  'Stimulus backroom deal backfires'
  By Mark Matthews
  ABC-KGO TV, Tuesday, March 17, 2009
  http://tinyurl.com/cszubn




[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread do.rflex


Congress, White House Pointing Fingers Over Who Killed Bonus Provision

Sam Stein - Huffington Post - 3/18/09


The question of who killed a provision that could have reined in lavish bonuses 
issued by bailout recipients remains a mystery, with key players either 
declaring innocence or pointing the finger at someone else. Senior Hill aides 
insist that the main congressional suspects were not involved, and contend that 
they are still searching for answers themselves.

On Tuesday, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oreg.) told the Huffington Post that a measure 
sponsored by he and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) -- which would have levied a 
35% tax on bonuses issued by TARP recipients exceeding $100,000 -- was 
inexplicably and anonymously removed from February's stimulus bill during 
House/Senate negotiations.

The result was that the legislation, while targeting future bonuses given by 
bailed-out firms, allowed companies like AIG to award senior executives $165 
million for 2008.

Whenever I went to one of these special interest groups that I knew were one 
of the people that was likely trying to unravel this, they would say 'oh my 
goodness. It wasn't us. It must have been someone else,' Wyden recalled. And 
so it was sort of a pin-the-tail on the donkey kind of exercise to figure out 
who was actually responsible for killing it.

The difficulty in finding the culprit underscores just how sensitive a topic 
these bonuses have become. Many sources on Capitol Hill claim to be totally in 
the dark about what happened during the conference committee. Others have 
simply been mum.

One name floated as a suspect is Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.). He chairs the 
Senate banking committee, has received large financial support from AIG, and is 
the insurance company's home-state Senator. But, in a statement released on 
Tuesday, the Connecticut Democrat said he supported Wyden's legislation: 
unfortunately, that provision was removed from the stimulus bill in 
Conference. Moreover, as one Hill aide notes, Dodd wasn't even part of the 
conference committee.

Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), on the other hand, was a member of the conference 
committee. But the Finance Committee Chair, according to officials, was not 
granted purview of executive compensation. That was considered Banking's 
domain. And in a statement to CNN on Tuesday, he noted that the stimulus was 
constructed in such haste that he didn't have time and other conferees didn't 
have time to address many of the provisions that were modified significantly. 
His office confirmed the quote, which seems to indicate that Baucus was not 
involved..

Then there is Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), who was also on the conference 
committee, and has long recoiled about using the tax-code as a political 
weapon. But the longtime Harlem Democrat, like Baucus, doesn't have 
jurisdiction over the bonuses. One House Democratic aide noted: This issue was 
put forward by the Senate Banking Committee and was never dealt by other 
members of the conference committee.

If not Dodd, Baucus or Rangel, then who? 

Much of the ensuing speculation has focused on the Obama White House and/or 
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Dodd, for starters, said that a separate 
provision limiting executive compensation that he introduced to the stimulus 
was modified at the insistence of the administration to include exemptions for 
bonuses protected by contracts.

Moreover, during the crafting of the stimulus, senior administration 
officials were letting it be known that they were concerned with hard caps on 
compensation. Publicly, chief adviser David Axelrod acknowledged that Geithner 
and Larry Summers had concerns about stringent limits.

A call to the White House to discuss this issue was not immediately returned. 
And while the president's press secretary Robert Gibbs has not been asked 
specifically about what happened during the stimulus conference committee, he 
has defended the administration from accusations that it dropped the ball on 
the bonus front.

Understand that the compensation structure for executives prior to the 
President of the United States, Barack Obama, laying out the way we're going to 
do business changing, there was -- Barack Obama came in and there was a new 
sheriff in town on executive compensation, Gibbs said on Tuesday. 

He changed the way we did business here and the way Wall Street did business, 
by instituting the toughest executive compensation rules that had ever been 
entered into, changing the lawlessness with which all of this was governed 
prior to that announcement.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/18/congress-white-house-poin_n_176412.html







[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willy...@... 
wrote:

 Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., 
 won passage of a provision earlier this year that 
 they said would have prevented the type of payments 
 now at the center of a storm.
 
 It was dropped without explanation in the final 
 compromise on the economic stimulus measure, 
 replaced by a less restrictive set of conditions 
 backed by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and 
 accepted by the White House.

   Judy wrote:
This is false.
   
   That's just your opinion - I don't agree.
  
 Judy wrote:
  Not a matter of opinion, sorry.
  
 Somebody is lying, that's fer sure; either Dodd
 or Reid - that's my opinion.
 
 Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, the 
 corporate crony who is the largest recipient of 
 AIG donations, is now leading the charge to tax 
 the retention payments in order to recoup the 
 $450 million the company is paying to employees 
 in its financial-products unit.
 
 But Dodd, it turns out, was for protecting AIG's 
 bonuses before he was against them.

This is false. Actually it was the White House
that insisted on the provision that excluded AIG;
Dodd opposed it. The administration is dishonestly
trying to pin it on Dodd, and the right-wingers
are happily helping out.

http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuse\
\
\
 s/
http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l

Dodd has his ethical problems, but he was on the
side of the angels in this instance.




 
 
 Read more:
 
 'Spare us your fake furry, DC hypocrites' 
 Posted by Michelle Malkin
 New York Post, March 18, 2009
 http://tinyurl.com/c3nepd
 
  Actually it was the White House that insisted on
  the provision that excluded AIG; Dodd opposed it.
  The administration is dishonestly trying to pin
  it on Dodd, and the right-wingers are happily
  helping out.
  
  http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuse\
  \
   s/
  http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l
  
  Dodd has his ethical problems, but he was on the
  side of the angels in this instance.
  
   According to Harry Reid, the Dodd words were included. 
   Dodd did it - maybe in the future he should read the 
   bill BEFORE he signs it - then he wouldn't have to go 
   into back-pedal mode.
   
   I think we should look at what we did put in the 
   bill. We did put the Dodd language... - Harry Reid
   
   During a late-night, closed door meeting last month, 
   negotiators for the House, Senate and White House 
   agreed to strip an amendment to the stimulus bill 
   that would have restricted bonuses to any company 
   receiving federal bailout funds. Instead of that 
   measure, another measure by Senator Chris Dodd (D) 
   from Connecticut was inserted that limited executive 
   compensation, but specifically exempted bonuses.
   
   Read more:
   
   'Stimulus backroom deal backfires'
   By Mark Matthews
   ABC-KGO TV, Tuesday, March 17, 2009
   http://tinyurl.com/cszubn





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread enlightened_dawn11
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@ wrote:
 
  Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., 
  won passage of a provision earlier this year that 
  they said would have prevented the type of payments 
  now at the center of a storm.
  
  It was dropped without explanation in the final 
  compromise on the economic stimulus measure, 
  replaced by a less restrictive set of conditions 
  backed by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and 
  accepted by the White House.
 
Judy wrote:
 This is false.

That's just your opinion - I don't agree.
   
  Judy wrote:
   Not a matter of opinion, sorry.
   
  Somebody is lying, that's fer sure; either Dodd
  or Reid - that's my opinion.
  
  Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, the 
  corporate crony who is the largest recipient of 
  AIG donations, is now leading the charge to tax 
  the retention payments in order to recoup the 
  $450 million the company is paying to employees 
  in its financial-products unit.
  
  But Dodd, it turns out, was for protecting AIG's 
  bonuses before he was against them.
 
 This is false. Actually it was the White House
 that insisted on the provision that excluded AIG;
 Dodd opposed it. The administration is dishonestly
 trying to pin it on Dodd, and the right-wingers
 are happily helping out.
 
Uh-oh:

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) looks like he may be facing a fresh political 
firestorm.

Dodd just admitted on CNN that he inserted a loophole in the stimulus 
legislation that allowed million-dollar bonuses to insurance giant AIG to go 
forward – after previously denying any involvement in writing the controversial 
provision. .

We wrote the language in the bill, the deal with bonuses, golden parachutes, 
excessive executive compensation that was adopted unanimously by the United 
States Senate in the stimulus bill, Dodd told CNN's Wolf Blitzer this 
afternoon.

But for that language, there would have been no language to deal with this at 
all.

Dodd had previously said that he played no role in writing the controversial 
language, and was not a part of the conference committee that inserted the 
language in the bill. As late as today, Dodd's spokeswoman denied the senator's 
involvement.

The AIG bonuses have caused a political firestorm, with Republicans and 
Democrats alike looking to lay blame for who's responsible, and leading 
lawmakers looking to revoke the bonuses.

Dodd's role in the legislation will likely come up as he faces the likelihood 
of a tough re-election. Former GOP congressman Rob Simmons announced he was 
running this week, and has already taken issue with Dodd's stewardship as 
chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@ 
  wrote:
  
   Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Ron Wyden, D-Ore., 
   won passage of a provision earlier this year that 
   they said would have prevented the type of payments 
   now at the center of a storm.
   
   It was dropped without explanation in the final 
   compromise on the economic stimulus measure, 
   replaced by a less restrictive set of conditions 
   backed by Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and 
   accepted by the White House.
  
 Judy wrote:
  This is false.
 
 That's just your opinion - I don't agree.

   Judy wrote:
Not a matter of opinion, sorry.

   Somebody is lying, that's fer sure; either Dodd
   or Reid - that's my opinion.
   
   Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, the 
   corporate crony who is the largest recipient of 
   AIG donations, is now leading the charge to tax 
   the retention payments in order to recoup the 
   $450 million the company is paying to employees 
   in its financial-products unit.
   
   But Dodd, it turns out, was for protecting AIG's 
   bonuses before he was against them.
  
  This is false. Actually it was the White House
  that insisted on the provision that excluded AIG;
  Dodd opposed it. The administration is dishonestly
  trying to pin it on Dodd, and the right-wingers
  are happily helping out.
  
 Uh-oh:
 
 Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) looks like he may be facing a fresh political 
 firestorm.


Not Exactly -


 Dodd just admitted on CNN that he inserted a loophole in the stimulus 
 legislation that allowed million-dollar bonuses to insurance giant AIG to go 
 forward – after previously denying any involvement in writing the 
 controversial provision. .
 
 We wrote the language in the bill, the deal with bonuses, golden parachutes, 
 excessive executive compensation that was adopted unanimously by the United 
 States Senate in the stimulus bill, Dodd told CNN's Wolf Blitzer this 
 afternoon.
 
 But for that language, there would have been no language to deal with this 
 at all.

Now from Alternet:
http://snipurl.com/e3scw

According to Dodd, officials at Treasury expressed concern that if the 
government were to prohibit payouts, it risked being sued by companies like 
AIG, which had contracts stipulating that bonuses were to be paid.

At the urging of Treasury officials, Dodd modified a clause he had previously 
inserted into the stimulus that prohibited bonuses from being issued by 
bailed-out companies. An exemption was added to allow bonuses that applied to 
in-place contracts. 

The alternative was, in my view, losing the entire section on executive 
excessive compensation, he said. Given the choice ... I agreed to a 
modification in the legislation, reluctantly. I wasn't negotiating with myself. 
I wasn't changing my own amendment. I was changing the amendment because others 
were insisting on it.

I would have preferred that we kept my language, as it left the Senate 
unanimously, Dodd added. In fact there were objections when I wrote the 
language even before it left the Senate. ... The administration expressed 
reservations with the amendment. They came to us and asked for modifications in 
the amendment. The alternative was, of course, losing the amendment entirely, 
which was a possibility. I didn't want to see that happen. 

I suspect we would be having a conversation tonight why we didn't include some 
language in here to deal with bonuses, golden parachutes and the like. ... 

I don't believe anyone had any idea, I certainly didn't, that a month and a 
half later from February we would be talking about AIG and the bonuses they are 
receiving for their retentions, these $165 million. So that was never a part of 
the consideration.

The disclosure should put to rest one aspect of the debate over how a company 
like AIG, which has received $170 billion in taxpayer funds, was allowed to 
dole out $165 million in bonus payments. Still unresolved is who in conference 
removed the amendment introduced by Sens. Wyden and Snowe that would have taxed 
bonuses exceeding $100,000 at 35 percent.

More detail in CNN's write up here:

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/18/aig.bonuses.congress/index.html






 
 Dodd had previously said that he played no role in writing the controversial 
 language, and was not a part of the conference committee that inserted the 
 language in the bill. As late as today, Dodd's spokeswoman denied the 
 senator's involvement.
 
 The AIG bonuses have caused a political firestorm, with Republicans and 
 Democrats alike looking to lay blame for who's responsible, and leading 
 lawmakers looking to revoke the bonuses.
 
 Dodd's role in the legislation will likely come up as he faces the likelihood 
 of a tough 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@ 
  wrote:
snip
[quoting extreme right-winger Michelle Malkin:]
   Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, the 
   corporate crony who is the largest recipient of 
   AIG donations, is now leading the charge to tax 
   the retention payments in order to recoup the 
   $450 million the company is paying to employees 
   in its financial-products unit.
   
   But Dodd, it turns out, was for protecting AIG's 
   bonuses before he was against them.
  
  This is false. Actually it was the White House
  that insisted on the provision that excluded AIG;
  Dodd opposed it. The administration is dishonestly
  trying to pin it on Dodd, and the right-wingers
  are happily helping out.
  
 Uh-oh:
 
 Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) looks like he may be facing
 a fresh political firestorm.

This piece from Politico is highly and almost
certainly deliberately misleading. Anybody who
read the link I provided would realize this.

The point is that Dodd *opposed the loophole*,
spoke out against it, argued with the
administration about it, but was ultimately
forced by Treasury to put it in or get no
limitations on executive compensation at all.

See the original link I provided:

http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuses/

http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l

Also see Glenn Greenwald's post at Salon;
his Update III specifically addresses Dodd's
CNN appearance:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/17/dodd/

http://tinyurl.com/cwmqbj

Treasury is stabbing Dodd in the back to cover
up its own stupidity, and as I said earlier, the
right-wingers are happily helping out in that 
effort.

This is truly reprehensible reporting by Politico.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread raunchydog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
 
 See the original link I provided:
 
 http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/17/treasury-attempts-to-blame-dodd-for-aig-bonuses/
 
 http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l

Jane Hamsher at Firedoglake has a petition No More Dough Till We Know Where It 
Goes I'm on her email list so I signed it last week. I hope anyone who feels 
so inclined will take a moment to sign. Jane has been leading the way calling 
the Obama to task on his promise for more transparency in government. 
http://action.firedoglake.com/page/s/Transparency http://tinyurl.com/cuj4uj





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread Richard J. Williams
Judy wrote: 
 Treasury is stabbing Dodd in the back to cover
 up its own stupidity, and as I said earlier, the
 right-wingers are happily helping out in that 
 effort...
 
It would probably be in the best interests of
the country for Obama, Gietner, Dodd, Reid, and 
Pelosi to just resign today, after trying to pull 
off this stunt - they just gave away millions of 
tax-payer dollars - they sold out to AIG and 
tried to trick the American public by acting
angry and surprised.

Sen. Dodd told CNN Wednesday that officials in 
the Treasury Department asked him to add the bonus 
loophole to the stimulus bill before it was passed.

Full story:

'I was responsible for bonus loophole, says Dodd'
CNN Politics, March 18, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/cbuu9u

For the administration official to blame Dodd in 
the pages of the New York Times for the payout of 
these bonuses, after the White House publicly fought 
him tooth and nail to weaken compensation limits, 
is completely disingenuous.

Full report:

'Treasury Attempts to 'Blame Dodd' for AIG Bonuses'
Posted by Jane Hamsher
Firedoglake, Tuesday March 17, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/cq2n6l

But now that a political scandal has erupted over 
these payments, the White House is trying to deflect 
blame from itself and heap it all on Chris Dodd by 
claiming that it was Dodd who was responsible for 
that exemption.

Read more:

'The dishonest Blame Dodd scheme from Treasury 
officials'
Posted by Glenn Greenwald
Salon, March 17, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/dzr68z




[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread Richard J. Williams
do.rflex wrote:
 Congress, White House Pointing Fingers Over 
 Who Killed Bonus Provision...
 
You need to get some smarts, Mr. Manning,
the AIG bonuses aren't even a blip on the radar 
compared to the crazed spending by the Obama 
Democratic Party Congress. And nobody knows 
where the money is even going. Obama is turning 
into a nightmare spender. 

The Obama, Reid and Polosi clique are bent on 
ruining our economy and turning this country 
into a Soviet-style communism. There's anger 
brewing in the masses and like Barry2 says, 
rebellion is in the air. 

Dodd will be defeated in the next election, now 
he's trying to put the blame for the AIG bonuses 
on Tim, Barak, Harry and Nancy. 

Dodd is history, I predict. He will be fired 
from his job as Chairman of the Senate Banking 
Committee for taking kickbacks from A.I.G.

Senator Barack Obama received a $101,332 bonus 
from American International Group in the form 
of political contributions...The two biggest 
Congressional recipients of bonuses from the 
A.I.G. are - Senators Chris Dodd and Senator 
Barack Obama.

Read more: 

'Obama Received a $101,332 Bonus from AIG'
http://tinyurl.com/dazprd

 Sam Stein - Huffington Post - 3/18/09
 
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/18/congress-white-house-poin_n_176412.html





[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread enlightened_dawn11
this partisan warfare has reached an unhealthy level, with the radicals on the 
right not even willing to wait to see the effects of the president's policies. 
it wouldn't have been tolerated even ten years ago, but the poison of the bush 
era continues to seep into american politics. pathetic and disturbing.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willy...@... 
wrote:

 Judy wrote: 
  Treasury is stabbing Dodd in the back to cover
  up its own stupidity, and as I said earlier, the
  right-wingers are happily helping out in that 
  effort...
  
 It would probably be in the best interests of
 the country for Obama, Gietner, Dodd, Reid, and 
 Pelosi to just resign today, snip



[FairfieldLife] Re: Backpedaling on AIG?

2009-03-18 Thread Robert
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_re...@... wrote:

 this partisan warfare has reached an unhealthy level, with the radicals on 
 the right not even willing to wait to see the effects of the president's 
 policies. it wouldn't have been tolerated even ten years ago, but the poison 
 of the bush era continues to seep into american politics. pathetic and 
 disturbing.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willytex@ wrote:
 
  Judy wrote: 
   Treasury is stabbing Dodd in the back to cover
   up its own stupidity, and as I said earlier, the
   right-wingers are happily helping out in that 
   effort...
   
  It would probably be in the best interests of
  the country for Obama, Gietner, Dodd, Reid, and 
  Pelosi to just resign today, snip

Basically I think they're stuck on keeping any change from seeping through.
They are afraid of any real change of anything.
Ronald Reagan is their hero, and that's that.
Bush was bad because he was just too arrogant about the policy of 
militarization and Reagan Voodoo Trickle Down...Cocaine/Winner take all, take a 
hike mike. damn hippies, get off my lawn; you're killing me; who cares? what me 
worry? Just say No!...Jimmie Who?

Obama aims for the opposite, from the ground up.
So, they say he's like Jimmie Carter?
Wow, the ultimate slur!

So, now the Joker plays the heard, the sheep, and angry mass sausage.
They are playing the fear card, at every turn.
The Russians are coming; this is socialism folks; playing into every Red State 
button, they can push, push, push...
And for those that feel powerless and fearful, well then, they just keep on 
listening to the same schlock everyday.
Rush Limbaugh is their point man, and he's just in it for the King Jester 
role...that's all the Republicans have left.
Ronald Reagan has become Rush Limbaugh...

'The Times They Are A Changin''

There's no going back to the way things were...it could not be sustained; 
R.G.