Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to laughingG
uh oh...just how far into Cougartown have I traveled, LG? Old enough to be your grandmother?! From: richardatrwilliamsdotus To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 1:21 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to laughingG laughinggull108: > Now, how about that spanking? I can be in NJ > in a few hours. Sorry Share. > You realize these gals are old enough to be your mother, right? > > Not too bad for a first attempt, gully boy, > > but you'll do better with practice.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to laughingG
All's forgiven LaughingG. Heck I just spent the whole morning learning the forgiveness prayers. Just in time! Anyway, have fun in NJ. love, LT From: laughinggull108 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 1:07 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to laughingG I'll take whatever praise I can get. Ever since my "headlights" of awareness, for just an instant, swept across that first post of yours, I've wanted nothing more than to align my awareness with yours so that, through me, you could respond to the posts of others. Some little bit here and there, that's all. Thanks for being such a good sport about my humor at your expense. My opinion of you just went up a few notches. Now, how about that spanking? I can be in NJ in a few hours. Sorry Share. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > Not too bad for a first attempt, gully boy, but you'll do > better with practice. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > Judy, as often happens, I saw what you had written ONLY because I opened > > > the post from laughinggull and tracked down til I found what he had > > > written. > > > > So you read what gully boy writes? To each her own, I guess. > > > > > Because I often enjoy what he writes. > > > > Get real woman! How can you enjoy anything anyone writes, > > much less gully boy, if you aren't able to *understand* what they write? > > > > > I often don't open your posts at all. Why should I? > > > > Duh, maybe because *everything* I write is the absolute truth and deserves > > to be read by *everyone*, including you? (If you know what's good for you, > > Share, you'll read what I write, or I'll be very, very offended and will > > pursue you endlessly on the WWW.) > > > > > I don't get, and probably partially my lack, > > > > Not *probably* but *definitely*, and not *partially* but *totally*, dear, > > dear Share. > > > > > that much enjoyment or wisdom from them. Even when they're to other > > > people. > > > > Your loss, not mine, dear, dear Share. > > > > > But certainly not when they're to me. > > > > Didn't you read what I just wrote? (wait a minute, I haven't posted it > > yet). Let me rephrase it so you'll understand better: *Your loss, not mine*. > > > > > Even here, look how you pick pick pick at every little point, going > > > sentence by sentence, using rhetorical questions in a confrontational > > > manner. And just so it's clear: terrible blooper is your phrase not mine. > > > And I never demanded anything from you. > > > > Share, you're free to think what you want but you would be *wrong*. And > > since your interpretive reading skills are pretty weak...no, let me > > rephrase that...since your interpretive reading skills are *nonexistant* > > you're free to think what you want but you would be wrong, *dead* wrong (uh > > oh, did I just make a death threat?). > > > > > In your need to be negative towards me, you actually missed Marek's point > > > and this caused your negativity to spill over onto his interesting and > > > positive idea. > > > > Wrong again, dear Share. Go back and reread his post (you *can* read, > > right?). The idea was neither *interesting* nor *positive*. Again, get real > > woman! > > > > > If there's something of yours that you really want me to read, if you put > > > "to Share" in the Subject line, then I will attempt to read it. > > > > You're joking, right? Dear, dear Share, please hold your breath > > until I write "to Share" in the subject line of *any* of my posts. Come > > down out of the clouds! > > > > > But can't promise that I will finish reading it. > > > > Again, your choice, but you would be wrong *again*. Just how many *wrongs* > > can you rack up in one post, huh, Share? > > > > > As for acknowledging my mistakes, this current discord between us began > > > with the Russian flash mob upset with Robin. FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF > > > THAT, I acknowledged that I could be mistaken. And that I was willing to > > > work things out WITH ROBIN. You trounced on that mercilessly in your > > > usual nitpicky style which destroys IMO any possibility for > > > reestablishing harmony. Later when I apologized to everyone, including > > > you, you responded by misrepresenting me. In what I deem a sneaky and > > > dirty fighting way. > > > > How dare you...I'll say it again: How dare you! Only I, and a few others of > > my choosing, are allowed to dredge up past arguments and expect everyone to > > be fascinated by all the interesting details. I'm not going to do anyone's > > homework for them, but if you want to see what *really* went down when I > > demolised Share in the above, please read the list of posts that follows. > > No, on second thought, find them yourselves. As I said, I'm not g
[FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to laughingG
Come on Share, think woman! What name is adopted by everything "revived" by our movement. We have just revived latex, organic of course. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > LaughingG if I giggle my head off during yogic flying this evening, it's all > on your head. Or your heart maybe. Or maybe your...Whatever! Anyway, > what the heck is an ML shop?  > > > Oh my gosh, what's hideous? Your Mexican jumping bean? Your dinner that > you laughed at? Quick, tell me. Please rescue this Damsel from all > hideousness at once. > > > What shall I bring to Wed or Thur S&T? What shall I bring? Sorry, no > light bulb coming on just yet. Maybe by end of workshop...   > > > BTW, thank you for being so upfront about your behind ness (-: > > Glad that LYAO hasn't put a dent in that, so to speak. > > > > From: laughinggull108 > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 9:37 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to laughingG > > >  > Share, I dare you not to think about this the next time you're in the Ladies' > Dome: an endless sea of women dressed in latex suits...not black, but > white...with only three openings: the crown chakra, the third eye, and of > course the nose/mouth for breathing/pranayama (unless, of course, you no > longer need to breath and are living off prana...hey, a light bulb just went > off in my head). And speaking of rumors, I hear it's all the rage with the MD > side of the movement...not so much with the men other than just objective > observers...because nonporous latex doesn't allow any of the positive vibes > generated during program to escape, but the perspiration generated during YF > is still a major problem (maybe a good sidha business opportunity...men, > ladie's sweat, bingo). Any truth to the rumor that an ML shop will soon be > opening on the square, or has it already opened? I'm so behind...pun intended. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > aaak!à> > > > > > rushing to workshop, more later, thinking latex... > > > > > > > > > > From: laughinggull108 > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 8:13 AM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to laughingG > > > > > > à> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > Judy, as often happens, I saw what you had written ONLY because I opened > > > the post from laughinggull and tracked down til I found what he had > > > written.Ãâà> > > > > > Because I often enjoy what he writes.ÃâàI often don't open your > > > posts at all.ÃâàWhy should I?ÃâàI don't get, and probably > > > partially my lack, that much enjoyment or wisdom from them.ÃâàEven > > > when they're to other people.ÃâàBut certainly not when they're to > > > me.ÃâàEven here, look how you pick pick pick at every little > > > point, going sentence by sentence, using rhetorical questions in a > > > confrontational manner.ÃâàAnd just so it's clear:Ãâà> > > terrible blooper is your phrase not mine.ÃâàAnd I never demanded > > > anything from you.Ãâà> > > > > > > > > In your need to be negative towards me, you actually missed Marek's point > > > and this caused your negativity to spill over onto his interesting and > > > positive idea.ÃâàÃâàÃâàÃâà> > > > > > If there's something of yours that you really want me to read, if you put > > > "to Share" in the Subject line, then I will attempt to read it.Ãâà> > > But can't promise that I will finish reading it. Ãâà> > > ÃâàÃâà> > > > > > > > > As for acknowledging my mistakes, this current discord between us began > > > with the Russian flash mob upset with Robin.ÃâàFROM THE VERY > > > BEGINNING OF THAT, I acknowledged that I could be mistaken.ÃâàAnd > > > that I was willing to work things out WITH ROBIN.ÃâàYou trounced > > > on that mercilessly in your usual nitpicky style which destroys IMO any > > > possibility for reestablishing harmony.ÃâàLater when I apologized > > > to everyone, including you, you responde
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to laughingG
LaughingG if I giggle my head off during yogic flying this evening, it's all on your head. Or your heart maybe. Or maybe your...Whatever! Anyway, what the heck is an ML shop? Oh my gosh, what's hideous? Your Mexican jumping bean? Your dinner that you laughed at? Quick, tell me. Please rescue this Damsel from all hideousness at once. What shall I bring to Wed or Thur S&T? What shall I bring? Sorry, no light bulb coming on just yet. Maybe by end of workshop... BTW, thank you for being so upfront about your behind ness (-: Glad that LYAO hasn't put a dent in that, so to speak. From: laughinggull108 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 9:37 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to laughingG Share, I dare you not to think about this the next time you're in the Ladies' Dome: an endless sea of women dressed in latex suits...not black, but white...with only three openings: the crown chakra, the third eye, and of course the nose/mouth for breathing/pranayama (unless, of course, you no longer need to breath and are living off prana...hey, a light bulb just went off in my head). And speaking of rumors, I hear it's all the rage with the MD side of the movement...not so much with the men other than just objective observers...because nonporous latex doesn't allow any of the positive vibes generated during program to escape, but the perspiration generated during YF is still a major problem (maybe a good sidha business opportunity...men, ladie's sweat, bingo). Any truth to the rumor that an ML shop will soon be opening on the square, or has it already opened? I'm so behind...pun intended. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > aaak! > > > rushing to workshop, more later, thinking latex... > > > > > From: laughinggull108 > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 8:13 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to laughingG > > >  > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > Judy, as often happens, I saw what you had written ONLY because I opened > > the post from laughinggull and tracked down til I found what he had > > written. > > > > Because I often enjoy what he writes. I often don't open your posts at > > all. Why should I? I don't get, and probably partially my lack, > > that much enjoyment or wisdom from them. Even when they're to other > > people. But certainly not when they're to me. Even here, look how > > you pick pick pick at every little point, going sentence by sentence, using > > rhetorical questions in a confrontational manner. And just so it's > > clear: terrible blooper is your phrase not mine. And I never > > demanded anything from you. > > > > > > In your need to be negative towards me, you actually missed Marek's point > > and this caused your negativity to spill over onto his interesting and > > positive idea.    > > > > If there's something of yours that you really want me to read, if you put > > "to Share" in the Subject line, then I will attempt to read it. But > > can't promise that I will finish reading it.    > > > > > > As for acknowledging my mistakes, this current discord between us began > > with the Russian flash mob upset with Robin. FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF > > THAT, I acknowledged that I could be mistaken. And that I was willing > > to work things out WITH ROBIN. You trounced on that mercilessly in your > > usual nitpicky style which destroys IMO any possibility for reestablishing > > harmony. Later when I apologized to everyone, including you, you > > responded by misrepresenting me. In what I deem a sneaky and dirty > > fighting way. > > > >  > > > > So it seems to me that acknowledging my alleged mistakes has not only been > > unproductive with you, it's also been counter productive. So why would > > I continue to do so? Answering this question as wisely as possible is > > what it's really time for. So that's what I'm aiming to do. > > > > PS to laughingG:  just in case I've been bad in the reply above, maybe > > you better include FF in your itinerary (-: > > > > Well, I guess NJ is OFF my itinerary gauging from the response I got. I was > feeling very, very naughty yesterday (must have been all those positive posts
[FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to laughingG
Share, I dare you not to think about this the next time you're in the Ladies' Dome: an endless sea of women dressed in latex suits...not black, but white...with only three openings: the crown chakra, the third eye, and of course the nose/mouth for breathing/pranayama (unless, of course, you no longer need to breath and are living off prana...hey, a light bulb just went off in my head). And speaking of rumors, I hear it's all the rage with the MD side of the movement...not so much with the men other than just objective observers...because nonporous latex doesn't allow any of the positive vibes generated during program to escape, but the perspiration generated during YF is still a major problem (maybe a good sidha business opportunity...men, ladie's sweat, bingo). Any truth to the rumor that an ML shop will soon be opening on the square, or has it already opened? I'm so behind...pun intended. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > aaak! > > > rushing to workshop, more later, thinking latex... > > > > > From: laughinggull108 > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 8:13 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to laughingG > > >  > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > Judy, as often happens, I saw what you had written ONLY because I opened > > the post from laughinggull and tracked down til I found what he had > > written.à> > > > Because I often enjoy what he writes.àI often don't open your posts at > > all.àWhy should I?àI don't get, and probably partially my lack, > > that much enjoyment or wisdom from them.àEven when they're to other > > people.àBut certainly not when they're to me.àEven here, look how > > you pick pick pick at every little point, going sentence by sentence, using > > rhetorical questions in a confrontational manner.àAnd just so it's > > clear:àterrible blooper is your phrase not mine.àAnd I never > > demanded anything from you.à> > > > > > In your need to be negative towards me, you actually missed Marek's point > > and this caused your negativity to spill over onto his interesting and > > positive idea.àààà> > > > If there's something of yours that you really want me to read, if you put > > "to Share" in the Subject line, then I will attempt to read it.àBut > > can't promise that I will finish reading it. ààà> > > > > > As for acknowledging my mistakes, this current discord between us began > > with the Russian flash mob upset with Robin.àFROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF > > THAT, I acknowledged that I could be mistaken.àAnd that I was willing > > to work things out WITH ROBIN.àYou trounced on that mercilessly in your > > usual nitpicky style which destroys IMO any possibility for reestablishing > > harmony.àLater when I apologized to everyone, including you, you > > responded by misrepresenting me.àIn what I deem a sneaky and dirty > > fighting way. > > > > à> > > > So it seems to me that acknowledging my alleged mistakes has not only been > > unproductive with you, it's also been counter productive.àSo why would > > I continue to do so?àAnswering this question as wisely as possible is > > what it's really time for.àSo that's what I'm aiming to do. > > > > PS to laughingG: àjust in case I've been bad in the reply above, maybe > > you better include FF in your itinerary (-:à> > > > Well, I guess NJ is OFF my itinerary gauging from the response I got. I was > feeling very, very naughty yesterday (must have been all those positive posts > from Thursday) and LMAO after I wrote that last line, and continued laughing > as I fixed dinner. I'm hoping you have a black latex Cat Woman suit (like the > one someone posted a couple of weeks ago as a tribute to Judy) but the > buttocks exposed to make the spanking go easier. See you next week for Show & > Tell Wednesday? I'm bringing my Mexican jumping bean. What are you bringing? > > Share, turn away, turn away, it's hideous! > > > > > From: laughinggull108 > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 6:29 PM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor > > > > > > à> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > Well I SUGGESTED moving to Wednesday.àSome agreed.àSome > > > > didn't. > > > > > > And some didn't like the idea of reserving *any* day > > > for this "special" use. > > > > > > > I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens next > > > > week. > > > > > > > > I like the FFL variety too.àI think Marek was suggesting > > > > something other than less variety. > > > > > > I don't believe anyone said Marek was suggesting less
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to laughingG
aaak! rushing to workshop, more later, thinking latex... From: laughinggull108 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 8:13 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to laughingG --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > Judy, as often happens, I saw what you had written ONLY because I opened the > post from laughinggull and tracked down til I found what he had written. > > Because I often enjoy what he writes. I often don't open your posts at > all. Why should I? I don't get, and probably partially my lack, that much > enjoyment or wisdom from them. Even when they're to other people. But > certainly not when they're to me. Even here, look how you pick pick pick at > every little point, going sentence by sentence, using rhetorical questions in > a confrontational manner. And just so it's clear: terrible blooper is > your phrase not mine. And I never demanded anything from you. > > > In your need to be negative towards me, you actually missed Marek's point and > this caused your negativity to spill over onto his interesting and positive > idea.    > > If there's something of yours that you really want me to read, if you put "to > Share" in the Subject line, then I will attempt to read it. But can't > promise that I will finish reading it.    > > > As for acknowledging my mistakes, this current discord between us began with > the Russian flash mob upset with Robin. FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF THAT, I > acknowledged that I could be mistaken. And that I was willing to work > things out WITH ROBIN. You trounced on that mercilessly in your usual > nitpicky style which destroys IMO any possibility for reestablishing > harmony. Later when I apologized to everyone, including you, you responded > by misrepresenting me. In what I deem a sneaky and dirty fighting way. > >  > > So it seems to me that acknowledging my alleged mistakes has not only been > unproductive with you, it's also been counter productive. So why would I > continue to do so? Answering this question as wisely as possible is what > it's really time for. So that's what I'm aiming to do. > > PS to laughingG:  just in case I've been bad in the reply above, maybe you > better include FF in your itinerary (-: > Well, I guess NJ is OFF my itinerary gauging from the response I got. I was feeling very, very naughty yesterday (must have been all those positive posts from Thursday) and LMAO after I wrote that last line, and continued laughing as I fixed dinner. I'm hoping you have a black latex Cat Woman suit (like the one someone posted a couple of weeks ago as a tribute to Judy) but the buttocks exposed to make the spanking go easier. See you next week for Show & Tell Wednesday? I'm bringing my Mexican jumping bean. What are you bringing? Share, turn away, turn away, it's hideous! > > From: laughinggull108 > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 6:29 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Best TM Rumor > > >  > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > Well I SUGGESTED moving to Wednesday. Some agreed. Some > > > didn't. > > > > And some didn't like the idea of reserving *any* day > > for this "special" use. > > > > > I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens next > > > week. > > > > > > I like the FFL variety too. I think Marek was suggesting > > > something other than less variety. > > > > I don't believe anyone said Marek was suggesting less > > variety, do you, Share? > > > > I guess you must have misunderstood. The point is that > > the *result* of Marek's suggestion would be less variety > > day to day, because if there were a "special" day every > > week designated for "creative" posts or neat finds, > > folks would tend to save them up so they would have > > something to contribute on that day. As a consequence, > > such posts would no longer be sprinkled as freely > > throughout the week as they are now. > > Judy, you need to re-read Marek's original suggestion because you have > *completely* misunderstood his intentions. The *result* of Marek's suggestion > would be less negativity through arguing, correcting, etc. etc. for at least > one day each week so that some people might actually want to visit and read > some of the posts on that particular day. Leave it to you to twist it into > something else. Feel free to contribute something on Wednesdays if you wish, > or sprinkle it throughout the week. You have my permission. And if you insist > on misrepresenting Marek's noble suggestion, I just might have to come ot NJ > and spank you! > > > > > One of the things that's so nice about this kind of > > forum is the spontaneity. I understand that
