[FairfieldLife] Re: Our literate media

2007-12-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"  
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > AP headline today:
> > > > 
> > > > "Energy Companies Drill with a Conscious"
> > > > 
> > > > Via Yahoo News:
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/3b9jr8
> > > >
> > The headline writer
> > apparently thinks "conscious" is the word for that little
> > voice in our heads that tells us when we're doing wrong.
> 
> The subconscience mind, in other words.
> 
> ; - )

LOL!




[FairfieldLife] Re: Our literate media

2007-12-16 Thread Patrick Gillam
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > >
> > > AP headline today:
> > > 
> > > "Energy Companies Drill with a Conscious"
> > > 
> > > Via Yahoo News:
> > > http://tinyurl.com/3b9jr8
> > >
> The headline writer
> apparently thinks "conscious" is the word for that little
> voice in our heads that tells us when we're doing wrong.

The subconscience mind, in other words.

; - )



[FairfieldLife] Re: Our literate media

2007-12-16 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > >
> > > AP headline today:
> > > 
> > > "Energy Companies Drill with a Conscious"
> > > 
> > > Via Yahoo News:
> > > http://tinyurl.com/3b9jr8
> > 
> > 
> > It's genuinely sad to hear that: "The U.S. Energy Information
> > Administration says 31,587 natural-gas wells were drilled for
> > exploration and production in 2006, up from 16,728 just four years
> > earlier."   How long can this go on?!
> 
> Good comments, important topic, but I was actually
> calling attention to the horrendous typo in the headline...
> 
> It's really even worse than a typo. The headline writer
> apparently thinks "conscious" is the word for that little
> voice in our heads that tells us when we're doing wrong.


Damn. I missed it. But while I'm at it... speaking about being
properly educated, I ran across this today:

Today's college freshmen may not remember much about politics before
President Bush, and the war has been going on for most of their
teenage years. Combine that with the administration's fine line in
disinformational BS and this is what you get:

I have now received three (3) student papers that discuss
Iraq's attack on the Twin Towers on 9/11. All three papers mention it
as an aside to another point. I've had two papers on the virtue of
forgiveness that argue that if we had just forgiven Iraq for the 9/11
attacks, we wouldn't be at war right now. I just read a paper on the
problem of evil which asked why God allowed "the Iraq's" to attack us
on 9/11. The thing that upsets me most here is that the the students
don't just believe that that Iraq was behind 9/11. This is a big fact
in their minds, that leaps out at them, whenever they think about the
state of the world.

http://crookedtimber.org/2007/12/12/how-things-seep-in/

I wouldn't want BushCo karma.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Our literate media

2007-12-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> >
> > AP headline today:
> > 
> > "Energy Companies Drill with a Conscious"
> > 
> > Via Yahoo News:
> > http://tinyurl.com/3b9jr8
> 
> 
> It's genuinely sad to hear that: "The U.S. Energy Information
> Administration says 31,587 natural-gas wells were drilled for
> exploration and production in 2006, up from 16,728 just four years
> earlier."   How long can this go on?!

Good comments, important topic, but I was actually
calling attention to the horrendous typo in the headline...

It's really even worse than a typo. The headline writer
apparently thinks "conscious" is the word for that little
voice in our heads that tells us when we're doing wrong.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Our literate media

2007-12-16 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> >
> > AP headline today:
> > 
> > "Energy Companies Drill with a Conscious"
> > 
> > Via Yahoo News:
> > http://tinyurl.com/3b9jr8
> 
> 
> It's genuinely sad to hear that: "The U.S. Energy Information
> Administration says 31,587 natural-gas wells were drilled for
> exploration and production in 2006, up from 16,728 just four years
> earlier."   How long can this go on?! 
> 
> There ARE alternate energy technologies today that are not being fully
> developed and/or implemented that could indeed cut way back on the
> need for fossil fuels. 

But at a significantly higher cost than gas, coal and oil. And it is 
still a much greater cost on top of that if you want electricity, or
be able to charge ones plug in electric vehicle, at night -- via
batteries storage of solar and wind. 

There is technology today that would enable the US and world to be off
oil and gas totally. Its not congress that is stopping that. Its the
consumer who is disinclined to spend 3-4 times as much for energy
(renewables plus battery storage). I am willing to pay it. Are you?



>It's inevitable that humanity will eventually
> *have* to implement them. It's my understanding that Big Oil has often
> blocked that kind of effort when it has appeared to be a threat to
> their dominance.
> 
> And, speaking of Big Oil: 
> 
> How Big Oil contributions impacted the Senate energy vote
> 
> 
> Big Oil buys Tax Loopholes from Congressmen - this week's edition of
> corporate run government
> 
> 
> Today the Senate passed an energy bill that helps reduce America's oil
> dependency and takes an important step toward reducing global warming
> pollution. Unfortunately, the bill does not close $13 billion worth of
> tax loopholes and subsidies for the oil industry and reinvest the
> money in clean and renewable energy technologies. Earlier in the day,
> 40 Senators blocked the bill, forcing Senate leaders to jettison the
> tax provisions.
> 
> "Oil companies have given $8 million to Senators over the past four
> years. Today's action by 40 Senators proved they have gotten their
> money's worth: $1,600 in tax breaks for every dollar the oil industry
> has spent in campaign contributions.
> 
>
http://www.nwf.org/news/story.cfm?pageId=D5668608-F1F6-7B10-3BE0FD3C6B3475B4
> 
> 
> Cumulative Oil & Gas Contributions to Senators
> Who Blocked a Measure to Rollback Oil Company Giveaways on HR 6
> 
> Source: Center for Responsive Politics
> 
> 
> OIL & GAS CONTRIBUTIONS  over past 4 years
> 
> Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) $577,556
> 
> John Cornyn (R-TX) $561,380
> 
> Bob Corker (R-TN) $215,350
> 
> Pat Roberts (R-KS) $205,850
> 
> James Inhofe (R-OK) $196,700
> 
> Mitch McConnell (R-KY) $150,500
> 
> Pete Domenici (R-NM) $145,950
> 
> Jon Kyl (R-AZ) $140,700
> 
> Mary Landrieu (D-LA) $133,650
> 
> Christopher Bond (R-MO) $129,350
> 
> Sam Brownback (R-KS) $129,155
> 
> Trent Lott (R-MS) $124,300
> 
> George Voinovich (R-OH) $122,050
> 
> Arlen Specter (R-PA) $119,878
> 
> Lamar Alexander (R-TN) $98,300
> 
> Jim Bunning (R-KY) $98,269
> 
> John Ensign (R-NV) $95,100
> 
> David Vitter (R-LA) $81,100
> 
> Michael Crapo (R-ID) $63,650
> 
> Jeff Sessions (R-AL) $58,800
> 
> Robert Bennett (R-UT) $58,700
> 
> Thad Cochran (R-MS) $58,500
> 
> Richard Shelby (R-AL) $56,800
> 
> Elizabeth Dole (R-NC) $53,400
> 
> Ted Stevens (R-AK) $44,700
> 
> Michael Enzi (R-WY) $42,500
> 
> John Sununu (R-NH) $41,900
> 
> Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) $41,250
> 
> Larry Craig (R-ID) $33,500
> 
> Judd Gregg (R-NH) $31,500
> 
> Lindsey Graham (R-SC) $29,600
> 
> Richard Burr (R-NC) $28,750
> 
> John Barrasso (R-WY) $27,500
> 
> Johnny Isakson (R-GA) $25,200
> 
> Jim DeMint (R-SC) $23,722
> 
> Mel Martinez (R-FL) $17,000
> 
> Chuck Hagel (R-NE) $16,600
> 
> Tom Coburn (R-OK) $9,600
> 
> John Warner (R-VA) $9,500
> 
> Wayne Allard (R-CO) $0*
> 
> Total $4,097,810
> *Sen. Allard was last re-elected in 2002 and will be retiring in 2008
> 
> [pdf file] http://tinyurl.com/3anmf4
>




[FairfieldLife] Re: Our literate media

2007-12-16 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> AP headline today:
> 
> "Energy Companies Drill with a Conscious"
> 
> Via Yahoo News:
> http://tinyurl.com/3b9jr8


It's genuinely sad to hear that: "The U.S. Energy Information
Administration says 31,587 natural-gas wells were drilled for
exploration and production in 2006, up from 16,728 just four years
earlier."   How long can this go on?! 

There ARE alternate energy technologies today that are not being fully
developed and/or implemented that could indeed cut way back on the
need for fossil fuels. It's inevitable that humanity will eventually
*have* to implement them. It's my understanding that Big Oil has often
blocked that kind of effort when it has appeared to be a threat to
their dominance.

And, speaking of Big Oil: 

How Big Oil contributions impacted the Senate energy vote


Big Oil buys Tax Loopholes from Congressmen - this week's edition of
corporate run government


Today the Senate passed an energy bill that helps reduce America's oil
dependency and takes an important step toward reducing global warming
pollution. Unfortunately, the bill does not close $13 billion worth of
tax loopholes and subsidies for the oil industry and reinvest the
money in clean and renewable energy technologies. Earlier in the day,
40 Senators blocked the bill, forcing Senate leaders to jettison the
tax provisions.

"Oil companies have given $8 million to Senators over the past four
years. Today's action by 40 Senators proved they have gotten their
money's worth: $1,600 in tax breaks for every dollar the oil industry
has spent in campaign contributions.

http://www.nwf.org/news/story.cfm?pageId=D5668608-F1F6-7B10-3BE0FD3C6B3475B4


Cumulative Oil & Gas Contributions to Senators
Who Blocked a Measure to Rollback Oil Company Giveaways on HR 6

Source: Center for Responsive Politics


OIL & GAS CONTRIBUTIONS  over past 4 years

Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) $577,556

John Cornyn (R-TX) $561,380

Bob Corker (R-TN) $215,350

Pat Roberts (R-KS) $205,850

James Inhofe (R-OK) $196,700

Mitch McConnell (R-KY) $150,500

Pete Domenici (R-NM) $145,950

Jon Kyl (R-AZ) $140,700

Mary Landrieu (D-LA) $133,650

Christopher Bond (R-MO) $129,350

Sam Brownback (R-KS) $129,155

Trent Lott (R-MS) $124,300

George Voinovich (R-OH) $122,050

Arlen Specter (R-PA) $119,878

Lamar Alexander (R-TN) $98,300

Jim Bunning (R-KY) $98,269

John Ensign (R-NV) $95,100

David Vitter (R-LA) $81,100

Michael Crapo (R-ID) $63,650

Jeff Sessions (R-AL) $58,800

Robert Bennett (R-UT) $58,700

Thad Cochran (R-MS) $58,500

Richard Shelby (R-AL) $56,800

Elizabeth Dole (R-NC) $53,400

Ted Stevens (R-AK) $44,700

Michael Enzi (R-WY) $42,500

John Sununu (R-NH) $41,900

Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) $41,250

Larry Craig (R-ID) $33,500

Judd Gregg (R-NH) $31,500

Lindsey Graham (R-SC) $29,600

Richard Burr (R-NC) $28,750

John Barrasso (R-WY) $27,500

Johnny Isakson (R-GA) $25,200

Jim DeMint (R-SC) $23,722

Mel Martinez (R-FL) $17,000

Chuck Hagel (R-NE) $16,600

Tom Coburn (R-OK) $9,600

John Warner (R-VA) $9,500

Wayne Allard (R-CO) $0*

Total $4,097,810
*Sen. Allard was last re-elected in 2002 and will be retiring in 2008

[pdf file] http://tinyurl.com/3anmf4