Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread Richard J. Williams 
On 1/15/2014 9:35 AM, Share Long wrote:
> Richard, I do wish Funny Farm Loungers would operationally define 
> their terms, as is done in Science. For example, what is meant by 
> seriously? It seems like you operationally define it as:
> 1. replying quickly to posts
> 2. replying to a lot of posts
> 3. replying to posts throughout the day and night
> 4. replying with a macro, which btw makes me think of macaroni (-:
>
> Do I have it right so far?
 >
Almost right - just add 5. If somebody monitors FFL 24 x 7, they are 
probably serious about reading messages on FFL.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread Richard J. Williams 

On 1/15/2014 8:48 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

On 1/14/2014 9:01 PM, awoelflebater@...  wrote:


Does anyone take anyone else seriously here?

>
You mean, serious enough to monitor all the messages to FFL 24 x 7?

No, I didn't mean that.

So, it has been established that nobody takes any of these messages 
seriously - except the informants that monitor the group 24 x 7, and 
that would be a serious thing to do. Is that what you meant?

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread Share Long 
Richard, I do wish Funny Farm Loungers would operationally define their terms, 
as is done in Science. For example, what is meant by seriously? It seems like 
you operationally define it as:
1. replying quickly to posts
2. replying to a lot of posts
3. replying to posts throughout the day and night
4. replying with a macro, which btw makes me think of macaroni (-:

Do I have it right so far?





On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:55 AM, "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


On 1/13/2014 12:24 PM, authfriend@... wrote:

BTW, when's the last time anyone saw Barry have as extended and wide-ranging a 
discussion with someone on FFL as I've been having with Bob Price?
>
>When is the last time anyone saw anyone have an extended and wide
ranging discussion with anyone on FFL? 
>
>Let's get serious - I mean, without using a "macro" fora response.
>
Other than Bob and Judy the last time there were conversations that were 
extended and wide ranging was when Robin was around. Go figure.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread Richard J. Williams 

On 1/15/2014 8:27 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously. *

>
When I said nothing I say is to be taken seriously, I wasn't being 
serious. So, just admit that you took whatI posted seriously. Now let's 
get to work!

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread punditster 
> Says the guy who writes virtually "every single post".
 >
 Ann -  I was not being serious when I posted that nobody takes these messages 
seriously. So, it's settled then: Judy is the only informant on FFL that takes 
anyone seriously. Go figure.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Seriously, it looks like nobody takes anyone seriously on this forum except 
Judy. She seems to take this all VERY seriously. At least seriously enough 
monitor every single post while she's at work and to read all the massages and 
reply to most of them. Go figure.
 

 Says the guy who writes virtually "every single post".
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken 
seriously. 
 

 Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I pointed 
out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for ages. After 
having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a painful loss of face 
when I reminded him. You can always tell by the lameness of his retaliatory 
shots when he's really been brought down. >
 Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" posting to 
show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've really been brought 
down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously anymore. You're finished on 
this group - exposed as a school yard bully and poser. Posting macros and 
replying to every Barry message is not a way to sustain a long conversation 
with anyone, but as a joke to indicate that you've lost the big debate - you're 
just obsessive and mean. That's what I think.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread awoelflebater 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Seriously, it looks like nobody takes anyone seriously on this forum except 
Judy. She seems to take this all VERY seriously. At least seriously enough 
monitor every single post while she's at work and to read all the massages and 
reply to most of them. Go figure.
 

 Says the guy who writes virtually "every single post".
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken 
seriously. 
 

 Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I pointed 
out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for ages. After 
having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a painful loss of face 
when I reminded him. You can always tell by the lameness of his retaliatory 
shots when he's really been brought down. >
 Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" posting to 
show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've really been brought 
down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously anymore. You're finished on 
this group - exposed as a school yard bully and poser. Posting macros and 
replying to every Barry message is not a way to sustain a long conversation 
with anyone, but as a joke to indicate that you've lost the big debate - you're 
just obsessive and mean. That's what I think.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread awoelflebater 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 On 1/14/2014 10:12 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
 Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I pointed 
out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for ages. After 
having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a painful loss of face 
when I reminded him. You can always tell by the lameness of his retaliatory 
shots when he's really been brought down. >
 Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" posting to 
show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've really been brought 
down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously anymore. You're finished on 
this group - exposed as a school yard bully and poser. Posting macros and 
replying to every Barry message is not a way to sustain a long conversation 
with anyone, but as a joke to indicate that you've lost the big debate - you're 
just obsessive and mean. That's what I think.
 
 Maybe it's time to "sacrifice" your "thoughts" to meditation, Ricky. Now, 
close the eyes...

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread awoelflebater 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 On 1/14/2014 9:01 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
 Does anyone take anyone else seriously here? >
 You mean, serious enough to monitor all the messages to FFL 24 x 7?
 No, I didn't mean that.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread authfriend 
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken 
seriously. 
 

 Seriously, it looks like nobody takes anyone seriously on this forum except 
Judy. She seems to take this all VERY seriously. At least seriously enough 
monitor every single post while she's at work and to read all the massages and 
reply to most of them. Go figure.
 

 On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:11 AM, mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
   Seriously, it looks like nobody takes anyone seriously on this forum except 
Judy. She seems to take this all VERY seriously. At least seriously enough 
monitor every single post while she's at work and to read all the massages and 
reply to most of them. Go figure.
 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote:

 As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken 
seriously. 
 

 Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I pointed 
out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for ages. After 
having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a painful loss of face 
when I reminded him. You can always tell by the lameness of his retaliatory 
shots when he's really been brought down. >
 Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" posting to 
show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've really been brought 
down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously anymore. You're finished on 
this group - exposed as a school yard bully and poser. Posting macros and 
replying to every Barry message is not a way to sustain a long conversation 
with anyone, but as a joke to indicate that you've lost the big debate - you're 
just obsessive and mean. That's what I think.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread Richard J. Williams 

On 1/15/2014 8:14 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

*I believe him.*

>
This is a very fast response time, Judy. So, you ARE monitoring these 
messages. it looks like you take this discussion very seriously - it 
looks like you are the only one. Go figure.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread Richard Williams 
Seriously, it looks like nobody takes anyone seriously on this forum except
Judy. She seems to take this all VERY seriously. At least seriously enough
monitor every single post while she's at work and to read all the massages
and reply to most of them. Go figure.


On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:11 AM,  wrote:

>
>
> Seriously, it looks like nobody takes anyone seriously on this forum
> except Judy. She seems to take this all VERY seriously. At least seriously
> enough monitor every single post while she's at work and to read all the
> massages and reply to most of them. Go figure.
>
>
>
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
> *As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be
> taken seriously. *
>
> *Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I
> pointed out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for
> ages. After having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a
> painful loss of face when I reminded him. You can always tell by the
> lameness of his retaliatory shots when he's really been brought down.*
>
> >
> Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" posting
> to show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've really been
> brought down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously anymore. You're
> finished on this group - exposed as a school yard bully and poser. Posting
> macros and replying to every Barry message is not a way to sustain a long
> conversation with anyone, but as a joke to indicate that you've lost the
> big debate - you're just obsessive and mean. That's what I think.
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread authfriend 
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken 
seriously.
 

 I believe him.
 
 Seriously, it looks like nobody takes anyone seriously on this forum except 
Judy. She seems to take this all VERY seriously. At least seriously enough 
monitor every single post while she's at work and to read all the massages and 
reply to most of them. Go figure.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken 
seriously. 
 

 Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I pointed 
out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for ages. After 
having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a painful loss of face 
when I reminded him. You can always tell by the lameness of his retaliatory 
shots when he's really been brought down. >
 Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" posting to 
show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've really been brought 
down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously anymore. You're finished on 
this group - exposed as a school yard bully and poser. Posting macros and 
replying to every Barry message is not a way to sustain a long conversation 
with anyone, but as a joke to indicate that you've lost the big debate - you're 
just obsessive and mean. That's what I think.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread punditster 
Seriously, it looks like nobody takes anyone seriously on this forum except 
Judy. She seems to take this all VERY seriously. At least seriously enough 
monitor every single post while she's at work and to read all the massages and 
reply to most of them. Go figure.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken 
seriously. 
 

 Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I pointed 
out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for ages. After 
having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a painful loss of face 
when I reminded him. You can always tell by the lameness of his retaliatory 
shots when he's really been brought down. >
 Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" posting to 
show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've really been brought 
down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously anymore. You're finished on 
this group - exposed as a school yard bully and poser. Posting macros and 
replying to every Barry message is not a way to sustain a long conversation 
with anyone, but as a joke to indicate that you've lost the big debate - you're 
just obsessive and mean. That's what I think.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread authfriend 
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken 
seriously. 
 

 Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I pointed 
out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for ages. After 
having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a painful loss of face 
when I reminded him. You can always tell by the lameness of his retaliatory 
shots when he's really been brought down. >
 Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" posting to 
show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've really been brought 
down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously anymore. You're finished on 
this group - exposed as a school yard bully and poser. Posting macros and 
replying to every Barry message is not a way to sustain a long conversation 
with anyone, but as a joke to indicate that you've lost the big debate - you're 
just obsessive and mean. That's what I think.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread Richard J. Williams 

On 1/14/2014 10:12 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I 
pointed out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here 
for ages. After having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he 
suffered a painful loss of face when I reminded him. You can always 
tell by the lameness of his retaliatory shots when he's really been 
brought down.*

>
Seriously. All Barry has to do is remind everyone of your "macro" 
posting to show the lameness of your retaliatory shots when you've 
really been brought down. Nobody takes you or your macros seriously 
anymore. You're finished on this group - exposed as a school yard bully 
and poser. Posting macros and replying to every Barry message is not a 
way to sustain a long conversation with anyone, but as a joke to 
indicate that you've lost the big debate - you're just obsessive and 
mean. That's what I think.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-15 Thread Richard J. Williams 

On 1/14/2014 9:01 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

Does anyone take anyone else seriously here?

>
You mean, serious enough to monitor all the messages to FFL 24 x 7?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-14 Thread authfriend 
Barry took with the utmost seriousness the fact that he has not, as I pointed 
out, been able to sustain a long conversation with anyone here for ages. After 
having claimed that I had "nothing to say," he suffered a painful loss of face 
when I reminded him. You can always tell by the lameness of his retaliatory 
shots when he's really been brought down.
 
 Judging by the response to their mutual egomasturbation thread, nobody here is 
interested in anything they think about *anything*.  :-) >
 Everybody can spot a couple of posers. It only takes posting one single 
"macro" as a response for people to no longer take them seriously. 
 Does anyone take anyone else seriously here?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-14 Thread awoelflebater 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 On 1/14/2014 10:09 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
 
 Judging by the response to their mutual egomasturbation thread, nobody here is 
interested in anything they think about *anything*.  :-) >
 Everybody can spot a couple of posers. It only takes posting one single 
"macro" as a response for people to no longer take them seriously. 
 
 Does anyone take anyone else seriously here?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-14 Thread Richard J. Williams 

On 1/14/2014 10:09 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


*/Judging by the response to their mutual egomasturbation thread, 
nobody here is interested in anything they think about *anything*.  :-)/*

>
Everybody can spot a couple of posers. It only takes posting one single 
"macro" as a response for people to no longer take them seriously.

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Seriously, was Religion that doesn't take itself deadly seriously

2014-01-14 Thread Richard J. Williams 

On 1/14/2014 8:55 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Other than Bob and Judy the last time there were conversations that 
were extended and wide ranging was when Robin was around. Go figure.

>
Judging by the response, nobody here is interested in what Bob or Judy 
think of film editing. Apparently neither of them know how to use Adobe 
Premier on a PC for digital editing. It's no good to just pose as a film 
critic when you can't even edit a home movie yourself with Microsoft 
Movie Maker. Go figure.