Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10

2009-08-20 Thread Christof Damian
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 18:15, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote:

 cdamian:BADURL:wikicalendar-1.15.tar.gz:mediawiki-wikicalendar


Just checked this one and it works. Probably was a temporary problem
with googlecode .

Christof

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 ==
 The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
 ==

 Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):

    beagle
    bmpx
    clipsmm
    f-spot
    fedora-business-cards
    kdeedu
    openmpi
    openvrml
    ppl
    R-RScaLAPACK
    rubygem-main
    rubygem-rails
    scheme2js
    tomboy

Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.

Peter

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule--Final Release Date 2009-11-10

2009-08-20 Thread Mat Booth
2009/8/19 Ankit Patel an...@redhat.com:

 Is there any way to get notification, when packages (re)build is done?

 I am referring to task - Ongoing Test Package Builds for Translation
 Review, Thu 2009-09-10 to Mon 2009-09-14 from the schedule, where FLP
 (Fedora Localization Project) team of translators might want to know whether
 the packages they have translated are rebuilt along with latest translations
 or not.

 Thanks!


You can add notifications in Koji, if that's what you mean.

-- 
Mat Booth

A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation.
Q: Why shouldn't you do it?
A: Posting your reply above the original message.
Q: What is top-posting?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Build requirements for threaded code?

2009-08-20 Thread Sam Varshavchik

Michel Salim writes:


On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 19:57 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:

-pthread means -D_REENTRANT and -lpthread.  -D_REENTRANT is basically
useless and you should use standard feature test macros or _GNU_SOURCE for
what you want.  So just linking with -lpthread is what I would call the
normal and recommended practice.  


The man pages are not maintained by people who ask the people who know.


Which raises a good question: who ought to be in charge of the manpages?
There ought to be a good way, once a problem is found (like in this
case), for the relevant manpage to get fixed.


The pthreads man page contains the maintainer's contact information, at the 
bottom.





pgp9Jq0mLQa69.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 ==
 The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
 ==

 Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):

    beagle
    bmpx
    clipsmm
    f-spot
    fedora-business-cards
    kdeedu
    openmpi
    openvrml
    ppl
    R-RScaLAPACK
    rubygem-main
    rubygem-rails
    scheme2js
    tomboy

Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.

They're eternally broken on ppc64.  Mostly due to Mono being broken on ppc64.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:50 -0400, Josh wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
  ==
  The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
  ==
 
  Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
 
     beagle
     bmpx
     clipsmm
     f-spot
     fedora-business-cards
     kdeedu
     openmpi
     openvrml
     ppl
     R-RScaLAPACK
     rubygem-main
     rubygem-rails
     scheme2js
     tomboy
 
 Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
 this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
 
 They're eternally broken on ppc64.  Mostly due to Mono being broken on ppc64.

Really? Then why has somebody added ppc64 to the ExclusiveArch list
for many but not all of the Mono packages? I think that spec files
from F-12 devel have been copied to F-11 without making sure that
Mono has been built for ppc64 there.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


rawhide report: 20090820 changes

2009-08-20 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Aug 20 06:15:06 UTC 2009

New package anjal
An email client for small screen devices
New package liblastfm
Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
New package mutter-moblin
Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter
New package nss-util
Network Security Services Utilities Library
Updated Packages:

PackageKit-0.5.2-0.1.20090819git.fc12
-
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Richard Hughes  rhug...@redhat.com - 0.5.2-0.1.20090819git
- Update to a git snapshot from the 0.5.x series.


abrt-0.0.7.1-1.fc12
---
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com 0.0.7.1-1
- fixes to bugzilla plugin and gui to make the report message more user-friendly


alexandria-0.6.5-1.fc12
---
* Thu Aug 20 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 0.6.5-1
- Update to 0.6.5
- Remove 2 upstreamed patches (1 patch still unremoved)
- Add 2 patches, will report upstream


allgeyer-fonts-5.002-4.fc12
---
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 5.002-4
- fix urls


amanith-0.3-13.fc12
---
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 0.3-13
- note that upstream is gone, drop URL from Source0


bti-023-1.fc12
--
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Michel Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org - 023-1
- Update to 023
- Build against readline v5, due to licensing incompatibilities with v6
  (bug #511301)


cobertura-1.9-3.fc12

* Wed Aug 19 2009 Victor Vasilyev victor.vasil...@sun.com 1.9-3
- Fix B(R) according to guidelines
- Use the  lnSysJAR macro
- Prevent brp-java-repack-jars from being run


colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc12
-
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to - 0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489
- Fix for desert LOS bug


condor-ec2-enhanced-1.0-17.fc12
---
* Tue Aug 18 2009 rr...@redhat - 1.0-17
- caroniad checks condor_config for its configuration before looking
  in configuration files
- Removed the init script as the daemon is controlled by condor now
- Split the documentation into two files, one for the AMI and one for
  the submit machine
- Added conflict with condor-low-latency


condor-ec2-enhanced-hooks-1.0-19.fc12
-
* Tue Aug 18 2009 rr...@redhat - 1.0-19
- Split the documentation into two files, one for the AMI and one for
  the submit machine
- Fixed obsolete issue with common package
- SQS/S3 queues/buckets no longer use GlobalJobId because they can be too
  long for AWS.  Instead, ClusterId, ProcId, and QDate is used.


condor-job-hooks-1.0-12.fc12

* Tue Aug 18 2009 rr...@redhat - 1.0-11
- Split documentation into two files, one for carod and one for
  the job-hooks

* Tue Aug 18 2009 rr...@redhat - 1.0-12
- Job hooks use JOB_HOOK as keyword instead of LL_HOOK
- Fixed version numbering

* Mon Aug 17 2009 rr...@redhat - 1.0-10
- Minor cleanup in common functions


condor-low-latency-1.0-19.fc12
--
* Tue Aug 18 2009 rr...@redhat - 1.0-19
- Split documentation into two files, one for carod and one for
  the job-hooks
- Added conflict with condor-ec2-enhanced
- Removed ll_condor_config and pulled its contents into the INSTALL
  documentation

* Mon Aug 17 2009 rr...@redhat - 1.0-18
- Handle AMQP broker restarts (BZ488998)
- Fixed typo that allows correct usage of --help (BZ491826)


control-center-2.27.90-2.fc12
-
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2.27.90-2
- Make the appearance capplet work again


cups-1.4-0.rc1.16.fc12
--
* Tue Aug 18 2009 Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com 1:1.4-0.rc1.16
- Fixed JobKillDelay handling for cancelled jobs (bug #518026,
  STR #3292).
- Use 'exec' to invoke ghostscript in the pstoraster filter.  This
  allows the SIGTERM signal to reach the correct process, as well as
  conserving memory (part of bug #518026).


dahdi-tools-2.1.0.2-8.fc12
--
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br - 2.1.0.2-8
- fix bz 495453 (/etc/modprobe.d/dahdi.blacklist and /etc/modprobe.d/dahdi 
doesn't end with.conf)


dhcpv6-2.0.0alpha3-1.fc12
-
* Wed Aug 19 2009 David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com - 2.0.0alpha3-1
- Upgraded to dhcpv6-2.0.0-alpha3

* Tue Aug 18 2009 David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com - 2.0.0alpha2-1
- Upgraded to dhcpv6-2.0.0-alpha2

* Tue Aug 18 2009 David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com - 2.0.0alpha2-2
- Remove LICENSE from the %doc line


dvdisaster-0.72.1-1.fc12

* Wed Aug 19 2009 Dmitry Butskoy dmi...@butskoy.name - 0.72.1-1
- Update to 0.72.1


ebtables-2.0.9-2.fc12
-
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 2.0.9-2
- fix source0 url


foomatic-db-4.0-5.20090819.fc12
---
* Wed Aug 19 2009 Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com 4.0-5.20090819
- 

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:50 -0400, Josh wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
  ==
  The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
  ==
 
  Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
 
     beagle
     bmpx
     clipsmm
     f-spot
     fedora-business-cards
     kdeedu
     openmpi
     openvrml
     ppl
     R-RScaLAPACK
     rubygem-main
     rubygem-rails
     scheme2js
     tomboy
 
 Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
 this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
 
 They're eternally broken on ppc64.  Mostly due to Mono being broken on ppc64.

Really? Then why has somebody added ppc64 to the ExclusiveArch list
for many but not all of the Mono packages? I think that spec files
from F-12 devel have been copied to F-11 without making sure that
Mono has been built for ppc64 there.

That could very well be.  I also know that there was some work done during F11
development to make Mono work on ppc64 and it did for a while.  Yet an update
seems to have hose that?

If people need access to a ppc64 box to fix Mono issues, just let me know.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Firmware licence question

2009-08-20 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)

I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what 
it is not permitted) and built automatically on install phase.


But it depend on http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx111-firmware/ and 
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx100-firmware/ binary firmware images.


So, I want maintain all this packages in Fedora. Main question - it is 
permitted? It will not be blocked as FE-legal?


With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev aka Pahan-Hubbitus.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote:

 Michael Schwendt wrote:
 
 ==
 The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
 ==
 
 Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
 ...
 kdeedu
 
 As far as I can tell, this one is a false-positive, unless someone can
 enlighten me precisely what's wrong.
 
 Recent changes have been made to make this package safer multilib-wise
 (fixing bug #515087 being one)

Ah, I think I found it (a missing Obsoletes, testing now).

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi,

TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
testing in Fedora:

rpm -Uhv 
http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm

Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
help with testing :)

My current effort is aimed to font packaging so that the fonts are
available to non-TeX Live users as well.

For more information:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive

Jindrich

-- 
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Firmware licence question

2009-08-20 Thread Michal Schmidt
Dne Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:51:04 +0400 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
napsal(a):
 I very want see this driver in Fedora:
 http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
 This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
 May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known
 what it is not permitted) and built automatically on install phase.

It doesn't matter what build mechanism it uses. It's a 3rd party
kernel module, so it won't be included in Fedora.

 But it depend on http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx111-firmware/
 and http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx100-firmware/ binary
 firmware images.
 
 So, I want maintain all this packages in Fedora. Main question - it
 is permitted? It will not be blocked as FE-legal?

License: Unknown for the firmware is definitely not a good sign.

Michal

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Firmware licence question

2009-08-20 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:51:04PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 
wrote:
 I very want see this driver in Fedora:
 http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
 This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
 May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what  
 it is not permitted) and built automatically on install phase.

Fedora does not allow stand-alone kernel module packages.  This would need
to be included in the kernel RPM itself.  The best way to get that to happen
is to get the driver into the upstream kernel.

 But it depend on http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx111-firmware/ and  
 http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx100-firmware/ binary firmware 
 images.

Unless you can find the actual license for the firmware in question, those
packages don't look acceptable to me.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Firmware licence question

2009-08-20 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)

Thank you for the answers.

20.08.2009 16:50, Josh Boyer wrote:

Fedora does not allow stand-alone kernel module packages.  This would need
to be included in the kernel RPM itself.  The best way to get that to happen
is to get the driver into the upstream kernel.
Yes, but not I developer of it. Additionaly it is outdated hardware, as 
I can understand...



Unless you can find the actual license for the firmware in question, those
packages don't look acceptable to me.

I'm not found any License mention. So, I'll ask it in acx100 mailing list.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Firmware licence question

2009-08-20 Thread Rex Dieter
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:

 I very want see this driver in Fedora:
 http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
 This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
 May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what
 it is not permitted) and built automatically on install phase.
 
 But it depend on http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx111-firmware/ and
 http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx100-firmware/ binary firmware
 images.
 
 So, I want maintain all this packages in Fedora. Main question - it is
 permitted? It will not be blocked as FE-legal?

Not really, kernel module/drivers need to be upstream, see also:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules
and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Binary_Firmware

-- Rex



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Firefox addon for Fedora-pkgdb search

2009-08-20 Thread Mat Booth
2009/8/19 Adam Miller maxamill...@gmail.com:
 Hello all,
    I decided posting this to the devel-list would be most appropriate
 because I assume it to be the crowd who would put something like this
 to use (but I could be wrong). I threw together a little Firefox AddOn
 that adds the pkgdb as a search option and then spoke with Máirín
 Duffy about a logo and she was nice enough to put together one awesome
 logo for the addon (thanks again for that!). I'm also in discussion
 with Luke Macken about making something similar except for Fedora
 Community, more on that once it comes to life but in the mean time,
 enjoy!

 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/13710

 Thanks,
 -Adam

 P.S. - If this was the wrong list to post to, many apologies and I'm
 open to suggestion on where to shoot info like this :)


Neat. I occasionally want to yum search for something when using a
non-Fedora system (or from a different Fedora release from the one I'm
using), so thanks. :-)


-- 
Mat Booth

A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation.
Q: Why shouldn't you do it?
A: Posting your reply above the original message.
Q: What is top-posting?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Martin Sourada
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
 Hi,
 
 TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
 testing in Fedora:
 
 rpm -Uhv 
 http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
 
 Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
 because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
 packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
 help with testing :)
 
 My current effort is aimed to font packaging so that the fonts are
 available to non-TeX Live users as well.
 
 For more information:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
 
Thank you so much for your effort :) 

Doing yum update texlive\* resulted in dep. problems with (x)dvipdfmx,
dvipng (requires libkpathsea.so.4) -- you're probably missing obsoletes
in texlive-dvipdfmx and texlive-dvipng. After I removed them (along with
xetex, which I tried once, but went back to just tex), the update
progressed smoothly, haven't tried runtime yet (though, seeing that your
repo has 5000+ packages and the yum updated installed/updated only 85, I
suspect I'll be missing some fonts I use).

Martin


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
 Hi,
 
 TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
 testing in Fedora:
 
 rpm -Uhv 
 http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
 
 Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
 because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
 packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
 help with testing :)
 
 My current effort is aimed to font packaging so that the fonts are
 available to non-TeX Live users as well.

It seems your spec making program has some bugs, as some packages have
names such as texlive-csplain.ARCH, this probably shouldn't be..?

When I try to install texlive-scheme-full on F11 x86_64 I get a bunch of
errors due to missing packages:

  -- Missing Dependency: texlive-findhyph is needed by package
texlive-collection-binextra-2009-14758.fc11.noarch (texlive)
Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-germkorr is needed by package
texlive-collection-langgerman-2009-14751.fc11.noarch (texlive)
Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-spverbatim is needed by package
texlive-collection-latexextra-2009-14750.fc11.noarch (texlive)
Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-fig4latex is needed by package
texlive-collection-pictures-2009-14752.fc11.noarch (texlive)
Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-findhyph is needed by package
texlive-collection-binextra-2009-14758.fc11.noarch (texlive)
Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-titlepic is needed by package
texlive-collection-latexextra-2009-14750.fc11.noarch (texlive)
-- 
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Martin Sourada
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:40 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
 progressed smoothly, haven't tried runtime yet (though, seeing that your
So, just noticed I needed to install texlive-csplain in order to have
it, but it does not work:

This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
 restricted \write18 enabled.
---! /usr/share/texlive/texmf-var/web2c/pdftex/csplain.fmt doesn't match
pdftex.pool
(Fatal format file error; I'm stymied)

How can I fix it?

Further, I noticed in csplain.log that it loads the document with
ISO-8859-2 coding, is there a way to switch it to UTF-8? texconfig does
not seem to work anymore for format installing/changing :(

Martin


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Firmware licence question

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello, All!

2009/8/20 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@ru.bir.ru:
 I very want see this driver in Fedora:
 http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
 This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...

This module has very sad story - since, it was made as a result of
direct reverse engineering (no clean room techniques were used), it
produced series of flamewars in LKML. As a result it was rejected from
inclusion into main kernel tree. More to say, the firmware status is
also unclear.

-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Firmware licence question

2009-08-20 Thread Andy Gospodarek
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:51:04PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 
wrote:
 I very want see this driver in Fedora:
 http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
 This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...
 May be except what it dkms? But it have not kernel modules (I known what  
 it is not permitted) and built automatically on install phase.

 But it depend on http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx111-firmware/ and  
 http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/acx100-firmware/ binary firmware 
 images.

 So, I want maintain all this packages in Fedora. Main question - it is  
 permitted? It will not be blocked as FE-legal?

 With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev aka Pahan-Hubbitus.


Here is what you need to do:

1. Have the driver and firmware pushed to the upstream kernel.  If it
goes upstream, it will generally be acceptable to Fedora.

2. Have the driver enabled on the rawhide kernel config.

3. Make sure the firmware gets included when building the
kernel-firmware package in rawhide.

4. What for the base version for rawhide kernels to make their way into
Fedora.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Firmware licence question

2009-08-20 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)

20.08.2009 18:01, Peter Lemenkov wrote:

Hello, All!

2009/8/20 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)fo...@ru.bir.ru:

I very want see this driver in Fedora:
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/
This is free and even packaged, so no problem there...


This module has very sad story - since, it was made as a result of
direct reverse engineering (no clean room techniques were used), it
produced series of flamewars in LKML. As a result it was rejected from
inclusion into main kernel tree. More to say, the firmware status is
also unclear.



Ehhh, shit.
Peter, thank you for clarification. Can you provide link to this 
discussion in LKML if don't forgot how find it?


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Pavel Lisy
Jindrich Novy píše v Čt 20. 08. 2009 v 14:44 +0200:
 Hi,
 
 TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
 testing in Fedora:
 
 rpm -Uhv 
 http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
 
 Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
 because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
 packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
 help with testing :)
 
 My current effort is aimed to font packaging so that the fonts are
 available to non-TeX Live users as well.
 
 For more information:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive

Thanks

one question: in F11 is csindex program missing. I've read somewhere
there was problem in missing autoconf for it. What about new TeX Live?
Is it there now? Can I help if csindex is still missing?

Pavel

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Juan Rodriguez
I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.

Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point.

-- 
Ing. Juan M. Rodriguez Moreno
Desarrollador de Sistemas Abiertos
Sitio: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Mary Ellen Foster
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
 rpm -Uhv 
 http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm

 Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
 because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
 packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
 help with testing :)

What's up with xetex? The package is named texlive-xetex.ARCH, and it
seems to depend on a package called texlive-xetex which isn't
provided in the new repository, and therefore pulls in the whole old
version of texlive from the core repository again ...

MEF

-- 
Mary Ellen Foster  --  http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Mary Ellen Foster
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:

 Thanks for noticing. I've tested only upgrade from texlive-2007
 installation with no dvipdfmx installed. I'll fix it in the next
 repo update.

Another related upgrade issue: texlive-psutils doesn't obsolete
psutils ... (is there a better place to note this sort of thing?)

MEF

-- 
Mary Ellen Foster  --  http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


sage idea

2009-08-20 Thread Neal Becker
Not much progress has been made on sage.  Perhaps this can help:
http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/wiki/Installation

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com said:
 Another related upgrade issue: texlive-psutils doesn't obsolete
 psutils ... (is there a better place to note this sort of thing?)

Why would texlive replace a stand-alone package (that has been around
forever as a stand-alone package)?
-- 
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Mary Ellen Foster
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
 What's up with xetex? The package is named texlive-xetex.ARCH, and it
 seems to depend on a package called texlive-xetex which isn't
 provided in the new repository, and therefore pulls in the whole old
 version of texlive from the core repository again ...

Sorry, never mind -- looks like it has an unversioned dependency or
something, texlive-xetex is in the new repo and once I excluded the
old repos it worked again. (Should obsolete teckit though ...)

MEF

-- 
Mary Ellen Foster  --  http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


No more Alpha tag requests

2009-08-20 Thread Josh Boyer
A general reminder.  As we are out of Alpha freeze now, that means we are not
taking tag requests for F12 Alpha any longer.  The package set for Alpha has
been finalized.

Thanks

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Mary Ellen Foster
2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:

 Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
 because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
 packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
 help with testing :)

One more issue: some packages (like R, for example) still depend on
tetex-latex, which I guess used to be a virtual provide of texlive
but is now gone. What's the plan for dealing with this?

Here's the full list of things that require tetex-latex according to repoquery:

a2ps-0:4.14-8.fc11.x86_64
asymptote-0:1.70-1.fc11.x86_64
fig2ps-0:1.3.6-4.fc11.noarch
hevea-0:1.10-3.fc11.x86_64
HippoDraw-0:1.21.1-9.fc11.x86_64
ipe-0:6.0-0.29.pre30.fc11.x86_64
jadetex-0:3.13-5.fc11.noarch
mediawiki-math-0:1.14.0-45.fc11.x86_64
pdfjam-0:1.21-1.fc11.noarch
pyscript-0:0.6.1-4.fc11.noarch
R-devel-0:2.9.0-2.fc11.x86_64
tetex-bytefield-0:1.2a-5.fc11.noarch
tetex-dvipost-0:1.1-10.fc11.x86_64
tetex-elsevier-0:0.1.20071024-2.fc11.noarch
tetex-IEEEtran-0:1.7.1-2.fc11.noarch
tetex-perltex-0:1.7-2.fc11.noarch
tetex-prosper-0:1.5-5.fc11.noarch
texmaker-1:1.8-2.fc11.x86_64

MEF

-- 
Mary Ellen Foster  --  http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Martin Sourada
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 16:29 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:53:06PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
 Please be sure you remove all the old formats generated with the old
 TeX Live. In most cases clearing the /var/lib/texmf/ and ~/.texlive* contents
 should make it work.
 
Thanks, didn't occurred to me, that I need to rm -rf
also /var/lib/texmf. It's working now :) When you'll do the upgrade in
Fedora proper, it might be a good idea to clear /var/lib/texmf then (via
the packages)...

 You might want to add:
 
 csplain  pdfetex - -etex -enc csplain-utf8.ini
 cslatex  pdfetex - -etex -enc cslatex-utf8.ini
 
 in /usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf instead of the links to 
 cp227.tcx translate-file.
 
Thanks, that did the job. I noticed during the time I tried to make
csplain working that removing and re-adding the texlive-csplain package
adds to this file lots of garbage which make csplain format generation
not working... You'll get lines like:

csplain pdftex - -extex -translate-file=cp227.tcx cslatex.ini pdftex -
-extex -translate-file=cp227.tcx cslatex.ini and so on

Would be worth fixing, even though it's a corner case...

Anyway, after installing some (which looked like I'd might need them)
collections and texlive-bbm, I was able to successfully build my
Bachelors' thesis (it's about general relativity, and it uses pretty
pretty much everything I've ever tried with TeX, so the coverage is
rather good), so I can say that (cs)plain (utf8) works in TexLive 2009
well.

Martin


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:48:49PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
  Hi,
  
  TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
  testing in Fedora:
  
  rpm -Uhv 
  http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
  
  Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
  because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
  packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
  help with testing :)
  
  My current effort is aimed to font packaging so that the fonts are
  available to non-TeX Live users as well.
 
 It seems your spec making program has some bugs, as some packages have
 names such as texlive-csplain.ARCH, this probably shouldn't be..?

Nope, it is intentional. It is needed to somehow distinguish the
noarch and arch-dependent part. So package texlive-csplain contains
the noarch bits and texlive-csplain.ARCH ships the binaries.

 
 When I try to install texlive-scheme-full on F11 x86_64 I get a bunch of
 errors due to missing packages:
 
   -- Missing Dependency: texlive-findhyph is needed by package
 texlive-collection-binextra-2009-14758.fc11.noarch (texlive)
 Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-germkorr is needed by package
 texlive-collection-langgerman-2009-14751.fc11.noarch (texlive)
 Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-spverbatim is needed by package
 texlive-collection-latexextra-2009-14750.fc11.noarch (texlive)
 Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-fig4latex is needed by package
 texlive-collection-pictures-2009-14752.fc11.noarch (texlive)
 Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-findhyph is needed by package
 texlive-collection-binextra-2009-14758.fc11.noarch (texlive)
 Error: Missing Dependency: texlive-titlepic is needed by package
 texlive-collection-latexextra-2009-14750.fc11.noarch (texlive)

Fixed. It was caused by old repodata. It should work now.

Jindrich

 -- 
 Jussi Lehtola
 Fedora Project Contributor
 jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
 
 -- 
 fedora-devel-list mailing list
 fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:38:57PM +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
 2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
 
  Thanks for noticing. I've tested only upgrade from texlive-2007
  installation with no dvipdfmx installed. I'll fix it in the next
  repo update.
 
 Another related upgrade issue: texlive-psutils doesn't obsolete
 psutils ... (is there a better place to note this sort of thing?)

Please use:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLive

or:

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/488651

for now or mail me directly.

Currently I have no better place to report bugs/RFEs.

Jindrich

 
 MEF
 
 -- 
 Mary Ellen Foster  --  http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
 ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
 
 The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
 Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
 
 -- 
 fedora-devel-list mailing list
 fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Juan Rodriguez
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:

  I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it,
 the
  reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
  anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.

 Thanks for calling it annoying. :-/  It's people like you that make me
 look forward to the autoqa team taking over the broken deps reports. Then
 I don't have to worry about people like you who don't see the value of
 the broken deps checks.


I'm sorry, I *do* value emails, as they let me know when something's wrong
(Like fail to build from source, or broken dependencies). I don't know what
I could've said instead... Repetitive?



  Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point.

 Doesn't matter much. A yum install beagle on ppc64 doesn't work
 anymore.


Alright, I'll push the update.
Sorry for calling it 'annoying'.




 --
 fedora-devel-list mailing list
 fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list




-- 
Ing. Juan M. Rodriguez Moreno
Desarrollador de Sistemas Abiertos
Sitio: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:

 I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
 reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
 anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.

Thanks for calling it annoying. :-/  It's people like you that make me
look forward to the autoqa team taking over the broken deps reports. Then
I don't have to worry about people like you who don't see the value of
the broken deps checks.

 Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point.

Doesn't matter much. A yum install beagle on ppc64 doesn't work
anymore.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Pavel Lisy wrote:
 Jindrich Novy píše v Čt 20. 08. 2009 v 14:44 +0200:
  Hi,
  
  TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
  testing in Fedora:
  
  rpm -Uhv 
  http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
  
  Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
  because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
  packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
  help with testing :)
  
  My current effort is aimed to font packaging so that the fonts are
  available to non-TeX Live users as well.
  
  For more information:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
 
 Thanks
 
 one question: in F11 is csindex program missing. I've read somewhere
 there was problem in missing autoconf for it. What about new TeX Live?
 Is it there now? Can I help if csindex is still missing?

I don't see csindex in TeX Live 2009 as well... Please ask directly
on the upstream mailing list tex-l...@tug.org, they will be happy if
you offer help :)

Jindrich

 
 Pavel
 
 -- 
 fedora-devel-list mailing list
 fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:48:00PM +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
 2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
  What's up with xetex? The package is named texlive-xetex.ARCH, and it
  seems to depend on a package called texlive-xetex which isn't
  provided in the new repository, and therefore pulls in the whole old
  version of texlive from the core repository again ...
 
 Sorry, never mind -- looks like it has an unversioned dependency or
 something, texlive-xetex is in the new repo and once I excluded the
 old repos it worked again. (Should obsolete teckit though ...)

and t1utils. I need to yet hack the dependency generator to obsolete
or require these external utilities.

For now I modified the spec creator to require versioned packages
every time to avoid these surprises.

Jindrich

 
 MEF
 
 -- 
 Mary Ellen Foster  --  http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
 ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
 
 The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
 Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
 
 -- 
 fedora-devel-list mailing list
 fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All,

I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
is below and feedback is welcome.

Cheers,
Peter

--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig   2009-08-20 17:10:23.0 +0100
+++ comps-f12.xml.in2009-08-20 17:20:47.0 +0100
@@ -4235,6 +4235,17 @@
 /packagelist
   /group
   group
+idmoblin-desktop/id
+_nameMoblin Desktop Environment/_name
+_descriptionMoblin is a desktop environment for
NetBook/NetTop/MID devices./_description
+defaultfalse/default
+uservisibletrue/uservisible
+packagelist
+  packagereq type=mandatorymutter/packagereq
+  packagereq type=mandatorymutter-moblin/packagereq
+/packagelist
+  /group
+  group
 idmongolian-support/id
 _nameMongolian Support/_name
 _description/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Jesse Keating
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
 is below and feedback is welcome.

Is Moblin a trademark of anybody?

If you're adding a group, be sure to add it to a category as well.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
 Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
 I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
 is below and feedback is welcome.

 ... this seems small. There are no other apps required?

Yes there are. I haven't added them yet as I wanted to get the group in first.

 You'd want an entry in the desktop category as well. Also, you want to
 give the localization team a heads-up, as those strings are translated,
 and we've passed string freeze.

OK. Will do that and add an updates patch.

Peter

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jonathan Underwood
2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
 2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:

 Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
 because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
 packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
 help with testing :)

 One more issue: some packages (like R, for example) still depend on
 tetex-latex, which I guess used to be a virtual provide of texlive
 but is now gone. What's the plan for dealing with this?

 Here's the full list of things that require tetex-latex according to 
 repoquery:

 a2ps-0:4.14-8.fc11.x86_64
 asymptote-0:1.70-1.fc11.x86_64
 fig2ps-0:1.3.6-4.fc11.noarch
 hevea-0:1.10-3.fc11.x86_64
 HippoDraw-0:1.21.1-9.fc11.x86_64
 ipe-0:6.0-0.29.pre30.fc11.x86_64
 jadetex-0:3.13-5.fc11.noarch
 mediawiki-math-0:1.14.0-45.fc11.x86_64
 pdfjam-0:1.21-1.fc11.noarch
 pyscript-0:0.6.1-4.fc11.noarch
 R-devel-0:2.9.0-2.fc11.x86_64
 tetex-bytefield-0:1.2a-5.fc11.noarch
 tetex-dvipost-0:1.1-10.fc11.x86_64
 tetex-elsevier-0:0.1.20071024-2.fc11.noarch
 tetex-IEEEtran-0:1.7.1-2.fc11.noarch
 tetex-perltex-0:1.7-2.fc11.noarch
 tetex-prosper-0:1.5-5.fc11.noarch
 texmaker-1:1.8-2.fc11.x86_64

These packages should be updated to require tex(latex).

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi All,

 I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
 is below and feedback is welcome.

Peter, thanks for all your work on packaging stuff, it's really great.
 I appreciate the work on introspection and gnome-shell a lot.

Are you planning a Moblin spin?  Or do see this as just having the
packages in Fedora, and the final Moblin releases are done by that
project?

I'm a bit unsure of how far away Moblin is from the Fedora core OS
right now; I know there's the NetworkManager/Connman split, but
ignoring that, do you (or anyone) have an idea of how many patches to
upstream projects they have to support the fast boot?  How different
is their early kernel boot, and what tradeoffs are involved?

What we really do need is some more directed coordination between the
two projects.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: 
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
  Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
  I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
  is below and feedback is welcome.
 
  ... this seems small. There are no other apps required?
 
 Yes there are. I haven't added them yet as I wanted to get the group in first.

Might as well add them in, I'm not sure there's a benefit to waiting.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
 Hi All,

 I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
 is below and feedback is welcome.

 Is Moblin a trademark of anybody?

Intel has handed over the management of Moblin to the Linux
Foundation. I don't see anything what so ever on their site about
Trademarks.

The most useful bits are this link.
http://moblin.org/about-moblin

There's nothing about Moblin trademarks in the annoucement here
http://linux-foundation.org/weblogs/press/2009/04/02/linux-foundation-to-host-moblin-project/

Is that something that should go to fedora-legal for verification?

 If you're adding a group, be sure to add it to a category as well.

Added, updated patch. BTW is a bug or a email to the i18n list the
best way to raise this with the localization team?

--- comps-f12.xml.in.orig   2009-08-20 17:10:23.0 +0100
+++ comps-f12.xml.in2009-08-20 17:36:24.0 +0100
@@ -4235,6 +4235,17 @@
 /packagelist
   /group
   group
+idmoblin-desktop/id
+_nameMoblin Desktop Environment/_name
+_descriptionMoblin is a desktop environment for
NetBook/NetTop/MID devices./_description
+defaultfalse/default
+uservisibletrue/uservisible
+packagelist
+  packagereq type=mandatorymutter/packagereq
+  packagereq type=mandatorymutter-moblin/packagereq
+/packagelist
+  /group
+  group
 idmongolian-support/id
 _nameMongolian Support/_name
 _description/
@@ -6237,6 +6248,7 @@
   groupidgnome-desktop/groupid
   groupidkde-desktop/groupid
   groupidlxde-desktop/groupid
+  groupidmoblin-desktop/groupid
   groupidsugar-desktop/groupid
   groupidwindow-managers/groupid
   groupidxfce-desktop/groupid

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
 Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com wrote:
  Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
  I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
  is below and feedback is welcome.
 
  ... this seems small. There are no other apps required?

 Yes there are. I haven't added them yet as I wanted to get the group in 
 first.

 Might as well add them in, I'm not sure there's a benefit to waiting.

I wanted to get the group approved. No benefit of waiting except that
I hadn't got around to adding them and wanted to get the feedback
sooner rather than later. I will go through my list and add them
shortly.

Peter

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi All,

 I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
 is below and feedback is welcome.

 Peter, thanks for all your work on packaging stuff, it's really great.
  I appreciate the work on introspection and gnome-shell a lot.

 Are you planning a Moblin spin?  Or do see this as just having the
 packages in Fedora, and the final Moblin releases are done by that
 project?

Eventually I plan on having a moblin spin but not for F-12. The work
in Fedora at the moment is separate to anything that is coming from
Moblin. The advantage that Fedora will have that at the moment
upstream Moblin doesn't support anything that isn't an Atom processor.
So we should in the long term be able to support the older Celeron
based Netbooks and possibly the VIA based ones or NVidia ones.

 I'm a bit unsure of how far away Moblin is from the Fedora core OS
 right now; I know there's the NetworkManager/Connman split, but
 ignoring that, do you (or anyone) have an idea of how many patches to
 upstream projects they have to support the fast boot?  How different
 is their early kernel boot, and what tradeoffs are involved?

Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
The NM/connman is an interesting split. It seems suse is assisting the
process from the build side of things but has written a NetworkManger
moblin GUI that looks the same as the connman one sot they are
interchangable. Obviously we'll use the NM one because NM is cool :-)
Other than the 30 odd new packages needed for Moblin there doesn't
seem to be massive convergence from the other core Fedora packages. In
fact there's some cross over for some of the gnome-shell stuff in that
they use mutter and associated stuff.

From the rest of it AFAICT from the poking I've done they've replaced
the standard init process with fastinit which I haven't even looked
at. Its in their git repo though.

 What we really do need is some more directed coordination between the
 two projects.

That would be fabulous, but only time will tell.

Peter

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Peter Robinsonpbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:

 Eventually I plan on having a moblin spin but not for F-12. The work
 in Fedora at the moment is separate to anything that is coming from
 Moblin. The advantage that Fedora will have that at the moment
 upstream Moblin doesn't support anything that isn't an Atom processor.
 So we should in the long term be able to support the older Celeron
 based Netbooks and possibly the VIA based ones or NVidia ones.

Well, when talking about older hardware an important factor is to what
extent the graphics chipset and driver can support the UI experience,
not just the CPU.

 Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
 Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
 The NM/connman is an interesting split. It seems suse is assisting the
 process from the build side of things but has written a NetworkManger
 moblin GUI that looks the same as the connman one sot they are
 interchangable. Obviously we'll use the NM one because NM is cool :-)
 Other than the 30 odd new packages needed for Moblin there doesn't
 seem to be massive convergence from the other core Fedora packages.

Doesn't seem to be convergence?

 In
 fact there's some cross over for some of the gnome-shell stuff in that
 they use mutter and associated stuff.

Right.  We share quite a lot, but then again the devil's in the
details as they say.

 From the rest of it AFAICT from the poking I've done they've replaced
 the standard init process with fastinit which I haven't even looked
 at. Its in their git repo though.

Hmmm...Ok.   I just typed up:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Moblin_Core_Merge

Any help filling it in (especially from Moblin developers who may be
lurking) would be appreciated!

I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
breaking compatibility with any of the corner cases people expect from
a general purposes OS like RAID.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:11:31PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
 2009/8/20 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com:
  2009/8/20 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com:
 
  Maybe a good idea is to start directly with TeX Live 2009 in Fedora
  because TL 2008 has different package set and TL 2009 contains newest
  packages and will likely be released this year. And before that we can
  help with testing :)
 
  One more issue: some packages (like R, for example) still depend on
  tetex-latex, which I guess used to be a virtual provide of texlive
  but is now gone. What's the plan for dealing with this?
 
  Here's the full list of things that require tetex-latex according to 
  repoquery:
 
  a2ps-0:4.14-8.fc11.x86_64
  asymptote-0:1.70-1.fc11.x86_64
  fig2ps-0:1.3.6-4.fc11.noarch
  hevea-0:1.10-3.fc11.x86_64
  HippoDraw-0:1.21.1-9.fc11.x86_64
  ipe-0:6.0-0.29.pre30.fc11.x86_64
  jadetex-0:3.13-5.fc11.noarch
  mediawiki-math-0:1.14.0-45.fc11.x86_64
  pdfjam-0:1.21-1.fc11.noarch
  pyscript-0:0.6.1-4.fc11.noarch
  R-devel-0:2.9.0-2.fc11.x86_64
  tetex-bytefield-0:1.2a-5.fc11.noarch
  tetex-dvipost-0:1.1-10.fc11.x86_64
  tetex-elsevier-0:0.1.20071024-2.fc11.noarch
  tetex-IEEEtran-0:1.7.1-2.fc11.noarch
  tetex-perltex-0:1.7-2.fc11.noarch
  tetex-prosper-0:1.5-5.fc11.noarch
  texmaker-1:1.8-2.fc11.x86_64
 
 These packages should be updated to require tex(latex).

Right. These packages need to be updated to reflect the newly
introduced virtual provides. The reason of adding virtual provides was
to make packages not dependent on a praticular TeX distribution.

These virtual provides, such as tex(tex), tex(latex) or
tex(xetex) were added at the beginning of the year 2008 so it works at
least for Fedora 9 and higher.

We should file bugs for these packages.

Jindrich

 
 -- 
 fedora-devel-list mailing list
 fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: [tex-live] TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi Norbert,

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
 Hi Jindrich,
 
 On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Jindrich Novy wrote:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
 
 How do you handle installation of
   texlive-scheme-*
 since the schemes are overlapping? AFAIR rpm does not allow sharing
 pf files?

Schemes and collections are generated as meta-packages, not really
shipping any files, but dependent on required collections and
packages. Here is a sample of scheme-context for example:

%package scheme-context
Summary: ConTeXt scheme
Version: %{tl_version}
Release: 13822%{?dist}
BuildArch: noarch
Requires: texlive = %{tl_version}
Requires: texlive-collection-context
Requires: texlive-collection-metapost
Requires: texlive-xetex
Requires: texlive-tex-gyre
Requires: texlive-antt
Requires: texlive-antp
Requires: texlive-iwona
Requires: texlive-kurier
Requires: texlive-lm
Provides: tex(context)

So even though collections and packages do overlap in schemes we have
no conflicts :) By installing a wider scheme only missing packages are
installed.

Jindrich

 
 Best wishes
 
 Norbert
 
 ---
 Dr. Norbert Preining prein...@logic.atVienna University of 
 Technology
 Debian Developer prein...@debian.org Debian TeX 
 Group
 gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094  fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 
 B094
 ---
 BEDFONT
 A lurching sensation in the pit of the stomach experienced at
 breakfast in a hotel, occasioned by the realisation that it is about
 now that the chamber-maid will have discovered the embarrassing stain
 on your bottom sheet.
   --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

-- 
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
 JN == Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com writes:

JN These virtual provides, such as tex(tex), tex(latex) or tex(xetex)
JN were added at the beginning of the year 2008 so it works at least
JN for Fedora 9 and higher.
JN We should file bugs for these packages.

There are many, many more packages that require tetex-latex at build
time.  Notably every R package, most likely because of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R.

 - J

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
 JLT == Jason L Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu writes:

JLT There are many, many more packages that require tetex-latex at
JLT build time.  Notably every R package, most likely because of
JLT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R.

I have adjusted the guideline page to reference tex(latex), but I
believe this will cause issues for EPEL as no RHEL version seems to have
tex(latex).

 - J

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Michel Salim
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:44 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
 Hi,
 
 TeX Live 2009 pretest is now available via external repository for
 testing in Fedora:
 
 rpm -Uhv 
 http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.noarch.rpm
 
Any chance you could build this for Rawhide as well? Otherwise, would it
be advisable to use the F11 packages on Rawhide?

Thanks,

-- 
Michel

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:

  Depends on which bits you look at. Most of the packages are based on
  Fedora packages, the whole lot is built using the suse build system.
  The NM/connman is an interesting split. It seems suse is assisting the
  process from the build side of things but has written a NetworkManger
  moblin GUI that looks the same as the connman one sot they are
  interchangable. Obviously we'll use the NM one because NM is cool :-)
  Other than the 30 odd new packages needed for Moblin there doesn't
  seem to be massive convergence from the other core Fedora packages.
 
 Doesn't seem to be convergence?

I think he meant divergence.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:

 Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
 this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
 
 They're eternally broken on ppc64.  Mostly due to Mono being broken on ppc64.
 
It should be the opposite.  Mono runs on ppc64 but some maintainers need
to update the ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch that is preventing their
packages from being built on ppc64.  Once those packages are fixed,
their dependent packages will be able to run as well.

I'll go through and start updating packages to stop excluding ppc64
since I'm tired of seeing mschwendt's report be ignored.  However,
people who really care about mono need to step up and start taking care
of this stuff.  I don't own or use any mono packages and I'm not happy
with the patent licenses so I don't want to keep working on these packages.

-Toshio



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:

 I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
 desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
 breaking compatibility with any of the corner cases people expect from
 a general purposes OS like RAID.

Mandriva went with a two-tier system for this: the fast init system
falls back to being slow when it runs into complex cases.

http://blog.crozat.net/2009/02/speedboot-explained.html

I know our boot speed guy has some plans to go in a similar direction
(he was telling me about this while we were preparing the F11 boot speed
test day).

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: TeX Live 2009 for Fedora

2009-08-20 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:26:13PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
  JLT == Jason L Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu writes:
 
 JLT There are many, many more packages that require tetex-latex at
 JLT build time.  Notably every R package, most likely because of
 JLT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R.
 
 I have adjusted the guideline page to reference tex(latex), but I
 believe this will cause issues for EPEL as no RHEL version seems to have
 tex(latex).

Thanks for updating the packaging guidelines. I will add te tetex-* provides
to be compatible with the legacy packages.

Jindrich

 
  - J
 
 -- 
 fedora-devel-list mailing list
 fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 13:37 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:

 I'm particularly interested in how far we can get the default Fedora
 desktop's boot speed close to that of netbook experience, without
 breaking compatibility with any of the corner cases people expect from
 a general purposes OS like RAID.

 Mandriva went with a two-tier system for this: the fast init system
 falls back to being slow when it runs into complex cases.

Sounds reasonable.

 http://blog.crozat.net/2009/02/speedboot-explained.html

 I know our boot speed guy has some plans to go in a similar direction
 (he was telling me about this while we were preparing the F11 boot speed
 test day).

The other thing I will say here is that it's very important for this
functionality[1] in particular to ensure we don't regress.  It's
really easy for almost anything to come along (say, some new ISCSI
scanning, or a HAL probe or a font-scanner or...) and hit the boot
process and no one notices for quite a while.

Here's an example of the Ts test that Mozilla has which means
startup performance:
http://graphs.mozilla.org/graph.html#tests=[{%22test%22:%2216%22,%22branch%22:%221%22,%22machine%22:%2251%22}]

This comes from their Talos project: https://wiki.mozilla.org/StandaloneTalos
I'm not sure how difficult it is to set up.  Now that we have nightly
livecd images though (thanks nirik  all), that could be a useful
basis for something to feed into a Talos like system if it could be
run on infrastructure.

[1] Though this is of course true of a lot of other things like the
live CD size, logged-in desktop memory usage, etc.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Add Moblin Desktop group to comps

2009-08-20 Thread Michel Salim
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 I would like to add a group for the Moblin Desktop. My proposed patch
 is below and feedback is welcome.
 
 Cheers,
 Peter
 
 +packagelist
 +  packagereq type=mandatorymutter/packagereq
 +  packagereq type=mandatorymutter-moblin/packagereq
 +/packagelist

Speaking of these two, any reason mutter-moblin does not currently
require moblin? (And when it's fixed, is it better to list both mutter
and mutter-moblin, or let depsolving pull in mutter?)

Regards,

-- 
Michel


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
It looks to me as if some people need to learn how to talk to eachother.
Look at this!

A big update package for Mono packages:

  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6615
  Date Released: 2009-06-18 11:01:34
  gbrainy, 
  giver, 
  gnome-do, 
  mono-zeroconf, 
  ipod-sharp, 
  f-spot, 
  muine, 
  tomboy, 
  tasque,
  podsleuth, 
  gnome-keyring-sharp, 
  notify-sharp, 
  beagle, 
  gtk-sharp, 
  mono-tools, 
  gsf-sharp, 
  lat, 
  evolution-sharp, 
  gnome-desktop-sharp, 
  gnome-subtitles

Then on July 1st:

  This update has been obsoleted by tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11

Huh? That sounds wrong:

  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7346
  tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11

Indeed. A single tomboy build obsoleted more than a dozen Mono packages
and actually got marked stable sometimes later without anyone adding
a comment. And finally a bit later only beagle was updated:

  beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11 bugfix update
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7465

That's packaging chaos. :-/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

2009-08-20 Thread Michel Salim
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:41 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
 On 08/20/2009 04:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
  On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
 
  Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on
  this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere.
  
  They're eternally broken on ppc64.  Mostly due to Mono being broken on 
  ppc64.
  
 It should be the opposite.  Mono runs on ppc64 but some maintainers need
 to update the ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch that is preventing their
 packages from being built on ppc64.  Once those packages are fixed,
 their dependent packages will be able to run as well.
 
 I'll go through and start updating packages to stop excluding ppc64
 since I'm tired of seeing mschwendt's report be ignored.  However,
 people who really care about mono need to step up and start taking care
 of this stuff.  I don't own or use any mono packages and I'm not happy
 with the patent licenses so I don't want to keep working on these packages.
 
Is there a way to mass-file bug reports, so that each Mono package that
currently do not build on PPC64 have a bug filed? (It's supposed to be
there for any ExcludeArch, but this rule is often ignored).

If maintainers are instructed to then block on the bug entries for their
build requirements that are not currently available, then we can break
from this situation where currently, a lot of maintainers (who don't
have PPC64 hardware!) just give up rechecking.

Regards,

-- 
Michel


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

libva package in for review

2009-08-20 Thread Adam Williamson
I have submitted a libva package for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546

this is for VAAPI video playback acceleration. It's a freedesktop
project which stands a reasonable chance of being the umbrella standard
for hardware-accelerated video playback in future, so it's quite a
significant piece to get into the distribution. It was discussed at a
recent packaging committee meeting (alongside VDPAU) and they seemed
quite keen to have it added. If people can help out with the review,
that'd be greatly appreciated (I'd offer to swap, but I'm not a
sponsor).

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Orphaning packages

2009-08-20 Thread Josh Boyer
I've orphaned the following packages in pkgdb:

gquilt
quilt
jfsutils

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/EL-5 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2009-08-20 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30191

Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec sources 
Log Message:
* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
- 518278 update to 2.020 - CVE-2009-1391



Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/EL-5/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- .cvsignore  2 Jul 2007 03:13:54 -   1.3
+++ .cvsignore  20 Aug 2009 07:26:24 -  1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.005.tar.gz
+Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020.tar.gz


Index: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
===
RCS file: 
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/EL-5/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec5 Mar 2008 22:32:17 -   1.6
+++ perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec20 Aug 2009 07:26:24 -  1.7
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
-Version:2.005
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:2.020
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Low-Level Interface to bzip2 compression library
 
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
+- 518278 update to 2.020 - CVE-2009-1391
+
 * Wed Mar  5 2008 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 2.005-5
 - rebuild for new perl
 


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/EL-5/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sources 2 Jul 2007 03:13:54 -   1.3
+++ sources 20 Aug 2009 07:26:24 -  1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fe1ec38a0faa79e2fc18c5bc8e44c9ad  Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.005.tar.gz
+50f85a3ecab19fa6d2ca18b8f990f219  Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020.tar.gz

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list


rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2009-08-20 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32519

Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec sources 
Log Message:
* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
- 518278 CVE-2009-1884, update to the latest release



Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- .cvsignore  2 Jul 2007 03:13:54 -   1.3
+++ .cvsignore  20 Aug 2009 07:36:01 -  1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.005.tar.gz
+Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020.tar.gz


Index: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
===
RCS file: 
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-10/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec5 Mar 2008 22:32:17 -   1.6
+++ perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec20 Aug 2009 07:36:01 -  1.7
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
-Version:2.005
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:2.020
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Low-Level Interface to bzip2 compression library
 
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
+- 518278 CVE-2009-1884, update to the latest release
+
 * Wed Mar  5 2008 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 2.005-5
 - rebuild for new perl
 


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sources 2 Jul 2007 03:13:54 -   1.3
+++ sources 20 Aug 2009 07:36:01 -  1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fe1ec38a0faa79e2fc18c5bc8e44c9ad  Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.005.tar.gz
+50f85a3ecab19fa6d2ca18b8f990f219  Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020.tar.gz

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list


rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2009-08-20 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32763

Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec sources 
Log Message:
* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
- 518278 CVE-2009-1884, update to the latest release



Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-11/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- .cvsignore  2 Jul 2007 03:13:54 -   1.3
+++ .cvsignore  20 Aug 2009 07:36:48 -  1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.005.tar.gz
+Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020.tar.gz


Index: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec
===
RCS file: 
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-11/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec26 Feb 2009 13:22:10 -  1.7
+++ perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec20 Aug 2009 07:36:48 -  1.8
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
-Version:2.005
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Version:2.020
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Low-Level Interface to bzip2 compression library
 
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 20 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 2.020-1
+- 518278 CVE-2009-1884, update to the latest release
+
 * Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 2.005-6
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
 


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2/F-11/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sources 2 Jul 2007 03:13:54 -   1.3
+++ sources 20 Aug 2009 07:36:49 -  1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fe1ec38a0faa79e2fc18c5bc8e44c9ad  Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.005.tar.gz
+50f85a3ecab19fa6d2ca18b8f990f219  Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020.tar.gz

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list


rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel .cvsignore, 1.20, 1.21 perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec, 1.24, 1.25 sources, 1.20, 1.21

2009-08-20 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12258

Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec sources 
Log Message:
Update to 1.30 (fix memleak when SSL handshake failed)
Add buildreq procps needed for memleak test



Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21
--- .cvsignore  28 Jul 2009 08:36:40 -  1.20
+++ .cvsignore  20 Aug 2009 08:37:15 -  1.21
@@ -1 +1 @@
-IO-Socket-SSL-1.27.tar.gz
+IO-Socket-SSL-1.30.tar.gz


Index: perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.24 -r1.25
--- perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec 28 Jul 2009 08:36:40 -  1.24
+++ perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec 20 Aug 2009 08:37:15 -  1.25
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 
 Name:  perl-IO-Socket-SSL
-Version:   1.27
+Version:   1.30
 Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Perl library for transparent SSL
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ BuildRoot:%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::Simple)
 BuildRequires: perl(IO::Socket::INET6), perl(Net::LibIDN), perl(Net::SSLeay) 
= 1.21
+BuildRequires: procps
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 Requires:  perl(Net::LibIDN)
 
@@ -60,6 +61,10 @@ done
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::Socket::SSL.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 20 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.30-1
+- Update to 1.30 (fix memleak when SSL handshake failed)
+- Add buildreq procps needed for memleak test
+
 * Mon Jul 27 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.27-1
 - Update to 1.27
   - various regex fixes for i18n and service names


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -p -r1.20 -r1.21
--- sources 28 Jul 2009 08:36:40 -  1.20
+++ sources 20 Aug 2009 08:37:15 -  1.21
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0099e07f576a84b5f34b6511138652c8  IO-Socket-SSL-1.27.tar.gz
+374f74487ef6fedc9326e20ac1e20dc0  IO-Socket-SSL-1.30.tar.gz

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list


rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.14, 1.15 perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec, 1.17, 1.18 sources, 1.14, 1.15

2009-08-20 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15197/F-10

Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec sources 
Log Message:
Resync with devel (fix memleak, i18n, and error handling)


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15
--- .cvsignore  4 Jul 2009 21:41:27 -   1.14
+++ .cvsignore  20 Aug 2009 08:48:20 -  1.15
@@ -1 +1 @@
-IO-Socket-SSL-1.26.tar.gz
+IO-Socket-SSL-1.30.tar.gz


Index: perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-10/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18
--- perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec 4 Jul 2009 21:41:27 -   1.17
+++ perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec 20 Aug 2009 08:48:20 -  1.18
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 
 Name:  perl-IO-Socket-SSL
-Version:   1.26
+Version:   1.30
 Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Perl library for transparent SSL
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ BuildRoot:%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::Simple)
 BuildRequires: perl(IO::Socket::INET6), perl(Net::LibIDN), perl(Net::SSLeay) 
= 1.21
+BuildRequires: procps
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 Requires:  perl(Net::LibIDN)
 
@@ -60,10 +61,23 @@ done
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::Socket::SSL.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 20 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.30-1
+- Update to 1.30 (fix memleak when SSL handshake failed)
+- Add buildreq procps needed for memleak test
+
+* Mon Jul 27 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.27-1
+- Update to 1.27
+  - various regex fixes for i18n and service names
+  - fix warnings from perl -w (CPAN RT#48131)
+  - improve handling of errors from Net::ssl_write_all
+
+* Sat Jul 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.26-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Jul  4 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.26-1
 - Update to 1.26 (verify_hostname_of_cert matched only the prefix for the
   hostname when no wildcard was given, e.g. www.example.org matched against a
-  certificate with name www.exam in it)
+  certificate with name www.exam in it [#509819])
 
 * Fri Jul  3 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.25-1
 - Update to 1.25 (fix t/nonblock.t for OS X 10.5 - CPAN RT#47240)


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15
--- sources 4 Jul 2009 21:41:27 -   1.14
+++ sources 20 Aug 2009 08:48:20 -  1.15
@@ -1 +1 @@
-096319c7ceea6d4f42a264c55a3ea318  IO-Socket-SSL-1.26.tar.gz
+374f74487ef6fedc9326e20ac1e20dc0  IO-Socket-SSL-1.30.tar.gz

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list


rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.18, 1.19 perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec, 1.21, 1.22 sources, 1.18, 1.19

2009-08-20 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15197/F-11

Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec sources 
Log Message:
Resync with devel (fix memleak, i18n, and error handling)


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-11/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19
--- .cvsignore  4 Jul 2009 21:33:18 -   1.18
+++ .cvsignore  20 Aug 2009 08:48:20 -  1.19
@@ -1 +1 @@
-IO-Socket-SSL-1.26.tar.gz
+IO-Socket-SSL-1.30.tar.gz


Index: perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-11/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -p -r1.21 -r1.22
--- perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec 4 Jul 2009 21:33:18 -   1.21
+++ perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec 20 Aug 2009 08:48:20 -  1.22
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 
 Name:  perl-IO-Socket-SSL
-Version:   1.26
+Version:   1.30
 Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Perl library for transparent SSL
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ BuildRoot:%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::Simple)
 BuildRequires: perl(IO::Socket::INET6), perl(Net::LibIDN), perl(Net::SSLeay) 
= 1.21
+BuildRequires: procps
 Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 Requires:  perl(Net::LibIDN)
 
@@ -60,10 +61,23 @@ done
 %{_mandir}/man3/IO::Socket::SSL.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 20 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.30-1
+- Update to 1.30 (fix memleak when SSL handshake failed)
+- Add buildreq procps needed for memleak test
+
+* Mon Jul 27 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.27-1
+- Update to 1.27
+  - various regex fixes for i18n and service names
+  - fix warnings from perl -w (CPAN RT#48131)
+  - improve handling of errors from Net::ssl_write_all
+
+* Sat Jul 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.26-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Jul  4 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.26-1
 - Update to 1.26 (verify_hostname_of_cert matched only the prefix for the
   hostname when no wildcard was given, e.g. www.example.org matched against a
-  certificate with name www.exam in it)
+  certificate with name www.exam in it [#509819])
 
 * Fri Jul  3 2009 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.25-1
 - Update to 1.25 (fix t/nonblock.t for OS X 10.5 - CPAN RT#47240)


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/F-11/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19
--- sources 4 Jul 2009 21:33:18 -   1.18
+++ sources 20 Aug 2009 08:48:20 -  1.19
@@ -1 +1 @@
-096319c7ceea6d4f42a264c55a3ea318  IO-Socket-SSL-1.26.tar.gz
+374f74487ef6fedc9326e20ac1e20dc0  IO-Socket-SSL-1.30.tar.gz

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list


rpms/perl-Sub-WrapPackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-Sub-WrapPackages.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-08-20 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
Author: eseyman

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Sub-WrapPackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24930

Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Sub-WrapPackages.spec sources 
Log Message:
Update to 1.3


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Sub-WrapPackages/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- .cvsignore  17 Jun 2009 20:28:51 -  1.2
+++ .cvsignore  20 Aug 2009 09:40:01 -  1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Sub-WrapPackages-1.2.tar.gz
+Sub-WrapPackages-1.3.tar.gz


Index: perl-Sub-WrapPackages.spec
===
RCS file: 
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Sub-WrapPackages/devel/perl-Sub-WrapPackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- perl-Sub-WrapPackages.spec  26 Jul 2009 16:36:45 -  1.2
+++ perl-Sub-WrapPackages.spec  20 Aug 2009 09:40:02 -  1.3
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Sub-WrapPackages
-Version:1.2
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.3
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 20 2009 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 1.3-1
+- Update to 1.3
+
 * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.2-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
 


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Sub-WrapPackages/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sources 17 Jun 2009 20:28:51 -  1.2
+++ sources 20 Aug 2009 09:40:02 -  1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a9a08c1208dd42f615fdc5dac897f45a  Sub-WrapPackages-1.2.tar.gz
+5fc8afd4f644ca5842d084a5d616c132  Sub-WrapPackages-1.3.tar.gz

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list


rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/devel perl-Alien-wxWidgets-SONAME.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.13, 1.14 perl-Alien-wxWidgets.spec, 1.21, 1.22 sources, 1.13, 1.14

2009-08-20 Thread Štěpán Kasal
Author: kasal

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5698

Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Alien-wxWidgets.spec sources 
Added Files:
perl-Alien-wxWidgets-SONAME.patch 
Log Message:
- new upstream version
- add patch to remember the canonical sonames of libraries, so that
  perl-Wx runs without wxGTK-devel

perl-Alien-wxWidgets-SONAME.patch:
 Any_wx_config_Bakefile.pm |   11 +++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

--- NEW FILE perl-Alien-wxWidgets-SONAME.patch ---
2009-08-20  Stepan Kasal  ska...@redhat.com

* inc/My/Build/Any_wx_config_Bakefile.pm: convert the lib*.so
file name to the canonical name (soname); the *.so symlink
usually belongs to package *-devel and may not be available at
runtime.

--- Alien-wxWidgets-0.42/inc/My/Build/Any_wx_config_Bakefile.pm.orig
2008-11-08 00:52:22.0 +0100
+++ Alien-wxWidgets-0.42/inc/My/Build/Any_wx_config_Bakefile.pm 2009-08-20 
15:51:52.0 +0200
@@ -32,6 +32,17 @@
$lib =~ m/(?:gtk2?|mac)[ud]{0,2}-/;
 my $dll = lib${name}. . $self-awx_dlext;
 
+   open PIPE1, ldconfig -p |;
+   while (PIPE1) {
+   if (s/^\s+${dll}\s(.*\s)?=\s+//) {
+   for (`objdump -p $_`) {
+   if (s/^\s+SONAME\s+//) { chomp; $dll = $_; }
+   }
+   last;
+   }
+   }
+   close PIPE1;
+
 $data{dlls}{$key} = { dll  = $dll,
   link = $lib };
 }


Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- .cvsignore  8 Dec 2008 21:18:58 -   1.13
+++ .cvsignore  20 Aug 2009 15:19:20 -  1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Alien-wxWidgets-0.42.tar.gz
+Alien-wxWidgets-0.44.tar.gz


Index: perl-Alien-wxWidgets.spec
===
RCS file: 
/cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/devel/perl-Alien-wxWidgets.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -p -r1.21 -r1.22
--- perl-Alien-wxWidgets.spec   26 Jul 2009 01:35:58 -  1.21
+++ perl-Alien-wxWidgets.spec   20 Aug 2009 15:19:20 -  1.22
@@ -1,14 +1,17 @@
 Name:   perl-Alien-wxWidgets
-Version:0.42
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:0.44
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries
 
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Alien-wxWidgets/
-Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MB/MBARBON/Alien-wxWidgets-%{version}.tar.gz
+#Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MB/MBARBON/Alien-wxWidgets-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MB/MBARBON/Alien-wxWidgets-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 
+Patch0:perl-Alien-wxWidgets-SONAME.patch
+
 BuildRequires:  wxGTK-devel
 BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Pluggable)
@@ -26,6 +29,7 @@ settings from an installed wxWidgets.
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n Alien-wxWidgets-%{version}
+%patch0 -p1
 
 
 %build
@@ -55,6 +59,11 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 20 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 0.44-1
+- new upstream version
+- add patch to remember the canonical sonames of libraries, so that
+  perl-Wx runs without wxGTK-devel
+
 * Sat Jul 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.42-3
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
 


Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- sources 8 Dec 2008 21:18:58 -   1.13
+++ sources 20 Aug 2009 15:19:20 -  1.14
@@ -1 +1 @@
-f96c09d393bc8b4cbd7ff8e412183032  Alien-wxWidgets-0.42.tar.gz
+eccb39521c346aa64348f1eff08be5e0  Alien-wxWidgets-0.44.tar.gz

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list