Re: [Finale] Printers used
On 11-Feb-07, at 1:16 AM, Stephen Ellis wrote: I have learned much from the thread concerning binding. I now pose an even more basic question: What printers are recommended for your oversized pages? I would like to purchase one capable of printing larger that 8.5 x 14. Thoughts? I use a Hewlitt-Packard 5100 laser printer that I bought used on eBay. It has capacity of up to 12.28 X 18.5 inches and is fast and tough. They are going used for about $600 for the basic model, but I suggest getting the networking card if you have more than one computer or printer. You might want an extra paper tray, too, depending on what you want to do with it. There are only two disappointments. I bought a duplexer for automatic double-sided printing, but it won't work with the thickness of paper I like, so I have to feed it through the straight paper path on the side of the printer twice (once each side). The other is that there seems to be a bug with 2-up printing. I have tried to make choral booklets on ordinary-weight paper with the duplexer, but it will always move the very last page onto a new sheet of paper. I don't know if this is a printer problem or a Finale problem (or an OS problem), but it keeps me from doing efficiently what I bought the printer for, in part. Christopher ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Printers used
Christopher, I think the HP duplexers are a lot less good than the printers themselves. Mine worked for a while and then gave up the ghost. Efforts at reviving it have not been successful. Supposedly, there was a repair kit for it from HP, but I haven't found one. Chuck I use a Hewlitt-Packard 5100 laser printer that I bought used on eBay. It has capacity of up to 12.28 X 18.5 inches and is fast and tough. They are going used for about $600 for the basic model, but I suggest getting the networking card if you have more than one computer or printer. You might want an extra paper tray, too, depending on what you want to do with it. There are only two disappointments. I bought a duplexer for automatic double-sided printing, but it won't work with the thickness of paper I like, so I have to feed it through the straight paper path on the side of the printer twice (once each side). The other is that there seems to be a bug with 2-up printing. I have tried to make choral booklets on ordinary-weight paper with the duplexer, but it will always move the very last page onto a new sheet of paper. I don't know if this is a printer problem or a Finale problem (or an OS problem), but it keeps me from doing efficiently what I bought the printer for, in part. Christopher ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Printers used
I've been using HP printers for the past 8 years or so, starting with the old 4MV, to the 5000m and now currently the 5100. I lease my computers and printers so I get a new one every 2-3 years, so I haven't encountered the wearing out issue too much. Of the 3, I thought the 5000 was the most robust. The 5100 not as much so. Like Chuck, I've experienced problems with the duplexer, especially regarding paper weight and 8.5 x 14 paper, which won't go thru the duplexer at all. My lease on the 5100 is up in May and I'll look at the 5200 but I'll also be scouting out other brands, including Xante. But all in all, my experiences with all my HP printers have been mostly positive. They are built like tanks and the output is extremely good. J D Thomas ThomaStudios On Feb 10, 2007, at 10:16 PM, Stephen Ellis wrote: I have learned much from the thread concerning binding. I now pose an even more basic question: What printers are recommended for your oversized pages? I would like to purchase one capable of printing larger that 8.5 x 14. Thoughts? Steve ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] How to get rid of Garritan plug-in?
I would like to uncouple the Garritan plug-in from a particular song, but not from the other songs I've arranged. Trying to select the instrument list does not work. Any ideas? Thanks; Bill Sinclair ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] How to get rid of Garritan plug-in?
In that particular document, just deselect Use Native Instruments VST. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 11-Feb-07 12:14 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: [Finale] How to get rid of Garritan plug-in? I would like to uncouple the Garritan plug-in from a particular song, but not from the other songs I've arranged. Trying to select the instrument list does not work. Any ideas? Thanks; Bill Sinclair ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Javier Ruiz?
Hi all, Anyone have the latest email for Javier Ruiz? Both the mac.com addresses I have are bouncing. Please reply privately. Dennis ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Staff Style Question
What steps, if any, work to make a staff style no playback? I'd *really* like to be able to set, for example, slashes as no playback, but can't figure out how to set that. Using FinWin04. cd -- http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/# http://members.cox.net/dershem ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] (no subject)
On 10 Feb 2007 at 22:35, Scott Jones wrote: Why not use 3+3 over 8 and 3/4 in the next box and THEN choose to display the time signature of 7/4? I just tried it in Finale 2006 for Mac and it works. Well, given that using EDUs works without having to define two time sigs, I don't know why you'd spend the time on an unneeded workaround. Secondly, my understanding was that display as 6/8+4/4 was a requirement (though I could be wrong on that). -- David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] 7/4
Why not use 3+3 over 8 and 3/4 in the next box and THEN choose to display the time signature of 7/4? I just tried it in Finale 2006 my understanding was that display as 6/8+4/4 was a requirement (though I could be wrong on that). you can set a different display than the defined beam grouping. more choices: use a different time sig for display -- shirling neueweise ... new music publishers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] 7/4
On 11 Feb 2007 at 23:32, shirling neueweise wrote: Why not use 3+3 over 8 and 3/4 in the next box and THEN choose to display the time signature of 7/4? I just tried it in Finale 2006 my understanding was that display as 6/8+4/4 was a requirement (though I could be wrong on that). you can set a different display than the defined beam grouping. more choices: use a different time sig for display My understanding was the required beaming was 6/8+4/4 and the required display time sig was 6/8+4/4, so I have a hard time seeing why you'd not just define the time sig with EDUs to get 6/8+4/4 as the underlying actual time sig *and* as the display time sig, all with one action. -- David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] 7/4
My understanding was the required beaming was 6/8+4/4 and the required display time sig was 6/8+4/4, so I have a hard time seeing why you'd not just define the time sig with EDUs to get 6/8+4/4 as the underlying actual time sig *and* as the display time sig, all with one action. both work. some people will prefer 3+3/8 + 4/4 instead of dealing with EDUs because it is far more intuitive (and newer users possibly don't even know what they are!); once EDUs are set in this dialogue box they stay there until you uncheck the EDU button. since this is an exception, probably it is faster and clearer to not use EDUs. i don't really care either way, whatever gets yer clock tickin'. -- shirling neueweise ... new music publishers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] 7/4
David W. Fenton wrote: On 11 Feb 2007 at 23:32, shirling neueweise wrote: Why not use 3+3 over 8 and 3/4 in the next box and THEN choose to display the time signature of 7/4? I just tried it in Finale 2006 my understanding was that display as 6/8+4/4 was a requirement (though I could be wrong on that). you can set a different display than the defined beam grouping. more choices: use a different time sig for display My understanding was the required beaming was 6/8+4/4 and the required display time sig was 6/8+4/4, so I have a hard time seeing why you'd not just define the time sig with EDUs to get 6/8+4/4 as the underlying actual time sig *and* as the display time sig, all with one action. The beaming was to be in 2 groups of 3, plus the standard 4/4. The original post mentioned that when he put 6/8 he got single 8th-note beaming rather than the 8ths in groups of 3 as he wanted. I'm not sure that anything is capable of doing that without using a different signature for display. What would the settings with EDUs be which would give the same effect of 2/dotted-quarter + 4/4 and yet would show 6/8+4/4? -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] 7/4
What would the settings with EDUs be which would give the same effect of 2/dotted-quarter + 4/4 and yet would show 6/8+4/4? 2/1536 + 4/1024 -- shirling neueweise ... new music publishers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Re: Finale Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15
Regarding my call for help on a 7/4 piece... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1/1.5 + 1/1.5 + 2/4 + 2/4 (or ... + 1/2 + 1/2, depending on whether you'd rather manually fix the sixteenth note beams or the eighth note beams). Which was logical, but, as shirling neueweise [EMAIL PROTECTED] pointed out, darcy, can you get decmial places to work there!? (i don't think so) doesn't work. select EDUs: 2/1536 + 4/1024 (quarters beamed separately) 2/1536 + 2/2048 (quarters beamed in groups of 2 [i.e. as half notes]) That just make my head hurt. But I'm sure that's just because I've never had to deal with EDUs (except in email and web addresses). David Bailey propsed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make one box 3 + 3 over 8 and the next box 4/4? ...which it would never have occurred to me to try. Simple enough though, and it absolutely does the trick. Thanks to all of you! Now, a more philosophical question: in a situation like this, would you rather read 7/4 with 8th-note groupings of 3, 3, 4, 4, or alternating measures of 6/8 and 4/4? -Clay ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] 7/4, continued
On Feb 11, 2007, at 1:01 PM, David Fenton wrote: While that gets the beaming right, it displays time sig of 3+3/8 + 4/4 Right--but from there it's pretty easy to use 7/4 as the display signature. Thanks again. -C ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] insert measures
Hi All: I'm working on a jazz score for 6 saxes, 5 trumpets, 4 trombones , drums, guitar, piano and bass. Somehow my saxes and my brass are out of sync on the score. Is it possible to insert measures to just the saxophones? That way I could sync up all of the horns. Thanks: Bob Florence MacFin 2007b ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] 7/4
Depends somewhat on the context and tempo, but unless it is extremely slow, I'd prefer 7/4 throughout. - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 11 Feb 2007, at 6:30 PM, Clay Zambo wrote: Re Now, a more philosophical question: in a situation like this, would you rather read 7/4 with 8th-note groupings of 3, 3, 4, 4, or alternating measures of 6/8 and 4/4? -Clay ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Re: 7/4
Now, a more philosophical question: in a situation like this, would you rather read 7/4 with 8th-note groupings of 3, 3, 4, 4, or alternating measures of 6/8 and 4/4? philosophical answer: it depends. is it really in 7/4 and this is an exceptional case where different beat groups are intended to be heard against the pre-established 7/4 (in quarters)? or is it in fact separate measures of 6/8 and 4/4? -- shirling neueweise ... new music publishers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] insert measures
Bob Florence wrote: Hi All: I'm working on a jazz score for 6 saxes, 5 trumpets, 4 trombones , drums, guitar, piano and bass. Somehow my saxes and my brass are out of sync on the score. Is it possible to insert measures to just the saxophones? That way I could sync up all of the horns. Thanks: Bob Florence MacFin 2007b The last time something like that happened to me, I had to do a Cut/Paste, and just manually move the screwed up lines by hand. As far as I can tell, Insert measures works on all staves, instead of just one. cd -- http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/# http://members.cox.net/dershem ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] insert measures
Carl Dershem wrote: Bob Florence wrote: Hi All: I'm working on a jazz score for 6 saxes, 5 trumpets, 4 trombones , drums, guitar, piano and bass. Somehow my saxes and my brass are out of sync on the score. Is it possible to insert measures to just the saxophones? That way I could sync up all of the horns. Thanks: Bob Florence MacFin 2007b The last time something like that happened to me, I had to do a Cut/Paste, and just manually move the screwed up lines by hand. As far as I can tell, Insert measures works on all staves, instead of just one. cd Hi Carl; Thanks a lot. That's NOT what I wanted to hear. :-) Bob F. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] insert measures
Bob, I'm afraid I don't understand why a simple copy+paste on the saxes would cause you any serious grief. Surely this is a simple problem to fix... ? Cheers, - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 11 Feb 2007, at 7:08 PM, Bob Florence wrote: Carl Dershem wrote: Bob Florence wrote: Hi All: I'm working on a jazz score for 6 saxes, 5 trumpets, 4 trombones , drums, guitar, piano and bass. Somehow my saxes and my brass are out of sync on the score. Is it possible to insert measures to just the saxophones? That way I could sync up all of the horns. Thanks: Bob Florence MacFin 2007b The last time something like that happened to me, I had to do a Cut/Paste, and just manually move the screwed up lines by hand. As far as I can tell, Insert measures works on all staves, instead of just one. cd Hi Carl; Thanks a lot. That's NOT what I wanted to hear. :-) Bob F. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] insert measures
Hi Bob, This situation has happened to me also. I got round it by adding a new set of staves and copying the parts. When you have copied the parts to their new positions copy the new parts back to their original staves and delete the surplus staves. George G. Manchester UK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Dershem Sent: 11 February 2007 23:49 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] insert measures Bob Florence wrote: Hi All: I'm working on a jazz score for 6 saxes, 5 trumpets, 4 trombones , drums, guitar, piano and bass. Somehow my saxes and my brass are out of sync on the score. Is it possible to insert measures to just the saxophones? That way I could sync up all of the horns. Thanks: Bob Florence MacFin 2007b The last time something like that happened to me, I had to do a Cut/Paste, and just manually move the screwed up lines by hand. As far as I can tell, Insert measures works on all staves, instead of just one. cd -- http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/# http://members.cox.net/dershem ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Finale Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15
Clay Zambo wrote: [snip] Now, a more philosophical question: in a situation like this, would you rather read 7/4 with 8th-note groupings of 3, 3, 4, 4, or alternating measures of 6/8 and 4/4? That depends on how the music was conceived -- alternating measures of 6/8 and 4/4 does not sound the same as one measure of 7/4, in my opinion. If it makes no difference to you as the composer, then make it simple. but if the different rhythmic stresses of 7/4 from 6/8 - 4/4 are important to the music, then leave it in 7/4. -- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] insert measures
On 12 Feb 2007 at 0:12, George Galway wrote: This situation has happened to me also. I got round it by adding a new set of staves and copying the parts. When you have copied the parts to their new positions copy the new parts back to their original staves and delete the surplus staves. Why do you need to do this? Just copy from the current location to the new location. You do have to add the Ctrl key to the click on the destination for copying (on Windows, of course), and occasionally for some reason Finale decides to ignore it and not copy, but I've found that usually closing Finale and re-opening makes it respond to the command again. I've never found it necessary to use scratch staves for copying horiziontally within the same staff -- I only use it when composing and needing to, say, exchange voices (where copying would destroy material that you want to keep). -- David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Re: Finale Digest, Vol 43, Issue 15
On 11 Feb 2007 at 19:30, dhbailey wrote: Clay Zambo wrote: [snip] Now, a more philosophical question: in a situation like this, would you rather read 7/4 with 8th-note groupings of 3, 3, 4, 4, or alternating measures of 6/8 and 4/4? That depends on how the music was conceived -- alternating measures of 6/8 and 4/4 does not sound the same as one measure of 7/4, in my opinion. If it makes no difference to you as the composer, then make it simple. but if the different rhythmic stresses of 7/4 from 6/8 - 4/4 are important to the music, then leave it in 7/4. This whole discussion confuses me. If the groupings are 3+3 8ths and the 2+2+2+2 8ths, then it's not really a 7/4 feeling at all (which usually groups into 3+4 or 4+3 quarters), and to me, using a 7/4 time signature is going to obscure what's really going on. I'd use the 6/8+4/4 time signature myself, I think, mostly because it's a lot of work to have alternating meters every two measures. -- David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
[Finale] Editing old file in FinMac2006, can't change system bottom margins
I've got a strange problem. I have edited a file from 2002 in FinMac 2006c, and I am at the very end of the operation, laying out the score. I can't change the bottom system margins of any system in the score. They are all set to zero, according to the window, but the bottom right handle is about 1.75 inches below the lowest system and obstinately refuses to be raised any more. It is exactly as if there are two extra staves that I can't see, but I can't find any tool that recognises that there are more than seven staves (what I can see.) File Maintenance finds no problems with the integrity of the doc, and Sort or Respace does nothing. I know if all else fails I can copy the contents to a new file and most likely the bug will not be copied to the new file, but that is a lot of work considering I am in the home stretch. Any ideas? I seem to be the only one this happens to. Or maybe I just edit old files a lot, so it happens more. Christopher ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Javier Ruiz?
Dear Dennis, I don't have your email to reply privately but, if you send me an email, I can give you the last address (snail mail) and phone numbers I have for Javier. Chuck On Feb 11, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: Hi all, Anyone have the latest email for Javier Ruiz? Both the mac.com addresses I have are bouncing. Please reply privately. Dennis ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836 phone (360) 671-3402 fax (360) 676-6055 www.chuckisraels.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] insert measures
On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:46 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: On 12 Feb 2007 at 0:12, George Galway wrote: This situation has happened to me also. I got round it by adding a new set of staves and copying the parts. When you have copied the parts to their new positions copy the new parts back to their original staves and delete the surplus staves. Why do you need to do this? Just copy from the current location to the new location. You do have to add the Ctrl key to the click on the destination for copying (on Windows, of course), and occasionally for some reason Finale decides to ignore it and not copy, but I've found that usually closing Finale and re-opening makes it respond to the command again. I've never found it necessary to use scratch staves for copying horiziontally within the same staff -- I only use it when composing and needing to, say, exchange voices (where copying would destroy material that you want to keep). Overlapping the source and target measures used to erase the articulations in only the overlapped area. So I do this by copy/paste or with scratch staves, as suggested. Christopher ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] insert measures
On 11 Feb 2007 at 20:05, Christopher Smith wrote: On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:46 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: On 12 Feb 2007 at 0:12, George Galway wrote: This situation has happened to me also. I got round it by adding a new set of staves and copying the parts. When you have copied the parts to their new positions copy the new parts back to their original staves and delete the surplus staves. Why do you need to do this? Just copy from the current location to the new location. You do have to add the Ctrl key to the click on the destination for copying (on Windows, of course), and occasionally for some reason Finale decides to ignore it and not copy, but I've found that usually closing Finale and re-opening makes it respond to the command again. I've never found it necessary to use scratch staves for copying horiziontally within the same staff -- I only use it when composing and needing to, say, exchange voices (where copying would destroy material that you want to keep). Overlapping the source and target measures used to erase the articulations in only the overlapped area. So I do this by copy/paste or with scratch staves, as suggested. In which versions of Finale was that but present? I'm on an old version (WinFin2K3), and have never experienced any such problem. And was it fixed in later versions? -- David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] Editing old file in FinMac2006, can't change system bottom margins
On Feb 11, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Christopher Smith wrote: I've got a strange problem. I have edited a file from 2002 in FinMac 2006c, and I am at the very end of the operation, laying out the score. I can't change the bottom system margins of any system in the score. They are all set to zero, according to the window, but the bottom right handle is about 1.75 inches below the lowest system and obstinately refuses to be raised any more. It is exactly as if there are two extra staves that I can't see, but I can't find any tool that recognises that there are more than seven staves (what I can see.) File Maintenance finds no problems with the integrity of the doc, and Sort or Respace does nothing. I solved it. Redefine Pages did it. Apparently, because I had resized the staves using the Zoom Tool after turning off the zoom in Page Size, the document thought that the systems were still the old sizes. Weird. Thanks anyway to those who I know were working on this. 8-) Christopher ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] insert measures
On Feb 11, 2007, at 8:16 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: On 11 Feb 2007 at 20:05, Christopher Smith wrote: Overlapping the source and target measures used to erase the articulations in only the overlapped area. So I do this by copy/paste or with scratch staves, as suggested. In which versions of Finale was that but present? I'm on an old version (WinFin2K3), and have never experienced any such problem. And was it fixed in later versions? Hmm, ya got me. I don't do it anymore, having been once bitten, twice shy. I think it was in 2005 that I noticed it. I remember reporting it here some time ago. Christopher ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Re: [Finale] OT: Stanford Symposium on Historic Performance
For those on the list interested in this issue, Stanford University will host this conference on April 19th through 21st. The full title of the symposium is: Reactions to the Record: Perspectives on Historic Performance. The papers and lecture demonstrations will focus on how the transition to recorded music had a profound effect on performance practice. Full information is available at: http://music.stanford.edu/Events/StanfordMusicSymposium/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
