Re: [Finale] Manual reset
Thanks. On Sep 22, 2015 1:48 PM, "Howey, Henry"wrote: > I have manually reset the list. > > Please message me directly with any problems. > > mus_...@shsu.edu > > Henry Howey > Professor of Music > Sam Houston State University > Box 2208 > Huntsville, TX 77341 > (936) 294-1364 > http://www.shsu.edu/music/faculty/howey.php > Owner of FINALE Discussion List > ___ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > > To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: > finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu > ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale To unsubscribe from finale send a message to: finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
RE: [Finale] Organ dynamics
It is reasonable to have different dynamics on different staves and even at different locations. On most most electronic organs all manuals (staves) and the pedal organ are under expression. Even without expression pedal(s), presets allow instantaneous registration changes to manuals which can change volume and tone dramatically. Roger -Original Message- From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of Ryan Beard Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 9:57 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] Organ dynamics Wow. Didn't mean to start up such a debate! Perhaps I should clarify my situation. I'm engraving a piece for organ by a dead composer. He has marked dynamics in the music. Sometimes there's one marking under the top staff only. Sometimes there's a marking under all three staves. Sometimes there's a marking above the top staff only, because I assume there wasn't any room to put it elsewhere. Since I don't have much experience with organ music, I don't know if the placement of the dynamics is the result of a lazy copyist (very likely considering other aspects of the MS), or if the dynamics mean something specific to the performer when placed in a particular location. I'd prefer to place the dynamics consistently throughout the whole work. There are no indications for the stops. On Apr 18, 2010, at 6:29 PM, David W. Fenton lists.fin...@dfenton.com wrote: On 18 Apr 2010 at 19:58, timothy.price wrote: On Apr 18, 2010, at 4:24 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: On 18 Apr 2010 at 9:40, timothy.price wrote: On Apr 17, 2010, at 7:50 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: The player could tell from the content of the music what was intended in regard to all of those parameters. So can any properly-trained modern organist. I've often thought that a good way to test musicianship is to give a player a passage with no dynamics, tempo marking, articulations or bowings and see what they make out of it. From a performers perspective, what you have said is fine, no problem. But the question about indicating performance markings was from a composer who' apparently has ideas as to where he want dynamics. If he wants to have the piece performed with HIS interpretation, then he best place the marking in the score, IMHO. Again, you're mixing contexts. The comment you quote was from my post about Bach's music, not about the original question. Don't pay any attention to non-organist comments, they can be misleading. If that's referring to me, No, I was not referring to you, but to John Howell's previous comment about thinking it best not to include dynamic markings, but that he was not an organist. I think that in the present instance, if you're an engraver of a MS by a dead composer, it's best to leave it alone and let the performer decide, rather than introducing your own judgements on what the dynamics should be, which may or may not be what the composer intended. So, I would agree 100% with John's remarks, which are very much in line with normal practices in editing/engraving music of dead composers where there are ambiguities. If one were to choose to supply a dynamic marking anyway, I think it would be best to clearly indicate that it is an editorial edition, thus leaving it to the performer to choose to honor it or not. But I'd tend to lean towards just leaving it out entirely, as John suggests. Most importantly, some editorial principles transcend the specifics of the instruments involved, and the editorial philosophy behind John's suggestion is one such, in my opinion. Like any music for any instrumentation, write what you want to hear it sound like. Romantic period instruments may have swell boxes, making the stops of that manual capable of dynamics from p to f, and many organ have been adapted. Stops may be applied to only one manual or the pedals independently. There is usually a crescendo pedal which adds stops up to full organ. Usually? This sounds exactly like something a non-organist, or an organist of every limited experience, would say. A large number of instruments lack swell boxes and electronic assistance like pistons and toe studs and the like. Yes, in my experience organs usually do have a crescendo pedal. No? As I said, they only sometimes have swell boxes. Am not sure what you are finding fault with. Hah! I have played on far more instruments that lack any form of dynamic control, because I've been trained almost entirely in older music, and played on historical instruments. So, I've personally played on more organs *without* any expression pedals or toe studs or pistons. The point is that there is no usually about it. Each organ is different, but within a particular tradition of organ building, one is likely to find particular characteristics. I won't go into the details of which traditions are which, but if you're a non-organist composing for a
RE: [Finale] Another naive computer question
Registration requires Administrator Level execution. By default, Vista does not Afford Administrator Level as a securoty measure. Right-click the Finale icon and select Run as Administrator. Roger -Original Message- From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Jones Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:28 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] Another naive computer question There was a thread back a while ago that addressed this. Seems to only happen to those who use Microsoft's VISTA operating system. There is a work around. Check the backlog of messages or go to the MM forums and search for it just in case tech support does not answer back as quickly as you might like them to. ___ J. Scott Jones Band/Orchestra Director/Freelance Trumpet Player-Teacher/Music Engraver On Oct 21, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: Prayer? Um, call their tech support. I have a friend who uses SmartMusic (another great MakeMusic product) that has this issue all the time. It loses it's registration On Oct 21, 2009, at 2:25 PM, David McKay wrote: I have problems registering the program. Always have had. I assume that I am allowed to have it installed on my desktop and my laptop, but when I try to register it on my laptop I either get an error message, or I get a message sayign registration successful, but then still get the message sayign that I have to register in 30 days when I open the program. Any suggestions? David McKay ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] Reregistering
In Vista, you need to run as Administrator to get registration to work. Right click and choose Run as Adminstrator from the context menu. That should solve the problem. You could also turn off user account control (UAC). However, that defeats part of Vista's security and puts it back like WinXP where the default that everybody and everything runs with full privileges. Several folks including David Fenton have pointed out that is a very unsecure way to set up your system. Vista's UAC is easier than having to log in to a separate administrator account to install and register. So far, so good for me. Roger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David McKay Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:48 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: [Finale] Reregistering I've installed FinWin 2004b on my new Acer M3100 Windows Vista computer. Every time I load up the program, I'm warned that I'd better register, or in 30 days I won't be able to use it. So I obediently register every time I load the program. Any suggestions? David McKay ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] Army Music (Way OT)
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Pilgrim Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:41 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] Army Music (Way OT) http://www.usscouts.org/mb/bugle_calls.html To the Colors seems a little perky. Perhaps it was Retreat (signaling the end of the official day)? Hope you find it. Mike Pilgrim (at the end of his official day) At 03:53 PM 2/22/2007 -0800, you wrote: Among many repressible memories of my days at Ft. Ord, CA ... I can .. Anybody remember what said music was? Dean M. Estabrook http://deanestabrook.googlepages.com/home Power embraces greed and abjurs justice Two Bugle Calls: To the Color (singular): Parade Rest (as I recall) And Retreat: (attention present arms) Roger ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] OT: Mac Pro unveiled
It seems that Video Card/Display adapter reviewers assume (without providing evidence that I can find) that 2D performance is acceptable on all adapters from 2003 on. Adobe says that ...hardware, operating system settings, and software settings...(and a) damaged font. Doing stuff other than gaming or viewing such editing, manipulating, and saving images is essetially ignored in the reviews I have found. It is likely that GPU/CPU tradeoff occurs in these tasks ignored by reviewers but central to this thread and the tasks that most of us perform. 1. 2006 QA to the point: Topic Title: What matters in a video card for 2D windows acceleration? http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=27threadid=1908172 refers to Adobe's site: http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/331412.html 2. 2004 Article http://www.a1-electronics.net/Graphics_Cards/Various/2004/Review_Dec04.shtml What will you be using it for? Is perhaps the first question asked. What will the intended use be of your ATI or Nvidia video card. Will you be mostly working with 2D applications or 3D such as games. If you are only looking to run say 2D office applications such as Corel WordPerfect, Photoshop and alike then you do not need to buy an expensive top of the range card but something from the mid-range of ATI or Nvidia will give you the all the performance you need and more for 2D work while still giving you acceptable 3D performance. 3. 2002 Article. The issue may be drivers as in the article linked and quoted below. ... it's a real problem. Now that graphics chips are getting the internal precision to produce some truly stunning images, we'll want to capture that high-quality output and store it. http://techreport.com/etc/2002q3/agp-download/index.x?pg=1 ..today's graphics subsystems have gobs of bandwidth, from main memory (2.1GB/s or greater) to the AGP bus (1GB/s for AGP 4X) to the graphics card's own internal memory (20GB/s in some cases). Graphics cards can render hundreds of frames per second for display. But once the frames have been sent out the RAMDAC to a monitor, standard operating procedure is simply to discard them. That's all well and good when all you want to do is play video games, but for other uses, it's a real problem. Now that graphics chips are getting the internal precision to produce some truly stunning images, we'll want to capture that high-quality output and store it. Unfortunately, even the very newest cards and drivers don't seem to be up to the job. Despite over 1GB per second of potential bandwidth on the AGP bus, current cards transfer data back into main memory much, much slower than needed. At least, that was the claim of more than one person who wrote in response to my article. Roger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David W. Fenton Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 3:04 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] OT: Mac Pro unveiled On 11 Aug 2006 at 22:47, Darcy James Argue wrote: On 11 Aug 2006, at 7:50 PM, David W. Fenton wrote: So, then, you're saying that, on the Mac at least, my use of the analogy of printer drivers and vector-based font descriptions does not hold? Again, David, if you're interested in learning more about how drawing is handled in OS X, I highly recommend the Ars Technica pages I linked to earlier: Im not really interested in how drawing works on OS X. What I'm interested is your assertion about how drawing interacts with graphics cards *on PCs*. My reading and understanding lead me to believe that it works differently than the way you've described the process. -- David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] O.T. Inkjet printer recommendations?
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A-NO-NE Music Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:48 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] O.T. Inkjet printer recommendations? Colin Broom / 2006/01/18 / 05:39 PM wrote: ... I like HP as a company, but I just bought Epson R220 only because there aren't other option for printing on CD. Boy this printer is an ink eater! -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com ... I also have the R220 for printing CDs. The R320 linked below, is a little bit more expensive than the R220 before the rebate. Cheaper Ink (also from Newegg) than Epson's $60+ for a five cartridge set: Wellprint WPT-6EP-SET Color Cartridge - Retail Model #: WPT-6EP-SET Item #: N82E16817403049 Regular Price: $20.00 This ink works fine (so far anyway) and significantly reduces the total cost of ownership. Epson R320, $159.99 + $10 shipping with $50 rebate: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16828103168 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by your Internet Service Provider] ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
RE: [Finale] Changing verse number
A simple test: In WinFin 2004 I entered a few measures of verse one as one one one one and verse two as two two two two. I then click assigned them. I then went into Edit Lyrics and cut (Ctrl-x) and pasted (Ctrl-c) verse one lyrics into verse two and verse two lyrics into verse one. The changes took effect when I exited the Edit Lyrics dialog box. When I finished, verse one had the two two two two and verse two had the one one one one. Based on this simple three measure test, I believe that you can change yours also. However, I would make a backup copy of the file before trying it. Roger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark D Lew Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 5:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Finale] Changing verse number On Sep 14, 2004, at 12:31 PM, d. collins wrote: I'm doing an 8-voice piece and I realize I made a mistake in assigning the verse numbers (I generally use a different verse for each voice). Is there any way I can correct this without removing the lyrics and doing all the click assigning again? I could of course leave the wrong numbering, but that will be a source of confusion in a couple of years... In case the above isn't clear, here's what I did: I typed the lyrics for voice for in the verse 5 box and clicked-assigned them. I would like to switch them to verse 4. I know of no way to change them without redoing them. What you might consider is entering text in the verse 4 box which says lyrics for verse 4 were inadvertently entered as verse 5, to serve as a reminder when you revisit the file years from now. mdl ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale