Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread Williams, Jim
Jef,
It is clear indeed & I will try next project. Thank you!

Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.

On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:13 PM, "SN jef chippewa"  
wrote:

> 
> if you are still entering music it should be on.  once you are 
> cleaning up the parts, it should be off.  obviously it would be best 
> to do all the cues in the score before doing the parts, but i know 
> this is not always possible.  if you have started working on the 
> parts and then add music or cues and need the MM rests to break then 
> this can be done manually (selectively, not to the entire document) 
> after it has been turned off.
> 
> it really is a workflow issue (when you do what in which order).  i 
> don't see how this particular tool could be made intelligent enough 
> to "know" when i need it to be on/off.  so i need to know at what 
> point it can no longer help me "blindly" and turn it off.
> 
> is that clear?  this is one of those things that is just clear in my 
> head for the work i do and maybe i can't *explain* so clearly :-), 
> but i hope this helps.
> 
>> OK, Jef...I'm listening...when should it be on? Off?
> 
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread SN jef chippewa

if you are still entering music it should be on.  once you are 
cleaning up the parts, it should be off.  obviously it would be best 
to do all the cues in the score before doing the parts, but i know 
this is not always possible.  if you have started working on the 
parts and then add music or cues and need the MM rests to break then 
this can be done manually (selectively, not to the entire document) 
after it has been turned off.

it really is a workflow issue (when you do what in which order).  i 
don't see how this particular tool could be made intelligent enough 
to "know" when i need it to be on/off.  so i need to know at what 
point it can no longer help me "blindly" and turn it off.

is that clear?  this is one of those things that is just clear in my 
head for the work i do and maybe i can't *explain* so clearly :-), 
but i hope this helps.

>OK, Jef...I'm listening...when should it be on? Off?

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread Williams, Jim
OK, Jef...I'm listening...when should it be on? Off? 

Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.

On Jan 21, 2013, at 7:56 PM, "SN jef chippewa"  
wrote:

> 
> it is actually a very useful feature, you need to decide when to use 
> it and when not to use it.
> 
>> Yes...at times I think this feature does more harm than good.
>> It is supposed to solve a problem that would arise from entering 
>> music into existing block rests.
> 
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread SN jef chippewa

>My mistake; I had this option checked when it shouldn't have been. 
>But this has spurred me to completely abandon linked parts and go 
>back to extracting parts.  That way, when there's a problem, even if 
>it's my fault, at least it's limited to the part I'm editing, and 
>doesn't have far-reaching affects that I may not notice for some 
>time.

you know how dissatisfied i am about some aspects of linked parts, 
but i hardly think this is a justifiable reason to abandon using the 
feature (in fact, i find it quite trivial).  sorry for busting your 
ass :-) but i think you have simply not mastered how to take 
advantage of this setting properly.

>For me, linked parts has only very marginal advantages, and I have 
>no interest in going to lengths to make a feature "work", at the 
>expense of my productivity.

different stages of work may involve different file settings.  if it 
is too much to remember all the things you need to change, prepare a 
checklist of things to change once you are at a specific stage in the 
job / score.  i tape things to the wall right behind my large monitor 
detailling different settings in bigger jobs so i can switch back and 
forth as needed and ensure consistency in the results.

ps... it ain't a bug

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread SN jef chippewa

it is actually a very useful feature, you need to decide when to use 
it and when not to use it.

>Yes...at times I think this feature does more harm than good.
>It is supposed to solve a problem that would arise from entering 
>music into existing block rests.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread Lee Actor
My mistake; I had this option checked when it shouldn't have been.  But this
has spurred me to completely abandon linked parts and go back to extracting
parts.  That way, when there's a problem, even if it's my fault, at least
it's limited to the part I'm editing, and doesn't have far-reaching affects
that I may not notice for some time.  For me, linked parts has only very
marginal advantages, and I have no interest in going to lengths to make a
feature "work", at the expense of my productivity.

-Lee

-Original Message-
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
Ryan
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:15 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Possible bug

In document options, go to Multimeasure Rests. Make sure that Update
Automatically is unchecked.
If it is unchecked, then it's a bug.
This is checked by default. (I wish it weren't.)


On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Lee Actor  wrote:

> Is this a bug, or is it just me: editing a linked part, I change the end
> point of a multimeasure rest to accommodate a clef change in the following
> measure.  When I go back to the score (no editing), then back to the part,
> the end point of the multimeasure rest has been reset to the default
value.
> In fact, edits to the end points of multimeasure rests in all linked parts
> are reset to the default value.  My default value for the end point is
-20,
> which I change to -45 for clef changes, so it's very obvious when it gets
> reset.  Bug?
>
> -Lee
>
> Lee Actor
> Composer-in-Residence and Assistant Conductor, Palo Alto Philharmonic
> http://www.leeactor.com
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread Williams, Jim
Yes...at times I think this feature does more harm than good.
It is supposed to solve a problem that would arise from entering music into 
existing block rests.

Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.

On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:14 PM, "John Blane"  wrote:

> Turn OFF "Update Automatically" in the Multirest options
> 
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Lee Actor wrote:
> 
>> Is this a bug, or is it just me: editing a linked part, I change the end
>> point of a multimeasure rest to accommodate a clef change in the following
>> measure.  When I go back to the score (no editing), then back to the part,
>> the end point of the multimeasure rest has been reset to the default value.
>> In fact, edits to the end points of multimeasure rests in all linked parts
>> are reset to the default value.  My default value for the end point is -20,
>> which I change to -45 for clef changes, so it's very obvious when it gets
>> reset.  Bug?
>> 
>> -Lee
>> 
>> Lee Actor
>> Composer-in-Residence and Assistant Conductor, Palo Alto Philharmonic
>> http://www.leeactor.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Finale mailing list
>> Finale@shsu.edu
>> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 
> 
> 
> John Blane
> Blane Music Preparation
> 1649 Huntington Ln.
> Highland Park, IL 60035
> 847 579-9900
> 847 579-9903 fax
> www.BlaneMusic.com
> j...@blanemusic.com
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread Ryan
In document options, go to Multimeasure Rests. Make sure that Update
Automatically is unchecked.
If it is unchecked, then it's a bug.
This is checked by default. (I wish it weren't.)


On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Lee Actor  wrote:

> Is this a bug, or is it just me: editing a linked part, I change the end
> point of a multimeasure rest to accommodate a clef change in the following
> measure.  When I go back to the score (no editing), then back to the part,
> the end point of the multimeasure rest has been reset to the default value.
> In fact, edits to the end points of multimeasure rests in all linked parts
> are reset to the default value.  My default value for the end point is -20,
> which I change to -45 for clef changes, so it's very obvious when it gets
> reset.  Bug?
>
> -Lee
>
> Lee Actor
> Composer-in-Residence and Assistant Conductor, Palo Alto Philharmonic
> http://www.leeactor.com
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread John Blane
Turn OFF "Update Automatically" in the Multirest options

On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Lee Actor wrote:

> Is this a bug, or is it just me: editing a linked part, I change the end
> point of a multimeasure rest to accommodate a clef change in the following
> measure.  When I go back to the score (no editing), then back to the part,
> the end point of the multimeasure rest has been reset to the default value.
> In fact, edits to the end points of multimeasure rests in all linked parts
> are reset to the default value.  My default value for the end point is -20,
> which I change to -45 for clef changes, so it's very obvious when it gets
> reset.  Bug?
> 
> -Lee
> 
> Lee Actor
> Composer-in-Residence and Assistant Conductor, Palo Alto Philharmonic
> http://www.leeactor.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



John Blane
Blane Music Preparation 
1649 Huntington Ln.
Highland Park, IL 60035
847 579-9900
847 579-9903 fax
www.BlaneMusic.com
j...@blanemusic.com



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Possible bug

2013-01-21 Thread Lee Actor
Is this a bug, or is it just me: editing a linked part, I change the end
point of a multimeasure rest to accommodate a clef change in the following
measure.  When I go back to the score (no editing), then back to the part,
the end point of the multimeasure rest has been reset to the default value.
In fact, edits to the end points of multimeasure rests in all linked parts
are reset to the default value.  My default value for the end point is -20,
which I change to -45 for clef changes, so it's very obvious when it gets
reset.  Bug?

-Lee

Lee Actor
Composer-in-Residence and Assistant Conductor, Palo Alto Philharmonic
http://www.leeactor.com




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale