Re: [Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-05 Thread Scot Hanna-Weir

On 6/4/06, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Actually, cmd-opt-` (the Fin2005 shortcut) *is* reserved by OS X.

Cmd-E is a lot easier to reach than cmd-opt-` anyway. I'm glad they made the
change, even if I sometimes go for the wrong combo when I forget which
version of Finale I'm in.



  Well, for once I count myself lucky that I started on PC and moved
to Mac, because cmd-E made worlds of sense to me. Isn't it amazing how
we can think something like cmd-E makes sense to switch between views?
We are so entrenched in Finale-land.

-Scot

--
Scot Hanna-Weir
Music Engraver
A-R Editions, Inc.

Music Educator
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-05 Thread Scot Hanna-Weir

On 6/4/06, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


It would be wonderful for ALL Finale users if there were a list of all
the changes, in some sort of alphabetical or logical order, rather than
the current oh yes, and I almost forgot, we also did THIS format of
the current incomplete list we get with each version.

Oh well, we can dream, can't we?  Apparently that's all we'll get to do
about such things, given MakeMusic's reply to your request.

Too many things to possibly list them all?  Give me a f#$%ing break!
If it's too long to possibly list them all, it would be too long for
them to have actually programmed them all!


  Let me start by saying I completely agree with you. There, now that
I have that out of the way... =)

  I think what happens with MM, and most software developers that do
this yearly, buy me cause I have a few new toys and a few more bugs
update thing, is that it is such a rush to production, that while they
do have a list of what they're working on, it's probably not always
clear what is actually going to get finished by production, and that
the final list of what makes it in is probably not known to any one
person.
  This is problematic...but more importantly symptomatic of this kind
of development. While it may be better business to release a yearly
update to rake in the revenue, for the stability and promise of the
program, I'd sincerely prefer that MM take their time, work on
specific problems that they, (and their dedicated users), want
addressed, and release the update when it is stable, ready, and
significantly improved.
  I guess we can dream, David.

-Scot

--
Scot Hanna-Weir
Music Engraver
A-R Editions, Inc.

Music Educator
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-05 Thread Don Hart
This matter stems from the same philosophy that provides us half-baked
(well, maybe undercooked) yearly upgrades, but it is a separate problem.  It
doesn't seem to me like the two need to be lumped together.  Though it would
be best to have a comprehensive list of changes arrive with each upgrade, I
would take that information whenever MM has a list sorted out.  How
difficult would it be to make a read me file available on the website?

To my knowledge a complete version history would be a first for MM, Coda, et
al.  I have personally found out about *very* useful features two to three
versions (years!) down the line, from this list as well as from other users
that I know and work with.  Wouldn't a detailed history of everything
changed, fixed, tweaked, etc. since version 2000 be helpful?  I don't
believe we've ever been offered anything except highlights (also know as
selling points and, in some cases, marketing ploys).

Don Hart



on 6/5/06 9:52 AM, Scot Hanna-Weir at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 6/4/06, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 It would be wonderful for ALL Finale users if there were a list of all
 the changes, in some sort of alphabetical or logical order, rather than
 the current oh yes, and I almost forgot, we also did THIS format of
 the current incomplete list we get with each version.
 
 Oh well, we can dream, can't we?  Apparently that's all we'll get to do
 about such things, given MakeMusic's reply to your request.
 
 Too many things to possibly list them all?  Give me a f#$%ing break!
 If it's too long to possibly list them all, it would be too long for
 them to have actually programmed them all!
 
  Let me start by saying I completely agree with you. There, now that
 I have that out of the way... =)
 
  I think what happens with MM, and most software developers that do
 this yearly, buy me cause I have a few new toys and a few more bugs
 update thing, is that it is such a rush to production, that while they
 do have a list of what they're working on, it's probably not always
 clear what is actually going to get finished by production, and that
 the final list of what makes it in is probably not known to any one
 person.
  This is problematic...but more importantly symptomatic of this kind
 of development. While it may be better business to release a yearly
 update to rake in the revenue, for the stability and promise of the
 program, I'd sincerely prefer that MM take their time, work on
 specific problems that they, (and their dedicated users), want
 addressed, and release the update when it is stable, ready, and
 significantly improved.
  I guess we can dream, David.
 
 -Scot

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-04 Thread Jonathan Smith
 While I'm on a rant, which clever Trevor decided to pop in the "Items to copy" dialogue EVERY time I want to mass mover copy something. (Someone, please tell me there is way out of this annoyance, maybe hidden deep in a program options menu that has a double sub dialogue that they have altered 4 times since v 3.5 and is now also located under the MIDI menu/playback/Gargantuan Personal Pain Instruments/Contact Make Music..etc..etc. menu option, but hey! ikey could get me there in one keystroke ;-)) This never happened in 2005 and before. For years I hounded Make Music to make the mass mover selections 'savable'. Finally in v2006 they did that, but on pain of 2 dialogue boxes to get the same job done! This is a move backwards not forwards.  To bypass, just use opt-click to copy -- the most recently used "Items To Copy" list is applied.  The dialog only shows up when you use opt-shift-click.  - Darcy Ah, ah! At last, pain relief in the form of the option key. Why they can't just put a "Don't show this again" check box in the Items to Move dialogue I'll never figure.Thanks Darcy.Jonathan ___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-04 Thread Darcy James Argue
On 04 Jun 2006, at 3:11 AM, Jonathan Smith wrote:While I'm on a rant, which clever Trevor decided to pop in the "Items to copy" dialogue EVERY time I want to mass mover copy something. (Someone, please tell me there is way out of this annoyance, maybe hidden deep in a program options menu that has a double sub dialogue that they have altered 4 times since v 3.5 and is now also located under the MIDI menu/playback/Gargantuan Personal Pain Instruments/Contact Make Music..etc..etc. menu option, but hey! ikey could get me there in one keystroke ;-)) This never happened in 2005 and before. For years I hounded Make Music to make the mass mover selections 'savable'. Finally in v2006 they did that, but on pain of 2 dialogue boxes to get the same job done! This is a move backwards not forwards. To bypass, just use opt-click to copy -- the most recently used "Items To Copy" list is applied.  The dialog only shows up when you use opt-shift-click.- Darcy Ah, ah! At last, pain relief in the form of the option key. Why they can't just put a "Don't show this again" check box in the Items to Move dialogue I'll never figure.Well, having the two separate keyboard shortcuts for copying is VERY useful, as you will soon find. Having just the one, with a "Don't show again" checkbox, would not be nearly as effective.For instance, if I want to switch from copying entries and hairpins to just the hairpins, I opt-shift-click for the first copy operation and uncheck the appropriate boxes, and then I just opt-click until I need to copy something other than hairpins.Much better than Fin2005 and earlier, which always required a separate trip to the "Copy Entry Items" *and* "Copy Measure Items" dialogs, for which there were [ahem] no keyboard shortcuts.- Darcy-[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://secretsociety.typepad.comBrooklyn, NY___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-04 Thread Jonathan Smith
Close, but used to be cmd ~.  Maybe on non-US keyboard maps it was cmd .  Christopher Are you sure? It was cmd-opt~ on my kbds (French and U.K. layout) with 2005. It was even something else way back many versions before, but my patience has worn too thin to bother finding it. This key stroke was not an OS thing, so it needn't have been changed. Jonathan___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-04 Thread Darcy James Argue
Actually, cmd-opt-` (the Fin2005 shortcut) *is* reserved by OS X.Cmd-E is a lot easier to reach than cmd-opt-` anyway. I'm glad they made the change, even if I sometimes go for the wrong combo when I forget which version of Finale I'm in. But anyway, if you use QuicKeys or iKey, you can make it whatever you want. - Darcy-[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://secretsociety.typepad.comBrooklyn, NY On 04 Jun 2006, at 3:22 AM, Jonathan Smith wrote:Close, but used to be cmd ~.Maybe on non-US keyboard maps it was cmd .Christopher Are you sure? It was cmd-opt~ on my kbds (French and U.K. layout) with 2005. It was even something else way back many versions before, but my patience has worn too thin to bother finding it. This key stroke was not an OS thing, so it needn't have been changed. Jonathan___Finale mailing listFinale@shsu.eduhttp://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale ___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-04 Thread dhbailey

Jonathan Smith wrote:


While I'm on a rant, which clever Trevor decided to pop in the Items 
to copy dialogue EVERY time I want to mass mover copy something. 
(Someone, please tell me there is way out of this annoyance, maybe 
hidden deep in a program options menu that has a double sub dialogue 
that they have altered 4 times since v 3.5 and is now also located 
under the MIDI menu/playback/Gargantuan Personal Pain 
Instruments/Contact Make Music..etc..etc. menu option, but hey! ikey 
could get me there in one keystroke ;-)) This never happened in 2005 
and before. For years I hounded Make Music to make the mass mover 
selections 'savable'. Finally in v2006 they did that, but on pain of 
2 dialogue boxes to get the same job done! This is a move backwards 
not forwards.





To bypass, just use opt-click to copy -- the most recently used Items 
To Copy list is applied.  The dialog only shows up when you use 
opt-shift-click.



- Darcy



Ah, ah! At last, pain relief in the form of the option key. Why they 
can't just put a Don't show this again check box in the Items to Move 
dialogue I'll never figure.




Because often you might want to move different items each time you try 
to move something.  You might just want to moved notes one time, you 
might just want to move expressions another time.  Having two different 
key combinations so that we can at all times have both possibilities 
(selecting what to move, or moving what we most recently selected to 
move) is a good thing.


Using what had been the old move what I've told you to move key 
combination to be the new What items would you like to move this time 
function is what is stupid.  The old behavior should have remained as it 
is, and a new combination should have been incorporated for the what 
items would you like to move this time function.


Such a usage of long-time behavior to get new results shows a lack of 
regard for long-time users at the expense of new users for whom it will 
be easy for them to simply ctrl-click to copy.  Of course, new users 
could just as easily have learned the old ctrl-shift-click behavior, and 
we could ALL have learned that ctrl-click would bring up the 
items-to-copy dialog.


Oh well, progress.  Just gotta keep reading that What's New 
documentation and pray that it really lists all the new additions and 
all the changes from previous behavior.


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-04 Thread Don Hart
It hasn't, and apparently won't any time soon, according to mac support.  I
suggested MM provide a comprehensive list of such things to them a while
back and was told there were too many things to possibly list them all.

*Someone* has to have that information, don't they?  Don't most programs
include comprehensive version histories with updates.  Maybe it would be a
long list, but I would certainly go through it carefully.  Is it just me or
does this seem extremely inconsiderate of the longtime Finale user?

Don Hart


on 6/4/06 6:14 AM, dhbailey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Oh well, progress.  Just gotta keep reading that What's New
 documentation and pray that it really lists all the new additions and
 all the changes from previous behavior.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Re: Kbd Commands Shortcuts

2006-06-04 Thread dhbailey

Don Hart wrote:

It hasn't, and apparently won't any time soon, according to mac support.  I
suggested MM provide a comprehensive list of such things to them a while
back and was told there were too many things to possibly list them all.

*Someone* has to have that information, don't they?  Don't most programs
include comprehensive version histories with updates.  Maybe it would be a
long list, but I would certainly go through it carefully.  Is it just me or
does this seem extremely inconsiderate of the longtime Finale user?

Don Hart


on 6/4/06 6:14 AM, dhbailey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Oh well, progress.  Just gotta keep reading that What's New
documentation and pray that it really lists all the new additions and
all the changes from previous behavior.





The developers have a list of what's new in each version.  It's not like 
it's a surprise to them, after all THEY're the ones who programmed the 
changes.  Little programming-elves don't sneak in at night and write new 
code so that the programmers have no clue what new goodies will appear 
in the next version.


Yes, it's inconsiderate and not just of the longtime Finale user but 
also of the new Finale user.  We all know that in order for 
documentation to ready for a new release it has to be written at the 
same time as the code is being developed and often contains 
inaccuracies, which is why there are READMEFIRST files which outline the 
discrepancies between the documentation and the actual program.


It would be wonderful for ALL Finale users if there were a list of all 
the changes, in some sort of alphabetical or logical order, rather than 
the current oh yes, and I almost forgot, we also did THIS format of 
the current incomplete list we get with each version.


Oh well, we can dream, can't we?  Apparently that's all we'll get to do 
about such things, given MakeMusic's reply to your request.


Too many things to possibly list them all?  Give me a f#$%ing break! 
If it's too long to possibly list them all, it would be too long for 
them to have actually programmed them all!


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale