Re: [Finale] staff groups reset removes my changes

2012-06-22 Thread SN jef chippewa

>what is the best way to deal with this?  set the piccolo in score 
>manager to flute (so it appears as fl. 1) and then set the piccolo 
>as a region in the score manager?  even if it plays piccolo in the 
>entire score?

here i mean mid-score instrument change, of course...

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] staff groups reset removes my changes

2012-06-22 Thread SN jef chippewa

in F2012 (recently upgraded from 2010) i am really having trouble 
with the way staff groups work.

i have over 60 groups somehow defined in the document...

when i "reset all groups and brackets" they are set to what finale 
thinks is right, not to what i defined in scroll view.  for example, 
i set the bracket which includes fl2-3 to also include piccolo, reset 
brackets and the piccolo is no longer included in the flutes group 
bracket because it is considered to be another instrument (?!).  i 
have unchecked "Automatic Instrument Family Group Brackets" in 
Program Options-Edit.

what is the best way to deal with this?  set the piccolo in score 
manager to flute (so it appears as fl. 1) and then set the piccolo as 
a region in the score manager?  even if it plays piccolo in the 
entire score?

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread Fiskum, Steve
I'm sorry but I don't have the time to bring up specific examples of the many 
file I did last year but when I get a moment I will send them to you privately. 
It has a lot to do with bracketing and groups names but mainly bracketing. 
Basically it gets down to, the old system and optimized systems allowed 
flexibility and the current system is very rigid especially when it comes to 
bracketing especially after the initial input and then editors or composer have 
their time with the proof and then I have to rework these groups. If everything 
was perfect when I initially put everything then YES, the new systems works 
well. But after that I have to whip out paper and a pencil and copy measure 
numbers down and track all the different edits, when before I would just make 
them without a care.

Cheers,
Steve


From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of Jari 
Williamsson [jari.williams...@mailbox.swipnet.se]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:46 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

On 2012-02-15 22:44, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
> That's interesting to note since this new way of
> working has forced me to create more groups than I ever had to do with
> previous versions of Finale.

Can you give an example where you need all these groups? Unless there
are lots of named groups in a score, I can't personally think many other
reasons. And if so, why are those numbers expanding compared to the
older method?


Best regards,

Jari Williamsson

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread Jari Williamsson
On 2012-02-15 22:44, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
> That's interesting to note since this new way of
> working has forced me to create more groups than I ever had to do with
> previous versions of Finale.

Can you give an example where you need all these groups? Unless there 
are lots of named groups in a score, I can't personally think many other 
reasons. And if so, why are those numbers expanding compared to the 
older method?


Best regards,

Jari Williamsson

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread Jari Williamsson
On 2012-02-15 22:05, J D Thomas wrote:
> Jari,
>
> Your site says this plugin is for Finale 2012 and later.  Is this info 
> correct?

Yes.


Best regards,

Jari Williamsson

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread Fiskum, Steve
Thanks for the info Jari. That's interesting to note since this new way of
working has forced me to create more groups than I ever had to do with
previous versions of Finale. I still think it was a bad idea to not let us
have a duplicate button within the group dbx if they were going to make this
radical change. Not to mention what this new grouping does to upgrading
files. What a mess!

I also believe it would be better to allow us the ability to place rages of
measures similar to the print dbx when printing specific pages (1-10, 30-52)
so I don't have to create unique groups for each occurrence. This would have
definitely cut down on the number of groups if they really were interested
in fewer groups. Not well thought-out.

I'm not saying that the new change is bad, I think the concept is good but
it's just not finished like so many other things in Finale (hairpins in
linked parts don't move independently from the score, copying measure
spacing adjustments to other measures in linked parts - unable to do,
separate "Extra Space from measure attributes" in linked parts vs. score,
the list goes on and on).

Steve


2/15/12 2:30 PM, "Jari Williamsson" 
wrote:
>... since Finale now do some
> hidden stuff to keep the number of groups at a minimum at all times.
> That's one reason why the hidden text is added.)
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jari Williamsson
> 
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread J D Thomas
Jari,

Your site says this plugin is for Finale 2012 and later.  Is this info correct?

J D Thomas
ThomaStudios

On Feb 15, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:

> On 2012-02-15 18:16, Robert Patterson wrote:
>> Great. I don't see said plugin. Is it one of yours, or does it come with
>> Finale?
> 
> "JW Split Groups", available on the tips site. (Btw, it was not as 
> trivial as I first thought it was to write, since Finale now do some 
> hidden stuff to keep the number of groups at a minimum at all times. 
> That's one reason why the hidden text is added.)
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jari Williamsson
> 
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread Jari Williamsson
On 2012-02-15 18:16, Robert Patterson wrote:
> Great. I don't see said plugin. Is it one of yours, or does it come with
> Finale?

"JW Split Groups", available on the tips site. (Btw, it was not as 
trivial as I first thought it was to write, since Finale now do some 
hidden stuff to keep the number of groups at a minimum at all times. 
That's one reason why the hidden text is added.)


Best regards,

Jari Williamsson

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread Robert Patterson
Great. I don't see said plugin. Is it one of yours, or does it come with
Finale?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Jari Williamsson <
jari.williams...@mailbox.swipnet.se> wrote:

> On 2012-02-15 15:03, Robert Patterson wrote:
> > Starting in Fin11, staff groups have measure ranges and no longer apply
> to
> > systems. On the whole I think this is a terrific improvement, but as far
> as
> > I can tell it seems the UI is still mired down in the system-oriented way
> > of doing things. What I would like to be able to do is select a staff and
> > split the group into two at that point, allowing me to edit it separately
> > from that point forward. Does that exist in the UI? I haven't been able
> to
> > find it. All I can find is a technique for deleting and recreating the
> > group over the range of a system. This doubly problematic: it's a lot of
> > work to recreate the group, and it gives one less control over the
> measure
> > range than I'd like.
> >
> > It looks like a simple plugin could do it, but I don't want to replicate
> > existing Finale functionality.
>
> There already is a plug-in to do it.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jari Williamsson
>
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread Jari Williamsson
On 2012-02-15 15:03, Robert Patterson wrote:
> Starting in Fin11, staff groups have measure ranges and no longer apply to
> systems. On the whole I think this is a terrific improvement, but as far as
> I can tell it seems the UI is still mired down in the system-oriented way
> of doing things. What I would like to be able to do is select a staff and
> split the group into two at that point, allowing me to edit it separately
> from that point forward. Does that exist in the UI? I haven't been able to
> find it. All I can find is a technique for deleting and recreating the
> group over the range of a system. This doubly problematic: it's a lot of
> work to recreate the group, and it gives one less control over the measure
> range than I'd like.
>
> It looks like a simple plugin could do it, but I don't want to replicate
> existing Finale functionality.

There already is a plug-in to do it.


Best regards,

Jari Williamsson

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Staff Groups (Fin11+)

2012-02-15 Thread Robert Patterson
Starting in Fin11, staff groups have measure ranges and no longer apply to
systems. On the whole I think this is a terrific improvement, but as far as
I can tell it seems the UI is still mired down in the system-oriented way
of doing things. What I would like to be able to do is select a staff and
split the group into two at that point, allowing me to edit it separately
from that point forward. Does that exist in the UI? I haven't been able to
find it. All I can find is a technique for deleting and recreating the
group over the range of a system. This doubly problematic: it's a lot of
work to recreate the group, and it gives one less control over the measure
range than I'd like.

It looks like a simple plugin could do it, but I don't want to replicate
existing Finale functionality.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups

2010-01-22 Thread David W. Fenton
On 22 Jan 2010 at 8:29, dc wrote:

> David W. Fenton écrit:
> >What am I doing wrong?
> 
> First question is optimization. You should make your changes in your groups 
> BEFORE optimizing. Is that what you did?

No, that was the problem -- I forgot the systems were optimized 
(without removing staves).

This one always bites me.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups

2010-01-21 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Jan 2010 at 19:53, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:

> David W. Fenton wrote:
> 
> > I am still incredibly stupid when it comes to creating staff groups.
> >
> > I have a piece with two sopranos, and to save left margin space, I'm
> > using "Sopranos" for the starting group name and "Sop." for the
> > abbreviation, and then I and II for the staff names of the individual
> > staves.
> >
> > The first staff is fine, but the succeeding staves lack any group
> > name.
> 
> If you have the same staves as part of two groups, are all groups set to 
> display group name?

I figured it out by accident -- the 2nd and 3rd system on the first 
page were optimized so I could crowd the systems a bit. I now recall 
that you have to do this kind of thing unoptimized.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups

2010-01-21 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

David W. Fenton wrote:


I am still incredibly stupid when it comes to creating staff groups.

I have a piece with two sopranos, and to save left margin space, I'm
using "Sopranos" for the starting group name and "Sop." for the
abbreviation, and then I and II for the staff names of the individual
staves.

The first staff is fine, but the succeeding staves lack any group
name.
   


If you have the same staves as part of two groups, are all groups set to 
display group name?



I've tried creating a staff group in both scroll and page views, and
it seems to make no difference. I've got orphan staff groups, in
scroll view, there are two extra groups that aren't defined to
display anything, and I see no way to get rid of them.
   


If you can see the group handle for an orphan group, select the handle, 
and from the "staff" drop down menu, use the option "remove group".


ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Staff Groups

2010-01-21 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Jan 2010 at 20:33, David W. Fenton wrote:

> I am still incredibly stupid when it comes to creating staff groups.
> 
> I have a piece with two sopranos, and to save left margin space, I'm 
> using "Sopranos" for the starting group name and "Sop." for the 
> abbreviation, and then I and II for the staff names of the individual 
> staves.
> 
> The first staff is fine, but the succeeding staves lack any group 
> name. 
> 
> What am I doing wrong?
> 
> I've tried creating a staff group in both scroll and page views, and 
> it seems to make no difference. I've got orphan staff groups, in 
> scroll view, there are two extra groups that aren't defined to 
> display anything, and I see no way to get rid of them.
> 
> (this is WinFin 2003, but I don't know that this kind of thing has 
> changed much since then)

OK, I just noticed that the problem is only on page 1 -- all 
succeeding pages display the staff group abbreviation correctly.

So, I've got two staves without it, the 2nd and 3rd ones on the first 
page.

Ideas?

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Staff Groups

2010-01-21 Thread David W. Fenton
I am still incredibly stupid when it comes to creating staff groups.

I have a piece with two sopranos, and to save left margin space, I'm 
using "Sopranos" for the starting group name and "Sop." for the 
abbreviation, and then I and II for the staff names of the individual 
staves.

The first staff is fine, but the succeeding staves lack any group 
name. 

What am I doing wrong?

I've tried creating a staff group in both scroll and page views, and 
it seems to make no difference. I've got orphan staff groups, in 
scroll view, there are two extra groups that aren't defined to 
display anything, and I see no way to get rid of them.

(this is WinFin 2003, but I don't know that this kind of thing has 
changed much since then)

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale