RE: [Finale] TAN: More iKey

2005-01-31 Thread Fiskum, Steve
Title: RE: [Finale] TAN: More iKey






From:  Robert Patterson

Sent:  Sunday, January 30, 2005 9:51 AM


I would love to try QuickKeys, but they've abandoned my OS. The demo 

doesn't even start.



What OS are you using? QuicKeys supports OS9 and OSX and you can still purchase older versions. I have been working with QKX3 and it blows away the old OS9 version. The addition of the logic and decision functions has greatly improved the application. QuicKeys can now handle all of the complicated macros that I had setup in OS9. As with Finale, there are a few speed issues when editing large macros within their new GUI but the macros are more reliable and fast when you run them compared to the older versions of QK especially when comparing it to the OS9 versions.

Cheers,

Steve




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] TAN: More iKey

2005-01-31 Thread Robert Patterson
The minimum OS version for QK X3 is 10.3. I have 10.2.8. Apparently QK 
X2 is discontinued. So they've abandoned my OS.

Fiskum, Steve wrote:
  From:   Robert Patterson
  Sent:   Sunday, January 30, 2005 9:51 AM
  I would love to try QuickKeys, but they've abandoned my OS. The demo
  doesn't even start.
What OS are you using? QuicKeys supports OS9 and OSX and you can still 
purchase older versions. I have been working with QKX3 and it blows away 
the old OS9 version. The addition of the logic and decision functions 
has greatly improved the application. QuicKeys can now handle all of the 
complicated macros that I had setup in OS9. As with Finale, there are a 
few speed issues when editing large macros within their new GUI but the 
macros are more reliable and fast when you run them compared to the 
older versions of QK especially when comparing it to the OS9 versions.

Cheers,
Steve


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
--
Robert Patterson
http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] TAN: More iKey

2005-01-31 Thread Simon Troup
 The minimum OS version for QK X3 is 10.3. I have 10.2.8. Apparently QK 
 X2 is discontinued. So they've abandoned my OS.

It may not worth you upgrading to 10.3 as 10.4 is due out soon. You could be 
better off waiting for both 10.4 and QK support for 10.4 to be in place before 
upgrading. 

Out of curiousity why didn't you go to 10.3?

Thanks anyway, that's a good reminder to check QK compatibility before 
upgrading the OS - I usually grab the latest version the minute it's released, 
I've probably just been fortunate not to have run into problems like this.
-- 
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art

-
Finale IRC channel
server: irc.chatspike.net
port: 6667
channel: #Finale
-

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] TAN: More iKey

2005-01-31 Thread Steve Gibons
The minimum OS version for QK X3 is 10.3. I have 10.2.8. Apparently QK
X2 is discontinued. So they've abandoned my OS.

Actually they are still selling QK 2. Give them a call (800.523.7638), 
they are pretty nice over there.

steve
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] TAN: More iKey

2005-01-30 Thread Robert Patterson
Another apparent iKey limitation is that it can only go one submenu 
deep? Does anyone know a way around this? Is iKey 2 any better in this 
regard?

I would love to try QuickKeys, but they've abandoned my OS. The demo 
doesn't even start.

--
Robert Patterson
http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] TAN: More iKey

2005-01-30 Thread Steve Gibons
iKey 2 is the same. There doesn't seem to have been much added to the 
functionality of iKey 2, but the user interface has become infinitely  
convoluted, and stuff that worked in iKey 1 is broken in iKey 2, ie; 
shortcuts triggered by activating an application do not work properly.

My experience with iKey 2 was terrible, I've been using iKey 1 for a 
year. iKey 2 is a mess, see earlier posts about it.

Robert, You are on 10.2?

steve
On Jan 30, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:
Another apparent iKey limitation is that it can only go one submenu 
deep? Does anyone know a way around this? Is iKey 2 any better in this 
regard?

I would love to try QuickKeys, but they've abandoned my OS. The demo 
doesn't even start.

--
Robert Patterson
http://RobertGPatterson.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale