Re: [Finale] OT: 18th - now 19th century trombones

2007-07-08 Thread dhbailey

John Howell wrote:
[snip]

(And in passing, are we correct in using the terms "Czech" Conservatory 
and Philharmonic, given that Czechoslovakia did not exist until it was 
created out of Bohemia and Moravia after WW I, and the "Czech Republic" 
is an invention of the late '80s or early '90s?  What were they called 
in Dvorák's lifetime?)


Dvorak was a Bohemian.  The big conservatory was in Prague, also part of 
Bohemia.  Most likely this would have been the seat of the major 
orchestra in the country as well, since it was a major European capitol.



--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: 18th - now 19th century trombones

2007-07-07 Thread Raymond Horton
Given the amount of research Shifrin has done, together with the music 
of the Dvorak 8th symphony (quite nonidomatic for slide trombone) and 
other Dvorak excerpts, I'll accept it, at least until your paper comes 
out.  



(BTW, is the "slide trombone specialist ... named a permanent 
instructor" in 1903 the one that Shifrin mentioned as teaching a year 
and then committing suicide?)



All that matters, in this case, was what instrument was in Dvorak's 
head.  That's hard to determine, but fun to try.



For me, this all has bearing on the extremely unusual trombone writing 
in the Janacek _Sinfonietta_, written decades later but still a great 
challenge on slide trombones.  If it were written for three or four of 
the four-valve Bb valve instruments, the parts would make much more sense. 



John Howell wrote:


Hi, Christopher (and Ray).  If only these question were that simple!  
Certainly the information on the Czech Conservatory is strong, but 
only if one assumes that (a) all symphony trombonists (or other 
instrumentalists) were hired out of that Conservatory and none were 
hired from other countries (unproven); and (b) that between 1860, when 
slide trombone was no longer banned from the Conservatory, and 1903, 
when a slide trombone specialist was named a permanent instructor, no 
one else was teaching slide trombone technique, perhaps as what we 
would call an adjunct.  Which actually seems unlikely, given that the 
Czech Philharmonic started using slide trombones in 1896, and used 
them exclusively from 1901.  And there also seems to be an assumption 
that Dvorák composed exclusively for that orchestra, which I suspect 
was definitely NOT the case, and a question of whether musicians in 
other orchestras in other countries would even have considered what 
the Praguers thought was proper!!


Facts are such messy things, but they do make a musicologist's life 
interesting!   This brief article (and thanks for the link) speaks not 
to the question of alto trombones, but to that of slide vs. valve 
trombones, but it's well worth knowing about for those interested in 
organology (which contrary to Mr. Shifrin's surprise is the accepted 
term used quite widely in musicological circles).


(And in passing, are we correct in using the terms "Czech" 
Conservatory and Philharmonic, given that Czechoslovakia did not exist 
until it was created out of Bohemia and Moravia after WW I, and the 
"Czech Republic" is an invention of the late '80s or early '90s?  What 
were they called in Dvorák's lifetime?)


John




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: 18th - now 19th century trombones

2007-07-07 Thread John Howell

At 12:03 AM -0400 7/7/07, Christopher Smith wrote:


Didn't he write quite a bit for valve trombone? 
Or some kind of weird hybrid piston-slide 
instrument?


Kind of funny, because his parts are eminently 
playable on regular slide tenor and bass 
trombones (the stuff I've played of his, 
anyway!)


Christopher



Wait a minute, I got curious and looked it up. See here...

http://www.trombone-society.org.uk/resources/articles/dvorak.php


Hi, Christopher (and Ray).  If only these 
question were that simple!  Certainly the 
information on the Czech Conservatory is strong, 
but only if one assumes that (a) all symphony 
trombonists (or other instrumentalists) were 
hired out of that Conservatory and none were 
hired from other countries (unproven); and (b) 
that between 1860, when slide trombone was no 
longer banned from the Conservatory, and 1903, 
when a slide trombone specialist was named a 
permanent instructor, no one else was teaching 
slide trombone technique, perhaps as what we 
would call an adjunct.  Which actually seems 
unlikely, given that the Czech Philharmonic 
started using slide trombones in 1896, and used 
them exclusively from 1901.  And there also seems 
to be an assumption that Dvorák composed 
exclusively for that orchestra, which I suspect 
was definitely NOT the case, and a question of 
whether musicians in other orchestras in other 
countries would even have considered what the 
Praguers thought was proper!!


Facts are such messy things, but they do make a 
musicologist's life interesting!   This brief 
article (and thanks for the link) speaks not to 
the question of alto trombones, but to that of 
slide vs. valve trombones, but it's well worth 
knowing about for those interested in organology 
(which contrary to Mr. Shifrin's surprise is the 
accepted term used quite widely in musicological 
circles).


(And in passing, are we correct in using the 
terms "Czech" Conservatory and Philharmonic, 
given that Czechoslovakia did not exist until it 
was created out of Bohemia and Moravia after WW 
I, and the "Czech Republic" is an invention of 
the late '80s or early '90s?  What were they 
called in Dvorák's lifetime?)


John


--
John R. Howell
Virginia Tech Department of Music
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: 18th - now 19th century trombones

2007-07-06 Thread Carl Dershem

Christopher Smith wrote:


The other interesting standard rep composer is Dvorak - quick - 
without looking:  What kind of trombones did Dvorak write for?


Didn't he write quite a bit for valve trombone? Or some kind of weird 
hybrid piston-slide instrument?


Kind of funny, because his parts are eminently playable on regular 
slide tenor and bass trombones (the stuff I've played of his, anyway!)


Wait a minute, I got curious and looked it up. See here...

http://www.trombone-society.org.uk/resources/articles/dvorak.php


Interesting looking instrument!  I wonder what it'd play like.

cd
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/dershem/#
http://members.cox.net/dershem

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: 18th - now 19th century trombones

2007-07-06 Thread Raymond Horton

Christopher Smith wrote:


On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:




The other interesting standard rep composer is Dvorak - quick - 
without looking:  What kind of trombones did Dvorak write for?


Didn't he write quite a bit for valve trombone? Or some kind of weird 
hybrid piston-slide instrument?


Kind of funny, because his parts are eminently playable on regular 
slide tenor and bass trombones (the stuff I've played of his, anyway!)


Christopher



Right - valve trombones in Bb.  Two tenor and one 4-valve bass.


The 8th symphony has a very rapid scale passage at the end that would be 
much easier on valves.  A few other licks in overtures.



Valve trombones hung on longer in Czechoslovakia than anywhere else, 
even Italy.  



RBH



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: 18th - now 19th century trombones

2007-07-06 Thread Christopher Smith


On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:56 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:



On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:




The other interesting standard rep composer is Dvorak - quick -  
without looking:  What kind of trombones did Dvorak write for?


Didn't he write quite a bit for valve trombone? Or some kind of  
weird hybrid piston-slide instrument?


Kind of funny, because his parts are eminently playable on regular  
slide tenor and bass trombones (the stuff I've played of his, anyway!)


Christopher



Wait a minute, I got curious and looked it up. See here...

http://www.trombone-society.org.uk/resources/articles/dvorak.php

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: 18th - now 19th century trombones

2007-07-06 Thread Christopher Smith


On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:




The other interesting standard rep composer is Dvorak - quick -  
without looking:  What kind of trombones did Dvorak write for?


Didn't he write quite a bit for valve trombone? Or some kind of weird  
hybrid piston-slide instrument?


Kind of funny, because his parts are eminently playable on regular  
slide tenor and bass trombones (the stuff I've played of his, anyway!)


Christopher



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT: 18th - now 19th century trombones

2007-07-06 Thread Raymond Horton
Shifrin, through all his European research, has reached conclusions 
about the use of alto vs tenor trombone in much of the standard 
symphonic rep. (described in that dissertation to which I linked you). 



Indeed, alto trombone use dropped off in the latter half of the 19th 
century, but it is not cut and dried.  Brahms, for one, intended his 
first parts to be played on alto. 



But, as you say, many parts were labeled "alto" by publishers and were 
clearly not intended, or even practical for the instrument - Bruckner 
symphonies being the most obvious example, with the first trombone 
extending often to low E.



One interesting reason for the changeover from alto to tenor is that 
many orchestras stopped supplying instruments.  Players, faced with a 
choice, bought the more versatile tenor trombone.



The other interesting standard rep composer is Dvorak - quick - without 
looking:  What kind of trombones did Dvorak write for?



RBH


Andrew Stiller wrote:


On Jul 5, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:

I was never aware of such 80's belief.  Up until this recent 
scholarship, all I ever "knew" was that a trio of trombones: alto in 
Eb, tenor in Bb and bass in F were the norm in Germany in the 1700s 
and early 1800s until replaced by two tenors and a Bb/F bass in the 
mid 1800s, more or less.




Sorry, my bad. The situation was as you outlined it. My main point 
though, that scores (later than the period you mention) that call for 
alto trombone don't actually want an alto trombone, and that scholarly 
opinion has now moved 360° on the subject, stands.


Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://www.kallistimusic.com/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale