[Fink-devel] ADV: Harvest lots of Email addresses quickly
Want To Get A Lot Of Email Addresses In A Very Short Time? Easy Email Searcher is a powerful Email software that harvests general Email lists from mail servers Easy Email Searcher can get 100,000 Email addresses directly from the Email servers in only one hour! Easy Email Searcher is a 32 bit Windows Program for e-mail marketing. It is intended for easy and convenient search large e-mail address lists from mail servers. The program can be operated on Windows 95/98/ME/2000 and NT. Easy Email Searcher support multi-threads (up to 512 connections). Easy Email Searcher has the ability to reconnect to the mail server if the server has disconnected and continue the searching at the point where it has been interrupted. Easy Email Searcher has an ergonomic interface that is easy to set up and simple to use. ¡¡Easy Email Searcher is an email address searcher and bulk e-mail sender. It can verify more than 5500 email addresses per minute at only 56Kbps speed. It even allows you send email to valid email address while searching. You can save the searching progress and load it to resume work at your convenience. All you need to do is just input an email address, and press the "Search" button. Click The Following Link To Download This Program: Download Site 1 Download Site 2 ¡¡If you can not download this program , please copy the following link into your URL , and then click " Enter" on your Computer Keyboard. Here is the download links: http://www.wldinfo.com/download/email/newees.zip http://bestsoft.3322.org/onlinedown/newees.zip Disclaimer:We are strongly against continuously sending unsolicited emails to those who do not wish to receive our special mailings. We have attained the services of an independent 3rd party to overlook list management and removal services. This is not unsolicited email. If you do not wish to receive further mailings, please click this link http://www.autoemailremoval.com/cgi-bin/remove.pl . Auto Email Removal Company. Ref# 0163545This message is a commercial advertisement. It is compliant with all federal and state laws regarding email messages including the California Business and Professions Code. We have provided the subject line "ADV" to provide you notification that this is a commercial advertisement for persons over 18yrs old. ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Lost my ability to X...
At 22:15 Uhr -0500 03.04.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: Chris Zubrzycki [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: so do a fink rebuild xfree86-rootless (if you are using unstable) Yup, was already doing a rebuild but it didn't help. Still don't get anything in the .app except the actual executable. :( What do you get when you do dpkg -c /sw/fink/debs/xfree86-rootless_4.2.0-2_darwin-powerpc.deb That is, does it contains the full XDarwin.app list of files? If no, then your package build is for some reasons messed up. If OTOH all the files are in there (and you have installed xfree86-rootless), then I'd check out your /Applications/XDarwin.app dir - maybe it is write protected or something like that. rm -rf /Applications/XDarwin.app it and then fink reinstall xfree86-rootless would help in that case. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (+49) 6151-494890 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Package nessus and gtk+ friends
At 22:57 Uhr -0800 03.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote: At 11:06 PM -0700 4/3/02, Justin Hallett wrote: gtk+ is a splitoff package which means it has the info for shlibs in the main info file which should be in the gnome dir. If your not running full unstable you'll need to copy over the gtk+ pkg from unstable gnome dir to local. No, the new gtk+ in in graphics, not gnome. The one in gnome does not have the splitoffs. ARGH! Good that you point this out, I haven't even noticed yet (and didn't update gtk+ yet either). I think I will have to talk a word or two with Alexander, this GTK+ business turned into quite a mess recently, grmubl. I'll fix it up ASAP. Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (+49) 6151-494890 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Source from CVS and compilation question.
I'm in the process of packaging Jython-- a pure java implementation of the python language that we are considering for unit testing WebObjects applications-- and have run across two issues that I thought I would run by the community (to see if I can still come up with a compliant package): - There isn't a sourceball available from jython.org that is complete. There are two means via which I can get a complete set of sources for the current release version. I could checkout the source from CVS using a known tag via anonymous cvs OR I could point to the sourceball archived by the Debian project. Are either means acceptable? Alternatively, I suppose a copy of the debian sourceball could be made available elsewhere if downloading it for the purposes of building a Fink package is in violation of Debian's acceptable use policy? - To compile the Jython grammar requires a commercial only package [JavaCC] . However, the source tree comes with the parser already generated by JavaCC as the developers recognize that not everyone will/can have access to JavaCC. To build, I simply have to touch the .java file that results from compiling the grammar. Does this fit within the Fink policy? Jython's license is certainly compliant. b.bum Do the voices in my head bother you? ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Lost my ability to X...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 07:38 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: Max Horn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: What do you get when you do dpkg -c /sw/fink/debs/xfree86-rootless_4.2.0-2_darwin-powerpc.deb It's missing there too... :( try verifying you have a full/valid tarball. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fink/X420src-1.tgz - -chris zubrzycki - - -- PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt ID: 0xA2ABC070 Fingerprint: 26B0 BA6B A409 FA83 42B3 1688 FBF9 8232 A2AB C070 Of course, you realize this means war. - -B. Bunny -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (Darwin) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8rFPa+/mCMqKrwHARAgKJAJkB7AYkvtQBlWrdYy+BSIJw4O1qPACeKZFr uC4VTTGfENE11psDo0Z0w/Y= =sKig -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Re: dpkg-1.9.20-2 breaks scanpackages and apt-get
This was already fixed in CVS shortly after I commited the patch. I can up the revision in additon, too, though. It was an accidental left over from debugging. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (+49) 6151-494890 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dpkg-1.9.20-2 breaks scanpackages and apt-get
Max Horn wrote: This was already fixed in CVS shortly after I commited the patch. I can up the revision in additon, too, though. It was an accidental left over from debugging. Sorry, I don't quite understand where this was fixed. Before complaining, I did a cvs update, fink rebuild and reinstall. Do I have to re-download the tarball? -- Martin ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dpkg-1.9.20-2 breaks scanpackages and apt-get
Martin Costabel wrote: Max Horn wrote: This was already fixed in CVS shortly after I commited the patch. I can up the revision in additon, too, though. It was an accidental left over from debugging. Sorry, I don't quite understand where this was fixed. Before complaining, I did a cvs update, fink rebuild and reinstall. Do I have to re-download the tarball? OK, after a new rebuild, it doesn't print This is Mac OS X 10.1.3 any more. It still prints Reading version and writes it 160 times at the beginning of the Packages.gz file. -- Martin ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] linker error building shared library
I'm trying to fink-ify a package, but I can't get the shared library to build. The link fails with the message: ld: udpiiu.o has local relocation entries in non-writable section (__TEXT,__const) I'm using glibtool to handle the compile and link phases of building the library. Any ideas as to what's causing the above error, and how to fix it? -- Eric Norum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Electrical Engineering University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Canada. Phone: (306) 966-5394 FAX: (306) 966-5407 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] pilot-link-shlibs does not compile
this is very odd it makes it for me everytime...can you scroll up to the part that is attempts to make the lib i think it's the second phase and paste that to me? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi, pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1 does not compile. it breaks as follows: mkdir -p /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw mkdir -p /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/DEBIAN install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw/lib mv /sw/src/root-pilot-link-0.10.99-1/sw/lib/libpisock++.*.dylib /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw/lib mv: cannot stat `/sw/src/root-pilot-link-0.10.99-1/sw/lib/libpisock++.*.dylib': No such file or directory ### mv failed, exit code 1 Failed: installing pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1 failed after removing the line lib/libpisock++.*.dylib in the Files section, it compiles. kilian ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst Phone: (780)-408-3094 Fax: (780)-454-3200 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] resource not available.. (errno) how to track down?
Hi. I went back and looked at your message again, and it is certainly over my head, which was why I didn't respond before. Others may have had a similar reaction... Have you tried Apple's new unix-porting list? http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/unix-porting -- Dave ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] resource not available.. (errno) how to track down?
Hi Chris, On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 08:05 PM, Chris Devers wrote: On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Steve Spicklemire wrote: Am I asking the wrong question here? Is there a better place to ask? Depends. What's the question, exactly? Null questions tend to be pretty unanswerable just about everywhere, but if you narrow it down a bit we might be able to help you ;) Sorry.. I should've posted a better reference than the original subject. Here is the thing I'm referring to: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1379754 If the question is about development of Fink itself, /or of preparing a package for distribution with Fink, then this is the right list. If you're asking a question about using Fink, as opposed to extending it, then try the Users or Beginners list. If you're not sure what category you're in, just fire away you'll get help one way or another... It's about getting vpython (and Numeric, on which it depends) ported and working with fink. I'm still working on the porting part. ;-) thanks, -steve -- Chris Devers[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache / mod_perl / http://homepage.mac.com/chdevers/resume/ More war soon. You know how it is.-- mnftiu.cc ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] resource not available.. (errno) how to track down?
Thanks David, yes.. but I posted on the very first day of its operation.. and there may have been too few eyes on the list at that point. I will try there again as well. Is the darwin dev list open to such questions? I'm afraid it's just a little weirder than anything I've had to debug before.. thanks for suggesting it! take care, -steve On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 08:07 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Hi. I went back and looked at your message again, and it is certainly over my head, which was why I didn't respond before. Others may have had a similar reaction... Have you tried Apple's new unix-porting list? http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/unix-porting -- Dave ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] xemacs, xpdf, ircii, mutt, frotz, oroborus: source not available
I've just run fink fetch-all on a new system, and discovered that a number of source files are no longer available where fink expects to find them. Some of these may be stashed in the source part of our bindist, I haven't checked that; but anybody trying to install these packages anew will be frustrated. Should be addressed before the end of next week, if at all possible. Extract from log appended below. -- Dave curl: (19) efs-1.27-pkg.tar.gz: No such file or directory file download failed for efs-1.27-pkg.tar.gz of package xemacs-efs-pkg-1.27-1 curl: (19) xemacs-base-1.58-pkg.tar.gz: No such file or directory. file download failed for xemacs-base-1.58-pkg.tar.gz of package xemacs-base-pkg-1.58-1 curl: (19) xemacs-sumo-2002-01-19.tar.gz: No such file or directory. file download failed for xemacs-sumo-2002-01-19.tar.gz of package xemacs-sumo-pkg-20020119-1 curl: (19) xpdf-0.93.tgz: No such file or directory file download failed for xpdf-0.93.tgz of package xpdf-0.93-1 curl: (19) ircii-20010612.tar.gz: No such file or directory. file download failed for ircii-20010612.tar.gz of package ircii-20010612-1 curl: (19) 'RETR': /pub/mutt/mutt-1.3.24i.tar.gz: No such file or directory. file download failed for mutt-1.3.24i.tar.gz of package mutt-ssl-1.3.24i-1 curl: (22) The requested file was not found file download failed for frotz-2.41.tar.gz of package frotz-2.41-3 curl: (22) The requested file was not found file download failed for oroborus-1.14.0.tar.gz of package oroborus-1.14.0-4 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] pilot-link-shlibs does not compile
a rebuild now works fine. very strange... i will try a remove/reinstall tomorrow. On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:23:10PM -0700, Justin Hallett wrote: Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] pilot-link-shlibs does not compile To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Justin Hallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 16:23:10 -0700 this is very odd it makes it for me everytime...can you scroll up to the part that is attempts to make the lib i think it's the second phase and paste that to me? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi, pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1 does not compile. it breaks as follows: mkdir -p /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw mkdir -p /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/DEBIAN install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw/lib mv /sw/src/root-pilot-link-0.10.99-1/sw/lib/libpisock++.*.dylib /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw/lib mv: cannot stat `/sw/src/root-pilot-link-0.10.99-1/sw/lib/libpisock++.*.dylib': No such file or directory ### mv failed, exit code 1 Failed: installing pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1 failed after removing the line lib/libpisock++.*.dylib in the Files section, it compiles. kilian ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst Phone: (780)-408-3094 Fax: (780)-454-3200 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] dpkg-1.9.20-2 breaks scanpackages and apt-get
The new dpkg-1.9.20-2 prints the messages Reading version This is Mac OS X 10.1.3 This breaks fink scanpackages, because it writes many copies of these messages into the Packages.gz files. These can then no longer be parsed by apt-get update. On the fink compile server: % zcat /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/Packages.gz | grep Reading version |wc 160 3202560 On the client machine: % sudo apt-get update Reading Package Lists... Error! E: Unable to parse package file /sw/var/lib/apt/lists/_Volumes_Software_sw_fink_dists_unstable_main_binary-darwin-powerpc_Packages (1) E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. -- Martin ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-1.9.20-2 breaks scanpackages and apt-get
And the one after that fixes it :) On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 04:18 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: The new dpkg-1.9.20-2 prints the messages Reading version This is Mac OS X 10.1.3 This breaks fink scanpackages, because it writes many copies of these messages into the Packages.gz files. These can then no longer be parsed by apt-get update. On the fink compile server: % zcat /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/Packages.gz | grep Reading version |wc 160 3202560 On the client machine: % sudo apt-get update Reading Package Lists... Error! E: Unable to parse package file /sw/var/lib/apt/lists/_Volumes_Software_sw_fink_dists_unstable_main_binary-darwin-powerpc_Packages (1) E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. -- Martin ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- Alexander Strange | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The limerick, a verse form iniquitous, Has nonetheless been ubiquitous. Once Congress in session, Declared its suppression, But people got around that by writing the last line with no rhyme or meter. ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Plans for 0.4.0 and future releases
On 4/4/02 10:32 PM, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 13:34 Uhr +0200 03.04.2002, Max Horn wrote: [...] I propose our next release be on Saturday, 13th April. (This gives us enough time to follow the procedure outlined below; also it means that in case of screw up, I have the sunday to fix up; feel free to suggest other dates, but make sure to include proper reasons as to why you think that date is better Plans have to change I fear. I have to work out of town the whole next week, returning on Friday, with no CVS access during that time. OTOH I have some free days following that weekend. Hence my proposal to release on Monday, 15th. Full plan: * stable freeze next Monday 8th (12 AM UTC) * deep freeze Saturday 13th (12 AM UTC) * Releaes on Monday 15th (no time set, it'll happen when it does). Please voice any concerns you have with this plan, and do so as early as possible. It's not yet set in stone :-) Cheers, Max Sounds good to me... Perhaps we should send out emails to Fink-Users and Fink-Beginners (perhaps even Fink-Announce?) to say that if they want a certain package to be in the stable distribution for the next release, to email the maintainer and give feedback on the packages they have tried... ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Ethereal
On 4/4/02 11:07 PM, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right now there is no support for snmp in ethereal, since I figured not everybody wants to have to install snmp just to get ethereal. I guess I could make an ethereal-snmp package if there is enough demand. Max This is slightly from left-field, but still relevant I think... What about implementing the other form of Splitoffs that was proposed a while back? Instead of having 'ethereal' and 'ethereal-snmp', for example, as separate .info files, there would be only one 'ethereal' .info file which specified the options, etc, for a different build of the package... This could certainly be in handy here, but if it's possible, should probably occur after the next distro release, and before Fink (package manager) 1.0, I think... ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] xemacs, xpdf, ircii, mutt, frotz, oroborus:source not available
On 5/4/02 11:33 AM, David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just run fink fetch-all on a new system, and discovered that a number of source files are no longer available where fink expects to find them. Some of these may be stashed in the source part of our bindist, I haven't checked that; but anybody trying to install these packages anew will be frustrated. Should be addressed before the end of next week, if at all possible. Extract from log appended below. -- Dave snip curl: (22) The requested file was not found file download failed for oroborus-1.14.0.tar.gz of package oroborus-1.14.0-4 Thanks for that! Unfortunately, the homepage for Oroborus seems to have disappeared. I was alerted previously to a mirror of the tarball for oroborus 2.0.4, and that has been updated in the .info file in unstable, but I cannot seem to find one for oroborus 1.1.4. (I have two versions because oroborus 2.0.4 was under development, although that seems to have stopped.) If anyone could point me to a mirror or has a copy of the tarball, that would be great, as I don't. (I do have the oroborus 2.0.4 tarball, though.) Thanks! ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] security policy (was tamperproof debs)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 big cut in the link i provided (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch7.en.html), they said outright that the framework is there. the tools (all?) support it. The reason it is not in place is the policy. That is what they are waiting to implement. Right now, in order to be a debian developer you must have a gpg key signed by at least one other developer, and there is a complex web of trust being built. the faq has more info on this. it's only an idea, but it seems like a smart one. it is something to think about early, like the xml info, so that way when we decide to use it, we will have already thought about it and will have layed (laied?) the foundation for it. At least the person who built the binary can be verified. - -chris zubrzycki - - -- PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt ID: 0xA2ABC070 Fingerprint: 26B0 BA6B A409 FA83 42B3 1688 FBF9 8232 A2AB C070 Twice blessed is help unlooked for. --Tolkien -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (Darwin) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8rUUv+/mCMqKrwHARAl7fAKCK22TnDc9ax7SJsa2PX6yABEvG8ACgqWly bKfl7lYxF58f4InVZBHnPbo= =VT57 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
