[Fink-devel] New Fink Feature: Interactive Control of unstable
As part of 'fink configure', HEAD now offers to enable/disable the unstable entries in /sw/etc/fink.conf:Trees. Default is to leave current settings unchanged. When enabling, the unstable analog of each presently-enabled stable tree is appended to the Trees field. Please test, fix wording of the prompt, complain about ordering of the newly-added entries or other unlikable behavior, etc etc. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gnupg2
Hi Corey!
On 5 Dec 2006, at 02:13, Corey Halpin wrote:
On 2006-12-03, Roland Kuhn wrote:
Just out of curiosity I wanted to install gnupg 2.0.1, so I updated
the info files for libgpg-error, libassuan and libksba8 and added a
gnupg2 package; all *.{info,patch} attached. It works for me (TM).
gnupg2 can be installed in parallel to the old gnupg 1.4.5 package.
Anyone interested in putting those packages into unstable?
I've put the updated libgpg-error in.
Great, thanks!
Thank you for doing the leg-work.
Well, that was easy. Now, after also installing pinentry-gtk, of
course, I can decrypt my mails in kmail and even use kwatchgnupg. But
one thing is still missing: I cannot verify my X.509 signatures
because of 'Not enough information to check signatures'. When
starting kleopatra I get
An error occurred while fetching the certificates from the backend:
Unknown system error
Meanwhile I've --import'ed my pkcs12 with gpgsm and gpgsm --list-
keys shows the right thing, so I'm a bit stuck. What else do I need?
I also compiled dirmngr (anyone interested in a .info?), but that
does not help. Below is the corresponding log from kwatchgnupg:
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - # Home: ~/.gnupg
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - # Config: /Users/
rkuhn/.gnupg/gpgsm.conf
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - # AgentInfo: /tmp/
gpg-39zq19/S.gpg-agent:9874:1
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - # DirmngrInfo: [not set]
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - OK GNU Privacy
Guard's S/M server 2.0.1 ready
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - OPTION display=:0
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - OK
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - OPTION list-mode=1
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - OK
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - OPTION with-validation=0
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - OK
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:01 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: - [EOF]
BTW: I've set 'disable-{policy,crl}-checks' in gpgsm.conf.
Ciao,
Roland
--
TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching
Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570
--
CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482
--
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a- C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M
+ !V Y+
PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++ h y+++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gnupg2
On 2006-12-05, Roland Kuhn wrote: Well, that was easy. Now, after also installing pinentry-gtk, of course, I can decrypt my mails in kmail and even use kwatchgnupg. But one thing is still missing: I cannot verify my X.509 signatures because of 'Not enough information to check signatures'. When starting kleopatra I get Well... I don't use kmail, pinentry-gtk, or kleopatra. So my experience here is a bit limited. :-) A bit of googling for: kmail Not enough information to check finds a number of people experiencing similar problems. So maybe this isn't a fink-specific issue? There was a post on kdepim-users that looked like it might be useful: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kdepim-usersm=115436026616733w=2 Does this help? crh pgp1iqROwk5oX.pgp Description: PGP signature - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New Fink Feature: Interactive Control of unstable
That's great! I wonder whether, when a user has changed the Trees entry, fink should automatically do a selfupdate at the end of 'fink configure'? -- Dave On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: As part of 'fink configure', HEAD now offers to enable/disable the unstable entries in /sw/etc/fink.conf:Trees. Default is to leave current settings unchanged. When enabling, the unstable analog of each presently-enabled stable tree is appended to the Trees field. Please test, fix wording of the prompt, complain about ordering of the newly-added entries or other unlikable behavior, etc etc. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks -- --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php? page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gnupg2
Hi Corey! On 5 Dec 2006, at 18:09, Corey Halpin wrote: On 2006-12-05, Roland Kuhn wrote: Well, that was easy. Now, after also installing pinentry-gtk, of course, I can decrypt my mails in kmail and even use kwatchgnupg. But one thing is still missing: I cannot verify my X.509 signatures because of 'Not enough information to check signatures'. When starting kleopatra I get Well... I don't use kmail, pinentry-gtk, or kleopatra. So my experience here is a bit limited. :-) Thanks for searching anyway. A bit of googling for: kmail Not enough information to check finds a number of people experiencing similar problems. So maybe this isn't a fink-specific issue? There was a post on kdepim-users that looked like it might be useful: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kdepim-usersm=115436026616733w=2 Does this help? No, I'm sorry. That user is one step ahead of me: he already can successfully use kleopatra ;-) I'll probably figure it out eventually... Ciao, Roland -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482 -- Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a- C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++ h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New Fink Feature: Interactive Control of unstable
Doing a selfupdate automatically after reconfiguring to use unstable would make sense, since users have to do that anyway if they're using rsync updating. (and going the other way it would still be a good idea) On 12/5/06, David R. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's great! I wonder whether, when a user has changed the Trees entry, fink should automatically do a selfupdate at the end of 'fink configure'? -- Dave On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: As part of 'fink configure', HEAD now offers to enable/disable the unstable entries in /sw/etc/fink.conf:Trees. Default is to leave current settings unchanged. When enabling, the unstable analog of each presently-enabled stable tree is appended to the Trees field. Please test, fix wording of the prompt, complain about ordering of the newly-added entries or other unlikable behavior, etc etc. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter (still) Got job? http://akhmac.blogdns.net/~hansen/akh_cv/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New Fink Feature: Interactive Control of unstable
On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:03 AM, TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 also on this topic, it's a long standing issue and I keep forgetting to mention it, but when you do the selfupdate from stable to unstable fink dies on gettext you ened to manually do fink install gettext-tools then selfupdate again. Just thought I'd mention that, since most users don't know how to solve that and the solution that fink provides doesn't help. Actually, I think the 'location' of this problem has moved, since the versions of gettext in stable and unstable are now identical. The problem now is if you do a fresh install from the installer you have the old gettext-tools, and if you selfupdate (even sticking to stable) you run into this glitch about gettext-tools not updating properly without manual intervention. -- Dave - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] another crypto question
On Dec 1, 2006, at 12:18 AM, David Reiser wrote: On Nov 30, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 29, 2006, at 10:22 PM, David Reiser wrote: Configure checks for the presence of 2 versions of libsoup, and if neither is present, testgtkhtml.c isn't compiled. Furthermore, when it is compiled, it is compiled into the top src directory, and the current fink implementation does not install testgtkhtml anywhere. So, it looks to me like we could disable access to libsoup (via buildconflicts) You don't even need to conflict. Just ignore it, or patch the makefile to remove that line. BuildConflicts aren't fun. - -chris zubrzycki Hmm. Patching configure or Makefile fits in my list of Not Fun. Someone else will have to do it or teach me how to get what I want without stomping on something else. I've been thinking abut this some more, and I've concluded that ignore it is really the right answer. The only time testgtkhtml is built is if crypto is active and libsoup is installed. Otherwise, configure checks for libsoup, doesn't find it, and says 'OK, I'll skip testgtkhtml'. Neither the build nor the install is disrupted by the absence of libsoup. Since fink doesn't keep the build directory anyway (usually), there is no existing circumstance that having or not having libsoup and its crypto siblings affects the installed version of gtkhtml3.8.15. Can we delete the crypto dependencies and move gtkhtml3.8.15 out of crypto? Dave -- David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] fink in cvs still at 0.24 ?
Hi, While trying to download the fink version in cvs, I don't see anything updated, and the fink version listed is fink-0.24.26, while my local fink is already at 0.25-2. I am following these instructions: http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/cvsaccess/index.php as linked from the homepage. This always worked, but I noticed recently that nothing got updated. How can I get the most recent fink version in cvs? thanks, - Koen. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fink in cvs still at 0.24 ?
On 12/5/06, Koen van der Drift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, While trying to download the fink version in cvs, I don't see anything updated, and the fink version listed is fink-0.24.26, while my local fink is already at 0.25-2. I am following these instructions: http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/cvsaccess/index.php as linked from the homepage. This always worked, but I noticed recently that nothing got updated. How can I get the most recent fink version in cvs? thanks, - Koen. fink selfupdate-cvs should do it. Any chance you're still stuck on 10.4-transitional ? -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter (still) Got job? http://akhmac.blogdns.net/~hansen/akh_cv/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fink in cvs still at 0.24 ?
On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: fink selfupdate-cvs should do it. Any chance you're still stuck on 10.4-transitional ? That's not what I meant, sorry for the confusion. I would like to install fink in HEAD. - Koen. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fink in cvs still at 0.24 ?
On 12/5/06, Koen van der Drift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: fink selfupdate-cvs should do it. Any chance you're still stuck on 10.4-transitional ? That's not what I meant, sorry for the confusion. I would like to install fink in HEAD. - Koen. Ah. It's been working for me. How old is your checkout? -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter (still) Got job? http://akhmac.blogdns.net/~hansen/akh_cv/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fink in cvs still at 0.24 ?
On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:50 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ah. It's been working for me. How old is your checkout? The file VERSION is from 20 September, an says 0.24.26.cvs. - Koen. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fink in cvs still at 0.24 ?
On 12/5/06, Koen van der Drift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:50 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ah. It's been working for me. How old is your checkout? The file VERSION is from 20 September, an says 0.24.26.cvs. - Koen. I really meant the age on your local machine. -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter (still) Got job? http://akhmac.blogdns.net/~hansen/akh_cv/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fink in cvs still at 0.24 ?
Koen van der Drift wrote: On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:50 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ah. It's been working for me. How old is your checkout? The file VERSION is from 20 September, an says 0.24.26.cvs. According to cvs log, the VERSION that says 0.25.99.cvs dates from 16 September and hasn't changed since. Maybe you have a sticky tag from checking out a specific version? Look at cvs stat VERSION. Anyway, cvs up -A should release the sticky tags and give you HEAD. -- Martin - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] What feature would you like to see in fink/Fink?
Charles Lepple wrote: On 12/4/06, Robert T Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool! I think the simplest implementation would be to send a successful build or install message to the maintainer Hi, I also like this idea, but I think any build reports should also include the envinronment (as seen by fink dumpinfo). Why? I enable MAKEFLAGS (PkgVersion.pm) in my various fink installations, which occasionally causes builds to break. I wouldn't want to report any false-failure due to parallel-unsafe compiles. Admittedly, it's been a long time since I've seen such a failure. Taking this a step further, one could add an optional info field like: ParallellMakeUnsafe: true To turn off MAKEFLAGS on per package basis, and maybe leave MAKEFLAGS on by default for those of us with *really* slow dual CPUs. :) From my testing, only a small minority of packages are affected by parallel-make. With most Macs shipping with 2+ cores these days, informed users could more easily take advantage of multi-processors. David (anxiously awaiting quad-quad Macs) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
