> Charles Lepple wrote:
> > On 12/4/06, Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Cool! I think the simplest implementation would be to send a successful
> >> build or install message to the maintainer

Hi,

        I also like this idea, but I think any build reports should also
include the envinronment (as seen by fink dumpinfo).  Why?  I enable
MAKEFLAGS (PkgVersion.pm) in my various fink installations, which
occasionally causes builds to break.  I wouldn't want to report any
false-failure due to parallel-unsafe compiles.  Admittedly, it's been a
long time since I've seen such a failure.

        Taking this a step further, one could add an optional info field
like: "ParallellMakeUnsafe: true" To turn off MAKEFLAGS on per package
basis, and maybe leave MAKEFLAGS on by default for those of us with
*really* slow dual CPUs.  :)  From my testing, only a small minority of
packages are affected by parallel-make.  With most Macs shipping with 2+
cores these days, informed users could more easily take advantage of
multi-processors.

David

(anxiously awaiting quad-quad Macs)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to