[Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-09-06 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
 The first option uses the screen real estate better. The column headers 
 that are somewhat too heavy could be made lighter by replacing the 
 two-liners stablebrversion and unstablebrversion by just 
 stable and unstable. It is clear at this point that the numbers in 
 the columns refer to versions.
 
 Also, as has been suggested, some color would be useful, for example 
 like here:
 
 http://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/martin.costabel/fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/test/passwd.html

Looks great. And so it has been implemented.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


[Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-19 Thread Kevin Horton
At 2:34 + 19/8/04, you wrote:
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
  http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html
Looks a bit too busy perhaps.
The second moves back a bit towards the original and keeps clear
stable and unstable divisions, but logically groups the various
dists:
  http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package2.php/passwd
Looks clean visually and clear content-wise. Maybe this is the way to go?
I like the first version, as it makes a very clear distinction 
between the binary distribution, and the source distributions.  It 
also avoids the not present for the unstable packages/binary 
distribution mix.  Looks great.

If you want to list the maintainers for each version, you could add a 
line below each package version, but you would then need to put 
borders on those cells.  This might be a bit busy.

Kevin Horton
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-19 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 19 août 2004, à 17:42, Martin Costabel a écrit :
The first option uses the screen real estate better. The column  
headers that are somewhat too heavy could be made lighter by replacing  
the two-liners stablebrversion and unstablebrversion by just  
stable and unstable. It is clear at this point that the numbers in  
the columns refer to versions.

Also, as has been suggested, some color would be useful, for example  
like here:

http://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/martin.costabel/fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/ 
test/passwd.html
Much better, though it does not solve the problem of multiple  
maintainers

Would it be possible to have multiple lines at the end in case of  
different maintainers? Not in the table, but as it is now at the bottom  
of the screen.

Michèle
http://micmacfr.homeunix.org


PGP.sig
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-19 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 19 août 2004, à 17:42, Martin Costabel a écrit :
The first option uses the screen real estate better. The column  
headers that are somewhat too heavy could be made lighter by replacing  
the two-liners stablebrversion and unstablebrversion by just  
stable and unstable. It is clear at this point that the numbers in  
the columns refer to versions.

Also, as has been suggested, some color would be useful, for example  
like here:

http://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/martin.costabel/fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/ 
test/passwd.html
Apart the maintainer problem, the layout makes a presupposition that  
all the other fields are identical for all versions, which is not  
always the case:
- Description may vary
- Section may vary
- License may vary

Then I'm not sure colors may be suitable for color-blind people, though  
I'm in this category and have no problem with them, but there are many  
different way of being color-blind.

Michèle
http://micmacfr.homeunix.org


PGP.sig
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-19 Thread David H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michèle Garoche wrote:
snip
| Then I'm not sure colors may be suitable for color-blind people, though
| I'm in this category and have no problem with them, but there are many
| different way of being color-blind.
|
maybe it is a good idea to follow this route and look at :
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
- -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBJOduPMoaMn4kKR4RA3vsAJwITc6b1KVe1s3kJvR68Jxo/mQbIACeMi5i
EwmMOAQlYssYVG9XDPrVefI=
=Cq8/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-19 Thread Freek Dijkstra
On 19-8-2004 19:29, Michèle Garoche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Then I'm not sure colors may be suitable for color-blind people, though
 I'm in this category and have no problem with them, but there are many
 different way of being color-blind.

If you want to know: find out!

I always love the visibone remarks on web layout. And in this case, one
www.visibone.com/colorblind they link to this site:
http://www.vischeck.com/vischeck/vischeckURL.php

As you can see, the colours are suitable.

Regards,
Freek




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-19 Thread Martin Costabel
Michèle Garoche wrote:
Apart the maintainer problem, the layout makes a presupposition that  
all the other fields are identical for all versions, which is not  
always the case:
- Description may vary
- Section may vary
- License may vary
Taking care of this would not be a problem of visual layout, but of 
database organization and would require some serious coding, I suspect.

It would go some way in the direction of debian's package database. They 
have completely different pages for the different distributions and for 
each package just a small page with links for the different versions, 
for example: 
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namesversion=allexact=1keywords=passwd
Then the page for each version has each and every bit of information one 
can ever want to have about the package. I am not sure if we want to go 
down this path. Our public is different (not to mention manpower).

Then I'm not sure colors may be suitable for color-blind people, though  
I'm in this category and have no problem with them, but there are many  
different way of being color-blind.
Yes, on the color layout page referred to by fink.css 
http://www.pixy.cz/apps/barvy/index-en.html I learned that there are at 
least 8 kinds of color blindness. But in our case, the colors wouldn't 
carry essential information, so this wouldn't be a problem. Anyway, I am 
not sure what this information is good for. Do there exist web sites 
where you can choose your variant of color blindness and you get pages 
in different color schemes?

--
Martin
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-19 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 19 août 2004, à 21:12, Martin Costabel a écrit :
Michèle Garoche wrote:
Apart the maintainer problem, the layout makes a presupposition that  
all the other fields are identical for all versions, which is not  
always the case:
- Description may vary
- Section may vary
- License may vary
Taking care of this would not be a problem of visual layout, but of 
database organization and would require some serious coding, I 
suspect.
I think particularly of packages which have now several variants. Maybe 
a warning to read the info file for the specific version could be 
sufficient.

Do there exist web sites where you can choose your variant of color 
blindness and you get pages in different color schemes?
Not directly, but there are several stylesheets based on different 
color schemes and you can choose among them the one which fits best 
your eyes (handicap or not).

Michèle
http://micmacfr.homeunix.org


PGP.sig
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=


[Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-18 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:

  http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html

Looks a bit too busy perhaps.

The second moves back a bit towards the original and keeps clear
stable and unstable divisions, but logically groups the various
dists:

  http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package2.php/passwd

Looks clean visually and clear content-wise. Maybe this is the way to go?

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-18 Thread TheSin
Both look good to me, I like the second best, the only thing is that it 
doesn't take in consideration multi maintainers in multi trees.
---
TS
http://southofheaven.org
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.

On 18-Aug-04, at 8:34 PM, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
  http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html
Looks a bit too busy perhaps.
The second moves back a bit towards the original and keeps clear
stable and unstable divisions, but logically groups the various
dists:
  http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package2.php/passwd
Looks clean visually and clear content-wise. Maybe this is the way to 
go?

dan
--
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks

---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-18 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
 http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html
Looks a bit too busy perhaps.
I think the use of cell padding makes it easy to understand where cells 
start and stop without cluttering things up (see below).  You find your 
system on the left column and then just scan along the line to find your 
available version(s).

The second moves back a bit towards the original and keeps clear
stable and unstable divisions, but logically groups the various
dists:
 http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package2.php/passwd
Looks clean visually and clear content-wise. Maybe this is the way to go?
I actually think this makes it difficult to tell what the difference is 
between '0.7.0' and 'cvs/rsync' because there's no line between them.  At 
first glance it seemed to me that the single table cell read 
'0.7.0[newline]cvs/rsync'.  I tried putting a line between them, but then 
it looks clumsy.

Also, in the 2nd example, all the point distros (0.7.0, 0.6.3, 0.4.1) show 
'not present' for unstable in the passwd example used.  If I understand 
correctly, the binary distributions never have an unstable version, so the 
2nd example will always have extraneous cells showing 'not present'.

Finally, perhaps CVS should not be mentioned in the final layout since 
rsync is the recommended update method now?  Although CVS update is still 
available, normal updaters aren't supposed to use it, and those that have 
a need for it should hopefully already understand what they need.  If 
space allows, '(rsync?) Source Distribution' contrasts nicely with 'Binary 
Distribution.

Hanspeter
--
The great tragedy of science is the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis
by an ugly fact.
  --Thomas Henry Huxley
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-18 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Also, if you change the background color of just the 10.2-gcc3.3 row to 
#d0, the very pale yellow color clearly separates the three System 
rows without being obtrusive.

Hanspeter
--
And when the last last law was down, and the Devil turned round on 
you - where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?
  --Robert Bolt, A Man For All Seasons

---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-18 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 19 août 2004, à 4:34, Daniel E. Macks a écrit :
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
  http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html
Looks a bit too busy perhaps.
The second moves back a bit towards the original and keeps clear
stable and unstable divisions, but logically groups the various
dists:
  http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package2.php/passwd
Looks clean visually and clear content-wise. Maybe this is the way to 
go?
Yes, this one is far better.
Michèle
http://micmacfr.homeunix.org


PGP.sig
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-18 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 19 août 2004, à 5:39, Hanspeter Niederstrasser a écrit :
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
Okay, two layout options now. Both now have more familiar (to users)
terms in the headings and clearer structure. The first is just
improvements to the visual layout and headings:
 http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/passwd.html
Looks a bit too busy perhaps.
I think the use of cell padding makes it easy to understand where 
cells start and stop without cluttering things up (see below).  You 
find your system on the left column and then just scan along the line 
to find your available version(s).

The second moves back a bit towards the original and keeps clear
stable and unstable divisions, but logically groups the various
dists:
 http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package2.php/passwd
Looks clean visually and clear content-wise. Maybe this is the way to 
go?
I actually think this makes it difficult to tell what the difference 
is between '0.7.0' and 'cvs/rsync' because there's no line between 
them.  At first glance it seemed to me that the single table cell read 
'0.7.0[newline]cvs/rsync'.  I tried putting a line between them, but 
then it looks clumsy.

Also, in the 2nd example, all the point distros (0.7.0, 0.6.3, 0.4.1) 
show 'not present' for unstable in the passwd example used.  If I 
understand correctly, the binary distributions never have an unstable 
version, so the 2nd example will always have extraneous cells showing 
'not present'.
It could be solved with an 'NA' text.
Finally, perhaps CVS should not be mentioned in the final layout since 
rsync is the recommended update method now?  Although CVS update is 
still available, normal updaters aren't supposed to use it, and those 
that have a need for it should hopefully already understand what they 
need.  If space allows, '(rsync?) Source Distribution' contrasts 
nicely with 'Binary Distribution.
Some users have no other choice than cvs, and just to ensure that all 
possibilities are present too.
Hanspeter
--
The great tragedy of science is the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis
by an ugly fact.
  --Thomas Henry Huxley
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Michèle
http://micmacfr.homeunix.org


PGP.sig
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=


[Fink-devel] Re: Package database webpage layout

2004-08-17 Thread Freek Dijkstra
I would recommend the following headings for end-users:

System
Binary distribution: Fink version; package version
   (Now: Point Distribution: bindist; Package)
Source distribution: Stable version; Unstable version
   (Now: Current: Stable package; unstable package)

I don't think the terms point and bindist are very well known.
Furthermore, the term package is a bit redundant. After all, the table
lists a version number, not a package name.

Also, it may be a good idea to make the distinction between heading (e.g.
Binary Distribution) and subheading (e.g. fink version) more clear.
Either visually (add a horizontal line between them) or layout (use
different font size or font weight). I accidentially read the headings as
Point bindist and Distribution package.

Regards,
Freek 




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink  Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel