Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 deps
Alexander Hansen wrote: You'd have to rebuild the package--the Depends information is coded into the .deb file. (or you could manually unpack the .deb file, edit the control file, and repack it). Being a professional lazy person, I found out that you can use dpkg to force-install that which you spent 3 days compiling - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] gcc42 deps
Apparently fink (dpkg ?) doesn't notice this error: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: gcc42: Depends: gcc42-shlibs (= 0:4.1.-20070124) but 4.1.-20070124 is to be installed But apt-get does. Fink shows: i gcc42 4.1.-20070124 i gcc42-shlibs 4.1.-20070124 While apt-get gives the above error. dumpinfo on gcc42 shows: depends: gmp-shlibs (= 4.2.1-1), libmpfr1-shlibs (= 2.2.0-2), odcctools (= 622.3-20060913), gcc42-shlibs (= 0:4.1.-20070124), libiconv, libgettext3-shlibs builddepends: gmp (= 4.2.1-1), libmpfr1 (= 2.2.0-2), libiconv-dev, gettext-tools, libgettext3-dev - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 deps
I see now that this is coming from the %e expansion in gcc42.info, but I don't know how to fix it without breaking something else. Robert T Wyatt wrote: Apparently fink (dpkg ?) doesn't notice this error: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: gcc42: Depends: gcc42-shlibs (= 0:4.1.-20070124) but 4.1.-20070124 is to be installed But apt-get does. Fink shows: i gcc42 4.1.-20070124 i gcc42-shlibs4.1.-20070124 While apt-get gives the above error. dumpinfo on gcc42 shows: depends: gmp-shlibs (= 4.2.1-1), libmpfr1-shlibs (= 2.2.0-2), odcctools (= 622.3-20060913), gcc42-shlibs (= 0:4.1.-20070124), libiconv, libgettext3-shlibs builddepends: gmp (= 4.2.1-1), libmpfr1 (= 2.2.0-2), libiconv-dev, gettext-tools, libgettext3-dev - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 deps
On 2/2/07, Robert T Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see now that this is coming from the %e expansion in gcc42.info, but I don't know how to fix it without breaking something else. Robert T Wyatt wrote: Apparently fink (dpkg ?) doesn't notice this error: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: gcc42: Depends: gcc42-shlibs (= 0:4.1.-20070124) but 4.1.-20070124 is to be installed But apt-get does. Fink shows: i gcc42 4.1.-20070124 i gcc42-shlibs4.1.-20070124 While apt-get gives the above error. dumpinfo on gcc42 shows: depends: gmp-shlibs (= 4.2.1-1), libmpfr1-shlibs (= 2.2.0-2), odcctools (= 622.3-20060913), gcc42-shlibs (= 0:4.1.-20070124), libiconv, libgettext3-shlibs builddepends: gmp (= 4.2.1-1), libmpfr1 (= 2.2.0-2), libiconv-dev, gettext-tools, libgettext3-dev Since this version of gcc42 doesn't have a declared Epoch, the %e should be removed from the dependency on gcc42-shlibs (carryover from the prior version, perhaps). -- Alexander K. Hansen (akh) Fink Documenter (still) - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 deps
Since this version of gcc42 doesn't have a declared Epoch, the %e should be removed from the dependency on gcc42-shlibs (carryover from the prior version, perhaps). Okay, so if I remove %e: from gcc42.info, how do I get apt to see the change? I've tried fink scanpackages, fink index, and sudo apt-get update, but still get the error. It's odd because fink says gcc42 is installed but apt-get dist-upgrade says,The following packages have been kept back newline gcc42 newline 0 packages updgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Which to me implies that apt-get thinks it needs to be upgraded but is keeping it back...? I obviously need a clue. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 deps
On 2/2/07, Robert T Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since this version of gcc42 doesn't have a declared Epoch, the %e should be removed from the dependency on gcc42-shlibs (carryover from the prior version, perhaps). Okay, so if I remove %e: from gcc42.info, how do I get apt to see the change? I've tried fink scanpackages, fink index, and sudo apt-get update, but still get the error. It's odd because fink says gcc42 is installed but apt-get dist-upgrade says,The following packages have been kept back newline gcc42 newline 0 packages updgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Which to me implies that apt-get thinks it needs to be upgraded but is keeping it back...? I obviously need a clue. You'd have to rebuild the package--the Depends information is coded into the .deb file. (or you could manually unpack the .deb file, edit the control file, and repack it). The issue is that fink treats 0:x.y.z = x.y.z, but apt thinks 0:x.y.z x.y.z -- Alexander K. Hansen (akh) Fink Documenter (still) - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 deps
Alexander Hansen wrote: You'd have to rebuild the package--the Depends information is coded into the .deb file. (or you could manually unpack the .deb file, edit the control file, and repack it). The issue is that fink treats 0:x.y.z = x.y.z, but apt thinks 0:x.y.z x.y.z Thanks! I understand now and was afraid that would be the answer. With almost any other package I would rebuild it at the drop of a hat, but of course it takes a bit longer with this particular one. (Manually editing the .deb would certainly be faster.) I hope that if it's fixed that the revision isn't bumped I'll probably go ahead and rebuild it anyway to keep apt-get happy and humming along. I suppose it's worth a feature request that the validator check for extraneous %e: on unepoched packages - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 deps
On 2/2/07, Robert T Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: You'd have to rebuild the package--the Depends information is coded into the .deb file. (or you could manually unpack the .deb file, edit the control file, and repack it). The issue is that fink treats 0:x.y.z = x.y.z, but apt thinks 0:x.y.z x.y.z Thanks! I understand now and was afraid that would be the answer. With almost any other package I would rebuild it at the drop of a hat, but of course it takes a bit longer with this particular one. (Manually editing the .deb would certainly be faster.) I hope that if it's fixed that the revision isn't bumped I'll probably go ahead and rebuild it anyway to keep apt-get happy and humming along. I suppose it's worth a feature request that the validator check for extraneous %e: on unepoched packages Yeah, we were talking about just that on IRC. -- Alexander K. Hansen (akh) Fink Documenter (still) - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
